Climate Smart Agriculture Project: using policy and economic analysis as a basis for investment project design and decision-
making Economics and Policy Innovations for Climate-Smart
Agriculture Program – ESA
Romina Cavatassi – Bjorn Conrad Rome –Investment Days 17 December 2013
www.fao.org/climatechange/epic
1
www.fao.org/climatechange/epic
OUTLINE OF THE PRESENTATION
• Background and rationale of the project
• Theory of change: the logic of the project
• How does it translate in practice
• Improving the building blocks of Investment proposal
• Moving Forward and conclusions
2
www.fao.org/climatechange/epic
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE
• Research on natural resources and agriculture: solid and interesting results but unclear link with policy changes or real world terms
• Agriculture: key sector to address challenges of food security under climate change (sink and source)
• Ag growth effective means of poverty reduction
• Projected CC impacts: need adaptation in agriculture
• Mitigation can come through synergistic measures and be an additional source of finance
3
www.fao.org/climatechange/epic
The CSA project aims building evidence-based agricultural development strategies, policies and investment frameworks to:
1. sustainably increase agricultural productivity and incomes,
2. build resilience and the capacity of agricultural and food systems to adapt to climate change, and
3. seek opportunities to reduce and remove GHGs compatibly with their national food security and development goals.
CSA PROJECT
4
www.fao.org/climatechange/epic
Develop a policy environment & and agricultural investments to improve food security and provide resilience under climate uncertainty
NEEDS RESEARCH COMPONENT
POLICY SUPPORT COMPONENT
Project Framework OUTPUTS
Investment proposals
5
www.fao.org/climatechange/epic
1. Working in three countries: Malawi, Zambia and Viet Nam.
2. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of primary and secondary data at hh and community level + climate and geo-referenced data and institutional data to:
a) assess the situation, b) Identify CSA best options in terms of adaptation but
also mitigation and food security (i.e. yield response, cost
benefit analysis, calculate mitigation potential etc), c) understand barriers to CSA adoption d) Identify enabling factors
Feeding into investment 6
www.fao.org/climatechange/epic
Identifying Best Practices
The natural approach to identifying CSA best practices is to examine proxies for the three pillars of CSA:
1. Productivity
2. Resilience
3. Carbon balances
•Performance on the 3 CSA dimensions is context specific: depends on the agro-ecological and socioeconomic contexts, and on the farming system it is being applied to.
7
7
www.fao.org/climatechange/epic
1. Coordination between climate change and agricultural policy (e.g. enhancing climate change and agricultural policy alignment in support of CSA, Supporting capacity to link
international and national policy issues)
2. Capacity development:
• Supporting master students, a PhD student and mentoring
• Implement training activities to agricultural frontline staff
• Support policy makers’ participation to UNFCCC negotiations
3. Collaboration with CCAFS: way forward and linking various project components
Overarching 8
www.fao.org/climatechange/epic
Using scenarios to improve planning
• Decision makers critically review and adapt the scenarios to ensure that they are plausible, challenging and relevant to their concerns
• Then, the scenarios are used to challenge policies and investments • Plans can be made more concrete and elaborate by
conducting back-casting
• Stress-testing investment proposals in the context of multiple scenarios will help make them more concrete, flexible and feasible
9
www.fao.org/climatechange/epic
Develop a policy environment & and agricultural investments to improve food security and provide resilience under climate uncertainty
NEEDS RESEARCH COMPONENT
What are the barriers to adoption of CSA practices?
Legal & Institutional Appraisal: mapping institutional relationships and identifying constraints
What are the synergies and tradeoffs between food security, adaptation and
mitigation from ag. practices?
POLICY SUPPORT COMPONENT
Identifying where policy coordination at the national level is needed and how to
do it
Facilitating national participation/inputs to climate and ag international policy
process
Project Framework
Evidence Base
Strategic Framework & Policy Advice
OUTPUTS
Investment proposals
Capacity Building
10
What are the policy levers to facilitate adoption and what will they cost?
www.fao.org/climatechange/epic
Building an EPIC-based investment proposal
• Country ownership and engagement
• Dynamic baseline and robustness of investment
• Identification and selection of project activities
• Basis for systemic interventions
EPIC as a model for intra-FAO cooperation on investments?
refined investment
different investment
11
www.fao.org/climatechange/epic
Some examples: With climate information can target interventions...
Source:
(FAO, 2013)
www.fao.org/climatechange/epic
The case of Zambia
Practices: Conservation Farming practices: minimum soil disturbance (MSD) and crop rotation(CR)
– MSD adoption remains very low: ~5-6% (sample size 4,187)
– Significant dis-adoption: ~90% of MSD adopters in 2004 abandoned it
– Adoption intensity is significantly higher for smallholders
Adoption: Strongest determinants
– Variability of rainfall
– Delays in the onset of rains
– Extension information
13
Thank you! www.fao.org/climatechange/epic
14