Transcript
Page 1: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Computer Associates International, Regional

Office Herndon, VA

Seth R. Takoch

AE Senior Thesis

Structural Option

April 15, 2003

Page 2: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Presentation Outline

Background InformationExisting Structural ConditionsDesign CriteriaRedesignConstruction ManagementLighting DesignConclusions and RecommendationAcknowledgements

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Page 3: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Location

15min. Off Beltway 35mins. Outside D.C

Wood Oak Dr.

Baseball Field

Page 4: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Background Information

Function: Computer Associates Int. Regional Headquarters

Size: 233,000 sq. ft. – 6 floors

Rentable Office Space: 207,000 sq. ft.

Architectural Features:

•Precast Concrete Façade with Glass Curtain Wall

•Six Story Glass Enclosed Atrium

•Adjacent Day Care Facility

Page 5: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Project Team

Owner – Computer Associates International Arcitect – Davis, Carter, Scott Structural Engineer – Smislova, Kehnemui, & Associates. General Contractor – Clark Construction Developer – Tishman Speyer Properties Mechanical – GHT Limited Plumbing – GHT Limited

Page 6: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Existing Structure

Flat Slab ConstructionConcrete Structure

• 30’ x 30’ Bays• 9” Thick Slab Thickness• 10’ x 10’ x 5-1/2” Drop

Panels• 24” x 24” Conc. Columns

Page 7: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Existing Structure

Wind Loads are Transferred by Diaphragm Action of Façade

Transferred to Framing by Tributary Area• 8 Frames N-S and 9 Frames E-W

Concrete Frames Resist Lateral Forces • Short and Long Frames

Floor Slab Adds Resistance due to Diaphragm Action

Page 8: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Design Limitations

Old Code – BOCA 96 New Code – IBC 2000 Local Zoning Ordinances Similar Square Footage Minimal Architectural

Changes Floor-to-Floor Heights

LIVE LOADS PER IBC 2000  

LOAD TYPE LOAD

ROOF ( RAIN ) 50 psf

ROOF ( SNOW ) HIGH ROOF 22 psf

ROOF (SNOW) LOW ROOF 30 psf

OFFICES, CUBICLES 50 psf

ASSEMBLY, STAIRS 100 psf

MECHANICAL 150 psf

CORRIDORS 80 psf

Page 9: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Proposal

To Redesign a Feasible and Desirable Alternative Structural System and to Incorporate Construction Costs and Schedule Length Into My Solution

Time = Money …

Money = Time

$$$$

Page 10: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Possible Faming Alternatives

Composite Steel Construction

Non-Composite Steel Construction

Page 11: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Steel Construction

Code – IBC2000LRFD Analysis

• Parameters• 30’ x30’ Typical Bays• Fy = 50ksi ASTM A992 Steel• F’c = 3ksi• Normal Weight Concrete• Shear Studs - 3-1/2”high, ¾” diameter

(composite)• 22 gage Metal Deck

Page 12: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Composite Steel Construction

Gravity Analysis – RAM • Determined Beam Sizes• Determined Column Sizes

2 Story Column Lengths 26’ – 28’ Tall• Ranging from W10’s to W12’s

Beam Sizes W12x14 Spaced at 6’ o.c.• Girders as Deep as a W21’s

Page 13: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Non-Composite Construction

Gravity Analysis – RAM • Determined Beam Sizes• Determined Column Sizes

2 Story Column Lengths 26’ – 28’ Tall• Using W12’s

Beam Sizes W12x14 Spaced at 6’ o.c.• Girders as Deep as a W24’s

Page 14: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Depth Comparison

Composite Steel

•Average – W12’s

•Critical Depth – W21

Non-Composite Steel

•Average – W12’s

•Critical Depth – W24

Advantage – Composite Steel Construction

Composite Saves 20 Tons

of Steel

Page 15: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Lateral System

Shear Wall to Resist Lateral LoadingBased on Critical Wind Loading and

Torsion2 – 60’ Long Shear Walls

• Reinforced to Resist Forces• Deflection of h/400

A trium

S hear Wall #2

Shear W

all #1

C enter of Rigidity

A trium

Page 16: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Design

Reinforcement Based on the Following Vn = (2f’c bd +

Avfyvd/s) Mn = Asfy (d-a/2)

