Indian Journal of Radio & Space PhysicsVol. 17, December 1988, pp. 203-219
Aerosols and Radiation Budget in the Middle Atmosphere
.// B V KRISHNA MURTHY
#' Space Physics Laboratory, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Trivandrum 695 022
A brief outline of the atmospheric aerosol formation, destruction and distribution processes and size distributions ispresented. Recent experimental observations in India are discussed. Some important aspects of the radiative effects of theaerosols are presented.
1 Introduction
Atmospheric aerosols playa very important role inmany atmospheric processes some of which may havein turn an impact on climate. However, our ability toassess the role of aerosols in atmospheric processcs isgreatly handicapped by the very limited informationavailable on the properties of aerosols. The inputs toatmospheric aerosols come from natural and manmade sources. The recent thrust to aerosol studiescame from the concern about the possible effects ofman-made aerosols on atmospheric processes andclimate. However, a realistic assessment of this cannot be made because of our incomplete knowledgeabout the characteristics of natural aerosols and theirrole in various atmospheric processes.
The radiation budget of the middle atmosphere isinfluenced primarily by ozone, carbon dioxide andwater vapour ~Aerosols affect the radiation budgetthrough scattering and absorption processes. For aproper evaluation of this effect, the data required onaerosol characteristics are rather scanty. Aerosol data over the Indian continent are very scarce if not virtually non-existent prior to nineteen eighties. A majorthrust to aerosol studies has been given in the IndianMiddle Atmosphere Programme.
2 Aerosols: Their Sources, Formation, Destructionand Distribution Processes
Aerosols are defined as suspended particles in solid and/or liquid phase in the atmosphere. They occurover a wide range of sizes from about 10 - 9 to 10 - 4 min diameter. The size range can again be subdividedinto three ranges based on atmospheric effects of aerosols, The smallest particles of sizes less than- 0.1 flm are called Aitken particles and :ue important in atmospheric electricity. Particles in the sizerange 0.1 flm to 1.0 flm are referred to as large particles and are effective in atmospheric optics and in ra-
diation budget. These are also effective as condensation nuclei. Particles of size range > 1.0 flm play animportant role in cloud physics and are effective ascondensation nuclei. The large particles (0.1 flm to1.0 fl m) are sometimes called haze particles.
Aerosol particles are either directly produced orformed by various gas-to-particle conversion processes. In either case, the 'original' aerosol particle undergoes a variety of chemical processes and physicalmodifications in the atmosphere. These processesand modifications result in a continually changingchemical composition and particle size distributionand hence physical properties. Particles from different sources are mixed by Brownian diffusion andcoagulation processes on a microscale and by atmospheric turbulence and circulation on a macroscale.The principal sources of aerosols are listed in Table 1with approximate estimates of their input levels. Thewide diversity in the different estimates is an indica- .tion of the uncertainty involved in making the estimates and the need for more relevant information.
Some of the characteristics of the size distributionof aerosols depend upon the various formation andtransformation processes of aerosols. Particles in thesize range below about 1 flm (transient/Aitken nuclei range) are produced by gas-to-particle conversionprocesses whereas particles of sizes greater than1 flm (coarse range) are formed directly by mechanical processes soch as wind blown dust and sea saltspray. The relationship between the particle production processes and size range is shown in Fig. 1. Panicles at the lower end of the size range have relativelyshort atmospheric residence times because of chemical reactivity and greater physical mobility, Theseparticles will eventually be incorporated in the0.1 flm to 1.0 flm range which is generally referred toas the accumulation moue. Conversion, of particles inthe transient and a<:cumulation ranges to coarse rangeand vice versa is not a very efficient process. Thus,
1()3
INDIAN J RADIO & SPACE PHYS, VOL. ]7, DECEMBER ]988
Table1-Estimates ofParticleProduction in106 tons/year
(ii) Particles formed fromgases
Converted su]phates 200Converted nitrates 35
Converted hydrocarbons 15Sub-total 250Total of man-made 280sources
Source
Man-made
After Peterson and Junge 1
(i) Direct particleproduction
TransportationStationary fuel sourcesIndustrial processesSolid waste disposalMiscellaneousSub-total
1.89.6
12.40.45.4
29.6
After Hidyand Brook2
37-110
1102327
160197-270
WIND BLOWNDUST
SEA SPRAYVOLCANOPLANT
PARTICLES
I I I I I -.. •0.01 0.1 1.0 10 100
TRANSIENT OR ~CHANICAl
+- AITKEN NUCLEI -+ ACClNJl.RIOOl -+- GENERRIOOl _RANGE RANGE RANGE
_ FINE PARTICLES ••• COARSE PARTICLES _
Fig. I-Atmospheric aerosol surface area distribution showingthe main modes and principal source and removal mechanisms
T ...
particles in the lower two ranges are quite distinctfrom those in the coarse range.
2.1 Gas-to-Particle Conversion Processes
It is seen from Table 1 that gas-to-particle conversion process is a major contributor to the aerosol particle production. It contributes more than half of thetotal particle production due to natural sources aswell as man-made sources. Atmospheric gases can interact with each other and with existing particles toform new particles or to modify the existing particlesby different processes. The main processes are (1)homogeneous homomolecular nucleation, (2) homogeneous heteromolecular nucleation, and (3) heterogeneous heteromolecular nucleation. The first process involves formation of new, liquid or solid ultra-
Natural
204
(i) Direct particleproduction
Sea saltWind blown dustVolcanic emissionsMeteoric debrisForest firesSub-total
(ii) Particles formed fromgases
Converted su!phatesConverted nitrates
Converted hydrocarbonsSub-totalTotal of natural sourcesGrand Total
50025025
o5
780
3356075
47012501530
109560-360
40.02-0.2
1461610
37-365600-620182-1095
208036903960
fine particles from a gas phase consisting of a singlegas species only. The second process involves formation of new particles from a gas phase consisting oftwo or more gaseous species. In this, the most common one of the species is water vapour. In the thirdprocess, i.e. heterogeneous, heteromolecular nucleation, growth of pre-existing particles takes place dueto condensation of gaseous species.
Atmospheric trace gases undergo chemical reactions to produce reaction products with a low vapourpressure. As more and more of these products areformed, a state of supersaturation will be reachedwith respect to these molecules. The degree of supersaturation will determine the degree of nucleation(formation of new particles) and condensation (deposition on pre-existing particles). From the thermodynamic point of view, more energy is required to form anew particle (nucleation) than to enlarge the surfaceof the existing particle (condensation). The followingreactions are considered to be important for the gasto-particle conversion: (1) sulphur dioxide reactswith hydroxyl radicals to form eventually sulphuricacid molecules, (2) non-methane hydrocarbons reactwith ozone and/or hydroxyl radicals to form aldehydes, alcohols, carboxylic acids and dicarboxylic acids, and (3) most secondary reaction products of nonmethane hydrocarbons react with oxides of nitrogento form organic nitrates. The particles formed bythese mechanisms are in the fine particle size range( <.05 ,urn). Gas-to-particle conversion can also takeplace through direct reaction of gases with particleson the surface or in the interior in case of liquid particles.
..
