EXHIBIT A
LETTER FROM HOLLYWOOD CITY MANAGER
EXHIBIT B
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF TOC BOUNDARIES
Prepared By: CALVIN, GIORDANO AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 600 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 February 11, 2010 P:\Projects\2010\103140 Hollywood TOC\Survey\Legal Descriptions\FINAL Hollywood TOC.docx
Sheet 1 of 17 Sheets
LAND DESCRIPTION TRANSIT ORIENTED CORRIDOR
CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
Portions of Sections 25 and 36 Township 50 South, Range 41 East and of Sections 1, 12, 13 and 24, Township 51 South, Range 41 East, all in Broward County, Florida and described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the East right-of-way line of State Road 7 as shown on State Road Department Right-of-Way Map Section 8610-108-202 and the South right-of-way line of South Fork New River Canal (260 foot right-of-way); Thence on the municipal limits of the City of Hollywood as described in Chapter 90-483, Laws of Florida, the following twenty-four (24) courses and distances:
1) Easterly on said South right-of-way line to the intersection with a line being parallel with and 200 feet East of the East right-of-way line of said State Road 7;
2) Southerly on said parallel line to the intersection with the North line of the South 525 feet of
Tract 29 of said Section 36 in “JOHN W. NEWMAN’S SURVEY”, as recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 26 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, also being the North line of Parcel A of “GRIFFIN-441 PLAZA”, as recorded in Plat Book 167, Page 20 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida;
3) Easterly on said North line to an intersection with the East line of said Tract 29, also being
the East line of said Parcel ‘A’;
4) Southerly on said East line to the North line of the South 150 feet of Tract 30 of said “JOHN W. NEWMAN’S SURVEY”, also being the North line of “MARLENE PLAZA”, as recorded in Plat Book 155, Page 3 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida;
5) Easterly on said North line to the intersection with the West line of the East 430 feet of said
Tract 30;
6) Northerly on said West line to the intersection with the North line of the South 188 feet of said Tract 30;
7) Easterly on said North line to the intersection with the East line of the West 115 feet of the
East 430 feet of said Tract 30;
8) Southerly on said East line and a Southerly prolongation thereof to the intersection with South line of said Section 25;
Prepared By: CALVIN, GIORDANO AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 600 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 February 11, 2010 P:\Projects\2010\103140 Hollywood TOC\Survey\Legal Descriptions\FINAL Hollywood TOC.docx
Sheet 2 of 17 Sheets
9) Westerly on said South line to the intersection with the Northerly prolongation of the East line of Block 2 of “PLAYLAND ISLES”, as recorded in Plat Book 37, Page 14 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida;
10) Southerly on said prolongation and said East line of Block 2 of and a Southerly prolongation
thereof to the intersection with centerline of Southwest 49th Court;
11) Westerly on said centerline to the intersection with a Northerly prolongation of the East line of Block 1 of said “PLAYLAND ISLES”;
12) Southerly on said Northerly prolongation and on said East Line of Block 1 to the Southwest
corner of said Lot 1, said Southwest corner lying on the North line of Block 1 of “BROWARD GARDENS”, as recorded in Plat Book 21, Page 48 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida;
13) Westerly on said North line to the Northeast corner of Lot 1 of said Block 1;
14) Southerly on the East line of Lots 1, 2, and 3 and the Southerly prolongation thereof and on
the East line of Lots 1, 2, 3, 28, 29 and 30 of Block 4 of said “BROWARD GARDENS” and the Southerly prolongation thereof to the intersection with the South line of Lot 6, Block 5 of said “BROWARD GARDENS”;
15) Westerly on said South line of Lot 6 to a point being 150 feet East of and parallel with the
East right-of-way line of said State Road 7;
16) Southerly on said parallel line to the intersection with the North line of Lot 1 of “R.W. CHAMBERS SUBDIVISION ADDITION NO. 1”, as recorded in Plat Book 108, Page 42 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida;
17) Easterly on said North line and on the North line of Lot 1 of “R.W. CHAMBERS
SUBDIVISION ADDITION NO.2”, as recorded in Plat Book 108, Page 43 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida to the Northeast corner of Lot 1 of “R.W. CHAMBERS SUBDIVISION ADDITION NO.2”;
18) Southerly on the East line of said Lot 1 and Lot 2 of said “R.W. CHAMBERS
SUBDIVISION ADDITION NO.2” to the Southeast corner of said Lot 2;
19) Westerly on the South line of said Lot 2 and the South line of Lot 2 of said “R.W. CHAMBERS SUBDIVISION ADDITION NO. 1” to the intersection with a line lying 150 feet East of and parallel with the Easterly right-of-way line of said State Road 7;
Prepared By: CALVIN, GIORDANO AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 600 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 February 11, 2010 P:\Projects\2010\103140 Hollywood TOC\Survey\Legal Descriptions\FINAL Hollywood TOC.docx
Sheet 3 of 17 Sheets
20) Southerly on said parallel line to the intersection with the North line of “ELLA’S LITTLE ACRES”, as recorded in Plat Book 34, Page 7 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida;
21) Easterly on said North line to the Northeast corner of Lot 3 of said “ELLA’S LITTLE
ACRES”;
22) Southerly on the East line of said Lot 3 and Southerly prolongation thereof to the intersection with the North line of Parcel A of “C & S SUBDIVISION”, as recorded in Plat Book 89 Page 40 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida;
23) Easterly on said North line to the Northeast corner of said Parcel A;
24) Southerly on the East line of said Parcel A and the East line of Parcel B and C of said “C &
S SUBDIVISION” to the Southeast corner of said Parcel C; Thence on the municipal limits of the City of Hollywood as described in City of Hollywood Ordinance Number 88-50 the following three (3) courses:
1) Easterly on the North line of Tract 15 of Section 36, Township 50 South, Range 41 East of said "JOHN W. NEWMAN SURVEY" to the Northeast corner of said Tract 15;
2) Southerly on said East line of Tract 15 to the intersection with the North line of "FRANCES
GROVE ESTATES", as recorded in Plat Book 26, Page 46 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida;
3) Westerly on said North line to the Northeast corner of Lot 34, Block 2 of said "FRANCES
GROVE ESTATES”; Thence Southerly on the East line of said Lot 34, and Lot 8, Block 2 of said "FRANCES GROVE ESTATES” to the Southeast corner of said Lot 8; Thence Southerly to the Northeast corner of the Northwest One-Quarter (NW ¼) of the Northeast One-Quarter (NE ¼) of said Section 1, Township 51 South, Range 41 East; Thence Southerly on the East line of said Northwest One-Quarter (NW ¼) of the Northeast One-Quarter (NE ¼) of said Section 1 to the Southeast corner of said Northwest One-Quarter (NW ¼) of the Northeast One-Quarter (NE ¼) of said Section 1; Thence Westerly on the South line of said Northwest One-Quarter (NW ¼) of the Northeast One-Quarter (NE ¼) of said Section 1 to the West line of said Northwest One-Quarter (NW ¼) of the Northeast One-Quarter (NE ¼) of said Section1;
Prepared By: CALVIN, GIORDANO AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 600 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 February 11, 2010 P:\Projects\2010\103140 Hollywood TOC\Survey\Legal Descriptions\FINAL Hollywood TOC.docx
Sheet 4 of 17 Sheets
Thence Northerly on said West line of said Northwest One-Quarter (NW ¼) of the Northeast One-Quarter (NE ¼) of said Section1 to the intersection with the North line of said Section 1; Thence Easterly on said North line of Section 1 to the intersection with the Southerly prolongation of the West line of Tract ‘A’, of the “MIRO CORNERS”, as recorded in Plat Book 148, Page 29 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida; Thence Northerly on said Southerly prolongation and on the West line of said Tract ‘A’ to the intersection with the South line of Tract ‘F’, of said “MIRO CORNERS”; Thence Westerly of said South line of Tract ‘F’ and the Westerly prolongation of said Tract ‘F’ to the intersection with the East right-of-way line of said State Road 7; Thence Northerly on said East right-of-way line of State Road 7 to the intersection with the West line of the East one-quarter (E 1/4) of Tract 14 of said Section 36 of said “JOHN W. NEWMAN’S SURVEY”; Thence Northerly on said West line of the East one-quarter (E 1/4) of Tract 14 to the intersection with the West right-of-way line of said State Road 7; Thence Northerly along said West right-of-way line to the intersection with the North line of said Tract 14; Thence Easterly on said North line to the Northeast corner of said Tract 14, also being the Southwest corner of Tract 10 of said “JOHN W. NEWMAN’S SURVEY”; Thence Northerly on the West line of said Tract 10 to the intersection with the Easterly right-of-way line of State Road 7; Thence Northerly on said Easterly right-of-way line to the POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS: A portion of Section 36, Township 50 South, Range 41 East, Broward County, Florida, described as follows: COMMENCE at the Southeast corner of the Southwest one-quarter (SW 1/4) of the Southeast one-quarter (SE 1/4) of said Section 36; Then run along the East boundary of said Southwest one-quarter (SW 1/4) of the Southeast one-quarter (SE 1/4), Section 36, North 02°40'05" West 32.97 feet to a point on the centerline of Stirling Road;
