Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES
Establish the correlation between the courses and the Program Outcomes (POs) and Program
Specific Outcomes (PSOs)
PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES: Considered at the end of the
Mechanical Engineering program
PSO-1 Graduates are able to analyze, design and manufacture mechanical systems
with latest available technologies.
PSO-2 Graduates are able to work on interdisciplinary projects in their research and
development activities.
(A.1) Course Outcomes (COs)
The CO of 8 courses are shown below,
➢ Evidence of COs being defined by course instructor is made available with the department which is
maintained in the course file
➢ Course file is prepared by the course instructor which consists of all the relevant data required for
CO and PO attainments.
➢ ELEMENTS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
C114.1 Apply the basic in core mechanical science and principles in their further Engineering
Career.
C114.2 Perceive the essentialities of sustainable energy generations.
C114.3 Impart wide Knowledge about primary parts of Global Voracious Consumers’ mechanical
products (Prime Movers, Refrigeration System, Air-Conditioning system and Boiler).
C114.4 Analyze and automate the joints and FOM’s eventually conceptualize robot for various
case scenarios.
C114.5 Recognize engineering materials of any tangible products. Apply the knowledge of tools,
machining process and joining processes.
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS III
C231.1 Know the use of periodic signals and Fourier series to analyze circuits and system
communications.
C231.2 Explain the general linear system theory for continuous-time signals and digital signal
processing using the Fourier Transform and z-transform.
C231.3 Employ appropriate numerical methods to solve algebraic and transcendental equations.
C231.4 Apply Green's Theorem, Divergence Theorem and Stokes' theorem in various applications
in the field of electro-magnetic and gravitational fields and fluid flow problems.
C231.5 Determine the extremals of functional and solve the simple problems of the calculus of
variations.
➢ MATERIAL SCIENCE & METALLURGY
C232.1 Understand and apply the concepts of crystal structures, crystal imperfections and
diffusions in metals.
C232.2 Analyze and interpret the mechanical properties of materials and identify the various modes
of failure.
C232.3
Understand various solidification mechanisms, develop binary phase diagrams and Analyze
the microstructures of ferrous, non-ferrous materials and its effects on mechanical
properties.
C232.4 Distinguish and apply various heat treatment processes, which are necessary for
engineering practice.
C232.5 Understand and apply the properties and potentials of various engineering materials.
C232.6 Analyze the properties and design various composite materials for various industrial
applications.
➢ KINEMATICS OF MACHINES
C244.1
Identify degrees of freedom, mechanism, structure, mobility of various mechanisms.
Analyze mechanisms using Grubler’s criterion, Classify mechanisms in to continuous and
Intermittent motion mechanisms.
C244.2 Ability to Calculate the velocity and acceleration of Planar Mechanisms.
C244.3 Determine the path of contact, arc of contact, contact ratio of a Spur gear.
C244.4 Design the epicyclic gear trains to find the speed and number of teeth’s in a gear train.
C244.5 Construct the various types of follower motions and Design cams and followers for
specified motion profiles.
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
➢ DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS I
C352.1 Describe the design process, properties of materials and apply codes & Standards in the
design of mechanical components.
C352.2 Apply basic stress and strain analysis techniques to machine components subjected to static
loads and utilizing failure theories in the design of machine elements.
C352.3 Design the shafts under different loading conditions and machine elements subjected to
fatigue loading.
C352.4 Analyze bars, beams subjected to Impact load and design the joints with threaded fasteners
under a given loading condition.
C352.5 Design of cotter, knuckle joint, keys, couplings and riveted joints
C352.6 Design of different machine components such as Welded joints, power screws and screw
jack.
➢ HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
C365.1
Analyze and calculate one dimensional steady state conduction heat transfer through plane
wall, cylinder, and sphere of uniform and non-uniform thermal conductivity with and
without heat generation.
C365.2
Determine temperature and heat flow from straight fins subjected to different boundary
conditions and also analyzes unsteady state conduction problems with lumped analysis
and using Heisler charts.
C365.3 Demonstrate the evaluation of convective heat transfer in free and forced convection from
walls, cylinders under different conditions.
C365.4 Do thermal design of heat exchangers using LMTD and NTU methods and also
demonstrate the heat transfer with change of phase that is boiling and condensation.
C365.5 Workout the radiation heat transfer problems for different cases including radiation shield
and also solve simple numerical on diffusion & convective mass transfer.
➢ MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS
C472.1 To Define, understand and Apply the fundamentals of vibration, causes and effects of
vibration in mechanical systems.
C472.2 To Develop schematic models for physical systems, formulate governing equations of
motion and compute critical speeds.
C472.3 To Analyze and Evaluate the damping system, rotating and reciprocating system.
C472.4 To Analyze and design vibration isolators and absorbers, measuring instruments.
C472.5 To Analyze and Evaluate the multi degree freedom vibration system.
C472.6 Monitor and interpret the condition of the rotating machinery through vibration signature.
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
➢ CONTROL ENGINEERING
C482.1 Apply mathematical modelling techniques to determine the transfer function of a system.
C482.2 Analyze the time response of first and second order systems.
C482.3 Apply the concept of RH (Routh-Hurwitz) Criterion and root locus technique to determine
the stability of a system.
C482.4 Interpret the frequency response of a system using Bode’s plot and Nyquist stability
criterion.
C482.5 Describe the state models and various controllers.
(A.2) CO-PO Matrices of Courses selected in (A.1) (six matrices to be mentioned; one
per semester from 3rd to 8th semester)
➢ Evidence of CO-PO and CO-PSO matrix being defined by course instructor is made available with the
department which is maintained in the course file.
➢ Course file is prepared by the course instructor which consists of all the relevant data required for CO
and PO/PSO attainments and corrective measures.
➢ ELEMENTS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
COURSE NAME: C124 (ELEMENTS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING)
COs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
POs
C114.1 3 - - - - - - - - - - 2
C114.2 3 - - - - - 2 - - - - 2
C114.3 3 - - - - - 2 - - - - 2
C114.4 3 - 2 - - - - - - - - 2
C114.5 3 - - - - - - - - - - -
AVG 3 - 2 - - - 2 - - - - 2
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
➢ ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS III
COURSE NAME: C231 (ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS III)
POs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
COs
C231.1 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C231.2 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C231.3 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C231.4 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C231.5 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -
AVG 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -
➢ MATERIAL SCIENCE AND METALLURGY
COURSE NAME: C232 (MATERIAL SCIENCE & METALLURGY)
POs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
COs
C232.1 3 2 - - - - - - - - - 2
C232.2 - 3 - 3 - 2 - - 2 - - -
C232.3 3 - 3 3 - - - - - - - -
C232.4 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C232.5 3 1 - - - - - - - - - -
C232.6 - 3 3 - - - - - - - - 2
AVG 3 2.2 3 3 2 2 2
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Justification for the defined table for C232 (MATERIAL SCIENCE & METALLURGY)
CO NO. JUSTIFICATION
C232.1
Strongly mapped with PO1: Applying the knowledge of engineering fundamentals in
crystal systems (SC, BCC, FCC, HCP), can evaluate APF and imperfections in metals.
Moderately mapped with PO2: By solving diffusion problems, analysing diffusion rate
and analyzing APF.
