-
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
ASSESSMENT PROCESS
PROPOSED SOL INVICTUS PV1 – 4
SOLAR FACILITIES, NORTHERN
CAPE PROVINCE
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS
NOTES OF THE MEETING
ADJACENT LANDOWNER (FARM RE/83 &
FARM RE/84)
HELD ON
TUESDAY 16 FEBRUARY 2016 AT 14:30
VENUE
FARM RE/83, NEAR AGGENEYS
Notes for the Record prepared by:
Savannah Environmental
Please address any comments to Gabriele Wood at the above address.
Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd
Contact: Gabriele Wood
Address: PO Box 148
Sunninghill, 2157
Tel: 011 656 3237
Fax: 086 684 0547
E-mail: [email protected]
-
FOCUS GROUP MEETING:
Venue: Farm RE/83, near Aggeneys
Date: Tuesday 16 February 2016
Time: 14:30
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION
Candice Hunter of Savannah Environmental welcomed all in attendance and introduced
herself as the Social Consultant for the EIA process being undertaken for the Sol Invictus
Development. She noted that the project includes the development of four (4) separate
commercial photovoltaic (PV) solar energy facilities, known as Sol Invictus 1, Sol
Invictus 2, Sol Invictus 3 and Sol Invictus 4). She noted that the project is located
within the jurisdiction of the Nama-Khoi and borders the Khai-Ma Local Municipality,
which both form part of the Namakwa District Municipality.
She stated that each development will be constructed as separate stand-alone projects,
with a separate project development company (or Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV)) as the
applicants for each project. The projects are detailed below:
Applicant Project Name Contracted
Capacity
DEA Reference No.
Cyraclox (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 1 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/873
Cyracraft (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 2 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/869
Cyrafusion (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 3 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/872
Cyralex (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 4 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/871
Ms Hunter stated that the purpose of each proposed PV facility will be to export the
generated power into the Eskom electricity grid. The projects are proposed to be bid
into the Department of Energy’s (DoE) Renewable Energy Independent Power Producers
Procurement (REIPPP) Programme.
Candice Hunter thanked the members of the meeting for the opportunity to brief them
about the proposed projects. She noted that the purpose of the meeting was to present
the background of the project, provide an overview of the environmental assessment
process and discuss any potential social issues and concerns with the proposed
developments. She noted that any issues raised would be recorded as part of the public
participation process and included in the Comments and Responses Reports which would
be appended to the Environmental Impact Assessment Reports that would be submitted
to the Department of Environmental Affairs.
-
MEETING ATTENDEES
Name Organisation & Position
Gert Goosen Adjacent Landowner- Farm RE/83 & Farm RE/84
Candice Hunter (CH) Savannah Environmental –Social Consultant
APOLOGIES
None
BACKGROUND & TECHNICAL ASPECTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED
PROJECT
Candice Hunter discussed the background and introduction to the project and the EIA
process. A Background Information Document (BID) and a map including the location
of the proposed developments were presented.
DISCUSSION SESSION
Question / Comment Response
GG: The dust is a problem on the existing gravel
road. With the increase of trucks, construction
vehicles and traffic the dust will increase
significantly. The areas next to the road will be
so full of dust that the sheep and game won’t be
able to graze in that area. If the road could be
tarred, that would be beneficial to control the
dust problem properly. Or proper dust
suppression measures would need to be put in
place.
CH: Comment noted. The appropriate dust
suppression measures will need to be
implemented by the appointed contractor as
stipulated in the Environmental Management
Programme (EMPr).
GG: Will there be continuous movement of
people on the access road?
CH: There will be more movement of people
during the construction phase and very
minimal movement during the operation
phase (20-25 years). The maximum number
of construction vehicle trips per day would be
approximately ~15 - 20 trips. Low and semi-
skilled workers will likely be transported to
site with busses (not hundreds of cars).
GG: Another concern is the risk of theft. It would
be necessary for the sides of the roads to be
fenced off properly, especially if there is an
increase in the movement of people. People will
be able to go over or through the fence as it is
not very high or secure. This increases the risk
CH: Comment noted, appropriate security
measures will be presented in the EMPr.
-
Question / Comment Response
of the safety of the sheep in terms of theft and
poaching. There is a bit of crime in the area and
this may result in an increase in crime as the
livestock will be more exposed with an increase
of people in the immediate area. With an
increase of people moving through the area this
also increases the risk of theft.
GG: How many people will be employed during
the construction phase? How many labourers?
CH: One PV solar energy facility of 150MW is
likely to create between 400-600
employment opportunities, depending on the
final design. Of this approximately 50-60%
of the opportunities will be available to low-
skilled local workers (construction labourers,
security staff etc.), 25% will be available to
semi-skilled workers (drivers, equipment
operators etc.), and 15% will be available to
skilled personnel (engineers, land surveyors,
project managers etc.).
GG: It is crucial that the project site area is
securely fenced off properly; especially with the
housing development and people living on the
farm during the operation phase. This will
prevent the risk of theft and people accessing
my farming area.
CH: The PV facilities will be fenced-off for
security purposes.
GG: There is a gate on the existing gravel road
as you come off the N14. Then the gravel road
is fenced on both sides and another gate is
located on the border of Farm RE/83 and Farm
Ou Taaisbosmond 5/66. What will happen to the
gates during the construction phase?
