ED 093 898
DOCUMENT RESUME
95 TM 003 680
AUTHOR Rubin, Donald; And OthersTITLE A Descriptive and Analytic Study of Compensatory
Reading Programs. Phase I Report.INSTITUTION Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J.SPONS AGENCY Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, D.C. Office
of Planning,' Budgeting, and Evaluation.REPORT NO PR-73-28PUB DATE Aug 73CONTRACT OEC-71-3715NOTE 662p.; For related documents, see ED 064 294-300
EDRS PRICEDESCRIPTORS
ABSTRACT
MF-$1.05 HC-$31.80 PLUS POSTAGEComparative Analysis; *Compensatory EducationPrograms; Data Analysis; Elementary Schools; PublicSchools; Questionnaires; *Reading Programs; *RemedialReading Programs; *Research Design; SchoolDemography; Student Characteristics; *Surveys;Teacher Characteristics; Test Construction
A survey of compensatory and noncompensatory readingprograms in grades 2, 4, and 6 of the U. S. public schools wascarried out in spring 1972. phase I, the subject of this report,involved two tasks: (1) describing what was meant by "compensatoryreading", and (2) identifying the characteristics of schools in whichcompensatory reading programs are offered. Data descriptive ofschools, teachers, students, and instructional practices wereobtained via mail questionnaires. This report describes samplingprocedures, questionnaire development, field procedures, reliabilityand validity checks, index development, a study of nonrespondents,and the results of data analysis. Included in the five appendixesare: Appendix A: sample design and nonresponse weIght.adjustments;Appendix B: copies of the questionnaires used in the study to elicitinformation from the principals and teachers about the students andreading program characteristics; Appendix C; nonrespondent telephone'interview form; Appendix D: item response data for each of thequestionnaires used in the study; Appendix E: the methodology forformalizing subjective notions about the effect of nonresponse insample surveys. (Author/MLP)
U.S- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.EDUCATION //WELFARENATIONAL INSTITUTE or
EDUCATIONOHS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY M RECEIVED FROMTHE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINAT ING IT. POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONSSTATED DO NOT NECESSARILY ReproSENT OFFiCIALNATIDNAL INSTITUTE OFEDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY
PR- 73 28
PHASE I REPORT
Contract No. OEC- 71-3715
A DESCRIPTIVE AND ANALYTIC STUDY OF
COMPENSATORY READING PROGRAMS
Donald Rubin
Donald A. Trismen
Oita Wilder
Allen Yates
BEST copy AVAILABLE
August 1973
EDUCATIONAL TEETSNI3 SERVICEPRINCETON, NEW JERSEY
PHASE I REPORT
Contract No. OEC-0-71-3715
A DESCRIPTIVE AND ANALYTIC STUDY
OF COMPENSATORY READING PROGRAMS
Educational Testing Service
Princeton, N. J.
August 1973
The research reported herein was performed pursuant to a contract with theOffice of Education, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.Contractors undertaking such projects under Government sponsorship areencouraged to express freely their professional judgment in the conductof the project. Points of view or opinions stated do not, therefore,necessarily represent official Office of Education position or policy.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
Office of EducationOffice of Planning, Budgeting, and Evaluation
TABLE OF CONTENTS
?Alit
Introduction 1
Sample Selection and Instrument Development 3
Sample Selection 3
Advisory Board 4
Instrument Development 5
Data Collection 7
Non-respondent Study I 7
Non-respondent Study II 11
Study of error attributable to non-response 17
Questionnaire response rates 30
Quality control 32
Data consistency 32
Data stability 33
Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire 33
School Principal Questionnaire 34
Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaire 34
Data Analysis
Compensatory reading program clustering analysis
Analysis of program variation among and within schools
Clustering of reading programs
Results
Differences and similarities among schools which doand do not offer compensatory reading
Differences among teachers of compensatory readingprograms funded by various sources and teachers ofnon-compensatory reading programs
37
37
44
46
4S
49
55
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd.)
Relationships between selected variables
The distribution and density ofprograms
Description of schools in termsreading program indices
Among and within cluster analysis
Description of school clusters in terms ofreading program index scores
Item analysis of questionnaire data
Appendix A Sample design and nonresponseweight adjustments
Appendix B Questionnaires
Appendix C Non-respondent study telephoneinterview form
Appendix D Questionnaire item response data
compensatory reading
of compensatory
Appendix E A method for formalizing subjectivenotions about the effect of non-responsein sample surveys
?al
59
62
67
69
70
71
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Respondent vs. Non-Respondent Groups in Termsof Stratification Variables
bat
9
Table 2 Incidence of Compensatory Reading Programsfor Respondents and Non-Respondents in Title Iand Non-Title I Schools 10
Table 3 Comparisons Between Original Respondent andTelephone Follow-up Groups 13
Table 4 Variables Included in Reading Program IndexAnalysis 18
Table 5 School and Program Background Variables 24
Table 6 Analysis of the Statistical DifferencesBetween Respondents and Non-Respondents
Table 7 Teacher Response Rates By School FundingCategories 30
Table 8 Teacher Response Rates By School IncomeCategories 31
Table 9 Reading Program Factor Loadings 38
Table 10 Eigenvalues of the Among/Within Schools Matrix 45
Table 11 Correlations Between Program Indices and SchoolClusters 47
Table 12 Comparisons Among Schools Categorized ByType of Funding
Table 13 Comparisons Among Teachers in Schools CategorizedBy Type of Funding
Table 14 Contingency Coefficients for Variables From thePrincipal Questionnaire (Weighted Data)
25
Table 15 Contingency Coefficients for Variables From theTeacher Characteristics Questionnaire (WeightedData)
Table 16 Incidence of Schools By Compensatory ReadingProgram Funding Category and GeographicRegion .
50
56
60
61.
62
LIST OF TABLES (conttd.)
Table 17 Incidence of Schools By Compensatory ReadingProgram Funding Category and Urbanizationof Attendance Area
Page
63
Table 18 Incidence of Schools By Compensatory ReadingProgram Funding Category and Total. School.Enrollment 64
Table 19 Proportions of Schools Offering Various Numbersof Compensatory Reading Programs 65
Table 20 Incidence of Schools By Compensatory ReadingProgram Funding Category and Proportion ofNon-White Students 66
Table 21 Means and Standard Deviations of ProgramIndex Scores By School Funding Category 67
Table 22 Means and Standard Deviations of ProgramIndex Scores By School Cluster 69
Various sections of this report were written by the followingindividuals:
Donald RubinDonald TrismenGita WilderAllen Yates
Many other ETS staff contributed to the study. Deserving of specialmention are:
Eugene AlwoodJules GoodisonFrieda HardyStanley Mac DonaldHervey Scudder
SUMMARY
A survey of compensatory and non-compensatory reading programsin grades two, four, and six of the U.S. public schools was carriedout in Spring 1972. Data descriptive of schools, teachers, students,and instructional practices were obtained via mail questionnaires.This report describes sampling procedures, questionnaire development,field procedures, reliability and validity checks, index development,a study of non-respondents, and the results of data analysis.
INTRODUCTION
General Background of Study
In July 1971, Educational Testing Service was requested by theU. S. Office of Education to develop design and analysis plans fora study of compensatory reading programs in U. S. public schools.This planning activity took place during the period July-December1971, and is described in the ETS Final Report for Contract No. OEC-0-71-3715 (A. Descriptive and Analytic Study of Compensatory ReadingPrograms, January 1972). The research reported in the present Phase Ireport represents the implementation of the first segment of theseplans. Additional segments of the overall research plan are beingor will be carried out during the period July 1972-June 1974 and willbe described in a later report.
One of the first problems to be solved in Phase I was that ofdefining the domain of interest. This involved two tasks--describingwhat was meant by "compensatory reading," and identifying the char-acteristics of schools in which compensatory reading programs areoffered. The definition of "compensatory reading" required attentionto a number of semantic and pragmatic issues. It soon became clearthat there was no commonly accepted meaning of the term, even (orperhaps especially) among those considered knowledgeable in the fieldof reading. "Compensation for what?" seemed to be the central question,and the possible answers lay in the areas of both educational under-achievement and economic deprivation. Of the two areas, educationalunderachievement seemed the more basic in the sense that it was botha necessary and sufficient condition for a compensatory reading program.Economic deprivation, while often a concomitant condition, does notnecessarily imply the presence of poor reading achievement. In ad-dition, if economic deprivation were a required element of the definitionof a compensatory reading program, then programs for underachievingreaders of non-poverty families would be excluded from the study.
A second issue bearing on the problem of defining "compensatoryreading program" was that of operational practicality. A large-scalefield study was to be conducted, involving the collection of question-naire data from many and diverse school personnel. Ultimately, in astudy of this scope, the identification of compensatory reading programshad to be made at the school level by local personnel, with the aid ofguidelines provided by the study. Two alternative strategies in thedevelopment of these guidelines were considered: (a) to provide ascomplete instructions as possible, attempting to cover every situationwhich could conceivably occur in practice, or (b) to provide a rela-tively straightforward definition, leaving it to the local schoolstaff to apply it intelligently and ask for help from the administrativestaff of the study where necessary.
-2-
It was decided to adopt a very basic and uncomplicated defini-
tion of "compensatory reading" while at the same time obtaining
information via questionnaire which would enable the definition
to be further constrained and the sample of programs narrowed at
any time.
Thus, the principal of each participating school was
instructed that "by compensatory reading instruction is meant any
reading instruction provided to students because they are reading
below their grade level."
If, for example, it were later desired
to obtain a subsample of programs offered only to students of
economically deprived families, this could be accomplished via
questionnaire items relating to family income.
The first phase of the Compensatory Reading Study, the subject
of this report,
was a Spring 1972 questionnaire survey of com-
pensatory reading programs offered in grades 2, 4, and 6 of the U.
S. public schools.
This survey had two major purposes:
(1) to
obtain for a representative national sample data descriptive of
the instructional characteristics of such programs, the schools
in which they were offered, and the instructional personnel who
staffed them, and (2) to obtain a sample which could serve as a
population list from which to draw a subsample of programs to be
studied more intensively during a succeeding phase of the study,
conducted during the 1972-1973 school year.
(This later phase
will be described in a future project report.)
-3 -
SANPLE SELECTION AND INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT
Sample SeJoction
The primary purpose of the Spring 1972 Survey
was to obtain
data descriptive of the characteristics of
compensatory reading
programs in grades 2, 4, and 6 of the U. S. public schools, the
teachers of these programs, and the schools in which theyare
offered.
Since no population list of compensatory readingprograms
exist, it was necessary to select
a sample of schools using the
1970-1971 School Universe Tape (or in
a few states, the 1969-1970
School Universe Tape) as the basic list.
Socioeconomic status of the community and racialethnic group
membership have been shown to be highly correlated with student test
performance.
Therefore, average income and percent minority were
used as the major stratifying variables in selecting this sample.
In addition, it was felt that degree of urbanization, geographic
region, and size of school might be important variables with respect
to describing compensatory reading programs on a nationally pro-
jectable basis.
Although they were not used as stratifying variables,
they were taken into account in the sample selection process (see
Appendix A, p. 12).
This procedure involved putting the schools
within each major stratum (as defined by income classes and percent
minority) in order by Census region.
The schools were then divided
into a number of approximately equal sized blocks, based upon the-
measure of size.
From each of these blocks, called "final strata,"
two schools were selected to form the initial sample.
Substitute
schools were drawn at the same time by defining four substitute
selection numbers at equidistant intervals before and after the
selection numbers.
The development of the sample design and the actual sample
selection were performed by The Research Divison of Westat, Inc.
Their comprehensive technical report of the sample selection process
is included as Appendix A of this report.
Their method of develop-
ing weight adjustments for nonresponse and sampling error is also
presented in Appendix A.
It should be noted, however, that the
sample was essentially self-weighting.
The end product of Westat's work was a listing of the sample
schools, which were then contacted by ETS during the Spring of 1972.
Associated with each sample school in this listing were five sub-
stitute schools, to be contacted sequentially in the event that
the previously listed school or schools refused to participate.
Prior to contacting any of the sample schools, letters describing
the study were sent to each chief state school ufficer and to each
superintendent in whose district a sample school was located.
After
the superintendent's consent was obtained, the principal of the
-4-
selected school was sent detailed information about the study andthe conditions of participation. Presumably, the final decisionregarding participation was made by the principal, in consulta-tion with his staff and the district superintendent.
Advisory Board
From the very beginning, the Compensatory Reading Projectobtained the counsel of an Advisory Board, composed of six in-dividuals who represent a range of interests in the educationalcommunity.
The following individuals agreed to serve:
Ruth W. HayreAssociate Superintendent of SchoolsSchool District of Philadelphia
D. Dwaine HearnExecutive SecretaryAmerican Association of Elementary,
Kindergarten, and Nursery Educators
Hernan La FontainePrincipalBilingual School, New York City
Alden LilywhiteFederal Liaison AssistantCouncil of Chief State School Officers
Francis PinkowskiAssistant Director for Planning and EvaluationNew Jersey Department of Education
David SeldenPresidentAmerican Federation of Teachers
The Board met twice during the course of the planning phase ofthe study, and once in Spring 1972. At the first meeting, the Boardreacted to the design of the study and provided valuable suggestionsfor maximizing cooperation among sample schools. In fact, the pro-cedures for contacting school districts adopted by the project staffwere developed by the Advisory Board (the procedures were, in themain, quite successful in obtaining district and school cooperation).At subsequent meetings, the Board gave counsel on a variety ofpolicy issues, among them payments to participants, score reporting,and public relations. The Board is expected to continue to functionin its advisory role through the remainder of the study.
-5-
Instrument Development
The main objective of data collection in Phase I was to describereading programs, compensatory and non-compensatory, in as much de-tail as possible in the sample schools. It was decided that question-naires to the individuals most directly concerned with such readingprograms would be the most efficient technique for data collectionin a sample of more than 700 schools. In the initial stages of ques-tionnaire development, ETS project staff consulted a series of expertsin the field of reading first on 'the general question of what constitutesa reading program and how reading programs might be described; secondon what (if anything) differentiates compensatory reading programs fromreading programs in general. (A list of the consultants to questionnairedevelopment appears in Appendix B.)
There was some degree of consensus among the project consultantsthat the variety and types of characteristics found to exist among read-ing programs in general would also be found to exist among reading pro-grams labeled compensatory, and that the goal of questionnaire developmentshould be to describe all reading programs. The consultants deliberatedat length about what constitutes a reading program and, as a result of theseries of meetings with consultants in the Fall of 1971, a comprehensivelist of questionnaire variables or topics was adopted. The variablesfell roughly into four general categories: institutional (or school)variables, instructional (or class) variables, teacher characteristics,and student (demographic and background) characteristics. It was soondecided that questionnaires to students would be unmanageable at thisstage, and that the student background variables would be tapped bymeans of group estimates made by school principals and Leachers. It
was also decided that certain of the variables were most logically theprovince of school administrators and others most logically belongedto teachers. As a result, three sets of questionnaires were developed:a School Principal Questionnaire, two different Class and Program ques-tionnaires (one for compensatory and one for non-compensatory programs),and a Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire. The first, the SchoolPrincipal Questionnaire, was designed to provide data concerning schoolsand school districts, and about administrative policies affecting com-pensatory reading programs. Included in the School Principal Questionnaireare items about the size of the school in which a given reading programexists, the staff, the reading levels of students, the eligibility ofthe district and the school for federal funds, and some demographiccharacteristics of the student population. For schools in which thereare compensatory reading programs, the School Principal Questionnaireasks about the sources and levels of funding, the degree of and basisfor student participation in the programs, as well as descriptions ofthe programs.
-6-
The Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire was intended to elicitinformation about those characteristics of individual teachers thatmight have some influence on their students. Included in this ques-tionnaire were items asking about the teacher's sex, ethnic matchwith students, certification, years and nature of teaching experi-ence, and training specific to the teaching of reading. Some itemsmeasuring teacher attitudes were also included: attitudes about theschool, the administration, and the students, as well as feelingsabout the program and the materials used in the teaching of reading.
The Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaires were designedto be the most comprehensive of the instruments. These two question-naires were the main vehicle for the collection of data about classroominstruction during the first phase of the study. The two sets ofquestionnaires were identical, with certain minor exceptions, exceptthat one was to be completed by teachers of compensatory reading andthe other by teachers of non-compensatory reading. In cases where ateacher taught both compensatory and non-compensatory reading, she wasto complete both questionnaires. In this way, it was hoped that suchdifferences as did exist between compensatory and non-compensatoryprograms could be documented quite simply. Examples of the sort ofvariables included in the Class and Program Characteristics Ques-tionnaires are the size, composition, and flexibility of instructionalgroupings, the methods and materials used, the time allotted to read-ing instruction during the school week and the time allotted to variousinstructional activities during the reading period(s), the availabilityand use of auxiliary personnel and services, and some demographiccharacteristics of students in the classes.
The questionnaires attained their final form by means of a seriesof clinical pretrials in schools near Princeton and in Trenton andPhiladelphia. The schools were chosen to represent a variety ofreading programs (the majority of them compensatory) in grades 2,4, and 6. Questionnaires were completed by principals and teachersin the chosen schools, following which ETS project personnel visitedthe schools to observe reading instruction and to discuss the ques-tionnaires with the principals and teachers involved. The classroom.visits served to validate the information provided in the questionnaires,and the interviews served to review the questionnaire format and thefeasibility of data collection by this method. Valuable insights wereprovided by the principals and teachers who participated in the pre-trials; the questionnaires were revised a number of times in theprocess. When a semi-final form was arrived at, a series of mailtrials was conducted in order to test the whole mail-out and returnreceipt procedure.
-7-
DATA COLLECTION
Every effort was made to ensure the highest possible responserate for the Spring 1972 survey. Letters explaining the purposeof the project were sent to each chief state school officer in whosestate a sample school appeared. Similar letters were sent to super-intendents and principals of selected schools. Teachers were paid anhonorarium to complete and return questionnaires. All questionnairerespondents were guaranteed that their responses would remain anony-mous, and were given individual return envelopes in order that nolocal school staff would have access to the data. For each sampleschool, there were two classes of respondents (principals and teachers),who were requested to complete and return three different instruments(school questionnaires to be completed by the principal; program char-acteristics questionnaires, to be completed by teachers of compensatoryand non-compensatory reading classes; and teacher characteristicsquestionnaires, also to be completed by teachers). Thus, there wereseveral possible ways of defining "respondent" and "non-respondent,"depending upon the criterion of data completeness one wishes to adopt.Eighty percent (585) of the 731 sample schools contacted returned atleast one or more questionnaires of any type and seventy-four percent(543) returned at least a principal's questionnaire.
Non-respondent Study
In addition to variables appearing in the Spring 1972 Surveyquestionnaires, there existed other sources of data on the basis ofwhich the respondent and non-respondent groups might be compared.These data sources were the ones used to supply stratification in-formation prior to sample selection. The following descriptive datawere available for respondents and non-respondents:
1. whether a school participated in one or more ESEA TitleI programs (not necessarily compensatory reading programs,nor even reading programs of any sort) during the 1970-1971 school year
2. percent minority enrollment of schools in districts of3,000 or more enrollment; for schools in smaller dis-tricts, percent nonwhite reported in the county by the1970 Census
3. 1966 average gross income per taxpayer reported by theInternal Revenue Service for the ZIP Code area in whichthe school was located
-8-
4. 1960 Census median family income for the county orindependent city in which the school was located
S. school enrollment
6. urbanization of school attendance area
7. geographic region of school attendance area
Table 1 shows, for respondents and non-respondents, comparisonsin terms of the above listed seven variables. Inspection of the tableshows a small but consistent tendency of the non-respondent group tobe less advantaged than the respondent group. This tendency is some-what consistent with the results of Non-respondent Study II, to bedescribed in the following section.
-9-
Table 1. Respondent vs. Non-Respondent Groupsin Terms of Stratification Variables
Variable Respondents Non-Respondents
Participation in Title I (program(s)
Ethnicity
60% 67%
Less than 5% minority 47 35
5-9% minority 14 14
10-19% minority 13 19
20-39% minority 12 13
40-59% minority 4 5
60-79% minority 4 4
80% or more minority 6 10Mean % minority 16.8 21.7
1966 average gross income per taxpayer
1960 median family income
School enrollment
Urbanization
$6226
$5499
517
$5919
$5248
512
Large city, over 500K 7.3% 8.7%Large city, 200K-500K 4.5% 3.3%Suburb of a large city 9.9% 10.4%Rural area near a large city 11.3% 9.8%Middle-size city, 50K-200K 4.7% 2.7%Suburb of a middle-size city 32.1% 31.1%Rural area near a middle-size city 2.3% 2.2%Small city or town, less than 50K. 4.7% 3.8%Rural area, not near a large or
middle-size city 13.1% 19.7%
Geographic region*Northeast 21.2% 15.8%North Central 32.1% 25.7%
South 29.3% 39.3%
West 17.4% 19.1%
*Geographic regions are defined as follows, based on the 1970 Census ofPopulation, General Population Characteristics, United States Summary, pub-lished by the Bureau of the Census:
Northeast--Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut,Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey
North Central--North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Minnesota,Iowa, Wisconsin, Missouri, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio
South--Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Tennessee, Mississippi,Alabama, Kentucky, West Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, Virginia,North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida
West--Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Utah,Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, Alaska, Hawaii
-10-
It should be noted that the above comparisons are in terms ofdata available prior to sample selection, even though more recentdata on some of these variables are available from the questionnaireresponses of the respondent group. The more recent data were notused to compare respondent and non-respondent groups, since theydiffered from the prior data in three important respects:
1. Title I/non-Title I was defined in the questionnairesrelative to compensatory reading programs, but for thestratification variables relative to _mat Title I fundedprogram (mathematics or health programs, for example).
2. The questionnaire information applied to the 1971-72school year, while the stratification data originatedfrom several sources and were appropriate for timeperiods anywhere from 1960-1971.
3. The questionnaire information applied to the sendingarea of the school, whereas the stratification informa-tion applied to a variety of larger geographic areasin which the schools were embedded.
It is possible, however, to compare the incidence of compensatoryreading programs for respondents and non-respondents in Title I andnon-Title I schools (not necessarily Title I reading schools), interms of questionnaire and telephone responses. (These telephone responsesare described in the following section.) Table 2 shows this comparison.
Table 2. Incidence of Compensatory Reading Programs forRespondents and Non-Respondents in Title I and
Non-Title I Schools
Respondents Non-Respondents
Title I SchoolsNon-Title I Schools
91%88%
87%85%
Non-respondent Study II
A Study of the differences between responding and non-responding schools was undertaken in order to assess the degreeto which the respondent group (and therefore the non-respondentgroup) was typical of the total sample. The procedure followedwas to select a small subset of the questionnaire variables whichwere descriptive of important school characteristics, and to in-corporate them into a short questionnaire which was then administeredby telephone during the winter of 1973. Since the selected vari-ables originally appeared on the principal questionnaire, theabsence of a returned principal questionnaire was taken as thedefinition of a non-respondent for the purposes of this study.Information on the following variables was obtained by phone:
1. presence or absence of a compensatory reading programduring the 1971-1972 school year
2. Title I funding of one or more of the compensatoryreading programs
3. school enrollment during 1971-1972
4. occupational categories of school families
5. estimated percentage of students at each of grades 2,4, and 6 who are reading one or more years belowgrade level
6. estimated percentage of pupils whose head of householdattained various levels of education
7. estimated percentage of pupils whose familiesreceive public assistance
8. estimated percentage of students of various racialor national origins
9. estimated percentage of school families havingvarious annual incomes
10. number of classrooms during 1971-1972
-12-
Information on the above variables was obtained from 188
non-respondents.
Two differences between the modes of obtaining
information in the original survey and in the follow-up study
should be mentioned, since they have contributed to differences
between the two sets of responses.
The first and most obvious
difference was that the phone respondents were asked to supply
information orally, without having the time allowed questionnaire
respondents to weigh their answers or search for supporting data.
In addition, it should be kept in mind that these were respondents
which, for unknown reasons, had refused the first request for
information.
A second difference lay in the fact that certain
questions which had been couched in categorical form in the ques-
tionnaire were asked in open-ended form in the phone interview.
The obtained free responses were then coded into the original
questionnaire categories by the interviewer
Tests of significance of the difference between the means
and standard deviations of the questionnaire respondent group
(Group I) and the telephone follow-up group (Group II) were
performed.
The pattern of these results suggests that there
may have been some differences, but that the question of whether
they are true differences or are in part due to response mode
biases cannot be definitely determined from this study.
Table 3
shows the obtained comparisons between groups, based upon un-
weighted data.
Variable'
-13-
Table 3. Comparisons Between Original Respondentand Telephone Follow-up Groups
Means 2
RespondentGrou
Compensatory reading (CR)during 1971-1972
CR funded by Title 1 during1971-1972
School enrollment during1971-1972
Occupation: % professional
Occupation: 2 business owner
Occupation: % white collar
Occupation: skilled worker
Occupation: % unskilled worker
Occupation: % unemployed
reading below grade level, gr. 2
% reading below grade level, gr. 4
% reading below grade level, gr. 6
Education: % attended college
Education: % h.s. graduate
Education: % attended h.s.
Education: % finished gr. 8
Education: 2. did not finish gr. 8
1.10 528
1.48 537
3.58 537
1:16 534
1.27 534
1.72 534
1.81 534
1.67 534
1.19 534
2.96 485
3.19 481
3.28 423
1.55 534
2.34 533
1.62 533
1.32 533
1.15 533
T-Testfor
Equalityof Means3
F-Testfor
Equalityof S.D.
Follow-upGroup
1.13 188 1.16 1.28*
1.36 175 _2.89* 0.93*
3.66 188 0.75 1.05
1.26 182 2.55* 1.40*
1.17 170 -2.91* 0.64
1.69 178 -0.56 0.88
1.79 174 -0.30 1.01
1.79 176 1.93 0.91
1.19 181 0.11 0.92
3.07 159 1.02 1.52*
3.16 155 -0.26 1.65*
3.23 145 -0.51 1.23*
1.57 179 0.32 0.87
2.21 174 -2.29* 0.87
1.74 174 -2.21* 0.72
1.25 172 -1.65 0.49
1.09 177 -2.04* 0.46
* Significant at .05 level
1See Appendix C for the complete telephone interview form
2Means are expressed in the coded metric (e.g., Yes = 1, No = 2)
3Comparisons for which the followup group mean is smaller are indicatedby a minus sign
Variable1
-14-
Table 3. Comparisons Between Original Respondentand Telephone Follow-up Groups (continued)
Means2
T -Test F-Testfor for
Respondent Follow-up Equality3 EqualityN of Means of S.D.Group Grou
% families receiving publicassistance 1.81 534 2.02 184 2.13* 1.37*
% White 3.32 536 3,31 188 -0.10 1.37*
% Black 1.43 535 1.59 181 2.14* 1.29*
% Spanish surnamed 1.13 535 1.21 182 1.96* 1.76*
% Oriental 1.00 535 1.01 178 0.30 1.51*
% American Indian 1.02 535 1.02 180 0.56 1.84
% Other 1.02 535 1.00 119 -0.75 1.30*
Income: % $12,000 and over 1.47 535 1.51 171 0.74 1.07
Income: % $9,000-11,999 1.68 534 1.57 169 -2.04* 0.83
Income: % $6,000-8,999 1.92 534 1.88 170 -0.70 0.81
Income: % $3,000-5,999 1.63 534 1.58 170 -0.83 0.80
Income: % Under $3,000 1.23 534 1.29 171 1.37 1.06
Number of classrooms 19.99 536 20.13 188 0.17 1.29*
* Significant at .05 level
1See Appendix C for the complete telephone interview form
2Means are expressed in the coded metric (e.g., Yes = 1, No = 2)
3Comparisons for which the follow-up group mean is smaller are indicatedby a minus sign
-15-
Inspection of Table 3 reveals that a significantly higher
proportion of the non-respondent schools reported that they had
a 1971-1972 compensatory reading program supported either totally
or in part under ESEA Title I.
Of all the questions asked in the
telephone follow-up of non-respondents, this one seems to be as
factual and insensitive to the vagaries of oral
response as any.
It would seem easy to remember, minimally dependent upon judgment,
and not apt to be falsified by the respondent.
Therefore, it may
be useful to regard this question as
a benchmark against which to
evaluate the possible effects of response bias in other items less
resistant to response bias.
Another item which shows a similar,
although less, pronounced, effect is that concerning the percentage
of pupils whose families receive public assistance, the differences
between groups being in the direction of making the non-respondents
appear somewhat more deprived-,
However, it should be remembered
that the item is considerably more judgmental than is the previous
one concerned with Title I funding.
The cluster of items concerned with percentage of school
families in various occupational categories shows a somewhat
mixed result.
The non-respondents have a significantly lower
percentage of business owners, and seem to have a higher percentage
of unskilled workers, although the latter difference does not quite
reach significance.
Contrary to expectation, one finds the non-
respondents to have a significantly higher percentage of profes-
sionals, which contradicts the implications of the Title I funding
and percent public assistance variables previously discussed.
The
results for this cluter are difficult to interpret, since they do
not exhibit the compensating pattern one would expect of such a
cluster.
That is, one would expect differences in the "higher"
occupations to be opposite in direction from those in the "lower"
occupations (the more doctors, the fewer unskilled or unemployed).
One possible response mode bias which may be operating in the
cluster of occupational items results from the fact that questionnaire
respondents were able to look at the entire item cluster before re-
sponding to any, while the non-respondents were asked the items
serially and thus were unable to relate their responses to each
other, and adjust them so as to add approximately to 100 percent
across categories.
This might in fact account for the largest dif-
ference being in the second occupational category presented, as
respondents suddenly attempted to compensate for a too-large first
response.
-16-
A similar situation prevails in the set of items relating toestimated annual income of selool families and, to a lesser extent,items about level of education attained by the head of household.Again, one would expect a situation in which positive differencesat one end of the income (or education) scale would be accompaniedby negative differences at the other. This was not the case, how-ever, and one must conclude that the data are more affected byresponse mode biases than they are by true differences between
v.' the respondent and non-respondent groups.
The items concerned with percentage of students of variousracial or national origins are consistent with the results forthe Title I funding item. The two racial categories for whichdifferences are significant, Black and Spanish surnamed, bothshow higher percentages for the non-respondent group.
The final cluster of items, those relating to the percentageof students at each of grades 2, 4, and 6 reading one or more yearsbelow grade level, show no significant differences between the twogroups. If one accepts the trends in the data discussed previously,to the effect that non-respondent schools may serve more deprivedpopulations, then this result suggests the operation of some sortof response mode bias. These items are perhaps the most threateningand at the same time the most judgmental of those asked of non-respondents during the telephone interview. One hypothesis is thatschool personnel are reluctant to provide information unfavorableto their school to telephone interviewers--more reluctant than theyare to provide the same information in a questionnaire survey.
In summary, the results of the follow-up study were notconclusive. There seems to be some reason to believe that non-respondent schools might serve more economically deprived populationsand be more likely to offer Title I funded reading programs. On
the other hand, it seems clear that a substantial portion of theobtained differences is a result of unknown biases due to the un-avoidable differences in response mode between the respondent andnon-respondent groups. Finally, it should be remembered that respondentsand non-respondents tend to respond differently, regardless of the trueconditions they are describing, and that some portion of the intergroupdifferences might be attributable to this influence.
-17-
Study of Error Attributable to Non-Response
It is possible to estimate the amount of error attributable tonon-response by making judgments, on the basis of known qualitiesof the non-respondents, about what their responses might have been.Basically the method formalizes subjective notions of how similarrespondents and non-respondents are to each other, and then calcu-lates a confidence interval for what the average response wouldhave been had all the non-respondents responded. Subjective notionsregarding the degree of similarity between respondents and non-respondents make it possible to estimate how much the average re-sponse would have changed had the non-respondents in fact responded.A technical description of the method employed here and the deriva-tion of the result can be found in Appendix E.
In this study, 731 schools were contacted initially. Of
these, 188 failed to return a School Principal Questionnaire,and are considered for purposes of this exercise the non-respondents.Of the remaining 543, there were 537 for whom usable School PrincipalQuestionnaire data were available, and 504 from whom Class andProgram Characteristics Questionnaire data (from the blue CompensatoryReading version)* had been received. This study of error attributableto non-response is based on the 188 non-respondent schools, plus 488schools from whom School Principal and Class and Program CharacteristicsQuestionnaires could be matched. For the latter 488 schools therewere 80 variables derived from the Class and Program CharacteristicsQuestionnaires (see Table 4) and 30 variables derived from the SchoolPrincipal Questionnaires (Table 5). For all schools there were 37background variables that had been obtained either from the samplingtape or the questionnaires or, in the case of the 188 non-respondents,by telephone follow-up.
*Appendix B contains copies of the questionnaires used in thisstudy. The following color coding scheme was used
Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaire, CompensatoryReading Version-Blue
Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaire, Non-CompensatoryReading Version-Yellow
School Principal Questionnaire-White
Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire-Tan
-18-
Table 4. Variables Included in ReadingProgram index Analysis
Class and Program Characteristics(Blue) Questionnaire Item Number Variable
17a
17b
17c
17d
18 (one or more of a, b, d)
18c
18e
18 (one or more of f, g, h, i)
19
20
2 0a
20b
20 (highest of a, b)
CR carried out during regular schoolhours in time scheduled for regularreading instruction
CR during regular school hours intime released from other classwork
CR before or after school or onweekends
CR during the summer
CR during time released from socialstudies, science and/or foreignlanguage
CR during time released frommathematics
CR during time released fromlanguage arcs
CR during time released fromphysical education, art, music,and/or seat work
CR instruction time per studentper week
CR instruction at same time eachday
Time of instructional period, ifsame time
Usual time of instructional period,if different
Frequency of availability of(a) remedial reading teacher, or(b) other professionals to CRP
more teaching
-19-
Table 4. Variables Included in ReadingProgram Index Analysis (continued)
Class and Program Characteristics(Blue) Questionnaire Item Number Variable
21c
21 (highest of d, e, h)
21 (highest of f, g)
23a
2 3b
23c
23d
2 3e
24
25
27
29a
29b
Frequency of availability ofparaprofessionals or teacheraides to CRP teaching
Frequency of availability of(d) parent or other volunteer,(e) student teacher or(h) older student in school toCRP teaching
Frequency of availability of(f) media specialist, or(g) resource teacher to CRPteaching
Frequency of organizing CR classinto groups by reading gradelevel
Frequency of organizing CR classinto groups by specific skilldeficiencies
Frequency of organizing CR classinto groups by shared interests
Frequency of organizing CR classinto groups by specific projects
Frequency of organizing CR classinto groups by other (than a-dabove) criteria
Adult/child instructional ratio
Frequency of change of CR groupcomposition
Major approach to teaching of CR
Extent to which basal readers usedin CR teaching
Extent to which programmedinstruction used in CR teaching
-20--
Table 4. Variables Included in ReadingProgram Index Analysis (continued)
Class and Program Characteristics(Blue) uestionnaire Item Number Variable
29c Extent to which total phonicsprogram used in CR teaching
29d
29e
29f
29g
29h
29i
29 j
29k
32 a
32b
32 c
32d
Extent to which supplementaryphonics program used in CRteaching
Extent to which a languageexperience approach used inCR teaching
Extent to which a linguisticprogram used in CR teaching
Extent to which non-standardorthography used in CR teaching
Extent to which Words In Colorused in CR teaching
Extent to which individualizedprograms used in CR teaching
Extent to which technologicaldevices used in CR teaching
Extent to which other (than a-jabove) approaches used in CRteaching
Frequency with which textbooksother than basal readers usedin CR teaching
Frequency with which books andprinted materials other thantextbooks used in CR teaching
Frequency with which newspapers,magazines, and other periodicalsused in CR teaching
Frequency with which teacher-preparedmaterials used in CR teaching
-21-
Table 4. Variables Included in ReadingProgram Index Analysis (continued)
Class and Program Characteristics(Blue) Questionnaire Item Number Variable
32e
32f
32g
32h
32i
32j
33a
3 3b
33c
33d
33e
33f
3 3g
33h
Frequency with which motion picturesand/or filmstrips used in CRteaching
Frequency with which slides andtransparencies used in CR teaching
Frequency with which tape recordingsand records used in CR teaching
Frequency with which video ortelevision tapes used in CRteaching
Frequency with which games, puzzles,and toys used in CR teaching
Frequency with which other (than a-iabove) materials used in CRteaching
Time spent in CR class improvingmotor abilities related toreading
Time spent in CR class increasingattention span
Time spent in CR class developingvisual discrimination
Time spent in CR class matchingletters or words
Time spent in CR class learningletter forms
Time spent in CR class developing asight vocabulary
Time spent in CR class learningword meanings
Time spent in CR class on phonicand/or structural analysis
-22-
Table 4. Variables Included in ReadingProgram Index Analysis (continued)
Class and Program Characteristics(BlueUmestionnaire Item Number Variable
331
33j
331
3 3e
33m
33n
34
39 a
39b
39 c
39 d
39e
39 f
39 g
Time spent in CR class being readto
Time spent in CR class reading
aloud
Time spent in CR class readingsilently
Time spent in CR class in creativewriting
Time spent in CR class reading forenjoyment
Time spent in CR class enrichingcultural background
Special training for teacher inteaching of reading fordisadvantaged pupils
Amount of CR pupil in-school timedevoted to instructional program
Amount of CR pupil in- school timedevoted to compensatory reading
Amount of CR pupil in-school timedevoted to instructional program(if CR differs from basic program)
Amount of CR pupil in-school timedevoted to reading in content
areas
Amount of CR pupil in-school timedevoted to independent ,reading
Amount of CR pupil in-school timedevoted to library activities
Amount of CR pupil in-school timedevoted to enrichment activities
-23-
Table 4. Variables Included in ReadingProgram Index Analysis (continued)
Class and Program Characteristics(Blue) Questionnaire item Number Variable
39h
40a -n
41
43
44
Amount of CR pupil in-school timedevoted to other (than a-g above)activities
Use of specified publishers'materials
Teacher creation of CR materials
Frequency with which each child inCR class reads aloud to class
Frequency with which each child inCR class reads aloud to teacher
-24-
Table 5. School and ProgramBackground Variables
Source Variable
School Universe Tape
Class and Program Character-istics Questionnaire
Title I funding (aay program)Percent minority enrollmentUrbanization of school attendance area
Average gross income per taxpayer for ZIPCode area in which school was located
Median family income for county orindependent city in which school was located
Existence of compensatory reading program
Title I funding of compensatory readingprogram
School enrollment
Parental occupation (6 variables)
Percent students reading below grade level(3 variables)
Parental education (5 variables)
Other non-local funding
Parental ethnic backgrOund (5 variables)
Parental income (5 variables)
Number of rooms in school
-25-
as 0, co 0a en or 43 .. A u% cm MN 4 el ce so N 0 0 03 sr c ee 4 P. C) CO CO CO .4 ap an ro oc sr sr te c) e4 en ce P. W* N sr m ce e IP 40 .0 sr C. cp r- em ve 0 0' Cn r- (NJ CC :n C Cm M N 0 MD 44 Cm sr M CO 0 V% 0 eM 00 MD el r- op 41
J 41 co J:: 7.: ..N sr c C ry .n 1, p. ,N 7. sr .e v) JO .? de: :7. JP co c: s- cc NI h. .4 Cs: cr sr MN 0 40 CS: 0 :.MN e- r* 0 C' 4C^ -C -4.1 4 C' .4 JJ Ph r i3 7%. C 0 UN P. Ca Ca C. ON t sr 0 0 41 4N .0 r. CO P. P. Ca C. .0-ENO OM ,r r4 0 CCs N NJ -d de, 4) CD 0 C) 4) C) CD CD CD .. 0 44 C CD CD CD 0 0 .4 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CC Cm 0 0 .4 c) 0 c) 0 c; 000 cp c 0 0 4) c) CD :3 C) CD :CDC 0 CD (.1 4) C C CD C CD CD 0 43 CD 0 0 CD CD CD
CCC00000CCOCC.00CCC000000CC0CC0000000CCCOOCCOCOCCO0
CP .4 4 ir .4 M .4 C. P. 0 PP CP 10 .0 C. CD .4 40 h. P4 4, N00 C. cm 0 es em .. .3 .7 em .. 0 P.4 gs P. sr r.0 CO 03.+ CP. PM .4 PM C Ur C CV sr cr c CD C- 01 r. 1;. 0M37 .0 le 0- en P- Cm MD 4C . 0) N u% .4 m 0 ye, cc cO 0 OC CC 0PU N 4 v CC .0 es r - co M CC a , c r- r- 4 rc r- JaC .4 CF. GO` . UN.. C. VM 4. cs r, .4 MN tD h- h, CP C0 xN sr e. cc srC" 0 00 Cr en r- DO es 00 M CV P. ON m 0 P. .0 aN .4' .O4 3, sr 40, O. 4) 4 CC CD rr m 0 es. i- fr. ,se ill M 4 U1 U1 4. C" P- sr soee r, es 04 No N 0 CD C> 0 Pm P. .4 .4 0 0 CD CD CD C; CD CC 0 0 Ca Ca C: 0 CD CD C C 0 0 0 0 CZ C> CD C C CD CD CDN 0 CD 0 C> 0 0 CZ 0 0 C> 0 CD CD CD C> CD CD C) CD z) 0 CD co co to C> C0 0 CD CD 0 CD CD C> C) CZ 0 0 C> C0 0 C> 0
X 0000C,00000000000000000CaCC00000000C0000000000C0C00
DJC)
C: pry UN PM Q0 us J r. Cr sr r% 0 r- r- cm on or r- 4 OD 0 Pa 0 sr us c4 tc 0a cc 40 m C4 P. .4 4$ 0 .4 CP 4, 40 P. 0 C> CO eVC L h a 4 4 0 h i 40 4 , OC 44 .4 h- 4 0 NN C , s r eN N. c aD ,r c) po hi CD C. 4 Cc. ce. P. 40 CAF C. M r- PC 1. X c* :O c CC 0 CD V* CC
r- P. OD A ca cc a: cr en es cm a C. 0, Ch gC CC CD M O' C" W c0 a, C. Cr 40 C. 0C W. = cr. CD W GC CP W e) Oe ,P x X P G^ cc m- 7 0 m c c .0 cr s o s r ,t un 4 s r s r s r sr s rJ J S J J U r sr sr .4. sr sr sr sr st sr sr 4. sr sr sr sr sr sr sr sr sr 4. sr 4. sr sr
44 cc zc OC 10 COT lc co oc co 00 x Oj lc rp A a> al ao a: m a; OD OD X SCp 70 1C fib» W ,0 0D c0 DD DC 00T 0 2D OC at 1DLc ed N r4 N N N N N N NN Nti N N N N N N N N in. N cm n: N N rs rs N cu N N N N A4 "I ro N CM N N N cs eo N N N NN0 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000?
o.-
O. 0M 0 01 P- 4 PI en .0 .1 4) N ce 0' N sr co eo V% CO 01 J P. en CD el en ao us UN PN CP h- .7 rm oD N em en 3" sr r. 1A r4 cr cr1.0 en 00 e. .. CV UM .7 *Z" CD CP On es on P.w a C. O1 pp P14 C. p. C. .4 p. 4. 0 r4 x eq M.. m c, 4 em .0 CP 41 p. 0 el es em .4 e.:3 .7 00 C) mN .0 h. CM UN UN V' sr J.I. ^4 0 .0 V) NN CP A m h 0 p. M sr cc 00 .0 <0 ell 0 ao 0 N.0 A en CP a% re OD sr ^>J
e edd0 e s 0 M U% un CD C W 4 MC Nee' G0 p. Pn pm 0 ,0 4. p, P. .0 4. m. .0 e0 CD 0 em us .. es c, e. c
'.0 0 eerqescco,oc-da000.-.00000.000000...00000000000000000000000000. 0 0000000000000000000c0c0c00000000000000000000000000
il)NH c.X 0.0000000000.000.c00.00000.000.00.00000000000000.A c c 1 1 I I
I I I 1 1 I I I I
E1z
W W CUNcC J1. c0 CD CV P. NM Cep 0C 0 op op es .. ce us en ea cp .4 a. CP CC A Pa CP M en P. ,r u% cp P. 0 0 c w.0 paCC eC CP P. e- so 4 W 4 sr eq r- C. Ua UN C. P. 1,4 sr r4 rs ee es cr C4 4.4 UN PN C, C, UN PM 40 .4 20 eV . os cr sto sr oM0srr4elPO..
NO NN sr so sr P- .4 sr sc U100 -00 uses 4% .. eo go so ,c rNM a co 0 0o r. .0 ... en c: cr a c0 Ce 0 P. CC I.. .7so n co0c00cuo.r0000000000N00000000000000oa00ccocco0000000C.) Z 00000000-.00000 0000000000000000000u0c00000000000000z rw H 00300000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000geU.1
LL
44
040 0 0 4) h" Ca a) C't J J P% m J M 0 cm en . .4 CP c" op G cm a a en ^' a a CD CP us sr NON sr sr 44 co en cm
44 01 Cm C W 4. 47 Cr h. .. CC UN r. 40 ti.. UN 1.4 CM C. en m M CP P+ 1 UN .. Cr 0 cm M C) p. m un .41 0 cm NCO gc p. el). e s cm e s : P , .40 cc en 0 cp em CD "4 .. r- .. P. .. CC. .6 6 .0 0 Cm CV h" ..J 04 sc C4 MM Ws Cs: .4 CP V' P. UN UN
44 0 . MS, '-00'- . a- mops r0 r- mD P. pn .0 a rr 10 0? el P. ct C .. U' C CD .. cD rA W .>7M 4r* On rs. 4) cm .r rsr. It CP CM Cr en a M r- C. h4 C: MCC CP so so 4 cs 0 co cD eu rm 0 em u% .. ^4 sr sr rs 4 .1- v tr cc -. n- sr e. un r. co .. l+P
O < 010 cp es 0 .4 ml 0 ey 4 4 4 01 J.. es cs c, 4. cs 45 N m cp is. se es es Op a e. is. us co ,0 N rp Q .7 en rm aw r'.r- P: 000 CD CD 0 0 0 el cm 0 0 CD 44 *4 r4 est pv e4 0p 4,, 0, N 0, 0, e, 0, N 0, 0, 0, e, .4 pm N .4 v. .4 pmAT
CD_eo-3- Lu.tlw >,).<1.Jc.)UUult1:0 ..%XX WWMcce-.34WWw000 M...4:1. DC J 0 u c6 :) :.: O.
fill 0. c r- o i 1, w t0 I 1 I r< V .44.1.0>c<uw.611<cumwacLuL:o1;c:pucowwom-nactucwwcox..dimuclwwoz-Nr-r.r-0=a00-0%;...me+re,e40--ccc-comccrccNimNeaesie4NrNmesperNrAmelesrmm..,.....-, ..... Ntsr,NraNNNNNNmN,N:NJevrstN/NN:NmNesr0.-mmmrlmeNelmme.smmelmm
OE
ST C
OPY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
Table 6 (continued)
04,
ANALYSIS
OF THE STAIIS;ICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RESPONDENTS ANu NONRESPONDENTS
MEAN Y
STNU ERR
H 0
HI
H 2
H 3
33J
1.604374
0.000900
0.007174
0.744902
0.0014548
0.006010
33K
1.442017
0.000823
-0.000585
0.284901
(1.004654
0.001951
331
2.065410
C.001046
-0.006689
0.284892
0.008063
0.007722
33M
1.619594
0.000061
-0.000042
0.284894
0.004306
0.007421
33N
1.983331
0.000934
-0.0021'57
0.204005
0.004414
0.006639
34 -TRAIN
1.491887
0.000745
0.004795
0.284899
0.006267
0.000955
39A
2.969736
0.001796
0.004801
0.204080
0.005970
0.006112
390
3.024388
0.000800
0.002332
0.764860
0.003160
0.003677
39C
2.485181
0.001677
-0.000614
0.284922
0.005499
0.009418
390
2.664131
0.001384
-0.003095
0.284493
0.005266
0.007344
19E
2.55/231
0.000931
-0.003579
0.284871
0.004662
0.00:140
39F
2.186287
0.000881
- 0.000059
0.784076
0.003333
0.005744
39G
1.850157
0.000949
0.003673
0.284491
0.00554:6
0.007183
40-SCOTT
3.200337
0.001583
0.000436
0.204891
0.004159
0.007129
40-HRPR
3.702407
0.001085
-0.003249
0.764863
0.004041
0..:04140
40-MACML
3.728068
0.000936
0.001219
0.284859
0.002388
0.003539
40-6m CO
3.794397
0.000844
-0.001241
0.204957
0.002213
0.00115P
40-GINN
3.593367
0.001035
0.007308
0.284063
0.001429
0.0041)4
40-H MFF
3.737021
0.001018
0.001798
0.204860
0.002040
0.003789
40-L1PPN
3.884631
0.000585
0.000569
0.284852
0.001376
0.002159
40-ALEBA
3.885063
0.000710
-0.000449
0.204954
0.001567
0.002587
40-K.REW
3.889557
0.000552
-0.000726
0.284852
0.001385
0.007043
1
40-SRA
3.485577
0.001152
-0.c00340
0.284867
0.002755
0.004717
rs,
cN
40-HARC
3.871876
0.000047
-0.002559
0.204957
0.003131
0.003108
1
40-0PENC
3.521002
0.000667
-0.000248
0.764853
0.001475
0.0O24I4
40-ITA
3.973388
0.000325
-0.000419
0.784850
0.000781
0.601136
40-PERR
3.842535
0.000892
-0.000045
0.204858
0.001929
0.003324
4I-CREAT
1.075331
0.000401
0.004126
0.284870
0.005078
0.005103
43-ALOUD
2.23C337
0.001877
0.007015
0.784969
0.009904
0.012051
44-ALONE
2.765053
0.002045
0.003023
0.284940
0.006793
0.01048.5
-27-
Table 6 presents the values of 7R' h0, h1' h2, h3 for each
of the 80 variables plus the standard error of YR ignoring the non-
respondents. As noted in Appendix E, Viz is a variable recorded
for all respondents but not for non-respondents, X is a background
variable recorded for respondents and non-respondents, 6, is
the subjective coefficient of variation for the non-respondents'
mean if their X distribution were the same as the X distribution
for respondents, 82 is a subjective coefficient of variation for
the non-respondents' regression coefficients, h0 is the relative
bias due to different sample X means for respondents and non-2
1respondents03 21h21 is relative variance due to uncertainty about
the equality of expectations of Y for respondents and non-,2 .
respondents due to sources other than X,622a is relative vari-
ance due to uncertainty about the equality of Y on X regressions
for respondents and non-respondents, and h2
3is relative variance
due to adding pN independent new units to the sample with mean.
25.NR.
First let e1
- 62= 0 so as to assume that aside from the
observed X difference the respondents and non-respondents are
just alike; i.e., only random sampling has generated the observed
X difference. The 95 percent confidence interval given by (1.1)
is then smallest and is
Viz (1 + h0 2h3)
Note that on the basis of h0
and h3
there are basically two types
of variables: the first group has larger than typical values of
h0and/or h
3and consists of variables 17B, 17C, 17D 18ABD, 18C,
18E, 18FGHI, 21C, 21DEH, And 21FG; the second group consists of
the other variables whose values of h0
and h3are typically small
(i.e.< 1.5%). For the first group, the 61 - 02 = 0 95% confidence
interval can be nontrivial; e.g., for 18C: 0.09(1 + .06 + .15),
plus 21%, minus 9%! For the second group, the typical confidence
interval is smaller than (+ .01 + .02).
-28-
It is important to examine what the variables in the first
group are. From Table 4, it can be seen that variables 17B, 17C,
and 17D concern when compensatory instruction is given; the values
of h0
suggest that the non-respondents tend to use "special"
class time less than the respondents, and rely more on regular
class time. This suggests that compensatory reading programs
may be more standard for non-respondents. Also from Table 4,
it can be seen that variables I8ABD, 18C, and 18FGHI concern
what subjects are displaced by compensatory reading instruction;
it looks as if non-respondents tend to take time away from mathe-
matics more than respondents, a procedure perhaps indicating
more serious reading problems. Again from Table 4, it can be
seen that variables 21C, 21DEH, and 21FG concern the availability
and use of additional personnel for compensatory reading instruc-
tion; the directions obtained for h0 are weak, suggesting that
the non-respondents have more paraprofessionals available, but
for all items the uncertainty from h3 is large. So far, the
indications seem to be that the non-respondents have more severe
reading problems than the respondents.
Now consider a non-zero 01
indicating that respondents and
non-respondents may have different Y expectations due to sources
other than the X variables. All values of h1
are essentially 29%.
Since the range of the 9596 confidence interval is at least
+ 201h1= + 588
1 '
% if 01
is substantial (e.g., 35%), the 95% con,
fidence interval will be at least + 20% for all variables. Of
course, if we believe that the X variables we have recorded are
the important sources of bias between respondents and non-respondents
(not a bad assumption in this case, since they include socioeconomic
status and approximations of student achievement variables), the
contribution of e1b1
to the confidence interval will be small for
all variables (e.g., if e1
. 10%, then 281 h1
.--, 6%).
-29-
Now consider a non-zero 02 indicating that the regression of
Y on X may be different for respondents and non-respondents. The
variables divide fairly well into the same two groups as before.
The second group has values of h2 below .02 and typically below
.01, while the first group has values of h2 above .02 except for
MEG and 21FG which have values about .013 (these two had small
h0 as well). Hence for the second group, even if 0 is quite
large, the contribution of 0 2h2 to the 95% confidence interval
will be typically small (e.g., if 02 = 100%, 262h2 typically
is less than 2%). However, for the first group of variables
such a large 02 can be quite important; e.g., for 17C if 02 = 100%,
202h2= 13%.
In summary, the results of this non-response study seem to
tell us that for variables 17B, 17C, 17D, 18ABD, 18C, 18E,
18FGHI, 21C, 21DEH, and 21FG, the inclusion of non-respondents
could have substantially (e.g., by about 30%) changed the average
response, probably in the direction indicating that the average
school has more serious reading problems than the responding schools,
while for the other variables the effect of the non-respondents
was probably not very important (e.g., <10%).
-30-
Questionnaire Response Rates
School response rates and the special study of non-respondentsare described in earlier sections of this report. For that pur-pose, a school was designated as responding if it returned thePrincipal Questionnaire. In addition, however, teachers in eachschool were requested to complete Program Characteristics Question-naires and Teacher Characteristics Questionnaires. Thus, it ispossible to define and determine questionnaire response rates--the proportion of questionnaires distributed in respondentschools which were returned as requested. These data are byno means error free, since the identification of teachers ineach school who were to have received questionnaires was carriedout by the school principal according to procedures specified byETS. Therefore, the number of teachers who should have returnedquestionnaires can be obtained only from data reported by the prin-cipal, and these data are, of course, characterized by their ownerror and incompleteness. Thus, if a principal did not supplyinformation specifying which teachers received questionnaires,there was no way of including that school in the response ratecalculation. If not all teachers listed by a principal did infact receive questionnaires, then the reported response rates wouldbe correspondingly low. Table 7 shows questionnaire response ratesfor several categories of schools.
Table 7.
School Category
Teacher Response Rates bySchool Funding Categories
N N
Expected ReceivedTeacher
Response Rate
All compensatory readingprograms partially ortotally supported byTitle I 441 298 68%
One or more (but not all)compensatory readingprograms partially ortotally supported byTitle I 715 496 69%
No compensatory programspartially or totallysupported by Title I 666 469 70%
No compensatory readingprograms offered 159 133 84%
Uncategorizable schools* 798 520 657
*The assignment of schools to funding categories was dependentupon responses to certain items in the Principal Questionnaire.These items themselves had a non-response rate, thus resulting insome uncategorizable schools.
-31-
Table 8 shows teacher response rates for schools categorizedby income level of student's head of household.
Table 8.
School Category
Teacher Response Rates BySchool Income Categories
N N
Expected ReceivedTeacher
Response Rate
$12,000 and over 232 144 62%
$ 9,000 - 11,999 527 371 72
$ 6,000 - 8,999 595 384 65
$ 3,000 - 5,999 755 504 67
under $3,000 560 398 72
-32-
Quality Control
A.
Data Consistency
A limited check on the consistency of the data was conducted
using a randomly selected 20 of the Phase I schools.
It was
decided that to verify any of the teacher data would cause more
ill will than a study of this nature could afford.
It was also
decided that to verify the student data through individual student
or parent interviews would be prohibitive in cost.
The check was,
therefore, limited to the school data
that had been collected via
Principal Questionnaire.
For each of the 20 schools, the appropri-
ate superintendent was contacted by phone and asked to respond to
twelve of the same questions as had been answered by the principal.
The questions were about the mobility of the school population, the
existence and extent of bussing to and from the school attendance
area, occupations represented by school families, existence and
cost of compensatory reading programs, and per pupil expenditures
for the district and the school.
The estimates of agreement are extremely conservative ones
because they are expressed in terms of percentages of cases in
which the principal and the superintendent agreed perfectly in
their responses.
For purposes of this study, if a principal re-
ports that migrant workers make up 0-10% of his school population,
and the superintendent estimates 11-25%, the item is treated as if
there were no agreement at all.
The percentage of agreement between the principal's original
responses and the responses given by the superintendent ranged from
25 (concerning per pupil expenditure in the district) to 95 (con-
cerning the proportion of migrant workers in the school population).
The average level of agreement over all questions was 58%.
This
is not so surprising considering that the two individuals responding
have distinctly different perspectives, and perhaps different sources
of information.
The highest levels of agreement were found to exist
for the following questions:
mobility of the school population out
of the school attendance area, percent of school families unemployed,
bussing in and out of the school attendance area, and the existence
in the school of one or more compensatory reading programs.
Overall,
where the percentage of agreement was low, the information sought
was more likely to be the province of one or the other class of re-
spondents.
Allowing, therefore, for the time lapse between the two
episodes of data collection, and for the differences in perspective
between the two sets of informants, as well as for the conservative
nature of the scoring, the information gathered was reasonably con-
sistent.
-33-
B. Data Stability
In an effort to assess one facet of the stability of thePhase I data, a random sample was chosen representing approximatelyten percent of the 535 schools from which questionnaires were re-ceived in the Spring of 1972. A total of 75 schools were contactedin an effort to obtain a final school sample of 50 and a finalteacher sample of 150. A second set of questionnaires, identicalto the first set, was then sent to each school six weeks after thefirst set had been sent. The six-week interval was judged to belong enough to minimize the effect of respondents' memory of theirresponses to the first administration, but short enough to minimizethe possibility of real change occurring. There was also thenecessity of obtaining responses before the close of the secondsemester. The principals of the schools, one teacher of compensatoryreading in each of grades 2, 4, and 6, and the teachers of thegrades 2, 4, and 6 with the lowest reading achievement were askedto complete questionnaires. A total of 60 schools responded, yield-ing 56 School Principal Questionnaires, 117 Teacher CharacteristicsQuestionnaires, 62 Class and Program Characteristics Questionnairesfor compensatory programs, and 68 Class and Program CharacteristicsQuestionnaires for non-compensatory programs taught to the studentswith the lowest reading achievement in their respective grades.Correlation coefficients between first and 'second responses werethen computed for each item of each questionnaire. The results,indicating an encouraging level of stability, are given belowby questionnaire. As was the case with the data consistency es-timates, the results that are reported, however high they appearto be, are extremely conservative representations. Once againonly perfect agreement between first and second response affectedthe correlation coefficients positively; in items in which degreesof agreement could have been obtained, any failure to agree perfectlywas treated as failure to agree at all.
Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire. The Teacher CharacteristicsQuestionnaire asked for two kinds of information: background char-acteristics of teachers and their attitudes toward their school andstudents. It would seem logical to assume that the responses toquestions concerning background would remain more stable over timethan would attitudes, and indeed the results bear out the assumption.Correlation coefficients for the background items ranged from .78(regarding special training in the treatment or diagnosis of readingproblems to 1.00 (sex of respondent and highest earned college degree),and averaged greater than .90. For the attitude items, correlationcoefficients ranged from .16 to .86, with the mean around .60. Gen-erally, the coefficients were higher for items concerned with teachers'attitudes toward their schools and administrations than for items
-34-
concerned with their attitudes toward disadvantaged children.This seems a reasonable finding, too, since children are morelikely to change over a shore time span than schools or administra-tions. Of the four types of questionnaires, the Teacher CharacteristicsQuestionnaires yielded the greatest stability over time.
School Principal Questionnaire. The stability of the datagathered by means of the School Principal Questionnaire varied withthe type of information requested. In the main, items that askedfor countable or immediately observable phenomena (school enroll-ment, number of classrooms, racial composition of student population,for example) were extremely stable (r .99, .97, .92, respectively).Items that required the school administrator to make judgments(estimated levels of education of school families and estimatedincomes of school families, for example) were less stable. In thecase of the educational levels, the correlation coefficients rangedfrom .58 to .81 for the five levels of education. Lowest of allwas the stability of responses to items that asked for attitudesand opinions. Correlation coefficients between first and second-time responses to judgments about the condition of the physicalplant, the adequacy of the instructional personnel, and the suita-bility of instructional equipment were .82, .79, and .50 respectively.
Some of the correlations represent items measuring phenomenathat could be expected to change over the short term. For example,the expectation of a summer reading program yielded a correlationcoefficient of .69 between first and second response. The experienceof the project staff with respect to obtaining a sample of summerprograms for study has borne out the variability of that item: in
many school systems, the final decision about a summer program isnot made until late Hay. Likewise, in schools where there is aspring testing program, the number of children in need of remedialreading instruction (r's ranging from .59 to .97) can reasonablybe expected to change within the time frame of the data stabilitycheck. By and large, considering the many opportunites for changein the real situations as well as in individuals' perceptions ofthem (and also in view of the conservative criterion of stabilityemployed), the stability over the six-week period in the School Prin-cipal Questionnaire was quite remarkable.
Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaires. The twoClass and Program Characteristics Questionnaires (blue, for com-pensatory reading programs and yellow, for non-compensatory programs)are essentially parallel, with identical questions in most cases butwith some additional items in the blue version that are particularly
-35-
applicable to compensatory instruction.
For both blue and yellow
forms, the overall stability of the responses over the six-week
period (although generally quite high) was :lower than for either
the Teacher Characteristics or School Principal Questionnaires.
In both blue and yellow versions, a small number of correlation
coefficients failed to approach statistical significance; all
were generally lower than the correlation coefficients for the
other two sets of questionnaires.
In both blue and yellow versions,
there was tremendous variation in the magnitude of the coefficients.
For the most part, the relative magnitude of the correlations
was similar for the two questionnaires (that is, types of questions
that seemed highly stable in the blue form also tended to be highly
stable in the yellow form); there were, however,
some interesting
differences.
The most stable item in both questionnaires was the one asking
for the age range (in years and months) of children in the classroom
(r blue = .92 for lower age limit and .97 for upper age limit;
r yellow = .97 for lower age limit and .96 for upper age limit).
Since assignment to class by age is usually a school decision, and
one that can be expected to remain constant, the high correlations
between first
and second response might be interpreted as evidence
of fairly reliable reporting.
The items asking for demographic data
cpncerning students exhibited less stability.
In the blue question-
naires, the correlation coefficients for demographic items range
from .28 (estimated mobility of students' families into the school
attendance area) to .89 (percentage of Black students in the class).
In the yellow questionnaires the range was from .42 (percentage of
students from foreign language speaking homes) to .94 (percentage
of Black students again).
It seems reasonable to assume, however,
that at least some of the difference between the first and second
estimates is attributable to actual changes in the composition
of the class.
The two attitude items in the Class and Program Char-
acteristics Questionnaires, which might be expected to exhibit low
stability relative to the more factual items, yielded correlation
coefficients of .70 and .84 for the blue version and .74 and .79
for the yellow.
All were statistically significant beyond the .01
level.The main body of the Class and Program Characteristics Ques-
tionnaire deals with characteristics of reading instruction.
The
questions are identical in the blue and yellow forms of the ques-
tionnaire and treat such variables as time and length of reading
period, type and use of auxiliary instructional personnel, nature
and frequency of instructional groupings, nature of materials used
and the frequency of their use, and goals of instruction.
As a
whole, the variability among responses to the program items was
-36-
great, and the coefficients of correlation for first and second
reponses ranged from -.05 to 1.0.
The greatest number of co-
efficients fell into the range from .65 to .75, and were signifi-
cant at or beyond the .01 level.
Interestingly, the yellow ques-
tionnaire responses seemed more stable over time than the blue.
That is, for any given program question, the coefficient of correla-
tion for the yellow questionnaire was likely to be higher than that
for the blue.
For example, one question asks teachers to choose
from among five terms the one that comes closest to describing
their major classroom approach to the teaching of reading.
The
correlation between first and second response to this item among
teachers of compensatory reading was .73; among non-compensatory
reading teachers, the correlation was .92.
With few exceptions,
the other program characteristics items behaved similarly, with the
yellow questionnaires showing greater stability than the blue.
In general, the lower correlations appeared among the items that
could most reasonably be expected to change:
extent of use of news-
papers in the classroom, frequency of classroom grouping by specific
project, and amount of time spent by students in independent reading,
for example.
High correlations existed among such items as those
reporting the availability of a special remedial reading teacher,
extra training gained by the respondent in the teaching of reading,
and who selected the reading materials used by the class.
Why the non-compensatory teachers' responses appeared to be
more stable over time than those of the compensatory reading teachers
can only be the subject of speculation.
Perhaps compensatory reading
programs are more apt to change over the short haul than are non-
compensatory programs.
Perhaps the teachers themselves are more
likely to re-think their responses, goals, and strategies.
Certainly,
the groups were somewhat different to begin with, since the teachers
of non-compensatory reading were all classroom teachers and some of
the compensatory reading teachers were not (they were, in some instances,
specialist teachers rather than classroom teachers).
In any event,
there was less of a tendency for the non-compensatory group to shift
responses over time than there was among the compensatory group.
Overall, the results of this limited study of data stability
were heartening, especially considering the conservative nature of
the estimation process.
For all subjects, the responses were reason-
ably stable over time.
Some (teacher characteristics, for instance)
were exceptionally stable.
Others were less so but usually in pre-
dictable and easily explained ways.
In all, there can be a com-
fortable degree of confidence in the reliability of the reporting
in the questionnaires.
-37-
Compensatory Reading Program Clustering Analysis
The Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaire wascompleted by all teachers of second, fourth, and sixth gradecompensatory reading programs in the Spring 1972 sample schools.The questionnaire was divided into two major sections, "ClassCharacteristics," and "Program Characteristics." The lattersection included 85 variables descriptive of a broad array ofinstructional practices. (The Class and Program CharacteristicsQuestionnaire appears in Appendix B of this report.) Clearly,it was necessary to devise some means of grouping compensatoryreading programs into stable, meaningful types for purposes ofclarity and economy of reporting.
The 85 program descriptive variables were factor analyzed,and 28 principal components with roots greater than one wereextracted. These 28 factors were then rotated using the Varimaxcriterion. Examination of the 28 rotated factors and the propor-tions of the total variance explained by each led to the decisionto perform similar analyses limited to three through ten factors,respectively. Each of these eight solutions was in turn examined,and the five factor solution was finally selected as the mostmeaningful. Table 9 shows the five factors and the variableswhich load highest on each.
Factor
-38-
Table 9. Reading Program Factor Loadings
Variables
Emphasis onbasic readingactivities
Use of audio-visual equip-ment andmaterial
Emphasis onsupplementaryreading ac-tivities
Instructionalflexibility- -tendency not toselect question-naire optionsgiven
Class time spent matching letters or wordsClass time spent learning letter formsClass time spent developing visual discriminationClass time spent developing a sight vocabularyClass time spent on phonic and/or structural
analysisClass time spent improving motor abilities
related to readingClass time spent increasing attention spanUse of a total phonics program
Use of motion pictures and/or filmstripsUse of slides and transparenciesUse of tape recordings and recordsUse of "other" materialsUse of video or television tapesUse of newspapers, magazines, and other
periodicals
Time spent in creative writingTime spent in "other" reading activitiesTime spent in independent readingTime spent in library activitiesTime spent in reading for enjoymentTime spent in enrichment activitiesTime spent reading in content areasOrganizing of reading groups by specific projects
Use of "other" approaches to teachingcompensatory reading
Frequency of organizing reading groups by "other"criteria
Teacher has special training in teaching readingfor disadvantaged pupils
Tendency to divide instruction equally betweenmornings and afternoons
Time devoted to "other" relevant readingactivities
Use of-basal readers
Loadin
.69
.66
.64
.52
.51
.49
.43
-.45
.64
.61
.59
.54
.49
.49
.51
.51
.49
.49
.47
.43
.43
.40
.72
.64
.47
.45
.43-.58
-39-
Table 9. Reading Program Factor Loadings (continued)
Factor
Compensatoryreading programoffered duringtime releasedfrom otherschool subjects
Variables
Instruction carried out during regular schoolhours in time released from other classwork
Instruction carried out in time released fromphysical education, art, music, and/or seatwork
Instruction carried out in time released fromsocial studies, science, and/or foreignlanguage
Instruction carried out in time released fromlanguage arts
Loading
.79.
.70
.61
.52
-40-
The first factor has been labeled "emphasis on basic readingactivities," and examination of Table 9 shows that it is definedchiefly by the amount of class time spent on activities closelyrelated to the mechanics of reading. It is interesting to notethat, although "time spent on phonic and/or structural analysis"loads positively on this factor, "use of a total phonics program"is the only variable with a substantial negative loading. Thiswould seem to indicate that, while phonics activities are an im-portant component of programs of this type, exclusive concentrationon phonics is avoided.
The second factor is clearly related to the use of audio-visual materials. The high loading of "use of 'other' materials"can be more readily understood by examining the actual questionnaireitem (Appendix B, Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaire,item 32). The "other" option appears at the end of the item, im-
mediately following several audio-visual options. It is quite likelythat many respondents interpreted the item to mean "other audio-visual." The high loading of the "use of newspapers, magazines,and other periodicals" is not inconsistent, since it would seemcharacteristic of teachers who are willing to make use of materialsother than books.
The third factor shown in Table 9, "emphasis on supplementaryreading activities," is the logical complement of the first factor("emphasis on basic reading activities"). It is perhaps the clearestfactor of the group to interpret, defined by such variables as at-tention to creative writing, independent reading, and library acti-vities. It is interesting to note that the spirit of the factorextends even to the organizing of reading groups by specific projects,an obvious implication of the emphasis on things related but peri-pheral to reading.
