ANNUAL REPORTInterstate Commission For Juveniles
Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities
2017
2
LETTER FROM THE CHAIR
Jeff Cowger (KS) Commissioner, Trea-surer
Michael Lacy (WV) Commissioner, Vice Chair
Traci Marchand (NC) Commissioner, Chair
3
This year was a time of unprecedented change for the Interstate Commission for Juve-niles, with disaffiliation from the Council of State Governments (CSG), new leadership at the National Office and a long overdue upgrade of our data system. Amid transition, we continued to advance our mission and strategic initiatives by providing extensive train-ing and developing several new resources. Having been a part of the Commission for 14 years, it was an honor for me to serve as the Commission’s Chair during this critical time.
Due to rising costs of the CSG affiliation, ICJ withdrew from our long-standing relation-ship with CSG in FY17. After months of work to establish new accounts and absorb additional accounting and human resources tasks, the disaffiliation was finalized on De-cember 1, 2016. Consequently, ICJ realized substantial savings that can be invested in future projects that promote public safety, victims’ rights and juvenile accountability that is balanced with safe-guarding those juveniles.
In addition to the structural transformation, ICJ underwent a major change in leader-ship following the resignation of its first Executive Director Ashley Lippert in December 2016. Ashley made tremendous contributions to ICJ, including expanding membership to include all 50 states, DC, and the USVI; launching the Juvenile Interstate Data System (JIDS); and spearheading the disaffiliation from CSG. ICJ will be forever grateful for her vision and her leadership. We are glad for continued opportunities to partner with Ashley in her new role as Executive Director for the Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision.
Following an extensive national search, ICJ welcomed its new Executive Director in April 2017. MaryLee Underwood is an attorney with vast experience in public policy and administration in government and non-profit agencies. With a background in social work focused on children and abuse, she has been instrumental in shaping national and state policy regarding human trafficking, sexual assault, and victims’ rights. MaryLee hit the ground running during this transition period and is working diligently to advance ICJ’s Strategic Plan.
JIDS is ICJ’s national web-based system that facilitates the supervision, transfer, accep-tance, tracking, and return of juveniles from one state to another. In FY17, the first major upgrade of JIDS was performed, which was critical for replacing outdated software that was no longer supported. The upgrade incorporated a sleek, new design with a modern interface, and up-to-date icons.
First-class training and resources are essential for Compact implementation. ICJ devel-oped several new resources, including a concise “Bench Card” for judges and a Best Practice Guide regarding “Interstate Relocations with the Receiving State.” The Training Committee provided extensive training to address the varied needs of 8,651 criminal justice and child welfare professionals throughout the U.S.
Throughout a year that brought forth much change, one constant guided our way: ICJ’s commitment to cooperative action to promote child welfare and public safety. Our ac-complishments and our continued success are direct results of the dedication and hard work of ICJ professionals across the United States. Thank you for your support of our collaborative work during FY17 and beyond.
Sincerely,
Traci Marchand, ChairChair, Interstate Commission for Juveniles
Each year, the Commission’s Annual Business Meeting provides opportunities for Commis-sioners, Designees, and key allies to collabo-rate, network, and learn. In August 2016, the Annual Business Meeting was held in Boston, MA, where members were welcomed by Peter J. Forbes, Commissioner for the Common-wealth of Massachusetts.
Effective collaboration was a major theme for the 2016 ABM. The first day featured an in-teractive “Team Building and Collaboration” seminar led by Fahy Mullaney and a scenari-os-based training entitled, “It Takes a Village to Return a Juvenile.” The second day featured a collaborative panel discussion entitled “Estab-lishing and Utilizing the State Council,” as well as updates from standing committees and re-gional representatives.
ICJ also honored one of its greatest collabo-rators by presenting the Second Annual Lead-ership Award to Mia Pressley, South Carolina Commissioner and South Region Representa-tive. As noted in her nomination by Anne Con-nor, “Her expertise on all things ICJ is truly ad-mirable, but made even more so by her ability to share that wisdom in a way that makes the audience feel validated.”
The meeting concluded with elections, where a vote of confidence was made when officers from the previous year were re-elected to serve their second one-year terms. New region rep-resentatives were elected to serve two-year terms. Judge Chandlee Johnson-Kuhn (NCJF-CJ) administered the oath of office to the newly elected officers and region representatives.
