Transcript
Page 1: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

http://www.cs.ru.nl/~henk/BP/bp1.htmlhttp://www.cs.ru.nl/~henk/BP/bp2.html

BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGYHenk Barendregt

University of Nijmegen Toernooiveld 1 

6525 ED Nijmegen The Netherlands

Proceedings of the Conference on Topics and Perspectives of Contemporary Logic and Philosophy of Science, Vol II, 

Cesena, Italy, January 7-10, 1987, (Ed. M. dalla Chiara), Clueb, Bologna, 1988, 37-55. 

Contents

AbstractAcknowledgements1 The aim

1.1 Overcoming suffering 1.2 The small and large vehicle 1.3 Detachment 1.4 Insight 1.5 The fruits 1.6 Methodology 1.7 Explaining apparent contradictions

o 2 The path 2.1 The laboratory 2.2 The basic exercises 2.3 The hindrances 2.4 Using the hindrances 2.5 Confronting suffering 2.6 Super consciousness

Page 2: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

2.7 Disgust 2.8 Emergency 2.9 Back in the world

o 3 Again 3.1 Repeating 3.2 The five groups 3.3 Sublime consciousness 3.4 Broken consciousness 3.5 Gluing consciousness 3.6 Types of consciousness

o Postscript

Abstract

Analytical philosophers have criticized some phenomenological texts from buddhism, existentialism and mysticism, because of the presence of logical contradictions. Being interested in those phenomenological texts, people with a different philosophical inclination sometimes make the following claims. ``There are two ways of viewing the world: the rational and the irrational. The first view gives rise to science (with all of its drawbacks), the second one to the `higher' truths of mysticism." In his book Exploring mysticism (Penguin, 1975), F. Staal disagrees with such claims. He put forward the following views. 1. Mysticism consists of experience and is as such neither rational nor irrational. 2. As phenomenon mysticism can be studied in a rational way. 3. In order to do this, it is advisable to practice meditation in order to have first hand experience.

Following Staal's program, this paper will first explain briefly how contradictions occurring in phenomenological texts can be understood. Then the main part of the paper will be devoted to a description of phenomenological data collected during the practice of buddhist meditation.

Acknowledgments

The information contained in this paper is obtained by following several practice periods of intensive meditation under the skilled guidance of The Most Venerable M.T. Mettaviharee, teacher of buddhist meditation in Amsterdam. I wish to thank Dr. Dick de Jongh of the University of Amsterdam, for improving the English text.

1. The aim

Page 3: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

Buddhism has been described in many ways. It has been called a religion, a philosophy, a way of life and a psychology. Each of these descriptions is correct and emphasizes different aspects. Buddhism is a religion as it deals with questions of life and death and the meaning of life. It is a philosophy as it does not need the hypothesis of a god or of life after death. Buddhism is called a way of life as it teaches the way of non-violence and compassion. Finally, it is called a psychology as it investigates the working of our mind and distinguishes different types of consciousness.

There is yet another way to describe buddhism, namely as a course. The aim of this course is first the lessening and in the end the elimination of human suffering. This goal is to be reached by using experimental phenomenology: investigation of our consciousness as it is presented to us by means of self-observation. The method, both in theory and in practice, and some methodological considerations will be treated in this paper.

1.1 Overcoming suffering

If we find ourselves in a situation that is not agreeable to us, there are essentially two different ways to attempt to overcome the resulting suffering. On the one hand we can try to change the situation itself. On the other hand we can try to change our consciousness of the situation in such a way that it is no longer experienced as unpleasant. Depending on the circumstances and our possibilities, these attempts will be more or less successful.

It is clear that on the one hand science, technology and democracy have contributed considerably to the way our world can be controlled. On the other hand, we have buddhism, in particular the `theravada' school (literary the `teachings of the elder') that is focussed on the second possibility: eliminating suffering by changing our consciousness. Having completed successfully the course described above implies that one is accomplished in being able to change freely one's consciousness. It may take many years, but the aim is worthwhile.

1.2 The small and large vehicle

At one time in history the theravada buddhists found themselves in a world having poor social-economic conditions. They were then criticized as ``thinking only about their own enlightenment, while the world is burning". This criticism was taken seriously. As a result so called `Mahayana' (`large vehicle') buddhism developed. The followers of this branch of buddhism worked on improving both their consciousness and the world. To them it did not matter that the goal of overcoming suffering was

Page 4: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

going to be reached more slowly in this way: ``we should reach nirvana as the last ones" became the bodhisattva vow of Mahayana buddhism.

The Mahayana buddhists used the pejorative term `Hinayana' (`small vehicle') for the traditional theravada buddhism. The difference is, however, a matter of emphasis. A follower of theravada, too, will find it important to care for our environment. But during the theravada buddhist course the attention is focussed on changing consciousness. The sooner one has reached the goal the better, because with an improved state of mind, it is so much easier to create order around ourselves.

Mahayana buddhism became successful in China, Tibet, Korea and Japan, whereas the theravada school throve in Thailand, Birma and Sri Lanka. It is tempting to explain this phenomenon by the difference in climate in the countries involved. In the north living conditions are more difficult, therefore controlling the environment is more important and Mahayana developed.

As modern society is quite proficient in manipulating the environment, whereas the method of dealing with consciousness is little known, I expect in the future more influence of theravada buddhism. This paper is about theory and practice as taught in this lineage.

1.3 Detachment

One may wonder whether it is possible at all to overcome suffering by changing consciousness. And if it is possible, whether it is desirable to do so. We shall only discuss the first question. The second one is left to the reader.

Suppose we are in a restaurant and the waiter does not come. Even if we have plenty of time, we usually get somewhat irritated, often without noticing it. It may happen that we suddenly realize: ``O, there is irritation in me", and at once that irritation becomes much weaker or even disappears completely. This phenomenon is called `néantiser' by Sartre. It feels like `melting away' the emotion. It should not be confused with suppressing the emotion.

This is the key to the end of suffering: we do not view ourselves as somebody that is irritated, but as somebody that sees irritation. We do no longer identify with the emotion.

For a relatively light emotion as described, it is reasonably easy to apply the required detachment. This kind of phenomenon, of melting a light emotion, is relatively well-known. For stronger forms of irritation or of suffering in general, this method of objectification is more difficult to use. A strong form of concentration is needed in

Page 5: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

order to do this. Otherwise the irritation, for example, may immediately return after we have objectified it and consequently it keeps control of our consciousness. However, concentration, albeit very essential, will not be the most important tool in reaching complete detachment.

1.4 Insight

In order to follow the buddhist course one has to develop insight in the way our mind works. One of the fundamental statements of buddhism is that our consciousness is selfless. Our feeling of `self' is seen to be a form of attachment that has to be overcome in order to eliminate suffering. It is remarkable that in order to obtain this insight one has to overcome a strong emotional resistance, the so called attachment to self. Easier to understand forms of insight will be described in sections 2 and 3. For example that we are manipulated by our emotions because these consist of several components that diligently reinforce each other.

1.5 The fruits

Having completed the buddhist path, or part of it, provides us with several sorts of profit. We have already mentioned insight in the functioning of our mind. Another effect is a considerable sharpening of our senses (something that can be obtained also through other kinds of training). Also we acquire the capacity to concentrate quickly.

However, the most important result, apart from the elimination of suffering, is freedom. Buddha said

As the sea is pervaded by one taste, namely that of salt,in the same way my teaching is pervaded by one idea, that of freedom.

Some explanation is due here. Both Spinoza and Freud have remarked that our behavior is determined only partially by our conscious will but much more by something else. For Spinoza this something is our feeling, for Freud it is our unconscious. Often these distinct forces (conscious will versus feeling/unconscious) cause conflicts. Buddhism holds that if we are no longer attached to our feeling, then we are free.

1.6 Methodology

Phenomenology investigates consciousness as it is presented to us, we may say internally. As was mentioned above, progress in the buddhist course is correlated to

Page 6: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

gaining insight in the functioning of our mind. In fact it is necessary to have this phenomenological information in order to proceed on `the path'.

One may question the value of information obtained by self observation: ``Is it possible to be objective and precise?" The answer is affirmative. The reason is that buddhist phenomenology derives its force from the systematic development of an essential discipline, namely meditation. During meditation mental tools are being built that are used for experiments. Experimental phenomenology is the principal method of meditation.

Nevertheless everything is internal, personal: with one's own means one studies the working of one's own consciousness. Therefore the objectivity of buddhist phenomenology may be questioned. The only thing that really convinces is taking part in the meditation experience. But perhaps the following comparison is reassuring. Mathematics is commonly recognized as a discipline of great precision and objectivity. Yet that subject depends essentially on a notion of truth that is internal (`intuition'). Although in mathematics one uses calculations and formal proofs, there is always a need to have an intuitive judgment that verifies the correctness of the computation or the proof. Thus Husserl and Gödel rightly see mathematics as a part of phenomenology. Even if mathematics is about structures that are beyond us, for example about the set of natural numbers 0, 1, 2, ... , it is nevertheless the case that our contact with these structures runs via internal processes. Because of this phenomenological contact we are able to develop an objective mathematics concerning these natural numbers.

It is useful to compare buddhist phenomenology not only with mathematics, but also with a science, say physics. In physics the theory is built on experimental data. It is not true, however, that in order to study physics, one first learns all the possible experiments and then the development of the theory. On the contrary, experiments and theory are essentially intertwined. At first some simple theory is based on some empirical data. Using this theory new questions may be asked and new and more refined or totally different experiments may be performed. Then the theory is extended. Etcetera.

The situation is analogous with buddhist phenomenology. To the beginning student it is advised to have some confidence in the theory, but not to have blind faith. When experience is obtained, more and more of the theory can be verified. In this respect the theory is often compared to a map of an unknown country. When during a trip in that country the data on the map turn out to be true, only then we start to have real confidence in it. In chapter 2 and 3 the theory and practice of buddhist phenomenology will be described simultaneously.

Page 7: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

1.7 Explaining apparent contradictions

Now we will explain how contradictions, which happen to occur in some buddhist texts, are possible. Suppose some part of reality U is described using some language L. Some of the regularities observed in L are in fact physical laws, but may be confused with logical laws. If we extend the reality U to U+, but keep as the describing language L, then statements may result that contradict statements made about U. Although the contradictions are only apparent, because the statements are about different `worlds', it may seem that logical laws are violated.

An example will be helpful. Consider a tribe living on an isolated island. Vision of the tribesman is such that they can only see the colors black and white. In their description of the world they say: ``Something is either black or white." Although we know that this is for them in fact an empirical law, the people of the island are tempted to consider this as a logical law. Sometimes they use the words `white' and `non-black' interchangeably. On some day someone has a mystical experience. In our language we can say that that person has seen the color green. In the language of the tribe she says: ``I have seen something very impressive. It was neither black nor white." For most of the people of her tribe she was saying: ``It was neither black, nor non-black." Therefore on the island one may think she is speaking nonsense. However, we know that she is not.