CH: I would need to confirm with the
developers.
GG: It is important that the developers
consult with me on their plans for the access
road and necessary agreements are put in
place.
GG: Where will the water be sourced from? CH: The water is planned to either be
sourced from boreholes and/or the
municipality.
GG: If they are considering borehole water
the developers can consult with me.
GG: How long is the construction phase? CH: It is estimated that the construction
phase of each solar energy facility is
expected to extend over a period of 18
months.
Do you know who owns Farm Zuurwater 3/62? GG: Yes Deon Maasdorp (contact details
were provided)
GG: Where are the construction workers going
to live? Are they going to live on the site?
CH: No constructions workers will be living
on the site. Majority of the construction
labour force will be sourced from the local
area. Employees that would need to be
-
Question / Comment Response
brought into the area will be housed in the
nearest towns. Overnight site worker
presence will be limited to security staff.
GG: Is it guaranteed that the developments are
going to happen? Where is the electricity going
to go to?
The purpose of the proposed PV facilities will
be to evacuate the generated power into the
Eskom electricity grid. The project is
proposed to be bid into the Department of
Energy’s (DoE) Renewable Energy
Independent Power Producers Procurement
(REIPPP) Programme.
GG: The developments may pose a risk to our
livestock production and farming activities. A
higher and secure fence would need to be put in
place to reduce the risks.
CH: Noted. Appropriate mitigation measures
would need to be put in place to address this
concern.
WAY FORWARD AND CLOSURE
In closing Candice Hunter noted that the answers to the questions which she could not
respond to will be provided in the Comments and Responses Report that will form part
of the EIA Report. She noted that the EIA Report will be made available for a 30-day
review period in due course and that Interested and Affected Parties (I&APs) would be
notified of the review period and further consultation meetings. She said that I&APs
could submit their written comments on the EIA process and proposed project to
Savannah Environmental. She noted that all comments received would be included in
the final EIA Reports that will be submitted to the Department of Environmental Affairs.
She thanked all in attendance for availing themselves for the meeting. The meeting
was closed at 15:30.
-
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
ASSESSMENT PROCESS
PROPOSED SOL INVICTUS PV 1 –
4 SOLAR FACILITIES, NORTHERN
CAPE PROVINCE
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS
NOTES OF THE MEETING
POWER LINE LANDOWNER
HELD ON
TUESDAY 16 FEBRUARY 2016 AT 15:30
VENUE
FARM ZUURWATER 3/62
Notes for the Record prepared by:
Savannah Environmental
Please address any comments to Gabriele Wood at the above address.
Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd
Contact: Gabriele Wood
Address: PO Box 148
Sunninghill, 2157
Tel: 011 656 3237
Fax: 086 684 0547
E-mail: [email protected]
-
FOCUS GROUP MEETING
Venue: Farm Zuurwater 3/62
Date: Thursday 20 August 2015
Time: 15:30
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION
Candice Hunter of Savannah Environmental welcomed all in attendance and introduced
herself as the Social Consultant for the EIA process being undertaken for the Sol Invictus
Development. She noted that the project includes the development of four (4) separate
commercial photovoltaic (PV) solar energy facilities, known as Sol Invictus 1, Sol
Invictus 2, Sol Invictus 3 and Sol Invictus 4). She noted that the project is located
within the jurisdiction of the Nama-Khoi and borders the Khai-Ma Local Municipality,
which both form part of the Namakwa District Municipality.
She stated that each development will be constructed as separate stand-alone projects,
with a separate project development company (or Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV)) as the
applicants for each project. The projects are detailed below:
Applicant Project Name Contracted
Capacity
DEA Reference No.
Cyraclox (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 1 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/873
Cyracraft (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 2 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/869
Cyrafusion (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 3 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/872
Cyralex (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 4 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/871
Ms Hunter stated that the purpose of each proposed PV facility will be to export the
generated power into the Eskom electricity grid. The projects are proposed to be bid
into the Department of Energy’s (DoE) Renewable Energy Independent Power Producers
Procurement (REIPPP) Programme.
Candice Hunter thanked the members of the meeting for the opportunity to brief them
about the proposed projects. She noted that the purpose of the meeting was to present
the background of the project, provide an overview of the environmental assessment
process and discuss any potential social issues and concerns with the proposed
developments. She noted that any issues raised would be recorded as part of the public
participation process and included in the Comments and Responses Reports which would
be appended to the Environmental Impact Assessment Reports that would be submitted
to the Department of Environmental Affairs.
-
MEETING ATTENDEES
Name Organisation & Position
Deon Maasdorp Power line impacted landowner- Zuurwater 3/62
Hester Maasdorp Power line impacted landowner- Zuurwater 3/62
Candice Hunter (CH) Savannah Environmental –Social Consultant
APOLOGIES
None
BACKGROUND & TECHNICAL ASPECTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED
PROJECT
Candice Hunter discussed the background and introduction to the project and the EIA
process. A Background Information Document (BID) and a map including the location
of the proposed developments were presented.
DISCUSSION SESSION
Question / Comment Response
DM: At the moment there are two power lines
running over our farm. We would have to first
speak to our lawyer, to get his insight and think
about adding another power line to our farm.
