Download - Genocide Boris
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 1/24
Student Paper | Genocide in Rwanda: The Schizoid Position Made Manifest
By
Boris Thomas
Abstract:
Using the theoretical lens of object relations, this paper explores the intersection of theprocesses associated with the Kleinian paranoid-schizoid position and the cultural, socio-economic, and political factors that provided the raw material for two rounds of ethniccleansings over a 40 years span in the African nation of Rwanda. Through a primer of 19th and20th century Rwandan history, including an exploration of totalitarianism, colonialism, and theroots of ethnic prejudice, this paper devotes particular attention to the massacres, beginning in
1990, that resulted in more than one million Rwandan people murdered and tens of thousandsmore who were wounded, raped and terrorized.
This paper takes the position that the paranoid-schizoid position and the related mechanism of projective identification—cornerstone pathology found in the phenomenon of fascism andtotalitarianism—are not atypical, but rather live within the seemingly normal individual. UsingRwanda as a case example, with the right internal and external conditions, the ego defenses canbe rallied and the unimaginable outcome of genocide can occur. Specific conditions including theattraction of the idealized other; simplicity of mind and the moral void; and the processes of distortion, decontextualization, character assassination, and absence of reference, among others,are discussed as contributing to the genocidal state.
Inspired by the 2004 film, “Hotel Rwanda,” which chronicled massacres occurring in Rwanda in1994 and the efforts of a private hotel manager to save 1200 lives while the world communitypassively looked on, this paper is written in the hope that the psychoanalytic framework discussed herein will serve as a template for understanding and possibly preventing the genocidalphenomenon, one that has occurred time after time in ancient and modern history, and one thatwe see continuing today.
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 2/24
Page 1
Genocide in Rwanda: The Schizoid Position Made Manifest
Introduction
This paper will explore the schizoid position and, more specifically, the process
of projective identification as the psychological underpinning of fascism, racism,
fundamentalism, and, finally, genocide. As a case example of this psychological process,
the African nation of Rwanda and its history of ethnic distinctions, dating back to the
16
th
century, and occurrences of genocide, taking place as early as 1959, will be
discussed.
Discussion
I. Rwanda and its History: A Genocide Primer
In my journey through Rwanda I encountered many of the killers: thegenocide was a crime of mass complicity, one could hardly avoid meetingpeople who had been involved. . . . A few gave the appearance of being
truly psychopathic individuals. The mass of others were ragged andilliterate peasants easily roused to hatred of the Tutsis. Perhaps the mostsinister people I met were the educated political elite, men and women of charm and sophistication who spoke flawless French and who couldengage in long philosophical debates about the nature of war anddemocracy. But they shared on thing in common with the soldiers andthe peasants: they were drowning in the blood of their fellowcountrymen.” (Keane, 1995, p. 29)
A. Pre-Colonial and Early Colonial History
Radically divergent interpretations of history provide the basis on whichcollective identities are built and act as powerful justification for currentbehavior. (Uvin, 1998, p. 14).
There is no agreement as to what exactly served as the primary distinguishing
characteristics among the three indigenous peoples of Rwanda, the Hutu, the Tutsi, and
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 3/24
Page 2
the Twa. (Uvin, 1998). Some say that the groups are distinctly different ethic groups
and/or races, while others believe that the tribes are distinguished only by
socioeconomic divisions, the Hutu traditionally holding the role of farmers; the Tutsi,
cattle herders; and the smallest group, the Twa, hunters and artisans (Uvin, 1998). The
most widely accepted pre-colonial historical account of these three groups is that the
cattle-rearing Tutsi traveled south in successive immigrations, fleeing famine and
drought, arriving in Burundi, Rwanda and other neighboring regions during the fifteenth
and sixteenth centuries (Uvin, 1998). The farmer Hutu were already in Rwanda, having
immigrated from central Africa centuries earlier. The Twa, a group representing no
more than one percent of the population, are the earliest inhabitants of Rwanda, always
engaged primarily in hunting and pottery-making (Uvin, 1998). For centuries the three
groups spoke the same language, believed in the same god, shared the same culture, and
belonged to joint clans, living side-by-side in Rwanda (Uvin, 1998).
Until the end of the nineteenth century, the northwestern part of Rwanda was
controlled by several small Hutu kingdoms in which a limited number of politically
powerless Tutsi also lived (Uvin, 1998). The Tutsi controlled a large kingdom located in
the central part of Rwanda and extending almost to the country’s current borders
(Uvin, 1998).
Near the turn of the twentieth century, a fourth group entered Rwanda,
descending, first from Germany, then from 1916 onward, from Belgium (Uvin, 1998).
