Pump DivisionpFlowserve PumpsIDP Pumps
Cavitation in Centrifugal Pumpsand Prediction Thereof
F k C ViFrank C. Visser
Flowserve Pump DivisionEtten-Leur, The Netherlands
Tutorial
Presented at 2005 ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Conference, June 19-23, 2005, Houston, Texas, USA, , , ,
Outline
• Part 1: What is cavitation and what does it mean forPart 1: What is cavitation and what does it mean for
pumping machinery?
• Part 2: Prediction of cavitation in centrifugal pumps
– Scaling laws
– Thermodynamic effect (temperature depression)
Eff t f di l d t i d– Effect of dissolved or entrained gases
– Calculating incipient cavitation (NPSH) from CFD
– Cavity length prediction
2
P t 1 Wh t i it tiPart 1 – What is cavitation
Cavitation is defined as the process of formation and disappearanceCavitation is defined as the process of formation and disappearance of the vapour phase of a liquid when it is subjected to reduced and subsequently increased pressures.
The formation of cavities is a process analogous to boiling in a liquid, although it is the result of pressure reduction rather than heat addition.
Cavitation is a thermodynamic change of state with mass transfer from liquid to vapor phase and visa versa ( bubble formation & q p p (collapse).
3
P t 1 Wh t i it ti ( t )Part 1 – What is cavitation (cont.)
Sheet cavity on pumpSheet cavity on pump impeller vane leading edge (suction side)
Speed = 2990 RPMNPSHA = 70 m(230 ft)Flow rate =1820 m3/hFlow rate =1820 m3/h(8015 gpm)
Vane marker stripes atVane marker stripes atintervals of 10 mm (0.4 in)
Cavity length = 25-40 mmCavity length = 25-40 mm (1.0 – 1.5 in)
(from Visser et al, 1998)
4
Part 1 What is cavitation (cont )Part 1 – What is cavitation (cont.)
Cavitation causes or may cause:P f l (h d d )• Performance loss (head drop)
• Material damage (cavitation erosion)• Vibrations• Noise• Vapor lock (if suction pressure drops
b l b k ff l )below break-off value)(Visser et al, 1998)
General Advice: TRY TO AVOID CAVITATION (under normal operation)General Advice: TRY TO AVOID CAVITATION (under normal operation)
Unfortunately, economic or operational considerations often necessitate operation with some cavitation and then it is particularly important tooperation with some cavitation, and then it is particularly important to understand the (negative) effects of cavitation.
Design optimization to minimize cavitation
5
P t 1 Wh t i it ti ( t )Part 1 – What is cavitation (cont.)
Typical cavitation damages
Centrifugal pump impeller Francis turbine runnercavitation pitting erosion @ inlet
(from Dijkers et al, 2000)cavitation damage @ discharge
(from Brennen, 1994)
6
Part 1 What is cavitation (cont )Part 1 – What is cavitation (cont.)
Cavitation behavior is typically expressed in terms of cavitation tparameters.
• Cavitation number:RUU
Upp
TeyeV
12
211 )(; :PumpslCentrifuga
• Net Positive Suction Head:ppNPSH V
01
• Thoma cavitation number:g
NPSH
HNPSH
TH
7
Part 1 What is cavitation (cont )Part 1 – What is cavitation (cont.)
In general, cavitation performance is related to some “critical” value:gNPSHA (=available) > NPSHc or NPSHR (=critical or required)
Typical “critical” characteristics identified for centrifugal pumps:Typical critical characteristics identified for centrifugal pumps:• Incipient cavitation (NPSHi)• Developed cavitation causing 3% head drop (NPSH3%)p g p ( )• Developed cavitation causing complete head breakdown
( vapor lock).
Choice of NPSHR is rather arbitrary, but usually NPSHR=NPSH3%Alternative choices:
• NPSHR=NPSH1% or NPSHR=NPSH5%• NPSHR=NPSHi (cavitation free operation)
8
Part 1 What is cavitation (cont )Part 1 – What is cavitation (cont.)