Moderately mapped with PO12: From the fundamentals, he is capable of identifying the
given materials.
C232.2
Strongly mapped with PO1: Applying the knowledge of engineering fundamentals such
as stress, strain, true stress, true strain, ductile, brittle properties will help to solve stress-
stain behaviour of materials and able to analyze elastic, plastic region properties.
Strongly mapped with PO4: By conducting experiments, able to evaluate the strength and
properties of the given materials.
Moderately mapped with PO6: Apply reasoning knowledge to assess safety of the
materials by analyzing the material behaviour.
Moderately mapped with PO9: experimentation and investigations can be performed in a
group in laboratories.
C232.3
Strongly mapped with PO1: Capable of identifying engineering materials, classification
and their microstructures.
Strongly mapped with PO3: apply the knowledge of homogeneous, heterogeneous
solidification mechanisms and with the help of cooling curves, Hume-Rothery rule, can
help to select the materials for solid solutions and to construct phase diagram.
Strongly mapped with PO4: investigating the amount of different phases present in the
constructed phase diagram and interpreting them.
C232.4
Strongly mapped with PO1: Applying the knowledge of various heat treatment processes
and its advantages in engineering materials.
Moderately mapped with PO2: by analyzing the material behaviour after heat treatments
and their behaviour based on the rate of cooling.
C232.5
Strongly mapped with PO1: Applying the knowledge for classification of engineering
materials and their applications, compositions and characteristics.
Weakly mapped with PO2: by analyzing the microstructure of given material, able to
identify the properties.
C232.6
Strongly mapped with PO2: Applying the knowledge of composite materials,
classifications, and matrix and reinforcement materials and analyzes fabrication processes
involved in composite materials.
Strongly mapped with PO3: by analyzing the fiber matrix orientations, developing the
solutions and strength using rule of mixtures in iso-stress and iso-strain conditions.
Moderately mapped with PO12: composite materials are new generation materials, so by
the basic knowledge of composites they are able to identify the composite materials and
their properties.
❖ This is how the justification is done by course instructor.
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
❖ It is done for all courses and is kept ready.
➢ KINEMATICS OF MACHINES
COURSE NAME: C244 (KINEMATICS OF MACHINES)
POs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
COs
C244.1 1 3 - - - - - - - - - -
C244.2 - 3 - - 3 - - - - - - -
C244.3 - - - 2 - - - - - - - -
C244.4 - - 3 2 - - - - - - - -
C244.5 2 - 3 - - - - - - - - -
AVG 1.5 3 3 2 3 - - - - - - -
➢ DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS I
COURSE NAME: C352 (DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS)
POs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
COs
C352.1 1 - 1 - - 1 1 - - - - -
C352.2 3 3 1 - 3 - - - - - - -
C352.3 2 3 1 - - - - - - - - -
C352.4 1 3 1 - 3 - - - - - - -
C352.5 1 3 1 3 - - - - - - -
C352.6 1 3 - - - - - - - - - -
AVG 1.5 3 1 - 1.5 1 1 - - - - -
➢ HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
COURSE NAME: C363 (HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER)
POs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
COs
C361.1 3 3 - - - - - - - - - -
C361.2 3 2 - - - - - - - - 1
C361.3 3 2 - - - - - - - - 1
C361.4 3 3 2 - - - - - - - - 1
C361.5 3 - - - - - - - - 1
AVG 3 3 2 - - - - - - - - 1
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
➢ MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS
COURSE NAME: C473 (MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS)
POs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
COs
C471.1 3 - - - - - - - - - - -
C471.2 - 3 - - - - - - - - - -
C471.3 - 3 - - - - - - - - - -
C471.4 - - 3 - - - - - - - - -
C471.5 - 3 - - - - - - - - - -
C471.6 - - - 3 - - - - - - - -
AVG 3 3 3 3 - - - - - - - -
➢ CONTROL ENGINEERING
COURSE NAME: C482 (CONTROL ENGINEERING)
POs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
COs
C482.1 3 - - - - - - - - - 3 -
C482.2 2 - - - - - - - - 3 3
C482.3 - 3 3 - - - - - - - - -
C482.4 2 3 - 3 - - - - - - - -
C482.5 - - 3 - - - - - - - 3 3
AVG 2 3 3 3 - - - - - 3 3 3
2. Similar table is prepared for PSO’s
➢ COURSE NAME: C124 (ELEMENTS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING)
PSOs PSO 1 PSO 2
COs
C232.1 - 1
C232.2 - 1
C232.3 - 1
C232.4 - 1
C232.5 - 1
Average - 1
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
➢ COURSE NAME: C232 (MATERIAL SCIENCE & METALLURGY)
PSOs PSO 1 PSO 2
COs
C232.1 2 3
C232.2 3 2
C232.3 2 -
C232.4 2 -
C232.5 1 -
C232.6 3 3
Average 2.17 2.67
➢ COURSE NAME: C244 (KINEMATICS OF MACHINES)
PSOs PSO 1 PSO 2
COs
C243.1 3 3
C243.2 3 -
C243.3 1 -
C243.4 2 -
C243.5 - 1
Average 2.25 2
➢ COURSE NAME: C352 (DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS 1)
PSOs PSO 1 PSO 2
COs
C352.1 3 -
C352.2 3 -
C352.3 3 -
C352.4 3 -
C352.5 3 -
C352.6 3 -
Average 3 -
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
➢ COURSE NAME: C363 (HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER)
PSOs PSO 1
PSO
2 COs
C361.1 - 1
C361.2 2 -
C361.3 2 -
C361.4 2 -
C361.5 2 -
Average 2 1
➢ COURSE NAME: C472 (MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS)
PSOs PSO 1 PSO 2
COs
C472.1 3 -
C472.2 3 -
C472.3 3 -
C472.4 3 -
C472.5 3 -
C472.6 3 3
Average 3 3
➢ COURSE NAME: C482 (CONTROL ENGINEERING)
PSOs PSO 1 PSO 2
COs
C482.1 2 2
C482.2 2 2
C482.3 2 2
C482.4 2 2
C482.5 2 2
Average 2 2
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(A.3) A Program Level Course - PO Matrix of all Courses including First Year
Courses
COURSE PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C111 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C112 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C113 3 2 2.66 2 3 - - - 1.2 2 2 3
C114 3 - - - 3 - - - - 3 - 2
C115 3 - - - - 1 1 - 1 1 - 1
C116 2 1.5 2 3 - 2 - - - - - -
C117 3 - - - - - - - - - - -
C118 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C121 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C122 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C123 2 3 3 2 - - 2 - - - - -
C124 3 - 2 - - - 2 - - - - 2
C125 2 3 - - - 2 1 1 - - - 2
C126 3 3 3 - - - - 1 - - - 1.4
C127 2 2 - - - - - - 2 - - -
C128 1 - - - - - - 2 - - - -
C231 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C232 3 2.2 3 3 - 2 - - 2 - - 2
C233 3 3 - 3 2.5 3 - 1 1 - - 1
C234 3 2.17 2 3 - - - - - 1 - 2
C235 2.8 2 2 2 - 2 2 - 1 - - 2
C236 2 - 1 - 3 - - 3 - - 3 3
C237 3 2.5 2.3 2 - - - - 3 - - 1.7
C238 2.5 3 2.33 2 - 2 - - 2 - - 1