Called the Bazungu, a term used for whites, this group, like the Twa, never constituted
more than one percent of the population, but, unlike the Twa, they owned the largest
portion of Rwanda’s assets, purchasing power, status symbols, and possessions (Uvin,
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 4/24
Page 3
1998). The Bazungu conquered Rwanda by military force and diplomacy, which involved
assigning a flaccid political role to the Tutsi king, followed by the annexation of the small
northwestern Hutu kingdoms and control under a centralized monarchic rule
(Uvin,1998). The Bazungu colonizers imposed legislation and taxation, compulsory
work programs, required mastery of Bazungu language (French), adherence to Bazungu
religion (Catholicism), and the application of a money-based market (Uvin, 1998).
Under these new institutions, power was granted—only to the Tutsi—in the form of
education, jobs in the governmental administration and armed forces with many Tutsi
chiefs acting as “‘rapacious quasi-warlords’” (Uvin, 1998).
B. Ethnic Differences, Prejudice, and the Vehicles of Distortion
Ethnicity is neither a function of objective cultural or physical distinctions, but
rather a social construct (Anderson, 1991). Ethnicity creates imagined communities
focused upon the erection of boundaries between in-groups and out-groups (Barth,
1969). Uvin (1998) reflects that it is not traits alone that set a group apart, but rather it
is the shared perception that defining traits set a group apart. Indeed, for decades
“distinct ethnicity has been a reality in Rwanda at the levels of public discourse, state
policy, and individual sentiment” (Uvin, 1998, p. 15). It is not surprising that during the
colonial period, the Bazungu deemed the Tutsi more intelligent, reliable, and
hardworking—more like themselves—than the Hutu (Uvin, 1998).
Despite their many similarities, the Hutu, Tutsi, and Twa have been deemed
three distinct ethnic groups. The Bazungu, comprised of Germans and Belgians, are two
additional ethnic groups, but under the definition of ethnicity and for the purpose of
looking at the colonial history of Rwanda, they can be deemed one ethnic entity.
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 5/24
Page 4
Nevertheless, another issue that complicates an understanding of the complexities of
ethnic distinctions among the Hutu, Tutsi, and Twa, are the numerous references,
replete with scientific “proofs,” to various physiological differences that signal racial
distinctions1 among the groups (Uvin, 1998). The idea of a ‘pure’ ethnic divide in
Rwanda is a myth: In southern Rwanda, for example, there was extensive intermarrying
between Tutsis and Hutus, as well as a long history of people exchanging identities from
Tutsi to Hutu (Keane,1995, p. 11).
Uvin (1998, p. 30) draws a critical distinction between the recognition of ethnic
difference and prejudice, stating that the later requires “the reduction of people’s
identity to their ethnicity with disregard for their other features” and “the attribution of
moral judgments to these identities.” Indeed, a number of prejudices operated in
Rwanda, many in place long before the arrival of the colonizers (Uvin, 1998). One such
prejudice, put into place with the arrival of the colonizers, was that the Tutsi were not
only “foreigners,” but also were genetically different, descendants of Ham, which was
supported by “scientific evidence” related to food habits, height, blood factors, and
lactose tolerance (Uvin, 1998). This belief persisted, even among the intelligentsia, until
1994 (Uvin, 1998).
It is not surprising that these prejudicial beliefs would be memorialized for wide
dissemination. Penned by a small group of Hutu intellectuals, the Hutu Manifest, for
example, set forth at its core the belief that “the problem is basically that of the
monopoly of one race, the tutsi . . . which condemns the desperate Hutu to be forever
subaltern workers.” (Uvin, 1998, p. 31). This passage was derived in part from a long
1 Race, unlike ethnicity, is based upon physiological characteristics rather than social constructs.
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 6/24
Page 5
folk historical memory of pre-colonial Tutsi misrule (Keane, 1995). To peasants with
this folk memory, the warnings and the increasingly hysterical propaganda against the
Tutsi had a powerful effect. “Tens of thousands became infected . . . by an anti-Tutsi
psychosis; they were convinced through newspapers, radio and the frequent public
speeches of Habyarimana’s closest supporters that the Tutsis were going to turn them
into beasts of the field once again.” (Keane, 1995, p. 9)
The Hutu extremists, most of them members or supporters of the ruling party,
produced a set of Ten Commandments that dictated how Hutus should treat their Tutsi
neighbors (Keane, 1995). Among other things, the Commandments described as
traitors any Hutus who “married, befriended or employed Tutsis; all Tutsis were
dishonest and they were to be excluded from business and from positions of influence in
education; crucially the Commandments . . . urged Hutus to ‘stop having mercy on the
Batusi.’” This last injunction was to be obeyed by thousands of Hutu peasants when the
genocide began (Keane, 1995, p. 10). Through these mechanisms, Tutsis were
marginalized and an atmosphere was created in which their mass destruction became
acceptable.
Uvin (1998) also cites violence as a phenomenon that solidifies ethnic prejudice
in several ways. He references violence as a traumatizing phenomenon that both the
perpetrator and victim—both in the present and in subsequent generations—must
manage. In the case of the Hutu and the Tutsi, both groups had been both victims and
perpetrators of violence. Accordingly, the feelings of aggression, injury, helplessness,
and shame are deep in the individual and collective memories and the identities of both
groups (Uvin, 1998).
