Effectively Using Digital Tools to Enhance Self-Directed Learning
and Critical Thinking
Dr. Nancy Hyland ([email protected])Dr. Jeannine Kranzow ([email protected]
Faculty and Student insights
2
Introduction
Overview of the Technological Challenges Facing Higher Education
3
From Gartner’s 2008 top strategic technologies:• Green IT• Unified communications• Business process modeling• Virtualization • Web platform and "cloud computing"• Real world web• Social software
4
PurposeDiscovering ways for faculty to empower student use of Information and Computing Technologies (ICT) to increase self-direction and critical thinking
5
Opportunity or Threat
“The potential for ICT to enhance extend and change the role of the teacher can be perceived as an exciting opportunity or a confidence crushing threat”
Loveless, 1998, p. 1272
6
Framework Constructivism Self-Directed Learning Critical thinking
7
Technology The gap (between what could be and what often
seems to be the case).
Example: Angeli, Valanides, & Bonk (2003) Investigating Communication in Web Environments
8
Quantity of Information does not equalcritical thinking (Hall, 2005).
***********************************Facilitators can guide students and help them see ways in which ICTs can support self-directed learning (Lesley, 2008)
9
Facilitator Role
Self-Directed Learning
Online learning renewed interest in SDLChou & Chen, 2008
10
Critical ThinkingFacione & Facione, 2007“…comes down to reflective decision-making
and thoughtful problem-solving about what to do or believe” (p. 40).
11
Interdependent Model of Technology/SDL/Technology
12
Critical Thinking
Self-Directed Learning
Technolgoy
Population/ Sample
92 graduate Education Leadership students• Students = Majority female• Blended or in residence courses Fall 2010
8 faculty• Core and adjunct
13
Instrumentation & Procedures Anonymous survey of students and faculty
First month of class
14
Findings79% attribute technology tools to being abetter student
E-text and e-libraries• Potential for critical thinking and SDL
behaviors
15
“BETTER” - defined (by students in thesurvey) as usage as opposed to higher levelthinking “Students use technology to organize
themselves and make better presentations”
“It allows a student to become more professional and up-to-date.”
“Technology gives a larger tool chest to pull from”
16
Findings(When technology distracts)
61% purchased hard copy of a digitally available text• Reasons:
Lack of training Insufficient time prior to adoption
17
Importance of Trainings“The danger is that technology drives the pedagogy and
that it encourages a ‘transmission’ approach…” (Unwin, 2007, p. 9)
Faculty findings similar to students Training avoids:
Lack of engagement with material Focus on managing the tool
18
Faculty Implications
… what higher education institutions need is a climate: (1) that encourages attempts to improve learning and teaching, (2) where pedagogical and curriculum concerns drive technological developments rather than vice versa, (3) where the best about the old way of doing things is adapted to meet new requirements
(Hannan, 2005, p.975)
19
Institutional Implications
In order for these communities to be effective instruments in this process, institutional administration must adopt a culture which supports these efforts for faculty members to work alongside other professionals toward a common goal in a comfortable environment (Unwin, 2007; Lave & Wenger, 1991).
20
Student Implications & Role
Perceive e-libraries and e-texts as having potential for increasing skills such as analysis, evaluation, and synthesis:• Instead of simply:• Organizational efficiencies• Time management
21
Conclusion Faculty can be the conduit between
student, technology, and Self-Directed Learning if all conditions are present 1) pedagogy 2) technology PD and 3) appropriately designed curriculum (designed with specific technologies in mind)
22