Afghanistan Water, Agriculture, and Technology
Transfer (AWATT) Program
Farm Resource Management (FRM)
Training Course November, 2010
Dr. Hamdy Oushy AWATT FRM Program Leader
Forage & Rangeland Management Specialist
Afghanistan – Nangarhar
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program i
Authority Prepared for USAID/Afghanistan under Cooperative Agreement No. 306-A-00-08-00506
awarded 03 March 2008, entitled Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer
(AWATT).
This document was completed in partial fulfillment of Clause 2a of the Award Document for
Cooperative Agreement No. 306-A-00-08-00506 awarded 03 March 2008, entitled Afghanistan
Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer (AWATT). The views expressed and opinions
contained in this report are those of the NMSU AWATT team and are not intended as
statements of policy of USAID.
Prepared by:
NMSU-AWATT Team with CSU, UIUC, and SIUC
Credits The program referred to in this document is based on the NMSU-AWATT Technical Proposal, as
revised, submitted February 4, 2008 in response to USAID Request for Application No. 306-07-020
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ iii
FARM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (FRM) ................................................................................................. 1
PROGRAM FOCUS AND BENEFITS .............................................................................................................. 1
FRM Concept................................................................................................................................................. 1
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 2
Rationale for Project .................................................................................................................................... 5
Description of Project ................................................................................................................................. 5
Analysis of Project ........................................................................................................................................ 6
FRM FOCUS ...................................................................................................................................................... 7
Strategies to Restore Agricultural Farm Diversity ................................................................................ 8
FRM Objectives ............................................................................................................................................. 8
FRM Benefits for Farmers ........................................................................................................................... 9
CHAPTER 1: AGROECOLOGY AS THE FUNDAMENTAL SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR FRM .............. 10
Building on Traditional Knowledge ........................................................................................................ 10
The Science of Agroecology ................................................................................................................... 10
Agroecosystem Processes Optimized through the Use of Agroecological Technologies ........ 11
Enhancing Productivity through Multi-Species Agroecosystems .................................................... 11
Healthy Soils – Healthy Plants ................................................................................................................ 12
Examples of Multifunctional Agroecological Technologies .............................................................. 12
Self-Sufficiency ............................................................................................................................................ 13
Elements of an Appropriate FRM Strategy .......................................................................................... 13
Requirements of a Pro-Poor FRM Strategy ......................................................................................... 13
Integration of Soil and Pest Management Practices ........................................................................... 13
CHAPTER 2: SOIL ......................................................................................................................................... 14
Addition of Organic Matter ..................................................................................................................... 15
Cover Crops Can Stabilize Soil .............................................................................................................. 16
Cover Crops Provide More than Nitrogen Cycling .......................................................................... 17
Leguminous Cover Crops Can Add Nitrogen through Nodulation .............................................. 17
CHAPTER 3: IRRIGATION ........................................................................................................................... 18
Potential Benefits of Irrigation Water Management .......................................................................... 18
CHAPTER 4: CROP ROTATION ................................................................................................................ 20
Conservation Crop Rotation .................................................................................................................. 20
Practical Functionality ............................................................................................................................... 20
Pest Control ............................................................................................................................................... 21
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program iii
Disease Control ......................................................................................................................................... 21
Insect Control ............................................................................................................................................ 21
Weed Control ............................................................................................................................................ 22
Soil Nitrogen ............................................................................................................................................... 22
Soil Tilth and Structure ............................................................................................................................ 22
Soil Moisture ............................................................................................................................................... 23
Reduction of Soil Erosion ........................................................................................................................ 23
Allelopathy .................................................................................................................................................. 23
Monitoring and Possible Redesign of Rotation ................................................................................... 23
CHAPTER 5: FORAGE LEGUME ................................................................................................................. 24
CHAPTER 6: INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK FARMING SYSTEM ................................................. 25
Diversified vs. Integrated Systems ......................................................................................................... 26
Advantages and Constraints of the System ......................................................................................... 27
Key Principles ............................................................................................................................................. 29
Lessons Learned and Recommendations ............................................................................................. 29
Key Issues/Questions for Project Design ............................................................................................. 30
CHAPTER 7: RURAL COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION .......................................................................... 32
Definitions ................................................................................................................................................... 32
CHAPTER 8: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE FRM ......................................................... 33
FRM Model in the Lower Watershed Areas of Nangarhar ............................................................. 33
CHAPTER 9: FARM ENTERPRISE ............................................................................................................... 35
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 35
Diversification of Farm Enterprises and the Increased Need to Produce for the Market........ 35
Need for Improved Management and Business Skills to Increase Profits and Farm Income.... 36
Definition of a Farm .................................................................................................................................. 36
CHAPTER 10: FARM MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................................... 39
Definition of Farm Management ............................................................................................................. 39
Farmer as a Manager Needs New Skills ............................................................................................... 39
Functions of Farm Management ............................................................................................................. 40
Further Reading .............................................................................................................................................. 41
Sources of Information and Examples of Best Practice............................................................................ v
TABLE OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Key aspects of an integrated crop-livestock farming system. ....................................................... 26
Figure 2 Phases of Farm Management .......................................................................................................... 40
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 1
FARM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (FRM)
PROGRAM FOCUS AND BENEFITS - FRM CONCEPT
A sustainable cropping system is an essential part of a complete farming system of soil, water,
air, plant, animal, and human resources. Considering how the farm fits into broader watershed
management (e.g. off-site effects and resource opportunities) is also fundamental to problem-
posing and problem-solving, resource management success, and development of sustainable
communities.
We should focus on understanding and improving soil quality, water quantity/quality, air quality,
nutrient and salinity management, crop yield and quality, irrigation/water management, and
integrated pest management. In addition, we should concentrate on reducing overall on-farm
energy use, inputs, production costs, pest incidences, pumping costs, and soil and water losses.
The key approach to achieving integrated sustainable management is to think system
(ecosystem, whole farm, and watershed), think critically (connect the dots), actively seek
resource opportunities, emphasize technology ―exchange‖ vs. ―transfer‖ with other producers
and partners, plan creatively and flexibly, and focus on keeping energy flow through the
integrated system. A reemphasis on biological factors is also necessary since recent agriculture
has essentially forgotten biological processes, but rather focused on chemical and physical
factors. Improving soil quality is a key to improving soil, water, air, plant, and animal resources.
Case studies, field trials, and demonstrations are all important approaches for technology
exchange. Interdisciplinary teams including producers and partners are necessary to develop
integrated sustainable farming systems.
We must utilize holistic approaches to management of soil and water resources. Integration of
needed conservation practices and management schemes assures critical resource concerns are
addressed and water quality, soil quality, and overall ecosystem health is maintained or
improved. Considering how the farm fits into broader watershed management is also essential
to ‗problem-posing and solving‘ to ensure resource management success.
Now is a critical time to implement management schemes to protect long-term soil
sustainability. Global reduction in agricultural productivity due to soil erosion and degradation,
depletion of irrigation water supplies, and competing land uses is putting a squeeze on capacity
to meet increasing world-wide demand for food and fiber. Couple this with the economic
challenges posed by the high cost of fossil fuels and derived products, such as fertilizers, and
struggling farm economies, and it becomes clear that the continued success of agricultural
systems is dependent upon our ability to maintain soil health and manage water resources
through holistic approaches in conservation planning.
In order to benefit the poor more directly, a Farm Resource Management (FRM) approach
must be applicable under the highly heterogeneous and diverse conditions in which smallholders
live; it must be environmentally sustainable and based on the use of local and indigenous
resources. The emphasis must be on improving whole farming systems at the field or watershed
level rather than specific commodities. Technological generation must be demand-driven, which
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 2
means that research priorities must be based on the socio-economic and environmental needs
and circumstances of resource-poor farmers (Blauert and Zadek, 1998).
The study ‖An Agroecological Basis for Natural Resource Management Among Poor Farmers in
Fragile Lands‖ prepared by Miguel A. Altieri (2005), indicated that food security in the
developing world will clearly need to be increased, especially in the marginal areas where the
majority of the poor people are concentrated. In order to benefit the poor more directly, a
new Farm Resource Management (FRM) approach must be developed to directly and
simultaneously tackle the following objectives:
Poverty alleviation;
Food security and self reliance;
Ecological management of productive farming system;
Empowerment of rural communities.
INTRODUCTION
We will explore the problem of crop rotation in Afghanistan, and discuss possible remedies and
solutions using the FRM approach.
New approaches to enhance productivity must depart from the intensive inputs of the Green
Revolution and use resource-conservation technologies. The use of such technologies, for
example, the incorporation of legumes in rotation schemes, can enhance the sustainability of
agroecosystems in many rural areas (Lappe et al., 1998).
A sustainable agricultural development strategy that enhances the environment must be based
on agroecological principles. Attention focused on the linkages between agriculture and natural
resource management will be of great help in solving the problems of poverty, food insecurity
and environmental degradation (Altieri et al., 1998).
