Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
EX.-A. No. 149 of 2017
(Inre: O.A. No. 341 of 2012)
Smt Anju Sharma Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
25.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the
applicant and Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal, learned counsel for the
respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
EX.-A. No. 149 of 2017
This is an Execution Application under Section 29 of the Armed
Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 filed by the applicant for non
implementation of the judgment and order dated 22.09.2016 passed
in O.A. No. 341 of 2012 directing the respondents to issue necessary
PPO to the applicant and other dues within the stipulated time.
At the threshold of the arguments, a statement has been made
by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC, Legal Cell that in compliance of the order
of this Tribunal, necessary PPO has already been issued, a copy of
which has been provided to the learned counsel for the applicant
during course of hearing.
It is directed that the Bank concerned shall release the amount
to the applicant within one month from the date of its communication.
Subject to the above, this Execution Application is disposed of
accordingly.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
M.A. No. 2517 of 2016
(Inre: O.A. No.470 of 2017)
Raj Kumar Yadav Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
25.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Manish Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant
and Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondents
along with Wg Cdr Sardul Singh, Departmental Representative.
M.A. No. 2517 of 2016
This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the
Original Application.
Heard.
The grounds shown in the affidavit filed in support of the
application seem to be genuine.
Accordingly, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the
O.A. is hereby condoned.
Let the case be registered as O.A. No.470 of 2017.
Order (Oral)
Heard Shri Manish Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant,
Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondents and
perused the record and with their consent, this Original Application is
being disposed of at the admission stage.
The applicant was initially enrolled as Air Man in Air Force on
20.03.1979. He was dismissed from service in pursuance of the DCM
on Ist March 1983 with six months’ R.I. He preferred O.A. bearing
No.149 of 2010, that too was dismissed by the Tribunal vide order
dated 07th April 2015 holding that the O.A. was time barred and the
application for condonation of delay was rejected and in
consequence thereof, the O.A. was also dismissed by the aforesaid
order.
Being aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal, the applicant
preferred Writ Petition No.3238 (S/S) of 2015 (Raj Kumar Yadav vs.
Union of India & others). The writ petition was also dismissed as not
maintainable, in view of the law settled by the Hon’ble Supreme
Court in the case of United Bank of India vs. Satyawati Tandon &
others (2010 (8) SCC 110) and later on in the case of Union of India
& others vs. Major General Shri Kant Sharma & another (2015 (6)
SCC 773). While dismissing the writ petition, Hon’ble High Court
observed as under :
“Appreciating the submissions of learned counsel for opposite parties and the fact that the issue of maintainability of writ petition against the judgment and order passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal has already been examined and decided in Writ Petition No.2200(SS) of 2015, vide order dated 22.05.2015, wherein it has been held that the writ petition against the judgment and order passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal is not maintainable, the instant writ petition is dismissed. However, it is open for the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum, if so advised.”
It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant
that since the High Court had directed the applicant to prefer
statutory presentation and the applicant approached the appropriate
authority and that the petition has been dismissed vide order dated
18th April 2016, hence the present O.A. is maintainable.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has
vehemently argued that since the order passed by the Tribunal still
stands and it has not been modified by the appellate authority i.e.
Hon’ble Supreme Court, the observation made by Hon’ble High
Court, that too with rider that if so advised, the O.A. is not
maintainable. All actions taken against the jurisdiction is a nullity in
law.
We have considered the rival submissions of the learned
counsel for the parties at length and perused the record. There is no
dispute over the provision of law that the writ petition was not
maintainable in the Hon’ble High Court. While dismissing the writ
petition, the observation that the applicant may approach before the
appropriate authority, if so advised, does not mean that the advise
given beyond the statutory mandate confers jurisdiction to the
applicant to prefer statutory petition, that too under the teeth of the
order of the Tribunal dated 07th April 2015.
Since the basic foundation of the impugned order of the
statutory authority is bad in law, we feel that the present O.A. is not
maintainable. However, option is given to the applicant to approach
the Hon’ble Supreme Court against the impugned order, but so far as
the present case is concerned, it is barred by principle of res
juudicata. An issue (dismissal order), against which the petition has
already been dismissed, is not open to be raised by another petition.
It is well settled provision that a thing, which cannot be done directly,
cannot be done indirectly.
In view of above, we feel that the present O.A. is not
maintainable and is, accordingly, dismissed in limine.
In the circumstances of the case, no order as to costs.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 60 of 2016 with M.A. Nos. 1717,2042,2419,2552 of 2016
and M.A. Nos. 347 and 702 of 2017
Lt Col Mukesh Baboo Applicant
In person
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
25.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Lt Col Mukesh Baboo, applicant in person and Shri
Asheesh Agnihotri, learned counsel for the respondents along with
Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
List this case on 31.10.2017 for orders before the appropriate
Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 264 of 2017
Devendra Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
25.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri SS Rajawat, learned counsel for the applicant and
Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, learned counsel for the respondents along
with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
Counter affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the
respondents is taken on record. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be
filed within two weeks.
List this case on 01.12.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A.(A). No. 239 of 2016 with M.A. No. 2089 of 2016
Shashi Mohan Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
25.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri KKS Bisht, learned counsel for the applicant and
Shri RKS Chauhan, learned counsel for the respondents along with
Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted
two weeks’ further time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if
any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List this case on 04.12.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, parties shall file compilation of case law and
chart of events
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
T.A. No. 27 of 2017
Sandeep Kumar Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
25.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Anoop Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for
the petitioner and Shri Amit Jaiswal, learned counsel for the
respondents along with Wg Cdr Sardul Singh, Departmental
Representative.
Paper book has been provided to the learned counsel for the
respondents.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the parties, list this case
on 31.10.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 120 of 2014
Jai Ram Yadav & Another Applicants
By Legal Practitioner for Applicants
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
25.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri MS Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and
Shri Namit Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents along with
Wg Cdr Sardul Singh, Departmental Representative.
List this case on 24.11.2017 for further hearing before the
appropriate Bench.
On the date fixed, parties shall file compilation of case law and
chart of events.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No 524 of 2012 alongwith O.A. No 168 of 2012 (Decided) with
M.A. No 2280 of 2016, M.A. No 2700 of 2016 & M.A. No 83 of 2017
Km Basanti Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
25.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri V.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and
Shri Namit Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents along with Maj
Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted two
weeks’ further time to file supplementary counter affidavit.
List this case on 13.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 56 of 2014
Smt Shyama Devi Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
25.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri K.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri
Virendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondents along with Maj Rajshri
Nigam, Departmental Representative.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted two
weeks’ further time to file supplementary counter affidavit. Supplementary
rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed by learned counsel for the applicant
within two weeks’, thereafter.
List this case on 29.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 205 of 2014 with M.A. No 1801 of 2017
Kumar Man Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
25.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri Raghvendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the
applicant and Shri A.N. Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents along
with Wg Cdr Sardul Singh, Departmental Representative.
M.A. No 1801 of 2017
Reply to supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the
respondents is taken on record. M.A. aforesaid is disposed of accordingly.
Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks’
time to file reply.
List this case on 23.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 241 of 2015
Arjun Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
25.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri J.N. Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Mrs.
Deepti Prasad Bajpai, learned counsel for the respondents along with Maj
Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
On call of the case, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he is
not prepared to argue the case today and prays for adjournment of the
case. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. Accordingly,
the case is adjourned.
List this case on 27.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 257 of 2016
Smt Bittan Devi Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
25.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Memo of appearance filed by Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate, on behalf of
respondents is taken on record. Registry is directed to show his name as
learned counsel for the respondents when the case is next listed.