I' I I I '" " 'I'!'I" " "I ",
KRISHNA MURTHY: AEROSOLS & RADIATION BUDGET IN MIDDLE ATMOSPHERE
... (2)
... (1)
Gas-to-particle conversion plays a major role in theaerosol production in the stratosphere. Sulphur dioxide is converted through various reactions to sulphateaerosols in the stratosphere. In fact it is this process ofgas-to-particle conversion which is primarily responsible for the Junge layer in the stratosphere. Eversince its discovery by Junge (Junge et ai. 3) the stratospheric aerosol layer has been a subject of great interest. It has been well established that the stratosphericparticles are primarily composed of liquid solutionsof sulphuric acid and water. Other substances likeammonium sulphate are also generally present(Hamill et ai.4). These sulphate particles are producedlocally in the stratosphere, mainly from precursor sulphur-bearing vapours. Sulphur dioxide (SOz) andcarbonyl sulphide (OeS) are the most important precursors. SOz, which is an important component ofvolcanic effluents, is injected directly into stratosphere in large quantities by major volcanic eruptions.During periods of quiescent volcanic activity, the major precursor gas is carbonyl sulphide (OeS) with carbon disulphide (eSz) as a possible secondary source(Sze and K05; erutzen6). Unlike most of the other sulphur gases, oes is expected to have a long tropospheric lifetime of several years (Turco et aU). oesoriginates in biological, volcanic and industrial processes (mainly from the surface). esz is less inert thanoes but it has aeronomic significance beGause of itspossible oxidation to oes. Apart from oes and esz,SOz from surface emission is also transported to lower stratosphere even during periods of quiescent volcanic activity. Detailed modelling studies have beenmade of the tropospheric oes cycle and the stratospheric sulphur balance during volcanically quiescenttimes (Turco et ai.8•9). These studies show that oes isthe dominant sulphur source compared to esz andSOz for the stratospheric aerosol layer. The precursor gases from troposphere are transported to stratosphere through eddy diffusion and direct injection.The direct injection can occur during thundercloudpenetration, tropopause folding and vertical convection especially in the tropical zone. Horizontal advection subsequently distributes injected material zonally and meridionally.
In the lower stratosphere, oes breaks up into sulphur and carbon monoxide by photo decompositiondue to absorption inthe extreme ultraviolet, 200-240nm. The sulphur atoms thus produced react rapidlywith molecular oxygen to form SO which in turn is rapidly oxidized to SOz. SOz is further oxidized mainlythrough reactions with OH (three-body reaction) toHzS04' For detailed discussion on the sulphur chemistry, articles by Turco et aU. 10 may be referred.
Depending on the saturation levels, the H2S04 andH20 vapours nuclease by heterogeneous heteromo-
lecular or homogeneous heteromolecular processes.It isgenerally believed that the former process ismuchmore efficient than the latter one. However, recent assessment in this regard (Yue and Deepakll) broughtoutthatattemperaturesaround - 7Soewhicharenotunusual in the stratosphere, the homogeneous nucleation mechanism can be a significant contributor tothe overall nucleation process. Yue and Deepak studied the relative contribution of the two nucleation
processes at different temperatures and vapour pressures (of Hz SO4 and HzO )and arrived at the above result.
Other processes of nucleation include ion nucleation and ion-ion precondensation nucleation. Ionnucleation involves condensation of gaseous vapours(e.g.,HzSO 4 and HzO) on charged molecular clusters.The electrostatic energy of the core ion stabilizes thenucleation embryo, effectively lowering the barrier tonucleation. The ion-ion precondensation nuclei maybe formed when large cluster ions of opposite chargesrecombine. The contribution of these processes tothe total nucleation is expected to be not significantcompared to the other processes described above.
After nucleation, an aerosol continues to grow byvapour condensation. Both evaporation and attachment processes take place at any given instant and thenet effect of these two processes determines the rateof growth by condensation. In the troposphere,growth of aerosol particles by condensation of watervapour plays an important role. The change in theparticle size is related to the relative humidity(HanePZ)by
[ , ( )] 1/3r(aw)= ro 1+P :law
where
ro E>ryparticle radiusp' Particle density relative to that of watermw(aw) Mass of condensed watermo Dry particle massaw Water activity which is essentially the relative
humidity f corrected for curvature of theparticle surface.
tlw is given by
[ 2St Vw]aw= f exp -~.-RwTr
where
5t Surface tension on the wet particle surfaceVw Specific volume of waterRw Specific gas constant for waterT Absolute temperature in Kr Particle radius
205
INDIAN J RADIO & SPACE PHYS, VOL. 17, DECEMBER 1988
For room temperature the value of2St Vj R" T isapproximately equal to 0.001056 ,urn,
2.2 Role of Meteoric Debris
The meteoric influx to the earth amounts to
1.6 x 107 kg per year. The meteor input to total stratospheric particulate mass input constitutes only afew per cent. Hunten et al.13 and Turco et al.14 madedetailed theoretical calculations on the effects of
meteoric debris on stratospheric aerosols. Turco etal,14 concluded from their model calculations thatmeteoric debris is an important natural aerosol constituent for particles larger than 1,um radius throughout the stratosphere and may be dominant for particles smaller than 0.01 ,urn radius above 20 km. Forother sizes, the meteoric debris generally constitutesless than 10 per cent of the total aerosol mass. Theircalculations show that very few meteoric particlesreach the upper troposphere in their natural state andparticipate as cloud ice condensation nuclei. This is incontrast to the Bowen's hypothesis1) of relation between precipitation and meteoric dust influxes.
2.3 Sedimentation
The fall velocity and the diffusion coefficient arebasic parameters to determine the sedimentationrate. These parameters are particle size dependent.Atsizes comparable to molecular dimensions, kinetictheory of gases is applicable and for larger particlesStokes-Cunningham formula is applicable.
For large particles, the fall velocity is given by
d Molecular diameter
ng Number density of molecules (air)YJ Viscosity of air
The slip correction factor (a) arises because thedrag force on the particle must be corrected for slippage of gas at the particle surface. With
1;;1IIYJ=- -ng mkT
where m is the mean molecular mass, and for Ilr ~ 1and as p ~ Ps,
v= j " 2 {hp,g ... (5)mkT 9 ng
The approximate values of fall velocity for differentsizes at different height~ are given in Table 2.
2.4 Coagulation
Coagulation is controlled by the diffusion coefficient and is thus important for smaller particles.Coagulation controls the smaller particle end of theaerosol size distribution whereas sedimentation controls the larger particle end. The rate of coagulationbetween two groups of particles of different sizeswithin a population n( r) is given by
dn(rlz)-'-= -4n(D] + Dz)(r1 +rz)dt
r ~,
... (8)
Table 2- Fall Velocities of Particles of Different Sizes
x n( r1) n( rz) d rid rz ... (6)
where D (= kT Bs) is the diffusion coefficient andn( r) is the concentration of the particles. SubstitutingforD,
dn(rl z) 2 kT[ 1 1 (1 1)]-~'-= --- -+-+113 2+2 (r1+rz)
dt 3 YJ rl rz r1 rz
x nh)n(rz)drl dr2 ... (7)
which can be written as
... (4)
... (3)v= msgBs
and the diffusion coefficient by
dsc = kT B,
where
ms Mass of the particleg Acceleration due to gravityk Eoltzmann's constant
Bs Particle mobility, defined as the velocity per unit driving force
Bs is given by
( p) aB=l--~-
s p, 6nYJr
Velocity v(cm/s)at.r=where
p Density of airPs Density of particlea (= 1 + I3l1r) Cunningham's slip correction fac
tor
13 1.26+ 0.40 exp (-1.10 rll)I (= 1IIi n dZ flg) Mean free path length
Altitudekrn
30201510
5,um
0.50.170.120.10
2,um
0.240,080.0550.045
1,um
0.060.020.0140.011
0.5,um
0.D15
0.0050.00350.003
206
I' " ,,''!'I'I"'" "I ,,,
KRISHNA MURTHY: AEROSOLS & RADIATION BUDGET IN MIDDLE ATMOSPHERE
The combination of r1 and rz results in a particle with
( 3 + 3)1/3r= rl rz
Fig. 2 (JungeI6) shows how a given model size distribution of particles undergoes changes due to coagulation. Rapid decrease in the small particle concentration can be seen in this figure. This results in a displacement of the maximum towards larger particles.
... (13)
... (12)
or
dn(r) = Cr -(v+ I) dr
dn(r) = CIr- Vd(log r)
Fig. 2-Change in number and volume distribution with size ofcontinental aerosols due to coagulation (fromJunge 16)
>I~.•. -.•.
10-1 100
RADIUS (}Jm)
~•.Q.
...Eu
chemistry is important in understanding the effect ofwet removal processes.
The log radius-surface(s) and log radius-volume( V )distributions are written as
ds(r) = 4Jlrz dn(r)d(log r) d(log r)
2.6 Aerosol Size Distributions
The relationship between aerosol producing processes and their contribution to different aerosoi size
ranges has been discussed earlier. The size distribution of aerosols is a very important information in thestudy of effect of aerosols on atmospheric processes.The aerosol size distribution can be expressed interms of number density distribution or surface areadistribution or volume distribution. The surface areaand volume distributions are very important in thestudy of aerosol chemistry.