HM: We also have developers that are wanting to
develop solar plants on our farm. The solar farms
have been authorised, they are waiting to see if
they become preferred bidders. We would need to
inform them about this proposed power line as well
as see if there is possible space. The developers
have a contract with us so we would need to speak
to them about having another power line on the
farm.
However, personally we do not want another
power line traversing our farm. We have a small
piece of land for farming purposes, we do not want
to divide our land even further and reduce our
farming areas even more.
CH: Comments noted. The developer will be
informed and will be in contact with you
soon regarding the power line route.
-
WAY FORWARD AND CLOSURE
In closing Candice Hunter noted that the answers to the questions which she could not
respond to will be provided in the Comments and Responses Report that will form part
of the EIA Report. She noted that the EIA Report will be made available for a 30-day
review period in due course and that Interested and Affected Parties (I&APs) would be
notified of the review period and further consultation meetings. She said that I&APs
could submit their written comments on the EIA process and proposed project to
Savannah Environmental. She noted that all comments received would be included in
the final EIA Reports that will be submitted to the Department of Environmental Affairs.
She thanked all in attendance for availing themselves for the meeting. The meeting
was closed at 16:30.
-
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
ASSESSMENT PROCESS
PROPOSED SOL INVICTUS SOLAR
PV1 – 4 SOLAR FACILITIES,
NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS
NOTES OF THE MEETING
NAMA-KHOI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY-
ACTING MUNICIPAL MANAGER
HELD ON
WEDNESDAY 17 FEBRUARY 2016 AT 09:00
VENUE
NAMA-KHOI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY, SPRINGBOK
Notes for the Record prepared by:
Savannah Environmental
Please address any comments to Gabriele Wood at the above address.
Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd
Contact: Gabriele Wood
Address: PO Box 148
Sunninghill, 2157
Tel: 011 656 3237
Fax: 086 684 0547
E-mail: [email protected]
-
FOCUS GROUP MEETING:
Venue: Nama Khoi Local Municipality, Springbok
Date: Wednesday 17 February 2016
Time: 09:00
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION
Candice Hunter of Savannah Environmental welcomed all in attendance and introduced
herself as the Social Consultant for the EIA process being undertaken for the Sol Invictus
Development. She noted that the project includes the development of four (4) separate
commercial photovoltaic (PV) solar energy facilities, known as Sol Invictus 1, Sol
Invictus 2, Sol Invictus 3 and Sol Invictus 4). She noted that the project is located
within the jurisdiction of the Nama-Khoi and borders the Khai-Ma Local Municipality,
which both form part of the Namakwa District Municipality.
She stated that each development will be constructed as separate stand-alone projects,
with a separate project development company (or Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV)) as the
applicants for each project. The projects are detailed below:
Applicant Project Name Contracted
Capacity
DEA Reference No.
Cyraclox (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 1 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/873
Cyracraft (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 2 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/869
Cyrafusion (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 3 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/872
Cyralex (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 4 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/871
Ms Hunter stated that the purpose of each proposed PV facility will be to export the
generated power into the Eskom electricity grid. The projects are proposed to be bid
into the Department of Energy’s (DoE) Renewable Energy Independent Power Producers
Procurement (REIPPP) Programme.
Candice Hunter thanked the members of the meeting for the opportunity to brief them
about the proposed projects. She noted that the purpose of the meeting was to present
the background of the project, provide an overview of the environmental assessment
process and discuss any potential social issues and concerns with the proposed
developments. She noted that any issues raised would be recorded as part of the public
participation process and included in the Comments and Responses Reports which would
be appended to the Environmental Impact Assessment Reports that would be submitted
to the Department of Environmental Affairs.
-
MEETING ATTENDEES
Name Organisation & Position
Jacques Cloete (JC) Nama Khoi Local Municipality – Acting Municipal Manager
Candice Hunter (CH) Savannah Environmental –Social Consultant
APOLOGIES
None
BACKGROUND & TECHNICAL ASPECTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED
PROJECT
Candice Hunter discussed the background and introduction to the project and the EIA
process. A Background Information Document (BID) and a map including the location
of the proposed developments were presented.
DISCUSSION SESSION
Question / Comment Response
JC: Have the scoping reports been accepted
by the DEA?
CH: The DEA have provided acceptance
for the scoping reports for the four PV
facilities.
JC: Is the impacted farm owned by the
municipality or is it privately owned?
CH: The impacted farm is privately
owned.
JC: Are the developers going to purchase the
farm or lease the area from the farm owner?
CH: The developers will lease the areas
for the solar plants for the duration of
the operation phase (20-25 years).
JC: Have the developers proposed these
projects to the municipality yet?
CH: I would need to confirm with our
clients.
JC: I was not aware of these projects. I
am the acting municipal manager, I
would like to be notified of the EIA
process going forward.
CH: Noted, your details will be added to
our database and you will be notified of
the EIA process going forward. The
Municipal Manager will also still be
notified.
-
Question / Comment Response
JC: It is important that we are informed
so that we are able to provide our
comments and for the relevant people in
our department to add their input. It is
important for the municipality to be
notified in writing via a formal letter
when reports are available for review
and comment. These projects would
also eventually need to be presented to
the council for notice. It is also
important that the relevant ward
councillors are informed of the projects
for the social responsibilities with the
communities.