There are, however, stronger contradictions. In his book Exploring Mysticism already mentioned, F. Staal discusses the following so called `tetra lemma' occurring in buddhist texts.

It is not A;it is not non-A;it is both A and non-A;and it is neither A nor non-A.

Even this contradiction may be explained. Simply consider again the tribe seeing only black and white. But now our mystic sees the color gray. Indeed gray is not white, not black. And it can be said that gray is both white and black. But also that it is neither white nor black.

I hope that the examples show that contradictions occurring in texts of mystics are not a sign that something essential is wrong. Nevertheless it is preferable that descriptions of altered states of consciousness are free from contradictions in the sense of logic. I will try to fulfill this requirement in sections 2 and 3.

Page 8: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

2 The pathIn section 1 we have already indicated briefly what is the key to the elimination of suffering. For example, by seeing in the right way that we are irritated, this irritation diminishes. This mental act of seeing what happens to us, is called mindfulness. The path, as the buddhist course is often called, consists of learning to become proficient in applying mindfulness. Once one has successfully completed the course, mindfulness is total and without effort. Then the mental formation of suffering can be fully seen and one is not touched by it anymore. This does not imply that one becomes cold or indifferent.

In order to get a better understanding on the nature of the path, it should be compared to a course to learn to swim. One can hear, read and speak about swimming, but progress can be made only by going into the water and doing one's exercises. Something similar holds for the buddhist path.

2.1 The laboratory

The beginning student of the buddhist course is advised to practice meditation daily, for example for a period of one hour. However, essential progress is usually only made possible by so called intensive meditation. `Intensive' means more than eight hours a day; it means engaging oneself every moment of the day with the act of mindfulness. By meditating intensively for a period of ten days, one may make definite progress.

It is clear that for complete devotion to mindfulness one has to live for some time under special conditions that are suitable for `the work'. Traditionally this happens in the monastery, the `laboratory' for the mind. The word `laboratory' may sound peculiar to some readers. Others may object to `monastery'. What is important are the following conditions.

Right living. A private room in which one is not disturbed. Right temperature. Not too cold, not too hot. Right food. Not too much, not too little; sufficiently nutritious. Right friends. Persons that take care of preparing food for the students should

respect the meditation work that is being done. Moreover an experienced teacher is essential.

During the intensive meditation period (retreat) one does not speak, except with the teacher in a daily interview in which he follows the progress of the student and gives hints.

Page 9: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

The remainder of the paper is a description of the exercises and the resulting experience as obtained during some meditation retreats. Although these experiences are my personal ones, the general tendency can be expected by anyone who follows the method.

2.2 The basic exercises

There are three basic exercises: walking, sitting and prostrating (bowing) all with the aim of increasing mindfulness. These exercises have to be performed with the utmost care. To outsiders (and many students of buddhism as well) they will seem absurd.

Walking. One starts by standing with the feet next to each other. One says slowly in oneself: ``standing, standing, standing". Then very slowly the right foot is lifted and put forward one step. Simultaneously one thinks: ``Right goes thus", the thought exactly following the movement. After this step there is a little pause. Then one makes a step with the left foot and the thought follows: ``left goes thus". One continues like this for one hour. The next time one walks, the mindfulness may be increased by naming more carefully the movements of the feet. First ``lifting, treading"; ``lifting" exactly when the foot leaves the floor and ``treading" exactly when the foot touches the floor again. Then one uses consecutively (each phrase for naming the movements is used for at least one hour): ``lifting, going, treading"; ``heel up, lifting, going, treading"; ``heel up, lifting, going, dropping, treading"; and finally ``heel up (extremely), lifting, going, dropping, treading, pressing front (foot), pressing back (foot)".

Sitting. One sits on the floor on a cushion with one's back straight and cross-legged. For example in full or half lotus position. The eyes are usually closed. One does not move, even if there is pain in the legs, one has an itch or something the like. One pays attention to one's breathing by following the movements of the abdomen: ``raising, falling" or ``raising, rest, falling". Again the naming follows the body. Sitting is done also for the period of an hour.

Prostrating. One starts by kneeling. One put one's hands together with the fingers stretched upwardly. In this position the hands are put before the breast and one thinks `purity'. Then the hands, still in the same position are put before the forehead and one thinks `compassion'. Finally one bows deeply, the elbows touching the knees and the lower arms and hands on the floor while keeping one's legs in a straight line. One puts the forehead in front of the hands on the floor, in this way raising one's behind. One thinks `wisdom'. This prostration exercise is done each time for twenty minutes.

It is important to consider the basic exercises not as a walking, sitting or bowing exercise, but as training in mindfulness.

Page 10: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

During the retreat only these three exercises are done, one after the other non-stop. The only interruptions consist of the meals, contact with the teacher, practical actions (like washing oneself and dressing) and sleeping. It is important to keep the meditation in the form of mindfulness also during the meals and the practical actions. One continuously pays attention to everything that is there, to the input of our senses.

2.3 The hindrances

At this moment things are becoming interesting. It turns out to be impossible to perform the basic exercises correctly. In ordinary life we are used to avoid discomfort as much as possible. If our position is uncomfortable, then we move. During meditation this is not done. Therefore all kinds of problems arise as disturbances. These prevent the student from paying attention to the meditation object (like our footsteps).

There are five groups of `hindrances': lust, hatred, drowsiness, doubt and restlessness. Each of these will be explained.

Lust. By this we mean feelings (or thoughts) that we like and cause desire. For example, the student may be thinking about the coming meal instead of paying attention to his footsteps or breathing. Lust may arise in many different ways. A characteristic attribute is that one is manipulated by it and cannot escape its grasp.

Hatred. This refers to all unpleasant feelings that cause aversion. This emotion manipulates us too. During sitting the student may be in pain, often extremely so. Some part of the body may itch. Or the student may be irritated. Because it is a rule not to move, the student is forced to confront suffering.

Drowsiness. This is a well-known phenomenon. After a period of being bored, the student may rather fall asleep, than pay attention. Sometimes, during sitting, this actually happens. The attentive student will notice that he gets drowsy not because he is tired, but because he has to do something that he does not like and that causes mental and physical resistance.

Doubt. The continuous alternation of pain, boredom and desire for something else makes the student wonder what he is doing. He is doubting whether he should not have spent his ten days on a nice holiday. The reasons for coming to the monastery are questioned.

Restlessness. Also this word is self-explanatory. Although it is often a negative experience, it is not classified as hatred. The reason is that restlessness may also be accompanied by lust. As an example in daily life we know the awaiting a meeting with

Page 11: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

a new love. In meditation restlessness is considered as a hindrance, because it prevents mindfulness.

2.4 Using the hindrances

At first the student will try to fight the hindrances. Discipline and concentration are said to be important. But even when trying very hard, it turns out impossible to overcome the disturbances. Disappointed and perhaps desperate the student consults the teacher.

An important method to continue practice, in spite of the disturbances, consists of so called `switching'. This will turn the hindrances into something positive. The method is as follows. As soon as a hindrance arises in the consciousness of the student, he tries to push it away in a gentle but firm fashion. If this succeeds, he then returns immediately to the original object of meditation, like the breathing. In case it is not possible to avoid the influence of the disturbance, the student changes his object of meditation. He switches to the hindrance itself and names it as `irritation', `lust' or the name of one of the other hindrances. As soon as the hindrance stops being disturbing, the student switches back immediately to the original object of meditation.

In this way it is almost always possible to exercise in mindfulness. An exception is the hindrance of drowsiness. If this occurs, the student may start the walking or even better the prostration exercise. In this way he does not fall asleep and moreover, obtains new energy.

Using the method of switching the student will understand better what genuine mindfulness is. This is not always obvious. It may happen that the student thinks he is mindful, but in fact is not fully so: there is one thing in which the student is more involved, namely concentration. By switching diligently between concentration and the object of meditation, the student will notice the difference between mindfulness and concentration.

2.5 Confronting suffering

Even if the method of switching helps the student with his meditation, it will not always be pleasant. On the contrary, it is almost certain that after skillful switching the hindrances will grow stronger and start alternating rapidly. The resulting hardship will be extreme. Strong pain or anxiety; restlessness.

At this point the student starts complaining to the teacher. He wants to discontinue the retreat. For him meditation has become like dying. However, the teacher advises the

Page 12: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

student to continue. ``In this life we often `die'. Each time when a new desire starts we are `born'. If the desire is strong, then we `burn'. Finally if it turns out to be impossible to obtain what we want, then we `die'. It is not that terrible. In our meditation we are working towards cutting through this circle of birth and death, this so called `samsara'. Finally we will not be born anymore and then we are free."

The student who has managed to endure the retreat so far will usually have enough discipline to continue. He names his suffering: ``This is suffering; this is suffering." But as the feeling is very strong, it does not melt away. The student is hoping that this will happen soon.

2.6 Super consciousness

Exactly this hope, this desire causes the discomfort to be even more strong. The situation is constantly deteriorating. Finally the student gives up all hope for improvement. Even then there is extreme suffering.

At that point something unexpected happens. Suffering remains, but suddenly it is not bothersome anymore. The student clearly sees the following. ``This is my body, this is my mind; both are burning, but it does not matter." From that point on the method of mindfulness also works for strong forms of suffering. This probably has been made possible as the student has developed a strong form of concentration.

This all may sound unbelievable. Perhaps the following may relieve some doubts. Suppose one pronounces repeatedly a particular word, for example the word `rubber', then it may seem that the word looses its meaning. Or rather the sound `rubber' and the concept `rubber' are being separated. Usually these two components are melded together in our consciousness. This phenomenon is well-known and is called a `jamais vu' or a `semantic fatigue'. Something similar may also happen with our suffering. Pain is being decomposed into two components: `pain as pure feeling' and `pain as something to run away from'. After this decomposition, using mindfulness, it is relatively easy to melt away the second part.

This method of splitting consciousness into various parts is characteristic for meditation as taught in theravada buddhism, the so called vipassana meditation. As a result one is able to understand better the functioning of consciousness. The word `vipassana' means `insight'.

The consciousness of the student is now getting more and more `pure'. The hindrances are less and less frequent. And if they do happen to come, it is easy to use mindfulness in order to melt them away. The student is able to see the growing of every hindrance; and then he uses mindfulness ``as a gun to shoot it away". This is how it feels at least.

