CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000
Ben Hill/Alico Road Wastewater Force Main Wastewater Flow Projections
November 2013
Prepared for:
Lee County Utilities 1500 Monroe Street
Fort Myers, FL 33901
Prepared by:
Post Office Box 1550 2122 Johnson Street
Fort Myers, Florida 33902-1550 (239) 334-0046
E B 642
Johnson Engineering i CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000
Executive Summary
At the direction of Lee County Utilities (LCU), Johnson Engineering has evaluated existing and projected
wastewater flow within the Three Oaks Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) service area. The Three Oaks
WWTP service area contains approximately 140 LCU-owned pump stations, 70 privately-owned pump
stations, and several developments that utilize septic tank treatment. As part of the wastewater flow analysis,
Johnson Engineering has completed the following tasks:
• Estimate existing and future populations for communities within the Three Oaks WWTP service area.
• Review existing population projections to estimate build-out rates.
• Use population projections and estimated build-out rates to estimate future wastewater flows based
on LCU / FDOH design criteria.
• Collect and analyze data from LCU-owned pump stations to estimate the actual existing wastewater
volumes and flow rates.
• Compare design-basis wastewater flows for existing communities to the actual wastewater flows as
measured in the field.
• Develop flow projections for the Three Oaks WWTP based on these data for years 2015 through
2040 (in five-year increments) and at full build-out.
This evaluation yields the following projections for wastewater flow to the Three Oaks WWTP:
Existing 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 Build-Out
Maximum Month Average Day Flow (MGD) 3.30 3.63 4.30 4.99 5.67 6.26 6.84 17.93
N
Three Oaks WWTP Service Area
Johnson Engineering ii CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... i
1.0 Existing and Allowable Build-Out Populations for Each Community ...................................................... 1
2.0 Population Projections ............................................................................................................................. 4
3.0 Wastewater Flow Estimation Criteria ....................................................................................................... 7
4.0 Existing Wastewater Flows to Individual Lift Stations and the Three Oaks WWTP ................................. 8
5.0 Wastewater Flow Calculations Based on Collected Data ..................................................................... 11
6.0 Assumptions and Considerations for Wastewater Flow Projections .................................................... 12
Figures
Figure 4.1: Seasonal Variation of Wastewater Inflow at the Three Oaks WWTP ............................................. 9
Figure 5.1: Daily and Monthly Average Water Inflow at the Three Oaks WWTP (2010 - 2013) ..................... 11
Tables
Table 1.1: Parcel Groups Existing Conditions ................................................................................................ 2
Table 2.1: Updated Lee Plan Population Projections per Planned Community ............................................. 4
Table 2.2: BEBR Based Growth Trends for Lee County ................................................................................. 4
Table 2.3: Lee County Planning Community Allowances Based on BEBR Growth Trends ........................... 5
Table 2.4: Percentage of Planning Community Overlap with the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area .............. 5
Table 2.5: Projected Populations within the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area
for Each Planning Community........................................................................................................ 5
Table 2.6: Projected Number of Homes within the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area
for Each Planning Community........................................................................................................ 6
Table 4.1: Pump Station Testing Results versus LCU and FDOH Criteria ..................................................... 8
Table 4.2: Design-Criteria Flows Calculated for Existing Conditions of Parcel Groups ............................... 10
Table 5.1: Projected Maximum Month Average Daily Flows for the Three Oaks WWTP ............................. 11
Table 6.1: “Ghost Parcel" Building Allowances Not Included Flow Projections ........................................... 12
Appendices
Appendix A .......................................................................................................................... Future Land Use Map
Appendix B ............................................................................................................ Parcel Group and Zoning Map
Appendix C ....................................................................................................................... Projected Development
Appendix D ............................................................................................................... Projected Wastewater Flows
Ben Hill Griffin Parkway / Alico Road Force Main Wastewater Flow Projections November 27, 2013
Johnson Engineering 1 CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000
1.0 Existing and Allowable Build-Out Populations for Each Community
A review of zoning classifications throughout the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area indicates that
approximately half of the communities are located within Planned Developments. With the
assistance of Lee County staff and LeeSpinsa
(1) Geographical Information Systems (GIS) data and parcel data provided by Lee County
were used to determine parcel zoning, sizes, and number of existing buildings.
, all of the Planned Development communities were
reviewed to estimate future population values. Communities not located within Planned
Developments were evaluated according to the following steps to determine existing and allowable
development:
(2) Future Land Use (FLU) classifications were used to estimate potential residential density
(see the Future Land Use Map in Appendix A).
(3) Areas with overlapping zoning and FLU classifications were evaluated based on these data
and assumptions from the Commercial / Industrial Land Use Analysis reportb
(a) Parcels within Industrial Zones:
(hereafter
referred to as the “land use analysis report”):
Countywide industrial growth of 375,000 square feet (annual allocation) plus an
additional 10,000 square feet per year is projected per the land use analysis report.
Based on the parcel data provided by Lee County, the Three Oaks service area
contains 1.69% of the County’s available industrial area. Assuming that the allocation
of industrial growth to the Three Oaks service area is directly proportional to this
percentage, it is projected that industrial growth will be 6,328 square feet of annual
allocation with an additional 169 square feet per year. Industrial growth is allocated to
parcels on the basis of a standard Floor-Area ratio of 0.195 as specified by the land
use analysis report.
(b) Parcels within Commercial Zones:
Countywide commercial growth of 1,100,000 square feet (annual allocation) plus an
additional 25,000 square feet per year is projected per the land use analysis report.
Based on the parcel data provided by Lee County, the Three Oaks service area
contains 2.43% of Lee County’s available commercial area. Based on the same
a Lee County online GIS tool (accessed October, 2013). b Prepared by Basile, Baumann, Prost, and Associates, Inc. and submitted to Lee County in June, 2007.
Ben Hill Griffin Parkway / Alico Road Force Main Wastewater Flow Projections November 27, 2013
Johnson Engineering 2 CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000
assumptions as (a), commercial growth is projected to be 26,766 square feet of annual
allocation with an additional 609 square feet per year. Commercial growth is allocated
to parcels on the basis of a standard Floor-Area ratio of 0.25 as specified by the land
use analysis report.
(c) Parcels Zoned Non-Commercial and Non-Industrial:
If the parcel has a FLU classification of urban or suburban, six units per acre are
assumed to be the allowable density. If the FLU classification is rural, one unit per acre
is assumed to be the allowable density.
Because wastewater flow analysis does not require resolution of individual parcels, neighboring
parcels were grouped together and their individual population growth estimates were aggregated.
This resulted in 68 parcel groups that each contain a mixture of zoning categories, Planned
Developments, and FLU classifications (see map in Appendix B). These data are summarized in
Table 1.1.
