GEOSS Task AR-09-01b Architecture Implementation PilotAIP Phase 4, (AIP-4)
AIP Task Team
February 2011
GEO Task AR-09-01bArchitecture Implementation Pilot
“fostering interoperability arrangements and common practices for GEOSS”
Other discussions
• in CFP slide 6, need to elaborate on the SBA integrator role
• In general, need to add improving usability of GEOSS/geoportal
• Developing/piloting practice/tools that better support web experiences and better dissemination of resources already submitted by providers
• Discussion about the availability of the Ontology registry in time for AIP-4
AIP-4 Call for Participation
• CFP Main Body• AIP Evolutionary Development Process• GEOSS Services Architecture
GEOSS AIP Phase 4 (AIP-4)
• SBAs: Increasing implementation of GEOSS with CoPs• Data: Foster access to EO Priority Observations
consistent with Data-CORE and Interoperability Arrangements.
• GCI: Utilize the agreed components baseline
DRAFT Schedule and Priorities
SBAs supported by GCI and Data Servers
GEOSS CORE-Priority EO Parameter Access Services
Communities of Practice
Water Energy
Data sharing
Data Harmonization
. . .
. . .
GCI
CoP Toolkit
Data Server deployment
AIP-4 Scope - draft
• Communities of Practice: SBA Integrators, CoP Toolkit
• GCI selected components as baseline• Data Servers:
– Foster access to UIC Priority Observations consistent with Data-CORE and Interoperability Arrangements
• Technology development– Semantics and ontologies for mediation– Data harmonization: quality, schemas– Data Sharing: DSTF, User identity
AIP-4 Call for Participation
• CFP Main Body• AIP Evolutionary Development Process• GEOSS Services Architecture
OperationalCapability
OperationalCapability
UserNeeds,
Scenarios
UserNeeds,
Scenarios
Design, Develop,Deploy
Design, Develop,Deploy
ADC activities including:
ArchitectureImplementation
Pilot (AIP)Task AR-09-01b
GEOSS CommonInfrastructure (GCI)Task AR-09-01a
support
persistentimplementation
requirements
SBA Tasks,UIC, CBC, STC
A process, elaboration of GEOSS Architecture
Consider:Role of Task ForcesRole of CoPsOther ADC tasks: DIAS
AIP Evolutionary Development Phases has piloted the GEOSS 10 Year Plan Architecture • AIP-1
– Kickoff: June 2007
– Result: "Core" Architecture defined most of the GCI IOC – Architecture Workshop
• AIP-2
– Kickoff: September 2008
– Result: SBA implementations of common cross-cutting architecture
• AIP-3
– Kickoff: March 2010
– Result: Enabled data sharing and network building in GEOSS SBA communities
DevelopmentDevelopmentActivitiesActivities
Kick-offKick-offWorkshopWorkshop
Call for Call for ParticipationParticipation
ConceptConceptDevelopmentDevelopment
PersistentPersistentOperationsOperations
(AR-09-01a)(AR-09-01a)
Participation
Participation
Participation
Participation
ParticipationArchitectureArchitecture
DocumentationDocumentation
Updates for each step
Baseline
AR-09-01b Architecture Implementation PilotEvolutionary Development Process
Operational Baseline and Lessons Learned for next evolutionary spiral
Continuous interaction with external activities
AIP Development Approach
AIP coordinates with other GEO Tasks
• DI-09-02: Multi-Risk Management • DI-06-09: Use of Satellites for Risk
Management• WA-06-02: Droughts, Floods and
Water Management• WA-06-07: Water Resource
Management• BI-07-01: BON• EN-07-02 - Energy Enviro. Impact• HE-09-01: Info Systems for Health• HE-09-02: Monitoring and
Prediction for Health
• US-09-01: User Engagement• DA-06-01: Data Sharing
Principles• DA-09-01: Data
Management• DA-09-02: Data Integration
and Analysis• DA-09-03: Global Data Sets• AR-09-02: Interoperable
Systems for GEOSS• AR-09-04: Dissemination
and Distribution Networks
AG- Agriculture Task
Community of Practice:Chartered to meet Decision Supportneeds
Community of Interest/Practices and AIP
SBA/CoP Integrator
Service Providers: Data, Observation, Mediation, Processing
CoP Science Community
GCI
Community of Interest:Birds of a feather, discussion group
Communities of Practices in AIP-4:-Integrated Global Water Cycle Obs.-Energy-Air Quality-Biodiversity-Global Agricultural Monitoring?-Geohazards?
