![Page 1: How Steep, Narrow, and Busy? A Feasibility Analysis for Proposed Bikeway Networks Jason Patton, PhD, City of Oakland, CA Carol Levine, Wilbur Smith Associates](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649f095503460f94c1dd50/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
How Steep, Narrow, and Busy?
A Feasibility Analysis for Proposed Bikeway Networks
Jason Patton, PhD, City of Oakland, CA
Carol Levine, Wilbur Smith Associates
![Page 2: How Steep, Narrow, and Busy? A Feasibility Analysis for Proposed Bikeway Networks Jason Patton, PhD, City of Oakland, CA Carol Levine, Wilbur Smith Associates](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649f095503460f94c1dd50/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview
Street grade analysis: Average slope, maximum slope, and an overall difficulty factor;
Right-of-way analysis: Street widths and prototypical cross-sections;
Volume analysis: Peak hour traffic and the carrying capacity of the cross-sections.
![Page 3: How Steep, Narrow, and Busy? A Feasibility Analysis for Proposed Bikeway Networks Jason Patton, PhD, City of Oakland, CA Carol Levine, Wilbur Smith Associates](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649f095503460f94c1dd50/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: How Steep, Narrow, and Busy? A Feasibility Analysis for Proposed Bikeway Networks Jason Patton, PhD, City of Oakland, CA Carol Levine, Wilbur Smith Associates](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649f095503460f94c1dd50/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: How Steep, Narrow, and Busy? A Feasibility Analysis for Proposed Bikeway Networks Jason Patton, PhD, City of Oakland, CA Carol Levine, Wilbur Smith Associates](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649f095503460f94c1dd50/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Planning Context
Oakland’s first Bicycle Master Plan (1999)– Corridor approach
Telegraph Ave. bike lane lawsuit– Change in climate on implementation– More emphasis on environmental review
Desire for ‘useful’ plan– Detailed inventory of bikeway network– 700+ segment database linked to GIS
![Page 6: How Steep, Narrow, and Busy? A Feasibility Analysis for Proposed Bikeway Networks Jason Patton, PhD, City of Oakland, CA Carol Levine, Wilbur Smith Associates](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649f095503460f94c1dd50/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Street Grade Analysis
![Page 7: How Steep, Narrow, and Busy? A Feasibility Analysis for Proposed Bikeway Networks Jason Patton, PhD, City of Oakland, CA Carol Levine, Wilbur Smith Associates](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649f095503460f94c1dd50/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Street Grade Analysis
Zone Area Average Slope
Maximum Slope
Difficulty
1 Flatlands ≤ 6% ≤ 8% ≤ 5
2 Lower Hills ≤ 8% ≤ 10% ≤ 15
3 Upper Hills ≤ 10% ≤ 12% ≤ 25
Distance
Ele
vati
on
Maximum S
lope
Average Slope
![Page 8: How Steep, Narrow, and Busy? A Feasibility Analysis for Proposed Bikeway Networks Jason Patton, PhD, City of Oakland, CA Carol Levine, Wilbur Smith Associates](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649f095503460f94c1dd50/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Street Grade Analysis:Slope difficulty factor
0
40
80
120
160
200
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Ele
vati
on
gain
(fe
et)
Difficulty Factor 3
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Difficulty Factor 16
Distance (feet)
Park Blvd Campus DriveDistance (feet)
Zone AreaAverage
SlopeMaximum
SlopeDifficulty
Park Blvd 2 Lower Hills 4% 8% 3
Campus Dr
3 Upper Hills 9% 12% 16
![Page 9: How Steep, Narrow, and Busy? A Feasibility Analysis for Proposed Bikeway Networks Jason Patton, PhD, City of Oakland, CA Carol Levine, Wilbur Smith Associates](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649f095503460f94c1dd50/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Right-of-Way Analysis
![Page 10: How Steep, Narrow, and Busy? A Feasibility Analysis for Proposed Bikeway Networks Jason Patton, PhD, City of Oakland, CA Carol Levine, Wilbur Smith Associates](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649f095503460f94c1dd50/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Right-of-Way Analysis
![Page 11: How Steep, Narrow, and Busy? A Feasibility Analysis for Proposed Bikeway Networks Jason Patton, PhD, City of Oakland, CA Carol Levine, Wilbur Smith Associates](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649f095503460f94c1dd50/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Right-of-Way Analysis:Cross-sections
Name Bikeway Type Travel lanesCenter Turn
Lane
Two-Way Streets
T2 Bike Lanes 2 0
T3 Bike Lanes 2 1
T4 Bike Lanes 4 0
T5 Bike Lanes 4 1
TS2 Shared Lanes 2 0
TS3 Shared Lanes 2 1
TS4 Shared Lanes 4 0
One-Way Streets
W2 Bike Lane 2 0
W3 Bike Lane 3 0
WS2 Shared Lane 2 0
![Page 12: How Steep, Narrow, and Busy? A Feasibility Analysis for Proposed Bikeway Networks Jason Patton, PhD, City of Oakland, CA Carol Levine, Wilbur Smith Associates](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649f095503460f94c1dd50/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Volume Analysis
Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) lane capacity
135% threshold
Alternatives if segments fail– Alternative alignment– Alternative cross-section– Eliminate as proposal– Keep as long-term project
![Page 13: How Steep, Narrow, and Busy? A Feasibility Analysis for Proposed Bikeway Networks Jason Patton, PhD, City of Oakland, CA Carol Levine, Wilbur Smith Associates](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649f095503460f94c1dd50/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Conclusions
Second generation bicycle planning – Greater specificity and thereby greater
credibility – "Feasible proposals" versus "feasible
projects"
Consensus-building – Publicly available data– Industry standard thresholds – Transparent decision-making