Download - A6 b6 advocacy_sean_laird_2011 ocasi ed
Managing Risk ….... by Knowing the Advocacy Rules
An Advocacy School Workshop for
OCASI – Ontario Council of Agencies Serving Immigrants
W. Laird Hunter, Q.C and Sean Moore
November 10-11, 2011
Toronto
Advocacy School
The Issues Prevailing Political and Public-Policy Environment Different Structures – Different Rules
• registered charities• non-charity NGOs
Relevant Public Ethics Regimes• Lobbyists Registration• Political / Election Finance
- political contributions - third party advertising
* Restrictions on Advocacy for Recipients of Government $ * Canadian Charities, “political activities” and the CRA Regulatory Regimes Governing Anti-terrorism and Money-
Laundering * Rules on Hospitality for Public Officials *
Advocacy School
Prevailing Political and Public-Policy Environment
overall public suspicion about all manner of “lobbying” federal parties engage in “bidding war” on public ethics
issues caught up in “accountability” narrative Harper Government’s antipathy towards those seeking
federal largesse Government’s showy “crack-down” on lobbying and
lobbyists and discouragement of NGO advocacy austerity ethos – substantial NGO funding cuts public concern about “charities” practices (e.g. C-470)
Advocacy School
Different Structures – Different Rules
Registered Charities Non-Charity NGOs Coalitions Unincorporated organizations Consultants
Advocacy School
Lobbyists Registration Regimes
exists at national (and , in some cases) sub-national level in:• Canada (feds and 7 - soon to be 9 – provinces
and some cities)• U.S. (federal level and in all 50 states & many
cities)• Australia (and some states)• European Community• Germany
Advocacy School
Lobbyists Disclosure Laws
In Canada since 1989 at federal level; provinces follow
Propelled by minor scandal, matched with rapid expansion of lobbying trade
focus has always been on Consultant Lobbyists; less so on In-House Lobbyists
laws largely limited to public disclosure requirements
much more aggressive compliance and enforcement
few investigations or charges laid so far; only in Quebec and BC
Advocacy School
General Orientation of Lobbying Laws Defines registerable “lobbying” as:
• being paid (except in Quebec) tocommunicate with a public office holder for the
purpose of influencing * a decision by government related to:
New or amended legislationNew or amended regulationsPolicies, programsFinancial benefitsProcurementArranging for meetings with public officials
(“consultant lobbyists” only, except Quebec)
Advocacy School
General Orientation of Lobbying Laws
Disclosure Requirements• “business card” information• corporate information• identity of government agencies/departments contacted• indication of object of lobbying activity • type of lobbying planned• sources of government monies, if any• info on contingency fees (if not already banned in
Quebec and federal jurisdiction)• at federal level, additional (up to monthly) disclosure of
“oral and arranged communications” with Designated Public Office Holders
Advocacy School
Public Office Holders (not DPOH)
• politicians (Minister, Members of House or Senate)
• political staff (of Ministers, MPs and Senators and parliamentary staff)
• all public servants at all levels including those in regulatory agencies
• persons holding Governor-in-Council positions (i.e. Cabinet or Ministerial appointments e.g. Crown corporation presidents etc.)
• in Quebec only – extends to municipal governments and some government-funded NGOs
Advocacy School
Three Types of Registered Lobbyists
• Consultant Lobbyists
• In-House Corporate Lobbyists
• In-House Organization Lobbyists
Advocacy School
Exemptions• other governments – domestic and
foreign• appearances / representations before
open public proceedings• interpretation, administration or
enforcement of existing law or regulations
• obtaining information only• some government-initiated
communications / consultations
Advocacy School
Designated Public Office Holders (DPOH)
• Ministers• Ministerial Staff• Deputy Minister and Associate Deputy
Ministers• Assistant Deputy Ministers• (all federal officials of comparable DM or
ADM rank, i.e. EX-4 or above)• Members of PM’s Transition Team
… and anyone else designated by Cabinet• e.g. ordinary MPs, Senators and OLO Staff
added as of Fall 2010
Advocacy School
Designated Public Office Holders
5-year cooling off period contact with DPOH requires month ly
reporting some government-initiated communications
are exempt from DPOH ComLog reporting (but not if $ involved)
Commissioner of Lobbying verifies info
Advocacy School
Monthly Reporting by 15th of subsequent month requires updating of any new information
• new “subject matter” information (new legislation, new program etc.)
• “prescribed” communications with DPOHs“arranged” and “oral” meetings either in-person or telephone
conversations; NOT reportable written correspondence, e-mails, faxes,
“electronic” communications ( not included in definition of “prescribed” contact and therefore not reportable for “Comlog”)
must report monthly, “prescribed communication” (oral and pre-arranged) indicating:• name and title of DPOH• date of meeting• subject matter at issue from “underlying registration information”• no detailed “narratives;” just “checking boxes”
Political Finance Laws … generally
highly variable charities generally non-permitted to donate financial limits variable variability in range of permitted activities in Canada, restrictions on third-party
advertising
Advocacy School
Canadian Political Finance Law Canada Elections Act:
• Individual donations only • none from charities or NGOs• reimbursement forbidden• Paid leave ok for candidates but not employee
campaigners• limitations on third-party advertising during writ period
Provincial Level• still no donations from charities• Quebec and Manitoba - individual donations only• some provinces with few restrictions or limits
Advocacy School
Anti-Terrorism NGOs and foundations obliged by law to ensure
that its activities and those of its grantees are not supportive of , and do not facilitate, terrorist activities, organizations or individuals
“due diligence”
Advocacy School
The Income Tax Act - Registered Charities and “political activities” The Advocacy Rules are contained in CRA Policy
Statement – CPS-022
The Advocacy Rules have 3 sources
Charities do not have a “right to free speech”
Any discussion about “advocacy,” “political activities” and “Canadian registered charities” is a conversation about how a special set of rules apply
Advocacy School
Key Concepts in 10% Rule
“advocacy” “a call to action’ “a well-reasoned
position
Advocacy School
The Income Tax Act - Registered Charities and “political activities”
CPS – 022 limits the “political activities” of registered charities
The Income Tax Act requires charities to devote “substantially all” of its resources to its charitable purposes and the Courts have held that “substantially all” means 90%
CRA – based on the ITA says “ for the purposes of this policy, a charity’s activities can be divided into 3 separate types:• Prohibited activities• Political activities• Charitable activities
Advocacy School
1) Prohibited Activity
partisan political activity
no financial (or in-kind) contributions to parties or candidates
Advocacy School
2) Permitted - But Limited - Political Activities
OK if “non-partisan” and “subordinate to charity’s purposes”
a call to action (“vote a certain way” or “write your MP”)
taking out a newspaper ad / starting an –mail campaign aimed at legislators
organizing a march on Parliament Hill
Advocacy School
3) Acceptable Advocacy Activity meet and communicate with politicians and officials, even
if intent is to change law or policy
BUT activity must be subordinate to the charity's purposes
All representations must:• relate to issue connected to charity's purposes; • be “well-reasoned”• not contain information that the charity knows, or ought
to know is false, inaccurate, or misleading• public release of info must not be selective • have no call to action
Advocacy School
CRA Standards for Acceptable Public-Awareness Campaigns
1. Charity does not explicitly connect its views to any political party or candidate for public office
2. The issue is connected to the charities purposes
3. The charity’s views are based on a well-reasoned position
4. Public awareness campaigns do not become the charity's primary activity
Sean MoorePrincipal, Advocacy SchoolPublic Policy and Advocacy [email protected] www.advocacyschol.org
W. Laird Hunter, Q.C.Richards Hunter [email protected]
Advocacy School