The On-Farm Resource Management (FRM) approach that USAID/DAIL/AWATT have
launched in Nangarhar province, Afghanistan, will demonstrate the best model to tackle the
problems of soil degradation, low organic matter, low water holding capacity, low productivity,
weeds, disease, and insects. We need to break the cycle of wheat/rice to solve these problems.
In Afghanistan, the main problems with the wheat/rice intensive crop rotation system are:
both crops are grasses, so they do not add any organic matter to the soil;
both crops only use the top 30 cm of the soil, where they have shallow root systems, so
the top 30 cm of the soil has been depleted and degraded;
Afghan farmers do not to return animal manure to the soil; instead, the majority use the
manure for fuel purposes.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 3
Wheat/ Rice Intensive Crop Rotation
Rice/wheat intensive crop rotation in Baghlan
Province on May 25, 2009; above, the wheat field
was close to maturity and harvest; below, the rice
nursery contained seedlings to replace the wheat
after harvest in June.
Wheat/rice intensive crop rotation in Baghlan
Province on November 18, 2009; right, rice fields
had been harvested and were ready to be plowed
for the planting of winter wheat; left, a germinated
wheat field had already replaced rice.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 4
Problems of Wheat/Rice Crop Rotation in Afghanistan
Soil Problems:
Salinity accumulation on soil due to lack of proper
crop rotation and proper farm management.
Weed Problems (Wild Oats):
Wild oats have invaded a wheat field due to lack of
crop rotation with Egyptian clover.
Weed Problems (Dodder Weeds):
Dodder weed has invaded farms due to lack of
proper crop rotation and farm management.
Intensive wheat/rice crop rotation.
The Green Revolution with its intensive inputs may
not work in a small farming system.
Wheat field: no animals, no farmers and no
diversity of production.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 5
RATIONALE FOR PROJECT
Continued use of short-term wheat-rice crop rotations in Afghanistan may not be sustainable.
As a consequence, farmers need viable production alternatives. If there are more options for
farmers, there is a better probability that agricultural and community systems can remain viable
and sustainable.
However, before farmers can make objective decisions about alternative, sustainable
agricultural practices, they need sound information from replicated, long-term research and
demonstration conducted at a realistic farm-size in different districts in Nangarhar Province in
Afghanistan.
The Farm Resource Management (FRM) project's principal investigator is Dr. Hamdy Soliman
Oushy, Associate Professor at the New Mexico State University and the Forage & Rangeland
Management Specialist at the USAID-Funded AWATT Program in Afghanistan. It is his
contention that although the rice/wheat crop rotations may have been profitable in the past,
they have had negative consequences like reducing organic matter in the soil and increasing soil
erosion, increasing the need for more external inputs like fertilizer and pesticide.
Integrated crop rotation using Egyptian clover may be a good alternative for farmers. Using
extended pasture rotations with livestock also diversifies the farming system and reduces
reliance on fertilizer, pesticide and fossil fuels.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
A selected section of farmland at Nangarhar Province in Afghanistan will be used in a unique
multi-disciplinary applied study involving USDA/ADT/DAIL/AWATT research scientists, DAIL
extension agents and Nangarhar stakeholders.
A farming system consisting of Egyptian clover rotations with livestock integrated into
conservation-based row crop production will be established. Teams will measure and compare
various agroecological attributes associated with this system. Costs and revenues will be
analyzed as well as how this type of agricultural system would affect soil fertility, weed and
disease control, and the local farming communities within and around Nangarhar Province.
The FRM field experiment will be similar to a small demonstration project at the Behsood,
Kama, Chaparhar, Shishem Bagh, and Khewa Districts‘ farms involving Egyptian clover
integrated into a wheat/rice cropping system. The system is being attempted because it has
already shown great potential in Egypt, Pakistan and India.
This new project will encompass a much larger area than the demonstration project and consist
of three types of land management:
Extended rotations of wheat/Egyptian clover;
Extended rotations of corn, cotton, pearl millet, Sudan grass/Egyptian clover;
Permanent forage of alfalfa in extended rotations;
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 6
ANALYSIS OF PROJECT
The project will be broken into three separate, yet integrated, components, including:
Agroecology attributes comparison
Soil fertility
Soil structure
Water quality
Livestock performance
Pest abundance
Economic analysis
It is intended to compare and contrast the economic value of a conventional wheat/rice crop
rotation and a wheat/Egyptian clover/rice cropland-forage system that involves extended
rotations.
Community perspectives analysis
The project will evaluate how an alternative agricultural system like FRM will affect local and
nearby communities in Nangarhar Province.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 7
FRM FOCUS
The main focus of the Farm Resource Management (FRM) program is to break the cereal
wheat/rice cycle in Afghanistan that has resulted in soil degradation, lower productivity, lower
organic matter, weed invasion, insects and disease problems.
Rain-fed wheat areas have negatively affected the
upper watershed, Samangan Province May, 2009
Rain-fed wheat areas invaded by weeds (wild oats)
have negatively affected the upper watershed,
Samangan Province
May, 2009
The FRM program is based on the introduction and the incorporation of Egyptian clover into
the current wheat/rice crop rotation as the best winter forage legume to correct the problems.
The FRM program will deal with seven components: soil, water irrigation, crop rotation, forage
legume, livestock, local farmers and community participation, farm economics, and monitoring
and evaluation. The FRM Program is a long-term program (2-3 years) and will be expanded to
the other districts in Nangarhar and other provinces in Afghanistan next year.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 8
STRATEGIES TO RESTORE AGRICULTURAL FARM DIVERSITY
Crop Rotations
Animal Integration
FRM OBJECTIVES
In general, the objectives of the Farm Resource Management Program in Afghanistan are:
To introduce the Farm Resource Management (FRM) system by incorporating Egyptian
clover into the wheat/rice cropping system in Afghanistan;
To assist local government, MAIL and DAIL extension workers, and farmers to improve
agricultural production through initiating and monitoring crop and forage production
activities and providing supervision and the necessary technical assistance;
To demonstrate farm resource management procedures for different farming systems
and traditional approaches in selected districts in Nangarhar Province;
To improve soil fertility, provide higher high quality protein forage and increase cereal
yields;
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 9
To break the cycle of the weed, insect and diseases problems;
To improve on-farm water use efficiency through implementing land laser leveling, water
turnout and water scheduling;
To provide high quality legume forage for livestock;
To release the pressure of overgrazing on the upper watershed by encouraging farmers
to keep their small ruminant animals on their farms at the lower watershed;
To improve farmers‘ livelihoods through more efficient and sustainable agriculture and
crop-forage-livestock production systems;
To develop and introduce low-cost crop and forage production technologies, through
the crop/livestock system, beneficial to farmers and their families through increased
incomes and improved efficiency in use of time or labor. Technologies will be
introduced through on-farm demonstrations, workshops, and field days;
To provide on-farm resource management demonstration training to farmers in selected
districts in water, crop and forage technology transfer including: water turnout, laser
land leveling, irrigation schedule, crop, forage and seed production, as well as practical
agronomic training on land preparation, fertilizer application and plantation.
FRM BENEFITS FOR FARMERS
The FRM Program expects positive results from the pilot demonstration plots in selected
districts of Nangarhar Province, and there have already been encouraging responses from
farmers in the area. Based on these factors, the program expects to improve farm production,
including increased livestock and crop production, more efficient water use, and general
economic benefits for all farmers participating in the program.
Specific anticipated benefits from FRM Program development for farmers are:
Improved soil productivity due to increased organic matter and nutrients;
Opportunity for upper watershed to heal, creating a more productive resource for
grazing, tree growth, and decreased flooding and siltation of the lower watershed
irrigation systems;
Increased quality of livestock marketed and increased yields of wheat, rice and fruit/nut
crops; and more efficient water use—all leading to higher per-capita income.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 10
CHAPTER 1:
AGROECOLOGY AS THE FUNDAMENTAL SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR FRM
To be of benefit to the rural poor, agricultural research and development should operate on
the basis of a "bottom-up" approach, using and building upon the resources already available:
local people, their knowledge, and their natural resources.
It must also seriously take into consideration, through participatory approaches, the needs,
aspirations, and circumstances of smallholders. A relevant FRM strategy requires the use of
general agroecological principles and customizing agricultural technologies to local needs and
circumstances. Agroecological principles have universal applicability but the technological forms
to be used depend on the prevailing environmental and socio-economic conditions of the target
farmer group.
BUILDING ON TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE
A logical starting point in the development of new pro-poor agricultural development
approaches are the very systems that traditional farmers have developed and/or inherited
throughout centuries. Such complex farming systems, adapted to local conditions, have helped
small farmers to sustainably manage harsh environments, and to meet their subsistence needs
without depending on mechanization, chemical fertilizers, pesticides or other technologies of
modern agricultural science.