CH: Noted, formal letters will be sent to
the municipal manager and ward
councillor regarding the EIA process. A
meeting has been arranged with the
relevant ward councillor and he will be
informed of the projects.
JC: Will we be sent the environmental
reports?
CH: Yes, we will add you to our
database. A copy of the EIA report will
be released in the next few months. We
will send a CD copy of the report to your
offices. You will have an opportunity of
30 days to comment on the report. The
comments that we receive will then be
included in the Final EIA Report that will
be submitted to the Department of
Environmental Affairs.
WAY FORWARD AND CLOSURE
In closing Candice Hunter noted that the answers to the questions which she could not
respond to will be provided in the Comments and Responses Report that will form part
of the EIA Report. She noted that the EIA Report will be made available for a 30-day
review period in due course and that Interested and Affected Parties (I&APs) would be
notified of the review period and further consultation meetings. She said that I&APs
could submit their written comments on the EIA process and proposed project to
-
Savannah Environmental. She noted that all comments received would be included in
the final EIA Reports that will be submitted to the Department of Environmental Affairs.
She thanked all in attendance for availing themselves for the meeting. The meeting
was closed at 09:30.
-
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
ASSESSMENT PROCESS
PROPOSED SOL INVICTUS PV1 – 4
SOLAR FACILITIES, NORTHERN
CAPE PROVINCE
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS
NOTES OF THE MEETING
NAMA-KHOI LOCAL MUNCICIPALITY,
WARD 1 COUNCILLOR
Held on:
WEDNESDAY 17 FEBRUARY 2016
Venue:
NAMA-KHOI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY, SPRINGBOK
Notes for the Record prepared by:
Savannah Environmental
Please address any comments to Gabriele Wood at the above address.
Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd
Address: PO Box 148
Sunninghill, 2157
Tel: 011 656 3237
Fax: 086 684 0547
E-mail: [email protected]
-
FOCUS GROUP MEETING:
Venue: Nama-Khoi Local Municipality, Springbok
Date: Wednesday 17 February 2016
Time: 10:30
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION
Candice Hunter of Savannah Environmental welcomed all in attendance and introduced
herself as the Social Consultant for the EIA process being undertaken for the Sol Invictus
Development. She noted that the project includes the development of four (4) separate
commercial photovoltaic (PV) solar energy facilities, known as Sol Invictus 1, Sol
Invictus 2, Sol Invictus 3 and Sol Invictus 4). She noted that the project is located
within the jurisdiction of the Nama-Khoi and borders the Khai-Ma Local Municipality,
which both form part of the Namakwa District Municipality.
She stated that each development will be constructed as separate stand-alone projects,
with a separate project development company (or Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV)) as the
applicants for each project. The projects are detailed below:
Applicant Project Name Contracted
Capacity
DEA Reference No.
Cyraclox (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 1 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/873
Cyracraft (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 2 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/869
Cyrafusion (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 3 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/872
Cyralex (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 4 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/871
Ms Hunter stated that the purpose of each proposed PV facility will be to export the
generated power into the Eskom electricity grid. The projects are proposed to be bid
into the Department of Energy’s (DoE) Renewable Energy Independent Power Producers
Procurement (REIPPP) Programme.
Candice Hunter thanked the members of the meeting for the opportunity to brief them
about the proposed projects. She noted that the purpose of the meeting was to present
the background of the project, provide an overview of the environmental assessment
process and discuss any potential social issues and concerns with the proposed
developments. She noted that any issues raised would be recorded as part of the public
participation process and included in the Comments and Responses Reports which would
be appended to the Environmental Impact Assessment Reports that would be submitted
to the Department of Environmental Affairs.
-
MEETING ATTENDEES
Name Organisation & Position
Hendrik S Appolis (HA) Nama Khoi Local Municipality - Ward 1 Councillor
Daphne D Meiring (DM) Nama Khoi Local Municipality - Ward Committee member
Candice Hunter (CH) Savannah Environmental – Social Consultant
APOLOGIES
None
BACKGROUND & TECHNICAL ASPECTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED
PROJECT
Candice Hunter presented the background and introduction to the project and the EIA
process. She presented a map including the location of the proposed development.
DISCUSSION SESSION
Question / Comment Response
HA: This will be the first solar project in our
ward. I don’t think there will be any challenges
or issues regarding the development of the
project. How many employment opportunities
will the development create for the local
community?
CH: Each proposed solar energy facility is
likely to create approximately 400-600
employment opportunities during the
construction period (12-18 months per
project). Majority of these employment
opportunities will be available to unskilled/
semi-skilled workers that will be sourced from
the local communities (between 50-60%).
There will be other economic benefits for the
local area (within a 50km radius) in terms of
community shareholding in the projects, there
is potential local socio-economic upliftment
from job creation as well the project developer
is obliged to spend a certain percentage of the
revenue from the project on socio-economic
development in the local area throughout the
projects operational phase (approximately 20
years).
HA: The project will bring many opportunities
for the area in terms of local employment, the
community trust, SED and EP. What the
community needs is for the employment of the
low skilled and semi-skilled personnel to be
CH: Noted.
-
Question / Comment Response
sourced from the local areas. As a ward
councilor representing Ward 1, I am very
pleased and supportive of this proposed
development.
HA: What is the duration of the construction
phase and operation phase of each project?