Table 1.1: Parcel Groups Existing Conditions
Parcel Group
EXISTING
Homes* (Units)
Commercial (SF)
Industrial (SF)
Schools (SF)
Stadium (Seats)
Hotels (Rooms)
1 2 10,841 400,937 0 0 0 2 3 0 34,158 0 0 0 3 63 0 0 0 0 0 4 13 0 130,172 0 0 0 5 2 0 153,697 0 0 0 6 0 0 185,352 0 0 0 7 0 0 80,630 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 0 134,657 61,250 0 0 297 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 941 65,107 0 0 0 0 19 2,982 26,675 0 1,796,224 7,600 0 20 0 25,451 0 0 0 0 21 145 1,399,775 0 0 0 250 22 0 3,761 0 0 0 0 23 925 50,008 0 123,815 0 0 24 460 3,761 0 0 0 0 25 26 64,662 31,690 0 0 0 26 196 0 0 0 0 0
Ben Hill Griffin Parkway / Alico Road Force Main Wastewater Flow Projections November 27, 2013
Johnson Engineering 3 CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000
Table 1.1: Parcel Groups Existing Conditions
Parcel Group
EXISTING
Homes* (Units)
Commercial (SF)
Industrial (SF)
Schools (SF)
Stadium (Seats)
Hotels (Rooms)
27 197 0 0 0 0 0 28 75 61,779 1,059,935 0 0 0 29 399 0 39,166 0 0 0 30 434 258,419 0 0 0 0 31 73 114,887 0 0 0 0 32 262 285,523 0 0 0 0 33 260 56,619 0 0 0 0 34 134 0 0 0 0 0 35 364 12,498 0 0 0 0 36 306 42,073 0 0 0 0 37 635 286,159 0 0 0 0 38 324 159,363 0 0 0 0 39 440 7,016 0 0 0 0 40 398 0 0 0 0 0 41 374 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 267 0 0 0 0 0 44 720 12,106 0 0 0 0 45 386 0 0 0 0 0 46 697 0 0 0 0 0 47 890 135,644 0 0 0 0 48 186 66,600 0 0 0 0 49 960 142,863 0 0 7,950 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 1,662 7,571 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 640 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 1,214 37,923 0 0 0 0 56 237 353,247 0 0 0 94 57 259 146,712 0 0 0 150 58 222 1,404 0 0 0 0 59 14 71,261 0 0 0 0 60 985 0 0 0 0 0 61 351 47,685 0 0 0 0 62 61 595,785 0 0 0 0 63 66 38,856 0 0 0 0 64 0 223,094 0 0 0 0 65 347 13,209 0 0 0 0 66 272 131,639 0 0 0 0 67 833 110,157 0 0 0 0 68 1,952 0 0 0 0 0 69 655 0 0 0 0 0 70 1,144 560 0 0 0 0
TOTALS 25,452 5,205,349 2,176,987 1,920,039 15,550 791 *All condominiums, single-family, and multi-family units included in homes.
Ben Hill Griffin Parkway / Alico Road Force Main Wastewater Flow Projections November 27, 2013
Johnson Engineering 4 CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000
2.0 Population Projections
Lee County Community Development has divided the county into 22 Planning Communities. Lee
County has also previously made a determination of the existing, remaining, and allowed
populations within each Planning Community. The Three Oaks WWTP Service Area overlaps with
five of these Planning Communities:
• Daniels
• Estero
• Gateway/Airport
• San Carlos
• Southeast Lee County
Per discussions with the Lee County Division of Planning, the total amount of allowable population
growth has increased from the values specified by the Lee Plan. Consequently, the population
numbers have increased to the values given in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1: Updated Lee Plan Population Projections per Planned Community
Planning Community Allowable Population* Existing Population* Remaining Population*
Daniels Parkway 18,258 12,222 6,036
Estero 46,034 21,745 24,289
Southeast Lee County 13,139 1,149 11,990
San Carlos 57,000 25,459 31,541
Gateway/Airport 41,064 6,528 34,536 *Per Lee County Community Development (October, 2013).
Population growth is estimated at five-year intervals through the year 2040 using the “remaining
population” values (see Table 2.1) and growth trends estimated for Lee County by the Bureau of
Economic and Business Research (see Table 2.2). The Bureau of Economic and Business
Research (BEBR) provides estimates for low, medium, and high growth rates; for the purposes of
these population projections, the medium growth rate was assumed to be the most likely trend.
The population growth estimates are summarized in Table 2.3.
Table 2.2: BEBR Based Growth Trends for Lee County
Population Growth Trend 2011 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
Low
625,310
638,900 687,800 727,900 759,300 782,100 797,500
Medium 675,000 763,200 848,000 928,500 1,004,500 1,077,300
High 720,400 840,600 964,900 1,092,700 1,223,300 1,357,900
Medium Growth Rate (%) - 7.95% 13.07% 11.11% 9.49% 8.19% 7.25%
Ben Hill Griffin Parkway / Alico Road Force Main Wastewater Flow Projections November 27, 2013
Johnson Engineering 5 CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000
Table 2.3: Lee County Planning Community Allowances Based on BEBR Growth Trends
Planning Community 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 TOTALS
Daniels Parkway 971 1,724 1,657 1,573 *110 *0 6,036
Estero 1,728 3,067 2,949 2,799 2,643 2,532 15,718
Southeast Lee County 91 162 156 148 140 134 831
San Carlos 2,023 3,591 3,453 3,277 3,094 2,964 18,402
Gateway/Airport 519 921 885 840 793 760 4,719 * Projections manually reduced to meet planned community full built-out capacity.
Because the boundaries of the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area and the designated Planning
Communities do not completely match, overlap percentages between the service area and each
Planning Community were determined (see Table 2.4). The population projections summarized in
Table 2.3 are multiplied by these overlap percentages to estimate the Planning Community
populations that are/will be within the Three Oaks WWTP service area (see Table 2.5).
Table 2.4: Percentage of Planning Community Overlap with the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area
Planning Community Percent-Overlap with
Three Oaks WWTP Service Area
Daniels Parkway 5%
Estero 70%
Southeast Lee County 4%
San Carlos 80%
Gateway-Airport Overlap 25%
Table 2.5: Projected Populations within the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area for Each Planning Community
Planning Community
Population Projections* for Three Oaks WWTP Service Area at Specified Years
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
Daniels Parkway 49 86 83 79 6 0
Estero 1,210 2,147 2,064 1,960 1,850 1,772
Southeast Lee County 4 6 6 6 6 5
San Carlos 1,618 2,873 2,762 2,622 2,475 2,371
Gateway/Airport 130 230 221 210 198 190 * Population projections are incremental increases for each interval shown.
Using an average of 2.35 persons per home (per 2010 Census data), the Planning Community
population projections are converted to projected numbers of homes as shown in Table 2.6.
Ben Hill Griffin Parkway / Alico Road Force Main Wastewater Flow Projections November 27, 2013
Johnson Engineering 6 CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000
Table 2.6: Projected Number of Homes within the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area for Each Planning Community
Planning Community
Home Projections* for Three Oaks WWTP Service Area at Specified Years
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
Daniels Parkway 21 37 35 33 2 0
Estero 515 914 878 834 787 754
Southeast Lee County 2 3 3 3 2 2
San Carlos 689 1222 1,175 1,116 1,053 1,009
Gateway/Airport 55 98 94 89 84 81 *Home projections are incremental increases for each interval shown.
The projected numbers of homes are allocated to Developments and Zoning Areas that have
Future Residential Development on a “per parcel group” basis according to the following
methodology:
(1) Count the number of parcel groups that have future homes available to build at a given
year (i.e. have not reached the allowable number of homes).
(2) Divide the number of parcel groups by the projected number of homes to be built
during a given interval.
(3) Assign the number of homes per parcel group from (2) to each parcel group.
(4) Check that the number of homes to be built does not exceed the allowable number of
for that parcel group.
(a) If the allowable number of homes is exceeded for a parcel group, the number of
homes allocated to that individual parcel group is reduced to meet the allowable
amount. The difference is evenly distributed to the other parcel groups.
These steps are performed for years 2015, 2020, 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040 and full build-out; details
are provided in Appendix C. The build-out of schools is assumed to be equally distributed among
parcel groups through 2040. In addition, building of remaining hotels is assumed to be completed
by 2025.
