Download - Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID
![Page 2: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
PJ Settlement Goals
Increase in the % of students with MR (ID) who are placed in regular classes (80% or more of day with nondisabled peers)
Reduction in the disparate identification of students by LEA, race, ethnicity, gender
Increase in the mean and median % of the school day spent with nondisabled peers
![Page 3: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
PJ Settlement Goals
Increase in the % of students who attend their “home school” (school they would otherwise attend if not disabled)
Increase in the % of students who participate in school-sponsored extracurricular activities with nondisabled students
![Page 4: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Goal #1
An increase in the percent of students with mental retardation or intellectual disability who are placed in regular classes, as measured by the federal
definition (i.e. 80% or more of the school day with non-disabled
students).
![Page 5: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Goal #3
An increase in the mean and median percent of the school day that students with mental retardation or intellectual disability spend with non-disabled
students. (TWNDP)
![Page 6: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Education Location of Students With ID
RESC2.4%
Hospital/ Homebound
0.0%Parochial or Private Non-Special Education
0.0%
Private Special Education
2.0%
Group Home/Shelter
0.0%
Quasi-Public0.0%
Out of State0.0%
Other Agency0.8%
Local School District93.7%
Other Public School Districts
1.2%
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 7: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Education Location of Students With ID
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Bridgeport 93.6% 1.2% 2.4% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0%
Connecticut
Local School
Other Public
RESCParochial or Private
Quasi-Public
Private Special
Group Home/
Other Agency
Hospital/ Home-
Out of State
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 8: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Average Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-
Disabled
24.5%
41.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
Bridgeport Connecticut
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 9: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-
Disabled
72.2%
26.6%
1.2%
79%-100% (Regular Classroom)
40%-79% (Resource Room)
0%-40% (Separate Special Education)
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 10: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-
Disabled
1.2%
26.6%
72.2%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
Bridgeport Connecticut
79-100% (Regular Classroom)40-79% (Resource Room)0-40% (Separate Sp. Ed. Classroom)
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 11: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-
Disabled
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
90.01
-100
%
80.01
-90%
70.01
-80%
60.01
-70%
50.01
-60%
40.01
-50%
30.01
-40%
20.01
-30%
10.01
-20%
0-10
%
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 12: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-
Disabled
0.0%
16.3%
0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%8.0%
10.0%12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%
100% Time with Non-DisabledPeers
0% Time with Non-DisabledPeers
Bridgeport Connecticut
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 13: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Goal #2
A reduction in the disparate identification of students with mental retardation or intellectual disability by
LEA, by racial group, by ethnic group or by gender group.
![Page 14: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By Gender
43.3%
56.7%
42.3%
57.7%
43.5%
56.5%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
Female Male
Bridgeport ERG I State
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 15: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By Racial/Ethnic Group
Other0.0%
Native American
0.0%Asian
American1.6%
White14.3%
Black46.8%
Hispanic37.3%
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 16: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By Racial/Ethnic Group
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
Students with ID 0.0% 1.6% 46.8% 37.3% 14.3% 0.0%
All students withdisabilities
0.0% 0.1% 43.3% 44.3% 11.2% 0.2%
Total school population 0.2% 3.4% 43.1% 42.5% 10.8% ---
Native America
Asian America
Black Hispanic White Other
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 17: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By Racial/Ethnic Group
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
Bridgeport 0.0% 1.6% 46.8% 37.3% 14.3% 0.0%
Connecticut 0.4% 1.3% 28.5% 21.3% 48.2% 0.4%
Native American
Asian American
Black Hispanic White Other
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 18: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By English Proficiency
Proficient91.7%
Non-Proficient
7.1%
Proficiency Unknown
1.2%
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 19: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By English Proficiency
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Bridgeport 91.7% 7.1% 1.2%
All students withdisabilities
90.5% 6.7% 2.8%
Total school population 39.4%
ProficientNon-
ProficientProficiency Unknown
Students with non-English
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 20: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By English Proficiency
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Bridgeport 91.7% 7.1% 1.2%
Connecticut
Proficient Non-Proficient Proficiency Unknown
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 21: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Goal #4
An increase in the percent of students with mental retardation or intellectual disability who attend the school they would attend if not disabled (“home
school”).
![Page 22: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Goal #5
An increase in the percent of students with mental retardation or intellectual disability who participate in school-
sponsored extracurricular activities with non-disabled students.
![Page 23: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Other Data
![Page 24: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID Within Total Enrollment
1.1%
1.4%
0.7%
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
1.6%
% of Students with ID
Bridgeport ERG I State
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 25: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID Within Special
Education
9.7% 9.3%
5.3%
0.0%1.0%2.0%3.0%4.0%5.0%6.0%7.0%8.0%9.0%
10.0%
% of Students with ID
Bridgeport ERG I State
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 26: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Students With ID Reported As Exiting Special Education
Deceased0.0%
Reached Maximuun Age
0.0%
Moved-Contiunued Education
35.8%
Moved-Unknown if Contiunued Education
26.4%
Returned to Regular
Education3.8%
Dropped Out0.0%
Graduating with Certificate of Completion
11.3%
Graduating with Diploma22.6%
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 27: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Students With ID Reported As Exiting Special Education
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
Students with ID 22.6% 11.3% 0.0% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 35.8% 26.4%
All students with disabilities 11.4% 1.9% 2.2% 17.1% 0.2% 1.7% 40.4% 25.1%
Graduating with
Diploma
Graduating with
Certificate
Dropped Out
Returned to Regular
EducationDeceased
Reached Maximuun
Age
Moved-Contiunued Education
Moved-Unknown if Contiunued
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 28: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Students With ID Reported As Exiting Special Education
22.6%
11.3%
0.0%3.8%
0.0% 0.0%
35.8%
26.4%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
Graduatingwith Diploma
Graduatingwith
Certificate ofCompletion
Dropped Out Returned toRegular
Education
Deceased ReachedMaximuun
Age
Moved-ContiunuedEducation
Moved-Unknown ifContiunuedEducation
2001-2002 School Year Data
![Page 29: Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/56814d0d550346895dba4879/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Staffing Ratios Per 1,000 School District Students
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
Bridgeport 7.70 0.50 1.20 1.10 1.40 2.00 4.80
ERG I 10.47 1.49 1.76 1.18 1.76 1.73 10.97
State 8.77 1.53 1.91 1.42 1.12 2.23 11.64
Sp. Ed. Teachers
Speech Pathologists
School NursesSchool
PsychologistsSchool Social
WorkersSchool
CounselorsSp. Ed. Aides
2001-2002 School Year Data