The traditional crop management practices used by many resource-poor farmers represent a
rich resource for modern workers seeking to create novel agroecosystems well adapted to
local agroecological and socioeconomic circumstances. Farmers use a diversity of techniques,
many of which fit well to local conditions and can lead to the conservation and regeneration of
the natural resource base as in the case of indigenous soil and water management practices in
Africa. The techniques tend to be knowledge-intensive rather than input-intensive, but clearly
not all are effective or applicable, therefore modifications and adaptations may be necessary.
The challenge is to maintain the foundations of such modifications grounded on farmers'
rationales and knowledge.
THE SCIENCE OF AGROECOLOGY
Agroecology is a science that provides guidelines to understanding the nature of
agroecosystems and the principles by which they function. It provides the basic ecological
principles for how to study, design, and manage agroecosystems that are both productive and
natural resource-conserving, and that are culturally sensitive, socially just and economically
viable--offering several advantages for the development of farmer-friendly technologies. Instead
of focusing on one particular component of the agroecosystem, agroecology emphasizes the
interrelatedness of all agroecosystem components and the complex dynamics of ecological
processes, including all environmental and human elements.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 11
Agroecology takes greater advantage of natural processes and beneficial on-farm interactions in
order to reduce off-farm input use and to improve the efficiency of farming systems.
Technologies enhance the functional biodiversity of agroecosystems as well as the conservation
of existing on-farm resources. Promoted technologies such as cover crops, green manures,
intercropping, agroforestry and crop-livestock mixtures are multi-functional, as their adoption
usually means favorable changes in other components of the farming systems at the same time.
First, agroecology relies on indigenous farming knowledge and selected modern technologies to
manage diversity, incorporate biological principles and resources into farming systems, and
intensify agricultural production. Second, it offers a practical way to restore agricultural lands
that have been degraded by conventional agronomic practices. Third, it provides an
environmentally sound and affordable way for smallholders to intensify production in marginal
areas.
Ecological concepts are used to favor natural processes and biological interactions that optimize
synergies so that diversified farms are able to sponsor their own soil fertility, crop protection
and productivity. By assembling crops, animals, trees, soils and other factors in spatial/temporal
diversified schemes, several processes are optimized. Such processes are crucial in determining
the sustainability of agricultural systems (Altieri, 1995).
AGROECOSYSTEM PROCESSES OPTIMIZED THROUGH THE USE OF
AGROECOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES
Agroecology takes greater advantage of natural processes and beneficial on-farm interactions in
order to reduce off-farm input use and to improve the efficiency of farming systems.
Technologies enhance the functional biodiversity of agroecosystems as well as the conservation
of existing on-farm resources.
Organic matter accumulation and nutrient cycling;
Soil biological activity;
Natural control mechanisms (disease suppression, biocontrol of insects, weed
interference);
Resource conservation and regeneration (soil, water, germplasm, etc.);
General enhancement of agrobiodiversity and synergism between components.
ENHANCING PRODUCTIVITY THROUGH MULTI-SPECIES AGROECOSYSTEMS
Many agricultural studies have shown that complex, multi-species agricultural systems are more
dependable in production and more sustainable in terms of resource conservation than
simplified agroecosystems. Significant yield increases have been reported in diverse cropping
systems compared to monocultures. Enhanced yields in diverse cropping systems may result
from a variety of mechanisms, such as more efficient use of resources (light, water, nutrients)
or reduced pest damage.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 12
HEALTHY SOILS – HEALTHY PLANTS
The ability of a crop plant to resist or tolerate pests is tied to optimal physical, chemical and
biological properties of soils; a diverse and active community of soil organisms contributes to
plant health. Organic-rich soils generally exhibit complex food webs and beneficial organisms
that prevent infection by disease-causing organisms.
EXAMPLES OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL AGROECOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES
Cover crops, green manures and mulching;
Intercropping;
Rotations;
Organic soil fertilization;
Agroforestry;
Crop-livestock integrated system (including aquaculture).
For example, cover crops function as an ―ecological turntable‖ which activates and influences
key processes and components of the agroecosystem: the complex of beneficial fauna, soil
biology, weed suppression, nutrient cycling, etc. Similarly the incorporation of green manures
not only provides nutrients, but also increases soil organic matter and hence water retentive
capacity, further reducing susceptibility to erosion.
Many of these proven and promising agroecological technologies can be integrated to enhance
the sustainability of farming systems. Farmer groups throughout the developing world are
implementing local agroecological initiatives in collaboration with NGOs. Many of their
experiences demonstrate the feasibility of stabilizing yields, regenerating and conserving soils
and water, preserving agrobiodiversity and enhancing food security, all based on agroecological
technologies and locally available resources (Pretty, 1995).
Agroecological field projects show that traditional crop and animal combinations can often be
adapted to increase productivity when the biological structuring of the farm is improved and
labor and local resources are efficiently used (Altieri, 1995). In fact, most agroecological
technologies promoted by NGOs can improve traditional agricultural yields, increasing output
per area of marginal land from some 400-600 kg/ha to 2000-2500 kg/ha. Integrating these
technologies also enhances the general agrobiodiversity and has associated positive effects on
food security and environmental integrity.
In general, data show that agroecological systems exhibit more stable levels of total production
per unit area over time than high-input systems; produce economically favorable rates of
return; provide a return to labor and other inputs sufficient for a livelihood acceptable to small
farmers and their families; and ensure soil protection and conservation as well as enhance
biodiversity (Pretty, 1997).
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 13
SELF-SUFFICIENCY
Before the rural poor in marginal areas can be expected to be a part of and compete with
regional markets, they must build up a minimum level of local self-sufficiency. This prevents
them from sinking to levels at which their food security is threatened. The kinds of technologies
developed should therefore emphasize as a prerequisite food self-sufficiency and independence
from outside resources (Reinjtes et al., 1992).
ELEMENTS OF AN APPROPRIATE FRM STRATEGY
Contribute to greater environmental preservation;
Enhance production and household food security;
Provide on and off-farm employment;
Provision of local inputs and marketing opportunities;
Promotion of resource-conserving multifunctional technologies;
Participatory approaches for community involvement and empowerment;
Institutional partnerships;
Effective and supportive policies.
REQUIREMENTS OF A PRO-POOR FRM STRATEGY
Use of agroecological technologies that optimize biological processes;
Minimize use of external inputs;
Minimize tradeoffs between productivity, sustainability and equity;
Farmer participation and partnerships.
INTEGRATION OF SOIL AND PEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Integration of soil and pest management practices used by farmers may result in synergism
leading to healthy and productive crop:
A. Enhanced soil fertility:
Fertilizer
Crop cover, Egyptian clover
Green manure
Mulching
Compost
Rotations, etc.
B. Enhanced pest regulation:
Crop diversity
Cultural practices
Pesticides
Habitat modification
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 14
CHAPTER 2: SOIL
Soil plays a vital role in a cropping system. Currently, soil in Afghanistan is suffering under the
existing management system. The soil will be analyzed for fertility before planting, and
reanalyzed after each crop rotation at the newly established AWATT Program soils lab in
Chaparhar district to determine chemical and physical properties.
Salt-contaminated soil in Balkh Province. Salt-contaminated soil in Balkh Province.
Compacted soil with low infiltration rate as a result of salt accumulation on soil surfaces.
The study ―Building Soil Fertility and Tilth with Cover Crops‖ by Marianne Sarrantonio, SARE,
2010, describes soil as an incredibly complex substance. It has physical and chemical properties
that allow it to sustain living organisms—not just plant roots and earthworms, but hundreds of
thousands of different insects, wormlike creatures and microorganisms. When these organisms
are in balance, soil cycles nutrients efficiently, stores water and drains the excess, and maintains
an environment in which plants can thrive.
To recognize that a soil can be healthy or unhealthy, one has only to think of the soil as a living
entity. It breathes, it transports and transforms nutrients, it interacts with its environment, and
it can even purify itself and grow over time. If one views soil as a dynamic part of any farming
system, unsustainable crop management practices amount to soil neglect, which sickens the soil
and causes it to lose life functions one by one.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 15
Compacted soil with low infiltration rate after rice is farmed in Baglan Province,
November, 2009.
Regardless of how healthy or alive the soil is right now, Egyptian clover as a cover crop can play
a vital role in ensuring that the soil provides a strong foundation for a farming system. While
the most common reasons for including Egyptian clover crop in a farming system may relate to
the immediate short-term need, the continued practice of planting Egyptian clover becomes an
investment in building healthy soil over the long term.
Egyptian clover improves soil in a number of ways. Protection against soil loss from erosion is
perhaps the most obvious soil benefit of cover crops, but providing organic matter is a more
long-term and equally important goal. Cover crops contribute indirectly to overall soil health by
catching nutrients before they can leach out of the soil profile or, in the case of legumes, by
adding nitrogen to the soil. Their roots can even help unlock some nutrients, converting them
to more available forms. Cover crops provide habitat or a food source for some important soil
organisms, break up compacted layers in the soil and help dry out wet soils.
