Download - Conductors Indictment
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
1/28
NOTICE OF IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES
If you are not a United States citizen, a plea of guilty to any offense, a conviction by trial verdict, or ayouthful offender adjudication subjects you to a risk that adverse consequences will be imposed on you by theUnited States immigration authorities, including, but not limited to, removal from the United States, exclusionfrom admission to the United States, and/or denial of naturalization. Because the immigration consequencesapplicable in your particular case may depend on factors such as your current immigration status, your length ofresidence in the United States, and your previous criminal history, you should consult with your attorney for advicespecific to your circumstances.
The following are designated as deportable offenses under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2), and any non-citizenconvicted of such an offense (within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1101[a][48]) “shall, upon order of the Attorney
General, be removed” (8 U.S.C. § 1227[a]), regardless of whether the offense is a felony, a misdemeanor, or anyother offense under State law:
• any controlled substance or marihuana offense (other than a first offense involving possessionfor one’s own use of 30 grams or less of marihuana);
• any offense involving a firearm, any domestic violence offense or violation of an order of protection, any stalking offense or crime of child abuse, and failure to register as a sex offender;
• any offense designated an “aggravated felony” under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43), including, but not
limited to: murder; rape; any controlled substance or firearm trafficking offense; bail jumping; burglary, robbery, receipt of stolen property, or any other theft-related offense or crime ofviolence for which a sentence of one year or more is imposed; or any offense involving moneylaundering of more than $10,000 or fraud, deceit or tax evasion in which the loss to the victim(s)is more than $10,000; and
• many other offenses described in 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2).
In addition, if the offense constitutes an “aggravated felony,” or if you are not a lawful permanent residentof the United States (or have not been such for at least five years with at least seven years’ continuous residency)and the offense is any deportable offense, there will be additional consequences, including, but not limited to, yourineligibility for discretionary cancellation of removal by the Attorney General.
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
2/28
NOTIFICACIÓN SOBRE CONSECUENCIAS INMIGRATORIAS
Si usted no es ciudadano de los Estados Unidos, una declaración de culpabilidad por cualquier
ofensa, un veredicto condenatorio mediante un juicio o una declaración como ofensor juvenil lo harásujeto al riesgo de que las autoridades inmigratorias de los Estados Unidos le impongan consecuenciasadversas, que incluyen, sin que estas se limiten a, su expulsión de Los Estados Unidos, exclusión de seradmitido a los Estados Unidos, y/o el rechazo de su solicitud para la ciudadanía o naturalización. Debidoa que las consecuencias de inmigración aplicables a su caso en particular pueden depender de factorescomo su estado de inmigración actual, el tiempo que lleva viviendo en los Estados Unidos y susantecedentes penales, usted debe consultar a su abogado para asesoría específica a sus circunstancias.
Las siguientes ofensas han sido clasificadas como aquellas que implican deportación de acuerdoa la ley 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2), y cualquiera que no sea ciudadano y sea condenado por tal ofensa (comolo define la ley 8 U.S.C. § 1101[a][48]) “deberá, bajo ordenes del Procurador General, ser expulsado” delos Estados Unidos (8 U.S.C. §1227[a]), sin importar si la ofensa es un delito mayor, un delito menor, ocualquier otra ofensa según las leyes estatales:
• cualquier ofensa por sustancias reguladas o marihuana (excepto la primera ofensarelacionada con posesión de 30 gramos de marihuana o menos para uso propio);
• cualquier ofensa que incluya un arma de fuego, cualquier ofensa por violencia domésticao violación de una orden de protección, cualquier ofensa por acechar o delito pormaltrato de menores, e incumplimiento a registrarse como ofensor sexual;
• cualquier ofensa clasificada como un “delito con agravante” de acuerdo a la ley 8 U.S.C.§ 1101(a)(43), incluyendo, y sin que estas se limiten a: homicidio; violación sexual;cualquier ofensa por tráfico de sustancias reguladas o de armas de fuego; huir estando bajo fianza, entrar sin autorización en propiedad ajena con la intención de cometer un
crimen, robo, recepción de propiedad robada, o cualquier otra ofensa relacionada conrobo o un delito de violencia por el cual se haya impuesto una condena de un año o más;o cualquier ofensa relacionada con el lavado de dinero por más de $10,000 o un fraude,estafa o evasión de impuestos en el que las pérdidas de la(s) víctima(s) sean mayores de
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
3/28
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
-against-
JOSEPH FOWLER,JOHN TWARDY,PATRICK JONES,
DENNIS DEGENFELDER,SEAN MACAULEY,MELANIE BANNISTER,BERNICE BELL,OMAR CARILLO,DONALD FINNERTY,
Defendants.
