Novel Functional Graphene and its Thermodynamic Interfacial Localization in
Biphasic Polyolefin Systems for Advanced Lightweight Applications
Antimo Grazianoa, Christian Garciad, Shaffiq Jafferc, Jimi Tjonga, Mohini Sain,a,b,*
aCentre for Biocomposites and Biomaterials Processing, Faculty of Forestry, University
of Toronto, 33 Willcocks Street, Toronto, M5S 3BS, Canada
bDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King’s
College Road, Toronto, M5S 3G8, Canada
cTOTAL American Services Inc., 82 South Street, Hopkinton, MA, 01748, USA
dBahen Centre for Information Technology, University of Toronto, 40 St. George Street,
Toronto, M5S 2E4, Canada
*Corresponding author:
Professor Mohini Sain
Email: [email protected]
MANUSCRIPT NUMBER: CSTE_2019_1854_R2
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
CHARACTERIZATION AND TESTING
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1718
19
20
21
22
23
FTIR spectrums were obtained by using an FTIR Tensor 27 Spectrometer (Bruker).
Each sample, in powder form, was mixed with Potassium Bromide and pressed into
pellets. Spectra were recorded in a wavelength range of 400 – 4000 cm-1, at a resolution
of 4 cm-1, over 32 scans.
Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA)
TGA was carried out using a Thermal Gravimetric Analyzer, TA instrument TGA Q500,
USA, under nitrogen atmosphere. About 5 – 8 mg of each sample was subjected to
degradation process from room temperature to 500° C, with a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
This technique was also used to determine the weight percentage of grafted MAPP onto
RFGO. In addition, the MAPP grafting density could be calculated through equation 1:
[1]
Grafted amount (mmolg
)= 1000×∆W(1000−∆W )×M (1)
where ΔW is the difference between % weight loss of RFGO and % weight loss of MR,
while M is the molecular weight of MAPP.
X-Ray Diffractions (XRD)
X-ray patterns were registered using an X-ray diffractometer PANalytical PW3710,
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
using Cu Kα radiation, with current intensity of 30 mA and generator voltage of 40 kV.
Data were taken at scan speed of 0.5 °2θ/min, step size of 0.02 °2θ and 2.5 sec time
per step. The °2θ range considered was 5 - 30. The interlayer distance (d) was
calculated using Bragg’s law (equation 2):
d ¿λ
2sin (θ) (2)
where λ is the X-ray wavelength (typically 0.154 nm), and θ the scattering angle.
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)
The lateral dimension of modified GO was obtained using an AFM Hitachi 5100N, in
tapping mode, under ambient conditions. Sample preparation was performed by
dispersing MAPP-RFGO in ethanol and then dropping this solution on a wafer surface.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FTIR, TGA, XRD and AFM were carried out to analyze the effectiveness of GO
modification in partially restoring the graphene structure, while functionalizing it with
amino groups, as well as the successfulness of the grafting of MAPP onto RFGO. As
seen from figure S1, the FTIR spectrum of GO indicated the typical oxygen moieties,
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
which are O-H (3400), C=O (1720 cm-1), C=C (1630 cm-1), C-O (1220 cm-1) and C-O-C
(1050 cm-1).[2]
Figure S1. FTIR spectrums of GO (red), RFGO (blue) and MAPP-RFGO (black)
After modification, some amino groups appeared in the RFGO spectrum, being C-N
(1564 and 1085 cm-1) and N-H (1460 cm-1). This proved the effectiveness of GO
functionalization.[3] Moreover, the peaks at 1720, 1220, and 1050 cm-1 almost
completely disappeared, indicating that the hydrazine monohydrate effectively removed
most of the carbonyl, carboxyl and epoxy groups, partially restoring the graphene
structure. When analyzing the MAPP-RFGO spectrum, strong bands between 2800 and
3000 cm-1 could be seen, representing CH2 stretching vibrations, typical of PP.[4]
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
Together with this, the appearance of imide groups (1400 and 1600 cm-1) demonstrated
that the covalent grafting process, through the reaction between the anhydride of MAPP
and the amino functionalities of RFGO, was successful.