The fourth factor is the most ambiguous of the five, and hasbeen labeled "instructional flexibility--the tendency not to selectquestionnaire options given." It seems composed equally of actualactivities (e.g., the division of instruction between morning andafternoon sessions) and the tendency to select the "other" optionof questionnaire items. This tendency can be viewed either as aresponse set or as reflecting the reality that the respondent'sinstruction is so unique as to be outside the coverage of thequestionnaire.
-41-
The fifth factor is clearly concerned with the offering ofcompensatory reading during time released from other school sub-jects. Its four defining variables are, in order of factorloading size, instruction carried out in time released from(a) other classwork, (b) physical education, art, music and/orseat work, (c) social studies, science, and/or foreign language,and (d) language arts. One of the most interesting aspects ofthis constellation of variables is that the size of the respectivefactor loadings corresponds exactly to one's expectations of thesubject areas from which time is released for compensatory reading.For example, one would expect that compensatory reading would becarried on more frequently during time released from physical educa-tion than from language arts, and the sizes of the respectivefactor loadings reflect this. Mathematics, the subject area listedin the questionnaire least likely to be preempted for compensatoryreading, also had the lowest loading (.44) on this factor. At
first glance, it might seem that this factor does not reflect anaspect of instruction as directly as do the other four. However,it should be remembered that the special treatment of being re-leased from other subjects to participate in compensatory readingclass s..Its these children apart from their peers, and may have aprofound effect upon their attitudes and motivations.
These five factors together account for 19% of the totalvariance. While this is not a large proportion, two considerationsshould be noted. The first 28 principal components account for 59%of the total variance. Thus it can be seen that the addition ofany one factor beyond five does not add appreciably to the propor-tion of variance accounted for. A second purpose of this analysiswas to reduce the number of program variables in order to presentas parsimonious and clear a description of programs as possible.If later analyses performed on the program outcome data collectedduring the 1972-1973 school year should indicate a need for amore complex descriptive framework, it will always be possible toadopt a more comprehensive factor structure.
In addition to the principal components analysis describedabove, a hierarchical group centroid analysis was performed on thesame data.
The cluster analysis procedure used is simply a hierarchicalapplication of Thurstone's (1947)* group centroid factor analysismethod. The hierarchical grouping method is similar to the proceduresused by Johnson (1967)** except that associations among clusters of
*Thurstone, L. L. (1947) Multiple-factor Analysis.The University of Chicago Press, p. 148.
**Johnson, S. C. Hierarchical Clustering Schemes.1967, 32, 241-254.
Chicago:
Psychometrika,
-42-
variables are computed as correlations between 2-score sums overthe respective variables within each cluster. At the first levelof clustering the most highly correlated pair of variables is
joined to form a new variable equivalent to the sum of 2 scoresfor the two variables chosen. In a similar way, hierarchicalclustering is advanced through successive levels by joining which-ever pair of remaining members (individual variables or previouslydefined clusters) has the largest association coefficient (highestcorrelation in absolute value). Preparation for further clusteringis accomplished at each level by computing new correlationsbetween the cluster just formed and all remaining individualvariables or previously formed clusters.
The outcome of hierarchical group centroid cluster analysisis a hierarchical tree pattern or dendrogram which graphicallyrepresents the associations among observed variables and/or theirlinear combinations. The results of this analysis tended to con-firm those of the factor analysis. That is, each of the fiveprogram indices (factors) resulting from the factor analysis hasan identifiable counterpart in the hierarchical cluster analysis.The cluster analysis typically identifies a pair or triad ofvariables as the start of a cluster, and then adds variables tothat basic cluster as the various intercorrelations dictate. Thus,
it is appropriate to examine the clusters to determine the extentto which they contain variables in common with their correspondingfactor.
The first (in order of magnitude of the correlation betweenvariables) cluster to appear is Initially defined by (a) the tendencyof teachers to report that they organize the compensatory readingclass into groups by criteria other than those listed in the Classand Program Characteristic Questionnaire, and (b) the tendency ofteachers to report that they use an approach to teaching compensatoryreading other than those listed in the questionnaire. These twovariables appear first with a correlation of .68. At the .42correlational level, the cluster is augmented by (a) the tendency tohave special training in the teaching of reading or in instructionaltechniques for disadvantaged pupils, and (b) the reported amount ofin-school time devoted to relevant reading activities other than thoselisted in the questionnaire. This cluster can be seen to correspondto the fourth program factor (instructional flexibility--tendencynot to select questionnaire options given) listed in Table 9.
The second cluster to emerge from the analysis is defined by thefollowing variables, the first two correlated .67 and the entire
cluster at .36:
-43-
Time spent by a typical pupil:
(a) matching letters or words
(b) learning letters or words
(c) improving motor abilities related to reading
(d) increasing attention span
(e) developing visual discrimination
(f) developing a sight vocabulary
This cluster corresponds to the first factor in Table 9(emphasis on basic reading activities).
The third cluster to emerge from the analysis is defined by thefollowing variables, the first two correlated .64 and the first threeat .48:
(a) the tendency to carry out compensatory reading instructionduring regular school hours in time released from otherclass work
(b) the tendency to carry out compensatory reading instructionin time released from physical education, art, music, seatwork, or study time
(c) the tendency to carry out compensatory reading instructionin time released from social studies, science, or foreignlanguage
This cluster corresponds to the fifth factor in Table 9(compensatory reading program offered during time released from otherschool subjects).
Cluster 4-7 did not correspond to any of the factors listed inTable 9. The eighth cluster to emerge from the analysis is defined bythe following variables, the first two correlated .48 and the entirecluster at .43:
(a) the tendency to use motion pictures and/or filmstrips incompensatory reading instruction
(b) the tendency to use slides and transparencies in compensatoryreading instruction
(c) the tendency to use tape recordings and records in compensatoryreading instruction
-44-
This cluster corresponds to the second factor in Table 9 (use ofaudio-visual equipment and materials).
The remaining factor listed in Table 9 (emphasis on supplementaryreading activities) appears initially as a pair of variables, at the.37 correlational level:
(a) amount of in-school time devoted to independent (self-selected reading
(b) amount of in-school time devoted to library activities
These two variables are then joined by the following triad ofvariables, forming the cluster at the .32 level:
Amount of time spent by a typical pupil in compensatory readingclass on
(a) creative writing
(b) reading for enjoyment
(c) enriching cultural background
The multi-method convergence on a single outcome, described in theforegoing section, lent credence to the obtained factor structure.
Anal sis of Pro ram Variation Amon and Within Schools
Data were obtained descriptive of compensatory reading programsin grades 2, 4, and 6 of each school in the sample, and many schoolsreported multiple programs at one or more grade levels. A programdescriptive questionnaire was completed by each teacher of each program,except in the case of team teaching, where a single questionnaire wascompleted by the team as a group. The next step in the data analysiswas to perform an analysis of variance on the program indices (factors)in order to assess the variation of programs among schools relative tothat within schools. There was some reason to hypothesize that programcharacteristics as described by individual teachers might vary con-siderably across grade levels, and therefore that this variation mightadd considerably to program variation within school. In order to assessthis possibility, the among/within schools analysis was carried outseparately by grades 2, 4, and 6 and for all three grades combined.Table 10 shows the results of this analysis.
-45-
Table 10 Eigenvalues of the Among/WithinSchools Matrix*
AllGrades
Grade2
Grade4
Grade6
No. of Schools 504 293 306 245
No. of Questionnaires 1958 606 565 431
Linear Combinations
1 2.94 2.39 2.06 2.50
2 2.45 1.66 1.89 2.40
3 1.72 1.55 1.70 1.64
4 1.57 1.17 1.38 1.59
5 1.30 0.94 1.01 0.83
* Eigenvalues of AW-1
, where
A = among mean cross-products matrixW = within mean cross-products matrix
Thus, when the number of variables equals one, the above eigenvaluesare identical to values of F.
The analyses shown in Table 10 were performed on the fiveprogram indices previously described. The eigenvalues shown areto be interpreted similarly to F values for each of the fivelinear combinations of the five indices. The first linear com-bination is that which maximizes the value of F, the second isthat which maximizes the remaining unaccounted for variance, andso on to the fifth linear combination which minimizes the valueof F. Referring to Table 10, it can be seen that for grades 2,4, and 6 combined, there is more variability among schools thanamong teachers within schools. For each of grades 2, 4, and 6separately, the results are similar but the among schools effectsare less marked. This result is intuitively credible, especiallyin view of the fact that the analyses were performed on theprogram indices, which reflect general, stable characteristics acrossgrades of compensatory reading programs. While the specific characteris-tics of programs might be expected to vary somewhat more across gradeswithin school, the generalized indices are more representative of
-46-
overarching educational approaches, and therefore are relatively
constant within schools regardless of grade level.
Also, spillover
effects caused by communication among students and teachers
undoubtedly contribute to these similarities.
As a result of these
analyses, it was decided to cluster average program per school.
Clustering of Reading Programs
The major objective of the data analysis is to define a limited
number of program types.
Therefore a cluster analysis was under-
taken, using the indices developed by the factor analysis previously
described.
Obverse factor analysis was the methodological technique
employed to carry out this clustering.
There were several reasons why it was desirable to define pro-
gram clusters, rather than working with a very large number of
program types.
One of the ultimate objectives of the study is to be
able to identify types of programs which are associated with relatively
large gains on the criterion variables.
In order that such information
be useful, it is necessary that the criterion estimates be stable
and that the program types be replicable.
Clusters based on relatively
large numbers of programs are more apt to possess the requisite
stability and replicability.
Since the among/within analysis
previously described showed relatively minor program index variation
across grades within schools, the obverse factor analysis was
performed for grades combined.
Thus, a given school was assigned
to only one cluster, applicable to each of grades 2, 4, and 6.
Examination of the eigenvalues suggested that the first 5 factors
be used as the basis for clustering schools.
A varimax rotation was
performed, and each school was assigned to one of the 10 clusters
(factors), defined by the poles of the 5 factors, on the basis of
its highest (absolute value) factor loading.
A matrix of the
correlations between the five program indices and the 5 bipolar
factors was generated as a means of describing the clusters.
Table 11 shows these correlations.
-47-
Table 11. Correlations Between ProgramIndices and School Clusters*
School Clusters
Reading Program Indices
r
I 2 3 4 5
I. Emphasis on basic reading activities .09 -.62 .75 -.09 -.01
II. Use of audio-visual equipmentand materials .44 -.54 -.62 -.20 .19
III. Emphasis on supplementaryreading activities .23 -.02 .13 .86 .33
IV. Instructional flexibility--tendencynot to select questionnaire optionsgiven
-.58 -.56 -.27 .25 -.43
V. Compensatory reading program offeredduring time released from otherschool subjects .59 .08 -.09 .16 -.70
* Correlations were computed over all schools, between the schools'factor scores on reading program indices and their obverse factorscores on school clusters.
The first school cluster is characterized by high positivecorrelations with indices II and V, and a moderately high negativecorrelation with index IV. These are schools which utilize releasedtime for compensatory reading instruction, with considerable emphasison the use of audio-visual equipment and materials. They tend eitherto use unique instructional approaches or to believe and report thatthey use such approaches.
The second cluster in Table ll has no high positive correlationswith any of the five program indices. It is characterized mainly bysubstantial negative correlations with indices I, II, and IV, a pat-tern which sheds considerable light on what these schools do notemphasize, but not a great deal on their actual practices. It is hopedthat the classroom observations planned for the 19/3-1974 school year mayprovide more information regarding instructional techniques in theseschools.
The third cluster is characterized by substantial correlationswith only two program indices -- positive with I and negative with II.These schools clearly concentrate their efforts on the basic techniques
-48-
of reading instruction, (see Factor 1 in Table 9) to the exclusion ofless traditional aids such as audio-visual materials.
The fourth cluster has only one substantial correlation, and isdefined rather purely by an emphasis on supplementary reading activities.
The fifth cluster is also primarily a one-index cluster, and ischaracterized by the avoidance of compensatory reading programs offeredduring time released from other subjects. These schools also show atendency to report their programs in terms of the options provided by thequestionnaire.
Examination of the school factor loadings on each cluster revealedthat certain schools did not have a substantially higher loading onany one cluster. It was therefore decided to remove these schoolsfrom their originally assigned clusters and form from them an eleventhcluster. This cluster is characterized by schools having small andonly slightly differing loadings on all five bipolar clusters.
_49_
RESULTS
Differences and Similarities Among Schools
Which Do and Do Not Offer Compensatory Reading
The preceding sections have treated aspects of sampling, instru-
ment development, data collection, and data analysis.
The analyses
described in the previous section had as their prime
purpose the
condensation of many variables into a smaller number of constructs
descriptive of schools and their compensatory reading
programs.
The
analyses to follow present the findings of the study, often in terms
of these constructs.
One item in the School Principal Questionnaire requested re-
spondents to indicate, for each compensatory reading program, whether
it was funded totally, partially, or not at all under Title I.
On
the basis of responses to this item, schools were classified as
(a) Total Title I (all compensatory reading programs totally or
partially funded by Title I),
(b) Partial Title I (at least one, but
not all, compensatory reading programs partially or totally funded
by Title I), or (c) Non-Title I (no compensatory reading programs
partially or totally funded by Title I).
It should be noted that
this categorization does not reflect the amount of funding, but only
its presence or absence, regardless of amount.
A fourth category,
that of schools which offer no compensatory reading programs, was
defined by responses to another questionnaire item.
The following
table compares a variety of school characteristics among these
four categories of schools, based on unweighted data.
-50-
Table 12. Comparisons Among Schools CategorizedBy Type of Funding
Means
Variable
TotalTitle I(N =76) **
PartialTitle I(N=152)
NonTitle I
111=123)
NoCRP(N -53)
Enrollment 500-699 300-499 300-499 300-499
Number of classrooms 21.6 19.3 19.0 19.3
Instructional organizationGrade 2, graded 73% 77% 71% 71%Grade 4, graded 78% 79% 71% 73%Grade 6, graded 70% 62% 66% 64%
Adequacy of instructional facilities(scale 1-4)
Size of physical piailt 1.9 2.2 2.1 1.8Condition of physical plant 1.7 2.1 2.0 1.8Suitability of physical plant 2.0 2.3 2.1 2.1Number of instructional personnel 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.1Number of teacher aides 3.0 2.6 2.5 3.0Number of other non-professionals 2.5 2.4 2.0 2.6Quantity of printed materials 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.9Quality of printed materials 1.7 1.9 2.1 1.9Quantity of audio-visual materials 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1Quality of audio-visual materials 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.0Quantity of instructional equipment 2.0 2.1 1.9 2.1Quality of instructional equipment 1.8 3.2 3.1 1.9Number of other professional personnel 2.2 2.3 2.7 2.4
Students moved from school attendance area 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%
Stuaents mov:d into school attendance area 0-10% - 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%
Students from migrant worker families 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%
Students whose families receive publicassistance 0-10% 11-25% 11-25% 11-25%
Students whose head of householdattained following levels of education:
Attended college 11-50% 0-10% 0-10% 11-50%Graduated from high school 61-90% 11-50% 11-50% 11-50%Attended high school 0-10% 11-50% 11-50% 11-50%
Finished eighth grade 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%Did not finish eighth grade 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%
**N's for individual variables may be less due to differential response to itemswithin questionnaires.
-51-
Table 12. Comparisons Among Schools CategorizedBy Type of Funding (continued)
Means
Variable
TotalTitle 1(N=76)**
PartialTitle I(N=152)
NonTitle I(M=123)
NoCRP(N=53)
School Families in followingoccupations:
Professionals 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%Business owners or managers 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%White collar workers 11-50% 11-50% 11-50% 11-50%Skilled workers 11-50% 11-50% 11-50% 11-50%Unskilled workers 0-10% 11-50% 11-50% 11-50%Unemployed 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%
School families having following annualincomes:
$12,000 and over 11-50% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%9,000-11,999 11-50% 11-50% 11-50% 11-50%6,000- 8,999 11-50% 11-50% 11-50% 11-50%3,000- 5,999 0-10% 11-50% 11-50% 11-50%
under 3,000 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%
Students of following racial origin:Caucasian or White 91-100% 51-90% 51-90% 51-90%Negro or Black 0-10% 11-50% 11-50% 0-10%Spanish surnamed 0-10% 0-10% 0-102 0-10%
Oriental 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%American Indian 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%Other 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%
Schools in which children are bussed in 29% 29% 30% 17%
Students bussed in 11-25% 11-25% 11-25% 11-25%
Schools in which children are bussed out 20% 23% 29% 19%
Students reading one or more yearsbelow grade level:
Grade 2 11-25% 11-25% 11-25% 11-25%Grade 4 11-25% 26-50% 11-25% 11-25%Grade 6 11-25% 26-50% 11-25% 11-25%
* *N's for individual variables may be less due to differential response to itemswithin questionnaires.
Variable
-52-
Table 12. Comparisons Among Schools CategorizedBy Type of Funding (continued)
Means
TotalTitle(N=76)**
PartialTitle(N=152)
NonTitle(N=123)
NoCRP(N-53)
Total school per pupil expenditure
Total district per pupil expenditure
Total funds for compensatory reading
Costs per pupil of compensatory reading
Number of students in CRPSchool totalGrade 2Grade 4Grade 6
Students participating in CRP(s)Grade 2Grade 4Grade 6
Basis for determining pupilparticipation in CRP
All students participateMembership in specific groupsDepressed reading levelsTeacher recommendationParent requestVolunteerOther
Number personnel participating in in-service training to prepare for CRP:
Regular classroom teachersSchool-located reading specialistsSchool district reading specialistsOther school personnel
Teacher resistance to implementation of CRP
NoneSome
$ 651
840
6,302
183
178
35
36
39
0-1%1-25%1-25%
24%
11%
88%84%
46%8%
4%
6.6.9
.7
1.2
80%20%
$ 585
795
22,230
308
165
35
34
38
1-25%1-25%1-25%
13%
60%93%87%32%9%4%
7.4
1.31.4
4.2
70%307.
$ 620
720
22,002
183
18434
35
31
1-25%
1-25%1-25%
21%
37%
85%85%
38%7%
2%
8.21.3
1.41.5
71%
29%
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*These items were in that section of the questionnaire not answered by those
respondents who did not have a compensatory reading program.
**N's for individual variables may be less due to differential response toitems within questionnaires.
-53-
Table 12. Comparisons Among Schools CategorizedBy Type of Funding (continued)
Means
Variable
TotalTitle I(N =76) **
PartialTitle I(N=152)
NonTitle I(N=123)
NoCRP(N-53)
Community resistance to CRPNone 87% 80% 86% *
Some 13% 20% 13% *
Use of volunteers in CRP classroom 45% 48% 54% *
Use of pupils as tutors 53% 32% 40% *
Expectation of Summer 1973 program 29% 40% 38% *
Grades included in Summer program:Grade 2 38% 40% 41% *
Grade 4 37% 41% 49% *
Grade 6 29% 30% 34% *
Basis of selection of summer programstudents
Previous summer program participation 13% 30% 23% *
Previous non-participation 5% 8% 6% *
Depressed reading level 43% 52% 54% *Membership in target group 12% 32% 28% *
Teacher recommendation 45% 53% 57% *
Parent request 38% 37% 40% *
Volunteer 1270 7% 11% *
Other 4% 2% 1% *
*These items were in that section of the questionnaire not answered by thoserespondents who did not have a compensatory reading program.
**N's for individual variables may be less due to differential response toitems within questionnaires.
-54-
Examination of Table 12 reveals that there are neither many
nor large differences among the four categories of schools--perhaps
not as many as might be expected. There seems to be a trend in the
data indicating that the "Partial Title I" schools are more dis-
advantaged economically and educationally than are the "Total Title I"
schools. In support of this hypothesis, the "Partial Title I" schools
show:
1. a less adequate number of teacher aides
2. a higher proportion of unskilled workers among parents
of pupils
3, a lower proportion of families making $12,000 and over,
and a higher proportion making between $3,000 and $5,999
4. a lower proportion of White students and a higher
proportion of Black students
5, a lower school and district per pupil expenditure
6. a higher proportion expecting to offer a Summer 1973 program
One possible explanation of this trend might be that the "PartialTitle I" schools have, because of their greater need, devoted a vari-ety of resources in addition to Title I to the solution of theirproblems, while the "Total Title I" schools have felt the necessityto provide compensatory reading programs only to the extent thatthey are supported by federal funds. A second possible contributingfactor is the presence of differential funding opportunities in cer-tain areas of the country. For example, the availability of Miller-Unruh funds in California provides disadvantaged schools an additionalsource of funds and many such schools might thus fall into the "PartialTitle I" category. It is also interesting to note that "membership ina target group" is a much more common basis of selecting summer programstudents in the "Partial Title I" schools, a finding which suggeststhe greater incidence of such groups (or the importance attached tothem as a problem) in these schools.
Table 12 shows that total school per pupil expenditures are lessthan total district per pupil expenditures for all three school fund-ing categories, and that the difference is greater for Total Titleand Partial Title I schools than for Non-Title I schools. This seemsto indicate that schools in the first two categories have fewer re-sources, relative to their own districts, than do the Non-Title Ischools. Since schools in all three categories have compensatoryreading programs, it is not surprising that they. all, on the average,seem to have less to spend than do the other schools in their district.It should be noted, however, that these data were supplied by schoolprincipals, who might be expected to make more accurate estimates ofexpenditures in their own school than in the district,
-55-
Perhaps the most striking differences among school fundingcategories are with respect to the "total funds for compensatoryreading" variable. Since these data refer to total funds, ratherthan funding per program or per pupil, it may be that differencesin school size, program size, and/or number of programs per schoolare at least partially responsible for the smaller total expendi-ture in Total Title I schools.
Differences Among Teachers of Compensatory Reading Programs
Funded by Various Sources and Teachers of Non-Compensatory
Each teacher who received a Class and a Program CharacteristicsQuestionnaire was also requested to respond to a questionnaireconcerning certain personal and professional characteristics. Thusit is possible to contrast teachers in each of several school cate-gories in terms of these characteristics. Table 13 shows theresults of these comparisons.
-56-
Table 13. Comparisons Among Teachers in SchoolsCategorized By Type of Funding
Variable*Total Partial Non- No
itle I Title I CR
Females
Years teaching experience
Years taught in present school
Type of teaching certificationNoneTemporaryRegular
85%
6-10
3-6
0%
11%89%
88%
6-10
3-6
2%
16%83%
91%
6-10
3-6
1%
11%
88%
84%
6-10
3-6
0%17%
83%
Highest earned degree:None 0% 4% 1% 5%
Diploma (less than 4 years work) 0% 2% 1% 8%
Bachelor's 71% 72% 75% 76%
Master's 29% 22% 23% 112
Doctor's 0% 0% 0% 0%
Special training in diagnosisand treatment of reading problemsacademic level of special training: 55% 65% 61% 46%
Undergraduate 18% 27% 29% 46%
Graduate 70% 48% 532 46%
Inservice 12% 20% 14% 8%
On the job 0% 3% 3% 0%
Other 1% 1% 2% 02
Chose school in which teaching 47% 44% 45% 54%
Chose class teaching this year 372 38% 41% 35%
Satisfaction with school conditions(scale from 1 = highly satisfied to4 = highly dissatisfied)
Physical facilities 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.0
Faculty 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6
Ability of student body 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.1
Attitudes of student body 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.1
Administration 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.9
Overall philosophy of education 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.9
*See the Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire in Appendix B for thecomplete items.
-57-
Table 13. Comparisons Among Teachers in Schools CategorizedBy Type of Funding (continued)
Variable*
Relief in giving compensatory programsto disadvantaged students at extracost (scale from 1 = definitely yes..3 Undecided, to 5 = definitely no)
Belief that compensatory programs areworthwhile (scale 1 = definitely yes..3 = undecided, to S = definitely no)
Beliefs about academic capabilitiesof disadvantaged pupils (scale from1 = strongly disagree...3 - uncertain,to 5 = strongly agree)
Can learn as well with properinstruction
Will always score lowerDo not wort to learnDo not have right backgroundHas been proven will never do
as well
Materials more important thanmethods in reading instruction
Methods more important thanmaterials
Teacher's ability more importantthan methods or materials
Have more trouble learning to read
Have shorter attention span
Have different linguisticexperiences
Do not have foundation of concepts
Total Partial Non- No
Title I Title I Title I CRP
1.8 1.7 1.7 2.0
1.6 1.5 1.5 1.7
3.5 3.4 3.5 3.2
2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5
1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9
3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1
3.6 3.6 3.7 3.5
3.9 4.0 4.0 3.5
3.8 3.8 3.9 3.6
3.4 3.3 3.6 3.4
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
3.8 3.7 3.9 3.6
*See the Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire in Appendix B for the
complete items.
-58--
Table 13. Comparisons Among Teachers in Schools CategorizedBy Type of Funding (continued)
Variable*Total Partial Non- No
Title I Title I Title I CRP
Learning to verbalize completethoughts important for disadvantagedchildren 3.9 4.0 4.0 3.9
Improving student self-imageimportant 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.2
Ability to ask questions importantin teaching reading 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.7
Wrong response as useful as correctresponse in teaching reading 3.9 3.8 3.9 3.9
nave lower aspirations 3.6 3.4 3.6 3.6
*See the Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire in Appendix B for thecomplete items.
-59-
Examination of Table 13 reveals that there are very few
outstanding differences among teachers in the various school
categories.
In particular, there is almost unanimous agreement with
respect to teachers' satisfaction with school conditions, beliefs
about the value of compensatory reading programs, and beliefs about
the academic capabilities of disadvantaged pupils.
Regarding the
latter, it is interesting to note that teachers, regardless of school
type, tend to believe that disadvantaged students can learn as well
as advantaged students, with proper instruction.
They reject the
notion that disadvantaged students do not want to learn.
Neverthe-
less, they agree that the disadvantaged student has more troubl_
learning to read, and agree that there are a number of problems
for these students to overcome, suchas not having the right back-
ground, having different linguistic experiences, and not having a
proper foundation of the necessary concepts.
It is also interesting to note that the tendency mentioned in
another section of this report for "Partial Title I" schools to
appear more economically and educationally disadvantaged than "Total
Title I" schools is to some extent borne out by the data on teacher
certification and education.
Examination of Table 13 shows that
"Partial Title I" schools have somewhat more teachers with no teaching
certificate or temporary teaching certificates, and no degrees or
degrees based on less than four years' work.
Likewise, they have
considerably fewer teachers with special training at the graduate
level in the diagnosis and treatment of reading problems.
Relationships Between Selected Variables
It was of interest to determine the degree of relationship for
selected pairs of variables in the Principal, Class and Program
Characteristics, and Teacher Characteristics Questionnaires.
Cross
tabulations of responses were obtained and examined.
Where expected
cell frequencies were too small to permit obtaining a meaningful
chi square, adjacent categories were collapsed as necessary.
For
each collapsed cross tabulation, values of chi square and contigency
coefficients* were computed.
Tables 14 and 15 give the contingency
coefficient values obtained.
* The contingency coefficient is defined as:
C'X
N+
2
-60-
Table 14. Contingency Coefficients For VariablesFrom the Principal Questionnaire
(Weighted Data)
VariablesContingencyCoefficient
Enrollment vs. % school heads of households who attended college .25
Enrollment vs. Z school heads of households who graduated high school .20
Enrollment vs. % school heads of households who attended high school ,16Enrollment vs. % school heads of households who finished 8th grade .22
Enrollment vs. % school heads of households who did not finish 8th grade .21
Enrollment vs. % family income 12K and over .23
Enrollment vs. % family income 9 - 12K .24
Enrollment vs. % family income 6 - 9K .14
Enrollment vs. % family income 3 - 6K .35
Enrollment vs. % family income under 3K .18
Enrollment vs. % Caucasian .31
Enrollment vs. % Black .26
Enrollment vs. % Spanish surnamed .22
Enrollment vs. bussing into school (yes or no) .14
Enrollment vs. % bussed in .40
Enrollment vs. % bussed from attendance area .07
Enrollment vs. existence of compensatoryreading program (CRP) .16
Enrollment vs. number of compensatoryreading programs (for schools which have one or more) .35
Enrollment vs. supplementary funding CRP .22
Examination of Table 14 shows that total enrollment of school hasa moderate relationship to a number of indicators of school socio-economicstatus. Interestingly, school size is much more highly related to thenumber of compensatory reading programs (in schools which have one ormore) than it is to the presence or absence of compensatory readingprograms in all schools.
-61-
Table 15. Contingency Coefficients For VariablesFrom the Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire
(Weighted Data)
VariablesContingencyCoefficient
Years of teaching experience vs. certification .35Years of teaching experience vs. degree held .28
Years of teaching experience vs. special training in reading .25
Years of teaching experience vs. ethnicity match to students .06
Years of teaching experience vs. free choice of school .06
Years of teaching experience vs. free choice of class .13
Years of teaching experience vs. responsiveness ofadministration to requests for materials, remedial helpfor students, changes in curriculum .12
Years taught in present school vs. free choice of school .08
Years taught in present school vs. free choice of class .14
Degree held vs. special training in treatment of readingproblems .16
Special training in treatment of reading problems vs. beliefin offering CRP's at extra per pupil cost .14
Special training vs. worthwhileness of CRP's .11
Teacher/student ethnicity match vs. responsiveness ofadministration requests for:materials .04
remedial help for students .05
changes in curriculum .02
Teacher/student ethnicity match vs. belief in offeringsCRP's at extra per pupil cost .04
Teacher/student ethnicity match vs. belief in worthwhilenessof CRP's 4 .05
Table 15 shows that, in general, the professional characteristics ofteachers bear slight relationship either to their freedom to choose schoolsand/or classes, their perceptions of administrators' responsiveness totheir requests, or their beliefs concerning the value of compensatoryreading programs. The student/teacher ethnicity match variable has notbeen shown to be related to any other teacher characteristic tapped bythis questionnaire.
-62-
The Distribution and Density of CompensatoryReading Programs
It is possible, based on a combination of data from thequestionnaires and the sampling population tapes, to summarize theoccurrence of compensatory reading programs with respect to geographiclocation, urbanization of school attendance area, and school fundingcategory. Table 16 shows, for the various program funding cate-gories, the incidence of schools in each of four geographic regions.
Table 16. Incidence of Schools ByCompensatory Reading Program FundingCategory and Geographic Region*
Geographic Region
Sch001 runaing categoryTotal
Title I(N=76)
PartialTitle I(N=152)
NonTitle I(N=123)
No Comp.Reading(N=53)
North East 28% 236 19Z 17%
North Central 32% 29% 38% 26%
South 20% 32% 34% 36%
West 21% 16% 9% 21%
*See footnote in Table 1 for listing of states in each region.
Table 17 shows, for the same funding categories, the distributionof sample schools by the degree of urbanization of the school sendingarea.
-63-
Table 17. Incidence of Schools By CompensatoryReading Program Funding Category and
Urbanization of Attendance Area
School Funding Category
Urbanization *
'Large city, over 500K population
:Large city, 200K-500K
,Suburb of a large city(over 500K population)
Rural area near a large city(over 500K population)
Middle-size city, 50K-200K
Suburb of a middle-size city(50K-200K)
Rural area near a middle-size city(50K-200K)
Small city or town, less than 50K
Rural area, not near a large ormiddle-size city
Total Partiali
Title I Title I(N=76) (N=152) :
I
3% 1 5% 1
7% 1%
17% 8%
!
14% 13%
8% 3%
32% 346
3% 3%
1% 5%
5% 15%
NonTitle I
No Comp.I
Reading(N=123) (N=53)
7% 13%
7% 4%
10% 8%
11% 6%
2% 82
30% 25%
0% 6%
3% 6%
20% 21%
1
* Categories defined as on 1970-1971 School Universe Tape
Reference to Tables 13 and 14 shows that the "Total Title I"Schools are most frequently found in the North East and in the suburbsof middle-size (50K-200K population) cities. The South is most fre-quently the location of "Partial Title I," "Non-Title I," and "NoCompensatory Reading" schools, and suburbs of middle-size cities arein each case the most frequent urbanization category. "Rural area,not near a large or middle-size city" is the urbanization categoryshowing the greatest frequency variation across funding categories,ranging from only 5% of all "Total Title I" schools to 21% of all"No Compensatory Reading" schools.
-64-
Table 18 shows the incidence of compensatory reading programsamong schools of various sizes, categorized by type of funding.
Table 18. Incidence of Schools by CompensatoryReading Program Funding Category and
Total School Enrollment
School Funding Category
1 TotalTitle I
' PartialTitle I
Non No Comp., Title I . Reading
Total School Enrollment (N=76) (N=153) '(N= 123) 1 04=53)i
Less than 100 0% 1% 2% 11%
100-299 11% 21% 24% 1 17%
300-499 25% 34% 24% 13%
500-699 42% 26Z 32% 38%
1700-899 12% 14% 8% 13%
:900 or more 11% 3% 10% 8%
c
There seems to be some tendency for the larger school tomake up a greater proportion of the "Total Title I" category thanthey do of either the "Partial Title I" or "Won-Title 1" categories.
-65-
A second question of interest concerns the proportion of schoolsoffering various numbers of compensatory reading programs. Table 19shows these proportions for groups of schools defined by fundingsource and regional location.
Table 19. Proportions of Schools OfferingVarious Numbers of Compensatory
Reading Programs
Number of CRP's Offered
School Category 1
More than2 3 4 4
Total Title I (N=76)
North East ' 28Z
North Central 42%South j 22%West I 8%
°artial Title T (N=152) !
North East 1 16%North Central 130%South 37%West 17%
38% 20% 0%19% 30% 0%
10% 30% 0%
33% 20% 100%
28% 40% 20%30% 25% 20%33% 15% 30%9% 20% 30%
!Non -Title I (N=123)North East 14% 19% 24% 21%North Central 43% 35% 29% 36%South 32% 32% 41% 36%West 11% 13% 6% 7%
17%17%33%
33%
33%33%
33%0%
0%
50%
50%
0%
Examination of Table 19 reveals some regional differences, butno clear patterns of response. It should be remembered, however,that each school principal determined the division of his schools'compensatory reading offerings into programs, guided by criteriafurnished him by ETS. It is probable that the application of thesecriteria was not completely uniform across schools.
-66-
The final relationship to be examined is that between schoolfunding category and proportion of non-White students. Table 20shows this relationship.
Table 20. Incidence of Schools by CompensatoryReading Program Funding Category andProportion of Noh-White Students
School Funding Category
Non-White Students
TotalTitle T(N=76)
PartialTitle(N=152)
NonTitle(N=123)
No Comp.Reading(N=53)
N %N % N
0-10% 57 75% 66 43% i 67 54% 33 62%
11-50% : 16 21% 43 28% 36 29% 15 28%
51-90% 1 1% 23 15% 13 10% 2 4%
91-1007. 2 3% 20 13% 7 6% 3 6%
A tendency for "Partial Title 1" schools to appear moredisadvantaged than "Total Title I" schools was noted in an earliersection of this report. The data of Table 20, which showrelatively high proportions of non -White students in "PartialTitle I" schools, are consistent with this tendency.
-67-
Description of Schools in Terms ofCompensatory Reading Program Indices
In a previous section of this report, the development of compensatoryreading program indices was described. Five indices were identified bymeans of factor analysis (see Table 9). It was then possible to comparevarious categories of schools in terms of their mean factor scores oneach index. Such a procedure gives a summary view of school categories.Although it compacts a large amount of descriptive information aboutreading programs into a relatively small number of variables, it has theadvantage of reducing the available information into a more comprehensibleform. Table 21 shows, for each of several school funding categories, themean index score and its associated standard deviation.
Table 21. Means and Standard Deviationsof Program Index Scores EySchool Funding Category
Funding CategoryTotalTitle I(N=76)
PartialTitle I
(N=152)
NonTitle I(N=123)
No. Comp.Reading(N=53)
Factor Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean LS.D.
1 - Emphasis on basicreading activities .27 1.55 -.35 1.48 -.06 i.42 .49 1.43
II - Use of audio-visualequipment and materials .23 1.43 -.15 1.26 -.28 1.09 .05 1.18
III Emphasis on supplementaryreading activities .07 1.00 -.38 1.00 -.18 .88 .38 1.07
IV - Instructional flexibilitytendency not to selectquestionnaire optionsgiven -.08 1.50 .64 1.55 .14 1.36 -.18 1.06
V' - Compensatory reading pro-gram offered duringreleased time .30 1.33 -.12 1.18 -.10 1.09 .21 1.43
-68-
Although it is impossible to assign absolute meaning to the
magnitude of the indices reported in Table 21, it is possible to
make comparisons across categories.
Perhaps the most striking
aspect of the Table 21 data is the pattern of positive and
negative index means.
It can be seen that, for each of the five
indices, the "Total Title I" and "No Compensatory Reading"
categories have mean indices of the same sign, while the "Partial
Title I" and "Non-Title I" categories have mean indices of the
opposite sign.
Moreover, the only index for which the "Partial
Title I" and "Non-Title I" schools had a positive mean index
score was "instructional flexibility--the tendency not to select
the questionnaire options given."
It is difficult to know
what these results imply, but it is possible to speculate about
their meaning.
One interpretation might be that the "Total
Title I" and "No Compensatory Reading" schools are attempting
to cope with moderate academic problems using relatively
traditional instructional approaches (indices 1, 2, 3, and 5).
On the other hand, the "Partial Title I" and "Non-Title I"
schools either are trying, or report they are trying, less
traditional means of approaching their reading problems, and
seem to be doing so via programs which do not take time away
from the regular curriculum.
The meaning of these data will be
further explored in succeeding phases of the study.
-69-
Description of School Clusters in Termsof Reading Program Index Scores
In an earlier section of this report (Clustering of Reading Programs),the development of school clusters was described. Table 11 and thediscussion following it showed how these clusters might be defined interms of their correlations with reading program index scores. Table 22shows index score means and standard deviations for each of the elevenschool clusters.
Table 22. Means and Standard Deviationsof Program Index Scores By
School Cluster
Reading Program Index *
No. of SchoolSchools Cluster
I II III IV V
Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D.
59 lA 1.32 1.37 1.85 1.44 1.78 1.66 -1.67 .73 2.11 1.13
46 1B -1.69 1.97 -1.82 1.61 -1.92 1.70 2.77 1.85 -2.86 1.84
73 2A -2.08 1.36 -1.96 1.41 -.68 1.33 -1.16 .90 -.93 1.38
41 28 1.93 1.75 2.85 1.62 .03 1.39 2.48 2.19 .55 1.54
70 3A 2.06 1.39 -1.12 1.05 .30 1.25 -1.05 1.23 .41 1.07
44 38 -2.13 1.38 1.39 2.00 -.93 1.62 1.43 1.75 .09 1.65
41 4A .34 1.65 .12 1.32 2.45 1.26 .05 1.15 1.17 1.50
37 4B .22 2.16 .07 1.23 -2.71 1.30 -.54 1.15 -.65 1.38
it 5A -.49 .1.71 .25 1.78 1.39 1.30 -1.38 1.31 -1.93 1.47
19 513 .70 1.83 .76 1.12 .04 .85 1.38 1.70 2.35 1.20
53 6 -.04 .79 -.17 .77 .40 .88 -.28 .95 -.15 .76
*Index 1Index IIIndex IIIIndex IV
Index V
Emphasis on basic reading activitiesUse of audio-visual equipment, and materialEmphasis on supplementary reading activitesInstructional flexibility- tendency not to select questionnaireoptions given
Compensatory reading programs offered during time releasedfrom other school subjects
See Table 11 for the correlations between these indices and the variousschool clusters.
-70-
Each of the reading program indices shown in Table 22 correspondsto the same-numbered index described in Table 9 of this report. Thefirst ten school clusters shown in Table 22 (1A, B through 5A, B)correspond to the same numbered clusters shown in Table 11, exceptthat the A and B designations refer to the poles of these five bipolarclusters. Cluster 6 is a conglomerate cluster, composed of schoolswhich were not clearly of any of the first ten clusters. Inspectionof Table 22 shows that, in general, the reading program index meansare consistent with the program index/school cluster correlationsshown in Table 11. That is, large correlations in Table 11 correspondto large values of the index means (both positive and negative) inTable 22. The relationship between the signs of the correlationsand the signs of the means are also consistent. Positive correlationscorrespond to a positive mean for the "A" cluster and a negative meanfor the "B" cluster, while negative correlations correspond to anegative mean for the "A" cluster and a positive mean for the "B"cluster. Exceptions to this pattern occur only where both thecorrelation and the values of the means are negligible, as, forexample, in the relationship between School Cluster 3 and ProgramIndex V. In general, the entries in Table 22 show that schoolclusters do in fact differ from each other in terms of one or moreprogram indices, in approximately the ways one would expect fromthe cluster/index correlations. For example, Table 11 shows thatProgram Index III correlates much more highly with School Cluster 5than with any of the other clusters, while Table 22 shows that thelargest pair of index means (both positive and negative) forProgram Index III are those associated with School Clusters 4Aand 4B.
Among and Within Cluster Analysis
Further confirmation of the finding that school clusters do indeeddiffer with respect to reading program variables of interest wasprovided by an analysis of variance performed on the school clusters.Eigenvalues of 123, 71, 61, 37, and 32 were obtained for the firstthrough fifth (respectively) linear combinations of the five readingprogram indices. These eigenvalues are to be interpreted similarly toF values. The first linear combination is that which maximizes thevalue or F, the second is that which maximizes the remaining unaccountedfor variance, and so on to the fifth linear combination which minimizesthe value of F. Since all the obtained eigenvalues are highlysignificant, it can be seen that the obtained school clusters aresignificantly different from each other, as measured by all fivereading program indices.
-71-
Item Analysis of Questionnaire Data
Appendix D contains the basic item response data for the
questionnaires (School Principal, Class and Program Characteris-
tics, Teacher Characteristics) administered in the Spring 1972
Survey.
Although the among/within schools analysis (described
in an earlier section of this report) showed that
grades within
schools were a relatively unimportant source of
program variation,
it was felt that the basic item data still should bedisplayed
separately by grade.
This was primarily because the among/within
analysis was performed on the
program indices, and therefore
left open the possibility that considerableamong grades vari-
ation might still exist at the individual item level.
Appendix A contains a discussion of the weighting procedures
used to adjust the questionnaire data fornon-response.
In general,
the weighted and unweighted item data
appear to be very similar,
but for certain items the differences can be appreciable.
Both
weighted and unweighted data are presented in Appendix D, in order
that the reader can make his own assessment of the importance of
whatever differences exist.
It should be noted that, for the
weighted data, the application of the weights renders meaningless
(without the appropriate transformation) the frequencies andmany
of the summary statistics reported.
As an obvious example, the
"cases processed" are not integers.
In comparing the weighted and
unweighted results, only the "percent" and the "percent below" of
the various item options are comparable.
Any attempt to summarize such a comprehensive body of data
would be both futile and misleading.
The interested reader will
find a wealth of information concerning the characteristics of
compensatory reading programs, their students, teachers, and
schools.
PHASE I REPORT
A DESCRIPTIVE AND ANALYTIC STUDY
OF
COMPENSATORY READING PROGRAMS
APPENDICES A, B, C, E
APPENDIX A
is
Sample Design for
"A Large Scale Evaluation of Compensatory
Reading and Reading Related Efforts
in the Elementary Grades"
Prepared for
Educational Testing Service
as a subcontract under
Contract OE C- 0-71-3715
by
The Research Division of
Westat, Inc.11600 Nebel Street
Rockville, Maryland 20852
December 31, 1971
Revised May 15, 1973
1. Introduction
This report sets forth the sample design for Phase I of ContractOEC-0-71-3715. That contract resulted from a response to RFP 71-25,Task B-10. The RFP suggested drawing a sample of schools from thosein the Elementary School Survey (ESS), sometimes referred to as the
"Belmont Survey." The ESS had been going on for several years, but
not during 1971-72. At the date of preparation of this report its
future was uncertain.
After some study of the sampling problem, it was decided to draw
a sample independent of the Belmont sample. The primary reason
was that it seem ad desirable to avoid overlap of the compensatory
reading sample (this study) with the Anchor Test Study, which was
being done during 1971-72. Also, a sample drawn from the Belmontsample would not have had enough opportunities for rational substitution.
Furthermore, the Belmont sample used size of LEA as a major stratify-ing variable, but previous studies have shown that size of LEA is poorlycorrelated with pupil performance as compared to community variableswhich reflect socio-economic status (SES). When the above factors wereconsidered, along with the need to coordinate with the ESS in the event ofits continuation, it was decided to draw an independent sample.
The sample design outlined below includes two stages of sampling.First is a sample of about 750 schools drawn for purposes of describingcompensatory reading programs. The second-stage sample is a subsampleof 200 schools for purposes of performance testing of pupils.
2. Stratification of the Universe and Sample Selection
2.1 Construction of Stage. I Sampling Frame
The 1970-71 School Universe Tape was used as the basic list ofschools from which to draw the sample. However, at the time the workhad to begin on the sampling frame, the 1970-71 lists were not availablefor New Jersey, Maine, Arizona, California, Minnesota, Connecticut,and South Dakota. The 1969-70 School Universe Tape was used forthese states. These two tapes were merged and selected data for thoseschools having enrollments in grades 2, 4 or 6 were extracted.
2. 2 Sources of Data Used for Stratification
Mayeske, et al.. in A Study of Our Nation's Schools (1969), showed thatsocio-economic status of the community and racial-ethnic group member-ship were highly correlated with test performance. Other variables,such as degree of urbanization, size of school, geographic location, etc.,were relatively unimportant community variables in the prediction ofperformance. For this reason, average income and percent minority arebeing used as the major stratifying variables in this study.
Unfortunately, income measures that can be identified with schoolattendance areas on a nationwide basis (for stratification purposes) areeither not available or prohibitively expensive to produce. An example ofavailable but expensive statistics is the Westat income estimator appliedto ED's and Block Groups in the 1970 Census Summary Tapes. Census
estimates of income were not available at the time of sample drawing andwill never be reported for areas below the Tract and MCD level.
One source of income data which was considered is the 1966 averagegross income per taxpayer reported by IRS by five-digit ZIP Codes. Sincethe 'LIP Codes of schools in the School Universe Tapes are known, it ispossible to match files to associate income data with schools. The IRS
2
data ZIP revenue tapes report number of taxpayers and aggregate grossincome for taxpayers with less than $3, 000 of income, $3, 000 and un,ler
$10, 000 of income, and $10, 000 and over. When the average gross incomeper taxpayer in the $10, 000 and over class exceeded $15, 000, the averagewas replaced by $15, 000 to avoid undue influence of a few large incomes.
Even then, average income for small ZIP Code areas is considered tobe a measure subject to wide variation and not necessarily indicative ofthe SES of the school attendance areas within the ZIP Code area.
Another source of income data is the 1960 Census. (Income data from
the 1970 Census were not available in time for this project.) Census medianfamily income data are reported by tract or minor civil division (MCD).However, identification of schools with tracts or MCD's would have beenprohibitively expensive in view of the budget available. Therefore, thesmallest geographic unit for which Census median family income wasassociated with schools was the county or independent city containing the
school.
Percent minority enrollment of schools in districts of 3, 000 or moreenrollment was obtained from a computer tape made available by the Officeof Civil Rights (OCR). For schools without this information, the percentnonwhite reported in the county by the 1970 Census was used.
The records in the School Universe Tape (combined 1969-70 and 1970-71, as described above) were augmented by adding income from the ZIP reve-nue tape, minority enrollment from the OCR tape, 1960 Census median familyincome, and percent nonwhite for the county from a Westat tape of countyCensus characteristics. Some analysis was done on the resulting tape todetermine whether to use Census county income or MS ZIP Code area in-
come. Cross-tabulations having percent minority on one dimension andeither Census income or IRS income on the other were prepared. Thesetabulations were run for various sizes of counties in terms of population
.. -
3
and for various size classes of numbers of taxpayers in five-digit ZIP Codes.On the basis of the observed relationship between minority enrollment andincome, a (largely subjective) decision was reached to use IRS five-digitZIP Code income data for schools in counties of 50,000 population or moreand to use county median family income as reported by the 1960 Census for
schools in counties with less than 50,000 population. The 1960 Censusincomes had to be appropriately transformed to be comparable to the 1966
ZIP Code incomes. This transformation is discussed tater.
One final source of data was used. The Program Reference File forthe 1970-71 school year contains a data item showing whether the schoolparticipated in ESEA Title I programs. If the record showed such parti-cipation for grades 1-6 for either academic or nonacademic programs,the school was labeled a Title I school. The Program Reference File isnot as complete as the School Universe Tape. Schools in the latter filethat are not in the Program Reference File, or in that file but without anindicator of Title I participation, were labeled as Title I schools if theirrecord in the School Universe File indicated federal funded compensatoryprograms. In this manner, it was possible to attach a Title I indicator toevery school in the file.
The format of the merged computer file is shown in Supplement A.
Since income statistics came from two sources at two different pointsin time, it was known that they would not be comparable without adjustment.All schools in counties of 50,000 or more population were given an incomemeasure from the IRS tape, so an equating adjustment was needed only for
1960 Census income for schools in counties of less than 50,000 population.
Examination of preliminary tabulations showed that there was a differentrelationship between IRS income and Census income for the counties contain-ing schools with less than 40 percent minority than for counties containing
4
schools with 40 percent or more minority. Table 1 shows the approximaterelationships found. Comparisons were made from the cumulative income
distributions, and the following rules were adopted:a. If percent minority is less than 40, add $1, 100 to Census income.
b. Otherwise, add $1, 500.
This translation makes it possible to record all income in IRS-equivalent units.
5
Table 1 Correspondence between Census median income (1960) and1966 average gross income reported by IRS for countieswith population under 50, 0000
IRS Income
Census
Income
Less than 40%
minorityL
40% or more
minority
$2, 000 $3,200 $3, 700
3, 000 4,400 4, 700
4, 000 4,800 5, 400
5, 000 5,600 5, 900
6, 000 7, 600 7, 800
Average differ-$1, 100 $1, 500
ence from Census
2.3 Assignment of Measures of Size and the Formation of Major Strata
For purposes of stratification, the following classes of income andpercent minority enrollment were used:
1.
Percent minority
1.
Income ($)
Less than 5 Less than 2, 0002 . 5 9.9 2. 2, 000 - 2, 9993. 10 - 19.9 3. 3, 000 3, 999
4. 20 - 39.9 4. 4, 000 - 4, 9995. 40- 59.9 5. 5, 000 - 5, 999
6. 60 - 79.9 6. 6, 000 - 6, 999
7. 80 and over 7. 7, 000 - 7, 999
8. 8, 000 - 8, 999
9. 9, 000 - 9, 999
10. 10, 000 and over6
Tabulations of number of schools, total enrollment, and "measure of
size" by Title I participation and the above classes of income and minority
are shown in Supplement A. The measure of size was assigned to schools in
such a manner as to optimize approximately the allocation of the sample tothe various size classes of schools in view of the anticipated variability Mthe universe and the cost of data collection. The measures of size assignedto schools are given in Table 2. The methodological basis for assignmentof the measures of size is given in Supplement B.
Table 2. Assigned measures of size.
Enrollment inGrades 2, 4 and 6
Assigned Measure
of size
Less than 50 4
50- 99 9
100 - t99 14
200 - 499 22
500 or more 35
Major stratum boundaries for both Title and nonTitle I schools areshown in Tables 3 and 4. In constructing the major strata, primaryemphasis was placed on income as a stratifying variable and secondary
emphasis on percent minority. This decision was based upon a prelimi-
nary analysis performed by Westat which showed that the relationship
between Title I status and percent minority is less pronounced than
the relationship between Title I status and income.
The number of schools, enrollments and aggregate measures of sizeof the major strata are shown in Tables 5 and 6.
Table 3 Identification of major strata - Title I schools
Percentminority
< 5
5 - 9. 910 - 19. 9
20 - 39. 9
40 - 59. 9
60 - 79.9
80'+
Income classes (thousands of dollars)
2 -2, 9
4- 5- 6- 7 - 1 8 -- I 9_r
4, 9 5 :9 6. 9 17.9. 8.9 9.9 104- NA
Note: Numbers in the clusters identify major strata
Table 4 Identification of major strata - nonTitle I schools
PercentI
minority I
<4 4 - 4. 9 5 - 5. 9.6 - 6. 9 7 - 7. 9 8 - 8. 9 9 - 9. 9
< 55 - 9. 9
10 - 19.920 - 39. 9
40 - 59. 9
60 - 79. 9
80 +
Income classes (thousands of dollars)an,
mole: Manbers in the clusters identify major strata
8
Table 5 Number of schools, enrollment, and measures of sizefor major strata, Title I schools
Major stratum Nu mbe rof schools i
Enrollment
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1, 449
1, 536
1, 286
947
2, 623
1, 922
1, 892
5, 603
1, 940
1, 474
1, 103
4, 563
1, 878
1, 777
1, 689
1, 610
1, 702
258, 332
181, 808
226, 175
265, 273
280, 696
302, 414
358, 208
677, 113
317, 303
297, 657
275, 846
679, 477
334, 893
382, 908
324, 930
329, 500
371, 199
I
..111. ....
9
Measureof size
21, 647
17, 718
19, 568
18, 649
28, 415
27, 049
36, 564
66, 429
27, 888
24, 435
20, 336
62, 516
29, 120
30, 715
27, 768
27, 364
30, 669
)
Table 6 Number of schools, enrollment, and measures of sizefor major strata, nonTitle I schools
Major stratum Number Enrollment Measureof schools of size
1 1, 710 216, 234 19, 376
2 2, 603 233, 897 24, 331
3 3, 676 357, 555 36, 869
4 1, 681 277, 552 23, 868
5 1, 060 209, 266 17, 161
6 602 158, 173 11, 474
7 4, 569 659,326 60, 450
8 1, 571 282, 564 24, 373
9 908 189, 194 15, 336
10 1, 502 329, 090 32,542
11 2, 603 525, 535 43, 417
12 816 167, 587 13, 757
13 1, 175 259, 326 20, 850
14 1, 613 363, 429 29, 360
15 1, 146 257, 419 20, 793
16 1, 107 262, 840 20, 747
10
2.4 Formulation of Final Strata
As discussed earlier, community variables which measure socio-economic status have been shown to be highly associated with test perfor-mance and this association provided the basis for the decision to use in-come and percent minority as the principal stratifying criteria. If only
pretesting and posttesting were involved no other controls would need tobe placed on the design. However, an important part of the study is todescribe compensatory programs on a nationally projectable basis. Forthis part of the job, degree of urbanization, geographic region, and sizeof school may be important.
If these factors had been brought in as major stratifying factors,
however, the number of substrata would have been too many for the sample
to be allocated. Another way to take them into account was developed.
The plan uses the following steps:
1. Put the schools in each major stratum, as defined by Tables 3and 4, in order by Census region, as follows:
N ortheast
North CentralSouth
West
2. Within the Northeast Region put the schools in order by degree ofurbanization from most urban to least urban, based upon reports in theProgram Reference File, as follows:
Large city, over 500, 000 populationLarge city, 200, 000 to 500, 000 population
Suburb of a large cityMiddle-size city, 50, 000 to 200, 000 population
Suburb of a middle-size citySmall city or town, less than 50, 000 populationRural area near a large city
11
Rural area near a middle-size cityRural area not near a large or middle-size cityUnknown
The classes were chosen by school principals and have obvious weaknesses,both because of the definitional problem and the arbitrary choices as towhich is "more urban" between selected pairs. They should serve somepurpose with respect to spreading the sample over various degrees ofurbanization, however, in spite of these weaknesses. Also, there will not
be any bias introduced into degree of urbanization because of the weaknessOf this classification.
3. The order of urbanization was reversed in the North Central Regionand Western Region so that the schools on the boundary of the listings be-tween two adjacent regions would have similar urbanization characteristics.
4. The schools, having been put in the above order in each majorstratum, were divided into a number of approximately equal sized blocks,based upon the measure of size and these blocks of schools are called"final strata." A detailed description of the formation of final strata isgiven later in this subsection.
5. The schools in each final stratum were assigned random numbersand sorted in the order of the random numbers.
6. Two schools were selected from each final stratum by a procedurediscussed in section 2.5 to form the initial sample.
7. Substitutes were selected by a procedure also described insection 2.5.
The aggregate measure of size of all schools is as follows (thesum of the figures in the last columns of Tables 5 and 6):
Title I schools 516, 850
NonTitle I schools
TOTAL
414, 704
931, 554
12
The UT upon which the contract was based specified that the sample ofschools shall be distributed as follows:
Title I participating schools 60%
Title I eligible but not participating schools 30%
Non Title I eligible schools 10%
It was subsequently found that there is no uniformly applied criterion of Titleeligibility and that eligibility, as determined by LEA's, is not reported onany of the available data bases. Therefore, we interpreted the re-quirement to call for 60 percent of the sample to be allocated to Title Ischools and 40 percent to schools not participating in Title I funds. Thereare, of course, some differences between participation, as indicated
on the data base, and actual participation. Actual status was determined
iron: the sampled schools.
The target number of schools to be selected for the first phase of thesurvey was 750, of which 720 were to come from the school universe listand 30 were to come from the sample of school districts drawn to fill ingaps in the school universe listings (see Section 4, below). Only 11 were
drawn from the district sample, so that the total sample size was 731.With two drawn per final stratum, we needed to identify 360 final stratato achieve a sample of 720 from school universe listings. After elimi-
nating all schools which participated in the Anchor study, only 11
eligible schools remained. These were drEmn from the district sample,
so that the total sample size was 731. With two drawn per final stratum,
we needed CO identify 360 final strata to achieve a sample of 720 from
school universe listings. Of these, 60 percent (216 final strata) were
allocated to Title I schools. The remaining 144 final strata were
allocated to nonTitle I schools. Table 7 gives the average of the ag-
gregate measures of size of the final strata for Title I schools and
for nonTitle I schools.
Table 7. Average measures of size of final strata
Total measureof size
Number of Average measurefinal strata of size
Title I schools 516, 850 216 2,393
Non Title I schools 414, 704 144 2, 88013
Once the schools were ordered within each major stratum asdescribed previously and the average final stratum sizes (given in Table7) were obtained, the definition of final strata within major strata pro-ceded as follows:
thLet A(gfi) represent the measure of size of the i school in the gth major
stratum, where f=1 for the Title I schools and f=2 for the NonTitle I schools.
Then, the aggregate measure of size, A (fp, for the tth major stratum was com-
puted as follows:
A(f)g
= Z A (1).
1 gi (1)
Then, the number of final strata, N (f), defined in major stratum g was
g
obtained from the following expression:
N(g)A(g)= A(f) / A (f), rounded to the nearest integer, (2).
where A (f) equals the average final stratum size indicated in Table 7. (That
(f) (f)is, A = 2393 if f= 1 and A = 2880 if f=2. )1The average measure of size, A()
g, for a final stratum defined in the
gth major stratum was then computed as follows:
A(1) = A (f) / N(f)g g g (3)
For a given major stratum, the value of A()g
will differ somewhat from the
overall average, A if ), depending upon how the number of final strata, N(g1),
computed in equation (2) was rounded for the major stratum.
Based on the ordering of schools by region and degree of urbanizationwithin each major stratum, cumulative measures of size, Cum A (f) weregi
computed for each school as follows:
14
(fh iCum (A (f )= E A .gi j=3. gi (4)
Final stratum boundaries (f)daries were determined from the Cum A . so as approxi-
mately to equalize the measures of size of the final strata. The procedureused is as follows:
1. The schools in the first final stratum within the g th major stratumffor each value of f are the schools for which Cum A (f
.) < A()
g . The nextgi
school (i. + 1) was added if Cum A(f.) - A (f) < A(f)gi + I g gi + 112. This final
stratum was identified as h=1.
2. The schools in the second final stratum within the same majorstratum were all of the schools following those in the first final stratum
-(f) )-fwith Cum A gi(f) (1
g< 2 A , including the next one if Cum A gi + 1 - 2A(
ge
A(f 112. The other final strata in major stratum g are defined in a
similar way.
f3. The result is N (g ) final strata of approximately equal size, defined
within the gth major stratum. Final strata are defined in the same way foreach major stratum.
2. 5 Drawing the Sample of Schools, Stage I
The schools were actually drawn into the sample by the following proce-dures:
1. The schools within each final stratum were sorted on the five-digitrandom number.
2. New Cum Al for the schools (now in random order within final
stratum within the gth major stratum) were obtained by cumulating across allfinal strata within a major stratum g.
))f f3. Compute A (g = A (g /4.
/
15
4. The selection numbers within the g th major stratum are
R(f) = A=(f)g I I g
R(f) A-- (f)g12 g
R(f) (f)= 5 Ag21 g
(f) (f)= 7 A
g22 g
R (f)(1) = A(f) - A=U.)
gNg
2 g g
5. The schools selected for the initial sample are those for which Cum(f) . (f)A nu:hides the selection numbers. The Cum A covers a selection
number if it corresponds to the first school on the major stratum list whosef)Cum A ( is greater than or equal to the selection number.
6. Substitute schools were drawn at the same time as the initial sample.
Four substitute selection numbers were defined at equidistant intervals off0.4 A (g ) before and after the selection numbers. The full set of selection
numbers in the gth major stratum were structured as follows:(f)
R g11(3) = 0.=(f)
2Ag
R = 0. 6A(f) -=(f)g11(1) g
R(f) =(f)gll = A
g
(f) fg11(2) = 1.4A(g)
(f))(--=fg12(4) = I. 13A. g
R(f) (f)gI2 (3) 2
== . 2A
g
16
H(f) --a(f)= 2. 6Ag12(1) g
1/(f) = x (f)g12 g
R(1) =a)=
812(2) ' 3. 4Ag
R(f) (f)= 3. 8Ag12(4) g
and so on, where the subscript in parentheses indicates an order of priorityof substitution (see below).
7. In addition to listing the initial sample and the substitute schools,all schools within the same school districts as the initial sample schoolswere listed for use in the sample supplementation procedure described inSection 2. 6 and Supplement C.
8. The priority order for substitution was:Substitute the school, if any, in the same school districtand with the same 2-4-6 grade structure that is closestin size (enrollment in grades 2, 4, and 6), provided it isin the same major stratum and has the same or adjoiningmeasure of size, No other school in the same districtshould be substituted.
Substitute schools in other school districts, up to a maxi-mum of four eligible substitutes for each primary sampleschool. The numbers in parentheses listed earlier indicatethe order of priority of these schools in obtaining substitutes.
A particular substitute school may, in some instances, bea possible substitute for more than one initial sample school,
9. Substitutes were to be used if the initially selected schoolrefused to cooperate, was previously selected for the AnchorTest study, or was a school participating in a Follow Throughprogram.
17
The procedures given above produced the sample of schools to besurveyed in Phase I (description of compensatory reading programs)except for those selected from the supplemental sample discussed below.
2.6. Supplemental Sample - Phase I
It is known that the sampling frame of schools (the School Universe Tape)is neither complete nor up to date. Part of that file was as old as Fall, 1969,at the time of sample drawing and there have been changes both in grade
composition and numbers of schools since the School Universe Tape wasprepared.
The following steps were taken to obtain a supplemental list ofschools.
a. Draw a sample of school districts with known probability of
selection.b. For each of them, obtain a complete listing of schools with enroll-
ments in grades 2, 4 and 6.c. Check this list against the listing of the School Universe Tape for
those districts.d. Any schools on the current list but not on the School Universe
Tape constitute a special sampling frame.
e. Stratify this special sampling frame and draw two schools
from each stratum. Subsample so as to achieve overall probabilities
of selection that approximate as nearly as possible the probabilities
that the schools included on the School Universe Tape had of inclusion
in the initial sample.
Since it was necessary to conduct the Phase I survey prior to the endof the 1971-72 school year, the plan to obtain lists of schools from sampleddistricts and then to match against the School Universe Tape became in-feasible. The fact that a similar augmentation sample had been drawn for
18
the Restandardization Survey (the so-called Anchor Testing) made itpossible to draw the sample in another way so that the survey deadlinescould be met.
The sample was drawn from the schools having grades 4, 5 and 6 thathad been identified in the Anchor Survey as not being on the School UniverseTape. A listing of schools with grades 2, 4 and 6 was desired, to matchthe Compensatory Reading study, but the differences in listings were not
judged to be great enough to invalidate the procedure.
The schools that had been included in the Anchor Survey supplement
were not permitted to come into the Compensatory Reading sample. Since
selection for the Anchor Study had been with probability approximately
proportional to a measure of size, probabilities of schools remainingfor the Compensatory Reading sample had to be adjusted upward to accountfor differences in average measures of size abetween schools alreadydrawn and those available for drawing in the Compensatory Reading sample.The methodology used in selecting the supplemental sample is describedin Appendix C.
2.7. Sampling of Teachers within Schools Phase I
A principal's questionnaire was sent to each school in the sample.In addition, a questionnaire was sent to every teacher of compensatoryreading in any of the grades 2, 4 or 6 of the sampled schools. Therewas no subsampling.
2.8. Sampling of Schools - Phase II
Phase 1 sample schools were surveyed in the Spring of 1972. The
Phase II sample was drawn on the basis of those returns. This samplingwas done by the prime contractor, Educational Testing Service, and isnot described here.
19
3. Estimation Procedures
3.1 Estimation - Phase I
hLet x(fg)
i ithrepresent the value of some characteristic for the school
f)in the hth final stratum in the gth major stratum. The variable x ( might
be dichotomous, equalling 1 if a school had a given characteristic and zerootherwise. It could also be a sum of student scores, or the number ofstudents tested, or the number of students in compensatory reading, etc.
f)Let w ( represent the sampling weight associated with the ghith
school selected into the sample. The value of w (g0 is given by the follow-
ing equation:
w(f) (f) /2A(f)ghi ghi . (5)
The expression given in equation (5) is the inverse of the selection proba-bility. In the cases in which a substitute school was used, the weight forthe substitute was computed from equation (5) as if the substitute had been
the primary selection.
ithThe sampling weight, w( for the participating school contained
in major stratum g and final stratum h was adjusted for nonresponse to obtain)Ithe final weight, w
(f Separate adjustments were made within each of
10 weighting classes, defined by grouping the major strata. The non-response adjustment, Ice, applied to all participating schools in weighting
class c was computed as follows:
kc = tE w(f) /E' w(f) ]ghi ghi ghi ghi c' (6)
where I' denotes the summation over the schools in class c that cooperated.That is, kc is simply the sum of the sampling weights of all schools in class
c selected into the sample divided by the sum of the sampling weights of thofeschools in class c that reported for the survey.
20
The final weight, wa)1., for school ghi contained in weighting class cghi
was computed as follows:
w(f)' w(f) .k . (7)ghi ghi cThe grouping of the strata into the 10 weighting biasses and the correspondingnonresponse adjustment factor (ke) for each class are given in Table 10 in
Section 3. 4. Also, some further discussion of nonresponse adjustments isgiven in section 3.4.
Then, an estimate of the total of the characteristic for the entire TitleI (or nonTitle I) universe is
X.(f)' =' (f)' (f)
Z w x , (8)ghi ghi ghi
where i indicates summation over the schools that reported.
Adding over Title I and nonTitle I schools, an estimate of the total ofthe X- characteristic for the entire universe is as follows:
s2 o
7- = Z x(
(9)f
An estimate of the ratio of the characteristic X to the characteristic Y isfound by
R'(f) = x(f)s / y(f)t , (10)
where y(f.)' is found from the formula for x(f)t, above, by substituting yfor x.
ft should be noted that substitution for schools that do not cooperatebiases the results unavoidable. However, the rules chosen for substitutionand for estimation are designed to reduce the impact of such biases.
21
Note also that if X is the characteristic "receives Title I funds,"separate estimates are made for f = 1 and for f = 2 and then they areadded together. Weights are assigned in accordance with the assignmentof schools for stratification purposes, and not in accordance with theirobserved status as Title I or nonTitle I schools.
3. 2 Estimation of Variances - Phase I
Let v2'
denote the estimated relvariance of the estimator x'. Then,x
2 / 2 2vx,gh
E (r) icl ghl xigh2) r / x;
where the subscript r denotes those final strata in which two schoolsreport, and xg' = xghi wg' for the first participating school in the final
stratum, and similarly for the second school. The summation is onlyover those final strata in which two schools reported. (For simplicity,the superscript (f) has been dropped.) The estimated relvariance of theratio x' /y' is
where
v2(xl/y1 = v2 + v2 - 2v11x' Y1
(12)
vxty, . ar)(xghi- r , andxgh2) ('''g'111 Ygh2)1 \ v
v2 .
371
= v,Y1Y1
22
x' y'r r
At the time the sample was designed it was presumed that nonre-
sponse would be low because of the multilevel substitution rules. However,
for a variety of reasons, 174 schools out of 731 did not respond and nosubstitutes responded for them. Therefore, many of the pairs of schools,upon which the above formulas are based, contained only one member ofthe pair or no members.
Two recognized procedures are available for estimating variancesin such cases. One is to regroup the unpaired respondents into "pseudo-pairs" and compute variances as in equations (9) and (10). The result isan overestimate of the variance, but all of the data are used. The secondmethod is to discard (only for variance-computation purposes) the unpairedschools and to estimate variances only from the complete pairs. The resultsare unbiased, if response is unrelated to variability, but not all of the datais used. The second method was recommended for this study.
3. 3 Illustration of Variance Computation
The computations are illustrated for major stratum 1. Final
results will, of course, be added over all strata. The basic computations
are shown in Table 9. The relvariance computations follow:
2 55,659,000vx 0.14298(19, 730)2
v2,
37,869 - 0.0474937
9(893)
1, 059 000x'y' 19, 730(893) - 0.06011
= 0.14298 + 0.04749 - 0.12022 = 0.07025
23
Table 9. Illustration of variance computations - (hypothetical data)
Majorstratumstratum
(g)
Finalstratum
(h)(i)
Finalweight*
g(wt hi )
x
g 1
Weightedx
(xghi
wghi
Y
ghi
Weightedy
(yghi
wghit )
Squared xdiff (000)
(1)
Squared ydiff.(2)
xy cross -
product (000)(3)
1 1 1 199 40 7,960 1 1992 129 10 1,290 1 129
6,670 70 44,489 4,900 467
2
2 ) noncooperating
3 1 129 20 2,580 1 1292 82 0 0 0 0
2,580 129 6,656 16,641 333
4 1 82 0 0 0 0
2 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 1 82 10 820 1 822 82 0 0 0 0
820 82 672 6,724 67
u12) noncooperating
7 1 199 I 60 11,940 1 1992 noncooperating
8 1 I 129 I 0 0 0 02 noncooperating
9 1 64 15 960 ** 1 64\ **la 64 25 1,600/ 1 64/2 226 20 4,520 1 ** 1 226)2a 64 0 0/ 0 0
- 1,960 - 98 3,842 9,604 192
Total for pairs x' = 19,730 y' = 893 55,659 37,869 1,059
Totals for all observations x' = 31,670 y' = 1,092
* Rounded for simplicity in the presentation.** The two schools are added before taking differences.