Prepared By: CALVIN, GIORDANO AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 600 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 February 11, 2010 P:\Projects\2010\103140 Hollywood TOC\Survey\Legal Descriptions\FINAL Hollywood TOC.docx
Sheet 5 of 17 Sheets
Thence North 88°26'59" West along the center line of Stirling Road, 465.73 feet to a point marking the intersection of the centerline of Stirling Road with the Southerly projection of the West line of Lot 7 in Block 2 of "FRANCES GROVE ESTATES" according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 26, Page 46 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida, and also the Point of Beginning; Thence Westerly along said centerline, 26.72 feet to an angle point; Thence South 84°34'01" West along said centerline 970.19 feet to an intersection with the projection of the East line Tract "A" of "MIRO CORNERS" according to the plat thereof as record in Plat Book 148, Page 29 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida; Thence North 05°37'07" West along the said East line of Tract "A", a distance of 165.32 feet; Thence North 12°58'43" East still along the said East line of Tract A"", a distance of 260.00 feet; Thence North 30°57'53" East still along the said East line of Tract A"", a distance of 120.00 feet; Thence North 61°51'07" West still along the said East line of Tract "A", a distance of 24.63 feet; Thence North 30°57'53" East, a distance of 325.00 feet; Thence South 61°52'07" East along the South line of said Tract "A" and also Tract "G" of said "MIRO CORNERS", A distance of 816.75 feet; Thence South 89°41'31" East still along the said South line of Tract "G", a distance of 31.40 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 7 in Block 2 of "FRANCES GROVE ESTATES"; Thence Southerly along the West line of said Lot 7 of "FRANCES GROVE ESTATES" and the Southerly prolongation thereof to the said centerline of Stirling Road and the POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: A Parcel of land contained in City of Hollywood Ordinance No. 0-88-48, said Parcel being more particularly described as follows: Lot 15, Block 2 of Frances Grove Estates Subdivision, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 26 at Page 46 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida; together with that portion of Stirling Road Right-of-way adjoining said Lot 15, Block 2 “FRANCES GROVE ESTATES” bounded as follows:
Prepared By: CALVIN, GIORDANO AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 600 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 February 11, 2010 P:\Projects\2010\103140 Hollywood TOC\Survey\Legal Descriptions\FINAL Hollywood TOC.docx
Sheet 6 of 17 Sheets
On the North by the south line of said Lot 15, on the East by a prolongation of the east line of said Lot 15, on the West by a prolongation of the west line of said Lot 15, and on the South by the present corporate limits of the City of Hollywood in the County of Broward and State of Florida; AND: A parcel of land contained in City of Hollywood Ordinance No. 0-91-83, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Lots 16, 17, 18 and 19, Block 2 of Frances Grove Estates Subdivision, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 26 at Page 46 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Stirling Road right-of-way adjoining said Lots 16, 17, 18 and 19, Block 2 “FRANCES GROVE ESTATES” bounded as follows: On the North by the south line of said Lots 16, 17, 18 and 19, on the East by a prolongation of the east line of said Lot 16, on the West by a prolongation of the west line of said Lot 19, and on the south by the present corporate limits of the City of Hollywood in the county of Broward and State of Florida. TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: Portions of Sections 1, 12, 13 and 24, Township 51 South, Range 41 East all in Broward County, Florida and described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of “PLAYLAND ESTATES SECTION 3”, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 36, Page 27 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida said point also being the intersection of the centerline of Atlanta Street, labeled Stanley Street on said “PLAYLAND ESTATES SECTION 3”, and the centerline of North 58th Avenue; Thence Southerly on said centerline of North 58th Avenue to the intersection with the centerline of Sheridan Street as shown on “SHERIDAN PARK”, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 43, Page 25 of the Public records of Broward County; Thence Westerly on said centerline of Sheridan Street to the intersection with the centerline of said North 58th Avenue; Thence Southerly on said centerline of North 58th Avenue to the intersection with the centerline of Thomas Street as shown on “BREEZE HAVEN No.2”, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 42, Page 23 of the Public records of Broward County; Thence Westerly on said centerline of Thomas Street to the intersection with the West line of said “BREEZE HAVEN No.2”;
Prepared By: CALVIN, GIORDANO AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 600 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 February 11, 2010 P:\Projects\2010\103140 Hollywood TOC\Survey\Legal Descriptions\FINAL Hollywood TOC.docx
Sheet 7 of 17 Sheets
Thence Southerly on said West line to the Southwest corner of said “BREEZE HAVEN No.2”; Thence Westerly to the intersection of the North line of “DELCREST MANOR”, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 59, Page 13 of the Public records of Broward County, and the centerline of said centerline of North 58th Avenue; Thence Southerly on said centerline of North 58th Avenue to the South line of said “DELCREST MANOR”; Thence Westerly to the intersection of the Easterly projection of Block 2 and the centerline of said North 58th Avenue, labeled Sharmat Avenue on “HOLLYWOOD ACRES”, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 25, Page 1 of the Public records of Broward County; Thence Southerly and on the Southerly projection on said North 58th Avenue as shown on said “HOLLYWOOD ACRES”, and as shown on “HOLLYWOOD COUNTRY ESTATES”, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 24, Page 9 of the Public records of Broward County, and as shown on “HOLLYWOOD BEACH HEIGHTS”, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 27 of the Public records of Broward County, to the intersection of the North line of Corrected Plat “HOLLYWOOD BEACH GARDENS”, and said North 58th Avenue, labeled Balboa Avenue on said Corrected Plat “HOLLYWOOD BEACH GARDENS”, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 14 of the Public records of Broward County; Thence Southerly on said North 58th Avenue as shown on said Corrected Plat “HOLLYWOOD BEACH GARDENS”, and on the plat of “HOLLYWOOD BEACH GARDENS”, Corrected Plat First Addition, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 15 of the Public records of Broward County, to the Northeast corner of the West one-half (W ½) of the Southeast one-quarter (SE ¼) of said Section 13; Thence Southerly on the East line of said West one-half (W ½) of the Southeast one-quarter (SE ¼) of said Section 13 to the Northeast corner of the Northwest one-quarter (NW ¼) of the Northeast one-quarter (SE ¼) of said Section 24, said point also being the centerline of South 58th Avenue, labeled South 60th Avenue as shown on the plat of “WEST HOLLYWOOD VILLAS”, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 30, Page 47 of the Public records of Broward County; Thence Southerly on said centerline of South 58th Avenue and on the centerline of the South 58th
Avenue as shown on the plat of “WEST HOLLYWOOD TRAILER CITY”, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 25, Page 35 of the Public records of Broward County to the South line of said “WEST HOLLYWOOD TRAILER CITY” plat; Thence Southerly on the centerline of said South 58th Avenue as described in Official Records Book 4189, Page 443, of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida, to the intersection with the North line of the Northwest One-Quarter (NW ¼) on the Southeast One-Quarter (SE ¼) of said
Prepared By: CALVIN, GIORDANO AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 600 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 February 11, 2010 P:\Projects\2010\103140 Hollywood TOC\Survey\Legal Descriptions\FINAL Hollywood TOC.docx
Sheet 8 of 17 Sheets