Present : Shri V.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri
Shyam Singh, learned counsel for the respondent assisted by Maj Rajshri
Nigam, Departmental Representative.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted two
weeks’ further time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may
be filed by learned counsel for the applicant within two weeks’, thereafter.
List this case on 06.12.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No 284 of 2016 with M.A. No 1800 of 2017
Rajendra Prasad Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
25.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri Rakesh Johri, learned counsel for the applicant and
Dr. Shesh Narain Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents along with
Wg Cdr Sardul Singh, Departmental Representative.
M.A. No 1800 of 2017
Counter affidavit filed by learned counsel for the respondents is taken
on record. M.A. aforesaid is disposed of accordingly.
Learned counsel for the applicant has already filed Rejoinder affidavit.
Pleadings have been exchanged.
List this case on 15.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
M.A. No. 1763 of 2017 (Inre: O.A.(A). No. 290 of 2015)
Kaptan Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Memo of appearance filed by Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate,
on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown
as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.
Present: Shri SK Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and
Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, learned counsel for the respondents along
with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
M.A. No. 1763 of 2017
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The cause shown in the affidavit filed in support of the recall
application is sufficient.
Accordingly, the application is allowed and the order dated
21.09.2017 passed by this Tribunal in O.A.(A) No.290 of 2015 is
hereby recalled, subject to payment of Rs.500/- as cost, which shall
be remitted to the Bar Association, AFT, Lucknow within a week.
Subject to deposit of cost, the case shall be restored to its
original number.
List this case on 13.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
M.A. No. 515 of 2016 with M.A. No. 1767 of 2016
(Inre: O.A. No. Nil of 2016)
Sharad Prakash Pal Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri RKS Chauhan, learned counsel for the
respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
On account of the call given by the AFT Bar Association,
Lucknow, the Advocates are abstaining from judicial work.
Two weeks’ further time is granted to the learned counsel for the
applicant for filing supplementary rejoinder affidavit, which has not
been objected by the learned counsel for the respondents.
List this case on 14.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
M.A. No. 2090 of 2016
(Inre: O.A. No. 337 of 2011)
Smt Pyari Gurung Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Dr Gyan Singh, learned counsel for the respondents
along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
On account of the call given by the AFT Bar Association,
Lucknow, the Advocates are abstaining from judicial work.
Dr Gyan Singh, learned counsel for the respondents has already
filed supplementary affidavit, which is taken on record.
List this case on 15.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
M.A. No. 2636 of 2016
(Inre: O.A.(A). No. Nil of 2016)
Dinesh Kumar Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Dr Shesh Narain Pandey, learned counsel for the
respondents along with Wg Cdr Sardul Singh, Departmental
Representative.
On account of the call given by the AFT Bar Association,
Lucknow, the Advocates are abstaining from judicial work.
List this case on 16.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 141 of 2012
Smt Rekha Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, learned counsel for the
respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
On account of the call given by the AFT Bar Association,
Lucknow, the Advocates are abstaining from judicial work.
List this case on 17.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 116 of 2013
Karamati Iqbal Khan Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the
respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondents
prays for and is granted four weeks’ further time to file counter
affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks
thereafter.
List this case on 28.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 134 of 2017
Shyam Babu Tiwari Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri VPS Vats, learned counsel for the respondents.
On account of the call given by the AFT Bar Association,
Lucknow, the Advocates are abstaining from judicial work.
As prayed by Shri VPS Vats, learned counsel for the
respondents, four weeks’ further time is granted to file counter
affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks
thereafter.
List this case on 30.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 152 of 2017 with O.A. No. 417 of 2012(Decided)
Rajendra Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal, learned counsel for the
respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
On account of the call given by the AFT Bar Association,
Lucknow, the Advocates are abstaining from judicial work.
As prayed by Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal, learned counsel for
the respondents, four weeks’ further time is granted to file counter
affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks
thereafter.
List this case on 08.12.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 257 of 2017
Shobha Devi Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Dr Shesh Narain Pandey, learned counsel for the
respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
On account of the call given by the AFT Bar Association,
Lucknow, the Advocates are abstaining from judicial work.
As prayed by Dr Shesh Narain Pandey, learned counsel for the
respondents, four weeks’ further time is granted to file counter
affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks
thereafter.
List this case on 07.12.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 331 of 2017
Sunita Yadav M/o Late Sigmn Subhash Kumar Yadav Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : None for the applicant and Shri Rajiv Pandey, learned
counsel for the respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted two
weeks’ further time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may
be filed by learned counsel for the applicant within two weeks’, thereafter.
List this case on 13.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 398 of 2017 with M.A. No 1595 of 2017
Smt Minakshi Bisht Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : None for the applicant and Dr Chet Narain Singh, learned
counsel for the respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
On account of call given by the AFT Bar Association, Lucknow, the
Advocates are abstaining from judicial work.
List this case on 22.11.2017 for orders.
In the mean time, learned counsel for the respondents may file
objection on amendment application.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 118 of 2011
Aditya Nand Tiwari Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Chief of Army Staff & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : None for the applicant and Shri Sunil Sharma, learned
counsel for the respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
On account of call given by the AFT Bar Association, Lucknow, the
Advocates are abstaining from judicial work.
List this case on 22.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 254 of 2014
TS Negi Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : None for the applicant and Dr Chet Narain Singh, learned
counsel for the respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
On account of call given by the AFT Bar Association, Lucknow, the
Advocates are abstaining from judicial work.
List this case on 22.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 230 of 2016
Akhilesh Kumar Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : None for the applicant and Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal, learned
counsel for the respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
On account of call given by the AFT Bar Association, Lucknow, the
Advocates are abstaining from judicial work.
List this case on 21.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 2 of 2017 with M.A. No 1769 of 2017
Inre O.A. No 254 of 2016
Rashid Ali Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : None for the applicant and Shri Namit Sharma, learned
counsel for the respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four
weeks further time to file counter affidavit on behalf of remaining
respondents.
Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed by learned counsel for the
applicant within two weeks’, thereafter.
List this case on 12.12.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 9 of 2017
Smt Radha Devi Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : None for the applicant and Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal,
learned counsel for the respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam,
Departmental Representative.
On account of call given by the AFT Bar Association, Lucknow, the
Advocates are abstaining from judicial work.
List this case on 22.11.2017 for hearing.
In the mean time, learned counsel for the applicant may file rejoinder
affidavit.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
T.A. No. 23 of 2016
Shyam Sunder Kumar Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
24.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : None for the petitioner and Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal,
learned counsel for the respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam,
Departmental Representative.
On account of call given by the AFT Bar Association, Lucknow, the
Advocates are abstaining from judicial work.
List this case on 24.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
M.A. No. 745 of 2016 with M.A. No. 1730 of 2016
Munisha Devi Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri AK Maurya, learned counsel for the applicant and
Shri Anurag Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents along with
Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
Reply to the objection on the application for condonation of
delay filed by the learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.
List this case on 13.11.2017 for disposal of application for
condonation of delay.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
M.A. No. 296 of 2017(Inre: O.A. No. Nil of 2017)
Smt Sunita Jaiswal Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Virat Anand Singh, learned counsel for the
applicant and Shri Namit Sharma, learned counsel for the
respondents.
Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted one
week’s further time to file reply to the objection on the application for
condonation of delay.
