Transcript
Page 1: Empire & Aftermath Postcolonial Egypt: Authoritarian Nationalism and the American Empire James E. Baldwin

Empire & Aftermath

Postcolonial Egypt: Authoritarian Nationalism and the

American Empire

James E. Baldwin

Page 2: Empire & Aftermath Postcolonial Egypt: Authoritarian Nationalism and the American Empire James E. Baldwin

Independence in stages

• In occupation since 1882, Britain annexes Egypt in 1914.• First World War sees fighting on Egyptian soil and Cairo

used as a military base.• Egyptian nationalists hoped to use post-war peace

conference to secure independence.• Nationalist leader Saad Zaghlul arrested and exiled,

resulting in unrest: the Egyptian Revolution of 1919.• Britain grants Egypt independence in 1922, but retains

for itself: defense of Egypt, control of imperial communications, protection of foreign interests, occupation of Suez Canal zone.

Page 3: Empire & Aftermath Postcolonial Egypt: Authoritarian Nationalism and the American Empire James E. Baldwin

Independence in stages

• World War 2: more fighting in Egypt, including aerial bombardment, British force king to appoint new government in 1942.

• Free Officers’ Revolution of 1952 overthrew monarchy and dedicated itself to full freedom from British influence.

• Agreement in 1954 to evacuate all British troops in Egypt.• Egypt during 1950s and 60s committed to non-alignment.• From 1970s, Egypt aligned itself more closely with the US –

has it now been incorporated into an American empire?

Page 4: Empire & Aftermath Postcolonial Egypt: Authoritarian Nationalism and the American Empire James E. Baldwin

Gamal Abdel Nasser

Page 5: Empire & Aftermath Postcolonial Egypt: Authoritarian Nationalism and the American Empire James E. Baldwin

Nasser’s program

• Challenging British hegemony in the Middle East.

• Arab unity in the face of imperialism.• Non-alignment in the Cold War.• Freedom from influence of international

capital.• Egyptianization of the Egyptian economy.

Page 6: Empire & Aftermath Postcolonial Egypt: Authoritarian Nationalism and the American Empire James E. Baldwin

The Suez War of 1956

Page 7: Empire & Aftermath Postcolonial Egypt: Authoritarian Nationalism and the American Empire James E. Baldwin

The Suez War of 1956: background

• Tension with Britain and France over support for Arab nationalism; tension with USA over arms purchases and funding for Aswan dam.

• Suez Canal Company: listed company, majority of shares owned by Britain and France.

• July 1956: Nasser declares nationalization of canal in speech in Alexandria.

Page 8: Empire & Aftermath Postcolonial Egypt: Authoritarian Nationalism and the American Empire James E. Baldwin

The Suez War of 1956

• Secret plan between Britain, France and Israel.• Israel invades Sinai, Britain and France intervene as

peacekeepers, in the process seizing control of canal area.• US very angry: puts enormous diplomatic and economic

pressure on British Prime Minister Anthony Eden.• Eden suddenly recalls British forces, causing collapse of

operation.• Experienced by Eden and the British political elite as a

deep humiliation, the war was the iconic moment of a longer process in which the US supplanted Britain as the dominant power in the Middle East.

Page 9: Empire & Aftermath Postcolonial Egypt: Authoritarian Nationalism and the American Empire James E. Baldwin

Nasser’s domestic policies

• Nationalization: beyond Suez Canal, most large businesses.

• Land reform: breaking up of large estates, with small plots of land granted to peasant families.

• Ambitious modernization drive.• Egyptianization: increasing restrictions on

economic activities of foreign citizens, ultimately leading to harassment campaign that forces out most of Egypt’s large expatriate population.

Page 10: Empire & Aftermath Postcolonial Egypt: Authoritarian Nationalism and the American Empire James E. Baldwin

Land redistribution ceremony in Minya, upper Egypt, early 1960s.

Page 11: Empire & Aftermath Postcolonial Egypt: Authoritarian Nationalism and the American Empire James E. Baldwin

Repression under Nasser

• Expulsion of foreign nationals as part of Egyptianization drive.

• Vicious suppression of Muslim Brotherhood after attempt to assassinate Nasser in 1954.

• The same campaign crushed all other forms of dissent, such as communists.

• Nasser set up extensive security apparatus: to control population and as counterweight to the military.

Page 12: Empire & Aftermath Postcolonial Egypt: Authoritarian Nationalism and the American Empire James E. Baldwin

Sadat’s turn to the US

• After war of 1973, Sadat decides that military conflict with Israel futile.

• Visits Jerusalem in 1977, peace deal signed in 1979 leading to Israeli withdrawal from Sinai.

• Policy of infitah – opening of Egyptian economy to foreign investment.

• Coincides with Iranian Revolution of 1979: US lost its main Middle Eastern ally and was searching for a replacement.

Page 13: Empire & Aftermath Postcolonial Egypt: Authoritarian Nationalism and the American Empire James E. Baldwin

US-Egyptian alliance

• Most important components: peace with Israel and support for US objectives in the oil-exporting regions of the Middle East.

• Neoliberal reform: also response to IMF pressure.• US support provided through military aid:

currently $1.5 billion annually.• Aid gives Egyptian armed forces huge disincentive

to engage in a coup that threatens US interests.

Page 14: Empire & Aftermath Postcolonial Egypt: Authoritarian Nationalism and the American Empire James E. Baldwin

Egyptian Revolution of 2011

Page 15: Empire & Aftermath Postcolonial Egypt: Authoritarian Nationalism and the American Empire James E. Baldwin

Aftermath of 2011 revolution

• Military tried to stage-manage transition to another authoritarian, military-friendly regime.

• Initially hoped Ahmed Shafik, former minister under Mubarak, would be elected president.

• After Mohamed Morsi’s victory, he attempted to seize control of repressive apparatus, rather than reform it.

• Old regime took advantage of widespread protests against Morsi to seize power again, with military now in more powerful position than security services.


Top Related