ADDITION OF ORGANIC MATTER
The benefits of organic matter include improved soil structure, increased infiltration and water-
holding capacity, increased cation exchange capacity (the ability of the soil to act as a short-
term storage bank for positively charged plant nutrients) and more efficient long-term storage
of nutrients. Without organic matter, there is no soil to speak of, only a dead mixture of
ground-up and weathered rocks.
Organic matter includes thousands of different substances derived from decayed leaves, roots,
microorganisms, manure and even groundhogs that died in their burrows. These substances
function in different ways to build healthy soil. Different plants leave behind different kinds of
organic matter as they decompose, so the choice of cover crop will largely determine which
soil benefits will develop.
There is a portion in soil that can be called the ―active‖ portion and one that might be called
the ―stable‖ portion, which is roughly equivalent to humus. The active fraction represents the
most easily decomposed parts of soil organic matter. It tends to be rich in simple sugars and
proteins and consists largely of recently added fresh residues, microbial cells and the simpler
waste products from microbial decay.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 16
In general, annual legumes are succulent. They release nitrogen and other nutrients quickly
through the active fraction, and long-term use of annual legumes (Egyptian clover) can increase
soil humus. Perennial legumes such as alfalfa may fall in both categories—its leaves will break
down quickly, but their stems and root systems may become tough and fibrous and can
contribute to humus accumulation.
Organic matter builds up very slowly in the soil. A soil with 3 % organic matter might only
increase to 4 % after a decade or more of soil building. The benefits of increased organic
matter, however, are likely to be apparent long before increased quantities are detectable.
Some, such as enhanced aggregation and increased water infiltration rates and nutrient release
will be apparent the first season; others may take several years to become noticeable.
Animal Manure
Animal manure is important for soil fertility, water holding capacity and productivity.
Animal Manure at Kefayt Dairy Farm in Mazar on May 10, 2010.
COVER CROPS CAN STABILIZE SOIL
The more you use cover crops (Egyptian clover), the better your soil health will be, research
continues to show. One reason is that cover crops, especially legumes, encourage populations
of beneficial fungi and other microorganisms that help bind soil aggregates.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 17
COVER CROPS PROVIDE MORE THAN NITROGEN CYCLING
Cover crops (Egyptian clover) help bring other nutrients back into the upper soil profile from
deep soil layers. Calcium and potassium are two macronutrients with a tendency to travel with
water, though not generally on the express route with N. These nutrients can be brought up
from deeper soil layers by any deep-rooted cover crop. The nutrients are then released back
into the active organic matter when the cover crop dies and decomposes.
LEGUMINOUS COVER CROPS CAN ADD NITROGEN THROUGH NODULATION
One of nature‘s most gracious gifts to plants and soil is the way that legumes, with the help of
rhizobial bacteria, can add nitrogen to enrich soil.
With the help of nitrogen-fixing bacteria, legume cover crops can supply some or all of the
nitrogen needed by succeeding crops. This nitrogen-producing team can‘t do the job right
unless the correct bacterial inoculant is matched with your legume cover crop species. Only
particular strains of rhizobia provide optimum nitrogen production for each group of legumes. If
legume roots don‘t encounter their ideal bacterial match, they work with the best strains they
can find, but they do not work as efficiently together and they produce less nitrogen.
Like other plants, legumes need nitrogen to grow. They can take it from the soil if enough is
present in forms they can use. Legume roots also seek out specific strains of soil-dwelling
bacteria that can ―fix‖ nitrogen gas from the air for use by the plant. While many kinds of
bacteria compete for space on legume roots, the root tissues will only begin this symbiotic
nitrogen-fixing process when they encounter a specific species of rhizobium bacteria. Only
particular strains of rhizobia provide optimum nitrogen production for each group of legumes.
Egyptian clover is a heavy nitrogen producer and the least winter-hardy of all true annual
clovers. This makes it an ideal legume cover before corn or other nitrogen-demanding crops in
Afghanistan. Egyptian clover draws down soil nitrogen early in its cycle. Once soil reserves are
used up, it can fix 100 to 200 lb N/acre or more.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 18
CHAPTER 3: IRRIGATION
We will determine the yield per unit of water and land. This will include laser leveling, raised
bed and advanced canal systems, scheduled irrigation, crop water requirements, and calculating
the amount of water irrigation delivered to each crop on the farm.
The study ―Integrated Water Management‖ by ASA-CSSA-SSSA (November 4, 2009 –
Pittsburgh, PA) reported that irrigation water management is an integral part of a complete
farm management program of soil, water, air, plant, and animal resources. The assessment will
enable the increased understanding needed to evaluate and implement alternative best
management practices for irrigation water management. Considering how the farm fits into
broader watershed management is also essential to problem-posing and solving for resource
management success.
The AWATT project provides technical assistance for producers in:
Cropland conservation;
Irrigation water management (e.g. installation of irrigation water management practices,
water measuring, irrigation scheduling, irrigation system design, reduced cultivation);
Nutrient management (e.g. soil, water, and plant nutrient analysis, developing basic
nutrient budgets, and determining appropriate fertilizer and manure applications);
Agronomic-related practices and management such as reduced tillage, crop rotations,
green manure crops, salinity and pest management, and wildlife conservation.
Irrigation water management is the process of determining and controlling the volume,
frequency, and application rate of irrigation water in a planned, efficient manner. The primary
purpose of this assessment is to evaluate and implement alternative best management practices
for irrigation water management within an integrated system, with the end result being a more
economical, sustainable, and producer-acceptable farming enterprise.
We hope that the water users will be able to reduce water quantities used, energy use and
costs for crop production, and the opportunity for ground and surface water contamination.
The greater the understanding we have of our soil, water, and plant resources, the better will
be our ability to manage all of our natural resources.
POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF IRRIGATION WATER MANAGEMENT
Water resources:
Conserves surface and ground water supplies;
Protects surface and ground water quality;
Substantial reduction in irrigation labor costs;
Significant increase in irrigation application efficiencies (higher yields);
Reduced pumping costs;
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 19
Potential detrimental effects of water quality (pH, salinity & sodium) on plants and soils
are properly assessed and managed;
Irrigation water losses through evaporation, runoff and deep percolation are minimized.
Soil resources:
Improved soil quality is possible because of increased biomass production (more crop
residues are produced);
Reduced soil erosion from both water and wind;
Proper assessment, management and prevention of saline, saline-sodic and sodic soils is
attained;
Reduced use of soil amendments;
Reduction in water-logged soils;
Reduced leaching resulting in higher nitrogen-use efficiency.
Land laser leveling and water turnouts in Nangarhar Province; they are important for proper farm water
management.
Plant resources:
Cost for crop production is reduced due to integration of IWM with nutrient
management practices;
Significant increases in yield and crop quality;
Reduced incidences of diseases and pests;
Available water quantity and quality meet the specific requirements of the crop
(consumptive use, leaching) (Rudy Garcia, 2008).
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 20
CHAPTER 4: CROP ROTATION
We will implement a new two-year rotation system in which wheat and Egyptian clover are
planted in the winter, while rice, corn, forage cowpea, soybean, pearl millet, and Sudan grass
are planted in the summer.
The study "Crop Rotations for Increased Productivity‖ by Michael D. Peel (January 1998)
defined crop rotation as a planned order of specific crops planted on the same field. Crop
rotation also means that succeeding crops are of a different genus, species, subspecies, or
variety than the previous crop.
The planned rotation sequence may be for a two- or three-year period, or longer. The general
purposes of rotations are to improve or maintain soil fertility, reduce erosion, reduce the build-
up of pests, spread the workload, reduce risk of weather damage, reduce reliance on
agricultural chemicals, and increase net profits.
CONSERVATION CROP ROTATION
This practice involves growing various crops on the same piece of land in a planned sequence.
This sequence may involve growing high residue producing crops such as corn or wheat in
rotation with low residue producing crops such as vegetables or soybeans. The rotation may
also involve growing forage crops in rotation with various field crops.
PRACTICAL FUNCTIONALITY
The effect crop rotations have on the land varies with the soil type, crops produced, farming
operations, and how the crop residue is managed. The most effective crops for soil
improvement are fibrous rooted high residue producing crops such as grass and small grain.
Perennial plants used for forage are very effective in crop rotations due to increases in organic
matter and reduced soil erosion. In addition, crop rotations help break insect, disease and weed
cycles.
Rotations add diversity to farm operations and often reduce economic and environmental risks.
Crop rotation is a low-cost practice that often forms the basis for other conservation practices.
Practices such as residue management, contouring, strip-cropping, diversions, terraces, and
waterways may not function properly without planned crop rotation.
Crop rotations have fallen out of favor because they require additional planning and
management skills, increasing the complexity of farming. Solid-seeded crops such as small grains
and flax have predominated in the past, but row crops such as sunflower, pinto bean, corn, and
soybean provide additional planting options and good reasons for crop rotations.