The estimated standard errors are:
= /01,670)2 (0.14298) 12,000
= 1(1, 092)2 (0.04749) = 238
a(x,,ly..) = J(31,670 11,092)2 (0.07025) = 7.69
Note the introduction of the second prime on x and y in the standard
errors. This is necessary because the pairs of schools for which data areavailable do not add to the totals for the population. Note also that one
should add over all strata to obtain results for the whole sample.
The example uses hypothetical data, but is representative of thecase in which y might equal 1 if the school has a compensatory reading
program and zero otherwise. The variable x might be the number of
fourth grade pupils who participate. Then xu/y" is an estimate of thenumber who participate per school (a ratio estimate).
3.4 Nonresponse Adjustments
It had been planned that if a sampled school refused to participatethe first substitute school would be included and if that school refused thesecond substitute school would be included, and so on, so that a high
participation rate would be achieved. However, the shortness of theavailable survey period and the fact that many schools did not "refuse"in the formal sense but simply did not act plus a variety of other circum-stances associated with school closings and consolidations producedrelatively high nonresponse to the survey. For example, out of 720schools drawn in the initial sample, 168 did not respond and no substitutes
25
were obtained for them. Another 22 schools were closed and, by the rulesestablished, no substitutes were drawn for them.
It was decided to take a sample of school districts and to surveythem to obtain a sample of schools that were not in the sample frame(primarily, new schools).
When the 22 closed schools were extrapolated by using basic samplingweights they were estimated to account for 6.5 percent of total schools.On the other hand, extrapolation of the (mostly new) schools from thespecial district sample amounted to 2.3 percent of the schools in theinitial sampling frame. Thus, by this approximate reckoning, the netdecrease in number of schools was 4.2 percent. The 1971 StatisticalAbstract (p. 100) shows an averag' annual decline in number of publicelementary schools of about 2.8 percent per year between 1964 and 1966.The decline between 1966 and 1968 cannot be computed because of inclusion
of some combined elementary-secondary schools, but the figures arenot inconcsistent with the 2.8 percent per year observed earlier. Consider-ing the amount of sampling error in the district sample and the fact thatnew districts were not given a chance to enter the sample, the reconcilia-tion of aggregate ,numbers of schools appears quite reasonable, i. e. , the
2.8 percent compared to the 4.2 percent computed above.
The result of the above analysis was the decision to consider closedschools as respondent schools with zero characteristics. i. e. , not to
include them in the nonresponse adjustments.
Table 10 shows the nonresponse weight adjustments (IQ. The lastcolumn shows the factor to be multiplied by the basic sampling weight to pro-duce the nonresponse-adjusted weights for each responding school in the
26
sample. These adjustment factors were computed as specified inequation (6) in section 3.1.
27
Table 1G. Nonresponse weight adjustments
Nonresponse MajorAdjustment Strata
Group Included(1) (2)
NumberSchoolsSampled
(3)
NumberSchoolsClosed(4)
NumberSchools
Nonresponse(5)
Basic WeightsNon-
responseAdjustment
(8)
Responding andClosed Schools
(6)
TotalSchools
(7)
1 1, 2, 3 48 0 16 2,775.0 4,146.8 1.494
2 4, 5, 6 62 1 20 3,916.1 5,457.0 1.393
3 7, 8, 9 110 2 30 7,298.8 10,098.7 1.384
4 10, 11, 12, 13 114 5 20 7,108.6 8,568.9 1.205
5 14, 15, 16, 17 98 0 19 5,366.2 6,500.2 1.211
6 18, 19, 20 58 10 14 6,751.3 8,632.4 1.279
7 21, 22, 23 36 1 10 2,647.7 3,396.2 1.283
8 24, 25, 26 70 3 8 6,336.2 7,190.8 1.135
9 27, 28, 29, 30 76 0 21 5,231.7 6,926.6 1.324
10 31, 32, 33 48 0 10 2,997.0 3,745.1 1.250--- ___
Subtotals 720 22 168 50,428.6 64,662.7
District Sample 11 0 6 764.8 1,459.0 1.908
Grand Total 731 22 174 51,193.4 66,121.7
.SUPPLEMENT A
SAMPLING UNIVERSE FILE STRUCTURE
1. Track: 7-track2. Density: 556 BPI3. Parity: Even4. Label: Unlabelled5. Record Size: 340 characters6. Blacking factor: 10 records /block7. Mode: Binary coded decimal (BCD)8. Contents of records:
COLUMN DESCRIPTION CODE
1 - 2 State code
3 - 7 School code
8 -12 School district code13 -15 County code
16 Title I1 if Title I on Program Reference Fileor, if not in that file, federally fundedcompensatory program indicates onSchool Universe File; 0 otherwise
17 Filler18 -19 Minority class code
18 Data from OCR tape 1
Data from county tape 2
19 Less than 5% 1
5- 9 210- 19 320 - 39 4
40 - 59 5
60- 79 6
80 or more 7
N.A. 8
A-1
COLUMN DESCRIPTION CODE
20 Degree of urbanization code
Large city, over 500K population 1
Large city, 200K-500K population 2
Suburb of a large city 3
Rural area near a large city 4Middle-size city, 50K-200K population 5
Suburb of a middle-size city 6
Rural area near a middle-size city 7
Small city or town, less than 50Kpopulation 8
Rural area, not near a large or middle-size city 9
No answer 0
21 Geographic division code
North East 1
North Central 2
South 3
West 4
22 - 26 Adjusted average income from IRS 1966ZIP Code file (Zi)
27 - 29 Percent minority30 Grade combinations
2, 4, 6 only 1
2 only 2
4 only 3
6 only 42, 4 only 5
4, 6 only 6
31 - 34 Pupils in grade 2
35 - 38 Pupils in grade 439 - 42 Pupils in grade 643 - 46 Pupils in grades 2, 4 and 647 - 50 Pupils in all grades51 - 55 Median income from county data file (Xi)
A-2
COLUMN DESCRIPTION CODE
56 Zi classesLess than $1, 000 0$ 1, 000 - $1, 999 1
$ 2, 000 - $2, 999 2
$ 3, 000 - $3, 999 3
$ 4, 000 - $4, 999 4$ 5, 000 - $5, 999 5
$ 6, 000 - $6, 999 6
$ 7,000 - $7,999 7$ 8, 000 - $8, 999 8$ 9, 000 - $9,999 9
$10, 000 or more +N. A.
57 Xi . classes
Less than $1, 000 0$ 1, 000 - $1, 999 1
$ 2, 000 - $2,999 2
$ 3, 000 - $3,999 3$ 4, 000 - $4, 999 4$ 5, 000 - $5, 999 5$ 6, 000 $6, 999 6$ 7, 000 - $7, 999 7$ 8, 000 - $8, 999 8
$ 9, 000 - $9, 999 9$10, 000 or more +N. A.
58 - 59 Probability of selection (Ai)60 - 61 Lowest grade in school62 - 63 Highest grade in school
64 - 65 F.I. P. S. * state code
66 68 F. I. P. S. * county code
69 - 70 State abbreviation71 - 75 ZIP Code
'Federal Information Processing Standards
A-3
COLUMN DESCRIPTION CODE
76 - 77 Population size code of county
Public schools in counties of:Less than 5, 000 population 61
5, 000 9, 999 population 6210, 000 - 24, 999 population 6325, 000 49, 999 population 6450, 000 99, 999 population 65
100, 000 - 199, 999 population 66200, 000 or more population 67N.A. 68
78 Tax return code<500 1
500 - 1, 999 2
2,000 - 3,999 3
4, 000 or more 4N.A. 5
79 Data source
From 1969-70 school universeFrom 1970-71 ELSEGIS III- C
90
80 File typePrimary sample 1
Substitute sample 3
81 - 110 School district name111 - 140 School name
141 - 153 City
154 - 175 Street address176 - 201 County name
202 - 210 Number of class sections202 - 203 Grade 2204 - 205 Grade 4206 - 207 Grade 6208 209 Ungraded
210 W A.
A-4
Mesta Research, inc. MULTIPLE LAYOUT CARD FORM.
CUSTOMER NAME ETS Compensatory Reading CONTROL NO. 0243
' -' - 1 - 4 1 - - I - 1 - 1 - 4 - 4 - 1
USOE CODE11
w-1t%.
A
ill1- 8t in 02 5-r ,..)
t7 el II.
i b'¢2cO 4.1
1V,Lb t- ulct ,),2I Z1
luz:
liqfp-0 .-
ei!c A 1s1V 2 1g `-/ct 44a 0
22 /3 24 ZS Z6
1riiziVt
27 ?I 23
1 I f . 1 1 f 111IT PUPILS I
74),---
iii(171U .../z5? 53 54 SS
its1.0
0.,,tsJi.iS6
u 0'72
1 traw
tiRIZ' roS7 S9 51
1_ I
SPANSPAR
I 1
SIPS 2or)
, 17:
1v43j,
163 '3
!ill
0- 1-u- aN 0c3
71 7? 73 74 75
d.
1213
r 8
2 iu11
0v 0Z6 7?
8'7''1-km*
lo
.
4ti8
1 7
1
48 u.,t A
Is-A33 4 S 6 P
3 1 1 1
1-c.)
W0sn 0a
1 I 10 11 17i1 1 1 4
z.140
-3 °.9-ii .a.
1.1'44-#4
1 1 1
30.0
lc/ ggi C6
030 31 3? 33 34
ii1 1-.0
35 36 37 30
hi0cf-sotf,,...
39 40 41 42
.4 .3co -1-4 1.''"c gg
43 44 4S 46
it<ER,n1-
i= ztCI AI 43 51101
0-I
10 tt
li,-'.I
62 $3
wI--
04 6.5
2js,02
66 br CI
SCHOOL. DISTRICT
- 30 A/N
t 7 3 4 S 6 7 6 3 00 11 17 13 14 15 16 14 II II
- 1 4 1 - 1 4 - r 1 1
1,1AME:
70 ZI 22 Z3 74 25 Z6 Z7 ?I 74
I 4 - 4 I f -I
SCHOOL.
30 31 3? 33 34 3S 36 37 33
I l f 111 4111114-f t
NAMEao At/14
31 40 41 4? 43 41 45 46 47 46 43 50 51 5? 53 S4 SS S6 S7 56 51 60
C114-t
I3 Piirq
61 67 63 64 65 6$ 67 68 13 70 71 7? 73114
sl-RESTa.a. Pi AI
7S 76 17 71 73 80
1-4 1-1-1-1--1-1-1-1-1-4-1-1--1-4-4--1-1-1
STREE rC..01-1r.
1 7 3 4 5 1 It I I 10 11 I? 13 14 IS1
1 t 1 1 I f 1 t 1 -4--4-1- -t-t 4 --1-4-1--1-1-1--t-1Nits.robeR ay.CLASS SEcTIOta
4 f I f I s f{ t I-1 1-1-1-1-1 1-1-1-1-1-1--t- t t t t 1
e 0 u_t..t -r-f NAME
alo A/N
16 17 Il II 20 ZI 22 /3 /4 ZS 26 Z7 ZO 79 30 31 3? 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
is04tC6
/4? 43
LUastl-%41 4S
LA)
ACtsSe
346 41
-1-
46 6P
. I.w'
AI 43
-92...
2%
SO 51 5? 53 54 SS 56 S7 SO S9 60 61 6? 63 64 65 66 67 63 69 10 77 7? /3 114 7S 76 77 78 71 L)
1 1 t -4--4 -1 4 4 4 9 4 4144
t? 3 436 719 10 11 1/13 14 1S
I-4 -1-1-4-f f-1--1.-1-1-4- 44- I I 1 1 f 1-1-1-1-1
16 17 16 19 20 21 22 21 Z4 2$ 26 27 20 2310 31 1? 33 34 3336 37 38 39 40 41
'-1
4? 43 44 4S
-4-7
48 49 SO
-1-4 -1--1-t-4-4 -4-4-1-4-1-1-1--t-4-1-1--1-1-4-1-4-1--1---1-1 4-1
SI 5? S3 S4 SS% S2 SS St 60 61 063 64 65 66 6/ 63 69 70 11 7? 73 74 7S 76 7770 74 80
- 1 - 1 - 4 1 - 1 4 1 - 1 4 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 - 4 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1-1-4 I 1 1 4 1 1 1-1-1-1-1-1-I-1-1-1-1-1-4 1 I-1 1 1 1 4 1 4 1 1-1 1 1 1 4 1-1 1 1 1 -1.- 1 1 4 1 1 1--1-
I 7 3 4 5 6 7 1 I to it 17 13 14 iS is 17 II It ZO Z1 22 23 74 2S 26 /7 211 Zt 30 31 3? 33 34 3S 36 VI 38 31 40 49 I? 43 41 45 46 47 AI 44 50 St 5? 53 54 55 56 57 511 51 60 61 6? II LI CS CS 6? CI 6910 It itnu 15 76 7? Z3 Zt 133
-4 11411 1 11-f- 1114111111111 " :_l__I_I_I_1_1 _1_1_ 1_1 _1_ _I__A 1_1_1 _1_ i_i A__i_ A 11-f-11 1-1411111-4--1-1-1-4 :
)in
I 7 3 4 5 6 1 t I 16 et t? 13 e4 15 16 17 18 19 ?I Z1 22 /3 24 7S 26 Z7 ?I Z9 30 31 32 31 34 3S 36 3/ 3$ 13 40 AI 4? 43 41 45 46 47 AI 41 SO 51 52 33 54 SS Ss 57 58 St 63 61 6? 63 64 6$ 65 67 65 St 70 71 7? Z3 74 75 76 77 71 ?I ta--1- I 1-4 1 1 4 1 I 1--+ -1--1 -1- 1-1- 1-1-1 1 4- 4-4--1-4-1 1 4 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 111711111111141.1111
NUHArm nr crwrilLS WITH fi41rS P. 4 go 6. WHICH TTTI.F 1
r49,1 1 rDLINNI 14 4y c400 t c0L111.4 co,
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
AVERAGE ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME (in $1.000)
cgon 1 cnOmq 19
r400 1 r01.11Mh SATOTAL Go446
-1.9 7 -2.9 1-3.9 4.4.9 -5.9 4-6.9 7 -7.9 0 -8.9 q- 9_9(1 -41 n 10+ NA it-xi Pg't Tn/41
J <33 9 197 J441 7471 5401 4561 1449 769 261 16774 1? 546 17177 171+74.77 7409 14.71 10.09 c7.04 99.57 91.70 59.64 64.94 49.70 37.50 42.65 49.07 4007
', 5-911 7 10 ana Sln 1o17 1014 475 167 In 19I1 6 78 3995 15966.60 4.07 6.77 7.44 0.61 17.39 14.40 17.41 17.24 10.17 18.75 5.68 10.14 10.14
an y 791 774 001 460 4311 166 41 1409 3 77 1405 144914647 701 4.44 10.4n 4.10 10.46 1101 1104 10.17 10.00 9.34 5.60 9.81 0.41
4_2.0=39% 17 1 197 041 1474 704 145 114 76 4149 10 64 4221 t 771I1.37 .41 11.79 14.55 19.69 9.64 11.67 10.64 6.47 12.19 31.25 4.66 11.92 11.92
5 40-S9% 7 4 117 cAA 644 149 tsq 76 7175 1 15 7161t.44 1.41 11.70 4.10 6.06 4.73 4.7n 206 4.74 1.13 2.55 4.10 6.10
4 60-79% 10 14 704 16q 110 7I6 60 6 P 1010 19 17 29 Y77917.02 6.69 4.9n 5.46 7.06 7.63 1.47 .47 .49 3.54 1.38 3.47 1.47
7 80% + 41 pn 964 947 744 164 105 17 1 2_f150 70 707930.44 4.11 14.54 14.04 1.74 4.77 1.14 1.14 .74 6.40 5.00 3426 s.P6
A NA 445 445 44527
crt
0
32.39 1.26 1.26
TrITALt1 -0) lni 246 7,14c 6741 1076A 0716 1200 1266 405 14011 12 1174 35419 15419Innon lon.nO 101.00 100.00 10n.On 100.00 100.00 lon.no 140.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Y
X
T0741.11 -x1 114 744 7049 6741 1n744 4714 3200 1765 405 14011 32 1174 35430 35419100.90 100.00 100.n0 100.00 100.04 1e0.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 10000 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
*CMCTS
l94"ti) TOTAL 106 744 7049 6741 107AA 01918 3 200 1265 406 34013 32 1374 35439 34191110.00 100.00 100.A0 iqn.nn 100.00 Inn.nn 100.0n 3(10.04 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
4F4N 5.04 1.01 3.50 3.14 ?.S0 0.72 P.?, 1.00 1.64 2.60 2.44 4.05 2.66 7.66
ST on, 1.00 1.94 P.11 ?.pn 1.01 1.74 1.40 1.32 1.0 1.99 1.37 3.14 2.06 2.66
X
LLI y = QV c c Lt.
61'Z 617 60'E SE1 EI.2 i yet b5*1 be1I cl"e bed ht. ibi AO is470'1.
00'001OSetE6S
/07E t6'E 6E'e WeE U9wi VV't 9Z 7U 't bb't 'WV bb'd 110.+7
00'001 00'001 00'001OS29E6S OoLSEe 6190L
00'001 00'001 00'001 00.001 00'001 00'001 00 001 00'001 04.001 00'001e0471.695 Wdeb LO6iLd OV..bV bLeLbCioVUUovibuiebUtii9Lb7 bSkod Uere KW/ ONvb.
SLJ.,1st
00'001 00'001 00'001 00'001 00'001 00'001 00'001 Wool OCOuI 00'001 Ou4u1 110001 00'001 00'0010SetLoS OSe9E6S OWLSEL JULt GO,LobS yedb LObILe 0199SV 4LeLoLlb47u0byl$01coutitV4:2,) t'sibe 0c9b IX-iillioi
A
00'001 00'001 00'001 00'0o1 00'001 00'001 00'061 Ou'oui 00001.0u'ou1 ou'Out ou'out UeuulOSetE65 Obe9C6S OWLSEe W9OL eu7E695 'deer) LObiL UL'otb", taeLbLlobutioyibuicoultv btoc 0Lirb (6-1)14101
Z1 Z2.1 OLOE915e4 WiSeL 9ISZL
UeGEbUbbZL
bet£
OEZt 60'S90o6ei Ubbil
66'E S1.1LUULLd
Zb9
LOOLEZ 6IL4
269 $6Z 112lowp0
E0'471
lOVUI, U9b9 0,1
E07171 476'47 00.Z£
YN
el OS' ble'e Lev LecL ccvc oc'vt tv'uc106LIL LLS L69Z WobT oLOVb obvLbe L4d9c ibvcci Ibt17 lbtl t08 L
Loy' WY' CeE te, L.PV 47,0.0 012'9I0e744 9L7 ti101 aoll ester c/itv 77111 co,d 409 t6L-09 9
beL4ighLub
tE01 tS'S
ov'l Met c.c't C'et, oLel tr,t S-rtoulpr evSub 0vicct cyrosJi vIVI 1,10.
itb el Witcoct
6110IZE LbL;4V
>_ Iso1i440Vb WLL0Vb ChbLI YGUI
CDQsti V3'047V7uJ L7tY47C
69'01 06'9 Oo'6Lbs979 9LeY1 UUL
ist.6 5'471
19Ll ceLl tci Lc-
116S-01,
`fa 0 ZZ 0071 %6£ -OZ
SOll E1'01 beet et'vt eL'11 et'o tr.'01 17'0 let bebk.liblo5dV OLLb OLLLL Levco 7ULL91 LLUVVI 010411 co'oci hvO bc5U------%6T-0T
oyo'b t9'el 90'471 Seel s6u sb'9 Oc'S 0$.01uvosys Ltbsi tivyt. 0,146 bbl141 tael,t ip;str. ,rsoKre ISvE tvo %6 -S
LOt CE'Zt I1.1'047 969 59'09 St'6, t907 Oesc evbe Lb/9 79.17
L'wocbc butiob Moe- tIW9LGL4 SLt1Vy 11007,1 Ut.O.GL LL/OL 4-it4LV Yo,./Ued ovbel 7 8S>
bt N'tirlUJ I OtV:1.40 1X-11 414 U tolo 8 °b 6 L-L 6 9v 6*2b b 6F 6 1.-L b C-e a L-t A7 pouuw t
Onvo9 11i01 1vilai/b hb110j, l Uovj
(000't9 UT) SWOON' SS090 OUSilfGV 299113A1( 9b 1whitrj 1 trov Ad pi WOW I Oci,j
i 1111 .,AVui 1141,1h.h1vUm.lb 'e Nl Slicho 40 tc0.61h
7t*2 t£ SE*1
00'001 00'001 00.00105(2915 66L0. 905
LI).2 £0'1 Id2'1 65'1 2119 92'e SE2 72'2 eb'l Azto IS
7E1 'Z 09 1 9ti T e bE e Lb 'e 59E e6eL 6d aCT7 tkocah
ottuoi tiuot 00001 00001 0060t 0001 utpwoot 0u-001 01.0001 ouw001Lw2b67 kebL ',bed CLIbb tbiddi 741671 beeVb 471507 LLLC 116 ivIca
00'0011.056915
00'001 00.001 00'0010511915 66L02 ribb
5.1.0z$ Je
00'001 0000, 00'001 00w0u4 00001 00001 00w06$ 00'001 WOul 00'001L57567 LesL 7752e ettbb ibLedi /LLoVi b76 71/47 LLLd L16 1X-111V101
A
00'001iG50915
00'001 00'001 00'001 6e001 004'00( 00'001 0u'00100'00I 00'001 40'001 00w601 40-001
to
051291g 661.02 065 L57b07 LC5L 775ee eCibt= i t. i f11671 bc76 ILLe 116 (6-1-)1V101
602$
92'1 92'1 LCIE <be69 5e9 5259 YN b
1W01 fic01 e(P's 69UI Vv. 421.1 I64'6 yb 76wo 6L'61 ,V'te L6'11 61'5e299e5 c99E5 54701 Lri li, 1:$ Lee/I eti.L LltiT--nv,vist 6096 cLt (,t. + 1108 L
WE ire 22'1 Ct EcS' it, 08'1 96'2 09'1 50r9 bbwi e9 di.'13
love61 tOLZI Cbe W2bi 742 06 7Ub 17d9U--77.T5 0o9 t./dt. cET- 9L %6L-09 v
9 I£'9 Su'e 421.4'e bb "1 00w1 ec47 Ihw ea'9 v7wo uv'el bbwe LtoLEt/vt. won 165 lit 9LU7t v67 41,19C I299 vucvl ',Lob ,115 too tse %65-01,
LE'CI LEI 911'7 ta'21: EI v6 (W01 LOCI 96'01 9L vi 1742.Y1 Sl'cI et.. GI.S14616v t/c!6,0 ItY1 Ybt t.tbL VW- OLed witol 6t ETF..rtr22Fa II w.b, b ott- %6E-0t 7
741.41 42901 55'9 tieb 28'01 12001 5w11 eL'11 11'11 474'6 00'11 twk. ve'e 1.9't1
b 1055 U1Ub5 29£L Erb 00biS 651. -5-5tot f795L 791I 02171" 0,21.01 797L 9L LVL 116T-0T- -1T
10'01 10'01 56'5 6£'91 L1'01 912'4.1 10et 21'421 L12e1 ve'6 220'e ue'% lit*, uL01s,cts S'itS Ltel bb utqUg----VTEt $162- LULL 9CS1 L7L1.1 twv,/ %8 -5
vet, OU'L, 111'27 uotiE oleo, rib*S9 weip, LLwOh 01.15 L7.77 tyruL by*de Lb.1.1/
010c/Z4 utrtinZ---rtlu eLe 7-arrrz---776,--V7stt 0.1M-915e9 to0177--STritic bYbt 47 --TS>
61 Nrot1U-0 1 Utir;v11.11 rJa 171.11-----VN +tit to to -T Pb b b b U - li to L- L b -97--9--bCg - 'TM t - 1. b z C-6-1-=1-1%-rao i 1
(4.400 Ivioi 1Vit1.
9!) WOW.) I OtIV4
(OWES' bl.) 1114)13NI gg021!) UUJailecIV UVV21:AV
Ad03 ISA1 J1111 JAVu 0101,X) JU J/15 30 !,t116V-Ph JVdwod
14W11 1013 1. 1.1V t AIi t.1 ijat I I0J I t cV J
41144r0 OF sr,onts 4174 nonnrc 7. 4 04 A. 144R-14 nn MnT HAVF TTTLF I
CA°1 1 CArumm 19 py c4pn 1 COLOom 96 AVERAGE ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME- (in $1,000/
PAGE
ce'll 1 COLUMN SA TOTAL TOTAL GRAMO
% Minority 1-1_9 7-2_9 1 -1 4 L.4 O 46 q A4 0 77 4 ile.4 4 49_9111:11 0 104-----NA 111t1 RP I YWCA.
420 1 Moira s] 14 a7 rri
1 <58 77 1C 671 1417 1474 4c44 7401 1411 717 1 c14C R0 SAO 10404 i'4444
14.74 '4.04 45.67 51.97 54,14 04.21 41.48 44.4. 73.77 44.14 70,1R 42.46 59.59 95,98 V7 CD
7 5-9% 17 7 On 117 O17 1077 414 4Q 114 1477 4 00 '747 n7A7 .1, -4
6.16 1.77 7.71 10.12 17,17 13.24 14.92 17.94 11.64 13.41 5.26 7.66 13.14 11.14 .. Au.
1 10-19% 71 2 101 lAi 44k OSA inA 194 14 PA 74 14110 'Lan g, .1170 11.1) 1.77 4.47 11.40 17.40 11.77 14.44 11.01 7.45 12.36 22.41 5.94 12.09 12.69 IS
rn 20-39% 9n 147 2110 791 719 440 746 SA 2012 7 L7 7041 776i
74.44 1.77 19.41 9.41 11.44 4.5A 9.73 8.84 9.84 10.27 1.75 3.63 9,94 9.94
40-59% 71 106 1AI 771 776 117 11 6 444 _24 QAA QA4 11.11 1.77 10.1' 5.11 4.01 ?.0? ?.41 1.20 .60 3.41 1.46 3.39 1.35
60-79$ 71 1.411 0 A4:1 LKO 11.11 14.47 4.14. 2,44 l 1.46 .41 .1.6 .10 1.44 .70 1.60 I40
7 80% 17 7n 196 174 77 14 7 747 cS AA7 P07 19.504 A.74 A.41 1.14 1.41 1.49 .51 .70 2.71 4.25 2.79 7.74
NA 414 414 33.57 1.51
_414 1.51
4
TrITAI I1 -Q1 140 91 ipla 1011 A749 7717 407, 7769 491 27169 114 1201 7477A 79774 woo w, nn 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
TATAI [1.41 104 cl 1014 1011 476c 7717 4027 27944 991 27169 114 1291 79776 ,4776 110.0n 10009 100.0n 10000 100,00 100,00 100,00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
4F 1FC7S
SPAY) TOTAL 1149 61 1014 1011 A7A5 7717 4422 2769 991 27149 114 1241 20776 */74 100.410 100.00 100.00 100.00 140,00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Woo 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Mr4I4 4.2, 2,32 P.77 7.14 7.17 1,99 1.90 1.80 1.51 7.07 1 46 4.0? 7.16 2.16
ST rick, 1.99 2.45 1.97 1.44 1.41 1.42 1.14 1.15 1.02 1.63 .40 3.16 1.64 1.64
oL"I
bt
bO'L
Se
99'1
C1'1
1,S1
Let
ul'e
7ee
Ll'e
7461
/111 IS
07Z
07'Z
'et
OS°1
Et'a
L7'1
(DC!
74).e
Ve
sL
b, 'Li
Up L
4,1"7
Wray.'
00'001
00'001
00'001 00'00I
OU.00I
UO'UOI 00'001 U0'001 00'001 O0001 00'001 0UOU1 W001 OU'vG1
ilLebIer7
04cd10,
SoLSEC bk9L2
SsEoSss9
eteste cs960e9 679S1104114oLut.197L9co 4c4uCt. r9v0U4 9u19
c147
-1V1v1 UNVG%,
u0'001
1:1L2ult7
S1 JetJC
00'00t
00'00I 00'001
00'001
00'001 00'0uI OU'uut. U0'001 uu'uOi
Ou'Out ou'vOl uu'IJO1
5445E6 tic94e
bsbSsb,
cICsid wittue9 b7,,s0,411Lt14009791.t. L[ duct. e.mout
tb,
(A-1)1VAvA
A
uJ
00'00i
00'00t
00'001 0000I
OU'001
00'001 00'u01 0000t uu'u01 ,40601/1 00'001 WIJIJI Ouuul vO'uUI
",fir" l
bLe619,
SoLSt4 0C944
$bli$S$7
1C.SEC utbOcv c7,Su,114b40tt9719to G4C0. ,703L /iLy
41;7
1b-trIViul
.<.
..-1
CC
...I
40
t
'-''
97*1
97'I
te6e
4Q 0._
L6 UL
IbZOL
16ZOL
YN
0C.l'" Se,
co
SZ't
t,
WI,
4L
40
99'1
eee
Lo'y
bvLt ,71
ua
vt.01.,e
Ot
7ds
ObVe
00-11
eb9101
t1b1
ltic
IC491
tbSSL t9 LLe7m
tztuLT-
41'41000
't
WO
+ %Pe
L
66'1
68'1
Ob'
90'1
90'
LC'
Sb'
,Ce
..,b6e
LS'i
LI.9
Go(rL
V,,.4
9 d_b
97COS
liblit
liSt.60
tilt'
Lae
0Ssb
079uL
c449c
U4411
4.4;49
,,/tc
'.t%6L-09
9
LU",
LO.,
We
4k
71'1
vc
'C',
vs's
lo'b
1c's1
90'7
teb1
290941
Z'aVol
S-su-s
LtsbOol
LL9
crols
olL yv7s5
'',ut
L.LL,
1214..1
[IL
td6'11
bIt
Sbl,
10'1
L-1/et
9t's
9c'b
VL'01
01'cl
Ib'91
19'91
/4'ud
ou'L,4
-nTOMiTS
u0SL4s
OUto
bLe
41-cvo
ibUdt
CddiS
l'et,Vt ;t1OCVST-70-11
c4Lwl.
t.t C
c411
ccT1
t5E-OZ
97'91
99'71
16'9
6c'Oi
Lb'vt
94'9
7/L1
1O'bt
47'91
ta"4I
Ou'it
(c'el
uc°91
-701T969
00iYb9
b9£91
Lu9S-
776fics,
7uo5i
LVru
UtuUsi 7491-61,1 orvif/t Wmuz
le/Li
z./
$L4
$6T -OT
6e1.1
6L'CI
ZeL
Z169
1''11
ts'Ll
L9'91
eeLt
47'61
L6't
17",1
SSY7YY
bbYhYV
VSVOt
16Y1
.711.7y
youve
1 711bU 1
Lks191
tLtvt
vv1T7-577--
c5S
$6-S
60'47
60'd7
CL'07
ws'cL
LI'bt
7c'SL
7s'oS
4e'2
us
Lu,e
ci'le
-TrETtLC
7144iLe
VitL01 etlue
,/7901e
,ove/Li ue*,Lvt. SLSSCS veLoz,/-4:717-67(7SW--ST.7 t<
oLUc
Its>
Ol
;,....0-I4J
IGCVO
iJZLi
i is
ix-1)
VN----+OT
0tir=rre--8-Sww--6L-L
6 9.-/
6 5-,
6"."1/4-7
b t-t.
13
C 4.
b T-r
A1TIO146 1
uhlto9
1V1.01
'W1U1
9S Nh1
101.1
1(J ct%)
(00011.1 uT) 4WO3NI SS0115 aaxsnrav snimanv
iJUd
t41.1410J
IA.
+.1
11111)...
I J1111 atyll
I.
"/ C 1,..10W-: N1 :1101u JV 0.1e0q111
SL71 Tr( Lb. 19.1 009 9E9 as't Yet We sue 111 Del AA, AS
ZE4 ZEc Lb 'E Si eve e bh bL CU '1 EL e SS 'e Su E $h E Oe et
00'001 00.001 00.001 00.001 OU'UO1 uts'001 00'001 00001 WIWI 00'1)01 UO001 ut'ubi OU'uOi70Lhi7 hOLhih 19,U2 sSie buOebE cbSisi islUS VOieb U6VCIL chvyti ccbit, UL401. ctib UhVdt,
00'001 00'001 00'001 00'001 00*001 titi'001 00.00; 0000l Oteu01 wu01 00001 001AI Ov1 00'001huLV17 hOLVil 197U2 sste UtWebt. ebsbt EbIUS /olcb obveit OriVcr tacSlt. 0470i dei iota
SIJJI At
A
00.001 WOO 00.001 OruOi 013.001 00.001 00*Uttt 00.9V1 0U*001 ubOul UU'UU1 OU'UOI uu'401
0
tOL7E7 701.717 19 V2 SSUZ VWUceol. etistit LSIO *puled 06ticll c777u pcbiL 04YUI cab 101.6 10-1)10101
ESibZ1.9 bZEY esZth
ESi Eb'OE
SS'EbeLV
ssq. s'47
b -I
1LbeLig 0Lb bbLLI
0L'i betbih4 bihL
e4*1:07[
9L'E 901buys[ bu9SU Cu,
YVO-L7
WU*UteL hi
V, 091 Eie hi..b hb.ti Wil behiDU cal 9Uhe uSb, S'LL '-/cL t..1
9E' Ou 90.4 09'd Let VY*S 4U*UL eLN,001 )S9 heLc hbic it.01 90-/ 1:141 WI
trv't uc* set Lbt D'E: u0', cV.4 ho'Li hc'S
VN b
+ $08 A
%6L -09 9
17.11 07E
Ob7L! Ob'Eiut.cts In4LS b7LL t;17
65.9 se'lz
04.£1 WEI 61:0Lefo'S
S7Os7udoud
Utivoti
7191 'Oil
SVOS 99'El 90.217Uet:41e k.Lou LSSI
LVdi SS S49 Vlld t.9I vie, euhe cb71 it 0Q1
WTI eE'b SS'01 IE'il be',! 75*71 e7.01 LV't, tbyeWW$7 viul 7417 I77, iL441 57041 if,s7---Z7T77--TS-----r7c
hl'hitehSs
sO'c WL1 S11'71 trCi 7e7i Lett W.7.4 S7*1l
116S
116E-0Z
llLl LL49 00lci 4LLAI 74U-I 4ctb dUct 77 Sci %6I-01
C8.11 ItLl 9L'91 89.1.1 0h.el uh'01 411.0 Ll.bbotibb Vild 41211W LbLLI cOVUI bOLL 1170 bC %6-S
b9.058[Lbei
1111U1
6771_ 95.11 be2S 5b.CS 99%7 LeSL Lebc Ibac47 71.*cl1501.1 07Lbe 417L7 117tr/ u9t7t built L6ut. vbc 111
10 0-6 b b d b L.- L 6 9-v b b-14 6.11-7 rt- 6 Z-c 6 I-
yS Nr.o I IUJ I WI, J
is>01 NNeilt,:i 1 OchS
AlIJOUN %
(00e it tt) apionNI SSolID wasnrav smnnAV K;mio) I (kiv:) Aip A.4 14JCIVJ l Uctv:.$
1 JuVci 378V71VAV Adal iPza11111 JAVh ii114 Utz Wilph ',It,OhJ:p AU J41'., JO tJoht.V-lh JU L.J1VJW.AA,
SUPPLEMENT B
ASSIGNMENT OF MEASURES OF SIZE
Measures of size have been assigned so as approximately to optimizethe design, that is, to maximize the amount of information for a fixed cost.The optimization, process involves using an estimated cost function whichcontains a cost of including a school in the sample and a cost per pupil ofconducting the study. It also involves some estimates of the expectedsampling variations.
Measures of size were studied in detail by Westat in the design of theAnchor test under another subcontract to ETS. That work has been reviewedcarefully for its applicability to the compensatory reading study. After
thorough investigation we have decided to use those results and have included
as part of this appendix a memorandum prepared for the Anchor test studywhich spells out the theory involved.
The Anchor study concerns pupils in grades 4, 5 and 6 while thecompensatory reading study concerns grades 2, 4 and 6. There appears tobe no reason why this difference should have any effect on the conclusions.
Also, the compensatory reading study calls for a survey of schools inPhase I which is to be followed in Phase II by a testing program. This callsinto question the use of the Anchor Test optimization which is based only ona testing program. That is, in Phase I of the compensatory reading studythere is no per pupil cost of the survey. However, the most expensive partof the compensatory reading study is the testing portion, so it makes senseto optimize the measures of size for that portion of the study. Furthermore,even in the Phase I survey the cost will vary with the number of teachersinvolved in compensatory reading and that number will be correlated with
number of pupils.
B -1
For these reasons, the theoretical results derived for the Anchortest have been determined to be applicable here. The measures of size,based upon the enclosure are as follows:
Enrollment in grades2, 4 and 6
Measureof size
Under 50 4
50 - 99 9
100 - 199 14
200 - 499 22
500+ 35
B-2
nestat Research, Inc.
TO
Memorandum W-4*
John Bianchini, ETS
FROM: Westat, Inc.(MHH)
Attachment
DATE:
SUBJECT:
August 6, 1971
Allocation of the standardizationtest to size uf school strata
This memorandum examines for the standardization study theimplications of the distribution of schools by numbers of students inthe eligible grades (4-6) on the allocation of the sample. We hope youwill look critically at the assumptions for computations of variancesand costs, and the results obtained, and give us any comments as earlyas feasible.
The tentative data used in this memorandum on the size distributionof schools were derived from the 1968-69 school universe tape. Similar
and additional results will be available later from the 1970-71 schooluniverse tape for use in actual sample selection. The results presentedin this memorandum may be altered substantially in the details, but notin their general character, as a result of the revisions that will be madewith improved data
This memorandum deals only with the implications of the size distri-bution of schools, and ignores other questions such as the succession ofgrades in the same school or different schools, the implications of whichwill be considered in a subsequent memorandum,
Since all students in the specified grades within the selected schoolswill be administered the anchor test, both the contribution to variance ofan average test score or percentile, and the cost of including a school inthe sample will be substantially influenced by the size of the eligible enroll-ment in a school. In this situation, strata based on size of schools may bedesirable, along with the use of other stratification criteria to be considered
217_11
* Revised 12/30171 all
Attachment
-2-
in a later memorandum. The size of a school is the number of studentsin it in grades 4, 5, and 6, and it should be feasible to approximate thisbased on the information on the 1970-71 school universe tape. Therewill be no bias, but a larger variance, if the approximation to the numberof pupils eligible to take the test in April 1972 is not a reasonably goodone for some of the schools.
*The theory. The percentile to be estimated is T. the test score
such that the desired proportion P of pupils has a test score less thanTP' with
P A
where
A is the total number of pupils in the specified grade in the universeof schools that have expected scores less than Tp, and
X is the total number of pupils in the specified grade.
We can estimate Tp from the sample by finding tp, the score such that1 t
P = A /X is the desired proportion observed in the sample,where
I
X is the sample estimate of the total eligible pupils in the specifiedgrade, and
I
A is the sample estimate of the number of these pupils with scoresless than tp.
For a stratified sample with the schools within a stratum selected withequal probability, and with the test given to all eligible students in each selected
I I
school, the sample estimates, A and X , are here assumed to be of the form
* See Hansen, Hurwitz and Madow, Sample Survey Methods and Theory, Vol. I,pp. 179-237 and 448-449,
where
Attachment
, L Nh nh
A = r xi-- Z: a , andh h i
nhL NX = 7:
hnh ii-- xhi,
Nh
nh
ahi
xhiL
-3- 1
is the total number of schools in stratum h,is the number of schools in the sample from stratum h,
this the number of eligible students in the i sampled school
in stratum h with scores less than tp,is the number of eligible students in school hi , andis the number of strata.
In practice, the population frequency distribution of scores is
estimated from the sample by estimating frequencies for scores orintervals of scores, using the same type of formula as that above for A .Then, percentiles are easily estimated from the estimated cumulativefrequency distribution by interpolation.
Confidence limits can be computed for Tp, based on the standard
deviation op of the sample estimate, p, of the proportion of students -who score less than T. This proportion p is a ratio-type estimate with variance
2 ba zp
L Nh2N - n S
I Z h h Ph ,2
3c- h N2 Nh nh
* See Ibid., p. 190, equation (4. 5), and the remark on p. 193.
Attachment
where
-4-
2Nh
2SPh = E (Zhi - Z
h) / (Nh
- 1),i
Zhi = Ahi - PXhi,
NZ h Z /Nh'. ih1
Ahi = the number of eligible students in school iof stratum h with a test grade below the percentileTP (the population parameter), and
Xhi the total number of eligible students in school i of stratum !-
The upper and lower.confidence bounds, t P and t P , for a68 percent confidence interval for the percentile U TP will approximatelythe sample estimates of the P
Uth and PLth percentiles, where*
pu = p + crp
, and
PL =P- a .p
An approximate cost function for a stratified sample of the type pro-posed for the standardization study, with all eligible students in a sampledschool taking the test, is
where
LC = C
0+ ZZhnh ,
h
C0 represents coste. that do not vary with the number or sizes of the
schools in the sample, andis the average cost associated with each school included in thesample in size class h.
* See Ibid., pp. 448-449.
Attachment-5-
The maximum precision of results will be achieved for a givennumber of schools in the sample of schools if the sample is allocated to the
i *size strata such that the sample from the hth size class s
Nh S Ph /1 Chn
h L= n .
r NhSPh /LChh
Here we make the assumption that, for any percentile Tp,
S = k SPh p h 'where expressions for kp and Sh will be derived later. Under this assumption,the expression for the optimum n.h becomes
Nh S WEh h v hnh = n L3: Nh Sh /rChh
The approximation Sph = kp'Sh implies that the Sph vary in the samerelative manner between the size strata, for any percentile. When thisholds, the optimum allocation of the sample will be the same for theestimation of each percentile. The basis for this assumption will be
indicated later.
In practice we do no know the Sh in advance of obtaining the samplesurvey results, but can often develop reasonably good approximations to
them, as demonstrated later. Also we can, at best, only approximate thecost function. Nevertheless, even very rough approximations can be highlyuseful in arriving at an approximately optimum allocation of the sample which
is good enough for the purpose.
* See Ibid. , p. 221.
Attachment
-6-
There is no bias in the sample if the approximations are inerror, although the variance is somewhat larger than it would be withthe values known. However, unless the estimated gains from optimumallocation to strata are substantial and the approximations used are inthe right direction, it may be desirable to use uniform fractions, sincethe effort to accomplish an optimum allocation could achieve a loss overproportionate sampling, instead of a gain.
It should be noted that optimum allocation can be achieved byvarying the sampling fractions between strata, or, alternatively, byvarying the numbers of additional strata to be introduced within size stratato achieve the same effect when two units are to be included in thesample from each stratum. We propose to do the latter by using additionalstratification, on other variables, within the size strata. Under some
circumstances the gains from an approximate optimum allocation can besubstantial over selecting a proportionate sample.
We shall now obtain approximate values for Sh and eh. Actually,as can be seen from the formula for the optimum nh, it isn't necessaryto obtain the absolute values, but only numbers proportionate to them,in order to allocate the sample in an optimum manner.
Appro-r.;:mate values for the cost function.
In the standardization study a tentative approximate value for Ch
is given by Ch = 100 + .85 Eh dollars,
where
Eh is the average number of tests to be administered to eligible pupilsper school in size class h.
* It was finally decided not to use size as a stratification variable, but toachieve approximate optimum allocation to size classes by sampling withprobability proportional to a measure of size. This allowed furtherstratification by other important variables, such as income and percentminority. The measures of size used were based on the optimum allocationindicated in Table 2 below.
Attachment
-7-
(Note that Eh is the average per school of all eligible pupils in grades4, 5, and 6 combined, and is different from ,Rh, which is the
average number per school of pupils in a specified grade for which a
percentile is to be estimated. The Xh appears in the variance approximationsand the Eh in the cost function.)
The values assumed in this cost function are the ones we discussed hereon a very tentative basis, and should be reviewed critically. The $100 isthe fixed cost for each school in the sample, independent of the number oftests administered. It is based on a fixed fee of $40 to be paid to acoordinator in each sampler] gchnoL plus other costs speculated to beof the order of $60, including the costs of obtaining cooperation of a schoolin the survey, the costs of providing instructions and controls, and other coststhat vary directly with the number of schools included in th.. sample. fhe
.85 Eh in the cost function is the allowance for the number of tests to beadministered in the school. The . 85 is the unit cost estimate that you pro-vided us and we understand is also included in the contract as representingthe variable costs that depend on the number of pupils tested. The differencesin the sample 'design will not be seriously affected if this fixed cost perschool included in the sample is off by as much as, say, 25 percent. Wehope that you will re-examine it and suggest an alternative level if you feelit is appropriate.
Approximate values for the variances, Si,. 2. We understand from... n
the analyses of data assembled in the Coleman report and from othersources that the proportion of students with scores less than Tp does notvary widely between size classes of schools. If we make this assumption, then
* A Study of Our Nation's Schools by George Mayeske et al (a U. S. Officeof Education working paper analyzing the data collected for theColeman report).
Attachment
Nh
Ph = AhiNh
7 Xhi
P
for each of the size classes. Under this assumption,therefore the SPh
2 (defined earlier) becomes
2SPh = ZZhi2 / (Nh - 1)
where
where
= r (Ahi - PXhi ')2/
(Nh - 1)
= r Xhi2
(Phi - P) 2/ (Nh 1),
Phi = A /Xhi hi
±,h
= 0, and
Moreover, for schools of size Xhi' Phithe expected value of (Phi P) 2 is
E(Phi - P) 2 . PQ 11 + .ophi (Xh. - 1)-',
Xhi 1
E(YPhij P"Phij P)Phi
.2E(YPhi - P)
Ylphij = 1 if the j.th pupil in the specified grade of school i, size-class h,has a score below.TP'
= 0 otherwise
YPhijiis the corresponding value for any other pupil in the same
grade of the same school, and
Ph = r r Y . / r X .hi = EA .ht / rXn t
. is the average value of Yhii,i.1
i.e., the proportion of students in this stratum withscores less than Tp .
Attachment-9-
in the above equation, Phi is intraclass correlation of the Yphi,among pupils within schools, for schools of size X.
Another way of stating pphi in terms of the total variance betweenpupils and the variance between school means is
2 - 2,ab
a/X Xhi hi
phi 2CT X Ihi
where
s
is the size of the grad: in the hith school,Xhi
a 2 is the total variance between pupils, and
ab2 is the variance between school means.
The subtractive term in the numerator will be negligible when Xhi isreasonably large.
We will now assume that the intraclass correlation, pphi, takeson approximately the same value, pp, for each size of school. Actually,
experience shows us for many different variables that on the averagethe intraclass correlation for clusters of different sizes ordinarily decreasesslowly as size of cluster increases. We may later modify the assumptionmade above of essentially equal intraclass correlation for each size ofcluster, but the discussion is simplified by making the assumption here,and possibly modifying it somewhat later.
with the above assumption, and substituting Xhi for Xhi - 1, theexpression for E (Phi - P) 2 is theri approximately
2 . PQ (I + p Xhi) .h
E(Phi - P) = P hiXi
Attachment
-10-
If the above expression is substituted for (phi p) .2 and if Nh is substituted.i.for Nh - 1, the equation for S
P h2 becomei
2
SPh PQ I Xhi (1 + PP Xhi) I Nh
where
=p (
h2Xh + pp X (1 + V
h2)
2V
h= the relvariance among schools within size stratum h
of enrollment in the particular grade for which a
percentile is computed.
If we now make, at least for the present, the further assumptionthat pp is the same for all percentiles (i.e. , pp = p ), we have
1-S Ph2 = PQ IX
h pX+h
2 2(1 + V
h)i._'
There is a limited amount of data available in an unpublished memorandum
in the Office of E..iu-:aLion files to support the above assumption.J.T.
We now have the evidence for the assumption made earlier whin-
we assumed that we could approximate Sph by kpSh. In the result
we have just obtained the value of kp is ART and
ii
Sh = 1Ith + p rCh2 (1 + Vh2).
Computations. We shall now apply these results to approximate data
obtained in the tabulation of the 1968-69 school universe tape referred toearlier.,....* For SAT scores for sixth graders in a recent study in Palo Alto, Calif the 011ie
of Education examined the variance between students of the Y.. variable(defined above on page 8) for the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles. For eachof these percentiles, the variance between schools was about 1/3 of the totalvariance between students. Hence, the intraclass correlation p
Pwas
approximately equal to 1/3 for each of these percentiles.
Attachment
Table 1 shows, by size class of combined enrollment in grades4, 5, and 6, estimates of the number of schools, total combined enroll-ment in grades 4, 5, and 6, average enrollment in the combined classes,and a rough estimate of the enrollment per grade. It also shows an
approximate value for 1 + Vh2. The Vh
2 values were not computed from
the data but were roughly approximated from the .width of the classintervals and the means for the size distributions of enrollment givenin Table 1. Nevertheless, they are likely to be reasonably good approxi-mations.
Table 2 shows the optimum allocation of the sample and comparesit with proportionate allocation for a sample of 1, 200 schools. We havecarried this computation through for two values of p: p = .15 and . . 20.
The use of values of .15 and . 20 for p are based on information you sentme in your memorandum of August 4, for STEP Series II Reading. Those
results are also consistent with results given by Angoff in which he
reported a variaiice between school mean enrollments equal to approximately25 percent of the variance between pupils. The ratio of between-school
variance to total variance of 25 percent would yield an intraclass correlationof .25.
The results summarized in A Study of Our Nation's Schools, cited
earlier, show approximately 35 percent of the total variance accounted forby schools. This variance is presented as an upper-limit estimate, and, again,is for an achievement measure and not just reading. They report essentiallythe same proportion of variance accounted for by schools for each of thegrades studied.
For these computations we have assumed that stratification ofschools would have the effect of reducing the proportion of total variance
* Educational Measurement (2nd Edition), edited by Robert L. Thorndike.American Council on Education, 1971. Chapter 15.
Attachment
-12-
accounted for by between-school variance to the alternate assumed
levels of . 20 and . 15. From the evidence in A Study of Our Nation'sSchools it seems clear that reductions of this order of magnitude and,in fact, considerably greater could be achieved if we had adequatevariables for use in stratification or estimation which are related toaverage economic and social characteristics of the families served bythe schools. Also, information on an individual school basis concerning
average characteristics of teachers and schools would be helpful forstratification. Discussion of the stratification or estimation potentialswill be the subject of another memorandum. Here we simply assumethat we can have some substantial gains from stratification, includingwhat can be accomplished prior to selecting the sample or introducedsubsequently in the estimation process. Consequently, we have chosen
the indicated assumed values for the intraclass correlation.
Results
From Table 2 it is seen that if p = .20, the variance (x k)for a sample of 1, 200 schools is reduced from . 930 for proportionate
allocation of the sample to .731 for optimum allocation, but at an increasein variable costs of from $297, 000 to $360,000. The gain is relativelymore than the increase in cost, but not strikingly so. Thus, if the pro-portionate sample were increased in size from 1,200 schools to 1,450,the cost of the proportionate sample would be the same as a sample of 1, 200 schoolwith optimum allocation. The variance (x k) for a proportionate sample ofthis size would be . 766. Thus we see that for a given size of sample thereis a substantial reduction in variance, but for equal costs the gain is amoderate one of approximately 5 percent.
A consequence of using optimum allocation instead of proportionate
allocation is a substantial decrease in the number of smaller schools inthe sample, and a corresponding increase in the larger schools. The result
Attachment
-13-
is an increase from an average of 67 persons per school to be tested**
to 91 students per school to be tested. This, of course, is the causeof the increase in cost for the optimum allocation of the sample.
In practice we will not know the standard deviation exactly, andthe gain from optimum allocation will be somewhat less than we haveestimated. However, in the nature of this problem, there are reasonsto assume that we should be able to approximate the optimum reasonably well.
As seen in Table 2, the results for o = .15 are essentially similarto those for p = . 20, but with considerably smaller variances as a resultof the reduced correlation.
We need to arrive at an early decision on the basis of these resultsand other considerations, or possibly on the basis of revisions of theseresults if you have suggestions on the cost function or other assumptionswe have made.
* This figure was not developed from our tabulations, but was obtainedfrom another source.
** From the data used in this analysis. the estimated average size ofschool for proportionate sampling was 57.7, and for optimumallocation with o = . 20 was 78. 3. The estimate of 91 was obtainedby computing 67 x 78.3/57.7.
Attachment ,.14-
Table 1. Preliminary size distribution of public schools based on enrollmentin grades 4, 5, and 6.
School SchoolsAverage
1 + Vh 2
wheresize class(combined Total enrollment Average V
h2 -
enrollmentin grades
Percentof
enrollmentin grades
per school,grades
enrollmentper grade relvariance
of4, 5 and 6) Number total 4, 5 and 6 4, 5 and 6 (rough) enrollmentNh Eh Eh Rh
Less than 11, 537 18 247 21 7 1.3650
50-99 10, 584 16 798 75 25 1.03100-199 18, 667 29 2, 782 149 50 1.03200-499 22,347 35. 6, 505 291 97 1.06500-999 1, 293 2 775 617 206 1. 10
1 , 000 + 29 .04 41
Totals 64, 457 100 11,1471
* These results were obtained by using 1968-69 schoo' tapes, for schoolscontaining grades 4, 5 or 6, and imputing grade enrollments by assumingthat the enrollment in grades 4, 5, and 6 contained in a school is g e,
twhereg is the number of grades 4, 5, and 6 in the school,t is the number of grades 1-12 in the school, ande is the enrollment in these grades.
The Rh was approximated simply as Eh / 3.
-15-Attachment
Table 2. Comparison of allocations of the sample, variances and costs
Schoolsize
class
Numberof
schoolsNh
Number of schools in sample, nh,for alternative allocations
Optimum allocation
Less than 5050-99
100-199
200-499
500 +
Totals
11, 537
10, 584
18, 667
22, 347
1, 322
64,457
Variance (x k)of estimated
normfor sample
of 1, 200**schools
Variable cost($1, 000)
1
Average numberof pupils insample per
grade per vhoolin sample
.I.
p = .20
49
114
348
630
60
1, 200
.731
398
Proportionateo = .15 allocation
55
119
345
622
60
1, 200
. 564
395
215
197
348
416
25
1, 200,--__.-- -'.0. . 20 p = .13
.930 . 715 .
%
i
325
* Only the ratios of these numbers were obtained from this study. They areadjusted to an assumed aveiag-e of 67 for all schools.
** The values in the table are computed as\
1N
h2 Nh - nh S,
n1..- .
N2 Nh nhTherefore, since Sph = PQS.
n2' the variance, a 2, for a particular
percentile TP , can be obtained approximately by P multiplying the tabled value by
PQ
X
SUPPLEMENT C
SUPPLEMENTARY SAMPLE OF SCHOOLS
The supplementary sample of schools is intended to provide a knownchance for schools not on the master sampling file (see Supplement A) to be
drawn-into the sample. In order to meet the survey deadlines, it was necessary
to use the same sample of districts that had been used to supplement theRestandardization sample in the Anchor Test Study, another project concurrentlyunderway by Educational Testing Service.
The following text describes that initial sample supplementation forthe Anchor Test Study and then describes the way in which the supplementationsample for the Compensatory Reading project was drawn from it.
C. 1 Summary of the Sample-Supplementation Procedure
After the primary Restandardization and Equating samples wereselected for the Anchor Test Study, a procedure was carried out to supple-ment the primary Restandardization sample with a sample of the relativelysmall number of public schools omitted from the sampling frame for onereason or another.
The supplementary Restandardization sample was selected in two
stages. A sample of 178 school districts was selected as the first-stagesample. Each district selected was asked by telephone to check the listextracted from the School Universe Tape of all schools in the districtcontaining grades 4, 5, and 6,44 and identify any eligible schools omitted
The Compensatory Reading Study covered schools with grades 2, 4, and 6,so the match is inexact.
C1
from this list. The second stage of selection consisted of subsarnpling thelists of missed (i.e., omitted) schools. This supplementary procedure.provided a sample of 20 missed schools for the Restandardization study.
C. 2 The Selection of a Sample of 178 Public School Districts forSample Supplementation for the Restandardization Study
For the selection of the supplementary sample of missed schools,the Office of Education specified that a sample of between 150 and 200 public-school district be surveyed for missed schools. It was decided to select this
sample from the set of the 703 districts represented in the primary Restan-dardization sample. In terms of sampling error, perhaps a somewhat moreefficient district sample could have been obtained by selecting the sampleof districts from all districts in the frame rather than from only thoserepresented in the primary sample. However, there was not enough timeavailable to contact districts for the first time to seek their participation inthe study. The use of a sample of districts already contacted was moreexpedient, and district cooperation for this supplementary procedure wasprobably better than it would have been otherwise. The steps that were usedto select this sample of districts are described below.
First, after the selection of the Restandardization sample, a listwas made of the 703 public school districts that contained at least one schoolselected for the primary Restandardization sample. Then, for each of thesedistricts, the probability that at least one of its schools would be selectedinto the sample was estimated. This probability, which is denoted by Pd, isreferred to as the initial district-selection probability. It was computed as
one minus the probability that the district would not be represented in thesample.
C-2
Before selection of the sample, the districts were grouped intostrata, based on geographic region and size as indicated by the initialdistrict-selection probability, Pd. Then, two districts (or more in fourstrata)* were selected at random from each of the strata. Since only those
districts represented in the primary sample had a chance to be selected forsample supplementation, missed schools in new districts not represented inthe school universe file had no chance of selection in the supplementarysample.
The districts were stratified by geographic region and the Pd valuesin conjunction with the sampling fractions given below in Table C. 1. (The
derivation or these sampling fractions is discussed later in this subsection.)This was done by first ordering the districts in each of the four regions bythe Pd values. Then, strata were defined by grouping the appropriatenumber of districts together within each region, districts with values of Pdbetween .9 and 1 were grouped into strata containing six districts so that,with two districts selected per stratum, the sampling rate would be one inthree. Of course, the number of districts in this P
d-interval was not always
six or a multiple of six in each region. Therefore, some of the districts inthis interval had to be grouped together with districts in the Pd-interval of.8 to .899. In general, districts in adjacent Pd-intervals were sometimesincluded in the same stratum. However, only in a few instances were stratadefined that contained districts from more than one region. This was doneonly to avoid grouping districts with Pd values of 1 with other districts, andto avoid placing districts that had substantially different sizes in the samestratum.
*The reason there were more than two districts selected from four stratawas that the smallest districts had to be subsampled at a 100 percent rate,as indicated later in this subsection.
C -3
Table C-1. District subsampling fractions and selection probabilities
initial
DistrictSelection
Probability
(Pd)
____
CorrespondingEstimatedAverage
District
Enrollment(thousands)
1
SubsamplingFraction
(f 2h)
District-Selection
Probabilitiesfor
Supplementation
(Pd'
)
1 50 1/2 .5
.9 - .999 35 1/3 .300 - .333
.8 - .899 25 1/4 .200 - .225
.7 - .799 18 1/6 .117 - .133
.6 .699 13 1/7 .0833 - .1000
.5 - .599 9.5 1/7 .0714 - .0833
.4 .499 7 1/7 .0571 - .0714
.3 - .399 5 1/7 .0429 - .0571
.25 - .299 3.9 1/6 .0417 - .0500
.20 - .249 3.2 1/6 .0333 - .0417
.15 - .199 2.5 1/6 .0250 - .0333
.10 - .149 1.6 1/6 .0167 - .0250
.075 - .0999 1.2 1/5 .0150 - .0200
.05 - .0749 .9 1/4 .0125 - .0188
.04 - .0499 .7 1/4 .0100 - .0125
.03 - .0399 .6 1/3 .0100 - .0133
.02 - .0299 .5 1/3 .0067 - .0100
.01 - .0199 .4 1/2 .0050 - .0100
Less than .01 .2 1 Less than .01
C - 4
The above process led to the definition of 82 strata of districts.As indicated previously, two districts were chosen at random from each ofthese 82 strata, except in four of the strata that had subsampling ratesof 1. As a result, 178 districts were selected from the 82 strata, 22coming from the four strata that had the 100-percent subsampling rate.
The district subsampling rates given in Table C. 1, which playedan important role in the definition of district strata described above, werebased on two considerations. One was the specification that between 150and 200 districts be selected. The other was an attempt to use approxi-mately an optimum allocation of the district sample to the 19 size-classintervals listed in Table C. 1. That is, since in many cases the standarddeviation on survey items among sampling units is roughly proportionalto the size of the sampling units, it was decided to select districts withoverall probabilities of selection for supplementation approximately propor-tional to their total enrollments in grades 4, 5, and 6. Also, since experiencefrom other studies indicates that standard deviations would tend to begreater than proportional to size for the smaller districts, and to someextent for the larger districts. the subsampling rates were set to produceoverall district-selection probabilities somewhat higher than proportionalto size for the larger and smaller districts.
The procedure used to determine the district subsampling ratesto conform to the considerations mentioned above was rather complex andincluded some personal judgment. First, the overall. probability thatschool district d would be selected for the supplementation procedure, Pd, isequal to the product of the initial district-selection probability for the pri-mary Restandardization sample, Pd, and the subsampling rate for the Pdinterval containing district d, f2h. That is,
Pd P f .d d 2h
C-5
(1)
Since the Pd values were known approximately, the P' values were determinedbythe choices of the interval subsampling rates, 12h values. In order tochoose the f2h values to make the P values approximately proportional todistrict enrollments, the relationship between district enrollments and thePd values was estimated. This was done by plotting a large number ofpoints relating district enrollment to Pd for a sample of districts repre-sented in the primary sample. The approximate relationship observed ledto the correspondence between Pd-intervals and district enrollments givenabove in Table C.1. For example, the average district enrollment ingrades 4, 5, and 6 of districts with initial selection probabilities between. 8 and . 9 was estimated to be 25, 000.
Once this approximate relationship between the Pa-intervals anddistrict enrollments was established, the f2h values given in Table C.1were determined (on a somewhat trial-and-error basis), which provided asample of 178 districts and produced overall district-selection probabilitiesapproximately proportional to district enrollment. Also, as indicated earlier,the subsampling rates for smaller and larger districts were set to provideoverall district probabilities somewhat higher than proportional to their en-rollments.
C. 3 The Selection of the Sample of Missed Schools from the DistrictsSelected for Supplementation of the Restandardization Sample
Each of the 178 school districts selected for the sample supple-ment was surveyed to determine if it contained any eligible schools omitted
from the School Universe Tape. To do this. lists were prepared of allschools contained in each of the 178 selected districts as indicated on theSchool Universe Tape. Each district was contacted by telephone and re-quested to verify the list of schools for that district. Except for very large
C -6
districts, an attempt was made to obtain the names, addresses, and enroll-ments in grades 4, 5, and 6 of missed schools over the telephone. Thevery large districts were asked to send a list of missed schools by mail.Even those districts that refused to allow their schools to participate inthe study were encouraged to help survey their districts for missed schools.As a result of their effort, all districts selected for sample supplementa-tion did participate in the district surveying process. This procedureyielded a total of 138 missed schools identified by the districts.
An attempt was made to give each missed school listed an overallselection probability approximately equal to what it would have been ifthe school had been included in the original sampling frame. This wasdone as follows. First, the measure of size, Ai, for each missed schoolwas determined from the enrollment in the same way that it was done for
*4:the other schools. (The school enrollments were often not provided andthe measures of size had to be approximated, based on the recorded en-rollments of the other schools in the same district. ) In order to provide aneasy way to produce the appropriate overall school-selection probabilities,an adjusted measure of size, Ai, was then computed from the originalmeasure of size, A., as follows:
I
A!1
= Ai /P'd (2)
Due to some reorganization of school districts, some consolidation of schools,and other factors, it was sometimes difficult to determine whether a parti-cular school was actually a missed school. For example, a missed schoolfor a particular district may have been included on the School Universe Tapeas belonging to another school district. Since it was not feasible to searchthe entire tape for a particular school, some judgments had to be made inidentifying missed schools.This procedure approximately matches the procedure used in the CompensatoryReading Study.
C-7
All missed schools with adjusted measures of size greater than1100 were included in the supplementary sample with certainty. All other
missed schools were listed district by district. Next, cumulative adjustedmeasures of size, cum (A!), were computed for each school on this list.
tA systematic sample of these missed schools was then selected by firstpicking the initial selection number as a random number, R, between 1 and1100. The selection numbers for the sample supplement were then computedas follows:
R, R + 1100, R + 2200, R + 3300,
These selection numbers identified the schools selected for the samplesupplement in the same way that the primary sample was selected. That
is, the school determined by a particular selection number was the firstmissed schoot on the list that had a cumulative adjusted measure of size,cum (A!1 ), equal. to or greater than the selection number. This procedure ledto the selection of 20 schools for the supplementary sample for the Re-standardization Study, including six sub-sampled with certainty.
The selection probability, Pi, ror a missed school contained indistrict d, except for missed schools selected with certainty, is given ap-proximately by the following equation:
P! = P(district d is selected)1 (3)
x P(school i is selected given that district d is selected)! (A) A.1 Pi 1 d tpi
A
d1100 d 1100 1100
Since the selection intervals used in the selection of the primary Restandardi-zation sample averaged about 1100 or so, the selection probability for amissed school given above was approximately equal to what it would havebeen if the school had not been omitted from the School Universe Tape.
C-8
Schools subsampled with certainty have selection probabilitiesequal to the district-selection probability. That is, for a missed schoolcontained in district d and selected from the lists of missed schools withcertainty, its selection probability is simply given as follows:
PT = pii. d
(4)
C. 4 Selection of the Supplementary Sample of Schools for the Compen-satory Reading Study
It was impossible to classify missed schools as having or nothaving Tile I programs. It was therefore decided to use a skip intervalwhich was a weighted average of the two used for the primary sample inState I. The data upon which the weighted average was based are:
Average SizeTotal Measure Measure
Title I 516, 850 2, 393
Non Title I 414, 704 2, 880
Weighted Average = 2520
The weighted average was rounded to 2500 and a skip intervalof 1250 was used.
Since the anchor sample supplement had been selected first, itwas necessary to adjust the selection procedures so that the selection pro-babilities would equal A.11250. The following adjusted measure of size was
I.
used:Ali' = [11001(1100-Apj (Ai/P4). (4)
where A! is the adjusted measure of size used for the Anchor supplementa-t
Ron and 1100 is the selection interval used in the selection of the supple-mentary sample for the Restandardization Study.
C-9
SYSTEM CHART
(Westat'scounty
data fil(randomaccess)
SUPPLEMENT D
1969-70school
universefile
1970-71school
universefile
PUB-69 'UB -70
1. Match2. Merge3. Reformat
Officefor CivilRights
surveyextract
Summaryby
states
OCR -SPublicschoolswith
grades2, 4, 6
sp -246
Publicschoolswith nogrades
-Other
Obtain;1. Average AGI (Zi)2. Median income
(Xi)3. Percent minority4. Total tax returns
Assign measure ofsize (Ai) and reformat
Programreference
filePRG-REF U-246A
Obtain;1. Degree of
urbanization2. Title I
information
(IRS zip codedata file(randomaccess)
SU-246W
Tabulation
SU-246B
Schools withand withoutTitle I progseparately
...--*-------'
D-1.
i. Define maj andSU-24GBmin strata
withSort by
2. Assign random 1. Final stratummaj, minnumber numberand final3. Sort 2. Pandora nu4oper--t. Define final stratanumbersstrata MSU-U
1
MSU-Usorted
SU-SA
Selectprimary andsubstitutesamples
MSU-SAwith file
typecode
MSU-SB
Sort by1. Major stratum2. State code3. District code4. Grade combo5. Grade 2, 4, 6
enroll
MSU-SBsorted
Selectadditionalsample fromsame schooldistrict
Substitutesample
Additionalsubstitute
sample
SUB -Si SUB -S2
Merge and sort by1. State code2. School district3. School code4. File type
Mastersamplefile
MSMP
CreateMSMP work file
anddistrict file
MSMPwithshorterrecordlength
MSMPworkfile
MSMPdistrictfile
MSMP-R MSMP- DIST -MSMP
PRM-S
Reportgenerator 1
Reportgenerator
Reportgenerator
Reportgenerator 4
Numericindex ofstates
Master Numericcross index ofreference schools
Numericindex ofdistricts
Alphalisting ofdistricts
0-2
Sort by1. State code2. District code3. School code
RM -SS
Createdistrict
file
Sort by1. State code2. District code
IST-PRM
Select schoolsin MSU-SE
with matchingdistrict codefrom D1ST-PRE
Schoolsin districts
whereprimary
sample wasdown
Sort by1. Final stratum2. State code3. District
codes......M5-DST
--1Generate distrecords fromeach finalstratum
DSF
Select schoolsin subsampledschools and
list
I
=12onschool
districts
D-1
MSU-SE
Sort by1. State code2. School code
DIST -hd
Compute P'dsort and
list
1
I
Listing ofdistricts with
t., Pic____>
Subsampleschool
districts
1
iSubsampledschool
districts
3C
APPENDIX B
Appendix B
Consultants to ETS in the questionnaire development process included:
Dr. Thomas EdwardsState University of New York at Buffalo
Dr. Roger FarrIndiana University
Dr. Jane RootSyracuse University
Dr. S. Jay SamuelsUniversity of Minnesota
Dr. Jaap TuinmanIndiana University
APPENDIX C
TELEPHONE INTERVIEW
FORM
1. Did your school conduct at least one compensatory reading programduring the 1971-1972 school year? (By compensatory reading instruc-tion is meant any reading instruction provided to students becausethey are reading below their grade level.)
