![Page 1: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
COMPARISON OF EOQ AND JIT PURCHASING
POLICIES
SHIBIN KT
CLASS NO: 423
S7 INDUSTRIAL
Guided by:Guided by:Regi KumarRegi KumarLecturerLecturer
![Page 2: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
OBJECTIVE OF STUDY
Ultimate aim of this study is to expand on two concepts namely the annual holding capacity of an inventory facility, and the break-even point between the annual holding capacity of an inventory facility and the EOQ-JIT cost indifference point, where price discount is available for EOQ system.
![Page 3: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
INTRODUCTION• Successful implementation of JIT
purchasing policy in various industries has promoted many companies that still use EOQ purchasing system to ponder whether they should switch to JIT purchasing policy.
• An EOQ-JIT cost indifference point (ie, the level of demand at which the total cost were same) existed between EOQ & JIT systems.
![Page 4: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
INTRODUCTION…
• JIT purchasing system is more convenient than EOQ.JIT has the advantage of physical plant square meter reduction.
• So, is it possible for an EOQ system to be more cost effective than a JIT system??
![Page 5: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
INTRODUCTION…
Schniedersans and Cao considered “Physical Plant Space” factor in their studies. They suggested JIT is preferable than EOQ at any level of demand. They failed to empirically ascertain the capability of an inventory facility.
![Page 6: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
INTRODUCTION…
EOQ price discount model can be categorized into two scenarios where the optimal order quantity is above or below Qmax, the maximum quantity that can be purchased and still receive a quantity discount rate ∏E.
![Page 7: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
EOQ with price discount model
TCE= KD + Qh + (PẾ - ∏E Q) D θ 2
Total ordering cost
Total holding cost
Cost of actual purchased unit
![Page 8: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
TCE= KD + Qh + (PẾ - ∏E Q) D θ 2
• PẾ = Purchase price / unit
• θ = Fixed order quantity
• K = Cost of planning an order
• D = Demand
• h = Holding cost of one unit for one year
• Qmax = Maximum quantity that can be purchased and still receive a quantity discount
with rate ∏E.
![Page 9: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
TCE= KD + Qh + PẾmin D θ 2 for Q›Qmax
PẾmin = Minimum constant purchase price
Optimum order quantity Q* = √2KD/h-2∏ED
when Q*‹ Qmax
When Q*›Qmax, Q** = √2KD/h
![Page 10: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Ultimate EOQ-JIT Cost Indifference
Point The annual demand at which the
inventory can be accommodated by the existing inventory facility and at which the total annual cost under the EOQ system equals the total cost under the JIT system.
![Page 11: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Modify Schniederjans & Cao EOQ-JIT cost indifference point.
Derivation of the function of the annual holding capacity of an inventory facility
Derivation of the break-even point between the annual holding capacity of an inventory facility
and the EOQ-JIT cost indifference point
Derivation of ultimate EOQ-JIT cost indifference point.
![Page 12: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
MODIFIY SCHNIEDERJANS & CAO EOQ-JIT COST INDIFFERENCE
POINT.
TCE = kD √h-2∏ED/2KD +
h/2 √2KD/h-2∏ED +
(PẾ - ∏E √2KD/h-2∏ED )K = Cost of placing an order
Substituted Q* instead of Q
![Page 13: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
TCJ = PJD-FN• PJ = Unit price under JIT system
• D = Annual Demand
• F = the annual cost to own and maintain a square meter of physical plant space.
• N = Number of square meters of physical plant space saved by adopting a JIT system.
![Page 14: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
REVISED COST INDIFFERENCE POINT
• For comparison,
• Z=Total optimal annual cost under
EOQ system - Total cost under JIT system
• Root of the above equation gives the revised cost indifference point as:-
![Page 15: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Dinds= FN(PJ-PẾ) + Kh +
√k²h² + 2Kh(PJ-PẾ)FN-
4∏EKF²N² (PJ-PẾ)² + 4∏EK
![Page 16: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
N= NE-NJ
NE = Square meter of an inventory facility under EOQ system
NJ = Square meter of an inventory facility under JIT system.
![Page 17: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Dinds= FNE(PJ-PẾ) + Kh +
√k²h² + 2Kh(PJ-PẾ)FNE-
4∏EKF²NE² (PJ-PẾ)² + 4∏EK
![Page 18: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
ANNUAL HOLDING CAPACITY OF AN INVENTORY FACILITY• The number of inventory that can be
held by the inventory facility at a specified time.
