Download - Damage tolerance analysis
![Page 1: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Damage Tolerance Analysis
![Page 2: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What is the root of DTA ? fatigue is the weakening of a material
caused by repeatedly applied loads.
![Page 3: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What happen in Fatigue ?
![Page 4: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
What is the cast of failure ? Physical harm to people or the
environment Loss or destruction of property or
equipment Loss of productivity or use of the failed
“system” or device Damaged reputation
![Page 5: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Different Fatigue Design Methodologies Infinite Life Design Safe-Life Design Damage Tolerance Design
![Page 6: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Infinite Life Design
Unlimited safety is the oldest criterion. For parts subjected to many millions of
cycles, like engine valve springs, this is still a good design criterion.
This criterion may not be economical or practical in many design situations.
endurance limit of the material is important in this design criterion.
![Page 7: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Something is wrong here !!
![Page 8: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Safe-life Design Safe-life refers to the philosophy that
the component or system is designed to not fail within a certain, defined period.
The benefit of safe-life designs includes reducing the likelihood of unplanned maintenance and reducing the likelihood of any failure
![Page 9: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Z 42 is made with safe life philosophy
![Page 10: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Safe life process evaluating the highest operational
stress on the component safety factors are often applied to
ensure that catastrophic failures Comparing S-N curve It has infinite life or limited life
![Page 11: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
S-N Curve
![Page 12: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Did I forget Something again ?
![Page 13: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
In order to overcome this shortcoming of the safe-life approach, the methods were must developed that assume the structure contains initial cracks.
Damage tolerance analysis
![Page 14: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Damage tolerance analysiswe have category :
Slow crack growth
structures are designed such that initial damage will grow at a stable, slow rate under service environment
Fail-safe structures are
designed such that propagating damage is safely contained after failing a major load path by load shift to adjacent intact elements
![Page 15: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Slow crack growth damage tolerance (and thus safety) is
assured only by the maintenance of a slow rate of growth of damage, a residual strength capacity
sub-critical damage will either be detected at the depot or will not reach unstable dimensions within several design life times.
![Page 16: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Fail-safe damage tolerance is assured by the
allowance of partial structural failure the ability to detect this failure prior to
total loss of the structure Fail Safe structure is designed and
fabricated such that unstable rapid propagation will be stopped within a continuous area of the structure prior to complete failure
![Page 17: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Usually:
Single load path • Slow Crack Growth
Multiple load path• Slow Crack Growth• Fail Safe
![Page 18: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Lug Example of Slow Crack Growth Structure
The lug fitting illustrated here has multiple lug ends at the pinned connection
occurrence and growth of damage at a typical location (B) would render the structure inoperative.
![Page 19: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Wing Box Example
a wing box is attached to the fuselage carry through structure by multiple fittings.
A case could be made to qualify this structure as Fail Safe Multiple Load Path.
if the skin was the major bending member with a design stress of sufficient magnitude to result in a relatively short critical crack length.
![Page 20: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Damage concept the majority of the life is spent growing
the resultant cracks to failure. analyses of in-service fractures,
cracking instances, etc. have indicated that a major source of cracks is the occurrence of initial manufacturing defects such as sharp corners, tool marks
![Page 21: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
typical growth behavior for a crack
structural element as it moves from an initial damage size to a damage size that causes structural failure
• Crack increment (Δa)
• number of loading events (ΔN)
• critical value (acr)
![Page 22: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
when the crack is small, it grows very slowly
![Page 23: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Damage growth effectQuality
Note that the shape of the crack growth curve (for a given configuration and loading) remains essentially constant for any given crack growth increment.
The effect of initial crack size is significant.
![Page 24: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Damage growth effectload history
The stress history experienced at each location on the aircraft will also differ due to changes in bending moment, twisting moment, shear loading.
The loading spectra for a lower surface location is typically more severe than a corresponding upper surface location.
![Page 25: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Damage growth effectmaterial properties
The crack growth rate (Δa/ΔN) can be derived experimentally for each material
the alloy having the slower growth rate characteristics (i.e. 2024-T3) will have a longer life
![Page 26: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Damage growth effectStructural Properties
The most complex of the parameters affecting crack growth behaviorare the structural properties.
![Page 27: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Life Prediction Methodology(Initial Flaw Distribution)
For predictions of safety limits, the initial cracks larger than detectability limit are of principal concern.
![Page 28: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
(Initial Flaw Distribution)
NDT ( nondestructive inspection )
![Page 29: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Life Prediction Methodology(Usage)
The sum of the load levels that a structure is expected to experience is determined by a projection of the amount of usage expected over the life in the various possible missions
![Page 30: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
(Usage )
![Page 31: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Life Prediction Methodology(material properties)
Crack growth data are generated in the laboratory under constant cyclic loading on simple specimens with accepted characterizing stress intensity factors.
![Page 32: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Life Prediction Methodology(Crack Tip Stress Intensity Factor)
The crack tip stress intensity factor(K) interrelates the crack geometry, the structural geometry, and the load on the structure
It defines as : β- geometric termfor structural
configurationσ- stress applied to the structure a- crack length
![Page 33: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Damage Size Characterizations
Reference Documat is JSSG-2006 . This approach assumes that cracks are
present in all critical locations. periods between inspections are greatly
influenced by the crack lengths assumed at the beginning of a usage period.
![Page 34: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Damage size in steps
![Page 35: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Crack Growth-Life Curve after Second Inspection
![Page 36: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Residual Strength
The strength of a structure can be significantly affected by the presence of a crack
The basic concept in damage tolerance design is to ensure the safety of the structure throughout the expected service life.
![Page 37: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Residual strenght curve
![Page 38: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Residual StrengthSlow crack growth Fail-Safe
detection of this failure prior to total loss of the structure
safely within the partial failure prior to inspection
![Page 39: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Residual Strength Capability Single Load Path Residual Strength Diagrams
![Page 40: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Built-Up Structure Residual Strength Diagrams
In built-up structures, due to the complex geometrical configuration, one or more failure criterion may have to be considered
![Page 41: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Built-Up Structure Residual Strength Diagrams
![Page 42: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Damage Tolerance Analysis Procedure
Step 1. Determine the stress-intensity factor (K) as a function of crack size for each member
Step 2. derive the stress history for the location under consideration.
Step 3. Obtain baseline crack-growth data (da/dN as a function of ΔK and R) for all the materials
![Page 43: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Damage Tolerance Analysis Procedure(continue)
Step 4. Using the results of Steps, 1, 2, and 3, calculate the crack-growth curve for each element
Start with a 0.02 inch flaw
![Page 44: Damage tolerance analysis](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061607/55615bcad8b42a87628b456e/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Damage Tolerance Analysis Procedure(continue)
Step 5. By using the results of the residual strength analysis plot the critical crack sizes, aDMC and aLTC
Step 6. For slow crack growth structure I. whether BD is equal to or greater than 2 design
lifetimes. II. whether CE (or C’E) is equal to or greater than ½ design
lifetime.
Step 7. For safe fail I. whether AF is equal to or greater than 1 design lifetime. II. whether CG (or C’G) is equal to or greater than ¼
design lifetime.