CH: The construction phase for each PV facility
will be approximately 18 months. The
construction phase for the CSP facility will be
approximately 36 months. The operation
phase for solar energy facilities will be
approximately 20-25 years.
HA: Will we be sent the environmental reports? CH: Yes, we will add your details to our
database. A copy of the EIA report will be
released in the next few weeks on our website.
We will send a CD copy of the report to the
local municipality. You will have an
opportunity of 30 days to comment on the
report. The comments that we receive will
then be included in the Final EIA Report that
will be submitted to the Department of
Environmental Affairs.
WAY FORWARD AND CLOSURE
In closing Candice Hunter noted that the answers to the questions which she could not
respond to will be provided in the Comments and Responses Report that will form part
of the EIA Report. She noted that the EIA Report will be made available for a 30-day
review period in due course and that Interested and Affected Parties (I&APs) would be
notified of the review period and further consultation meetings. She said that I&APs
could submit their written comments on the EIA process and proposed project to
Savannah Environmental. She noted that all comments received would be included in
the final EIA Reports that will be submitted to the Department of Environmental Affairs.
She thanked all in attendance for availing themselves for the meeting. The meeting
was closed at 11:30.
-
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
ASSESSMENT PROCESS
PROPOSED SOL INVICTUS PV1 – 4
SOLAR FACILITIES, NORTHERN
CAPE PROVINCE
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS
NOTES OF THE MEETING
KHAI-MA LOCAL MUNCICIPALITY
LED & IDP MANAGERS
HELD ON:
WEDNESDAY 16 FEBRUARY 2016
VENUE:
NUWE STREET, POFADDER
Notes for the Record prepared by:
Savannah Environmental
Please address any comments to Gabriele Wood at the above address.
Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd
Address: PO Box 148
Sunninghill, 2157
Tel: 011 656 3237
Fax: 086 684 0547
E-mail: [email protected]
-
FOCUS GROUP MEETING
Venue: Khai-Ma Local Municipality, Nuwe Street, Pofadder
Date: Wednesday 16 February 2016
Time: 11:30
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION
Candice Hunter of Savannah Environmental welcomed all in attendance and
introduced herself as the Social Consultant for the EIA process being undertaken
for the Sol Invictus Development. She noted that the project includes the
development of four (4) separate commercial photovoltaic (PV) solar energy
facilities, known as Sol Invictus 1, Sol Invictus 2, Sol Invictus 3 and Sol Invictus
4). She noted that the project is located within the jurisdiction of the Nama-Khoi
and borders the Khai-Ma Local Municipality, which both form part of the Namakwa
District Municipality.
She stated that each development will be constructed as separate stand-alone
projects, with a separate project development company (or Special Purpose Vehicle
(SPV)) as the applicants for each project. The projects are detailed below:
Applicant Project Name Contracted
Capacity
DEA Reference No.
Cyraclox (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 1 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/873
Cyracraft (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 2 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/869
Cyrafusion (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 3 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/872
Cyralex (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 4 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/871
Ms Hunter stated that the purpose of each proposed PV facility will be to export the
generated power into the Eskom electricity grid. The projects are proposed to be
bid into the Department of Energy’s (DoE) Renewable Energy Independent Power
Producers Procurement (REIPPP) Programme.
Candice Hunter thanked the members of the meeting for the opportunity to brief
them about the proposed projects. She noted that the purpose of the meeting was
to present the background of the project, provide an overview of the environmental
assessment process and discuss any potential social issues and concerns with the
proposed developments. She noted that any issues raised would be recorded as
part of the public participation process and included in the Comments and
Responses Reports which would be appended to the Environmental Impact
Assessment Reports that would be submitted to the Department of Environmental
Affairs.
-
MEETING ATTENDEES
Name Organisation & Position
Roger Basson (RB) Khai-Ma Local Municipality – LED manager
Jillian Nortje (JN) Khai-Ma Local Municipality – IDP manager
Candice Hunter (CH) Savannah Environmental – Social Consultant
APOLOGIES
None
BACKGROUND & TECHNICAL ASPECTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED
PROJECT
Candice Hunter presented the background and introduction to the project and the
EIA process. She presented a map including the location of the proposed
development.
DISCUSSION SESSION
Question / Comment Response
RB: Is the impacted farm privately
owned?
CH: The impacted farm is privately owned.
JN: Are you still working within a 50km
radius for socio-economic benefits?
CH: Yes, renewable energy projects under the
REIPPP are obliged to contribute to local
economic development. Between 12% and
20% of the people employed on each project
have to be residents of local communities
located within 50km of the project site.
CH: Each proposed solar energy facility is likely
to create approximately 400-600 employment
opportunities during the construction period
(12-18 months per project). Majority of these
employment opportunities will be available to
unskilled/ semi-skilled workers that will be
sourced from the local communities (between
50-60%). There will be other economic benefits
for the local area (within a 50km radius) in
terms of community shareholding in the
projects, there is potential local socio-economic
upliftment from job creation as well the project
developer is obliged to spend a certain
-
Question / Comment Response
percentage of the revenue from the project on
socio-economic development in the local area
throughout the projects operational phase
(approximately 20 years).
JN: Which communities will benefit? CH: It is too early on in the process to state
which communities will benefit specifically.
However, communities within the 50km radius
will benefit.