Traci Marchand (NC) Commissioner, ChairMichael Lacy (WV) Commissioner, Vice ChairJeff Cowger (KS) Commissioner, TreasurerMichael Farmer (CA) Designee, Compliance Committee ChairDavid Barrett (ME) Commissioner, Finance Committee ChairShelley Hagan (WI) Commissioner, Information Technology Committee ChairJulie Hawkins (MO) Commissioner, Rules Committee ChairAnne Connor (NV) Commissioner, Training Committee ChairMaria Genca (CT) Designee, East Region RepresentativeNina Belli (OH) Commissioner, Midwest Region RepresentativeMia Pressley (SC) Commissioner, South Region RepresentativeJessica Eldredge (UT) Designee, West Region RepresentativeRick Masters, Legal CounselTrudy Gregorie, Victims Representative
ANNUAL MEETING PROMOTES COLLABORATION
For a complete list of the Commission’s committee rosters, go to www.juvenilecompact.org.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Mia Pressley Leadership Award 2016
FOUR STRATEGIC INITIATIVES FOR 2016–2019
Develop sustaining leadership via training and professional development
Using data to analyze and evaluate
performance and enforce/monitor
compliance.
Enhance communications and
collaboration to foster better out-
comes for juveniles
Utilize and promote the State Council
to increase national awareness/visibility
at the state level
4 5
GROWTH & INDEPENDENCEFor nearly a decade, the Commission enjoyed a strong and productive affiliation with the Coun-cil of State Governments. Unfortunately, affilia-tion-related costs rose steadily over the years until it was no longer fiscally responsible for the Commission to maintain its affiliation. In order to become an independent agency, ICJ estab-lished new accounts and procedures for bank-ing, insurance, human resources, and more. Since the disaffiliation was finalized on Dec- ember 1, 2016, ICJ realized over $90,000 in savings in fiscal year 2017 and will save an ad-ditional $150,000 in FY 2018. These funds can be used for future projects that promote ICJ’s mission and strategic initiatives. To ensure a smooth transition, $140,000 allocated to the long-term investment portfolio in FY17 was re-tained in the cash reserve account. In FY18, these funds will be transferred to the long-term investment fund as planned. The Juvenile Interstate Data System (JIDS) is
ICJ’s web-based system that facilitates the su-pervision, transfer, acceptance, tracking, and return of juveniles from one state to another. JIDS enables the 50 states, US Virgin Islands and District of Columbia to manage workflow and communications, as well as provide con-sistent service to juveniles.
In fiscal year 2017, the first major upgrade was performed on JIDS since its launch in 2012. The upgrade was critical because the previous version relied on outdated software (for which technical support was no longer available). The upgrade incorporated a sleek, new design with a modern interface and up-to-date icons. New features also enhanced security and optimized database indexing to improve system perfor-mance. To support successful use of JIDS, 18 Workflow Guides and the Sandbox Training En-vironment were also updated.
UPGRADED TECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL OFFICE STAFF
MaryLee Underwood Executive Director859.721.1060Jennifer AdkinsMIS Project Manager859.721.1063Emma Goode Administrative and Logistics Coordinator 859.721.1062LaVonne Rutten Training and Information Technology Coordinator | 859.721.1061
MaryLee Underwood, JD, joined the National Office as Executive Director in April 2017
NEW RESOURCES & PUBLICATIONS
n On Demand Training: It Takes a Village to Return a Juvenile
n Identified Elements in a Values Driven Script for Dispute Situations Provided by Member States
n Best Practice Guide: Intrastate Reloca-tions
n “About ICJ” Fact Sheetn Advisory Opinion 1–2016: Pre-adjudi-
cated Home Evaluation Requestsn Advisory Opinion 1–2017: Demanding/
Sending State’s Authority to Seek the Return of a Juvenile in Cases Where Charges are Pending in the Receiving/Holding State Under ICJ Rule 7-103
n Administrative Policy 01–2017: Code of Conduct
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT ASSESSMENTS
In fiscal year 2017, the Commission launched its second large-scale per-formance measurement assessment. States were randomly assessed on pre- determined standards selected by the Compliance Committee related to:
n ICJ Rule 4-102: Sending and Receiving Referrals.
n ICJ Rule 4-103: Transfer of Supervision Procedures for Juvenile Sex Offenders
n ICJ Rule 5-102: Absconder Under ICJ Supervision
n JIDS Privacy Policy 5.0 – Expectations Regarding Information Gathered and Shared
n JIDS Privacy Policy 21.0 – Review of In-formation Regarding Retention
In fiscal year 2017, 75% of states were assessed with preliminary results reflecting high levels of compliance throughout the nation. Remaining states will be assessed early in FY 18.
