CLEAN ENERGY MECHANISMS IN CONVENTIONAL POWER GENERATION
H.AZOUZ, CDM Project Management Officer at STEGE-mail: [email protected]
December 2004: Tunisia established their Designated National Authority (DNA) for approving CDM Projects.
December 2005: The Ministry of Industry, Energy and Small and Medium Enterprises established a CDM Task Force which aims at promoting the structuring of CDM projects in the energy and industry sectors.
107,600 millions teCO2
Synthèse des émissions évitées du portefeuille MDP Energie et Industrie par thème
Energies renouvelables
13%
Autres projets énèrgitiques
37%
Energy effi ciency32%
Industrial processes
17%
Substitution énèrgitique
1%
107,600 millions teCO2
Since the Kyoto Protocol came into force on February 16, 2005, the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) recorded an edifying growth on the international scene, enabling thus developing countries, notably Tunisia, to participate in climate change control by undertaking projects aimed at reducing greenhouse gases (GHG), which projects also contribute to sustainable development in countries where they are implemented.
1. SIDI DAOUD 34 MW
2. BIZERTE 190 MW
Project DesignationNumber
of projects
Emissions avoided per annum (CO2
Kt)
Emissions avoided over the duration of the credit
(CO2 Kt)
ENERGY EFFICIENCY 37 609 34 662
ENERGY SUBSTITUTION 3 94 944
OTHER ENERGY PROJECTS 14 1765 40 296
INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES 2 1 799 17 985
RENEWABLE ENERGIES 20 736 13 714
Solar Projects 5 104 1 395
Biomass & Biofuel Projects 5 277 4 874
Wind Power Projects 10 355 7 445
The Executive Board
Institutional Players involved in the CDM
The Designated National Authority (DNA): set up by the host country, upon ratification of the Protocol
Designated Operational Entities (DOEs)
• Supervises the establishment of the CDM
• Registers CDM projects• Issue URCEs.
• Determines sustainable development criteria specific to the country
• Controls the of project approval process.
• Check and validate CDM projects• Inform the public.
• The baseline scenario for emissions (« business as usual » scenario) which builds on a methodology approved by the Executive Board.
• A monitoring plan for the emissions of the project developed based on methodologies that are to be approved by the Executive Board.
• A project environmental impact study.
• The feedbacks compiled during the consultation of local stakeholders held by the project developer.
Step 1: Developing the CDM Project Document
The developer of a CDM project is to submit a Project Design Document (PDD) to the Executive Board for approval and it must contain:
Step 2: Project Validation by the Designated Operational Entity (DOE)
Upon evaluation of the project by the DOE, the latter makes the decision to validate it or not. During this validation step, the DOE is to make the project document public and subject it to comments for 30 days. In their validation report, submitted to the Executive Board, the DOE must specify the feedbacks compiled and the way they were addressed.
Following the review of the validation report, the Executive Board may determine to register the project or not as a CDM project, within 8 weeks from reception at the most . This registration will later allow the issuance of the UREC.
Step 3: Final Registration of the Project
Step 4: Monitoring, Verification and Issuance of URCEs
The verification of project emission reduction is ensured by another DOE. The project emission monitoring report drafted by the project developer and the said DOE’s verification report must be published. Further to the verification report, the Executive Board may issue a URCE volume equivalent to the emission reductions noted.
The collection of a statutory tax of 2 percent on URECs is provided for for each registered CDM project to support an adapation fund set up by the Kyoto Protocol. This fund is meant to finance climate change adaptation projects for the most vulnerable countries. The CDM projects planned in the least advanced countries are exempted from this tax.
Centrale Sidi Daoud
Menzel Témime.
Implantation de la Centrale et du posteImplantation de la Centrale et du posteCentrale
Sidi Daoud
Menzel Témime
Centrale Sidi Daoud
Menzel Témime
Centrale Sidi DaoudCentrale
Sidi Daoud
Menzel Témime.