Junge 16 found that the number density size (radiusr) distribution can be approximated by a power law inthe size range 0.04-10 flm in the case of continentalaerosols. This is written as follows
... (9)
... (11)
'" (10)
zr dr1 drdt
x V 3 3r - r1
The number of particles with radii r decreases bycoagulation with smaller and larger particles by
Iz= -Ko L~~f(~_,r)n(rl)n(r)drldrdt
So, the total change!:!..nin particles with radii ris givenby
Itl!:!..n(r)= 0 (II + Iz) dt
The largest particles which can thus participate insuch formation of particle with radios.,. are of size,r( = rl21/3. The total number of particles with radii rformed during d tis then
I, ~ K,L](;'.1r' - ..;)n(r,) n(r' - rll
2.5 Aerosol Removal Processes
There are two processes of direct removal of particles from the atmosphere. These are (1) dry deposition, i.e. gravitational sedimentation, discussed in thepreceding paragraphs, and (2) wet removal. Wet removal is of two types, namely, rain out and washout. Inrain out the particles are in~orporated in precipitation nuclei during processes occurring within theclc,ud. Washout involves incorporation of a materialinto precipitation as a consequence of processes occurring below the cloud. These removal processes arehighly size dependent. Furthermore, the removal rateof hygroscopic and non-hygroscopic particles will bedifferent because hygroscopic aerosols will iftcreasegreatly in size with increasing relative humidity. Thewet removal processes are important mainly in thelower troposphere where cloud formations exist.However, in tropical latitudes-where the vertical extent of the clouds (thunderclouds) often extends intothe stratosphere, the wet removal processes can become important even at altitudes of upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. Study of precipitation
207
INDIAN J RADIO & SPACE PHYS, VOL. 17, DECEMBER 1988
.. . (14)
and
d V(r) 4 ,dn(r)~--=- nr'--d(log r) 3 d(1og r)
The power law index (v lis typically 3 but could varyfrom 2 to 6. This type of distribution has been veryuseful as it is a simple function. However, it is generally found to be more representative, if the size distribution (especially of tropospheric aerosols) is expressedas a sum of log normal distributions with differentmode radii. It appears'that each particle source willhave particles with their own lognormal distributions.So, with multiple sources, which is in general the case,a multi modal log normal distribution with each modespecified by a total number density, a spread parameter and a mode radius will represent the size distribution. The multi modal log normal distribution can berepresented by
dN =I ---117 n; exp [_ [log (~nJ]d r (2 n) - r 0; In 10 201
E
~ 1~I'"'eu..
••~E 10::::J
C
zo~~0::~Z~UZ -1o 10u~...JU~ -20::10~0.. 00() 1 0.1 1-0 10
PART I C lE RADIUS(fJm}
T .•
0:J
... (15)
where
N Particle concentration for particles of radius r
n; Integral over the individual log normal distri-butionStandard deviationIndividual mode radius
Fig. 3-Measured (from panicle impaction and simple particlelight scattering detection) size distributions of stratospheric aerosols. The approximate height of observation above the local tropopause (in km) is indicated for each distribution (from Turco et
at.III).
at equatorial latitudes in view of the source of aerosolsin the inter-tropical convergence zone.
2,7 Aerosol Continuity Equation
The diffusive flux of the particles is usually derivedfrom the relationship
In Eq. ( 17), Qcan be taken to represent the rate of aerosol production due to different processes, u( = 1/ tf'tf is the residence time lis the wet removal rate, and yisthe coagulation rate (discussed in previous sections).
where De is the eddy diffusion coefficient and ng is theair number density. The eddy diffusion coefficient isoften derived from measurements of long-lived tracers such as N20 and CH4 (species which are not produced photochemically in the atmosphere).
The aerosol continuity equation can be written hyincluding the rates of production, destruction (removal) and transport. This is written as
... (17)
... (16)
an a , a-= Q- un- y-- (nv)-~ (¢II)at az az
Two modes are generally adequate to characterizemost aerosol distributions. A third mode may be ne,cessary to represent the Aitken nuclei especially nearsources of combustion particulates.
Stratospheric aerosols can be represented by asingle mode as these are dominated mainly by SO 4
aerosols. These are discussed in detail in literature] o.
Fig. 3 shows some of the observed distributions 10.
The numbers on each distribution denote the heightabove the tropopause. There is remarkable similarityin the distributions at r> 0.1 ,urn. Turco et al.17 ex
plained this as due to the constant input rate of gaseous sulphur to the stratosphere and to the dependence of aerosol removal rate on particle size. Theremoval rate varies as r hecause of an r'dependenceof particle mass and an r dependence of sedimentation rate. These factors constrain the size distrihution
to a relativCly small variation. At sizes less than 0.1,urn, the small particle concentration decreases withincreasing separation from tropopause. This canprobably be attributed to increasing aerosol maturitywith altitude in the stratospherelK• The distrihutionsshown in Fig. 3 correspond to high latitudes. It wouldbe interesting to see the corresponding distributions
20~
I' I 'I' II ,," II'I'!'I"I '~'I I l·tlIIHI.1
KRISHNA MURTHY: AEROSOLS & RADIATION BUDGET IN MIDDLE ATMOSPHERE
methods and indirect methods. The direct methodsinvolve actual collection of aerosol samples ,from theatmosphere using impactors and analysing these todetermine the aerosol characteristics such as chemi
cal composition and size distribution by laboratorymethods. The impactors are carried by balloons andthe collected samples are recovered for later analysis.Another direct method is the filter method in which
aerosols of different size ranges are collected by usingdifferent filters and are analysed for their mass distribution and chemical composition.
Indirect methods use the aerosol property to scatter and absorb the incident light and thereby causingextinction. The scattered light signal strength or theattenuation of the light signal as it traverses a knownpath in the atmosphere is recorded. This can be analysed to determine aerosol characteristics such asnumber density and size distribution. The indirectmethods can be carried out in situ using balloon orrocket platforms. Balloon-borne dustsondes211 areamong the indirect in situ experiments that have beenwidely conducted. In the balloon-borne dustsondesthe air containing aerosols is pumped into an illuminated cell. The light scattered by the pumped-in air isrecorded. As aerosols pass through the cell they giverise to scattered light pulses. The number of pulsesand the pulse width give information on the aerosolnumber density and the size when analysed using calibration data. Another indirect method using balloonborne/rocket-borne payloads is the light scatteringmethod2!'22. In this method, the scattered sunlight byair molecules and aerosols is recorded at differentscattering angles at different altitudes. The recordedsignal strength as a function of scattering angle is analysed to derive the aerosol characteristics.
The ground-based techniques for the measurement of aerosol characteristics employ indirect methods (remote sensing). Among these are the turbiditymeasurement technique and the multi-wavelength solar radiometer. Turbidity measurements are carriedout by a sun photometer using wide band filtersB.These measurements can be used to obtain the Angstrom's turbidity coefficient and the wavelength exponent using power law size distribution for aerosols.As the size distribution differs significantly from power law distribution, especially for lower troposphericaerosols which contribute most to the total atmos
pheric turbidity, it is necessary to make measurements at a number of wavelengths using narrow bandfilters to derive the size distribution function. Multiwavelength radiometers (MWR) use this method. InMWR, the aerosol optical depth is obtained as a function of wavelength by making measurements of directsolar flux at a number of wavelengths in the visible atdifferent solar zenith angles. By adopting inversion
05
2520--.J
10 0,
60 50 40 30
NORTH LATITUDE (deg)
o90 80
wo=>
'::: 15
~«
Fig. 4-Latitudinal cross-sections of aerosols. The mixing ratiounits (indicated by the contour lines) are in particles/ mg of air. Thethick dashed band indicates the tropopause altitude (from Rosen
eta!.19).