Rotating to a different crop such as barley in place of wheat usually results in higher grain yields
when compared to continuous cropping of wheat. Even greater benefits are usually obtained by
rotating two distinctly unrelated crops, such as a small grain seeded into land where the
previous crop was a legume such as Egyptian clover or other herbaceous dicot such as flax or
sunflower.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 21
Some of the more important beneficial effects that can be obtained from a well-planned crop
rotation are:
Reduced insect and disease problems;
Beneficial residual herbicide carryover;
Improved soil fertility;
Improvements in soil tilth and aggregate stability;
Soil water management;
Reduction of runoff and soil erosion;
Reduction of allelopathic or autotoxic effects;
Reduced reliance on chemicals;
Better moisture efficiency;
Higher yields;
Improved aesthetics and wildlife habitats.
PEST CONTROL
Pest control is often an important reason for crop rotation. Rotations can be used to prevent
or partially control several pests and reduce the reliance on chemical and mechanical control. A
combination of crop rotation and pesticides is often more effective in reducing pest populations
to economic levels than pesticides alone.
DISEASE CONTROL
Crop rotation has tremendous potential for reducing and often preventing the transmission of
disease. Disease pressures change with changing environmental conditions. Crop rotation, in
combination with mechanical or biological control practices and fungicides, is the most
desirable method of disease control.
INSECT CONTROL
Insect populations may increase in a region where only one or two crops are continuously
grown in contrast to a region where several crops are grown in rotation. Insects such as corn
borer, sunflower seed, and stem weevil and many others readily migrate to nearby or distant
fields. Therefore, only partial control can be obtained by rotation. Increasing field isolation from
fields seeded to the same crop the previous year will often increase the effectiveness of crop
rotation as an insect control method.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 22
WEED CONTROL
Rotations can be used to cause shifts in weed populations. Populations of certain weed species
can be suppressed by competition from the crop raised or by the selective use of herbicides.
Wild mustard populations can be reduced by selective treatment of small grain grown in
rotation with row crops. Grass weed populations, often a problem in small grains, can be
reduced by the rotation with Egyptian clover.
Herbicides can have both beneficial and harmful residual effects on the next crop. Therefore,
planning the correct sequence of herbicide use together with crop selection has become a
necessary part of rotation management.
Aggressive weeds in wheat field in Baghlan Province, May 25, 2010.
SOIL NITROGEN
Legumes in the rotation can be used to increase the available soil nitrogen. Symbiotic nitrogen-
fixing bacteria called rhizobia form nodules on the roots of legume plants and convert or fix
atmospheric nitrogen to organic nitrogen. The amount of nitrogen fixed varies with species,
available soil nitrogen, and many other factors. Fixed nitrogen not removed from the land by
harvest becomes available to succeeding crops as the legume tissues undergo microbial
decomposition. When the legume crop is seeded, rhizobia inoculum should always be applied
to the seed to ensure the most productive commercial strains are available to form nodules
and that inoculating bacteria are always present. Even though indigenous bacteria may be
present in the soil, research shows improved commercial strains of rhizobia have more capacity
to fix nitrogen.
SOIL TILTH AND STRUCTURE
Many farmers who rotate crops comment on the improvement in tilth or friability of soil
following soybean or other row crops. In a study involving corn, sugar beet, and barley planted
in succeeding years, soil aggregate stability was increased from 67 to 76 % when three years of
alfalfa were added to the rotation. Increased aggregate stability reduces the tendency of the soil
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 23
to puddle or crust, increases the rate of water infiltration under certain conditions, and may
also reduce wind erosion.
SOIL MOISTURE
Crop rotation can lead to greater overall efficiency in soil water utilization. Spring-seeded small
grains usually deplete soil water 3 to 4 feet deep. In contrast, sunflower, safflower, corn, and
sugar beet are deep-rooted crops, which can deplete soil water to depths of 5 to 6 feet.
Therefore, deep-rooted crops such as sunflower following small grains can take advantage of
the extra reserve of deep moisture and any nitrogen that was positionally unavailable to a
shallow-rooted crop.
Alfalfa and sweet clover, also deep-rooted crops, can be used to dry up saline seeps and other
wet areas. Depletion of soil water in saline areas prevents the accumulation of salts on the
surface, permits movement of the salts downward by leaching, and allows re-cropping to a cash
crop such as wheat.
REDUCTION OF SOIL EROSION
Crop rotations combined with recommended tillage practices can play an important role in
reducing wind and water erosion. Solid seeded crops such as small grains provide more
protection against water erosion than row crops. Permanent crops such as hay or pasture
provide even more protection against erosion. Management of crops to provide sufficient
residue throughout the year is essential for satisfactory control of both wind and water
erosion. No-till or minimum till farming is highly desirable as a conservation practice, but crop
rotation must be used to reduce the build-up of insects, disease and weed pests.
ALLELOPATHY
The reasons for improved yields from crop rotations are not completely understood. Research
has attempted to reveal some of the unknown factors. Allelopathy refers to plant material or
chemicals derived from these materials which inhibit the germination, growth or development
of another species. Autotoxicity refers to plant material that inhibits the germination, growth
and development of the same species. Legumes such as alfalfa, while often beneficial to non-
related species, exhibit autotoxic effects to alfalfa seedlings. Research in Illinois indicated older
stands caused greater inhibition of new seedlings. This study indicated that one year without
alfalfa was sufficient to nullify the detrimental effects of the alfalfa.
MONITORING AND POSSIBLE REDESIGN OF ROTATION
The implementation phase will likely reveal the need for additional adjustments to the plan. The
effectiveness of the rotation must be monitored against the goals of the plan, changes in the
needs of the overall farm management and marketing strategy, and the rotation guidelines
suggested earlier.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 24
CHAPTER 5: FORAGE LEGUME
We will introduce Egyptian clover, which has high nitrogen fixing, high-yield capacity of up to
five cuts per winter season, high nutritional value for livestock, a deep root system, increases
soil fertility, and improves soil properties.
Egyptian clover is a crop of ancient cultivation in Egypt (landrace) where it is a major winter
crop; from there it was introduced to Sindh-Pakistan in the early years of the twentieth
century. It was well-adapted to the conditions and farming systems of the irrigated subcontinent
and spread rapidly throughout northern India (Roberts & Singh, 1951). It is now the major
cultivated fodder crop on millions of hectares; it has been the most rapid spread of a fodder in
recent times and is all the more notable for being mainly under smallholder conditions. It is also
grown in the USA, and in parts of southern Europe as both a winter and summer crop.
Egyptian clover and/or Berseem clover (Trifolium alexandrinum) is a summer annual or winter
annual legume. It is the most important forage legume in Egypt; it is cultivated as a major crop
in all rural areas of the country. In Egypt, it is a winter forage legume crop and considered the
major feed for livestock during the winter and spring seasons. It plays an important role in the
suppression of weeds and erosion prevention, provides high nutritional values for livestock,
produces green manure, improves soil fertility, and provides chopped forage and grazing.
It is a fast-growing summer annual; Egyptian clover can produce up to 18 tons per jerib of fresh
green forage from five cuts under irrigation in Afghanistan. It is a heavy producer of nitrogen
and the least winter-hardy of all true annual clovers. It draws down soil nitrogen early in its
cycle. Once soil reserves are used up, it can fix 23 to 45 kilograms of nitrogen per jerib or
more. It becomes well established quickly, making it an excellent cover for crop rotation in
Afghanistan with wheat or barley in winter or with corn, pearl millet, vegetables, and Sudan
grass in summer.
Egyptian clover is the fertility foundation of agriculture in the Nile Delta of Egypt, and has
nourished soils in the Mediterranean region as a green manure for thousands of years. At 16
C°, Egyptian clover will be ready to cut approximately 60 days after planting, and produces up
to 200 Kg seed/Jerib if it is left to mature.
Forage legumes are very important
Egyptian clover is the major winter forage legume in Egypt. This highly nutritional and nitrogen-fixing crop has
been introduced to Afghanistan by AWATT to break the cycle of wheat/rice crop rotation and to provide high-
quality feed for livestock.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 25
CHAPTER 6: INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK FARMING SYSTEM
We will provide fencing, shading, and structures made from local materials. We will suggest purchasing
compatible breeds, provide temporary grain sources, and establish a livestock marketing system.
Large livestock (cows) looking for feed.
Small ruminants graze in upper watershed areas in Samangan Province, May 2009. Such overgrazing will
destroy the upper watershed habitats.
A study published by IFAD in January 2009 indicated that integrated crop-livestock systems
within the FRM system are a method of diversifying a farm for improved long-term
sustainability. Such a system has been shown to be beneficial to soil parameters that improve
soil quality.
