![Page 1: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
IN-GROUPS VS. OUT-GROUPS
![Page 2: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
REASONS FOR RIVALRIES
Geographic Proximity
Frequent Meetings in Important Games
Events that Increased tension between groups
Pre-existing Social and Political Tensions
10 Great Sporting Rivalries
![Page 3: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
FOOTBALL: FSU VS. UF
Two Oldest Public Universities in Florida
One or both of them often highly ranked
(1994) Choke at Doak Game 28 Points from FSU in the
last quarter to tie game 31-31
The Comeback - FSU vs. UF
![Page 4: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
FEEDING AN OLD RIVALRYAUBURN VS. ALABAMA
Roll Tide/War Eagle
The Iron Bowl Alabama vs. Auburn 1893 SEC Division
Rivalries and In-Group Bias.
![Page 5: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
CASE STUDY: BARCELONA – REAL MADRID
Barcelona - Real Madrid Why could this rivalry be
considered more than just a soccer match? Provide details from the video.
How has the rivalry changed over time?
![Page 6: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
CASE STUDY: AC MILAN VS. INTER MILAN
Italian Derby
Inter first allowed players from other countries to play when AC Milan wouldn’t
Differences have dissipated since their first match in 1908, but tension remains.
![Page 7: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
CASE STUDY: THE OLD FIRMCELTIC F.C. VS. RANGERS F.C.
Celtic vs. Rangers - More than a Game
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Roots of Conflict National Identity: Native
Scots (Rangers) – Scots Irish (Celtic)
Religious Affiliation: Protestants (Rangers) – Catholics (Celtic)
Video: The Football Wars
![Page 8: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
CASE STUDY: ALI VS. FRAZIER
(1971)“Fight of the Century” Both undefeated Extension of tension in the
country Ali came to represent the
movement against Vietnam. Frazier became symbol for conservative America
Frazier won. (1974) Rematch: Ali won. (1975) Final Fight: Ali won in
the Philippines
Frazier vs. Ali - Rivals
![Page 9: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
CASE STUDY: MIRACLE ON ICE
Sport: Hockey U.S vs. Soviet Union Key Match: 1980 Winter
Olympic Games Semifinal
Importance: Cold War Era Competition between
countries. U.S as the underdog
story. Miracle On Ice
![Page 10: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
CASE STUDY: INDIA VS. PAKISTANSPORTS AS A MICROCOSM OF THE
WORLD India-Pakistan Conflict
Fight over region of Kashmir.
Both countries have nuclear weapons
Conflict Analysis - India vs. Pakistan
Tension in the India/Pakistan border
Tension rises in the Border
Rivalry in Sports How do people live the
rivalry?
![Page 11: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
GROUP BEHAVIOR AFFECTS CONFLICT:CONFORMITY TO OUR GROUP
Important Studies: Solomon Asch
Group Pressure
Stanley Milgram Obedience to Authority
Irving Janis Groupthink: the tendency
of group members to conform by adopting a narrow view of some issue.
How are group pressure, obedience to authority and groupthink part of our allegiance as fans to a team?
![Page 12: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
.
ASCH EXPERIMENT
![Page 13: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
65% of subjects administered what they thought was lethal voltage on the shock machine.Milgram described the dilemma as a conflict between conscience and authority.
![Page 14: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
GROUPTHINK
![Page 15: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
I THINK, YOU THINK, WE THINKGROUPTHINK
•Groupthink: the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an incorrect or deviant decision-making outcome. Characteristics of groupthink include: Illusion of invulnerability Collective rationalization Belief in inherent morality Stereotyped views of out-groups Direct pressure on dissenters Self-censorship Illusion of unanimity Self-appointed mindguards
![Page 16: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
GROUPTHINK: ILLUSION OF INVULNERABILITY
Creates excessive optimism that encourages taking extreme risks.
![Page 17: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
GROUPTHINK: COLLECTIVE RATIONALIZATION
Members discount warnings and do not reconsider their assumptions.