C241 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C242 3 - 2 3 2 2 - - - - - 2
C243 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 - - - 1
C244 1.5 3 3 2 3 - - - - - - -
C245 3 3 1 2 2 - 2 - - - -
C246 3 3 3 3 3 3 - - - - - 3
C247 2 - - 3 - - - - 3 1 - -
C248 3 3 - 2.4 - - - - 2 - - 2.4
C351 2.5 - 2 3 - 1 2 2 3 3 3 2
C352 1.5 3 1 - 1.5 1 1 - - - - -
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
COURSE PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C353 3 - 2 - - - 2 - - - - 2
C354 2 2.5 3 2.67 - - - - - - - -
C355 2.5 1.6 1.25 - - - - - - 1 - 1
C356 2.5 3 3 3 2 - - - 2 - - 1
C357 - 3 - 3 3 - - - - - - -
C358 - 3 - 3 3 - - - - - - -
C361 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 - - - - 3
C362 2 2.3 2.5 - - - - 1 - - - -
C363 3 3 2 - - - - - - - - 1
C364 3 1.5 - 1 2 - - - - 2 - 1
C365 3 2 2 - 3 - - - - - - 1
C366 2.4 2 2 2 - - 2 - - - 1 1.5
C367 3 1 2 3 - - - - 2 - - 1
C368 2 - 2 - 3 - - - - - 2 3
C471 2.75 2.16 2 2 - - - 1 1.5 1 2 2
C472 3 3 3 3 - - - - - - - -
C473 2 2 - - - - - - - 1.6 - 2
C474 3 3 3 3 - - - - - - 3 2
C475 1 2 1 - - 1.4 1.4 - - - - 1
C476 2.5 2.75 2.5 2 - - - - 2.25 - - 1
C477 3 - 3 3 3 - - - 1 1 - 1
C478 3 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 3
C481 2 3 3 3 - - - - - 3 3 3
C482 3 3 2.6
C483 2 2 2 - - 1 - 1 - - - -
C484 2.6 2.2 2 2.4 2 2 3 3 2 3
C485 2.25 2.5 2.25 1.67 3 1.34 2 2.25 1.75 1.75 3 1
Table-1.1a: Program level defined CO-PO Matrix
PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
IDEAL LEVEL 2.56 2.4 2.3 2.56 2.65 1.88 1.88 1.73 1.87 1.72 2.4 1.8
NO. OF COURSES
MAPPED 59 48 40 35 19 19 14 14 18 13 10 38
Table-1.1b: Programme levels intensity
Table-1.1a represents the PO levels for each course of the programme. Also, Table-1.1b represents ideal PO levels
of the programme and intensity of PO levels. Here PO1, PO2, PO3, PO4, PO12 are of high intensity but other
POs are of moderate intensity.
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Fig 1.1: Ideal PO levels for the program
Table -1.1a shows the CO-PO mapping prepared by the course instructor and the average PO
levels for each course is tabulated in the above matrix. The average value of PO level is calculated by
summing up all the column elements mentioned in the matrix. The information is tabulated in Table 1.1a
is also summarized with the help of column chart as shown in Fig 1.1.
It is observed that some of the defined PO levels are strong and some of them are moderate
hence we can aim to achieve the program between moderate to strong attainments with the help of direct
and indirect assessments.
It is found that all the program outcomes are difficult to define and achieve with high levels for
each course this is because the program is affiliated to university (VTU) and we don’t have the freedom
to frame the syllabus to define all POs with high levels for each course.
Actual attainments for each course are calculated based on the PO levels defined in the Table 1.1 which
gives average value of PO level.
(B.1) Attainment of Course Outcomes
B.1.1 Describe the Assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the
Evaluation of Course Outcome is based
The assessment is prepared based on more than one process; it involves mainly the internal assessment,
assignments, university examination and course exit survey of theory and practical’s, by the department
to evaluate course outcomes (COs).
The assessment process consists of two phases namely
1. DIRECT ASSESSMENT
2. INDIRECT ASSESSMENT
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
1. Course Exit Survey
2. Placements/ Soft Skill Training
3. Co-curricular and extra -
curricular
4. Industrial Visit/Internship
DIRECT
ASSESSMENT
INDIRECT
ASSESSMENT
1. Continuous Internal
Evaluation (CIE)
2. Assignments
3. Semester End Examination
(SEE)
ASSESSMENT PROCESSES
Here direct assessment process is used to achieve CO attainment. Whereas both direct and
indirect assessment process is used to achieve PO attainment. Fig-1.2 shows the flow chart for
assessment process.
Fig-1.2: Flow Chart Representation of Assessment Process
1. DIRECT ASSESSMENT tool consist of two parts namely:
A. Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE)
B. Semester End Examination (SEE)
Process of attainment of COs by Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE) and Semester End Examination
(SEE) is as shown in fig 1.3 which is explained as follows:
➢ Before course delivery the course instructor prepares COs, which are mapped to POs/PSOs along
with levels.
➢ The internal marks are based on the performance of students and it is assessed based on 50 Marks for each &
three tests are conducted.
➢ Each faculty pre-sets targets for assessment of course based on previous experiences of external
results and internal assessments.
➢ Internal questions papers are prepared and the questions are mapped with CO/PO/PSOs
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
➢ The department has developed an automated excel spread sheet to assess the course outcomes and
program outcomes automatically.
➢ The Excel sheet calculates the attainment for each COURSE outcome.
➢ For assessment of COs, the attainment obtained from the internal marks and assignment marks are
considered.
➢ Continuous internal evaluation (CIE) = 30% internals assessment +10% assignment assessment.
➢ Semester End Examination (SEE) Assessment is done based on the university marks obtained by the
student in his final examination.
➢ Direct assessment = Continuous Internal Evaluation (40% CIE) +Semester End Examination (60%
SEE).
Fig1.3: Flow chart of attainment of course
Fig 1.3 and Fig 1.4 shows the flow chart of CO attainment and sample of course outcome which are
already explained step by step.
1. INTERNAL TESTS (30%)
2. ASSIGNMENT (10%)
UNIVERSITY EXAM
MARKS (60%)
SEMESTER END
EXAMINATION
(SEE)
CONTINUOUS
INTERNAL
EVALUATION (CIE)
ATTAINMENT OF COURSE
OUTCOME’S
FINAL COURSE
ATTAINMENT
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Fig 1.4: Sample of course outcome attainment
ATTAINMENT OF THEORY COURSE:
Fig 1.5 shows the flow chart of attainment for theory course which is explained as follows.
➢ The process of Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE) is done based on three internals and three
assignments are given by the course instructor.
➢ Internals are conducted as tests for 50 marks each. The Test question paper will be prepared as per
blooms taxonomy and also meets/satisfies the CO/PO/PSO’s mapping.
➢ Three Technical Assignments will be given by the course instructor for evaluating students for each
semester.
➢ Semester end examination (SEE) assessment is done based on the university marks obtained by the
student in his final examination.