List this case on 14.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
M.A. No. 1043 of 2016 (Inre : O.A. No. Nil of 2017)
Smt Krishna Thapa Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Lalit Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and
Shri VPS Vats, learned counsel for the respondents along with Maj
Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted
two weeks’ further time to file objection on the application for
condonation of delay. Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and
is granted one week’s time to file replication to the objection.
List this case on 14.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 61 of 2014
Sukhvir Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant
and Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal, learned counsel for the respondents
along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
Inspite of the order dated 19.09.2017, learned counsel for the
respondents has not filed the status report.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted
one week’s further time to file an affidavit taking into account the
earlier order passed by the Tribunal. The respondents shall produce
the original documents during the course of hearing.
List this case on 30.10.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 208 of 2014
Pravind Kumar Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Shailedra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the
applicant and Shri DK Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents
along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted
one week’s further time to file supplementary counter affidavit in
terms of the earlier order dated 16.08.2017 passed by the Tribunal.
List this case on 31.10.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 147 of 2017 with M.A. No. 1273 of 2017
Smt Gomati Devi Mother of Late Sanjay Kumar Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Shailedra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the
applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, learned counsel for the respondents
along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
A preliminary objection has been raised by Shri Amit Jaiswal,
learned counsel for the respondents that the applicant should have
preferred Execution Application before the AFT, Principal Bench,
Delhi. The objection raised by the learned counsel for the
respondents is misconceived for the reasons that the Tribunal has
granted relief to the next of kith and kin of Late Sanjay Kumar and the
applicant is the mother of Late Sanjay Kumar and she is residing in
the present address. It was obligatory for the respondents to comply
with the judgment and order dated 18.05.2015 passed by the AFT,
Principal Bench, Delhi in O.A.No.450 of 2014. The letter dated 29th
May 2015 indicates that request has been made to the IHQ of MoD
for finalization of the matter with regard to payment of family pension.
It appears that the benefit has not been extended to the
applicant inspite of the fact that the respondents in the counter
affidavit have admitted that the case is under process.
List this case on 14.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, parties shall file compilation of case law and
chart of events.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 320 of 2017
Smt Saroj Tiwari Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Shailedra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the
applicant and Shri Namit Sharma, learned counsel for the
respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted
two weeks’ further time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit
may be filed within two weeks’ thereafter.
List this case on 04.12.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, parties shall file compilation of case law and
chart of events.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 324 of 2017
TD Kolekar Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Chief of Army Staff & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Rohit Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and
Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, learned counsel for the respondents along
with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted
four weeks’ further time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit
may be filed within two weeks’ thereafter.
List this case on 05.12.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 335 of 2017
Tomy Barghese Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Birendra Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the
applicant and Shri Ashish Agnihotri, learned counsel for the
respondents along with Wg Cdr Sardul Singh, Departmental
Representative.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted
two weeks’ further time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit
may be filed within two weeks’ thereafter.
List this case peremptorily on 24.11.2017 for orders.
We are posting this case peremptorily for the reason that the
Promotion Board is likely to be scheduled in the month of December
2017.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) PKG/-
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
T.A. No. 38 of 2012
Subhash Chandra Singh Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri Yash Pal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Shri
Md. Zafar Khan, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri
Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
On call of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he
does not intend to file Supplementary Rejoinder Affidavit.
List this case on 17.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
T.A. No. 56 of 2016
Vinesh Kumar Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : None for the petitioner and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld.
Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal
Cell.
None is available on behalf of petitioner. In the interest of justice, the
case is adjourned.
List this case on 30.10.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 161 of 2016
Guddu Raja Ansari Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri Ashok Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr.
Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
List this case before appropriate Bench on 31.10.2017 for further
hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
M.A. No. 935 of 2017 In re: O.A. No. 213 of 2010
Shriman Narayan Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri P.N. Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and
Shri Namit Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Cost has been deposited by learned counsel for the applicant in terms
of order dated 21.09.2017.
List this case on 14.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
M.A. No. 1338 of 2017 In re: T.A. No. 760 of 2010
Radhey Ram Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri Yash Pal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Dr.
Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Cost has been deposited by learned counsel for the petitioner in terms
of order dated 18.09.2017.
As prayed by learned counsel for the respondents, list this case on
17.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 153 of 2016
Vrajesh Kumar Shankhdhar Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri R. Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri
Md. Zafar Khan, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri
Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks’
further time to file reply to affidavit in terms of order dated 18.08.2017.
List this case on 17.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
O.A. (A) No. 241 of 2016 with M.A. No. 1499 of 2017
Ranjeet Kumar Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Chief of Army Staff & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri Rohit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri
Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri
Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
M.A. No. 1499 of 2017
Counter affidavit filed by learned counsel for the respondents is taken
on record. M.A. aforesaid is disposed of accordingly.
M.A. No. 1686 of 2017
Rejoinder affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken
on record. M.A. aforesaid is disposed of accordingly.
Pleadings have been exchanged.
As prayed by learned counsel for the applicant, list this case on
20.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Cases of Court No. 2 taken in Court No. 1
T.A. No. 44 of 2016 with M.A. No 1766 of 2017
Sundra Singh Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
23.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri P.N. Chaturvedi Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Shri
Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
M.A. No 1766 of 2017
Rejoinder affidavit filed by learned counsel for the petitioner is taken
on record. M.A. aforesaid is disposed of accordingly.
Pleadings have been exchanged.
List this case on 21.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) UKT
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 18 of 2014
Gokula Nand Pandey Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri R. Chandra, learned counsel for the applicant
and Ms. Anju Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that she is not
prepared to argue the case today and prays for adjournment of
the case. Learned counsel for the applicant has no objection.
Accordingly, the case is adjourned.
List this case on 09.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed , learned counsel for the respondents
shall produce original documents pertaining to case for perusal
of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ukt
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 21 of 2015 with M.A. No. 1011 of 2017 & M.A. No. 1243 of 2017
Maj Saurabh Dutt Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: The applicant Maj Saurabh Dutt in person and Dr.
Shailendra Sharma Atal, learned counsel for the respondents.
In pursuance to our order dated 11.09.2017, learned counsel
for the respondents was directed to bring on record details of bank
account of Respondent No 6 from 2009 till date and also the
receipt of the FDR including the date on which it was opened and
encashed prematurely. Learned counsel for the respondents has
not furnished information as directed by the Court and today he is
asking adjournment of the case. Learned counsel for the
respondents could not satisfy the Court as to why so much time
has been taken to comply with directions of the Court.
The applicant has vehemently opposed the adjournment
stating that learned counsel for the respondents is avoiding to
furnish the details for a long time.
We hereby direct the learned counsel for the respondents to
furnish the details of bank account as ordered on 11.09.2017, by
the date fixed, failing which an adverse inference may drawn
against private respondent and the case shall be heard from the
prayer of grant of interim relief.
List this case on 06.11.2017 for hearing. On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall
produce original documents pertaining to the case for perusal of
the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ukt
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
T.A. No. 531 of 2010
Sultan Ram Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for Petitioner
Versus
Secy Govt of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri P.N. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the
petitioner and and Shri D.K. Pandey learned counsel for the
respondents and Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
As prayed learned counsel for the parties, list this case on
09.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents
shall produce original documents pertaining to the case for
perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) SB
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
T.A. No. 107 of 2011
Lekh Raj Singh Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Mohd Shariq Khan, Advocate holding brief of
Shri Yash Pal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and and
Mohd Zafar Khan, learned counsel for the respondents and Maj
Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
On the case of the case, learned counsel for the applicant
submits that he does not intend to file supplementary rejoinder
affidavit.
Pleadings have been exchanged.