Page 13: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

If the student is a `good boy' and applies mindfulness also to feelings of lust, then a strong and stable consciousness will result. All phenomena are the same as before and all mental faculties are the same. But there are almost no disturbances anymore. Pain is strong, but far away.

The hindrance of doubt seems to be conquered completely. ``It is true indeed that it is possible to improve one's consciousness by means of meditation" the student is thinking. [As the student would find out later, a remarkable aspect of the new consciousness is that some of one's ordinary skills are impaired. Writing is rather difficult, as if one is doing it with the wrong hand. Reading is extremely tiresome. Estimating distances does not work well either. Objects seem nearer than they really are. Sometimes one is not well-balanced while walking. After some trial and error one quickly is able to re- establish correct estimation of distances. The left-right aspects of the walking exercises play an important role in repairing the disturbances in one's equilibrium.]

The altered state of consciousness satisfies descriptions occurring in mysticism. The student is taken by rapture and feels omnipotent. By melting away these kind of narcissistic feelings the consciousness of the student is getting to be even more stable. It satisfies the statement of the Hindi "Atman is Brahman" (the self is god). The student thinks he is enlightened. However, as will turn out soon, there is still a long way to go.

2.7 Disgust

The student is now continuing to meditate having a consciousness that is neither pleasant nor unpleasant, but is nevertheless very exalted. There is almost nothing to do. The hindrances are gone and being mindful on for example breathing is effortless.

At one moment the student notices that it becomes difficult to keep his super consciousness. More and more pressure is growing on his mind (or is it the head?). Even if it does not bother him, it is a threatening omen.

At any price the student wants to keep his exalted consciousness. But most unfortunately he cannot keep his strong concentration any longer and he falls back on what used to be his old consciousness. It turns out that this consciousness is totally neglected. It looks like a giant abyss. Desperately the student tries to regain his exalted consciousness. It does not work. Then suddenly the student looses all grip and falls in the abyss. The experience is indescribable. The following symptoms are some indications of what happens.

Chaos: perception is completely confused; everything is turning.

Page 14: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

Anxiety: there is an `infinitely' strong anxiety; all other anxieties seem to be derived from this basic one.

Disgust: one is extremely sick; the stomach turns and one has to vomit. Craziness: it feels as if one is crazy; the mind and the body are present, but

there is no ego anymore that controls everything.

The experience is more terrible than death, at least that is how it feels like. Nevertheless thinking operates as usual.

Panic stricken the student goes to the teacher, who is available 24 hours a day during the intensive meditation retreat, precisely for these cases of depersonalization. The student hopes that the teacher can perform some miracle. But that is not what happens.

The teacher reacts in an unexpected way. He says the following. ``Remember the theory. Our existence has three characteristics: changeability, suffering and selflessness. Changeability means that no phenomenon is permanent. Even the visual image that we have of a solid object is not constant. If we look well, we will see many small fluctuations in the image as perceived. In this changing world we look for some hold, something that is constant. In our ignorance we consider our ego, our self, as a fixed remaining entity. But that is an illusion. Why would our ego feel the need to be consolidated, if it were really permanent? Well, the changeability causes the circumstances in which we live to be often in conflict with the ideas of the ego and friction results. That is suffering. Finally, selflessness means that the phenomena out of which our consciousness is built up, are essentially beyond our control. These three attributes of our existence, changeability, suffering and selflessness are in fact three aspects of one single truth. Now you have experienced yourself these three characteristics. This is important. Just continue your practice."

But the student is not at all interested in meditation anymore. He just wants to stop his depersonalization. The teacher notices this and gives specific instructions. ``Instead of prostrating for twenty minutes, you should do it from now on each time twenty minutes longer. That is, first twenty minutes, then forty, then sixty and so on. Work well on your mindfulness. Then the nausea will disappear by itself. However, if it comes back, do not name it as `nausea' but as `knowing'. Do not feed it it."

2.8 Emergency

Back in his room the student has lost all motivation and does not want to continue the practice. However, stopping for a rest deteriorates the situation: the abyss becomes more threatening and nauseating. In utter despair he follows the instructions of the teacher. After a couple of hours it turns out that the exercises have a calming effect. Especially the prostrations function well against the sickness. Then the student wants

Page 15: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

to relax. But each time he slackens his mindfulness, he is pushed back into the abyss. It is like having a knife on one's throat forcing one to meditate fully. It is a matter of life or death. Being tired, the prostration exercises give new energy.

After having worked for many hours like this, being exhausted, the student is not sure whether he can go to bed. It may induce the nausea again. The student goes to the teacher and asks whether it is possible to go to sleep. ``All right, sleep with mindfulness", is the answer.

The student sleeps remarkably well. However, the next morning the emergency is still there. Only after some days of extremely hard work, the student re-establishes a stable consciousness without nausea. His ego feeling returns, albeit in another more light form. The student keeps some suspicion towards the method.

2.9 Back in the world

Returning from the laboratory the student enters `the world'. It turns out that he can function normally. Eventually this brings back some confidence to the student. However, sometimes there is nostalgia for the feeling of ego that he has left behind. But the new form of ego also has its advantages. An irritating situation can be relativized more easily. And indeed it turns out that all anxieties are corollaries to the fundamental one. By knowing this one, all other anxieties have become less serious.

3 AgainIt may take a while before the student is motivated again to join an intensive meditation retreat. One of the possible motives is the memory of the super consciousness described in 2.6. Another reason may be, that on the one hand the student has gained confidence in the theory as parts of it turned out to be true, and on the other hand the theory promises much more. A description will be given now of the work done after one has chosen to continue the practice.

3.1 Repeating

The student notices that he has to start from scratch. The technique learned at the previous retreat has been lost. Fortunately progress is much faster now.

Again there are hindrances. Again they can be used to increase mindfulness. Again there is strong pain or strong suffering. Again there arises strong concentration, making the extreme pain easy to take. Again a stable consciousness results.

Page 16: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

However, the teacher is not satisfied. ``If there is strong pain, but you do not mind, then you first form the pain, while you throw it out later. That is a waste of the energy that it all takes. You should prevent the formation of the pain and in general of your feelings. Then you do not need to throw away anything. Cut through the addiction to your feeling. Stay with the input, with the contact of your senses."

The student is not able to do that. He again develops a super consciousness. Again he notices that he cannot keep it up. When he falls this time, the nausea is less strong, as it is a known phenomenon by now. After only an hour the consciousness of the student is stable again.

3.2 The five groups

In order to proceed from here, the following facts from the theory should be known.

Our phenomenological awareness (as always both physical and mental) can be divided into five groups (`skandha' in Pali; usually translated with `aggregate'):

1. input (of our senses);2. feeling;3. perception;4. output (conditioning, will);5. consciousness (state of consciousness).A more elaborate description will be given now.1. Input. Everything that we are aware of enters through one of the six senses. These are characterized by the following verbs: to see, to hear, to taste, to smell, to feel (to perceive by touch) and to think. The first four senses, namely the eyes, the ear, the tongue and the nose do not need further description. The fifth sense, bodily feeling, has many manifestations. For example itch, pain and cold. There is no special location for this sense. The sixth sense is the mind. This is usually not considered as a separate sense, but rather as the place where all senses come together and are being processed. There are, however, some good arguments for classifying the mind as a sense. If we look up something in our memory, we obtain information that was not there before. If we have some thoughts after seeing some object, then, although that thinking is a consequence of the seeing, it is a separate input for our awareness. In the buddhist theory there is also processing of the input, but this is placed in the groups (2) - (5).2. Perception. This group will be discussed first, because group (2) is somewhat more complicated. After the senses have delivered the input to us, perception makes recognizable units from the data. It makes a classification; as they say ``it distinguishes this from that".

Page 17: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

3. Feeling. This group should not be confused with sense number five, the feeling of touch, itch, cold, etcetera. In group two we give a value judgment to our sense input. We say ``This is pleasant, this is unpleasant and this is neutral." Our feeling indicates whether we like to have a phenomenon in our consciousness or whether we don't; or that we are indifferent to it. Indeed, according to the theory feeling comes in three forms: positive, negative and neutral. Because buddhism sees feeling as the direct cause of our behavior, group (2) is considered as very important. Positive feeling is equated with lust; negative feeling with hatred; and finally neutral feeling with ignorance. Lust, hatred and ignorance are seen as the three fundamental sins. Of these three ignorance is the most persistent one, since it is hidden and can change suddenly into lust or hatred. The reader may wonder why positive and negative feeling (`desire and sadness') are repudiated. One may reason as follows: ``All right, one is better off not having negative feelings, but don't the positive ones form the meaning of life?" To this one may reply that it is certainly the case that for example sex and good food are pleasant. But the desire for it has a hold on us, it manipulates us. The goal of buddhism is to be free from this desire. The mentioned delights will remain pleasant, even after one is enlightened. But then they are pleasant on the level of group (1), the sensory data. Although the following simile is not perfect, one may compare the enlightened enjoying- without-desire to listening to beautiful music. We enjoy the music of Mozart, but we do not cry when the symphony is over. Having `positive feeling', in the technical sense of buddhism, means desire that is constantly directed to the object of desire, even if it is absent. A comparison with Calvinism is appropriate here. In this persuasion just as in buddhism lust is considered a sin. However, in Calvinism it is something that is given a negative value: it is something that is not allowed and one should be ashamed of it. In buddhism lust is considered as something that is present in us. It is considered a sin because it is the cause of suffering and bondage. But that is all.4. Output (conditioning, volition). According to buddhism our behavior is conditioned. This applies to everything we do, both with our body and with our mind. Cybernetically this conditioning can be viewed as the output of our body-mind complex: our nerves are firing to control our movements and our thoughts. Phenomenologically conditioning is correlated to volition: we usually have the impression that we want to do whatever we are doing. However, this volition can be seen as a side effect. Therefore it is adequate to describe group (4) simply as output.5. (State of) consciousness. In the first place consciousness is the integrating factor that unifies our input and its processing. So there is a difference between input, perception and consciousness. Input as such is still disconnected. (Sometimes when it is dark we may see that our visual input consists of small fluctuating parts.) Then, perception classifies the input, but only locally so. Finally consciousness gives a global image.

Page 18: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

In the second place group (5) refers to our mood, to our mental state. It will turn out that the way our consciousness unifies our awareness is strongly dependent on our feeling.

There is a strong interaction between the five groups. Feeling results from input, but in a manner that depends on perception and consciousness. If someone says something rude to us, then the resulting feeling depends on who has spoken to us, that is, depends on perception. Moreover the result of the unfriendly words depends on our mood of the moment. That is, our state of consciousness (group (5)) also influences our feeling.

Conversely, feeling plays a central role in perception, conditioning and consciousness. In the next sections we will give evidence for this. Because of its central role, feeling is therefore placed as second group, directly after input.