Section 24, also being a point on the municipal boundary of the City of Hollywood, as established by Chapter 63-1426, Laws of Florida; Thence Westerly on said municipal boundary and on said North line Northeast One-Quarter (NE ¼) of the Southeast One-Quarter (SE ¼) of said Section 24, to the centerline of right of way of Southwest 17 Street (Pembroke Road); Thence continue Westerly along said municipal boundary and along said centerline to a point on the centerline of South 61st Avenue, labeled Northwest 3rd Avenue .on “AMENDED PLAT OF HOLLYWOOD PINES”, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 20 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida; Thence Northerly on said center line of South 61st Avenue to the North line of said Section 24; Thence Northeasterly to the Southeast corner of Lot 18, BEVERLY PINES, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 35, Page 38 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida; Thence Northerly on the East line of said BEVERLY PINES, the East line of GRANDWAY ACRES, recorded in Plat Book 56, Pager 35, the East line of BREEZE HAVEN, recorded in Plat Book 37, Page 17 and the East line of CRESTHAVEN NO. 2, recorded in Plat Book 34, Page 49 all recorded in the Public Records of Broward County, Florida, to the Southwest Corner of DU PARC ESTATES AMENDED, according to the plat therof as recorded in Plat Book 38, Page 23 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida; Thence continuing Northerly on the West line of said DU PARC ESTATES AMENDED to the South line of Parcel A, DEVELOPMENT EAST PLAT, according to the p[lat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 122, Page 23 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida; Thence Westerly on the South line of said Parcel A and on the South line of LYNDON PARK, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 29, Page 25 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida and its Westerly extension to an intersection with the centerline of South 62nd Avenue; Thence Northerly on said centerline of South 62nd Avenue to the intersection with the centerline of Hollywood Boulevard; Thence Westerly on said centerline of Hollywood Boulevard to the intersection with the East right-of-way line of the Sunshine State Parkway; Thence Northerly on said East right-of-way line of the Sunshine State Parkway to the intersection with the Centerline of Sheridan Street;
EXHIBIT C
SKETCH/BOUNDARY MAP
EXHIBIT D
HOLLYWOOD CURRENT FLU DESIGNATIONS WITHIN PROPOSED TOC
S 62ND AVE
PEMBROKE RD
TAFT ST
SHERIDAN ST
STIRLING RD
N SR
7
N 56TH AVE
FLORIDA TPKE
S SR7WASHINGTON ST
N 64TH AVE
N 58TH AVE
HOLLYWOOD BLVD
GARFIELD ST
JEFFERSON ST
ATLANTA ST
SW 51ST ST
MCKINLEY ST
SW 49TH CT
POLK STTAYLOR ST
S SR
7
Created : 2-26-2010
LegendProposed TOC BoundaryHollywood City Boundary
Hollywood Future Land UseCommercialCommunity Facilities
IndustrialLow (5) ResidentialLow-Medium (10) ResidentialMedium (16) ResidentialOffice Park
0 1,500 3,000750Feet
²
City of HollywoodProposed Transit Oriented Corridor
Hollywood Future Land Use
EXHIBIT E
BROWARD COUNTY CURRENT FLU DESIGNATIONS WITHIN PROPOSED TOC
S 62ND AVE
PEMBROKE RD
TAFT ST
SHERIDAN ST
STIRLING RD
N SR
7
N 56TH AVE
FLORIDA TPKE
S SR7WASHINGTON ST
N 64TH AVE
N 58TH AVE
HOLLYWOOD BLVD
GARFIELD ST
JEFFERSON ST
ATLANTA ST
SW 51ST ST
MCKINLEY ST
SW 49TH CT
POLK STTAYLOR ST
S SR
7
Created : 2-26-2010
LegendProposed TOC BoundaryHollywood City Boundary
Broward Future Land UseCommercialCommunity FacilitiesIndustrial
Low (5) ResidentialLow-Medium (10) ResidentialMedium (16) ResidentialOffice ParkResidential in Irregular Areas
0 1,500 3,000750Feet
²
City of HollywoodProposed Transit Oriented Corridor
Broward County Future Land Use
EXHIBIT F
SANITARY SEWER, POTABLE WATER, AND DRAINAGE
VERIFICATION LETTER
February 10, 2010 Steve Joseph, P.E. Deputy Director of Operations, Public Utilities City of Hollywood Department of Public Utilities P.O. Box 229045 Hollywood, FL 33022‐9045 Re: Hollywood Transit Oriented Corridor ‐ Land Use Plan Amendment CGA No. 10‐3140 Dear Mr. Joseph: Attached is a public facilities impact analysis (sanitary sewer, potable water, and drainage) for the above‐referenced land use plan amendment. We are proposing to amend the City’s Future Land Use Element to establish a Transit Oriented Corridor land use designation along State Road 7/US 441. Please review the analysis and issue a letter saying there is adequate capacity to serve the proposed amendment. If you should have any questions please contact me at 954‐921‐7781 / sreale@calvin‐giordano.com. Respectfully, CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Scott Reale, AICP Planner Attachment
SANITARY SEWER ANALYSIS: Identify whether the site is currently and/or proposed to be serviced by septic tanks.
The bulk of the site is served by the City of Hollywood Southern Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Some of single family homes may still be served by private septic tanks, although policies in the City’s Comprehensive Plan Utilities Element and Broward County Health Department require new development to connect to the public sewer system, if lines are available.
Identify the sanitary sewer facilities serving the amendment site including the current plant capacity, current plus committed demand on plant capacity, and planned plan capacity.
The site is served by the City of Hollywood Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant located at 1621 North 14th Avenue in Hollywood. This plant has a licensed capacity of 48.75 MGD‐AADF. The committed flow is 3.14 MGD. Current annual average daily flow (AADF) as of January 2010 is 40.13 MGD. Total flow is 43.265 MGD. The total flow of licensed capacity is 80.18%. Plant is currently rated at 50.00 MGD and will be rerated to 55.50 MGD upon renewal of plant permit. There is no capacity issue with this project since there is an actual decrease in demand.
Identify the net impact on sanitary sewer demand resulting from the proposed amendment. Provide calculations, including anticipated demand per square foot* or dwelling unit.
* square footage numbers are for analytical purposes only
The new uses are expected to decrease sanitary sewer demand by 725,000 gpd.
Identify the projected plant capacity and demand for the short and long range planning horizons as identified within the local government’s adopted comprehensive plan. Provide demand projections and information regarding planned plant capacity expansions including year, identified funding sources and other relevant information.
The City of Hollywood has large user agreements in effect with several municipalities in South Broward. The following table illustrates the projected future flows, according to the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
Current Land Use:
5,309 dwelling units x 315.0 gpd = 1,672,335 gpd25,000,000 sq. ft. commercial x 0.1 gpd = 2,500,000 gpd2,000,000 sq. ft. community facilities x 0.2 gpd = 400,000 gpd2,000,000 sq. ft. industrial x 0.1 gpd = 200,000 gpd1,000,000 sq. ft. office x 0.2 gpd = 200,000 gpd
4,972,335 gpd
Proposed Land Use:
5,309 dwelling units x 315.0 gpd = 1,672,335 gpd15,000,000 sq. ft. commercial x 0.1 gpd = 1,500,000 gpd1,000,000 sq. ft. community facilities x 0.2 gpd = 200,000 gpd1,000,000 sq. ft. industrial x 0.1 gpd = 100,000 gpd2,000,000 sq. ft. office x 0.2 gpd = 400,000 gpd
2,500 hotel rooms x 150.0 gpd = 375,000 gpd4,247,335 gpd
Change in Demand 725,000 gpd DECREASE
Sanitary Sewer Demand
Large User Flow Projection
City 2015 2020 2025
Hollywood 23.8 25.5 27.3
Other Large Users 28.0 30.0 33.8
Total Plant Flow 51.8 55.5 61.1
Provide information regarding existing and proposed trunk lines and lateral hookups to the amendment site.
As individual parcels within the amendment area are redeveloped, the City will evaluate the need to upgrade any of the gravity lines, force mains or lift stations within the area, as by City Ordinance new developments are required to connect to the sanitary sewer system. POTABLE WATER ANALYSIS: Data and analysis demonstrating that a sufficient supply of potable water and related infrastructure will be available to serve the proposed amendment site through the long‐term planning horizon, including the nature, timing and size of the proposed water supply and related improvements.
The Comprehensive Plan states there will be a sufficient supply of potable water for the short and long term planning timeframes. Currently, the average rate is approximately 22 MGD. This is a noticeable decrease from when the Potable Water Sub‐Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan was last updated, which was based largely on the 2006 City of Hollywood Water Quality Report. The amount of water that can be handled (capacity potential) is approximately 41 MGD. Identify the facilities serving the service area in which the amendment is located including the current plant capacity, current and committed demand on the plant and the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) permitted withdrawal, including the expiration date of the SFWMD permit.
The area is served by the City of Hollywood Water Treatment Plant at 3441 Hollywood Boulevard. The plant has a design capacity of 41 million gallons per day (41 MGD). SFWMD Water Use Permit No. 06‐00038‐W (Exhibit G) was issued to the City of Hollywood on April 10, 2008. The expiration date is April 10, 2028. The permit authorizes the continuation of an existing use of ground water from the Biscayne Aquifer and the Floridan Aquifer system for public water supply with an annual allocation of 14,372.66 million gallons and a monthly allocation of 1,321.2 million gallons (Floridan, Chaminade, South, and Piccolo).
