Transcript
  • 1

    AGeometricModelBasedonFrequencyThatRevealstheNatureofTimeTheodoreJ.St.John,MS,MA,Ph.D.

    Abstract Thepurposeofthispaperistopresentahypothesis:thatfrequencyisthe

    keytounderstandingthefundamentalnatureoftime.Timeandspacearemirror

    imagesofeachotherandtheyaretwodifferentwaysofexpressinginverse

    frequency.Thereasonthisisimportantisbecause,bystartingwithfrequencythe

    relationshipsofphysicscanbeexpressedbylinearequations.Itisknownthat

    frequencyisdirectlyproportionaltoandthusequivalenttoquantumenergy.By

    expressingtherelationshipofspatialfrequencyvs.temporalfrequencyasasimple

    geometricmodel,severalwell-knownrelationshipsfallintoplacewithouthavingto

    stretchthemodelintowarpedexpressionsofspacetimethatrequirecomplicated

    hyperbolicfunctionsorfieldequations.Theresultisasensibleinterpretationofthe

    meaningoftime,spacetime,quantumparticlesandquantumwavefunctions.The

    modelalsolendsitselfdirectlytoanunderstandingofhowspaceandtimebecome

    dissociatedandtransformintoquantumbitsofinformation,whichautomatically

    modelsrealityasaquantumcomputer.Theimplicationsoftheseinterpretations

    provideabridgebetweenphysics,asaphysicalscience,andlifesciencesthattakein

    informationfromtheirsurroundings,convolveitwithitselfasparticlesandthereby

    shapeandreshapematter,allowinglivingorganismstochangewithtimeandadapt

    totheirenvironment.

    Introduction Therehavebeenmanybooksandarticlesaboutthenatureoftime,especially

    sinceStephenHawking,broughtittotheforefrontinhisbookABriefHistoryoftime.

    (Hawking1990)PhysicistLeeSmolinsaidthatunderstandingthenatureoftime

    mightbethemostimportantquestionforthisgenerationofphysiciststoanswer

    becausetimeholdsthesecrettounderstandingtheuniverse.(Smolin,TimeReborn:

  • 2

    FromtheCrisisinPhysicstotheFutureoftheUniverse2013)Heconcludedthat

    timeisrealinthesensethat:“Whateverisrealinouruniverseisrealinamomentof

    time,whichisoneofasuccessionofmoments.”Anotherphysicist,RichardMuller,

    explainedthattheBigBangasa4-dimensionalexplosion“continuouslycreatesnot

    onlynewspacebutalsonewtime.”(Muller2016)Butmanyothersstillthinkthat

    timeisanillusion(Barbour1999).Andthereareafewwhoconsidertimetobe

    somethingthatcanbeviewedasanintrinsicgeometricpropertyofthree-

    dimensionalspace.Chappell,et.al.presentedthisusingCliffordgeometricalgebra.

    (Chappell,etal.2016)However,they“absorbedtimeintoanexpressionofan

    invariantspacetimedistance”.Soratherthanexplainingthenatureoftime,theyhide

    itinthesquareofaquaternion,whichagreeswithwhatmostCosmologistsbelieve:

    thattimeissomehowmixedwithandthushiddeninspacetocreatespacetime.

    However,thenatureofspacetimeisevenmoremysteriousthantime.

    Generalrelativitytheoryisthemainframeworkthathasbeenusedtoapproachthe

    problemofunderstandingspacetime,andithasservedtoexplainalargebodyof

    observationalinformation,includingtheredshiftinlightfromfar-awaystarsand

    galaxies,nuleosynthesis,(whichpredictstheamountofhydrogenthatshouldhave

    fusedintohelium)andthemicrowavebackgroundradiation,believedtobethe

    “echo”oftheBigBang.(Kaku1993,pg.643)Butthishasgeneratedevenmore

    questionsandcomplextheories,likeStringTheory,M-Theory,CausalSetTheory,

    theAmplituhedronTheoryandLoopTheory.

    AccordingtoGeorgeMusser,contributingeditoratScientificAmericanand

    authorofSpookyActionataDistance(Farrar,StrausandGiroux,2015)andThe

    CompleteIdiot’sGuidetoStringTheory(Alpha,2008),“Ifphysicistshavelearned

    anythingfromthelongslogtounifytheirtheories,itisthatspaceandtimeforma

    systemofsuchstaggeringcomplexitythatitmaydefyourmostardenteffortsto

    understand.”(Musser2018)“Thebottom-linelessonofquantumgravity”said

    Musser,“isthatnotallphenomenaneatlyfitwithinspacetime.Physicistswillneed

    tofindsomenewfoundationalstructure,andwhentheydo,theywillhavecompleted

    therevolutionthatbeganjustmorethanacenturyagowithEinstein.”