According to the TGA curves (figure S2), GO underwent two main degradations, the first
being related to the moisture content removal, while the second (the major mass loss)
regarding the decomposition of oxygen related moieties, such as carbonyl, carboxyl and
epoxy groups.[5]
Figure S2. TGA curves of GO (red), RFGO (blue), MAPP (green) and MAPP-RFGO
(black)
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
On the other hand, RFGO had a much slighter weight loss, which proved that the GO
modification was successful in removing most of the oxygen containing functionalities,
thus partially restoring the graphene structure. By comparing the TGA curve of MAPP-
RFGO with the one of MAPP, the weight loss of the former is smaller than the one of
the latter, demonstrating effective grafting of MAPP onto RFGO.[6] Additionally,
considering that MAPP completely degraded at about 470 °C, it is worth noticing that,
above this temperature, MAPP-RFGO had roughly 20% of its weight left, which is the
amount of RFGO in MAPP-RFGO. This is another way to confirm that MAPP was
successfully grafted onto RFGO. Next, since MAPP is completely degraded at 500 °C,
while the weight of RFGO and MR remain the same, even at higher temperatures, the
weight concentration of grafted MAPP onto RFGO could be calculated,[1] and its value
was found to be 58%. Lastly, by using equation 1 and following the work done by Zabihi
and coworkers,[7] the grafting density of MAPP onto RFGO was estimated (0.35
mmol/g).
Figure S3 shows the XRD patterns of GO, RFGO and MAPP-RFGO. GO was
characterized by a peak at 2θ = 10.4°, corresponding to an interlayer distance (d) of
0.85 nm.[8]
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
Figure S3. XRD patterns of GO (blue), RFGO (red) and MAPP-RFGO (black)
Conversely, in the case of RFGO, a peek was seen at 2θ = 25.2°, meaning that d=0.36
nm, which is very similar to the one of pure graphene (0.34 nm).[9] This confirmed,
along with the FTIR and TGA results, the partial reconstruction of graphitic structure, via
functionalization and reduction of GO. Lastly, in the MAPP-RFGO pattern, the peaks
corresponding to the crystalline planes of PP appeared, indicating the grafting of MAPP
onto RFGO.[10]
Figure S4 illustrates the AFM image and height profile of MAPP-RFGO. Its thickness
was around 8 nm, which is considerably higher than the one of single layer GO (~1 nm).
[11]
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
Figure S4. AFM image of MAPP-RFGO (A) and its height profile (B)
It is believed that the functionalization of GO with EDA, to obtain RFGO, increased the
thickness to about 3.5 nm, due to the presence of amino functionalities on both edges of
the GO main lattice, as reported elsewhere.[12] Therefore, when grafting MAPP onto
RFGO, lengthier functional groups were covalently attached, on both sides of RFGO,
making the thickness of MAPP-RFGO reasonably rise to 8 nm.[13]
REFERENCES
[1] O. Zabihi, M. Ahmadi, T. Abdollahi, S. Nikafshar, M. Naebe, S. Page, S. Page, S.
Page, S. Page, S. Page, S. Page, S. Page, S. Page, S. Page, Supplementary
Information Collision-induced activation : Towards industrially scalable approach
to graphite nanoplatelets functionalization for superior polymer nanocomposites
S1 S2, (n.d.) 1–15.
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
[2] B. Lin, Z.T. Li, Y. Yang, Y. Li, J.C. Lin, X.M. Zheng, F.A. He, K.H. Lam, Enhanced
dielectric permittivity in surface-modified graphene/PVDF composites prepared by
an electrospinning-hot pressing method, Compos. Sci. Technol. 172 (2019) 58–
65. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.01.003.