~ 20E
Recourse has to be taken to numerical methods tosolve the continuity equation. One-dimensional modelling using the continuity equation has been carriedout for stratospheric aerosols and the results havebeen reviewed by Turco et al.lO The model predictions compare fairly well with the observations; However, realistic three-dimensional modelling is neededto understand the global variation of stratosphericaerosols. Modelling of tropospheric aerosols is still inits infant stage mainly because of the plethora ofsources of different nature.
2.8 Latitudinal Structure of Aerosols
Fig. 4 shows the latitudinal distribution of aerosolparticles with radius greater than 0.15 ,um. Verticalarrows on the latitude axis indicates the location of theobservation sites. The observations have been madeusing balloon-borne particle counters. The heavydashed line indicates the tropopause height. The figure shows the well-known Junge layer in the stratosphere. The latitudinal distribution shows greater aerosolloading in the low latitudes. It also points to relative paucity of aerosol measurements at lower latitudes. With the advent of satellite-based observations
(SAGE II), a better global coverage of aerosol characteristics is now available.
3 Brief Outline of Experimental Methods forAerosol StudiesExperimental methods for the study of atmospher
ic aerosols can be classified into two categories: direct
AEROSOL DISTRIBUTION DURING SEP-OCl1972
209
INDIAN J RADIO & SPACE PHYS, VOL. 17, DECEMBER ]988
4 Studies on Atmospheric Aerosols in IndiaIndia Meteorological Department has been con
ducting turbidity measurements at a number of selected Indian stations and the results have been published and discussed in literature23• These results es
tablish the temporal- and location-dependent variations of atmospheric turbidity. At many of the locations, a summer maximum of turbidity is recorded.In this article no attempt is made to cover these results.
. -
402.~ ;0 3:5POWER LAW INDEX
o
E..•
4O~1---...••r----"""----"'·"""---1
by Jayaraman etal.22 at Hyderabad. The profiles byJayaraman et al. were obtained by the indirect methodof light scattering which may be sensitive to a widersize range than the profiles measured by the impactorwhich is sensitive to 0.1-1.0 ,urn range with a peak at0.15 ,urn. The difference between the two profilescould be at least partly due to this. Also, the profile ofChagnon and Junge was obtained in 1960 whereasthe profiles by Jayaraman et al. correspond to eighties.
One prominent feature of the impactor profile isthe stratospheric aerosol peak. This is not seen prominently in the profiles by Jayaraman et al. The stratospheric peak of aerosols is mainly a large particle peak,i.e. particles> 0.15 ,urn and the smaller particles donot exhibit this peak4. As pointed out earlier the lightscattering method gives aerosol information coveringa much wider range including smaller particleswhereas the impactor is confined to a relatively smallrange (0.1-1.0 ,urn). This may explain the differencebetween the impactor profile and profiles of Jayaraman et al. with regard to stratospheric peak.
Considering the profiles by Jayaraman et al., thetropospheric aerosol number densities at Trivandrum are much greater than those at Hyderabad,whereas in the stratosphere no such significant differences are seen. The difference could be due to a reallatitude effect or because of the profiles corresponding to different years. This can be resolved only by simultaneous measurements at the two locations.
Jayaraman et al., comparing the power law indieesobtained at Hyderabad and Trivandrum (Fig. 6),found that the Trivandrum values (observed in 1980)are much smaller than the Hyderabad values (of1984), indicating that the particles found over Trivan-
•10
n{----n.10.85 Hyd .. Joyaraman et 01. -18.f.·64 Hyd
~ •...•....••'ll€'on Feb.eO TvmChagnonand -Ap( 60 Hyd
Junge2S
.. ,10 10 10
AI!AOSOl NUNBEA MN$ITY (.-1)
•10
methods24 the columnar aerosol size distributionfunction can be derived from MWR observations.
A very powerful ground-based method for thestudy of aerosol characteristics with good altituderesolution is the lidar (acronym for Light Detectionand Ranging) method. In lidar (operated in monos tatic mode) a high power pulsed laser is used as a transmitter. The laser beam isdirected into the atmosphereby suitable optics. The backscattered light from theatmosphere is received by a suitable telescope and isdetected by a photomultiplier tube whose output isfurther amplified for recording. The backscatteredsignal strength is analysed to obtain information onaerosol characteristics25 - 27.
4.1 BaIloon-borne/Rocket-borne Measurements
Alitude profiles of aerosol extinction/numberdensity have been obtained using balloon-borne androcket-borne payloads22. These payloads make useof the scattered sunlight to derive the aerosol characteristics. The vertical profiles22 of aerosol numberdensity obtained are shown in Fig. 5 and the derivedpower law index in Fig. 6. Chagnon and Junge2S publishea a vertical profile of aerosol number densityobtained by using a balloon-borne impactor at Hyderabad. The impactor responds to the particle sizerange 0.1-1.0 ,urn with maximum sensitivity at 0.15,urn. This profile is also shown in Fig. 5 for comparison. The aerosol number densities in the impactor profile are much smaller than the latter profiles obtained
'0
;:c
10
Fig. :;- Aerosol numhcr density profiles ohtaincd at Hyderilhad(Hyd.) and Trivandrum (Tvm.)
Fig. 6- Power law index profiles ohtained at Hyderahad andTrivandrum
210
I' I II ", '" "l'I"1 " "1 '
KRISHNA MURTHY: AEROSOLS & RADIATION BUDGET IN MIDDLE ATMOSPHERE
Fig. 7- Aerosol lll!mber density profile obtained from CW lidarobservations at Trivandrum
4.3 Pulsed Ruby Lidar Observations
A pulsed ruby lidar has been in regular operation atTrivandrum since October 1986 to study the characteristics of the altitude profiles of aerosols. The rubylidar operates at a wavelength of 694.3 nm with laserenergy of about 1 J per pulse. The pulse width is 4 flSand it is operated at a pulse repetition rate of 2 pulses/
of turbulence layers in the lower atmosphere can leadto accretion of aerosols between these layers. In theturbulent layers, aerosols would be well mixed horizontally whereas in the regions between them mixingwould be poor leading to accretion of aerosols. It isknown that the height of the nocturnal atmosphericboundary layer (ABL) over land (with clear skies andweak to moderate winds) is considerably low (200 m).Typically a stable sporadic regime would prevail under these conditions33• T.his regime is characterizedby narrow turbulent regions under favourable conditions, i.e. wind shears. Specifically, in regions wherethe Richardsonnumber(Ri) is quite small ( < 0.25)instabilities (Kelvin-Helmholts instabilities) grow andturbulence would prevail. Acoustic radar and radiosonde observations showed stratified turbulence in
the nighttime lower atmosphere due to windshears33,34. Parameswaran et a/.3D examined the windand temperature profiles to obtain Richardson number and found conditions to be favourable for stratifi
ed turbulence when the layered structures in aerosolswere observed. Thus aerosols can act as tracers ofstratified turbulence in the lower atmosphere.
103 104
AEROSOl. NUMBER DENSITY Icm-3)
,5,\,,,
\~I \I ,I 4\
, ,'•••••• I....... _--" .••.
~)..•.
~ ~.•.
.............. ~.
2000
18001600E 1400~ 1200
:)...5 1000c800
600400200 L102
drum are relatively bigger than those over Hyderabad. This they attribute to the influence of SierraNegra (lat. 0 .8°S,long. 91.2°W) volcanic eruption (13Nov. 1979) on the aerosol characteristics over Trivandrum in 1980 (observations were made in Feb.1980). However, it is difficult to see how the volcaniceruption can influence the tropospheric aerosols at aplace located - 16,000 km from the eruption after 3months .
4.2 CW Lidar Measurements
As discussed above, lidars are capable of providingrange resolved information on aerosol characteristics. Lidars can be operated in monostatic or bistaticmode. In the monostatic mode, high power pulsed lasers are used as transmitters. In the bistatic mode, CWlasers are used and this mode is particularly useful inthe studies on angular dependence of aerosol scattering. But the range capability of this mode of operationis limited to lower tropospheric altitudes only ( < 4km). At Trivandrum, a CW lidar and a pulsed lidarhave been operated to study aerosol characteristics29,3o.