JN: This 50km radius is a bit of a problem,
because the closest town to the project is
Aggeneys. There may be other communities in
the local municipality that need more upliftment
and assistance. For instance, Aggeneys may be
better off than Onseepkrans who have a lot of
struggles and issues in terms of unemployment.
Aggeneys is a mining town and the
unemployment rate in that town is not as bad
as Onseepkrans.
RB: When would construction of these
projects commence?
CH: EIA’s are currently being undertaken for the
projects. The Scoping Phase has been
completed for the PV facilities. The identified
environmental issues are to be further assessed
in the EIA phase. Public participation meetings
will take place prior to submitting the EIA report
to the Department of Environmental Affairs. It
is envisaged that environmental authorisation
will be received from the Department of
Environmental Affairs within the next six
months.
The aim is to bid the projects in the REIPPP
Programme Round 5 Bidding Window which is
anticipated to be in the last quarter of 2016.
Construction would begin in the second half of
2017 if Preferred Bidder Status is awarded.
JN: It is important for skills capacity is
maximised through these projects.
CH: Noted.
RB: Uplifting the communities is key for
the municipality. Transparency is
important especially through the process
of the community trust and who is
appointed. It is necessary for needs of the
community to be met and for the local
municipality to be involved in the
community trust process. There needs to
CH: Noted. This will be suggested in the Social
Impact Assessment report.
-
Question / Comment Response
be a central communication process
between all the key stakeholders
involved.
A community needs analysis is important
and should be done in conjunction with
the local authorities. The local
municipality is the vehicle for
development in the areas and should be
involved throughout all the processes.
RB: Will we be sent the environmental
reports?
CH: Yes, we will add you to our database. A
copy of the EIA report will be released in the
next few months. We will send a CD copy of the
report to the municipality (municipal manager).
The municipality will have an opportunity of 30
days to comment on the report. The comments
that we receive will then be included in the Final
EIA Report that will be submitted to the
Department of Environmental Affairs.
WAY FORWARD AND CLOSURE
In closing Candice Hunter noted that the answers to the questions which she could
not respond to will be provided in the Comments and Responses Report that will
form part of the EIA Report. She noted that the EIA Report will be made available
for a 30-day review period in due course and that Interested and Affected Parties
(I&APs) would be notified of the review period and further consultation meetings.
She said that I&APs could submit their written comments on the EIA process and
proposed project to Savannah Environmental. She noted that all comments
received would be included in the final EIA Reports that will be submitted to the
Department of Environmental Affairs. She thanked all in attendance for availing
themselves for the meeting. The meeting was closed at 12:30.
-
From the desk of Candice Hunter
E-mail: [email protected]_____________________________________
RECORD OF TELEPHONE DISCUSSION
Name: Mr Jasper Mostert
Farm: Farm Ou Taaisbosmond 5/66 (Impacted Landowner)
From: Candice Hunter – Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd
Project: Sol Invictus Developments
Subject: Impacted Landowner Meeting
Date: 01-04-2016
Candice Hunter of Savannah Environmental contacted Mr Jasper Mostert, the
registered owner of the farm Ou Taaisbosmond 5/66. Mr Jasper Mostert is the
impacted landowner for the proposed Sol Invictus Developments.
Candice Hunter called Mr Mostert and explained that Savannah Environmental is
undertaking the EIA for the Sol Invictus PV facilities. Candice Hunter introduced
herself as the Social Consultant for the EIA processes being undertaken. She noted
that the purpose of the telephone meeting was to discuss any potential social issues
and concerns with the proposed developments. She also explained that this is an
opportunity for the landowners to raise any issues and concerns that they might
have regarding the project. She said that any issues or concerns raised would be
documented as part of the public participation process and included in the
Comments and Responses Report that would be submitted to the DEA with the final
EIA Report.
-
DISCUSSION SESSION
Question / Comment Response
JM: The access road to the site would need
to be fenced off on both sides as well as the
project site area would also need to be
fenced. So that grazing can still continue
around the project areas. Basic livestock
fencing to keep the cattle inside is all that
would be required. Up until now there hasn’t
been too much movement of vehicles along
the access road so it hasn’t been necessary
to fence off the sides of the road. However it
will need to be fenced off if the developments
go ahead.
CH: Noted.
CH: Do you have any other concerns or
issues with the proposed developments?
JM: I have no issues with the proposed
developments.
WAY FORWARD AND CLOSURE
In closing Candice Hunter noted that the answers to the questions which she could not
respond to will be provided in the Comments and Responses Report that will form part of
the EIA Report. She noted that the EIA Report will be made available for a 30-day review
period in due course and that Interested and Affected Parties (I&APs) would be notified of
the review period and further consultation meetings. She said that I&APs could submit
their written comments on the EIA process and proposed project to Savannah
Environmental. She noted that all comments received would be included in the final EIA
Reports that will be submitted to the Department of Environmental Affairs. She thanked
Mr Mostert for availing himself for the telephonic discussion.
-
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
PROCESS
PROPOSED SOL INVICTUS PV1-4 SOLAR
FACILITIES, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PHASE
PUBLIC MEETING
HELD ON
4 MAY 2016
VENUE
POFADDER CIVIC HALL, POFADDER
Notes for the Record prepared by:
Savannah Environmental
Please address any comments to Gabriele Wood at the above address.
Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd
Contact: Gabriele Wood
Address: PO Box 148
Sunninghill, 2157
Tel: 011 656 3237
Fax: 086 684 0547
E-mail: [email protected]
-
1
SOL INVICTUS PV 1 – 4 SOLAR FACILITIES, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE
Venue: Pofadder Civic Hall, Pofadder
Date: 4 May 2016Time: 17:30
NOTES
A public meeting was convened on Wednesday4 May 2016 at 17:30 at the Pofadder Civic Hallin Pofadder. The public meeting and the dates of the review period of the draft EIA Reports
were advertised in the Volksblad and Gemsbok newspapers at the onset of the public review
period. I&APs registered on the projects database were also invited to attend the public
meeting on 29 April 2016. No one attended the public meeting and the meeting was
subsequently cancelled at 18:00.
-
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
PROCESS
PROPOSED SOL INVICTUS PV1-4 SOLAR
FACILITIES, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PHASE
FOCUS GROUP MEETING
DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND SANITATION
HELD ON
5 MAY 2016
VENUE
DWS OFFICES, LOUISVALE ROAD, UPINGTON
Notes for the Record prepared by:
Savannah Environmental
Please address any comments to Gabriele Wood at the above address.
Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd
Contact: Gabriele Wood
Address: PO Box 148
Sunninghill, 2157
Tel: 011 656 3237
Fax: 086 684 0547
E-mail: [email protected]
-
1
SOL INVICTUS PV 1 – 4 SOLAR FACILITIES, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE
Venue: DWS, Louisvale Road, Upington
Date: 5 May 2016
Time: 11:00
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION
Gabriele Wood of Savannah Environmental welcomed all in attendance and introduced
herself as the Public Participation and Social Consultant for the EIA process being
undertaken for the Sol Invictus Development. She noted that the project includes the
development of four (4) separate commercial photovoltaic (PV) solar energy facilities,
known as Sol Invictus 1, Sol Invictus 2, Sol Invictus 3 and Sol Invictus 4). She noted that
the project is located within the jurisdiction of the Nama-Khoi and borders the Khai-Ma Local
Municipality, which both form part of the Namakwa District Municipality.
She stated that each development will be constructed as separate stand-alone projects,
with a separate project development company (or Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV)) as the
applicants for each project. The projects are detailed below:
Applicant Project Name Contracted
Capacity
DEA Reference No.
Cyraclox (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 1 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/873
Cyracraft (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 2 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/869
Cyrafusion (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 3 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/872
Cyralex (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 4 150MW 14/12/16/3/3/2/871
Ms Wood stated that the purpose of each proposed PV facility will be to export the
generated power into the Eskom electricity grid. The projects are proposed to be bid into
the Department of Energy’s (DoE) Renewable Energy Independent Power Producers
Procurement (REIPPP) Programme.
Gabriele Wood thanked the members of the meeting for the opportunity to brief them about
the proposed projects. She noted that the purpose of the meeting was to present the
background of the project, provide an overview of the environmental assessment process
and discuss any issues of specific concern with the proposed developments. She noted that
any issues raised would be recorded as part of the public participation process and included
in the Comments and Responses Reports which would be appended to the Environmental
Impact Assessment Reports that would be submitted to the Department of Environmental
Affairs.
-
2
MEETING ATTENDEES
Name Organisation
Shaun Cloete (SC) Department of Water and Sanitation
Thalita Botha (TB) Savannah Environmental – Environmental Consultant
Gabriele Wood (GW) Savannah Environmental – Public Participation and Social
Consultant
APOLOGIES
None
BACKGROUND & TECHNICAL ASPECTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED
PROJECT
Gabriele Wood presented the background and introduction to the project and provided an
overview of the potential environmental impacts of the project identified in the draft EIA
(refer to attached presentation).
DISCUSSION SESSION
Question / Comment Response
SC: Where will water from the project be
sourced from?
GW: Water is proposed to be sourced from the
existing boreholes within the farm property.
SC: A water use license application will need to
be submitted for a new borehole. If existing
boreholes are proposed to be used, then these
would need to be registered. It should be noted
that existing boreholes are used to supply water
for household and farming purposes.
GW: The applicant will submit a water use license
application once the project has received
environmental authorisation. Proof that a WULA
has been submitted to the DWS is required for
bidding purpose.
SC: The applicant will have to complete a form
registering their intention to submit a water use
license application. A pre-checklist meeting will
need to be held with the applicant.
GW: Comment noted. The applicant will liaise
with the DWS in this regard once environmental
authorisation is received.
SC: Will the proposed power line cross any
drainage lines?
GW: Water resources were not identified within
the project area.
-
3
WAY FORWARD AND CLOSURE
In closing Gabriele Wood noted that the draft EIA Report is currently available for review.
She stated that the comments received would be responded to and included in the final EIA
Reports that would be submitted to the Department of Environmental Affairs. She thanked
the members of the meeting for availing themselves for the meeting and the inputs which
were provided.