7
TRAINING & COLLABORATION TO PROMOTE THE SPIRIT OF THE COMPACT
6
Training and other resources provided at 4 conferences:
n Mississippi Juvenile Justice Symposium in Biloxi, MI
n American Probation and Parole Asso-ciation 41st Annual Training Institute in Cleveland, OH
6,341 trained via On
Demand training
Did you know there are 9,765 registered website users and there were over 38,500 visits to the ICJ website in fiscal year 2017? Mobile access increased 29% since last fiscal year.
63 teleconference
meetings
1,136 trained via 42 live
WebEx
1,039 trained via ICJ State Offices
n American Probation and Parole Associa-tion Winter Training Institute in Reno, NV
n Coalition for Juvenile Justice Annual Conference in Washington, DC
American Probation and Parole Association (APPA)Association of Administrators of the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (AAICPC)Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators (CJCA)Conference of Chief Justices (CCJ)Conference of State Court Administrators (COSCA)International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP)Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision (ICAOS)National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG)National Children’s Advocacy Center (NCAC)National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL)National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ)National Governors Association (NGA)National Juvenile Detention Association (NJDA)National Runaway Safeline (NRS)National Sheriffs’ Association (NSA)National Center for Victims of Crime (NCVC) Justice Solutions
EX OFFICIO MEMBERS
MISSION STATEMENT:The Interstate Commission for Juveniles, the governing body of the Interstate Compact for Juveniles, through means of joint and cooperative action among the compacting states, preserves child welfare and promotes public safety interests of citizens, including victims of juvenile offend-ers, by providing enhanced accountability, enforcement, visibility, and communication in the return of juveniles who have left their state of residence without permission and in the cooperative supervision of delinquent juveniles who travel or relocate across state lines.
135 trained via TTA
requests
98
FINANCIAL OUTLOOKAs fiscal year 2018 approaches, the Commission’s financial outlook is very positive. The long-term investment portfolio continues to gener-ate an increased rate of return on the Commission’s funds since be-ginning the investment opportunity in 2014. The current balance in the portfolio is $807,044, with an average rate of return of 9.25% for FY17. Because of the prudent financial decisions made in FY17, the Com-mission finished the year 25% under budget.
Balance in cash reserve: $1,113,927Balance in long-term investments: $807,044FY17 Total Revenue: $1,218,359FY17 Total Expenses: $820,837
Statistics on juvenile movement gathered for this report were attained from the Juve-nile Interstate Data System (JIDS) for the period of July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017.
RETURN DATAIn fiscal year 2017, states returned 2,097 runaways, escapees, absconders and juve-niles charged delinquent. Non-voluntary returns are fairly evenly split between accused delinquents, runaways, and absconders, while absconders and runaways together make up over 80 percent of all voluntary returns.
11
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Runaway
Returns by Type – Fiscal Year 2017Total Returns = 2,097
Num
ber
785
52
808
661
66
263
56
Type of Return
Escapee Absconder AccusedDelinquent
Non Voluntary Returns = 189 9% increase from FY16
Voluntary Returns = 1,908 3% increase from FY16
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
Parole
Transfer of Supervision by Type – Fiscal Year 2017
Num
ber
704
4,848
105497
Type of Transfer
Probation
Sex Offenders = 602 5% decrease from FY16
Total Transfers = 5,552 7% decrease from FY16
10
GATHERING DATAA comprehensive and accurate review of returns and transfers is only possible if JIDS is used to document each juvenile case correctly.
TRANSFER DATAIn fiscal year 2017, 5,552 juveniles transferred supervision to another state. Probation transfers decreased 10 percent from FY16, for a total of 4,848 probation transfers sent/received. Parole transfers decreased 6 percent from FY16, with 704 cases referred.
Overall, 11 percent of all incoming parole or probation transfers were for sex-offenders, or 602 juveniles out of 5,552 total transfer requests submitted. Additionally, states sent 232 expedited transfer requests.
