Transcript
Page 1: Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

bySoumya Roy, Graduate Student

Department of Earth and Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of Houston

Page 2: Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

1. Introduction

2. Multichannel Analysis of Surface Wave (MASW) in Nutshell

3. MASW Analysis of Seismic Data - La Marque, Tx

4. Results and Interpretation

5. Future Avenues

Page 3: Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

Introduction• Estimating a near-surface S-wave velocity (Vs) structure is important

• Provide static solution for multi-component seismic analysis

• Ground Roll inversion can provide near-surface Vs solution

• Multichannel Analysis of Surface Wave (MASW) is one of the most

popular methods for Ground Roll (mainly Rayleigh wave) inversion

• MASW is applied to different real data sets from La Marque Geophysical

Observatory, TX

-Dulaijan, 2008 (modified after Farrell et al., 1984)

Effect of a Near-surface Low-velocity Layer in x-t domain data

Page 4: Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

MASW in Nutshell

Shot gather

F.T.

- Park et al., 1998- Xia et al., 1998

Page 5: Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

Galveston, Texas

UH Coastal Center

La Marque Geophysical Observatory University of Houston Coastal Center

Galveston County, Texas

N

Entrance

Sledgehammer-Planted Geophone

Sledgehammer-Land Streamer

Accelerated Weight Drop- Planted Geophone

Page 6: Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

La Marque Geophysical Observatory

• The topography of the field site is flat.

• Sediments are from the Quaternary Beaumont Formation

consisting of clay and silty clay (Capuano et al., 1996).

• One seismic experiment was performed along the road whereas

other two was done on solid land blocks

Seismic Experiments• Experiment 1: Source: 10 lb Sledgehammer Receiver: Land Streamer• Experiment 2:

Source: 10 lb Sledgehammer Receiver: Planted Geophone• Experiment 3:

Source: Accelerated Weight Drop Receiver: Planted Geophone

Page 7: Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

La Marque Geophysical Observatory

Sledgehammer-Land Streamer Sledgehammer-Planted Geophone

Sample Interval: 0.5 msRecord Length: 2 sec

Sample Interval: 2 msRecord Length: 3 sec

N

E

S

W

Page 8: Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

La Marque Geophysical Observatory

Accelerated Weight Drop – Planted Geophone

EW

Sample Interval: 0.5 msRecord Length: 3 sec

Page 9: Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

Sledgehammer-Land Streamer

Sledgehammer-Planted Geophone

Accelerated Weight Drop–Planted Geophone

Raw Shot Gathers

OBSERVATION #1 : Raw Shot Gather Quality Is Better for Planted Geophone Cases

Page 10: Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

Dispersion Curves: Sledgehammer-Land Streamer

Near-field effects : •Non-stabilized surface waves•Degrade near-offset lower frequencies (having deeper information) in the fundamental mode.

Far-field effect:•Dominance of higher modes •Affect the higher frequencies (having shallower information) of the fundamental modeλ≈ 20m

DMax ≈ 10mOBSERVATION#2: •Depth Penetration ≈ 10m

Page 11: Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

Dispersion Curves: Sledgehammer-Planted Geophone

Higher Modesλ≈ 45mDMax ≈ 22.5m

OBSERVATION#3: • Better Mode Separation • Lower Noise Level• Depth Penetration ≈ 22.5m

Page 12: Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

Dispersion Curves: Accelerated Weight Drop – Planted Geophone

λ≈ 36mDMax ≈ 18m OBSERVATION#4:

•Depth Penetration ≈ 18m

Page 13: Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

2-D Shear-wave Velocity Profile

Sledgehammer-Land Streamer

Sledgehammer-Planted Geophone

Observation#5:Road

Sledgehammer-Land Streamer

Sledgehammer-Planted Geophone

tStatics = ∑ Δzi / Vi

Page 14: Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

Is There Any Shear Wave Anisotropy ?

1022102310251026

NS

SN

WE

1022102310251026

EW

Page 15: Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

Future Plans

• Use of higher modes

• Passive MASW

• Synthetic modeling using Finite-Difference code

• Well log and VSP at La Marque Geophysical Observatory

• Comparing MASW statics with regular statics

Page 16: Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity

Acknowledgement• Dr. Robert R. Stewart• Dr. C. Liner• AGL colleagues- Ms Tania Mukherjee, Mr.

Bode Omoboya, Mr. Anoop William• Mr. Li Chang and Mr. Joe Jackson


Top Related