Ben Hill Griffin Parkway / Alico Road Force Main Wastewater Flow Projections November 27, 2013
Johnson Engineering 7 CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000
3.0 Wastewater Flow Estimation Criteria
The projected number of homes, commercial space and industrial space at given years are used
to estimate wastewater flow to the Three Oaks WWTP according to the following criteria:
• (2.35 persons/home)c × (98 gallons/day/capita)d
• 15 gallons/day per 100 square feet (SF) of commercial/office space
= 230.3 gallons/day/home e
• 10 gallons/day per 100 SF of industrial spaced
• 100 gallons/day per hotel roomd
• 15 Gallons per Day per 100 SF of Schools
o Because the numbers of students are unknown at this time, proposed schools were
treated similar to commercial space.
c National Census (2010) d Integrated Water Resources Master Plan e Florida Department of Health (FDOH) 64E-6
Ben Hill Griffin Parkway / Alico Road Force Main Wastewater Flow Projections November 27, 2013
Johnson Engineering 8 CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000
4.0 Existing Wastewater Flows to Individual Lift Stations and the Three Oaks WWTP
As part of this contract, 127 Lee County pump stations within the Three Oaks WWTP service area
were tested to determine existing flows. The testing consisted of installing water level monitors
inside pump station wetwells and collected data for a period of one week. The changes in water
level over time, combined with the known dimensions of the wetwells, allows for calculation of
inflow and pumping rates.
Daily inflow data for the Three Oaks WWTP plant show an average variation of +/- 20% between
the seasonal (Thanksgiving - Easter) and non-seasonal (Easter-Thanksgiving) times of the year
due to the large number of part-time residents in Lee County. The flow values summarized in
Table 4.1 are based on data collected between June 10, 2013 and August 8, 2013. This time
period is likely to be in the “transition period” of non-season to seasonal population changes (see
Figure 4.1). The average inflow during peak season for 2012-2013 is 3.20 MGD; during lift station
testing, the average inflow is 2.68 MGD. To account for seasonal variation, an adjustment factor of
1.19 (3.20 MGD / 2.68 MGD) is applied to the field-measured flows (see “Adjusted Flow” column in
Table 4.1). The field-measured flows are compared to design-criteria flows based on the Lee
County Utilities (LCU) and FDOH specifications described in Section 3.0. In most cases, the
average measured flow is approximately 52% of the design-criteria flow.
Table 4.1: Pump Station Testing Results versus LCU and FDOH Criteria
Lift Station Groups Contributing Facilities
Measured Flow
(GPD)
Adjusted Flow
(GPD) Design Flow
(GPD) Adjusted / Design
(%)
7842 134,657 SF Commercial 17,631 21,012 20,199 104%
7848 297 Room Hotel 21,580 25,719 29,700 87%
7805, 7780, 7817, 7821, 7781
937 Homes 65,107 SF Commercial
35,995 42,899 225,557 19%
7814, 7743, 7702, 7703, 7706, 7707
781 Homes 50,008 SF Commercial 123,815 SF School
165,845 197,653 213,077 93%
7735 196 Homes 33,169 39,531 45,139 88%
7832 260 Homes 2,473 SF Commercial
47,737 56,893 60,249 94%
7769 88,099 SF Commercial 4,422 5,270 13,215 40%
7835, 7836 374 Homes 31,271 37,269 86,132 43%
7709 119 Homes 14,795 17,633 27,406 64%
7783 386 Homes 34,643 41,287 88,896 46%
7792 7793 690 Homes 42,120 50,198 158,923 32%
7838 119 Homes 11,896 14,178 27,406 52%
Ben Hill Griffin Parkway / Alico Road Force Main Wastewater Flow Projections November 27, 2013
Johnson Engineering 9 CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000
Table 4.1: Pump Station Testing Results versus LCU and FDOH Criteria
Lift Station Groups Contributing Facilities
Measured Flow
(GPD)
Adjusted Flow
(GPD) Design Flow
(GPD) Adjusted / Design
(%)
7767, 7775, 7777, 7800, 7776
960 Homes 142,863 SF Commercial 7950 seats Stadium
71,801 85,572 274,317 31%
7823 1,662 Homes 162,317 193,448 382,759 51%
7756, 7757, 7758, 7759
1,006 Homes 114,698 136,696 231,682 59%
7822 258 Homes 32,105 38,262 59,417 64%
7809 71 Homes 12,842 15,305 16,351 94%
7807 78,048 SF Commercial 10,595 12,627 11,707 108%
7834 272 Homes 53,591 SF Commercial
25,415 30,289 70,680 43%
7753, 7754, 7760, 7761, 7765
555 Homes 49,659 59,183 127,827 46%
TOTALS 940,536 1,120,924 2,170,640 N/A
AVERAGE RELATIVE TO DESIGN-CRITERIA 52%
Figure 4.1: Seasonal Variation of Wastewater Inflow at the Three Oaks WWTP
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
3.50
3.75
4.00
Sep-2012 Nov-2012 Jan-2013 Mar-2013 May-2013 Jul-2013 Sep-2013
Ave
rage
Dai
ly In
flow
(MG
D)
Seasonal Variation of Wastewater Inflow at the Three Oaks WWTP
Off-Season Peak-Season Off-Season
Testing Period
Ben Hill Griffin Parkway / Alico Road Force Main Wastewater Flow Projections November 27, 2013
Johnson Engineering 10 CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000
The existing wastewater flows for each Parcel Group are calculated using design-criteria described
in Section 3.0, and the values have summarized in Table 4.2. Based on design-specifications, the
total wastewater generated within the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area is calculated to be 7.3 MGD.
As shown in Figure 4.1, the Three Oaks WWTP has not experienced this amount of inflow, even
during peak season. Lee County provided the daily inflows at the Three Oaks WWTP for the past
three years, and the data range from 1.7 MGD to 4.0 MGD. The Average Daily flow to the WWTP
during the testing period was 2.68 MGD, which corresponds to approximately 37% of the total
design-basis flow given in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2: Design-Criteria Flows Calculated for Existing Conditions of Parcel Groups
Parcel Group
Calculated Flow (AADF, GPD)
Parcel Group
Calculated Flow (AADF, GPD)
Parcel Group
Calculated Flow (AADF, GPD)
1 42,180 24 106,502 47 225,208 2 4,107 25 18,856 48 52,826 3 14,509 26 45,139 49 274,317 4 16,011 27 45,369 50 0 5 15,830 28 132,533 51 383,894 6 18,535 29 95,806 52 0 7 8,063 30 138,713 53 147,392 8 0 31 34,045 54 0 9 0 32 103,167 55 285,273
10 56,024 33 68,371 56 117,010 11 0 34 30,860 57 96,655 12 0 35 85,704 58 51,337 13 0 36 76,783 59 13,913 14 0 37 189,164 60 226,846 15 0 38 98,522 61 87,988 16 0 39 102,384 62 103,393 17 0 40 91,659 63 21,028 18 226,478 41 86,132 64 33,464 19 990,649 42 0 65 81,895 20 3,818 43 61,491 66 82,387 21 268,360 44 167,626 67 208,248 22 564 45 88,896 68 449,556 23 239,101 46 160,535 69 150,847
70 263,547
TOTAL FOR ALL PARCELS (GPD) 7,289,511
TOTAL FOR ALL PARCELS (MGD) 7.289
Ben Hill Griffin Parkway / Alico Road Force Main Wastewater Flow Projections November 27, 2013
Johnson Engineering 11 CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000
5.0 Wastewater Flow Calculations Based on Collected Data
Lee County experiences a seasonal population increase during the winter months. This increase is
demonstrated by the daily inflow variations experienced at the Three Oaks WWTP as shown in
Figure 5.1. A factor relating the average daily flow during peak season to the maximum month
average daily flow is calculated using the Three Oaks WWTP inflow data for the past year:
• Peak Season (Thanksgiving through Easter) Average Daily Flow (ADF)= 3.20 MGD
• Maximum Month Average Daily Flow (MMADF) = 3.29 MGD
• Peak Factor = MMADF / ADF = 3.29 / 3.20 = 1.03
Figure 5.1: Daily and Monthly Average Water Inflow at the Three Oaks WWTP (2010 - 2013)
The maximum-month average daily flows are provided in Table 5.1.
