![Page 1: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe
and galaxy evolution
Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration:
(A. Baldi, M. Brusa, N. Carangelo, P. Ciliegi, F.
Cocchia, A. Comastri, V. D’Elia, C. Feruglio, F. La Franca, R. Maiolino, G. Matt, M. Mignoli, S. Molendi, G.C. Perola, S. Puccetti, C. Vignali)
+ M. Elvis, P. Severgnini, N. Sacchi, N. Menci, A.
Cavaliere, G. Pareschi, O. Citterio...
![Page 2: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Hard X-ray Surveys
Most direct probe of the super-massive black hole (SMBH) accretion activity, recorded in the CXB spectral energy density
SMBH census
Strong constraints to models for the formation and evolution of structure in the Universe
AGN number and luminosity evolution
AGN clustering and its evolution
![Page 3: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Cosmic X-ray Background
![Page 4: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Hard X-ray Surveys
Most direct probe of the super-massive black hole (SMBH) accretion activity, recorded in the CXB spectral energy density
SMBH census
Strong constraints to models for the formation and evolution of structure in the Universe
AGN number and luminosity evolution
AGN clustering and its evolution
![Page 5: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
XMM/Chandra Surveys
Wide and medium-deep several deg2
30-100 sources/XMM field,
Fx 10-14 50% of the CXB
LX-Z diagram coverage
Rare and peculiar sources, avoid cosmic variance Relatively “easy” multi-
wavelength follow-up (ESO-VLT,3.6m, ATCA, VLA, TNG & Chandra)
HELLAS2XMM CDFN CDFS Lockman Hole
![Page 6: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The HELLAS2XMM survey- 1.5 deg2 of sky covered, 232 2-10keV sources down to F 2-10keV=610-15 cgs
- nearly complete photometry down to R~25- nearly complete spectroscopy down to R~24: 160 z
- 100 broad line AGN; 41 narrow line AGN and gal. 16 have logLX>44 QSO2!- 11 XBONGs; 1 star; 3 groups of galaxies
- 40 sources with X/O>8, 19 z - 6 broad line AGN; 13 narrow line AGN (12 QSO2!)
Fiore et al. 2003 A&A, Cocchia et al. in
preparation
![Page 7: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
X-ray to optical flux ratio15-20% of the sources have X/O>10 over a large flux range30-40% have X/O>3. Optical identification of sources with X/O>3-10 is possible in the shallower surveys! HELLAS2XMM CDFN SSA13 Lockman Hole
Large area surveysat Fx10-14 can beused to gain infoon the fainter sources, making the remaininghalf of the CXB!!!
![Page 8: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
High X/O = QSO2!
Mignoli, Cocchia et al. 2004
![Page 9: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
X-ray obscured AGNPerola, Puccetti et al. 2004 A&A
PKS0312_22QSO1 z=2.14 X/O=3.1 logNH=22.8
PKS0537_111R=25 X/O=50 logNH 23
PKS0537_11aQSO2 z=0.981 LX=44.2 X/O=30 logNH=22.2
PKS0537_153R>25 X/O>21 logNH 23
![Page 10: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
XBONGs
O = type 1 AGN =type 2 AGN = Early type Gals.
![Page 11: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The HELLAS2XMM survey in a context
HELLAS2XMM – 1.5 deg2 - 232 sources F2-10keV 10-14 cgsFiore et al. 2003
Lockman Hole - 0.09 deg2 - 55 sources F2-10keV 510-15 cgs (Mainieri et al 2002)
CDFN - 0.037 deg2 - 88 sources F2-10keV 10-15 cgsCDFN - 0.051 deg2 - 44 sources F2-10keV 310-15 cgs(Barger et al. 2002)
CDFS - 0.037 deg2 - 80 sources F2-10keV 10-15 cgsCDFS - 0.051 deg2 - 43 sources F2-10keV 310-15 cgs
SSA13 - 0.015 deg2 - 20 sources F2-10keV 410-15 cgsBarger et al. 2001
HEAO1 (Grossan) - 26,000 deg2 - 63 sources F2-10keV 210-11 cgs
![Page 12: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The evolution of number and luminosity densities
Fiore et al. 2003 A&ANon parametric determination
![Page 13: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Black hole mass density
A ~ 5x1039 erg s-1Mpc-3
A (1-) LBol
BH ~ ——————
c2 LX
=0.1 LBol/LX=40
BH ~ 3x10-5 MΘ Yr-1 Mpc-3
BH ~ 4x105 MΘ Mpc-3
.