The views of Spinoza and Freud concerning the bondage of our behavior are related to this theory. According to Spinoza our feeling determines our actions. According to Freud the determining factor is our unconscious. Buddhism reconciles these two views. Also according to this theory feeling determines our actions; however, large parts of that feeling are unknown. That is another reason why our ignorance is considered to be a sin: it determines our actions without our realizing it. And in addition we usually make rationalizations about our motives for those actions.

3.3 Sublime consciousness

The student analyses his experiences in the light of the theory of the five groups. Using strong concentration, he is able to endure strong pain, without being bothered by it. Probably that is because the connection between feeling and conditioning is interrupted. A drawback is, that it takes a considerable amount of energy. If one could disconnect the link between input and feeling, then perhaps suffering could be overcome much more easily. For this it is necessary to know exactly how feeling is formed.

Work is resumed. As usual the pain slowly develops during sitting. As soon as the pain becomes unbearable the student automatically switches to super consciousness: ``Ouch, now I can take it." But the teacher is dissatisfied: ``You should not hide your pain, but stop forming it!"

The student is increasing his mindfulness. As soon as a little pain arises, he sees it. But he also notices, that directly after the pain is melted away using mindfulness, a whiff of pleasure arises because the pain is gone. Previously he had failed to notice this.

Page 19: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

It now becomes an exercise in swiftness of the factor mindfulness. It runs as follows. Pain; melting; pleasure; melting; pain; melting; pleasure; melting; etcetera. At first the student is not well synchronized with this flux of phenomena. Then it goes better. Suddenly the student gains momentum. Part of consciousness is disappearing. Almost the student becomes nauseated again. But using mindfulness the formation of the sickness is prevented. And then, quite unexpectedly, he can do it: siting quietly for a long period without having pain. It simply is not being formed.

Now things are going quite well and effortless. Consciousness is becoming calm and stable. Because little effort is required much more calm as before. The consciousness described in 2.6 is now seen quite differently. As compared to the present consciousness that previous super consciousness is thick and treacly, due to the presence of neutral feeling. At the time it seemed to be the utmost experience.

The student enjoys his present sublime consciousness. It is stable. Having had previous experience with an altered state of consciousness the student wonders whether he can loose it again. At first sight there seems nothing to loose.

3.4 Broken consciousness

Suddenly something happens. There is new pain. The student is unable to prevent its formation. How come? The pain-pleasure method does not work. Moreover it is not clear whether or not the student is bothered by the pain. But it is quite strong.

The teacher is consulted. He says: ``The pain (and more generally the feeling) is supported by your perception and consciousness." The student does not understand this remark. The teacher continues: ``While working with the pain, you may try to notice small fluxes in your consciousness." The student asks: ``Should I name this and make it melt away using mindfulness?" The teacher: ``Yes, but only do this when you have confidence in your practice. You will interrupt the continuity of your consciousness, of your existence. Everything will start turning like being in a roller coaster. Then continue your practice, even if you feel sick. After a while-no one can say how long it will take-the turning will stop. Do not try to step out of the roller coaster, otherwise you will fall down."

The student, who by now has got used to strange phenomena, is quite intrigued by these words. He continues the practice. Walking. Sitting. Pain is not being formed. After long sitting pain is being formed. At one moment it becomes almost impossible to melt away the pain. Then comes a strong outburst of pain. An even stronger blast of mindfulness is able to melt away the pain. By properly paying attention the student notices that his perception-right after the melting away of the pain-disappears locally for a short moment. The vision of an object laying in front of the student melts away

Page 20: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

for less than a second. It leaves a hole in his perception. The student tries again. Pain; melting; hole in perception. Pain, hole, pain, hole, ... ; faster and faster.

Then suddenly pain is not formed anymore. But consciousness collapses also. There is only awareness, with every now and then a puff of perception or consciousness. Intellect appears to be functioning normally. The holes in consciousness are turning around quickly. During the nausea described in 2.7 this must have happened also. But then the student did not see any details because of lack of mindfulness. Also perception of the body is disturbed. During walking the room seems to be a jolting carriage. The student does not become sick, because mindfulness watches his stomach well.

The experience is not pleasant, but not terrible either. However, when after two hours everything still keeps turning, the student starts to worry. Then he develops restlessness and wants to have a stable consciousness. There is nevertheless no nausea nor anxiety.

3.5 Gluing consciousness

The student decides to consult the teacher. His room is at a different wing of the monastery. Walking there, while developing strong mindfulness, the consciousness of the student suddenly is glued together. It just happened, without doing anything special. It is a new consciousness; yet everything in it is the same as before. The student changes his mind and starts walking back to his room. Then his mindfulness weakens and he falls back to his broken consciousness. This makes him decide to go to the teacher after all.

After the student has told what had happened, the teacher says: ``Your practice is going well. Especially the way your consciousness has been glued together. Feeling will be substituted by mindfulness. In case your consciousness breaks again, name it as `knowing'. Do not identify with either the new consciousness, nor the broken old consciousness."

After the return to his room, it takes a couple of hours for the student's consciousness to stabilize. Then he starts analyzing what has happened.

The functioning of consciousness is apparently analogous to that of a television screen, consisting of rapidly fluctuating images. Normally we have the impression of continuity. Probably the reason is that feeling works as a kind of glue for these separate fluctuating images. By the meditation technique feeling is (temporarily) switched off. Therefore there is no more glue and consciousness will show itself in its

Page 21: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

broken form. The student does not understand well how everything works, but the phenomena are interesting.

3.6 Types of consciousness

Back to work. The exercises are going well. There are few disturbances and sublime consciousness results. Pain is not being formed. However, later pain arises again. When this pain is being melted away, consciousness starts breaking again. The student thinks ``O, that is all right; I know how to depersonalize!" But he is wrong, it is going to be tough. The depersonalization is different this time and as this was unexpected, the student is getting restless again. Working hard makes consciousness stable. It becomes sublime again, even more so than before.

After continuing the work, the student falls again in a depersonalization. He becomes angry: ``There is no end to this!" This emotion of angriness has an unexpected effect. The broken consciousness is glued together instantaneously. But how ugly it is. Everything exhales malignity: the walls are angry, each footstep is angry, everything is angry.

Work is continued. Consciousness breaks and the angriness in the walls suddenly disappears. The student tries whether consciousness can be glued together also with other feelings. First he tries lust. It works; when consciousness is glued together with lust everything becomes luscious. The student has no objection and keeps this type of consciousness. In the dining room he notices, however, that he is taking too much food. A habit he had overcome already at the beginning of the retreat. When the desert comes he promises to himself not to take too much. Nevertheless, he is taking more than he can eat comfortably. Apparently his hands took more than his mind wanted.

Back in his room the student decides that a consciousness glued together with lust is undesirable and he gives it up. During the resulting depersonalization the student happens to feel insecure. This time, by accident, the broken consciousness is glued together with anxiety. Everything exhales this emotion. The student is walking around in the surrealistic world of a phobic.

After having made a more quiet consciousness, the student goes to the teacher for his daily interview. The teacher is dissatisfied about these experiments. ``You have to continue the basic exercises. Feeling has to be substituted by mindfulness. Do not glue with feeling, but with mindfulness. The difference is that you are dependent on your feeling. Mindfulness on the other hand sets you free. Be not attached to particular forms of consciousness. Let them come and go by themselves. The final goal is freedom. When you will have it, sublime consciousness may arise as often as you want. However, if you make some type of consciousness now, then you want to do

Page 22: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

that. As a result there is hidden feeling in it and you will not be free. This means that for example your sublime consciousness will depend on something. Therefore it will be impossible to keep it. When finally you will be free, then you do not depend on anything, you have become `unconditioned'."

The period of intensive training is over, however. With good feeling the student returns home. So the work is not finished yet.

PostscriptThe way to the elimination of suffering is the way to eliminate attachment to self. This means the elimination of our addiction to feeling. Personal experience of a small part of the way is described here. Striking occurrences were the following.

Strong pain, without minding it; super concentration and super consciousness; depersonalization (very strong withdrawal symptoms); sublime consciousness; stabilization either by means of feeling or by means of mindfulness.

The possibility of using mindfulness to relativize problems is commonly known, albeit that usually no terminology for this act is given. The most striking aspect of the method of vipassana meditation is that this mindfulness, if combined with effort and concentration, can be used in a very powerful way.

The path is not always pleasant, but it is quite varied and remarkable.

[Continued as Mysticism and Beyond (1993/1995).]

Mysticism and beyondBuddhist phenomenology, part II

Henk Barendregt

Katholieke Universiteit, NijmegenEcole Normale Supérieure, Paris

May 22, 1993;Revised March 8, 1996.

Published in: The Eastern Buddhist, New Series, vol XXIX, 262-287, 1996.

Page 23: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

Contents

     Introduction 1.  Opposites     Improper Opposites     Proper Opposites 2.  The cover-up model for the human mind 3.  `Things that may happen'     Laboratory conditions     Mysticism     Nausea 4.  Freedom     Attachment to mysticism     Components of consciousness     Disentangling the knot     Levels of freedom 5.  A program for science     Value of the cover-up model     Some conjectures      References

AbstractThis paper is an extension of Buddhist phenomenology, Barendregt [1988], hereafter called part I. That paper is a personal account of part of the mental training towards the purification of consciousness. For the reading of the present paper, however, no acquaintance with part I is required.

This paper continues the description of experiences obtained during the practice of intensive vipassana meditation. Moreover, based on these experiences a model is presented for one particular aspect of the human mind: the mechanism of desire, suffering, mysticism and mental purification. The model makes very clear the goal of the meditation training and explains well the phenomena described in the Buddhist literature. Besides that the model is claimed to be useful for the understanding of several psychosomatic phenomena.

I dare say that the observed phenomena are valid in general and are of essential value for the eventual theory of the human mind.

AcknowledgmentsThis paper has been written on the basis of several intensive

Page 24: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

vipassana meditation retreats under the skillful guidance of the most venerable Phra M.T. Mettavihari, teacher of vipassana meditation in Amsterdam and his assistant H. van Voorst. I thank prof. M. Beeson of the University of San José for corrections in a draft of this paper and also prof. Vladimir Uspensky of Moscow University who suggested several improvements.

IntroductionThis paper is an elaboration of a lecture given at the University of Delft (October 2, 1992) for the symposium Over grenzen (On boundaries); a preliminary version (in Dutch) is in Vlug [1993]. A model will be presented for the human mind in which mysticism plays a clear role. Moreover, the model discusses also the cause of human suffering and desire and our possible liberation from it.