Table 5.1: Projected Maximum Month Average Daily Flows for the Three Oaks WWTP
Existing 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 Build-Out
Average Day Flow (MGD) 3.20 3.53 4.17 4.85 5.50 6.08 6.64 17.41
Maximum Month Average Day Flow (MGD) 3.30 3.63 4.30 4.99 5.67 6.26 6.84 17.93
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
Was
tew
ater
Inflo
w (M
GD
)
Daily and Monthly Average Wastewater Inflow at the Three Oaks WWTP
Monthly Average Flow Daily Average Flow
Ben Hill Griffin Parkway / Alico Road Force Main Wastewater Flow Projections November 27, 2013
Johnson Engineering 12 CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000
6.0 Assumptions and Considerations for Wastewater Flow Projections
Listed below are important assumptions and considerations for the flow projections in this report:
• Many homes within San Carlos Park (Parcel Group 25) currently use on-site septic tanks for
wastewater disposal. Wastewater from these homes is included in the projected flow for
this area. Flow projections for this area also include homes outside of the Community
Projections described in Table 2.5 because these homes are likely to connect to LCU
services in the future.
• It is anticipated that the Alico Road area (Parcel Group 16) will not experience a net
population increase relative to existing allowances. It is understood that unused
development allowances for Alico West will be reallocated to Alico East.
• Several developments appear to be built-out but still have an allowance for new homes and
commercial space. Additional home/commercial building allowances for these “ghost
parcels” are not included in flow projections. The additional building allowances for “ghost
parcels” that are not considered in flow projections are summarized in Table 6.1.
Table 6.1: "Ghost Parcel" Building Allowances Not Included Flow Projections
Parcel Group
Additional Building Allowances (Not Considered)
Homes Commercial Space (SF)
24 932 2,034,478
26 123
27 794
29 492
34 431
40 422
49 2,618
55 399
69 463
70 186
• Because the distribution of single-family homes, multi-family homes, and condominiums is
unknown for future developments, flow projections for all future dwellings utilize parameters
specified for single-family homes.
• Southeast Lee County projections may need to be updated with higher population
densities if Parcel Groups 15 and 16 are removed from the Density Reduction Groundwater
Resources (DRGR) area of Lee County.
Appendix A
Future Land Use Map
REVISIONS
SHEETSCALEFILE NO.PROJECTDATE
2122 JOHNSON STREETP.O. BOX 1550
FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33902-1550PHONE (239) 334-0046FAX (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #642
Future Land UseAlico Road Force MainLee County, Florida
Oct. 2013 20139390-000 As Shown Exhibit 1--
16
18
25
51
15
68
55
12
17
49
8
19
50
6
3
9
53
23
5
27
37
110
67
36
4
5265
57
35
5662
30
39
60
21
70
13
14
40
69
33
22
29
46
47 44
28
58
34
11
27
63
45
41 43
64
61
31
24
48
32
38
66
26
20
59
DRGR
S
UC
S
S
S
WR
W
S
UC
TP
R
S
CLW
S
S
W
CLW
INDD
UC
UC
CLW
AP
OS
R S
UC
W
W
W
OS
CLU
W
W
ICI
GI
W
OS
CLW
CLU
W
UC
W
W
S
W
W
W
W
CLW
W
UC
W
CLW
W
UC
UC
W
PF
OS
OS
CLU
INDD
OL
S
AP
W
R
S
CLU
W
PF
W
CLU
S
W
S
S
CLU
W
S
W
W
CLW
PF
R
W
W
W
W
CLW
W
UVI
W
CLW
W
CLU
INDD
CLW
S
CLU
W
W
CLU
CLW
W
S
CLW
CLU
S
CLW
PF
W
CLW
SOS
S
W
W
UC
S
W
W
W
W
DRGR
W
W
DRGR
W
W
W
DRGR
CLU
W
W
R
CLU
W
CLW
W
W
W
W
W
W
PF
W
W
W
S
W
W
DRGRR
W
PF
W
W
CU
S
W
PF
W
CLU
CLW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
DRGR
DRGR
W
W
W
W
W
DRGR
W
S
CLUCU
CLW
W
S
DRGR
W
W
W
PF
DRGR
W
W
WW
W
CLW
W
CLW
W
W
W
R
W
W
W
CLW
W
S
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
PF
CLW
W
CLW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
DRGR
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
DRGR
W
AP
CLU
CLU
W
DRGR
W
W
CLU
W
W
W
W
W
PF
CLW
W
W
CLW
R
W
CLW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
CLW
W
CLU
W
CLU
S
W
CLW
W
UC
W
W
W
W
S
W
W
W
PF
W
WCLU
W
CLW
W
W
W
DRGR
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
DRGR
W
W
PF
W
R
W
W
R
CLW
W
W
W
W
W
CLW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
CLW
W
DRGR
W
W
W
W
CLW
CLU
W
W
W
CU
W
W
CLW
CLW
W
CLW
DRGR
W
W
CLU
DRGR
W
W
CLU
CLU
PF
W
W
W
W
DRGR
W
CLW
CLW
CLU
DRGR
CLW
W
DRGR
CLU
CLW
CLW
CLW
W
CLW
DRGR
W
CLW
S
CLW
S
W
CLW
W
CLU
W
W
W
CLWW
W
W
CLU
CLW
W
W
W
S
W
W
W
W
CLW
CLW
W
W
W
W
S
CLU
W
W
W
CLW
CLW
W
W
DRGR
CLW
W
WCLU
S
DRGR
DRGR
W
W
DRGR
W
PF
S
CLU
CLU
W
DRGR
CLW
S
CLW
CLW
W
W
W
W
W
W
DRGR
DRGR
DRGR
S
DRGR
S
CLW
S
DRGR
S
CLW
CLW
W
W
W
W
W
W
PF CLU
UC
W
CLU
DRGR
S
DRGR
W
PF
CLW
S
W
W
CLU
W
CLU
CLW
W
W
DRGR
CLW
CLW
W
W
CLU
S
W
W
CLU
CLW
W
S
CLW
DRGR
W
DRGR
CLW
CLU
W
CLW
W
DRGR
CLW
DRGR
CLU
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
UC
DRGR
PF
S
DRGR
W
CLW
W
PF
CLW
W
W
W
W
W
W
DRGR
CLUCLW
INDD
W
CLU
CLU
W
DRGR
CLW
DRGR
W
W
INDD
CLW
W
W
W
W
CLW
CLW
CLW
UC
CLU
W
W
W
INDD
W
CLW
DRGR
CLW
CLW
W CLW
W
W
R
CLW
CLU
W
W
W
INDD
INDD
W
W
S
CLW
INDD
W
CLU
CLW
W
S
CLW
CLU
CLU
W
CLW
OS
PF
DRGR
W
W
W
I-75
S TAMIAM
I TRL
ALICO RD
CORKSCREW RD
LEE
RD
THR
EE O
AK
S PK
WY
OR
IOLE
RD
BEN
HI LL G
RI FFIN
PKW
Y
ESTERO PKWY
SAN CARLOS BLVD
PARK RD
WINGED FOOT DR
ESTERO BLVD
WILLIAMS RD
BROADWAY W
VIA
CO
CO
NU
T PO
INT
ISLA
ND
PA
RK
RD
SANIBEL BLVD
SAN
DY
LN
MATANZAS RD
MIA
MI B
LVD
IRIS RD
TERMINAL ACCESS RD
PHLO
X D
R
PITTSBURGH BLVD
BROADWAY E
ESTERO PKWY EXT
CYPRESS DR N
RIV
ER R
AN
CH
RD
PINEAPPLE RD
BRIARCLIFF RD
TREE
LIN
E AV
E S
BABCOCK RD
FOREST BLVD
KANSAS RD
PEBB
LE B
EACH
RD NEW JERSEY BLVD
ALICO RD
WILLIAMS RD
BEN
HIL
L G
RIF
FIN
PK
WY
PARK RD
WILLIAMS RD
THR
EE OA
KS PK
WY
SAN
DY
LN
\\ftm
s01\
draw
ings
\201
3\20
1393
90-0
00\A
rcG
IS\A
lico
Roa
d\fu
ture
land
use
.mxd
q0 2,000 4,000
SCALE IN FEET
NOTES1. The Future Land Use layer shown wasprovided by Lee County government andis dated 9/30/11.2. The aerial photographs shown wereprovided by Lee County government andwere taken in 2012.3. Parcel groups 42 and 54 do not existsince they were merged with other parcelgroups.