SBA/CoP Integrator-Lead AIP CoP WG-Liaison from AIP to CoP-Expert in SBA science and geoinformatics-Lead application of GEOSS architecture to CoP
CoPs supported by AIP
• Objective: Work with CoPs to increase network building and data sharing
• Role of the SBA Integrator– Builds network through Community Portal, using CoP toolkit
and other information and services to meet the needs of the community
– Build on the best practices and interoperability arrangements.
• CoP Toolkit– Community Portals and Application Clients for DSS needs– Community Catalogues– Priority Data Servers for SBA
Support of SBAs/CoPs by AIP processes
• Existing scenario and Use case process
• Add processes to support data needs– Priority observations with CORE and web services– Data quality, e.g., GeoViQua
Building on WPS progress
• Several WPS’s in previous AIP phases.• WPS are building blocks for workflow• Introduce workflow into WIP-4 with tools, e.g.,
Taverna toolbox– Example from WPS and Teverna from GeoViQua
e.g. PyWPS– Publish via myExperiment
EC FP7 Projects Participating in AIP
• Current in AIP-3– EnerGEO, – EO2Heaven, – EuroGEOSS, – GENESIS, – GIGAS, – GIS4EU, – SAFER, – UncertWEB
• New contributions possible:– ISTIMES - DM– DEWFORA- Drought– ENDORSE: "Energy
Services for GMES" - www.endorse-fp7.eu
– GeoViQua– GLOWASIS - Water– (Current GCI call)
AIP-4 Call for Participation
• CFP Main Body• AIP Evolutionary Development Process• GEOSS Services Architecture
Architecture ViewpointsArchitecture Viewpoints
InformationViewpoint
ComputationalViewpoint
EngineeringViewpoint
Implementation/Development
Viewpoints in “Reference Model - Open Distributed Processing (RM-ODP)” ISO/IEC 10746
TechnologyViewpoint
EnterpriseViewpoint
Community Objectives Business aspects: purpose, scope and policiesWhat for? Why? Who? When?
Information sources and models What is it about?
Types of services and protocolsHow does each bit work?
Solution types: distribution infrastructureHow do the components work together?
Implementation system: hardware, software, distributionWith what?
Abstract/Best Practices
SBAs for AIP-4
• Established– Disaster
Management– Energy– Health: Air Quality– Water Drought– Arctic SDI– Biodiversity and
Climate Change
• New in AIP-4– Agriculture
• Maybe in AIP-4– Climate (Liping
NOAA) – Weather (FP7)
One page for each SBA needed in the following pages
GEOSS SoA Enterprise Viewpoint
Cloud Computing Infrastructure
Disaster Management (Arnaud, GIS-FCU)
GEOSS SoA Enterprise Viewpoint
res
reqWPS
Clients
At a specific service levelAt a specific service level
Resources
Disaster Management (Arnaud, GIS-FCU)
GEOSS SoA Enterprise Viewpoint
Encapsulating WPS(OGC-compliant )
Standard Services(Hadoop-based)
Cloud Computing Infrastructure
Services
Resources
Clients
The features of decision making in response phase
unpredictablesemi-structured to unstructuredtransnational
Cloud/Grid computing will be a good solution to support the semi structured to unstructured decision making at a specific service level
Geo Portal
RegistrationSearch
Interact with
Services
Execute AccessAccess
Energy• AIP-2 and AIP-3 have established the GGI capacity to disseminate Energy and Environment related Web
Services using existing standard (OGC).• The on-going FP7 MACC project has established Quality and Uncertainties, as key parameters to be part of
any data set for Energy and/or Environment• Focus for AIP-4 will be made on:
– Providing end-user with Quality and Uncertainties parameters for any relevant data set at Metadata level for Search & Discovery purpose and at Web Service level for end-user full information presentation
– Selecting the suitable development framework for building Graphical User Interface that has the capacity to trigger remote Web Services (WMS, WFS and WPS) in operational services such as SoDa
• Support will be needed from existing initiative such as QA4EO to help Energy Web Services providers to properly build Metadata taking into account the Quality and the Uncertainties parameters associated to the data sets. Metadata should latter be deployed on a GEOSS compliant Catalogue.