.
![Page 14: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
2-10 keV AGN luminosity function models
LDDE with constant NH distribution La Franca et al. 2005
Solid = observed dashed = best fit
![Page 15: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
2-10 keV AGN luminosity function models
LDDE with variable absorbed AGN fraction La Franca et al. 2005
![Page 16: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Fraction of obscured AGN
La Franca et al. 2005
![Page 17: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Comparison with CDM HC models
Menci,Fiore,Perola & Cavaliere 2004
Processes of galaxy formation and evolution described by a semi-analytic model.
Galaxy interactions: main triggers of accretion (Cavaliere & Vittorini 2000)
L(2-10keV)=0.01 L(bol.)
no other parameter tuning
![Page 18: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
![Page 21: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Comparison with CDM HC models
Menci,Fiore,Perola & Cavaliere 2004
![Page 22: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
CXB Resolved fraction
LogL<43.5
43.5<LogL<44.5
LogL>44.5
Menci et al 2004
![Page 23: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Summary most of the CXB <6-8keV is resolved in sources Black Hole mass density ~2 times higher than that
estimated from optical and soft X-rays: better agreement with CXB estimates and with local space density
Differential evolution of number and luminosity densities.
Nice agreement between the evolution of luminous QSO and CDM HC models. Problems with low luminosity AGN?
Revision of Unified Schemes
![Page 24: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Revision of Unified Schemes
. Mild
![Page 25: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Revision of Unified Schemes Strong:Low L Seyfers and powerful QSO: different populations.A working scenario:Seyferts – associated to galaxies with merging histories
characterized by small mass progenitors. Feedback is effective in self-regulating accretion and SF, cold gas is left available for subsequent nuclear activation produced by loose galaxy encounters (fly-by).
QSOs – associated to galaxies with large mass progenitors. Feedback is less effective, most gas is quickly converted in stars and accreted during a few major mergers at high Eddington rates.
The obscuration properties of the two populations can be different in term of geometry, gas density, covering factor, ionization state, metallicity, dust content etc..
![Page 26: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
What’s next ?
1) Paucity of high z logLX<44.5 sources? Real or are we missing highly obscured AGNs?
2) Compare the obscuration properties of Seyfert 2 galaxies and QSO2
3) Deconvolve accr. rate and BH mass:4) Seyfert-QSO/galaxy clustering and
its evolution
![Page 27: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
1) Paucity of Seyfert like sources @ z>1 is real? Or, is it, at least partly, a selection effect?
Are we missing in Chandra and XMM surveys highly obscured (NH1024 cm-2) AGN? Which are common in the local Universe…
![Page 28: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Imaging surveys up to 8-10 keV (ASCA,BSAX, Chandra, XMM):most of the CXB <6-7 keV is resolved in sources. But only 40-50% in the 5-10 keV band. Few % E>10keV.The light-up and evolution of obscured accreting SMBH is still largely unknown
Worsley et a. 2004
![Page 29: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
What’s needed?
Sensitive observations at the peak of the CXB (~20-40 keV) to probe highly X-ray obscured AGN
But.. How deep should we go?
…and how hard should we go?