1. ri Yes
2. No
(If no, skip to item 3)
2. Was one or more of your 1971-1972 compensatory reading programsfederally funded either totally or in part under Title 1 of theElementary and Secondary Education Act?
Yes
No
3. What was your school enrollment during the 1971-1972 school year?
El Less than 100
0 100-299
300-499
LI 500-699
El 700-899
900 or more
4. Please estimate the percentage of school families in each of thefollowing occupational categories for the 1971 -1972 school year.
0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%
(a) Professionals (Doctors 11:3Lawyers, etc.)
(b) Business ownersor managers 0
(c) White collar workers(clerks, salespeople,etc.) E
(d) Skilled workers; farmowners Fl E
(e) Unskilled, farm, orservice workers
(f) Unemployed 0
5. Please estimate the percentage of students in your school duringthe 1971-1972 school year at each of the following grade levels
who are reading one or more years below grade level according tocurrent test data. The estimate should be based upon the conceptof national norms for the grade for which you are reporting.
(a) Grade 2
O None
O 1-10%
O 11-25%
O 26-50%
El 51-75%
O 76-90%
O 91-100%
(b) Grade 4
O None
,_..j 1-10%
1 11-25%
17 26-50%
51-75%
i 1 76-90%
"j 91-100%
(c) Grade 6
;_i None
; ; 1-10%
i_ 11-25%.
"j 26-50
0 51 -75%
O 76-90%
£ 91-100%
6. Please estimate, for the 1971-1972 school year, the percentageof pupils whose head of household attained the following levelsof education.
0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%
(a) Attended college 0 CD 0 '0CO Graduated from high
school but did notattend college 0 0 0
(c) Attended but did notgraduate from highschool Li 0 0 0
(d) Finished 8th grade butdid not attend highschool 0 M 0
(e) Did not finish 8th grade 0 0 0 07. Please estimate, for the 1971-1972 school year, the percentage of
pupils whose families receive public assistance.
1. 0 0-10% 3. L_J 26-50% 5. 0 76-90%
2. El 11 -25% 4. 0 51-75% 6. p 91-100%
8. Please estimate, for the 1971-1972 school year, the percentage ofstudents of the following racial or national origins.
(a) Caucasian or White
(b) Negro or Black
(c) Spanish surnamed
(d) Oriental
(e) American Indian
(f) Other (Specify )
0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%
0
DI
O 0 00 0 0O 0 LiO 0 0O 0 0O E 0
9. Please estimate, for the 1971-1972 school year, the percentageof school families that have each of the following annual incomes.
(a) $12,000 and over
(b) Between $9,000 and$11,999
(c) Between $6,000 and$8,999
(d) Between $3,000 and$5,999
(e) Under $3,000
0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%
0 0 0
O
El
10. What was the number of classrooms in your school during the 1971-1972school year (Do not include offices, auditorium, or gymnasium)?
School Name
FOR ETSUSE ONLY
SURVEY OF COMPENSATORY READING PROGRAMS
SCHOOL PRINCIPAL QUESTIONNAIRE
School District
Principal's Name
DIRECTIONS: This questionnaire is in two parts. The first part is intended toelicit information about your school and the students in it. PLEASE FEEL FREE TOCONSULT OTHERS IN YOUR SCHOOL OR SCHOOL DISTRICT IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THE INFORMATIONREQUESTED. The second part of the questionnaire has to do with compensatory readingprograms. By compensatory reading instruction is meant any reading instructionprovided to students because they are reading below their grade level,
PART I
PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR SCHOOL. Answer all questionswith reference to the current school year unless otherwise indicated.
1. School enrollment this year (number of pupils).
0 Less than 100
0 100-299
300-499
J 500-699
0 700-899
E] 900 or more
2. Number of classrooms. (Do not include offices, auditorium, or gymnasium.)
OMB No. 51-572020Expires 9/72
(1-5)
(6)
(7-9)
Page 2
3. If you have a combination of graded and ungraded classes, indicate below theinstructional organization for each grade or, if ungraded, the equivalent gradesin your school. (Check only one box in each lettered row.)
Instructional Organization
Grade or Equivalent
Check each grade NOTincluded in your school Graded Ungraded Graded & Ungraded
(a) Kindergarten 0(b) Grade 1
(c) Grade 2 0(d) Grade 3 El(e) Grade 4 El 0(f) Grade 5
(g) Grade 6 El(h) Grade 7 0(1) Grade 8
(10-18)
4. Number of classes at each grade level: (19-28)
K 3
1
2
4 7
5 8
Special orungraded
5. Percent of total student body that moved from school attendance area last year. (29)
76-90%
91-100%
6. Percent of total student body that moved into school attendance area last year. (30)
76-90%
91-100%
1E1 0-109 3 26-50% 520 11-25% 4 51-75% 60
10 0-10% 30 26-50% 5020 11-25% 4 51-75% 60
Page 3
7. Estimated percentage (this year) of pupils from families of migrant workers. (31)
1 0-10% 26-50% 76-90%30 5020 11-25% 51-75% 60 91-100%40
7a. Do you feel this is an accurate estimate? (32)
1 Yes
20 No
8. Estimated percentage of pupil..4 whose families receive public assistance. (33)
10 0-10%
20 11-252
3 26-50%
4 0 51-75%
5[:] 76-90%
60 91-1002
8a. Do you feel this is an accurate estimate?
10 Yes
20 No
9. Estimated percentage of pupils whose head of household attained the followinglevels of education. (Check only one box in each lettered row.)
0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%
(a) Attended nollege
(b) Graduated from high school but didnot attend college
(c) Attended but did not graduate fromhigh school
(d) Finished 8th grade but did notattend high school
(e) Did not finish 8th grade
9a. Do you feel these are accurate estimates?
10 Yes
20 No
(34)
(35-39)
(40)
Page 4
10. Estimated percentage of school families that have each of the following annualincomes. (Check only one box in each lettered row.)
0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%
(a) $12,000 and over
(b) Between $9,000 and 41,999
(c) Between $6,000 and $8,999
(d) Between $3,000 and $5,999
(e) Under $3,000
10a. Do you feel these are accurate estimates?
1 Yes
2 0 No
0 0 01=1
0D OD
11. Estimated percentage of school families in each of the following occupationalcategories. (Check only one box in each lettered row.)
(a) Professionals (Doctors,lawyers, etc.)
(b) Business owners or managers
(c) White collar workers (clerks,salespeople, etc.)
(d) Skilled workers; farm owners
(e) Unskilled, farm, or serviceworkers
(E) Unemployed
lla. Do you feel these are accurate estimates?
1 Yes
2 No
0-10% 11-50% 51 -90% 91-1007
O 0 D
0O 0 0
O ED 0
O D D
(41-45)
(46)
(47-52)
(53)
Page 5
12. Estimated percentage of students of the following racial or national origins.(Check only one box in each lettered row.)
0-107 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%
(a) Caucasian or White 0(b) Negro or Black 7 0(c) Spanish surnamed
1__] El C.] CD
(d) Oriental F-1
(e) American Indian 0 0(f) Other (Specify ) 1-__]
(54-59)
12a. Do you feel these are accurate estimates? (60)
1 ED Yes
2 No
13. Are children bussed to your school from other neighborhoods not in your school's (61)regular attendance area?
1 Yes
2 El No
14. If children are bussed in, about what percentage of the total student body isbussed in ?
1 0-10%
2 11-25%
26-50%
AO More than half
15. Are children bussed from your school's attendance area to schools in otherneighborhoods?
1 E Yes
2 No
(62)
(63)
Page 6
16. Using your best professional judgment, rate each of the followingcharacteristics for your school.
Highly Highly
Adequate Adenuate Inadequate Inadequate
Size of physical plant for pupil f-1 0 0 (64)
Condition of physical plant 0Suitability of physical plant for
flprogram overation
Number of instructional personnel 0Number of other professional personnel C.-..]
Number of teacher aides 0Number of other non-professionals F-1
r--tL_J
Quantity of books, periodicals, and 0 (71)other printed materials
Suitability (quality) of books,periodicals, and other printed 0materials for instruction
Quantity of audio-visual materials LI El
Suitability (quality) of audio-..1 El
visual materials for instruction
Quantity of instructional equipment LI- 0 0 El
Suitability (quality) of instructional 0 E] (76)equipment for instruction
Page 7
17. Estimate the percentage of students in your school at each of the following (77-79)grade levels who are reading one or more years below grade level accordingto current test data, The estimate should be based upon the concept of nationalnorms for the grade for which you are reporting.
(a) Grade 2
n None
n 1 -10%
I} 11-25%
7 26-50%
Ei 51-75%
77 76-90%-7 91-100%
(b) Grade 4
7 None
I_' 1-10%
E 11-25%
7 26-50%iE. 51-75%
E 76-90%
E 91-100%
(c) Grade 6
n None
7 1-107
7 11-25%
7 26-50%
51-75%
E 76-90%
9]-100:''.
Page 8
18. Are there students in your school who in your judgment are in need ofremedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction?
1 u Yes
2 0 No
If no, go on to question 19.
a. If Yes, how many students?
b. If Yes, how many students are there in need of remedial readinginstruction in each of the following grades?
1 4 7
2 5 8
3 6 Ungraded
PART II
(80)
(81-83)
(84-101)
DIRECTIONS: This part of the questionnaire is intended to elicit information aboutthe compensatory reading program(s) in your school. By compensatory reading instructionis meant any reading instruction provided to students because they are reading belowtheir grade level.
If you have more than one compensatory reading program in operation in your school duringthis academic year, space is provided in some instances for you to answer questions abouteach program individually. Some guidelines for determining what constitutes "a program"for purposes of this survey are presented below.
1. If instructional groups (for example, grades) are exposed to essentially the samekinds of materials, personnel, and services, the total over all grades should beconsidered a program.
2. If a separate classroom or space is set aside for reading instruction, staffed byspecial personnel and supplied with special equipment or materials, such an entityshould be considered a program.
3. If teachers receive special training for compensatory reading instruction duringsummers or relaxed time, and that training is funded by supplementary sources, suchtraining, in and of itself, should be considered a program.
Page
19. Does your school conduct at least one compensatory reading program as defined?
1 Yes If so, please go on to question 21 and complete the remainderof this questionnaire. At the same time, please distributequestionnaires in the manner prescribed below.
2 0 No If not, DO NOT COMPLETE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE. HOWEVER, PLEASEARRANGE FOR TEACHER QUESTIONNAIRES TO BE COMPLETED BY ONETEACHER OF EACH OF GRADES 2, 4, AND 6 (3 teachers in all) HAVINGTHE CLASS WITH THE LOWEST AVERAGE READING ACHIEVEMENT. These
teachers should receive Teacher Characteristics Questionnaires(tan) and Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaires(yellow).
DISTRIBUTION OF QUESTIONNAIRES IN SCHOOLS HAVING ONE OR MORE COMPENSATORY READINGPROGRAMS AS DEFINED:
1, Questionnaires should be distributed to all teachers of compensatory reading ingrades 2, 4, and 6, AND to the ONE teacher in EACH of grades 2, 4, and 6 havingthe class with the lowest average reading achievement. All teachers to whomquestionnaires are to be distributed should receive at least two questionnaires,one Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire (tan) and one Class and ProgramCharacteristics Questionnaire (blue or yellow).
2. Teachers of compensatory reading should be given blue Class and Program Character-istics Questionnaires: the teachers of grades 2, 4, and 6 whose classes have thelowest average reading achievement should be given yellow Class and ProgramCharacteristics Questionnaires.
(102)
3. If teachers are involved in more than one Compensatory Reading Program (seedefinitions above), they should be given separate blue Class and Program Character-istics Questionnaires For each program in which they teach 2nd, 4th, and 6th graders.
4. If compensatory reading teachers teach pupils at more than one grade level, theyshould be given separate blue Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaires foreach grade level (2, 4, and/or 6) at which they teach.
5. Teachers of multi-age or ungraded classes should be instructed to respond to theirquestionnaires with reference only to the pupils at grade levels appropriate to thestudy (2, 6, and 6), using years in school as the indicator. Thus, a teacher of aclass containing 3rd, 4th, and 5th graders should answer with respect to her 4thyear students only.
6. It is possible that, following directions 1 through 6 above, you will discover thatyou need additional questionnaires. If that is the case, please return the enclosedcard to Educational Testing Service, indicating the number of additional question-naires you will need.
7. Teachers who work as a team in instructing any of the appropriate groups of studentsshould be given one Class and Program Characteristics Ouestionnaire per group ofstudents and instructed to complete the Ouestionnaire together. The teachers shouldbe given separate Teacher Characteristics Questionnaires, however; one per teacher.
Page 10
20. How many separate and distinct compensatory reading programs are currentlyoperating in your school? (Include teacher training programs conducted duringthe summer preceding the current school year.)
One
Two
1:1 Three
Four
More than four
(103)
20a. If there is more than one compensatory reading program in your school, please listeach program below. Use a brief, descriptive title to identify each program, oneon each line. Thereafter, when asked to answer questions separately for eachprogram, report on the separate programs in the order you list them here.
Program 1
Program 2
Program 3
Program 4
21. Are any of the compensatory reading programs in your school funded totally orin part by funds (federal, state, local, or other) supplementary to the regularongoing school budget?
Yes
0 No) If No or Don't know, skip to question 22.
Don't know
(104)
21a. When was the first compensatory reading program funded by supplementary sources (105)made available in your school?
F-1 One year ago
More than 1 but less than 2 school years ago
More than 2 but less than 3 school years ago
Three or more school years ago
Don't know
Page 11
22. How long has (have) the present compensatory reading program(s) been available (106-109)in your school? (Answer separately for each program.)
Program Program Program Program2 3 4
One school year or less
More than 1 but less than 2 school years7-
More than 2 but less than 3 school years
Three or more school years
23. What was your school per pupil expenditure last year?
O Check here if you don't know
24. What was your district per pupil expenditure last year?
Check here if you don't know
25. What are the total funds allocated for compensatory reading in your school? (120-125)
O Check here if you don't know
26. What are the costs per pupil of compensatory reading in your school?
(126)
(127-130)
0 Check here if you don't know (131)
27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, pleaseprovide the following breakdown(s) of costs by program and by component parts.
Program Program Program Program1 2 3 4
Total cost of program
Cost of personnel:ProfessionalOther
Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check)
(132-155)
(156-179)
(180-203)
(204-207)
Page 12
28. How many pupils participate in (each ofyour school? (If there is more than oneindividual children participate in more
Program 1
Program 2
Program 3
Program 4
Number of
the) compensatory reading program(s) inprogram answer separately for each. Ifthan one program,count them in each total.)
Pupils
29. Approximately what percent of the pupilsparticipate in the compensatory readingeach program.) If classes are ungraded,school instead of grade level and check
Grade
PROGRAM I00 0
in Lel 4-1cI I I
I vo 4-I0 ,I C.1 Iri
K DD001 00002 E'0003 '00004 0 OD El5 0 E_I-
6 07 Darn8 EEI00
PROGRAM 2
trlCs1
i0 r-1
at each grade level in your schoolprogram(s)? (Answer separately foranswer using number of years in
this box O.
EO 000OO 000O 0000000O 000O 000D ODO
PROGRAM 30c, o
in *n ,-.1cv I I
I k0 s-I0 4-1 C1 In
O 0000O 000O 000O 000O 000O 000O 000E 000
PROGRAM 400 0
LA lel 1-1Cs1 1 II k.0 f-I0 t-1 c",1 in
00000O 000O 00010000O 000O 000O 0000
30. About what percentage of the students participating in each of the compensatoryreading programs in your school are from culturally, linguistically, and/oreconomically deprived backgrounds? (Mark one box in each lettered row.)
(a) Program 1
(b) Program 2
(c) Program 3
(d) Program 4
51-90% 91-100% Don't know
0 0
OO 0 0
(208-223)
(224)
(225)
(229)
(233)
(237)
(241)
(245)
(249)
(253)
(257)
(261-264)
Page 13
31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the compensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box .
Number of class sections
Number of students
Total for School Total for Grades
2 4 6
(265)
(266)
(274)
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
FEDERAL
ESEA Title I
Other(specifv)
PROGRAM I PROGRAM 2.-1 1m o
--1 ri 1-1 viO u W 0 4.3 W4..) W C .6.4 W CO 0 0 0 0 0E4 114 % EW 114 %
O 0 0O0 D
STATE (specify)
E1J
0D Li D
LOCAL (specify)
D
OTHER
D 00 0D 0 0
D 0O 0CD
00 0
0 D
DE 1-1D
PROGRAM 3
-4 4-11-1
C0 0
E-1 a Z
O DO ElEJ 0 0ID 0
0O 0 0O 0
0D-
E 0 0
O 0CLJ
O 0 D
PROGRAM 4r1
r-ICO 4A
4 00.>.1-s 1
0 03 0F4 124 Z
O 0 0El
0 0 0O 0
O 00O 0 0
O 0 0O 0 0
DCheck hero if you cannot provide information requested in question 32.
(287)
(303)
(315)
(327)
(339)
Page 14
33. Was any teacher resistance encountered in the implementation of the compensatory(340)
reading program(s) in your school?
None at all
0 Some
0 A great deal
34. Was any community resistance encountered in the implementation of thecompensatory reading program(s) in your school?
E3 None at all
0 Some
El A great deal
(341)
35. What is the basis for determining pupil participation in the compensatory (342-348)reading program? (Mark all that apply.)
All students in the school participate
Membership in one or more specific target groups (i.e., economicallydisadvantaged, migrants, non-English-speaking)
0 Depressed reading levels (as indicated by test results)
Teacher (or other staff) recommendation
Parent request
Volunteer
El Other (specify)
36. Since June 1971, how many and what types of personnel in your school haveparticipated in inservice training activities to prepare them for teachingin a compensatory reading program for elementary students?
Number ofindividuals
Regular classroom teachers
School-located reading specialists
School district reading specialists
School personnel other than above (specify)
(349)
Page 15
37. Does the compensatory reading program use parents or other volunteers (paid (357)or unpaid) to help in the classroom?
1 Yes 2 No
38. Does the compensatory reading program use pupils as tutors? (358)
lED Yes 20 No
39. Do you expect to have a compensatory reading program in the SUMMER of1973 (the summer after next)?
1 Yes 20 No Don't know
(359)
40. If you do expect to have a summer program, for which of the following grades (360-369)
will the program be conducted? (Circle all that apply.)
K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ungraded
Oa. On what basis do you expect to select students for the summer program? (370-377)(Check all that apply.)
O Previous participation in a compensatory reading program
O Previous non-participation in a compensatory reading program
O Depressed reading level
Membership in one or another specific target groups (economically deprived, etc.)
Teacher or other staff recommendation
LI Parent request
O Volunteer
O Other (specify)
PLEASE CHECK TO MAKE SURE ALL QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED. THEN, RETURN
YOUR QUESTIONNAIRE TO ETS IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED.
1. What is your sex?
BEST COPY AIA11111E
SURVEY OF COMPENSATORY READING PROGRAMS
TEACHER CHARACTERISTICS QUESTIONNAIRE
Male Female
FOR ETS. , ii "USE ONLY
1-771-7-i1-5)
2. How many years of teaching experience (public and nonpublic), including thisschool year, have you had?
0 One year or less
More than 1 year but less than 3 years
At least 3 years but less than 6 years
At least 6 years but less than 10 years
At least 10 years but less than 20 years
Twenty years or more
3. How many years, including this school year, have you taught in this school?
One year or less
0 More than 1 year but 1.,:ss than 3 years
At least 3 years i..ut less than 6 years
At least 6 years but less than 10 years
At least 10 years but less than 20 years
0 Twenty years or more
(8)
4. What type of teaching certification do you have? (9)
0 No certificate
Temporary, provisional, or emergency certification
Regular certification
5. What is the highest earned college degree you hold? (Do not report honorary degrees.)
(10)
No degree
A degree or diploma based on less than 4 years of work
A bachelor's degree
A master's degree
A doctor's degree (EdD, PhD, etc.)
OMB No. 51-S72020Expires 9/72
6. Have you had any special training in the diagnosis and treatment ofreading problems?
Yes No
a. If Yes, at what academic level was the training?
1::] Undergraduate
Graduate
Inservice
U On the job
Other (specify)
(12)
7. Are most of your students of the same racial or national origin as you? (13)
Yes No
8. Were you assigned to or did you choose the school in which you are teaching? (14)
Was assigned to school Chose school
9. Were you assigned to or did you choose to teach the class you are teaching (15)
this year?
0 Was assigned to class Chose class
The questions that follow are all designed to elicit your opinions about your school,the pupils you teach, and any compensatory reading program you might be involved in.Please answer the questions as candidly as you are able. There are no "right" answersto these questions; we are interested in obtaining some information about how teachersfeel about compensatory reading programs and about the pupils in them.
10. Compared with other elementary schools in your district or community, how (16-21)
satisfied are you with respect to the following things about your school?
Highly Moderately Moderately HighlySatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied
Physical facilities(buildings, etc.)
Faculty (teachers)
Ability of student body
Attitudes of student body
Administration
Overall philosophy ofeducation
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
00
U
11. How responsive is the administration of your school to any requests you (22)
might make for additional teaching materials or equipment?
Highly responsive
Moderately responsive
Not at all responsive
12. For remedial or other help for one of your students? (23)
Highly responsive
Moderately responsive
Not at all responsive
13. For changes in your curriculum? (24)
Highly responsive
Moderately responsive
Not at all responsive
14. Do you believe there is a sound basis in educational policy for givingcompensatory programs to disadvantaged students at extra per pupil cost?
Definitely yes
Probably yes
I am undecided
Probably no
Definitely no
(25)
15. Do you believe that compensatory programs are generally worthwhile? (26)
E:3 Definitely yes
ED Probably yes
I am undecided
0 Probably no
Definitely no
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
16. The following statements are =all related to the academic capabilities ofdisadvantaged pupils. For each'statemerit, indicate the degree to whichyou agree or disagree with tli idea expressed.
a. With proper instruction they can learn about aswell as any other pupils.
b. No matter how good the instruction these pupilsreceive they will always score lower thanmiddle class children.
c. These children do not want to learn.
d. The pupils want to learnthe right background for
e. It has been sufficientlywill never do as well as
f . ,
g.
h.
but they do not haveschool work.
proven that such pupilsother students.
Materials are more important than methods inthe teaching of reading.
Methods are more important than materials in theteaching of reading.
The teacher's ability is more important thaneither method or materials in the teachingof reading.
i. Disadvantaged children have more trouble learningto read than advantaged children.
j. Disadvantaged children have a shorter attentionspan than advantaged children.
k. Disadvantaged children have different linguisticexperiences than advantaged children.
1. Disadvantaged children are disadvantaged mainly inthat they do not have the foundation of conceptsthat advantaged children have.
m. Learning to verbalize complete thoughts isparticularly important for disadvantaged children.
n. Improving the student's self-image as a learner is nparticularly important for disadvantaged children. I-1
o. The ability to ask questions which require acomplete answer is extremely important inteaching reading to disadvantaged children.
p. In teaching reading, a wrong response can beas useful as a correct response.
q. Disadvantaged children often have loweraspirations than advantaged children.
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
0Cu
wU
El
0
4-1
bo0
VQs
o
4J ao
0 0 7 )
0(30 )
0
(35 )
0
El
(40)
D
El
(43)
FOR ETSUSE ONLY
1 1 1 1 1 1 (1-5)
SURVEY OF COMPENSATORY READING PROGRAMS
CLASS AND PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS QUESTIONNAIRE
This questionnaire is designed to elicit information about your reading instructionand the group(s) to which you provide such instruction. Because reading instructionand instructional groups are so variable, some definitions are given below. Pleasekeep the definitiont in mind as you answer the questions, and refer to them as oftenas you need to.
The main purpose of the questionnaire is to provide descriptive information aboutcompensatory reading programs in grades 2, 4, and 6. By compensatory reading instructionis meant any reading instruction provided to students because they are reading belowthdix grade level.
In many instances, the questionnaire asks for information about classes. For purposesof this study, a class is any instructional group that is exposed to a common set ofmaterials, personnel and/or services, however large and extensive that set might beand that can sensibly be treated as a group in terms of its general characteristics.IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF A TEAM THAT TOGETHER INSTRUCTS SUCH A GROUP, PLEASE COMPLETETHIS QUESTIONNAIRE TOGETHER WITH THE OTHER MEMBER(S) OF THE TEAM.
If your class includes children from several grade levels, please answer the question-naire with respect to the grade level(s) that are appropriate to this study (2, 4,and/or 6).
I. CLASS CHARACTERISTICS
If you are a classroom teacher, answer questions 1 and 2. If you are NOT a classroomteacher, skip to question 3.
1. What grade do you teach? (6)
0 Two
Four
0 Six
0 Ungraded
la. How many pupils are in your class? (Give actual number) (7-9)
How many are boys? (10-11)
How many are girls? (12-13)
OMB No. 51-S72020Expires 9/72
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Page 2
2. How many of the pupils in your class receive compensatory reading instructionas defined above?
All of the pupils in my class receive compensatory reading (14)
instruction
from me(15)
some from me and some from another teacher
Selected pupils in my class receive compensatory reading (16)instruction
from me (17)
some from me and some from another teacher
3. The following questions refer ONLY to those pupils who receive their compensatoryreading instruction from you. If you are a classroom teacher, and if all of thepupils in your class receive compensatory reading instruction, answer the questionsin terms of the total class. IF ONLY SOME OF THE PUPILS RECEIVE COMPENSATORY READINGINSTRUCTION FROM YOU, ANSWER IN TERMS OF THOSE PUPILS ONLY. If you provide compen-satory reading instruction to more than one class (as class is described above),answer the questions with respect to one class per program. Answer the questionswith reference to the class in any given program that meets earliest each week. Be
sure to include all meetings of that class. If you do teach compensatory readingto more than one class, indicate in the box how many classes you teach.
r--]
(18-19)
How many pupils receive compensatory reading instruction from you? (Include anypupils who may be sent to your classroom especially for compensatory readinginstruction.)
Total number of pupils (20-22)
a. How Llany are boys? (23-24)
b. How many are girls? (25-26)
4. What is the age range cf the childten in your compensatory reading class?
Age of oldest Age of youngest child: (27-34)
Years Monels Years Months
5. What percentage of the puhils in your compensatory reading class have received (35)
compensatory reading instruction prior to this year?
DI gone
1-25%
71 26-50%
:j 51-75%
7-1 76 100%
Don't knowBEST COPY AVAILABLE
Page 3
6. About what percentage of the children in your compensatory reading classattended some form of Preschool? (Include Headstart, day care, or nurseryselool: DO NOT INCLUDE PUBLIC SCHOOL KINDERGARTEN.)
None
LI 1-25%
(36)
26-50%
51-75%
76-100%
Don't know
7. About what percent of the pupils in your compensatory reading class are members (37-42)
of the fcllowing racial or national origin groups? (dark one box in eachlettered row.)
(a Caucasian or White
(b) Negro or Black
(c) Spanish surnamed
(d) Oriental
(e) American Indian
(f) Other (Specify)
None 1-25% 26-50% 51-7f% 76-100%
0 0
CD 0rl 1
8. Estimate the percent of the pupils in your compensatory reading class who are (43)
from homes in which the dominant language is not English.
one
L: 1-25%
26-50%
[:: 51-75%
1 ! 76-1007
ri Don't know
BEST COPY AVAILAbLE
Page 4
8a. Among the homes where the dominant language is not English, what language(s)is (are) spoken? (Mark all that apply.)
American Indian
Chinese
Japanese
(44-49)
Spanish-Portuguese
El French
Other (Specify)
9. Estimate the percentage of pupils in your compensatory reading class who have (50-57)
persistent problems in each of the following areas. (Mark one box in eachlettered row.)
(a) Speech
(b) Vision
(c) Hearing
(d) Frequent illness
(e) Mental retardation
(f) Emotional problems
(g) Family instability
(h) Other (Specify)
None 1-10% 11-50% 51-100% Don't know
E.J
00
F-1
771
O 0 010. Estimate the percentage of pupils in your compensatory reading class whose (58-64)
family incomes are derived from each of the following occupational categories.(Mark one box in each lettered row.)
(a) Unskilled or service workers
(b) Skilled workers or farm owners
(c) White collar workers (clerks,salespeople, etc.)
(cl) Business owners or managers
(e) Professionals (doctors,lawyers, etc.)
(f) Unemployed
(g) Don't know
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
None 1-10% 11-50% 51-90Z 91-100%
17 ! 1
Li 0n
,1
L.1 0
Page 5
11. What is the average absentee rate in your compensatory reading class? (About (65)
what percentage of the class is absent on any given day?)
0-10%
11-20%
21-30%
31-40%
41-50%
More than 50%
12. Which of the following would you judge to be the major causes of absenteeism (66-71)
among your pupils? (Mark yes or no for each cause.)1 2
Yes No
0 Illness of pupil
Illness of other family member(s)
Lack of parental concern
c:3 Need for pupil to perform other duties at home
L_J Suspension or expulsion
Other (Specify)
13. Estimate the percentage of your pupils whose families have moved into this (72)
school attendance area during the school year.
None
1-25%
0 26-50X
51-75%
76-100%
Can't estimate
BEST COPY AVA1LAL3LE
Page 6
14. Estimate the percentage of your pupils who have moved out of the schoolattendance area this year.
0 None
U 1-25%
10 26-50%
E] 51-75%
76-100%
0 Can't estimate
Questions 15 and 16 ask for your opinions about the pupils you teach. Please answerthe questions as candidly as you are able; there are no "right" answers.
15. How far do you expect the average pupil in your compensatory reading classwould be able to go in school if he were given the opportunity?
Eighth grade, or lower
0 Ninth, tenth, or eleventh grade
High school graduate
Junior college, business school, or some other post-secondary course,but not a four year college
F-1 Four year college or beyond
u Other (Specify)
16. How far do you expect the average pupil in your compensatory reading classwill actually go school?
Eighth grade, or lower
Ninth, tenth, or eleventh grade
High school graduate
Junior college, business school. or some other post-secondary course,' but not a four year college
Four year college or beyond
0 Other (Specify)
) -JCopIf AVAILABLE
1.
(73)
(74)
(75)
Page 7
II. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS
The following questions refer to your compensatory reading instruction (see definitionon page 1). If you are a classroom teacher, and all of the pupils in your class receivecompensatory reading instruction, answer the questions in terms of the total class. If
only some of the pupils receive compensatory reading instruction, answer the questionsin terms of those pupils only, and in terms of that part of the instructional programthat is directed to them.
If you are a reading teacher or specialist teacher, answer the questions with referenceto the class to which your instruction applies. If you teach more than one class (asclass is defined on page 1), answer the questions with reference to the one class perprogram that meets earliest in the week. Be sure to include all meetings of that class.If you teach in MORE THAN ONE PROGRAM, fill out separate questionnaires for one class ineach program.
If you do teach more than one class, check this box. D (76)
If you teach in more than one program, check this box. ED (77)
17. When is compensatory reading instruction carried out? (Check all that apply.) (78-82)
0 During regular school hours in time scheduled for regular readinginstruction
0 During regular school hours in time released from other class work
Before or after school or on weekends
0 During the summer
0 Other (Specify)
18. If compensatory reading instruction is carried on in time released from other (83-92)
class work, which of the following subject matter areas receive correspondinglyreduced time? (Mark all that apply.)
0 Social Studies
0 Science
0 Mathematics
0 Foreign Language
0 Language Arts
0 Physical Education
ED Art
F-1 music
0 Seat work, study time, etc. BEST COPY f -LABLE
0 Other (Specify)
Page 8
19. What is the average amount of formal instruction time per student in (93)
compensatory reading?
a. Minutes per instructional period:
[=3 1-15
U 16-30
0 31-40
c 41-50
L_J 51-60
0 61-75
0 76-90
fl 91 or more
b. Number of instruction periods per week: (94)
0 One
n Two or three
El Four or five
U More than five
20. Do most pupils receive compensatory reading instruction at the same time of (95)
day every instructional day?
1 E Yes
2j] No
a. If yes, when is the instructional period? (96)
IT Before school
i 1 Morning (Before lunch)
0 Afternoon (After lunch)
After school
b. if no, when does instruction usually take niace?
1-7 Mostly in the morning
1-1 Mostly in the afternoon
LI About equally divided between mornings and afternoons
OOP
(9 7)
Page 9
21. What additional personnel are available to you in your teaching of (98-106)
compensatory reading?Frequently Occasionally Rarely Not Available
ERemedial reading teacher orsupervisor
Other professionals (counselors,psychologists, etc.)
Paraprofessionals or teacheraide
E
Parent or other volunteer
Student teacher 0Media specialist CD 0Resource teacher (music,art,etc.)
Older student in school
Other (Specify) rE] El-
22. During the school year, how many teachers other than yourself have held your (107)
particular teaching assignment with your compensatory reading class for atleast two consecutive weeks? COUNT SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS AND REPLACEMENT TEACHERS;DO NOT COUNT STUDENT TEACHERS OR CLASSROOM AIDES.
None
One
f-1 Two
Three
More than three
23. If your compensatory reading class is organized into groups, indicate the (108-112)
frequency with which you organize these groups by each of the following criteria.Frequently Occasionally Rarely Never
Reading grade level
Specific skill. deficiencies
Shared interests
Specific projccts
Other (Specify)
0 0El 0 nO 0
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
rage 10
24. How often do the following instructional groups operate (occur) in thecourse of your teaching of compensatory reading?
All of Rarely orthe time Frequently Occasionally Never
Adult and child in one-to-onerelationship
Adult and children in groupsof between 2 and 10
Adult and children in groupsof between 11 and 20
Adult and children in groupsor more than 20 (includeswhole class instruction)
Individual pupils workingindependently
Pupil teams workingindependently
Other (Specify)
(113-119)
25. If your compensatory reading class is organized into groups, about howfrequently does the composition of the group change?
F-1 Daily
0 Weekly
Bi- weekly
C:1 Monthly
Rarely, if ever
I Other (Specify)
26. In a sentence or two, describe the outstanding features of your compensatoryreading program.
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
(120)
Page 11
27. Which one of the following terms comes closest to describing your major (121)
classroom approach to the teaching of compensatory reading?
Linguistic - phonetic
1-1 Language experience
Modified alphabet
Eclectic
Other (Specify)
28. How long have you used this method? (122)
This is the first year
For one or two years
0 For three, four, or five years
ED For six years or more
29. To what extent do you use each of the following approaches to teaching (123-132compensatory reading in your classroom?
I
, Not att All Minimally Somewhat Extensively
Basal readers 0Programmed instruction C:] 0A total phonics program C71 0A supplementary phonics program El
Language experience U
A linguistic program U U El 0Non-standard orthography
ED 0(ex., i.t.a.)
Words in color r-1 0Individualized programs ED 0 El
Technological devices such asthe 'talking typewriter" or
--,, i
L....ali
1 i
teaching machines
Other (Specify and describe)
.7
BEST COPY
Page 12
30. Who selected the materials that you are currently using in your teaching of (134)
compensatory reading?
0 You, and you alone
0 You, as a member of a team or committee
r-iAn individual who asked for your views; or a team or committee ofwhich you were not a member but on which your views were represented
ED An individual, team, or committee, operating without any input fromyou
0 Other (Specify)
31. How satisfied are you with the materials you are currently using in yourteaching of compensatory reading?
(135)
0 Totally satisfied
ED Satisfied in major aspects; dissatisfied in some minor ones
0 Lukewarm; neither devoted nor opposed to the materials
0 Dissatisfied in major asnects; satisfied only in some minor ones
U Totally dissatisfied
32. How frequently do you use the following materials in the course of your (136-145)compensatory reading instruction?
Not Rarely or
Available Often Sometimes Never Use
Textbooks other than basalri 0readers
Books and printed materials 0other than textbooks
Newspapers, magazines, and 0 0 0other periodicals
Teache r- prepared materials 0 0 F-1(dittos, etc.)
Motion pictures and/orfilmstrips 0Slides and transparencies F-1
Tape recordings and records 0 0Video or television tapes r-i F-1
Games, puzzles, and toys 0Other (Specify) 0 C:3
BEST cOeY AVAILABLE
Page 13
33. How much time does a typical pupil in your compensatory reading class spend (146-160)
in each of the following types of activity?
A great deal Some Little or none
Improving motor abilities related to reading IT 0Increasing attention span C:1
Developing visual discrimination 0 ED 0Matching letters or words
Learning letter forms F-1 0Developing a sight vocabulary
F-1 ci r-1(Whole word recognition)
Learning word meanings (Vocabulary)
Phonic and/or structural analysis CD (:]
Being read to
Reading aloud 0 0Reading silently (independent silent reading)
Creative writingr-1
Reading for enjoyment UEnriching cultural background
Other (Specify) n34. Have you had any special training in the teaching of reading or in instructional (161)
techniques for disadvantaged pupils in connection with your current teachingassignment?
1 Yes
2 No
If no, skip to question 39.
If yes, Please answer questions 35-38.
135 COPYAVN14_ACI:i.
Page 34
35. What form did the special training take? (Check all that apply.)
O Summer workshop or institute
O College course (whether or not for degree credit)
0 After school or weekend workshop(s)
O Released-time workshop(s)
Individual instruction with supervised practice teaching
1_1 other (SpecOy)
36. Which of the following areas were explored in the course of the specialtraining you received? (Check all that apply.)
1 i New instructional techniques in reading
ri Diagnosis of reading problems
El Open classroom methods
El Individualized instruction
O Use of equipment and materials
7 Techniques for cultural enrichment
1 1 Other (Specify)
37. Over what time period did the special training extend?
O One summer
111 One academic semester
One academic year
1 1 One calendar year
1 One summer and one academic year
LI Other (Specify)
BEST COPY. AVAILABLE
(162-167)
(168-174)
(175)
Page 15
38. How long ago did you receive your special training?
Less than one year ago
E] More than one but less than two years ago
1:1 More than two but less than three years ago
Three or more years ago
39. For a typical pupil in your compensatory reading program, about howmuch in-school time is devoted to each of the following reading orreading-related activities?
Basic reading instructionalprogram
Compensatory reading
Instructional program (onlyif compensatory reading pro-gram is different from basicinstructional program)
Reading in content areas(Science, Social Studies,etc.)
Independent (self-selected)reading
Library activities
Enrichment activities (in-clude trips, specialassemblies, etc.)
Other relevant activities(Specify)
Less than Between More than 11 hour 1 and 4 hour a day(5+
None per week hours/week hours/weekO 000O 00DO 0D0O 000O E0010000O ODDO 00E1
(176)
(177-184)
Page 36
40. Please indicate below what materials you use in your compensatory readinginstruction, and to what extent you use them.
Use as majorresource inteaching
Series Titles(Specify) readingScott Foresman
Harper Row
Macmillan
American Book Co.
Ginn & Co.
Houghton-Mifflin.
Lippincott
Allyn & Bacon
Holt, Rinehart &Winston
SRA
Harcourt Brace &World
Open Court
ITA
Merrill Linguistics
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Use as supple-mental or op-tional coursein class
Occasionallyrefer to my-self but don'tuse in class
Don'tuseatall
0(185)
00El0000(195)
0
0(205)
0
(215)
(218)
Page 17
Use as major Use as supple- OccassionallyList all additional resource in mental or op- refer to my-materials used, including teaching tional course self but don'thardware reading in class use in class
o 0 0o 0 0o 0 0a a EI
o a 0o 0 0o 0 0a o 0a a oo o 0a a a
41. to you create any of the materials you use in teaching compensatoryreading?
1 r:] Yes
2 D No
a. If Yes, which of the following types of materials do you create?(Check all that apply)
El Worksheets
I=-1 Printed stories, poems, or essays
1:1 Transparencies for overhead projector
E] Filmstrips
El Slides
CI Motion Pictures
0 Charts
CI Tapes
CI Other (Specify)
(219-229)
(230)
(231-239)
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Page 18
42. How would you rate each of the following activities in terms of importanceto you as goals in your current teaching of compensatory reading?
Improving motor abilities relat2dto reading
Increasing attention span
Developing auditorydiscrimination
Matching letters or words
Learning letter forms
Developing a sight vocabulary(Whole word recognition)
Learning word meanings(Vocabulary)
Phonic and/or structuralanalysis
Developing skill in using contextclues
Practicing syllabification skills
Practicing punctuation andparagraph skills
Developing comprehensionskills
Improving comprehension rate
Developing limtening skills
Reading aloud
Reading silently (independentsilent reading)
Developing study skills
Developing library skills
Improving verbal communication
Creative writing
Reading for enjoyment
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Major Secondary Of little or no
Goal Goal Importance as a goal
0
0
0
(240)
(250)
(260)
Page 19
Major Secondary Of little or noCoal Goal importance as a goal
Enriching cultural background
Improving self-image E.]
Improving attitudes toward reading
Other (Specify) 0
(261-264)
43. About how often does each child in your compensatory reading class have theopportunity to read aloud to the class?
At least once a day
Several times a week, but not daily
About once a week
Less than once a week, but regularly
0 Seldom or never on a regular basis
44. About how often does each child in your compensatory reading class have theopportunity to read aloud to you alone (or to another adult)?
At least once a day
Several times a week, but not daily
About once a week
Less than once a week, but regularly
Seldom or never on a regular basis
(265)
(266)
45. How successful would you consider your compensatory reading teaching to bewith respect to each of the following criteria? (267-271)
Highly Moderately Moderately TotallySuccessful. Successful Unsuccessful Unsuccessful
Enhancing pre-readingskills
Enhancing measuredreading achievement
Improving attitudestoward reading
Improving students' selfimages
Remediating culturaldeprivation
01:1
0
0BEST COPY AVAILABLE
FOR ETSUSE ONLYNE
CLASS AND PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS QUESTIONNAIRE
( 1-5)
This questionnaire is designed to elicit information about your reading instructionand the group(s) to which you provide such instruction. Because reading instruction andinstructional groups are so variable, some definitions are given below. Please keep thedefinitions in mind as you answer the questions, and refer to them as often as you need to.
In many instances, the questionnaire asks for information about classes. For pur-poses of this study, a class in any instructional group that is exposed to a common set ofmaterials, personnel, and/or services, however large and extensive that set might be, andthat can sensibly be treated as a group in terms of its general characteristics. IF YOUARE A MEMBER OF A TEAM THAT TOGETHER INSTRUCTS SUCH A GROUP, PLEASE COMPLETE THIS QUESTION-NAIRE TOGETHER WITH THE OTHER MEMBER(S) OF THE TEAM .
I. CLASS CHARACTERISTICS
1. How many pupils are in your reading class? (Give actual number.) (6-8)
a. How many, are boys? (9-10)
b. How many are girls? (11-12)
2. How do the pupils in your class receive their reading instruction?
ElAll of the pupils in my class receive reading instruction (13)
Elfrom me(14)
El some from me and some from another teacher
ri Selected pupils in my class receive reading instruction (15)
El from me(16)
r-i some from me and some from another teacher
The following questions refer ONLY to those pupils who receive their reading instructionfrom you. If all of the pupils in your class receive reading instruction from you, answerthe questions in terms of the total class. If only some of the pupils receive readinginstruction from you, answer the questions in terms of those pupils only.
3. How many pupils receive reading instruction from you? (Give actual number.)
a. How many are boys?
b. How many are girls?
OMB No. 51-S72020Expires 9/72
(17-19)
(2o-gi)
(22-23)
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
ti
Page 2
4. What is the age range of the children in your reading class?
Age of the oldest child: / Age of youngest child:(24-3$
Years Months Years Months
5. What percentage of the pupils in your reading class have received compensatory anreading instruction prior to this year?
None
1-25%
26-50%
El 51-75%
U 76-100%
ri Don't know
6. About what percentage of the children in your class attended some form of pre- (33)
school? (Include Headstart, day care, or nursery school. DO NOT INCLUDE PUBLICSCHOOL KINDERGARTEN.)
El None
ri 1-25%
D 26-50%
I--] 51-75%
I--1 76-100%
Don't know
7. About what percent of the pupils in your class are members of the following racialor national origin group? (Mark one box on each lettered row.) (34-39)
(a) Caucasian or white
(b) Negro or Black El 0 0 0(c) Spanish surnamed 0 r=1 0 El(d) Oriental 0 El El EJ(a) American Indian El 0 0 El(f) Other (Specify) 0 El [::] D
% 1H0% 5n0% 916-0%
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Page 3
8. Estimate the percentage of the pupils in your class who are from homes in which thedominant language is not English. (40)
None
1-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-100%
j[ Don't know
a. Among the homes where the dominant language is not English, what language(s) (41 -46)is (are) spoken? (Mark all that apply.)
E=I American Indian
r--1 Chinese
El Japanese
Spanish-Portugueie
French
El Other (Specify)
9. Estimate the percentage of pupils in your class who have persistent problemsin each of the following areas. (Mark one box in each lettered row.)
(47-54)
None 1-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100% Don't know
(a) Speech 0 Q = 0 = 0(b) Vision ED 0 0 0 = 0(c) Nearing -1:1 0 0 0 0 0(d) Frequent illness El = 0 0 E:=1 C:]
(e) Mental retardation 0 = 0 0 0 I=(f) Emotional problems 0 = = ED ED(g) Family instability El El 0 0 0 I=(h) Other (specify) 0 El = 0 0 El
1 2 3 4 5 6
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Page 4
10. Estimate the percentage of pupils in your class whose family incomes arederived from each of the following occupational categories. (Mark one boxin each lettered row.)
(a) Unskilled or service workers
(b) Skilled workers or farm owners
(c) White collar workers (clerks,salespeople, etc.)
(d) Business owners or managers
(e) Professionals (doctors,lawyers, etc.)
(f) Unemployed
(g) Don't know
None .1-11% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%O 00O 0E100000O 0000O E10 El
11. What is the average absentee rate in your class? (About what percentage ofthe class is absent on any given day?)
0-10%
0 11-20%
21-30%
31-40%
1.-50%
More than 50%
12. Which of the following would you judge to be the major causes of absenteeism (63)
among your pupils? (Mark yes or no for each cause.)
1 2
Yes No
(55-60)
(61)
(62)
0 0 Illness of pupil
Illness of other family member(s)
Lack of parental concern
Need for pupil to perform other duties at home
Suspension or expulsion
Other (Specify)
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Page 5
13. Estimate the percentage of your pupils whose families have moved'into thisschool, attendance area before the end of the school year.
(69)
None
1-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-100%
Can't estimate
14. Estimate the percentage of your pupils who have moved out of the school (70)
attendance area this year.
C:] None
C:3 1-25%
26 -50X
51-75%
76-100%
Can't estimate
Questions 15 and 16 ask your opinions about the pupils you teach. Please answerthe questions as candidly as you are able; there are no "right" answers to thesequestions.
15. How far do you expect the average pupil in your reading class would be able (71)
to go in school if he were given the opportunity?
Eighth grade, or lower
Ninth, tenth, or eleventh grade
High school graduate
Juniorcollege, business school, or some other post-secondary course,
but not a four year college
Four year college or beyond
Other (Specify)
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Page 6
116. How far do you expect the average pupil in your reading class will actually (72)
go in school?
Eighth grade, or lower
0 Ninth, tenth, or eleventh grade
High school graduate
ri Junior college, business school or some other post-secondary course,1---1 but not a four year college
Four year college or beyond
Other (Specify)
II. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS
The following questions refer to your reading instruction. If you are a classroomteacher, and all of the pupils in your class receive reading instruction from you,answer the questions in terms of the total class. If only some of the pupils receivereading instruction from you, answer the questions in terms of those pupils only, andin terms of that part of the instructional program that is directed to them.
17. What is the average amount of formal instructional time per student in reading?
a. Minutes per instructional period: 1 0 1-15 5 0 51-60 (73)
2 C:3 16-30 6 61-75
3[:] 31-40 7 76-90
40 41-50 8 91 or more
b. Number of instruction periods per week:
10 One 3 [:: Four or five (74)
2 Two or 4 More than fivethree
18. Do most pupils receive reading instruction at the same time of day every (75)
instructional day?
1 Yes
2 No
OarCOPY
41/411481C
Page 7
If yes, when is the instructional period? (76)
Before school
Morning (before lunch)
Afternoon (after lunch)
After school
If no, when does instruction usually take place? (77)
Mostly in the morning
Mostly in the afternoon
About equally divided between mornings and afternoons
19. What additional personnel are available to you in your teaching of reading? (78-86)
Frequently Occasionally Rarely Not Available
Remedial reading teacher orsupervisor
Other professionals (counselors,psychologists, etc.)
Paraprofessionals or teacher aide
Parent or other volunteer
Student teacher
Media specialist
Resource teacher (music,art,etc.)
Older student in school
Other (Specify)
1-1
000 0
00
20. During the school year, how many teachers other than yourself have held your (87)
particular teaching assignment with your reading class for at least two consecutiveweeks? COUNT SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS AND REPLACEMENT TEACHERS: DO NOT COUNT STUDENTTEACHERS OR CLASSROOM AIDES.
None
L_J
2
3
0 More than 3
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Page 8
21. If your reading class is organized into groups, indicate the frequency with (88-92)
which you organize these groups by each of the following criteria.
Frequently Occasionally Rarely Never
Reading grade level
Specific skill deficiencies
Shared interests
Specific projects
Other (Specify)
D DO
0 022. How often do the following instructional groups operate (occur) in the course (93-99)
of your teaching of reading?All of Fre- Occasion- Rarely orthe time quently ally Never
Adult and child in one-to-onerelationship
Adult and children in groupsof between 2 and 10
Adult and children in groupsof between 11 and 20
Adult and children in groupsof more than 20 (includeswhole class instruction)
Individual pupils workingindependently
Pupil teams workingindependently
Other (Specify) F-1
D
0
0
D
23. If your reading class is organized into groups, about how frequently does thecomposition of the group change?
O Daily
0 Weekly
Hi-weekly
Lir Monthly
0 Rarely, if ever
L...j Other (Specify)
BEST COPY AVAIIML
(100)
Page 9
24. In a sentence or two, describe the outstanding features of your readingprogram.
25. Which one of the following terms comes closest to describing your major (101)
classroom approach to the teaching of reading?
Linguistic-phonetic
Language experience
Modified alphabet
0.Eclectic
Other (Specify)
G Don't know
26. How long have you used this method? (102)
This is the first year
U For one or two years
For three, four, or five years
For six years or more
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Page 10
27. To what extent do you use each of the following approaches to teaching (103-112)reading in your classroom?
Not at Exten-All Minimally Somewhat sively
Basal readers
Programmed instruction
A total phonics program
A supplementary phonicsprogram
Language experience
A linguistic program.
Non-standard orthography(ex., i.t.a.)
Words in color
Individualized programs
Technological devices such asthe "talking typewriter" orteaching machines
o
ori o
U
o0
Other (Specify and describe)
28. Who selected the materials that you are currently using in your teaching ofreading?
You, and you alone
You, as a member of a team or committee
E:3An individual who asked for your views; or a team or committee of whichyou were not a member buton which your views were represented
An individual, team, or committee, operating without any input from you
0 Other (Specify)
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
(113)
Page 11
29. How satisfied are you with the materials you are currently using in yourteaching of reading?
Totally satisfied
Satisfied in major aspects; dissatisfied in some minor ones
Lukewarm; neither devoted nor opposed to the materials
Dissatisfied in major aspects; satisfied only in some minor ones
Totally dissatisfied
30. How frequently do you use the following materials in the course of yourreading instruction?
Textbooks other than basalreaders
Books and printed materialsother than textbooks
Newspapers, magazines, andother periodicals
Teacher-prepared materials(dittos, etc.)
Motion pictures and/orfilmstrips
Slides and transparencies
Tape recordings and records
Video or television tapes
Games, puzzles, and toys
Other (Specify)
Not Rarely orAvailable Often Sometimes Never Use
0 0
D
000 0El
D-
tiD 0
(Ilk)
(115-120
BEST COPYP0,110311.
Page 12
31. Now much time does a typical pupil in your reading class spend in each (125-139)
of the following types of activities?
Improving motor abilities relatedto reading
Increasing attention span
Developing visual discrimination
Matching letters or words
Learning letter forms
Developing a sight vocabulary(whole word recognition)
Learning word meanings(vocabulary)
Phonic and/or structural analysis
Being read to
Reading aloud
Reading silently (independentsilent reading)
Creative writing
Reading for enjoyment
Enriching cultural background
Other (Specify)
A great deal Some Little or.none
O 0
0 D 0O
O
32. Have you had any special training in the teaching of reading or in instructional (14techniques for disadvantaged pupils in connection with your current teachingassignment?
1 Yes
2 No
If no, skip to question 37.If yes, please answer questions 33-36.
;BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Page 13
33. What form did the special training take? (Check all that apply)
Summer workshop or institute
College course (whether or not for degree credit)
After school or weekend workshop
Released-time workshop
Individual instruction with supervised practice teaching
Other (Specify)
34. Which of the following areas were explored in the course of the specialtraining you received? (Check all that apply)
(":3 New instructional techniques in reading
Diagnosis of reading problems
0 Open classroom methods
Individualized instruction
Use of equipment and materials
O Techniques for cultural enrichment
Other(s) (Specify)
35. Over what period of time did the special training extend?
One summer
O One academic semester
One academic year
One calendar year
One summer and one academic year
Other (Specify)
36. How long ago did you receive your special training?
Less than one year ago
More than one but less than two years ago
More than two but less than three years ago
E Three or more years ago
(141-146)
(147-153)
(154)
(155)
BEST COY AVAILAtu
Page 14
37. How would you rate each of the following activities in terms of importanceto you as goals in your current teaching of reading?
Improving motor abilities related toreading
Increasing attention span
Developing auditory discrimination
Developing visual discrimination
Matching letters or words
Learning letter forms
Developing a sight vocabulary (wholeword recognition)
Learning word meanings (vocabulary)
Phonic and/or structural analysis
Developing skill in using context clues
Practicing syllabification skills
Practicing punctuation and paragraph skills
Developing comprehension skills
improving comprehension rate
Developing listening skills
Reading aloud
Reading silently (independent silentreading)
Developing study skills
Developing library skills
Improving verbal communication
Creative writing
Reading for enjoyment
Enriching cultural background
Improving self-image
Improving attitudes toward reading
Other (Specify)
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Of little orMajor Secondary no importancegoal goal as a goal
00
U (156)
(166)
(176)
(181)
Page 15
38. For a typical pupil in your reading class, about how much in-school time (182-189)
is devoted to each of the following reading or reading-related activities?
Less than Between More than 11 hour 1 and 4 hour a day
None per week hrsiwk (5+ hrsiwk)
Basic reading instructional oprogram
Compensatory reading 0 0 0 0Instructional program (only ifcompensatory reading program is Ddifferent from basic instructionalprogram)
Reading in content areas (science,social studies, etc.)
Independent (self-selected)reading
Library activities
Enrichment activities (includetrips, special assemblies, etc.)
Other relevant activities(Specify)
BESTCOPY
AVAILAubi:
Page 16
39. Please indicate below what materials you use in your reading instruction, and to
what extent you use them. Use as major Use as supple- Occasionally Don't
resource in mental or op- refer to my- use
teaching tional course self but don't at
Series Titles (Specify) reading in class use in class all
Scott Forsmann 1.0CI
Harper Row 0 0 0ii
0Macmillan U
0American Book Co.
0 Dor0
Ginn & Co. 0 00
Houghton-Mifflin
0D 0
Lippincott
0210
Allyn & Bacon 0
Holt, Rinehart Et 0Wins ton
0 0 0 CISRA
Harcourt Brace &1:.1_)
D20World 0 0
Open Court
0 INt° ITA LI 0 0 LlMerrill. Linguistics El 0 u24
;List all additonal important materials;used, including hardware
Page 17
Use as majorresource inteachingreading
0
Da0
Use as supple-mental or op-tional coursein class
0
a00
Occassionallyrefer to my-self but don't (225-234use in class
oE.)
0
40. Do you create any of the materials you use in teaching reading?
1 0 Yes
2 0 No
a. If yes, which of the following types of materials do you create?(Check all that apply. )
Worksheets
0 Printed stories, poems, or essays
Transparencies for overhead projector
ID Filmstrips
E) Slides
Motion pictures
Charts
0, Tapes
0 Other (Specify)
,
BEST COPY AVAILAtO
(235)
(236-244)
Page 18
41. About how often does each child in your reading class have the opportunity (245)
to read aloud to the class?
0 At least once a day
Several times a week, but not daily
About once a week
Less than once a week, but regularly
Seldom, or never on a regular basis
42. About how often does each child in your reading class have the opportunityto read aloud to you (or to another adult)?
(246)
At least once a day
Several times a week, but not daily
O About once a week
ri Less than once a week, but regularly
Seldom, or never on a regular basis
43. How successful would you consider your teaching of reading to be with respect (247-251)
to each of the following criteria?
Highly Moderately Moderately TotallySuccessful Successful Unsuccessful Unsuccessful
Enhancing pre-reading skills 0 l.....1
r-1ED
Enhancing maasuzod reading 0 Elachievement
Improving attitudes toward reading(-_-_] 0
Improving students' self images D 0 7-1
Remediating cultural deprivation 0
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
APPENDIX E
APPENDIX E
A method for formalizing on investigator's uncertainties about
the effect of non - response in sample surveys
1. Description of the method
In most surveys there are at least some non-respondents. In
special cases one may be able to estimate the effect of non-response
under some fairly general models.1 More often, the investigator
is left with having to make subjective judgements about the possible
effect of the non-respondents. Given this situation, it seems
reasonable to try to formalize these subjective notions so that
they can be easily stated, communicated and compared across re-
searchers. An easy way to do this is by using Bayesian methods
which are in fact based on the notion of subjective probability.
It should be emphasized that there is no "magic" in this
approach--one cannot know how non-respondents would respond
without data; however, one can formalize subjective notions on
how similar they probably are to respondents and thus formalize
notions on what effect they would have had on the results had
they responded. One might also want to think of the method as
summarizing the results of simulations, where one uses the
respondents to generate "reasonable" hypothetical responses for
the non-respondents.
The method proposed here is for the case of a simple random
sample of N units, a proportion p of which are non-respondents.
1. Cochran, W. G. Sampling Techniques. (2nd ed.) New York:John Wiley Z, Sons, 1963. P. 363.
-2-
The objective is to estimate the average value of a variable Y
which is recorded for all respondents but not for non-respondents.
However, both respondents and non-respondents do have
"background variables" X (xl,...,xq
) recorded (e.g. measures
of socioeconomic status, race, sex, etc.).
There are two subjective parameters (prior parameters),
01 and 02, that summarize subjective notions about the similarity
of respondents and non-respondents. These plus the observed (X,Y)
data for respondents and the observed X data for non-respondents
rleld a "subjective confidence interval" (posterior distribution)
for what the average Y in this sample would have been had all
the non-respondents responded (not the average Y in the population).
02 is a subjective coefficient of variation2 for the non-
respondent's regression coefficients. That is, letting 0 (i)
R
be the regression coefficients of Y on X (i) for respondents,
the investigator is 95% sure that the regression coefficients
of Y on X") for non-respondents will fall in the interval
6(R i) (1 ± 282
)
For conceptual simplicity we assume 02 is the same for all X
variables. We use coefficients of variation because they seem
2. Snedecor, George W., & Cochran, William G. StatisticalMethods. (6th ed.) Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State UniversityPress, 1967.
well suited to summarize subjective notions of large and small
(e.g., 8 1% seems small, while 6 = 100% seems large). This
formulation is most appropriate for Y positive but can be used
for a y that takes on negative values.
Even if the regressions of Y on X were identical for
respondents and non-respondents, the two groups might 'Rave
different Y means. However, as more X variables are added the
investigator should be more confident that if the Y means for
respondents differ, the difference should be reflected in the X
variables. Hence we define 81
to be the subjective coefficient
of variation for the non - respondents' mean if their X distribution
were the same as the X distribution for respondents. That is,
letting ail, + 8Rii be the expected Y for a group of respondents
whose average X is XR, the investigation is 95Z sure that the
expected Y for a group of non-respondents whose average X ':.s YR
lies in the interval
R(a
R+ 8 -R)7 i)(1 + 28
1)
-
Intuitively, as the number of X variables increases 81
should decrease since 81reflects uncertainty about differences
between respondents and non-respondents due.to sources other
than the X variables, but the inclusion of more X variables
should not necessarily increase or decrease 02.
The subjective 95% confidence interval for the average Y
if all units had responded is Chgn
(1.1) TFR
where yR is
functions of
'(1.2) ho2 plit(XNa XR)/YR, RR the least squares regression
coefficient for Y on X for the respondents, 7CNR and 3R
-4--
1 + hip + 2 a2h21 1
e2h2 h22 2 3
the
the
average
data:
Y for respondents and the hi are simple
the average X for non-respondents and respondents
respectively.
"2oR
1 2(1.3) h = 2 [1. + , o8 the least squares residual
YRJJ
variance in the regression of Y on X for the respondents;
2
(XNRh2
= 7 + ;2 -.2 2
( NR R)( R
Sx1 )0714R R x R R )
R
where Sxx
is the centered cross products matrix of X
for the respondents:
"2o
(1.5) h3_2 R 1 + a - S
-11
3 v2 Np(1-P) NR g xxa -NR R )
Y R
The term h0is relative bias due to different sample X means for
respondents and non-respondents assuming that aside from the
observed X difference non-respondents are just like the
2 2 .
respondents; the term 01h1
is relative variance due to uncertainty
about the equality of expectations of Y for respondents and
non-- respondents due to sources other than X;the term 62h2 is
relative variance due to uncertainty about the equality of Y
-5-
on X regressions for respondents and non-respondents; and the
term h3
is relative variance due to adding pN independent new
units to the sample with mean XNR assuming that aside from the
X difference they are just like the respondents.
If either h0
or h3is large (e.g. close to 1) it is clear
that the average Y for the whole sample might be quite different
from T?R
even if non-respondents are assumed just like respondents.
The effect of the investigator's confidence that non-respondents
are similar to respondents is determined by 111 and h2. If all hi
are small (near zero, e.g. .01), unless the investigator has
a tremendous fear that non-respondents and respondents differ,
the effect of non-response in the survey on the average Y will
be small. The example in section 3 will demonstrate the use ..
the hi
in detail.
-6-
2. Derivation of the result
This result is derived as follows from a Bayesian point of view.
(1) The Model for the density of Y (the X data
are considered to be constants) is in both
groups a linear regression with constant residual
variancew:thallY.conditionally independent.
(2.1) 2 , , 2 ,For Respondents (YilaR,I1R,o R)-N(aR 1RAi,u RJ
(2.2) For Non-respondents (Y la2 Nr/ 2 NI
i NR0 'NR' NR'f
-'aNR NR/
(2) The Model for the prior distribution of the parameters:
2(a
R' IR' R) flat
2 all
NR NR. R' IR' 011)-N(aR Al;, yart + 13,R1;)2) inde-pendent
+ 6 '1 apendent
(2.6)
(0 la 0 0-)-N(e 02
RR'BR
)-NR R'R' R R 2 --
22
(0 la B ,cA)" 0L XcNR R'- R R
f
The average Y if all units had responded is
ytot
= (1-p)yR pyNR
where yNR is the unknown mean for the non-respondents.
find the expected value of ytot
given the data (the posterior
We first
mean of Ytot). This is done in three steps:
(1) Find the conditional expectation given the data and all
parameters (take expectations over the distribution of
yNR given the data and all parameters as specified by
(2.2)).
(2) Find the conditional expectation given the data and
respondents' parameters (the expectations over the prior
distribution of non-respondents' parameters given the
-7-
data and respondents' parameters as specified
by (2.3), (2.4), (2.5).
(3) Find the conditional expectation given the data (take
expectations over the posterior uistribution of res-
pondents' parameters) found from (2.1) and (2.3).
The result of step (1) is
(1-P)R + P(4NR + -12111R 2-CNR)
The result of step (2) is
(1-P)R + p(aR 4- 13107;R)
And the result of step (3) is
(l-p) TFB. + p(c^tit + SBX;B)
where the hats refer to the usual least squares estimates of
the regression parameters for the respondents. Since
yR A aR + 8RX this can also be written-1'
+P
$. a - /7 )1R -1 NR R
Now find the variance of y given the data (equivalently, p 2
tot
i:imes the variance of 37NR). The same three steps are used
except now variances are calculated rather than means, where we
use the well-known relation
V(A) = E8 V(AIB) + VB E(AIB).
All expectations are conditionally given the data.
Letting 4, represent the full set of parameters, the result of
the first step is thus
E V(7NR 14) +
-8-
0E(3
NR I+) =
a2NR _E () +V (a +B X )pN NR -NR-NR
Now condition on the respondents' parameters and take expectationS
over the prior distribution of $NR
given OR (Step 2):
2
E
0R 2 -
+ EOR
[ (a + $ X ) + 0 (X -X ) B B (pN -R -R-R 2 -NR -R-
+ V (a + B X )
R-R RNR
As a final step, evaluate the expectations over the posterior
distribution of +R
oR / 2
+01(
2
0- 2(a + B X )pN + 1 i' R -R-R- N(1-0L
r-1
2
L Ro t" NR 7 ) (RiR fR aR 4x)(ECNR XR)
2+ 0R (KNRR) S;x (NR 712). N(1-1:01
^2 2(-teeny at this step we are assuming of aR )
Hence the posterior variance of -itnt given the observed
data is e2h2 + e2h2 + h23where the h2 are defined in equations
1 1 2 2
3. Pratt, J. W.; Raiffa, H.; & Schleifer, R. Introduction toStatistical Decision Theou. Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard Business School, 1965.
-9-
(1.3), (1.4) and (1.5). Since the posterior bias is given by
h0
in (1.2), the posterior confidence interval for ytOt
given
the data in equation (1.1) follows.
Computationally, for q > 1 Y's and r X's,
(1) Compute the means of the X's and Y's for respondents iR , IR
and their centered cross products SXX
(2) Compute the means of the X's for non-respondents XR
(3) Sweep the X's from Sxx to obtain the q x r matrix of
regression coefficients OR , the q vector of residual
"2
'variances o
Rand the r x r matrix S
-1-xx
(4) Calculate the scalar a1
= (IC - )1NR R
)s-xx1(1 - i
NR R)'
. ...
(5) Calculate the 1 x q vector a2 = (XNR 4)4'
(6) Square each element of a2 to obtain the 1 x q vector a3.
Then letting the superscript (i) indicate the ith element of a vector
h") = p 41)/ii(zi)0
c,.(1)2
(1.1h' -1 P
-R
(i)-
IR
h(il P- a") + ;(i)2
a2 -3 -R 1
-(i)
.(i) 1(0 -.4t 1
h3
pN
- + a..
Y(i) -0.1)IR
PHASE I REPORT
A DESCRIPTIVE AND ANALYTIC STUDY
OF
COMPENSATORY READING PRO(aAMS
APPENDIX D
..-
PART I
SCHOOL PRINCIPAL QUESTIONNAIRE
ITEM ANALYSIS
1. School enrollment this year {number -of pupils).
1
3
5 0G
Less than 100
100-299
300-499
500-699
700-899
900 or more
SCORE INTERVALS
1.000
F
5.4
PCT CF Palli.61
0.8 41.7 100.02.000 14.0 21.3 56.3 91e13.000 17 .ii 27.4 3905 64.04.000 3s= 2 .4 224 345.000 5.6 9.1 646 14404.000 3.0 4.9 3.0 4.9
CASES PROCESSED a 614130MINIMUM VALUE a 1.0404MAXIWN VALUE a 6.0040SW CF scuaes a 191.4290SUN SUID. SCGnES 494.2044MEAN 3.1051STND. DEW. IN/ a 1.2009SM. OEV. tte.11 1.2914MEDIAN m 3,0047
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
F
LI
Pia
44a
CF
547_190.097 Lila 50 91.4
141 Z7. 421 79.7140 31.1 &SO 52.171 11aZe- -.ELF 30.441 7.4 41 7.6
53:7-1.100404.4000
/471.40U03.20/0
-1701ri.1s41443404d5
Li:3T COri rts;,,:iLABLE
2. Number of classrooms. (Do not include offices, auditorium, or gymnasium.)
SCORE EiWiC$ F PCT LF P*84.0
0.0 - 1.99 017 ill .61.5 100.02400 5.99 4.4 7.1 6046 98.86000 .- 9.99 10.6 17.2 56.4 91.710.00 13.99 9.6 16.0 45.9 74.514.00 - 17.99 9.1 14.7 36.0 58.618.00 - 21.99 10.3 16.8 27.0 43.922.00 - 25.99 7.4 12.0 16.7 27.126400 * 29.99 4.0 6.3 9.3 15.130.00 ... 33.99 1.6 2.8 603 6.634.00 37.19 1.2 2.0 3.5 5.838.00 41.99 1.0 1.7 2.3 3.442.00 45.99 0.9 1.4 1.3 2.146A 0 -. 49.99 0.1 0.1 6.4 0.750.00 53.99 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.654.00 57.99 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.658.00 61.99 440 0.0 0.1 00162.00 - 0 499 0.1 0.1 C.1 0.166.00 - 69.99 0.0 0.0 -.Oa -0.070.00 - 73.99 0.0 0.0 -6.0 -0.074.00 71.99 0.0 0.0 .1400 .a0e076.00 81 e 19 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.062.00 85.99 GI._ _AO -0.0 0.066.00 89.91 0.0 0.0 *0.0 *0.090.00 93.99 0.0 0.0 0.0 *44094.00 - 57.99 G.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.098.00 - 100.00
CASES PROCESSEDNG. ULANK O1AMINIMUM VALUE s04111MUM VALUE aSUN 0 SCORES di
SIUN SOD. SCORESMANSW. GEV. (Ni aSTNU. OEV. (W41 aMEDIAN
11
0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.061.51591.00001.0410062.0000
1031.640922826.0117
140714.3_ _ _9.477194555116.3335
' P6T CPCT
1 0.2 536 100.012 2.2 535 99.854 10.1 543 97.6TO 14.1 469 87.579 14.7 499 74.4
117 21.8 320 59.783 15.5 403 37.950 9.3 120 22.423 4.3 70 13.116 3.0 47 8.814 2.6 31 5.812 Z.t L1 3.21 0.2 , 0.90 0.0 4 0.73 0.6 4 0.7C 0.0 1 0.2
J.2 1 0.20 4.0 0 0.00 0.0 0 0.00 4.0 0 0.00 a.0 0 0.00 u.0 a 0.00 0.0 0 0.00 0.0 0 0.00 1.1.0 U 0.00 u.0 0 0.0.