• Collaboration with GEO Portal developers should be considered in order to ensure a proper and consistent dissemination and presentation of Energy and Environment data sets on the GEO Portal
• A persistent example addressing Quality and Uncertainty parameters should be deployed as a Web Service, preferably exploited in an operational service such as SoDa. This Web Service should be able to properly carry those parameters for end-user’s information.
• Search, Find Bind mechanism must be addressed and demonstrated through the GEO Web Portal facilities.• Web-based applications using generic framework and triggering Energy and/or Environment related Web
Services must be realized. These Web-based applications must ensure that they properly display the Quality and Uncertainties parameters attached to the geo-localized data. Collaboration with IT partners offering existing frameworks is foreseen.
Reference to MACC project: http://www.gmes-atmosphere.eu/documents/deliverables/r-rad/D_R-RAD_2.1_1.RAD.MACC.v1.0.pdf
Health: Air Quality (Stefan/NGC, EO2Heaven)
• Durban Scenario
GEOSS SoA Enterprise Viewpoint
GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot, Phase 4, GEO Water Tasks
Will Pozzi and George Percivall
GEO Task WA-06-02b, Impacts of Drought, Co-POC and NASA WaterNet Project Manager, and Open Geospatial Consortium, GEO Task AR-09-01b Task POC
Presentation before the 2010 GEO Drought Response Initiative, Winnipeg, CA, 10 May 2010
www.ogcnetwork.net/AIP
Proposed Decision Making Services in the Final GEO Water Societal Benefit Area Workplan (discussed within IGWCO and Doug Cripe)
courtesy of Justin Sheffield, Princeton, African Drought Monitor
Global Drought Monitoring and Early Warning Service
Proposed Decision Making Services in the Final GEO Water Societal Benefit Area Workplan (discussed within IGWCO and Doug Cripe)
Architecture courtesy of USA NOAA National Office of Hydrology Remote Sensing Center (NOHRSC)
Cryosphere Monitoring Service
Drought Early Warning requires assembly within an information system (GEOSS) the uses of water, so that drought vulnerability can be assessed or included
Soil Moisture in the European Union Europe Drought Observatory: agricultural impact (http://edo.jrc.ec.europa.eu/php/index.php?action=view&id=19)
Agricultural use, cooling water for power generation, domestic use, environmental flow requirement for ecosystems
Agriculture (Liping Di)
• Crop condition monitoring
• USDA, China, • CoP • Will – irrigation
water
GEOSS SoA Enterprise Viewpoint
Agriculture-Crop Condition Monitoring (Liping Di)• Crop condition information is critical to
decision making in both public and private sectors that concern agricultural policy, production, food security, and food prices.
• Crop conditions change quickly due to changes of various growing conditions, such as temperature, soil moisture, fertilization, or disease, etc.
– Timely and repeat monitoring with a full spatial coverage and sufficient spatial resolution throughout the growing season is necessary.
• Satellite remote sensing provides the best method to monitor crop condition globally.
– Conditions are measured by comparing the current vegetation indices derived from remote sensing to multiple-year statistics of the indices (e.g., Mean, Maximum, Minimum, Medium, etc).
– Multiple nations and organizations are monitoring the crop conditions.
– Standardizing the condition measures and serving the measures to global users under GEOSS framework will be meaningful
• Participants: GMU, USDA NASS, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science..
GEOSS SoA Enterprise Viewpoint
Arctic SDI (Doug N, EEA?)