In the CW lidar experiment, argon ion laser operatingata wavelength of 514.5 nm was used as the transmitter. The receiving telescope was located at a hori~zontal separation of about 430 m from the transmitter. Using this experimental set-up, the angular dependence of atmospheric scattering has been studied.A method of solution of the bistatic lidar equation hasbeen developed to obtain the aerosol characteristicssuch as size distribution parameter and refractive index. The altitude profiles of aerosol number densityhave also been obtained up to an altitude of - 2 kmfrom the bistatic lidar observations30.
Monthly mean profiles of aerosol number densitycorresponding to months preceding and followingthe south west monsoon season clearly showed thewashout effect of monsoon rains3'.
The aerosol number density profiles on individualdays showed layered structures in altitude (the profiles correspond to the early night period of 19002000 hrs 1ST). Some typical profiles are shown in Fig.7. The fluctuations in the aerosol number density withaltitude are well above the altitude resolution and errors of measurements. Aerosols in the lower troposphere can be expected to show normally a smoothvariation with altitude especially at a tropical stationlike Trivandrum where convective mixing would bestrong. Since the fall velocities in the size range underconsideration (0.1 flm to 10 flm) are less than 2 m/hr(Ref. 32), the aerosols lifted by convection in the daytime would remain in the lower troposphere throughout the night. The observation of structured layers isnot in accordance with this behaviour. But presence
"
'\,
2ll
INDIAN J RADIO & SPACE PHYS. VOL. 17. DECEMBER 1988
2_
-"-220
~a216
..0:\ ~:r~21.3km
~T204
II
~'].e.m
9.3k",
~H'~ __ ~ I.akm
Q.4--x'D
0·21.,I!.
-,xlO
~0.0;: 0.2
v zS
J110!)
s!
0.0i 0.1... _4..
X'D0.50.4
--XIOo.z
OHOJF"'AMJJA
1186 '981
taining the extinction profile. The bars parallel to theX-axis indicate the total error in the extinction values
contributed by various factors. The extinction profileshows a very prominent maximum in the altituderange 3-4 km. This feature is revealed by all the profiles obtained. While the value of maximum extinctionshowed variation from month to month, the altituderange of its occurrence remained more or less thesame. During the local summer months the maximumis quite sharp compared to that in the winter months.This maximum has been attributed to change in aerosol size distribution due to water vapour condensation leading to an increase in the number oflarger particles and/or an increase in the total number of particles by vertical redistribution due to lack of mixing(turbulence )which may arise due to wind velocity gradients. It is worthwhile to study the effect of Hadleycell circulation in the vertical distribution of aerosols
in this regard.Study of variation of monthly mean extinction
shows that the variability is least in the middle troposphere (Fig. 9). The month to month variations in upper(13.8 km)and lower tropospheres (1.8kmand 4.3km) are quite different. The variation in extinction inthe lower stratosphere (21 .3 km) is different from thatin the troposphere. This is quite understandable because the stratospheric aerosols are mainly of localorigin rather than due to direct transport from troposphere. Fig. 9 also shows the monthly mean temperature variation at 21.3 km. It is seen that stratosphericaerosol extinction at 21.3 km shows variations opposite to those in temperature indicating an inverse relationship between the two. Modelling studies on stratospheric sulphate aerosol (which is dominant in the
..10I()' Ilf6
AEROSOL EXTINCTION (",-1)
11
20
min. The altitude resolved backscattered signal is received and analysed by solving the lidar equation toobtain the altitude profile of aerosol extinction. In thelidar equation, two unknowns, namely, the cxtinctionand backscatter function are involved. In order to
solve the Iidar equation, an empirical relationship between the two is assumed based on theoretical calcu
lation using Mie scatteringfunctions27. The altitude ofminimum in turbidity is identified from thc lidar observations which is generally around the tropopauseheight and it IS assumed that at this altitude, the extinction is contributed mainly by Rayleigh scattering, i.e.contribution due to aerosols to extinction at this alti
tude is assumed to be negligible. With this assumption, the lidar equation is solved to obtain the total atmospheric extinction profile. From this, the altitudeprofile of aerosol extinction is obtained by subtracting the contribution due to Rayleigh scattering. Usingthis method of analysis, altitude profiles of aerosol extinction have been obtained from ruby lidar observations on 5-10 days in a month in the early night period. The error budget has been estimated andit has been found that the total error in theaerosol extinction contributed by variousfactors is, in general, less than 15 per centand is much less at lower altitudes « 10 km).From the aerosol extinction, the aerosol numberdensity is obtained using the Mie scattering theoryand assuming a aerosol refractive index of 1.5 and apower law index (v) of 3.5 for the size distribution. Atypical profile of aerosol extinction is shown in Fig. 8(it may be noted that the height resolution of this profile is much less than that of CW lidar profiles shownin Fig. 7, and hence the ruby lidar profiles do not showthe fine layered structures shown by CW lidar profilesin the lower height ranges). The discontinuity in theprofile between 16.5 km and 19.5 km is because theaerosol extinction at 18 km is taken to be zero for ob-
Fig. 8-Aerosol extinction profile obtained at Trivandrum fromruby lidar observations on 2 Oct. 1986
Fig. 9- Monthly mean variation ot aerosol extinction at fixed altitudes. The variation of monthly mean temperature obtained from
balloonsonde observations at 21.3 km is also shown.
212
I I jJ '. j".,il~II~. L
---------
KRISHNA MURTHY: AEROSOLS & RADIATION BUDGET IN MIDDLE ATMOSPHERE
Fig. 10- Annual mean profile of aerosol extinction and numberdensity obtained from ruby Iidarobservations at Trivandrum
AEROSOL NUMBER OENSITY(I;;1
107 108 109
ing the available logistics into account.The radiometers give the total aerosol optical depth as a function ofwavelength (in the visible and near IR) after due account is taken of the Rayleigh seatter and absorptioncomponents.
Agashe and Mahajan38 and Nair et al.37 reportedmorning to evening differences in the aerosol opticaldepth on some occasions at Pune and Trivandrum.The effect of relative humidity on aerosol opticaldepths has been studied by Krishna Moorthy et al.39
using Trivandrum data. They reported a steep increase in optical depth at relative humidities greaterthan 70 per cent which is in agreement with theoretical estimates based on growth of aerosol particleswith increase in humidity40. Nair et al. 37 reported seasonal v.ariation in wavelength dependence of aerosoloptical depth. Fig. 11 shows the wavelength dependence of aerosol optical depth for the three~easons,namely, summer, monsoon and winter months. Thepeak in optical depth at 935.0 nm is due to absorptionby atmospheric water vapour which has a strong absorption band around this wavelength (measurements at 935 nm were made to determine the total co
lumnar water vapour content). Nair et af.37 inferred
from the seasonal variations (Fig. 11) a monp.omOdalstructure of the columnar aerosol size distribution insummer and monsoon and a bimodal structure inwinter months. They attributed this to the presence ofdominant source of aerosols in the summer and monsoon months in contrast to winter months.
IMAP aerosol campaigns-In the preceding sections, a summary of observational results on aerosolsobtained in India is given. In the Indian Middle Atmosphere Programme, a coordinated experimentalprogramme is being carried out in a campaign modeto study the aerosol characteristics. The experimentsinclude rocket- and balloon-borne experiments (scattering method) and ground-based (lidar and MWR)measurements for the determination of aerosol char
acteristics. A pre-campaign has already been carriedout in October 1986 from Trivandrum (rocket- andground-based experiments) and in April 1984 andOctober 1985 from Hyderabad (balloon-borne experiments). The results of this pr~-campaign indicatean altitude dependent aerosol size distribution. Theyalso indicate that the size distribution could be· quitedifferent from an inverse power law. The results havebeen reported in a scientific report41.