![Page 18: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
GROUPTHINK: BELIEF IN INHERENT MORALITY
Belief that whatever the group does it will be right as they all know the difference between right and wrong.
Tendency to overlook the consequences of what they decide.
Are we born good people or is morality taught?
![Page 19: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
GROUPTHINK: STEREOTYPED VIEWS OF OUT-GROUPS
Negative views of those who are different creates conflict.
Question: Are we born to hate or are we taught to hate?
![Page 20: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
GROUPTHINK: DIRECT PRESSURE ON DISSENTERS
Members are under pressure not to express arguments against any of the group’s views.
![Page 21: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
GROUPTHINK: SELF-CENSORSHIP
Doubts and deviations from the perceived group consensus are not expressed
Why could self-censorship be problematic on the long run?
![Page 22: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
GROUPTHINK: ILLUSION OF UNANIMITY
The majority view and judgments are assumed to be unanimous.
![Page 23: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
GROUPTHINK: SELF-APPOINTED MINDGUARDS
Member of a group who serves as an informational filter, providing limited information to the group and, consciously or subconsciously, utilizing a variety of strategies to control dissent
![Page 24: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
IN-GROUPS AND OUT-GROUPS“We all see only that which we are trained to see.”
![Page 25: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
IN-GROUPS AND OUT-GROUPS
Social Identity
Social categorization divide world into in-group (“us”) and out-group (“them”)
![Page 26: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
IN-GROUPS AND OUT-GROUPS
Sport rivalries feed on the distinctions between in-groups and out-groups. So do other conflicts.
An in-group is a social group commanding a member’s esteem and loyalty; it is the one we identify with.
An out-group is a social group toward which one feels competition or opposition.
In-group bias: view our own group more favorably
![Page 27: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
JANE ELLIOTT'S "BLUE EYES/BROWN EYES“IN-GROUPS VS. OUT-GROUPS
3rd Grade Teacher Jane Elliott Experiment conducted on the days after Martin Luther
King assassination (1968) Wanted to explain discrimination to 8 year olds. Experiment deals with stereotypes, prejudice,
discrimination, and the creation of in-group bias.
![Page 28: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
GLOSSARY Stereotypes - beliefs about attributes that are thought to be
characteristic of members of particular groups. A mental image or judgment of a group based on opinion without regard to individual differences. They can be either positive or negative.ex. Women are nurturing, car salesmen are dishonest
Prejudice - A negative judgment or opinion formed about a group without knowledge of the facts.
Discrimination - Treating someone less favorably based on the group, class or category they belong to. Discrimination is prejudice in action.
![Page 29: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
JANE ELLIOTT'S "BLUE EYES/BROWN EYES“IN-GROUPS VS. OUT-GROUPS
1) What did you learn? Did any part of the film surprise you? What scene or scenes do you think you'll still remember a month from now and why those scenes?
2) How was the exercise that Elliott designed a response to the children's question, "Why would anyone want to murder Martin Luther King?" Did the film provide an answer to the question? Can you answer the question?
3) What features did Elliott ascribe to the superior and inferior groups and how did those characteristics reflect stereotypes about blacks and whites?
4) What did the children's body language indicate about the impact of discrimination?
5) How did the negative and positive labels placed on a group become self-fulfilling prophecies?
![Page 30: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
JANE ELLIOTT'S "BLUE EYES/BROWN EYES“IN-GROUPS VS. OUT-GROUPS
6) How are the results of the experiment different when it is done with adults?
7) In the prison seminar, one of the white women asserts that all people face some kind of discrimination. Another woman challenges her, claiming that whites can't really know what it's like to face discrimination every minute of every day. What do you think?
8) It's easy to understand why third-graders might not refuse to obey their teacher, but when the exercise is done with the prison guards, why don't any of the adults object?
![Page 31: I N -G ROUPS VS. O UT -G ROUPS. R EASONS FOR R IVALRIES Geographic Proximity Frequent Meetings in Important Games Events that Increased tension between](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062417/5517e80d550346c1568b47f2/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
JANE ELLIOTT’S DIVERSITY TRAINING
Diversity Training