List this case on 21.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents
shall produce original documents pertaining to the case for
perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ukt
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
T.A. No. 87 of 2013
Mahindra Singh Bisht Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Alam Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner
and and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the
respondents and Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
Learned counsel for the applicant apologies and submits
that though he has amended the T.A. earlier but due to certain
misconception and mis-understanding, he in Court, had
restricted his prayer only for grant of disability pension. Today,
he requested the Court for challenging the discharge. Since
learned counsel for the applicant wants to press his prayer to
challenge the discharge therefore, in the interest of justice, we
recall our order dated 31.08.2017 to that extent only. Now the
T.A. shall be heard on his prayer of discharge only.
List this case on 22.11.2017 for hearing.
In this case, learned counsel for the respondents is
directed to confirm if the policy of 1988 was followed in letter
and sprit and an Inquiry as required was held before his
discharge as undesirable soldier, as also if Show Cause Notice
was issued.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents
shall produce original documents pertaining to the case for
perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ukt
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
T.A. No. 74 of 2016
Smt. Kaushalya Devi Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Vikash Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for
the petitioner and and Shri Anurag Mishra, learned counsel for
the respondents and Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
As prayed by learned counsel for the parties, list this case
on 28.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents
shall produce original documents pertaining to the case for
perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ukt
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
M.A. No. 1720 of 2017 with M.A. No. 1721 of 2017,
In re: O.A. No. 79 of 2014
Smt. Harbhajan Kaur Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A) Memo of appearance of filed today in Court by Shri Ashish Kumar
Singh, Additional Central Government Standing Counsel is taken on
record.
Present : Shri P.N. Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and
Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by
Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
M.A. No. 1720 of 2017.
This is an application for condonation of delay in filing application for
grant of leave to appeal in O.A. No. 79 of 2014. Admittedly, the application
is time barred and has been moved beyond statutory period. The Tribunal
lacks jurisdiction to condone the delay under the Armed Forces Tribunal
Act, 2007. It is well settled proposition of law that the Tribunal is not
empowered to condone delay in moving application for leave to appeal.
Accordingly application for condonation of delay in moving application for
grant of leave to appeal is not maintainable and is rejected.
M.A. No. 1721 of 2017
This is an application for grant of leave to appeal which has been
filed beyond the statutory period of limitation. Application for condonation
of delay has been rejected.
In consequence there of the application for leave to appeal is also
rejected.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
M.A. No. 1730 of 2017 with M.A. No. 1731 of 2017
In re: O.A. No. 33 of 2012
Sherpal Chahar Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Memo of appearance of filed today in Court by Dr. Chet Narain
Singh, Additional Central Government Standing Counsel is taken on record.
Present : Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr.
Chet Narain Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
M.A. No. 1730 of 2017.
This is an application for condonation of delay in filing application for
grant of leave to appeal in O.A. No. 33 of 2012. Admittedly, the application
is time barred and has been moved beyond statutory period. The Tribunal
lacks jurisdiction to condone the delay under the Armed Forces Tribunal
Act, 2007. It is well settled proposition of law that the Tribunal is not
empowered to condone delay in moving application for leave to appeal.
Accordingly application for condonation of delay in moving application for
grant of leave to appeal is not maintainable and is rejected.
M.A. No. 1731 of 2017
This is an application for grant of leave to appeal which has been
filed beyond the statutory period of limitation. Application for condonation of
delay has been rejected.
In consequence there of the application for leave to appeal is also
rejected.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
T.A. No. 7 of 2017
Cpl Sushil Kumar Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A) Memo of appearance of filed today in Court by Shri Kaushik
Chatterji, Ld. Counsel for Union of India is taken on record. His name shall
be shown in the cause list when the case is next listed.
Present: Shri Kaushik Chatterji Ld. Counsel for the respondents,
assisted by Wg Cdr Sardul Singh, OIC Legal Cell.
The present T.A. has been received by way of transfer from Hon’ble
Allahabad High Court.
Notice on behalf of respondents has been accepted by Shri Kaushik
Chatterji, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.
Let fresh notice be issued by the Registry to the petitioner returnable
at an early date.
List the case on 01.12.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
Dy. No. 2360 of 2016 with M.A. No. 363 of 2017 & M.A. No 1749 of 2017
In re: O.A. No. 135 of 2014
Rajendra Pratap Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri V.P. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri
D.C. Lohumi, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri
Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
M.A. No 1749 of 2017
Supplementary rejoinder affidavit filed by learned counsel for the
applicant in Court today is taken on record.
M.A. aforesaid stands disposed of accordingly.
O.A. No. 135 of 2014 It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that pleadings are
complete and the case is ripe for hearing.
List the case on 17.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to the case for perusal of the Bench.
Learned counsel for the parties shall submit synopsis/written
arguments and list of events.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
Dy. No. 1572 of 2017, M.A. No. 1751 of 2017 & M.A.No. 1752 of 2017
In re: O.A. No. Nil of 2017
Ravinder Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Chief of Army Staff & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri Rohit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri
Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
M.A. No. 1752 of 2017
Objection file by learned counsel for the respondents on application
for amendement of the O.A. is taken on record.
M.A. aforesaid stands disposed of accordingly.
M.A. No. 1751 of 2017
This is an application for amendment of the O.A. moved by the
applicant. By means of this application, the applicant intends to add two
new prayers in the prayer clause of the O.A. It is submitted that the
applicant originally had made prayer for a direction to the respondents to
decide the statutory petition of the applicant, but now by means of this
application, the applicant also wants to challenge the District Court Martial
proceedings.
Application is allowed. The applicant is directed to amend the O.A.
within two weeks.
O.A. No. Nil of 2017
Learned counsel for the respondents may file objection to the
application for bail within the aforesaid period of two weeks.
List the case on 13.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
M.A. No. 1974 of 2015 in re: O.A. No. NIL of 2017
Smt. Brijesh Balyan Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri K.K. Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri
Bhanu Pratap Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Learned counsel for the respondents has raised a preliminary
objection regarding maintainability of the O.A. on the ground that personnel
of Coast Guard are not governed by the Navy Act. However, no documents
have been furnished in support of the objection raised.
Further time is prayed for to bring on record the relevant documents.
List the case on 29.11.2017 for orders.
By the next date, learned counsel for the respondents shall bring on
record documents in support of the objection raised. It is further directed
that a responsible officer of the Navy shall also remain present on next date
of listing to assist the Tribunal.
Copy of the order be supplied to learned counsel for the respondents
free of cost.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
M.A. No. 863 of 2017 & M.A. No. 1750 of 2017
In re: O.A. No. Nil of 2017
Jitendra Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and
Shri Virendra Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
M.A. No 1750 of 2017
Objection on application for condonation of delay filed by learned
counsel for the respondents in Court today is taken on record.
M.A. aforesaid stands disposed of.
O.A. No. Nil of 2017
Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted four
weeks’ time to file replication.
List the case on 21.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
M.A. No. 989 of 2017, M.A. No. 1753 of 2017 & M.A. No. 1754 of 2017
In re: O.A. No. Nil of 2017
Lal Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri P.N. Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr.
Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
M.A. No. 1753 of 2017
Objection on application for condonation of delay filed by learned
counsel for the respondents in Court today is taken on record.
M.A. aforesaid stands disposed of.
M.A. No. 1754 of 2017
Replication to objection on application for condonation of delay filed
by learned counsel for the applicant in Court today is taken on record.
M.A. aforesaid stands disposed of.
O.A. No. Nil of 2017 Learned counsel for the applicant prays for short time to file better
affidavit in support of his application for condonation of delay.