➢ CIE is considered for 40% of the total internal marks and SEE for 60% of total external marks to
calculate attainments
ATTAINMENT RESULT FOR EACH CO
Direct: Attainment cal Based on the IA, Assignment and External University Marks (40%
(IA+Assignment) + 60 External University):
COURSE
OUTCOMES
(CO)
"a1"
IA (30)
Final
CO
Level
"a2"
Assignment
(10) Final
CO Level
"Da"
Combine
a1&a2,
(75% of
"a1"+25% of
"a2"), is the
outcome for
total 40
(30+10) marks
"Db"
External
University
CO Level
"FA"
Direct
Assessment
(40% of
"Da" + 60%
"Db")
Avg
Attainment
CO1 0.4157 1.0000 0.5618 0.4225 0.4782
0.4820
CO2 0.3959 1.0000 0.5470 0.4225 0.4723
CO3 0.4825 1.0000 0.6119 0.4225 0.4983
CO4 0.4816 1.0000 0.6112 0.4225 0.4980
CO5 0.3592 1.0000 0.5194 0.4225 0.4613
CO6 0.4358 1.0000 0.5768 0.4225 0.4842
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Fig 1.5: Flow chart of attainment of theory course
LABORATORY ASSESSMENT:
➢ Performance of students in labs is assessed through continuous evaluation for each experiment.
➢ The Students are motivated to give concentration on the experiments in the laboratory and are
grouped in to batches and each batch is allocated a slot of 3 hours a week
➢ The student’s performance is evaluated in each experiment is based on their performance during lab
conduction through rubrics.
➢ CIE is considered for 40% of the total internal marks and SEE for 60% of total external marks to
calculate attainments
➢ Each student is assessed at the end considering both conduction of experiments (Labs) and
completion of models (Workshops).
Rubrics for laboratory is as shown in Table-1.2. and Fig 1.6 shows attainment of laboratory course
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Experiment
Name
Marks Distribution Total
Marks
25
Observation
10%
Conduction
10%
Viva
10%
Result
10%
Internal Test
60%
Table-1.2: Rubrics for laboratory evaluation
Fig 1.6: Flow chart of attainment of laboratory course
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
TECHNICAL SEMINAR:
➢ The assessment of the technical seminar is based on the topic selected, the knowledge of the topic
and the presentation skill.
➢ Final year students must select technical Seminar talk on their subject interest. Marks will be awarded
based on students’ performance.
➢ Each student has to present technical seminar in the presence of internal peer review committee
members with technical seminar co-ordinator.
➢ Seminar topic course materiel should be prepared by each student and need to get the approval from
their respective guide well in advance.
➢ The power point presentation has to be prepared by the students. It should meet the basic requirement
of the committee members in terms of topic selected, the knowledge of the topic and the presentation
skill.
➢ The students are advised and motivated for any improvement in the presentation. At the end of the
day, the students will have the confidence to come front and explain his ideas to improve engineering
and society.
Table-1.3 shows the rubrics for seminar evaluation.
STUDENT
NAME
WITH
USN
SEMINAR EVALUATION RUBRICS
TOPIC
SELECTION
(10Marks)
PRESENTATION
(15 Marks)
LEVEL OF
UNDERSTANDING (15
Marks)
REPORT
(10
Marks)
Total
(50 Marks)
Table-1.3: Rubrics for seminar evaluation
PROJECT WORK:
➢ Generally, 2 to 4 students are permitted to form a project batch who is interested in carrying out a
project of their interest.
➢ The Department Advisory Committee (DAC) consisting of HOD, Dean and senior faculties will
monitor the progress of students through their allotted guides.
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
RUBRICS FOR PROJECT EVALUATION:
Review # Agenda Rubrics
Review Overall
Assessment Weightage
marks
Progress Evaluation-
I
Project Synopsis/
Proposal
Evaluation
Problem Statement, Literature
Review 10
Progress Evaluation-
II
Mid-Term Project
Evaluation
Methodology and Design of
Existing System and Feasibility
of Project Proposal, Planning of
Project Work and Team
Structure
40
Progress Evaluation-
III
Semester-End
Project
Evaluation
Demonstrate and Presentation of
Project Work with Project
Report
50
Table-1.4: Project Evaluation Rubrics
Table-3.4 shows the project evaluation rubrics
➢ Project progress is evaluated in three stages by faculty members for 10%, 40% and 50% of total
CIE marks respectively.
➢ Levels of internal assessment: Synopsis, Midterm & Final evaluation.
➢ External assessment is based on the University examination evaluated by Internal & External
examiners allotted by University.
➢ CIE is considered for 40% of the total internal marks and SEE for 60% of total external marks to
calculate attainments
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Fig 1.7: Flow chart of attainment of project work course
➢ The Course Instructor prepares the CO-PO matrix.
➢ After internal and external assessment CO attainment is calculated.
➢ After the CO attainment calculation, the attainment level is recorded
➢ Target level is set for courses.
➢ Gap analysis is recorded by the course instructor and suitable action is planned if gap exists.
➢ If target is met, the target is revised for the subsequent year.
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
CAY: 2016-2017 (PERFORMANCE OF 2013 BATCH)
B.1.2 Record the Attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to set
Attainment levels
Subject Subject Code CO Attainment
(%)
CO Target
(%)
CO
Level
Engg. Maths I C111 69.61 65 3
Engg. Chemistry C112 66.23 65 3
Programming in C & Data Structure C113 70.14 65 3
Computer aided engg. drawing C114 59 60 2.5
Basic Electronics C115 71.93 60 3
Computer Programming Lab C116 75.57 75 3
Chemistry Lab C117 71.25 75 3
Environmental Studies C118 70.24 70 3
Engg. Maths II C121 60.24 65 3
Engg. Physics C122 73.23 65 2
Elements of civil Engg. C123 59.93 65 2.5
Elements of Mechanical Engg. C124 62.36 60 3
Electrical Engg. C125 53.07 60 2
Workshop Lab C126 80.03 75 3
Physics Lab C127 85.91 75 3
Constitution of India, Professional
Ethics and Human rights C128 56.66 70 2.5
Engineering Mathematics III C231 66.56 65 3
Material Sc. & Metallurgy C232 62.01 65 3
Basic Thermodynamics C233 50.29 55 2
Mechanics of Materials C234 49.2 50 2
Manufacturing Process I C235 68.99 65 3
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Subject Subject Code CO Attainment
(%)
CO Target
(%)
CO
Level
Computer Aided Machine Drawing C236 56.53 60 2.5
Metallography & Material Testing
Lab C237 82.57 75 3
Foundry & Forging lab C238 83.43 75 3
Engineering Mathematics IV C241 45.65 65 1.5
Mechanical Measurements &
Metrology C242 51.12 60 2