Animals are important components of any healthy
agricultural production systems. Animals drafting in Afghanistan, May 25, 2010
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 26
The increasing pressure on land and the growing demand for livestock products makes it more
and more important to ensure the effective use of feed resources, including crop residues. An
integrated farming system consists of a range of resource-saving practices. It will aim to achieve
acceptable profits and high and sustained production levels, while minimizing the negative
effects of intensive farming and preserving the environment.
Based on the principle of enhancing natural biological processes above and below the ground,
the integrated system represents a winning combination that:
Reduces erosion;
Increases crop yields, biological soil activity and nutrient recycling;
Intensifies land use, improving profits;
Can therefore help reduce poverty and malnutrition and strengthen Environmental
sustainability (IFAD, January 2009).
DIVERSIFIED VS. INTEGRATED SYSTEMS
Diversified systems consist of components such as crops and livestock that coexist
independently from each other (FAO, 2001). In a diversified system, integrating crops and
livestock serves primarily to minimize risk and not to recycle resources. In an integrated
system, crops and livestock interact to create a synergy, with recycling allowing the maximum
use of available resources. Crop residues can be used for animal feed, while livestock and
livestock by-product production and processing can enhance agricultural productivity by
intensifying nutrients that improve soil fertility, reducing the use of chemical fertilizers.
Integrated
Crop-- Livestock
Farming System
Figure 1 Key aspects of an integrated crop-livestock farming system.
Nutrient
Cycling
Forage
Crops
Livestock
Production
Crop
Residues
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 27
A high integration of crops and livestock is often considered a step forward, but small farmers
need to have sufficient access to knowledge, assets, and inputs to manage this system in a way
that is economically and environmentally sustainable over the long term.
ADVANTAGES AND CONSTRAINTS OF THE SYSTEM
Advantages
In an integrated system, livestock and crops are produced within a coordinated framework. The
waste products of one component serve as a resource for the other. For example, manure is
used to enhance crop production; crop residues and by-products feed the animals,
supplementing often inadequate feed supplies and contributing to improved animal nutrition and
productivity.
The result of this cyclical combination is the mixed farming system, which exists in many forms
and represents the largest category of livestock system in the world in terms of animal
numbers, productivity, and the number of people it serves.
Animals play key and multiple roles in the functioning of the farm, and not only because they
provide livestock products (meat, milk, eggs, wool, and hides) or can be converted into prompt
cash in times of need. Animals transform plant energy into useful work: animal power is used
for plowing, transport and in activities such as milling, logging, road construction, marketing, and
water lifting for irrigation.
Animals also provide manure and other types of animal waste. Excreta has two crucial roles in
the overall sustainability of the system:
Improving nutrient cycling:
Excreta contains several nutrients (including nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) and organic
matter, all important for maintaining soil structure and fertility. Through its use, production is
increased while the risk of soil degradation is reduced.
Providing energy:
Excreta is the basis for the production of biogas and energy for household use (e.g. cooking,
lighting) or for rural industries (e.g. powering mills and water pumps). Fuel in the form of biogas
or dung cakes can replace charcoal and wood.
Crop residues represent the other pillar on which the equilibrium of this system rests. They are
fibrous by-products that result from the cultivation of cereals, pulses, oil plants, roots and
tubers. They are a valuable, low-cost feed resource for animal production, and are
consequently the major source of nutrients for livestock in developing countries.
The overall benefits of crop-livestock integration can be summarized as follows:
Agronomic: Through the retrieval and maintenance of the soil‘s productive capacity;
Economic: Through product diversification and higher yields and quality at less cost;
Ecological: Through the reduction of crop pests (less pesticide use and better soil
erosion control);
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 28
Social: Through the reduction of rural-urban migration and the creation of new job
opportunities in rural areas;
The system has other specific advantages:
It helps improve and conserve the productive capacities of soils, with physical, chemical
and biological soil recuperation. Animals play an important role in harvesting and
relocating nutrients, significantly improving soil fertility and crop yields;
It is quick, efficient and economically viable because grain crops can be produced in four
to six months, and forage formation after cropping is rapid and inexpensive;
It helps increase profits by reducing production costs. Poor farmers can use fertilizer
from livestock operations, especially when rising petroleum prices make chemical
fertilizers unaffordable;
It results in greater soil water storage capacity, mainly because of biological aeration and
the increase in the level of organic matter;
It provides diversified income sources, guaranteeing a buffer against trade, price and
climate fluctuations.
Constraints:
Nutritional values of crop residues are generally low in digestibility and protein content.
Improving intake and digestibility of crop residues by physical and chemical treatments is
technically possible but not feasible for poor small farmers because they require
machinery and chemicals that are expensive or not readily available.
Crop residues are primarily soil regenerators, but too often they are either disregarded
or misapplied.
Intensive recycling can cause nutrient losses.
If manure nutrient use efficiencies are not improved or properly applied, the import of
nutrients in feeds and fertilizers will remain high, as will the costs and energy needs for
production and transportation, and the surpluses will be lost in the environment.
Farmers prefer to use chemical fertilizer instead of manure because it acts faster and is
easier to use.
Resource investments are required to improve intake and digestibility of crop residues.
Mixed farms are prone to using more manure than crop farms do. Manure transportation is an
important factor affecting manure use.
Challenges:
1. To develop strategies and promote crop-livestock synergies and interactions that aim to:
Integrate crops and livestock effectively with careful land use;
Raise the productivity of specific mixed crop-livestock systems;
Facilitate expansion of food production; and
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 29
Simultaneously safeguard the environment with prudent and efficient use of natural
resources.
2. To devise measures (for instance, facilitating large-scale dissemination of biodigesters) to
implement a more efficient use of biomass, reducing pressures on natural resources; and
develop a sustainable livestock manure management system to control environmental losses
and contaminant spreading.
KEY PRINCIPLES
Cyclic
The farming system is essentially cyclic (organic resources – livestock – land – crops).
Therefore, management decisions related to one component may affect the others.
Rational
Using crop residues more rationally is an important route out of poverty. For resource-poor
farmers, the correct management of crop residues, together with an optimal allocation of
scarce resources, leads to sustainable production.
Ecologically Sustainable
Combining ecological sustainability and economic viability, the integrated livestock-farming
system maintains and improves agricultural productivity while also reducing negative
environmental impacts.
LESSONS LEARNED AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The maintenance of an integrated crop-livestock system is dependent on the availability
of adequate nutrients to sustain animals and plants and maintain soil fertility. Animal
manure alone cannot meet crop requirements, even if it does contain the kind of
nutrients needed because of its relatively low nutrient density and the limited quantity
available to small-scale farmers. Alternative sources for the nutrients need to be found.
Growing fodder legumes and using them as a supplement to crop residue is the most
practical and cost-effective method for improving the nutritional value of crop residues.
This combination is also effective in reducing weight loss in animals, particularly during
dry periods;
Given their traditional knowledge and experience, local farmers are perfectly capable of
applying an integrated system. In practice, however, relatively few adopt this system,
mainly because they have limited access to credit, technology and knowledge. The crop-
pasture rotation system is complex and requires a substantial capital outlay for
machinery and implements. Associations of grain and livestock producers are useful for
filling these gaps and can promote the adoption of a crop-livestock system;
Veterinary services are generally unable to reach poor small farmers in remote areas.
Therefore, for livestock production to be improved, more attention needs to be paid to
making veterinary care accessible, particularly in terms of prevention;
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 30
Better livestock management is needed to safeguard water. Livestock water demand
includes water for drinking and for feed production and processing. Livestock also have
an impact on water, contaminating it with manure and urine. All of these aspects need
to be given due consideration.
Intensification of agriculture through appropriate incorporation of small livestock has
the potential to decrease the land needed for agricultural production and relieve the
pressure on upper watershed areas, forests and rangelands.
Horses graze pearl millet (Shandawel-1 variety) at Kefayt Dairy
Farm in Mazar-e-Sharif, November 1, 2010.
KEY ISSUES/QUESTIONS FOR PROJECT DESIGN
The increase in demand for livestock products presents opportunities for small farmers who
can increase livestock production and benefit from related income. However, in terms of
environmental impact, the growing number of livestock and the increase in livestock processing
can have a negative impact on natural resources unless actions are taken to identify farming
practices that are economically and ecologically sustainable. Thanks to the dynamic interaction
of its various components, the highly improved integrated crop-livestock system can guarantee
more sustainable production and therefore constitutes a valid new approach.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 31
Camels and dairy cattle graze pearl millet (Shandawel-1 variety) at Kefayt Dairy Farm in Mazar-e-Sharif,
November 1, 2010.
Experience in the use of this system has shown that:
Adopting sustainable management practices can improve production while preserving
the environment;
Residues, wastes and by-products of each component serve as resources for the others;
Poor farmers have the traditional knowledge needed to integrate livestock and crop
production, but because of their limited access to knowledge, assets and inputs,
relatively few adopt an integrated system.
