![Page 1: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca2+
WavesLester Ingber
http://www.ingber.com [email protected]
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
10 Aug 2013 12:40 UTC
![Page 2: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Table of Contents
Scales of Neocortical Interactionsp + q A InteractionsA-Model Fits to EEGComputational AlgorithmsOutlook
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 3: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
3
Scales of Neocortical Interactions
![Page 4: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Neuronal Scales of Neocortical Interactions
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 5: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Interactions Among Scales
• Include molecular and quantum scales• Ca2+ ions
• Research into interactions across multiple scales• Interactions between the largest scalp EEG scale and the smallest Ca2+ scale?
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 6: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
SMNI
• Statistical Mechanics of Neocortical Interactions (SMNI)• Progression of aggregation of probability distributions
• Synaptic interactions via quantal transmissions• Neuron-neuron interactions across minicolumns & macrocolumns
• Minicolumn of hundreds of neurons• Macrocolumn of thousands of minicolumns
• Macrocolumnar aggregation to regions (scalp EEG scales)• Region of thousands of macrocolumns• About 15-20 billion neurons in cerebral cortex
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 7: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
SMNI Successes
• Short-term memory (STM)• STM duration and stability• STM capacity rules of 72 (auditory) and 42 (visual)• STM primacy versus recency rule (first > last > middle)• Hick’s law: g-factor linear time to access sets of STM• Rate of minicolumnar information diffusion (nearest neighbors)
• Short-ranged unmyelinated within epochs of long-ranged myelinated fibers• Scaled up to fit scalp EEG data
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 8: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Coding of Neuronal Information
• Firing patterns among neurons• Assumed by SMNI since 1980• Recent experimental confirmation
• Synfire synchronized firings in laminae• Others
• Astrocytes (a class of glial cells)• Paramagnetic and diamagnetic encoding
• Quantum-mechanical encoding in microtubules
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 9: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Tripartite Neuron-Astrocyte-Neuron
• Astrocyte• Important class of glial cells• Nourish neurons• Major source of Ca2+ waves (includes “free” unbuffered ions)
• Up to tens of thousands of free ions/wave• Concentrations up to 5 µM (µM = 10−3 mol/m3)• Range up to 250 µm• speed 50˗100 µm/s
• Influence Glutamate quantal (integral units) concentrations in synaptic gaps• Primary excitatory neurotransmitter depolarizes and excites neurons
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 10: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
10
p + q A Interactions
![Page 11: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Regional Magnetic Vector Potential A
• Regional Scales• Neocortical current I due to coherent synchronized firings
• Observed values → includes all theoretical screening, etc.• Wire model of minicolumns fit to I has log dependence on r
• Magnetic vector potential A I
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 12: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Molecular Ca2+ Wave
• Consider only sources from regenerative processes from internal stores
• Process involves Ca2+ released from IP3R acting on other IP3R sites• Process requires or affects other processes, e.g., IP3, mGluR, mAChR, etc.
• Momentum of Ca2+ ions in wave with mean p• |p| = 10−30 kg-m/s
• |p| < |qA| = 10−28 kg-m/s• q = -2 e where e = -1.6 10−19 C (charge of electron)
• Duration of a wave up to 500 ms
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 13: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
p + qA Interaction
• Canonical momentum Π = p + q A• Established in both classical and quantum physics
• Classical comparison of magnitudes of molecular p and regional qA• Quantum treatment of p + qA for wave packet in p-space
• SI units (p + q/c A in Gaussian units, c = light speed)• Many-body p effects not yet considered
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 14: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
p + qA p-Space Wave Function
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 15: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
p + qA r-Space Wave Function
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 16: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Quantum Effects in r-Space
• Influences real part of wave function ψ in r-space• Not Aharonov-Bohm effect (phase of ψ)
• Note r → r – q A t / m• If persisted100 ms → displacement of 10−3 m = mm (macrocolumn)
• Synaptic extent (not gap ~ nm) ~ 104 Å (Å = 10−10 m) = µm
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 17: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Possible Long Time Quantum Coherence
• Several examples of extended quantum coherence in “wet” media• Bang-bang (BB) kicks or quantum Zeno effect (QZE)
• A mechanism sometimes used in quantum computation
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 18: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Classical and/or Quantum Effects
• Alignment of Ca2+ waves along A || I
• A influence on regional-averaged synaptic quantal transmissions• Ca2+ waves influence quantal transmissions influencing background B• A affects p of Ca2+ waves• A therefore affects background synaptic activity
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 19: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
19
SMNI Fits to EEG
![Page 20: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Fits to EEG to Test A Influences
• SMNI conditional probability of firing P• SMNI Lagrangian L function of firings M(t)
• All parameters taken within experimentally observed ranges• SMNI “threshold factor” F argument of nonlinear means and covariance• Minicolumnar-averaged quantal means and variances of synaptic interactions
• Scales of application of Lagrangian• STM mesocolumn (converge to minicolumn; diverge to macrocolumn)
• Mesocolumn of excitatory E and inhibitory I firings• Trough of minima permit “centering mechanism” (CM)