Applied Thermodynamics C243 44.59 55 1.5
Kinematics of Machines C244 56.59 60 2.5
Manufacturing Process II C245 53.56 60 2
Fluid Mechanics C246 56.3 60 2.5
Mech. Measurements & Metrology
Lab C247 72.67 75 3
Machine Shop C248 76.3 75 3
Management and Entrepreneurship C351 61.04 60 3
Design of Machine Elements I C352 50.55 55 2
Energy Engineering C353 67.19 65 3
Dynamics of Machines C354 62.55 65 3
Manufacturing Process III C355 66.74 65 3
Turbo Machines C356 45.23 55 1.5
Fluid Mechanics & Machines Lab C357 79.52 75 3
Energy Conversion Engg. Lab C358 82.76 75 3
Computer Integrated
Manufacturing C361 71.39 65 3
Design of Machine Elements II C362 43.06 50 1.5
Heat & Mass Transfer C363 52.03 55 2
Finite Element Methods C364 59.34 60 2.5
Mechatronics & Microprocessor C365 74.61 65 3
Subject Subject Code CO Attainment
(%)
CO Target
(%)
CO
Level
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Table-1.5: CO-Attainment in percentage and levels
CAY m1:2015-16 (PERFORMANCE OF 2012 BATCH):
Subject Subject
Code
CO Attainment
(%)
CO Target
(%)
CO
Level
Engg. Maths I C111 84.69 60 3
Engg. Chemistry C112 66.63 60 3
Programming in C & Data
Structure C113 67.14 60 2
Computer aided engg. drawing C114 64.83 60 3
Basic Electronics C115 56.24 55 2
Computer Programming Lab C116 82.43 70 3
Chemistry Lab C117 75.49 70 3
Environmental Studies C118 69.58 70 3
Subject Subject
Code
CO Attainment
(%)
CO Target
(%)
CO
Level
Engg. Maths II C121 84.05 60 3
Non-Traditional Machining C366 72.83 65 3
Heat & Mass Transfer Lab C367 76.72 75 3
CAMA Lab C368 85.92 75 3
Economics C471 68.18 65 3
Mechanical Vibrations C472 56.24 60 2.5
Hydraulics and Pneumatics C473 53.33 60 2
Operations Research C474 52.39 60 2
NCS C475 65.88 60 3
ESA C476 64.73 65 3
Design Lab C477 84.91 75 3
CIM and Automation Lab C478 87.62 75 3
Operations Management C481 62.32 60 3
Control Engineering C482 68.24 65 3
Tribology C483 70.66 65 3
Automotive Engg. C484 59.99 65 3
Project Work C485 92.52 75 3
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Engg. Physics C122 71.3 60 3
Elements of civil Engg. C123 64.41 60 3
Elements of Mechanical Engg. C124 59.14 60 2.5
Electrical Engg C125 60.17 60 3
Workshop Lab C126 70.36 70 3
Physics Lab C127 83.9 70 3
Constitution of India, Professional
Ethics and Human rights C128 67.92 65 3
Engineering Mathematics III C231 66.64 60 3
Material Sc. & Metallurgy C232 62 60 3
Basic Thermodynamics C233 50.3 55 2
Mechanics of Materials C234 49.2 50 2
Manufacturing Process I C235 69 60 3
Computer Aided Machine Drawing C236 56.5 60 2.5
Metallography & Material Testing
Lab C237 82.5 70 3
Foundry & Forging lab C238 83.4 70 3
Engineering Mathematics IV C241 69.63 65 3
Mechanical Measurements &
Metrology C242 51.1 60 2
Applied Thermodynamics C243 44.6 55 1
Kinematics of Machines C244 56.6 60 2.5
Manufacturing Process II C245 53.6 60 2
Fluid Mechanics C246 56.3 60 2.5
Mech. Measurements & Metrology
Lab C247 72.7 70 3
Machine Shop C248 76.3 70 3
Management and Entrepreneurship C351 61 60 3
Design of Machine Elements I C352 50.6 55 2
Subject Subject
Code
CO Attainment
(%)
CO Target
(%)
CO
Level
Energy Engineering C353 67.2 60 3
Dynamics of Machines C354 62.6 60 3
Manufacturing Process III C355 66.7 60 3
Turbo Machines C356 45.2 55 1.5
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Fluid Mechanics & Machines Lab C357 79.5 70 3
Energy Conversion Engg. Lab C358 82.8 70 3
Computer Integrated
Manufacturing C361 71.4 60 3
Design of Machine Elements II C362 43.1 50 1
Heat & Mass Transfer C363 52 55 2
Finite Element Methods C364 59.3 60 2.5
Mechatronics & Microprocessor C365 74.6 60 3
Non-Traditional Machining C366 72.8 60 3
Heat & Mass Transfer Lab C367 76.7 70 3
CAMA Lab C368 85.9 70 3
Economics C471 68.2 60 3
Mechanical Vibrations C472 56.2 60 2.5
Hydraulics and Pneumatics C473 53.3 60 2
Operations Research C474 52.4 60 2
NCS C475 65.9 60 3
ESA C476 64.7 60 3
Design Lab C477 84.9 70 3
CIM and Automation Lab C478 87.6 70 3
Operations Management C481 59 55 2.5
Control Engineering C482 62.4 60 3
Tribology C483 71.9 60 3
Automotive Engg. C484 61.3 60 3
Project Work C485 90.9 70 3
Table-1.6: CO-Attainment in percentage and levels
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
TARGET SETTING :
Course instructor sets the target based on various factors such as past performance of students, difficulty
of the subject, quality of question paper etc.,
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
C111C112C113C114C115C116C117C118C121C122C123C124C125C126C127C128
TA
RG
ET
%
COURSE
SET TARGETS-1ST YEAR COURSES
2017-18 2016-17 2015-16
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
C111C112C113C114C115C116C117C118C121C122C123C124C125C126C127C128
TA
RG
ET
%
COURSE
SET TARGETS-1ST YEAR COURSES
2017-18 2016-17 2015-16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
C111C112C113C114C115C116C117C118C121C122C123C124C125C126C127C128
TA
RG
ET
%
COURSE
SET TARGETS-1ST YEAR COURSES
2017-18 2016-17 2015-16
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Fig 1.8 and 1.9: Target set summary for 1st and 2nd year courses
It is observed from the Fig 1.8 and 1.9 that the target enhanced for each batch of 1st and 2nd year
courses respectively. These figures also indicate that target kept constant for very few of the courses as
the target was not achieved. In such cases course instructor initiate target achieving methodology such as
tutorial classes, remedial classes and extra classes for slow learners and coursewise weak students.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
C231C232C233C234C235C236C237C238C241C242C243C244C245C246C247C248
TA
RG
ET
%
COURSE
SET TARGETS-2ND YEAR COURSES
2017-18 2016-17 2015-16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
C351C352C353C354C355C356C357C358C361C362C363C364C365C366C367C368
TA
RG
ET
%
COURSE
SET TARGETS-3RD YEAR COURSES
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Fig.1.10 and 1.11:Target set summary for 3rd and 4th year courses
It is observed that from the Fig:1.10 and 1.11 that course instructor increased the target
percentage for each batch of 3rd and 4th year students. Targets are increased successively for most of the
courses of 3rd and 4th year. Also it is seen that for few courses target remains unchanged which means
targets are not met for that course. In such cases course instructor plans target achieving action plans
such as tutorial classes,extra classes, remedial classes for slow learners of that particular course.
GAP ANALYSIS WITH SET TARGETS : Target set for each batch is summarised in this section.