  • 3

    Ratherthanproposinganewfoundationalstructure,thispaperreflectson

    andreconsidershowtheoldfoundationswereinterpreted.AccordingtoE.A.Burtt

    inTheMetaphysicalFoundationsofModernScience,beforethedaysofNewton,the

    treatmentoftimeasanindependententitywasconsideredbymanytobea

    philosophicalblunder.(Burtt2003,pg.158)

    “Clearly, justaswemeasurespace, firstbysomemagnitude,and learn

    howmuchit is, later judgingothercongruentmagnitudesbyspace;so

    we first reckon time from some motion and afterwards judge other

    motions by it; which is plainly nothing else than to compare some

    motionswithothersbythemediationoftime;justasbythemediationof

    spaceweinvestigatetherelationsofmagnitudeswitheachother.”

    Inotherwords,aunitoftimeisjustaunitofmotionthatiscapturedor

    “clocked”byacyclicalmotiondeviceasaunitmeasuredinthepast,tobeusedasa

    commondenominatorforothermotion.Spacetimethenissimplyaspatiotemporal

    processthatimplicitlyflowsandweexperienceitasmotion.Butitmustbeexpressed

    asapairofexplicitmeasurablequantitiesthatappearto“dancewitheachother”

    andmoveindependentlywithaninverserelationship.Thisinverserelationshipwill

    beexplainedandillustratedbelowinasimplegeometricmodel.

    TheHypothesis Thehypothesispresentedhereisthatfrequency,whichisdefinedasinverse

    time,e.g.incyclespersecond,shouldbeconsideredthemostfundamental

    spatiotemporalprocess-unitinnature.Thentime,astheinverseoffrequency,is

    simplyamirrorimageofaquantumunitofenergy,bothofwhicharebyproductsof

    relativemotion.Wemaythinkthatwesensetime,butmotion,whichisubiquitous,

    iswhatweactuallysense.Aquantumunitofenergyisjustenergyinmotionand

    thereisnosuchthingasanobjectatrest.Anobjectonlyappearstobeatrestinits

    ownreferenceframe.Itisalwaysinmotionrelativetoeverythingelseinthe

  • 4

    universethatismovingwithrespecttoit.Thereasonthattimeisa“problem”inthe

    firstplaceisbecausewearetaughttothinkofitasaprimaryfundamentalunit.And

    thatisbecausedoingsoallowedearlyphysiciststopredicttheoutcomeofrelative

    motion.Thatiswherethemoneyis,sotospeak,becausemeteringmotionand

    predictingtimeandlocationofarrivalisextremelypracticalanduseful.Butthat

    modelseparatesandhidesthefundamentalnatureofrealityandfoolsusinto

    thinkingthatthephysicalaspectiswhatisreal.Eventuallythatmodelreachedits

    limitandbegantocreateproblems,liketheonesdescribedaboveandother

    “singularityproblems”.(Smolin,TheTroubleWithPhysics2006)

    ThesolutionIsubmitistorecognizefrequency–theinverseoftime–as

    primary.Westartwiththeconceptofenergy.Theword“energy”referstoan

    implicitconceptthatjustis.Tosaythatitisimplicitmeansitcannotbeexpressed,

    onlyimplied.Ifwetrytoexpressit,wemakeitexplicitviatheexpression.Asimplicit

    totheuniverse,energyisubiquitous;itcanneitherbecreatednordestroyed.But

    onceexplicated,(seeDavidBohm’sWholenessandtheImplicateOrder(Bohm1980))

    itcanbechangedinform.Andtheword“form”impliesashapethatcanbe

    representedbyaquantity.Themostfundamentalunitofenergyisaquantumunit,

    andweknowfromquantummechanicsthatitcanbeexpressedasafunctionof

    frequency:𝐸 = ℎ𝑓,whereℎisPlanck’sconstant.Infact,thesameequationholds

    whetherfreferstotemporalfrequency,whichisinversetime𝑓! =!!,orspatial

    frequency,whichisinversespace,𝑓! =!!,wherecisthespeedoflight.Thesis

    usuallywrittenaswavelength(𝜆)asintheequation𝐸 = !!!.Andsince!

    !definesthe

    momentumofaphotonandmomentumimpliestheparticulateformofenergy(a

    quantumparticle),spatialfrequencyisgenerallyignored.Perhapsthatisbecause

    focusingon“objects”isofmoreinteresttothosewhowanttobeobjective.However,

    timeisnotanobjectandsoitcannotbeunderstoodbyfocusingonobjectivereality.

    Method Theapproachusedhereistopresentamodelwithoneunitofenergyandits

    equivalent–oneunitoffrequency–onarectangularcoordinatesystem,asshownin

  • 5

    Figure1(withenergyrepresentedbyavectorarrowwithmagnitudeofone),and

    frequenciesrepresentedasthefirstunittoscaletheaxes.Sothefrequencyofone

    unitofenergywouldbeonecycleperwhateverunityouchoose.Andthevalueofc

    woulddependonthatchoiceofunits.Wewillnotchoosecommonphysicalunits.