List the case on 20.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 93 of 2016 with M.A. No. 1675 of 2016, M.A. No. 2401 of 2016 & M.A. No. 399 of 2017
Smt. Shakuntala Devi Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri R. Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri
Virendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
By means of order dated 21.09.2017, the applicant was granted time
to file rejoinder affidavit. Today again a request has been made by learned
counsel for the applicant for granting further time to file rejoinder affidavit.
In the interest of justice, two weeks further time is granted to learned
counsel for the applicant to file rejoinder affidavit.
List the case on 30.10.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 95 of 2017
Gaganjot Kaur Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present :None for the applicant. Shri Sunil Sharma, Ld. Counsel for
the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
It is informed at Bar that Maj (Retd) R.D.Singh is unable to attend
Court today.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that he shall file
counter affidavit on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4 since other
respondents, i.e. respondents No. 5 to 8 have been arrayed in personal
capacity.
In pursuance of order dated 20.03.2017, notice was issued to
respondent No. 5 in exclusion to respondents No. 6 to 8.
As per office report dated 18.05.2017 notice was issued to
respondent No. 5. Neither the served notice nor acknowledgement has
been received, as such, in view of A.F.T. (Practice) Rules, service on
respondent No. 5 is deemed sufficient and the case shall proceed against
said respondent ex parte.
List the case on 17.11.2017 for further orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 311 of 2017
Smt Alka Mishra Applicant
W/O Vimal Kumar Mishra
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri V.P. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri
Bhanu Pratap Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Learned counsel for the applicant prays for short adjournment to
enable him to file application for bail. He may do so within two weeks.
List the case on 14.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 313 of 2017
Smt. Mithilesh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri Alam Singh, Advocate, holding brief for Shri S.S.L.
Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal,
Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal
Cell.
Learned counsel for the respondents is granted four weeks’ further
time to file counter affidavit.
Applicant may file rejoinder affidavit within next two weeks.
List the case on 04.12.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
T.A. No. 42 of 2016
Smt. Savitri Devi Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri P.N. Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and
Shri Virendra Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted two
weeks’ further time to file reply to the supplementary rejoinder affidavit filed
by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
List the case on 13.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
T.A. No. 77 of 2016
Ashok Kumar Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri K.K.S. Bisht , Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Dr.
Shesh Narain Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted two
weeks further time to file rejoinder affidavit.
List the case on 14.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
M.A. No. 1756 of 2017 in re: T.A. No. 9 of 2017
Smt. Sharda Devi Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri V.A. Singh, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Shri
Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Wg Cdr
Sardul Singh, OIC Legal Cell.
M.A. No. 1756 of 2017
Impleadment application has been filed by mother of the deceased
soldier claiming division of family pension. Thus, she is a necessary party.
The application is accordingly allowed.
Necessary amendment may be incorporated by learned counsel for
the petitioner in the array of parties within ten days.
He shall also take steps within the aforesaid period for service of
notice on the newly impleaded respondent. Office shall issue notice to the
newly impleaded respondent immediately after receipt of steps.
List the case on 05.12.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
M.A. No. 816 of 2017 In re: T.A. No. 6 of 2013
Zamir Ahmed Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Col R. N. Singh (Retd), Ld. Counsel for the petitioner
assisted by Shri V.A.Singh & Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan, and Shri
Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Photo copy of receipt with regard to deposition of cost of Rs.500/-
has been produced by learned counsel for the petitioner. He states that he
shall submit the original receipt in office by the next date of listing.
Pleadings are complete.
List the petition on 24.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to the case for perusal of the Bench.
Learned counsel for the parties shall submit synopsis/written
arguments and list of events.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
T.A. No. 39 of 2017
Govind Singh Negi Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Mohd Shariq Khan, Advocate holding brief of Shri
S.G. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and and Shri
V.P.S. Vats, learned counsel for the respondents and Maj
Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
Learned counsel for the applicant prays for time for better
preparation of the case. As prayed, the case is adjourned.
List this case on 27.11.2017 for hearing. On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents
shall produce original documents pertaining to the case for
perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ukt
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 49 of 2010
Asha Devi & Others Applicants
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
13.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
O.A. No. 49 of 2010, Asha Devi & Others vs. Union of India and
others is dismissed.
For orders, see our order of date passed on separate sheets.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) RPM/-
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
M.A. No. 1671 of 2017 In re: O.A. No. Nil of 2017
Anupama Mishra Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Managing Director AGI & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
12.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri Virendra Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant
and Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the Respondents, assisted
by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four
weeks’ time to file objection on application for condonation of delay.
Replication, if any, may be filed by Ld. Counsel for the applicant
within next two weeks.
List this case on 16.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
M.A. No. 986 of 2013
Smt. Meera Devi Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
12.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri OP Kushwaha, Advocate, holding brief of Shri Ashok
Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel
for the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
It appears from a perusal of the record that application for
condonation of delay in filing the counter affidavit was filed by the Ld.
Counsel for the respondents. Delay is condoned and counter affidavit is
taken on record.
M.A. No. 986 of 2013
The applicant has approached this Tribunal for grant of liberalised
family pension with delay of 19 years, 10 months and 26 days. Matters
relating to liberalised family pension inhibit recurring cause of action.
Delay is accordingly condoned. Let O.A. be registered.
Admit.
Rejoinder affidavit has already been filed.
List this case on 08.11.2017 for hearing.
Respondents shall produce original record on the next date of
listing. Parties shall also file compilation of case law and chart of events.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
EX-A. No. 68 of 2017 In re: M.A. No. 2265 of 2016
Akhila Nand Pandey Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
12.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Mohd Shariq Khan, Advocate, holding brief of Shri S.G.
Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for
the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for further time to
comply with the order of the Tribunal.
As prayed, six weeks’ further time is granted to Ld. Counsel for the
respondents to comply with the order and file compliance report failing
which the respondents shall deposit cost of Rs.10,000/- in this Tribunal.
List this case on 05.12.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 264 of 2015
Natha Yadav Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
12.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Mohd Shariq Khan, Advocate, holding brief of Shri S.G.
Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for
the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
It is informed at Bar that Shri S.G. Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant
is unable to attend the Tribunal today and adjournment is prayed for to file
rejoinder affidavit.
List this case on 15.11.2017 for hearing.
Meanwhile rejoinder affidavit may be filed by the Ld. Counsel for the
applicant.
Respondents shall produce original record on the next date of listing.
Parties shall also file compilation of case law and chart of events.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
T.A. No. 9 of 2017
Smt. Sharda Devi Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
12.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri V.A. Singh, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Shri
Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Wg Cdr
Sardul Singh, OIC Legal Cell.
It transpires from a perusal of the record that application for
condonation of delay was filed by the respondents in the Hon’ble High
Court bearing No 33086 of 2008 for condoning delay in filing the counter
affidavit.
With the consent of Ld. Counsel for the parties, delay in filing counter
affidavit is condoned and counter affidavit is taken on record.
Rejoinder affidavit has also been filed by the petitioner.
Having heard Ld. Counsel for the parties, we find it a fit case for
admission.
Admit.
List the case on 13.10.2017 for hearing on application for
impleadment/TA.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
T.A. No. 15 of 2017 & M.A. No. 1740 of 2017
Bhupendra Singh Bhadauria Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
12.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Col Y.R. Sharma (Retd), Advocate holding brief for Maj
R.D. Singh (Retd), Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Appoli
Shrivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri
Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
It is informed at Bar that Maj R.D. Singh (Retd), Ld. Counsel for the
petitioner is ill and is also out of station. Accordingly, adjournment is prayed
for on his behalf.