ANNUAL STATISTICS
7,842 travel permits
issued197
juveniles
Airport surveillance for
12
From
You
r Sta
te R
etur
ned
(Hom
e/D
eman
ding
Sta
te)
Fr
om O
ther
Sta
tes
Ret
urne
d (H
oldi
ng S
tate
)
STAT
E Ru
n Es
c Ab
sc
Acc
Tota
l To
tal
Tota
l Ru
n Es
c Ab
sc
Acc
Tota
l To
tal
Tota
l Ai
rpor
t
De
l
Vol
Non
Vol
Del
Vo
l N
on V
ol
Sup R
eq
M
et
Al
abam
a 5
0 5
2 12
12
0
8 0
14
4 26
23
3
0Al
aska
1
0 0
0 1
1 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
1 0
Arizo
na
17
1 5
4 27
26
1
23
0 14
11
48
45
3
11Ar
kans
as
19
0 10
0
29
26
3 20
0
7 4
31
28
3 0
Cal
iforn
ia
83
1 60
12
15
6 14
6 10
41
0
34
14
89
78
11
6C
olor
ado
23
0 13
9
45
42
3 34
0
22
3 59
52
7
12C
onne
ctic
ut
3 0
5 12
20
3
17
4 0
2 2
8 3
5 0
Dela
war
e 1
0 11
3
15
14
1 0
0 5
1 6
3 3
0Di
stric
t of
Col
umbi
a
6 0
41
2 49
46
3
2 1
35
29
67
62
5 0
Flor
ida
57
1 47
32
13
7 12
6 11
55
1
22
6 84
68
16
0
Geo
rgia
35
0
12
9 56
53
3
36
0 26
21
83
81
2
60H
awai
i 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
2 1
1 0
Idah
o 5
0 52
10
67
63
4
14
0 9
5 28
28
0
0Illi
nois
28
1
30
15
74
63
11
11
0 23
19
53
45
8
15In
dian
a 26
1
14
8 49
45
4
30
18
15
19
82
78
4 0
Iow
a 8
1 19
7
35
34
1 30
3
20
9 62
61
1
0Ka
nsas
16
0
54
3 73
72
1
25
0 10
3
38
33
5 0
Kent
ucky
14
26
8
4 52
52
0
11
4 25
6
46
44
2 0
Loui
sian
a 7
0 2
1 10
10
0
12
0 5
5 22
18
4
0M
aine
0
0 2
0 2
2 0
4 0
6 0
10
10
0 0
Mar
ylan
d
11
4 31
21
67
63
4
5 2
64
4 75
64
11
1
INTE
RST
ATE
MO
VEM
ENT
OF
JUV
ENIL
ES:
JU
LY 1
, 201
6 –
JUN
E 30
, 201
7 KE
Y Ru
n =
Runa
way
Es
c =
Esca
pee
Absc
= A
bsco
nder
Ac
c De
l = A
ccus
ed D
elin
quen
t Ai
rpor
t Sup
Req
Met
= A
irpor
t Sup
ervi
sion
Req
uest
Met
Vo
l = V
olun
tary
This
cha
rt de
tails
the
retu
rn o
f run
away
s, e
scap
ees,
abs
cond
ers,
and
juve
nile
s cha
rged
de
linqu
ent.
It in
clud
es th
e nu
mbe
r of j
uven
iles
sent
bac
k to
the
hom
e/de
man
ding
sta
te
(“Fro
m Y
our S
tate
Ret
urne
d”) a
long
with
the
num
ber o
f inc
omin
g ju
veni
les
whe
re th
e st
ate
liste
d is
the
hold
ing
stat
e (“F
rom
Oth
er S
tate
s Re
turn
ed”).
The
tota
l ret
urns
are
ca
tego
rized
as
eith
er v
olun
tary
or n
on-v
olun
tary
.