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 7/24
Page 6
With the feelings of mistrust split along ethnic lines, there were administrative
details that served to facilitate the organization and effectuation of genocide. In 1926
the Belgians issued identification cards, based on ethnicity and differentiating the Hutu
from the Tutsis, followed by a census of Rwanda in 1933, which ensured that all
Rwandans had been classified and preceded the mandatory requirement that
identification cards be carried by all citizens (Keane, 1995). An eyewitness to the grisly
scene of a Tutsi village where all villagers were massacred in a church described the
government building occupied by the local Hutu administrator charged with running the
village:
Most poignantly in a room at the very back is a library of index cards. Theseare in fact the identity cards of every local resident. There are thousands of these thin paper cards on to which are fixed the photographs of the bearers .. . . The colonial government introduced this system of populationregistration and their Rwandan Hutu successors entrenched it as a means of political control . . . . These cards . . . have been used as instruments of genocide. . . . The [Hutu killers] had a ready-made death list.” (Keane, 1995,pp. 85-86).
C. Independence and the First Massacres
In 1957 the Party for the Emancipation of the Hutus (“PARMEHUTU”) was
formed (Keane, 1995). In 1959, shortly therafter, the Tutsi king, Mwaami Rudahigwa
died, and in the wake of his death, Hutus rose up against the Tutsi nobility (Keane,
1995). Tutsis fled to neighborhing Uganda, Tanzania, Burundi, and Zaire (Keane, 1995).
Between 1959 and 1962 more than 2000 Tutsi were killed (Uvin, 1998). It is believed
that the violent turn of events did not occur without the covert connivance of the
Bazungu (Uvin, 1998).
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 8/24
Page 7
In 1962, under pressure from the United Nations, and with little preparation, the
Bazungu transferred sovereignty from Belgium to local authorities (Uvin, 1998).
However, the Bazungu had every intention of maintaining control over its many holdings
in Rwanda, and had grown fearful of the Tutsi elite, which had become increasingly
anticolonial in its views (Uvin, p. 1998). Between December 1963 and 1964 more Tutsi,
15,000 to 20,000, were killed, prompting the departure of 140,000 to 250,000 Tutsi (40-
70% of the surviving Tutsi population) for other countries (Uvin, 1998). It is from the
descendants of these refugees that the Uganda based Rwandan Patriotic Front (“RPF”)
was formed, and whose guerrilla soldiers would invade Rwanda in 1990 (Keane, 1995;
Uvin, 1998).
In the resulting power structure, the PARMEHUTU, a small Hutu elite, was on
top (Uvin, 1998). Thousands of Tutsi remained in Rwanda, many well educated and
relatively wealthy. A Rwandan elite of approximately one percent of the population,
including virtually all of the Bazungu, lived wealthy, urban, educated, globally mobile, and
Westernized lives (Uvin, 1998). By contrast, the majority of the population in Rwanda,
Hutu peasants, remained as poor and powerless as they were prior to independence
(Uvin, 1998). PARMEHUTU eventually morphed into the National Revolutionary
Movement for Development (“MRND”), which was formed in 1975 by army chief of
staff, General—later, President—Juvenal Habyarimana, and entrenched as a single party
ruling entity (Keane, 1995).
[MRND] effectively was in charge of all fields of human endeavor and allsectors of the economy from subsidizing prices; allocating jobs; fundingresearch; building hospitals, schools, and vocational training centers; andregistering births and deaths to prescribing social behaviors, sexual mores, orpolitical thought—all activities previously left to the market, the family, orthe church, or not done at all. Until 1990, there were no other political
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 9/24
Page 8
parties, no independent unions, no human rights organizations; in the early1980s, all large cooperatives were also brought under state control. TheCatholic Church, to which more than half of all Rwandans belong, making it apotential major source of counterpower, was closely associated with thestate; its leaders were thoroughly co-opted in both state and party structures
at all levels. A dense network of hundreds of kilometers of well-maintainedroads, together with a fast-growing vehicular fleet, allowed the central stateto relay messages rapidly to the farthest corner of the country. (Uvin, 1998,p. 22).
Torture and other arbitrarily instituted punishments became a regular part of life in
Rwanda, generating little surprise that Habyarimari was elected by a 98% majority year
after year (Uvin, 1998). A totalitarian state was in place and fully functioning with the
intent to eliminate any opposition.
MRND avoided sharing power with any other party until July 1990, when
Westeran aid donors pressured Habyarimana to concede to the principle of multi-party
democracy (Keane, 1995). In response to a guerrilla attack of the RPF, which invaded
Rwanda from Uganda in October 1990, the Rwandan army began training civilian
militias, called Interhamwe (“those who stand together”), while, for three years,
Habyarimana put off the establishment of a genuine multi-party system (Keane, 1995).