M.A. No. 1740 of 2017
Objection on bail application filed by Ld. Counsel for the respondents
in Court today is taken on record.
List the case on 15.11.2017 for orders.
On the next date of listing, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner shall
provide copy of the amended T.A. to Ld. Counsel for the respondents as
directed in our earlier order dated 05.10.2017.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
T.A. No. 18 of 2016
Balram Singh Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
12.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Col Ashok Kumar (Retd), Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and
Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner states that he shall serve copy of the
written arguments on Ld. Counsel for the respondents during course of the
day.
Ld. Counsel for the respondents may file reply to the written
arguments by the next date of listing.
List the case on 31.10.2017 for further hearing.
Respondents shall produce original record on the next date of listing.
Parties shall also file compilation of case law and chart of events.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 164 of 2013
Warrant Officer Shashi Kant Chaturvedi Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
12.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Col R.C.Dixit (Retd), Advocate holding brief for Shri P.N.
Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal,
Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal
Cell.
It is informed at Bar that Shri P.N. Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the
applicant is out of station and prayer for adjournment has been made on his
behalf.
The case is according passed over for the day.
List again on 13.11.2017 for hearing.
Respondents shall produce original record on the next date of listing.
Parties shall also file compilation of case law and chart of events.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
T.A. No. 41 of 2016
Smt. Shakuntla Devi Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
12.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri Y.R. Sharma , Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Shri
Anurag Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri
Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Adjournment is prayed for by Ld. Counsel for the applicant.
The case is accordingly adjourned.
List again on 31.10.2017 for hearing.
Respondents shall produce original record on the next date of listing.
Parties shall also file compilation of case law and chart of events.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ANB
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
T.A. No. 75 of 2016
Rajesh Kumar Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
12.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri Rohit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Dr.
S.N. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri
Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that while preparing the
case, it has come to his notice that rejoinder affidavit has not been filed by
the petitioner before Hon’ble High Court. He prays for short time to file
rejoinder affidavit.
List the case on 16.11.2017 for orders.
Meanwhile, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner may file rejoinder affidavit.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ANB
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
T.A. No. 42 of 2017
Col Mukul Singhal Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
12.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri Mohan Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Dr.
Chet Narain Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and, as a matter of last
opportunity, is granted four weeks’ time to file counter affidavit.
List the case on 15.11.2017 for hearing.
Respondents shall produce original record on the next date of listing.
Parties shall also file compilation of case law and chart of events.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) anb
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
M.A. No. 1837 of 2015 with M.A. No. 56 of 2016
In re: O.A. No. Nil of 2015
Harishanker Dwivedi Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
12.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Shri S.K. Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr.
Shesh Narain Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks’
time to produce case law on the point of maintainability of the case.
List this case on 03.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) Ukt/-
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
M.A. No. 1384 of 2016 In re: O.A. No. Nil of 2016
Smt. Laxmi Devi Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
12.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri S.K. Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Shri PN
Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the applicant and Dr. Shailendra Sharma
Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC
Legal Cell.
Shri S.K. Singh, Advocate, submits that Shri PN Chaturvedi, learned
counsel for the applicant is out of station today and prays for adjournment
of the case. Accordingly, the case is adjourned.
List this case on 16.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ukt
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 248 of 2015 alongwith T.A. No. 121 of 2011 (Decided)
Smt. Malti Devi Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
12.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A) Present: Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate, holding brief of Shri V.K.
Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel
for the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate, prays for and is granted two weeks’
further time to file supplementary rejoinder affidavit.
List this case on 17.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ukt
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 307 of 2016 with M.A. No 1755 of 2017
Jagirman Rai Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
12.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri
VPS Vats, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam,
OIC Legal Cell.
M.A. No 1755 of 2017
Counter affidavit filed by learned counsel for the respondents is taken
on record. M.A. aforesaid is disposed of accordingly.
On perusal of record, it transpires that application for condonation of
delay has not been filed by learned counsel for the applicant alongwith
Original Application. He prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to move
application for condonation of delay.
List this case on 13.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ukt
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 228 of 2015 with M.A. No. 260 of 2016
Ramesh Chandra Dixit Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
12.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present : Applicant Shri Ramesh Chandra Dixit in person and Dr.
Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, assisted by Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted three
weeks’ time for better preparation of the case and to amend prayer clause
of the Original Application.
List this case on 20.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ukt
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case listed in Court No. 2 taken up in Court No. 1
M.A. No. 1679 of 2017 with M.A. No. 1680 of 2017
In re: O.A. No. 183 of 2016
Union of India & Others Applicants- Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants- Respondent
Versus
Smt. Bhagwan Devi Respondent-Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Respondent-Applicants
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
11.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha, Member (A)
Present: Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants-
Respondent assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
M.A. No. 1679 of 2017
This is an application for condonation of delay in filing application for
grant of leave to appeal in O.A. No. 183 of 2016. Admittedly, the application
is time barred and has been moved beyond the statutory period. The
Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to condone the delay under the Armed Forces
Tribunal Act, 2007. It is well settled proposition of law that the Tribunal is not
empowered to condone the delay in moving application application for leave
to appeal. Accordingly, application for condonation of delay in moving
application for grant of leave to appeal is not maintainable and is rejected.
M.A. No. 1680 of 2017
This is an application for grant of leave to appeal which has been filed
beyond the statutory period of limitation. Application for condonation of delay
has been rejected.
In consequence thereof, application for leave to appeal is also
rejected.
(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) ukt/-
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case listed in Court No. 2 taken up in Court No. 1
M.A. No. 661 of 2013 with M.A. No. 529 of 2016
Vikas Pandey Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
11.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha, Member (A)
Present: Shri P.N. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the applicant and
Dr. Shaialendra Sharma Atal, learned counsel for the respondents assisted
by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Reply to objection on application for condonation of delay filed by
Ld. Counsel for the applicant is taken on record.
The applicant has impugned order dated 30.09.2011 with regard to
discharge from Air Force service. Against the impugned order of
discharge, the applicant preferred the present application on 18.04.2013
with delay of one year and seven days.
Submission of Ld. Counsel for the applicant is that on account of
financial problems and certain unavoidable circumstances, the applicant
could not approach the Tribunal within six months’ time as required under
the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007.
The cause show is sufficient. Delay is accordingly condoned. Let
the case is registered as O.A.
The issue involved requires hearing.
Admit.
Counter affidavit be filed by the respondents within four weeks.
Applicant shall have two weeks’ thereafter to file rejoinder affidavit.
List the case on 23.11.2017 for orders.
(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) ukt/-
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case listed in Court No. 2 taken up in Court No. 1
M.A. No. 203 of 2017 with M.A. No. 204 of 2017
In re: O.A. No. 203 of 2013
Pushkar Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
11.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha, Member (A)
Present: Shri Ravi Prakash Tripathi, holding brief of Shri V.A. Singh,
learned counsel for the applicant and Shri R.K. S. Chauhan, learned
counsel for the respondents assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Shri R.K.S. Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is
allowed four weeks’ further time to file objection on application for
condonation of delay in filing recall application.
Replication may be filed by the applicant within next two weeks.
List the case on 22.11.2017 for orders.
(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) ukt/-
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case listed in Court No. 2 taken up in Court No. 1
M.A. No. 1270 of 2017 In re: O.A. No. Nil of 2017
Sandeep Kumar Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondent
By Legal Practitioner for Respondent
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
11.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha, Member (A)
Present: Applicant Sandeep Kumar in person. Shri Kaushik Chaterjee,
learned counsel for the respondents assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC
Legal Cell.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted two
weeks’ further time to file objection on application for condonation of delay.