Mas
sach
uset
ts
18
0 15
1
34
20
14
4 0
5 9
18
6 12
0
Mic
higa
n 30
0
15
2 47
38
9
4 3
8 1
16
16
0 11
Min
neso
ta
17
4 23
12
56
56
0
10
0 13
12
35
30
5
2M
issi
ssip
pi
3 0
1 1
5 4
1 14
0
2 1
17
17
0 0
Mis
sour
i 16
1
10
5 32
29
3
24
0 64
9
97
92
5 2
Mon
tana
4
1 4
1 10
10
0
2 0
6 1
9 9
0 0
Neb
rask
a 24
0
36
6 66
61
5
14
0 22
5
41
38
3 0
Nev
ada
14
1 20
5
40
37
3 22
0
43
6 71
70
1
8N
ew H
amps
hire
7
0 2
0 9
9 0
5 0
2 0
7 6
1 0
New
Jer
sey
6 0
3 6
15
10
5 8
0 16
6
30
26
4 0
New
Mex
ico
15
0 13
3
31
31
0 15
0
7 3
25
23
2 0
New
Yor
k
28
0 12
0
40
39
1 10
1
17
5 33
20
13
2
Nor
th C
arol
ina
22
1 6
6 35
29
6
37
2 24
6
69
63
6 21
Nor
th D
akot
a 5
0 8
5 18
18
0
11
0 14
5
30
30
0 0
Ohi
o 24
0
30
14
68
63
5 36
9
23
9 77
74
3
0O
klah
oma
26
0 9
4 39
36
3
13
0 12
6
31
29
2 0
Ore
gon
13
0 34
5
52
47
5 32
1
48
6 87
79
8
1Pe
nnsy
lvan
ia
18
1 29
7
55
44
11
11
0 20
8
39
37
2 4
Rhod
e Is
land
4
0 2
1 7
4 3
1 0
2 0
3 3
0 0
Sout
h C
arol
ina
19
0 17
3
39
36
3 11
1
12
6 30
27
3
0So
uth
Dako
ta
4 3
13
1 21
21
0
10
5 8
0 23
21
2
0Te
nnes
see
32
2 15
10
59
57
2
40
0 6
10
56
54
2 0
Texa
s 40
0
24
18
82
72
10
78
0 25
2
105
101
4 25
Uta
h 19
0
10
1 30
29
1
24
0 17
6
47
45
2 8
Verm
ont
1 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0Vi
rgin
Isla
nds
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0Vi
rgin
ia
33
0 53
28
11
4 10
0 14
14
0
19
12
45
40
5 0
Was
hing
ton
24
1 32
7
64
61
3 11
0
51
7 69
66
3
8W
est V
irgin
ia
1 1
4 1
7 6
1 2
0 7
6 15
13
2
0W
isco
nsin
16
1
9 12
38
35
3
9 1
18
3 31
27
4
0W
yom
ing
3 0
4 0
7 6
1 13
1
5 2
21
21
0 0
Tota
l 85
1 53
87
4 31
9 20
97
1908
18
9 85
1 53
87
4 31
9 20
97
1908
18
9 19
7
1514
Par
ole
Supe
rvis
ion
Prob
atio
n Su
perv
isio
n
STAT
E In
c Se
x In
c O
ut
Sex
Out
Fa
il
Fail
Inc
Sex
Inc
Out
Se
x O
ut
Fail
Fail
Off
Term
Off
Term
Sv
sn S
vsn
Vio
O
ff Te
rm
O
ff Te
rm
Svsn
Svs
n Vi
o
Alab
ama
26
1 23
6
3 5
0 0
101
8 89
62
3
62
0 0
Alas
ka
2 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
11
2 11
4
0 7
0 0
Arizo
na
21
2 19
4
1 7
0 0
148
9 15
4 85
7
106
0 0
Arka
nsas
9
0 8
23
2 26
0
0 65
7
67
62
5 74
0
0C
alifo
rnia
37
6
35
24
7 21
0
0 25
4 28
26
8 36
4 23
38
0 3
1C
olor
ado
8 2
8 17
0
28
0 0
87
6 98
18
3 19
17
2 2
0C
onne
ctic
ut
8 0
5 9
0 9
0 0
22
1 23
13
1
14
1 0
Dela
war
e 5
0 3
11
0 13
0
0 71
3
52
58
4 59
0
0Di
stric
t of
Col
umbi
a
26
3 22
17
1
21
0 0
53
1 82
37
3
35
0 0
Flor
ida
44
9 41
56
9
47
0 0
247
24
259
357
30
330
3 2
Geo
rgia
51
8
40
71
3 64
3
3 24
6 21
22
8 23
6 15
23
0 0
0H
awai
i 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 6
1 10
6
0 7
1 1
Idah
o 7
4 5
10
1 11
0
0 52
8
56
125
14
109
5 5
Illino
is
22
4 19
58
2
34
1 1
120
12
137
356
22
326
2 2
Indi
ana
24
4 26
5
3 1
0 0
132
10
110
86
13
87
0 0
Iow
a 11
1
7 1
0 1
0 0
101
12
91
41
13
33
0 0
Kans
as
13
2 9
23
3 15
0
0 57
5
53
92
19
105
1 1
Kent
ucky
15
3
12
16
7 12
1
1 96
11
78
23
1
21
0 0
Loui
sian
a 11
4
16
4 1
8 0
0 85
14
83
58
4
47
0 0
Mai
ne
0 0
3 0
0 1
0 0
12
1 11
5
0 6
0 0
Mar
ylan
d
25
1 29
54
9
52
0 0
149
17
135
145
18
157
2 2
Mas
sach
uset
ts
3 0
1 21
0
17
0 0
42
3 41
31
0
35
0 0
INTE
RST
ATE
MO
VEM
ENT
OF
JUV
ENIL
ES:
JU
LY 1
, 201
6 –
JUN
E 30
, 201
7
KEY
Inc
= In
com
ing
Sex
Off
= Se
x O
ffend
erIn
c Te
rm =
Inco
min
g Te
rmin
ated
Out
= O
utgo
ing
Out
Ter
m =
Out
goin
g Te
rmin
ated
Faile
d Sp
rvsn
= R
etur
n fo
r Fai
led
Supe
rvis
ion,
as
hom
e/se
ndin
g st
ate
Fail
Sprv
sn V
io =
Ret
urne
d fo
r Fai
led
Supe
rvis
ion
due
to v
iola
tion,
a
s ho
me/
send
ing
stat
e
This
char
t illu
stra
tes
the
mov
emen
t of j
uven
iles
unde
r sup
ervis
ion.