LEGEND
Study area
Parcel groups
Future land useFUTURE URBAN AREAS
Central Urban - CU
Urban Community - UC
Suburban - S
Outlying Suburban - OS
Industrial Development - INDD
Public Facilities - PF
University Community - UC
INTERCHANGE AREAS
Industrial Commercial Interchange - ICI
General Interchange - GI
University Village Interchange - UVI
AIRPORT AREAS
Tradeport - TP
Airport - AP
NON-URBAN AREAS
Rural - R
Open Lands - OL
Density Reduction / Groundwater Resource - DRGR
Conservation Lands Upland - CLU
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREAS (WETLANDS)
Wetlands - W
Conservation Lands Wetland - CLW
Appendix B
Parcel Group and Zoning Map
REVISIONS
SHEETSCALEFILE NO.PROJECTDATE
2122 JOHNSON STREETP.O. BOX 1550
FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33902-1550PHONE (239) 334-0046FAX (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #642
Zoning (Parcel Based)Alico Road Force MainLee County, Florida
Oct. 2013 20139390-000 As Shown Exhibit 2--
16
18
25
51
15
68
55
12
17
49
8
19
50
6
3
9
53
23
5
27
37
110
67
36
4
5265
57
35
5662
30
39
60
21
70
13
14
40
69
33
22
29
46
47 44
28
58
34
11
27
63
45
41 43
64
61
31
24
48
32
38
66
26
20
59
I-75
S TAM
IAMI TRL
ALICO RD
CORKSCREW RD
LEE
RD
THR
EE O
AK
S PK
WY
OR
IOLE
RD
BEN
HI LL G
RI FFIN
PKW
Y
ESTERO PKWY
SAN CARLOS BLVD
PARK RD
WINGED FOOT DR
ESTERO BLVD
WILLIAMS RD
BROADWAY W
VIA
CO
CO
NUT
POIN
T
ISLA
ND
PA
RK
RD
SANIBEL BLVD
SAN
DY
LN
MATANZAS RD
MIA
MI B
LVD
IRIS RD
TERMINAL ACCESS RD
PHLO
X D
R
PITTSBURGH BLVD
BROADWAY E
ESTERO PKWY EXT
CYPRESS DR N
RIV
ER R
AN
CH
RD
PINEAPPLE RD
BRIARCLIFF RD
TREE
LIN
E AV
E S
KANSAS RD
ALICO RD
WILLIAMS RD
BEN
HIL
L G
RIF
FIN
PK
WY
PARK RD
WILLIAMS RD
THR
EE OA
KS PK
WY
SAN
DY
LN
7812
7745
7820
7823
7819
7844
7832
7777
7813
7834
7758
7722
7708
7845
7774
7828
7762
7776
7797
7753
7768
7808
7835
7759
7718
7721
7836
7806
7746
7800
7847
7787
7826
7843
7719
7780
7849
7751
7723
7715
7818
7811
7738
7726
7752
7816
7791
7717
7829
7792
7785
7825
7743
7737
7798
7739
7732
7822
7830
7727
7837
7755
7709
7742
7740
7790
7772
7846
7734
7763
7804
7729
7714
7817
7814
7747
7840
7842
7749
7716 7795
7824
7769
7767
7710
7770
7779
7703
7810
7748
7724
7782
7730
7815
7848
7831
7788
7781
7731
7704
7728
7736
7827
7735
7775
7765
7794
7702
7778
7789
7750
7705
7786
7707
7821
7796
7741
7771
7799
7802
7807
7841
7733
7793
7754
7756
7713
7809
7766
7838
7761
7700
7764
7784
7757
7725
7760
7706
7712
7805
7803
7783
7839
7744
7711
7701
7773
\\ftm
s01\
draw
ings
\201
3\20
1393
90-0
00\A
rcG
IS\A
lico
Roa
d\zo
ning
par
cel b
ased
.mxd
q0 2,000 4,000
SCALE IN FEET
NOTES1. The Zoning layer shown was derivedfrom Lee County parcels. The parcelswere provided by Lee County government.2. The aerial photographs shown wereprovided by Lee County government andwere taken in 2012.3. Parcel groups 42 and 54 do not existsince they were merged with other parcelgroups.
LEGEND
Study area
Parcel groups
LCU service areas
Zoning (parcel based)
Agriculture
Commercial
Community Facilities
Industrial
Mixed Use Planned Development
Mobile Home
Planned Unit Development
Private Recreational Facilities Planned Dev.