The main campaign has been planned to be carriedout in two phases: phase 1in premonsoon period andphase 2 in postmonsoon period. Phase 1has iilreadybeen carried out in April 1988. The experiments included (i) balloon-borne measurements of aerosols,ozone and electrical conductivity from Hyderabadand (ii) rocket-borne and ground-based experiments
-410
_ Annuol •••eon 0••.0.01 fttlftd""___ Annual ••• " aerosol nu__
_ .Ity
-7 -6 -510 10 10
AEROSOL EXTINCTION 1m-I)
-810
32
2&24! 20III
Q::216.. ....•c 12
•4
Rose et ap6 have also obtained an annual meanprofile of aerosol extinction (Fig. 10).This is the meanof sixty profiles corresponding to the period October1986 to September 1987. The bars parallel to X-axisindicate the standard deviations at the correspondingaltitudes. The mean aerosol number density profile isalso shown in the same figure. These profiles can beconsidered as reference profiles of aerosolextinction/number density at a tropical coastal station like Trivandrum.
4.4 Spectral Measurements of Total Extinction with MWR
As part of the Indian Middle Atmosphere Programme, multi-wavelength radiometers (MWRs)have been deployed at Trivandrum, Mysore, Pune,Visakhapatnam, Jodhpur and Delhi (Refs 37 and 38);these places have been selected pased on the geographical and environmental conditions and also by tak-
stratosphere) formation due to homogeneous heteromolecular and heterogeneous heteromolecularnucleation processes show that the formation processes are less effective at higher ambient temperatures 11 • Wang and McCormick35 from a study of association between aerosol extinction (obtained from satellite instrument SAM II) and temperature reportedboth negative and positive correlations between thetwo. The negative correlation was attributed to thestratospheric microphysical processes (formationprocesses) and the positive correlation to the horizontal eddy transport.
113
INDIAN J RADIO & SPACE PHYS, VOL. 17, DECEMBER 1988
....
Fig. 12-Solar radiationspectra(from Coulson42)
5.1 Effect of Aerosols on the Atmospheric Heating
Aerosols absorb energy from the solar and planetary radiation fields, exchange energy by collisionswith the ambient gas and emit thermal radiation. Incase any phase change is possible, they acquire or loselatent heat. The interaction with the radiation field is afunction of the size distribution and the refractwe in
dex of the particles and the spectral density of the radiation. The collisional heat exchange with the ambient gas depends upon the temperature and densityof the ambient gas and also upon the temperature of
The radiation field should be defined at each pointin space and for each wavelength for the study of interaction of radiaiton with the atmosphere and resulting aeronomic and thermal effects. The analysis of theradiation field can be done from the equation of radiative transfer43.44.The radiative transfer equation expresses the energy balance in each unit volume of theatmosphere. including absorption, scattering andemission. The equation can be solved by analyticalmethods only for the most simple cases. To obtainquantitative solutions numerical methods are generally used45.
The most important elements contributing to themiddle atmosphere radiation budget in terms of cooling and heating rates are shown in Fig. 13. The figureshows the vertical distribution of solar short wave
heating rates by 03' 02' N02, H20 and CO2 and terrestriallong wave cooling rates by CO2, 03 and H20.The mean heating due to 03 is balanced by the corresponding cooling due to infrared radiation from CO2(15 ,urn), 03 (9.6 ,urn) and water vapour (18 ,urn). Nearthe stratopause the 15 ,urn band of CO2 yields a radiative temperature change (net cooling) about twice aslarge as the 9.6 ,urn band of 03 and about 10 timeslarger than that from the 18 ,urn band of water vapour.
• 1914
fA•
1986 In"
SOLAR RADIATION
•
1981Ir~
'E
,,CI
'l'E
I 8lA(M. 800v AT 5!JOOK, ~,,OJ,U ,:i. ,isI ",0
."
I",c>a: Ia: ",0- I
I/",c>
/
, ",O.Co,/
..../.., "p.Co,, - I ol. r.::..::.. -/~ ___ ~"f'C~2400
2100J200
1'0
0'80·60·,0·20·0r
1·0•.. Q.
~ 0,8~c 0·6u •..Q.o 0"~0 0·2III 0a:••••
0,0c 1·0
0·80,60·40·20·0400
600 800 1000WAVElENGTH (nm)
5 Effect of Aerosols on Radiation in theMiddle AtmosphereNo detailed discussion attempted here on the much
more extensive topic of radiation budget in middle atmosphere, which is also beyond the scope of this presentation. However, for the sake of completeness a fewof the important aspects of this are being presentedhere.
The solar radiation spectra at the top of the atmosphere and at the sea level are shown in Fig. 12.The absorption due to various molecular species is also indicatt:d at the corresponding spectral regions. The difference between the top of the atmosphere and the sealevel curves is due to scattering (apart from the molecular absorption bands which are marked).
Fig. II-Wavelength dependence of aerosol optical depth forsummer, monsoon and winter seasons in the years 1984. 1986 and
1987. The peak at 935 nmis due to water vapour absorption.
on aerosols from Trivandrum. The experiments atTrivandrum were conducted within two days of theirbeing done at Hyderabad to enable comparison.
214
! I, "
!t!,~~!UIl!,!~; ! ~:Jl.l.IIi;Ul.uIlUU,I~, j, ,I.'i.j 1,I,j,
KRISHNA MURTHY: AEROSOLS & RADIATION BUDGET IN MIDDLE ATMOSPHERE
.5cx
100 ~zUJ~~
1CS' ~IXU.UJa::
>-
101~ZC)<
-3 ~10
155 10'MIELENGTH (J.lm)
1.0o
100 •••• , •••• ~ •••• I' "-' • l'T • ~"'I .~ I2.5
80~
----IIIr /-TOTAL -t-- "..
...•. - -- "h"III •C.... I
::!'t'
><2.0
'I " \l&J C;r; , I I \'I \l&J , ~ I \~ >
~" '• i=20 ~I' fI}
a:1.5 I ~ I
lI..I ---
01 , , I •••• I ••.• ' I JI
I I, ••• I •••• I •• II.IJI10
!l00 !l10a:/COOlING (K/elay)
HEAnNG (K/doy)~I
~--
I.IJ IX
Fig. 13-Vertical distribution of solar short wave heating rates byD." O2, N02, H20 and CO2 and terrestrial long wave cooling rates
by CO2, D., and Hp(from London"")
Fig. 14-Real and imaginary refractive indices of aerosols as functions of wavelength (from Ivlev and Popova49)
Mugnai et al. used the zeroth order logarithmic distribution function (Zold) suggested by Espenscheid etal.50 for the aerosol size distribution. This is given by
the particles. Thus the equilibrium conditions for agiven particle size distribution are a function of the altitude, time of the day, season and planetary albedo.The energetic equilibrium of aerosols in the atmosphere has been studied in detail by Fiocco et al.47 andMugnai et al.48• Their analysis is based on the equilibrium condition for a spherical aerosol particle of radius r, expressed by
dN z z~= Cz exp [-(In r-ln rm) l2(ln a) ]dr
... (19)
where Pa,s is the power absorbed from solar radiationby the particle, Pa,pla the power absorbed from planetary radiation, p., the thermal power radiated by theparticle, and p" the power lost by the particle due tocollisions with the ambient gas. Fiocco et al.47 analysed these terms in the equilibrium equation usingthe complex refractive index values for the syntheticaerosol model of Ivlev and Popova49 (shown in Fig.14) and for summer and winter conditions at 45°N using the US standard atmosphere. In the particle sizeinterval 0.1 to 0.3 ,urn, daily average heating rates forsummer are 0.15-0.25 KI day and for winter these are0.07-0.1 K/day in the stratosphere.
Mugnai et al.48 carried out the analysis for particleshaving special significance to stratosphere. Their analysis was for the realistic case of polydisperse particles instead of mono disperse particles as in the analysis by Fiocco et a/.47 They carried out analysis for (a)sulphuric acid droplets with no impurities and therefore with no absorption in the visible, (b) impure sulphuric acid droplets with a small amount of absorption in the visible (imaginary refractive index = 0.001), (c) impure sulphuric acid droplets withhigher absorption in the visible (imaginary refractiveindex = 0.005), and (d) volcanic ash.
where Cz is a constant whose value depends on theaerosol concentration, rm is the mode radius, and a isrelated to the width and the skewness of the distribution.
