IAEAInternational Atomic Energy Agency
Passive Neutron Assay of Uranium Mass Measurements in Scraps and Wastes
V. Nizhnik, M. Pickrell SGTS/TND
IAEA
Conventional Passive Multiplicity
• Passive multiplicity is based on a theoretical hierarchy called the Point Model• So named, because it is a zero dimensional.
• Therefore, spontaneous fission, multiplication, and alpha-n production are UNIFORM across the sample.
• Therefore, the sample nuclear material is evenly distributed in a homogenous matrix.
IAEA
The Modification Necessary to Measure Uranium Wastes
• What happens when the material is not uniform and evenly distributed?• The conventional method develops a bias error.
• This work developed a modification of the Point Model / Passive Multiplicity equations to analyze non-uniform, inhomogeneous samples.
• Applied to uranium wastes with metal ingots mixed with diffuse oxide powder.
IAEA
Passive Multiplicity (PM) Assumptions Kill this slide
• Homogeneous distribution of nuclear material through an item matrix material
• The same chemical form of Uranium material in the item, i.e. uniform (a,n)-neutron production rate in the item volume
• Uniform physical property of uranium material (mostly concerns material density)
• If item properties are in compliance with listed statement:• all the neutrons are equal in the term of multiplication
• Alpha parameter is the same for any point of item material
Then Passive Multiplicity Analysis can be applied for precise U mass analysis
IAEA
Wastes: “Close Look” Example
Uranium Metal Production Process
Ideal CaseUF4 + 2 Mg Umetal + 2 MgF2
Product: Single U metal piece and burnt matrix material; both of known mass
In realityUF4 + 2 Mg X·Uchunks + Y·UF4 + Z·MgF2 + W·MgProduct: Number of U metal chunks, un-burnt UF4 in un-burnt Mg+MgF2 matrix. Their mas ratios are unknown.
Impact on Neutron Multiplicity:• Non-homogeneous distribution of U material
• Multi-component chemical composition
• Unknown mass ratio for uranium material components
• Non-uniform (a,n)-neutron production rate
• Spatial dependent neutron multiplication
IAEA
Passive Multiplicity
Conventional Passive Multiplicity Equations
Modified Passive MultiplicityAssumptions and known parameters:
Assign: x –U metal fraction in total U mass in item
Then: (1-x) – fraction of UF4 in total U mass in item
U metal chunks are pure: no (a,n)-neutrons production (a = 0)
Dispersed un-burnt UF4 material in Mg+MgF2 matrix is non-multiplying media due to low density (M = 1)
Alpha value for UF4 is known, based on U isotopic information
Long Crocs
IAEA
Modified Passive Multiplicity
M – multiplication in the metal chunks
x – U metal fraction in total U mass in item
mU – total U mass in measured item
U metal term UF4 term
• Corrects for non-uniform distribution of multi-component Uranium material
• Determines total Uranium mass in measured item
• Determines U mass in metal and UF4 form
• Determines neutron Multiplication in metal phase (gives information on average metal chunks size)
IAEA
Example of U Waste Measurements
Plutonium Scrap Multiplicity CounterCounter:
•Efficiency 55%: allows fast acquisition of neutron multiplicity data with good statistics
•Size of the measurement cavity: d=20cm, h=42cm
Items:
•34 Uranium waste items with various Gross Weight (up-to 30kg)
•Packed in Poly bags to fit in the measurement cavity
Target total uncertainty:•Not more than 2.3% for 1 Sigma confidential interval
IAEA
Rejection of Cosmic Rays Bursts
Cosmic rays prompt neutron “bursts” when interacting with High-Z (Uranium) material nuclei; they produce high multiplicities of detected neutron and affect counting rates.
Good Cycle
Good Cycle
Cycle-by-Cycle Multiplicity Distribution
Bad Cycle
Rejected by RSD based rejection logic
Rejected by Multiplicity Distribution analysis logic
IAEA
Analysis with Modified PM
Conventional vs Modified Method ResultsMeasurement of a batch of uranium waste items (individual item U mass and Total U mass)
Theoretical bias of Conventional vs Modified PM for NU
U metal average multiplication: M=1.05
UF4 Alpha value a=3.85
Bias of Total U mass in the measured batch
The bias is higher in case of analysis of enriched Uranium since values of Multiplication in metal phase and Alpha in UF4 phase are higher then for natural Uranium
Relative content of UF4(1-x)
Theoretical Bias