Replication may be filed by learned counsel for the applicant within
next two weeks.
List the case on 14.11.2017 for orders.
(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) ukt/-
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case listed in Court No. 2 taken up in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 213 of 2016
Suresh Singh Chauhan Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondent
By Legal Practitioner for Respondent
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
11.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha, Member (A)
Present: None for the applicant. Shri Kaushik Chaterjee, learned counsel for the respondents assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
List revised. None is present on behalf of the applicant to press the Original Application in second round after pass over.
Shri Kaushik Chaterjee, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
The Original Application is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is hereby discharged. (Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) ukt/-
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case listed in Court No. 2 taken up in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 251 of 2016
Smt. Kanta Devi Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondent
By Legal Practitioner for Respondent
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
11.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha, Member (A)
Present: Shri V.P.Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Shri K.K.S. Bisht,
learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, learned
counsel for the respondents assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Supplementary counter affidavit filed by the respondents is taken on
record.
Supplementary rejoinder affidavit may be filed by learned counsel for
the applicant within two weeks.
List the case on 16.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original record pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) ukt/-
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case listed in Court No. 2 taken up in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 274 of 2017
Sahamatul Nisha Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondent
By Legal Practitioner for Respondent
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
11.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha, Member (A)
Present: Shri Ram Dheeraj Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant.
Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell for the respondents.
As prayed by OIC Legal Cell, four weeks’ further time is granted to file
counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed by learned counsel for the
applicant within two weeks thereafter.
List the case on 11.12.2017 for orders.
(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) ukt/-
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case listed in Court No. 2 taken up in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 524 of 2012 Alongwith O.A. No. 168 of 2012 (Decided) with M.A. No. 2280 of 2016, M.A. No. 2700 of 2016 & M.A. No. 83 of 2017
Km Basanti Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondent
By Legal Practitioner for Respondent
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
11.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha, Member (A)
Present: Shri V.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri
Namit Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents.
The case stands released.
List before Court No. 2 on 25.10.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) ukt/-
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case listed in Court No. 2 taken up in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 118 of 2011
Aditya Nand Tiwari Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Chief of Army Staff & Others Respondent
By Legal Practitioner for Respondent
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
11.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha, Member (A)
Present: Shri P.N. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the applicant. Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell for the respondents.
Shri Sunil Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents is reported to be out of station. As prayed, list the case on 24.10.2017 for hearing. On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench. (Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) ukt/-
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case listed in Court No. 2 taken up in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 385 of 2011
Sharma Naresh Kumar Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondent
By Legal Practitioner for Respondent
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
11.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha, Member (A)
Present: None for the applicant. Shri A.K. Singh, learned counsel for
the respondents assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
Shri V.A. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant is reported to be
out of station.
The case is accordingly passed over for the day.
List again on 27.10.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) Ukt/-
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case listed in Court No. 2 taken up in Court No. 1
O.A. No. 94 of 2016
Abdul Hameed Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondent
By Legal Practitioner for Respondent
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
11.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha, Member (A)
Present: None for the applicant. Shri Virendra Singh, learned counsel
for the respondents assisted by Maj Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell.
In spite of notice sent by the Registry, none appears to press the
case.
Shri Virendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
The case is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) ukt/-
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case listed in Court No. 2 taken up in Court No. 1
O.A(A) No. 241 of 2016 with M.A. No. 1499 of 2017
Ranjeet Kumar Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant
Versus
Chief of Army Staff & Others Respondent
By Legal Practitioner for Respondent
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
11.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha, Member (A)
Present: Shri Rohit Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant. Maj
Rajshri Nigam, OIC Legal Cell for the respondents.
OIC Legal Cell informs that Shri Amit Jaiswal, learned counsel for
the respondents is not available and prayed for adjournment of the case.
The case is accordingly adjourned.
List again on 23.10.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) ukt/-
Form No. 4
{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Case listed in Court No. 2 taken up in Court No. 1
T.A. No. 515 of 2010
Shyam Sunder Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondent
By Legal Practitioner for Respondent
Notes of the Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
11.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha, Member (A)
Present: Shri P.N. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner and
Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, learned counsel for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted two
weeks’ further time to file rejoinder affidavit.
List this case on 26.10.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall produce
original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the Bench.
(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice D.P. Singh) Member (A) Member (J) Ukt/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
M.A. No 828 of 2017 Inre O.A. (Nil) of 2017
Smt Shyamal Sri Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
10.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 02.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. No 195 of 2015
Narendra Kumar Rai Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
10.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 02.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. No 101 of 2016
Smt Madhubala Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
10.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 02.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. No 105 of 2016 with M.A No 1216 of 2017
Lt Col Rajeev Bhola Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
10.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 02.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. No 31 of 2017 with M.A. No 722 of 2017
Mange Ram Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
10.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 02.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
T.A. No 17 of 2010
Smt Suman Devi & Others Applicants By Legal Practitioner for Applicants
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
10.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 02.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
T.A. No 28 of 2017
Smt Rajesh Tyagi Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
10.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 02.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. No 301 of 2012
Padam Bahadur Gurung & Others Applicants By Legal Practitioner for Applicants
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
10.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 02.11.2017 for hearing.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. No. 106 of 2013
Mahabir Singh Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
10.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 02.11.2017 for hearing.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. No. 285 of 2013
Smt Sunita Devi Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
10.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 02.11.2017 for hearing.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
M.A. No 1788 of 2016 with M.A. No 1163 of 2016
AK Das Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 01.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
M.A. No 1789 of 2016
Arvind Kumar Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 01.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
M.A. No 2668 of 2016 Inre O.A. No 219 of 2014
Chandrabhan Singh & Another Applicants By Legal Practitioner for Applicants
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 01.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
M.A No 769 of 2017 Inre O.A. (Nil) of 2017
Smt Mohika Tiwari Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 01.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
M.A. No 869 of 2017 Inre O.A. (Nil) of 2017
Dhananjay Mishra Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 01.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
M.A. No 1103 of 2017 Inre O.A. (Nil) of 2017
Smt Sanjogi Devi Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 01.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
M.A. No 1201 of 2017 with MA. No 1202 of 2017
Inre T.A. No 775 of 2010
RN Pandey Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 01.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
M.A. No 1426 of 2017 Inre O.A. (Nil) of 2017
Smt Prabhawati Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 01.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. No. 172 of 2014 with M.A. No 703 of 2015 & M.A. No 704 of 2015
Smt Chandra Kali Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 01.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. No. 75 of 2015
Ravi Singh Thakur Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 01.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. No. 121 of 2015 with M.A. No 589 of 2016
Smt Priyanka Mishra Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 01.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. No. 5 of 2017 with M.A. No 1224 of 2017
Rakesh Kumar Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 01.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. No. 307 of 2017
Smt Maya Thapa Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Chief of Army Staff & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 02.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. No. 381 of 2017
Smt Kamil Nisa Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 02.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
T.A. No. 16 of 2015
Kamal Singh Bhadoria Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 02.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
T.A. No. 80 of 2016
Anoop Kumar Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 02.11.2017 for orders.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. No. 253 of 2012
Krishna Kumar Thakur Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Chief of Army Staff & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 01.11.2017 for hearing.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. No. 355 of 2015
Smt Rama Devi Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 01.11.2017 for hearing.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. No. 301 of 2016
Smt Radha Devi W/o Late Sub Pratap Singh Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 01.11.2017 for hearing.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2
O.A. (A) 128 of 2017 With M.A. No 244 of 2016
Suraj Singh Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of Registry Order of the Tribunal
09.10.2017
The Court will not assemble today due
to holding Circuit Bench at Nainital.