5361
1. 400062.4000
10714.0000404830.4044
19.911649.43149.439119.777.
3. If you have a combination of graded and ungraded classes, indicate below theinstructional organization for each grade or, if ungraded, the equivalent grades
in your school. (Check only one box in each lettered 'row.)
Instructional Organization
Grade or Equivalent
Check each grade-NOTincluded in your school
1.
(a) Kindergarten
SCURF INTERVALS F
Graded2.
Ungraded Graded & Ungraded:5 4-
CF P-.BLW
1.000 20.1 34.2 5(1.4 100.0
2.000 32.83.000 3.64.000
55.9 38,4 45.84.6 Soli 9.8
1.9 laT
CASES PROLESsEU * 50.6181NU. &ANA OATA 28.0900OININUN VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0080SUN OF SCORES si 104.4419SUM S00. SCORES 216.4913MEAN 1.7847STNOc OEV. (NI .2 0.7029STAID. UV. (141/ * 0.7010NEO1AM a 1.1411
(b) Grade 1
aCUKE INTERVALS
i.00G4.0003.0004.000
CAES Pit4CLSEUNO. rLANK Ak) AMINIMUM VALUEMAAI MUM VALUc4UM UFSkirl 540. $caKesAtAN41P4U. UEv. 1t
STMj. utv. (* -L)MLOIAN
*
a
a
F PL, LF C-PCT
142 48.6 497 100.0
300 444 356 71.435 7.0 66 11.120 4s 0 40 4.0
497401.00004.0000
927.0000&971;4000
1.46540.706.1
1.4550
F PCT C.F P-8LW F PLT C-PCT
5,2 8.4 56.8 100.0 43 0.4 100.043.4 14.4 934'7 91.2 377 74.6 4o9 91.66.1 8.6 9.9 16.1 45 8.4 94 18.041. 4422 4.8 S.2 47 V.2 47 9.2
58.81.01 51224.giCCO 25
CO 00 1.4004i.0000 4.0000
104109 Al2 0.g000302.6464 4106.000U2./622 2./8750.6.6.61 0.10990.0947 0.710b2.0540 2.1,4650
(c) Grade 2 D 0 0SCORE INTERVALS F OCT CF P81. 8
1.000 4 e$ 8.2 51.6 100.12.000 42.1 7.7.4 53.8 91.83.000 5.6 9.6 10.4 Lea4.000 14 0.9 .0.2 8.9
CASES FROCESSEO sAO. BLANK GA TA 0
58e6C76254090
14141148.41 VALUE 0 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE m 4.04000SUM OP SCORES 12844576SUM S20. SCORES 0 310.5720MEAN a 2.1915SYNU. OEV. (hi * 047047SIND. OEV. IN -11 04108MEDIAN a 2.0700
(d) Grade 3
SCORE INTERVALS
OF FCT
F GF C-PC
40 7.8 511 100.0369 72.2 471 92.251 10.0 102 20.051 10.0 51 10.0
0CF P1161 F
Ic404 51,6 100o0 442.000 41.4 /4.0 51.5 91.3 3113.000 5.3 9.0 10.1 170 484.000 4.9 4.9 8.3 49
CASES PROCESSED 4 18.6138O. BLANK OA TA 25.0000MINIMUM VALUE 0 1.10000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000SUM OF SCORES * 127.0933SUM WO. SCORES * 303.6899MEAN a 2.1443STNO. UEV. INI 0.6925STAID. OEV. (N-i ) * 0.6905MEDIAN 2.0517
(e) Grade 4
SCORE INT EK V ALS
1.000
F
.4__ 11.2 sea .09.0 452.000 43.7 74.5 52.1 88.8 3813.000 3.7 642 8.4 14.3 364.000_ 4.7 8.1 49
CASES PROCESSEDNU. 0A TAPI MI MUM VALUE *MAX 1 MUM VALUE *SUM- OF ,SORES
SQO. SCORES '3
NE AN 4
SING. OEV. IN, mg
ST NO* 0E%14. (011 aMED IAN
511261.acioa4.0004
1135. 40004791.0000
2.44110.12690.22762.0840
014.7 CF CPCT
8.672.59.49.6
512 100.0460 91.497 18.949 9.6
51225
1.00004.4044
1136. 00004744.000j
2.19340.72310.14302.0714
PST c,F C -PCT
deb 211 100.074.6 466 91.27.0 85 16.646 49 9.6
54.6631 51126,Z4.0000
1.000U 1.00004.0000 4.0000
143.5419290,1973
2.1124
1.11/.00004077.J000
2.1r4a066160 08(1390.7020 0.71012 .0211 2.41)25
.3. (f) Grade 5
SCORE INTERVALS
2.0003.0004.000
F PCT CF F CF C -PCT
_3_143 100.0 65 1"941.3 70.7 49.1 83.9 362 71.73.3 5.7 let 13.2 32 6.34.4 1.5 444 715 46 9.1
CASES PROCESSED a 56.5143h041 BLANX DATA a 26.0000MINIMUM VALUE aMAXIMUM VALUE aAys.AF SCORESSUM $40. SCORES a
MEANSIND. DWG (NI a
STNO. DEW. (N.11 aMEDIAN
(g) Grade 6
SCORE INT ERVAL:4
1.0002.0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSES; a6LANX DATA
MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE 0
St.M OF SCORES A
SUM SQU. SCORES a
MEANSIND. UEV. IN)
MEDIAN
(h) Grade 7
a
CURE INTERVAL4
2.0003.000
. 4_01.00
CASES PROCESSEDhC. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES aSUM SQO. SCORESREAM
OEV. pa_ 4STNO. UEV. (1.4.1) aMEOIAN a
1 .00004.0000
119.6885275.0473
2.04560.71110.72431.9792
1:1
PCI CF P-8324
Sub 100.044U 87.178 15.44b 9.1
505321.40004.0000
A069.40004537.0000
2.11680.7470.73752.4180
0F OCT ..F C.PCT
14.4 25.1 Sc.1 loo.g 10436.6 65.3 44.3 14.9 3442.0 3.3 5.7 9.6 193.7 6.3 6.3 38
59.055821.00001.00004.0000
246.21331.94170.72400.73221.8818
j03 100.0399 79.357 11.318 7.6
S0334L.40,20
4.00009,7.0000
4451.40041.06210.13920.71991.0313
0F fCT
47.1. 78412.1 20.20.4 0.6Gia OA,
CF P.BL0 F
51.9 100.13 344 74.1.
12.7 21.3 84 13.30.7 1.1 4 U.9
44 goti 3 0.7
19.8414_14.1.00i0
1.00004,10000
,J3.5654103.42351.22480.46t50,47041.1352
C--PCT
435 100.001 20.9
1.63 0.7
435102
1.00004.0000
536.0000764.0000
1.41220.48790.46651.1323
(1) Grade 8
SCORE INTERVAL F PCT CF P-04. it F Pid CF C-PCT
11000
1
49 a9.50.40.3
s 3 015.90.6A*5
59.9 100.0 35960
33
84.54.4.10.7U.7
44566
03
100.013.31.40.7
2.0003.0004.000
10.20.7043
17.01.10.5
CA SE 5 PAW. ESS EliKC. BLANK DATA
a*
55.067415.00 CO
425112
01141 PUN VALUE 1.0000 1.0000SAM SUN VALUE A 4.0300 . 4.U000SUM OF SCORES 71.0199 500.0000SUM S00. SCORES u 95.7071 04.0000PE AN . 14 043 1.1765s7 NU. 0E11. 110 u 0.4350 0.4494St k0 . DEV 1N -11 0.4421 0.44943ME 01/04 a 1.1026 1.0919
4. Number of classes at each grade level:
K (A) 3 0)1 (5) 4
2 (C.) 5
Special orungraded (.3)
QUESTION 4 PART A
PUT Gf Co-PCTSCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P.s81.4 F
es_G 20.0 33.3 _59.11_80.G 52 12.4 418 100.01.800 11.2 18.11 39.4 68.5 78 18.7 366 87.62.000 16.1 27.0 28.4 47.7 141 33.7 Zol 68.93.000 8s5 12.3 10.7 57 13.6 147. 35.24.000 5.4 9.0 7.3 12.2 66 15.8 90 21.55.000 0.7 1.2 1.9 3.2 7 1.7 24 5.74.000 1.0 1.6 1.2 2.0 13 17 4.17.000 0.1 04 0 a 04 2 0.5 4 1.08.000 0.1 0.1 062 1 0.2 2 0.59.000 0.1 0.1 0.1 1
CASES PROCESS ED aNO. BLANK CA IA m
RI NI NUN VALUE a
MAXIMUM VALUE 0SUM Of SCORESSUM SVO. SCORES .
ME AN
SIND. OEV. 4641SIND. 1A-1) aOECIAN
59.547816.00000.0900800
91.0484212.9051
1.52431.49851.5112103787
418_./19
04440400
9a% ilake4104iki
2.4464Isoa371
2.460$QUESTION 4 PART
F GP CPCTSCORE 1NTERVALS PCT CF t4 F PCT
G. 0 5.6 9.7 563 100.0 8 1.? 4/6 100.01.000 144 24.5 53.7 90.3 i6 **Jae 468 --8T1,.32.000 13.7 2363 38.4 65.8 115 24.2 W2 74.53.000 Alt/ 244 42.3 133 27.9 287 60.34.000 7.0 12.1 13.2 22.5 84 16.1 154 32.45.000 4.0 b.8 4.1 1 O. 42 8.8 DS 14.36.000 1.1? 2.2 3o? 12 4.5 26 5.57.000 0.5 0.9 1.2 2.0 4 0.8 ---147 2.98.000 0.4 0.? 0.6 1.1 6 1.3 10 2.19.000 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 4 468 4 0.8
CASES PROCESSEDh0. isLAMx OA TA
mm
:8.342426.00000.0
40661
PIA/MUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE * 9.0000 9.0000iiM _OF goRgsu ri s4b. SCUKES
_I39.2920411.4348
.4433.0000i-41115:4UX'
NE a 2.3015 3e0LOSUEV_IN) * A.65C2 1.26114
K0.1 OEV. 4KAi 146845 1;i741MLUIAN a 201727 2.4644
4. Number of classes at each grade level:
K (P 3
-MI- 4
2 (c) 5
ALEST1UN 4
CO 7 -0)8 (j)
Special orungraded 13)Pala C
SCUKE INTEkVALS F PCT
1.0002.0003.000
14.914.012.2
25.924.221.2
53.134.224 a
92.166.242.0
4.000 0.4 11. 0 120 20.85.00 3.3 5.8 5.6 9.46. 000 1.0 1.8 2.4 4.07.000 0.9 1.5 1.3 2.28.000 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.79.000 041 0.2 0.1 0.2
44 SE 5 PROCkS5E0 *NI). ASK DATA aPIM MUM VALUERAX HU 84 VALUE aSW Of SCORES aSUM SOD. SCORESPE AN a
SIND. Tik V. 1N1SI PIZ OEV. 4 ti../1MEDIAN
F -LF
6 1.3 4/9 /00.072 15.0 473 98.7
121 23.3 401 83.7139 _49,9 280 58.5
73 15.2 /41 29.440 8.4 64 14.213 4.T
9 149 15 3.14 0.8 6 16 32 0.4 4 0.4
57670325.0000
47958
0.09.0000 9.0000
1.37.3026 1414. 0000473.6563
2.3753 2.95201.5959 1.534)1.6.099 1.33b12.1691 26 7914
CiCeST14.)14 4
1NT ERVA
1.0002.0003.0004.000600056 UNJ6.0GO7.0008.0009.000--
CASES PROCES;ACISO. di, ARK OAMINI VALUEMAXIMUM VALUES1d4 lIF SCUREI _-LM Su0. SCUA ES
MEANST OEV ti)S11716. amkolgut 2
PART 0
_
LF P.BL la
100k0
F.
PL,T
415
CO C -PC T
473 100.013.7 23.9 51.8
...
90.3 66 L4.0 4b6 98.515.0 26.2 38.1 60.3 124 20.2 400 84.6A4.4 43.0 40.1 149 41.3 276 58.4
Del 1 0.0 10.7 18 .6 76 "'I iZif -21.1263 4.0 4.6 8.1 24 2.1 52 11.0
1.4 4.1 16 3.4 id 5.90.3 0.5 Ida 169 12- 2.5U.2 0.4 0 al 1.4 4 0.8 8 1.70.6 1. 0 0.6 49 4 u.8 4 0.8
143C528.0000J.0
47364
06J9.0000 9.0000
133.0769 1374.000059.0493 )062.0000
2.3112 2.90491.6158 1.304*1.0341 1.506/2.1233 2. 1669
4. Number of classes at each grade level:
K 3 (1:1)
1 Le) 4 co2 cc) 5 (F)
Special orungraded (.3)
QUESTION 4 PANT E
SCORE INTERVALS
0.0
F
6.31.000 15.82.000 13.53.000 12.74.000 5.55.000 1.96.000 1.7U000 0.38.000 0.39.000 0.3
GASES PROCES SECNO. BLANK DA TA *1111 SI SUS VALUE O
MAXIMUM VALUE 4.
SUM OF SCORES 0sum £00. SCORES *LEANSTNO. DEW. IN) =
STNO. DEW. (tell s
.11
MEDIAN
QUESTION 4
6 CO7 (a8 0)
PCT CF P411.1*
10.8 58.4 100.027.1 net 89.223.1 36.2 62.021 .,7 22.7 39.09.4 10.1 17.33.3 4.6 7.92.9 2.7 4.60.6 1.0 1.70.6 0.7 1.10.6 0.1 041
51441124.00000.0900400
130.3972444.3562
2.23331.619514436a .0216
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.0002.0003.0004 40005.000
PAST P
GF
_068
PLT
L./
C.PCT
/011.080 16.8 468 98.3
119 25.0 3.11 81.53.41 30.9_ - 109- *6,570 14.7 122 25.623 4.0 52 10.919 4.0 49 64.4 4.46 la 2.12 464 6 1434 aos___ .4 0.8
414,b10.619.0000
/34800000
F PCT CF P....ft* F'
9.9 16.11, 59.1 100.0 913.7 23.2 494 83.2 6714.2 33.9 35.5 6060 13210.1 17.8 21.3 38.1 1255.5 9.3 10.8 18.3 45-2.0 3.3 5.4 9.1 24
6.000_ 1.6 2.7 3.4 5.7 1647.000 0.9 1.5 1.8 '.1 ti
8.000 0.5 04 0.9 1.1 59.000 __CO__ G.! 0 .1__. 0 AL. 3
CASES PROCESSED m
hG. BLANK 0A TA =
0/14/AUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE 0tiUM OF SCORESStiM S40. SCORES aAEAh
4906.40002.63191 oa L22
-1;i1.482. 7/09
'P a T
IIii14.8
4$2 100.0
29.2 376 83.227.7 244 54.014.4 119 26.35.3 54 11.93.5 30 6.6I 14 3.11.1 0 L.S0.7 3 0.7
59.1379 45224.00G0 850.0 -0.09.0000 9.0000
128.8226 1291.0000468.8562 -41779.3". 412ao-
2.1 1413 2.4562STNO 0kV. INS = 1.7441ST NO. DEV 1.7994MED IAN 1.9483
1.5640---.1a687.
2.6440
4, Number of classes at each grade level:
QUESTICE4 4
K `Al 3 (D) 6 t6)(5) 4 (E) 7 04)
2 (c) 5 (F) 8 0)Special orungraded
PART13)
SCORE INTERVALS. F PCT CF
C. 0 14.41.000 13.62.004 11.43.000 9.24.000 4:85.000 1.76.000 147.044 1.14.000 0.79.000 0.4
24.3 59.223.0 44.41
11.3 31.215.6 /9.68.2 10.62.9 5.83.0 4.01.9 341.1 1.2CO 0.4
PCT cf CPCTF
100.0 20 4.7 422 100.07161' 65 L5.4 402 95.3U.S AO 25.4 331 79.9MI 112 26.5 230 5e517.9 58 13.7 116 24.69.7 22 9.2 60 14.26.8 14 4.3 30 9.034 11 1o6 24 5.1La 1 -1.9 13 3.10.1_ il 4.2_ s. £4
CASES PROCESSED 59.2040 422NO. BLANK DATA mB 41.0000NINCHON VALUEMAXIMO* VALUESUN OF SCORES
si
SUN SOO. SCUMMEANSINU. DEV. OaSTBDe OM, IN*1)MEDIAN 0
0.0 0.09.0000 9.4000
120.0731 1227.4000400:7625 4939;4042.0283 2.0161.9155 1.60211.9319 --------GiRPAI1.6434 2.6696
CMS I 10111 4 PART H
1P-8L1iSCUM INT EAV A iS F PCT CF
0.0 47.2 79.7 54.2 100.01.040 4.5 7.6 13.0 2042.000 2.5 44 7.5 12.63.000 24 3.4 5.0 8.44.000 048 1.3 3.0 5.05.000 0.3 0.6 2.2 3.76.000 1 .0 1 l 1.9 3.27.000 . 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.18.000 0.6 1.0 0.8 1.39.000 4.1 463 0.1 0.2
CASES PRUCESSED 0
NO. BLANK DATA 059.246020.0000
PININUM VALUE ft
MAXIMUM VALUE 0SUN OF SCORES 0
0.09.0000334744
SUM SGD. SCORES 144.3446MEAN a 0.5640MD. DEV. (NI 0 1.4567SIND. NV. IN -41 1.4414MEDIAN 44100
F
77
1WCT
46.4
CO C.PCT
1.66 100.022 1343 69 53.621 12.7 67 40.420 1.2.0 46 27.7i -5.47 lb IVO3 4.6 17 10.27 4.2 (.4 8.46 Y . 7 0 ir -4.25 3.0 7 4.22 1.2 2 1.2
166371---0.4
9.0000275.4000
1.73-9:404.4
1.05662.4744Eraki0.7727
4. Number of classes at each grade level:
K 3 (0)1 to) 4
2 _ALL.,,
6 (6)7 04)
5 (F) 8 COSpecial orungraded (..3)
QtesTium 4 PART I
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P -BL
060 49.1 92.9 59.21.000 4.4 7.5 10.12.000 Zet 3.3 5.73.000 1.2 2.0 3.64.000 0.4 0.7 2.45.000 0.3 0.5 2.06.000 0.6 1.1 1.71.000 04 0.3 1.08.000 0.6 1.0 0.89.000 0.2 C.4 0.2
CASES PROCESStOW. BLANK DATA mMINIMUM VALUE aMAXIMUM VALUE ASUM OF SCORES aSUM $00. SCORESMEAN a
STNO. 0EV. (N)STAG. OE V. IN -13MEDIAN a
QUESTION 4 PART J
S 1-11-1 KVALS
0.01.0002.0003.0004.0005.00G6.0001.0008.000
_90000
CASE S PROCESSED s
NU. BLANK OA TA aMINI MUM VALUE 0MAXIMUM VALUE aSUM Of STORESSUM S40. SLUNESMEAN4INO. 0EV IN)
S1 M13. DEW. IN-1)MfiCiAN
59.162221.000009.000027.5135
121.87730.44511.39411.40660.1029
100.011.19.66.14.13.32.61.71.40.4
P Fta CF C..Pt T
7$ 54.9 142 100.017 12.0 64 45.117 12.0 47 33.111 1.7 30 211
4 t.8 19 13.43 2.1 15 10.64 1.0 12 8.5t 0.7 8 5.64 2.8 7 4.93 2.1 3 2.1
142395
Oea9.0000
405.0000s.d0001.44312..0432.4582Os 4 LAS
PO' CF P..8L W PVT F C =PC T
.8 ii.110.7 42.34.0 16.0 II .8 34.9 41 17.7 92 39.72.2 8.6 4.8 18.9 24 i03 51 22.0
2,3 100.0 432 100.019.5 17.2 4846 -Tar
_
1.2 4.8 2, 6 10 ,3
0.1 2.1 1.4 5.50 2_ 0.6 0.7 2.6
. 0.1 1 .1 0.6 2.20.3 14 0.3 1.10.0 0.0 ..0.40 -0.0
L4 6.0 7. ----/-1--.-6
6 406 11 5.62 0.9 1 3.03 --i-.-S --5----2-:22 0.9 2 0.90 0.0 0 -0.0
25.2044299.0000
232305
0.00.0000 44400038.6692 379.0000119.041d
1.5291 1.63361.5414 1.57001.5810 1-7.31'W1.1431 1.2133
5. Percent of total student body that moved from school attendance area last year.
10 0-10%
2 11-25%.
30 26-50%
40 51-75%
50 76-90%
60 91-100%
SCORE INTERIMS F PCT CF P-11L0 F P67 CF C-PCT
1.000 44.4 72.5 61.3 100.0 351 b74,11 540 100.02.000 13.0 22.2 16.9 27.5 134 25.3 175 33.03.000 3.1 5.0 3.8 6.3 33 6.2 41 7.74.000 0.4 446 0.7 1.2 5 0.9 4 1.55.000 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 1 0.2 3 0.66.000 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.5 2 0.4 2 0.4
CASES PROCESSED 0NO. BLANK DATA a
61.24417.0000
5307
MINIMUM VALUE a b44 10_ 1.0080MAXIMUM VALUE a 6.0000 6.0000SUM OF SCORES a 43.3415 759.4000SUM SOU. SCORES a 1420464 436.50900MEAN at 1.3608 1.4321STNO. DEV. IN1 0.6518 0.7244MO. DIV. INs11 0.6975 00.1250MEDIAN a 1.1817 1.4465
6. Percent of total student body that moved into school attendance area last year.
0-10% 3 26-50% 50 76-90%
20 11-25% 40 51-75% 60 91-100%
SCORE INTERVALS F C-PCT f P C w
1.000 340 *4.4 $40 100.0 42.4 69.2_ 613 10002.000 144 47.4 190 35.8 14.8 24.1 18.9 30.83.000 38 7.2 46 8.7 3.5 5.7 4.1 0.84.000 7 14.4 is 1.5 0.5 0.9.___ Gob_ _1.05.000 1 0.2 1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.16.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0
LASES PROCESSED a 530___
61.2641NU. BLANK DATA * 7 1.0C40MINIMUM VALUE a 1.0000 1.0000_MAXIMUM VALUE a 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES a /75.4000 85.0123SON SAO. SCORES a 4395.0000 _.43,7424._MEAN a 1.'644 1.31764I NO. DEV. IN) 00024 0.4491SIMI). DEV. IMili a 0.7034 0.4545MtOlAk a 1.4794 1.2229
. _.
7. Estimated percentage (this year) of pupils from families of migrant workers.
0-10% 3E1 26-50% 50 76-90%
2E1 11-25% 4Ej 51-75% 60 91-100%
P4,1* 1:F-C--PCT
96.4 53a 100.04.3 10 3.61.3 7 1.30.0_ _.0 0.00.0 0 0.004 0 0.0
s coRe INTERVALS KT CF P.-ii..11 F
14200_0_ 59 .4 97.0 61.3 MG. 0 5142.000 14 2.0 108 3.0 123.000 0.6 1.0 0.o 144 74.000 0.4 0.0 .4.0 .0 0_5.A00 0.0 0.0 000 -0.0 06.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0 ..0.4 0
CASES PROCESSED * 6162653 533NU. KAU OATA a 4.0000 4*INDIUM VALUE a 1.0000 1.0000MAXI MUM VALUE * 3.0000 3.0000SUM CF SCORES 0 63.1052 559.4000SUN S40. SCORES 69.0043 625.4000MEAN 1.0398 1.4466SIND. OEV. (ND 0.2413 0.4696StNO. OEV. IN-11 062423 062696MEDIAN a 1.0153 1.4145
7a. Do you feel this is an accurate estimate?
10 Yes
20 No
CUdSTI ON 7A
SCOKE INTERVALS
1._0_00
aitib
CASES PROC65 S60thDo 8LANA DATAMINIMUM VALUEPi. X1041114 VALUESUM Of SCORESSUP 500. SCORES
PCT CP P..11 LW F PST at4CT60.41.1
94.2 61.5 100.0 524.1 1.1 1 a11 9
61.!1!9sx 4.0000c 1.0000
2.0000a 62.6/119
64181111
98.3 533 106.01.7 9 1.7
5334L.,00042. ki 000
ipvtiwaa56001000
PEA, i f 0 10 0 119 10 0169STNO e DEV i /I/ c 0.2321 -0;17 air: i t N U OtV. 41 N-11 .1 0.1332 061494010;104 a t.00C1. : 1.0060
8. Estimated percentage of pupils whose families receive public assistance.
10 0-10% 30 26-50% 50 76-90%
20 11-25% 40 51-75%
6yESTION 6
SCOitE 1 KM RV ALS
60 91-100%
F PCT CF F-5414 F CF C-PCT
_1.000 _310 31.1_ 61:1_10.2AL243 1004. 514 1.0.44.0
2.000 1742 21.1. Me 44.5 134 29.2 269 50.43.000 9.0 14.1 12.3 20.3 7 14.6 113 21.24.000 2.2 3,5 3.5 3.6 21._, 409 35 6.65.000 1.2 1.9 1.3 2.1 13 2.4 1.4 2.66.000 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 U.2 1 0.2
CAI06 PROCESSE0 41.5320 534NO. SLAM DATA = 3.0400 3MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 4.0040MAXIMUM VAL.Ut 6.0000 6.4000SUM OF SCORES a 108.6456 966.4040SUN SOO. SCUKES * 2"ita_41_41. 4244.4004MEAN . 1.7443 114020SIND. 04V. (NI 0.1123 :..4061
MO. Ott. IN -11 0.9403 1.0070MEDIAN A 1.4703 1.21a4
8a. Do you feel this is an accurate estimate?
10 Yes
20 No
IA
SCORE 1i47ERVALS F PCT CF F-114 F CF CPCT
1. 000 59.5 97.4 (1.1 100.0 51.7 97.5 5.30 100.02.000 1.6 2.6 1.6 2.6 13 -2.5 13 2.5
_cks4s_PRAcg4tPNO. BLANK DATAAlkIMUM VALULKAA1 MUM VALUbSUM CF SCORESSUM SQ0* SCOkESMEANSYNC. bEii. -04-1ST hit DE V. 1N-11PLE DI AN
_61.09_______±01 5307.0000 . 7
1.0000 1.4400
..._tAqc9 2.000062.6744 543.400065.8156 569.0000_A.0258._ 1.4.1245
0.1562 0.15470.1515 0.15461.0132 1.0124
9. rstimoted percentage of pupils whose head of household attained the followinp,Levels of education. (Check only one box in each lett.:.red row.)
O-107, 11.-5fr. 51-90% 91-1007.
(a) Attended college
QUESTION 9
SCORE ENTER VALS
PART A
0000CF 14.13LW F PVT
1.000 35.0 56.9 41.6 100.0 283 51_01_,2.000 22.9 37.1 2605 43.1 205 36063.000 3.3 5.4 34 6.0 39 7.14.000 0.4 0.6 40.4 0.6 4 .4.)04
CASES PA0CESSE0 a 6/4549NO. CLANK CAIA a 3.0000MINIMUM VALUE a 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE a 4.0000SLM OF SCORES a 92.1130SQM Me SCORES a 162.3439PE AN a 1.4975STK). DEW. (N)STAID. 06Vs (W.II a 0.6337MEDIAN a 1.3789
(b) Graduated from high school but didnot attend college
CeJEST10,4 9 PART I
SCORE 114TERitirS
LOC.°2.0003.0004.000
LASES PRWASSEC 0
DA TA a-iiNliUM VALUE °MAXIMUM VALUE aSAM OF SCORES *SUN SOO. SCORES aMEAN a.11'1/44 AEI/. IN)STOW. &EV. (W.1)MEDIAN
.
x9.624.0_1.4
5316
C -PCT
*ALIO°. 0246 44.743 1.14 , 0.6
4.0000626.0000
1516.40001.Ooad.40Oec.6321.43620090
PCT
99_9
CF P -BLW F
4448.2
_4t11.4....110AS91.4 90 .1 271
39.0 25 A 41.9 1972.±9_. _AO _ 2.9 17
61.44E6ite00C 0
1.00004.0000
366.96342.340.69500.70072.3322
CF C -PC?
43 549 100.051.2 465-01 737.2 214 40 5
-3.2 I T 3.2
529
1.400o----460000
4245.0400
2.45350..776
-0:6761--2.0137
9. rstimared percentage of pupils whose head of household 3ttnined the followinglevels of educptton. (Check only one box in e.nch letti.xyd row.)
0-107. 11-502 51-90% 01-100%
(c) Attended but did not graduate fromhigh school 0 0 0
414STION 9 PART C
SCOAt INTERVALS
1.000
F
28.1
PCT
46.92.000 2040 45453.000 440 6454.000 00 1.1
CASTS PROCISSEG1104 WAR OATA aATUIROM ilium14A1111416 VALUESUM OP scams aSUM SOO. SCORES a
PIEAM a
ST ND. Of V. INJSUMO. OM. 1* 11MUM
(d) Finished 8th grade but did notattend high school
C-PCT
100.0
CF P.41.6
t1.4 1410.0
F
249
PO'
47.1
CF
_549
a a.6 5141 235 46.4 460 52.94.7 746 39 744 45 1.50.7 1.1 a Lel 4 i 1
6144446 529440000e0.40 '14woo*AGO° '.40.6000
9945416 ambooso1070240 4.636.4000
1.6171 1.0257046545 060700.6419 046711145677 14126b0
0 0 0QUEST ION 9 PART 0
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P.116
1.000 46 75.8 61.42.000 104 17.5 14.93.00i1 2.4 4.6 4414.000 1.3 _2.1 143
CASES PNOCESSEO 61.4446AO. ALMA OATH A 440000
F- PLT CF C.qqa
100.0 394 75.b 541 1U0.02443 92 1.7.E 147 24.46.7 24 4.6 39 6.78.1 11 2.1 11 2.1
521
Pi NINIAN WALK 103000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000SUM OP SCOREIL_ 11.1233SUN 4404 SCORES 135.7402ME AM * 1.33C0STAR. Otli iNi 0.6630ST 3. OEV. 4N-4) = 046665Rt41AN a 1,1514
.0040444000
694.00004i5441000
1.434110.063S
-0.0644leibil
9. retimaed percentage of topils whose head of household :it tzithed the followinglevels or edou.ition. (Check only one box in each lettered row.)
0-102 3.1.-507, 51-90% 91-1002
(e) Did not finish 8th grade 0 0 0 0
T
QUESTION 9 PART 6
INTEAVALS F PCT CF et.
1.0QC 54.2 88 e 4 61.4 100.0 448 07.0 515 100. 0
2.004 5.9 9.6 1.1 11.6 57 1101 61 13.03.000 0.9 IA 1.3 2.0 1.6 10 1.94.000 0.3 0.5 043 0.5 2 0.4 2 0.4
CASES PROCESS ED 61.44E6 515NO. ALARM DATA * 4.0000OWL PUN VALUE 100000
.4.1___
1.41000
ItAX 1 NUN VA WE 4.0000 4.4000SUNAW__IICORE S 70.1703 594. 4000SUN SOD. SCORES a 91.4348 780. 4000MAN 1.1424 1.A534ST NO DEV 0.4249 0.'492STNO DIV tNI 1 0.4324 0.4296MEDIAN 1.0657 1.4748
9a. Do you feel these are accurate estimates?
10 Yes
2E] No
fieLEST 1ON 9A.
SCORE F POF:C 1 CF P-.8L 6 F
AtkA 61.4 100.0 481 904 $34 100.02.000 5.7
la9.2 5.7 9,2 51 1.6
CASES PROCESSED a 01t4.4640_5. OCCO
332P40. 8k ANK DATA aMl NI MUM VALUE 1.0000 1.4000SA XI NUM VALUE a 2 .0000 2.4000SUM OF SCORES di 61.0869 583.0008SUN SQO. SCOIAES 74.4406 685.0000MEAN 1.0959__a
DEV tN ) a_691454.2895 0.4444
STK). 0E v. iN-11 a 0.2119 0.4947NED 1.0909 1"449
10. Est boatedincomes.
percentage of school families that have each of the following annual(Check only one box in each lettered row.)
0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%
(a) $12,000 and over CQUESTION 10 PART A
SC041 1NTERVALS 1 KT CF F81N F Pot CF C40*
1.000 42.2 68.6 61.5 100.0 330 63.2 544, 100.02.000 14.7 23 19.3 31.4 143 21.4 192 36.83.000 4.0 406 7.5 40 7.7 49 9.44000 0.6 1.0 0.6 160 9 4«.7 .9 X.7
CASES PROCESS 4kNO. BLANK_ OATA011411114 VALUEPARMA! VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO SCORESNE ANsrhu. OEV D4)
a
a
ST ND DEli WI bRED IAN
4164649 5222.0000 151.0000 1.066004.00000 4.0000
8660372 T726 0000147.0113 1406. 0000
1.3117 1.4.789x«6517 04_144_0.6631 O. /12Z1.2186 1.4909
(b) Between $9,000
f41, EST ION 10
and $11,999
PART 11
o I:1
SCORE INT 1R V AL F KT CF P- T
1.000 27 44 41.4 100.0 204 39.1 522 100.02.004 28.9 47.0 33.0 Ma 214 -54' -446 93.000 5.0 881 5.0 8.2 44 4.4 44 8.44 .000 Owe 0.0 .0.0 0 0s0 0 0.0
CASES PROCESSED143« BLANK OA TA
61.40233.0000
52215
0141841.1 VALUE a 1.0000 Ls 0000MAXIMUM VA Luc a 3.0000 3.41000SUM Of SCORES a 100.2_5 884* 0000SlM SWO. SCORES a 187.9603 ab96;+.40JJ*AN L 6327STM. Ukkle tN) a U. 12s6_ 0.*174
OEV, ihrli m 0 .6340 00164MkO IAN 4 1.6087 1/.084i
10. Estimated percentage of school families that have each of the following annualincomes. (Cheek only one box in each lettered row.)
0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%
(c) Between $6,000 and $8,999
itESTION 10 PART C
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P"BLW F Pia GP C=PCi
17.7 26.d 61.4 100.0 132 25.4 5Z0 100.069.01_2.000 32.4 53.4 43.7 /1.2 291 54.03.000 10.5 17.1 104.9 1704 93 17440104 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.7 4 0.1
CASES PAOCESSIO a 41.4023 520WAAilAALAMOUL a ta0H---- 17AMMAN VALUE a uomm 1.0000MAXIMUM VAWE a 4.0000 41.00001
__ANO OF SCORES * - 116.4040 AmamiSUM SOO. 5404ES 41 250.1044 4193.0000MEAN a 1.8544 1.9404iTNO. OEV. (NI " 0.6901 04.07 @3
STNU. 01V. (Ni) " 0.4588 040/1111
NED1AN 140965 1.9399
318 74.691 18.74 0.8
(d) Between $3,000 and $5,999
Gl1E5I'IOti 10- PAP"(
0 0
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF PLIT
1.00C 27.8 45.3 41.4 100.0 248 47.62.000 24.7 40.1 31.4 54.1 214 41.13.000 7.8 12.7 8.9 140 53 10.64.000 1.1 1.9 Lel leo 4 0.8
4F-C.=-100
521 100.0273 5i;76-
59 11.34 Os 4
LASES PROCLSS EV a 61.4023 521NO. SLAW CA IA = iA0440 __.... !6AIM RUM VALUE 0
___ ____ -1.0000 -17.0-04---
MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES " 105.0548 457.9040SUN SO U. SCORES a 214 7929 166 3.000--ME AN a 10109 4.0449STNO. DEW. (N) 0 9.0356 0.6976----________...lailli Ot V. (N.41 0 0.7614 -- --3:bRED 1 AN 0 1.616$ 1. )314
JO. Estimated percentage or school families that have each of the following annualincomes. (Check only one box in each lettered row.)
0-107 11-50% 51-902 91-100%
(e) Under $3,000 0 0 0 0QUEST ION 10 PART E
C40CTSCORE INTERVALS PCT CF F CF
50.4 81.1 61.4 100.0 416 81.6 510 100.02.000 7.9 1204 10.6 17.3 64 13.3 94 18.43.000 2.6 44 2.7 4.$ 23 4.5 25 4.94.000 02 0. a__AIAL 2 0.4 2 0.4
CASES PAuCESSEGNG. BLANK DA TA *
61.40233.0000
51027
MINIM* V*Ui 1.0000 l.Y000NAN1NUN VALUE 4.0000 4.0000SW OF SCORES 74.9231 631.0000Sum SOO. SCORES 101. C 020 93 1.40Q0*AN 1.2202 1.4313ST Kis, UV 4. (NI 0.5209 0.429StNO. BEV. 114-11 0.5252 0.3434MEDIAN 1.1045 1. 1,130
30a. Do you feel these
1 Yes
20 No
tii0 los 10A
SCORE INTERVALS
0.3
are accurate estimates?
F C7 CF P-41111 F -PUT
1.000 50.1 85.7 56.5 100.0 4432.000 8.3 14.3 8 3 14.3 10
CASES PROCESSED 50.4720NO. BLANK DATA 24.0000MININUN VALUE 1.0000
_ARAX1 MUM VALUE .ogooSW4 OF SCORES aSUN S00. SCORES *NEM51NO. Obi. tN1 *SIN°. UE11. (01-.1
MEDIAN
66.614283.492318.14270.34960.35261.0032
4.; F Corgi
86.4 511 100.013.6 70 13.-6
513
1.00002.4WD1.4.4-Wila
723.00001.13650.64.130.443*1.0790
11. Estimated percentage of school families in each of the following occupationalcategories. (Check only one box in each lettered row.)
0-10% 1 l-50Z 51-902 91-100%
(a) Professionals (Doctors,lawyers, etc.) 0 Q 0 0
WASTION 11 PART A
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF 100.61.6 F FT CF CPCI
1.000 53.8 67.1 61.4 140.0 449 64.9 529 100.02.000 7.4 U.S 7.6 1243 ; la /3A $0 25.13.000 0.5 0.1 0.5 04. 7 101 7 1e34.000 0.0 OA .00.4 000 0 0.0 0 0.0
CASE 5 PROCESSED a 61.4114AU. OLANK OATA = 3.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000P4A01141.1 VALUE 3.04100SUN OP SCORES = 1103o$L440_SUN 500. SCORIA 46.7469NE AN 1.1318SIND. OEV. (N) 0.3615SIND. 1411. itfr.1) 0.3635ME 0 1 AN a 1.0103
(b) Business owners or managers
GOESTION 11 PAR? 0
0 0
T PICT CF P.415F
6.000 .J.0 ,J /42.4 i 1.4 100.02.000 14.2 23.1 14.7 23.93.000 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.64.000
-- i1.10._ 0141. .70,0_2.9 .0
CASES PUOCESSECNO. BLANK DATA418IMUN VALUE At
MAXiNUM VALUE s
$4M PF_SPIRe.S _5601 SOO. SCORESOtAN 11.
SIND. DEW. IN/_ _____ .
SINN. DEW. (N-.13REDIAN *
52902.00003.11060
441169006804.0000
1.16450.6046eatialki160691
F Pi.I Cr CPCI
390 73.6 530 100.0134 25.1 140 26.4
6 1.1 6 1.10 U.0 0 0.0
41.4114 5303.0000 710000 -130006"3.0000 300004
70.6149 676.0000108.0048 980.4000'1.2414 1.4755U.4445 0.47140.4536 (447191.1372 1.1795
11. Estimated percentage of school families in each of the following occupationalcategories. (Check only one box in each lettered row.)
0-30% 13-50% 51-90Z 91-100%
(c) White collar workers (clerks,salespeople, etc.)
QUEST ION II MIT C
C4CTSCOPE INTEkVALS F PCT CF 1013L11 F P6,
1.400 25 .l 41.4 61:4_10160_ 191 36.0 530 100.02.000 31.7 514 59.1 564: MK 554 339. 44.03.000 4.0 605 44 6.3' 4S 44 45 6.54.000 0.0 0.0 -0.8 -0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
CASES PROCESS ECNO. BLANK OATS a
41.41143.0040
3307
AI N1 PUN VALUE 1.0000 164000NAZI NUR VALUE a 3.0000 4,00000SUN CIF SCORES 101.1266 0t410000SLN SWO. 5Cuict5 166.5220 A112.4040MEAN A 1.4446 1.1245STAID. OEV. 4N1 a 065%66 0.6076MAO. 0E V. INI) a 0.4035 0.6004ME0 IAN 1.4516 1.017
(d) Skilled workers; farm owners
QUESTION 11
i NT 6Fi ALS
1. QOP
2.0003.000`.000
PART 0
F
IB .0
PCT
49.3
F
174al-732
PUT
Jd**53e013"
CF- PCT
530 100.0
CF P-ALM
61.4 100.030.412.30441
41.820.1U.9
43.4I2.9
_ _
70.72140
A51:
0.4
CASES FPUCESSELNO. BLANK CATA Mk
41.41143.0000
530
4.4000063.4000
NINIPUP VALUtMAA/MUN VALUEMM OF SCURE
1.0000
1184706254.9233
1.92970. 1137
SUS Su C. SCOREa a
WithST140. 0kV. INI
L907.40001.4d400.6491
STNO. DEV. IN.13 aNEOIAN a
0.72971 e9141 1.43244
13. Estimated pefeencage of school families in each of thv rol3owing occupntionalcategories. (Check only one box in each lettered row.)
0-102. 11-502 51-902 91-1002
(e) Unskilled, farm, or serviceworkers
MAISTIOU 11 PRAT E
SCORE INTERVALS F PCI CF P-.81.tt F NA CF t-OCT
27.7 45.0 41.4 100.11L 230 4544 US 10044_1.0002.000 27.1 44.2 334 55.0 216 41.1 247 14.73.000 602 104 6.16 10.4 61 12o* 69 13.14.000 0.4 0.t _OA _OAL 4 0iali 6 0.4
CASES PROCESSED *AO. &LAM DATA 0
41.41143.0000
52512
*d1 AUD VAWE 14400 1.0000MUM. VAWE 0 4.0900 4:0000SUN OF SCORES 0 102473I 011904113t
SUN $00. SCORES 0 119.0419 159.0000MEAN 111 1.4452 1.1,097
SENO, GEV* (NI * 0.6040 0.1133STAO. OEV. IN-4) 40 0 .6196 061140MEDIAN 1.6124 144144
(f) Unemployed
0UESTION 11 PART F
SCURE INTERVALS
0 0 0
F PCT CO F CF C4CI
_1.000 51.7 44.1 41.4 100.0 4,tt2.004 6.4 14.0 9.4 15.9 /7 12.11
3.000 1.2 1.9 24 1.9 11 244.000 0.0 '13410_ 60 4)-0
CASES PROCESSED a 451.411481.ANK DATA 3.0000
N1 AI VALUE 0 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 0 3.0000SUOLIEEgAii_ * 7Z63644SUM SUO. SCOkES 56.5512KLAN 0 1.1744STHO. OEV4b (Ni it 04245STK). 01V. (14-43 = 0.4330HEOIAN 1.0944
545 100.0ia 17.111 2.10 0.0
52512-1.40403.400(1
626.000041044000
1.4,9240.4442
--Ar.44461.4034
lla. Do you feel these are accurate estimates?
1 Yes
2 0 No
QUESTION 11A
SCORE INTERVALS F
1.000 34
PCT CF P'41. F
90.4 60.1 100.0 464
P43 CF
119.0 549 100.02.000
&kilt tiOCESSIO
Ssi
a
9.b S.11 9.6 Si
60.66117
14.0 51 11.0
NO. kW DATA a 11.0400 12PI NI MN VALUE * 1.06C0 L. 0000O1aM04 VALUE s logiMai 2400UOStill OF ICONS * 6640414 Si 34.01011
SUM 190. SCORES 0 MAW 6913.00.0MEAN 4 1.0930 I. ALAS
STNO DIV ( h h a 0.2143 0.3135STNO. Of V. Hell a 0.2461 0.313114E01 AN * 1*0330 1.4621
12. Estimated percentage of students of the following racial or national origins.(Check only one box in each lettered row.)
0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%
(a) Caucasian or White
ta
Ctilicf INTERVALS F PCT CF P-41. W L7r C.41CT
.t_1_110(
4
Ask_Iti_ 41. 7 100.0 39 705 ..S4 100.0aaaa3.0004.000
S0 600 Se .116.2 26.2 S3.137.0 39.9 37.0
94.2 46 11.6 49691.71164.1 151 2644 449 64.1$9.9 29 5" 29# 55.8
CASE 3 PROCESSED 41.610 534NO. (iLANK CA T A a 1.0060 3AI NIRLIR VALVE a 1.0000 -Thiii1-14300MAXIMUM VALUE a 4.0000 414000SIM OF SCORES a 209.8502 ITT 6.0000SUM 30U. SCORES 160.3432 6350.0000PEAR * 3.4025 3.3256STN.)* UE V (NJ 0.4661) 09111STNO !UV. IN -1 i a 046739 .9120NEIMAN sr 3.6657 3.6040
12. Estimated percentage of students of the following racial or national origins.(Check only one box in each lettered row.)
0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%
(b) Negro or Black
QUESTION 12 FART 4
SCORE INTERVALS F PC1 CF P610 F C.4C1
_/.000 46.1 14.8 4144 /.00.0 350 64.3 505 100.02.004 10,5 1701 14.5 2402 193 20.* ASS 30.73.000 2.9 4.4 54 4.1 20 14 52 10.34.000 2.0 3.3 a.o 3.3 24 44.4' 24 4.8
CASES PROCESSIOWS_ BLANK CA1A =
61.62332.000
50532
11111111014 VALUE 1.0000 10)000MAXIMUM VALUE * 4.0000 4.JONSUM OF SCO1l Q1_41391- $34.41000SUM SOO. SCORES 0 141.2194 1304.0000MEAN 1.3454 1.4574
D. t N a 0,7244 0.6026STMO. DeVe (1411 0 0.7303 0.054MEDIAN 1.1442 1.4414
(c) Spanish surnamed
QUE541ON 12 PAO C
11-CT C4C TCF 1)+91.6 F PL.T CF
1.000 56.5 91.6 61.6 10000 430 44.* 464 100.02.000 -4.0 6.5 5.2 8.4 42 4.1 11.23.000 140 1.6 1.2 1.9 10 4.1 42 2.5.4.400 012 0s3 0.2 0.3 2 0.4 .2 0.4
CASES osocesseo = 41.6234 484W. BLANK DATA 2.0000 53014IMOM VALUE 1.0000 L. 0004r-MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.4000SUM OF SCORES 64./276 552.0000SUM SOO. SCORES = 94.1720 72000000MEAN 0 1e/C:5 1./405STND. OEV. (Pd 0 _Q=3141 _
0.34220.4421
SM. OM Vw 1N1 ---G4TUT44101AN . 1.0457 1.U6Z6
12. Estimated percentage of students of the following racial or national origins.(Check only one box in each lettered row.)
(d) Oriental
OLESTION 12 PART 0
0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%
0 0
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF
1.000 61.5 91.1 61.6 300.0 474 5104 476 100.024000 0.1. 04 0.1 0.2 2 0.4 2 0.43.000 0.0 000 ...OA .41p0 0 0.0 0 0.04.000 0.11 0.0 ...0.0 ...OA 0 04 0 0.0
CASES PROCESSEDMO. BLANK DATA
61.623124000
476
MIRIMUN VALUE a 1.0000 160000MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 240000SUM OF SCORES_ 61.1414 47040000SO SOD. SCORES 61.1765 412.0040REAM a 1.1119 1.0042STMU. UEVe 1M1 0.0417 0.064?STRO. 01V. 4A*11 000411 0.06*4MEDIAN 1.0400 1.0021
(e) American Indian
0LiSiiON PART E
0 O
Saila It ERVALS
1.000
PCT
9104
CF P-111.11
61.6 k.0.0
F
454 98.7 460
C -PCT
100.0
2.000 0.6 0.9 0,4 0.1 5 Aal b 1.3
3.000 0.0 0.0 -o.o -Oda 0 0.0 1 0.24.000 0.0 6.0 -o.o -o.o 1 0-2 1 0.2
GASES PROCESSED 41.6239 460NO. SLAM DATA 0 2.0000. 77RIN1MUS1 VALUE 1.0000 1.0400MAXIMUM VALUE 0 2.0000 44.0000
SUN OF SCORES 6/.1917____ 446.0060SUM SOD. SCORES 0 63.3443 490.0000ME AM 1.0013 1.0174STMU. DEV0 ted 4 0.0156 0.1736STtQ. GEV. 4N-.11 0 04164 041.18MEDIAN 1.0047 14006
12. Estimated percentage of students of the following racial or national origins.(Check only one box in each lettered row.)
0-10X 11-50% 51-90% 91-1002
(f) Other (Specify
04441141* 12 FART P
SCORE INTERVALS
Loco
F
61.4
ECT
94.9
CF POL b
41.6 100.0
F
1001
.2
PCT
I.
40044
CF Ce.PCT
Las L40. 0"5 6400
2. 1.9.s_.J9a.0003.0004.000
0.30.0 0.0
4.5
0.1'403Oa
1.1 I!
0
CASE So PROCESS1DNO. *LOA DATA111111110 waneMAY Mill VALUEUM OF SCORES
100. SCORESME All
a
STNO. 0Ev. tft) -MO. o4v. 4N-11.1501114
61.62312.0000I .120431
LO5faa
tsaaaa44000
444 P154.000
114.400067.4444 1444410001.031 1.015/04432? 0E014490.220 0.1814/014025 1.0250
12a. Do you feel these
1 Yes
2 0 No
are accurate estimates?
EILESTION 124
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF PPEL F PGA a-C.41C?
1.000 6007 gii4 1409 528 944.9 544 100.02.000 0.9 1.4 0.9 1.4 6 A 6 1.1
GASES PROCESSED a 61 S21124L. &AUK DATA a 3.0000MINI MUM VALUE 1.0.000 L.0000MA Xi MUM VALUE a 2.0000 2.4)000SUR OF SCORES a 62.3421 54 0. 0000SUR .S00. SCORES 64.0628 .332.:4000NEAN 14139
0.1165 itg0OEV. IN -1I 0.1115 0.102 6
1.0010 1.1)057
13. Are children bussed to yourregular attendance area?
1 Ei Yes
2 fl No
QUESTION 13
school from other neighborhoods not in your school's
scoae INTERVALS F PCT CF P...aL1( F FLY
1.040 15.9 15.7 41.7 100.0 147 27.4 536 100.02.004
CASES PROC9SS00 a
45.9 74.3 45.8 74.3 319
41.6797
22.6 349 72.6
53640. 6L ANS OAT* a 1.0000I%1141 MUM VALUE A 1*(440 1.4000M&1 PUN VALUE a 2.0000 2.4000SUM OP SCORE S a 107.4991 92544000NM 5410. SCORES a 199.0090 L703.0000MEAN 0 1.7424 1._1157S7NO. CEW* (NJ 4.4311 0.4461ST NO. OE V. 04.4 0.4446 0.1410)Otti LAN a 1.8246 1.111.1.1
14. If children are bussedbussed in ?
4iiESTION 14
in, about what percentage of the total student body is
1[:3 0-10% 30 26-50%
20 11-25% 40 More than half
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0G_O_
2.4043.000
_4.400
LASES PAWCESSECNC* 81ANA DATARINI RUM VALUEPAXIMUN VALUESLN OF SCORESSUM 920* SCOREKANSTNU. U4" V. IN1STNO. DEW. IN-41 A(*DIAN
Aa
a
A
F F Ply LF C--PCTPCT CF
1..8 42.1 32.8140.0 135 44.9 201 100.0
346 11.1 194 51,9 34 114.11 453 53.1
6.1 18.7 454 46.8 Si iia 449 41.3
/A? Ziet 26.1 69 23.6 68 23.6
32.164G24510000
1.000044.000
76.3167230.9314
2.3219AALLIA41.294724111
488249
4.400062140000
41$14,00000Z1.1104144484
-Ik-aZ5CWLe 7647
15. Are children bussed from your school's attendance area to schools in otherneighborhoods?
1 0 Yes
2 No
QUESTION 15
SCORE INTERVALS F
L._0_00 _12.9
PCT CF P114IA F
21.2 61.0 100.0 121
CF
24*6 SIO 100.02.440 48.1 78.4 44.1 784$ 4129 11.1 VW 7762
CASES MOUSED a 44.944i S3040. SLAM QATA 7.0000 7A/NINUM VALUE a 1.0000 1.04900RAAIRUN VALUE 2.0000 2.0990SUft OF SCORES a 109401 E5 11111.0000
U11 S00. SCORES 20662448 1737.0409NEAN 1.7065 ain11TNO. 0EV. IN/ a 0.4062 0.40/STIgis DE V. IN.11 0.4116 Owt201PEOLAN a 1.6456 1.02/
16. Using your best professional judgment, rate each of the followingcharacteristics for your school.
Size of physical plant for pupil
PART A
Highly HighlyAdequate Adequate Inadequate Inadequate
F PT GP C-qPCTSCORE INTERVALS F PCT CV 14.11L ti
1.000 1564 2'100 610 190.0 134 40.0 536 100.02.000 32.1 52.1 44.2 I'm 274 skol 442-74.03.000 12.2 19.8 14.1 22.41 100 4044 146 23.94.000 1.9 3.0 1.9 3.0 20 3.1 40 3.7
CASES FROCESSE0Kt. BLANK DATA *
61.61111.4000
5361
NININUX VALUE fil 1.0000NAAINUM VALUE di 4.0000 4.4000SUNOF SCARES * 123.6944 1086.00001086.0000
5146. SCORES a 284.4234 4522.0044otAN 2.4017 2.0261sup. O. it./ s 00950 0.11
01.41 * 9.7412 OaTVC-eN601AN a 149789 1.9891
16. Using your best professional judgment, rate each of the followingcharacteristics for your school.
(1) Condition of physical plant
LC)Suitability of physical plant forprogram operation
HighlyAdequate Adequate Inadequate
0HighlyInadequate
QUESTION /6 OAST
SCORE INTERVALS F OCT CP P...111.4 F OCT CF 0-PCT
1.000 16 27.2_ 61.7 100.0 137 29.3 36 /00.02.040 35.1 546, 44.9 `12 : 294 554 Sig 70.T3.000 T.3 1/40 1 11.9 65 12 .1 SS 15454.000 2.5 4.1 24 4.1 IS 444
.
- Le 3.4
CASES PROCESSEDStO. ALARA OA TA
aa
61.611?1.0004
5361
IMAM VALVE 14000 14:0000NAY MAN VALUE 4.0000 4.4000SUM ar SCOROS a 118.9466 10/6e0000SUN SOO. SCORES at 263.2431 1214. 0000ME AN 1.9285 1.4955ATIMIDa_OiVa (NJ 00445 0.1312STRO. O$V. 46141MEOIAN *
0.74461.9011
0.1111.-L44154)
QUEST ION 16 FAST C
r -PTA- c-PCTSCARS INTERVALS PCI CF P.1.81.01
1,111_0112.000
&.." 16.9 4192 100.0 96242
18.1-53.1
5314315
100.081.932.2 32.6 $0 413411
3..400 1690 264 18 e6 30.4 132 24.2 153 28.84.000 2.6 4.3 246 4:3 21 4.0 Al 4.0
CASES PROCESSE0 a 4/.1951 S31hO. BLANK CA TA = 6.4000 6
0141*30 VALUE a 1.0000 L-.424420
MANIPUR VALUE a 44400 4.%1001)
SUM o SCORES * 13342644 A140. `10011
SUM Slin. SCORES 325.1235 ttWilia00KAM 2.1114 2.1469STNL. OEV. (NI a 9A1,11 0.1524STNO °EV. I N -I1 0.1413 04530ME 0 IAN 2.1241 2. L011
16. Using your best professional judgment, rate each of the followingcharacteristics for your school.
(D) Humber of instructional personnel
Highly RighlYAdequate Adeauate Inadequate Inadequate
(5) Number of other professional personnel
st It3M a
_12.02.0003.000
....
LASES PROCESS EC =
1'3. OL,AA .PA TAPIMPUM VALUE s=
MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SC0J4A =SuM Sfay. SCuRtiMEANSINN. 0Ev. 4.19 =
STKO. 06r. IN-11 =ME6IAm
00e.TION lc
SCOK* 1NTEK8AL.";
1.0002.0003.0004.000
F PCT CP P..81 a
dots 14.0 0_1c5"1.SLOILO41.2 66,9 52.9 86.01i.5 18.7 11.8 19.10.3 0.4 0%3_ Q.4
61.4it54qQOP31.00004.0000
126.4409.480.90062.05610.58340.58822.0386
PAST t
PCT
3.2 b.*34.2 5b.7J;/.1 31.71.6 3.0
LF
60.455.120.4I,d
CASES PRUCt:JE0 = 60.360NC. BLANK CATA = 7.0CCOPIAIOuN vALUii 1.0000MAXIMUM LUt = 4.0000Sum Of SUAES 4 13a.106*Sur W46. SCUksS 342.86o0KaAN 2.2641
iNi J.6616utv. 414-11 = 4.6611
mtolAN 2.2290
F Pia C-PCT
78 L4.*0 .$4, 100.0353 0421. 456 85.4101 1d.9 143 19.3
2 0.4 2 0.4
53431.00004.0000
.1.095.00002431.0000
0.'0960.340i2.4354
-UL. F pt,T .F C-PCT
le0.L 48 4.i 3.10 100.09L.4 301 5o.b 482 90.9
34.6 167 Ji.5 Ica 34.23.0 14 telt) 14 2.6
5307
1.00004.u0u4
i207.0000&i79.u0u4
2.47/40.65i10.059/2.4209
16. Using your best professional judgment, rate each of the followingcharacteristics for your school.
HighlyAdequate Adequate
QE) Number of teacher ides
(G) Number of other non-professionals
Inadequate
CJ
HighlyInadequate
0
011127101. 14 PAOT P
SCORE /NT IRVALS F PCT CF F PC. 7 CF CPCT
448 _A144 LOOaD 23 4.4 1Z7 100.02.000 1h7 29.5 2 1 et 99.2 161 30o6 504 92o62.1100 U.4 47.3 30.4 418.1 251. 47.4 2143 6$1.44.000 1160 14.4 11.0 1984 92 17 ..5 22 1 31.5
CASE1 PROCISSIONO. °LARK SAT*
10.041010.0000
527l0
MUMS VS WE 1.4000 1.4000NMI NU1L 11111/4 06600 4.4000SUM OF 1COOIS 107.4449 /466. I/004SN 500. SCORES 545.46$7 43916404j0RE AN 2.1122 2. laid
STUB). OEWo IA) 0.1123 0.1791ST60. 090. 1611 0.190 0.7799MEC iAM 2.1310 2.6167
QUEST ION 16 FART
SCORE INTERVALS
_L. T3002.0003.0004.000
F PCT
_at/4.4 $7.3lea 30094.4 1.0
CF 1011Lit
51.1 100057 el 9,40.323.3 36.9
CASES PROCESSED 59.9217NO. SLAM DATA 11.0060MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUS VALUE 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 145.7436SUN SRO. SCORES 0 383.2E15KEAN a 2.4320ST60. OEV. 1141 - 0.6930STOW 0211. 044 0.6449MEDIAN 2.3067
F PUT CF C-1PCT
19 4.6 546 100.02-8 -r 94.9 rOT 96.4117 314 2111 41.441 7.8 41 7.0
52611
/292.00004424.4000
2.45630.690/
2.4444
16. Using your best professional judgment, rate each of the followingcharacteristics for your school.
49 of books, periodicals,other printed materials
0) Suitability (quality) of books,periodicals, and other printedmaterials for instruction
and
HighlyAdequate
0Highly
Adequate Inadequate Inadequate
CUEST1OM 16 PART
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CP PalLW F PGT C.FG-PCT
1.000 12.5 20.4 61.4 100.0 319 223 934 1001_024400 39.0 6444 4$.9 79.6 312 42.2 41, 77.73.000 9.3 13.2 141.0 16.2 77 16.4 itS 13344000 0.6 1.0 0.6 1.0 6 /t1 __bilk .1
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATA
0 61.44313.0000
5343
MINIMUM VALUE e 14000 14004MAXIMUM vaima 4.0000 440000SUM OF SCORES 120.9547 1030. VsfAOSUM SQ0. SCORES a 262.3403 A236.0000NE M, 1.1643 1.943057140. UV. (141 0.6241
.
0.4394ST MO. 0E V. 116.44 0.6333 046400ME0166 1.9672 149456
OUESTICk 146 PUT 1
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0013
F
124_
PCT
19.4
CF P..01.11
41.3 1014_02.0003.000
.409.0 ________ __
43.65.3__I:= Z.
71.10.9G.4
49.35.7
80.49.3oAA
CASES PR:II:ESSE°HG. BLANK OAT*
0
61.31464.0000L 40130MINIMUM VAIUt
MAA2M11M VALUE * 4.0000SON_ OP SCORES 116.541745U4 S. SCORES 239.147MEAN L 9003STMO. MU. (Mk = 0.3341ST AO. 011 V. 1#4.4) a 0 0423AEOIAN 4 1.9273
ir -cf-tzm
120 2L*5 SAA 100.030-4)4W 4T3 Tf.-543 8.1 46 th
°lie 3 0.4
5334T4T4004---44000
995.4000a21;44504
0.)57i1.6992
16. Using your best professional judgment, rate each of the followingcharacteristics for your school.
Highly HtghlyAdequate Adequate Ihadequate Inadequate
Quantity of audio-visual materials
Suitability (quality) of audio-visual materials for instruction
QUE5711.1.4 16 PAST .1
SCORE INTERVALS F OCT CP 1"111.6 F 106T COCPCT
1 004 LO a 144.7 6163 100.0 97 18 al 544 100.0a.000 04 37.1 53.1 03.3 302 so. a 635 81.83.000 1160 2464 IS a SSA 3.27 21.9 133 25.0CAN 0.1 12I 0.7 L.2 6 16 6 1.1
CASES PROCESSED' 6101E0RD. ,IN DATA SADAOMINI NUS VALUE a 1 40000RA 41 NM VALUE 4.0000SW4 OF scans 1284E04SUS 500. SCORES 21 e. conRE AN a 2.1411SIM). 0111. 11141 a 0.1614STRO DIV. Mal iKa ii AN
04/ 4124011E
41iESTION 16 PAST IL
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CP P.I1L11
02le4.6000
1106.411011454.1/014
264141901t4/112_000.00U41596
F Po..7 C. Csalo CT
1.000 12.0 19.7 60.1 104.0 106 0.0 530 100.02.000 40.6 64.7 411.9 00.3 353 ilea, 424 40.03.000 Sol 13.3 43 13.7 70 1342 I L 1.3.44.000. 0.2 0.3 0.42 063 k._. 0.2
CASES PROCESSEDNO. :AMR DATASIMKO VALUEMAAIRUO VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESREARSUM. DEV. 4N1STOW. DEN. 10141MOLAR '
a 10.1441a 7.0040
1.04004.0000
a 11402415a 250.4812a 1.9434a 0.5132
0.51101.1549
5307
-7474416480026.11000s164. 0000
1.93560.5792
16. Using your best professional judgment, rate echaracteristics for your school.
HighlyAdequate
(_L) Quantity of instructional equipment 0LkAl Suitability (quality) of instructional1-1/ equipment for instruction
04iEST ION 14 PANT L
S CURE INTERVALS
ach of the following
HighlyAdequate Inadequate Inadequate
0 U.
F PCT CF PSLW F PCT CF CPC T
1.000 814 14.3 6104 100.0 $3 1545 544 100.02.000 WA 62.0 51.7 55.7 1S2 4242 451 $4.53.000 1344 225 14.1 21.9 116 211 110 22.34.900 ____ . 0.3 0._4 0.2 0.4 3 Orb 3 0.6
CASES PROCESSEDh4.1. ULANR OA TAAIM NUM VALUE a
MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SOMESUM SQ0. SCuRES m
WE AN a
Aj&G. tokti. iNt 4STMO. 01W.mEDIAN
ouestlOg 16
SCORE 1NTElVA1,S
1.0002.0003.0004.000.
61.43543.0(10140004.0000
12804481291.62702.0900.611100.61762.049
53431.0000400000
1/07. ONOs503.U000
2.47300.62430.0249
. 240542
ACT'-- 0-$1.w ----r P" CF C-PCT
LOA 17.0 _III:A_ADgA.9 97 14" 532 100.044.9 734 50.9 83.0 3837-7 2 A 413-41.46.0 9.8 6.0 9.8 50 9.4 )0 9.40.G C,C. ..0,(_m0,0 0 0.0 0 0.0
CASES PROCESS IC m 41.271SNO. BLANK DATA
.
MIMI MUP VALUE 1 .0000MAXIMUM VALUE m .0000
.0F SCORES 114.4,02Sum SO G. SCOmES 243. 7806MEAN 1.9279ST NO. qhvf 4111 0.5116STM0 U V. tg-1.1 4 0.516-1MEDIAN a 1.9507
53251440003.140150
1017. 0000-aria J00J
1.91110.2142
1.9390
17. Estimate the percentage of students in your school at each of the followinggrade levels who are reading one or more years below grade level accordingto current test data. The estimate should be based upon the concept of nationalnorms for the grade for which you are reporting.
(a) Grade 2
None
1-10%
11-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-90%
91-100%
OUEST1(N 17
SCURF INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.0005.0006.0007.000
PAR'S A
F----
cF 6.461.F OCT CF
3.4 6.1 55.0 100.0 Lk 4.416.9 30.2 524 93.9 150 30.9
__A4,11.9004701 96.9
21.2 39.2 3166 63.1 196 4464 120 66.011.1 19.1 13.7 24" 93
146 2.6 2.7 4.8 17.J40,44.5
__Al§27
_0165.6
1.1 1.4 1.1 1.4 10 2.1 10 2.14.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0 9.9 ...(k___ 0.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. MANS OATH
55.924752.0000
48552
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000PA )(1 MUM VALUE 21 6.0000 6. 0000SUM OF SCORES a L436.0000SUM SOO. SCORES
.10120004523.0513 4716.0000
MEAN 24043 2.9.08ST1409_ DGV. 1M) a 1.0046 0.0704SIND. tiEV. / a 1.0160 0.4794ME u I AM 2.0903 2. 6954
17. Estimate the percentage of students in your school at each of the followinggrade levels who are reading one or more years below grade level accordingto current test data. The estimate should be based upon the concept of nationalnorms for the grade for which you are reporting.
(b) Grade 4
None
011-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-90%
91-100%
4UE S T I ON 17 PART
14k:r CFCfiC ISCURF INTERVALS F PCT CF POLN F.-
L.000 0.5 O.8 54.4 100.0 3 0.6 4di 100.02.000 11.1i 21.9 $3.9 99.2 116 241 4741 99.43.000 23.5 43.2 40.0 77.3 194 40.3 362 15.340000 14.2 284 11.6 34.1 130 z70 LW 34.95.000 3.1 6.9 4.3 1.9 31 604 36 T.94.000 0.6 1.1 0.6 1.1. 7 1.5 7 1.57.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0 4.0 0 0.0
CASES PROC OSSEO a 54.437 401NO. BLANK OA TA a 5504210 56
-r. votioP INI MUM VALUt a 100000SA* INUM VALUE * 6.0000 604000SUM OF SCORES * L73. d492 4 53 44 U000SUM SOO. SCORES * 601.5119 i-32117/01Z-IIE AN m 3.1495 3.1892STNU. IN) * 0.9199 0049443iSTRO. UV. 04-4.1 * 0.9265 ----GiAA4MEOIAN m 3.1317 3.1264
17. Estimate the percentage of students in your school at each of the followinggrade levels who are reading one or more years below grade level accordingto current test data. The estimate should be based upon the concept of nationalnorms for the grade for which you are reporting.
(c) Grade 6
[:3 None
D11-25%
0 26-50%
D 51-75%
0 76-90%
0 91-100%
CUESTIGN 17 PART C
Cl a-sc. F tart
1.000 0.6 1.4_ 4 /.4 100.0 6 1.4 4413 1 (to. 02.000 10.2 21.5 46.8 91.1 93 24.0 411 98.63.440 17.4 36.7 36 06 774 153 36.2 ea,4 76.64.000 31.6 11a 40.5 12? 30.0 In 40.45.000
.149.35 7.5 462 9.0 36 605 44 10.4
6.000 0.7 1.5 CO 1.5 7 107 d 1 9
.____i_a_N__ _ 404 .,4 00; / 02_ 0.2
CAse 5 PROCESSED a
__AO .:T9
47.3640
..____k__
423NO. KAHN DATA a 112.0000_ ).14MI MAW VALUE a 14,0000 1.4004MAXI MUM VALUE a 6. MO 7. 4000SUN OF SCGIMS aSUN SQO. SCONE a
.154.6361551.0415
_#.386.400Uqt91111,0000
MEAN mg 3 4700 3.44113STNO OEV I NI a 049704 164124STNO. iJEV (N*11 111 069608 1.013iiItE0146N 41 1.2410 3.44353
4.
18. Are there students in your school who in your judgment are in need ofremedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction?
10 Yes
2 0 No
WEST* ON 1
SCORE INTE RV ALS
1.000
F PCT CF 16.1114t F
420 69.3 61.6 100.0 371
F4,7 Cif CPCT
69.3 SAS 100.02.000
CASES PACC IS I 0
16.9 30.7 1469 30.1 M4
61.6031
30.1 166 30.7
535NO. OLANA DATA14114INUN VALUERAX1NUN VALUE
2.00001.00002.0060
1.00002. 4000
SIA Of SCORESSWI EGO. SCORESPEAR
aa
110.11,4.31466
le 10 ?I
6.116.0000t02 la 0000
la 1065----Getorr-STAO. OEV. 4N1
SIND. OEVe14E01A11
0 646130.46501.2216
0.4eLs1...210
18. Are there students in your school who in your judgment are in need ofremedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction?
Yes
20 No
If no, go on to question 19.
a. If Yes, how many students?
b. If Yes, how many students are there in need of remedial readinginstruction in each of the following grades?