Before studying gap between CO attainment % and Target set % here we study gap between target set
with each successive batch. ( e.g., Target % of LYG – Target % of LYGm1)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
C471 C472 C473 C474 C475 C476 C477 C478 C481 C482 C483 C484 C485
TAR
GET
%
COURSE
SET TARGETS-4TH YEAR COURSES
2017-18 2016-17 2015-16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
C111C112C113C114C115C116C117C118C121C122C123C124C125C126C127C128
TAR
GE
T %
COURSE
Gap analysis of Targets-1ST YEAR
2015-16 TARGET% 2016-17 TARGET% 2017-18 TARGET%
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Fig.1.12 and Fig 1.13: Target set Gap analysis for 1st and 2nd year
Fig.1.12, 1.13, 1.14 and 1.15 shows increase in target % for each successive year that is for each
successive batch of students. This means set targets for the particular course is achieved. If target is not increased
this indicates that set target is not achieved and hence requires some corrective action for the subsequent year.
Fig.1.14 and Fig 1.15: Target set Gap analysis for 3rd and 4th year
In the above Fig 1.12,1.13,1.14 and 1.15 it is observed that gap does not exist between few
courses for successive years for example C124 and C125 in first year this is an indication that target is
not achieved in the previous year. Similarly C233,C234,C243 and C246 target is not increased between
two successive year this means there is no gap between targets indicates necessary action plan is to be
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
C231C232C233C234C235C236C237C238C241C242C243C244C245C246C247C248
TA
RG
ET
%
COURSE
Gap Analysis of Targets-2ND YEAR
2015-16 TARGET% 2016-17 TARGET% 2017-18 TARGET%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
C351C352C353C354C355C356C357C358C361C362C363C364C365C366C367C368
TA
RG
ET
%
COURSE
Gap Analysis of Targets-3RD YEAR
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
initiated by the course instructor of those courses.Similar analysis can be carried out for 3rd and 4th year
courses and they are self explainatory through drawn graphs.
GAP ANALYSIS WITH ATTAINED CO% AND TARGET SET:
Fig.1.16 and 1.17: Gap between CO attainment and set Target
Fig.1.16 and 1.17 shows the CO attainment and CO target in % for each courses with year of
study. Here in the above Fig’s we have shown first year and third year summary of results for CO
attainments. In the above figures CO Attainment in % is shown as vertical column and CO Target % is
shown as a curve passing through these CO Attainment columns. If gap exists between the target curve
and the top of column then there exists a gap which indicates that target is not achieved. If the target
0
20
40
60
80
100
CO
%
COURSE CODE
First year CO Attainments for 2016-17
CO Attainment (%) CO Target (%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
CO
%
COURSE CODE
Third year CO Attainments
CO Attainment (%) CO Target (%)
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
curve intersects the CO Attainment column then there is no gap ( because of intersection) and target is
attained for that course and course instructor is supposed to revise the new target for that course.
Attainment of POs and PSO’s are computed on the basis of direct and indirect attainment methods.
The POs and PSOs attainment is calculated and measured based on levels and percentage.
Direct Assessment Tools:
➢ Direct assessment for POs and PSOs are computed using the CO attainment of each course.
➢ The CO attainment is calculated both in percentage and in levels.
➢ Level-1 is Low, Level-2 is Modetrate and Level-3 is High.
➢ The automated excel sheet converts the COs percentage in to levels based on the set target of students
scoring more than target set percentage.
➢ The course instructor set the level for attainment based on his knowledge and experience as
mentioned in the previous session.
➢ The detailed procedure has been described below with snap shots.
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Fig 1.18: Details of course
➢ In the main sheet of the excel format the details of the subject wil be entered as shown in the figure.
➢ The details such as semester, subject, session, class strength will be entered.
➢ The target for the subject will also be entered in this sheet.
➢ Once the details of the course and the target is set, the next part is to enter the marks for the questions
and to relate it with their respective COs.
➢ The total marks for individual COs will be calculated by the excel sheet automatically and will be
displayed
C.1.1 Description of assessment tools and processes used for measuring the attainment
of each Program Outcome and Program Specific Outcomes
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Fig 1.19: Marks entry and mapping questions with COs
COvs PO and COvs PSO:
In the CO-PO sheet the course instructor maps the COs to the respective POs with its level’s and the
COs with PSOs.
Fig 1.20: Mapping COs with POs and PSOs
➢ The mapping will be done based on three levels as below.
LEVEL 1- Less Related
LEVEL 2- Moderately Related
LEVEL 3- Strongly Related
Marks Entery Sheet :
➢ In the CO-1 to CO-6 Test sheet of the excel format, the first row represents the present and absent
status of the student for that respective internals.
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
➢ The course instructor enters the marks in the excel sheet for the respective questions for which the
student has answered and obtained the marks.
➢ Fig shows the marks obtained by the students for Q1, Q2 and Q5 questions for 10 marks
Fig 1.21: marks entry of the students
Calculation Sheet :
➢ The automated excel sheet directly considers the marks entered in the CO1-6 T1 sheet which the
course instructor has entered.
➢ Then the excel sheet calculates the percentage for each mark scored for that respective question and
displays in percentage.
➢ The excel sheet calculates the averages of percentage marks of part-A (Q1-Q4) and part –B (Q5-Q8)
➢ Final average of the percentages is being calculated by considering the averages of A and B.
➢ The last row in the excel sheet indicated by letter Y conforms that student attained that particular CO.
➢ Finally, the number of Y will be counted by the automated excel sheet and the co attainment is
calculated T.
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Fig 1.22: individual marks calculations in %
CO LEVEL:
Fig 1.23: target level’s
➢ The target levels which the course instructor sets are based on his experience from the previous
results and expectation and is been displayed as in above fig. 3.23 for a particular course.
➢ If 80% of students score more than 60% of marks, then it is considered as LEVEL 3- strongly related
➢ If 70% of students score more than 60% of marks, then it is considered as LEVEL 2- moderately
➢ If 60% of students score more than 60% of marks, then it is considered as LEVEL 1- less related
➢ In the attainment calculation sheet of the excel format the final level calculation will be calculated for
all COs
➢ The calculation will be based on considering 40% IA marks and 60% externals marks and with this
the final attainment is done.
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Fig 1.24: course attainment calculation for three tests
➢ The attainment calculation for all the three internals has been calculated and displayed
➢ The attainment calculation is being done both in level and percentage.
Fig 1.25: course attainment calculation in level for three tests
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Fig 1.26: course attainment calculation in percentage for three tests
➢ The average of all the COs final attainment will be calculated.
➢ The above fig shows the level attained by the course for the respective COs in the three internals.
➢ Attainment level calculation is done based on considering internal marks, assignments and externals
marks
➢ Final attainment level is the average of all COs attainment level.
➢ Final attainment percentage is the average of all COs attainment percentage.
Fig 1.27: course attainment level result
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Fig 1.28: course attainment in %
➢ Attainment result calculation is done based on considering internal marks, assignments and externals
➢ Continuous internal evaluation (CIE) = 30% Internals assessment +10% Assignment assessment.
➢ Semester End Examination (SEE) Assessment is done based on the university marks obtained by the
student in his final examination.
➢ Direct assessment =Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE 30%) + Internals Assignment (10%
Assignment) +Semester End Examination (SEE 60%).