    Instead,“naturalunits”areexpressed(i.e.madeexplicit)sothateachoneis“one

    unitofenergy”.

    BecausethetipofeacharrowinFigure1representsthe“particleboundary”

    (thismeanstheenergyboundaryofaquantumparticle,notthephysicalboundary),

    theregionoutsideofoneunitrepresentsthepartoftheuniversethatisnotthe

    particle.Logically,“nottheparticle”meanstheinverseoftheparticle;therefore,

    outsideoftheboundaryonthespatialaxisrepresents3-Dspace(s)andonthe

    temporalaxis,itrepresentstime(t).

    Figure1

    Thismayseemlikeanunconventionalwayofusingarectangularcoordinate

    systembecausetheunitsforenergyaredifferentfromtheunitsofspaceandtime.

    Butwedothesamethingwithvectorsthatrepresentmotionthathasmagnitude

    anddirection.Itisasuperpositionofrelationships.Regardlessofwhatunitsof

    measurementsareassigned,therelationshipsremainthesame.The“outside”

    domaincorrespondstorelativisticrelationshipsandthe“inside”domain

  • 6

    correspondstoquantumrelationships.Thesetwodomainsareoftenmixed

    mathematically,forexampleaunitofpowerisaunitofenergyperunittimeor

    𝑃 = !!.InFigure1,thisusestheinsideunitofenergyasthenumeratorandthe

    outsideunitasthedenominatorandtheresultistheslopeofthediagonalline.Orif

    yourotatetheaxeswithtemporalunitsastheverticalandspatialunitsasthe

    horizontal,theslopewouldrepresentaunitofforce,sinceforceisaunitofenergy

    perunitdistanceor𝐹 = !!,whereswouldrepresentaunitofmeasureinone

    dimension–thedirectionoftheforce.(Halliday,ResnickandWalker1993)

    AsitisinFigure1,theslopeofthediagonallineis!!= 𝑐ontheoutsideand

    ! !!!= !

    !ontheinside.InHartreenaturalunits,𝑐 = 1isthespeedoflightand!

    != 𝛼is

    thefinestructureconstant,whichisconsideredbymosttobeafundamental

    constantinnature(Nair,etal.2008).Inthegeneralrelativityframework,itisa

    fundamentalphysicalconstantcharacterizingthestrengthoftheelectromagnetic

    interactionbetweenelementarychargedparticles.Butithasmultiplephysical

    interpretations(seehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant)and

    someevensuggestthatitmaynotbestrictlyconstant(Webb,etal.1998).According

    tothemodelpresentedhere,itissimplyacluethattheexpressionofthequantum

    domainisthemirrorimageoftherelativisticdomain.

    Presentingspaceandtimeinthiswayallowsseveralotherrelationshipsto

    fallinplaceaswell,asshowninFigure2,wherethesubscriptin𝐸! standsfor

    deBroglie,todistinguishitfrom𝐸! ,whichisrestenergyand𝐸! ,whichistotal

    energy.(ReproducedfromFigure6of(StJohn,TheHolomorphicProcess-

    UnderstandingtheHolographicNatureofRealityasaMetamorphicProcess2018))

  • 7

    Figure2

    Noticethatthekineticenergytermisrepresentedbythepartofthetotal

    energyvectorthatliesoutsideofthe“particle”boundary.Itisareflectionofthefact

    thataquantumparticleisaunitofenergy,geographicallyexpressedintheenergy

    domain,whichissuperimposedovertherelativisticdomain(sandt,notlabeledin

    thisfigure).Inotherwords,aparticle,oranyphysicalobject,canbeperceivedasan

    independentobject–or–asanobjectthatisinmotionrelativetoanythingelseinthe

    universethatismovingrelativetoit.Andthetworepresentationscanbe

    superimposedbyapplyingtheappropriatescalingfactororcoordinate

    transformation.TheLorentzfactor,𝛾servesthispurposehere.

    Figure1andFigure2werepresentedtovalidatethismodeloffrequency

    withitsinverses(spaceandtime).Inordertouseittounderstandthenatureof

    time,theouter(relativistic)rectangulardomainwillbescaledasusual,seeFigure3,

    withlinearincrementsoftime,andtheinner(frequency)domainwillbescaledwith

    incrementsofinversetime.ThusFigure3isatwodimensionalrepresentationofa

    torus,withthequantumdomainastheregioninsidethecircle–theeventreference

    or“eventhorizon”inblackholelingo–andtherelativisticdomainontheoutside.

    Theverticalaxisstillrepresents3-Dspace,butwe’refocusingontimeinthisfigure,

    sothelabelsareleftoffinthefigure.Allfourquadrantsareshownbecausetheinner

    domainwillbeidentifiedasapolardomaininthenextsection.