1 4 7
C..PCT
100.0
2 5 8
3 6 UngradedWESTION 184
SCORE INTERVALS
.0.0 - 9.99
F
4.0
PCT
11.0
0 61ALM
17.4100.0
F
20. 6.3
CF
31510.00 ." 2449 14.2 340 32.9 694' 94 40.5-. 495 93.730.04 ... 41.99 64 14.4 14.7 56.4 41 4L03 199 63.250.00 - 41699 liaot_l _L30 32.6. 33 10.4 LJa 41.97040 - 19.99 2.5 6.8 9.0 24.5 24 1.4 99 31.410.00 - 149.99 &A 4.4 665 11.7 21 1.0 75 23.8110.00 ... 129.99 0.9 2.5 4.1 21.2 7 4.2 'ea 154.130.00 -. 149.99 O. LA 3.2 .. 4.7' 6 1.9 41 13.0150.00 ..- L69.99 00 1.4 407 70 6 1:9 45 11.1110.04 -. 144.99 0.4 lel 2.1 5_ell 6 1e9 49 9.2190.00 "- 209.09 0.4 1.0 1.7 4.7 5 1. 4.3 7.3214.00 . 229.99 0.1 0.2 1.4 3.8 L 0.3 1.8 5.7230.00 "- 249.99 0.2 0.5 1.3 3.5 3 1.4 Al 5.4250.00 -. 269.99 0.2 0** 1.1 3.0 3 1.0 14 4.4210.00 - 489.99 0.1 0.4 49 2.4 1 0.3 11 345290.00 -. 309.19 0.3 0.8 CA aL 4 1.3 Ill 3.2310.00 ". 329.99 0.1 G.2 0.5 1.2 T 0.3 6 1.93341100 ". 349699 0.1 C. 404 1.0 1 u.3 5 1.6350.00 - 369.99 0.0 4.0 0.3 0.8 0 0.0 4 1.3370.00 -. 389.99 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.8 3. Oa 4 1.3390.00 "1 409.99 0.0 0.0 .2 0.6 0 0.0 3 1.0419.00 "1 429.99 AJAL 0.0 0.1_ 0.6 0 0.0 3 1.0430.00 - 449.99 Q.1 0.2 0.2 0.6 1 0.3 4 1.0450.00 - 469.19 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0 4.0 2 0.6470.00 - 489.99 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 1 0.3 4 0.6490.00 - S09.99 0.1 0.2 ILI 0.2 1 4.3 1 0.3510.00 -. 5Z0.00 0.0 0.0 .4.0 -.0.0 0 0.0 Q 0.0
-313----CASES MAIDC6:SSE0._.... .______
36 .9543...
140 ALMA DATA a 2140000 2221111W4 VAAjztE 1.0000 1.4000
VALUE 11 504.0404SUM OF SCOMOS a 640207111 2447414oasoSUM S. $CQMLS 185025.1415 4446471.0000MEAN ' 56.3435 70.*095SING. OEV. INT m 67.4605 77.4269Mao 4110. (0111 0 14.494/ 77.45141 ECIMM :a 346449 4 44040
1R. Are there students in your school who in your judgment are in need lofremedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction?
DYes2 D No
If no, go on to question 19.
a. If Yes, how many students?
b. If Yes, how many students are there in need of remedial readinginstruction in each of the following grades?
QUESTION 1O!
4 7
2 5 8
3 6 Ungraded
PART A
SCOal INT iERV AL S
0.0 -. 1.99
F
3.6
PCT
12.3LAO '''4.00
11441
5099999
13.99
1044.04.3
354.713.414.6
14.00 17.99 1.8 6.011.00 21.19 22 -Gs22AO 15699 MA 2.40ICAO 29.9! 0.2 0.730000 33 94) OA 1.4134.00 37.99 0.4 1.238400 - 41.94 0.2 0.642.00 - 45.99 0.0 0.0464,00 -- 49.99 Os C GO 05W 53490 Cia- 0.354.00 5749 0 40 0.0MAO 61.99 0 A 0.162.00 - 614419 044 0.066.00 - 69.99 0.0 0.070.00 - ... 73.99
7 4 990.1 0.3
74 00 - 04 GA71.00 . 81.19 0.0 0.082.00 =- 45429 0.0 0.086.00 - 119.9V 0.1 044390.00 - 93649 0.0 -0.044 .00 ,:-. 97.99 0.0 0.098.00 100.00 0 00 0a
CF 1211.14
29.525.911.311.47.153lel263Sal1.3.1.00.80404t.30.50.30.30.3us4.10.10.1
-0.0...OA..12.0
F Pe,T GF C-1PCT
10060 27733340
1063a.,4001O.3
&ea 100..0:1 #311;
./Ait aLop a49,2
87.7510038.1134.0 2G 7.6 Ili 30.9.
11.1 22 0.4 61 23.310.4 9 3.4 39 14.97.7 2 0401 30 11.57401 :400 3.8 ' 28 10.74.5 4 1.5 18 6.93.3 3 1.1 L4 5.32.b 0 0.0 1 i 4.22.6 0 Owti 11 4.22.6 3 /al £1 4.21.9 0 0.0 8 3.11.9 4 14.5 8 3.11.1 o 0.0 4-1. 51.1 0 0.0 4 1.51.1 1 0.4 4 1.5
0.9 a 0.1/0.3 0 .040 1 0.40.3 0 04.0 1-I 0.40.3 044 0.4
-0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0dO .0 0
-0-13,700.0 0 0.0
4-0.0-04GASES popcEsuoR0. ALAM DOKINImum vi.LuE
=29.1003 262
271.00000.0
WV0. to
MAAIMUM_YALyk a 116.0000 86.00SUM OF SCOWES 303.63C9 A ti
still SQ0 SCONESMEAN
aa
1517.144IO2925
9441414104)64LIN atl.
ff-tiii.; V. Ihi a 12.21147 1361198"STND. uEv. 1 t*.41 12.4984 14421MEDIAN
. .
0.5970 9.157o
18. Are there students in your school who in your judgment am in need ofremedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction?
10 Yes
20 No
If no, go on to question 19.
a. If 'Yes, how many students?
b. If Yes, how many students are there in need of remedial readinginstruction in each of the following grades?
3. 4
2 OSIL 5 8
3 6 Ungraded
7
QUEST ION 188 PART 5
SCOPE INTERVALS
0.0 .- 1.995099.99
11.99
2.00 -6440 ..;
10.00 .14.00 -. 17.9918.00 21.9922.00 - 45.9926.00 - 29.1930 AO - 33.99:14.00 37.9931.00 - 41.9942.00 - 45.9946.04 - 49.9950.00 . 53.9954 440 -.. 57.9954.00 61.9962.00 -, 65.9966.00 - 09.9970.00 - 73.9914.00 - 71.9974.00 - 41.9942410 - 85,9986.00 - 89.9990.00 - 93.9994.00 -.. 41c 9998.00 . 100.40
CASES nix assotoiCh 81.46IK OA TAMN' MUM VALUiPAM RUM VALVESUN OP SCORESSUN S00. SCORESSUSSING. C. (N)SINU. OEV IN -1)MEDIAN
CF
40ata1121.45
100.001.664694469
F PCT
3.3 Met4.4 110a .
4.1 14.35.0 15.4
CF F
32:11 140.0 24Oa. 111.4 j 79114 54.51 314.105 40.3 i ft
Pia
A.4OA/0401.1.6
2.0 6.0 84 24.9 19 867 92 32.31.3 1.9 1.2 18.9 17 0.0 73 25.61.5 4.4 4.9 14.9 16 5.6 56 19.60.6 1.414 34
3.4la 10.5,,,
4;11V
4.1169
4034
14.011.9
0.2 067 147 5s2 2 . 4.1 43 8.14*1 0.4 1.5 4:5 2 Oa 20 7.00.3 0.9 1.3 4.0 4 1.4 14 6.3.0.2 11.11__0.3 0.10.0 00
3.2 3 i1 14 4.9_1.0044 eit
244.1.6
40
1.40.0
117
3.92.5
O. 1..±_1_ 04 1 .6 ' 3 lel 1 2.50.4 1.2 0 0.0 4 1.40.0 0.9
3.0 0.0 0.4 1.2 0 i.0 4 1.40.1 03 0.4 1.2 1 0.4 4 1.4
003 0.9 0 G.0 217i10.0 0.00.1 44 0.3 0.9 1 0.4 3 1.10311-_, 4L0 1.02-4.19.4-9
0.2 0.6 04J-0 2 0.7
.
-i-Mi-- 2 0.74).0 060.1 0.3 4.2 0.6 1 0.4 2 0.7
U ..9_ 0.1 0.4 01
a.00;4--
1 0.4-1----.4__AgtILL
0.1 0.4 Del 0.4
0
-iiiig 265
248. MCC°0.0
99.0000
4520.4
99.0000363.9 387
9034.703111.1009
4816044"1151444.0000
t3 ;PAL41
_ _.
_.:._
14.832614.858710.1087
*10 .
13.449513.61097.2070 . _ ._.....
18. Are there students in your school who in your judgment are in need ofremedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction?
0 Yes
2E1 No
If no, go on to question 19.
a. If Yes, how many students?
b. If Yes, how many students are there in need of remedial readinginstruction in each of the following grades?
QUESTION 188 PART C
4 7
5 8
6 Ungraded
SCORE INTERVALS F FC7 CP P'8141 F . Pa- 1:F C=PCT
3Co 837.1
0.0 - 1.19 a 12.13.80 'w 5+91
___.3
9+6 31036400 . 9.99 4 o 2 13.5
1040 ...8 13.99 5o6 186214.00 17.99 105 4.91840 - 21499 1.9 60022.00 - 25.99 14 3.328.00 d 29+91 0.8 2.630.00 ... 33.11 0.8 2.63440 - 37699 0.1 2.438.00 -. 41.99 0.0 0.142.00 .- 45.99 0.0 0.046.00 - 49.99 0.1 0.45© .00 - 53.19 0.4 1454.00 - 57.19 0+0 0+058.00 - 41.99 0.2 0.762.00 - 65.99 0.0 0.066.00 - 69.99 0.0 0.0li.e.00 --' 73499 0 60 OA
4,-GW17- 7799 0.1 0.378.00 -. 814,99 0.1 0.382.00 *Soft 000 0.0_.86.00 -. 89.99 0.0 t;.09000 93.919 0.1 0.39440 -- 117 99 060 0.0
0.0i:04- - -1-0-G41T) 0.0
1741347076024.334, 3aa1.71.04.90.9OA0.5Oa0.20.20.2Oa0.20.10.1
C01-*0.0...CNA)
CASES PRAXES $ EC) a 30.1132NO. U. ANK DA TA 0
AI NI NUN VALUE. =AAA! NUM V ALUt az.
257.00000.0
90.0CCOSUN OF SLUM S a
_340.0311
SUN SOO. SCORES a 8174.0814MEAN 18 11.0416SING._ DEV INI = 12.5102ST NU. DEO'. 1N-4 i a 1201114MOAN_ . 709116
100.0 23 444 21 100.08749 IrF 440" az 9 L.6Se.6 39 14.2 17.9 65143.1 14" 1441 50.924.9
.3021 7.6 90 32.7
20.0 19 6.9 69 25.114.0 12 4.4 50 18.2NO b 4.2 36 13.8sa 10 3" 32 11.69.6 9 3.3 22 8+03.2 1 4.4 -T3--4a3.1 0 ticali i. 4.43.1 1 sJ.4 12 4.420 5- 4.1 -11 48013 0 04 6 2.2LA 3 144 6 2.204 0.--4-Car- 3 r.10.8 0 0.0 3 1.1.0.8 0 0.0 3 LaO.. 1 47474- 3' LI003 1 004 Z 0.70.3 0 460 1 0.40.3 0 ii-.0- 1 0.40.3 1 4.4 1 0.4
-0.0 0 woe 0 0.0-0+0 0 ii.0 0 4.). 0
275X62
Oo ta)
90.4.0000
363 z.-asoo111U652.00Ott
134)407413.441113.664310.Z04.10
18. Are there students in your school who in your judgment are in need ofremedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction?
1 D Yea
20 No
If no, go on to question 19.
a. If Yes, how many students?
b. If Yes, how many students are there in need of remedial readinginstruction in each of the following grades?
1 4 ija 7
2 5 8
3 6 Ungraded
GAMSTION 188 PART 0
SCORE INTERVALS PC1 CF P..81W P PLT GP C -PCT
4.0 1.99 2.6 8.0 32.42.00 4* 5.94 111.3 34.1 21.66.00 1.99 4.4 ME 18.3
10.00 13.19 4 47 14.4 14.114.00 17.99 2.0 6I 1.418030 - 21.99 2.2 6.6 7.422.00 25.99 1.8 5.5 3k32640 6 20.99 0.6 1.8 3.330440 - 33.99 0.8 2.3 /lei34.00_ - 37.19 0.5 1.4 la311.00 41.19 0.4 1.3 1.742.00 45.11 0.1 0.3 1.346.00 - 49.90 04 0.4 1.230.00 33099 0.3 Oa 1.134.00 . S7.99 0.0 0.0 Gel
00 - 61.19 0.1 0.4 0.162.00 - 65.49 0.0 0.0 0.666.00 69 99 0.0 0.0 0.67040 - 73.99 0.2 0.5 0.674.00 - 17.99 0.3 ha C*511140 81.99 0.0 Oat tel&GOO - #5449 OA_ CA 4..186.00 89.99 0.1 0.3 0.190.00 93.99 0.0 0.0 -0.Q94.00 97.99 0.0 0.0 -G.0OM. - 1.00.00 0.0 0.0 -GO
100.0 16 5.5 290 x.00.092 .o 76 26.9 M4 94.531.1 40 13.8 216 67.643.5 47 164 II* 53. 820.1 23 1.9 109 37.622.9 27 So 3 86 29.716.3 16 5.5 59 20.314.8 6 2.1 43 14.8.2.1 9 3.1 27 12.8'Oa -6 2.l 28 9.75.3 6 2.A 22 7.64.0 I ..4 Lb 5.53.7 1 0.4 15 5.23 a 4 '1.4 14 4.83o4 0 0.0 10 3.422,4 2 0.7 le 3.42.0 0 #.1..0 8 2.8aot) 0 0.0 II 2.82.0 21.5 40.4 L0.3 00.3 1
0.0 00.0 0-0.0 0
0.7 8 2.81 :4 6 2714.1 . 2 0.7000 1 0.303--- -I--0.0 0 0.00.0 0 0.04.0 0 0.0
CASES PROCESSED 0 _12.4432 290i47-7----
0.4NO. SLANK DATAM IN I MU M VALUE "
242.00000.0
MAXIMUM VALUE 0 87.04C0 87.0000SUN OP SCORES 391.0112 ,4254.0000SUN 300. SWROS st 11004.6453 13417141.00110MEAN . '2.0314 144***05160. DIV. IN) 0 13.9274 19.A522IMO. °EV. (Nli 14.1413 13.A192MEDIAN 0 8.0822 10.9362
18. Are there students in your school who in your judgment are in need }ofremedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction?
1 fl Yes
2 0 No
If no, go on to question 19.
a. If ".es, how many students?
b. If Yes, how many students are there in need of remedial readinginstruction in each of the following grades?
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Ungraded
f
M4E/ION /04 PAST E
SCORE INTERVALS F OCT CP PfILN PuT CF C..PCT
0.0 1..119 1.4 4.7 30.6 1040 7 44p. 410 100.02.00 5.99 11.4 3.7.3 294 9,1.3 42 30V4 :AS 'LA4.00 - 1.10 44 13.1 1707 440 40 144 Aiii 674
10.00 -.. 13.99 54,1 180 13.1 44.1 42 AMA :t4$ $4.a14.00 .- 17 .99 2.2 1.2 8.4 27.5 -25- 9.3 9 36010.00 21.19 1.9 6.1 6.2 19.3 24 6.9 74 27.422.00 - 25.99 1 1 3.7 4.3 14.2 14 5.4 50 18.5164040 -.- 29.99 0.5 /se 34 ILLS 1214ria30.00 33.99 0. 1.9 2.7 ea 7 2.6 13 12.234.00 - 37.940 046 2.4 1a 6.9 7 2.0 26 9.636.00 - 41.99 0.4 1.3 1.5 4.9 4- 1.5 19 7.042.00 - 45.99 0.3 1.0 1.1 3.b 4 1.5 15 5.646.00 - 49.99 0.1 0.3 0.8 2.6 1 0.4 IL 4.15000.. 53.99 -Oa Oa 4.7 8.3 4 1:5----LIF-- 3.794.00 - 57.99 6.0 GO 6.4 2.4 0 tiolik 6 2.255.00 6149 0.1 0.5 1441 1.4 1 0.4 6 2.242.00 - 65.99 0.0 GA 0.4 1.2 0.---;:e0-. .
,V- 4.986.00 -. 69699 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.2 0 0.0 5 1.970.00 ... 13.99 0.1 0.3 G.4 1.2 1. 4,14 5 1.974.00 - 77.99 0.1 0.3 0.1 4.9 it 0.4 4 ---2.5MAO - 81.19 0.0 0.0 6.2 0.7 0 0.0 3 1.182.00 '.. 85.99 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.7 2 0.7 I La84.60 - 89.99 0.0 04,1 0.0 04 1 0.4 1 0.490.00 - 93.99 0.0 0.0 -(0 -.040 0 4.0 0 0.094.00 - 97.99 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.Q 0 000 0 0.098.00 -. 160.00 0 .0 0.0 .0.0 .---1 a WO. O 0.0
CASES PROCESSED a 34 6C40 210a'. -Iiiiii. -64iA a 2 6i-acdo 267AI NI MUM VALUE ils ',OGG° 1.6104J!eA.AI MUM VALUE * 89.0000 44,4000SUN OF SCORES 'ST eT140 :431;4016-SUN SAO. SCORES 0 9211.4727 114444000NUN so 11,69#}1 Lita2430SIND. DEVe (NI a 12.8969 1445440SING. DE V. ite4 i m 13.1129 14.6151PIED 1 AN A.30:2 10,.714
18. Are there students in your school who in your judgment are in need ofremedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction?
1 0 Yes
2 0 No
If no, go on to question 19.
a. If Yes, how many students?
b. If Yes, how many students are there in need of remedial readinginstruction in each of the following grades?
1
2
3
4 7
5 8
6 Ungraded
11131171 ON 166 PART P
sofa INTERVALS
0.0 1.99
F
2.0
PCT
1.230.I615.613.4
, CF Fat/MU
27.9 100.021.1 st A .
114.3 63,113.0 461.3
P
12653639
P6T
4.725.714.213.4
CF C.-PCT
03 100.0griti, .0363at 69.6140 55.3
2.006.00
10600
..
...3.9910I9
13./9
11.54 44.3
14.00 1799 WI 6.5 ea 3161 20 1.9 101 39.916 .00 21.99 2.2 LS 4.9 14.6 26 10.3 41 32.022.00 .' 25699 1.1 6.1 4.7 16.6 17 6.7 35 21 &T26.04 351.09 0.4 1.4 1.11 lea 3 2.0 36 MO30.00 ". 33449 0.1 0.1 &, 9.4 3 11 33 13.034.041 - 37699 044 jd 3.4 Sal_ 4 Los AO 11.9SO AO 91.19 0.9 3.1 1.0 72 10 4.0 26 10.342.00 . 5.49 0.0 G.0 1.2 4.2 0 0.0 16 6.346.00 49.99 G.1 0.3 14 4 02 1 004 16 6.350600 .. 33.19 0.4 163 1st 3.9 6 2.4 15 5.954.00 57.00 0a 0.3 4..7 2 «4 1 0.4 9 3.6341.0_0_ 61.99 0.4 1.4 4.6 1.1 5 2.1.0 a 3.2*2.00 65.99 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 1 U.4 3 fa66.00 69.19 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.870.00 73499 0.4 LA 0.1 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.814.00 77.94 0.0 41.0 OA 0.4 4- 0.0 a Oa76.60 01*99 0.0 0.0 6.1 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.8$1.00 OS. 09 0 A 0.0 0.1 OA 0 0.0 2 0.046.00 -. 111.91 OA 0.0 0.1 0.4 4- 0.0 2 0.890.00 - 13.119 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.844.00.. 97.99 0.0 0.0 Ost 0.4 0 4.0 Z 0.8911.00 . 100.00 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.4 2 U.6 2 0.6
CASES FROCOSSIO 27.4500 253D. BLANK DATA 279.0000
MINIMUM YAtUE ° 0.0 aMAXIMUM VALUE 99.0000 99.4000SON OP SCOR6S 352.0440 4211
SUM $00. 3COM a 1151412 12139 T.0000KAN 11,4A42 5.4636SIND. 0111. IN/ a 13.79113INOe OEV (46-1 1460497 15. 6447HENAN 9 ,1A14 11.3846
18. Are there students in your school who in your judgment are in need f
remedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction?
10 Yes
2 a No
If no, go on to question 19.
a. If Yes, how many students?
b. If Yes, how many students are there in need of remedial readinginstruction in each of the following grades?
1 4 7 10,_
2 5 8
3 6 Ungraded
PART GWASTION 1E8
SCORE INTERwALS F PCT
0.0 - 1.99 2.8 11.62.006.041 -
10.00
5.199649
13.19
3.11.21.1
30.111.310.7
14.00 -19.00 .22.00 -
17 .9921 9925.99
0.60.3GA
5.53.33.9
li GOO - 294 ils 0.1 0.730.00 - 33.49 0.2 1.834.00 37.99 Oe C Q. 0
CP P...11LW F PT CF C-PCT
Ica took) la 22.77.3 73.4 17 -a.74.4 43.3 9 12.03.2 31.0 9 14140
2.3 20.3 9 "lr1.5 14.7 4 ).31.2 11.5 5 407OA 1.6 .1 1..:4---0.7 6.9 3 4.00.5 S. 0 0.0
4 3.6 0 0.0 4 5.346.00 - 49.99 0.0 0.0 0.4 3.11 0 0.0 4 5.3SO AO - 53.99 0.1 OA OA 3.6 1 ---1-.1-- --4 5.3mscso - 5199 OeG 0.0 03 249 0 0.0 3 4.05600 . 61.99 0.1 1e3 0.3 2.9 1 1.3 3 4.062.00 .. 65 .99 0.0 G.0 0,2 1,6 V -040 --------3-4.4766.00 -. 69.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 i6 0 0.0 2 2.770.00 73.99 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.6 1 4.3 2 2.774 .00 77.99 0.0 0.0 471 0.$ 0 0.0 11:-.3711.00 ... 61.99 0.1 0.8 04 Q.d 1 1.3 1 1.362.00 .. 95099 0.0 0.0 ..0.0 ....0 40 o 0.0 0 0.01/6 00 - 69 .99 0.0 4.0 -0.0 ....0 ,0 0 --Goa-- 11- 0.0-90.00 - 93.99 0.0 0.0 -*C. C -0.0 0 0.0 0 0:094.00 .. 97.99 0.0 0.0 `0.0 -0.0 0 0.0 0 0.096.00 100.00 Oa 0.0 ...Co .000 0 0-.0- 0 0.0
GASES PROCESSED e 10.3323 TSNO. 81. Aftilit EAT A e 454.00000161 WOO VALUE e 0.0 0.4OAX1 MUM VALUE 0 4000000 80.4000SUM OF SCORES 3° 95.4211 $2-4-4;iiiiilliStitil SQ0. SCORES e 2640.9053 .30146.40130MEAN a 9.2443 12.3200SIND* Ca; -INT a 1:377755 lie ditt.6SI t*D OEV IN-4. / e 14.4955 15.4231tifiD1 AN 4.9141 7.,530
. _ _.._ . ..____
i5 100.0511 77.341 54.7&I 42.723 30.716 24.014---0.18.7
010.7
5 6.7
i5 100.0511 77.341 54.7&I 42.723 30.716 24.014 18.7---0. 0
10.75 6.7
18. Are there students in your school who in your judgment are in need ofremedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction? 1
1 Yes
2 No
If no, go on to question 19.
a. If Yes, how many students?
b. If Yes, how many students are there in need of remedial readinginstruction in each of the following grades?
1 4 7
2 5 8443 6 Ungraded
PANT NuesilifsTaa
SCORE INTERVALS
0.0 -, 1.94
F
4.0
PCT
46.7
CF P8101
1.6 100.0
F
20
PO
A.).1
CF
57
CPC I
494, 0446.914.93444
2.00 .6.00 -
10A40 L -
5o994. 9913.99
104OAOa
12.9i41.67.0
4.63.2244
S3.331.4'26.8 1
87S
14O030303m.1
ST-2032
14.00 - 17.99 0.5 6.1 1.7 19.8 6 10.5 17 29.818.00 - 21.99 Oa SoS Loa 13.6 . 4 To0 . /L 19.322.00 - 25.99 0.3 3.3 0.7 8.2 3 S.3 7 12.32x.00 29.91 0.0 0.0 0.4 409 0 4.0 4 13SO .40 -. 31.49 0.1 Oe 7 OA 409 I 1.8 4 7.034.00 -. 37 .111 444 Co 0 0.4 4 .2 0 0.0 3 5.3
5.1.-38.00 - 41.99 0.1 1.6 0.' 4.j 1 1.8 4
42.00 - 45.99 0.1 1,6 0.2 2.6 I A00 2 3.546.60 - 49.99 0.0 0.0 0.1_ 1.0 0 0.0 1 1.8
50.00 53.99 0.4 0.0 0.1 1.0 0 0.0 1 1.854.00 ii. 57.419 0.0 0.0 LA IWO 0 440 1 1.85440 - 61.99 0.1 A.0 0.1 1.4 1 1.4 1 1.862.00 - 65 .99 0.0 G.0 -0.0 4.0.0 0 U. 0 0.066.00 69.99 0.0 0.0 '"4.0 -.0.0 0 doa 0 0.070.04 73.99 0.0 0.0 ...4.0 -0.0 0 0.0 0 0.014.00 - 77.19 0.4 0.0 *010 ...0A 0 000 0 0.078.00 - 411.99 0o0 0.0 ..0.0 00 A . 0 000 0 0.082.00 .. 85.99 000 Co 0 A.® a 0 .0 0 0.0 0 0.016.00 - 89.99 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0 440 0 0.090.00 - 93.99 0.0 0.0 'CaO *0.0 0 0.0 0 0.094.00 - 97.99 0.0 0.0 .°4 .0 .00.0 0 000 0 0.088 .00 .0 100.00 000 0.0 0.4 -0.0 0 0.0 4 000
CASES PROCESSED a 4.1641 57has .LANK OA TAPI RI NUO VALUE *MAXI NUM VALUE
472.04000.0
ligAggs&L
48--C
0.060.0000
SUN Of SC0,01! S 034110 2.0044SUN 340. SCORES 1446.1414 14020.0040MEAN 7.4141_____ 9.6696SING. OE V. 1 $ I 0 10.8685 12.4436SIND . NV. IN...li 11.5627 12.31411MEDIAN 2.8337 ____ ___40.41444.
18. Are there students in your school who in your judgment are in need ofremedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction?
1 fl Yes
2 fl No
If no, go on to question 19.
a. If Yes, how many students?
b. If Yes, how many students are there in need of remedial readinginstruction in each of the following grades?
1 4 7
2 5 8
3 6 Ungraded (8)
QUESTION 18d PARI 1
IL PC7 F c-pcT
0.0 to 99 1.4 .P0.9 _1.010010 it 34.3 44 100.02.00 5.59 0.3 7.2 e.4 65.1 2 **1 42 66.76.00 9.99 0.5 12.7 2.3 57.9 2 6.1 20 60.6
/0.600 _13.99 9..3 41; '1A4._,A54___ 4 12.1 16 54.5lit .00 17.99 0.3 7.5 1.5 37.0 3 9.1 14 44.418.00 21.99 0.6 14.4 1.2 29.5 4 14.1 11 33.322.00 25.9c 0.3 6.5 0.6 15..1 3 9.1 7 21.226.00- 29.99 0.0 0.0 0.3 606 0 0.0 4 12.110.00 33.99 0.0 0.6 0.3 6.6 1 3.0 4 12.13...qti -38.00
37 ..99_
41.99,Q. C0.0
Oo0.0
4.20.2
.8_. 00
0.0060
33
9.19o1
42.00 - 45.94 0.0 0.0 0.2 5.6 0 0.0 3 9.1_46.00 49.99
53.990.00.0
0000.0
. 0f*2b.a
5.8-3.4
00
0604.0
33
9.19.1
54.00 S7.99 0.0 0.0 002 5.6 0 0.0 3 9.156.00 b :.:99 G. C 0.0 0.2 5.8. 0 0.0 3 9.1
65.99 0.1 2.2 -ora- 'soli 1 3 9.162.0066.00 - 69.99 0.0 0.0 Co1 3.6 0 4.0 2 6.1
- 0.0 ci Co 1 3.6 0 0.0 2 6.1_700.0074.00 71 99 0.1 1 06 3.6 3.0 2' 6.176.00 81 59 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.0 0 0.0 1 3.0
. _AZ 85.99 0.4 4*c _ 0 0.0 1 3.0464,00 - 89.99 0.0 C.0 0.1 z.o 0 0.0 L 3.09U.00 - 0 .0 0.0 Co 1 2.0 0 J.0 1 3.0
57.99_ 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.0 0 0.0 1 3.098.00 100.00 6.1 2.0 4c1 2.0 1 4.0 1 3.0
CASES ER0CESSE0 * 4.0184 33W. ELANK CATA * 45660400 504MININA VALUE * 0o0 0.0I.AXIMUR VAL0t a 99.0000 99.0000SUM OF SCORtS * -s27iie8 53-57.40011
St04 SOO. SCORES * 2153.2178 2)315.0000MEAN 4 13.114 16.4121Sliev. 0EV. (NI * 19.0749 22.4564l'tu.A. OEV. IN-/) = 22.CC50 22.6044
rcUIAN : 8.102; 11..01700
19. Does your school conduct at least one compensatory reading program as defined?
1 Yes
2 No
F Pier CF C4C1
475 90.0 528 LOO. 0-53 ii1o0 53 10 .0-
5289
SCORE 1 iffERVA LS- F PCT CF P".111.11
_Aid 11/91 60_0 130_90_iigka_2.000
CA$E $ 0110CSee ii
7.4 12.9 7.8 x29
_44,1911NO fiLAAR OAT A a
-9.0000
14 IN 1 SUM VA IA& 1.0000 1.0000AAA Mg VALUE 2.0000 2 .000OSU( OF SCARES 68.5016 5111G-u000
SUN SOO. SCORES . 1441a6 487. 00210PEAR * le 1.2117 1. 004
... _. --___ _ _.
SING. 1.4iii. thi a 0.3347_ ...
0.4005SIND. DEV 1*.)) a 0.3314 0.40022titE0 IAN 160734 1,550
20. How many separate and distinct compensatory reading programs are currentlyoperating in your school? (Include teacher training programs conducted during
the summer preceding the current school year.)
One
Two
Three
41;t4iSTI UN 20
SCORE 1 tatilVALS
1090..2.0003.0004400.5000
DIFour
More than four
F P-411:01- F (:F C-PCT
23.q !,4.8 40511._AlA.0 I4 7 4"I 444 1,0.013.4 27.2 26.2 53,2 Lit* 29.7 257 57.96.5 13.3 12.8 26.0 61 13.7 125 28.2
_Ale. 7.7 CO_ 12411... 3$ 7.9 44 14.42.7 5.4 2.7 5.4 14 ia.; 5 29 6.5
CAE.S.PNCE4SfitJ 41
rtO a Al% DATA49.187030.0000
44431
XIMMUM IOWA 1.0000 1.4000VAAtRUMIYALUE 5.009 5.0000_a___
SUM OF SCORES 9/.0417 iliir.W.10-
SUM $410. SCORES 259.4958 2549.40001411__..... L.9737 2u690ftma. GEV. (N1 1.1748 laciliistmo. OEV. (N-11 0 1.1149 1.2084
0q.?_10.," - ._____... . 4 0111 ..._______ .._ 1.7652
21. Are any of the compensatory reading programs in your school funded totally or
in part by funds (federal, state, local, or other) supplementary to the regularongoing, school budget?
Qi/ESTIDN 21
Yes
C2I No
Don't know
SCORE INTERVALS PCT Ci F Pt.t LF
_1*_110._Q 36_ 10:3 330 74.2 4.79 1 .93.02.000 14.8 26.8 1506 21.1 129 21.4 140 29.83.000 1.5 9 1.3 2.9 11 2.3 2.3
CASi:S PROCESSED60. s3L ANA DATARINI ILIUM VALUEPAX'. PUN VALUE
ss
a
SUM OF SCORES4(.p1. S00._ SCORESSE Ai4
S7 NU. OEV. IN) xST_ND Ofr V N-11MDIANSAMPLE FUR STATS
21a. When was the first compensatorymade available in your school?
14ESIIiA4 214
52.52475.0C COIROOCO3.0000
65-.0612
to2/5/60.44640045121.1903
50.99820NOTEIVALUES IN LAST INTERVAL tAGLOW
47051. ii4300,3.0000
58 8.(100004.6 0000
0.4490.0,500-144-5-5
PROM CALCULATIONS.
reading program funded by supplementary sources
One year ago
More than 1 but less
More than 2 but less
Three or more school
Don't know
than 2 school
than 3 school
years ago
years
years
ago
ago
S&.L4 EhVALs FCT CF P-8LW F pc..r L.F C--PCT
1.000 400 _14m0 41..9 1.00_t_O 60 16.1 472 100.02.000 4.4 106 35.3 84.2 33 8.4 312 83.93.000 4e2 10o0 30.8 73.6 33 d.9 219 7504.000 2317 584 26.1 43.6 217 56.3 146 66,15.000 3.0 7.1 3.0 7., 29 1.0 24 7.8
CASAS PRUC4SS4eLAtot OAT A
KIN MUM VALUEPAX' MUM V ALL:=ousi OF SCORES
SfVD SCORtot N
Sin). DEV. 161St60. UEV. (N-1)RE 01 ANSAMPLE FOP S-1 A1
a
a
.11
se
03A6ioz.6600
1.04005. °PAO
122.7014440.685
3.1.15511.17351.18693.6103
28.8i0ONOIEIVALOE LS' I
472643
I .U0005. u0 Uti
t093.JOLW496I.u0O0
3.A. don1..L806
3.1097iliTCF.VAL t AL LUCII:v
Fii0i- C'ALCULAiIO
22, How long has (have) the present compensatory reading program(s) been availablein your school? (Answer separately for each program.)
Prgtgiam Prg9ant Pr(o9am ProVam2 3 4
One school year or less
More than I but less than 2 school yearsI
I
I More than 2 but less than 3 school years/
Three or more school years
QM 22 PART A
PCi LF C4CTSCORE INTERVALS
1.000 6.7 54.6 12.2 100.0 59 51.8 1/4 100.02.000 4.2 34.6 5.6 45.4 39 34.Z 55 441,62
3.000 1.2 10.2 1.3 1048 15 £3.& 16 14.04.000, 0.1 0.6 0,1 11_6 1 0.9 / 0.9
LASES PROCESSEil 12 4420 114N. BLANK DATA 356.00143 361PI N1 NUN VALUE 1.0800 160000PA II AUK VALUE 40100 4.4000SUP CF SCORES 19.1112 1156.00044
SUP SQO SCORES a 36.4040 344.4000SEMI 1.5673 1**116
,51NUo OEVo 04) a 0.741163760. OE W. 04..1 J, 0.7264 0.743914E01 AN 1.4151 1.4661
CUE .11061-22 PART
1NtEN.VALS
J.00,o_a .0003.000.4.000 .
8
F
2.60.1
.pc3.
OCT
15.031,310.3
CF P -8LM P
OA 2 _WA_ 423.7 45.0 19101 13.8 9G.3. As 3
PLT
57.5
12.34.4.
CF C.:Pct.
74 looao-41.5
4.2 1.40.43 4.1
CASES PRCES SEUNO BLANK DATA a
X A Al NUM VALUEGf SGORkS
SUP SW. SCORESPEAR aST40. GEV. (1/1_ .
ay. IN-1/ a14E01 AN
8.1787391.14000
2..00004e 0000
.13.272326.84 Si
1.62i8Od(159-0.16021.4096
730032
lo 40a044)410430
119.0000441; aido
1.0301066542Gisat1.4494
22. How long has (have) the present compensatory reading program(s) been availablein your school? (Answer separately for each program.)
GL1E
( 1Prog am Prog am1 2
lProgr;)am Prog am
3 4
One school year or less
More than 1 but less than 2 school years
More than 2 but less than 3 school years
Three or more school years
PMT C
SCORE INTERVALS I PCT CF F
__Is000_ _14 614_2.000 1.7 23.9 LA 30.33.000 0.5 6.4 1.0 14.44.000 0.6 64 0.6 030
4C.70:14110. _
LASES PROCESSED aNO. EL ANK DA TA ....aMINIMUM VALUE * 1.0000ilik X 1 MU14 VALUE a 4.0000SUM OF SCORES a 110 k417 _SUM Si D. SCORES 24.66.35REAM 11 1.6077STP46. UEV.INk a 0.9212
. . _
ST NU* pew. IN -L1 a 0.929"'EDI AN a 1.3103
CeUE1TION 22 PART 0
SCORE INTEKVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
Lase 5 PRLICESSfiC,G. BLANK DATA
MINIMA VALUE14AX NUN VALUESUN OF SCOAEisCk SwO. SCORESPt ANST:W.44V. ill)STND. DEV.ME0 IAN
F PCT
20.43.20.eOs.
LF C-PC
37 54.4 o8 100.21 30.9 31 45.
5 7.4 AO 14.5 7.4 7.
68407.
1e 00004.4000
./14.4004244.40t$0
1.4)76)CLeshjit0.4i11.4189
GF ' -8LW F Pt.T C-PCT
2408 100.0, 175 64."!) 417 100.04.4 170 30 13.1 411 19.41.2 4.9 7 3.2 12 5.50.4 1.7 5 2.3 5 2.3
24.012700.4.9001.00004 400030.0450.0.0toi.243100'6144.40391.1077
217258
1.400Q4.0000
06.4.400U434.40124
1.47190.0:3300.614Z14.44J4
23. What was your school per pupil expenditure last year?
Check here if you don't know
PGA cf F PT i:F C-PCTSCOAF 11+63E-CA1'4.5
0.0 2.4 1 10. 11.4 Loo.0 27 L4.9 161 100.0- 40.00 18.0 as.s 3- 119.99 0.3 1.4 1.7 154 85.1
120.00 199099 0.2 1.2 17.8 87.1 2 1.1 151 83.420040 279.99 0.2 LAO 11A 8640 2 1.1 149 82.3280.00 359.99 0044 108 17.3. 85.0 4 44.4 147 61.2360.00 439.99 0.4 2.0 1.7.0 43.2 3 1.7 143 79.044040 - 519.99 1.7 6.4 16.6_ 0/.2_ 17 9.4 140 77.3520000 599099 3.1 15.0 14.8 72.8 16 8.8 123 68.0600.00 619.99 2.7 13.0 11.8 57.8 28 15.2 107 59.1680.00 159099 3.2 15.5 9.1 44.8 23 12.7 79 43.6760.00 839.99 1.6 13.4 6.0 29.2 22 12.2 ib 30.9840.00 . 919.99 u .so 4.6 3.3 16.4 10 2.5 44 18.8/0.00 159.99 Q.1._ 3.2 1.4 11_.6 8 8 4.4 44 13.3
1000.00 - 1019099 0.1 0.6 lei 8.4 2 1.1 16 8.81080.00 1159.99 0.4 2.1 1.6 7.7 4 2.2 14 7.7
1160.00 - 1239099 Q.3 1.4 11_ 1.4_._ 3 1.7 10 5.51240.00 1319.99 0.2 1.0 C.1
_
4.2 3 1.7 7 3.9
1320.00 1399.99 0.0 0.7 3.2 0 4" 4 2.2/400.00 1479.59 9.4 ;.0. Got _La_ 0 4" 4 4.21400000 - 1559.99 0.0 0.0 0.7 302 0 4.0 4 2.2
1560.00 - 1639.99 0.5 2.7 0.7 isi 2 1.1 4 2.21_71999_. Q.4 0.1. .__41.§.P,_ _ I 0.6 2 1.1
1120.00 - 1199..4v 0.0 0.2 C. C 0.2 1 0.6 1 0.61800.00 - 1879. iv 0.0 0.0 -.0.14 -J.4 0 4.0 U 0.0180t.i_.00 j 559.9_9 0.0 0ev -0.i 70.o 0 v.0 0 0.01960.00 - 2-000.00 0.0 td.o 0.13 -0.0 0 4.0 0 0.0
CASES PROSU SEC)hu. °LANA DATA141 A4 i KIM VALUEn441 VALUE 41
Si M OF SCURESSUS 5.i0. SCORES *
a
a
$.7 hi". 'Av. 1h) 33
ST SO uEv. a
Ati; LANGutS11 ON 21A
SCukE ihrcnVALs
_20490290.0000
0,01125.0900
12710.21090.1034320E 06
626.2466339.1(43347.8201647,7432
F PC r CF P-81.01
0.O 21.1 4C.0 52.9 /00.01.000 31.8 60.0 31.8 600
i.A SE S__PlOCkS SED a141 hi PUP VALUEMAXIMA', VALUE a4U$ OF 'SCOKES a
sum 5Q0. Ss.OitESPE AN sSTNU. 9t.y.(611,,_.,Sitiao UEV. N-1PitUIA14
S2.8(1.J.01.0000
31.755831.75580.6004044180.49450.6372
181494
4725.0004J10987'5. u000
0.09)6093 08007.6.1442355.4999456.484760.1420
F Pc.1 CF C--PC T
190 40.0 415 100.0285 Oi3e0 285 60.0
4750.vz.vooua 504000
285.010Li0..30 +00.4,4 90.49040.4a667
24. What was your district per pupil expenditure last year?
LES TION 24
IAA El Check here if you don't know
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT -PCTcf. F FLT CF C
0.0 - 199.99 1.2 4.7 26.5 100.0 524 14411_30.0200.00 5996'99 500 14.0 25.3 91.3
_13, 44 /403 226 94.6
600600 999.99 16.3 414.3 284 79.3 :149 0108 104 14. 31044h - 1349.19 ol,o4_,_ JAIL 3.7 14.i 27 114 3 1441400.00 - 1799.99 0.9 3.2 1.2 4.5 7 2.9 8 3.316G0.00 2199.99 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.3 0 0.0 1 0.442200.00 2599409 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.3 0 0.0 1 0.42600000 2999.99 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.3 0 0.0 L 0.43000.00 3344.99 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.3 : 0 0.0 1 0.434004003800.00
3199.99-4/99 99
_GS_0.0
0440 0.3 $.3 0 0.0 1 0.40.40.0 C.3 1.3 0 v.0 1
42 C0. 0C 4519.99 Q .0 0.0 C.3 1.3 0 14.0 1 0.44600.00 4999.99 .0 0.3 1.3 0 0.11 1 9.45000.00 5341.99
.____0.00.0 0.0 0.3 1.3 0 04 L 0.4
5400.00 5799.19 0..0 0.0 0.3 1.3 0 0.0 L 0.45800.00 6199_ 99 0.0 0.0 0.3 tc3j 0 0.0 1 .0.4t 2 CO. 00 - b599.99 0.0 0.0 0.3 163 0 0.0 1 0.44600.00 . 6999.99 0.0 0.0 C.3 1.3 0 0.0 1 0.47000.00 7399.99 0.0 U 4.0 0.3 1.3 0 4140 1 0.47400.00 7 7 4i « 99 GO; 0.0 0.3 1441 0 41;e1 1 0.47800.00 - 8000.00 0.3 1.3 0.3 163 1 04.4 1 0.4
BASES Pk0CESSEL aKG. BLANK DATA a
OISIOUN VALUE ANAIINUN VALUE *
SUN OF SCORES *SUN 5000._540RES AMEAN a
STS10. DEV. (NIAPO. 00(.....01!41 aNEDIAN
IAEST ION 44A
26";5i26230.0000
3.0000000.0000
22001.00/40.371251311
2963e68194069
769 62002
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT
..... apt234
3.000004111440400
1115141.418000.215771W 09
-7-8797550.497552./055
G7 P -6LW F PL.7 GF C-PCT
.... _. _ --00.. -01.000
27.7 52.3 52.9 100.0 . 250225
51.647.4
475425
100.047.425.2 47.7 25.2 47.71
cifkgteltAkssEP 52.6877 47 5MINIMUM VALUE a 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE a 14.0000 1 0000SUM OF SCORES a 25.2176 225.000SUS 503,. SCORES * 254 1 is 223.0000REAN .4788 0.4737
0.4.9 95 0.4991SIND. DEv. 14-11 A 0.5043 0.4954SEC IAN a 0.4556 0.450o
25. What are the total funds allocated for compensatory reading in your school?
GUE II ON 25
SCORE INTERVALS
0.0 _ 2199.992200.00 6599.9966 C0.04 10999.9911000.00 - 15399.9915400.00 19799. 9919800 .00 24199.9924200.00 26 599 .99266 00.00 32999.9933000.00 . 37399.9931400.00 41799. 9941800 .00 46159.9446200 .00 50599.9950600.00 54999.9955000.00 59399 .9959400.00 63799.9943800.00 66199. 9466200 72559. 94/2600600 76999.9477000.00 81399.9411400.00 65799 .94158 C0.00 90199.9490200 .00 94599.9444600 .00 S6999.9499000 .00 - 103399.941 C3400 .00 -10779i±54i17400.00 -110000.00
GASES PROCESSEDNO. 6LANK OA tAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUP Sloth SCORESMEAII
SIND. DEV. 4N/S IA V. (1*-11MEDIAN
i6SII0N 2511
VAD Check here if you don't know
iCT CF P.4)L6 F ii.T 6F C.PCT
_3.0 13.9 100.0 24, 10.0.1 1.11. 100.0
1.2 10.8 78.1 13 9.9 107 81.7
3.0 9.6 69.4 25 /9A 94 71.8
1417 666, 4704 18 14.7 69 52.7
1.3 4.8 34.9 12 i;i: Cf. iii. 9
0.5 3.6 25.9 5 3.6 39 29.81.0 3.1 22.6 9 09 1.4. 2640.6 2.2 1507 7 /..1. 25 14.10.5 1.6 11.5 5 3.8 16 13.7
0e4 Lai 7.9 2 1.5 13 9.90.3 0.9 6.4 3 Z-i 11 8.40.1 0.6 4.3 1 i.i a IS 8 6.1084. 04_ 3.4 4 0.8 7 5.30.1 0.4 2.9 1 0.8 6 4.60.0 Co3 2.4 1 0.8 5 3.80.0 0.3 2.1_ 0 0.0 4 3.1
0.0 0.3 2.1 0 060 4 3.1
0.1 13.3 2.1 1 0.8 9 3.1
0.2 0.2_, 1.0 a 1.5 3 2.30.0 0.1 0.5 0 4.0 1 0.80.0 0.1 0.5 0 0.0 1 0.8_o.0 C.1. 0.5 0 00 1 0.8
0.0 0.1 0,5 0 4.4) 1 0
U.0 0.1 0.5 U ki 0 1 0.8
_.Q_s1 0.1 .4 1 0.8 1 0.8
0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
8.622.Q12.19.03.3bog4.23.61.12.10.90.5C.60.20.00.00.51.1_C.00 00
0.00.00.00.5C.0
a 1/4E0933i0 .0000
0.0JC.000.0000i0S128.6815
0.6802891E 1015109 .12t016160 .335916796.671'41 C484. 6066
F FLT
/31344
CitI0 431. y 090_
i236171.00000.79998096 Ll
17047.144511690.472711959./52311855.3547
. .
CF PtiL T
0.0 14 .7 27 *8 52.9 100.0 145-1.000
CASES PROCESSED aMINIMUM VALUEMAXI MUM VALUE aSUM OF SCURESSUM Ms SCORES aMEANSTNO. 0E9. 1M/SIND. CE V. 4611)Mk01AN
/0-
38.2 72.2 38.2 72.2 330
52.88170.01.0660
38.141638 .16560.7216o.4#0120.45250.8011
i.F CPCT
30.5 475 400.069.5 330 69.5
4756;u1.00uv
330.0000
000940.4605
0.7803
26. What are the costs per pupil of compensatory reading in your school?
CU;cS11ON 26
SCORE /NTERVALS
ttO
200.00 599.99600000 999.99
1000.00 13996991400.00 1 7S90 991800.00 - 2199,99
2iatt D Check here if you don't know
F ief CF 01LW F Pc.7 itf C-.PCT
7.I.j_ 511.4. I1 a8_100 .4.) 68 59.64.5 35.4 5.3 41.6 38 33.30.3 3.5 C.8 6.2 5 4.40.0 0.0 _..0.1...._ 2.7_ si.... 0.00.1 1.1 0.3 2.7 1 0.90Q 0.0 0.2 1.6 0 0.0
C42 Lets 0 0.00.2 /.6 1 0.9Col 0.7 0 0.0
AA__ Oft 7 0 0000.1 0.7 0 iile00.1 0.7 0 0.0
22 00 .00 2599.99 O. C 0.02600600 2998.49 0 al 0s93000.00 3594499 0.0 0.03400 aCk0 31189.99 _ _
3800.00 4149.99 0.0 0.04200.00 - 4599.99 0.0 0.04600.00 4999.995000.00 5399.995400.00 5799.995800000 6199.996200.00 6599.996600800 - 6999.997000.00 7399.997400.00 7799.997800.04 8199.998200.00 85 59.998600.00 8999.999000 .00 9399.999400.00 - 9799.991800.00 100004.00
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA is
MINIMUM VALUE °MA X1 MUM VALUESUN OF SCARES aSAJA SQ0. SCORES aREAM_ _ _ .
SMOG OEV IN1 A
SIND. OEV. (1011MOVJAh
cuesti
scutke INTEkVALS
1.000
CASES PROCESSED aMI hi MUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE z
&Le spkEsSUN SOD. SCORES a
AN a
itNO. (AV. 03 aSTNU. UEV tt-1 3 aMEO1AN
OeC 0.0 0.1 0.7 0 41.00.0 0.0 Col 0.7 0 O.0.4 0e0 Col 0.7 0 . 0.00.0 9 .0______ 0 0.0
114 100.046
8______4
40.47.0.2.6
3 2.62 Le$a 1e82 1.8L 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.41 0.91 0.9..__o.i. ___._
0. 0.0 0.1 0.7 0--i.0-------"-----C----"6; 90.0 0.0 0.1 Del 0 0.0 1 0.9
._0.0. G.0 0.1 0.7 0 {40 1 0.90e0 CO Co1 Oa 4-----O-ai--- -1---13-6-904 0.0 Os& 0.7
_ o9Q. _
0.1 0.7 0.1 0 e70.0 0.0 1'0.0 -0.0o.c _._.04t0._170 .30.0 0.0 e 0 .1.0.0
355800000.0
90.0G00 _ _ .
3737.884813670694000
292.8455-605.0 986838.62431AZ..21111
0 0.00 ilo01 i1.90 41.000 ia.0-
L 0.91 0.9
.0.943 0.00 0.00 O.0
114
0.09000.0000
1-613-4.6!Oiri0.99841441 48
301.419281144;4349888.4602135.4939
F PCT CF 1313Liti F Pia 4F CPCT
14.4 4;4 5x.9 100 124 Lb.L 475 100.07i *4 14.8 39.6 74.6 351 73*9 351 73.9
52s$ I 17_.0.0000
39.562039.56300.74800.434104.4383U.6315
4750.101
14.10i;i045 16 VOUO451.4000
0.73890.43920.43910. 0244
\27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, please
provide the following breakdown(s) of costs by program and by component parts.
Program Program Program Program2 3 4
Total cost of programIF
Cost of personnel:ProfessionalOther
Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check)
06631ION 21 Pan a
SCORE INTERVALS F PU CF P0$.8 F Cf Cog.PCT
0.0 9999.99
3041.: 512::
.41 100.0 32 delie 7.1.100.01400060030000.00
. 291911.9449919.89
3t$10
0.4104.0
5.134447
44.411044.
0 43:34- 5.6
39 54.911.3
_50004.01 70000.00 0.4 4.4 4 doe 4 5.47400400 - 6999904 0.0 0.0 0.2 2 a 0 4.0 4 2.840000.06 -.109999.94 0.0 0.0 002 2.2 0 1.0 2 2.81104V0.00 -129999.94 0.1 1.3 0.2 2.2 1. 1.4 2 2.8130000.00 ..1499916i4 0.0 0.0 04 044 0 040 1 1.4150000.00 °149999.14 0.0 04 0.1 0.8 0 0.0 A 1.4110000.00 169949.94 Oot 434 0.1 OA 0 OA 1 1.4190000.00 209999.94 0.0 C.0 0.1 0.8 0 0.0 1 1.4210040.00 -229999.94 0.G 0.0 C.1 0.8 0 0.0 1 1.4230040.0C ...449999.94 04 000 ;AA 0.8 0 0.0 1 1.42500041.00 . 269999.44 0.0 0.0 O. O. 0 040 1 1.4220000.06 - 290000.00 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.8 0 0.0 1 1.4290000006 - 310000 ,0Q 0.0 040 Qol 0.8 0. JO
0 4 .4.1
1.41.- -f.4110000.06 -330000.00 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.43
130000.06 ..150000.00 0.0 0.0 C.1 0.6 0 Jo0 1 i.4350000.06 -470004.00 0.0 OA 0.1 0.4 0 __9.QL
0-1 1.41 /.4370000.04 .'390000.00 0.0 0.0 0.1 0441
390400.06 '410044.00 004 0.0 O. 0.8 0 0.0 1.4410000.06 ..420000.00 0.1 0.8 0.1 0_2 1
. . _ 1 1.4
LASES PROCESSEDNU. dLANK DATA 0
Iff
7.8453 71494
11.4MIMIPUM VALUE.4.004:10
0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 420000.0000 420000..004u
OF SCOTS- u 13109101210 031580.4000_SlipSUM 5,50. SCOkES
_
0.144652E 11MEAN 17842.3945 4A57/.06DisTAy. Af .._011124i41_ 950.7109SIND. DEVe I11 -41 0 44087.7144MEDIAN a 9484.11247 144154.0626
27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, please
provide the following breakdown(s) of costs by program and by component parts.
Program Program Program Program3 4
Total cost of program (lb)Cost of personnel:ProfessionalOther
Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check)
.
F
8 ta1d4
CFCZFCT
41 100.0
ONEST ION 27
SeCaliE 1NTEKVALS
0.0 . 799:99
F
0.9
FCT
24.0
CF P4316
3.9 100.0800.00 2399.14 0.2 4.4 300 16.0 I -Tar- 33111.4
2440.00 3919.59 0.2 4.2 24 714 3 7.0 32 74.4400040 5599.99 0.4 GO 2.6 67.1 0 460 29 67.45600.00 7199.99 0.3 4.1 2.4 47.1 3 lra isi-40;ii7200.00 .. 8799.94 0.4 10.0 2.3 59.0 4 9.3 24 60.54440600 - 10399.99 0.3 7.9 1.9 49.0 4 9.3 22 51.210400.00 - 11,59.94 0.2 8.6 106 41.1 2 -4-..-.7- i8 41a12000.00 .. 13599.19 0.4 14,7 1.4 35.6 5 11.4 16 37.213600.00 . 13199.99 0.1 64 466 20.9 3 7.0 11 25.615200.00 ' . 16199.99 0.1 3.5 0.6 16.4 .2 7..-7 6 18.616450.00 18399.99 0.1 2.0 604 10.9 1 4.3 6 14.016400.00 - 19999.94 0.1 1.6 4.3 4.9 I 4.4 i 11.624000.00 ... 21599.99 0.0 0.9 0.3 7.3 i Zip 4 11:3
21604400 -.. 23199.99 0.0 0.0 443 6,4 0 000 3 7.023240.40 24799.99 0.4 4.0 G.3 6.4 0 0.0 3 7.024400.00 - 26399.99 i, .0 0.0 0.3 6.4 0 3.-0 3 7-.0
26404.00 . 27999,99 0.1 lee 0.3 604 1 2.1 3 7.0
24040.00 29599.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 4.6 0 0.0 2 4.1
29600.00 ... 11199.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 4.6 0 3-ai 2 4.1
31200400 - 327499.99 0..0 0.0 0.2 446 0 0.0 Z 4.1
32440.00 -. 34311909 0.0 0.0 C.2 606 0 0.0 2 4.1
34400.40 35999.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 4.6 0 4.0 2 4.1
36040.00 .. 37599.99 0.0 0.0 G.2 4.6 U 0.0 2 4.137600.01 - 39200.00 0.0 0.0 0.2 4.6 0 0.0 2 4.1
39200.01 40000.00 0.2 4ei 0.2 4.6 2 4o-7 2 4.1
CASES PkOCESS60 " .3.9250_ 43NO. BLANK CATA 0 425.0000 -4nMINIMUM VALUE " 0.0 0.44
PAXIMUM VALUE " 39852.0000 39852.0000SUM OP SCUMS a 4iii1WIRW- 42'14424;4044
SUM SAO. SCORES a 0.67756244 09 0.79,0463e 10MEAN a 9465.4443 9984.4014SIND. OlVe (N1 " 5112.3164 922163398:)TNO. OEVe IN-11 = 10535.6415 1337.3547MEDIAN xi 8640.9140 9000.4000
27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, pleaseprovide the following breakdown(s) of costs by program and by component parts.
Program Program Program Program1 2 3 4
Total cost of program 4)Cost of personnel:ProfessionalOther
Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check)
4
.
QUESTION 37 PART C
SCOAE INTEgVALS
090 - 3 99* 99
410.40 = 1119.19 0.l 5.r1200.00 ". 1999049 Ool 9s42000600 2799 99 0.1 7.42800.00 3599.99 0.0 0.036 00.0 0 - 4399.99 0.0 0.04413000 - S119. 99 0.0 0.052 00 AO 5149.94 0.0 0.0*GOO &DO - 6 714* 99 0.3 1944680000 7399 999 09 2_ ILA_1600400 - 8399.99 0.0 0.08400.00 9199.99 (.O 04092004.00 - 9999.99 0.1 54
10000 .00 IC 71119 SS 01.0 0.018800.00 115!9«49 04.11 0.01140000 ' 12399 99 COLL 4 6124 00.00 - 13199 .9913200600 13999140 00 90 0 - 14719. 9914800 - 1551439 991560040 3`319.9916400*00 J7199.99172 00.0 0 11 999.9918000*()C 18719. 9918800 .00 - 1 9511. 9919400 .00 - 20000« CO
F KZ
0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0Oa 0.0C. 0.0
_SUS C.00.1 3.80 .0 0.0
.g_tg0.1 5.0
CF 1.81.6
1.4 _/00_441 2Sol 7544 2IA *Job 00.9 60.2
00.8 52.8a.. $2.0 0o.. 52.8 I
0.8 Oa °-OA 53 00.5 33 .40.3 31.1C.3 11.1 00.3 21.1.
04 IS .3 0aa isa 0Oa _Li .3 aO. 1097 0Qe2 10.1 00.2 100 004 10.1 00.2 10.7 0
_QA2 10.7 0C.2 10.7 -0C1 5.0 0
ALI__ SAO 00.1 5.0 1
CASES. PROCESSEQ 1.4412NO. 8L AM DATA 451.0800NI NI KIM VALUE 0.0PA X 1 MU 01 VALUE = 20000.0400SUN OF SCORES 410304746Skis SO Os SCORES * 0 e 12971146 011
8411AN__ 541,35743SING. O. 5795.5791SING. 0E11. (61-'1 104/4.3514NEIMAN
GF C-.PCT
2560 8 100.0254 0 6 75.00.0 4 50.0
A405 4 50.01.0 3 -Era4.0 3 37.5
12.5 3 17.5
0.0 2 25.00.0' 2 25.0
1F-13.15-Osti 2 25.0
5 2 25.0
0.0 1 12.50.0 & L2.5490 -1-12750.14 I 12.50.0 1 12.5
.50.0 1 12.50.0 L 12.5
1.2.54.1.0 1 U.S
12.-5
81.67
42000...1004474514000
0.41931/9a 49994.41254
o716.36Z44500.4000
27. If there are separatc compensatory reading programs in your school, pleaseprovide the following breakdown(s) of costs by program and by component parts.
Program Program Program Program1 2 3 4
Total cost of program
Cost of personnel:Professional
11111111Other
Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check)
QUESTION
SCORE
0.0500.001500.002500.00
27 PAR1 0
INTERVALS
- 499.99
P
0.1
PCT
17.4
Cf 111.44.M
C.8 100.0
F
4
PGT
46.5
GF C -PCT
a 100.0- /4494.49- 24,9.1,
3499.19
0.8Qa04.2
18.50.0
24.4
447-0.544
84.403.9-43.9
121
5a9&lig'5.9
LA.1641
1,0
74:570.6$8:8
3500.00 - 4499.99 o.o 0.0 0.3 39.5 0 0.0 9 52.94500.0,0 + 5499.99 0.0 0.0 0.3 31:5 0 44 9 52.95500.00 + 6499.99 0.1 14.4 AO jea 0 '4,W 9 52.96500.00 - 7419.99 0.0 0.0 .0.4 MO 0 a" 9 52.97500.00 ... 8499.19 0.0 0e0 Oil 25.0 2 AL.* 9 52.98500.00 - 9499.99 0:0 0,0 0.2 25.0 3 1104 7 41.29500.00 - 10499.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 25.0 0 4.0 4 23.5
10500.00 - 11499.99 0.0 4.0 0.2 25.0 0 0.0 4 23.511500.00 - 12499.19 0.1 7.9 0.2 25.0_ 1 5.9 4 23.-5_12500.00 - 13499.99 0.0 0.0 Oct 17.1 0 000 3 17.613500000 - 14499.49 0.0 0.0 0.1 17.1 0 0.0 3 17.614500.00 - 15499.99 cle.C___ 00_ 0.1 11.1 1 ao9 3 1.1015500.00 - 16499.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 17.1 0 J.0 2 U.S16500.00 - 17496.99 0.0 0.0 C.IL 17.1 0 0.0 2 11.811500.00 - 18499.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 17.1 0 " 2 11.814500.00 - 19499.19 0.0 0.0 La 17.1 0 °.0 2 /1.8-19500.Q0 - 20459.99 0..0 04.0 0.1 17.1 0 000 2 11.820500.00 + 21499.99 040 0.0 Owl 17.1 0 4e0 2 11.821500.00 + 22499.99 0.0 12.-1- 1 5.9 A 11.8GO 00122500.00 -. 23499.99 0.0 0.0 Col 17.1 0 0.0 1 5.9.23500.104 - 24499.99 0.0 0.0 _0.1 _174,1_ 0 0.0 i 5.924500.00 - 25000.00 0.1 17.1 0.1 17.1 IL 9e9 1 5.9
cAsks,iTucsEo 4 0.83781400 8LANK CATA 458MINIMUM VALUL a 0.0 0.0WI.MUM VALUE __25_040400. 20000.0400
5849.6914 140334.0.40410
SUM SQ0, SCURES 04059048E 49 0.120334LL 10MEAN
(11)
AA
7006.1A11_8793.3594
2?02000Ou599
ME 0I AN i0429.03E8 bat:646090200.0000
27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, pleaseprovide the following breakdown(s) of costs by program and by component parts.
Program Program Program Program41 2 3
Total cost of program
Cost of personnel:Professional 0Other
Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check)
QUESTION 27 PART E
F
6.
15
.142313_0
PUT CF CPCT
5 48 103 _1.00.0/00i-- -9-7141.4 $4.463.k. .....A_22.3 29244 36
.,3,4._. ... _25_44.9 15
/.9k9_.. 8
"-"0 5
A " .j
i .0 4
a.0 3
. IA 3
0.0 2
kleiti 21.0 213.0 1
000 1
Usk° _ ;job
___
1
0.0 L
4o0 1
LOD372
94.283.5?Q.'?57.335410
42.-314.6
7.85.84.94.93.92.92.91.91.91.91.01.0
1.01.01.01.0
SCORE INTERVALS
0.0 1249.1V
t PCT CF P°'8LW
OA,Ji 4 . 4 11.1 100.01250.00 3749.993150.04 6249.996250.00 - 8149.99
1.1 15.5 10061.6 14.1 ke01.4 11.8 1.3
95.600.063_. 9
4750.00 - 11249. S911250.00 13141.4913150.00 - 16249.49
2.3 20.5 5.9Lo4 12.6 3.60.4 7.6 $a
33.132.620.0
16250001 . 187$0.0018190.01 21230.0021230.01 - 23150.00
0.6 5.0 1.40.2 1.50.2 1.6
.$4.6
12.4445.9
-5
2
- ..2
23750.01 - 26250.0C26250.01 - 2019044028750.01 -. 31250 .00
0.0 0.3 040.0 0.0 0.4C 0 0.3 0.4
4.23.93.9
10
_ 1.
31250.02 33750 .0033150.02 36250.4036250.02 - 38750.00
0.1 CA 0.40.0 0.0 0.30.1 0.6 0.3
3.62.62.6
1
0_2
38750 .02 - 412:0..0141250.02 431506.0143750.02 46250.01
0.0 0.0 0.20.0 0.0 0.2G.1 1.1 0.2
2.02.02.0
0
0I
46250.02 - 487504144750.0a - 51250.0111210.03 5315 0.-0.
0.0 0.0 010.0 0.0 0.1co ,0 0.O 0.10.0 0.0 0.10.0 0.0 0.10.1 0.9 0.1
0.90.90.9.
00
00
0
1
53750 003 56250. C256250.03 50150.0254150.03 60000600
0.90.90.9
CASES PROCESSED m
igicALANA,ORTR11.0306
30A.g_SitMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES
30.000060000.0000110430.9375
30.U00004400.4000
11.0.0).0.4400a fir77-Cli.W709.60414480V141
9565.4148
_Is_SUR SOO. SCORES m
MEAN a001925152E 10
9993.14368625.6819_sTNo.._DP19..ft.4.1
SM. OEV. (141iMEOIAM
9044.6 2509120.9117
27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, pleaseprovide the following breakdown(s) of costs by program and by component parts.
Program Program Program Program1 2 3 4
Total cost of program
Cost of personnel:Profeasional iOther
Cannot break down cost (s)for program (Check)
.
.
PARTUESTION 27
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF 11. lit. id
0.0 1199.99 .41 18 6.0 100.02000000 4911. 19 0.9 15.s 4.9 81450.00 7991.49 1.4 23.6 4.0 65.1$000 AO 1. 10999.99 0.9 14.8 2.1 42.1
11000.00 . 13999.99 - 1.2 20.5 1.6 27.214040o 01 17000.00 0.0 0.7 Co4 6.?11400.01 20000030 0.1 1.7 4.4 5*9ao00o.01 23041400 0.2 3.0 063 4.223000,01 4. 26000.40 0.0 0.Q 0.1 1.226000 .01 29000.00 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.221000.02 32000.00 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.$32080.02 4. 35000:00 0.0 0.0 8.1 1.235000.02 311000.01 Q.0 0.0 001 1.238000 .02 4. 41 Gies 01 0.0 0 ea 0.1 1.241000 Al 44000.01 0.0 0.0 04 10344000.02 47000.01 44.6 OA eel 1.247000.02 4. S0000 .01 0 .0 0.0 0.1 1.250000.00 - 529994 94I 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.213000.00 595919.98 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.256000 .00 . 58199.96 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.259000.00 61919.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.242000.00 .4 64919 .99 0.0 40
4.0O. I /.2
65000.00 67 999 .94 0440 0.1 1.264000.00 - 70000.00 0 *I 1.2 G.1 1.2
F PLY
12 18.59 13.4
15 Lial10 1204
1 is2 Ast
0 0.0o 0.0
0.11
0 000
C;ITC T
6$ 100.0
44 47.729 44.6
-VI.6 9.25 7.7
4.61 1.51 1.51 1.5
1.5Q J.0 1. 1.50----460--- 1--0 00 10 0.0 1Cr -Ta 10 00 1
0 4.0 10 -via- 1Q 0.0 1
0 044 10- -1.1":0"-- 11 L.5 1
0A0
°A
0
0
'6":1)111-404.000060.0000
0
41040.0000
4914114T0-00-047849.4040
L448048d 11
CASES PROCiiSE0Me BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXI MUM VALUESUM CF SCURESSUM 5514,. SORESREAMMO. DEV. ( ft 1HMOs °EV. ( 1 )
65366.06004c674.3612
.62623104 C9E288.71096283.29319071.2070_
41.A4C4
9131.44229202.4004640'0.44004
1.51.51.5-1.5 .
1.51.51.51.51.51.51.5
27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, pleaseprovide the following breakdown(s) of costs by program and by component parts.
Program Program Program Program1 2 3 4
Total cost of program
Cost of personnel:Professional t4)Other
Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check)
G
P1.T CF C-PCTFSCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF PailLU
0.0 499.19 0.1 5.9 104 100.0 1 *4,7 _4.5 100.0500.00 - 1499.99 001 7.2 14 94 4. I 6.7 /4 93.31900.00 2499.99 002 17.5 1.2 116.8 2 133 13 86.72900.00 - 3499.99 0.0 0.0 1.0 69.3 0 0410 73o33500.00 - 44S9.99 0.3 1961 1.0 69.3 3 20.0
.4411 73.3
4500.00 5499.19 Lioe 0.0 0.7 50.2 0 0.0 8 53.35500600 - 6499.99 C.2 12...E 5_1_12, 2 8 53. 36500.00 7419 *99 Gel 7.9 445 Mel 1
_10.364 6 40.0
7900600 " 0419.99 0.0 0.0 C.4 30.2 0 060 5 33.36500.00 . 9499.19 0 o4 50 C.4 30.2 / 5 33.39500.00 10499.951 Gel 7.9 0.3 24.3 2
_b.//3.3 4 26.7
10500.00 1/ 419.19 0.Co 0.0 0.2 16.4 0 0.0 2 13.311500.00 - 12499 .99 084 C.0 0s2 16.4 0 0=0.. 2 13.312500.00 - 13499 99 0.1 6.3 0o2 16,4 1 0.7 2 13.313500.00 14499.99 0.0 0.0 Col 10.1 0 41.0 1 4.7'.
10j10.00 154 996 99 0_00 4.4_ 1901 0 "9 L 6.715500 .00 - 16494.99 0.0
_0.00.0
.
0.1_
10.1 0.