Between 1990 and 1991 thousands of Tutsis were killed in separate massacres around
the country, while politicians and newspapers who opposed the MRND were
persecuted (Keane, 1995). In November 1992, prominent Hutu activist Dr. Leon
Mugusera appealed to Hutus to return the Tutsis “back to the Ethiopia” via the rivers2
(Keane, 1995).
2 In 1994 thousands of Tusis were lined up along the banks of the aKagera River, executed, then pushedinto the fast-moving current, resulting in the mass accumulation of dead and bloated bodies in Uganda’sLake Victoria (Keane, 1995). Ignorant Hutu peasants erroneously believed that the aKagera flowed toEthopia (Keane, 1995).
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 10/24
Page 9
Starting in September 1993, after Habyarimana committed to a negotiated
agreement to share power with the Hutu opposition and the RPF, and to integrate the
RPF with the Rwandan army, he stalled once again, instead diverting his efforts to the
intensified training of militias (Keane, 1995). In the early spring of 1994, extremist radio
station Mille Collines began broadcasting exortations to attack the Tutsis, spurring
human rights groups to warn the international community of impending disaster (Keane,
1995). Following is an eyewitness account of Rwandan peasants listening to a Mille
Collines radio broadcast:
One group is gathered around a radio. “Beware of the cockroaches,” thepresenter says. “It is the duty of all Muhutu to rise up and resist theinvasion of the cockroaches. Remember the victory of 1959. LetRwanda not be destroyed by the invaders.” The voice crackles its poisoninto the minds of the loitering crowd. (Keane, 1995, p. 101).
With the murder of President Habyarimana on April 6, 1994, Rwandan armed forces
began killing Tutsis and moderate Hutu politicians, going house to house to implement
the massacre (Keane, 1995). Thousands died the first day. “In one hundred days up to
one million people were hacked, shot, strangled, clubbed and burned to death . . . . This
is not to ignore the vast numbers who were wounded, raped and terrorized . . . .”
(Keane, 1995, p. 29).
II. The Schizoid Position: A Psychological Basis for Genocide
A.
The Depressive and the Schizoid Positions
In the depressive position, the infant is able to synthesize “loved and hated
aspects of the complete object” and, thus “[give] rise to feelings of mourning and guilt,
which imply vital advances in its emotional and intellectual life,” Klein (1946, p. 294).
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 11/24
Page 10
The depressive position stands in contrast to the paranoid-schizoid position in which
“splitting processes, involving the splitting of the first object (the breast) as well as the
feelings towards it, are at their height” (1948, p. 34). Although Klein named these two
processes based upon the clinical data she gathered in observing and treating children,
they are readily applicable to adults and are useful in explaining a broad range of psychic
and behavioral phenomenon.
You know, I was watching a history show the other night. It was all about the SS troops[in Nazi Germany] and how they took innocent people and put them in ovens. I wasdisgusted and upset by it. I’m affected by those things. You know, when I heard aboutthe tsunami and watched the news coverage, I sat at the edge of my bed and cried. Mysister, well, she wouldn’t care. She doesn’t know where Indonesia is and couldn’t be
bothered to find out. She just doesn’t see it as her problem. But I’m different; I reallycare about these things. I really care about people. * * * I just worked a flight fromChicago to LA, and there were the usual bunch of entitled people sitting in first class.We were running low on bin space, and one of the passengers needed a place to put histhings away. I said to the passenger that it would be no problem, that we’d find a spacefor his belongings in another section of the plane. And then, up stands L.. Epstein from[seat] 5F, “You know there should be plenty of closet space in this plane. There’s noreason why his belongings should have to go to another section of the plane.” I couldn’teven bother to be nice. I turned around and I said, “Sit down!” At that moment, if Ihad an oven, BAM! he would have been right in it and I would have hit the [ignition]button. I mean it. I really would have done it! * * * All I need is one passenger to actlike an asshole. After that I can only see all of them as assholes.
This excerpt, taken from a session with a patient whom one would quickly
describe as thoughtful and caring, illustrates the ease with which a normally
compassionate individual can leave civility and entertain the most vicious fantasies—
fantasies in which others are grouped, reduced to subhuman proportions, and disposed
of in the most hideous ways—without guilt or regard for the cautionary tales of history.
Bollas (1992) refutes the notion that fascists—and by extension, fundamentalists
and other extremists—are insane, while liberals are sane. He replaces it with the idea
that, indeed, the type of pathology found in fascism lives “inside each of us” (1992, p.
197). The paranoid-schizoid position and the mechanism of projective identification are
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 12/24
Page 11
“involved in all communication but in its virulent forms [lies] at the heart of hatred,
racism, and idealization” (Young, 2001, p. 12).