-
1
SOL INVICTUS PV FACILITIESSOL INVICTUS 1; SOL INVICTUS 2; SOL INVICTUS 3 and SOL INVICTUS 4
NEAR AGGENEYS, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE
EIA PROCESS
Public Meeting: 4 MAY 2016
• Welcome and introduction
• Purpose of the meeting
• Project information
• EIA Phase
• EIA process & feedback of the findings of
environmental studies
• Questions and Answers session
• Way forward &closure
MEETING AGENDA
• Work through the facilitator
• Language of choice
• Questions to be taken during the discussion
session
• Identify yourself
• Equal participation
• Cellphone etiquette
CONDUCT OF THE MEETING
Introduction to the proposed project
Provide a summary of findings: EIA for PV facility
Identify issues/risks to the proposed project in
consultation with stakeholders and interested and
affected parties
To record comments
PURPOSE OF THE MEETING
• Project Proposal :
BACKGROUND
Applicant Project Name Contracted Capacity
Cyraclox (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 1 150 MW
Cyracraft (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 2 150 MW
Cyrafusion (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 3 150 MW
Cyralex (Pty) Ltd Sol Invictus 4 150 MW
• Location :
• 30 km south-west of Aggeneys in the
Northern Cape Province
• Portion 5 of Farm Ou Taaisbosmond
66
• Nama Khoi Local Municipality, and
Namakwa District Municipality.
BACKGROUND (Cont.)
-
2
• Full extent of the 5 000 ha farm
portion was considered;
• Phased Sensitivity Analysis;
• Technically viable and preferred
layouts provided for the impact
assessment
Project Alternatives
• Maximise electricity production through exposure to the solar
resource;
• Creation of local employment, business opportunities & skills
development for the area;
• “Clean” power generation in the Northern Province and South
Africa;
• Springbok Focus Area (REDZ 8) of the Renewable Energy
Development Zones (REDZs)
NEED AND DESIRABILITY PROJECT COMPONENTS
• Photovoltaic (PV) panels (Fixed Mounted PV or Tracking
PV systems)
• On-site substation
• Power line
• Access roads
• Workshop
• Office buildings
• Batching plant
• Battery storage
PHOTOVOLTAIC (PV) TECHNOLOGY
Fixed Tracking
• Predetermined angle
• Less space required
• Low maintenance & installationcosts
• Robust structures
• Panels move with the sun
• Qualified technician required forregular servicing
• More energy generated throughtracking
• National Environmental Management Act (No107 of 1998)• Overarching environmental legislation in South Africa
• Specifies the requirements for the EIA process
• Authorisation is required from DEA through thisEIA process
• Independent environmental studies must beundertaken in accordance with the EIARegulations
LEGAL BACKGROUND
1212
-
3
EIA PROCESS & PUBLIC INVOLVEMENTPHASE 1
Notification ofEIA Process
1. Application form - DEA
2. Advertise - local papers
3. Site notices
4. Written notification –I&APs
PHASE 2
Scoping Phase
1. Consultation -Stakeholders & I&APs
2. Distributed BID
3. Public Review - DraftScoping Report
4. Final Scoping to DEA
PHASE 3
Environmental ImpactAssessment Phase
1. On-goingconsultation
2. Public feedbackmeetings
3. Public Review - draftEIA Report & EMPr
4. Appeals Process
PHASE 4
Decision Making
1. Authority Review -Final EIA Report
2. Take decision-approve/reject
3. Inform I&APs ofdecision
4. Appeals Process
We are here
THE EIA PROCESSES• Assessment of issues:
• Impacts on biodiversity and avifauna
• Impacts on visual aesthetics
• Impacts on heritage resources
• Impacts on the social environment
• Impact assessments studies were undertaken to inform the EIA
process
• Sensitive areas/features identified through specialist studies &
consultation were used to inform the final design
• Positive impacts - economic benefits at the local& regional scale• Approximately ~600 employment opportunities• 45% of the opportunities will be available to low-skilled
workers• 22% will be available to semi-skilled workers• 33% will be available to skilled personnel• Skills Development• Economic benefits for local businesses
• Numbers are likely to vary depending on the final
design of the proposed project
IDENTIFIED IMPACTS
1515
• Medium – Low impacts on birds• Medium-Low impact on Ecology (Fauna and Flora)• Medium - Low visual impacts• Low impacts on heritage resources• Cumulative impacts: The are 10 renewable energy
projects in area (30 km). Cumulative impacts associatedwith these are considered to be medium – low and canbe managed to acceptable level
IDENTIFIED IMPACTS
1616
17171818
-
4
1919 2020
2121
• No environmental fatal flaws identified in the EIA phase
• Layouts avoids identified sensitive areas within the
project area
• Impacts can be mitigated or enhanced through
implementation of EMPr
• The majority of impacts expected to be limited to the
site itself
• Benefits of the project expected to outweigh negative
impacts
• Project can be authorised with recommended conditions
CONCLUSION
• EIA report available for public review:
PV1-PV2: 29 April 2016 – 31 May 2016
PV3-PV4: 3 May 2016 – 2 June 2016
• I&APs invited to submit comments or questions
• Minute any issues / concerns from stakeholder / public
meetings
• Final EIAr to be submitted to DEA in June 2016
• Registered parties to be notified of the DEA decision
• Appeals process
WAY FORWARD
2323
DISCUSSION / QUESTIONS
2424
-
5
WHO TO CONTACT
Gabriele Wood of Savannah Environmental
PO Box 148, Sunninghill, 2157
Tel: 011 656 3237
Fax: 086 684 0547
E-mail: [email protected]
2525