  • 8

    Figure3

    Historically,physicistshavetaken𝑡 = 0tobealegitimatestartingpointfor

    measurement.ButaccordingtoFigure3,𝑡 = 0correspondsto!!= ∞oraninfinite

    frequency.Obviouslythereisnosuchthingasinfinitefrequency,sousing𝑡 = 0asa

    referencepointforlinearlyscaledmotioncreatesaproblem.Theproblemisthat

    regardlessofwhatunitsofmeasureyouchoose,oneunitisoneunit.Andifthe

    fundamentalunitofmotionisaunitoffrequency,thenunitsofspaceandtimemust

    berepresentedasinversesbetween0and1.Inotherwords,ameasurementofone

    unitisatruemeasurementsousing𝑡 = 1asaneventreferencemakesthemodelfit

    reality.Theproblemwithback-projectingthatmeasurementtozeroisthatit

    stretchesthetruth,andtryingtoforcerealitytofitthemodelcreatesawarped

    interpretationofreality.Withoutageometricmodel,mathdoesn’trevealthis

    problem.DifferentialCalculusforexample,handlesthisstretchingoperationby

    shrinkingthepolardomainintermsoftimedowntoapoint:thelim!→!∆!∆!,andthen

    definesthatusinglinearunitsofmeasureasinstantaneousspeedinonedirection.

    Formostpracticalpurposesthisisfineandveryusefulbecauseitisaccuratewithin

    theprecisionlimitsofmeasurement.

  • 9

    Butquantumphysicsisallaboutthepartinsidethelimitas∆𝑡 → 0and

    ∆𝑠 → 0.Whenitwasbeingdeveloped,NielsBohrformulatedthe“correspondence

    principle”,whichrequiresthatthebehaviorofsystemsdescribedinthenew

    quantummodelmustreducetothesameprovenresultsastheclassicalmodel.But

    thentheyhadtoprovideinterpretationsthatdidnotcorrespondtorealityaswe

    knowitinthe“realworld”.Theyacceptedthatthequantumworldwasjustweird.

    Andphysicistsworkingwithspecialandgeneralrelativityhaveacceptedthesame

    “copout”:thatthecosmosisjustwarpedandweird.

    Toanengineer,theproblemisthatphysicistsarenotconcernedwiththereal

    worldandtherefore,mistakethemapfortheterritory.Engineersrecognizethe

    warpingeffectasanartifactthatiscausedbymapping,whichisarequiredpartof

    anengineer’scurriculumbecauseitisastandardmethodusedforsolvingboundary

    valueproblems.Conformalmapspreserverelationshipsintheformofsizeand

    attitude(senseofangles)fromonedomaintoanother.(Kreyszig1979,pg.599)In

    thiscase,theslopeofthediagonallineinthefigureisaconformalprojectionofa

    unitinthedimensionperpendiculartothespace-timeplane,i.e.themotion

    dimension.Therefore,themodelpresentedhereiscalledtheSpace-Time-Motionor

    STMmodel.(StJohn2018)

    Sothequantumpoint,lim∆!→!∆!→!isjustthecircleyoumightdrawonaplaneto

    representthethirdaxiscomingoutofthepage.Incontrolsystemdesign,engineers

    makegreateffortstoensurethatcontrolsystemsavoidapproachingsingularpoints,

    like𝑡 = 0called“poles”becausetheyrepresentconditionsofmaximuminstability

    inthesystem.(Ogata1970,pg.23)That,Isubmit,istheproblemwithmodern

    theoreticalphysics.Themodelsthatheldtimeasaprimaryfundamentalunit

    becameunstableandtheback-projection“blewup”ina“cataclysmicexplosion10-

    20billionyearsago”,asMichioKakuputit(Kaku1993)becausetheyassumethat

    therewasabeginningtotheuniverse.Butifthereisnosuchthingaszerotimeor

    zerospace,i.e.nobeginningtotheuniverse,theneventhoughrealeventscanbefit

    intothemodel,themodelstilldoesn’tfitreality.

  • 10

    Ontheotherhand,frequencyisequivalenttoarealunitofenergy.Spatial

    frequencyandtemporalfrequencyareexplicitunits,justlikespaceandtime,but

    neitheroneisseparatedintothreedimensions,sotheyworktogetheraslinear

    relations,commonlyusedasFourierandLaplacetransforms.Spaceandtimestill

    workasscalesthatcanbemanipulatedanywayyouwant,tobuildsymbolicmodels

    thatareappropriateforspecificapplications.Butextendingthelinearscalesbackto

    theoriginbrushesoverthemeaningofthequantumunitofmotion.Thatunitisa

    unitofvibration–akernelinformation.Andthatinformationreflectsthemeaningof

    time.

