Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
1
Brian Foster
Oxford
What were the major developments of the lastdecade and what do they teach us about thefuture? - underpinning of SM by precision physics at LEP&SLD;- detailed structure of proton at HERA;- discovery of matter-antimatter asymmetry inb system;- discovery of non-zero neutrino mass.
Why and how the ILC??
DESY/Zeuthen, 7/8 Feb. 06
Particle physics over the last decade –the case for the International Linear Collider
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
2
Where were we in 1994?
The Standard Model was theoretically fully fledged - but experimentally still incomplete – neither ντ
nor the t quark had yet been discovered.
However, the tremendous success of the SM inexplaining such a wide variety of natural phenomenameant that everyone was sure that these discoverieswere imminent – indeed for t there had been severalfalse alarms.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
3
Precision @ LEPLEP dominated the 90s and thereby the first half of the decadeof our review.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
4
Precision @ LEPTwo stages – LEP I sat on the Z0 resonance from 1989 - 1995; after energy upgrade in 1995, energy increased every year upto 210 GeV in 2000.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
5
Precision @ LEPSimply measuring the probability of the production of W pairsat LEP II is a triumphant confirmation of SM gauge structure.
only ν exchange
No ZWW vertex
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
6
Discovery of t quarkFor many years, we had excellent reasons to believe that thetop quark existed: the symmetry of the SM, and indirectprecision measurements at LEP, all told us that it had toexist, and even gave us a reasonable hint as to its mass, which,when it was discovered at Fermilab, was found to be spot on.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
7
Precision @ LEP and tLEP searched – and sometimes thought it had found things –but left the Higgs and/or SUSY discovery for the future.
mH < 219 GeV at 95% CL
An historical aside – the false alarms of various LEP“discovery” proved need for more than 1 experiment.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
8
Inside the proton
HERA @DESY in Hamburg
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
9
e p
Inside the proton
eq
e
pp remnant
e
e
qpp remnant
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
10
Inside the proton
At higher and higherresolutions, the quarksemit gluons, which also emit gluons, which emit quarks, which…….
Heisenberg’s UPallows gluons, and qqpairs to be produced for a very short time.
Low Q2 (large λ)Medium Q2 (medium λ)
Large Q2 (short λ)
At highest Q2, λ ~ 1/Q ~ 10-18 m
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
11
Inside the proton
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
12
Matter-antimatter puzzle
As far as we can see in universe, no large-scale antimatter. Sakharov conditions imply this needs CP violation.
Why does the Universe looks like
this not that?
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
13
Matter-antimatter puzzle
This effect is large in Bdecays – but the interestingdecays are very rare => build a high luminosityB factory to produce manydecays and look at theirtime development
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
14
Matter-antimatter puzzle
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
15
Matter-antimatter puzzle
Simply count decays as function of t!
t2
Decay length ~ 1/4 mm
Second B decays
t1
First B decays
K0s
d s
J/ψcc
(or ) Asy(t) = N(B0→ J/ψ K0
s) - N(B0→J/ψ K0s)
N(B0→ J/ψ K0s) + N(B0→J/ψ K0
s)
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
16
Matter-antimatter puzzleCurrent state of the art from BaBar.
B and anti-B are indeed different & CP is violated.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
17
Neutrino massFor many decades, Davis et al had measured the solarneutrino flux and found it to be only around half what the SSMpredicted. As the SSM was further and further refined, the probability grew that the explanation for this was that neutrinos have a mass and therefore can oscillate into each other, so that“active” types leaving a signal in detector oscillated into “inactive” types.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
18
Neutrino mass
The pioneeringwork of Koshiba and SuperK (whichlike all the best particle physicsexperiment, was built to look at something completelydifferent)led to the discovery of ν mass.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
19
Neutrino mass
SuperK results
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
20
Neutrino massBeautiful confirmation by SNO
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
21
Neutrino mass
SNO had first published results using pure D2O, which showeda clear deficit of νe coming from the Sun. By adding NaCl tothe water, the efficiency to detect n capture was greatly improved.
SNO can detect νe from Charged, Neutral and Elastic Scatteringvia the processes below:
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
22
Neutrino massSNO results
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
23
What did we learn?
We gained a lot by having complementary machines - hadron machines found top; leptonmachines found CP violation in Bs and establishedgauge structure of SM; lepton-hadron machineselucidated structure of proton. Neutrino physicsrequires specialist infrastructure.
The Standard Model has been a tough nut to crack.