• Scaling SMNI to scale of scalp EEG
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 21: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
SMNI Lagrangian
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 22: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Intuitive Lagrangian L of Firings M
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 23: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
SMNI Threshold Factor
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 24: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Centering Mechanism (CM)
• Shift background noise B in synaptic interactions• Shifts are consistent with experimental observations of selective attention
• Shift B to keep F M (no constant offset)• Minima typically driven to small values of AE E ME - AI E MI
• Defines “trough” along line in M firing space• Maximizes number of minima within firing boundaries• STM firing patterns appear within a sea of “noise”
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 25: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
PATHINT STM With CM
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 26: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Dependence of Synaptic Background B on A
• Quantal mean of mesocolumnar average• a = ½ A + B• A is coefficient of firings• B is background “noise”
• Influenced by astrocytes Ca2+ waves• Model A influence as B = B0 + B1 |A|
• A I Φ• Φ is EEG electric potential at previous t for these fits
• A model requires Dynamic Centering Mechanism (DCM) at each t
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 27: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Preliminary Results
• EEG Data: http://kdd.ics.uci.edu/databases/eeg/• Collected by Henri Begleiter in large NIH alcoholism study• Entered into KDD database by Lester Ingber in 1997
• Knowledge Discovery in Databases• merged with http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/
• Paradigms to test attentional states during P300 events• Train in-sample to L and test out-of-sample
• Sensitive Canonical Momenta Indicators (CMI)• A model has stronger signal than no-A model
• similar to aggregated data over 11,075 runs
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 28: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Histograms of Control and Alcoholic Data
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 29: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
29
A Versus No-A Models
A model No-A model
![Page 30: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Supplementary Analysis
Marco Pappalepore and Ronald StesiakOverall, mixed results were demonstrated when evaluating the efficacy or improvements of the CMI when comparing to the EEG data.However, many definitively positive improvements with the A model were observed, both when comparing to the EEG data and the no-A model.See http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_supp.zip
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 31: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
31
Computational Algorithms
![Page 32: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Adaptive Simulated Annealing (ASA)
• http://www.ingber.com• http://alumni.caltech.edu/~ingber• http://asa-caltech.sourceforge.net• https://code.google.com/p/adaptive-simulated-annealing
• C-language importance-sampling for global fit over D-dimensional space.• ASA annealing temperature exponentially decreasing T schedule
• Faster than fast Cauchy annealing with polynomial decreasing T schedule• Much faster than Boltzmann annealing with logarithmic decreasing schedule
• Over 100 OPTIONS provide robust tuning since 1989 (VFSR → ASA)• ASA_PARALLEL OPTIONS hooks developed as PI 1994 NSF PSC project• ASA currently used as PI of NSF XSEDE projects.
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 33: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
PATHINT & PATHTREE
• Time path-integral of short-time conditional multivariate probability• PATHINT parallel hooks developed as PI 1994 NSF PSC project• PATHINT → PATHTREE is fast accurate binomial tree• Natural metric of the space is used to lay down the mesh• Short-time probability density accurate to Ο(Δt−3/2)• Tested in finance, neuroscience, combat analyses, and selected
nonlinear multivariate systems• PATHTREE used extensively to price financial options
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 34: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Calculations on XSEDE.org
• Adaptive Simulated Annealing (ASA) fit SMNI to EEG data• 6 CPU-hrs for each of 120 train-test runs = cumulative CPU-month+• 6 CPU-hrs for all runs on XSEDE in parallel
• NSF Extreme Science & Engineering Discovery Environment
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 35: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
35
Outlook
![Page 36: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Tentative Conclusions
• Top-down interactions• Regional coherent firings Selective Attention• Attention Consciousness• Attention influences molecular scales via p + qA
• Certainly in domain of classical physics• Possibly in domain of quantum physics
• SMNI support for p + qA interactions at tripartite synapses• DCM control of background synaptic activity B• Control of STM during states of selective attention
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 37: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Future Research
• Tripartite models that influence synaptic background B• Test models of A influences on B by fits to EEG data
• Coherence times for “beams” of Ca2+ waves• PATHINT and PATHTREE codes
• Volunteers welcome on XSEDE.org platforms• http://ingber.com/lir_computational_physics_group.html
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 38: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Acknowledgments
• National Science Foundation NSF.gov• Extreme Science & Engineering Discovery Environment XSEDE.org
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx
![Page 39: Electroencephalographic (EEG) Influence on Ca 2+ Waves](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/568167d6550346895ddd2f1e/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Lester Ingber
Published over 100 papers and books in:theoretical nuclear physics, neuroscience, finance,
optimization, combat analysis, karate, and education.
http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca.pdf http://ingber.com/smni13_eeg_ca_lect.pptx