Identify the wellfield serving the service area in which the amendment is located including the permitted capacity, committed remaining capacity, remaining capacity and expiration date of the permit.
The following limitations to annual withdrawals from specific sources are stipulated: Floridan Aquifer System‐Floridan Wellfield: 3,168 MG. Biscayne Aquifer‐Chaminade Wellfield: 5,475 MG. Biscayne Aquifer‐South Wellfield: 3,577 MG.
The following limitations to maximum monthly withdrawals from specific sources are stipulated:
Floridan Aquifer System‐Floridan Wellfield: 259.00 MG. Biscayne Aquifer‐Chaminade Wellfield: 497.30 MG. Biscayne Aquifer‐South Wellfield: 324.90 MG.
Annual and maximum per month supplied from the Piccolo Wellfield shall be 2,153 MGY and 240 MGM respectively.
Rated Capacity for these facilities is indicated below, as noted in the staff report for WUP 06‐00038‐W.
Source Status Code GPM MGM MGYBiscayne Aquifer E 35,000 1,532.2 18,369 Floridan Aquifer System E 5,900 258.3 3,101 Floridan Aquifer System P 17,000 744.2 8,935 Totals: 57,900 2,537.7 30,432
Identify the net impact on potable water demand, based on adopted level of service resulting from the proposed amendment. Provide calculations including anticipated demand per square foot* or dwelling unit.
* square footage numbers are for analytical purposes only
The new uses are expected to decrease the potable water demand by 850,000 gpd.
Identify the projected capacity and demand for the short and long range planning horizons as included within the adopted comprehensive plan ‐ provide demand projections and information regarding planned plant capacity expansions including year, funding and other relevant information. If additional wellfields are planned, provide status including the status of any permit applications.
The following table identifies the planned expansions to the Water Treatment Plant, as identified in the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan and 2007 Water Master Plan. Reverse Osmosis is an ongoing project at the Water Treatment Plant, and the City has agreed to construct and operate the necessary reverse osmosis treatment capacities to meet future demands.
Year Capacity Improvements2010 43.3 MGD 4 MGD R/O2015 47.3 MGD 4 MGD R/O2020 51.3 MGD 4 MGD R/O2025 55.3 MGD 2 MGD R/O; 2 MGD mod.
Provide information regarding existing and proposed trunk lines and water main hookups to the amendment site.
The City’s water distribution system consists of over 600 miles of pipe with diameters ranging from 1‐inch to 36‐inch, 2 elevated 1 MG storage tanks, approximately 40,200 connections, over 2,400 fire hydrants, and over 7,500
Current Land Use:
5,309 dwelling units x 350.0 gpd = 1,858,150 gpd25,000,000 sq. ft. commercial x 0.1 gpd = 2,500,000 gpd2,000,000 sq. ft. community facilities x 0.2 gpd = 400,000 gpd2,000,000 sq. ft. industrial x 0.1 gpd = 200,000 gpd1,000,000 sq. ft. office x 0.2 gpd = 200,000 gpd
5,158,150 gpd
Proposed Land Use:
5,309 dwelling units x 350.0 gpd = 1,858,150 gpd15,000,000 sq. ft. commercial x 0.1 gpd = 1,500,000 gpd1,000,000 sq. ft. community facilities x 0.2 gpd = 200,000 gpd1,000,000 sq. ft. industrial x 0.1 gpd = 100,000 gpd2,000,000 sq. ft. office x 0.2 gpd = 400,000 gpd
2,500 hotel rooms x 100.0 gpd = 250,000 gpd4,308,150 gpd
Change in Demand 850,000 gpd DECREASE
Potable Water Demand
valves. The WTP has three discharge mains, a 24‐inch water main (South header), a 30‐inch water main (West header), and a 20‐inch bypass header that supply water into the distribution system transmission lines. There are currently 30 miles of transmission mains of 16 to 30‐inches in diameter and approximately 480 miles of distribution mains, 6 to 14‐inches. Additionally, it is estimated that there are 200 miles (40 percent of total pipe inventory) of distribution pipe 4‐inches and less.
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: Provide the adopted level of service standard for the service area in which the amendment is located.
The level of service standards for the City's drainage service areas are based on Florida Building Code (FBC), South Florida Water Management District, City's codes and ordinances, and standards and criteria for water management works from other regulatory authorities having jurisdiction. The minimum standards are as follows:
SUBJECT ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDSite Development Requirements:
Wet detention volume shall be provided for the first inch of runoff from the developed project, or the total runoff of 2.5 inches times the percentage of imperviousness, whichever is greater. For Water Quantity, a storm event of 3 day duration and 25 year return frequency shall be used in computing off‐site discharge rates.
Buildings: To have the lowest floor elevation no lower than the elevation for the respective area depicted on the National Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for flood hazard areas based on 100 year flood elevation, or; for commercial properties 6 inches for residential properties 18 inches above the crown of the adjacent public street or road, whichever is the highest.
Identify the drainage district and drainage systems servicing the amendment area.
The Florida Department of Transportation is responsible for operating and maintaining the stormwater system along the State Road 7 right‐of‐way. All other drainage systems within this amendment located outside of the SR 7 R/W are being maintained and operated by the City of Hollywood, Department of Public Utilities.
Three systems for disposing of stormwater are employed in the City of Hollywood.
1. Surface percolation through swales – This system is utilized primarily in residential areas where curbs do
not occur. In some areas of the City the effectiveness of the swale system is thwarted by excessive landscaping, tree planting, and paving for additional parking.
2. Underground infiltration trench drains – Also known as “French” drains; work well in areas where soil conditions are conducive to percolation. As with swale drainage, this type of system has the added benefit of allowing stormwater to be retained in the soil.
3. Positive drainage systems – This type of system employs pipes and drainage structures to move stormwater from the flooded site to an outfall site into a lake or canal. This system is by far the most rapid and efficient means of stormwater removal.
Identify any planned drainage improvements, including year, funding sources and other relevant information.
There are no major deficiencies in the Amendment area.
Indicate if a Surface Water Management Plan has been approved by, or an application submitted, to the SFWMD and/or any independent drainage district for the amendment site.
N/A. There is no SFWMD permit for the overall area. Identify the permit number(s), or application number(s) if the project is pending for the amendment site. If an amendment site is not required to obtain a SFWMD permit, provide documentation of same.
N/A. There is no SFWMD permit for the overall area.
If the area in which the amendment is located does not meet the adopted level of service and there are no improvements planned (by the unit of local government or drainage authority) to address the deficiencies, provide an engineering analysis which demonstrates how the site will be drained and the impact on the surrounding properties. The information should include the wet season water level for the amendment site, design storm elevation, natural and proposed land elevation, one hundred year flood elevation, acreage for proposed water management retention area, elevations for buildings, roads and years, storage and runoff calculations for the design storm and estimated time for flood waters to recede to the natural land elevation. As previously stated, the Amendment area currently meets the adopted level of service standards. Redevelopment activity with the Amendment area will be required to continue to meet the adopted level of standards by utilizing retention and exfiltration methods as approved by the City.
EXHIBIT G
SFWMD WATER USE PERMIT
SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATER USE PERMIT NO. RE-ISSUE 06-00038-W
(NON - ASSIGNABLE)
FORM10299 Rev 5f9J
Date Issued: 10-APR-2008 Expiration Date: April 10,2028
Authorizing: THE CONTINUATION OF AN EXSTING USE OF GROUND WATER FROM THE BISCAYNE AQUIFER AND FLORIDAN AQUIFER SYSTEM FOR PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY USE WITH AN ANNUAL ALLOCATION OF 14372.66 MILLION GALLONS.
Located In: Broward County, S25,36/T50S/R41 E S19-361T50S/R42E S1,2,3,10, 11,12,13,14,15,241T51 S/R41E S1-231T51 S/R42E
Issued To: CITY OF HOLLYWOOD (HOLLYWOOD WATER TREATMENT PLANT) POBOX 229045 HOLLYWOOD. FL 33022-9045
This Permit is issued pursuant to Application No.070518-17, dated May 18, 2007, for the Use of Water as specified above and subject to the Special Conditions set forth below. Permittee agrees to hold and save the South Florida Water Management District and its successors harmless from any and all damages, claims or liabilities which may arise by reason of the construction, maintenance or use of activities authorized by this permit. Said application, including all plan and specifications attached thereto, is by reference made a part hereof.