➢ Final attainment calculation in percentage is the average of all COs attainment values
CO/POs and CO/ PSO’s LEVEL calculation:
➢ The value of the POs and PSOs in levels are calculated based on the attained COs levels .
➢ The POs and PSOs which are been mapped with COs in the CO-PO/PSO mapping sheet will be concidered
and the values of COs for the mapped POs will be displayed in the cell for that POs
➢ The average of all the COs values for that individual POs will be calculated and will be displayed
Fig 1.29: CO/POs and CO/ PSO’s LEVEL calculation
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
POs LEVEL:
➢ The final individual POs level are obtained and are been displayed in the PO result sheet .
Fig 1.30: POs attainment in level
PSO’s LEVEL:
➢ The final PSO’s level are obtained and are been displayed in the PSO result sheet .
Fig 1.31: PSOs attainment in level
Indirect Assessment Tools:
Assessment Process Targeted
Students Frequency
Assessment
Tool
Exit survey All students Yearly Excel sheet
Placement All students Yearly Excel sheet
Sports All students Yearly Excel sheet
Placements/ Soft Skill Training All students Yearly Excel sheet
Industrial Visit/Internship All students Yearly Excel sheet
Table-1.7a: Indirect Assessment
Indirect assessment tools/process are tabulated as shown in Table-1.7a which is used to gather
information required for indirect attainment of the programme. Here exit survey consists of course exit
survey, graduate exit survey/programme exit survey. Also various other forms of indirect assessment
tools are shown in the table.
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
C.1.2 Provide results of evaluation of each PO & PSO
PO attainments are recorded as shown in below table 1.7b-
PO Attainment CAY (2016-17)
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C111 1.5 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C112 2 1.5 - - - - - - - - - -
C113 2 1.5 2 - 2 - - - - - - -
C114 2 - - - 2 - - - - 2 - 1.5
C115 2 - - - - 1 1 - 1 1 - 1
C116 2 2 2 2.5 - 2 - - - - - -
C117 3 - - - - - - - - - - -
C118 2 1.5 - - - - - - - - - -
C121 2 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C122 2.5 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C123 1.5 2 2 1.5 - - 1.5 - - - - -
C124 2.5 - - - - - 2 - - - - 2
C125 1.5 2 - - - 1.5 1 1 - - - 1.5
C126 2 2 2 - - - - 1 - - - 1
C127 2.5 2 - - - - - - 2 - - -
C128 3 - - - - - - 2 - - - -
C231 2 2.5 - - - - - - - - - -
C232 2 1.5 2 2 - 1.5 - - 1.5 - - 1.5
C233 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2 2.5 - 1 1 - - 1
C234 2.5 2 1 2 - - - - - 1 - 2
C235 2.5 2 2 2 2 2 1 - - 2
C236 1.5 - 1 - 2 - - 2 - - 2 2
C237 2.5 2 3 2 - - - - 2.5 - - 1.5
C238 2.5 3 2.5 2 2 - 2 - - 1
C241 2 1.5 - - - - - - - -
C242 2 1.5 2 1.5 1.5 - - - - - 1.5
C243 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2 2 2 - - - 1
C244 1.5 2.5 2.5 2 2.5 - - - - - -
C245 3 3 1 2 - 2 - 2 - - - -
C246 2 2 2 2 2 2 - - - - - 0.9
C247 2 - - 2.5 - - - - 2.5 1 - -
C248 3 3 - 2.5 - 2 - - 2 - - 2.5
C351 2 - - 2.5 - - 2 2 2.5 2.5 2.5 1.76
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C352 1.5 2.5 1 - 2.5 1 1 - - - - -
C353 2 - 1.5 - - - 1.5 - - - - 1.5
C354 2 2 2.5 2 - - - - - - - -
C355 2 1.5 1 - - - - - - 1 - -
C356 2.5 3 3 3 2 - - - 2 - - -
C357 - 3 - 3 3 - - - - - - -
C358 - - - 3 3 - - - - - - -
C361 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2 1.5 2
C362 1.5 1.5 1.5 - - - - 1 - - - -
C363 2 2 1.5 1
C364 2.5 1.5 - 1 2 - - - - 2 - 1
C365 2 1.5 1.5 2 1
C366 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 3 - 1.5 - - - 1 1.5
C367 2 1 1.5 2 - - - - 1.5 - - 1
C368 1.5 1.5 2 - - - - - 1.5 2
C471 2.2 2 2 2 - - - 1 1.5 1 2 2
C472 2.5 2 1 1 - - - - - - - -
C473 1.5 1.5 - - - - - - - 1 - 1.5
C474 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 - - - - - - 2.5 2
C475 1 2 1 - - 1 1 - - - - 1
C476 2.5 3 2.5 2 - - - - 2.5 - - 1
C477 3 3 3 3 - - - 1.5 1.5 - 1
C478 2 1.5 2.5 2.5 2 2.5 - 2 2 - - 2
C481 3 2.5 2.5 2.5 - - - - - 2.5 2.5 2.5
C482 2.5 2.5 - 2 - - - - - - - -
C483 2 2 2 - - 1 - 1 - - - -
C484 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2 2 - - 1.5 2
C485 2.25 2.5 2.25 1.67 3 1.34 2 2.25 1.75 1.75 3 1
Table-1.7b: Course wise PO Attainments
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Direct
Attainment 2.1 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.2 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.8 1.6 1.9 1.6
Indirect
Attainment 66 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8
Total PO
Attainment 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 1.9 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.9 2.1 1.8
Table-1.8: Final PO attainment of the Programme
Table-3.8 shows the total attainment for CAY (2016-17) which is calculated as follows:
Total attainment = (0.8*Direct Attainment + 0.2*Indirect Attainment)
PSO attainments for CAY (2016-17) are recorded as shown in Table 3.9
Course PSO1 PSO2
C231 - 1
C232 1.5 1.5
C233 1 2
C234 2.5 1
C235 1.5 1
C236 2 1.5
C237 2 1.5
C238 1.5 1
C241 - 1
C242 1.5 1.5
C243 1.5 2
C244 2 1.5
C245 2 1
C246 1.5 2
C247 1.5 -
C248 3 3
C351 2 2
C352 2.5 -
C353 - 1
C354 2 1.5
C355 1 1
C356 2 2
C357 2 2
C358 - 2
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Course PSO1 PSO2
C361 2 2
C362 1.5 1
C363 1.5 -
C364 1.5 1.5
C365 1.5 1.5
C366 2 2
C367 1.5 -
C368 2 1
C471 - 1.5
C472 2.4 1
C473 1 1.5
C474 - 1.5
C475 - 1
C476 2 3
C477 2 -
C478 2 2
C481 2 2
C482 1.5 1.5
C483 2 1.5
C484 1 1.5
C485 2 1
Table 1.9: Course wise PSO Attainments
Course PSO1 PSO2
Direct Attainment 1.78 1.55
Indirect Attainment 2.6 2.8
Total PSO Attainment 1.94 1.8
Table-1.10: Final PSO Attainment
Table-3.10 shows final PSO attainment which is calculated as follows
Total PSO attainment = (0.8*Direct Attainment + 0.2*Indirect Attainment)
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