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, by this indictment, accuses
the defendant JOSEPH FOWLER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
itt d f ll
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
4/28
SECOND COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant JOSEPH FOWLER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant JOSEPH FOWLER, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about
December 26, 2013, with intent to obtain a benefit for himself, and for another person, wrongfully
provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed profession, trade,
craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Hudson Line Physical
Characteristics Test CP 5 to CP 12.
THIRD COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant JOSEPH FOWLER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
5/28
FOURTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant JOSEPH FOWLER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant JOSEPH FOWLER, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about
March 14, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for himself, and for another person, wrongfully
provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed profession, trade,
craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Physical
Characteristics Hudson Line Test CP 5 to CP 12.
FIFTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant JOSEPH FOWLER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
6/28
SIXTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant JOSEPH FOWLER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant JOSEPH FOWLER, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about
April 9, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for himself, and for another person, wrongfully
provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed profession, trade,
craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Hudson Line Physical
Characteristics Test CP 5 to CP 12.
SEVENTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant JOHN TWARDY of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
7/28
EIGHTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant JOHN TWARDY of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant JOHN TWARDY, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about
January 24, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for himself, and for another person, wrongfully
provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed profession, trade,
craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Hudson Line Physical
Characteristics Test CP 5 to CP 12.
NINTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant JOHN TWARDY of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
8/28
TENTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant JOHN TWARDY of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant JOHN TWARDY, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about
March 1, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for himself, and for another person, wrongfully
provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed profession, trade,
craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Hudson Line Physical
Characteristics Test CP 5 to CP 12.
ELEVENTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant PATRICK JONES of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
9/28
TWELFTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant PATRICK JONES of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant PATRICK JONES, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about
March 6, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for himself, and for another person, wrongfully
provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed profession, trade,
craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Hudson Line Physical
Characteristics Test CP 5 to CP 12.
THIRTEENTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant DENNIS DEGENFELDER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
10/28
FOURTEENTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant DENNIS DEGENFELDER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant DENNIS DEGENFELDER, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on
or about March 10, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for himself, and for another person,
wrongfully provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed
profession, trade, craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Scenario and Operating Rules Test 2.
FIFTEENTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant DENNIS DEGENFELDER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
11/28
SIXTEENTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant DENNIS DEGENFELDER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant DENNIS DEGENFELDER, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on
or about March 15, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for himself, and for another person,
wrongfully provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed
profession, trade, craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Scenario and
Operating Rules Test 2.
SEVENTEENTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant DENNIS DEGENFELDER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
12/28
EIGHTEENTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant DENNIS DEGENFELDER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant DENNIS DEGENFELDER, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on
or about April 3, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for himself, and for another person,
wrongfully provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed
profession, trade, craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Scenario and
Operating Rules Test 2.
NINETEENTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant DENNIS DEGENFELDER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
13/28
TWENTIETH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant DENNIS DEGENFELDER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant DENNIS DEGENFELDER, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on
or about April 29, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for himself, and for another person,
wrongfully provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed
profession, trade, craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Hudson Line Physical Characteristics Test CP 5 to CP 12.
TWENTY-FIRST COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant SEAN MACAULEY of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
14/28
TWENTY-SECOND COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant SEAN MACAULEY of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant SEAN MACAULEY, in the County of New York, on or about April 26,
2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for himself, and for another person, wrongfully provided a
copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed profession, trade, craft and other
vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Hudson Line Physical Characteristics
Test CP 5 to CP 12.
TWENTY-THIRD COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
15/28
TWENTY-FOURTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant MELANIE BANNISTER, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on
or about April 13, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for herself, and for another person,
wrongfully provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed
profession, trade, craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Scenario and Operating Rules Test 2.
TWENTY-FIFTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
16/28
TWENTY-SIXTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
The defendant MELANIE BANNISTER, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on
or about May 7, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for herself, and for another person, provided
answers, with an intent to wrongfully benefit another, to current questions on a pending
government licensing examination, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority New Haven
Line Physical Characteristics Test CP 112 to CP 234.
TWENTY-SEVENTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
17/28
TWENTY-EIGHTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant MELANIE BANNISTER, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on
or about May 7, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for herself, and for another person,
wrongfully provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed
profession, trade, craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority New
Haven Line Physical Characteristics Test CP 112 to CP 234.
TWENTY-NINTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
18/28
THIRTIETH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
The defendant MELANIE BANNISTER, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on
or about May 9, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for herself, and for another person, provided
answers, with an intent to wrongfully benefit another, to current questions on a pending
government licensing examination, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority New Haven
Line Physical Characteristics Test CP 112 to CP 234.