The model is based on experience obtained during several intensive vipassana meditation retreats (more than 90 days over a period of 7 years, after several preparatory years of so called concentration meditation). The motivation for such a training is twofold. First of all, the purpose of the training is inner calm and freedom, in themselves of enough value. Secondly, part of the training consists of an introspective study of consciousness. Thereby one obtains insight in the functioning of the mind, complementary to information obtained in disciplines such as neurophysiology and cognitive science.

First several misunderstandings are discussed in §1. Then in §2 the model will be presented. It will be useful for the understanding of the description of the phenomenological data described in §3,4. In §3 mystical and other experiences are described that are obtained during the path of mental purification. In §4 the account of this training will be continued, but no longer focused on existentialist experiences. It turns out that there is something better than mysticism: freedom. Finally in §5 a program is sketched for scientific verification of the reported phenomena and other statements.  

  1. Opposites In discussions about mysticism and other forms of spiritual development several pairs of opposites are often mentioned. Examples of such pairs are rationalism-mysticism, reductionism-holism and determinism-free will. In these discussions it is often assumed that there are two ways to view the world: the rational, reductionist and deterministic view versus the mystic, holist and

Page 25: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

intuitive one. Also other pairs are added: Western-Eastern, materialistic-spiritual. We claim that these pairs are only superficially opposed. That the predicates Western versus Eastern form an oversimplification that does not serve right to the spiritual traditions in the west or the scientific achievements in the east. It is remarkable that those opposites that are relevant get only little attention. These are insight-control and internal-external.

Improper opposites  Rationalism-mysticismThis seems to be a proper opposite. A rationalist only makes statements if these are based on logical thought. In mysticism this is not the case; sometimes even some contradictory statements are made. Conversely, in mysticism one is warned against the influence of rational thinking.

Nevertheless this pair is only apparently in opposition. In Staal [1975] the following is stated: `Mysticism consist of experience. As such it is neither rational nor irrational; but this experience can be studied in a rational way'. Paradoxical statements may be made understandable, if we realize that using common language uncommon experience has to be described.

The following example - already given in part I - may be explanatory. Suppose there is an island with inhabitants that are able to see only the colors black and white. In their `logic' one has the following law: `something is either white or black'. In the language on the island the word for `black' is `non-white'. Hence this law can be formulated as: `something is either white or non-white'. Now someone on the island has the mystical experience that we know as seeing the color green. The mystic may say: `I have seen something; it was neither white nor non-white (and it was splendid)'. According to the logic of the island this is a contradiction. But we know better.

A rationalist may object that even if the statements of a mystic may not be impossible, there is no logical ground for them. This objection may be refuted by pointing out that the statements of a mystic are empirical, based on experience in a trained consciousness. Nevertheless it would be good if a mystic would state clearly that he or she is speaking about internal experience.

So much for the allergy of rationalists against mysticism. As to the converse - the allergy of a mystic against rational thought - it can be said that again there is a misunderstanding caused by a difference in

Page 26: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

motivation. The mystical training is directed towards a cultivation of introspection as a refined instrument. This introspection should not be distorted by projections and the like. Often rational thinking acts as a disturbance for proper perception of phenomenological experience. Therefore one has to be careful with rational thought during the purification of consciousness. It is sufficient to be always aware of our thinking or reasoning whenever present - however, that is not so easy.

In conclusion, mysticism and rationality are not incompatible. Both are based on a refinement of the human mind, albeit in somewhat different directions. It is important that rationality is not confused with bureaucracy and mysticism not with mystification.  Reductionism-holism Reductionism is the method that tries to understand the behavior of certain objects in terms of their components. In this way science has achieved great successes. By selecting in a situation the right components whose behavior can be described and be used in a description of the behavior of the total situation, one has obtained a good understanding of many phenomena in nature.

Holism on the other hand emphasizes that one should not neglect the global view. `The whole is more than the sum of its parts' is one of the slogans of holism. As pointed out by Nagel [1961], the truth of this statement depends on the way the concept `sum' is interpreted. If one has an amplifier, a cd-player, speakers and wires, than one does not yet have a working stereo-set. The parts have to be connected in the correct way by using the wires. If in the interpretation of the concept `sum' this correct wiring is included, then the total is the sum of its parts. A holist may maintain that with a stereo-set one can listen to cd's, something that is not possible with any of the parts. This is correct, but should be stated as `the properties of the whole are not the sum of the properties of the parts'. The aim of reductionism is to describe the properties of a whole as a function (not a mere addition) of the properties of the parts. Usually the total has extra properties (that is why we make compound objects). It may also happen that properties of the parts are lost after the total is formed (e.g. iron Fe is susceptible to rust, but iron-oxide FeO2 is not; sodium Naand chlorine Cl are poisonous but NaCl, table salt, is not).

Holism may be defended as follows. If one has not yet succeeded to select in a given setting the proper components together with a successful description of these, then a more global approach is the

Page 27: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

only possibility. In this situation reductionism is a working hypothesis, a scientific program. Moreover, even if the reductionist analysis of a situation happens to be completed successfully, it is still important to pay attention to the total. As comparison one may think of the performance of a piece of music. First one has to practise the difficult passages (reductionism). Thereafter these passages and the other parts should be integrated into a balanced total (holism).

As conclusion I want to state that reductionism and holism do not contradict each other. On the contrary, they can complement each other fruitfully.  Determinism-free will It is noteworthy that in the history of human thought this pseudo-discrepancy has been three times the cause of intensive polemics. This happened in fundamental discussions in theology, in classical physics and more recently in artificial intelligence. The main idea is simple. Nature, including homo sapiens, is completely determined according to some theories. This for different reasons depending on the particular school of thought. According to some theological views God completely determines the world. According to classical physics the laws of nature and the state of the universe at a given moment completely determine the future. Now, if the world is completely determined what about our free will? It seems at least that we have one. In artificial intelligence, in which man is considered as an information processing system, the question comes up in an analogous way.

One has invented many ingenious arguments to try to give a solution. Quantum mechanics seemed to be reassuring. Nature is apparently not deterministic, according to some interpretations of this theory, and thereby the human dignity is saved. To this one may make the following objections. First of all this solution is not satisfactory, because in this way our behavior is based on stochastics, on the throwing of a die - not very dignified indeed. Moreover in spite of the phenomena described in quantum physics, determinism is not ruled out in principle. The often cited experiment of Aspect based on a theorem of Bell is sometimes seen as a proof that determinism is impossible, see Aspect [1982]. But although the experiment is very interesting, it does not lead unambiguously to this conclusion.

The matter is, however, much more simple. In the philosophical struggle in which one tries to choose between determinism or free

Page 28: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

will it is assumed that the two are mutually exclusive. This is not correct. The reader may try to give a careful argument that determinism implies that there is no free will; this attempt will be in vain. The reason is that determinism means not only that things are completely determined but also that this is so by a cause, by nature. Well, we are part of nature and therefore our presence and our behavior is of genuine influence on the course of things.

The following example may be useful. Imagine we have a chess computer, a cheap one that always uses the same strategy. Now if playing against it we win a game, then we always can win by repeating our successful strategy. It is clear that this machine is deterministic and does not have a free will. Now imagine that we have a more expensive chess computer, one that learns from its mistakes. After winning from it in a game, we cannot win again with our previous strategy. The machine will remember that it is not good to repeat its moves. We can state that this second machine has a rudimentary form of a free will: it reacts differently under similar circumstances. But since the machine is programmed its behavior is deterministic. So determinism and free will are compatible.

Still one may object. In some views on a human free will - e.g. the one propagated in Christianity - there is an (eternal) soul that independently makes decisions. In this sense the second chess computer does not have a free will, since its behavior is exactly determined by the position on the board and by its past experience. But a really independent soul that makes decisions that are not based on anything is in fact being haphazard, is a random generator. This is not what is meant by free will - even in Christianity. According to this religion one should base one's actions on the dictates of one's conscience (taking into account the circumstances). Doing this, however, our behavior is comparable with that of a chess computer of the second kind, albeit that we are much more refined.

The reader may feel uneasy about this. That is so for good reasons. The fact that we may have a free will and are at the same time completely determined is related to a fundamental characteristic of our existence: we are selfless. We have no absolute control over what happens in our mind. Says Saint Augustine: If my mind orders my body to do something, then my body obeys so well, that one can hardly distinguish between the order and its execution. If, however, my mind orders my mind to do something, then it does not listen, even if it is the same mind. Why this monstrous phenomenon and for what purpose? Schopenhauer says something related: We are able

Page 29: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

to want to do something, but we cannot [force ourselves to] want to want something.

Having a free will means that we can make a decision based on a considerations involving among other things our thinking and feeling. Being determined means that those considerations follow a fixed path. But the only way to know the outcome of those considerations and thereby of that decision is to live and go through the process. The outcome is of interest because even if it was determined, it was unknown before. Compare this to a computer that calculates the number pi in 106 digits. The digits are determined before the computation starts, but nevertheless the computation has to be done.

In conclusion, we are not without a free will. However, that free will is beyond our absolute control - it just follows the internal feelings and thoughts in our mind. In fact we are selfless, i.e. we do not possess these feelings or thoughts.

Proper oppositesIn the discussion about spirituality it is good to emphasize two genuine opposites: control-insight and internal-external.  Control-insightThis pair of opposites indicates two fundamentally different attitudes towards life. Very often we want to control circumstances in and around us. This is for good reasons: these circumstances determine our well-being, our degree of happiness. However, once we have enough to eat and live relatively comfortable, our desire to control may expand and makes us want things that are beyond our capacity. This results in suffering, because there will be things that we want that are outside our reach. Insight on the other hand also gives us pleasure but one that is more permanent. For the pleasure of eating a cake we must pay by not having it any more. The pleasure of understanding the theorem of Pythagoras will remain inside us and can be revived as soon as we care to think about it.

The difference between the quest for control or insight can also be seen in the motivations to do science. Originally science is motivated by our strong curiosity, which is the quest for insight. We want to understand the phenomena around us. Now what exactly is insight, understanding? An absolute answer why things behave the way they do cannot be given. This is known already by children that have discovered that after every answer given to them they can ask again `Why?'. Insight consists of a simplification of the

Page 30: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

situation. It consists of knowledge about parts of the situation from which properties of the situation itself can be derived. This was already discussed when we dealt with reductionism. We understand how and why the planets make a loop-shaped movement between the fixed stars. We understand what is the chemical basis of heredity.

With this understanding we may obtain considerable control of the situation around and inside us. This results in the second motivation for science. We want to be able to control things. And indeed we are reasonably able to do this as a spin-off from our obtained insight. We can go to the moon; we can program a bacteria to produce human insulin. These are impressive examples.

Unfortunately it is the case that the public opinion and therefore also the politicians see the capacity to control as the main motivation to do science. Therefore science has to be defended by short term successes in its applications. The aim to obtain insight thereby becomes somewhat neglected.