PO AttainmentCAYm1 (2015-16)
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C111 2 2.5 - - - - - - - - - -
C112 2 1.5 - - - - - - - - - -
C113 2 1.5 2 - 2 - - - - - - -
C114 2 - - - 2 - - - - 2 - 1
C115 2 - - - - 1 1 1 1 1
C116 2 1.5 1.5 2.5 - 2 - - - - - -
C117 3 - - - - - - - - - - -
C118 2 1 - - - - - - - - -
C121 2 3 - - - - - - - - - -
C122 2 1.5 - - - - - - - - -
C123 1 2 2 1 1
C124 2 - - - - - 2 - - - - 2
C125 1.5 2 - - - 1.5 1 1 - - - 1.5
C126 2 2 2 - - - - 1 - - - 1
C127 2.5 2 - - - - - - 2 - - -
C128 3 - - - - - - 1 - - - -
C231 1 1 - - - - - - - - - -
C232 2 1 2 2 - 1 - - 1 - - 1
C233 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
C234 2 1 1 2 - - - - - 1 - 1
C235 2 1 1 1 - 1 1 - 1 - - 1
C236 1 - 1 - 2 - - 2 - - 2 2
C237 2 2 2 2 - - - - 2 - - 1
C238 3 3 2 2 - 2 - - 2 - - 1
C241 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C242 2 - 2 2 2 2 - - - - - 2
C243 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 - - - 1
C244 1 2 2 2 2 - - - - - - -
C245 3 3 1 2 - 2 - 2 - - - -
C246 2 2 2 2 2 2 - - - - - 1
C247 2 - - 3 - - - - 3 1 - -
C248 3 3 2 2 2 2
C351 2 - - 2.5 - - 2 2 2.5 2.5 2.5 1.76
C352 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2
C353 2 - 2 - - - 2 - - - - 2
C354 1 2 2 2 - - - - - - - -
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C355 2 1 1 - - - - - - 1 - 1
C356 3 3 3 3 2 - - - 2 - - 1
C357 - 2 - 2 2 - - - - - - -
C358 - - - 2 2 - - - - - - -
C361 2 2 2 2 2 2 - 2 - - - 2
C362 2 2 3 - - - - 1 - - - -
C363 2 2 1 - - - - - - - - 1
C364 2 1 1 2 - - - - 2 - 1
C365 2 1 1 - 2 - - - - - - 1
C366 2 2 2 2 2 - 2 - - - 1 1
C367 2 1 3 2 - - - - 2 - - 1
C368 1 - 1 - 2 - - - - - 1 2
C471 2 2 2 2 - - - 1 1 1 2 2
C472 2 2 1 1 - - - - - - - -
C473 1 1 - - - - - - - 1 - 1
C474 2 2 2 2 - - - - - - 2 2
C475 1 2 1 - - 1 1 - - - - 1
C476 3 3 3 2 - - - - 2 - - 1
C477 3 - 3 3 3 - - - 1 1 - 1
C478 2 1 2 2 2 2 - 2 2 - - 2
C481 2 2 2 2 - - - - - 2 2 2
C482 2 2 - 2 - - - - - - - -
C483 2 2 2 - - 1 - 1 - - - -
C484 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 - - 1 2
C485 2.25 2.5 2.25 1.67 3 1.34 2 2.25 1.75 1.75 3 1
Table-1.11: Course wise PO attainments
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Direct
Attainment 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.4
Indirect
Attainment 2.8 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.9
Total
Attainment 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.7 2.0 1.8 1.9 1.7
Table-1.12: Final PO attainment of the Programme
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Course PSO1 PSO2
C231 - 1
C232 1.5 1.5
C233 1 2
C234 2 1
C235 1 1
C236 2 1
C237 2 1.5
C238 1.5 1
C241 1
C242 1.6 1.6
C243 2 2.5
C244 2 1.6
C245 2 -
C246 1.6 2.4
C247 2 -
C248 3 3
C351 2 2
C352 2 -
C353 - 1
C354 - 1
C355 - 1
C356 1 1
C357 1 1
C358 2 2
C361 1.5 1.5
C362 - 1.6
C363 2 2.5
C364 2 1
C365 1.5
C366 1.5 1.5
C367 1.6 1.6
C368 2.5 2.5
C471 - 1.5
C472 2 1.5
C473 - 1
C474 2 1
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Table-1.13: Final PSO attainment of the Programme
Table-1.14: Final PSO attainment including Direct and Indirect Attainment
Table 3.11 and 3.13 shows the course wise PO attainments, PSO attainments. Also, tables 3.12 and 3.14 shows
the total/overall PO/PSO attainments. Results obtained from the above tables will be discussed in detail in the
next section with the help of charts.
Course PSO1 PSO2
C475 1 1.5
C476 - 1.5
C477 - 1
C478 1.5 2
C481 2 -
C482 2 2
C483 2 1
C484 1.6 1.6
C485 2 1
Attainments PSO1 PSO2
Direct Attainment 1.74 1.56
Indirect Attainment 2.7 2.8
PSO Attainment 1.93 1.81
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
SUMMARY OF PO/PSO ATTAINMENS:
Fig.1.32 and 1.33: Overall PO attained for previous 3 batches
Attainment of POs for the past 3 batches is as shown in Fig.1.32 and Fig 1.33 with the help of
column chart and line chart respectively. These figures give the summary of PO levels attained for each
batch of students as mentioned in the chart. It is observed that attained PO levels are slightly more for
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
PO
Le
vel/
Stre
ngt
hOVERALL PO LEVELS ATTAINED SUMMRY FOR THE
PREVIOUS 3 BATCHES
2.2 2.22.1
2.3 2.3
1.91.8 1.8
21.9
2.1
1.8
2.22 2
2.2 2.2
1.91.8
1.7
21.8
1.91.7
2.12.2
22.1
2.2
1.81.7 1.7
2
1.7
21.8
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
PO
Lev
el/S
tre
ngt
h
Programme Outcomes
OVERALL PO LEVEL ATTAINMENT FOR PREVIOUS 3BATCHES
Mechanical Engineering
AMC ENGINEERING COLLEGE
the year 2016-17 batch students. It is concluded that by practicing OBE procedures laid by NBA we can
gradually keep increasing the attainment levels for the subsequent batches.
Fig 1.34: Overall PO attainment in terms of relative percentages
PO attainments can be measured in percentage as shown in Fig 3.34 with the help of column chart. In
this chart we use the concept of measuring POs as a relative percentage. For example, ideal average
value of PO1 which can be attained from the programme is 2.56 but attained value of PO1 for the output
batch 2016-17 is 2.2 therefore relative PO1 percentage is (2.2/2.56) *100 = 86%.
Similarly, ideal average value of PO 12 which can be attained from the programme is 1.88 but attained
value of PO 12 for the output batch 2016-17 is 1.80 in this case relative PO12 percentage is (1.80/1.88)
*100 = 96%
It is observed that relative percentage of almost all POs are greater than 80% hence programme is
strongly attained with relative PO percentage as shown in above Fig 1.34.
Also, the relative percentage of attained PSOs is greater than 80% for all the three output batches. Hence
PSOs defined by the department of mechanical engineering of the college are strongly attained.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
PO
Rel
ati
ve
%
OVERALL PO RELATIVE PERCENTAGE FOR PREVIOUS 3
BATCHES