Recreational Vehicle
Residential
Residential Planned Development
Appendix C
Projected Development
Cumulative 2015
Parcel Group Homes Commercial Industrial School Stadiums Hotel
1 51 917 244 0 0 0
2 7 0 1,437 0 0 0
3 21 0 0 0 0 0
4 7 0 1,437 0 0 0
5 7 0 1,437 0 0 0
6 0 0 1,437 0 0 0
7 0 0 1,437 0 0 0
8 7 0 1,437 0 0 0
9 7 4,108 0 0 0 0
10 6 4,108 0 0 0 0
11 0 0 1,437 0 0 0
12 7 0 0 0 0 0
13 7 0 1,437 0 0 0
14 0 4,108 0 0 0 0
15 1 0 0 0 0 0
16 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 1 3,734 0 33,926 0 0
18 52 917 0 0 0 0
19 52 0 0 63,106 0 0
20 0 917 0 0 0 0
21 51 917 0 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 52 917 0 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 52 917 244 0 0 0
26 0 0 0 0 0 0
27 0 0 0 0 0 0
28 0 917 244 0 0 0
29 33 0 244 0 0 0
30 52 917 0 0 0 0
31 51 917 0 0 0 0
32 25 917 0 0 0 0
33 52 917 244 0 0 0
34 0 917 0 0 0 0
35 52 917 0 0 0 0
36 51 917 0 0 0 0
37 52 917 0 0 0 0
38 11 917 0 0 0 0
39 0 1,155 0 0 0 0
40 20 0 0 0 0 0
41 20 0 0 0 0 0
42 0 0 0 0 0 0
43 52 917 0 0 0 0
44 21 1,155 0 0 0 0
45 21 1,155 0 0 0 0
46 20 0 0 0 0 0
47 20 1,155 0 0 0 0
48 21 1,155 0 0 0 0
49 21 1,155 0 0 0 0
50 21 0 0 0 0 0
51 21 1,155 0 0 0 0
52 21 0 0 0 0 0
53 10 0 0 0 0 0
54 0 0 0 0 0 0
55 21 1,155 0 0 0 0
56 21 1,155 0 0 0 0
57 20 1,155 0 0 0 0
58 21 1,155 0 0 0 0
59 20 1,155 0 0 0 0
60 0 0 0 0 0 0
61 20 1,155 0 0 0 0
62 21 1,155 0 0 0 0
63 21 1,155 0 0 0 0
64 21 1,155 0 0 0 0
65 0 1,155 0 0 0 0
66 20 1,155 0 0 0 0
67 21 1,155 0 0 0 0
68 21 0 0 0 0 0
69 10 0 0 0 0 0
70 20 1,155 0 0 0 0
Cumulative 2020
Parcel Group Homes Commercial Industrial School Stadiums Hotel
1 133 3,210 854 0 0 0
2 19 0 5,030 0 0 0
3 58 0 0 0 0 0
4 19 0 5,030 0 0 0
5 19 0 5,030 0 0 0
6 0 0 5,030 0 0 0
7 0 0 5,030 0 0 0
8 20 0 5,030 0 0 0
9 20 14,377 0 0 0 0
10 18 14,377 0 0 0 0
11 0 0 5,030 0 0 0
12 19 0 0 0 0 0
13 19 0 5,030 0 0 0
14 0 14,377 0 0 0 0
15 2 0 0 0 0 0
16 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 3 13,069 0 118,741 0 0
18 157 3,210 0 0 0 0
19 156 0 0 220,872 0 0
20 0 3,210 0 0 0 0
21 155 3,210 0 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 156 3,210 0 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 156 3,210 854 0 0 0
26 0 0 0 0 0 0
27 0 0 0 0 0 0
28 0 3,210 854 0 0 0
29 33 0 854 0 0 0
30 156 3,210 0 0 0 0
31 155 3,210 0 0 0 0
32 25 3,210 0 0 0 0
33 156 3,210 854 0 0 0
34 0 3,210 0 0 0 0
35 156 3,210 0 0 0 0
36 149 3,210 0 0 0 0
37 157 3,210 0 0 0 0
38 11 3,210 0 0 0 0
39 0 4,042 0 0 0 0
40 20 0 0 0 0 0
41 62 0 0 0 0 0
42 0 0 0 0 0 0
43 156 3,210 0 0 0 0
44 64 4,043 0 0 0 0
45 63 4,043 0 0 0 0
46 62 0 0 0 0 0
47 62 4,043 0 0 0 0
48 63 4,042 0 0 0 0
49 64 4,043 0 0 0 0
50 64 0 0 0 0 0
51 64 4,043 0 0 0 0
52 64 0 0 0 0 0
53 10 0 0 0 0 0
54 0 0 0 0 0 0
55 64 4,043 0 0 0 0
56 63 4,043 0 0 0 0
57 61 4,043 0 0 0 0
58 63 4,043 0 0 0 0
59 62 4,042 0 0 0 0
60 0 0 0 0 0 0
61 62 4,042 0 0 0 0
62 64 4,043 0 0 0 0
63 64 4,043 0 0 0 0
64 63 4,043 0 0 0 0
65 0 4,042 0 0 0 0
66 28 4,042 0 0 0 0
67 64 4,043 0 0 0 0
68 64 0 0 0 0 0
69 10 0 0 0 0 0
70 35 4,043 0 0 0 0
Cumulative 2025
Parcel Group Homes Commercial Industrial School Stadiums Hotel
1 133 5,503 1,464 0 0 0
2 31 0 8,623 0 0 0
3 93 0 0 0 0 0
4 31 0 8,623 0 0 0
5 31 0 8,623 0 0 0
6 0 0 8,623 0 0 0
7 0 0 8,623 0 0 0
8 32 0 8,623 0 0 0
9 32 24,646 0 0 0 0
10 29 24,646 0 0 0 3
11 0 0 8,623 0 0 115
12 31 0 0 0 0 0
13 30 0 8,623 0 0 0
14 0 24,646 0 0 0 0
15 3 0 0 0 0 0
16 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 5 22,404 0 203,556 0 250
18 277 5,503 0 0 0 0
19 276 0 0 378,638 0 0
20 0 5,503 0 0 0 0
21 275 5,503 0 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 276 5,503 0 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 276 5,503 1,464 0 0 0
26 0 0 0 0 0 0
27 0 0 0 0 0 0
28 0 5,503 1,464 0 0 0
29 33 0 1,464 0 0 0
30 275 5,503 0 0 0 0
31 251 5,503 0 0 0 0
32 25 5,503 0 0 0 0
33 276 5,503 1,464 0 0 0
34 0 5,503 0 0 0 0
35 276 5,503 0 0 0 0
36 149 5,503 0 0 0 0
37 277 5,503 0 0 0 0
38 11 5,503 0 0 0 0
39 0 6,929 0 0 0 0
40 20 0 0 0 0 0
41 107 0 0 0 0 0
42 0 0 0 0 0 0
43 276 5,503 0 0 0 0
44 109 6,931 0 0 0 0
45 108 6,931 0 0 0 0
46 107 0 0 0 0 0
47 107 6,931 0 0 0 0
48 108 6,929 0 0 0 0
49 110 6,931 0 0 0 0
50 109 0 0 0 0 0
51 109 6,931 0 0 0 0
52 109 0 0 0 0 0
53 10 0 0 0 0 0
54 0 0 0 0 0 0
55 109 6,931 0 0 0 0
56 108 6,931 0 0 0 26
57 61 6,931 0 0 0 100
58 107 6,931 0 0 0 0
59 85 6,929 0 0 0 0
60 0 0 0 0 0 0
61 107 6,929 0 0 0 0
62 109 6,931 0 0 0 0
63 109 6,931 0 0 0 0
64 108 6,931 0 0 0 0
65 0 6,929 0 0 0 0
66 28 6,929 0 0 0 0
67 109 6,931 0 0 0 0
68 109 0 0 0 0 0
69 10 0 0 0 0 0
70 35 6,931 0 0 0 0
Cumulative 2030
Parcel Group Homes Commercial Industrial School Stadiums Hotel
1 133 7,796 2,074 0 0 0
2 42 0 12,216 0 0 0
3 126 0 0 0 0 0
4 42 0 12,216 0 0 0
5 42 0 12,216 0 0 0
6 0 0 12,216 0 0 0
7 0 0 12,216 0 0 0
8 43 0 12,216 0 0 0
9 43 34,915 0 0 0 0
10 40 34,915 0 0 0 3
11 0 0 12,216 0 0 115
12 43 0 0 0 0 0
13 41 0 12,216 0 0 0
14 0 34,915 0 0 0 0