In the same way most people are involved in controlling their circumstances in order to have happiness. Because our capacity to control has its natural limitations, in this way there will always be resulting suffering. Later we see that there is a better way. The possibility of insight in the functioning of our mind and the resulting spin off towards the lessening and eventually stopping of our suffering is the main basis for the existence of Buddhism. These will be explained by a model in §2.  Internal-externalThis pair of opposites can be approached also by the words subject-object. The following is meant. Suppose we are in an unpleasant situation. Then there are essentially two different ways to try to do something about the resulting suffering: 1. to change the situation itself (external); 2. to change our consciousness of that situation, so that it is no longer perceived as unpleasant (internal).

Applied science allows us to make our surroundings more pleasant to live in. This is in accordance with the first method of external control. However, as mentioned before, control has its limits (scientific, political, ecological and financial). Therefore it is good to know also another method to solve our suffering. This consists of an internal modification of our consciousness in such a way that the situation in which we are is no longer perceived as unpleasant. In order to do so an essential change in the way our mind functions is

Page 31: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

necessary. What kind of change this is will become clear by the model of our mind given in the next section.

The method to perform this change in our consciousness is called the path of purification. Perhaps this path does not appeal to you; perhaps it does. In any case, the information obtained this way is important for the understanding of the human mind.

Most human beings use the external method for their happiness. The method of internal control is important for the purification of our consciousness. However, when the path is completed, there is no difference between the two methods anymore. Both will be seen as tiresome manipulations. Moreover, in that state of buddhahood there will be no longer need for either form of control. Also this almost paradoxical aspect will be explained by the model in the next section.  

  2. The cover-up model of the human mind How does the human mind function? This is no doubt the most important open problem in science. One may wonder whether in principle it is possible at all that the human mind understands itself. It has been argued in Hofstadter [1979] that on grounds of the existence of so-called universal Turing machines the perspectives are promising. But it has to be said that, in spite of progress in cognitive sciences, the quintessence of this problem remains unsolved. This essence can be formulated as follows: `What is consciousness?' In the mentioned book by Hofstadter an interesting hypothesis about the working of self-consciousness is stated. But this hypothesis is mainly about the aspect `self-'; about consciousness as such little is known yet.

In what follows I will concentrate on one particular aspect of consciousness: suffering and desire. As is probably well-known, Buddhism often refers to these. To an outside observer this may seem somewhat perverse. There is, however, a clear reason for this emphasis. By means of suffering and desire we are conditioned to do whatever evolution has made us to do; we are `programmed' by them. And to follow the metaphor of programming, it can be stated that the Buddhist path towards the end of suffering consists of the development of a new `operating system'. If one has succeeded in doing this, then a difficult step will follow: switching the mind from the old to the new operating system.

Page 32: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

We will now present the cover-up model of the human mind and its conditioning and our possible liberation from it. The model is based on experience reported in §3,4. It is presented first for better understanding of the phenomena. The model is central to the Buddhist teaching and will be presented in four points.

(I). Depending on external circumstances and our personality we will perceive situations in which we find ourselves as pleasant or unpleasant. This feeling depends on time because the external and internal circumstances are subject to change. This often causes a problem. Even if we feel pleasant at a certain moment, the next moment this may no longer be the case, because situations in life change considerably. If we use the external method to be happy, then we constantly have to change something in a situation in order to feel satisfied. We are slaves of the circumstances in which we live.

(II). The mechanism by which we are conditioned is as follows. Within ourselves there is something that I call the (fundamental) process. Although the process is an essential part of us, it is usually not visible. The process has three characteristics:

i. it is a continuously fluctuating chaos;ii. it is nauseating, unbearable;

iii. we have absolutely no control over it.

A well-known description of the process in which the second aspect is emphasized is contained in Sartre [1938]. In the work on phobias by my father Barendregt [1982], ch.12, the process is described under the name `it'. In this work the first and third aspect of the process are being emphasized in an explanation of the working mechanism of phobias.

Although the process is continuously working within us, usually we are unaware of this fact. This is because the process is hidden, anesthetized. This anesthesia is done by our `feeling'. This feeling is present in us having a certain volume. In order to hide the process there is a certain threshold. If the volume of the feeling is below the threshold, the process becomes more or less visible and suffering results, see fig.1. This pushes us to external or internal actions resulting in more feeling. Some well-known reactions are: eating or fighting as external ones and becoming sad, angry or depressed as internal ones. Many more possible reactions exist. As soon as the threshold of the volume of feeling is reached, the

Page 33: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

suffering disappears.

If the volume of feeling is exactly on the threshold value of hiding the process, then an unstable equilibrium results. In principle one is happy, but because of the fluctuations in the process one has to be active constantly in order to remain so. This situation is the state of desire, see fig.2. Some well-known reactions are: eating, having sex as external ones and fantasizing as an internal one. Other possible reactions are painting, composing, planning; of course there are many more possibilities.

1. Suffering 2. DesireFig. 1,2. The tangle represents the fundamental nauseating process that occurs in our consciousness but is hardly visible. (There are three smaller tangles that will be explained later.) The curved lines (at the points of the arrows) represents the level of feeling until where the process is anesthetized. In fig. 1 there is suffering because the process is partly visible (i.e. above the level; think of feeling as an opaque liquid). In fig.2 the level of feeling is exactly at the threshold to hide the process. This results in desire. One feels pleasant, but because of the changeability of the process continuous action is necessary in order to keep it covered. The thick arrows represent the dependence of feeling on external circumstances and our volition to manipulate these.

If the volume of feeling is above the threshold, then the process is completely hidden and happiness and inner calm result. This is the state of mystical experience: the fluctuating nausea of the process is far away and not visible, see fig. 3. Nature is stingy, however, to give us such a large volume of feeling.

The process is usually hidden. Even in the state of suffering one does not realize that the process is there: one is busy with the actions in order to change the level of feeling, and often one is even successful in this (at the price of becoming e.g. aggressive or

Page 34: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

depressive). Nevertheless, there are certain situations in which the process becomes visible. Intensionally this happens in meditation; unintentionally at a depersonalization or other forms of mental breakdowns, see fig. 4. It cannot be emphasized enough, that the process is of an extreme nauseating and unbearable quality. Our system (i.e. our body-mind combination) wants to avoid the process at any costs. This means that we have to perform actions that produce feeling in order not to see the process. The existence of the process and our necessity to hide it is the driving force behind all inhumanities a human being can commit. It is the very cause of war.

3. Mysticism 4. NauseaFig. 3. By trained concentration (in Buddhagosa [1976] more than 10 chapters are devoted to the attainment of it) the volume of feeling is kept higher than strictly needed to hide the process. This results in mystical experience: inner calm and rapture. The thin arrow represents the dependence of the level of feeling on internal circumstances and our volition to maintain the high level. Fig. 4. Because it takes relatively much effort to maintain the volume of feeling represented in fig.3, it may happen that the level suddenly drops down far below the threshold needed for the cover up. The process becomes visible in its malicious form.

It is clear that the continuous struggle to keep the volume of feeling high enough to cover the process is a form of symptomatic treatment.

(III). Fortunately, there is also a real medicine against the process. This consists of insight to be developed using mindfulness, combined with concentration and effort, see fig. 5. By means of mindfulness, concentration and effort one becomes (temporarily) protected against the horror of the process. But this protection is

Page 35: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

different from the one by feeling: using the three the process becomes visible without having the need to hide it immediately. One trains oneself in observing objectively the process (`O, this is suffering; knowing. O, this is desire; knowing.') Then it may happen that insight in the functioning of the process develops, see fig. 6. This insight will have as effect that suddenly part of the process gets untangled and then dissolves into nothingness (disappears; Sartre uses the made-up word néantiser).

5. Concentration andmindfulness

6. Insight

Fig. 5. The thin arrow represents concentration on the act of mindfulness. This is necessary to keep a distance from the effects of the process in order to be able to dive into it and investigate its structure. Fig. 6. With insight in the structure of the process the tangled knot will be somewhat unraveled. We cannot do this at volition; it should overcome us.

(IV). By a systematic application of the method just described, one can purify the process and make it less malicious. Then - at a moment of insight combined with surrendering - it is possible that the principal knot of the chaotic tangle of the process is found and by insight in its functioning the entire process disappears completely, see figs. 7, 8. Although one will be completely aware of this important happening, one cannot choose the moment in which it occurs. It just may happen.

Page 36: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

7. Fundamentalinsight

8. Cessation

Fig. 7. Insight occurs in the essential knot of the tangle and the process starts to disintegrate extremely fast. Fig. 8. The process has disappeared. Now with a low level of feeling a mystical state can be reached. This is the so called `fruit of the path'. There are three residual processes that remain to be purified.

According to the Buddhist tradition there is not just one process to be eliminated, but four in total. These have to be disentangled one by one in a similar manner and in a fixed order. See figs. 9-12.

9. Second processin position ofeliminated one

10. Second cessation

Fig. 9. In order to do the remaining work the fruit of the path has to be given up. The second process will be allowed at the position of the eliminated first one. Then the work proceeds as in figs. 5, 6 and 7. Fig. 10. The second process has disappeared. In order to make this happen, special attention should be paid that one does not move back from the situation represented in fig. 9 to that in fig. 8. The situation in fig. 10 is essentially better.

Page 37: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

11. Third cessation 12. NirvanaFig. 11. Work is continued and the third process has also disappeared. Fig. 12. The fourth process has disappeared and nirvana remains. In this state the five components (see §4) of our usual consciousness are completely absent but there remains a fundamental constant awareness. It is said that this is the same for all people that have reached this state. In order to continue life a small process has to be created. Since this process is made by ourselves it can be stopped at volition.

A description of the psychological effects of the cessation of one or more processes can be found in §4. Given enough persistence and right practice, every human being is said to be able to accomplish the cessation of the four processes. After the four are dissolved one is completely unconditioned. Then one is in the state of nirvana and has reached buddhahood.  

  3. `Things that may happen' We now will continue the description started out in part I of the path of purification of our consciousness as taught in classical (theravada) Buddhism. Mystical experiences may occur along the way, but they are not the final goal. Also very negative experiences may occur. Together these states of paradise and hell are traditionally given the following neutral name: `things that may happen'.

Laboratory conditions Because the work of purifying the mind is rather subtle, several prerequisites (laboratory conditions) have to be fulfilled. One has to isolate oneself temporarily in a room and spend all time to the work. One does not speak, read or write. In general one does not have contact with others, except the teacher who gives daily feedback. This is done for at least ten days. In short, one goes to a monastery for a meditation retreat. Usually several retreats are necessary in order to experience the phenomena reported below.

