A standard for collection-level description: the RSLP Collection Description Model and
SchemaCollection-Level Description & NOF-digitise projects
NOF-digitise programme seminar,London,
22 February 2002
Pete Johnston
UKOLN, University of Bath
Bath, BA2 7AY
UKOLN is supported by:
[email protected]://www.ukoln.ac.uk/
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
2
RSLP Collection Description Model and Schema
• [based on earlier presentations by Andy Powell, UKOLN]
• RSLP and the RSLP CD project• Overview of RSLP collection
description model• Overview of RSLP collection
description schema• Syntax • Implementing the RSLP schema
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
3
Research Support Libraries Programme
• Support for researchers– disclosure of collections– discovery of/access to collections– collaborative management of collections
• Collections in RSLP– projects describing primarily (but not exclusively)
collections of physical items– projects also describing digital catalogues (which
describe physical items) i.e. collections of metadata records
– projects creating new digital collections of collection descriptions
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
4
RSLP collection description project
• Project– Sept 1999 – Sept 2000– funded by RSLP, with support from OCLC– collaboration between UKOLN (Andy
Powell, Michael Day) and Michael Heaney (Oxford)
• Aims– means of consistent collection description
in RSLP– minimise duplication of effort in projects– simple, high-level, aligned with other work
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
5
RSLP collection description project
• Broader context– resource discovery on the Web– delivery of resources by resource
creators/owners– rather than (or as well as) by intermediary
– remote access to resources for all – (potentially…)
– emphasis on customer/user rather than provider
– user wants to work across “domains”, across physical & digital resources
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
6
RSLP Model
• Michael Heaney, An Analytic Model of Collections and their Catalogues
• Independent of implementation• Identifies
– Entities– Attributes/properties of entities– Relationships between entities
• Complex– “tries to get it right not make it easy”
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
7
RSLP Model (2)
• Functionally concerned with– finding (providing access points)– identifying (describing sufficiently well)
• Based primarily on a library and archival view of ‘collection’...
• … but applicable across wide range of collection types
– Physical or digital– All types of item– All sizes of collection
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
8
Content
ItemProducer
Creator
Administrator Location
RSLP Model (simplified view)
CollectionCollector
Owner
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
9
RSLP Model : Collection
• "an aggregation of physical and/or [digital] items“
• ...as discussed earlier!
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
10
RSLP Model : Location
• “the physical or digital place where a collection is held”
• physical location - e.g. a library or museum
– postal address
• digital location - e.g. an online service– URL, Z39.50 target details, ...
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
11
RSLP Model : three agents
• “a person or corporate body related to the collection or location”
• Collector – gathers items into a collection
• Owner– has legal possession of a collection
• Administrator– has responsibility for the physical or
electronic environment in which a collection is held
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
12
RSLP Model : three agents
• agents– initiate actions– have rights– control access
– to location– to collection
– control use– copyrights– ownership
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
13
External relationships
• Collection to collection– Has-Part, Has-Complement– Has-Association
• Collection to publication– Has-Publication
• Collection to collection description– Is-Described-By
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
14
Schema
• structured set of metadata attributes• concerned with the simple description
of subset of entities in RSLP model– Collections– Locations– Agents
– collectors– owners– administrators
• based on Dublin Core where possible
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
15
What RSLP schema is not!
• NOT a replacement for existing detailed collection description formats (e.g. EAD)
• NOT a replacement for MARC• NOT a replacement for Dublin Core• NOT the answer to all collection
description problems!
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
16
Administrator Location
Schema vs. model
Collection
Item
Content
Collector
Owner
Producer
Creator
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
17
Collection attributes
general attributes• title, identifier, description, strength, physical
characteristics, language, type, access control, accrual status, legal status, custodial history, note
subject attributes• concept(s), object(s), name(s), place(s),
time(s)
date attributes• contents date range, accumulation date
range
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
18
Location attributes
general attributes• name, identifier, access conditions, see also
location• postal address, postcode, country, locator
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
19
Agent attributes
general attributes• name, organisation, role, phone, fax, email,
agent history
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
20
Relation attributes
relations between collection and location• hasLocation/isLocationOf
relations between collection and agent• collector (creator), owner
relations between location and agent• administrator
relations between collections (external)• hasPart/isPartOf,
hasDescription/isDescriptionOf, hasAssociation hasPublication
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
21
Data entry guidelines
• Produced by RSLP CD project• Guidance for content of RSLP schema
attributes– especially “encoding schemes”– subject terminologies for CLDs?
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
22
XML syntax
• Collection descriptions can be encoded in XML for exchange
• Syntax uses conventions of Resource Description Framework (RDF)
– W3C recommendation for metadata on the Web
<?xml version="1.0"?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/” xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/”> <dct:Collection about="urn:x-rslpcd:950783065-29150"> <dc:title> The Pitman Collection </dc:title> </dct:Collection></rdf:RDF>
<?xml version="1.0"?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/” xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/”> <dct:Collection about="urn:x-rslpcd:950783065-29150"> <dc:title> The Pitman Collection </dc:title> </dct:Collection></rdf:RDF>
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
23
XML syntax (2)
• A single collection description record is made up of a linked set of descriptions of
– collection– location– collector(s)– owner(s)– administrator(s)
• N.B. schema and syntax are NOT a full implementation of the model
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
24
Collection types
• enumerated list of collection types• terms split into four areas
– type, curatorial environment, content, policy/usage
• with terms joined ‘.’s to form value• examples...• Collection.Library.Dispersed • Catalogue.Museum • Finding-Aid • Collection.Archive • Index.Internet • Catalogue.Internet.Subject
• Collection.Image
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
25
Extension of RSLP schema
• New “local” attributes can be added…• … but model is important, so…• Consider carefully where local
attributes added– is this an attribute of a collection?– is this an attribute of a location?– is this an attribute of a new entity?
• Consider how local attributes handled in exchanging CLDs
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
26
Extension of RSLP schema (2)
• e.g. RSLP CD schema says nothing about
– “administrative metadata”i.e. info about the CLD (who created/modified, when etc)
– rights information for CLD
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
27
Implementation
• Web-based tool–http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/rslp/tool/
– created as part of RSLP CD project– creates single collection descriptions that
conform to the model and schema– saves as XML or HTML– reloads XML for edit– also available for download
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
28
Implementation (2)
• Relational databases– demonstrators for download at:http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/rslp/tools/
– many database implementations by RSLP projects
– mapping/exporting from other schema to RSLP CD schema
• RSLP CD schema as a “Dublin Core for collections”?
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
29
Implementation (3)
• Details of NOF implementation to be decided
• Projects might create CLDs locally for harvesting
• NOF might simply host central CLD database with web form for entry of project CLDs
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
30
Summary
• Collection as aggregate of items• Approaches to collection(-level) description• CLD as metadata
– resource discovery metadata made to be shared
• CLDs complement item-level metadata• CLDs potentially useful in wide range of
contexts– disclose collections across domains, sectors– use by human agents, software tools
• RSLP CD schema as standard for simple, generic CLDs
Collection-level description & NOF-digitise projects, London, 22 Feb 2002
31
Acknowledgements
UKOLN is funded by Resource: the Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries, the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) of the UK higher and further education funding councils, as well as by project funding from the JISC and the European Union. UKOLN also receives support from the University of Bath where it is based.
http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/