Upon written notice to the permittee, this permit may be temporarily modified, or restricted under a Declaration of Water Shortage or a Declaration of Emergency due to Water Shortage in accordance with provisions of Chapter 373, Fla. Statutes, and applicable rules and regulations of the South Florida Water Management District.
This Permit may be permanently or temporarily revoked, in whole or in part, for the violation of the conditions of the permit or for the violation of any provision of the Water Resources Act and regulations thereunder.
This Permit does not convey to the permittee any property rights nor any privileges other than those specified herein, nor relieve the permittee from complying with any law, regulation, or requirement affecting the rights of other bodies or agencies.
Limiting Conditions are as follows:
SEE PAGES 2 - 6 OF 6 (30 LIMITING CONDITIONS).
South Florida Water Management District, by its Governing Board
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY: On ELIZABETH VEGUILLABy
DEPUTY CLERK
PAGE 1 OF 6
PERMIT NO: 06-00038-W PAGE 2 OF 6
LIMITING CONDITIONS
1. This permit shall expire on April 10, 2028.
2. Application for a permit modification may be made at any time.
3. Water use classification:
Public water supply
4. Source classification is:
Ground Water from: Biscayne Aquifer Floridan Aquifer System
5. Annual allocation shall not exceed 14373 MG.
Maximum monthly allocation shall not exceed 1320.8046 MG.
The following limitations to annual withdrawals from specific sources are stipulated: Floridan Aquifer System-Floridan Wellfield: 3,168 MG. Biscayne Aquifer-Chaminade Wellfield: 5,475 MG. Biscayne Aquifer-South Wellfield: 3,577 MG.
The following limitations to maximum monthly withdrawals from specific sources are stipulated: Floridan Aquifer System-Floridan Wellfield: 259.00 MG. Biscayne Aquifer-Chaminade Wellfield: 497.30 MG. Biscayne Aquifer-South Wellfield: 324.90 MG.
Annual and maximum per month supplied from the Piccolo Wellfield (contractual quantities) shall be 2153 MGY and 240 MGM respectively.
The pumpage from the North wellfield stand-by wells 20 and 21 is limited to 0.75 MGD.
6. Pursuant to Rule 40E-1.6105, F.A.C., Notification of Transfer of Interest in Real Property, within 30 days of any transfer of interest or control of the real property at which any permitted facility, system, consumptive use, or activity is located, the permittee must notify the District, in writing, of the transfer giving the name and address of the new owner or person in control and providing a copy of the instrument effectuating the transfer, as set forth in Rule 40E-1.6107, F.A.C.
Pursuant to Rule 40E-1.6107 (4), until transfer is approved by the District, the permittee shall be liable for compliance with the permit. The permittee transferring the permit shall remain liable for all actions that are required as well as all violations of the permit which occurred prior to the transfer of the permit.
Failure to comply with this or any other condition of this permit constitutes a violation and pursuant to Rule 40E-1.609, Suspension. Revocation and Modification of Permits, the District may suspend or revoke the permit.
This Permit is issued to:
City of Hollywood P.O. Box 229045 Hollywood, FL 33022-9045
7. Withdrawal facilities:
PERMIT NO: 06-00038-W PAGE 3 OF 6
Ground Water - Existing:
1 - 24" X 90' X 2100 GPM Well Cased To 69 Feet 1 - 32" X 145' X 2100 GPM Well Cased To 125 Feet 1 - 32" X 112' X 2100 GPM Well Cased To 90 Feet 1 - 32" X 155' X 2100 GPM Well Cased To 135 Feet 1 - 32" X 150' X 2100 GPM Well Cased To 128 Feet 1 - 24" X 80' X 2100 GPM Well Cased To 55 Feet 1 - 24" X 95' X 2100 GPM Well Cased To 60 Feet 1 - 12" X 1185' X 800 GPM Well Cased To 960 Feet 1 - 32" X 144' X 2100 GPM Well Cased To 125 Feet 2 - 10" X 75' X 2400 GPM Wells Cased To 60 Feet 1 - 12" X 1185' X 1100 GPM Well Cased To 920 Feet 1 -18" X 80' X 2500 GPM Well Cased To 70 Feet 1 - 24" X 80' X 2100 GPM Well Cased To 60 Feet 1 - 24" X 86' X 2100 GPM Well Cased To 70 Feet 2 - 16" X 1200' X 1000 GPM Wells Cased To 1005 Feet 1 - 12" X 1314' X 1000 GPM Well Cased To 926 Feet 1 - 24" X 77' X 2100 GPM Well Cased To 60 Feet 1 - 18" X 75' X 2500 GPM Well Cased To 60 Feet 1 - 32" X 150' X 2100 GPM Well Cased To 139 Feet 1 - 12" X 1185' X 1000 GPM Well Cased To 950 Feet
Ground Water - Proposed:
17 - 16" X 1300' X 1000 GPM Wells Cased To 900 Feet
Surface Water - Existing:
8. Permittee shall mitigate interference with existing legal uses that was caused in whole or in part by the permittee's withdrawals, consistent with the approved mitigation plan. As necessary to offset the interference, mitigation will include pumpage reduction, replacement of the impacted individual's equipment, relocation of wells, change in withdrawal source, or other means.
Interference to an existing legal use is defined as an impact that occurs under hydrologic conditions equal to or less severe than a 1 in 10 year drought event that results in the:
(1) Inability to withdraw water consistent with provisions of the permit, such as when remedial structural or operational actions not materially authorized by existing permits must be taken to address the interference; or
(2) Change in the quality of water pursuant to primary State Drinking Water Standards to the extent that the water can no longer be used for its authorized purpose, or such change is imminent.
9. Permittee shall mitigate harm to existing off-site land uses caused by the permittee's withdrawals, as determined through reference to the conditions for permit issuance. When harm occurs, or is imminent, the District will require the permittee to modify withdrawal rates or mitigate the harm. Harm caused by withdrawals, as determined through reference to the conditions for permit issuance, includes:
(1) Significant reduction in water levels on the property to the extent that the designed function of the water body and related surface water management improvements are damaged, not including aesthetic values. The designed function of a water body is identified in the original permit or other governmental authorization issued for the construction of the water body. In cases where a permit was not required, the designed function shall be determined based on the purpose for the original construction of the water body (e.g. fill for construction, mining, drainage canal, etc.)
PERMIT NO: 06-00038-W PAGE 4 OF 6
(2) Damage to agriculture, including damage resulting from reduction in soil moisture resulting from consumptive use; or
(3) Land collapse or subsidence caused by reduction in water levels associated with consumptive use.
10. Permittee shall mitigate harm to the natural resources caused by the permittee's withdrawals, as determined through reference to the conditions for permit issuance. When harm occurs, or is imminent, the District will require the permittee to modify withdrawal rates or mitigate the harm. Harm, as determined through reference to the conditions for permit issuance includes:
(1) Reduction in ground or surface water levels that results in harmful lateral movement of the fresh water/salt water interface,
(2) Reduction in water levels that harm the hydroperiod of wetlands,
(3) Significant reduction in water levels or hydroperiod in a naturally occurring water body such as a lake or pond,
(4) Harmful movement of contaminants in violation of state water quality standards, or
(5) Harm to the natural system including damage to habitat for rare or endangered species.
11. If any condition of the permit is violated, the permit shall be subject to review and possible modification, enforcement action, or revocation.
12. Authorized representatives of the District shall be permitted to enter, inspect, and observe the permitted system to determine compliance with special conditions.
13. The Permittee is advised that this permit does not relieve any person from the requirement to obtain all necessary federal, state, local and special district authorizations.
14. The permit does not convey any property right to the Permittee, nor any rights and privileges other than those specified in the Permit and Chapter 40E-2, Florida Administrative Code.
15. Permittee shall submit all data as required by the implementation schedule for each of the limiting conditions to: S.F.W.M.D., Supervising Hydrogeologist - Post-Permit Compliance, Water Use Regulation Dept. (4320), P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680.
16. In the event of a declared water shortage, water withdrawal reductions will be ordered by the District in accordance with the Water Shortage Plan, Chapter 40E-21, F.A.C. The Permittee is advised that during a water shortage, pumpage reports shall be submitted as required by Chapter 40E-21, F.A.C.
17. Prior to the use of any proposed water withdrawal facility authorized under this permit, unless otherwise specified, the Permittee shall equip each facility with a District-approved operating water use accounting system and submit a report of calibration to the District, pursuant to Section 4.1, Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications.
