Transcript
Page 1: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 1Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone

Fields

Henk Eskes, Jan Fokke Meirink, Ankie Piters

Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt

Page 2: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 2Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

GOME ozone data assimilation

TM3DAM:• ECMWF meteo, second moment advection, • Gas-phase + heterogeneous chemistry parametrization• Detailed forecast error modelling• KNMI GOME Fast Delivery ozone columns

Internet User Service:• 5-day ozone forecast • GOME ozone data bases

www.knmi.nl/gome_fd

Page 3: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 3Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

SCIAMACHY Validation strategy

TM3DAM:• Monitoring of Sciamachy ozone columns• SCIA observation minus forecast• Using GOME validation results (D. Balis, J.C. Lambert)

Observation minus forecast:• Check on Gaussian statistics• Bias and standard deviation• Dependence on: * latitude, latitude-longitude maps * time * viewing angle * spatial resolution * solar zenith angle * … * cloud parameters

Page 4: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 4Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

OmF: SCIA vs assimilated GOME

Scia NRTProcessor 3.5325/10 to 6/11 (GOME bias corrected)

Page 5: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 5Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

OmF: latitude dependence

Scia NRTProcessor 3.5325/10 to 6/11 (GOME bias corrected)

Page 6: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 6Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

OmF: distribution

Scia NRTProcessor 3.5325/10 to 6/11 (GOME bias corrected)SZA < 60 degree

GOME OmF, rms=8DU,Gaussian

Page 7: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 7Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Ozone: viewing-angle dependence

Scia NRTProcessor 3.5325/10 to 6/11

1 sec

0.25 sec

0.5 sec

Page 8: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 8Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

OmF: viewing-angle dependence

0.5 sec integr.timeScia NRTProcessor 3.5325/10 to 6/11 GOME bias corr.

Page 9: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 9Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

CONCLUSIONS:

SCIAMACHY NRT total ozone:• Negative bias 20-25 DU Solution: use SCIAMACHY FM ozone cross-sections• Viewing-angle dependence Solution: correct viewing angle• Still biases, especially high Solar Zenith Angles, seasonality Advice: upgrade processor to GOME GDP 3.0 Polarization, realistic cloud information• RMS (noise) very promising: comparable to / better than GOME

Validation with data assimilation - OmF differences• Good statistics, to detect subtle effects Small biases, noise statisitics, correlations, jumps in time …

Page 10: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 10Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Validation support

Validation tools:Sciamachy validation web page: www.sciamachy-validation.org

ACVT-MASI activity:Submission of assimilation ozone profiles to NILU

Page 11: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 11Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

www.sciamachy-validation.org

Page 12: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 12Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Faraday

www.sciamachy-validation.org

Page 13: Comparison of SCIAMACHY NRT Ozone Columns with GOME Assimilated Ozone Fields

Page 13Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

www.sciamachy-validation.org


Top Related