• Qh=NE/α• NE=Number of square meters of an
inventory facility• α=square meters occupied by unit
inventory
![Page 19: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
• It is assumed that size of inventory facility is b times the size which holds the optimal order quantity:-
Qh=bQ*• So, NE=ɑbQ*
• Since Q*<Qmax• NE should be limited up to
ɑbQmax:-
NE<ɑbQmax19
![Page 20: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
By substituting the value of NE in annual demand function; we will get
Dh safe = bNE²
2Kb²α² + 2∏ENE²
Di ≤ Dh Safe
Di= Cost indifference point
![Page 21: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
BREAK EVEN POINT1. The break even point between the
annual holding capacity of an inventory facility & EOQ-JIT cost indifference point is (Neq, Deq)
2. Y = Annual holding capacity of an inventory facility - EOQ-JIT cost indifference point.ie;Dh safe-Dind
3. Setting Y = 0. The root of the eqn will be the break even point represented by square meter of an inventory facility.
![Page 22: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
4. Neq= The break-even point represented by the square meter of an inventory facility for order quantity below Qmax.
5. By substituting the value of Neq, value of Deq can be foundout.
6. Deq= Break even point represented by the annual demand of an inventory for order quantity below Qmax.
![Page 23: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Ultimate EOQ-JIT Cost indifference point for order quantity below Qmax
• NE ‹ αb Qmax
• NE ≥ Neq
• Dui = [(PJ-PẾ) FNE + Kh] +
√k²h² + 2 (PJ-PẾ) FNEKh-
4∏EKF²NE² (PJ-PẾ)² + 4∏EK
![Page 24: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Order quantity above Qmax
1. Minimum purchase price PEmin will remain constant.
2. ∏E, discount rate = 0.
3.NE › αb Qmax. Since Q* › Qmax
![Page 25: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
EOQ-JIT cost indifference point when Q*>Qmax
NE ≥ Neq** = 2 αb (⍺bF+h)
(PJ – PEmin)hDui** = [(PJ-PEmin) FNE + Kh] +
√2(PJ-PEmin) FNEKh+ K²h²
(PJ-PEmin)²
![Page 26: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
• Survey showed that among all the RMC suppliers surveyed ; approximately 60% of them purchased cement using the JIT system.
• Because their demand volume was too low , ordering cost were high.
• 40% of the users were engaged in cement business. so their demand volume was high.
26
SURVEY
![Page 27: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
CASE STUDY DATAS
• Q max= 10000 tones• Order quantity = 40000 tones/order• Q**= 35829 tones• NE= 5600 meter square
• Neq= 5016meter square• Deq= 476930 tones• Dui**= 480646 tones
27
![Page 28: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
1. Since,NE>Neq;
Dui**>Deq
EOQ IS PREFFERED
2. Routine order quantity = 40000 tons/order.
Capacity of carrier in JIT System = 1500 tons.
EOQ IS PREFFERED
![Page 29: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Conclusion of CASE STUDY & SURVEY
• The selling price of a product will usually drop during an economic slump , thus causing the JIT companies into liquidation.
• EOQ companies can still make profit from selling raw materials.
• EOQ companies can supply raw materials to the small and medium sized JIT companies and can control the market price to some extent.
![Page 30: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
• It is better for larger companies whose inventory ordering sizes can’t be economically split to adapt EOQ system of smaller and medium size companies to adapt JIT system.
• By adopting JIT system smaller companies can operate faster, eliminate waste, maintenance of large storage facilities.
30
![Page 31: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
CONCLUSION• Analysis showed that, if the order quantity is
below Qmax, it is possible for an EOQ system to be more cost effective than a JIT system, if the break even point Neq is less than αbQmax.
• If the ordering quantity is above Qmax, EOQ system is more cost effective, when the annual demand reaches the demand at break even point.
• So EOQ can be more cost effective than JIT system.
![Page 32: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
REFERENCES• Wu Min, “EOQ, JIT and fixed costs in the ready-
mixed concrete industry”, Int. J. Production Economics, Vol 2, No. 4, 2006, pp. 167–180.
• Cao, Q., Schniederjans, M.J., 2004. “A revised EMQ/JIT production-run model: An examination of inventory and production costs”. International Journal of Production Economics 87 (1), 83–95.
• Marc J. Schniederjans, “A note on JIT purchasing vs. EOQ with a price discount: An expansion of inventory costs.
• www.sciencedirect.com• www.google.in
32
![Page 33: Comparison of Eoq and Jit Purchasing Policies](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020720/5467cf5cb4af9f182b8b4778/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33