The challenge for development practitioners is to ensure that poor small farmers can increase
the productivity of traditional farming systems, adopting an effective integrated system that
produces usable biomass while conserving natural resources, and can therefore be sustainable
in the long term.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 32
CHAPTER 7: RURAL COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
Local communities, village leaders, district governors, DAIL, extension workers, USAID, and
ADT will participate and contribute during the transition to the new system.
DEFINITIONS
The FAO Informal Working Group on Participatory Approaches and Methods (IWG) provides
some useful definitions in a web site dedicated to participatory project formulation.
With regard to rural development … participation includes people's involvement in decision-
making processes, in implementing programs, their sharing in the benefits of development
programs and their involvement in efforts to evaluate such programs (Cohen and Uphof, 1977).
Participation is concerned with . . . the organized efforts to increase control over resources and
regulative institutions in given social situations on the part of groups and movements of those
hitherto excluded from such control (Pearse and Stifel, 1979).
Participation can be seen as a process of empowerment of the deprived and the excluded. This
view is based on the recognition of differences in political and economic power among different
social groups and classes. Participation in this sense necessitates the creation of organizations of
the poor which are democratic, independent and self-reliant (Ghai, 1990).
Participatory development stands for partnership which is built upon the basis of dialogue
among the various actors, during which the agenda is jointly set, and local views and indigenous
knowledge are deliberately sought and respected. This implies negotiation rather than the
dominance of an externally set project agenda. Thus people become actors instead of being
beneficiaries (OECD, 1994).
Participation is a process through which stakeholders influence and share control over
development initiatives and the decisions and resources which affect them (World Bank, 1994).
The IWG uses elements of these descriptions to provide its own definition as:
… A process of equitable and active involvement of all stakeholders in the formulation of
development policies and strategies and in the analysis, planning and implementation, and
monitoring and evaluation of development activities. To allow for a more equitable development
process, disadvantaged stakeholders need to be empowered to increase their level of
knowledge, influence and control over their own livelihoods, including development initiatives
affecting them.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 33
CHAPTER 8: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE FRM
We will monitor and evaluate the lower watershed models in terms of:
Soil fertility and properties;
Yield performance;
Water irrigation and consumption;
Forage production and livestock feeding system;
Manure production and recycling;
Economic returns; and
Socioeconomic analysis.
FRM MODEL IN THE LOWER WATERSHED AREAS OF NANGARHAR
Work Plan
1. The USG team and DAIL are in the planning stages to roll out Farm Resource Management
(FRM) in Nangarhar.
2. Once successful results are realized, this can be replicated in other provinces and regions.
Site selection
1. Pilot villages will be selected in the following districts: Chaparhar, Kama and Behsood of
Nangarhar.
2. A number of farmers will be selected to participate in the program.
Basic criteria for farmers’ selection
1. Willingness to follow the advice of AWATT/DAIL extension staff on different practices;
2. Ownership of livestock;
3. Willingness to sign an agreement with DAIL to continue with the program based on
established criteria;
4. Ability and willingness to invest their own money for 25% of the project as an indication of
commitment and ownership of the program.
Soil analysis of the selected plots
1. Soil analysis of the selected plots will be carried out in the DAIL Shisham Bagh soil lab;
2. Efforts would be made to restore any soil deficiencies before planting.
Agricultural inputs
1. The selected plots would be laser leveled;
2. An improved and certified variety of wheat would be planted using seed drill;
3. Recommendations from the soil analysis report would be followed for the type and quantity
of fertilizers required;
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 34
4. Egyptian clover would be planted on plots where wheat and other crops had been grown in
the past;
5. Growth, number of cuts, health of animals and milk production would be monitored to
assess benefits as compared to traditional forages;
6. Irrigation of the plots would be carefully monitored throughout the season.
Roles and responsibilities:
1. The project owner is DAIL and as such they will participate with their extension and
research system during the implementation and evaluation phases;
2. DAIL will monitor and evaluate the socioeconomic, soil, water, and crop yields;
3. DAIL will have the final say on where the farms will be established;
4. DAIL will have primary responsibility for community integration as well as follow- up with
the community in all matters;
5. Program organizational leadership will be provided by USAID-OAG, although all activities
are team-oriented.
6. The ADT will provide the following:
Fencing, shading areas, and feeding facilities;
High-quality Egyptian clover, wheat and rice seeds;
A training facility to disseminate knowledge about the FRM model in Nangarhar,
including improvement of irrigation and agronomic practices.
7. USDA will provide technical support to:
ADT and USAID; and
Will work with the DAIL to help them achieve best practices.
8. AWATT is the lead implementing partner and subject matter expert. They will:
Lead the project from a technical and implementation standpoint;
Interact with all parties to include the farmers;
Provide on-the-job training of DAIL staff and selected farmers in the field, an integral
part of the plan.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 35
CHAPTER 9: FARM ENTERPRISE
INTRODUCTION
In 2010, the FAO reported that farmers are intensifying existing patterns of production and
diversifying their farm enterprises in an attempt to improve their livelihoods. Technical know-
how is not enough. In order to be competitive and take advantage of the new opportunities
that are arising, farmers increasingly have to adapt their farm business to market changes and
improve efficiency, profitability and income.
The desire to increase income by taking advantage of market opportunities requires farmers to
become better decision makers and better at competing in a new environment. The emphasis
on the competitive market calls for better farm management skills. Marketing and farm
management have rapidly gained predominance globally over the last two decades. Farm
business management skills and knowledge is recognized as important for farmers to effectively
respond to present day farming challenges. Farm management advice helps farmers to make the
right choice between crop enterprises according to individual levels of financial, labor and land
endowments and at their level of risk adversity. As farmers become more market-oriented,
extension needs are changing and extension workers and farmers face new challenges in
providing appropriate advice.
As a response to these changes, the service has been involved in providing strategic guidance to
policy makers and program managers in farm management extension, developing training
approaches and materials for improving farm management skills of extension workers and
farmers and provide guidance to policy makers and extension workers on farm data collection,
analysis and dissemination. Close internal partnership is also maintained with other services in
the Rural Infrastructure and Agro Industries Division, as well as with other divisions and
services in FAO.
DIVERSIFICATION OF FARM ENTERPRISES AND THE INCREASED NEED TO
PRODUCE FOR THE MARKET
The farming population in Afghanistan is largely made up of small-scale farmers who cultivate
most of the agricultural land. These farmers cultivate small plots and have a limited supply of
family labor and access to credit. As a result of these structural difficulties, farm incomes are
low.
The decrease in farm income among rice/wheat producers in Afghanistan due to the declining
productivity has triggered a change toward farm diversification. Afghan farmers need to
diversify their farming system into mixed crop-livestock systems and shift production from
staple crops to higher value commodities. In order to improve farm income, farmers require
knowledge of market trends and opportunities as well as the skills necessary to manage their
farm in an increasingly competitive environment.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 36
Grain Production (Rice)
Afghan Farmers processing their rice grain in Baglan Province, November, 2009.
Extension services provided by MAIL agencies in Afghanistan have traditionally focused on
technology transfer. They have consisted mainly of technical messages, such as agronomic
practices, pest and disease control, and water management. Farm management and agribusiness
need to be improved in Afghanistan.
NEED FOR IMPROVED MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS SKILLS TO INCREASE
PROFITS AND FARM INCOME
Farmers who possess the skills to manage their farms both efficiently and profitably and
respond to market changes will be in a better position to take advantage of existing
opportunities to increase income.
As producers, farmers require improved technologies and practices that lead to intensification
of agricultural production. But farmers must also have the capacity to respond to market
opportunities through diversification of farm enterprises (cropping activities, as well as
livestock, aquacultural and other non-crop activities).
Efforts must then be directed toward strengthening the capabilities of small farmers. They must
move from being simple producers to becoming efficient farm planners and managers involved
in commercial farming. The need to increase income by taking advantage of market
opportunities means farmers must be able to compete in this new environment. This is what is
meant by market-oriented farming.
DEFINITION OF A FARM
A farm consists of resources and enterprises; resources or factors of production are limited. A
farm is a piece of land on which a farm household undertakes agricultural activities as part of its
livelihood. In addition to the land itself, a farm may include structures erected on the land, such
as wells, irrigation channels, fences to control livestock, buildings to house livestock or to store
farm produce, and a house in which the farm family lives. The farm also includes the crops,
livestock and other enterprises that support the livelihood of the farm family. Some of the
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 37
operations conducted on the farm include the cultivation of fields, the tending of orchards and
vegetable gardens, the raising of livestock, as well as combinations of these activities.
In order to grow a crop or raise livestock, farmers need land and water, labor and capital.
These are called resources and sometimes ―factors of production.‖ Resources are limited and
farmers face problems of choice as to how to combine the resources they have in the best way
and at the lowest cost in order to increase their income.