    Soratherthanstretchingorbrushingoverit,wewilluseapolarcoordinate

    systemandcorrelatethepolardomainwithquantumspaceandtherectangular

    domainwithrelativisticspace.Thenwecorrelatevectorsinrelativisticspacewith

    phasorsinquantumspace.Thebenefitofthisapproachisthatitprovides

    interpretationsthatcorrespondtoprovenresultsinbothquantumandrelativistic

    models,describedin(StJohn2018),aswellastherealworld,i.e.itwillbeshown

    belowthattherelationshipsderivedfromthisapproachproducethegoldenratio,

    whichisevidentinthestructureoflivingorganisms.

    PhaseVectorsandPhasorDiagrams

    Vectorsaredefinedbytheirmagnitudeanddirectionandarenormally

    superimposedoverrectangularcoordinatesystems.“Phasors”asshowninFigure4

    arephasevectors,i.e.theydefinetheirangleasmeasuredfromareference(usually

    thehorizontalaxis)inapolarcoordinatesystem.Soratherthanscalingtheinside

    partofthetaxisas!!,phasorsuseangularfrequency,𝜔.Theyarecommonlyusedin

    electricalengineeringtorepresentwavesofalternatingcurrentfortransmissionof

    powerorradiosignals.Intheseapplications,phasorsalwayshaveconstant

    magnitude,like𝐸,theradiusofthecircleinFigure1,sotheyaremoreusefulfor

    constantamplitudewaves.Here,theportionofthevectorinsidethecircleinFigure

    2thatrepresentsaparticle“atrest”isrepresentedasthesolidphasorinFigure4.

    Theendpointofthisdiscussionwillbetoillustratewhatthistypeofcoordinate

  • 11

    systemrevealsastimepasses(thegoldenratio),butwashiddenwhenthequantum

    domainwasignoredandthushidden.

    Aphasordiagramonlyneedsoneaxistoscaleitsmagnitudeandprovidea

    referencefortheangleofthephasor,butinthisapplicationweneedboththe

    quantumandrelativisticsystemsbecausewhateverhappensinonedomainalso

    happensintheotherandwewillbeabletojumpbackanforthasneeded.

    Figure4

    Eventhoughenergyappearstobecollapsedandlocalizedintoaparticle,a

    particleisstillinmotionrelativetoeverythingelseintheuniverse,soitmustbe

    expressedasaspatiotemporalunit.Thiscanbeaccomplishedbyseparatingthe

    phasorinFigure4intoaspatialcomponent(atanangle𝑘𝑟totheleftdashed

    phasor)andatemporalcomponent(atanangle𝜔𝑡totherightdashedphasor).The

    differenceangle𝜃 = (𝑘𝑟 − 𝜔𝑡)representsthephasedifferencebetweenthetwo.As

    timepasses,thesetwoexpressasseparatewaves,but𝜃 = 0representsthephasor

    thatremainsconstanttorepresentthesolidphasor(nottheonesthataredashed

    lines),collinearwiththerelativisticvector𝐸! inFigure2.

    Thephaseangleisthesameexpressionusedastheargumentofatransverse

    wave,suchas𝑦 𝑥, 𝑡 = 𝑦!sin(𝑘𝑥 − 𝜔𝑡),where𝑦!isthemaximumamplitudeofthe

    wave,𝑘 = !!and𝜔 = !!

    !.Butinthatcase,themodelisusedtoplotthewavemoving

    eitherinspaceorintimewhiletheotherisheldconstant.Aphasordiagramallows

  • 12

    thembothtochangetogetherasinversesofeachother.SoonephasorinFigure4

    mustrotatetotheleftastheotherrotatestotherightatthesameconstantangular

    rate.Again,thisleavestheoriginaldiagonalphasor,thetotalenergyofthequantum

    particle,toremainunchanged.

    Astheleftvectorbeginstorotateleftandgetahigherslope !!inreference

    totherelativisticframe,(asshowninFigure4),thiswouldbeinterpretedtomeanit

    isincreasingspeedandsincethevectorcomponentprojectedontothespaceaxisis

    gettinglarger,thatsuggeststhattheparticleisgettingbiggerordiffusing.Similarly,

    therightvectorprojectsasifitwereslowingdownandgettingsmalleror

    collapsing.Sothiswouldmeanthattheparticleisbeginningtoseparateitselfinto

    aninnersphereandanoutersphere.Inreality,onewouldarguethatthisisrelated

    totheHeisenberguncertaintyprinciple,andnothingishappeningtotheactual

    particle.It’sthemodelthatmustchangeinordertorepresentchangethatresults

    fromthepassageoftime.Andsincetheappearanceofthephysicalparticledoesn’t

    change,thespatialpartoftheexpressionhastoberenormalized,moment-by-

    moment,whereasthetemporalpartdoesnot.Thequestionis,whatdefinesthat

    “moment”.Thatiswherethegoldenratioappearsinthemodel.