In addition, the Permittee shall submit a report of recalibration for the water use accounting system for each water withdrawal facility (existing and proposed) authorized under this permit every five years from each previous calibration, continuing at five-year increments.
18. Monthly withdrawals for each withdrawal facility shall be submitted to the District quarterly. The water accounting method and means of calibration shall be stated on each report.
19. The Permittee shall notify the District within 30 days of any change in service area boundary. If the Permittee will not serve a new demand within the service area for which the annual allocation was calculated, the annual allocation may then be subject to modification and reduction.
PERMIT NO: 06-00038-W PAGE 5 OF 6
20. Permittee shall determine unaccounted-for distribution system losses. Losses shall be determined for the entire distribution system on a monthly basis. Permittee shall define the manner in which unaccounted-for losses are calculated. Data collection shall begin within six months of Permit issuance. Loss reporting shall be submitted to the District on a yearly basis from the date of Permit issuance.
21. Permittee shall maintain an accurate flow meter at the intake of the water treatment plant for the purpose of measuring daily inflow of water.
22. Prior to any application to renew or modify this permit, the Permittee shall evaluate long term water supply alternatives and submit a long term water supply plan to the District. Within one year of permit issuance, the Permittee shall submit to the District an outline of the proposed plan. The assessment should include consideration of saline intrusion, wellfield protection, plans for compliance with applicable wellfield protection ordinances, expected frequencies and plans to cope with water shortages or well field failures, and conservation measures to reduce overall stresses on the aquifer.
23. For uses with an annual allocation greater than 10 MGD and a permit duration of 20 years, every five years from the date of permit issuance, the permittee shall submit a water use compliance report for review and approval by District Staff, which addresses the following:
1. The results of a water conservation audit that documents the efficiency of water use on the project site using data produced from an onsite evaluation conducted. In the event that the audit indicates additional water conservation is appropriate or the per capita use rate authorized in the permit is exceeded, the permittee shall propose and implement specific actions to reduce the water use to acceptable levels within timeframes proposed by the permittee and approved by the District.
2. A comparison of the permitted allocation and the allocation that would apply to the project based on current District allocation rules and updated population and per capita use rates. In the event the permit allocation is greater than the allocation provided for under District rule, the permittee shall apply for a letter modification to reduce the allocation consistent with District rules and the updated population and per capita use rates to the extent they are considered by the District to be indicative of long term trends in the population and per capita use rates over the permit duration. In the event that the permit allocation is less than allowable under District rule, the permittee shall apply for a modification of the permit to increase the allocation if the permittee intends to utilize an additional allocation, or modify its operation to comply with the existing conditions of the permit.
24. The Water Conservation Plan required by Section 2.6.1 of the Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications within the South Florida Water Management District, must be implemented in accordance with the approved implementation schedule.
25. If a proposed well location is different from a location specified in the application, the Permittee shall submit to the District an evaluation of the impact of pumpage from the proposed well location on adjacent existing legal uses, pollution sources, environmental features, the saline water interface, and water bodies one month prior to all new well construction. The Permittee is advised that the proposal must be in compliance with all permitting criteria and performance standards in effect at the time of submittal, and that a formal modification of the permit shall be required if the withdrawals from the well location will result in an environmental or resource impact significantly greater than that anticipated in the permit review process.
26. If at any time there is an indication that the well casing, valves, or controls leak or have become inoperative, repairs or replacement shall be made to restore the system to an operating condition. Failure to make such repairs shall be cause for filling and abandoning the well, in accordance with procedures outlined in Chapters 40E-3 and 40E-30, Florida Administrative Code.
27. The Permittee shall submit to the District an updated Well Description Table (Table A) within one month of completion of the proposed wells identifying the actual total and cased depths, pump manufacturer and model numbers, pump types, intake depths and type of meters.
28. The Permittee shall continue to submit monitoring data in accordance with the approved saline water
PERMIT NO: 06-00038-W PAGE 6 OF 6
intrusion monitoring program for this project.
29. Public water utilities that control, either directly or indirectly, a wastewater treatment plant, and which had determined, at the time of issuance of its consumptive use permit and pursuant to Section 403.064, F.S., that reuse of reclaimed water was not feasible must advise the District of any change in this determination that may occur during the term of the consumptive use permit. In the event the utility determines reuse has become feasible, then the District will require the utility to provide the information listed in Sections 3.2.3.1. and 5.2.5.2.A.
30. Permittee shall implement the following operating plan: Construct and operate the necessary reverse osmosis treatment capacities and Floridan aquifer wells as outlined in Exhibits 8 and 8A to meet future demands as described in this Staff report. Failure to timely implement this alternative water supply will result in modification to this permit. Permittee shall provide annual updates to the District regarding the status of implementation of all alternative water supply projects. The status report shall include work completed to date, expenditures, capacities and any changes in timelines.
EXHIBIT H
SOLID WASTE VERIFICATION LETTER
P:\Projects\2010\103140 Hollywood TOC\Planning\Due Diligence\LETTERS\Backup\letter to solid waste4.docx
February 10, 2010 Ram N. Tewari Director, Solid Waste Operations Division Broward County, Florida Re: Hollywood Transit Oriented Corridor ‐ Land Use Plan Amendment CGA No. 10‐3140 Dear Mr. Tewari: I am writing to you at the suggestion of Greg Turek, Director, City of Hollywood Public Works Department and Ron Kaplan, Senior Counsel for Waste Management Inc. of Florida. Attached is a solid waste analysis for the above‐referenced land use plan amendment. We are proposing to amend the City and County Land Use Plans to establish a Transit Oriented Corridor land use designation along State Road 7/US 441 in Hollywood. You’ll see from the attached analysis that we are actually decreasing the proposed uses from what is currently permitted. Please review the analysis at your earliest convenience and issue a letter verifying the solid waste information attached is correct. If you should have any questions please contact me at 954‐921‐7781 / sreale@calvin‐giordano.com. Respectfully, CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Scott Reale, AICP Planner Attachment
SOLID WASTE:
1. Provide the adopted level of service standard for the service area in which the amendment is located.
Land Use Solid Waste Generated/Unit
Residential 8.9 lbs. per unit per day
Industrial & Commercial
• Factory/Warehouse 2 lbs. per 100 sq.ft. per day • Office Building 1 lb. per 100 sq.ft. per day • Department Store 4 lbs. per 100 sq.ft. per day • Supermarket 9 lbs. per 100 sq.ft. per day • Restaurant 2 lbs. per meal per day
• Drug Store 5 lbs. 100 sq. ft. per day
School
• Grade School 10 lbs. per room & 1/4 lbs. per pupil per day • High School 8 lbs. per room & 1/4 lbs. per pupil per day
Institution
• Hospital 8 lbs. per bed per day • Nurse or Intern Home 3 lbs. per person per day • Home for Aged 3 lbs. per person per day • Rest Home 3 lbs. per person per day
2. Identify the facilities serving the service area in which the amendment is located including the
landfill/plant capacity, current demand on landfill/plant capacity and committed landfill/plant capacity.
According to the City’s Comprehensive Plan, Broward County’s two resource recovery facilities are operating at 73 percent of capacity and sufficient capacity including only Broward County Waste is available to meet long‐term needs. Each of Broward’s resource recovery facilities is expandable by 33 percent, from 2,250 tons per day to 2,990 tons per day. Further, a site for a third resource recovery plant adjacent to the Broward County BIC Landfill is available to meet future needs. Hollywood sends its waste to the South Broward County Resource Recovery Facility for Incineration. The Board of County Commissioners has been designated by the Governor as the agency for the planning and implementation of all solid waste recovery projects in Broward County. The County has designed and picked sites for two resource recovery sites in Broward County. The one to be used by the City of Hollywood is located at State Road 7 and State Road 84. The design capacity for the next stage of the Broward Interim/Contingency Landfill is 2,500,000 tons. This is one of six cells to be further developed in this landfill. The South‐Resource Recovery Plant has received certification for a generating capacity of 96.1 megawatts, and a current 66 megawatt capacity. The design disposal capacity of the resource recovery plant is 698,235 tons per year.