From the values of p.: for each particle size, Mugnaiet al. obtained the heating rates (K/ day) from the expressIOn
where T is the air temperature, x the aerosol massmixing ratio, Ps the particle density assumed(= 2.3 g/cm3 for volcanic ash particles and 1.6 g/cm3
for sulphuric acid droplets), and Cp the specific heat atconstant pressure. Aerosol mass mixing ratio xis taken to be constant with respect to altitude with a valueof 10 - 9. g/ g of air. The daily average heating rate forthe polydisperse aerosol given by the Zold distribution is calculated from the daily average heating ratefor each particle size in the range 0.01-10 ,urn.
Fig. 15 shows the daily average heating rate as afunction of the mode radius rm for a= 1.8 and 2.2 andrefractive indices as specified for sulphuric acid particles (a), (b) and (c) and volcanic ash particles (d). Theresults shown in Fig. 15 apply for equatorial atmosphere for which the US standard atmosphere 1966
Pa.s + F..pla - Po - Pc = 0 ... (18)
dT=3xPcl4nr3 gCpdt... (20)
215
INDIAN J RADIO & SPACE PHYS, VOL. 17, DECEMBER 1988
v-=1.8
I 01
o
(b)001
~101
MODE RADIUS (~m)
Fig. 15- Daily average heating rate (K/ day) as a function of mode radius of aerosol size distribution
for equatorial conditions for a= 1.8 and 2.2 (from Mugnai etal.4~)
for 15°N is used. Fig. 15 shows that the heating ratesfor all the models (a), (b), (c) and (d) maximize aroundthe altitude of stratospheric sulphate (aerosol) layer.An increase in the heating rate from the sulphuric acidmodels (a) to (c) is quite evident (with increase of imaginary part of refractive index) and is due to the increasing absorption of solar radiation by the particles.The heating rates for the volcanic ash mGdel (d) areslightly smaller than those for the sulphuric acid particle model (c) but greater than tl}ose for (a) and (b).There is also a general increase of the heating ra te withthe mode radius rffi' An increase in amoves the heating rate pattern to the left, towards smaller values ofrffi' Fig. 15 shows that there are large variations ofheating rate with height and aerosol composition. Theheating rates are always positive indicating that aerosols add heat to the ambient gas by conductionthroughout the stratospheric aerosol layer region.These heating rates of aerosol when compared toother heating rates in the same region (shown in Fig.15) are quite small. However, during volcanic erup-
216
tion when stratospheric aerosol loading increases enormously, the aerosol heating rates can become significant. For example, the results of Cadle et al.51 indicate that fine ash particles from the Mt. Agung eruption(in 1963) were located during the winter of 1964/65in a broad latitude over the equatorial region with apeak mixing ratio of25 x lO-9 g/g of air at about lOoSat 20 km altitude. Thus the calculations of Mugnai etal.48 show that this would result in a heating rate of0.25 K/ day. Over and above this the heating rates dueto sulphuric acid particles (due to volcanic eruption)are to be added. Thus it is evident that during majorvolcanic eruptions, the aerosol heating rate becomesquite significant to effect the ambient thermal structure. Fig. 16 shows plots of temperature deviations atthree levels (19.5,16.5 and 9.5 kIn) obtained at PortHedland (Australia) from balloon observations dueto volcanic eruption ofMt. Agung in 1963 (Ref. 52).Monthly means were calculated for five years beforethe eruption and deviations from the means werecomputed. The three month running averages of the
" I II ", " "111"1" "I '" I ;'11111'; Ii
KRISHNA MURTHY: AEROSOLS & RADIATION BUDGET IN MIDDLE ATMOSPHERE
Fig. 17- Radiative convective equilibrium temperature distributions of the earth's atmosphere (from Wang and Domoto54)
transfer equation. In the analytical models oh:limatechange due to aerosols, the change in the earth-atmosphere system albedo from unperturbed (withoutaerosols) condition (A ) to perturbed (by introduction of an aerosol layer in the atmosphere) condition(A ') is obtained. If A' >A, the aerosol layer will reduce the energy of the earth-atmosphere system(causing a 'cooling') and if A' <A it will increase theenergy of the system (causing a 'heating'). The aerosollayer is characterized by the parameters a and b,where a is the fraction of incident radiation absorbedby the layer and b is the fraction of incident radiationbackscattered by the layer. Russel and Grams57showed that for an 'optically thin' aerosol layer, thecritical value Oc of 0 ( = a/b) is approximated by
Oc=(1-A)2/2A ... (21)•
The models predict that an aerosol layer witho > Oc will cause a decrease in system albedo A and alayer with 0 < Oc will cause an increase. Fig. 18 showsOcas a function of surface albedo A. The regions of increased and decreased energy to the earth-atmosphere system are marked in the figure. Table 3 givesthe values of Oc for different surface types.
Harshvardhan and Cess58 gave an expression forthe surface temperature change (Ii. T.)due to a stratospheric aerosol layer with total optical thickness 'l' by
f.,.T;= -{1-[(1-0.37'l')/(1-0.11'l')]
-1.96 X 10-11[T]4 'l'} x 162 ... (22)
where T is the ambient temperature in the aerosollayer (in stratosphere). Although this expression isnon-linear in 'l', it will turn out to be practically linear
Ollll ~ IlAK ••••••••••
••• •• NAZI " •••••••••
000 • aIMtlIlIl
••• Q.IM --.. •.••••....
220 UO 140 no zeo 210 210 zeo 100
TEMPERAT'-"E (K)
o
1000_IOI~ 210
900
100
100
100
200
":" 3001o.Q! 4001
~
rJ-c~~~Fig. 16-Temperature changes in stratosphere due to volcanic er
uptionoiMt.Agungin 1963 (from Newe1l52 )
5.2 Climatic Effects
The effect of aerosols on earth's climate has been
investigated by a number ofworkers55,56. The investigations on this are based on analytical methods ornumerical methods involving solution of radiative
deviations are shown in Fig. 16. The figure clearlyshows a large temperature increase at the two higherlevels of 16.5 and 19.5 km (stratosphere) associatedwith theMt. Agung eruption in 1963.There isno significant effect noticeable at 9.5 km. However, an indication of a decrease is seen. An increase in stratospheric temperature is reported due' to the EI Chichonvolcanic eruption.in 1982 (Ref. 53).
Aerosols in the stratosphere reduce the solar radiation flux by absorption that is incident in the troposphere. Thus an increase in the aerosol loading in thestratosphere after major volcanic eruption couldcause tropospheric cooling (an indication is seen inFig. 16 at 9.5 km). The extent oftropospheric coolingis proportional to the solar energy lost by the troposphere.
The radiative effects of the aerosols on the troposphere have been investigated employing numericalsolutions of radiative transfer equation. The radiativeconvective temperature distribution in the troposphere would be modified by the presence of aerosols,the effect being a general cooling effect in the troposphere. To illustrate the effect, the radiative convectivetemperature distributions as obtained by Wang andDomoto54 are shown in Fig. 17. It shows the distributions for cloudless and average cloudy conditions(mean cloud albedo assumed to be 0.55 throughoutthe solar spectrum) and for clear (without aerosols),light haze and dense haze atmospheres. As seen fromthe figure the effect of aerosols is to reduce the tropospheric temperatures. In general, the effect of aerosolsis to decrease the solar radiation reaching the earth'ssurface and increase the global albedo of the earth-atmosphere depending upon the absorption and scattering properties of aerosols.
217
INDIAN J RADIO & SPACE PHYS, VOL. 17, DECEMBER 1988
t- -
8 Turco R P,Whiuen R C, Toon 0 B, Pollack J B & Hamill P,Nature( GB), 283 (1980) 283.
9 Turco R P, Toon 0 B, Whitten R C, Inn E C Y & Hamill P, IGeophys Res (USA), 86 (1981) 1129.
10 Turco R P, Whitten R C & Toon 0 'B, Rev Geophys &SpacePhys( USA), 20 (1982) 233.
11 Yue G K & Deepak A,I Geophys Res( USA), 87 (1982) 3128.12 Hanel G, Adv Geophys (GB), 19 (1976) 73.13 Hunten D M, Turco R P & Toon 0 B, I Atmos Sci (USA), 37
(1980) 1342.14 Turco R P, Toon 0 B, Hamill P & Whitten R C, I Geophys Res
(USA), 86(1981) 1113.15 Bowen E G,J Meteorol( USA), 13 (1956) 142.