![Page 30: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Residual CXB after subtracting the resolved fraction below 10 keV
Comastri 2004
We need to resolve:
80% of CXB @10-30keV (similar to Chandra and XMM deep fields below 10 keV)
50% of CXB @ 20-40keV
![Page 31: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
CXB fraction>50% res.CXB>80% res.CXB
F(20-40keV)<710-15 cgs or0.75 Crab10-15 cgs or0.1 Crab
F(10-30keV)<10-14 cgs or0.65 Crab210-15 cgs or0.13 Crab
![Page 32: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
What’s next (3)
Deconvolve accr. rate and BH mass:•Optically unobscured AGN: MBH from broad line FWHM •Optically obscured AGN: MBH from bulge light
Franceschini et al. 1999 Marconi et al 2004
![Page 33: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Unobscured sources A detailed spectral analysis allows to make use of the correlations between FWHM of the broad emission lines and BH masses
Spectroscopy FWHM emission lines MMBHBH
Mclure & Jarvis 2002
Vestergaard 2002
![Page 34: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Obscured sources The nucleus is obscured so we can study the host galaxy
Imaging Morphology Bulge MMBHBH
Mc Lure et al. 2002
Log(MBH/Mo) = -0.5 MR – 2.96
![Page 35: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
BPM16274 #69
B/T = 1
Pks0312 #31
B/T = 0.8
Hellas2XMM
![Page 36: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
The GOODS sampleWe extended our analisys to a sample of optically obscured sources in the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) fields taking advantage of the superior quality of the HST images
Z band Ks band
![Page 37: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
B/T =0.39
B/T =0.5
![Page 38: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
MBH, L/LEDD of obscured and unobscured AGN
* = broad line AGN
![Page 39: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
What’s next (4)
AGN clustering D’Elia et al. 2004
![Page 40: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
AGN clusteringD’Elia et al. 2004 0=10’’
![Page 41: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
ELAIS S1 XMM-SWIREX-ray sources clustering and evolution
45’
XMM PN+MOS 50ks net expo. 0.5 deg2 479 X-ray sources
R=16.8
R=17.1
![Page 42: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
FX=1.510-13 cgs
![Page 43: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
ELAIS S1 XMM-SWIRE 6 extended sources in the 0.5 deg2 field
R=19.5FX=1.510-14
R=20.3
![Page 44: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Unobscured
Obscured
ELAIS-S1 number counts
![Page 45: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Clustering in the ELAIS-S1 field
2-10 keV:0=11+/-6 arcsec
0.5-2keV0=4+/-2.5 arcsec
![Page 46: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
What’s next
How galaxy activity traces the cosmic WEB (direct comparison with models for the evolution of the structure in the universe)
COSMOS! ACS-XMM-VIMOS-Chandra
![Page 47: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
COSMOS multiwavelength project
Need to go to larger scales 2 sq. deg.
“COSMOS is an HST/ACS Treasury project (..) Goal: Interplay between Large Scake Structure, evolution and formation of galaxies,dark matter and AGNs”
![Page 48: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
COSMOS project: COSMOS project: overviewoverview
MULTIWAVELENGTH DATA
Scheduled/observed:HST/ACS (600 orbits), XMM-Newton (0.8 Ms), SUBARU (b,v,r,i,z), VLA, GALEX, CFHT, Mambo …
proposed:Chandra (1.4 Ms), XMM (additional 0.8 Ms)+ Spitzer (200 orbits), VLT/VIMOS (70 nights)
http://www.astro.caltech.edu/cosmos/
http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~Eaussel/Cosmos/multiwavelength.html
![Page 49: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
800 ksec XMM-Newton Cosmos field
XMM pn true color image (courtesy I. Lehmann)
PI: G. Hasinger; 25 pointings 32 ksec each
![Page 50: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
![Page 51: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Direct Imaging at E=10-80 keV
1Crab = 250 sources deg2 = 12 sources X 15’ diam. FOV0.5 Crab = 550 deg2 = 27 sources X 15’ diam. FOV0.1Crab = 2350 deg2 = 120 sources X 15’ diam. FOV
![Page 52: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
RFLA inceff228
F = focal lenght R = reflectivity
L = mirror height
= inclination angle
Designing a mission concept:Goals ≤Crab sensitivity, 15’15’ FOV;