The City of Hollywood after considering the available technologies and their feasibility decided to enter into an agreement with Broward County for the disposal of its waste stream at the south regional facility. Ash, which will generate from the mass burn plant, will have to be disposed by landfill methods at the South Broward Ash Landfill (SBAL). This landfill will have a design capacity of 1,653 tons with two cells still to be developed. The Trash Transfer Station used by the City of Hollywood is located in Hollywood at 1600 South Park Road and currently has an available capacity of 2,500 cubic yards per month (cy/month). The current demand is 5,500 cy/month. Since 2000 the annual tonnage has been averaging 55,000 tons per year. Since the City is almost fully developed it is not expected that this annual tonnage will increase, significantly. This 50,000 tons represents approximately 2% of the total capacity of the Broward County Landfill in 1990 and approximately 7% of the south resource recovery plant when it is opened. Although various individual cells within the existing Class I sanitary landfill used by the City of Hollywood will reach capacity by 2015, the landfills have sufficient acreage to allow expansion beyond the long‐term planning horizon.
3. Identify the change in demand resulting from this amendment. Provide calculations including assumed demand per square foot* or dwelling unit.
* square footage numbers are for analytical purposes only The new uses are expected to decrease solid waste demand by 967,750 lbs/day.
4. Letter from service provider verifying the information in items 1‐3 above.
Current Land Use:
5,309 dwelling units x 8.9 lbs/day = 47,250 lbs/day25,000,000 sq. ft. commercial x 9.0 lbs/100 SF/day = 2,250,000 lbs/day2,000,000 sq. ft. community facilities x 1.0 lbs/100 SF/day = 20,000 lbs/day2,000,000 sq. ft. industrial x 9.0 lbs/100 SF/day = 180,000 lbs/day1,000,000 sq. ft. office x 1.0 lbs/100 SF/day = 10,000 lbs/day
2,507,250 lbs/day
Proposed Land Use:
5,309 dwelling units x 8.9 lbs/day = 47,250 lbs/day15,000,000 sq. ft. commercial x 9.0 lbs/100 SF/day = 1,350,000 lbs/day1,000,000 sq. ft. community facilities x 1.0 lbs/100 SF/day = 10,000 lbs/day1,000,000 sq. ft. industrial x 9.0 lbs/100 SF/day = 90,000 lbs/day2,000,000 sq. ft. office x 1.0 lbs/100 SF/day = 20,000 lbs/day
2,500 hotel rooms x 8.9 lbs/day = 22,250 lbs/day1,539,500 lbs/day
Change in Demand 967,750 lbs/day DECREASE
Solid Waste Demand
EXHIBIT I
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ANALYSIS
Trip
s%
In%
Out
Trip
s%
In%
Out
Gen
eral
Lig
ht In
dust
rial
110
2,00
010
00 S
FT
= 6.
97(X
)13
,940
1,84
088
%1,
619
12%
221
1,96
012
%23
588
%1,
725
Gen
eral
Off
ice
710
1,00
010
00 S
FLn
(T) =
0.7
7Ln(
X) +
3.6
57,
856
1,18
388
%1,
041
12%
142
1,03
517
%17
683
%85
9H
otel
310
0R
oom
sT
= 8.
92(X
)0
058
%0
42%
00
49%
051
%0
Com
mer
cial
(Ret
ail)
820
25,0
0010
00 S
FLn
(T) =
0.6
5Ln(
X) +
5.8
324
5,80
94,
298
61%
2,62
239
%1,
676
23,9
4648
%11
,494
52%
12,4
52Si
ngle
Fam
ily21
049
68D
UT
= 9.
57(X
)47
,544
3,72
625
%93
275
%2,
795
3,60
463
%2,
271
37%
1,33
3El
emen
tary
Sch
ool
520
2,00
010
00 S
FLn
(T) =
0.9
9Ln(
X) +
2.5
947
,600
12,0
5254
%6,
508
46%
5,54
43,
846
43%
1,65
457
%2,
192
Subt
otal
362,
749
23,0
9912
,722
10,3
7834
,391
15,8
3018
,561
Gen
eral
Lig
ht In
dust
rial
110
1,00
010
00 S
FT
= 6.
97(X
)6,
970
920
88%
810
12%
110
980
12%
118
88%
862
Gen
eral
Off
ice
710
2,00
010
00 S
FLn
(T) =
0.7
7Ln(
X) +
3.6
513
,396
2,06
188
%1,
814
12%
247
1,72
817
%29
483
%1,
434
Hot
el31
025
00R
oom
sT
= 8.
92(X
)22
,300
1,67
558
%97
242
%70
41,
750
49%
858
51%
893
Com
mer
cial
(Ret
ail)
820
15,0
0010
00 S
FLn
(T) =
0.6
5Ln(
X) +
5.8
317
6,35
83,
164
61%
1,93
039
%1,
234
17,0
9348
%8,
205
52%
8,88
8Si
ngle
Fam
ily21
049
68D
UT
= 9.
57(X
)47
,544
3,72
625
%93
275
%2,
795
3,60
463
%2,
271
37%
1,33
3El
emen
tary
Sch
ool
520
1,00
010
00 S
FLn
(T) =
0.9
9Ln(
X) +
2.5
930
,334
5,58
454
%3,
015
46%
2,56
92,
075
43%
892
57%
1,18
3Su
btot
al29
6,90
217
,130
9,47
37,
659
27,2
3012
,638
14,5
93
Gen
eral
Lig
ht In
dust
rial
-6,9
70-9
20-8
09-1
11-9
80-1
17-8
63G
ener
al O
ffic
e5,
540
878
773
105
693
118
575
Hot
el22
,300
1,67
597
270
41,
750
858
893
Com
mer
cial
(Ret
ail)
-69,
451
-1,1
34-6
92-4
42-6
,853
-3,2
89-3
,564
Sing
le F
amily
00
00
00
0El
emen
tary
Sch
ool
-17,
266
-6,4
68-3
,493
-2,9
75-1
,771
-762
-1,0
09
TOTA
L N
EW
TR
IPS
-65,
847
-5,9
69-3
,249
-2,7
19-7
,161
-3,1
92-3
,968
ITE
110:
AM
Pea
k H
our:
T =
0.92
(X) (
88%
In, 1
2% O
ut);
PM P
eak
Hou
r: T
= 0.
98(X
) (12
% In
, 88%
Out
) IT
E 71
0: A
M P
eak
Hou
r: Ln
(T) =
0.8
0Ln(
X) +
1.5
5 (8
8% In
, 12%
Out
); PM
Pea
k H
our:
Ln(T
) = 0
.74L
n(X
) + 1
.83
(17%
In, 8
3% O
ut);
Not
e: P
M p
eak
hour
equ
atio
n fr
om IT
E 5t
h Ed
ITE
310:
AM
Pea
k H
our:
T =
0.67
(X) (
58%
In, 4
2% O
ut);
PM P
eak
Hou
r: T
= 0.