Thi
s in
clud
es
the
num
ber
of c
ases
term
inat
ed, w
heth
er it
was
a s
ex-o
ffend
er re
late
d ca
se,
faile
d su
perv
ision
s, a
nd fa
iled
supe
rvisi
ons
due
to v
iola
tions
.
Mic
higa
n 9
1 15
0
0 0
0 0
98
23
105
26
6 22
2
2M
inne
sota
12
1
9 1
0 0
0 0
112
9 90
76
9
99
4 4
Mis
siss
ippi
9
2 9
1 0
5 0
0 61
5
65
32
1 34
0
0M
isso
uri
19
2 14
35
4
32
0 0
162
18
159
26
2 22
0
0M
onta
na
4 1
5 9
2 5
0 0
39
4 28
10
2
15
2 2
Neb
rask
a 4
1 4
0 0
0 0
0 41
8
33
89
6 10
2 0
0N
evad
a 18
3
13
25
0 24
2
2 12
7 11
12
9 15
0 10
17
5 2
1N
ew H
amps
hire
4
0 3
5 0
1 0
0 9
3 11
14
2
14
0 0
New
Jer
sey
4 1
2 15
0
7 0
0 88
6
84
172
24
172
1 1
New
Mex
ico
3 3
5 5
0 10
0
0 40
3
60
35
1 48
2
1N
ew Y
ork
10
1 12
14
1
6 0
0 16
4 16
17
2 61
3
55
0 0
Nor
th C
arol
ina
21
4 21
0
0 8
0 0
182
18
177
77
7 82
1
1N
orth
Dak
ota
4 2
5 13
2
9 0
0 32
2
37
49
6 38
0
0O
hio
19
2 13
11
6
19
1 0
107
11
119
90
11
94
0 0
Okl
ahom
a 12
0
14
2 0
1 0
0 81
13
71
85
11
59
0
0O
rego
n 15
4
13
14
2 20
0
0 11
2 17
12
0 97
19
67
0
0Pe
nnsy
lvan
ia
20
0 27
2
0 1
0 0
145
15
140
307
31
249
2 1
Rhod
e Is
land
4
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 11
1
8 19
0
16
0 0
Sout
h C
arol
ina
16
1 20
6
2 5
1 0
96
9 10
6 83
8
89
2 2
Sout
h Da
kota
3
2 6
6 2
13
0 0
33
3 31
11
0
13
0 0
Tenn
esse
e 24
7
18
28
5 33
0
0 12
4 10
13
9 10
2 3
105
0 0
Texa
s 37
5
45
15
4 15
0
0 30
3 27
31
0 28
8 51
26
5 2
2U
tah
7 2
5 5
0 4
0 0
62
9 51
43
9
59
1 1
Verm
ont
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
8 0
8 7
2 3
0 0
Virg
in Is
land
s 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
5 0
1 0
0Vi
rgin
ia
20
2 21
24
5
24
0 0
116
17
119
130
17
165
0 0
Was
hing
ton
14
3 9
24
16
19
3 1
156
19
122
161
21
156
4 3
Wes
t Virg
inia
9
0 10
0
0 0
0 0
60
3 43
11
1
18
0 0
Wis
cons
in
11
0 10
14
2
13
0 0
95
10
86
130
13
129
0 0
Wyo
min
g
2 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
26
3 39
33
7
30
1 1
TOTA
L 70
4 10
5 66
7 70
4 10
5 66
7 12
8
4848
49
7 47
98
4848
49
7 47
98
46
36