Page 38: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

For a detailed description of what happens in the daily routine at a meditation retreat, see Goldstein [1982]. In part I an account of the practise at several retreats is given.

One has to train oneself to notice well our sensory input. In principle one does this by having as main focus of attention the raising and falling of the abdomen caused by breathing. But if strong disturbances come from other places (like pain or itch) or from other senses one has to direct the attention to these. It is important that next to seeing, hearing, feeling, tasting and smelling also thinkingis considered as a sensory activity. This view is typical of Buddhism. Like the eye that sees and the ear that hears it is the mind that thinks and it is considered as one of the senses. Indeed, thoughts are input for our consciousness. Moreover, they can be very stubborn disturbances.

Paying attention to the input of our senses is in principle not difficult. But often one forgets to do it. Therefore one needsconcentration and effort that keeps our attention to the most prominent phenomenon in our consciousness.

At first one does not understand what is the purpose of the exercises. Nevertheless with the right confidence one does the work. An important disturbance is the pain during sitting meditation. In ordinary life one changes position in such cases (external change). But during the exercises one does not comfort oneself by moving the body. One does not consider oneself as someone that haspain, but as someone that sees pain. In other words one distances from the pain, although it remains present. Pain is a disturbance for the exercises since it causes our attention to stay away from observing raising and falling. In principle one still can work well, by switching to the observation of the feeling. However, this is difficult: we do something else, namely dislike the pain and fight against it. In an analogous way thoughts, possibly with fear or desire as subject, can act as disturbances. The method to handle these is as follows. One observes our thoughts and states internally: `O, there is fear' or `O, there is desire'. By exercising in this way with the necessary patience and calmness one will create a state of mind that is more and more beyond fear and desire.

Mysticism  Let us first try to specify what mysticism is. According to one definition it consists of experience that cannot be described very well by means of common language. Such experiences themselves can nevertheless be rather common. It is hard to imagine that the

Page 39: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

taste of a mango is described better than by `the taste of a mango'. Therefore by the given definition experiencing that taste falls under mysticism. This is not very satisfactory. Another description may be as follows. `Mysticism consists of experiences that are not common'. Again this definition points in the right direction, but it is still incomplete. Sitting in a roller coaster is for most people not a daily experience. Although the resulting mental and physical experiences are related to those occurring during the systematic purification of consciousness (and this is so not by accident, see §4), these are not the main goal of this training. Let us venture a third definition. `Mysticism consists of experiences on the border of being and non-being, often accompanied by strong feelings of rapture'. This description is adequate for our purpose.

Proceeding the path of purification, it may happen that our consciousness suddenly flows away and is replaced by a new consciousness. It is placed at a different location in our head; that is how it feels at least. The change takes place in less than one second. A very stable consciousness appears as a result from which pain and desire can be observed in an effortless manner. One is not carried away by these emotions as usually. The mind is without disturbances. In case they come, one can look and blow them away. But there is more: the entire consciousness is filled with rapture, with ecstasy. At first one is a bit restless because of the thrilling experience. Later one can look at this restlessness and this makes it disappear. Then a feeling results that is only blissful and calm (la volupté calme, Baudelaire). With a Christian background one could call this experience the union with God. The Hinduists speak of Atman is Brahman (Self is God). With a Buddhist background one thinks that one is liberated. If one does not have a religious background, then the experience feels better than anything experienced before. In part I this state is calledsuper consciousness. Perhaps not very dignified a name, but that is intended.

NauseaOne thinks that the liberation is permanent. Indeed, one is not depending anymore on outer circumstances. Every disturbance can be eliminated at will. But it turns out later that one is still depending on something: the power to concentrate. After a couple of days one looses this and suddenly the volume of feeling falls down far below the threshold. Then a huge nausea appears. Its intrinsic properties are described already in §2. Again it should be repeated how strong is this experience. It is worse than dying; one becomes insane. Even if one had the impression to be a peaceful person, after this experience one realizes that one is not. In case someone would have

Page 40: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

triggered this experience of nausea, one could have killed that person if one is making the false assumption that the other person is the cause of the nausea. In the monastery one realizes that the nausea is part of our system and that we cannot blame anyone for it.

The effect of the nausea is such that one is in utter despair. At this moment it is important that there is a teacher. He advises to continue to practise. One does not believe in meditation anymore, however; one resents it. But now our thinking comes at help. One realizes that by exercises one has reached this state; therefore by exercises one should be able to get out again. Supported by this inner confidence practise is resumed. After many hours of extreme hard work consciousness turns to normal.  

  4. Freedom Above we have claimed that homo sapiens is free. We can make a decision on grounds of some considerations. These considerations, however, are being disturbed. In §1 we have cited Saint Augustine and Schopenhauer for this. But if we know ourselves sufficiently well, then we should have noticed this ourselves. The model in §2 provides an adequate explanation for these phenomena, analogous to Freud's unconscious. Part of our consciousness is hidden by our feeling. Our behavior, however, is being influenced by this hidden part. Possibly it works against our conscious will. Therefore we have inner conflicts. In Buddhism this hidden part of consciousness is called ignorance. Eventually ignorance has to be eliminated by the process of purification of the mind. Now we will continue the description of this path of purification.

Attachment to mysticismThe remembrance of the experience of super consciousness is so strong and beautiful that one tries to have it again, while continuing the meditation practise. In some articles on spirituality one can read: `This experience is so special that I want to have it again, at any price'. A good teacher of Buddhist meditation will point out that we have attachment to this experience. It is an intermediate state on the way to freedom. We should have distance from these experiences too, otherwise it impedes our progress. `But cannot we enjoy it just for a little while?' the student asks the teacher. `It is a waste of time!' is the severe, disappointing but also fascinating answer. Also in the Christian tradition one is warned against attachment to the mystical experience. Saint John of the Cross speaks about the `gluttony for God'. Attachment to mental states -

Page 41: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

even if they are very elevated ones - is called `spiritual materialism'.

Components of consciousnessThe teacher points out that observing the phenomena has to happen in a more refined way. He presents the theory that the phenomena of our consciousness are a combination of five components: sensory input, feeling (positive, negative and neutral), perception (i.e. classification of the input), conditioning (that can be seen as an output of our body mind system, that is the way we behave) and finally awareness1. Of course the knowledge of the five components of our consciousness is at first only theoretical. In the practise they should be perceived directly by experience. Work continues. At a certain moment one clearly sees that the pain (caused by the sitting meditation) is not atomic but built up from pure pain (input and feeling) combined with a reaction against it (conditioning) that wants us to do something about the pain. As soon as this is seen sharply, both the pain and its counter reaction disappear. Continuing the exercises this way one reaches a new mystical state: sublime consciousness. It is as elevated as the super consciousness described in §3, but it hardly requires energy to maintain it. Therefore one has the hope that this state is permanent. It is not; at a certain moment sublime consciousness disappears. Disturbances appear again and one is not able to handle these appropriately. The teacher is consulted. He advises to take a distance from all phenomena, not just pain and desire as before, but also from states like the super and sublime consciousness. Finally he says: `While continuing to practise you should have good confidence in the theory, because strange things may happen. If this is the case, continue to practise, even if you feel sick.' At this point one already has experienced several unusual phenomena. Work is continued more with fascination than with worry.

1 In order to understand better the difference between this element and input, the following example from physiology is illuminating. It is known that there are people with a special kind of blindness. They claim that they cannot see at all. If asked, however, to point at a certain object - say a pencil - on a table, they are consistently able to do this correctly. One can say that the first four components of their consciousness function well, but the fifth does not.

Disentangling the knot Practise continues. Pain, distance; desire, distance; sublime consciousness, distance! One does not feel like dissociating from this sublime state. But being obedient one does it nevertheless. The consequences are dramatic. Sublime consciousness persists some moments. `O, sublime consciousness; knowing' the student is observing. With this `knowing' one creates a distance from it. Then

Page 42: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

suddenly one slides away into the state of nausea. `O, nausea; knowing' is the neutral observation. After naming the state of nausea like this a couple of times, one is suddenly pushed up into the state of sublime consciousness. This `sliding away' and `being pushed up' feel like experiences known in daily life. `Sliding away' may be compared to the experience we have when we receive bad news that touches us personally. `Being pushed up' may be compared to experiencing an orgasm. After some exercising the student succeeds in undergoing these phenomena with equanimity. All previous meditation training is being used for this. There is a strong urge to stop this exercise. But the student keeps looking. After a while calmness develops in spite of the fierce phenomena. Experience proceeds as follows: 

sublime, knowing; nausea, knowing;sublime, knowing; nausea, knowing;

....

The process is proceeding like a ride in a roller-coaster, but without the physical or mental effects that one usually has in such a situation. This is because one has already practised enough to handle the nausea. The situation is like sitting in a fluctuating fierce fire, but the student is not at all affected by it. All the time, however, one has to intervene a short moment in order to keep distance and not to be stuck in either the nausea or the sublime consciousness. But otherwise one is a pure observer of the phenomena. Continuing the practise the following happens. At one moment the student forgets to make this distance - from the nausea it was - because of some distraction. In spite of this omission the phenomena go on as follows. 

nausea, knowing; sublime, knowing;nausea, --; sublime, knowing;

nausea, knowing; sublime, knowing;

Apparently one does not need to take part; it goes by itself. The student realizes that this is better, because it requires some work to have to create all the time a distance using this `knowing'. Then he withdraws himself in order to look only. And then this happens. 

nausea, --; sublime, --;nausea, sublime;nausea, sublime;

--, --;--, --;

Page 43: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

.

The process disintegrates extremely fast. As a piece of knitwear, that falls apart if one pulls the right end of wool. Also later the process would not come back. In this way the process described in §2 is completely dissolved. By contrast to the attainment of the sublime consciousness or the falling into the state of nausea the cessation of the process is not dramatic at all. It is a relief, comparable to the feeling that one has after a cold, when one is able again to breathe through the nose. It is even a very large relief. But it is not dramatic.

Levels of freedom One has, however, not yet reached the end of the path of complete purification of our consciousness. This is because - according to the Buddhist tradition - there are in total four processes that are there to be disentangled in an analogous manner. This has to be done in a fixed order. Each of the four cessations causes an essential change in ones personality.

cessation of process change in personality

1 elimination of insecurity, belief in selfand superstition;

2 dilution of fear and desire;

3 elimination of fear and desire;

4 elimination of conceit, sleepiness, restlessness,attachment to existence and ignorance.

When the four processes have been eliminated one has reached so called nirvana.