1 Crab=0.2 cts/Msec/cm2 20-40 keV; S/N=3, Csource=Cbkg 20 cts/Msec Aeff100cm2 @ 30 keV.
T. Area - grazing angle - t. diameter/focal length -mirror coating tradeoffs:
![Page 53: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Possible solutions based on Wolter-1 Possible solutions based on Wolter-1 design: design:
• Telescope 60cm diameter, <0.1deg, long focal lenght, e.g. 30-50m, small A/F.L. e.g. 0.02 – 0.01 Vs. 0.09 - 0.12 (XMM e Chandra): SIMBOL-X baseline Focal plane of 5-8’ FWHM
• Telescope 30cm diameter 0.1-0.3deg, 8-12m F.L., + multilayer coatings + multiple units: HEXIT-SAT Focal plane of 15-20’ FWHM
•Telescope 90cm diameter, 0.1-0.3deg, 20-30m F.L., + multilayer coatings: Simbol-X development study Focal plane of 15-20’ FWHM
![Page 54: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Image quality: which PSF do we need?
1’
1’
1’
10’
10’
10’
50”HPD; eq. 2Crab
30”HPDEq.2Crab
15”HPDEq.0.2Crab
![Page 55: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
HEXIT-SAT
4 mirror modules(XMM technology)8m focal length33cm diameter200 bilayers W/Si
400 cm2 @30keV200 cm2 @50keV1400 cm2 @1 keV
![Page 56: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
HEXIT-SAT flux limit
1Msec: 20-40 1/3 Crab 10-30keV 1/10 Crab
![Page 57: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Flux limits
![Page 58: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Flux limits S/N=3 1Msec
Markarian 3: a highly obscured (NH=51023cm-2), high luminosity (logL20-100keV=43.8) Seyfert at 60Mpc BeppoSAX MECS-PDS data Mark3 X 10 a QSO2
![Page 59: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Flux limits S/N=3 1MsecCircinus galaxy: a nearby (4Mpc), highly obscured (NH=21024cm-2), low luminosity (logL20-100keV=41.7) AGN BeppoSAX MECS-PDS data Circinus X 100 a bright Seyfert
![Page 60: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Flux limits S/N=3 1Msec
NGC1068: a Compton thick (NH=1025cm-2) AGN at 20 Mpcobserved luminosity logL20-100keV=42, unobscured luminosity logL20-100keV≈44,A nearby QSO2??!!BeppoSAX MECS,PDS NGC1068 X 10 a QSO2
![Page 61: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Possible solutions based on Wolter-1 Possible solutions based on Wolter-1 design: design:
• Assume telescope diameter <60cm
• <0.1deg, long focal lenght, e.g. 30-50m, small A/F.L. e.g. 0.02 – 0.01 Vs. 0.09 - 0.12 (XMM e Chandra) Focal plane of 5-8’ FWHM
• 0.1-0.3deg, 8-12m F.L., + multilayer coatings + multiple units Focal plane of 15-20’ FWHM
![Page 62: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
• if the d-spacing is varied in a continuous way (supermirror) and the absorption is negligible (E > 10 keV) it is possible to reflection bands 3-4 times wider than those for total reflection in mirrors with a single layer of e.g. Au, Pt, Ir.