GEOSS SoA Enterprise Viewpoint
Biodiversity and Climate Change (CNR and USGS)• Continue the collaboration with EC-JRC
(G. Dubois) Digital Observatory of Protected Areas (DOPA) enhancing the AIP-3 eHabitat Pilot
• Continue the collaboration with NASA JPL (G. Geller) working on interoperability and data/model integration
• Try to contribute also to the GEO Model Web sub-task (AR-09-02d)
GEOSS SoA Enterprise Viewpoint
Climate and Weather
• WMO Information System (WIS)
• NESDIS: Martin• CEOS?• GOOS - Liping
GEOSS SoA Enterprise Viewpoint
GEOSS Information framework
GEOSS SoA Information Viewpoint
Data Harmonization in AIP-4 (Herve updates)
• Uncertainty – GeoViqua, UncertWeb• QA4EO - CEOS• Data Schemas – INSPIRE
– Test Facility for validating schemas
GEOSS SoA Information Viewpoint
Components deploy Services
GEOSSClearinghouse
GEO Web Portal
GEOSS Common Infrastructure
Components & Services
Standards andInteroperability
Best PracticesWiki
User Requirements
Registries
Main GEOWeb Site Registered Community Resources
Community Portals
Client Applications
Client Tier
Mediation Tier
CommunityCatalogues
AlertServers
WorkflowManagement
ProcessingServers
Access Tier
GEONETCastProduct AccessServers
Sensor WebServers
Model AccessServers
Test Facility
MediationServers
GEOSS SoA Engineering Viewpoint
Component Development in AIP-4
• GCI usage and enhancement– New: Ontology Registry, URR
• Community Portals– CEOS portals for Virtual Constellations and CWIC– Geonetcast via Eumetsat Portal– CBC connection
• Data Servers– Data Sharing– Geoss data CORE
GEOSS SoA Engineering Viewpoint
Development status for ADC activities
Development Status
AIP SIF GCI CT
Development X
Demonstrational X
Pre-operational X X X
Operational uses X X
Superseded X
Discontinued X
EUMETSAT development status categories
CoP web presence: Community Portals
• IGWCO not on Community Portal– Watercycleforum.com
• Nadine
GEOSS SoA Engineering Viewpoint
Deployment of Priority data services
• Deploying a data service– See AIP-2 video
• Metadata for adding into GCI– Confirm visibility (browse, access) in GWP
• Data Sharing: CORE, user registration/identity– Metadata about data sharing
• Data harmonization: schemas, quality.
• Used by many CoPs
GEOSS SoA Engineering Viewpoint
Make priority data fully available as services
US-09-01aCritical Earth Observation
Priorities
DSTFGEOSS
Data-CORE Roadmap
Compare the 2 lists
Highest Ranked EO Parameters
Datasets tagged as CORE
(Pledge List)
AIP-4 Access
Services Pilot
Priority EO Parameters available as
CORE
GEOSSCORE-Priority EO Parameter Access
Services
Sbageotask.larc.nasa.gov
CORE = full and open with no restrictions. No data reuse conditions. There may be cost and attribution requirements.
No cost recovery in AIP-4
DIAS connection to this emphasis?GTHN – Global terrestrial Hydro Network
Data Sharing (Steve Browdy)
• Working with the DSTF, • User Management
– User identity– User registration
• Data Access Conditions:– Data-CORE, Non-Commercial Use, other
• let a user know when she/he is leaving the GEO site and entering another.
Semantic Mediation (Cristiano, Nagai)
•Coordination with GEO task AR-09-01d on semantic mediation issues•Support to the optimization and extension of the GI-DAC service broker•Integration and harmonization of thematic thesauri with reference ones:
•Water Ontology from AIP-3•Drought Vocabulary from EuroGEOSS•More contributions are welcome…
•Coordination with GEO task AR-09-01d on semantic mediation issues•Support to the optimization and extension of the GI-DAC service broker•Integration and harmonization of thematic thesauri with reference ones:
•Water Ontology from AIP-3•Drought Vocabulary from EuroGEOSS•More contributions are welcome…
References
• GEO – earthobservations.org
• GEO Architecture Implementation Pilot– www.ogcnetwork.net/AIpilot
• GEOSS registries and SIF– geossregistries.info
George [email protected]
Nadine [email protected]