15 4 0 0 0 0 0
16 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 7 31,739 0 288,370 0 250
18 404 7,796 0 0 0 0
19 402 0 0 536,403 0 0
20 0 7,796 0 0 0 0
21 401 7,796 0 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 403 7,796 0 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 402 7,796 2,074 0 0 0
26 0 0 0 0 0 0
27 0 0 0 0 0 0
28 0 7,796 2,074 0 0 0
29 33 0 2,074 0 0 0
30 401 7,796 0 0 0 0
31 251 7,796 0 0 0 0
32 25 7,796 0 0 0 0
33 402 7,796 2,074 0 0 0
34 0 7,796 0 0 0 0
35 403 7,796 0 0 0 0
36 149 7,796 0 0 0 0
37 404 7,796 0 0 0 0
38 11 7,796 0 0 0 0
39 0 9,816 0 0 0 0
40 20 0 0 0 0 0
41 126 0 0 0 0 0
42 0 0 0 0 0 0
43 381 7,796 0 0 0 0
44 155 9,819 0 0 0 0
45 154 9,819 0 0 0 0
46 153 0 0 0 0 0
47 135 9,819 0 0 0 0
48 154 9,816 0 0 0 0
49 157 9,819 0 0 0 0
50 156 0 0 0 0 0
51 155 9,819 0 0 0 0
52 155 0 0 0 0 0
53 10 0 0 0 0 0
54 0 0 0 0 0 0
55 156 9,819 0 0 0 0
56 154 9,819 0 0 0 26
57 61 9,819 0 0 0 100
58 154 9,819 0 0 0 0
59 85 9,816 0 0 0 0
60 0 0 0 0 0 0
61 153 9,816 0 0 0 0
62 156 9,819 0 0 0 0
63 155 9,819 0 0 0 0
64 154 9,819 0 0 0 0
65 0 9,816 0 0 0 0
66 28 9,816 0 0 0 0
67 155 9,819 0 0 0 0
68 155 0 0 0 0 0
69 10 0 0 0 0 0
70 35 9,819 0 0 0 0
Cumulative 2035
Parcel Group Homes Commercial Industrial School Stadiums Hotel
1 133 10,089 2,684 0 0 0
2 52 0 15,809 0 0 0
3 128 0 0 0 0 0
4 53 0 15,809 0 0 0
5 52 0 15,809 0 0 0
6 0 0 15,809 0 0 0
7 0 0 15,809 0 0 0
8 54 0 15,809 0 0 0
9 54 45,184 0 0 0 0
10 50 45,184 0 0 0 3
11 0 0 15,809 0 0 115
12 54 0 0 0 0 0
13 51 0 15,809 0 0 0
14 0 45,184 0 0 0 0
15 5 0 0 0 0 0
16 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 8 41,074 0 373,185 0 250
18 563 10,089 0 0 0 0
19 560 0 0 694,169 0 0
20 0 10,089 0 0 0 0
21 470 10,089 0 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 561 10,089 0 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 561 10,089 2,684 0 0 0
26 0 0 0 0 0 0
27 0 0 0 0 0 0
28 0 10,089 2,684 0 0 0
29 33 0 2,684 0 0 0
30 458 10,089 0 0 0 0
31 251 10,089 0 0 0 0
32 25 10,089 0 0 0 0
33 538 10,089 2,684 0 0 0
34 0 10,089 0 0 0 0
35 561 10,089 0 0 0 0
36 149 10,089 0 0 0 0
37 562 10,089 0 0 0 0
38 11 10,089 0 0 0 0
39 0 12,703 0 0 0 0
40 20 0 0 0 0 0
41 126 0 0 0 0 0
42 0 0 0 0 0 0
43 381 10,089 0 0 0 0
44 206 12,707 0 0 0 0
45 174 12,707 0 0 0 0
46 154 0 0 0 0 0
47 135 12,707 0 0 0 0
48 205 12,703 0 0 0 0
49 209 12,707 0 0 0 0
50 208 0 0 0 0 0
51 206 12,707 0 0 0 0
52 206 0 0 0 0 0
53 10 0 0 0 0 0
54 0 0 0 0 0 0
55 207 12,707 0 0 0 0
56 205 12,707 0 0 0 26
57 61 12,707 0 0 0 100
58 205 12,707 0 0 0 0
59 85 12,703 0 0 0 0
60 0 0 0 0 0 0
61 204 12,703 0 0 0 0
62 207 12,707 0 0 0 0
63 206 12,707 0 0 0 0
64 204 12,707 0 0 0 0
65 0 12,703 0 0 0 0
66 28 12,703 0 0 0 0
67 206 12,707 0 0 0 0
68 206 0 0 0 0 0
69 10 0 0 0 0 0
70 35 12,707 0 0 0 0
Cumulative 2040
Parcel Group Homes Commercial Industrial School Stadiums Hotel
1 133 12,382 2,684 0 0 0
2 62 0 19,402 0 0 0
3 128 0 0 0 0 0
4 63 0 19,402 0 0 0
5 62 0 19,402 0 0 0
6 0 0 19,402 0 0 0
7 0 0 19,402 0 0 0
8 64 0 19,402 0 0 0
9 64 55,453 0 0 0 0
10 60 55,453 0 0 0 3
11 0 0 19,402 0 0 115
12 65 0 0 0 0 0
13 61 0 19,402 0 0 0
14 0 55,453 0 0 0 0
15 6 0 0 0 0 0
16 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 9 50,409 0 458,000 0 250
18 765 12,382 0 0 0 0
19 762 0 0 851,934 0 0
20 0 12,382 0 0 0 0
21 470 12,382 0 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 763 12,382 0 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 763 12,382 3,294 0 0 0
26 0 0 0 0 0 0
27 0 0 0 0 0 0
28 0 12,382 3,294 0 0 0
29 33 0 3,294 0 0 0
30 458 12,382 0 0 0 0
31 251 12,382 0 0 0 0
32 25 12,382 0 0 0 0
33 538 12,382 3,294 0 0 0
34 0 12,382 0 0 0 0
35 762 12,382 0 0 0 0
36 149 12,382 0 0 0 0
37 764 12,382 0 0 0 0
38 11 12,382 0 0 0 0
39 0 15,590 0 0 0 0
40 20 0 0 0 0 0
41 126 0 0 0 0 0
42 0 0 0 0 0 0
43 381 12,382 0 0 0 0
44 259 15,595 0 0 0 0
45 174 15,595 0 0 0 0
46 154 0 0 0 0 0
47 135 15,595 0 0 0 0
48 258 15,590 0 0 0 0
49 263 15,595 0 0 0 0
50 262 0 0 0 0 0
51 259 15,595 0 0 0 0
52 259 0 0 0 0 0
53 10 0 0 0 0 0
54 0 0 0 0 0 0
55 260 15,595 0 0 0 0
56 246 15,595 0 0 0 26
57 61 15,595 0 0 0 100
58 258 15,595 0 0 0 0
59 85 15,590 0 0 0 0
60 0 0 0 0 0 0
61 226 15,590 0 0 0 0
62 260 15,595 0 0 0 0
63 259 15,595 0 0 0 0
64 257 15,595 0 0 0 0
65 0 15,590 0 0 0 0
66 28 15,590 0 0 0 0
67 259 15,595 0 0 0 0
68 259 0 0 0 0 0
69 10 0 0 0 0 0
70 35 15,595 0 0 0 0
Cumulative Buildout
Parcel Group Homes Commercial Industrial School Stadiums Hotel
1 133 628,363 388,721 0 0 0
2 451 0 1,094,899 0 0 0
3 244 0 0 0 0 0
4 751 0 662,669 0 0 0
5 121 0 2,602,081 0 0 0
6 0 0 542,092 0 0 0
7 0 0 3,183,810 0 0 0
8 1,916 0 1,290,000 0 0 0
9 934 651,000 0 0 0 0
10 75 2,122,331 0 0 0 3
11 0 0 569,000 0 0 115
12 6,282 0 0 0 0 0
13 79 0 1,875,000 0 0 0
14 0 1,200,000 0 0 0 0
15 1,191 0 0 0 0 0
16 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 1,950 1,204,000 0 458,000 0 250
18 1,663 603,495 0 0 0 0
19 1,318 0 0 851,934 0 0
20 0 279,169 0 0 0 0