+.1.0 1 6.7.16500.00 - 17499.99 G.0 0.0 0.1 10.1 0 0.0 1 6.717500.00 18499499 Co C Co0 0.1 0 0.0 1 6.711500.00 19499.99 0 .0 0.0 Col 10.1 0 jot) 1 6.719S100A0 20499099 0.0 0.0 C.1 10.1 0 0.0 1 6.7105004100 21499.99 0.0_000 Oil 0 u.p 1 6.721500 .00 22419.59 0.0 0.0 0.1
_10410.1 0 0.0 1 6.7
22500 .00 - 23499 .99 0.0 0.0 0.1 10.1 0 0.0 1 6.743900.00 _2L*499 .99 1001 .._....4.1..1.0.$11. A Da? 1 6.7245004,00 25000600
.0.1fl .0 0.0 '.0.0 -9.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
GA5E5 PROCISSEC a 1.4042. . . . . . _ .-453.0000400.0000
24500.0000
154611
400.4004
10470004.0000
104704.00000.1.441173t 10
444_6.929729S2a-6176140.9941750.0000
NO. BLANK DATA =AINImum VALUEMAXIMUM 114.WL aSUM OF SCORES s
SU* SQD0 SCORtS a9147.1324
0.1345017E 4170441510_
STNO. (Av. th$STRO. DIV. IN.-11 aM601AN
6776.246112566.0/17
27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, please
provide the following breakdown(s) of 'costs by program and by componint parts.
Program Program Program Program2 3 4
Total cost of program
Cost of personnel:ProfessionalOther
Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check)
401710N 27 PARS'
PCT F -4 LW- f fa "LF-C4faSCORE 1 NT E RV ALS F
0.0 499059 ()e1 9.3 0.9 10060 1 14.3 7 100.0500.00 - 1499019 0.0 0.0 008 901.7 6-577
1500.00 - 2499.99 0.0 0.1 90.7 0 0.0 6 85s72500.Q0 3419.99 0 43 22.7 0.1 94.7 1 1443 6 85.Tjb00.00 4419.99 0.2 23.0 0.6 68.1 2 ii:4 5 71.44500.00 -sy 5459.49 G.0 0.0 0.4 45.1 0 1.1.0 3 42. 9
5500.00 6499.99 0.1 13.4 0.4 45 .1 1 14.4 42.965 60.00 7499.99 0.0 0.0 4.3 31.7 0.0 2 a.67560.00 8499.99 0.0 0.0 4.3 31.7 0 0.0 2 28.6E130.0 -74-560ZU
..11"12t99i0499. S9
0.0-0.G
0.0 4.3 31..7 0'0
4.0 22 28.6TG60.0 0.3 31.7
icisoo .0o - 11499.19 0.0 0.0 0.3 31.7 0 0.0 2 28.61159A.00_7_12500.00
244t9.« IP 9_
13499.99. _
0.0 C*00.3 31.7 0
00.04;0
22
28.62466C.3 31.7
13500.00 14499.99 0.0 0.0 0.3 31.7 0 0.0 2 28.614500.00 - 15499.99 0.0 0.0 4.3 31.1 0 0.0 211.6
15500.u0 16499« 49 0.0 0.0 0.3 31.7 -0- 0` :00 2 28.616500.00 17499.19 On 0.0 0.3 31.7 0 0.0 Z 28.617500.00 19499.99 04C 0.0 04 51.7 0
-IF1.00:0
22
28.628.611500.00 /9499.99 0.0 0.0 003 31.7
19300.00 20499.99 0 «I 1141 C.3 31.7 1 14.3 2 28.420500.00 2/499.99 0.1 15.9 0.1 1589 1 143 L 14.321500800 - 22449.49 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0. 0
WOO .00 - 23499.95 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.023500.00 24499.99 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
-diar0 JLi 0 0.0
24500.00 .. 25000.00_0.0 0.0 C.0 0 o.o 0 0.0
CASES PROCESSE0 *
=
0.9022461.0000
0.0
7468
0.JNU. 6LANK4ATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM * 20135000.000 ZiJ 65 0 000_yASUN OF SCORES 8006.5977 56200.4000SUP $140. SCONES * 0.1303848E G9 0.94)15976 09MEAN .
STNO is [h1 **8874.4110 6314.4152
7939.66806109.3516AiOIAN 42864158 6575.6203
425 O. 0 OLIO
27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, pleaseprovide the following breakdown(s) of costs by program and by component parts.
Program Program Program Program2 3
'Total cost of program
Cost of personnel. .,..
Professional
NOther
Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check)
I A_
.
iiil-rQUESTION 27
SGRE INTERVALS
0.0 6415.99
P
la 1
OCT
41.5700.00 2099.99 1.7 13.1
21011.00 34941.19 0.7 Ilia35_40.1410 4E99.99 0.9 11.64900.00 6299699 0.4 4.6300.00 769199 0 .1 0.97700.00 9049.99 Q.0 0.09100.00 10499.111 0.2 2.6
1090040 . 111111.419 0.0 0.01151g1.00 13299 .99 0.4 0.013300.00 1.4699.99 0.1 1.614144600 14099.99 0.0 0.014100.00 17449. 49 0,0 0.017E00 400 1$$99.99 0.0 4.016900.00 - 202SS 99 0.1 1.120300.00 21649. 99 Q.L. 0.021100.04 - Z3099.99 0 C 4.023100. 00 24499.99 0.I 1.424500 00 W 25899. 99 AAQA025900.00 27219. $9 O. 0.027300.00 2E699099 Goa 0.01E700600 30099.99 0.4 0.030100.00 31499.99 0.0 42031500, 01 - 32900.04 0.0 0.032900.01 34300.00 Q.O 0.034300 .01 350t0.40 0.1 1.4
CF POLM F PT GF C-PCT
1e5 100.0 21., 30*3 66 100.04.4 18.9 16 24.2 44 66.73.7 35.3 7 10.6 L8 42.41.9 AIS .5 6 1414 21 314.81.G 13.7 4 6.1 1.3 19.7
0. 7 da 9 1 1.5 9 13.64.6 10..1 a lie0 8 1210.6 64 3 4.5 8 12.10.4 5.5 0 0.0 5 7.60.4L 5 a 0 0.0 5 7.60.4 5 a5 1 15 $ 7.6C.3 3.b 0 0.0 4 6.10.3 3.0 0 __0.4_0.3 3.8 0 0..0
0.3 3.8 1 1.504 _LLB 9 0.004 2.8 1 L.
c.a 2.8 1 L.50 a___1.4 0 _ 04.0
0.1 1.4 0 13--:6
0.1 1.4 0 0.004 1.4 0 9.00.1 1.4 0 0.00.1 1.4 0 0.00.1_ 14,4__ 0 0.0 .
0.1 1.4 1 15
4443
CASES PRA C_ 66444NO. BLANK GAYA * 4C4.0CCO
PlNINUA VALUE s 0.0 0.0RAXIMUN VALUE * :25000.0000 4600.0090SUR CF MORES s 23093.1406 464i713-0004
SUN SOO. SCORES C 29411260E 09 0.44v84199t 10
MM!_ 1.0_614.17.45455.23C5
4640./416a171:3343SUM. O. IN/
SM. OEV. iN11 * 5858.3184 6220.6477REIMAN a 1211.2.114 662.6000
6.16.16.14.54.53.01.51.51.51.51.51.51.51.5
27. If there are separate compens4ory reading programs in your school, pleaseprovide the following hreakdown(s) of costs by program and by component parts.
Program Program Program Program1 2 3 4
'. Total cost of program
Cost of personnel:Professional
.
OtherJ)
L]I
Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check)
PART
F
1.1
SCORE INTERVALS
0.0 -" 399.99
PCT
29.1
CFP.41.0
1.4 104.4400.00 1 1 1190 19 162 113.1 1.6 70.91200.00 ' I 9S44 911 0.4 10.5 1.4 37.42000.00 ' 2749.99 4.1_0 1.0 27832800.00 3599.99 0.0 C.9 0.7 20.23600.00 4319.99 0.1 3.1 4.7 19.34400. Q0 - 5119,19 0 .0 0.0 146 16.25200*00 5949.99 0.2 5.7 0.6 1646000.00 6799.99 0.0 0.0 0.4 10.56800.04 7509099 0.1 3.0 04.2_4 )0637600.00 . 4399.99 0.1 1.8 0.2 6.81400.00 9199.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 5.09200.00 9999.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 5.010000 .00 10 7 40. g9 OA 0.0 5.O10400.00 ' 115$9.99 044 0.0 0.2 5.0104004.00 12399.99 0*C 0.0 0.2 5.012400.00 13199 .99 0.0 0.0 0.2 5.013200.00 139996 00 0.0 0.0 C.2 5.014000.00 14199.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 5.014400 a00 15599.99 0.0 000 .0.2 5.015600.00 14394.19 0.1 1.9 G.2 5.016400.00 ' 17199.19 0.1 3.1 .0.1
.C.45lel
172 00.00 . 17999.99 0.0 0.0 -4/.014000.00 18799.99 0.0 0.0 -A.0 -0.018600.00 19591.99 0.0 0.0 -0.019600.00 20000.00 0.0 0.0 .0CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK OATA aP1M1MUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALVE a50.1 Of SCORES 0
SUM SRO. SCORES 4NEAh C. _-ST Ku. Oklis (N-/1 =
3.64/$427.0000
0.0t707,1040081/9.2070
Oe 1/074341 462390.2311
4525.1/44Oilt M67,
F
131243210202100
--Z-V-C.PCT
41.0 42 100.041.6 at eto9.57.14;82.4V. 0
40.04,4 S 11.9
0.0 2 4.80.0 4 4.8
3.7 40.514 31.0
21.d 19.07 16.7
5 11.9
0 "3" 4.a000000
0
00
0.0 24.0 213 AU.0v.0
2
22
Uo
42433
0.jiI072.0000
103951.00000,86*9975c 09
4475.0237Jd10.4.242-i854542JLU3
GA a.
4.84.8.84.84.84.84.82.40.00.00.00.0
27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, please
provide the following breakdown(s) of costs by program and by component parts.
Program Program Program Program1 2 3 4
'Total cost of program
Cost of personnel:ProfessionalOther
Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check)
..
4USTLON 2i-- FART It
Oa C-F- C -PCSCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF PBLN
0.0 - 249.99 0.2 27.1 0.6 100.0 2 2504 __ 8 3,000150.00 749099 0.1 1506 .4 72.9 A 1205 6 75.tie AO 1249.99 0.0 4.4 003 574 1 12.5 5 62.
125040 1749.99 O.9 0.0 0e3 51.3 0 0:0 * 50.1750.00 2249.99 0.1 C.3 51.3 1 1243 4 50.2250.0C -- 2749.99 O.0 t2 0.2 32.5 1* 12.5 3 1702150.0C 3249.99 000 0.0 IC 26.3 0 ...9.0 ____Z .003250.00 8149.99 0.0 060 0.1 26.3 0 U*0 2 25.3750600 4249.99 0.0 .0.0 0.1 2603 0 000 2 25.4250:40 4149.99 0.1 0.1 26.4 0 _0.0 2 25.4750.00 5249.99 0.0 0.0 6.1 26.3 0 0.0 2 25.5250000 5749 99 0 0.0 Col 26.3 0 0.0 2 25.5150.00 6249.99 0.0 000 C. 1 26.3 0 0.0_ 2 25.6250000 749.49 0.0 0.0 0.1 28.3 0 0.0 2 25.6750400 7249.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 26.3 0 0:0 Z 25.7250.00 749.99 g. i 11.6 0.1 26.3 1
o0
11.11ii.4--0.0
211.
a.1i.12.
7750.000250.00
8249.998749.99
0.430 Al
C.00.0
0.1001
14.714.7
4750.0 C 9249.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 14.7 0 O0 1 12.9250 AO 9749.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 14:1 0 4.0 1 12.975040 10249099 0.0 0.0 0.1 14.7 0 0.0 L 12.
/0250:00 10749.99 O. C G.0 0.1. 14.7 0 40 1 12.1C750.00 11249.99 0.0 0.0 (1.1. 14.7 0 61.0 1 12.11250000 11 749099 0.0 OA 0.1 1,4.7 0 0. 43 1 12.11750.00 - 12 000:00 0.1 14.7 0.1 14.7 1 /4... 1 12.
CASES PROCESSEDNO. IL *AIWA
NI NUM VAL U t114111 NUN VALUESUN of SCORE SSUN 500. 4COM5 aNtAkSINO. OEV. 46)MEW AN
0.56%_1.6.0.0400
0.012000.04C0
1094.29220.1649578E 04
3125 .6141114230.14.711115.0)27
8441
00a12000.4004Z511.4000
0.21180211" 093188.47i040270,46174305..1203A75060004
\27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, pleaseprovide the following breakdown(s) of 'costs by program and by component parts.
Total cost of program
Program Program Program Program1 2 3 4
Cost of personnel:ProfessionalOther
Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check)
LOJEST ON 27 PART L
F OCT CF CPCTaURE INT ERV ALS F PC, CF PASLW
0.0 - 199 e99 0.1 13.2 0.6 100 .0 4614 5 100.0-8(40200.00 599.99 0.3 53.1 0.6 136.8 2 406 4
6 00.00 999.99 0.0 o.o 0.2 33.1 0 000 2 40.01000.00 1399.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 33.1 0 044 A
--------240.0
--4-U0140Q.00 1159.99 0.0 0.0 13.2 33.1 0 0.0IA 00400 2199 99 0.6 C.0 0.2 33.1 0 000 2 40.02200.00 -.- 2599.99 G. G
U.00.0CA
0.2 33.1 00
OAOa
2 40.040.026 00.00 2999.99 41.2 33.1
.3000600 - 3399.99 0 .0 0.0 0.2 33.1 0 " ° & 40.03400.00 3115.99 0.0 04
0.00.2 33.1 0 6L10
0.022
_40.040.03800 .00 - 4199.99 0.0 0.2 33.1 0
4200.00 4599.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 33.1 0 10 2 40.046 00.9 4999 .99 0.1 22.1 0.2 33.1 1
.040.0 2 40.0
a;ki 1 Z0.05000e00 5399.99 0.0 040 0.1 10.45400.00 5799.99 0 .0 0.0 0.1 10.4 0 04 1 20.05600.00 6199.99 0.0
15 .00.0U.0
0.1 10.4 0 0.04.0
1 20.020-00200.00 - 65 99. 99 0.1 10.4 0
66 00.00 - 6999.99 C. 0.0 0.1 10.4 0 00 20.07000.00 7 399.99 0 eC
0.10.0 0.1 10.4 0 U.
443-a0'
11
20.020.07400.00 7799 .99 10.4 0.1 10.4 1
140000 130(10.40 0.0 060 00 000 0 4" 0 0.0
0.6339463.0000
5470
0.07113;11-000
14090.00000.60400506 06
--1-76P/e59-904032.76964490.164)
500;4040
CASES PROCESSEDNO. 6LANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
aaa
MAXIMUM VALUESUN OF SCOPESSUP SW. SCORES wo
7463.40001316.7019
7226041.000MEANSM. 000. (N!MEDIAN
2080 .25442659.2 5394 74.1/38
27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, pleaseprovide the following breakdown(s) of costs by program and by component parts.
Program Program Program Program1 2 3 4
Total cost of program1 --1
Cost of personnel:Professional
r
Other
Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check) .4)
9.
DC6511061 27 PART N
F
24.028.9
215260
CF C.-PCT
4S.b 475 100.0
SCORE INTERVALS
Q.0
PCT CF
4504 52.9
81. w
100.01.000 54.6 28.9 54.6 54.7 260 54.7
CASES PROCESSED 52.6817 47AXI NI MUM VALUE 0.0 o.aPA XI NUN VALUE a 1.0000 10000SUS OF SCOPES a 18..116 160. 0000SUN SOO. SCONES 26 .49 16 260.4000SEAN 0.5463 0.1474MO. DEW. I 60 0.4979 0.4476SIND. 06V. 04'4 I 0.5426 0. 4964
M:01 AN a 0.5646 0 24$0
4 6.16 STI ON 27 PART IA
SCGI4k INT E ALS F PCT CF P -8LW F PT F CPCI
36.5 69.1 52.9 100.0 317 on.7 475 100.01 .000 16.4 34.9 16.4 30.9 1.56 .3 156- 43.3
CASES : 52.8177 405.
SI NI Ali VALUE a 0.0 0. 0
MAXIMUM VA LUk s 1.0000 L.0000SUN OF SCOKES a 16.3532 156.4000SiiiSQ00 SCORES aSEAN
16.36324.3012 1522
SIND 0 DEV. INS a 0..41240 .4666
0.'7120.4417NO. toOl (N-1.1 .
SE0 LAN = 0.2238 0.4.492
27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, pleaseprovide the following breakdown(s) of costs by program and by component pafts.
Program Program Program Program2 3 4
Total cost of program1 ]
Cost of personnel:ProfessionalOther
Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check) (9) (e)
GUESTION PART 0
F Pi.i GF C.PCTSCOR E INTERVALS F PCT GP 101k
0.0 4401 a3.4 52.9 100.0 392 61.5 475 100.01.000 6 I 16.6 8.8 14.6 43 11.3 i3 17.5
CASES PROCESSED a 52.84170.;-aMINIMUM VALUE O. 0
MAXIMUM VALUE a 1.0000 1.0000SUN UF SCOAES 83.0000SUM SOO. SCORES
_..274750.7475 104)000
MEAN 0 oli Ss 6.174/STNO. 01V. 041 0.3119 ..411.40/97S Th0. OE V. / a 0.3154 0.4801ME 0I AN 4 0944 0.1059
P ART P
SCURF INTERVALS F PC I CF p.431.10 F. kJ F*C...FCT
o.0 46.4 92.2 52.9 100.0 432 90.9 475 100.01.000 4 .1 1.3 4.1 T .8 43 901 43 if. 1
CASES PPM& SEG . SjLoll
MINI MUM VALUE 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 4 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 49124,5U4 SOO. Scames 4.1265ME AN 0.0140
54m0._Piv. oik___Ti__ ____ 04602 ___
S1,w. ULVo ite.// a 0.270BMLOIAN a 0.0423
4700.01.0000
43.U000
O. U9050.469
0.449b
28. How many pupils participate la (each of the) compensatory reading program(0 inyour school? (If there is more than one program answer separately for each. Ifindividual children participate In more than one program, count them in each total)
Member of Pupils
Program 1
'Program 2
Program 3
Program 4
?4ES71DN 3d PART A
CF C4CTSCORE INTERVALS F FCT CF ft-8L 10
O.0 24.99 11 .9 28.0 41.5 1 00. 0 94 4t1 444 100.025.00 ... 74.90 19.4 30.2 35.6 72.0 177 3149 340 78.875.00 '.. 1a4.,9 6.0 1369 16.2 SSA 75 169 173 39.0
125.00 -. 1744_99 105 100 IA 1960 17 3.6 96 22.4175.00 .' 224.99 2.1 4.2 ta 15.9 20 45 ili 18.2225.00 ..- 274.99 2.0 4.0 9.4 11.4 17 3.9 61 137275.00 324. 99 1.0 2.0 US 701 _14_..-___407 44 9.932540 .. 314.80 00 14 1.9 Sae 8 isi/ 341- 7.2375640 -. 424649 0.6 1.1 401 44: 6 &.4 24 5.4425.00 + 474.99 0.3 005 106 102 3 9.7 16 4.1475.00 524.99 0.5 1.0 1.3 2.6 5 iol 15 3.4525.00 - 574.09 0.2 0.4 068 1.7 3 0.7 10 2.3515.00 - 624.19 0.1 0.2 C.6 2 I. 0.2 7 1.6625600 .. 614.99 0.1 0.1 0.5 101 / 002 b 1.4675.00 - 724.90 0.4 0.9 U.S 0.9 i 4 044 5 1.1725.00 - 774.99 0.4 060 0.1 Q el_ 0 0.0 0.2775.00 - 124.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.2825.00 -. 874 a 99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.2915.00 - 924.99 0 .0 0.0 0.1 (1_ 0 u410 1 0.2'925.00 474040 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0 0040075.00 -. 1024.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0 as() 1 0.2
1025.00 1074.99 94 0.0 0.1 0 IL-1
0.21C75.00 1124.94 U el Col G.1
_AWL_0.1 1 62 0.2
1125.00 1174.99 0.O 0.0 ..C C -0.0 0 oti 0 0.01115600 .- 1200300 0.0 0.0 010 -G.0 0 uO 0 0.0
CASES PROCESSEDNU fas AN It DATA a
1 &1
49.414331.0000
444314; uoao
4.4.00.40046046.0000
$111.61 NUN VALUE w
1,AX! MUM VALUESUN t SCURF S i
4.000O1100. CC CO4E110 . 5130
SUI4 $0D. SCORES aMEAN17ND. ULY. CIO_ AL
3950.000004.5664
12441_55126.1161
53.0516
Od108.211713564245/-3-57;76i61.4.58[
sup. ay. IN*11 aFEW AN a
'
28. How many pupils participate in (each of the) compensatory reading program(s) inyour school? (If there is more than one program answer separately for each. Ifindividual childrenIparticipate in more than one program, count them in each total)
Number of Pupils
odistiom
Program 1
'Program 2
Program 3
Program 4
PART 111
F
1010.0 -
INTERVALS
29444
F
110
PGT
44.6
CF P-111.41
Z6.2 100.0
PEI trrPC1i9i.8 254 100.0
10.04 ss/GAO
110601 Is
69494.109 AO1044.04
0.83.0la
33.811.3
4.11
16.8goo4.1
554421.610.2
iFFTCW--Til 64:233 1300 4 25.214 s.5 11 12.2
-Kr-150.00190.00x34.00 -
149699229.99269:49
0.30.20.4
1.30.61.6
1.51.21.0
5.134.34.0
4 1.6 1.72 0.8 13 5.14 1.6-i- -.4- -rli 4.3
2:81 4.4 6 2.40 4 *0 5 2.0
-1** 4.1:4-- "3 -2.01 0.4 4 1.61 0.4 3 1.21 Ao 4 OA0 0.0 1 0.40 0.0 1 0.40_.- 'O;o ................1 ).4 1 0.4
270.00310.00330.00
AI .99349.9938194 49
0 .10.10.a
Oa0.30.0
Coe4460.5
2 012.11.8
390.00430.00 .470.00 -
429. 99469.44509.99
Gel0.00.1
0.50.2C.3
0.50.30.3
1.8la1.1
5104 00 s'550,00510.00 -
549 .99549.94629.99
0.10.00.0
040.0000
La4.10.1
0 a0.20.2
630.00 -670.00 -
469.99700.00
0.00.1
0.00.2
0.10.1
---0:2O.
'254CASES FRUCESS EC 26./619NO. SLANK DATA 214. GGRG 221RINI NUN VALUE 0.0 OokiMAXIMUM VALUE 646.0000 Wr6;31100SUM OF SCORES a 1514.4744 /6130.0080SUM SOO. SCORES a 214749. 4374 ta24396. +1000NE AO = 58.0461 -61;51119-STNO. 001. IN) a 14.5310 64.2/71MO. 04V. ii0.1) 81.4021 84.4411MbOIAN a 26 .3448 41:11154
28. Now many pupils participate in (each of the) compensatory readig program(s) inyour school? (If there is more than one program answer separately for each. Ifindividual children participate in more than one program, count them in each total.)
Number of Pupils
Program I
=Program 2
Program 3
Program 4
PART
F
5.7
SCORE INTERVALS
0.0 - 29.19
PCT
504
CF I"'
11.3 100.030.00 69.99 Z.7 23 ig6 .49.570 600 109.99 1..2 11.0 2.11 237
110.00 10.99 SILL la 14.6150.00 189 .99 001
_221GT 1.3 11.6
190.00 229.99 060 0.0 1.2 11.0230.00 269. 99 0.4270.00 - 3101.19 0.1
_1.10.6 0.9 /a?
310.00 349.91 0.3 2.4 CA 7.1350.0 0 389.99 A.1 C. / 0.5 4.7390.00 429.99 0.1 0.6 0.4 34430.00 - 469.99 0 el 0.6 4.4 3.3410.04 - 509.99 0.1 0.7 G.3 Tel510.00 549.94 0.0 124 0.2 1.11350.00 519.99 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.9510.00 629.99 eel 4.7_ 0.2 1.9630.00 69.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.2670.00 - 100.00 0 .1 1.2 C.1 1.2
F
49311441
03I2
r1
1
01
0L
PA.T
44.1
1.F
6231LT
C-PC
1100055.927.915.3
2Te912.63.b0.9 13 II./0.0 La 10.84.7 12 10.80.9 9 6.11.8 8 7.20.9 b 5.40.9 5 440.9 4 3.6u.9 3 2.7
0.0 2 1.80.9 2 1.80.0 "
0.9 L 0.9
CASES P4OCESSEDNU. BLANK DATA
a 11.317035144000
411364
MINIMUM VALUE a 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 0 682.0CCO 682.0003SU6 3 SCORES 878.7747 13 6 0000
..s0_4410,.Acuokk4 !" 240004.6113 4434328.00007/4409'MAN
STNO. DEW. (Ni 113 .1903 123.0154
IJN40.PEVA a 1.29.0109 123.0335MECLAN 19.5700
28. How many pupils participate in (each of the) compensatory reading program(s) inYour school? (If there is more than one program answer separately for each. Ifindividual children participate in more than one program, count them in each total.)
Number of Pupils
Program 1
Program 2
Program 3
Program 4
CF PabLN F. -"kJ- '0 C-KT
4LIESTI ON 28 PART
FSCORE INTERVALS PCT
0.0 - 19.99 1.4 164,5 5.3 100a 16 49.6-33.
54 100.020.00 59.99 1.9 36.5 3.9 73.5 111 3 38 7T)7. 4
40.00 . 99.99 0.8 14.1 2.0 37.0 7 13:0 20 37.0100.00 .. 139.99 0.1 2.8 1.2 220 2 34 13 2401140.00 ... 179.99 0.4 7.3 1.1 2Q ..0, 4 . 744 AL 20.4180.00 119.99 0.1 1.6 0.7 1Z.4 1 1.9220.00 ..- 259.94 0.1 1.6 0.6
0.5i.4s.t..i).6
1.9aatxl 1113..01
260.00 299.94 0.0 0.0340400 ... 339.99 0.2 3.0 005 9. 2 34 5 9.334044 - 379,.99 0.0 0.0 4.4 646 OA 3 546-56-73-C-6).-0 411.99 0.0 0.0 0.4 6.6 0 4.0 3420.00 - 459.99 4.1 1.5 0.4 6.6 1 1 9 3 5.6460.00 .- 499.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 4.1 0 O.0 2 3.7500.00 - 539.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 4.1540.00 579.99 0.0 4.0 0.2 Ca 0 aa 3.7580.00 - 6t9.99 0.1 1.6 0.2 4.1 1 149 2 3.7
0.0 0.0 440-620.00 -. 655.99660.00 - 699.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.42 0 Veit 1 1.9700.00 - 739.99 0.!..G. 0,0.. 001 1.6 a a
'a-.1 1.9
740.00 - 779:09 0 .0 040 Col 244T"- 0- 0 1 16-9780.00 - 819.99 0.0 0.0 C.1 2.6 0 44.0 1 1.9820.00 0.0 0.0 2.6_ ,..0 0.0
---d1 1. 9.r...
860.00 -.659.99899499 O. G 0.0
.4.1O.1 2.6 0- 1
900.00 - 939499 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.6 0 u.0 1 1.9940.00 L-980.00
979.9910066
011oso
4.6oike
0.1a0.0 0.G
10-
l.94.010
1.90.0
CASES PROLES SELA
f.3 5i 54421RLAMX -DATA 415 4000
MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUt 147.0000 9474u000SUM OP SCORES a 550.8130 379. 0000SUM SOO. SCORESMEAN
IA
a223365.4115
10344236L964597.0000
99.6111176 .7595 163.-avasSIND. 0EV. itNii
S] D. DEW. I N-1 196 .1290 /65.Z20dE I AN 45.7463 44..0.44
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box 0.
UUETION 29
SCORE INTERVALS F
0.0 4561.000 19
CASES PROCESSED 0
CF CPC7 F
90041 475 100s 0 51.1
FC7 CF-P6Lw
96.7 5_39 100.04.0 19 460 L*11
475
3.3 14 3.3
52.11017MINIMUM VALUE a (44) 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.4000 1.00004404 OF SCORES = 19.4000 1.7321,4410 SOO. SCORES = 19.0000 1.7521WAN 0 0.0400 0.0331amO. DEV. IN1 la 0.1940 001790STNO. DEV. IN-Il a 0.064 0.LSC7MkOIAM a 0.4406 0.0171
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box 0.
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4..a o 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
in In 1-1 in in 1-1 in in r-i in in r-IN 1 1 N 1 1 N I 1 N I I
I kr) ri I VD r-I I D -.1 I D 1-10 r- es.' in 0 1-1 t-st in 0 r-I N trt 0 r-I N toGrade
(14 ED EI 0,1E1 El (0001:14100041ASTICh 29 PART A
CF 04LN F Poi CF C--PCT
1.000 22.7 70..2 29.1 100.10 195 74..1 43 100.02.000 4.3 14.5 7.1 23.9 38 14.4 68 25.93.000 0.9 3.0 2.b 9.3 10 4.8 30 11.44. 000_..._.....___ "9 e.3 LP. _60 20 7.6 7.6
CASES PROCES S EL/ 4NO.. IL MK OA T A 0
29.82932060000
63212
--I.;1000.4.0000
481.000075 -7 ...at li
1.4491O. 68..00.4447-1.1744
PI NI MUM 118Ltik *Pi1X1 NUN 9 ALUi *SUM CF SCO8E S 0
_ .
1.04C04.0000
41.608278.2660
1.39490.8235._. -_______0.8316
.
11365
Sul 540. wAes .MEAN aSING. DE 9 IN) 'aiiiii;-Ri;64.4i0E01 At. sz
29. Approximately what percent: of the pupils at each grade level in yourk school
participate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box 0.
PROGRAM 1
8r-I
1-10 r-IV)
tr)Grade
PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 30o o
tr)eV 1 1
I %ID0 CsI letr-I 0
PROGRAM 4lc, 00 0 8 2tr) tn 1 -i in
CV I I CI I I
I VD I %ID 6-I1-1 C.4 U1 0 r-{ C.4 U1
K Vi) El El E.] Or] El t40 CI CD GI OD CI 1:1QLES71ON 29 PART 8
SCURE INTERVALS F PCT CF P..81.111 -F --04a CF C....PCT
1.000 ioa 83t1_ 42.1 100.0 19.A _OA_ A44 100.02.000 4.5 12.6 2.0 16.3 46 43.0 20 14.33.000 0.1 4.2 4.5 3.8 1 0.8 4 3.34.000 0.3 1.4 0a4.6 A__ ___ 4,4 ______ I .214
6A4ES PROCESSEDND. BLANK DATA =PIN1PUM VALUE aMAXIMUM VALUE *
__OF SCORES aSUM Si. 0 SCORESMEAN aSTD. DEV 1111 aSIN° DEV. 11.11 a14ED IAN a
DES1104 Vi PART C
12.1318346.0C40
1.00004.0000
14.89,1422.5824
162211045S5704,62111
1.01176
123.452
1000044.4000
440.00011224. J000
1.44195
osiiozwatil
SCORE IN7E4vALS-. F PCT F LF CPCT
2.000_./9D
0.5 8.95..C.L00.0_1.2 21.0
436
70.8/41.7
5613
100.023.2
3.000 0.3 4.5 0.7 12.1 3 5.4 7 42.54.000 0 1.6 0.4 10 4 7.4 4 7.1
CASES PROCESSEDm:,...__BLANK_Olk01141041114 VALUE.
a
a0
5.6(41tiOSG9100000
56419
1.4000MAXIMUM VALUE a 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SLURES 0 7.0_11115. 80a0000104 Wb:--cdf.):Es a 15.4889 158.44,A)MEAN a 1.4064 1.t2064/1111. LIEV a 0.8445 0.ddi,
LTEAT. 1.'4;1* '041:191MEDIAN a 1.1328 1.1512
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box E.
Grade
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2
0 Oif,cst I I
C rl C9 In
00In InCNI I I
C) 4-1 CsC1
i in
PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4
2CNI I 1
0-1ul
00 0In InCSI I I
O r4 CS' in
K DODD DODO El CI EIWEJ El10:00 ODD ED a o o
QUEST 10N 29 PART
'ha 4F C -PCTSCUitE ANTERVALS F PC' CF 111.4LN F
1.000 2.6 714 3.6 100.0 0 74.6 44 190.02.000 0.7 184 1.0 214 7 2408 AO 29.43.000 0.2 6.1 4.3 8.7 2 8.9. .3 8.84 4000 Oki_ 2.3 0.1 2.3 1 4.9 1 2.9
CASES PROCESSIC aKO. &LAM BATA
3.1415434.0000
34441
MINIMAR VALUE I4040 4 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 0 4 AGOG 4.0000SUN OF SCORES 4.9823 40.4000SOS SOO. SCORES 0 8.6319 86.4000MEAN a 1.3717 141.14
OEV. (NJ 0.7C10 O. 73443STNO. 08V. (N*11 0.4338 0.7434MEDIAN gs 1.1849 1.4084
GAAS T tON 29 PARTE
F OCT F.- -PL.7 4F C..PC1CF P*4116
1.000_ t.s.#__41.0 41.8 130.0 78 21.01 1.69 100.(1.000 24.9 59.6 33.0 79.0 21.2 87418 493 18.43.000 3.4 8.3 8.1 19.4 33 8.9 79 21.44.000 4.0 11.1 ______4.6,_111., 48 _14.8._ 46 12.t
CASES OROCESSIOfrt;. BLANK DATA
41.1114104.0000
3169
1.0000_106
1.4000MAA1NU M VALUE * 4.0000 4.40000SUR OF SCORES 87.5748 789.0000SUN We:. I40gES Iii;31W- i.454:40-40MeAN a 200,1 2.4..414STNO. OEv. (NJ 0 0.bd50STNO. DEV. (14...11 0.8836 044662MEDIAN 0 /4664 24,v024
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box D.
PROGRAM 1
ul
O4Grade
0 0in (-I
I I%CoN ul
PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3
ul
0
00 0ul 1-4 In
I I0 "-I Iey In 0 '-
PROGRAM 40 0
0 0in g2er !r -4
I I N I I0 -1 I 0 -1cs1 in 0 1-4 N in
K DODO DE-tiOD opoEl DODD1 DopEietiziooptotOoo Doon
01115/1011 29 FART F
F PU F C-PCT
1.§L0.(1...0
SCOMI INTERVAL
1.000
F
6.0
PCI
31.9
CIF
167'Luis
100,02.000 10.0 . 33.3 11.7 66.1 92 119 66.93.000 166 9.4 1.0 1444 18 10.1 27 13.24.000 1.0 S.3 1.0 5.3 9 5./ 9 5.1
CASES PROCESSED110. KAIAK RATAIMIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE m
SUM UP SCORES m
18.66,1291.0000
1.00004440)
35.1331SUM SOO. scages . 77.5699MEAN A 10 OWIND. OEV. INI m 0.7130ST100. OEV. IN-41 m 008449MEDIAN so 1.1391
176297
. . . . _ .
lati,000
4.00g133.0000133.40041.00404424
141261
PART G
F F I)" CF CPCTSCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P81.61
1.000 2.6 .40.0 .5 100.0 26 44o1 aA 104.02.000 4.6 S3.7 boa 7000 40 55 67.93.000 063 Bel 1.4 16.3 4 4.9 LS 18.54_00,0______ 1.1 12_,6 1.1 12.6 11 14.6 11 13.6
CASES PROCESSED * 6.9224 81C. BLANK DATA al 3$9.0040 394MINIMUM VALUE so 1.00410
MAXIMUM VALUE m 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES:WI $00. SCORLS a
_. _ . ... 16.932X /62.U000311500-'
..-____-__40.8626
-ME AN or 1.98152 2.U004SUM. 0EV. IN) ......,
Imo; Tit-v- iii-1,.0.V5j60.4616
...(4.AI1 :
Mkt) IAN a 1.6728 1.6625
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box La
Grade
PROGRAM 1
0 00ell ell rl`I %0 4-I0
PROGRAM 2
ellC1 1 1
10 t's14-4%Co
PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 400 0
CNI I IP-I0 14 N ell
orCV
a 6-1K o El O DODOD 1:3401::2 moDOD 0000
QUESTION 29 AR H
S6JRE INT ERV ALS
.taiNg2.0003 .0004.409 _
CAVE.) ORGC,ESEDI A ko kPArA
MINIMUM VALUEPAX! NUM VALUESUM q SCCESSUP. S40. SCORLISPEA t%
SINOP LEV 1k1 *STNL. DEV. IAT-11Mt CI AN
a
Ca
aaa
PLtSTILIN
SCORE. INTERVALS
1..0002.0003.0004 .000
UMSES PROCLSSECJ.O. ALAtt!1/4 DATA zMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE
_SUM OF SCORESSUM 5467. SCORESMEANST O. LiEV thi
N1ME 0 I AN
4
1.51.90.20.3
*PART I
PCT CF
4935.37.5
F PST CF. C''PCT
_ALILLIAVAP2.4 61.1 200.5 12.8 2G.3 7.5 3
3.96024.244000_
1.00004. 00007413 1
15.83441.8 1400,843,40.97321.1296
F OCT-
2 .1 4.731.0 70.06.0 13.55.2 .41.
.4003_42.211.2
44.263177.0900
1.00004.0000
102.8336_263.1112
2.32320.1.4.Ct
o79I2.1467
4,4554.05.0165
_40 100.045 62.5
5 12.57.5
40415_
4.000073.0900
1.61.4.1004I. 02500.0333
1.1500
F t CO t4 CT
100.0 24 0.1 395 100.09.3 266 6103 93.925.3 54 13.1 105 26.6AAA 51 52.9 51 12.9
39 580
1. w006.4.0000
922. 00004390, 4i0U0
2.34420.1760o-xtra-2.1824
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) if classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box C.
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 40 o 0 00 0 0 0 t0 0a
tr, Lrl rI lf1 tn rt U1 Irl g-4 tri tri r-304 I I cs1 I i cI I I CNI I I
I '0 ,-I I V:r 1-1 i V, r-1 I M) r-ICr 'l CV sr, 0 1-1 cI IA 0 ri cs1 tri 0 ri C1 tri
Grade
1( C3 Ei D 0000000 Cl El EI1 0 DOD O EJ01112 ODDEIUD EIDNOODEI DD
QUESTION 29 PART .1
SCORI INTERVALS F PCT CF F PUT a--C-OCT
1.0002.00(3.4004.000
3.1 15.5 19.1 100.0 _39 X5. 100.012.6 64.2 1444 4405 131 45.4 MO 44.9
216 13.5 4.0 20.3 25 Line MI 19.1LA4____41) .
6.9 13 _6.5 6.5
Ass PRoCESSE0 19.61E1Ilk. BLANK DATA 172.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MARIMUN VALUE 4.0000SW Of SCORES * 411,4111.2
SUR SOD. SCORES 48.9164PE AN 2.1148STMe. .:)Ev TN) As 1$010 OEV 411 0.7614MEOIMM 2.0375
QUS71ON 24_ PASTA
SCORE PCT CP p. bus
1.000 2.I eg 7 100.02.000
_LWboo 51.7 6.6 75.E
3.000 0.1 IA 19 .14 .000 _44..s._
-1065
CASES PROCESSEDU. KAM DATA
MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUN OF SCORES14A SQ0. SCORES$tEAN
Sihu. 44v. (N1 aMO. DIV. 0041MEDIAN
6.7303396.0000
1.00004.0000
11.840142.8646
2.04350.65030.91211.9464
199Z76
1.00004.0400
419.0000967.000-
2.4.055
00.12752.4305
F PLT CF C-PCT
21 25.3 93 100. 045 54.2 b2 74.7
8 96 Al 20.59, ...4p.a 9 113.8
63492.4.00004.0000
171.40004.17.0000
2.0.020.6629
1.1,556
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately for
each program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years in
school instead of grade level and check this box O.
0Grade
PROGRAM 3.00 0
CI I
1-1 ctO I n 0
PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 300 0
in -1c+i
00 0in tri i-I
1 I I I
ino 4-1 I t((v e-tct inI 0 1-1 c
K DODD Fa ED Ei El DODDODD DODD DOD
2 DODD DODD DOD3 (IDE:JOE) DODD DOD
Q4ESIICII 29 'PART L
PROGRAM 400 0
inn/ I
In 0-I
4-I tO0 (-4 cI
O CIDEDDDODD
NDDODD
SCORE INTERVALS . F
1.000 1.02.000 2.73.000 0.34.000
CASES PROCESSEG a40. BLANK OAT aMINIMUM VALUE aMAY VALUESUM OF SCORESSkil SOC. SCORES aMEANSTMO. OEV. 4N1STNO. OEV.MEDIAN
PAif- M
F
112732
PCi
lA.44147.04.7
'CO C*PC T
43 100.032 Via 43 11.42 4 a7
ACT
24443.04.97o1
CP
4.2.3.20.S0.2
P.151.$0
100.073.112.09.4
SCORE INTER PALS F
1.066 3 .0
2.000 30.13.000 5.04.000 4.6
GASES PROLESSECRG. bLANA04f4MINI 44 V4tUt aMAXIMUM VALUE aSW OF SCORESSi* SOO. SCORES *
REAMOEV. iNi ss
HMO. OE V. 101.-11
MEOIAM
a
a
4.2644446.0000
43432
1.00004.0000 4.0000164450 82o V4100
17.1165 176. 000010210 1.90700.1143 0.709204229 0.11.74.
1.6977 i4.444119
ACT F e i.. 'CP C -PCTCF P1. b
6.9 43.5 160.0 as 4 183 100.071.0 40.5 93.1 265 69.2 X56 93.311.5 9.6 22.2 48 12.5 93 24.3I G. 7 Ad. 0 -0 _ 45 4.7 45 14,1
43.4443ae.00coi.00004.0000
914.t41#9245055i1
2.25500..1400.74552.1017
48392
4.4000*mow2.495Q0.7514
2.1243
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box p.
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 40 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0
in t" 1M til til 1-4 IA trt rl kr) 2 ,tc-3 1 I es1 I I ("I I I es1 I II 0 r-I I W v-I I tD mi I %O *-)0 I-I CV ir1 0 ri CV Irl 0 ri CV IA 0 rl C4 WI
Grade
3 noonmoonciotlocio(opoCioQ&;EST ION 29 PANT N
SCORE INTERVALS F st, F PirT LF C -PCT
1.000 as0 15.3 1563_100._0_ 2i L544 144 100.02.000 13.6 70.6 16.4 84.1 131. Ikea LIA 04.03.000 1.4 7.2 2.7 14.2 13 Zol AS 13.64.000 _ _1.3 7.0 J.3 7.0 12 CDS IA 6.5
IIASE 5 FROCESSIGNO. (RANK OA TA aURIMI VALUE 4SAX IMUN VALUE go
5W OF 304101E4SUM SOD. SCORESME Ak a
ahu. UEV. iN) 4OEVe 4,4041 0
NE0 IAN
QUESTION 29 PART 0
19.3316 10428 5.0000 29
1.0000 UAW*4.0000 400080
390996 37 /4.410(1091.6056 861. 40002.05.8 2.04090.7012 O. 693410 a 2E2 0.69571.9921 8.0082
3-6RE INTERVALS
__X*.acC2.0403.000
____ 4.000__ ____..._...
F
AO6.30.3II;
FCT
15.369.03.3
144
ai;21L*S.47.81.4114
-F1358.4
I2
14.96iga--4.b
13.0
CF C.-PCT
0 T 100.0ri 65.116 48.412 13.8_ -....
_100.0840157J124
CASE $ FROCESbEt 22 9.1119 87hL. BLANK_ _44 TA x. 344 POSAV
1.0000388
I NI SO I VA LUtMAXIMUM VALUE a 4.0000 40000SUN OF SCORES a 49 4318 189.0000504 i10. .ColiLS 4/.7264 4/3.304i)94E. AN 2.1290 2. A. 144tsilo). ay. h/ 0.010 O. 43410SYI40 0.11455 0.04513MEDIAN 2.0032 2.4259
I.
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box D.
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4o 0 00 O 0 O 0 0In in r.1 trlN t I N I I N S I
r11-1
1--I-I I
1-;q:)0 N 0 ; N 0 (.4
Grade
0t 8r. I-I
(.14-10 I-I
M:1N
3 ODEJD OCIOD DOCICIMODO4 16A 0 0 DODO DODO
QUESTION 29 FART
FCTSCONE INTERVALS CF 14.61.14 F PO
1.000 0.9 22.1 3.9 100.0 9 40 199e 92.000 3.0 77.7 27 67.5 31 77.52.7 66.53.000 0.1 3.8 0.4 9.2 2 5.0 4' 10.04.191 0.2 5.5 4 .54.. 4.L._ $.0
LASES PROCESSED
QUESTION 29
NO._ILANK DA1A aNINIMUN VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUN OF SCORESsum vac. scmEsmuot
a
SINO. DEVa_ANIDEV. 1.4.41
MEDIAN
PMU
344241
1.00004.0000.3A44 4816.3144loi24300100.71711.9049
40435
1.000044.0000
1700000167.40001.4000.6640469361.9074
f FCT F 'our -C-F. C-PCTSCORE INTERVAL CF p-81, h
1.000 3.2_ 7.7 41.3 1Q0.0 28 1. 366 100.0
2.000 28.7 69.4 314 92.3 249 4-- 340 92.43.0004.000,
4.6 11.640_143_
9.544_11.3
23.0 4744_
/2.8120_.
tl44_
24012.0
CASES PROCESSID a
Rai, BLANK DATA a
MINIMUM VALUE aMAXIMUM VALUE a
SUM Of sums .SUM 500. SCORESKEAN a
SM. 06V. IN/sum. 01V. W1IMEDIAN
41.11211105.0000
1.00004.000013.5/64
215.62172.2451005120.76152.1100
368LO7-17.7J-407-44M140
643.0004i-5-1):110
2.49080. /7340.17,442.1265
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box 0.
Grade
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 20
vi in 1
t-I
(.4va04 in
0 0en en 4-4
I1-40 4
I-I tDNI Vin
PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4o oo oin 2 ,-I 0 2 t-4
C4 I I CV I 8
I VI) I V) f-40 r-1 c4 In 0 1-4 c4 It._--3 DOD DOCI DODO DO
4 DODOWD El D WO El El DODDS T 1004 29 PART P
F
23
SCORE I NTERVALS P
2.2
PCT CF P°'81.W
12 .0 18.1 100.0
PO Cpf_ C -PC T
12.5 114 100.02.0003.000
0009
13.3I ?1.4
71.1 16.4 88.04.3 3.2 14.91.6 A«± C_ ?.6
1301714
704 1419.2 34
87.516.8:7 .6
CASES PittICESSEL 18.6512
_.7-4).__, .14
184M. al-Mot DATA 1.35.0000 491MINIMUM VALUE 0 1.0000 WOOMAXIMUM vALUE 4.0000 4440000SW OF SCuRES * 046559 490. 11000SUR SQD. SCORES * 3. 6421 920.40410PEAN 2.1242 2.1196STN. 0Ev. (h)tlfto. ay. 4/4.41'*
0.7 08 70.7284
0.71240.1143
MECUM 2.0350 2.0308
.44 PART S
tATERvALS F PCT CF 0-8LN F C4CT
1.000 1.3 14.2 1.1104.!9 13 14" 87 100.0at 000 6.1 66.4 7.0 05.8 57 414.5 74 85.13.000 0 .6 6.3 1.8 19.3 6 0.9 17 19.54.000 1.2 13.1 4.4 tAkA LI 14.4 11 12.6
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
*a
.1247440109
87388
MINIMUM VALUE . 1.0000 1.11000
PAM NUR VALUE a 4. 0 CC 4.Q000SUM OF SCORES
-19.90434.4 ie I4
189.4400.471:40-a4SW' SOD. SCTJRES
MEAN 2.11416 2. i 7Z4
sTND. Dtv. 0.8334 0,4034S ThOdo DE V. EN-1l s 0.843aME 01 AN 2.0313 2.J35i
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box 0.
Grade
3 DODD 0000 DDDD DDD4 DDDD DODO EDIDIDWIDEIDD5 tUPOOD DODO DDDD EMOD.
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 40 0 01" In r-i
0 Ci Giir.1
0 0 0 0kr1 In In In rt til In r-1
CV 1 I 44 I 1 CV I I N I II m, r-1 0 I 11, r-1 1 v, 1-10 r-I N srs Q rl C4 Ill 0 r-I N in 0 ri N tti
CUE STI ON 29 PART T
_ . _
F Pi.t t.F- C-PC TSCORE INTERVALS PCT a P.8 Li*
0., 01_446 4.3 tctO*0 8 _ _1 1 . 1 -- . . . 4 5 -
1 0 0 . 0
2.000 2.1 CO441 3.7 83,4 26 62.2 37 82.21.000 0.5 14.2 1.0 22.5 5 11 .1 9 20440
_ Q 0 0.5 1 C.5 12142 4 81.9 4 8.9
CASES PR ULE3 E0 is
NO. CLANK DATA a4.4524
424.004045
430MINIMUM VALUE a 1.0000 1.4000PAM NUM VALUE 4.4400 4.0000SUM OF, SCOPES 9.7119 952.44.119--SUP Si4/0 St 0 iit S 4 24.4223 229.4000SEAN a 2.1815 2.1111
!,41J N/ a 0.6522 Os /950_SIM/144S7.4 DEV . 114.11 a 0.9678 -0;iiiiiii5
t4E01 AN a 2.04112 2.0119
4titiSTICiii 29 PART U
SCORE INTE RVAL PCT C -I- -ti C C T
1.000 3.1 10.8 36443 100.0 37 11 .2 329 100.0-18.82.000 254 61.4 32.4 4982 221- 29-1
3.000 3.1 844 7.3 24.2 31 9.4 11 21.6_.dtt0P0 4.2 11.6 6,2 14,6 40 12.2 40 12.2
CASES PR tiCES S EL, aNO. &Atli( DATA a
364686141440440
329146----I:4/6a-*PINTO/UN VALUE a 1440000
PARANA VALUE a 4.0400 4444200SUM CP SCORES a 80411927 132.4400SUP SOD SC 0 OiE S 414 199.5844 1 8100MEAN a 2.2141 2.4249SIND. DEV 4.0.1.. a, 0.7836 0. 1011
-S Th0. OE Y. 1 W./ i 067147 0.6027NEOIAN 2.0616 2.4769
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this boxO.
Grade
3
4
5
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 40 0 0 0°s
o 0 °nin in i-i in ors ,-4 u, Ill 1-1 v, in -ies4 1 $ hl I i h/ i i hi 1 1I V:r
in I V:r 1-1 I ND r-I I ND *-10 P-1 hi in 0 ...I hl VS Co 1-1 hi IA 0 t-I hi In
111000 DEJO D 000 CI 0 (1] 0 0 0 E3 CI CD MOODC3 0 0 ID OD Cl WO E3 DODO
CUEStit44W- PART V
SCORE INTE RV ALS F PC?'1.0002.00034,0004.000
CASES PROCES SEuNO 81. AN K DATA .RINI NUN VALUE aMAX110.1.1 VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCONESWEANSTNO. UE v. iNISTNO. DE v. N-111E 01 AN
PVT GF C -PCT
34_ . .4144. _ 17.1 100.0 31 Id.? A66 100.011.3 45.9 14.1 62.4 111 66.9 US 81.31.k 9.5 2.8 14.5 13 7.6 24 14.5kva . .
7.1. . 1.2_111._ .1.1..... ciA,.. ____ -11
- _404
CUE S T I CM 29 PART ai
$CiiftE 1NTE RV ALS
1.0002.0003. 0004.0190_
LASES PROCESI.EbIX ANS DATA
MINIMUM VALUE6A XI NUN VALUE 0
SUR SOU. SCORESMEAN
N1_STNO. DEV. IN-41Pala AN a
17.1115 164303.10009_ 309
1. 0000 1.4.404-04.4CC0 4.4,0003564479 336. 000062.0094 766. UAW2.0519 2w42410.7413 0.72770.7640 0:11901.9919 1o5!66
F PCT
1.4 11.64.6 62.70.4 5..11.1 14.6
CF P -flLd F Poi .F C-PCT
a .100,0, 13 L6.7 76 100.04.3 64.4 50 6444 66 83.31.5 19.7 5 4.4 IS 19.2
._14440 10 12.6 LO 12.8
7.7077 78351.00.00 497_
1.0600 1.00004.0000 4.00001414915 166.00404 iollil 418.:0002.1654 2.15440864 O. 648)
. -
0.9460 0045442.014C 20,400
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this boxO.
Grade
PROGRAM I PROGRAM 2a0
O
In in eiC4
1 Or-I Cs) irt
3 004 DOOD5 00D6(1)DDD
00in it) r-
0I
C4
C4Co
O 000O 000E1000O 000-
Gustt ON a 9 PART A
SCORE 1 NTEIV ALS
1.0002 «0003 .0004 OGG
CASES PROCESSEDNU. &LANK DATA 41
141 Mt NUN VALUENAZI MUM VALUESW/ OFSUM SOO. SCORES aMtSIND. GEV. t NI
74 aMEDIAN ss
GUEST' ON 29
scum 1 itsTE OV ALS
1.0002 .0003.0004.000
PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 400 0tiltl I rl0 v
I-1 C.4
0a 0trs ars
Ir-O
0 1
I-4 tNI
0 0 0 a D-00100 CI 0 00 0 000 ID 0 0
D C3 C3 0 Eli 0 0
f PCT CF
CAS_ - 4.1 100 .02.2 54.8 302 79.20e4 1.5 1.0 24;4
. _ 4 1504.
PART' Y
4 .09894a 7. 0000
10414004.06105.5607
23.1376t / 461Q.9304L.01012. 0334
F PGI C-PCT
9 24.0 41 10.0.023 564 32 7410 0
4 is& 9 21.05 122 $ 12.2........._ ... ... ___. __._-_ ......
41434
1.406004.0000
07.00217.4000
2. &220O. siedoOs d99*244000
f PCT CP P11.ti
4.9 13_.6_ 35.2 100.0.....
22.4- 64.4 30.3 86 .23.8 10.8 1.7 214,83.9 ......A1.0,_ .3.2 11. C
CASES PROCESSEDNO. S. AN It DATA *
35 .17/7A§1.-O_O_CO_
MI MINIM VALUE *. _ ...
/ 4. Ct.00MAXIMUM VALUE * 44,41640SUM OF_ SCOSE1 I° 77.05_45SUP SOD. SCORES 23 191.5 413MEAN * 2 .1899STNU Delia 1 Al al 0.2060STNO* OE V. 14.../8 s .0. 4177PE DI AN a 2.0418
LP C -PCT
4.6_14 .3 U2 /40.197 85.740 12.4 19 24.539 12.1 19 12.1
322LS3
4w00716.0000
1011.40a02.22360._6376"0:43492.0030
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box 0.
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2a 0 00 0 0 0 0U tn r.4 in v-$ .-I in in rcq I I c-.4 I I CV I i
I c el0 9-I4 N in 0 4-I 04 in 0 r-I csi ul
PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4
Grade
6 Ot_z)OOOMDCE:1 DODO7 D DODO E18 ODD DODO DOD DODO
GUL 571 ON 29 PARE
0 0in in rits1 I I
1 .o 4-10 r1 CV in
4 hi' ALS F PCT CF p..64.1d F YC3 LF C.-PCT
.2..9Z000 10.0
1.64.000 .0
CA Sty PA 1:CES Et.;Nth BLANK OA IA_MI NI MUM VALUEPA 3t1 MUM VALUESUM Cf SC-LJAESLO SQL) S(.OKE 5MEANS1N0. UEV N1$ MD. LE V. N-1 )FE D 1 AN
CLc 5 'LON 29
INI RV
I.tiCJ2.000
.0004. CCO
CA 'tS PALLE,NU. bL 'AK Um TAMINIMUM VALUEPik XI MUM 11A LUt
SCURE.,SUM Swu. SCOkLSricai9r40. LEV . 4 Hi
zr(.44;. 0E V. U -11hE 01 AN
i.e.a..9 15 ..5._ 10 0.0 29 19.0. 1.03 op. a64.5 12.5 6/.1 99 64 a 4.24 d 1.010.1 2.6 16.5 15 9o8 14 16.34.1! A.0 0.4_ 10 bob 4.0 6.5
a 15.4496 53.317.0000 422
a 1.000 18.4000a C CG 4.u000
7.
_3.147 2 sts 3412.040203.1.4870.7638Lei B14
312. u0y072 0. 4000
2.u3iOA 73990.74,24/.1 79d
a
a
PAW! AA
F
4.e0.31.2
PLT
65.64.1
IS .d
CF
7.46.aA.41.2
t90.0_445 4.I:::
F
115049
PL
14.907.62.4
14..4
1..F
74661J
9
C-PC
100.085.1/7.612.2
7.2962i4.00cv1.00004.0 CCO14.127641.28842.21040.07i20.94652.c4CZ
74401
1.00004.vOUU
159. uthill
391.41)442. 14000.81060.62232.4140
29, Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program,) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box 0,
Grade
PROGRAM I PROGRAM 20 00 0
in in0 0in in 1-1 r-IN I I N I I
0 .I-i (N
NDI In I .00 f--I N In
PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 40 00 0 oin in 1-i in 0
in (-Icsi I I N I I
I ND 4-1 4-10 I-4 N In 0 rI-I (N
NDI in
6 DODO DODD ODD Ei 1:3
7 ChdP 00D DODD DODD DODD8 0000 0000 0000 0000
VLESTION 24 i" A +;: r A6
1Port:i4VAL
_A0002.0043.0004.000
PRC/C6S:',60hO. BLANK DATA =
141Ni MUM VALUE aPAAIMUM VALUE m
SUM CF StARESSUM SO. SCORESKEANSTNU. DEV. t IiSIND. DEVo 1N-11 20RODIAN
4Lb4TILIN 29
a
IP.TEPVAL'J
2.0003.0004.000
LASS PROCESSEDNU. iiL AN& DATA
VALUEPA A1114UM VALUtSUM SF.5LP 5i4). SCURES aMEAN
F PCT
.9,3 41.62.0 40.10, 7.71..AP 0.6
PART AC
5Ttista...pty,. th ) aST-Pili IJEV 1N -1 )ME 01 AN a
CF P-aL4
3.31.31.0
161
I30004.0000
.9.7Q7627 «9.145
.4172J$
1.21602.1426
100.062 .433.5I5.0
F pt.j
Z 1.)20 40.8
3 7.310
C-PL T
.l 100.033 80.513 31.710 Z."...4
41434
1.40v34.u000
97.1000275.40.)4
2.-bb$V1.4,3b1.46672. 251
193.70.8k. J..
POT
5.0. 7,
27625.9
CF
0.0_19g08.6 41.31.9 14.11.1 8.1
F
614.,328
910
PuT
51.3l).56.29.1
LIU474.9i 0
C-PCT
100.042.717.39.1
13.4904 110'59.0000 365
1.0000 1.4L1JJ4.00(0 4.4.1013O
186. t.o00047 .4817 416. %/Ova1.6363 1.6909091/t) 0.960,0.9537 0.90491.3:20 1.373J
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box 0.
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2
0 00u)csi I I
%CIi ri0 '-I CV IAGrade
0 00ul
0CV I
I to4-1 Cs1 ul
PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4a o0 0 0 o
IA Ul r-I Ul Ul 1-1cs1 I I Cs1 I 1
I NO 4-1 I 10 *-1or10 I-I (4 In 0 f-I C4
o DD DDD DOD DEI7 CI D 0 D 1:11 CNC D El
8 DO DD EI 00 DDD*ist
/.002.0003.000
CASES POtUCESSEUCLANK DATA s
NAN/SUM VALUEMAXIMUM vALueSUM CF SCOM $ 1.1
Su* SGO. SCOkt SMEANSIN D. A
SOW, OEVe IN-1ME CI AN
4E S T1 ON 29
ORk 1017 ERVA1.4
1.0002 .0003.0004. 000
CASES Pii4CES5 ECNO . BLANK DATA a.NINIOWN VALUL aMAAI CUM VALUESAM S _
540. SCORES sMEANSINO. OEV. 1 hi =STIO TAY. IN-11PEJI AN
a
_-PCT CF P-61.14
.. g.5 .511.a_i_ _ 1..0 100.01.6 31.9 2.1 41.30.1 2.5 0.5 9.49.3 49 4.3 6.4
5.0049421.0000
1.00004.0.0007!.$ 1415.97151.5759p.8412_0.94041.311.
PART At
._F PCT CP P-tiLw
1.4 750 10 00.00.5 25.0 0.5 25.00.0 G.0 -..4.0 -0.00.0 0.0 -4.0 -ore
1.8177449.0440
1.00001.0444
_1.34113.28481.2498U.43290.63321.1065
F PLI .F C-PCT
31 600 47 100.012 4545 16 34.0
1 4.01 4 8.53 e.4 3 6.4
47428
1.00044.4000
70.4000/36. 4000
/.94940.82140.83011.4581
F PCT C-PCT
15 78.9 19 10:404 11.1 4 21.10 0.0 0 0.00 0.0 0 0.0
19956
1.40002.4004
23.000031.44441.41050.90770.44641.1333
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box 0.
Grade
6 DODO 000 E3 DODO D,07 D OD QOOD 10008 LKAO DOD O 0000 0000
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 40 0 0 a0 0̂.
a 0°n o CI
In In .1 In In r..1 In In r1 u1 0 HCs 4 I 1 C`i I 1 C1 i i N I II NO 4-1 1 v::0 4-1 I VC0 4-1 1 u:4 rl0 H N In Q I-1 N 1r1 Q H N 1r1 0 '- N In
WJES 41 CN Z9 PARI AF
SCCKE INTERVALS
1 cO. .P.C4
2.0001.000A.0000
F PC4 Ka CF C....PCYCF PVILW F
O. 5Lte6 100.0 6 60410 &O 100.00.4 36.8 0.5 40194 3 30.0 4 40.00.0 0.0 4.1 12.6 0 0.0 L 10.00.1 12.4 ___e_e_l_ 12.6 1_4/.1.0 1 10.0
CASES PFtUCES s 1.0834NU BLANK DA TA 4D4.4000111611M0.4 VALUE * 1.0000PAM SUM VALUE 4.00CO
:4101, OF * 1'a9.48-SUM SUO. SCORES * 1,..1115MEAN 1.7451
_4.1.1w4 .01Y 1 .
STNO. OE V (144.11 a 3. 54 C4Mt. 1 AN = 1.4819
GUEST' ON 24 PART AG
SCORE iteTEAV-ALS F
..e._
FCT
64,_4_
CF P -BLw
L.4. to_ ty
F
642.000 A.4 27.0 4.5 3566 233.000 0.3 2.4 1.L 603 44.0OO 066 t.4 GO 6.4, 6
10400
1.1.4004/
4.0000106630434. 0000
14.643U00.91.650446641.4344
P4,T GF C.*PCT
06.0 97 100.02447 43 34.04.1 Li) 10.36.4 0 6.2
1*.itt PROLESSEO a 12 .4314 97rtuf _iikAtO, DATA s 474._0_0410 07eMINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.UU40MAXI MUM VALUE s 4.0CCO 4.u000SYM Cf.. SccM4 s .mi 14....1_402_ ii.o. uo0JSLR SQU. SLO14i.S s 36.8914 48 8.610QJMEAN s 1.5111 1..205257NU . u4V. 41'0 i! 08171 O. d3titsSIND. DE V. IN-11 14 0.9626 0.0i32MEDIAN 1.2142 1.478
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box 1.
Grade
Caif' a%
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 40 0 0 00Q 0 0 0 0 01trt trt 4-.1 u't r$ r-I gil r$ 1-1 ut u't 1-1
C4 1 I CN1 I 1 C9 1 I C4 I II ..0 el I I M7) rl I V) rl0 ri (NI V 0 rl CNI VI 0 rt (NI 111 0 r-I Csi Irt
6 00 000 00 0007 0 0 0 0 po 0 0 0 0 0 0 08 0 0 ID Ok410 0 0 (tat 0 0 0 0 0 0
NiLiiv A
2.0003.0004.006
PART AN
F PCT CF (3448LW F
2.4; AG2 4.7 100.0, 31lei 22.5 1.7 37.1 8Q.3 7.2 0.7 14.6 20.3 7.4 6.3_ 7.4 3
CASES FAUCESSEU 4 .D6 S2NU et. ANK.....w:A_..,__.......__ 444 909GO.141111/0401 VALUE 1.0000MAXI MUM VALVE a 4.0060SUM CF SCOKBS._ .14 4242SUP S00. SCORES 15.6803MEAN 11 1.5905S 1140 ...40..._ .i N ) - -1* ..-Q.3103
. ._____
-.STI40. DEv. tx-11 = 1.0269t4E01 Ail a 1.2947
CAA 511.0s 29 Pair Al**
la" CF CPCT
'70.5 44 100.018.2 13 29.54.5 5 11.4#.4 3 b.8
SCURE 1NT E1OVALS F PCI C F F
1...,001) 1.5 77.4 1.9 162.000 0.4 22.6
_100.0G.4 22.6 2
3.000 u.0 CC -000 -00 o4.090 0.0 0.0 -6.6 -0.0 0
CASES PROCESSED 1,13165NJ. BLANK : 400.p.ocg_ta,".T.A
SI Naiiiii VA OEKAM KtoM VALUE
44 1.00602.0660
SUM Cr SCOOS 2125 $1SUP i.4.6 . ;C5RE,aii:Ali
.*
3.14t01.2255
.5 Tilu., .441; .ftP.0 * _0.0,01SIND. D. (04-1) me 0.6115ME.01AN 2 1.14e6
44431
1.00004.0000
65AGO12 9. J000
1.4774O. 1670.87571.4097
PCT
641.911.10.0U.()
CF C-PCT
id 100.0i 11.10 0.0U 0.0
18457
1.00002.0000
20.000024.a0401.L1110.4114.5
0.32441.a62
29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box j.
Grade
6
7
8
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4
.?4 In U
0 c:0 0 0 0 oin R $LA
0en r4 in in r4
Csi I I N I I N I I N I II V) e...1 I D ri I %0 0-4 I %/) H0 r'l N in 0 14 N in o -1 N In 0 1. N In
DODD DODO DODD01:1 DODD D DODDDODD DODD DEIOCI(WIDEDO
__. - ".1181.WF P41 F PO' C.FCT
104.0 8 do .9 9 100.02.000 0.0
..
0.0.PL9
0.1 0 U.0 L 31.13.000 .0 O.0 0.1 14.5 0 0.0 A 11.14_1104 A _11.44 1 11.1
CASiS PROCESSEDtQaOLANK DAIAKINIMOM VALUERAXIMUM VALUESUM a SCORESSUN .:44). bLOKSMEAN
V.TMO tiEW IN):TM O.MLOI AN
_
a
aa
0.94i2459.0000
L00004.004.*#4,5
2.98231.41;17xo.b49.1601145
9466
1.1)0044cJ000
12.J00024.401.00643430.304Z81.6444LotObl
30. About what percentage of the students participating in each of the compensatoryreading programs in your school are from culturally, linguistically, and/oreconomically deprived backgrounds? (Mark one box in each lettered row.)
(a) Program 1
(b) Program 2
0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%
0 0(c) Program 3 1:1
(d) Program 4.,
Don't know
--_____ __-_-
tESTli3N._
ART A_
17,61509.68 t0Oa
PCT
34.030.414.574.70.5
F
/TO
PCI
16.4 10)2 100.0
SCORE INTERVALS
1.000.2.0003.0004.000
CF P -b Lb
51.7 100.034.2144E.,.-0.3
66.035.7
1318373_15.43
2464618.4 Lot
To3
oia34.816.50.65.000
-A7.$0,5 U.6
CASES PROCESSED aNO. SLAM DATA 4
111 Pa NUN VALUESARI NUR VALUE 0SUM OF SCORES 0SUM O. SCORES aMEAN aSIND. DEW. 041 aSTNO. DE10. 11+41 aPtEOTANSAMPLE F OR ST AT S a
51.737412.00001.00005.00g9_
112.1940304.53712.17941.07,51.0,412.0116
51.46990NOTE:VALUES
462--Iir-----
1.000%NOG_
at2T.Q0002.4,32914.40351.00471.9542
1W LAST-A SI- fNlik VAL
FROM CALCULATIONS.
E
GLES 7 ION 30 P ART
$ PCT F PIA cfSCORE INTERVALS
2 102 014 401 zooMOO b.3 23.0 17.7 64.4 -62 23.2 165 61.83.000 6.9 25.2 11.4 41.3 59 24.1 :03 34.6
. a . 43 16..1 ,4! 0455.00E 0 C1 0.0 0.1 1 0.4 1 0.4
CASES PROCESSED 447_NO. BLANK DATA a 205.0000 204MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000PARIMUN_VALUE talc% 5.0000SUM OF SLURES 60.9133 5T 5-SuP SW. SCORES 164.2442 L56 9.40UU0kAiN 4._*1.114 2. L.617STOW. DEW. INI 1.0922 /./.01.1STNO. DEV. ifioqi 1.1177 1. L 09tMECJAN = 2. u000SAMPLE FOR STATS 27.511CCWO1E:446AS U LAST 1NTEkVAL f:XCLIJOLL.
FKOM CAL CULA .
30. About what percentage of the students participating in each of thelcompensatoryreading programs in your school are from culturally, linguisticallyt, and/oreconomically deprived backgrounds? (Mark one box in each lettered row.)
0-102 11-50% 51-9074 91 -100% Don' t know
(a) Program 1. 0
(b) Program 2 0 0(c) Program 3 0 ID 0(d) Program 4
CUEST1DN 30 PART
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.0005.000
CASES PROCESS E0NO. BLANK DATAAl NI NUN VALUE aMAXI MUN VALUE aSUM OF SC GRESSUM SQL). SC CAE S aMEAN-ffr iii. D1c1f. TST NO. OE V IN -11PIE I ANSAN, LE F Ok STA-TS a
F PCT Cf p-a tad F "Cr *CiPCT*
406 3106 12.7 10000 51 40.6 125 100.0 i
3.2 2504 1.9 6204 30- 21-44 14.. 3-9-.12 06 21.9 O./ 311.0 22 la" 44 35.21.7 13.7 1.9 15a2 20 1O*0 22 1.7.60.2 1.4 0.2 1.4 I 1.6 2 -176
ELESTION PART G
1213S1345.0000
100E009.0000
264490670.7241201 .01.1119
i1.9
12 o55470NOTE !MIMESFAON
125
tadoouS. otiou
689.00;:0260694
1./1631.35AO
IN LAST INTEK VAL EAGLIitil)CALCULATIONS.