Cavitation Phenomena
9
Cavitation Visualization Test PumpCavitation Visualization Test Pump
Pump Division
Begin Visual CavitationBegin Visual Cavitation
0% h d d1% head drop
3% head drop
4.05Head (m) Begin visual cavitation
0% head drop
3.95
4.00
3.85
3.90
3 75
3.80
3.85
3.70
3.75
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Pump Division
NPSH (m)
0% Head Drop0% Head Drop
0% head drop1% head drop
3% head drop
4.05Head (m) Begin visual cavitation
0% head drop
3.95
4.00
3.85
3.90
3.75
3.80
3.700 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
NPSH ( )
Pump Division
NPSH (m)
1% Head drop1% Head drop
0% head drop
1% head drop
3% head drop
4.05Head (m)
Begin visual cavitation 0% head drop
3.95
4.00
3.85
3.90
3.75
3.80
3.700 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
NPSH ( )
Pump Division
NPSH (m)
3% Head drop3% Head drop
0% head drop1% head drop
3% Head drop
4.05Head (m)
Begin visual cavitation0% head drop
3.95
4.00
3.85
3.90
3.75
3.80
3.700 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
NPSH ( )
Pump Division
NPSH (m)
RecirculationRecirculation
0% head drop1% head drop
3% head drop
Recirculation
4.05Head (m)
Begin visual cavitation0% head drop
3.95
4.00
3.85
3.90
3.75
3.80
3.700 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
NPSH ( )
Pump Division
NPSH (m)
Part 1 What is cavitation (cont )Part 1 – What is cavitation (cont.)
10
Part 1 What is cavitation (cont )Part 1 – What is cavitation (cont.)
Typically (in practice):Typically (in practice):
• NPSHA > NPSH3%
• NPSHi > NPSHA (especially for low capacity)
Pumps run okay, BUT with some developed cavitation. u ps u o ay, U t so e de e oped ca tat o
General misconception:General misconception:
NPSHA > NPSHR No Cavitation
(This will only hold if NPSHR = NPSHi.)
11
Part 2 Cavitation predictionPart 2 – Cavitation prediction
• Scaling lawsScaling laws
• Thermodynamic effect
• Effect of dissolved or entrained gases
• Calculating incipient cavitation (NPSHi) from CFDCa cu at g c p e t ca tat o (N S i) o C
• Cavity length prediction
12
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)
Predicting NPSH at speeds other than reference or test speed ( scaling laws)
NPSHi:2
,2
NNNPSHNPSHNNPSH REFiii
(
,
HNPSH
N
TH
REF
constant)
NPSH3%:
(
2
%3%3
NNPSHfNPSH
H
REF
TH
1,;1,
%,3%3
fNNfNNN
f
REFREF
REFREF
“Postulate”: Amount of developed cavitation depends on residencetime f depends on size of the pump and ratio N/NREF
13
REF
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)
Alternative approach to account for deviation from affinity law:Alternative approach to account for deviation from affinity law:
%3%3
REF NNNPSHNPSH
21
%,3%3
REF
REF N
Choice of is rather arbitrary and relies heavily on empiricism
Conservative choice:N < NREF , = 1N > NREF , = 2
14
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)
Thermodynamic effecty(temperature depression)
Cavitation performanceCavitation performance depends on:• Temperature of liquidTemperature of liquid• Type of liquid
NPSHR reduction(E.g. Stepanoff method, orHydraulic Institute correctionHydraulic Institute correctionchart)
(from Brennen, 1994)
15
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)Predicting thermodynamic effect
Equilibrium theory:VfgL
REF
VBh
BNPSH
NPSHNPSHNPSH
;2
%,3%3
Stepanoff (1965 1978):
LpfgV VB
TCgvBNPSH ;2
NPSHBBStepanoff (1965, 1978):
][][; 112
2
1
1
ftormh
TCgB
NPSHBB
pL
][;64][;29 11
11
34
34
ftBH
NPSHormBH
NPSH
hfgV
Non-equilibrium theory bubble dynamic (CFD) calculations, involvingtime-dependent two-phase flow calculations
HH VV
16
time dependent two phase flow calculations
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)
Influence of dissolved and/or entrained gases: “conceptual effective or artificial” vapor pressure:
PE = PV + P P (Ch 1993)PE = yP0 (Chen, 1993)
Key characteristic:Performance (breakdown) comes from gas evolution and gasPerformance (breakdown) comes from gas evolution and gas expansion, rather than classical vapor formation.