70(X
) (49
% In
, 51%
Out
)IT
E 82
0: A
M P
eak
Hou
r: Ln
(T) =
0.6
0Ln(
X) +
2.2
9 (6
1% In
, 39%
Out
); PM
Pea
k H
our:
Ln(T
) = 0
.66L
n(X
) + 3
.40
(48%
In, 5
2% O
ut)
ITE
210:
AM
Pea
k H
our:
T =
0.75
(X) (
25%
In, 7
5% O
ut);
PM P
eak
Hou
r: Ln
(T) =
0.9
0(X
) + 0
.53
(63%
In, 3
7% O
ut)
ITE
520:
AM
Pea
k H
our:
Ln(T
) = 0
.99L
n(X
) + 2
.59
(50%
In, 5
0% O
ut);
PM P
eak
Hou
r: Ln
(T) =
1.1
1Ln(
X) +
0.9
6 (5
4% In
, 46%
Out
)
EX
IST
ING
LA
ND
USE
INT
EN
SIT
IES
PRO
POSE
D L
AN
D U
SE IN
TE
NSI
TIE
S
NE
T C
HA
NG
E
Hol
lyw
ood
TOC
LU
PA
ITE
7th
Editi
on E
quat
ion
PM P
eak
Hou
r of G
ener
ator
TRIP
GEN
ERA
TIO
N A
NA
LYSI
S
Land
Use
IT
E La
nd U
se
Cod
eD
aily
Trip
sA
M P
eak
Hou
r of A
djac
ent S
treet
Inte
nsity
EXHIBIT J
MASS TRANSIT VERIFICATION LETTER
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT – Service and Capital Planning 1100 Park Central Boulevard, Suite 3500• Pompano Beach, Florida 33064 954-357-8340 • FAX 954-978-1189
Broward County Board of County Commissioners Josephus Eggelletion, Jr. • Sue Gunzburger • Kristin D. Jacobs • Ken Keechl • Ilene Lieberman • Stacy Ritter • John E. Rodstrom, Jr. • Diana Wasserman-Rubin • Lois Wexler
www.broward.org
Page 1 of 2
February 22, 2010
Scott Reale, AICP Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 RE: Hollywood Transit Oriented Corridor Land Use Plan Amendment CGA No. 10-3140
Dear Mr. Reale:
Broward County Transit (BCT) has reviewed your correspondence dated February 10, 2010 regarding Hollywood Transit Oriented Corridor Land Use Plan Amendment CGA No. 10-3140 Land Use Plan Amendment application, for current and planned bus service. Current fixed-route county bus service to the amendment site is currently provided by BCT Routes 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 441 Breeze, and 95 Express. Please see the following table for detailed information:
BCT
ROUTE DAYS OF SERVICE
HOURS OF
SERVICE
A.M. – P.M
SERVICE
FREQUENCY
3 Monday – Friday
Saturday
5:50a – 8:25p
6:25a – 8:25p
60 Minutes
60 Minutes
5
Monday – Friday
Saturday
Sunday
6:00a – 10:00p
7:00a – 9:50p
8:05a – 8:50p
30/60 Minutes
60 Minutes
60 Minutes
7
Monday – Friday
Saturday
Sunday
5:00a – 11:40p
5:05a – 11:53p
8:40a – 8:30p
30 Minutes
30 Minutes
40 Minutes
9
Monday – Friday
Saturday
Sunday
5:30a – 10:55p
5:50a – 10:45p
8:30a – 8:10p
45 Minutes
60 Minutes
60 Minutes
12
Monday – Friday
Saturday
Sunday
6:00a – 8:00p
6:00a – 8:15p
10:00a – 7:45p
45 Minutes
60 Minutes
60 Minutes
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT – Service and Capital Planning 1100 Park Central Boulevard, Suite 3500• Pompano Beach, Florida 33064 954-357-8340 • FAX 954-978-1189
Broward County Board of County Commissioners Josephus Eggelletion, Jr. • Sue Gunzburger • Kristin D. Jacobs • Ken Keechl • Ilene Lieberman • Stacy Ritter • John E. Rodstrom, Jr. • Diana Wasserman-Rubin • Lois Wexler
www.broward.org
Page 2 of 2
BCT
ROUTE DAYS OF SERVICE
HOURS OF
SERVICE
A.M. – P.M
SERVICE
FREQUENCY
15 Monday – Saturday
Sunday
5:40a – 10:05p
10:15a – 7:05p
45 Minutes
90 Minutes
16
Monday – Friday
Saturday
Sunday
6:00a – 9:50p
6:00a – 9:50p
10:00a – 6:50p
30/60 Minutes
60 Minutes
60 Minutes
17
Monday – Friday
Saturday
Sunday
5:23a – 8:23p
6:00a – 8:23p
10:00a – 6:50p
60 Minutes
60 Minutes
60 Minutes
18
Monday – Friday
Saturday
Sunday
4:40a – 12:38x
4:45a – 12:20x
6:45a – 10:21p
15 Minutes
20 Minutes
30 Minutes
95 Express Monday – Friday
Peak Only
5:45a – 9:46a
3:45p – 7:45p
30 Minutes
30 Minutes
441
Breeze
Monday – Friday
Peak Only
5:07a – 11:07a
2:42p – 7:52p
30 Minutes
30 Minutes
Future fixed-route bus services including route extension, weekday frequency, weekday span of service, weekend headway improvements, weekend span of service, and premium high capacity transit improvements are specified in the Broward County Transit Development Plan (TDP) and Broward MPO 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Please call me at 954-357-8450 if you require any additional information. Sincerely, John A. Ramos, Senior Planner Service and Capital Planning
P:\Projects\2010\103140 Hollywood TOC\Planning\Due Diligence\LETTERS\Backup\letter to mass transit.docx
February 10, 2010 John A. Ramos Senior Planner TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ‐ Service and Capital Planning 1100 Park Central Blvd., Suite 3500 Pompano Beach, FL 33064 Re: Hollywood Transit Oriented Corridor ‐ Land Use Plan Amendment CGA No. 10‐3140 Dear Mr. Ramos: Attached is a mass transit analysis for the above‐referenced land use plan amend‐ment. We are proposing to amend the City of Hollywood’s Future Land Use Element to establish a Transit Oriented Corridor land use designation along State Road 7/US 441. Please review the analysis and issue a letter verifying the traffic circulation information. If you should have any questions please contact me at 954‐921‐7781 / sreale@calvin‐giordano.com. Respectfully, CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Scott Reale, AICP Planner Attachment
G) MASS TRANSIT ANALYSIS
1. Identify the mass transit modes, existing and planned mass transit routes and scheduled service (headway) serving the amendment area within one‐quarter of a mile.
The Amendment area is served by fixed route scheduled bus service operated by Broward County Mass Transit. Following are the bus routes in and around the US 441/State Road 7 Corridor in Hollywood:
441 Breeze (Golden Glades Park & Ride to Sample Road) Runs along US 441/State Road 7 in the amendment site. Headways are approximately 30 minutes on weekdays. No weekend service. 95 Express (Flamingo Road/Pines Boulevard to Miami‐Dade County Government Center via Pines Boulevard and I‐95) Runs along Hollywood Boulevard in the amendment site. Headways are approximately 30 minutes on weekdays during rush hour. No weekend service. Route 3 (Century Village to Sheridan Street and U.S. 1 via Taft Street) Runs along Taft Street in the amendment site. Headways are approximately every 60 minutes. Route 5 (Century Village to Hallandale City Hall via Pembroke Road) Runs along Pembroke Road in the amendment site. Headways are approximately 30 minutes on weekdays and Saturday, and 60 minutes on Sundays. Route 7 (Pines Boulevard & U. S. 27 to Young Circle) Runs along Hollywood Boulevard in the amendment site. Headways are approximately 30 minutes on weekdays and Saturday, and 40 minutes on Sunday. Route 9 (Young Circle to Broward Central Terminal) Runs along Johnson Street in the amendment site. Headways are approximately 45 minutes on weekdays and 60 minutes on weekends. Route 12 (West Regional Terminal to North Beach Park) Runs along Sheridan Street in the amendment site. Headways are approximately 45 minutes on weekdays and 60 minutes on weekends. Route 16 (Pembroke Lakes Mall to Dania City Hall via Stirling Road) Runs along Stirling Road in the amendment site. Headways are approximately every 30 minutes during peak hours on weekdays, 60 minutes during non‐peak weekday hours, and 60 minutes on weekends. Route 15 (County Line Road and Southwest 52 Avenue to Fort Lauderdale Hollywood Airport Tri‐Rail Station) Runs along Stirling Road, Griffin Road, and US 441/SR 7 in the amendment site. Headways are approximately every 45‐50 minutes on weekdays and Saturdays, and 90 minutes on weekends. Route 18 (Golden Glades Park & Ride to Sandlefoot Cove Boulevard) Runs along US 441/State Road 7 in the amendment site.
Headways are approximately 15 minutes during weekdays, 20 minutes on Saturday, and 30 minutes on Sunday.
The Broward County Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) identifies a “Transit Bridge” proposed for the State Road 7/441 corridor. This project includes, but is not limited to Bus Rapid Transit, signal prioritization, rapid fare collection and integration with land use policies. The intention of the Transit Bridge is to improve transit service between Broward and Miami‐ Dade Counties. Long‐range transit improvements include light rail proposed along State Road 7. The Transit Investment Plan identifies light rail for development during the 2021‐2030 stage of the Plan. This will provide transit opportunities, linking Palm Beach County to Miami‐Dade, along State Road 7. This project proposes a change to Transit Oriented Corridor, which offers a means for transit to opportunities to grow and is a preliminary step in assisting the initiatives in the Transit Investment Plan. The State Road 7/441 Collaborative is actively working to explore transit opportunities throughout this corridor. The Collaborative is made up of cities throughout Broward County and Miami‐Dade who have an interest in both redevelopment opportunities and advancing transit along State Road 7/441. The City of Hollywood is a member of the Collaborative and is interested in exploring options for increasing transit use, which is a component of the City initiated Transit Oriented Corridor land use designation.
2. Quantify the change in mass transit demand resulting from this amendment.
The area is already well served by mass transit. The purpose of a Transit Oriented Corridor is to encourage the development and use of mass transit. The requested change from General Business to Transit Oriented Corridor creates a decrease in the number of trips from the existing use. This is due to the mixed‐use environment, utilizing office space, retail and a residential component. This land use category also relies on the use of the transit corridor, State Road 7/441. With the projected improvements to this roadway and the anticipation of several mixed‐use projects, the peak‐hour trips expected are projected to be less than the existing approved use.