CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 1
Computer Networks
Chapter 2 – Data Link Layer Issues
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 2
LAN Properties• Shared medium• High data rate• Low delay• Low error rate• Native broadcast support• Limited physical extent (a few kms)• Limited number of stations (100’s)• STAs are peers• Local management (not under PTT regulation)
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 3
Medium Access• Access allocation so that
– One STA at a time accesses medium– Each STA gets a fair share– Delays are reasonable– Overhead and waste are minimized
• Approaches– Tokens– Contention
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 4
Token-based Approaches
• Token Ring– STAs linked (simplex) to two neighbors– Token circulates physical ring– Add STA by insertion into ring
• Token Bus– STAs attached to bus– Token circulates logical ring– Add STA to bus and insert into logical ring
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 5
Contention Approaches
• ALOHA– Can’t sense medium, so just talk!
• CSMA– Listen before talk
• CSMA/CD– Add collision detection (need sensitive PCS)
• CSMA/CA– Use collision avoidance (when VCS used)
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 6
IEEE 802• 802.1 – common issues
– Addressing, management, bridging, security• 802.2 – LLC
– Type 1 – best effort / Type 2 - reliable• 802.3 – CSMA/CD LAN
– From Xerox Ethernet• 802.4 – Token Bus• 802.5 – Token Ring• 802.11 – Wireless LAN• 802.16 – Wimax• Note – FDDI standardized by ANSI
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 7
Names, Addresses, Routes
• Name – what– Location-independent identifier– May be human-friendly or not
• Address – where– Independent of source location, but will
change if destination moves• Route – how to get there
– Depends on both source and destination
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 8
LAN Addresses• LANs are broadcast medium – need both
– Source address (for return messages)– Destination address (to filter)
• IEEE 802 addresses– 16 and 48 bits (also 60 for 802.6 DQDB)
• 48 bit addresses managed by IEEE– Pay to get 224 address block, Vendor Code (OUI)– G/L bit is 0 if global, 1 if locally managed
2nd Octet 4th OctetG/I bit (group/individual)G/L bit
(global/local)
OUI3rd Octet 5th Octet 6th Octet0
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 9
Multicast Addresses• Service Discovery
– Solicitation (client mcast to Z-Servers address)– Advertisement (Z-Servers mcast to Z-Client addr)
• Why Multicast (group) addresses?– Reduce interrupt handling by hosts– Hardware filter
• Why G/I bit?– Allow filtering by hash buckets in HW– SW filters all hits in relevant hash buckets
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 10
Broadcast
• The all 1’s address (0xffffffffffff) is bcast• Means that all STAs must receive• Really, though, only those implementing
the protocol used in the broadcast packet have to…
• Broadcast address interrupts everyone anyway
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 11
Multiplexing Field• Multiple higher layer protocols• Format and data alone cannot distinguish• Multiplexing field selects which one
– Protocol type in Ethernet– DSAP and SSAP in IEEE 802
• Service Access Point (SAP) Structure– G/L and G/I bits also, hence 6 bits– All 1’s = all SAPs (!!!)– Others assigned by IEEE – too few!