Dissolved and/or entrained gases result in reduction of (effective) field NPSHA:
NPSHA* = (P01 – P ) / gNPSHA (P01 PE) / g
“Hidden danger”: NPSHA > NPSHR but NPSHA* < NPSHR
17
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)
( ) f CPredicting incipient cavitation (NPSHi) from CFD
T i l hTypical approach:
Create 3D geometry model/grid of impeller passage
Solve flow field with CFD code (non-cavitating)
Calculate incipient NPSH from CFD pressure field (next slide)
18
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)Streamline through point of minimum pressure
ppg
ppNPSH Vi
i 21
,01
ppppUpp
Vi
ii
min1,1
221
,1,01
)(
ppNPSH min01
gppNPSHi
min01
So: NPSHi follows from pmin and p01 of calculated pressure field, anddoes not require pV to be known!
19
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)
Running simulations for several flow rates produces NPSHi curve:
(from Visser 2001)
20
(from Visser, 2001)
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)
Note: CFD calculated characteristic is for impeller flow!
To project it on pump throughput one needs to accountfor volumetric efficiency ( eye wear ring leakage flow):y ( y g g )
Qimpeller = Qpump + Qleakage Qpump = Qimpeller - Qleakage
Computed curve shifts left by amount Q = Qleakage Computed curve shifts left by amount Q Qleakage
;~),,,,,f( 2
1leakage L
puuDLDpQ
2Re;Re/2373.0;Re/24 25.0
turbulentlaminaru
L
It becomes particularly important to take Qleakage into account for lowNS (specific speed) impellers. For high NS the relative influence is less.
21
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)
What if NPSHA < NPSHi ? Find region on impeller blade surface where p < pV
• physically unrealistic but it gives• physically unrealistic, but it gives• first “indication” of cavitation area, and• first approximation of cavity bubble lengthfirst approximation of cavity bubble length
Note: The actual cavity will be biggerNote: The actual cavity will be bigger bubble length will be underestimated
22
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)
To visualize p < pV region from non-cavitating flow simulation:
Plot isotimic surface for threshold value pV*
pppp AVV ,11* )(
pUp
Up
VA
2
21
1
221
1
)(
NPSPApNPSHAgp
pp VA
01
2,1 )(
NPSPAp 01
23
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)
Example:
Plot of p < pV region
NPSHA = 15.5 m (51 ft)NPSHi = 28 m (92 ft)( )N = 2980 RPMQ = 400 m3/h (1760 USGPM)
Cavitation on bladeCavitation on blade suction side
24
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)
Putting LCAV = m L(p<pV), m=O(3), one can get some impression of g CAV (p pV), ( ), g pexpected cavitation erosion rate
Güli h (1986 1988 1989) n
CAVL 23632
Gülich (1986, 1988, 1989):
(*)
nn
SeACAV
CAV
LLEELE
TAULLCE 23632
10,
8
or (*)
with n = 2.83 for blade suction side and 2 6 for blade pressure side
nnCAV LLEELE 1212
n = 2.6 for blade pressure side
Equation (*) is especially powerful when comparing designs and q ( ) p y p p g gevaluate susceptibility to cavitation erosion (in a relative sense).
Design optimization studies
25
Design optimization studies
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)
• Results and theory thus far do not require two-phase flow l l ticalculations.
• Still it provides important information of an impeller design p p p gregarding cavitation performance.
• Next level of improvement has to come from CFD calculations• Next level of improvement has to come from CFD calculations with cavitation model.
