Oil Shale Symposium, Golden, CO, October 14-15, 2008
Environmental Review of Selected Oil Shale TechnologiesJames R. Covell, RDS-EG&G Technical ServicesWashington Division, URS
2
Objectives
1. To identify environmental impacts that should be considered for the potential development of oil shale resources. Evaluation based on:– publicly available information from Environmental
Assessments– experience from previous oil shale retorts
2. To assess qualitatively the resource requirements of different oil shale technologies– Water– Energy– Land
3
Environmental Evaluation
• General Classes of Oil Shale Technologies Evaluated– In Situ: Indirect Horizontal, Indirect Vertical, Combustion– Modified In Situ– Surface Retorting: Underground Mining, Surface Mining
• Environmental and Resource Considerations– Land Use (Footprint)– Surface Water– Groundwater– Air Quality (Includes Fugitive Dust and Particulates,
CO2 emissions)– Water and Power Requirements
4
Qualitative Environmental Assessment
• Environmental assessments are not absolute and are relative only to other classes of oil shale technologies
• Assessments are based on the potential of a given impact– A “high” potential does not indicate that the impact cannot be
mitigated; only that the impact should be anticipated– Assessments only consider innate environmental characteristics
of the oil shale technology classes• For example, surface retorting processes possess inherently
low potential for groundwater impacts and high potential for air quality impacts
– Assessments do not consider mitigating methods used to reduce or control a given impact
5
Locations - Lease Award R&D Tests
2007 BLM
6
Technology - In Situ, Horizontal Development, Indirect Heating, Energy Source - Spent Retort Combustion
Source: Chevron EA
7
Technology- In Situ, Horizontal Development, Indirect Heating, Energy Source - Spent Retort Combustion
Qualitative Environmental Characteristics
• Moderate Footprint• Reduced External Power Requirements• Moderate Potential for Air Quality Impacts
– GHG (CO2) Generated by Combustion of Spent Retorts• Low Water Demand• Low Potential for Surface Water Impacts• Moderate to High Potential for Groundwater Impacts
8
Technology - In Situ, Horizontal Development; Indirect Heating/Controlled Temperature; Energy Source - External
Source: EGL, 26th Oil Shale Symposium
9
Conceptual Well Field, Plan View
Source: EGL Environmental Assessment
10
Technology - In Situ, Horizontal Development; Indirect Heating/Controlled Temperature; Energy Source - External
Qualitative Environmental Characteristics
• Moderate Footprint• High External Energy Requirement• Moderate Potential for Air Quality Impacts• Low Water Demand• Low Potential for Surface Water Impacts• Moderate to High Potential for Groundwater Impacts
11
Technology – In Situ; Vertical Development; Indirect Heating/Controlled Temperature; Energy Source - External; Hydrologic Containment
Plan View
Vertical View
Source; Shell Oil Company
12
Technology – In Situ; Vertical Development; Indirect Heating/Controlled Temperature; Energy Source - External; Hydrologic Containment
Qualitative Environmental Characteristics• Small Footprint• Aquifer Contacts• Process Fluids Contained (Freeze Wall)• High External Energy Demand• Small Process Water Demand• Post-Retorting Water Demand • Low Potential for Surface Water Impacts• High Potential for Groundwater Impacts• Low Carbonate CO2 Production• Air Quality Impacts- Unknown at Present
13
In Situ Combustion (Rock Springs)
Source: US Department of Energy
14
Technology – In Situ; Horizontal Development; Direct Heating; Energy Source - Retorted Oil Shale
Qualitative Environmental Characteristics
• Moderate Footprint• Low External Power Requirements• Moderate Potential for Air Quality Impacts• Carbonate CO2 Generated in Combustion• Low Water Demand• Low Potential for Surface Water Impacts• High Potential for Groundwater Impacts
15
Modified In Situ ProcessModule Construction
Modified from Stevens and Talbert
16
Technology – Underground Mining/Surface Retort and In Situ; Vertical Development; Direct Heating; Energy Source - Retorted Oil Shale
Qualitative Environmental Characteristics• Larger Footprint• Moderate External Power Requirements (Mining)• High Potential for Air Quality Impacts • High Water Demand • Moderate Potential for Surface Water Impacts• Moderate to High Potential for Groundwater
Impacts
17
Technology – Underground Mine/Surface Retort
Alberta Taciuk Processor (ATP) Retort
Cross Section, White River Oil Shale Mine
Source: Aho, 26th Oil Shale Symposium
18
Technology – Underground Mine/Surface Retort
Qualitative Environmental Characteristics
• Larger Footprint (Spent Shale Disposal)• Moderate to High External Power Requirements• High Potential for Air Quality Impacts• Carbonate CO2 Generated in Combustion• High Water Demand• High Potential for Surface Water Impacts• Moderate Potential for Groundwater Impacts