    Result:TheGoldenRatio Thereisapointinthetwophasors’rotationwherethetwoslopesreacha

    veryspecialvalue.Figure5showsthisfortheleftphasor(kr)andFigure6forthe

    rightphasor(𝜔𝑡).Thatspecialvalueisthepointwheretheslope,whichisaratio,

    reachesthegoldenratio,∅ = 1.618… What’ssospecialaboutthegoldenratio?Itis

    thesolutiontotherelation∅ = 1+ !∅.If∅istheslopeoftheleftphasor,thismeans

    thatifthereferencescaleshiftsbyoneunitoneitheraxis,i.e.onemomentintime

    andonemomentinspace,thentherotatedphasorwiththeslope,∅,canbereplaced

    byanewphasor(shownasphasor3)withthesameslopeasphasor2,exceptas

    referredtotheoutsidereferenceframe(justascand!!wereshowninFigure1)and

    shiftedbyoneunitasshowninbothFigure5andFigure6.

  • 13

    Andthereisa“twist”:Sincetheangleofeachphasorisfoundbytakingthe

    arctan(theoppositeovertheadjacentsidesoftherighttriangle),itiseasyto

    calculatethatthetwonewphasorsarerotated(ergotwisted)by13.28oinopposite

    directionsascomparedtotheoldvector,phasor1.

    Asmentionedabove,justbeforetheshift,the“size”ofthe“newparticle”in

    theunshiftedreferenceframe(theprojectionofphasor2onthespaceaxisinboth

    figures)isdifferentfromtheoriginalparticle(phasor1).Theprojectionoftheleft

    (spatial)phasorinFigure5suggeststhattheparticleisgrowing,butbecauseit

    doesn’tappeartobephysicallylarger,thescaleofthespaceaxishastobe

    renormalized.Ineffect,the“new”phasor,phasor3,seemstohavecollapsedalong

    withthenewrenormalizedcoordinatesystem.Sowecanimaginethattheparticle

    expandsfora“goldenmoment”thencollapsesbacktotheoriginalsize.Orwecould

    saythattherectangularcoordinatesystemrotatedtoputphasor3backat45!

    givingtheparticleitscharacteristicangularmomentumorspin.Whenthat

    happens,thetemporalphasormustalsorotatetotherighttoaccountforthe13.28o

    tokeep𝜃 = 0.Theresultisthesameparticlethatcontainsa“module”ofinverse-

    temporalinformation,i.e.itisafrequencymodulatedunitofinformation(what

    NassimHarameincallsaPlanckunitthatmakesuptheunifiedfield).

  • 14

    Figure5

    Figure6

    Soevenifnothingphysicalabouttheparticleitselfchanged,theobserver’s

    perceptionchangedbecausetheparticleappearstohaverotatedinspaceandtime.

    Wesensethemotioninspacebecauseithasmomentum,and“pulls”the

    surroundingspaceinward,whichwemeasureasgravity.Andwesensethatithas

  • 15

    movedintime,butweinterpretittobeunchangingintime.Ratherthanthinking

    thattheparticlechangedintime,wethinkthattimehaschangedindependentofthe

    particle.Andthatisaperfectlylegitimateinterpretationformostpracticalpurposes.

    Butifthatistrue,wheredidthetimego?

    Itwentinwardasamomentofinversetimeanditsreflectionwentoutward

    asournormalnotionofamomentintime:i.e.theclassic“arrowoftime”.Because

    thespaceaxiswasrenormalizedbutthetemporalaxiswasnot,theoldtemporal

    phasorstillappearstorepresentasmallerparticle(projectionofphasor3onthe

    spaceaxis),whichwecouldimagineobjectivelyasan“event-particle”(atermfrom

    ProcessPhilosophy(Whitehead1929))orqbitofinformationcollapseinsidetoward

    theinfinitesimalcenterofthephysicalparticle.Thissuggeststhatatorusisabetter

    modelthanaspheretorepresentquantumparticles.Anditmightcorrespondto

    energylevelsthatrepresentelectronorbitalsinthecurrentmodelsofphysics,but

    thathasnotbeenverified.Andifthismodelrepresentsalivingbeing,itsuggests

    thattheinner“event-particle”mightbeassociatedwithourmemoryandwithour

    geneticcodestoredasquantumunits,twistedinthehelicalformofDNA,being

    programmedinrealtime.