To go beyond the SM, we need to get to theenergy frontier - preferably with both lepton& hadron machines.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
24
The LHC Project
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
25
The ATLAS hall now
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
26
The LHC GPDs
The discovery potential of the LHC is vast:
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
27
Why/what is ILC?
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
28
Why/what is ILC?I have no time for more than a bare outline ILC physics case. It rests on three legs:known phenomena thatILC will definitely study-top quark;
current δMW
the Higgs: for which there is very strong indirect evidence and if LHC doesn’t find it then ILC willbe essential to understand why;new particles forwhich there is verystrong theoreticalprejudice
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
29
Why/what is ILC?Furthermore the high precision of the ILC means that itis sensitive to phenomena far above its CM energy becauseof quantum corrections – as LEP proved.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
30
Because radiated synchrotron-radiation power goes like m-5,circular e+e- colliders bigger than LEP (the previousCERN machine) are uneconomical. We didn’t know how to build complementary machines (like Tevatron (p-antip) and LEP) when LHC was proposed. Now we do – the ILC.
Why/what is ILC?
The ILC is a linear collider – thus there is no synchrotronradiation produced in bending e+e- in a circular orbit. Thechallenges stem from this – in circular machines, the beamspass through each other many times/ second, giving manychances for interaction – “luminosity”. In ILC, they passthrough each other once and then are dumped.
The only way to restore the luminosity is to crush the beamsto a tiny volume so that one pass gives all the particles thesame chance to interact that many passes gives less densebunches.
SLC
FFTB
TESLA
500 nm
50 nm
5 nm
1000 nm
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
31
Status of the ILCTESLA was the catalyst that in the last three years has movedthe ILC forwards very rapidly.There will only be one machine like this in the world – soit is essential that world-wide agreement be obtained. Thishas been in place for ~3 years.ECFA report:“..the realisation, in as timely a fashion as possible, of a world-wide collaboration to construct a high-luminosity e+e- linear collider with an energy range up to at least 400 GeV as the next accelerator project in particle physics; decisions concerning thechosen technology and the construction site for such a machine should be made soon”
HEPAP report:“We recommend that the highest priority of the U.S. program be a high-energy,high-luminosity, electron-positron linear collider, wherever it isbuilt in the world…. We recommend that the United States prepare to bid to host the linear collider, in a facility that is international from the inception.”
ACFA: “ACFA urges the Japanese Government to arrange a preparatory budget for KEK to pursue an engineering design of the collider, to study site and civil engineering, as well as to investigate the process for the globalization.”
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
32
Status of the ILCIn January 2004 the Science Ministers of the OECD met in Paris and, following the detailed work of a GSF Consultative Group on particle physics that produced a road Map,agreed a statement on the Linear Collider: Ministers
“acknowledged the importance of ensuring access to large-scale research infrastructure and the importance of the long-term vitality of high-energy physics. They noted the worldwide consensus of the scientific community, which has chosen an electron-positron linear collider as the next accelerator-based facility to complement and expand on the discoveries that are likely to emerge from the Large Hadron Collider currently being built at CERN. They agreed that the planning and implementation of such a large, multi-year project should be carried out on a global basis, and should involve consultations among not just scientists, but also representatives of science funding agencies from interested countries. Accordingly, Ministers endorsed the statement prepared by the OECD Global Science Forum Consultative Group on High-Energy Physics (see Appendix).”
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
33
Status of the ILCIn August 2004, group of “Wise Men”, chaired by B. Barish,chose the “cold”, superconducting, RF technology over thecompeting “warm” X-band RF.
Despite the fact that both US and Asian research had been in warm technology, both regions accepted the decision andunited behind cold technology; 18 months on, transition isnow complete.
ICFA moved ahead quickly to appoint a Global DesignEffort (GDE) to transform the technology decision into afull Technical Design Report, capable of being presented toworld governments for a decision to construct.
B. Barish appointed as GDE director, with three regionaldirectors:BF (Europe), F. Takasaki (Asia), G. Dugan (Americas)
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
34
GDE
– The Mission of the GDE
• Produce a design for the ILC in 3 stages - BCD, RDR and TDR, that includes a detailed design concept, performance assessments, reliable international costing, an industrialization plan , siting analysis, as well as detector concepts and scope.
• Coordinate worldwide prioritized proposal driven R & D efforts (to demonstrate and improve the performance, reduce the costs, attain the required reliability, etc.)