List on 01.11.2017 for hearing.
I/C Registrar
Form No. 4 [See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2 M.A. No. 686 of 2017 (Inre: O.A. No. Nil of 2017)
Mithlesh Devi alias Lali Devi Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
06.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
List has been revised.
Present: Shri R Chandra, learned counsel for the applicant and
Shri Ashish Saxena, learned counsel for the respondents along with
Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
M.A. No. 1685 of 2017
Reply to objection on delay condonation application filed by
learned counsel for the applicant in Court, today is taken on record.
We have gone through the affidavit filed in support of the
application as well as reply to the objection for condonation of delay
in filing the original application.
It appears that there was no intentional and deliberate delay on
the part of the applicant challenging the impugned orders.
Accordingly, the cause shown seems to be sufficient. The application
for condonation of delay is allowed and the delay in filing the Original
Application is hereby condoned.
Objection raised by learned counsel for the respondents is
hereby rejected.
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we find that
it is a fit case for admission.
Admit.
Let the case be registered as O.A.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted
four weeks’ time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any,
may be filed within two weeks’, thereafter.
List this case on 28.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) RPM/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 258 of 2016
Smt Asha Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
06.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
List has been revised.
Present: Dr Ashish Asthana, Advocate, holding brief of Shri
Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri
Ramesh Chandra Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents along
with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
Dr Ashish Asthana, Advocate, submits that Shri Shailendra
Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant has not come to the
Court since he is out of station and he prays for adjournment of the
case.
Accordingly, the case is adjourned. In the meantime learned
counsel for the applicant shall file rejoinder affidavit.
List this case on 30.10.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) RPM/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 94 of 2017
Smt Sanju Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
06.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
List has been revised.
Present: Shri VP Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and
Shri Rajiv Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents along with
Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted
two weeks’ further time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if
any, may be filed by learned counsel for the applicant within two
week’, thereafter.
List this case on 07.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) RPM/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 355 of 2017
Pratap Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
06.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
List has been revised.
Present: Shri Prabhav Srivastava, learned counsel for the
applicant and Dr Gyan Singh, learned counsel for the respondents
along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental Representative.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted
two weeks’ further time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if
any, may be filed by learned counsel for the applicant within two
week’, thereafter.
List this case on 07.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) RPM/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 255 of 2015
Kishan Kumar Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
06.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Col Ashok Kumar(Retd), learned counsel for the
applicant and Shri Kaushik Chatterji, learned counsel for the
respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
Learned counsel for the respondent is hereby directed to
produce the necessay documents, as asked by this Court, by means
of an affidavit by next date.
List this case on 08.11.2017 for further hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall
produce original documents pertaining to the case for perusal of the
Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) RPM/-
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
O.A. No. 159 of 2014 with M.A. No. 1353 of 2017
Krishna Nand Rai Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
06.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri R Chandra, Advocate, holding brief of Shri Yash
Pal Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal,
learned counsel for the respondents along with Maj Rajshri Nigam,
Departmental Representative.
M.A. No. 1353 of 2017
Rejoinder affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is
taken on record. M.A. No. 1353 of 2017 stands disposed of.
It is informed at the Bar that Shri Yashpal Singh, learned
counsel for the applicant is out of station. Therefore, in the interest of
justice, the case is adjourned for the day.
List this case on 09.11.2017 for hearing.
On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall
produce original documents pertaining to the case for perusal of the
Bench.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) RPM/-
Form No. 4 [See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2 M.A. No. 1678 of 2017 Inre O.A. No. Nil of 2017
Smt. Vinita Singh Applicant By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus Union of India & Others Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
06.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri S.K. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant
and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, learned counsel for the
respondents and Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file objection on the application for
condonation of delay. Replication, if any, may be filed by
learned counsel for the applicant within two weeks, thereafter.
List this case on 10.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ukt
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
M.A. No. 1676 of 2017 with M.A. No. 1677 of 2017 Inre T.A. No. 174 of 2010
Radhey Shyam Yadav Petitioner
By Legal Practitioner for Petitioner
Versus
Chief of Army Staff & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
06.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the
petitioner and and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, learned counsel
for the respondents and Maj Rajshri Nigam, Departmental
Representative.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file objection on the application for
condonation of delay. Replication, if any, may be filed by
learned counsel for the applicant within two weeks, thereafter.
List this case on 07.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ukt
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
M.A. No. 339 of 2016 with M.A. No. 1222 of 2016 & M.A. No. 714 of 2017
Inre O.A. No. Nil of 2016
Rati Bhan Yadav Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
06.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri V.P. Pandey, learned counsel for the
applicant and Shri Amit Sharma, learned counsel for the
respondents.
M.A. No. 1689 of 2017
Better affidavit in support of application for condonation of
delay, filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on
record.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file objection, if any.
List this case on 13.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ukt
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
M.A. No. 28 of 2017 Inre O.A. No. Nil of 2017
Jai Bihari Singh Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
06.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri P.N. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the
applicant and Dr. Chet Narain Singh, learned counsel for the
respondents.
Vide order dated 18.08.2017, learned counsel for the
applicant was directed to bring on record postal receipts of
application sent by him to concerned authorities for providing
copy of GCM proceedings.
M.A. No. 1690 of 2017
Affidavit with regard to production of postal receipts, filed by
learned counsel for the applicant today in the Court is taken on
record.
This original application has been filed by the appellant after
a lapse of about 29 years. By means of this application, the
appellant has made prayer to direct the respondents to furnish a
copy of GCM proceedings held for the trial of the appellant
under Army Act Section 69 under which appellant was awarded
punishment of “rigorous imprisonment and to be dismissed from
service on 15.07.1988”.
Keeping in view the prayer of the appellant, we direct the
learned counsel for the respondents to provide copy of GCM
proceedings of the year 1988, if held with them otherwise file an
affidavit regarding weeding out of the documents.
List this case on 24.11.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ukt
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
M.A. No. 362 of 2017 Inre O.A. No. Nil of 2017
Smt. Janki Devi Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
06.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri K.K. Singh Bisht, learned counsel for the
applicant and Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, learned counsel for the
respondents.
Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted
two weeks’ further time to file replication to objection on
application for condonation of delay.
List this case on 30.10.2017 for orders.
(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) ukt
Form No. 4
[See rule 11(1)]
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 2
M.A. No 458 of 2017 with M.A. No. 741 of 2017 Inre O.A. No. Nil of 2017
Santosh Kumar Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Others Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents
Notes of the
Registry
Orders of the Tribunal
06.10.2017 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)
Present: Shri J.N. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant
and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, learned counsel for the
respondents.
M.A. No. 1688 of 2017
Replication to objection on application for condonation of
delay, filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on
record.
M.A. No 458 of 2017
This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the
original application. As per office report, there is delay of 01
year, 06 months and 06 days in filing the original application.
The reasons given in the affidavit filed in support of the
application for condonation of delay seem to be genuine. The
application for condonation of delay is allowed and the delay in
filing the original application is hereby condoned. Objection
raised by learned counsel for the respondents is hereby
rejected.
Admit.
Let the case be registered as O.A.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is
granted four weeks’ time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder
affidavit, if any, may be filed by learned counsel for the applicant
within two weeks, thereafter.