Will this angry flight attendant patient become genocidal? Fairbairn (1943, p. 65),
making reference to internalized bad objects stated:
[w]hether any given individual becomes delinquent, psychoneurotic,psychotic or simply ‘normal’ would appear to depend in the main uponthe operation of three factors: (1) the extent to which bad objects havebeen installed in the unconscious and the degree of badness by whichthey are characterized, (2) the extent to which the ego is identified withinternalized bad objects, and (3) the nature and strength of the defences[sic] which protect the ego from these objects.
The patient displays his awareness of his departure from the depressive position and
into the schizoid position. His awareness and struggle with the two sides of himself
illustrates the tendency of the ego “towards integrating itself and towards synthesizing
the different aspects of the object” (Klein, 1948, p. 34). Notwithstanding Klein’s
reference to the synthesizing expression of the life instinct (1948), or Fairbairn’s three
factors set forth above, the point that Bollas makes, which will be more fully discussed
below, is that fascism exists on a continuum with genocide at one extreme with another
continuum therein. “Intellectual genocide,” for example, consists of the mental
processes that precede the genocidal act (Bollas, 1992, p. 207).
There are small acts of fascism that we can easily effect by thought, word, and
deed; and the seeds of fascism, racism, fundamentalism, and related acts of obliteration
of the other exist in all of us as does primitive aggression.
B. Fear of Annihilation and Projection
Citing the writings of Sigmund Freud, Klein described the operation of the death
instinct (1946, 1948), which she stated is “felt as fear of annihilation and takes the form
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 13/24
Page 12
of fear of persecution” (Klein, 1946, p. 296). Similarly, Fairbairn (1943, p. 79) called the
death instincts “masochistic relationships with internalized bad objects.” This fear of
persecution can result in several defensive processes that are set forth below.
Klein (1946) discussed the infant’s relationship to its mother around a basic task,
feeding, and, correspondingly, the breast as a first external object with which the infant
develops a relationship. Addressing two polar feeling states—gratification associated
with being fed and nurtured, and frustration associated with hunger and neediness that
are not readily satisfied—Klein (1946, p. 298) described, respectively, the “good” and
the “bad” breast, and a cycle of projection and introjection by which the ego manages
these good and bad objects.
Courtesy of the infant’s oral aggression, which is expressed through teething,
chewing, and biting, the bad breast is perceived by the infant as fragmented, taken in “in
bits” (Klein, 1946, p. 297). Infantile oral aggression is a manifestation of the first
destructive impulse that is projected outwards by the infant in response to the
frustrations generated by the bad breast (Klein, 1946). This projection outwards
constitutes “a dispersal of the destructive impulse which is felt as the source of danger,”
and is, in Freudian terms, a deflection of the death instinct or fear of annihilation (Klein,
1946, p. 297). It is a defensive process by which the ego—in the face of “the primary
anxiety of being annihilated by a destructive force [experienced from] within”—splits
itself (Klein, 1946, p. 297). By contrast, the gratifying breast, taken in—or introjected—
via gratifying sucking and the resulting feeling of satiation, is felt to be complete, and
counteracts the projective processes of splitting and dispersal (Klein, 1946). The
process cycles, with the infant being able to hold on to the feelings of gratification
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 14/24
Page 13
associated with the good breast, but only until the feeling of frustration associated with
the bad breast sets in once again. Klein (1948, p. 31) streamlined her description of
these processes as follows:
To summarize: the frustrating (bad) external breast becomes, owing toprojection, the external representative of the death instinct; throughintrojection it reinforces the primary internal danger-situation; this leads toan increased urge on the part of the go to deflect (project) internal dangers(primarily the activity of the death instinct) into the external world. There istherefore a constant fluctuation between the fear of internal and externalbad objects, between the death instinct acting within and deflected outwards.
C. Defenses in Protection of the Ego and Projective Identification
Klein (1946, p. 299) cites four defensive processes used by the ego to protect
itself in the scenario presented above: Idealization, by which the object is split, with the
good aspects of the breast exaggerated so as to protect against “fear of the persecuting
breast”; projection, also associated with splitting, whereby the ego deflects the death
instinct, thus avoiding fear of persecution and annihilation; introjection, by which the
good object is taken in and used by the ego as a defense against anxiety; and denial. The
bad object is
not only kept apart from the good one, but its very existence is denied,as is the whole situation of frustration and the bad feelings (pain) towhich frustration gives rise. This is bound up with denial of psychic reality. . . possibly only through strong feelings of omnipotence . . . . (Klein,1946, p. 299).
In this process, it is not only the object that is denied and annihilated, but also the
“object-relation which suffers this fate, and therefore a part of the ego, from which the
feelings towards the object emanate, is denied and annihilated as well.” (1946, p. 299).