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
35
GDE – StaffingChris Adolphsen, SLACJean-Luc Baldy, CERNPhilip Bambade, LAL, OrsayBarry Barish, CaltechWilhelm Bialowons, DESYGrahame Blair, Royal HollowayJim Brau, University of OregonKarsten Buesser, DESYElizabeth Clements, FermilabMichael Danilov, ITEPJean-Pierre Delahaye, CERN, Gerald Dugan, Cornell UniversityAtsushi Enomoto, KEKBrian Foster, Oxford UniversityWarren Funk, JLABJie Gao, IHEPTerry Garvey, LAL-IN2P3Hitoshi Hayano, KEKTom Himel, SLACBob Kephart, FermilabEun San Kim, Pohang Acc LabHyoung Suk Kim, Kyungpook Nat’l UnivShane Koscielniak, TRIUMFVic Kuchler, FermilabLutz Lilje, DESY
Tom Markiewicz, SLACDavid Miller, Univ College of LondonShekhar Mishra, FermilabYouhei Morita, KEKOlivier Napoly, CEA-SaclayHasan Padamsee, Cornell UniversityCarlo Pagani, DESYNan Phinney, SLACDieter Proch, DESYPantaleo Raimondi, INFNTor Raubenheimer, SLACFrancois Richard, LAL-IN2P3Perrine Royole-Degieux, GDE/LALKenji Saito, KEKDaniel Schulte, CERNTetsuo Shidara, KEKSasha Skrinsky, Budker InstituteFumihiko Takasaki, KEKLaurent Jean Tavian, CERNNobu Toge, KEKNick Walker, DESYAndy Wolski, LBLHitoshi Yamamoto, Tohoku UnivKaoru Yokoya, KEK
49 members
New MembersPeter Garbincius (FNAL)Marc Ross (SLAC)Bill Willis (Columbia)Andre Seryi (SLAC)John Sheppard (SLAC)Ewan Patterson (SLAC)Maseo Kuriki (KEK)Kiyoshi Kubo (KEK)Nobuhiro Terunuma (KEK)Norihito Ohuchi (KEK)Susanna Guiducci (INFN)Deepa Angal-Kalinin (CCLRC)
TotalsAmericas 23Europe 23Asia 16
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
36
ILC Parameters
• Ecm adjustable from 200 – 500 GeV
• Luminosity ∫Ldt = 500 fb-1 in 4 years
• Ability to scan between 200 and 500 GeV
• Energy stability and precision below 0.1%
• Electron polarization of at least 80%• The machine must be upgradeable to 1 TeV
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
37
BCD overview
The ILC Baseline Design was completed in December 2005:
Process overseen by ILC Executive - B. Barish, G. Dugan, BF, F. Takasaki, T. Raubenheimer, N. Walker, K.Yokoya.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
38
Damping rings Example - development from TESLA TDRto BCD - damping rings area in which technology has really advanced
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
39
Damping rings Three candidates emerged from Snowmass:
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
40
Damping rings Pulser development at KEK ATF
BCD has 2*6km e+, 6 km e-; dogbone backup.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
41
Next steps for GDE RDR will take forward the BCD, refine thedesign and in particular gather industrialisation data in order to form the basis for reliable cost estimate with the RDR.
There are 3 new boards: Change ControlBoard; Global R&D Board; Design & CostBoard. The RDR will be produced using a matrixstructure of “area systems” and “technicalsystems” to account for the structure of theproject.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
42
Next steps
New structures & people now in place for next step to RDR.
Progress will be reviewed in March in Bangalore.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
43
Next steps ICFA FALC
FALC Resource Board
ILCSC
GDEDirectorate
GDEExecutive Committee
GlobalR&D Program
RDR Design Matrix
GDEChange Control Board
GDEDesign Cost Board
GDER & D Board
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
44
Change control The board has overseen the consolidation of the baseline design and the production of aWord document containing all the information. Has begun to deal with requests for changesto the baseline as further work and R&D is completed. Careful methodology developed - categorisesthe importance of the change, then assignsnumber of board members to review itdepending on importance.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
45
Change control
During process, all GDE members can comment on proposed change.
N. Toge, chair, is very methodical and hasestablished good discipline in the group.
Now dealing with the fourth proposed changeto the BCD - this one quite a major one related to the RF frequency of the damping rings.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
46
Change control
QuickTime and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
47
Other boards
Design & cost board produced a (very)detailed programme of work to lead ustowards the most important deliverable of theRDR - a believable, robust and affordablecosting.