    Keepinmindthattheprojectionsonthespaceandtimeaxesdonot

    representtotalenergyoftheparticle,butratherwavesinspaceandtime.Butthe

    differenceinphaseanglesbetweenthenewandoldparticlecanberepresentedasa

    differentwavethatmodulatestheparticlefrequency.Andasawave,itisaunitof

    information.ThissupportstheideathatperhapsInformationTheoryprovidesa

    betterapproachtounderstandingrealitythantheStandardModelofParticle

    Physics.(DaviesandGregersen2010)

    Itisalsoimportanttonotethatthegoldenratiocanbewrittenintheform

    ∅! = 1+ ∅.Sothisreferstheslopebacktotheinsidedomainoftheoriginal

    referenceframeandpresentstheoldenergytermasbeingsquared.Inclassical

    wavetheory,thesquareofawaveamplitudereferstointensity,i.e.theamountof

    energythatpassesthroughaunitareaperpendiculartothewavedirectionintime.

    Inthiscase,thatdirectionisinward.

  • 16

    Thegoldenratiohasbeenknownforcenturiesandusedinartand

    architecturebecauseapplyingittodetermineproportionsforfiguresandbuildings

    createsaestheticallypleasingresults.Anditappearsasacommonpatterninleaves,

    plants,fruitsandflowers(veryobviousinpineapplesandpinecones)aswellas

    seashells(forexamplethenautilus)andanimals,includinghumans.Clearlythe

    goldenratioismuchmorethanatoolforart.AccordingtotheSTMmodelpresented

    here,itistherelationshipthatshapeseveryfiberofourbeingandeverymomentof

    spaceandtime.Andasprojectionsoflife,weliterallyresonatewithit.

    Conclusion Thisprocess,whichIcalltheholomorphicprocess,bywhichtheunifiedfield

    separatesintotwodomains,projectsitselfinwardandoutward,reflectsonitself(at

    thepointthatitsmotionreachesthegoldenratio)andreunifies,ishowthree

    dimensionsofspacearemixedwithonedimensionoftimetomakespacetimeseem

    tobesomekindofweirdphenomenondifferentthanenergywheninfactitisjust

    information-modulatedenergy,whichiscalled“truth”sinceitactuallyhappened.If

    spaceisrepresentedasasphereonthree-dimensionalcoordinatesystem,thentime

    isjusttheinward-outwarddirection.Itisassimpletounderstandasconsideringthe

    radiusofaspheretobeafourthdimension,exceptthateachspherecapturesthe

    implicitprocessasinformation.Wejusthappentoscaleitbyastandardclock.

    There’snothingspecialaboutstandardclocktime.Itwasameasureofmotionthat

    wasrecordedandisnow“clocked”asareferenceattheNationalInstituteof

    StandardsandTechnology(NIST).Soitiseffectivelyanointedandtreatedasbeinga

    sacredunit.

    Thelogicaltwist(thinkingthattimeitselfisdifferentthaninversefrequency)

    andstrictdefinitionoftimeasanunchangingunit,objectifiesandhidesthemeaning

    oftime,becauseitignorestheconvolutionprocess.Convolutionmeansthatspace

    andtimeformaconvolutedwhole,i.e.theinformationpresentontheoutsideis

    continuouslyconvolved,withtheparticle.Thisprocessshapestheparticleintoa

    formthatcanbeperceivedatthemacroscopiclevelasbeingatrest.It’stheformor

  • 17

    shapethatimpliestheinformationanddictatesitsbehavior.Thisisexactlyhow

    anatomicalinformationgetsinfusedorimpliedinanx-rayorholographicfilm.But,

    whereastheinformationinahologrammustbedeconvolvedbyilluminatingitwith

    anotherlaser,theinformationinaquantumparticleisautomaticallydeconvolved

    byrelativemotion(itsbehavior).

    Oneexample,ofhowrelativemotiondeconvolvesinformation,was

    demonstratedbyAlbertEinsteinwhenheusedstatisticalanalysisofBrownian

    motion(randommotionofdustparticles)toprovethattheirmotionimpliedthe

    existenceofformswenowknowasmolecules.Inhis1956paper,InvestigationsOn

    TheTheoryoftheBrownianMovement,hehypothesizedthatthemovementofdust-

    particlesonthesurfaceofasphericaldropofliquidwasthevisiblemacroprocess

    impliedbyrandomcollisionswithmolecules.Hedevelopedanequationforthe

    distributionofthenumberofparticlesperunitvolumeasafunctionoftime(t)and

    position(x).Hesaid,“wewillcalculatethedistributionoftheparticlesatatime

    𝑡 + 𝜏fromthedistributionatthetimet.”Thenhesolvedforthemomentofthe

    distribution.Aswithanystatisticaldistribution,the“moment”providesuswitha

    singlemeasureofacollectivebehavior,deducedfromtheshapeofthedistribution.

    Thatmeansthattheshapeevolvesbyconvolvingthefunction,definedbythe

    implicitnatureofthemicrosystem,withtime.Byexpandingandrearrangingit,he

    effectivelydeconvolveditandsolvedforthediffusioncoefficient.Thisdeconvolved

    expressionwasthenverifiedbyexperimentalobservationofdustparticles.