21 470 516,491 0 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 1,721 108,791 0 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 5,266 155,492 53,167 0 0 0
26 0 0 0 0 0 0
27 0 0 0 0 0 0
28 0 25,538 646,611 0 0 0
29 33 0 287,521 0 0 0
30 458 680,844 0 0 0 0
31 251 246,614 0 0 0 0
32 25 268,483 0 0 0 0
33 538 172,536 8,579 0 0 0
34 0 24,900 0 0 0 0
35 1,140 239,816 0 0 0 0
36 149 70,559 0 0 0 0
37 1,444 274,060 0 0 0 0
38 11 311,841 0 0 0 0
39 0 352,136 0 0 0 0
40 20 0 0 0 0 0
41 126 0 0 0 0 0
42 0 0 0 0 0 0
43 381 419,774 0 0 0 0
44 466 76,094 0 0 0 0
45 174 250,000 0 0 0 0
46 154 0 0 0 0 0
47 135 510,678 0 0 0 0
48 325 205,959 0 0 0 0
49 1,300 1,120,000 0 0 0 0
50 1,025 0 0 0 0 0
51 815 152,429 0 0 0 0
52 724 0 0 0 0 0
53 10 0 0 0 0 0
54 0 0 0 0 0 0
55 752 767,153 0 0 0 0
56 246 383,753 0 0 0 26
57 61 299,151 0 0 0 100
58 570 242,595 0 0 0 0
59 85 112,931 0 0 0 0
60 0 0 0 0 0 0
61 226 108,065 0 0 0 0
62 817 1,103,434 0 0 0 0
63 756 399,762 0 0 0 0
64 300 767,905 0 0 0 0
65 0 221,253 0 0 0 0
66 28 93,361 0 0 0 0
67 872 244,553 0 0 0 0
68 725 0 0 0 0 0
69 10 0 0 0 0 0
70 35 37,664 0 0 0 0
Appendix D
Projected Wastewater Flows
LCU and FDOH Criteria
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 Buildout
Parcel Group
PROPOSED
(AADF, GPD)
PROPOSED
(AADF, GPD)
PROPOSED
(AADF, GPD)
PROPOSED
(AADF, GPD)
PROPOSED
(AADF, GPD)
PROPOSED
(AADF, GPD)
PROPOSED
(AADF, GPD)
1 11,907 31,197 31,602 32,007 32,412 32,756 163,784
2 1,756 4,879 8,002 10,894 13,557 16,219 213,249
3 4,836 13,357 21,418 29,018 29,478 29,478 56,225
4 1,756 4,879 8,002 10,894 13,787 16,449 239,204
5 1,756 4,879 8,002 10,894 13,557 16,219 288,074
6 144 503 862 1,222 1,581 1,940 54,209
7 144 503 862 1,222 1,581 1,940 318,381
8 1,756 5,109 8,232 11,125 14,017 16,679 570,236
9 2,228 6,763 11,067 15,140 19,214 23,057 312,741
10 1,998 6,302 10,676 15,049 18,893 22,736 336,291
11 144 503 12,362 24,222 24,581 24,940 79,997
12 1,612 4,376 7,139 9,903 12,436 14,970 1,446,841
13 1,756 4,879 7,771 10,664 13,326 15,989 205,629
14 616 2,157 3,697 5,237 6,778 8,318 180,000
15 230 461 691 921 1,152 1,382 274,276
16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 5,879 20,462 60,045 99,629 113,981 128,334 748,385
18 12,113 36,639 64,619 94,211 131,172 178,037 473,513
19 21,442 69,058 120,358 173,041 233,093 303,279 431,266
20 138 482 825 1,169 1,513 1,857 41,875
21 11,883 36,178 64,158 93,520 109,754 110,098 185,715
22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 12,113 36,408 64,388 93,980 130,712 177,576 412,716
24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 12,138 36,494 64,535 93,957 130,980 177,906 1,241,304
26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
28 162 567 972 1,377 1,782 2,187 68,556
29 7,624 7,685 7,746 7,807 7,868 7,929 36,393
30 12,113 36,408 64,158 93,520 106,991 107,335 207,645
31 11,883 36,178 58,631 58,975 59,319 59,663 94,844
32 5,895 6,239 6,583 6,927 7,271 7,615 46,025
33 12,138 36,494 64,535 93,957 125,683 126,088 150,534
34 138 482 825 1,169 1,513 1,857 3,735
35 12,113 36,408 64,388 93,980 130,712 177,346 298,602
36 11,883 34,796 35,140 35,484 35,828 36,172 44,797
37 12,113 36,639 64,619 94,211 130,942 177,807 373,658
38 2,671 3,015 3,359 3,703 4,047 4,391 49,323
39 173 606 1,039 1,472 1,905 2,339 52,820
40 4,606 4,606 4,606 4,606 4,606 4,606 4,606
41 4,606 14,279 24,642 29,018 29,018 29,018 29,018
43 12,113 36,408 64,388 88,914 89,258 89,602 150,788
44 5,010 15,346 26,142 37,169 49,348 61,987 118,740
45 5,010 15,115 25,912 36,939 41,978 42,411 77,600
46 4,606 14,279 24,642 35,236 35,466 35,466 35,450
47 4,779 14,885 25,682 32,563 32,997 33,430 107,738
48 5,010 15,115 25,912 36,939 49,117 61,756 105,787
49 5,010 15,346 26,373 37,630 50,039 62,908 467,390
50 4,836 14,739 25,103 35,927 47,902 60,339 236,058
51 5,010 15,346 26,142 37,169 49,348 61,987 210,600
52 4,836 14,739 25,103 35,697 47,442 59,648 166,737
53 2,303 2,303 2,303 2,303 2,303 2,303 2,303
55 5,010 15,346 26,142 37,400 49,578 62,217 288,231
56 5,010 15,115 28,512 42,139 54,318 64,193 119,348
57 4,779 14,655 25,088 35,521 35,954 36,388 78,856
58 5,010 15,115 25,682 36,939 49,118 61,757 167,619
59 4,779 14,885 20,615 21,048 21,481 21,914 36,529
60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
61 4,779 14,885 25,681 36,708 48,887 54,386 68,253
62 5,010 15,346 26,142 37,400 49,578 62,217 353,675
63 5,010 15,346 26,142 37,169 49,348 61,987 234,113
64 5,010 15,115 25,912 36,939 48,887 61,526 184,276
65 173 606 1,039 1,472 1,905 2,339 33,188
66 4,779 7,055 7,488 7,921 8,354 8,787 20,453
67 5,010 15,346 26,142 37,169 49,348 61,987 237,597
68 4,836 14,739 25,103 35,697 47,442 59,648 167,031
69 2,303 2,303 2,303 2,303 2,303 2,303 2,367
70 4,779 8,667 9,100 9,533 9,967 10,400 13,784
331,259 939,010 1,579,350 2,195,968 2,736,702 3,268,394 13,418,979
*PROPOSED FLOW is the Cumulative Proposed Flow up to that year.
**All Flows are Average Daily Flow, Gallons per Day (GPD)