• The d-spacing follows a power law distribution:
d(i) = a / (b+i)c
i = bi-layer index a /(2 sin c) c 0.25 b> -1
Wide band Multilayer (supermirrors)Wide band Multilayer (supermirrors)
![Page 63: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Number of modulesNumber of modules 4
Number of nested mirror shellsNumber of nested mirror shells 50
Reflecting coatingReflecting coating 200 bilayers W/Si
Geometrical profile Geometrical profile Wolter I (lin. approx)
Focal LengthFocal Length 8000 mm
Total Shell HeightTotal Shell Height 800 mm
Plate scalePlate scale 26 arcsec/mm
Total Shell Height Total Shell Height 800 mm
Material of the mirror wallsMaterial of the mirror walls electroformed Ni
Min-MaxTop DiameterMin-MaxTop Diameter 112 - 330 mm
Min - Max angle of incidenceMin - Max angle of incidence 0.096 - 0.295 deg
Min-Max wall thicknessMin-Max wall thickness 0.120 - 0.350 mm
Total Mirror Weight (1 module)Total Mirror Weight (1 module) 65
Field-of-View (diameter FWHM)Field-of-View (diameter FWHM) 15 arcmin
Single module effective areaSingle module effective area 75 cm2 @40 keV
Main characteristicsMain characteristics
![Page 64: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
XEUS-I Multilayer optimization
From Pareschi & Cotroneo:
50m focal lenght
200 W/Si bi-layers on shellsfrom 1.3m to 2.8m diameter.30 W/Si bi-layers on shellsFrom 2.8m to 4m
2000-3000 cm2 @20-40 keV
![Page 65: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Background LEOActive shields instrument
BeppoSAX PDS:
Phoswich NaI(Tl) 3mm detector CsI(Na) 50mm active shield
Sky+particle ind.
Dark Earth
CXB
![Page 66: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Internal Background LEOLow inclination (4 degrees) orbit: low and regular background
Total average BKG = 5.610-5 cts/s/cm2/keV/mmPL average BKG = 410-5 cts/s/cm2/keV/mm
13-60keV
![Page 67: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Internal Background HEOActive shield instrument
EXOSAT 200,000 km apogee500 km perigee
ME Argon 1-15 keV
ME Xenon 5-50 keV1.5cm thick
ME Xenon total internal BKG 10-50 keV = 50-60 cts/s/detector310-3 cts/s/keV/cm2 = 210-4 cts/s/keV/cm2/mm 10 times less than XMM MOS
![Page 68: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Internal Background HEOSimulations
From Armstrong et al. 1999Montecarlo for an L2 orbit
Assuming 90% efficiency anticoincidences, total BKG=10-4 cts/s/cm2/keV/mm
Within a factor of 2 of that seen by EXOSAT ME
20 times less than XMM MOS
2-3 times higher than LEO low inclination orbit BKG
![Page 69: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
CXB from outside the FOV
Reference PIB=10-4 counts/s/cm2/keV
CXB(20-40keV)=1.3810-11 erg/s/cm2/deg2 =8.610-3 ph/s/cm2/deg2
Det. Spot= (HPR/plate scale)2 #mod.
Spot(HX)=(7.5”/260”/cm)24 = 0.01 cm2
Spot(Xeus)=(5”/41.3”/cm)2 = 0.046 cm2
Spot(SXB)=(15”/69”/cm)2 = 0.15 cm2
Spot(SXM)=(7.5”/69”/cm)2 = 0.037 cm2
CXB(HX) = 910-5 counts/s/deg2 PIB(HX) = 210-5 counts/sCXB(Xeus) =410-4 counts/s/deg2 PIB(Xeus) = 4.610-5 counts/sCXB(SXB) = 1.310-3 counts/s/deg2 PIB(SXB) = 1.510-4 counts/sCXB(SXM) = 3.210-4 counts/s/deg2 PIB(SXM) = 3.710-5 counts/s
![Page 70: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
![Page 71: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
![Page 72: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
![Page 73: High Energy Large Area Surveys, the history of accretion in the Universe and galaxy evolution Fabrizio Fiore and the HELLAS2XMM collaboration: (A. Baldi,](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070416/5697c0291a28abf838cd791c/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Conclusions
To improve the present knowledge on the sources making theCXB, to have a more complete census of SMBH up to z=1-2, i.e. the golden agegolden age of AGN and galaxy activity, we should go down to fluxes where:
80% of the 10-30keV CXB is resolved in sources (0.1Crab); 50% of the 20-40keV CXB is resolved in sources (0.75Crab)
This can be done with lightweight (<400kg), multilayer optics with Aeff500 cm2 @20-30 keV and 15” HPD