The theory states that in this final state one does not have left any of the constituents of consciousness. But one keeps some kind of basic awareness that is constant and for everyone the same. If one has disentangled the four processes, then one is nevertheless able to continue life. From nirvana, however, this is not possible, because no perception takes place. What is needed is a little bit of concentration using which one can create an arbitrary process of consciousness. On this it is possible to base ones personality. Because this process is created by volition, it can easily be dissolved at any moment in order to regain the freedom of nirvana.  

  5. A program for science

Page 44: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

 In psychology one often is suspicious about information obtained through introspection. The meditation experience, however, is obtained by introspection of a trained mind. In part I it is argued that the truth of statements verified by meditative experience is as reliable as that of mathematical theorems. Indeed, mathematics also is based on intuition in a trained mind. It will be of definite value, nevertheless, if the reported phenomena can be verified by external experimental science. Probably several other phenomena will be discovered along the way. How this should be done is totally unclear. It may keep us busy for the next century.

Value of the cover-up model This paper has given in, §2, a description of a model for one aspect of the human mind, based on experience obtained during Buddhist meditation. The model explains how the mind is in an impure state and that our behavior is in fact a symptomatic cover-up of this imperfection. Also the model describes how this imperfection may be purified. No explanation has been given, however, why the mind is impure and how the process of purification works. (In the monastery the monks are not allowed to think about this; it distracts from the work to be done. Back at home I do want to think about these matters.)

One may wonder what is the value of the model with its `cover-up' mechanism for suffering and desire. An alternative common sense model could be that at a moment in which unpleasant things happen to us an ad hoc process of suffering is created and similarly for desire when we are in pleasant circumstances. This common sense model has as drawback that there is no natural place in it for the possibility of purifying the mind. In this model a purified mind can be seen at best as one in which the emotions of suffering and desire do not function anymore. A rather boring view of buddhahood in which it is confused with indifference. Because it often is in view of the common sense model that perfection is interpreted, many persons are repelled by it. The cover-up model gives a better meaning to the purification of the mind in which there is no indifference but equanimity. Also there is a clear place for mysticism in this model. In the common sense model this state beyond fear and desire is difficult to interpret.

To skeptics this argument may not be convincing, because it presupposes that there is something like purification of the mind. There is, however, a well-known fact in medical science that may help to appreciate the value of the cover-up model. People react differently to pain. That is, one person may feel just a little pain

Page 45: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

whereas another person feels much pain at the same outer stimuli. In the cover-up model this can be explained by assuming that the fundamental process is of different degrees of strength in different persons. In the common sense model one has to assume that the ad hoc process of suffering has various degrees of strength in different persons. If it is true that having a low pain threshold is uniform in the sense that a person is in the same degree more sensitive than others to various kinds of pain, including psychological forms of pain, then this is some evidence for the cover-up model. Indeed, the degree of strength of the fundamental process, together with the cover-up mechanism implies some kind of uniformity.

The model of imperfection and its purification explains well an important incident in the history of Chinese Buddhism. At the time that Hung Jen, the fifth patriarch of zen Buddhism in China, felt that he wanted to appoint his successor, he asked his disciples to write a poem expressing their understanding of the teachings. Then the head monk Shen Hsiu wrote the following poem.

     The body is like the bodhi2 tree,     the mind is like a mirror bright.     Constantly we should wipe them clean,     Not allowing any dust to align.

Monks at the monastery were impressed and expected that the head-monk would become the successor of the fifth patriarch. There was, however, a novice named Hui Neng that could not read or write. When he heard the verse of the head monk he asked a friend to write down the following poem.

     There is no body,     there is no mind.     Since fundamentally nothing exists     where is the dust to align?

It was Hui Neng who was chosen as sixth patriarch. How can we understand this? The head monk was describing the state of mysticism in which one has to keep working to keep the volume of feeling at level (see fig.3). Hui Neng described the state of nirvana (fig.12), in which no work needs to be done.

2 The word `bodhi' means enlightenment; hence `bodhi tree' refers to the one under which Buddha is said to have reached enlightenment.

Some conjectures 

Page 46: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

Experience with the path of purification leads me to make several statements. Although I fully believe most of the statements, I will formulate them as conjectures. It will be worthwhile to look for some experimental evidence for them. In the process of doing this more information probably will be obtained about the human mind.

The first conjecture is concerned with the correctness of the principal model given in this paper.

Conjecture 5.1: The cover-up model describes correctly the mechanism of suffering and desire.

The next conjecture is about psycho-somatic phenomena. It almost sounds too good to be true, because one explanation is given for a variety of syndromes. Nevertheless, in the course of the path of purification very clear evidence has been obtained.

Conjecture 5.2: The fundamental process may localize at certain places in the body and cause several psycho-somatic problems.

i. Torticollis may be caused by a localization of the process in the neck. (This means that the neck is forced in an unnatural position, e.g. with the head always towards the right.)

ii. Ulcers may be caused by a localization of the process in the stomach.

iii. Migraine may be caused by a localization in some unusual part of the brain.

iv. Hyper-ventilation may be caused by a localization of the process in the center for control of breathing.

v. Eczema may be caused by the localization of the process in the skin.

Some phenomenological evidence for this conjecture is the following. Experiencing the nausea, it suddenly may happen that it disappears. At such a moment the mind is completely free. Careful observation of the body, however, shows that then the process is located somewhere else in the body. This localization can be at various places. If the process is left at such a location, then the effects mentioned in the conjecture can be observed (in a mild form).

The second conjecture is about psychological effects. These are claimed to be caused by special ways of covering up the process.

Page 47: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

Conjecture 5.3:

o Phobias are caused by covering up the process using fear, a strong source of feeling that is preferable to the selflessness of the process. This is the model of phobias of my father in Barendregt [1982], ch. 12.

o Depressions are an efficient way to cover-up the process. Again one has to pay for it by being in an undesirable state.

o Hypnosis can be explained as follows. During the induction of the hypnosis one has successfully made a link between behavior (the post-hypnotic order) and the cover-up of the process. An efficient way to avoid experiencing the process is to obey the post-hypnotic order.

Some evidence for this last conjecture concerning hypnosis was given in part I, §3.6.

These somatic and psychological effects are well-known but nevertheless not daily occurring to most persons. A very common effect of the process is described in the following conjecture.

Conjecture 5.4: Ego, the way we see ourselves having important effects on the way we behave, is linked to a cover-up of the process by the feeling it gives to us. Therefore we are attached to our way of being. This link is even so strong, that one almost can identify the (first) process with ego. This also explains why the cessation of the first process corresponds to stopping the belief in ego as a separate entity.

In Hofstadter [1979] a thesis is stated (on page 709) that our feeling of self is related to `strange loops'. A strange loop is something that is isomorphic to a part of itself. The image we obtain in a mirror, if another one is put opposite to it, ideally forms a strange loop.

Conjecture 5.5: The isomorphism in the strange loop that is involved in our self-consciousness is related to mindfulness.

Some evidence for this thesis is that in the meditation practice one has sometimes the experience of an awareness of an awareness of an awareness of an ... , pointing at a

Page 48: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

strange loop and its potential infinity. This is at the same time evidence for Hofstadters thesis. The role of mindfulness is evident from the role awareness plays in this observation.

Lucas and later Penrose [1989] have claimed that it follows from Gödels incompleteness theorem that the human mind is not a computer. I disagree with the reasons they give, agreeing for example with Hofstadters refutation of Lucas' argument. Nevertheless, I do agree with the thesis that the human mind is essentially different from a (present day) computer (including neuro computers). The reason comes from meditation practice in which one can experience that there is something like nirvana that is awareness without perception or consciousness.

Conjecture 5.6: In the eventual theory of human consciousness nirvana will play a crucial role. It will be an important step forward if nirvana can be described in terms of physics.

The process, its unbearableness and the possible liberation from it are so to speak axiomatic properties of the model given in this paper. The following conjectures are concerned with the background of this model. They are presently more important than the previous one because there is more chance of verification at the present stage of science.

Conjecture 5.7: The human mind has more than one center of control (for our thoughts and emotions). But only one of these is visible in our momentary consciousness. At different moments we may be in different centers of control. These centers are not synchronized. The fundamental process is the friction, a neural storm, caused by this asynchronism. The act of mindfulness makes a partial synchronization between the centers of control. Also walking meditation described in part I, with its left-right symmetry, plays an important role in this synchronization. The cessation of the process means a complete synchronization of some centers of control.

Some well-known evidence for the fact that we have more than one consciousness process, more than one mind, is the following. If we stay up late, then we become sleepy. If we stay up long enough, it may happen that suddenly we are not

Page 49: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

sleepy anymore. Although we react normally, we can feel in such a state that we are in a `different' consciousness process. Relatively early in the meditation experience one repeatedly experiences transitions to other centers of consciousness. This happens during the mystical state. During the transition one has to `cross' the fundamental process, which at this time feels like an area of sleepiness.

The following is an important consequence.

The well-known phenomena of the multiple personality syndrome are quite natural aspects of the human mind. In `normal' people the various personalities are similar. In `pathological' cases the various personalities are dissimilar.

Whether meditation may cure some forms of the multiple personality syndrome I do not know.

A friend psychiatrist suggested the following chemical basis for the hiding of the process.

Conjecture 5.8: (M. Fraenkel) `Feeling', that is used for the symptomatic hiding of the process, is caused by endorphins produced by our body-mind system.

As endorphins are similar to heroin, this hypothesis explains well why our attachments are so stubborn. Or conversely, the model explains the well-known effects of heroin.

I hope that many people will work on this fascinating subject of the human mind. Perhaps as a consequence meditation will become more widely known. Let it be for the well being of all human beings.     References

Barendregt, H.P. [1988]Buddhist phenomenology, in: Atti del Congresso Temi e prospettive della logica e della filosofia della scienza contemporanea. Cesena 1987. Vol. 11, CLUEB, Bologna, 37-55.Barendregt, J.T. [1982]

Page 50: BUDDHIST PHENOMENOLOGY

De zielenmarkt, Boom, Meppel.Buddhagosa, B. [1976]Visuddhimagga, The path of purification, appeared originally in the fifth century AD. Translation by Nyanamoli, Shambhala, Boston, London.Goldstein, J. [1983]The experience of insight, Shambhala, Boston, London.Hofstadter, D.E. [1979]Gödel Escher Bach, an Eternal Golden Braid, Harvester Press, Hassocks, Sussex.Nagel, E. [1961]The structure of science, Routledge, London.Penrose, R. [1989]The emperor's new mind, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Sartre, J.-P. [1938]La nausée, Gallimard, Paris.Staal, F. [1975]Exploring mysticism, Penguin.Vlug, A. [1993]Balanceren op de rand van de rede, with contributions of D.R. Hofstadter, H.P. Barendregt, H.B.G. Casimir and G. Zukav, Lemniscaat, Rotterdam.

-=-


Top Related