R&D board has to try to impose a structureand discipline on inherently chaotic system- R&D - eliminating wasteful duplication while preserving & enhancing necessary duplication.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
48
Test facilities
TTF exists at DESY, SMTF (FNAL), STF (KEK):
Stimulate SCindustry in theregions -collaborate onSC technology
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
49
Test facilities
ATF @ KEK has been a great success. Timefor further improvement:
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
50
ILCCommunications
• Launch of New ILC Website @ Snowmass
www.linearcollider.org
• “One Stop Shopping”– electronic data
management system (EDMS), news, calendar of events, education and communication
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
51
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
52
European GDE
European GDE met in Oxford on 25/10/05.Discussed obviously regional issues:- how to get more resources from inside Europe, in particular the EU;- regional outreach - Europe has particulardifficulties & challenges here.
The European GDE does NOT discuss thetechnical issues of the BCD or take up European positions on them - these arematters for the full GDE.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
53
European GDE
Two meetings in CERN to explore in particular the similarity between LHC and ILC cryogenics and to utilise CERNexpertise, particularly in civil engineering.
Very encouraged by the great interest onthe ground in CERN in the project, thevery constructive and positive meetingswe have had and the growing involvementof CERN staff in the ILC.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
54
European GDE
European Outreach group re-established atOrsay meeting. B. Warmbein will join theteam shortly as communicator/PA to EGDE director, based at DESY.
EGDE director’s advisory group also meetlast week at Orsay. Discussed plans for FP7initiative for European cryogenic RFdevelopment centre based probably at oneof big labs. BF visiting CERN next week todiscuss with DG.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
55
Political scene CERN Council strategy group now fullyactive. Plenary meeting in Orsay last weekwas I think quite successful. Usual suspectssaid usual things. Nothing startlingly new. Some particular points:- L. Foa said: “we did it 4 years ago - physics hasn’t changed - our conclusions stand.”
Ground rules of the group say that the current Council position as laid out in theRome meeting will be “reiterated”.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
56
Political scene
Sterile argument about whether we need towait for LHC results keeps rearing itshead. As a scientist I keep charging in tojoin it. As a politician, I should keep mytrap shut.
Tendency to talk up direct competitionbetween ILC and Neutrino Factory perhapssomewhat increased.
Tendency to talk up CLIC as direct competitor to ILC perhaps somewhat diminished.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
57
Political scene
The Zeuthen meeting will be very important -on the assumption that it does the sensiblething, it does give a chance to really tie inthe European governments to a brightfuture for pp.
At Lisbon special CERN Council meeting, we will start to see the process by which the governments will hopefully put theirmoney where their mouths are.
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
58
Political scene
US affairs perhaps starting to look somewhatrosier. State of Union message had major science initiative, “American Competetiveness Initiative” (ACI). Aim is toinvest $136B over 10 years - “Doubling the Federal commitment to the most critical basic research programs in the physical sciences over the next 10 years”
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
59
Political scene
2007 HEP budget request is an increasefrom ~$720M -> $775M. The ILC playsa prominent part in the rhetoric of thebudget justifying the increase - but otherthings are also in there.
Such an increase would be very welcome, buta lot more needs to be done before an ILCbased in the US could be considered realistic.
GDE Plan & Schedule
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Global Design Effort Project
Baseline configuration
Reference Design
ILC R&D Program
Technical Design
Bids to Host; Site Selection;
International Mgmt
LHCPhysics; CLIC
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
61
PostscriptInteresting historical note – something else which has happennedin the last decade is:
The Financial Times a few months ago did a poll of the most influential Europeans in the last 25 years:
1. The Pope
2. Mikhail Gorbachev
3. Margaret Thatcher
4. Gro Harlem Brundtland
5. Helmut Kohl
6. Tim Berners-Lee
7. Jacques Delors
Brian Foster - The last decade in pp
62
SummaryThe last decade has seen both the strengthening of theexperimental basis of the Standard Model and the firstsigns of cracks in it. We are at the threshold of a decade of major discoveriesin particle physics, through the LHC and hopefully at theend of the period the linear collider, which will surelychange our understanding of the forces and particles thatdrive the Universe.
The next decade promises to be even more exciting than the last.
The GDE is driving the ILC towards completing a TDRin 2008; progress is on schedule. We need to ensure thatthe political ground is properly laid as well as the technical;and that the community speaks with one voice; having clearpriorities, but also more than LHC + ILC.