Implantation de la Centrale et du posteImplantation de la Centrale et du poste
34-MW SIDI DAOUD WIND FARM
Step Commissioning AG Type Number
Unit capacity
(kW)
Total capacity
(MW)
A 2000 AE32 32 330 10,56
B 2003
AE46 10 660
8,72AE52 1 800
AE61 1 1320
C 2009 AE61 26 1320 34,32
Total capacity (MW) 53,60
Carbon Credit Generation
Cycle -Sidi Daoud
Wind Farm
18 juin 2009PIN to WB
04 Février 2009
04 Avril 2010http://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/DB/AENOR1350630320.17
URCE SALE CONTRACT ENTERED INTO WITH THE INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR
RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOPMENT, AS TRUSTEE OF THE
SPANISH CARBON FUND
Environmental impact assessment for the wind power generation plant
3rd tranche, 34.32 MW, 26 windturbine
Sidi DaoudWind Power Project
November 2009
EIA
Report on the social and environmental
management plan for the Sidi Daoud wind power
generation plant and the Sidi Daoud-Menzel
Temime HV line
Safety and environment Directorate
CDM Project for the 3rd tranche of the Sidi Daoud
wind farm (34 MW)
June 2013
ESMP
Siège social : 38 rue Kémal ATTATURK, Tunis
ETUDE DE SUIVI DE L’AVIFAUNE DE LA CENTRALE
EOLIENNE DE SIDI DAOUD
Rapport final
Juillet, 2013
AVIFAUNA NOISE
Emission reductions
(MWh) (tCO2) (tCO2) (tCO2) (tCO2)November 2012 7279,96 4045 0 0 4045December 2012 13274,81 7375 0 0 7375January 2013 11925,71 6626 0 0 6626February 2013 9822,40 5457 0 0 5457March 2013 8819,15 4900 0 0 4900April 2013 6349,25 3528 0 0 3528May 2013 6403,72 3558 0 0 3558June 2013 7786,55 4326 0 0 4326July 2013 3731,53 2073 0 0 2073August 2013 4229,93 2350 0 0 2350September 2013 3522,09 1957 0 0 1957October 2013 5043,32 2802 0 0 2802November 2013 - - 0 0 -December 2013 - - 0 0 -
Total 48997
Nov to Dec 2012 9654Year 2013 57929
Total 67583Emission reduction estimated in ex-ante calculation of registered PDD :
Emission Reductions Month Year
Net Electricity Generated
Baseline Emissions
Project Emissions
Leakage
BIZERTE WIND FARM: 190 MW
METLINE
KCHABTA
METLINE KCHABTA EXT.
METLINE
EXT.
KCHABTA
TOTAL
Number of wind turbines
46 45 26 26 143
Unit power (MW) 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.32
Installed power (MW)
60.72 59.4 34.32 34.32 188.76
Commisioning May 2013
Carbon credit generation cycle for the Bizerte
wind farm
4 February 2009
April 8, 2010http://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/DB/DNV-CUK1337768970.01
13 June 2008PIN to WB
URCE sale contract entered into with CDC CLIMAT ASSET MANAGEMENT acting in the name and on behalf of
CDC CLIMAT, and SOCIETE DE PROMOTION ET DE PARTICIPATION POUR
LA COOPERATION ECONOMIQUE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSSESSEMENT FOR THE
WIND POWER PLANT PROJECT IN THE BIZERTE
AREA
DIRECTORATE OF CORPORATE MATTERS
PREVENTION AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT
Novembre 2008
EMISSION REDUCTIONS
August 2012 9 080 5 016 0 0 5 016September 2012 17 195 9 499 0 0 9 499October 2012 10 400 5 745 0 0 5 745November 2012 95 52 0 0 52December 2012 -5 -3 0 0 -3January 2013 -223 -123 0 0 -123February 2013 8 417 4 650 0 0 4 650March 2013 14 606 8 068 0 0 8 068April 2013 14 192 7 840 0 0 7 840May 2013 25 342 14 000 0 0 14 000June 2013 29 825 16 476 0 0 16 476July 2013 17 831 9 850 0 0 9 850August 2013 19 949 11 020 0 0 11 020September 2013 16 869 9 319 0 0 9 319October 2013 29 527 16 311 0 0 16 311November 2013 - - 0 0 -December 2013 - - 0 0 -
Total 117 720
Emission Reductions (teCO2)Month Year
Net electricity supplied to the grid (MWh)
Baseline Emissions (teCO2)
Project Emissions (teCO2)
Leakage Emissions (teCO2)
“nationally appropriate mitigation actions by developing country Parties in the context of sustainable development, supported and enabled by technology, financing and capacity-building, in a measurable, reportable and verifiable manner.” (UNFCCC, 2008 ; paragraphe 1 b ii)
Les NAMAs