Wall Floor ShearBendin

g

  1#4 @ 12"

8 - #11

  2#4 @ 12"

6 - #11

1 3#4 @ 12"

6 - #9

  4#6 @ 12"

4 - #9

  5#7 @ 12"

2 - #9

  6#9 @ 12"

1 - #9

  1#4 @ 12"

8 - #11

  2#4 @ 12"

6 - #11

2 3#5 @ 12"

6 - #9

  4#6 @ 12"

4 - #9

  5#8 @ 12"

2 - #9

  6#10 @

12"1 - #9

Page 17: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Construction Management`

Address Two Main Issues

•Cost Comparison

•Project Duration

Page 18: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Construction Management

Total Building Cost• D4 Cost

• Total = $27,678,667• 20-25% Accurate• Range of $34.6 million to $20.8 million • Not Very Accurate• $115.33 / sq. ft.

`

Page 19: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Construction Management

Total Building Cost• Means Building Construction Cost Data

• Separate Estimates for Steel and Concrete• 10 -15% Accurate• More Precise Than D4• Steel Framing = $96.74 / sq.ft.• Concrete Frame = $98.45 / sq.ft. • Difference = $1.71 / sq.ft. = $410,400

`

Page 20: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Construction Management

Cost Comparison• D4 Cost = $115.33/sq.ft. = $27,678,667• Means Steel = $96.74/sq.ft. = $23,217,600• Means Concrete = $98.45/sq.ft. =

$23,628,000• Percentage Savings Using Steel = 1.7%

Savings

`

Page 21: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Construction Management

Scheduling• Means Data to Calculate Duration • Primavera Utilized to Schedule Sequences• Total Duration Steel Erection = 376days• Total Duration Concrete Placement = 847

days

`

Page 22: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Construction Management`

After Scheduling Concrete – 260 Days

Page 23: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Construction ManagementAfter Scheduling – 150 Days

`

Page 24: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Construction Management

Savings• Advantage Composite Steel Construction

Time

• Advantage Composite Steel Construction

`

Composite Design is Considered One of the Most Economical Methods of Floor Construction for an Office Building

Page 25: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Construction Management

Crane Sizing• On Site 3-1/2 Months• Tower Crane

• Placed Through Atrium• Liebherr 200HC• Hook Radius – 197ft.• Capacity – 5,070#• Satisfies Critical Lift of 3,000# @160ft.

`

Page 26: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Lighting Design

Design of Lighting of Daycare Facility• Minimum Footcandles of 30fc• Fluorescent Luminaries• 120’ x 56’ Space to Illuminate• 2’ x 4’ Fixtures with 3” Louvers Spaced

on a 16’ x 8’ grid• Specification From Lithonia• Workplane of 2-1/2 ft.

Page 27: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Lighting Design

Designed Using LuxiconRenderings on April 15, 2003

• At 9:00 am with Daylighting• At 1:30 pm with Daylighting• At 5:00 pm with Daylighting• Without Daylighting

Page 28: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Lighting Design

9:00 am

Page 29: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

At 1:30 pm

Lighting Design

Page 30: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

At 5:00 pm

Lighting Design

Page 31: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

• Without Daylighting

Lighting Design

Page 32: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Lighting Design

The Lighting Design Meets Required Parameters of 30fc

Page 33: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Conclusion

In Conclusion, Composite Steel Construction is a Better Alternative to Non-Composite Construction.

Composite Steel is a Viable Alternative to a Two-Way Flat Slab System

Page 34: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Shout Outs’My Family

My Friends

The AE Student Body

The Entire AE Faculity

Smislova, Kehnemui, & Associates, P.A.

Computer Associates

The ‘U’

And All Of Those Out There That Stuck With Me

Page 35: Computer Associates International, Regional Office

SETH R. TAKOCH STRUCTURAL OPTION

Questions

?


Top Related