Natural resources
These can be likened to ―gifts of nature.‖ They include land, water, soil and rainfall. These are
resources that do not come from ―human effort.‖ Land: a typical farm family may own or rent
some land for cultivation. Water: Farmers will have some access to water. These might be
springs, dams, wells and rivers or water collected from rainfall. This water may be on the land
used by the farmer or it may be from a communal source.
Labor resources
This is human effort. It is needed on all farms. Farmers may have three different sources of
labor:
Farm family (family labor),
Hired labor, or
Labor provided through cooperation between members of the community where the
farmer lives.
Capital resources
These are simply resources that are produced as a result of ―human effort.‖ Cash is used by
farmers both small and large. However, small-scale farmers often use very little cash capital in
farming. Most of the capital on their farms is found in kind. These include livestock, tools,
equipment, buildings, land improvement measures, as well as stocks of seed, fertilizer and
animal feed. Capital is an important resource for all farmers.
Resources have alternative uses
Farm resources have two characteristics:
They are scarce
They have alternative uses.
The quality and quantity of the resource, the techniques employed and the skills used in
obtaining the best possible combination all help to determine the quality and quantity of the
final product. They all contribute to production by acting together.
Understanding farm enterprises
Farm enterprises are the crop and livestock production activities associated with the farm.
These activities include the production of rice, wheat, clover, yams, corn, vegetables and
livestock.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 38
Generally a farm is made up of several enterprises. Each farm enterprise has its own inputs and
outputs. Inputs are the scarce resources used in the production process: the use of the land,
the labor of farmers and their families and any workers who may be hired, the mental effort put
into planning and managing, the seed for the crops and feed for animals, fertilizers, insecticides
and other supplies, tools and implements, and draught livestock or tractors. All the things that
go into agricultural production are inputs. The outputs are the crop and livestock products the
farm produces.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 39
CHAPTER 10: FARM MANAGEMENT
DEFINITION OF FARM MANAGEMENT
The farmer is both producer and manager. The role of the farmer is twofold. The farmer is at
the same time producer and manager. The first role of the farmer is to take care of plants and
livestock in order to produce useful products. For crops, this includes the preparation of the
seedbed, the sowing of the crop, the elimination of weeds, the management of soil moisture
and measures for the control of pests and diseases. For livestock this includes herding and
feeding, protection from disease, and where necessary provision of housing.
THE FARMER AS MANAGER NEEDS NEW SKILLS
Another of the farmer‘s roles is that of manager and decision-maker. Where the skills of
production are mostly physical, the skills of management are largely mental backed by will. They
involve making decisions or choices between alternatives. The decisions that farmers must
make as managers include choosing between different crops that might be planted in each field,
choosing the livestock to be kept on the farm, and deciding how to distribute available labor
time among different tasks, especially at times of the year when several tasks need to be carried
out concurrently. They also involve choices as to what and how many draught animals need to
be kept for work in the field.
As agriculture becomes more market-driven and commercial in nature, the farmer must
develop skills in buying and selling. Farmers must decide whether to purchase improved seeds,
fertilizers, pesticides and new implements. They must decide whether or not to employ
additional labor in farming. They must decide how much of each crop to be kept for home
consumption and how much to be sold. They must decide when to sell the produce and to
whom to sell.
Some common definitions of management include ―making decisions to increase profit,‖
―making efficient use of available resources,‖ ―using, managing and allocating resources.‖ Farm
management is about producing with limited available resources (e.g. land, labor and capital).
Farmers need to know how to combine these resources in the best possible way in order to
assure the best outcome. They require improved management skills to become more
competitive as farming becomes more market-driven. Farmers need to develop managerial skills
so that they are better equipped to take advantage of opportunities and to make their farms as
productive as possible while increasing profits.
Farm management takes time and work, and this is just as critical to success as the planting,
growing, harvesting and marketing of a crop or a livestock product. Good farmers need to
learn from their day-to-day experience and recognize their mistakes, become accountable for
their actions and be willing to change their thinking based on new information.
The common functions of management that help farmers deal with changes are shown in the
diagram and described below.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 40
FUNCTIONS OF FARM MANAGEMENT
1. Diagnosis
2. Planning
3. Implementing
4. Monitoring
5. Evaluation
Diagnosis involves analysis of the current situation of the farm and its enterprises and
identifying the constraints and opportunities to increase profitability and sustainability. It entails
analyzing the causes of problems and identifying ways of overcoming them. Diagnosis is
conducted for a single farm enterprise or alternatively for the whole farming operation.
Planning is considered the most fundamental and important principle. It entails deciding on a
course of action, formulating policy and procedure, and assessing the future physical and
financial performance for each enterprise and for the farm as a whole. Plans are prepared based
on resources available and on personal objectives.
Implementation includes the purchase of the inputs and materials necessary to put the plan
into effect and overseeing the process. This is a very important function within the farming
context because in dealing with crops and livestock, the farmer is faced with a large number of
daily decisions.
Monitoring and evaluation involves checking on the actions and progress achieved.
Monitoring implies not just scrutiny of the progress of some change in the farming pattern but
also checking on the whole system over time. Monitoring is a tool for evaluating the physical
and financial performance of the farm business. The results of monitoring are used as inputs in
making decisions about the day-to-day activities of the farm.
Plan
Implement
Monitor
Evaluate
Diagnose
Figure 2 Phases of Farm Management
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program 41
Evaluation is used to assess the outcomes and impact of the farm business. Evaluation involves
making comparisons of the farm business performance over time and between farms. The
results are used to identify strengths and weaknesses. The process is a cycle.
FURTHER READING
Green Manures for Organic Soil Improvement - Garden Organic Guide Booklet
Beds: Labor-Saving, Space-Saving, More Productive Gardening - Pauline Pears, HDRA/Search Press 1992
Soil Care and Management - Jo Readman, HDRA/Search Press 1991
The Vegetable Garden Displayed - Joy Larkcom, RHS 1992
Planning the Organic Vegetable Garden - Dick Kitto (Thorsons 1986)
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program v
SOURCES OF INFORMATION AND EXAMPLES OF BEST PRACTICE
Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. 1999. Animal Agriculture and Global
Food Supply. In Task Force Report, no. 135. Ames, Iowa: CAST.
Delgado, C., M. Rosegrant, H. Steinfeld, S. Ehui and C. Courbois. 1999. Livestock to
2020: The Next Food Revolution. Food, Agriculture and the Environment Discussion Paper 28,
Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2000. Small Ponds Make a
Big Difference: Integrating Fish with Crop and Livestock Farming. Rome: FAO.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2001. Mixed Crop-Livestock
Farming: A Review of Traditional Technologies based on Literature and Field Experience. Animal
Production and Health Papers 152. Rome: FAO.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2003. Integrated livestock-
fish farming systems. Rome: FAO.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2007. Tropical Crop-
Livestock Systems in Conservation Agriculture. The Brazilian Experience. Rome: FAO.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Bank Group.
2001. Farming Systems and Poverty: Improving Farmers' Livelihoods in a Changing World.
Rome: FAO.
International Fund for Agricultural Development. 2008. Improving Crop-Livestock
Productivity through Efficient Nutrient Management in Mixed Farming Systems of Semi-arid
West Africa. http://www.ifad.org/lrkm/tags/384.htm (accessed 8 May 2008).
International Fund for Agricultural Development. 2005. Integrated Crop-Livestock
Farming System, Burkina Faso. Rome: IFAD.
International Fund for Agricultural Development. Undated. Community Approach to
the Development of Integrated Crop/Livestock Production in the Low Rainfall Area.
http://www.ifad.org/lrkm/tans/3.htm (accessed February 2008).
International Livestock Centre for Africa.1998. Crop-Livestock Interactions. A Review of
Opportunities for Developing Integrated Models. Llangefni, United Kingdom: Stirling Thorne
Associates.
International Livestock Research Institute. 1996. Nutrient Cycling in Integrated
Rangeland/Cropland Systems of the Sahel. Niamey: ILRI, Sahelian Center.
AWATT Farm Resource Management Training Manual
Afghanistan Water, Agriculture and Technology Transfer Program vi
Keftasa, D. and International Livestock Centre for Africa. 1988. Role of Crop Residues
as Livestock Feed in Ethiopian Highlands. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop at the International
Conference Centre. Arusha, United Republic of Tanzania, 27-30 April 1987. Addis Ababa: ILCA.
Preston, T.R. and E. Murgueitio. 1992. Sustainable Intensive Livestock Systems for the
Humid Tropics. World Animal Review 72:2-8.
Van Keulen, H. and H. Schiere. 2004. Crop-Livestock Systems: Old Wine in New Bottles?
In New Directions for a Diverse Planet. Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress,
Brisbane, Australia, 26 September-October 2004.
http://www.cropscience.org.au/icsc2004/symposia/2/1/211_vankeulenh.htm
Miguel A. Altieri. 2005. An Agroecological Basis for Natural Resource Management Among
Poor Farmers in Fragile Lands. The International Development Research center.