Download - ANTI - TECHNOLOGY
ANTI - TECHNOLO
GY
Wendi Bistak
Arin Giannandrea
Jen
Gra
bow
ski
Areas of Concern
– Access to Technology– Cost: Money and Time– Standards & Expectations
District Perspective
Access to Technology
– Inequality based on income– Often hampered by location – Opportunities vary widely
District Perspective
District Perspective
– Abuse of programs– Cost of funds– Cost of time– Does technology pay?
Value vs. Cost
District Perspective
– Goal of NCLB– Complications
Standards & Expectations
Teacher Perspective
Technology fails the teacher
– Training– Technical Support– Practical Use Concept
Teacher Perspective
Teacher ability does not equal the
technology available
Training does not meet the speed of technological
advancement
Teacher Perspective
Technical Support is just as important as the equipment. However…
Technicians Teacher & Available Equipment
Need
Teacher Perspective
Student Achievement is Compromised– It divides gender and promotes stereotypical
views of Computer Science and Information Technology
Any knowledge gained from classroom instruction becomes IMPRACTICAL!!!!
If you don’t use it…you lose it!!!!
Home PerspectiveIs technology hurting our kids?
• Parents• Health Issues• Safety Issues• Brain Issues
Home PerspectiveConcerning the Parent
• Technology doing the parenting• Excessive multi-tasking interfering with Family
Relationships• Children’s technology skills surpass parents
Home PerspectiveConcerning the Child’s Health
• Connection between technology and childhood obesity
• Bad habits • Old Order Amish Community
Home PerspectiveConcerning the Child’s Safety
• Long list of offenses• Cyberbullying – victimized 24 hours a day• Need of training in cybersafety, cybersecurity
and cyberethics.
Home PerspectiveConcerning the Child’s Brain
• Lack of real communication skills• Damaging to creativity, attention and
motivation• Violent and aggressive behavior • Desensitize children’s ability to see the differe
nce between right and wrong
Bibliography• Bassett, Jr. D. R., M.S. Tremblay, D. W. Eslinger, J.L. Copeland, J.D. Barnes and G.E. Huntington.(2007)
Physical Activity and Body Mass Index of Children in an Old Order Amish, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 39(3), pp.410-15.
• Bell, Sherry Mee; Judge, Sharon; Puckett, Kathleen (2006). Closing the Digital Divide: Update From the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. The Journal of Educational Research, 100 (1), 52-60. Carll, Elizabeth K. (2007) Violent Video Games: Rehearsing Agression, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 13.
• Ferguson, Sue. (2005) How Computers Make our Kids Stupid, Maclean’s, 118(23) pp.24-30.• Konrad, Walecia. (2007) Do You Know Where Your Kids Are? Good HouseKeeping.pg.148 • Long, Cindy. Mind The Gap. NEA Today, (2008). 24-31• McQuade, Samuel C. III. (2007) We Must Educate Young People About Cybercrime Before They Start College,
The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(18), pg. B29.• Kadijevich, Dj. (2006). Achieving educational technology standards: the relationship between student
teacher’s interest and institutional support offered, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22.• Papastergiou , M. & Solomonidou, C. (2005) Gender and information and communications technology:
Greek high school students’ favorite internet activities, Computers and Education 44 (4), pp. 377–393.• Racine, E. (2005). What’s Going On Online?. Momentum, 36(2), 26, 28-9.• Simkins, Michael. (2006). Does Technology Pay. Technology & Learning, 26 (7) 22-5. • Trotter, Andrew. (2007). E-Rate’s Imprint Seen in Schools. Education Week, 26 (30) 12. • Valadez, J & Duran, R. (2007). Redefining the digital divide: Beyond access to computers and the internet,
The High School Journal, 90(3), 31-44.• Wallis, Claudia (2006) The Multitasking Generation. Time.167(13)pg.48• Wolfsberg, Jeffrey S. (2006) Student Safety from Cyberbullies, in Chat Rooms and in Instant Messaging, The
Education Digest, 72 (2), pp.33-7.