Klein (1946, p. 300) references dual phantasied attacks on the mother, one, oral,
to “rob the mother’s body of its good contents,” and the other, anal/urethral, to
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 15/24
Page 14
“[expel] dangerous substances (excrements) out of the self and into the mother.” Klein
posits that the excrements or bad parts of the self are projected out “not only to injure,
but also to control and to take possession of the object” (1946, p. 300) who is
perceived as a persecutor. Through this process, the mother, now containing the bad
parts of the self, is not felt by the infant to be a separate individual: Mother is now “the
bad self” (1946, p. 300, original emphasis). This process forms the basis of projective
identification.
Making reference to psychotic disorders, Klein (1946, pp. 300-301) cites the
“identification of an object with hated parts of the self” as a contribution to the
“intensity of . . . hatred directed against other people.” The process allows for the
despised and/or hated part of the self—for the infant, the excrement—to be projected
out and placed into another. The other now carries the bad and the individual who has
made the projection completes the split by using denial and omnipotence (“I am
virtuous; the other is bad, and without virtue”) that support a sense of paranoia (“the
other and others like him are dangerous and threatening to me”) thus justifying the
means for thwarting the perceived threat of the destructive other. The inner world that
gets projected out is ruled by persecutory fears and “leads to the introjection—a taking
back—of a hostile external world; and vice versa, the introjection of a distorted and
hostile external world reinforces the projection of a hostile inner world” (Klein, 1946,
p. 304). Fairbairn presents a projective/introjective scenario not unlike that set forth by
Klein. The child wants to escape his bad objects, but cannot because he is identified
with them and they have, especially in the form of his parents, “wielded power over him
in the external world,” hence, “these objects retain their prestige for power over him in
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 16/24
Page 15
the inner world” (Fairbairn, 1943, p. 67). The child cannot reject his bad object parents
because he needs them (Fairbairn, 1943, p. 67).
Uvin’s observation that the violence experienced by both the Hutu and Tutsi are
deep in their individual and collective identities, followed by the ability of the Hutu to
systematically murder the Tutsis, is a prime example of bad objects being introjected,
violently projected, then reintrojected with all of the violence intact. The Hutu, for
example, already knew the feelings of injury, helplessness, and shame associated with
being the victim of violence. Accordingly, through their violence against the Tutsis, they
projected their own state of injury, helplessness, and shame into the Tutsi. However,
the feelings were not eliminated through this projection. The Tutsi remained as
reminders of the Hutu’s collective and individual sense of weakness. Thus, the Tutsis
are hated, which in turn generates the use of more violence and supports the desire to
eliminate the holder of the projective identification as well as the need to justify the
heinous act of eliminating the despised other. Omnipotence and grandiosity then acted
to assist the Hutu in splitting themselves off from expressions of self-hate, which had
been carried out through eradicating (by word and deed) the Tutsis.
A significant source of anxiety associated with projective identification arises
when “the impulses to control an object from within it stir up the fear of being
controlled and persecuted inside it” (Klein, 1946, p. 304). Correspondingly introjection
and reintrojection of a forcefully entered object reinforces the individual’s feelings of
inner persecution “since the introjected object is felt to contain the dangerous aspects
of the self. The accumulation of anxieties of this nature, in which the ego is . . . caught
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 17/24
Page 16
between a variety of external and internal persecution-situations, is a basic element in
paranoia.” (Klein, 1946, pp. 304-305).
D. Dangers of the Idealized Other
Through projective identification germinate the seeds of unthinking obedience
to the leader, whoever it may be; and the group, whatever it may demand. With racism
and nationalism “we give our superegos over to the leader, the organisation [sic] or
group or gang or nation or ‘the cause.’” (Young, 1993, p. 5). Violence and destruction
are not far behind. Indeed, Klein (1946, p. 300) calls projective identification “the
prototype of an aggressive object-relation.”
The excessive projection out of parts of the self can result in the feeling that
parts of the personality are lost. The other, which can take the form of the individual or
the state, then becomes the holder of all good, and, accordingly, “becomes the ego-
ideal” a process that impoverishes the ego (Klein, 1946, p. 301). “Very soon such
processes extend to other people, and the result may be an over-strong dependence on
these external representatives of one’s own good parts” (Klein, 1946, p. 301). Simply
stated, others hold the goods, leaving the individual self puny and weak, needing to rely
upon those idealized others. In agreement with Freud, Fairbairn discussed the super
ego as an “internalized object, with which the ego has a relationship . . . . based upon a
process of identification” (1943, p. 61).
Armstrong-Perlman (1994, p. 224) describes the individual trapped in
relationships with theher who has “become the ego ideal, now externalized, who must
be submitted to at all costs.” Indeed, this dependent relationship provides infinite
amounts of psychic fuel for subsequent splitting since “[t]he frustrating aspects of the
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 18/24
Page 17
relationships are denied as well as the consequent rage, hatred, and humiliation, and the
shame regarding the humiliation.” (Armstrong-Perlman, 1994, p. 224). Loss of this ego-
idealized other is experienced by the weakened self as “potentially catastrophic: The
fear is that loss will lead either to the disintegration of the self, or to a reclusive
emptiness to which any state of connectedness, no matter how infused with suffering, is
preferable.” (Armstrong, Perlman, 1994, p. 224).