    Aseachmomentoftimepasses,thequantumbitsofinformationthatare

    present–inthepresent–(onthesurfaceofeveryquantumparticle)collapseinward

    andbecomeinfusedintotheparticleasbitwiserecordings,collectivelycalled“the

    past”.Soaunitofinverse-timeisinterpretedasa“momentofthepast”–asingle

    “logical”quantumbitofinformationstoredinthree“physical”dimensions.

    Collective,itformsafour-bitqbit.Aspartofalargerquantumcomputer,itself-

    programs,self-correctsandrunsitself,whichisanideathatiscurrentlybeing

    studied.(Lloydd’Arbelofn.d.)(Lloyd2007)(Almheiri,DongandHarlow2015)

    (Wolchover2019)Theoutward-pointingvectorsimplycorrespondstothe

    mysteriousarrowoftime.

  • 18

    Themostprofoundimplicationofthisisthatallphysicalmatter,includinga

    livingorganism,isrecordingeverymomentintime.Soweareareflectionofevery

    event,actionandwordthatweexperienceincludingthosethatwegenerate.These

    interpretationsprovidesabridgebetweenphysics,asaphysicalscience,andthelife

    sciences,whichmustincludeinformationfromtheenvironmentthatconvolveswith

    particlestoallowlifetogrow,changeandadapt.

    Bibliography• Almheiri,Ahmed,XiDong,andDanielHarlow."Bulklocalityandquantum

    errorcorrectioninAdS/CFT."JournalofHighEnergyPhysics2015,no.163(2015).

    • Barbour,Julian.TheEndofTime:TheNextRevolutioninPhysics.Kindle.OxfordUniversityPress,1999.

    • Bohm,David.WholenessandtheImplicateOrder.1980.• Burtt,E.A.TheMetaphysicalFoundationsofModernScience.Mineola,NY:

    DoverPublications,2003.• Chappell,JamesM.,JohnG.Hartnett,NicolangeloIannella,AzharIqbal,and

    DerekAbbott."TimeAsaGeometricPropertyofSpace."FrontiersinPhysics;MathematicalandStatisticalPhysics,Nov2016.

    • Davies,Paul,andNielsGregersen,.InformationandtheNatureofRealityFromPhysicstoMetaphysics.CambridgeUniversityPress,2010.

    • Halliday,David,RobertResnick,andJearlWalker.FundamentalsofPhysics.4th.NewYork:JohnWileyandSonsInc,1993.

    • Hawking,Stephen.ABriefHistoryofTime;FromtheBigBangtoBlackHoles.NewYork:BantamBooks,1990.

    • Kaku,Michio.QuantumFieldTheory,AModernIntroduction.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,1993.

    • Kreyszig,Erwin.AdvancedEngineeringMathematics.4th.NewYork:JohnWileyandSons,1979.

    • Lloydd’Arbelof,Seth."Universeasquantumcomputer."https://cds.cern.ch/.https://cds.cern.ch/record/412531/files/9912088.pdf(accessedOct20,2020).

    • Lloyd,Seth.ProgrammingtheUniverse:AQuantumComputerScientistTakesontheCosmos.2007.

    • Muller,RichardA.Now:Thephysicsoftime.W.W.Norton&Company,2016.• Musser,George."WhatisSpacetime."ScientificAmerican,June1,2018.• Nair,R.R.,etal."FineStructureConstantDefinesVisualTransparencyof

    Graphene."(Science)320(June2008).

  • 19

    • Ogata,Katsuhiko.ModernControlEngineering.EnglewoodCliffs,NewJersey:Prentice-Hall,Inc,1970.

    • Smolin,Lee.TheTroubleWithPhysics.Boston:HoughtonMifflinCompany,2006.

    • —.TimeReborn:FromtheCrisisinPhysicstotheFutureoftheUniverse.Kindle.HoughtonMifflinHarcourt,2013.

    • StJohn,TheodoreJ."TheHolomorphicProcess.UnderstandingtheHolographicNatureofRealityasaMetamorphicProcess."ArchivesofPhysicsResearch9,no.2(2018):17-44.

    • StJohn,TheodoreJ."TheHolomorphicProcess-UnderstandingtheHolographicNatureofRealityasaMetamorphicProcess."ArchivesofPhysicsResearch9,no.2(2018):17-44.

    • Webb,JohnK.,VictorV.Flambaum,ChristopherW.Churchill,MichaelJ.Drinkwater,andJohnD.Barrow."ASearchforTimeVariationoftheFineStructureConstant."arXiv:astro-ph/9803165v4,1998.

    • Whitehead,AlfredNorth.ProcessandReality.Edinburgh:SimonandSchuster,1929.

    • Wolchover,Natalie."HowSpaceandTimeCouldBeaQuantumError-CorrectingCode."QuantaMagazine,Jan3,2019.


Top Related