• Calculations with a cavitation model are time consuming and tend to be “CPU-expensive”
• Several cavitation models exist to date, and development of cavitation models is still ongoing
26
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)
CFD Cavitation models
Typically two approaches:
• Equilibrium models– Barotropic or pseudo density models; =(p)– Somewhat “simplistic”, yetp , y– Attractive since they can be used in single phase codes
• Bubble dynamic modelsy– Rayleigh-Plesset equation– Vapor-liquid interaction (time-dependent mass & heat transfer)– Closer to realityCloser to reality– More complicated and more “CPU-expensive”– E.g. Volume of Fluid (VOF) model
27
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)Example:
Plot of cavity bubble
Equilibrium modelqCFX-TASCflow(CEV-model)
NPSHA 15 5 (51 ft)NPSHA = 15.5 m (51 ft)NPSHi = 28 m (92 ft)N = 2980 RPMQ = 400 m3/hQ = 400 m3/h (1760 USGPM)m 3
Cavitation on blade suction side
28
Part 2 Cavitation prediction (cont )Part 2 – Cavitation prediction (cont.)Application:
With CFD it ti d l di t NPSH3% f CFDWith CFD cavitation models one can predict NPSH3% from CFD calculated head drop curves
(from Visser, 2001; CEV-model prediction)
29
( , ; p )
Concluding Remarks
• Cavitation is a phenomenon which can seriously impact• Cavitation is a phenomenon which can seriously impact performance and operation of pumps.
• Predicting cavitation performance is an important topic• Predicting cavitation performance is an important topic, not only for pumps, but for fluid machinery in general.
• Traditional (scaling) methods are still important and• Traditional (scaling) methods are still important and useful.
• CFD methods provide further insight and are becoming• CFD methods provide further insight and are becoming more and more common.
Bubble dynamic (CFD) methods are emerging and hold a• Bubble dynamic (CFD) methods are emerging and hold a promise for the future.
30
ReferencesReferences
Brennen, C.E.H d d i f PHydrodynamics of Pumps. Oxford University Press (1994)
Chen C CChen, C.C.Cope with dissolved gases in pump calculations.Chemical Engineering, vol. 100 (1993), pp. 106-112.
Dijkers, R.J.H., Visser, F.C. & Op De Woerd, J.G.H.Redesign of a high-energy centrifugal pump first-stage impeller.Proceedings of the 20th IAHR Symposium August 6-9 2000 CharlotteProceedings of the 20 IAHR Symposium, August 6 9, 2000, Charlotte,North Carolina, USA.
Gülich J F and Pace SGülich, J. F. and Pace, S.Quantitative Prediction of Cavitation Erosion in Centrifugal Pumps.Proceedings of the 13th IAHR Symposium (1986), Montreal, Canada.
31
References (cont )References (cont.)Gülich, J. F. and Rösch, A.Cavitation Erosion in Centrifugal Pumps.World Pumps, July 1988, pp. 164-168.
Gülich, J. F.Guidelines for Prevention of Cavitation in Centrifugal Feedpumps.EPRI Final Report GS-6398, (1989).
Gülich, J. F.Beitrag zur Bestimmung der Kavitationserosion in Kreiselpumpen auf Grund derBlasenfeldlänge und des KavitationsschallsBlasenfeldlänge und des Kavitationsschalls.Thesis, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, Germany, 1989.
Stepanoff A JStepanoff, A.J.Pumps and Blowers – Two-Phase Flow.John Wiley & Sons (1965), Krieger Publishing (1978)
32
References (cont )References (cont.)
Visser, F.C., Backx, J.J.M., Geerts, J., Cugal, M. & D. Miguel Medina TorresPump impeller lifetime improvement through visual study of leading-edge cavitation.Proceedings of the 15th International Pump Users Symposium, TurbomachineryLaboratory,Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA, pp. 109-117. y, y, g , , , ppAlso in: Pumping Technology, vol. 2 (1998), pp. 149-157.
Visser F CVisser, F.C.Some user experience demonstrating the use of CFX-TASCflow computational fluiddynamics for cavitation inception (NPSH) analysis and head performance predictionof centrifugal pump impellers. FEDSM2001-18087Proceedings of the 4th ASME International Symposium on Pumping Machinery,May 29 – June 1 2001 New Orleans Louisiana USAMay 29 June 1, 2001, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
33