• SNAP (Subnetwork Access Protocol) – When DSAP = SSAP = 0xaa– extra protocol type field (5 octets)– 3 OUI octets, 3 vendor-assigned octets
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 12
Bit Order
• Bit order is order in which bits are put onto the medium
• Not standard ( )– LSB first canonical and for most LANs– MSB first for 802.5, FDDI
• Bridges must convert– Shuffle bit order within octets
• Impact on ARP and higher layer protocols
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 13
LLC
• 802.2 LLC has two significant types– Type 1 – datagrams (best effort)– Type 2 – reliable (connection oriented)
• Type 1 Control – 1 octet– UI – unnumbered info (datagram)– XID – Exchange ID (command/response)
• ID of transmitter• LLC types supported
– Test – (Cmd/Rsp) – Rsp echo data in Cmd
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 14
LLC Type 2
• Control is 1 or 2 octets, per type• 2-octet control fields contain 7-bit seq #s
– I = Information (data) – SN plus ACK SN– RR = Receive Ready (ACK) – ACK SN– RNR = Rcv Not Ready (Busy) – ACK SN– REJ = Reject – ACK SN
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 15
LLC Type 2
• Control is 1 or 2 octets, per type• 1-octet control field types
– SABME = Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode Extended (start connection)
– DISC = Disconnect (end connection)– DM = Disconnected Mode (confirm DISC)– FRMR = Frame Reject (receipt of invalid pkt)– UA = Unnumbered ACK (for DISC/SABME)
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 16
802.3 Issues
• CSMA/CD– Listen before talk– Detect collisions– Binary exponential backoff
• Minimum frame length– So all STAs detect collision– Slot time = 2τ (512 bits at 2.5km and 10Mbps)
Start Tx
Start Tx
DetectCollisionEnd Tx
End Tx
Start Rx
End Rx
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 17
802.5 Issues
• Each packet traverses every station in physical ring
• Each STA has transceiver buffer with special HW to recognize token, addresses
• Two bits at end of each frame for ACK:– A bit (address recognized)– C bit (frame copied)
• Each STA may modify bits• Sender sees A/C bits when frame returns
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 18
802.5 Issues• A/C Bits on return:
– A=0: Address not recognized (give up)– A=1, C=0: Address recognized, but STA busy (try again)– A=1, C=1: Address recognized and frame copied (success!)
• What does a bridge do with these?– Clear both?– Leave unmodified– Set A and C if bridge forwards– Clear A and set C if bridge forwards
• A/C used for other purposes:– Ring order (bcast frame with A bit clear indicates predecessor)
• Only 31 functional addresses for multicast– Mapping– Oversubscription
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 19
Packet Bursts
• Station processing rate may be slower than the LAN data rate
• While OK on average, packets may be sent in a burst
• Early packets received, later ones lost• Problem if naïve protocol retransmits
whole burst every time
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 20
Why Bridges?
• Limit number of stations in LAN– Packet lengths– Delay
• Size limitations– 802.3 collision detection
• Traffic– Capacity is shared
• Simple, high performance, allow limited location transparency (keep IP address)
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 21
Point-to-Point Links
• Flag– Special pattern to delimit frames
• In HDLC, 01111110• In DDCMP, DLE-SOF & DLE-EOF
– Bit-stuffing/character-stuffing for data transparency• In HDLC, 011111… -> 0111110… on Transmit• In DDCMP, … DLE … -> … DLE DLE … on Transmit
• Addressing– Needed if multiple stations on medium– Traditionally assume master/slave
• Control – Like LLC Type 2• Checksum – 16 bit CRC
flag address control data flagchecksum
HDLC format
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 22
Point-to-Point Links
• Multiplexing– Protocol field in PPP (16 bits – see RFC 1700)
• Service– If links not reliable, need reliable transfer per hop
(HDLC, DDCMP, LLC Type 1)• What is probability of success for k hops with FER P?• What is cost per attempt for k hops with FER P?• What is overall cost for success for k hops with FER P?
– If links reliable, then datagram service OK (PPP, LLC Type 2)
flag Addr=0xff Ctl=0x03 data flagchecksumprotocol
PPP format
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 23
Link Reliability IssuesEnd-to-end Success Rate
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Path Length (Hops)
Prob
(Suc
cess
) P=0.001P=0.005P=0.01P=0.05P=0.1P=0.5
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 24
Link Reliability IssuesExpected Cost per Attempt
0
5
10
15
20
25
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Path Length (hops)
E(C
ost/a
ttem
pt) P=0.001
P=0.005P=0.01P=0.05P=0.1P=0.5
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 25
Link Reliability IssuesExpected Number of Attempts/Success
0123456789
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Path Length (hops)
E(A
ttem
pts/
succ
ess)
P=0.001P=0.005P=0.01P=0.05P=0.1
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 26
Link Reliability IssuesExpected Cost per Success
01020304050607080
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Path Length (hops)
E(C
ost/s
ucce
ss) P=0.001
P=0.005P=0.01P=0.05P=0.01
CEN 5501C - Computer Networks - Spring 2007 - UF/CISE - Newman 27
Per Hop vs. End-to-End BECPkt Sent Pkt Sent
Pkt Recv
Pkt Recv
ACK Recv
ACK Recv
Per HopEnd-to-End