E. Simplicity of Mind and the Moral Void
Referencing Klein’s depictions of aggressive infantile phantasies, and recalling the
myriad instances of racially and ethnically based violence and genocide, Young (1993, p.
6) describes the underlying internal psychological process as constituting paranoid
phantasies that are “persecutory and schizoid because fears and feelings about the self
are split off and projected into the Other—initially the mother/breast and later to
outgroups.”
Both Young (2001) and Bollas (1992) cite the achievement of a simplicity of mind
as a key element of moving, respectively, to a fundamentalist or fascist state of mind.
Psychoanalytically, the simplification to which they refer is a regression in which the
middle ground is eliminated and the world split—divided “into safe and threat, good and
evil, life and death” (Young, 2001, p. 3). In defining the “fascist state of mind” Bollas
(1992, p. 200) states as a core element, “the presence of an ideology that maintains its
certainty through the operation of specific mental mechanisms aimed at eliminating all
opposition.” Opposition is threatening, and the individual who is threatened in this way
suffers from Kleinian phantasies of annihilation, psychotic anxieties that further support
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 19/24
Page 18
rigid views (Young, 2001) in which others are first seen as part objects, then as
nonexistent.
In the wake of idealogy that will tolerate no opposition, a “moral void” is
generated, resulting in the need for “a victim to contain that void,” which leads to an act
of violence (Bollas, 1992, p. 203). Correspondingly, the mind has split off a dead core
self and projected it into a victim identified with the moral void. The fascist mind has
transformed the human other into a “disposable nonentity, a bizarre mirror
transference of what has already occurred in the fascist’s self experience” (Bollas, 1992,
p. 203). Through projective identification, the victim has been exterminated, but the
process must be completed. Denial and omnipotence, which Bollas (1992, p. 203) terms
“delusional grandiosity,” are enacted, thus idealizing the entire process of annihilation.
“Mental contents are now regarded as contaminates, and the Fascist mind idealizes the
process of purging itself of what it has contained.” (Bollas, 1992, p. 203). Following is
an excerpt taken from an interview with a member of the Hutu elite shortly after the
killings began in 1994:
Birchman’s face seems to swell as he rants on about the RPF and how theykilled the president in order to provoke the Hutus and start a civil war. Thisman is probably the second-most prominent academic in Rwanda. He hasstudied in Belgium and Canada. His English and French are impeccable andhe wears spotlessly clean clothes. Yet he struggles to hide his hatred of theTutsis. He is much too clever to blurt out his feelings . . . . Instead, he saysthat Tutsis inside the country co-operated with the RPF. They helped theminvade. As long as he has known them this is the feeling he has had. “They
were not loyal to the government.” (Keane, 1995, p. 172) [Birchman] is aman of such cleverness that he has contrived not to see any of the tens of thousands who have been killed in and around Butare. Nor has he heard anyscreams of dying people. (Keane, 1995, p. 173)
Birchman is an example of an individual deep in the schizoid position. His denial is
complete: Although he sits within earshot of people being killed, he hears and has seen
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 20/24
Page 19
nothing. He has idealized his own party and the anti-guerrilla rhetoric that supports and
justifies his hatred of the Tutsis and condones their deaths. His lack of connection with
the bloodbath leaves him clean, spotless, omnipotent, and grandiose. In Rwanda, circa
1994, there were many more like Birchman—individuals and groups also deep in the
schizoid position.
F. Schizoid Mechanisms and Societal Schemas
Bollas (1992, pp. 207-209) sets forth the following processes that move the
individual and/or group first toward a “fascist state of mind” and ultimately to genocide:
Distortion renders the opponent less intelligent and/or credible than before (Bollas,
1992). This instrument was used widely by the Hutu in building forces to annihilate the
Tutsis. Casting the Tutsis as foreign, evil, and wanting to kill the Hutus are only three
examples. The following statement illustrates one such distortion: “It is true that the
minds of ordinary Hutus are being poisoned against us. They are being told that we will
kill them like they killed our people.” (Keane, 1995, p. 140).
With decontextualization the opponent’s point of view is taken outside of its
proper context, thus leaving him to struggle with correcting this idea (Bollas, 1992). The
folk history belief that the Tutsis were bent on visiting harm on the Hutus as they did in
olden days, was a belief taken out of context and reality and utilized to incite the Hutus.
Given what has always been a limited numbers of Tutsis, as well as a further depleted
Tutsi population in Rwanda, due to earlier massacres and the many who had fled the
country, even with the existence of the RPF, it was unlikely that the Tutsis could have
rendered the Hutus servile. Bollas (1992) states that removing the victim/opponent
from his tribe and isolating him for the purpose of persecution is a non-rhetorical
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 21/24
Page 20
example of decontextualization. The fact that even after many Tutsis escaped Rwanda
for refugee camps in neighboring countries, they continued to be murdered by Hutus in
the camps (Uvin, 1998) is an example of actual decontextualization. The Tutsis were
systematically driven out, only to be ambushed and killed when they thought they were
safe from harm.