THIRTY-FIRST COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
19/28
THIRTY-SECOND COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant MELANIE BANNISTER, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on
or about May 9, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for herself, and for another person,
wrongfully provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed
profession, trade, craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority New
Haven Line Physical Characteristics Test CP 112 to CP 234.
THIRTY-THIRD COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
20/28
THIRTY-FOURTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
The defendant MELANIE BANNISTER, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on
or about May 20, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for herself, and for another person, provided
answers, with an intent to wrongfully benefit another, to current questions on a pending
government licensing examination, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority New Haven
Line Physical Characteristics Test CP 112 to CP 234.
THIRTY-FIFTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
21/28
THIRTY-SIXTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant MELANIE BANNISTER, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on
or about May 20, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for herself, and for another person,
wrongfully provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed
profession, trade, craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority New
Haven Line Physical Characteristics Test CP 112 to CP 234.
THIRTY-NINTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
22/28
FORTIETH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
The defendant MELANIE BANNISTER, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on
or about May 29, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for herself, and for another person, provided
answers, with an intent to wrongfully benefit another, to current questions on a pending
government licensing examination, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority New Haven
Line Physical Characteristics Test CP 112 to CP 234.
FORTY-FIRST COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
23/28
FORTY-SECOND COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant MELANIE BANNISTER of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant MELANIE BANNISTER, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on
or about May 29, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for herself, and for another person,
wrongfully provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed
profession, trade, craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority New
Haven Line Physical Characteristics Test CP 112 to CP 234.
FORTY-THIRD COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant BERNICE BELL of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
24/28
FORTY-FOURTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant BERNICE BELL of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant BERNICE BELL, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about
May 9, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for himself, and for another person, wrongfully
provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed profession, trade,
craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Hudson Line Physical
Characteristics Test CP 5 to CP 12.
FORTY-FIFTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant OMAR CARILLO of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
25/28
FORTY-SIXTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant OMAR CARILLO of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant OMAR CARILLO, in the County of New York, on or about May
8, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for himself, and for another person, wrongfully provided a
copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed profession, trade, craft and other
vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Hudson Line Physical Characteristics
Test CP 5 to CP 12.
FORTY-SEVENTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant DONALD FINNERTY of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(3),
committed as follows:
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
26/28
FORTY-EIGHTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant DONALD FINNERTY of the crime of IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A
GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, in violation of Penal Law §200.55(4),
committed as follows:
The defendant DONALD FINNERTY, in the County of New York and elsewhere,
on or about May 9, 2014, with intent to obtain a benefit for herself, and for another person,
wrongfully provided a copy of a current test used to determine competence in a licensed
profession, trade, craft and other vocation, to wit, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Hudson Line Physical Characteristics Test CP 5 to CP 12.
CYRUS R. VANCE, JR.District Attorney
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
27/28
GJ #3-16A
No.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
-against-
JOSEPH FOWLER,JOHN TWARDY,PATRICK JONES,DENNIS DEGENFELDER,SEAN MACAULEY,MELANIE BANNISTER,BERNICE BELL,OMAR CARILLO,DONALD FINNERTY,
Defendants.
INDICTMENT
Filed: N/A as to all defendants
This indictment fully supersedes Indictment1481/2015, filed on May 19, 2015, as to alldefendants.
-
8/20/2019 Conductors Indictment
28/28
IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(3) - DEF. J. FOWLER, 3 CtsIMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(4) - DEF. J. FOWLER, 3 CtsIMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(3) - DEF. J. TWARDY, 2 CtsIMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(4) - DEF. J. TWARDY, 2 CtsIMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(3) - DEF. P. JONESIMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(4) - DEF. P. JONES
IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(3) - DEF. D. DEGENFELDER, 4 CtsIMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(4) - DEF. D. DEGENFELDER, 4 CtsIMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(3) - DEF. S. MACAULEYIMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(4) - DEF. S. MACAULEYIMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(3) - DEF. M. BANNISTER, 9 CtsIMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(4) - DEF. M. BANNISTER, 9 CtsIMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(3) - DEF. B. BELLIMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(4) - DEF. B. BELLIMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(3) - DEF. O. CARILLOIMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(4) - DEF. O. CARILLO
IMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(3) - DEF. D. FINNERTYIMPAIRING THE INTEGRITY OF A GOVERNMENT LICENSING EXAMINATION, P.L. §200.55(4) - DEF. D. FINNERTY
CYRUS R. VANCE, JR., District Attorney
A True Bill
Elise Roecker
Foreman
Cybecrime and Identity Theft Bureau