[3] H.-J. Shin, K.K. Kim, A. Benayad, S.-M. Yoon, H.K. Park, I.-S. Jung, M.H. Jin, H.-
K. Jeong, J.M. Kim, J.-Y. Choi, Y.H. Lee, Efficient Reduction of Graphite Oxide by
Sodium Borohydride and Its Effect on Electrical Conductance, Adv. Funct. Mater.
19 (2009) 1987–1992. doi:10.1002/adfm.200900167.
[4] H.K.F. Cheng, N.G. Sahoo, Y.P. Tan, Y. Pan, H. Bao, L. Li, S.H. Chan, J. Zhao,
Poly(vinyl alcohol) Nanocomposites Filled with Poly(vinyl alcohol)-Grafted
Graphene Oxide, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 4 (2012) 2387–2394.
doi:10.1021/am300550n.
[5] B. Zhong, H. Dong, Y. Luo, D. Zhang, Z. Jia, D. Jia, F. Liu, Simultaneous
reduction and functionalization of graphene oxide via antioxidant for highly aging
resistant and thermal conductive elastomer composites, Compos. Sci. Technol.
151 (2017) 156–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.08.019.
[6] B. Yuan, C. Bao, L. Song, N. Hong, K.M. Liew, Y. Hu, Preparation of
functionalized graphene oxide/polypropylene nanocomposite with significantly
improved thermal stability and studies on the crystallization behavior and
mechanical properties, Chem. Eng. J. 237 (2014) 411–420.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.10.030.
[7] O. Zabihi, H. Khayyam, B.L. Fox, M. Naebe, Enhanced thermal stability and
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
lifetime of epoxy nanocomposites using covalently functionalized clay :
experimental and modelling †, New J. Chem. 39 (2015) 2269–2278.
doi:10.1039/C4NJ01768D.
[8] A. Barra, N.M. Ferreira, M.A. Martins, O. Lazar, A. Pantazi, A.A. Jderu, S.M.
Neumayer, B.J. Rodriguez, M. Enăchescu, P. Ferreira, C. Nunes, Eco-friendly
preparation of electrically conductive chitosan - reduced graphene oxide flexible
bionanocomposites for food packaging and biological applications, Compos. Sci.
Technol. 173 (2019) 53–60. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.01.027.
[9] H.M.A. Hassan, V. Abdelsayed, A.E.R.S. Khder, K.M. AbouZeid, J. Terner, M.S.
El-Shall, S.I. Al-Resayes, A.A. El-Azhary, Microwave synthesis of graphene
sheets supporting metal nanocrystals in aqueous and organic media, J. Mater.
Chem. 19 (2009) 3832–3837. doi:10.1039/B906253J.
[10] Y. Li, J. Zhu, S. Wei, J. Ryu, L. Sun, Z. Guo, Poly(propylene)/Graphene
Nanoplatelet Nanocomposites: Melt Rheological Behavior and Thermal, Electrical,
and Electronic Properties, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 212 (2011) 1951–1959.
doi:10.1002/macp.201100263.
[11] M. Fang, K. Wang, H. Lu, Y. Yang, S. Nutt, Single-layer graphene nanosheets
with controlled grafting of polymer chains, J. Mater. Chem. 20 (2010) 1982–1992.
doi:10.1039/B919078C.
[12] N.H. Kim, T. Kuila, J.H. Lee, Simultaneous reduction, functionalization and
stitching of graphene oxide with ethylenediamine for composites application, J.
Mater. Chem. A. 1 (2013) 1349–1358. doi:10.1039/C2TA00853J.
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
[13] F. You, D. Wang, X. Li, M. Liu, Z.M. Dang, G.H. Hu, Synthesis of polypropylene-
grafted graphene and its compatibilization effect on polypropylene/polystyrene
blends, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 131 (2014) 1–7. doi:10.1002/app.40455.
190
191
192
193