Denigration combines distortion and decontextualization, thus belittling the
opponent’s view (Bollas, 1992). Caricature allows for the person or group to be more
significantly identified with the qualities associated with the already denigrated views of
the person’s or group’s view (Bollas, 1992). Character assassination attempts to eliminate
opponents by discrediting the personal character of one who holds an opposing view
(Bollas, 1992). Further investigation into the history of Rwanda, especially regarding the
individuals involved in the socio-political battles fought among the Tutsis, Hutus, and
Bazungus is necessary to present examples of denigration, caricature, and character
assassination.
Change of name, which is often used in debate to recast the opponent’s ideas, can
also be used to further reduce the individual or group (e.g. “nigger” for black or “kike”
for Jew) (Bollas, 1992). The Mille Collines broadcasts in which the tutsi were reduced
to a despicable insect, “cockroaches,” exemplifies one way in which the Hutu extremists
managed to further reduce the image of the already discredited Tutsis.
Categorization as aggregation conveys the point at which the individual is now part
of a mass, without any individual identity (Bollas, 1992) (e.g. “What do you expect, he’s
a Republican”). In Rwanda, the process of aggregate categorization experienced a long
history, beginning before colonial days, but was manifested in many ways during Bazungu
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 22/24
Page 21
rule and post independence. The use of identification cards with ethnic classifications
stamped upon them was one way in which the individual was instantly categorized and
reduced. The association with the category of a variety of characteristics (e.g. Hutu as
descendants of Ham or Tutsis as intelligent and like the Bazungu) were easily accessed.
The aforementioned constitute what Bollas (1992, p. 207) calls “committive
genocide.” Absence of reference, which is the deliberate omission of an individual’s or
group’s existence and their works and/or culture, constitutes what Bollas (1992, p. 207,
209) names “omittive genocide.” The institution of a single party after independence,
not unlike the transfer of power to the Tutsis during colonialist days, is an example of
omittive genocide whereby entire groups of people were rendered impotent and
unimportant in the face of a totalitarian state.
Conclusion
The constellation of socio-economic, political and other historic factors that
contributed the raw material needed for the creation of a mechanism for mass murder
are many—too many to be fully described herein. However, the underlying psychic
phenomenon of projective identification and its societal manifestation form a schema for
a limited understanding of decades of genocidal destruction in Rwanda. There are many
factors that have not been explored, one being the failure of the international
community to assist a nation where genocide occurred not once, but twice in a 40 year
time span. It is unfathomable that one million people would be slaughtered when 20,000
of the same people were massacred fewer than 40 years before.
Colonialism and its remnants, as well as totalitarianism, served as the
overarching economic/governmental structures that facilitated the destruction described
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 23/24
Page 22
above and much more. Fairbairn (1943, p. 80) stated that the weakness of
totalitarianism, however, is its reliance upon widespread success, “for only under
conditions of success can the regime remain a good object to the individual. Under
conditions of failure, the regime becomes a bad object to the individual; and the socially
disintegrating effects of separations-anxiety then begin to assert themselves at the
critical moment.” A flame of hope burns.
8/2/2019 Genocide Boris
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/genocide-boris 24/24
References
Anderson, Benedict, (1991). Imagined Communities. New York: Verso.
Armstrong-Perlman, E. M. (1994). The allure of the bad object. In J. S. Grotstein and D.
B. Rinsky (Eds.), Fairbairn and the Origins of Object Relations (pp. 222-233). NewYork: Guilford Press.
Barth, Fredrik, (1969). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Cultural
Differences. Boston: Little, Brown.
Bollas, C. (1992). The fascist state of mind. In Being a Character (pp. 193-217). London:Routledge.
Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). The repression and the return of bad objects (with specialreference to the "War Neuroses"). In Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality (pp.59-81). London: Routledge.
Keane, F. (1995). Season of Blood: A Rwandan Journey . New York: Viking.
Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. In J. Riviere (Ed.), New Developments in Psychoanalysis (pp. 292-320). London: Hogarth Press.
Klein, M. (1948). On the theory of anxiety and guilt. International Journal of Psycho-
Analysis, 29, 114-123.
Uvin, P. (1998). Aiding Violence. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press, Inc.
Young, R. M. (1993). Psychoanalysis and the other: Psychopathology and racism. RetrievedMarch 7, 2005, from www.shef.ac.uk/uni/academic/N-Q/psysc/staff/rmyoung/papers/paper16h.html
Young, R. M. (2001). Fundamentalism and terrorism. Retrieved March 7, 2005, fromhttp://psychematters.com/papers/young2.htm