16 Junge C E, A ir Chemistry and RadioActivity(Academic Press,New York, USA), 1963.
17 Tur,o R P, Toon 0 B, Pollack J B, Whitten R C, Popoff I G &Hamill P, I Appl Meteorol( USA), 19 (1980) 78.
18 Oberbeck V R, Farlow N H, Ferry G V,Lem H Y & Hayes D M,Geophys Res Lett (USA), 8 (1981 ) 18.
19 RosenJ M,HoffmanDJ &PepinT J, ProcIntConfStru Compand Gen Cirofthe Upper&LowerAtmos( USA), 1 (1974)lOt.
20 Hofmann D J, Rosen J M, Pepin T J & Pinnick R G,J Atmos Sci(USA),32(1975) 1446.
21 De BaryE & Rossler F,J Geophys Res( USA), 71 (1966) 1011.
22 Jayaraman A, Subharaya B H & Acharya Y B, Phys Scr(Sweden), 36 (1987) 358.
23 Mani A, Chacko 0& HariharanS, Tellus(Sweden), 21 (1969)829.
24 King M D, Byrne D M, HermanB M & ReaganJ A,J A tmosSci(USA), 35 (1978) 2153.
25 Clemasha B R, Kent G S & Wright R W H, I Appl Meteorol(USA), 6 (1967) 386.
26 McCormick M P,Swissler T J, Chu W P & Fuller Jr W H, I Atmos Sci (USA), 35 (1978) 1296.
)27 Parameswaran K, Rose K 0, Satyanarayana M, Presennakumar B & Krishna Murthy B V, Sci Rep SPL : SR : 001 : 87(Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Trivandrum, India),1987.
Chagnon C W & JungeC E,J Meteorol( USA), 18 (1961) 746.
Parameswaran K, Rose K 0 & Krishna Murthy B V, I GeophysRes (USA), 89 (1984) 254t.
Parameswaran K, Thomas John, Rose K 0, SatayanarayanaM, Selvanayagam D R & Krishna Murthy B V, Sci RepSPL : SR : 003 : 87 (Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Trivandrum, India), 1987.
31 Parameswaran K & Krishna Murthy B V, Indian I Radio &Space Phys, 15 (1986) 145.
32 Elterman L & Campbell A B, I Atmos Sci( USA), 21 (1964)457.
33 Mahrt L, Heald R C, Lenschow D H, Stankov & Troen I B,Boundary-Layer Meteorol{Netherla(Uis), 17 (1979)247.
34 Mahrt L, I Atmos Sci( USA), 42 (1985) 332.
15 Wang P H & McCormick M P, I Geophys Res (USA), 90(1985) 2360.
i 3{l Rose K 0, Parameswaran K, Satyanarayana M & Krishna'Y, Murthy B V, An overview of !idar studies at Trivandrum,
, Paper presented at the Second Workshop on lMAP Scien-tific Results, Vikram Sarabhai Spae Centre, Trivandrum,24-28 April 1988.
\ 37 Nair P,R, Krishna Moorthy K & Krishna Murthy B V, Results'\ of multi wavelength radwmeter studies at Trivandrum, Paper presented at the Second Workshop on lMAP Scientific Results, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Trivandrum,24-28 Apri11988.
INCREASED ENERGY
()O2 ()04 0·6 008 lo()
SURFACE ALBEDO A
DECREASED ENERGY
10
100
()O()l
o
..J«~ 0·1I-a:u
..JoIIIoa:ILl«
Table 3- Values of Oe for Different Surface Types57
Peterson J T & Junge CE, Man's Impact on Climate (M.I.T.Press, Cambridge, USA), 1971.
2 Hidy G W & BrockJ R, Proceedings of the Second International Congress (Academic- Press, New York, USA), 1971. 9.
3 JungeCE,ChagnonCW & MansonJ E,J Meteorol( USA), 18(1961)8t.
4 HamillP, ToonOB&KiangCS,JAtmosSci( USA), 34 (1977)1104.
\ 5 Sze N D & Ko M K W,AtmosEnviron(GB), 14 (1980) 1223.6 Crutzen P J, Geophys Res Lett( USA), 3 (1976) 73.7 Turco R P, Hamill P,Toon 0 B, Whitten R C & King C S, I At
mos Sci( USA), 36 (1979) 699.
Surface Type A15,
Urban areas
0.20t.6Deserts
0.300.82Praiaries and farm lands
0.201.6Forests
0.162.2Oceans
0.085.3
Snowfields
0.700.064r
References
Fig. 18-Relationship of critical aerosol parameter 15, to surfacealbedo A for optically thin aerosol layer (from Russel and
Grams'7)
for change in optical thickness due to an increase in i .• 28
aerosol loading. This expression is obtained assum- \ 29ing sulphuric acid aerosols. The value of ~ T"from the \
above equation is calculated tobe - 0.8Kfor r= 0.03 f 30and T = 2140 K. Thus the model predicts a decrease .in surface temperature due to an aerosol layer (stratospheric). This means that the increased solar albedoeffect dominates over the increase in trapping or'greenhouse' effect due to a stratospheric aerosol layer.
218
, I " ,,, II 'I'!'I'I ""1 I.,
KRISHNA MURTHY: AEROSOLS & RADIATION BUDGET IN MIDDLE ATMOSPHERE
h8 Agashe V V & Mahajan R D, Study of atmospheric aerosols atPoona, Paper presented at the Second Workshop on IMAP Scientific Results, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre,Trivandrum, 24-28 April 1988.
.-5'9 Krishna Moorthy K, Nair P B & Krishna Murthy B V, IndianJRadio &Space Phys, 17 (1988) 16.
40 Shettle E P & Fenn R W, AFGL-TR-079-0214 (AFGL, Massachusetts, USA), 1979.
41 Krishna Murthy B V,Parameswaran K, Rose K 0,Satyanarayana M, Krishna Moorthy K, Nair P R, Jayaraman A, Acharya Y B, Banerjee S K, Vinchi J T, Subbaraya B H, Zalpuri K S, Garg S C, Thomas John, Somayajulu V V, Seshadri N, Sharma A K & Joseph K T, IMAP Scientific Report(under print in India), 1988.
42 Coulson K L, Solar and Terrestrial Radiation (AcademicPress, New York, USA), 1975.
43 Chandrasekhar S, Radiative Transfer (Oxford UniversityPress, Oxford, UK), 1950.
44 Kourganoff V, Basic Methods in Transfer Problems, OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford, UK), 1952.
45 Liou K N, An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation (Academic Press, New York, USA), 1980.
46 London J, Proceedings of NATO Advanced InstrumentationConference on Atmospheric Ozone, US Dept. of Commence; No. FAA-EE-80-20-1980, 1980.
47 Fiocco G, Grams G & Mugnai A, J Atmos Sci (USA), 33(1976) 2415.
48 Mugnai A, Fiocco G & Grams G, Q J R Meteorol Soc (GB),104 (1978) 783 .
49 Ivley L S, Popova S I, Izv Atmos Oceanic Phys (USSR), 9(1973) 1034.
50 Espenscheid W F, Kerker M & Matijevic E, J Phys Chem(USA), 68 (1964) 480.
51 Cadle R D, Kiang C S & Louis J F, J Geophys Res (USA), 81(1976) 3125.
52 Newell R E, SciAm( USA), 224 (1971) 32.
53 Labitzke K, Naujokat B & McCormick M P, Geophys Res Leu(USA), 10(1983)24.
54 Wang W & Domoto G A, J Appl Meteorol ( USA), 13 (1974)
/ 521.-'55 Rasool S I & Schneider S H, Science (USA), 173 (1971) 138.
56 Harshvardhan, NASA Tech. Memorandum 79573 (USA),(1978).
57 Russel P B & Grams G W, J Appl Meteorol( USA), 15 (1975)1037.
~ .. Harshvardhan & Cess R D, Tellus(Sweden), 28 (1976) 1.
219