F FCT FSCONE INTERVALS
1.000 tat 1041.0 262.000 e5 24.7 34 61.2 1330000 0*$ 6.3 2e2 36.6 6
2.4fa 165.000
.
u.0 C.0-1.01-2-e_a_-0.0 0
CASES PROCESSIDNO BLANK OAT* aMINIMUM VALUE atiA X IMO aSLN CF SCORESSUN $00. SCORES aPEANST ND. ()EV. 1N1 aSTNO. OE V N- ImtomSAMPLE FOR STATS a
44.0324011.0000
180000
13.12(740.344042445_1.2311I.3547
6. C7320NU 1E3 VALUES, IN
44.421.3
9:112612
FROM CAL
4.F C-PCT
01 100.035 57.422 36,116 26.2
0.0
6/714
1000004.0000
366.40044
1.23901.2494
6462LAST I titT RV AL E XC L upEu
CULAT 104 ".
31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the compensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box 0.
31
SCORE IhTERVALS f PCT CF MILW P P" C PCT
0.0 10.2 44.9 524 103.0 447 9..L 475 100.01.000 20 Sol *.7 5.1 28 5e9 old $.9
CASES #ROCESSEV a S2o$817 4111
MIAIRUO VAWE 0.0 Oeti
KAXINUM VAWE 1.0000 1.0000WM OF SCOAES 2.715S Z0. 0000SUN EQ0o SCORES 2.71S% 2EoOOOONEAR 004513 4164$19
SlUNOs 00V. 011 a 0.2207 0.4.355
STNO. OEVo (tli 0.2228ALOIAN 0.0271 (64313
31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the compensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) Xi classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box 0.
Number of class sections
Number of students
QUESTION 31 1481 A
Total for School Total for Grades
2 4 6
SCORE INTERVALS F FCT
00 _ ). 94 ...__4_ _Jai2.00 - 5.19 12.3 10026.00 .. 94,11 12.1 2448
10.00 -. 13.99 3.A.:0 Al._4_14.00 .... 17.94 Z. 1e016.00 - 21.99 Zo8 1.022440 ... _./..5_0.1 _IA__ AIL&2 4,000 . 29494 005 lel30.00 -. 31499 0.3 0.734.00 - 17.99 0.1 G.218.00 .... 41.99 04442 C.542.00 - 45099 0.1 0.246.00 - 49.99 0.0 0.050400 ... 53.19 0.0 04054400 .... 57.19 Oa 0.058000 .... _61.99_ p.s".__0.062.00 - 65.99 0.1 0.166.00 - 69.99 0.0 0.010.00 __73499 G.0 0.074.00 ... 1,019 0.1 0.210000 - 81019 0.1 0.2
__ANLOIA,._ Aift19 .04....._Git46.00 - 89.99 0.0 0.010.00 ..- 93.99 0.0 0.0
.114.00 - 97.99_. _PAL __019_
98400 - 00.00 0.0 OA
GASES FR000569NO. BLANK OA TA
MINI Millm VALUEPAAIMUN VALUE 0
Skim ii7lcoaesSUM SOO. SCORES116A0-- A5mG. U. 4N1SING. GEV. 4N-.4.41
a
0_40 I AN a
11111,
CF 1104. i F
44641 10460 13L3444 94.2 9226.1 63.9 10813.9 34.2 .124 .
469 zi.o 326.0 14.8 323A27410 23
0.5 3 LC. 1.1 2
0.3 0.7 1
0.2 0.5 00.2 0 00.2 0.5 0
0.2 o.sCei 0.3 00.1. 0.3cla, 003 10.1 042 L
-03.0 -000 0
-C.0 -0.0 00
-0.0 0
40.7068IL GIL CCCO
1.0000430.0000385.1052
4442 .05116_4.441(629436.31151.0.722
PCT
4.544.829.114 .b
8.0el.
1111.1M
CF G -PCT
.111.190.0358 96.52,641 71.7*AC 42.6104 280012 19.4t14-...1901? 4.611 3.0
7 1.96 1.64 1.13 0.83 0.83 Cie
3 0.8.
Oe 8 .
2 0.5
1.6le/0.10.50.3
0.00.0u.00.0J.0 2 0.5403- '2 0.50.3 1 0.30.0 0 0.0
0.0 0 0.00.0 0 OAire-0 --.45 0.0
171104
1.000080.0000
4488.0000T1154. 3004)
1/.0189-3640119.a1568..3815
1.101..
31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the compensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box .
Number of class sections
Number of students
441E5110N 31 PAM 8
SCORE INTERVALS F
Total for School Total for Grades
2 4 6
.101111.111 ,11,
Pei CP P8 LW F PSI GO C-40
0.0 ... 1.99 11.9 3G.7 38.800 .0 . $1- 24.9 353 100.01600 5 .19 ie24.1 62.3 24.9 b4.3 24 i 4874 ay rr. 16484 9.99 1.7 464 ao 7.0 17 4.$ AL 8.8
10.00 - 1.3.9_9 0.4 0.9 1.0 2.4_. 5 1.4 14 4.014.00 11.99 0.2 0.4 Oa 1.7 1 004 9 -2;318.00 21.99 0.3 0.7 0.5 1.3 3 048 7 2.0412.00 25.99 0.,C C.0 4:2 0.5 . .! 41.0 4 1.124.00 29 099 0.0 4.0 Oa 06 v 4;0- - 4-13130.00 33.99 0.0 0.0 ea 0.4 1 U.3 4 Lol34.00 37.99 0.0 4.0 0.2 0.8 0 °4438.00 41.99 0.2 0.4
3 0.80 .2 0 ,6 ----.2.---C MI- b t
42.00 - 45.99 0.0 0.0 41.0 0.1 0 u.0 L
417.;46.00 49.9v 0.0 c.o 0.0 44 _ 0 u.050.04 51.99 4.0 G.1 0.0 061 r--- ii33 1 6.354.04 57.99 4.0 0.0 460 -0.0 . 0 0.0 0 0.050.00 61.99 0.0 0.0 -.0.0 ailo . 0_ u0 .
0 0.042 800 65.91 0.0 0.0 -04 ..0 .0 0 -4.41---- --0--- -140b6.00 - 49.09 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0 004 0 0.070.00 73.99 0.0 0.0 0.0 ...OA 0 _4 0 0.000
4 0.074.00 77 .99 0.0 0.0 440 411360 4078.00 . 81. 99 0.0 0.0 0.0 ...ILO 0 " 0 0.0abec.l is.99 _ _ ._. . 9.4.___ 0.0 _ -4_._0_ -00 _ 0 0.0 0 0.086.00 - 89.99 u .43 0.0 ..4.) 03 -0.0 4 4.4 ---a--- -o-aSO .00 93.99 Oe 4 0.0 0.0 --0.0 0 Us° 0 0.094.00 - 37.99 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0 u.0
0 o4- 'I) :::98600 - 100.00 0.0 04 ...CA ...MO
CASES PROCESSES s 380799 353no. 8LARK DATA a 12040000 1217MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 060PAX IMUM VALUE a 52.0000 52.u000SUS OF SCORES 0 11069308 1201;11400
SUM S. SCORES ° 688.5144 14245.0000PE AN 0 2.8805 3.4023'SWtiii. 0-Eit . i 14) S 3.8381 44076--SIND. OEV. t N11 & 3.8886 4.41446E3;1404 s 3.2375 3.24$51
31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the compensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box O.
Number of class sections
Number of students
Total for School
PART CQUESTION 31
SCORE iNteovAL
0.0 -' 1.99
F
14.4
PCT
37.8
CF 10411,W
31.2 100.0MI *SA1e2 SO47 1.11
1.00CAS *
10.00
S.999e/19
13.99
41.11.40.1
5 to 03.70.8
14.00 -.16000 -22.00 -.
17.9921.9435.99
0.10.20.6
0.20.7C.0
0.40.40.1
1020.90.3
26.00 -'. 29.99 0 .0 0.0 04 04330.00 33.99 0 4 0 4 Sol 0.334.00 -.. 37.114 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.136.00 .. 41.69 0.0 0.0 0.0 Os/4 2 .00 . . 45.19 041) O.0 44 0.146.00 49.99 O. O. Q. 0.0 0.150000 - 53 699 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.154.00 57.99 000 0.0 4°160 ...se
61.99 0.0 0.0 *0.0 41.0./#ao62.00 .. 65.19 0.0 0.0 u0 00 .'0 .066 .00 69. Si
73.99Q.006
0.00.0
'0.00.0-0.0-0.0_10.007_
74.00 77.99 0.0 0.0 -0.41 -0.0MOO 81.99 0.0 0.0 ',OA -*Oda/14,00..7!_____ 009. 0 .,0 0.0 -O.0 -0.0
o.0 0.0 -0.0 -0406.00 - Ec.99va .00 9:3 19 0.4 0.0 04.0 4.094.00 - 97.99 0.0
0 AC.0 -0.0 -0.0
98.00 - t00 .00 0.0 .04.0 1'0.0
Total for Grades
2 4 6
ira
F
101223
234
Pid
1o,9640t
4631 el
_
GF C--PCT
_0_ 1°04 00249 71.126 7.41_ 3.1
7 2.06 1.74 0.6Z 0.62 0.6
14.0 .01
0.3144
_ 0.013.0443
_ALAI() i 9.30 0.00 0.0
. 9 . _0*0..1 030 0.0
___ 13_56°0 ;Ia.-0 4.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 44440 4.00 4.00 0004 th;i:1-
1111000-0U
000.5
004
0.30.30.30.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Geo
casts PROCESS E0 "' .
c.
14SAMI123 60000
3301W a BLANK DATA 1MINIMUM VALUE al 0.0 0.4RAM MUM VALUE a 53. WO 53.4000SUM OP SCORES 13 9o.49111 1044;440o5U SAO. SCORES 0 390.0913 41634.4000
1 ka k I a.
_- -. . .1 ._ 3.3 3 _10133 33_i
ST ha i:g V (d u 3.01059at
STN0 OE V ( N I i = 3.05C1 3. V 727
_14 tCB AN.. ° . WM? 3..2274
sr.
31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the comp4nsatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box D.
Number of class sections
Number of students
Total for School Total for Grades
2 4 6
OUESTION 31
SCORe INTERVALS
0.0 .
HAT C
1.99
F
12.8
ICT
31.9.00 5.49 16.9 51.3
6.00 - 9.99 2.3 Tau10.00- 13.19 0.4 1.314.00 17.99 0.2 0.113.00 21. 99 0.2 0.?12 .00 25.99 0.0 0.0
29.99 0.0 0.030.00 33.49 O. C 0.034.00 - 37,99_ 0.4 C.038.00 - 41.99 0.0 C.042.00 45.99 0.0 0.046.00 .' 49.99 0.0 0.050 600 . 33.99 0.0 OA54.00 4' 57.99 0..0 0.051600 -. 61.99 O. GO62.00 - 65.99 OA 0.066.00 -'. 69.99 0.0 0.170.00 T3.99 0.0 0.014.00 11.419
.. ...... __0.0
..
0.070.00 41.49 0.0 0.0
.40 - 95.99. 044.4266.00 -L". 4.Q 0.1.90.00 93.99 0.0 0.0944.0C - 9709 13.0 0.098.00 100.00 0.0 0.0
...,..
..a.
Cr P84W
3209 100.020.1 01.134 9.80.9 2.8C.5 1.50.3 Os90.0 0.10.0 0.10.0 0.4Ps 0 040.0 OA0.0 0.10.0 0.10 A 0.1000 0.10.0
F P41" CF C -PCT
95 300181- 59.a
2042.3CI
00
0
109 100.0214-679-.73
6=5 314.3 114.1.4 T4.0 50 2
.2-0.0 /0.0 1
j0.0 1J.0 1
10.03462;11.60.60:60.30.30;30.30.3
0 0.0- -IT .0.1O 0.0 1 0.3O 0.0 1 0.3
0.0 (ilia 0 111° 1 0.3A. 0.3O 0.00 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O 0:0O 0.0O 0.0O 0o0
C.0 0./ 1-.0.0 -0.0 0_.0 .0 .0 .
0"a.° 41,0 0'4.0 ...0.0 00.0 ...0 .0 °...C0 ....0.0 0-f29011_ 0
0 .0 ...0.o 0
CASES PREXESSEL),CATA *
32.930.163.0000
409166
1.1 NI MOM VALUE a 0.0 0.0PAAI_PUN VALUE 60.0000 60.4r000
S0174 a sttitE. 87 4424 043:4000$W4 Me SCORES 649.7444 V949su000!TAN 3u503iN U. 0E9 IM) a 3.5656 4.7796
SW). LJEV. ii 3.1210 4./d73tiM)I 24,8443 3.400,
31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the compensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box D.
Number of class sections
Number of students
Total for School Total for Grades
2 4 6
41CUESTIIII
F
PART e
SCORE INTERVALS I PC/ CF Pwi CF C.-PCT
000 99.19 24.2 61.2 39.9 100.0 195 54.0 A0_100.0100.40 219.99 9.3 3309 1163 34.6 96 27.1 166 46.0364.40 s 491.19 2.7 6.7 5.9 14.6 30 403 ea /6.8
411.19 a__ ALOI 302 ihi 1* 102 _40. 5
700.00 - 899.99 0.6 1.5 1.1 2.7 7 1.9 12 3.3100.00 10119.14 0.1 0.3 0.3 14 2 kle 1.41100 000 - 1299.99 0.0 0.0 0.4 _0_1_9_ °_ " 0 0.81300.00 1499.99 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.9 0 U . 0 3 0.8110.00 1699.99 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.9 1 "3 3 0.84700004 - IAVial 0.0 kag (to cat 0 0.0 2 0.62900.00 - 2099899 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.8 0 4.0 0.62100.00 2299.99 Oo 0 0.0 0.3 008 0 U . 0 2 0.62300.40 2499.99 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.6 0 "0 2 0.62100.40 - 2699.99 0 4 0.0 Oa Q. 4- 0.0" 2 0.62700.00 2419.99 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.6 0 0.0 2 0.62900.00 3099.99 0.6 0.0 4e3 0.6 0 000 2 0.63100.00 - 3299. SS 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0 "0 2 0.63300.00 - 3499.99 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.0 1 0.3 2 0.63500.00 3699.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 0 J.0 1 0.33700.00 3699.V0 0.0 Oa 0.2 0.5 6 0.0 0.33,00.44 4 099.99 0.0 0.0 C.2 0.5 0 41.0 0.34100.00 1. 4299409 0.0 OA 002 0.5 0
10.04.4 1
0.30.34300.00 -* 4499.99 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5
4500.00 - 4699.99 04. 0 0.0 -0.0 ...O.() 0 0.0 0 0.04700000 4499099 0.0 04.0 -0.0 ....0.0 0 0e0 0 0.04104.00 5000.00 060 0.0 4'0.0 -0.0 0 00- 4- 0.0
CASES PROCESSED 3903 18 361ITC-NO. BLANK DATA 111.0000MINIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4,0000
VALVE a 4460.04C0 446 0.0000_PAIIINUMSUM OF SCORES a 69610313 11/.64-T4.7046
SUN SUO. SCORES a 7413735.0060 0.5161102i 08MEAN ft 176.1464 191.41275TNO. DEV. TN * 395.7138SIM). DEV. t141-1/ . 400.0203 A 8 00 11MECIAN a 63.3031 05./202
-
31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the comp'ensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box
Number of class sections
Number of students
Total for School Total for Grades
2 4 6
QUESTION 31
SCONE
u.00.00 -
30.00 -50.070.00 -90.00 -
110._ 00 -
PART
I NTE RV ALS
929.9949.9969.11984.99
109 99129.99
t
F
15"
CF
4 ki7 10010 9613246"Y"2377
PuT
46.7364412.810.06.41.91.9
CF C-PCT
359 100.0263 73.3IA 36.5*5 23.7*9 13.64e 7.2L9 5.3
PC7
37x712.9 31.74.9 11.134.6_,_ _9 A_
1.7M 4.30.6 1.40.6 1.4
25.4 62 ..3
12.4 30.51.5 111.4_3.9 9.52.1 5.21.b 3.11._
130.00 --. 149 .99 0 .4 1.0 1.0 2.4 . 6 1.4 12 3.3150.00 -. 4.69.99 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.4 1 0.3 6 1.7
04.01)...1% j 8S 8 9._ 0,._.1 0.5 1.2 1 003 5 1.4190.00 - 209. S9 0.0
___Osa_i.o 0.3 0.6 0 0.4 4 1.1
410.00 - 24:3 59 4I 0.3 0.3 o.a 2 0.6 4 1.100.00 - 249.99 0.0 0.2 0__.5 0 0.0 2 3.6iiboo - 264.49 0.0
_c.90.0 014
_ _0.5 0 0.0 2 0.6
270.00 289.99 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 1 J.3 2 0.6optoo - 309.99 0.0 0,0 CA 0.2 0 0.0 -1 0.3114) .00 124.99 0.0 .0.0 0.1 0.3 4.0 1 0.3330.00 -- 345.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0 0.0 1 0 o 3
350.00 -.- 309.99 p.c C. 0 0..1 ..__0.3 0 0.0 1 0.370.00 - 3d9.99 0.0 CA 0.1 0.3 0 '00 1 0.3
350.00 409.99 0.0 o.o C1 0.3 0 0.0 1 0.3Jiotoc - 429.99 0.1 0 3 41,1 0..L 1 ki.3 l 0.3430.00 - iv 4S. ii 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0 4.0 0 0.04 50.00 . 469.99 0.0 G.0 -0.0 .-13 .4 0 0.0 0 0.0470.00 - 469 .99 0. 4 4._0 -'0. 0 -43.0 0 0.0 0 0.0440.O-4 506.46
_0.0 .4 0.0
_-0.0 ____...0 .0 0 4:4 0 0.0
LASES FROCESSEC a 359U6NU. BLANK OATA
MINI NUN VALUE * 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE__ 430.0400 43 0.0000
SUN OP sctiiii_a
1244.4714 34755.0000SUM S00. SCORES M10414150 /11471 0000MEAN a 19.141, 35.AZ37SItUj. OEV. I ttil 40.0819 42. i3J.
ST140. DEV ( N-11 40.5833 42.v9t,NELII44 17.74.33 22.e513
31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the compensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box a
Number of class sections
Number of students
Total for School Total for Grades
2 4 6
QUESTION 31 PART 6
F PCT -V. PT
102 28 .7133 37.537 10.4
CF -CZ131C7'
355 300.0253 11.3120 33.8
SCORE INTERVALS
0.0_ 9_,991040 . 29:9930.00 49.99
CF P-65
39.16 1_00,013.8 34.93.9 9.8
2408 62.711.0 2768
_50400 .99 .1?-4 5 ft.) 1.1 1T e9. 27_ ... 111.6 A4 23.470.00 89.99 2.3 5.9 4,6 1106 27 /et, $6 15.890.00 - 109.99 1.0 2.4 2.3 5.7 13 4.7 29 8.2
..110.9..0 7 129499 0 ..6 .._1_0_ 1.3_ /94 8 4 ea 16 4.5230.00 - 149.99 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.8 1 0.4 8 2.3150.00 16999 0.1 0.2 006 1.6 1 U.3 7 2.0170.00 - 189.99 94 9A6 _0.5 10 2 0.6 6 la190.00 409.99 0.1 C.2 0.3 o .a 1 4.3 4 1.1210.00 229.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 C*6 0 4.0 3 0.8230.00.2 449.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 Oet 0 4.0 3 U.825 0.00 i69. 49
_Us C 0.0 Oa 0.6 0 0.0 3 0.8
270.00 289.99 0.1 0.4 0.2 046 2 0.6 3 0.8290.00, 99 00... 9,4 441_0 Q. 0 4.o. L 0.3316440 . 329.99 0.0 0.0 O.1 11.3 0 4.0 1 0.3330.00 - 349.94, 0.0 0.0 Col 0.3 0 0.0 1 0.3.350.0C -. 0.0 .9 .0.1_____p.3 0 0.0 L 0.3370.00 - 389.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0 0.0 1 0.3
390400 - 409.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0 000 I. 0.341044 429 099 04 _(..,9
.04 0 .3 0 4.0 1 0.3
430.00 iv49 .99 0.1 C.3 O.:. 0.3 1 0.3 1 0.3450.00 469.99 0.0 0.0 »C.0 -0.0 ° 00 0 0.0_470.00 .7 4.8909_ 0.0. 0.0 ..0.0_....0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0490.00 500. GO 0.0 0.0 ..0,0 c1,42 0 4.0 J 0.0
ASES PRUDESSgC, _39,4414 355NL. EI. ANY. DATA 118QC GO 120OI0.1)4U14 VALUE a 0.0 0.P..AIMUM VALUE .04:1QP.QQ.. 450.000JSLIM CF Sc.ORk S 1102.8208UN SOO: SCORES so IC3419.1250 LA*3284.1400MEAN is 29.8674 35.17716
STAID. LEV. 61 11' 41.4653 44.61$61
STNU. CoEV. (N-11 az 41.9550 44.751OLLIAN 17 .2 5Gti 21..)514#
31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the compensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box
Number of class sections
Number of students
Total for School Total for Grades
2 4 6
LT 17_ skTE
fiaiEST ION 31
SCURF 1 t4T
060_10.0030.00 -50.00
S
29.Vg49.9989.9489.99
109.99
149.99169.99189e99109.94229.99249.94.269.99289.99309_699329 .99349.93644993494 .94400.00
PAR i
F
14.69413.94.71.31.2
at0.00.1083(i20.1
. I0.10..0
0.00 .10.0
.0GoQ0.0
KT
42.3244311447.033.73.4416.2
0.00.4Go96,66
0.2.2
0.40.0
P42620.00.00600.0
Z4 ---ii:iii,
346119.9LOGO
4.22.9
1401600.90,66
0.3C.30.20610.1G.1
-0.00.0
-0.0
10060
F
11094322816178
1
5
11
1
0
01
000
0
04;1"--
44.1290""
doll5.0"5.4ie.ob
063
ia0.4J.30.30.0J.0.30.0JU4640.0
.F-C-ilicT
317 10060---ZoTIi5. 3113 35.681 25.63 16.7
37 11.740 6.312" 3.812 3.811 3.5
1.94 1.3a 0.9
0661 0.31 0.3
0.30 0.00 J. Li
0 0.0J 0.0
57.731.420.112.38,65
2.92.92.51.61.00.8
70400 -50.00
)10.00.2.130.00150.00170 .00__:_
190.40210600230 .00 .7
270.00 -290400 -
0.60.20 .2
310.G0330.00350600370.00 -490.00
062
_70.0*0 .0
-0.0
CASES OROCESS EU.M. 81100. 8A1A
VALUE
34651i5155.0000
a 060
-317158
06.1
PIAXISUM VALUE 318.0000 310.4000
5UM OF SCORES 109968815 14841.0000
SUM. ACM. SCURES 99647e6875 11302AL.000031.8423 37.4534
SIND. UEV. (N) 43.2605 46.787ST AU UEV. t N*1 / 4369010 46.4410kc4.)1Ati 156E4732 20.4),IL
32. Indicate the approximate 3evel of funding for the compensatory reading progrom(s)in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROCRAM 4
FEDERAL
ESEA Title I
...404.J
0H
..-1
UW004
000:4
to-IrU0H
N-IwW004
000Z
I-404.404JWOJJWC0
1-s
vi
04L4
0=
ri0A.,0H
nt
0P.
0
0Z
(8) o o pop oci pop DapMAMMA 32 PAW, A
SCORE INTERVALS F !CT CF P-6L 1 PIA
LQ 13.1 1492.000 L1.6 32.63.000 10.4 30.6
33.121.41044
lama43.130.6
124 47.4-11/- 419.4LOT 34.6
-F C.-PC T
348 100.0l04 62.2LOT 32.6
CASES PROCESSED *M. !WANK CATA4161RUM VALUERAA1PUM VALUESUM OP SCORES140 920. SCORESMEANST I). DEW. Stftl
41146_015_16_ 011REOIAN
a
a
39.4464146.00CO1000403.0.000
14.7607
1.93700.41670.43041.9031
328L47
1._00043.d000
439.4004475. 0004_
1.44820.44760.4369L.91.24
GUEST1001 32
SLORE-INTERVALS
FART
F PCT CF PriLts F 144.T.
4.90_2.0003.000
6.2 17,0 35.7 109.04.3 12.0 29.4 U.S 45
45.929.4
25.2 74.5 25.2 70.5 53 44.4
1513 100.0'94 -64.154 34.6
CASES PROCESSEDMO. SLAM CATA
35.6924140.(1CC4
__MINIMUM VA1 MI___21 1.0900RAX1MUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 90.3194SUM SOO. SCORES 249.91141MEAN a 2.530$5TNO. OLV. (1443 0.77385TMOe (N-As a 0.7441AU-am a 2.7911
L53322
1,6%0004
304.0000712.U000
0.040/
L.0711
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for
in your school by each source indicated below
FEDERAL
ESEA Title I
PROGRAM 1
4.) wc4+
Nm Z0
PROGRAM
the compensatory reading program(s)
: (Answer separately for each program.)
2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4r4
0 0r4 -1 4-I
1.0 0 0Li 8-4 a0 to 0 0 0
134 Z E-0 N
0el ..-1140 0004.88-404iPa
0 0 0 Z0Z E 114
WO 0(14 n
QUESTION 32 PA C
_ .
F-- PCT CF F *Pa- F d-PC T
I.OLG2.0003.000
2.5 7.3 344_100.0 191.6 4.6 3/e6 9207, 16
30.2 66.1 30.2 66.1' 26
49.121.743.1'
05 100.04. 70.828 43.1
NC. 8L ANY. CATAPINIPUM VALUEPAZIPUN VALUESuM OF SCORESSUN S410. SCORESMEAN 4SIND. DEv. IN1 *
ahac 4/EV.. ktv!I)PEOIAN it
34.3259159.0CCO
1.0G003.0000
96.3655241.9629
2.80600.5488
2.9224
4101.0000
-;464013944000343.000020/1004,4390
QIXSIION 32
SCURF INTEkVALS
PART
F FLT F G,f .
/. 0002.0003.000
1.5 4.60.9 2.d30.9 92.7
310 ko,c 12 36.431.6 95.4 11 34430.9 92.7 10 40.3
6.3 100.0-11 63.610 30.3
A SE PROCESSEDbt. INK CA TA
lt I PaMUM VALUENA ill ilU* VALUE
SUM OF SCORES *SUM SAO. SCORESAN
SIND. ay. (N)th-qk
mifo I At; a
It
33.3223 33163.0000 442
1.0000_ 1.00003.060096.0054
263013232.881r3.44(7
64.0000146.0000
9.k015 _0.0269
2.9605 1*'
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)
in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4
ri fel vi r.1 vi .-1 41is
S4.1 0 0 4.1 0 4.1
.1.i N 14 0 .i.i k 1.4.1 14 0
0 C1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01.0 CI4 a I-, cii Z 10 CI4 Z H Pa Z
FEDERAL
ESEA Title I
Other(specify)
ODD DOD ODD000) DOD ODDcuesiign 32 PAR E
SCORE 1 til EAV ALS F PC7 CF Petei.to F P 6T Ce-P d4C I
1.000 0.1 AA 33.8 100.0 1 5.3 19 100.02.000 0.7 2.0 3307 .99.7 6 31.6 18 94.73.000 33.0 97.7 33.0 17.1 12 40.2 12 b3.2
CASES PROCESSEDNU. el ASK DATA
33.8013161.4040
I4456
141818UM VALUE _Ls_CACO 1.4000MAXI NUR V ALU k MOO 3.4000SAM OF SCORE S a 1004134 49.0004SUN WO. SCORES a 100.1230 1336+3000MEAN I 2 1148 2.37414SiNee Div. ( NJ * 0.1714 0. SokidSTNO. eft. (14-1/ = 0.1740 0. (WeNEDI *Pi a 2+1114 2.70003
PART4UESTION 32
-iccoir .I. iitiiii ALS F Oa C.'t CPCTF PCT CP P8LiA
1.000_ 0.2 C. I 33.3 100.0 3 1$.0 14 100.0C.6 33.1 11.3 2 is.? 'r73.02.000 0.2
3.000 32 oti 98.1 32.9 VW 7 51.4 7 Se 3
CASESE...i. -PROCEcseu - 33.3221 / Z--- -....___ ____ .. ..... _____ _
NO. BLANK DA TA a 164.0000 463MINIMUM VALUE a 1. 0000 144004MAXI MUM min a 3.00GOSUN Cr SCORES = 91.21.1 20.0000WO S9.. ,SCCiNEL,_ ..4 a 297_10 al 7460000ME AN w 2.9799 2: --3-333-
I IND DEV Ift1 a 0.1842 0K49d$.314041,.001A(470.".. 063170 0.4876%EDI AN ill 201734 2e-6429-
32. Indicate the approximate leve); of funding for the compensatory reacting program(s)
in your school by each sourcedicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM
Lb at\14
0114 z
FEDERAL
ESEA Title I
Other(specify)
rIrd
(-4
PROGRAM 2
U
0
4-4
0z
3 PROGRAM 44-4 4-1O Z
r4 .1-1 r.i 4.1
10 4-i W 10 4.t1-1 1-4 0 4.1 $.1
0 10 0 0 0I (14 Z F-'
C
El 0 ODD ODD ODDD OG D D(9r 0 DM El
UEStIct4 32 PART 6
_
SC ORE INTERVALS
1 .00g2.0003.000
CASES PRLC ESED
PC7 CP .41,14 F i1c.per0.1 CIL 33.3 [00.0 1 25.0 4 100.00.1 0.3 Via 99.7 1 45.0 3 75.0
33.1 99.4 33.1 911.4 2 U.O.5 2 50.0
33 3211O. EL* kli OA TA .3 /4144.0000
MINIMUM VA LUk a 1.0000mmxIMUM vitt.UkSUO4 OF SCORES 99.6439
291141t4
473.1.0000
hEmm a 2 .99. 15SIND. °EY. Ili) 0.2U3STRO. _UV. ($- 1 ) a: AgalttMEOIAN a 24,9s72
3400009.41000
23.44)002.45000462t20..9514Z.A100
UãS1LQN 32 PART
SOME INTER ALS F PCI Cil p-aLit FP..i C-PGT
i000 o.i oj 3.3.3 10040 1 344 3 100.024000 0.1 0.3 334 99 a 1 33" -2 46,73.000 33.1 99.4 33.1 914 1 3383 1 333
LA SE S PKESS ED a81.ANK DATA
/4 IN I 141.01 VALUéP.AX1 kum vAt.utSUM OF SCOmiS
SQ0._iftAh
IND. UEV, (Ai asit40. cEv. (N-le
"MIN
33.11211b4.0000
1400003.0000
99.6E3900. 44,64
2.99150,11930.12112.991/
3472
1. ki0007
6.400014.4000
0.61051. u0U0
44)U)
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)
in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
FEDERAL
ESEA Title i
Other(specify)
PROGRAM 1r-i0ri ..-40 4.1 0
4., 14 C0 0 0(-0 04 Z
PROGRAM 2..-40
0-1 +4t " 04J W C0 t 0El 14 Z
PROGRAM 3P-I0rI '4
0 " . 04.41-1CJJWC0 0 0EI Al Z
PROGRAM 4.-IcorI -1
0 43 00 ' 0
El CLI Z
DOD DOD DOD E1nOD.DIDD DOD DODWO CIAO OD ODD DOD
32
SCORE INTERVii5
1.0002.0003.000
FART I
PCT CF 1"8LW F CF C -PCT
0.2 0.5 34.1 100.0 Z__,k4.3102 3.4 34.0 99.5 9 64661
__A4-1.0014°141 850
32.8 96.1 3248 96.1 3 21.4 3 21.4
CASES PROCESSED 14.1316NO. BLANK DATA 44 158.4080MINIMUM VAL.U1 1:0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES * 100.034SidtikODA_KOJA4 3006_1423PEAK x 2.9585STNO. OEV. 4hI 4 0.2254STNO itr!-11 * 0.2240MEC1AN a 2.8797
CIESTIZI6 32
Icon
PART 4/
INTERVALS F e44 GP A -d1K F
1.0002.0003.000
G.5 .._O.32.3
2.39662
33.6 100.0 572
336132.3
91.496.2
4-.ASES FRuCESSEDNO. 8LANA DATAMINIMUM VALUE_
*VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEAN
a
aat
as
Sb,O. CEV. (MI51140 O V. Pr ;1ME Ci ts
14 .
461
0016000U3.00
29.000065.00002.47140.931C4.0.572.456i
3.7 14 100.04.6 -14;3
14.3 2 14.3
33.6108162.0000 461A.AcoP 1.00043.0000 564000
99.0280 25.0000294.5142 51.4000
641463 MITT-0.2856 O. 0;3902900. 0.o993269101
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM 1. PROGRAM 2, PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4
a cd 0:!4
FEDERAL
ESEA Title I
Other(specify)
4-4 ...404..$
44p
Va0 i 0
f4 P4 Z
rj ri 4-4 mrt eiZ k W 0 UM 04.1 0
k 0 .kkO4Jk0O 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
t-t P4 z -' AI Z El At =
17300 DOD ODD ODDD OD DOD COO DOGO DD DD0IVIDDODOO
SCORE J NTE RV ALS
tp_op2.0003.000
NO a 81-AkX DATA Ja
MINIMA VA LUkMAXIMUM wALuEUM OP SCORES Is
SUR SW. SCORESMEAN aSTNO. DEV. (NITNG. 01v. 1N-1_1 m
ME DI AN
a
PART X
QUESTION 32
INTEIN ALS
F i0C1 0 Out614'' F Pt.' C. C....PCT
0.4 Li. 33.50.1 0.3 33.133.0 96.7 33.Q
v0134- 4 44.4 9 100.090 419 : 2 44.2 S 55.6SU/. 3 3304 3 33.3
PART L
33.4572162.0000
1.00003.0600-
99.56L8a97446C82.97630.21020.21342.9933
F PCT- -al.000 0.4.04 __CM2.000 0.2 C.73.000 33.1 96.8
CASES PficCtiEti.NO. 61.Alvm DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAX! MUM VALUE 0
SuA OF SCORES s5um 500 5C0146$__ s.PLANSINU. DIV. iml m
SINR..U4v (N-liMEGIAN a
J3053343 99.433.1 96.6
t: I .0000_1.0003.0000
99.4031290.#
2.98240.16180.11042.9938
9444
1.00#103.0110®L7.0003940000
I. 68890.6749O. /2813_1.7300
F
2
6F C.'PCT
7 100.03 41.9 5 71.42 28.6 2 28.b
468kith/0
ie %IWO14.U04J32.00002.u0J00.15590.6102400JJ
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)In your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
FEDERAL
ESEA Title I
Other (specify )
PROGRAM 1
04-4
0 4..) 04,1 14 00 0 0H $2.4 Z
PROGRAM 2
00 U 04../ 1-i 00 0 0
E4 CLI Z
PROGRAM 3
04-I -rt0 4..) 044k041$400 0 0
1.4 CI4 Z
PROGRAM 4
4-I 140
0 4..i 0
0 0 0F4 CL4 Z
I:3 0D OD 00D OD 00(4)0 0 0(00 0 0
QUESTION 32 PART N
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
CASES PROCESSEDNJ. OLANK DATA aMINLOVII VALUE aAAALNUO VALUE41.1* OF SCORES aSUN SAO. SCORES *MOAN aLINO. DEV. IN) uST N0. DEV. IN-1) aMiD1AN
4UETION 32 PART N
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
CASES PROCESSED a
NU. BLANK QA TA aKNIMUM VALUE144XLNUN VALUE ski$4 OF SCORES a
4414 SOD. SCORES aKm ANSIND. DEV. IN)IND. DEV. IN-41 a
ftDIAN a
F Pi,T
0 0.03 1..0I ,4.0
GF C -PCT
4 100.04 100.0A 25.0,
4
4712.40003.40009.4000
21.40002..45000.43300.'0002.twa
F PcT
2 44.03 60.00 0.4
GF C-PCT
4701.40002.04048.400014.00001.60400.484V0.'4771.6667
100.04100
O 0.0
O 0 0O 0 0
0 0
PCT CF P-841
0,0 0.0 _33.4 100.00.1
33630.4
99.633.433.3
100.099.6
33.4055163.00002.00043.4000
100.049099.9427a .9 9
0.06030.06122.9980
F PC1 CF P-Ella
0,3 C.9 33.1 100.00.3 0.9 13.4 09.133.1 90.2 33.1 98.2
33.1455162.0000
1.00003.0000
100.310499.2202
2.91260.21260.21602.9904
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4
O 0H H H H 4-4
FEDERAL
ESEA Title I
. Other(specify)
01.10H
4.;
$4
CL4
0
O 0 44 0 4a v P 0 44O 0 0 0Z E-. CL4
0 Z 14
E3120O DDD ODODD
QUESTION 32 PART U
SCORE INTERVALS
Lo0002.0003.000
CASES PROCESSED aW. BLANK DATA nMINIMUM VALUE *MAX[40k VALUE a.mIM OF SCORES aSUM SQO. SCORES is
MEANSING. DEV. iNI,IND. DEV. IN..11 aMtO/AN
QUESTION SZ PART P
SCORE INTERVALS
1.4442.0003.000
CASES PROCESSED aN0. BLANK DATA aMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE a4014 OF SCORES40M SOD. SCORES aMEANBIND. DEV. (N$ =4fM0* DEV. IN-11 aMEDIAN
F PUT
1 34.4I 34.31 33.3
H0uW0CI4
000Z
HIIIsh
t0o
e.1
0H11kCL4
0
())C0Z
O DD 000 ODDD OC] DODD OD DOD ODD
O (AD D 41-3 D
t,F C...PC T V7Wci
3 1.04.4 G*I 0.32 66.7 0.0 0.01 33.3 33.2 .91007
3472
.?
3.04006.0000
14.00441;404o4.41651.0000,2.4400
F
I
I 14.00 0.0
CF 11-81A
33.3 100.033.Z 29.733.1 9907
33.3464164.4444
1.0000360000
99.13$,296.4114
2.9944044.40.11412.9441
GF Cw40CT- F Cl CF P-t3Lso
2 100.0 G.I C.3 33.2 110*01 10.4 4.0 C.0 334 99.70 0.0 33.1 99.1 33.1 99.7
2
4711.u004.i2.u0003.u0005.u040
0./0711.24)44
33.23010'0004
1.00G03.0400
99.1143294.341520,400.10860.11Q22.2945
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatoryin your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separate
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3-I . ..4 .-1
co co
H H H 8,4
0 00 W 0 0 kco o o co o
ro
0 014
0 0I. at e-o P. Z E-1 PI ZSTATE (specify)
reading program(s)
ly for each program.)PROGRAM 4
00 al ZP.
L) %WI DOODO ODDEIF] DOD ODD DODDOD DOD DOD DODWitSTION 32 PART Q
SCORE INTERVALS F P..T
1.000 22 /.62.000 123 511.73.000 80 45.6
6F C -PCT F PCT
225 100.0A03 90.240 35.6
CASES PROCESSEDNU. SANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESon OF SCORES
=
0=
225250
1.40403.4000
508.0000i0M SOD. SCORES = .&434.4044McAN 2.2576SIND. DEV. (N) A 0.6220sIND. DEV. (N-11 0.6234MtOIAN 2.4354
4UEsIION 32 PART R
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
F Ptor
9 /o*70 57.443 49.1
CF P-8L6
,5 6.6 38.4 100.012.6 32.7 35.9 93.423.3 60.7 MS 60.7
38.39.7120.0000
4.00003.044097.555
262.411172.54080.61670.62492.6760
(oF C--PC T PCT CP P-Ikw
L22 100.0 0.7 1.1 34.2 100.0113 92.6 6.7 ls.6 33.5 97.9
43 35.2 26.4 74.4 24.4 78.4
LASES PROCESSEDN0. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUEion OF SCORES
u
a
0a
122353L40003.4040
178.40004UN SQ0. SCORES = 676.0004Mc AN a 2.4101iTNO. OEV. = 0.3904SIND. DEV. (N-11 = 0394dMtOIAN a 2.4429
34.2111154.0000
1.03003.431100
94.5361268.0040'446320.47070.47772.8619
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding forin your school by each source indicated below:
STATE (specify)
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2
CO 40r-i ri t-i vi0 6-1 0 0 4-044 S-I C 4.1 640 0 o
Ho
t-4 Do Z 13+
the compensatory reading program(s)(Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4
o o- t-C P-i .1.4
W 0 U 0 0 WO 41 $1 C 14 14 Co o o o o o ZoZ 1i 144 Z C-0 04
0 0 El 0(5)0 0 0WD 0 D00 DOD 00 ODD00 DOD 00T I ON 32 PART S
SCORE INTERVALS
.0002.0003.000
C.ASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA.144 MOW VAPJ aiMAMMON VALUE aSION OF SCORES 42
500N_SOD. SCORES aMEAN a.14410. DEN. (NI a41140. DEV. (A141AiDIAN
likea T1 ON 32 PART T
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
CASES PROCESSEDBLANK DATA
NI NINUM VALUEK NUN VALUE
SON OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMt ANSIND. DEW. 1 NJ 21
bINO. DEV. N-1)Mt DIAN
a
a
IF- P kol CF CliCi. F PCT CF P41Lw
3 5.4 So 100.0 0.3 C.9 31.9 100 .S____33 111.9 53 94.6 3.3 9.1 334 99 oi20 13.1 40 35.7 30.1 119.3 104,1 09.3
56419
1.04403.0400
129.0040315.401A
2.30360..)644Cizt02.25 To
F
2 9.150.0
9 44.9
.F CPCT fi
33.0394L 5800000
togoo3000;
etoohisAdatss2 .01470.34560.35112.9406
Pt/ CF P .41T
22 10640 00_2 0.5 33.4 1002Q 90.9 1.0 2.9 33.3 99.5
9 40.9 32.3 96.6 32.3 96.6
22453
1. 00003.'4000
5 14 4100012 T.14000
2.31620.03150.04632..a182
32.406162 .0U00
_ 1.40003.0000
99.0149294.1M3
2.96050.21990.22332.9422
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4
STATE (specify)
QUETION 3Z PART U
.-1 .m
4-1 s4 4-1 4-I ,.I vi0 I., 0 0 i. 0 0 41 4)4-I $ 0 1.1 k 0 4., k 0-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0H 61.1 Z H 111 Z t4 114 Z
100-I rt0 1-) 04.1 k 00 m oH Pa Z
DE)O DOD DOD DODtur:10D0)000 COO DODDOD ODD ODD ODD
SCORE INTERVALS F pa CF CFC.PCT P PCT
1.000 1 /2.5 6 100.0 4.1 0.3 33.5 100.02.000 5 6z.5 7 47.5 0.6 1.9 33.4 99.73.000 2 2540 2 23.0 32.1 340 97.4
GASES PROCESSEDN44, SLAM( DATA a
8467
33.4646i63.0000
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.0000 3.0000WM OF SCORESSuM SQD. SCORESMEAN
mAs
a
17.000039.0000
54.59t029744210
2.4.250 2.9760STNO. DIV. IN/ a 0.5990 0.16794T140. DEV. (N.-1/ 0.0409 0.170MEDIAN a 4,4000 2.9189
QuEsTTON 32 PART V
SCORE INTERVALS F Pa 6F C-PCT f PCT CF
1.000 2 26.6 7 100.0 0.2 0.6 33.5 IN.°2.000 5 71..4 5 71.4 0.5 1.5 33.5 99.43.000 0 0,0 0 0.0 32.8 97.9 32.8 97.5
CAiES PROCESSED00. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE4001 OF SCORES4UM SO. SCORESNtANaNO. DEV. 041Si NO. DEV. 0..4/MEDIAN
s
4681.0004e0004)
12.000422.40001. T1410.45140.4440104000
33.4643163.0040
1.00003.6660
49.51147297.1820
2.97360.19100049352.9893
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading prograra(s)
in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4..4 r-I
CO tO td CS
r.i 01 p-I get . 1.4 .ri 1.4 .r.1O 4-I
0t.1.3 0 CO -LI di cd aj 41
4.1 ia g 4.1 w 0 owc.ww0o 4 0 0 ad 0 0 0J 0 0 all 0
STATE (specify) t-4 ck Z H P-1 Z H 154 Z E-t M. Z
DQD ODD ODD DOD0 D DOD 490DOD DOD DOD DODAii-E.Stiiiki .32 PART M
F Pia C.F C-PCT f PCT CF P-411.14
10000 2 4.0 *0 5 100.0 g...._. ... -___ .A 4000 1 20;0 3 5000'34100 2 40.0 A 44.0
0.2 046 3_3'3 100.0O*1
134l0.3
4962316133.1
94.4itg a.
a iwi i #110C ES S E D .3" 5 334321Nil. IL MK DATA 0 470 164 .0000I/ NI not VALUE a 1.w000 L.9400taliiai4 0ALie s 3o0000 3 *COWStilt 0/P SCORES = lououa Of. lit.4404 *PI ..APORES * . 00009 19400149OliAN 211 2.4000 1.9465STNO. REV. (Ni is O. 11964 00159341.440..0EV. IN-11 ° 1. 4104,110 0 .1511ME 0 1AM = 2.0009 2.5459
44UtatION 32 PART X
SCORE INTERVALS F 1/42 GO C.PC r
1.000 1 3.4.3 3 100.02.000 1 13.3 2 46.T3.000 1 33.3 1 33.3
CASES PRUCES SEP = 3nJ. BLANK DATA ° 411NININUN VALUE 1.44000MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.00004.iN OF SCORES mg 41.40041
aUM SRO. SCORES mg 14.0000MEAN = 2:40o4$INO. 0EV. NiI 0 0.0105Fis604b REV. IN-11 = 1.0000
04ILDIAN 2.0000
F PCT CF P-bLo
0.1 C.3 33.3 100.00.1 0.1 33.2 0.9a
33.1 99.4 3 3.1 99.4
33.32421&44.04360
1.00001.4000
19.6439190.62.99150.1193
2.9912
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4.-4
..-1 ...1 ..-1o o o o
.--i ..-1 4-1 .ri ri ..-1 .-I rtO Si 41 u 4-0 a} 0 1J 0 03 14 4$W g w W C w W 0 w W 0O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0H C4.4 :4 1-4 Cid Z H 1:74. Z H P. ZSTATE (specify)
QUESTION 32 PART Y
01;JEJ ODD OCIEJ DODDOD COO DOD ODEty)000(4000 ODD DOD
SCORE INTERVALS F
1.000 0 0.02.000 0 tis03.000 1 100.0
CF C-PCT F FCT CF P.41L01
L9.003. 9.0 i1.3 1000_0i 10006 0.0 0.0 3)41 100.01 100.0 33.3 14040 13.3 100.0
CASES PROCESSED a 1 33.2694NJ. ALANX DATA a 41'4 145.0064MINIMUM VALUE a 3404000 3.0000MAX/RUM VALUE a 3.4000 360040SJM OF SCORES a
34.410000 910,414,SUN SOD. SCORES a 9.4000 2494361MEAN sr 3.4000 :i.0041SING. DEV. INI a 0.JMEDIAN = 3.4000
klutsrion 32 PART 2
SCORE INTERVALS F PuT 4.,F C-..PCT F 'PCT CF P.,ALW
1.000 2 60.7 $ 00.0 0.2 0.6 33.4 100.02.000 t 13.3 1. 33.3 0.1 11.4 3114 99.43.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 33.1 91.0 33.1 99.0
CASES PROCESSEDNJ. BLANK OATA
ais
3472
33.3606164.0000
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.4000 1.0040MAXIMUM VALUE * 2.Q0041 1.6640SJM OF SCORES a 4.4000 49.4341SJA SW. SCORES = 6.0000MEAN = 1e434
_ft6d1410___2.9646
STNO. DEV. (NI 41 0.4714 04606SEND. DEV. IN-11 8 0.)774 04630MEDIAN a 144540 24011910
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)
in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM I PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4
toco.-1
to to
,-I .41-1 v-I . v4 ri ,-1 rt 4-1 ...I
013 4.1 al o 4.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 04.i 0 0 as 0 0 al 1.4 C. as It 0O 0 o o cd 0 0 0 0 0 ( 0E+ CLI z E-1 C14 X E-I C14 = I.4 C14 XSTATE (specify)
iiitieT1QM 32 PART AA
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
CASES PROCESSEDMae BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUN OF SCORESSUM SW. SCORESMeANSIND. UV. iNiMiDIAN
*
a
a
a
QftbTIOM 32 PART AO
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
D E,ID ODD ODD DO DD DOD ODD DODD E(AC D
F PI.T
1 400.0.0 0.0Q 0.0
GF C -PCT
1 /00.00 0.00 0.0
1474
1.40001.40001.00001.00001.40000.41.0000
F Net CF
I IOU.°0 0.00 0.0
10
0
LASES PROCESSED a
J. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUEsUlt OF SCORES
4741.00001.00UuLWOW
SUM SOD. SCORES 1.0000MiAN 1.4004SIND. DEV. (14/ 0.4AtOIAN 1.4040
F PCT
O_ 0.30.0 0.4334, 94.1
CF P-410
33.2 100.&3114 99.7
99.7
33.2304145.0000
L24000MAO.
99.014i29463421
2.9,400.101160.11422.9949
100.00.00.0
F
0.1
PC/
463
CF P41LW
33.2 190.00.033.1
04000
33.133.1
99.799.7
33.2304165.0000
1.0000
31110090. 410,290444111
2.90400.10$40.11022.9005
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)
in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
LOCAL (specify)
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2
m m..-1 ....1 r1 ..40 V 0
14 0 44 1444 44
440 0 Z0 0 0
(-4 04 l'4 At
or
0z
PROGRAM 3
00 44 W44 140 c 0Et A. Z
PROGRAM 4
ro0-1M44 14 C
W
0004 z(-4
kficIEIDEMODO DOD DODDOD ODD DOD DOEDOD DOD DOD DODQUESTION 12 PART AC
SCORE ifireRvaCt
4.0002.0003.000
F
0!1St30
CF 10-61.6
100.11
PO! CF C-PCT
zbirl 4$2 100.0
F PC7
2,6 7.3 144S9.9 Lit MO1.5.1 48 0.1
34 Ilia am 92.728.2 424. -SW 024
GASES PROCESSED 252 144167N. BLANK DATA * 221 1484000PN Nl NUM VALUE a 4.4qao 1,00000MAXI PUN VALUE 1.0000 3.4400SIM OF SCORES 479.0000 91641141SU L _SOD. CORE S 1009.00# 2714412MEAN 1.9008 247518STNO« DE V. IN) a 0.6253 0.579
1/41.11 0.0205 0403MEDIAN L.V172 244,20
0UE4T1AN 32 PART AC
SCORE INTERVALS F INA GF PCT CF 16-81.N
1.000 44 30.3 14S 100.0 4., 13.1 37.0 100.0z.000 78 93.8 1.01. 49.7 7.4 204 32.1 84.93.000 23 AS4 23 15.9 24.7 44.1 24.7 66.8
LASES PROCESSEDKANN OA TA
143330
364117134.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0040 100000Oda NUN VALUE 3.0000 3404030/6 OF SCORE S 269.0000 93347JO SOO. SCORES 561.0000 2344567
MEANST NO. OE V 04/ a
11.4.455Z0.6641
143100.7142
STNO DEV. IN-1/ 0.666) 0.7241MEDIAN 1.4444 2.7512
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4r-1 . .-+ ,-1vs vs 4 taH .0 4-1 .g4 4-4 vi H -ri
0 0 0 W 4-, 0 0 4.4 0 0 0 00 14 0 0 14 0 u 14 0 u f4 c.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0H 114 Z H 114 Z I PO4 Z
LOCAL (specify)
El opowooferciocoo DO DOD DIOD ODD DOD ODDQUESTION 32 PART AE
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
-F -P44
21. 345.36 50.09 12.1
IX-C4C I
/a 100.04$ 62.59 U.S
f PCT CF POL0
7.1 is.0 44.4 100.016.1 44.5 3167 Si .0
54.4 40.5 1464 40.5
CASES PROCESSEDM. BLANK DATA a
72403
41.6140106.0000
mpomym VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE =
1.0000 1.00003.4040 3 .0.6ao
SUM OF SCORES a 126.0000 12.3.449sup 590. SCORES " 232.4990 22(6 01441,MEAN 61500 2.2141STNO. OEM. IN) a 0.6614 0a4041sno. oay. (W.11 ooli.0#4 0.74,'1MEDIAN 67500 24449.
QUESTION 32 PART AF
SCORE INTERVALS F 101.4 C-..00CY
1.0002.000
1116
34.450.0
J2ai
100.065.6
3.000 5 15.6 5 15=4
F PCT Cf P...1111.w
1.1 3.3 3444 100.01.52111
4.352.4
33.031.9
96.792.4
GASES PROCESSED * 32 34.0760NU. BLANK DATA 443 155.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0040 60000MAXIOW VALUE 3.0000 3.0400SLIM OF SCORES a so.v000 56.5474SUM SOD. SCORES a 10.6houg_ 290.3131MEAN 1:diz5 2.8900SIND. DEV. IN! 0.66/6 0.4035SIND. DEW. IN-1/ 0 0.0U7 0.4496MEDIAN 1.4/25 . WM*
i
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM l PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4
0 0 to 0.-1 .44 r4 vi .1 4-1 1'.4 r1M 1-0 n) co 44 4 4 a .4) M a W4..) 1.1 0 ,1-1 14 0 4-1 1.1 0 1.1 1.1 0'0 M 0 0 M 0 0 M 0 0 M 014 Ad Z H N Z H N Z H N ZLOCAL (specify)
00D 0E30(W00 100 000 0E30DOD 0 00 0
QUESTION 32 Pint-AG
SCORE INTERVALS
:10002.0003.000
CASES PROCESSED a
NU. *LANK CA TA144 Mi mum VALUEMAXIMUM voiLUt aSUN OF SCORESit* SQ04 SCORESNtANUNa. oev. (N)ST NO. oev. (14-41MEDIAN
QOESTON 32 PART AM
SCORE INTERVALS
F
5
130
F
PCT CF P11-M
1.2 33.6 A00.0
CF C..PCT
2164 18 1004
F
0.472.2 13 7Z2u.o 0 0.0
0.532.7
1.4 31.2 28 .8
17.3 32.7 27.3
18451
414000
33.64001624000
100002,0000
310000057.0000
IMMO2464413SOI61912
1.12220.44790.,609
2404070.24980.2934
1.4017 2.2841
F C.q0CT F PCT t.F P-.81.4
1.000 3 34.3 9 100.0 0.4 1.2 33.8 100.02.000 5 35.6 6 66.7 1.3 3.9 33.4 98.83.000 1 11.1 1 11.1 32.1 94e$ 32.1 94.6
LASES PROCESSEDalie BLANK DATA a
9466
33.8121159 .04130
MINIMUM VALUE 164000 L0000NA4144N-VALUE 3. M000 3.0000S4M OF SCORES a 16.0000 29.2726S404 SOD. SCORES 32.0000 2244,11145seAN, s' 1;1116 2.9360SIND. DIV. (NI a 0.0285 0.2903STUD. (AV. (**1) 0.0407 0.2947MEOIAN t.aloao 2.9727
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)
in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4
cs to to m-4 ..-1 r-1 ..e4 1-.4 ....1 r1 .r.40 f4 0 0 4.3 0 000 M4, 04.J W 0 4.> W 0 4.31.40 w 1.4 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0H Ai Z H A4 Z F4 A4 Z (-4 A. Z
LOCAL (specify)
DOD DOD DOD DDDDDD OD ow otpap DDDOD DDD DOD ODD
WESTION 32 PM? AI
SCORE INTERVALS F OCT' CF C.,,PCT t pc/ CF P-8LN
1.000 2 44.0 5 100.0 0.2 0.6 33.4 100.4_2.000 2 40.0 3 40.0 0.2 Oa 144 99.43.000 1 20.0 1 2000 3303 940 33.4 111.1
CASES PROCESSED m 5 33.4222NJ. BLANK DATA = 470 143.0000MINIMUM VALUE a 1.4000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 0 3.0000 34411140i4N OF SCORES a 9.0000 0110164444UN SOD. SCORES a 19.0000 294101.11MEAN :a 1.6000 269414SIND. DEV. (NI a 0.14B3 0,1731sINO. OEV. (N..1.1 a 0.6367 0.1757NcOlAN 0 1.7500 209936
QUESTION 32 PART AJ
SCORE INTERVALS F PST CF C-PCT pc/ CF P-BLW
4 100.0 C.2 C.6 33.4 100.01.000 2 60.02.000 2 54.03.000 0 0.0
OASES PROCESSED a
NJ. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE$414 OF SCORES nAIM SOO. SCORES is
folcAN
SOW. DEV. (NI aSINO, DIV. (W.1/Mc D1AN 0
2 50.0 0,2 0.7 33.2 99.40 0.0 33.0 98.7 33.0 98.7
4471
1.40402.4.1000
6.000010,400410b0040.60000.57141.$000
33.4222163,0000
1.00003.0000
S14.64410290.31312.94150.417110.17572.9936
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding forin your school by each source indicated below
LOCAL (specify)
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM.-1
. r0
J 14 WW m0 4
14a,
0w Z E-t 1:1.
0 td14 134
the compensatory reading program(s)(Answer sepirately for each program.)
2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4
0100Z
.- -.4 rlr-1
..40 .t.J 01 Ww 0 14 00 4 0 0 4 0E-1 04 Z E-t N
DOD ODD ODD ODDODD DOD ODE: DOD
titc)DODWIDD ODD ODDQUESTION 32 PART AK
SCORE'INTERVALS
100102.0003.000
CASES PROCESSED =ND. BLANK DATA a
SINIAUN VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE5401 OF SCORES =SUN ,400. SCORES 0AEANSENO. DEV. (N).1ND. DEW. (N-I)MEDIAN
4UtST1ON 32 PART AL
SCORE INTERVALS
F
1_ 44,32 66.70 4.0
4.4 t-PCT.
3 1043.0Z0 IL 0
3472
1.40002.44405.40004.40401.66070.t7140.27741.1500
F PCT CF P-B LW
Gel 0.3 33.2 100.0944 0.1 $ 1.1 99.732:1 9444 32.9 99.1
33.2367165.0000.
100000344460994M429740Alt
2.91170.1.3380.13592.9952
F PO CPCT F PCT CF P-BLit
1.000 2 54.0 42.000 2 50.0 23.000 0 0.0 4
LASES PROCESSED =NJ. BLANK DATA 2'
MINIMUM VALUE aMAXIMUM VALUESUN OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORES 0
Me AN a
SINO. OEV. (NIsTNO. ()EV. (N-I) =Mc WAN a
4*71
1.44JJ2.40046.1400
10.40041.20440.20400.'7741.2044
100.0 o.a_ 0.4 33.5 100.650.0060
0.333.0
0.1S4.6
33.333.0
49.448.6
33.4406163.0000
1.00003.400099.1444
294.33472.97940.17774.18042.9127
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for
in your school by each source indicated below
LOCAL (specify)
PROGRAM I.-4
m.-.4 ,-1O ub 4)4-) 1-i 0O 0fl 04
(0 Z
PROGRAM.-1
to
mw4.
4.JN0E-1 cs4
the compensatory reading program(s)(Answer separately for each program.)
2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4
CO
1-1 1-1m
...4 4-4 .-I 4-1W 0 &I W 0 us 0
O 004
tO 0 0 coz I" Z E4 P.. Z
0
p Li o DOD ODD EDEDOD ODD 'ODD DEC]DOD DIMAKUDDWDO
:14,Ei I I 001 3i PART AN
SCORE INTERVALS
-.0002.0403.000
LASES PROCESSEDNJ BLANK DA TAMI N I MUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORES14c A N
SING. OEV. (NI a'4141}. OEV. I W.1 /MEDIAN a
aaaaaaa
a
00t4TION 32 PART AN
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
LASES PROCESSEDretail BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXI MUM VALUESON OF SCORESSON SQO. SCORES11/4 AN
S T NO. 0EV. (NI4/ NO. OEV. ( I+4. I
1E01 AN
aes
aaaaaaaa
F Pul
3 75.01 25.00 0.0
I;F C -PCT F PCT
4 100.0 0.3 C.91 25.0 0.1 4.40 0.0 3360 91.1
4471
14, 0041U
2.00005.00007.0000idf4a100.43300.20001.4647
F NA
2 66.71, 31..i0 4.0
CF P114
31.4 100.0IS. 09.131.0 41.7
C.F CPCT
3472
1.40402.44044.40446.40441.63330.4.7140..2771/
L 43011
.3 100.01 33.30 0.0
33 .4212163 .00001.09003.0000
99.364'3297 I1)47
2.978/0.19460.14752.9935
....... _______..... _._ . ________P C T L. F P-0Lva
0 a 4..... _C.6 33.3_100.Q0.1 0.4 33.1 99.4
33.0 91.0 33.0 99.0_-.. .43 . 3384
164 400001.00003. OCGO
99.41/0529118592.98400.16620.16872.9949
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM Irico
OS 4.1 at4.1 W g0 I oH cu Z
PROGRAM 21-.1
co
to ,.., e4.) 14 0o ft oH Gt4 Z
PROGRAM 3r-1co
to u a1.) 84 00 RI 0E4 cti =
PROGRAM 4r-ico
ft 43 QJ 14 00 ea 04 94 Z
33.59601b2.0000
I. O 0003.0000
99.9643298 .13 445
2.97550.20430.20742.9921
OTHER
(AD DJ cIttit Do Doo DooOD ODD CI El D
DOD DOE OD ElwULS T ION 32 PART AO
4Uts T I ON 32 P ART AP
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
F RuT
2 Ai. 63 17.6
12 70.4
GASES PROCESSED 17Ni. KAM( DATA 458MINIMUM VALUE = 1.40u0MAXIMUM VALUE 3.1,m)00,
)UM OF SCORES 44.4DUUSUN SOD. SCORES 21 122.4000MEAN = 2.662STAID. DEV. IN) 0.6910SIND. 0EV. IN-I) = 0,1143MEDiAN 2.1917
CF C*PC T F PCT
17.612 70.4
CF Lki
33.59601b2.0000
I. O 0003.0000
99.9643298 .13 445
2.97550.20430.20742.9921
17 100.0 0.3 C.9 33.6 100.015 88.2 Goa Goi 33.3 99.112 70.6 33.1 98.4 33.1 90.4
17 100.0 0.3 C.9 33.6 100.015 88.2 Goa Goi 33.3 99.112 70.6 33.1 98.4 33.1 90.4
CF C*PC T F PCT
GASES PROCESSED 17Ni. KAM( DATA 458MINIMUM VALUE = 1.40u0MAXIMUM VALUE 3.1,m)00,
)UM OF SCORES 44.4DUUSUN SOD. SCORES 21 122.4000MEAN = 2.662STAID. DEV. IN) 0.6910SIND. 0EV. IN-I) = 0,1143MEDiAN 2.1917
CF LkiCF Lki
33.59601b2.0000
I. O 0003.0000
99.9643298 .13 445
2.97550.20430.20742.9921
i
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4m
-1 ...1g 44 CU4.4 WI g0 t 0H NI z
OTHER
...4as
.,-Ig 1-1 (1,1
-1-) WI C0 0 0H N Z
(a to- -.4 .1-1 r4 44g a 0 0 i..) di
4-I WI ' 4J W 00 0 0 0 ' 0H Cm Z H N Z
E D E l teLP 11 ED
D D D ODD ED
ODD ODD DOD OEDQUEOION 32 PART AQ
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002,0003,000
F
I
3
1
P6T 1.F C- PC T
9.1 IA 100.027.3 10 90,963.6 7 63.6
i ----PC i ----Eii --P-41 .4
414 33.5 100_.0___.c.1
0.333.1
C.9 33.4lea 33.1
99.798.d
4.ASES PROCESSED a 11 33.4658kJ. BLANK DATA a 464 163,0000MINIMUM VALUE a 1.u000 1.0000
3.0000MAXIMUM VALUE a 3.u000sUM OF SCORES 28.4,1000 99.9114iiipt S120. SCORES 0 76.0000 298.963
2.9835MEAN 2.6456SIND. DEV. IN) a 0.056 0.1418SING. OEV. (N-I) a 0.6610 0.1440HENAN 2.1143 2.9941
WOWLON 32 PART AR
SCORE INTERVALS F 1461 6F C-PCT
1,000 2 8 100.0 G 2 qd 33.3 It"2.000 0 0.0 6 1$.0 Q.( 0.0 33.1 99.33.000 6 15.0 6 15.0 33.1 95.3 33.1 99.3
LASES PROCESSED a 8 :. 3 .3121
NU BLANK DATA aMINIMUM VALUE a
461i.I.WiiJ
164.00001.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE a 3.O0Ou 3.0000suM OF SCORES a 20.0000 99.4833SuM SQU. SCORES a 56.u000 291.9619MEAN a 2.5000 2.9815sTNO. °EV. IN) * 0.6660 0.1693s(NO. DEV. (N-I) aHcOLAN *
0.)02542.6333
0.11192.9963
\32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)
in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4
as m sv m4-4 v4 ..-1 4-1 e-1 .-1
ca c..) a) al u cu as u cou 14 g r! V, 2 4., I.. 0 I-) 1-I 00 (a o 0 0 0 0 a) 0 0 0 0(-4 P. Z E-c P. Z Ei P. Z (.4 P. Z
OTHER
DIDO DOD DOE DODWEIOIDDO MOD DODDOD ODD ODD E]Dkidlit I ION 32 PART AS
SCORE INTERVALS F Pc T .F C-PCT F PCT CF P.-13Lv.
1.000 0 0.0 3 100.0 4.4 4.0 31.3 100.02.000 2 66.7 3 100.0 044 0.5 33.3 100.03.000 1 33.3 1 33.3 33.2 Sea5 334 47905
CASES PROCESSED 11
NCI. BLANK DATA "Mt NIKON VALUE aMAXI MUM VALUE itSUM OF SCORES -QUA SOD. SCORES me
Kt AN zs
SINO. DE V . IN) a4i N0. OE V. (N-41 aNEW AN a
wut4 I ION 32 PART AT
SCORE INTERVALS
1.3002.0003.000
LASES PliOCESSE0NU BLANK DATAMI NI MUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESus OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORESMc AN41ND. UEV. I NIMt 0 IAN
aaaaaaaaa
3 33.3412472 144.0000
440000 2.000030:A0U0 3.00007.,40000 99.11437
17.410011 299.22.3333 24,99 Li'0.4714 0.06650.2774 0.0676_2.45030 247916
F Pia
1 L00. u0 U..O0 tj.0
L.F C-PCT
I474
14, .10:101.0001014,030001.000111.4000110.t)1.110011
1 100.00 0.00 0.0
F 1;Ci
G.1 CS0.c C0
33.1 99.7
CF 13-0 IA
33 t2 100.433.1 99.733.1 99.7
33.2314165.0000
1 00003. MO
99.5143298. 34*5
2.99400.10860.11022.991115
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding forin your school by each source indicated below
LOCAL (specify)
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM
(tt sts.14
4.1 06
014 3-c 44
O m o oH 44 z E-1
Cd
the compensatory reading program(s)(Answer separately for each program.)
2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4
td 0
0O 2 11 I 0 .C.0 0
4.1 14 0O 0 0 0 0
Cc+
0 Z0Z H Ai Z H
0 0 E3 E3 0 E3 0 0 0 0 EJ E3goo 000lignoottc.JoEl ED E3 El E3 E3 E3 0 E3
illUET 10N 32 PART AV
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
CASES PROCESSEDNJ. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESall OF SCORESsus SOD. SCORESMEANSIND. DEV. 3 N)ML DIAN
laiES T 10.4 32 PART AU
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
GASES PROCESSEDNt1 BLANK OA TAMd NI MN VALUEMAXI MUM VALUESaM OF SCORESsuM SQD. SCORESMt ANSr NO. OEV.MiD1AM
a
a
a
F
1 100.0O a.00 u.0
LF PCT
J. 100.0 G.1 C.3o -0.0 0.0 0.0
43 000 33.1 90.1
CF 13413.
33.3 100.03141 99.73344 99.7
1 33623114474 /65.0000
1.4000 1..0001.0000 3.0000.1.4000 99.31431.0000 298.34131.4000 2.99400.4 0.10E61.4044 0.1102
2.9983
F
1 A40e0O 0450
O 444a
i;F C -PCT k PCT a P-81.11
1
00
10000.00.0
0.1_ Ca_ 3102 'octal_
0.033.1
cal19.1
33.133.1
99.7C9.7
1 33 23i4414 165.0000
1.4040 11_0,0001.0000 3.00001.0000 Et 431.4000 i941.34951.4040 2.99400.0 0.10861.u000 0.1102
26990
32. indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4.-c .
CO tOCO
r-iCO
r-io-t 4.1
el 4 ,--i rt rl ri0 A.) 0., el 4-f oi s0 4r 0 n:1 4./ al4.1 li a u N C 4.,-0 0 0 °w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/4 04 Z E-1 Cki Z 1-$ Gil Z 14 Cki Z
OTHER
ODD ODD ODD D0ODE' 01.110 000 0E10tiliPEIDOVEDO DOD DE1E1
Quebitos 32 PART Am
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
F
012
KT
OA33.366.7
CF C -PCT
3 *90., 03 100.02 66.7
F
O. C_
PCT
Co ca
CF P..8 Lei
3.3 100 U0.1
33.3Eta
99033.3 100.033.3 99.7
CASES PROCESSED et 3 33.3408NO. BLANK DATA at 472 A64.0000MINI NUN VALUE .
4.4094 2.0000!TAXI MN VALUE ItSum OF SCORES a
3000008.0000
3.4. 00009940343
SUN SQL). SCORES a 22.0000 299.4214$kAN iiSIND. DEV. (NI at
2. 4,667 2.99140.4,714 0.0479SIND. DEV. I N-1i 0.2774 0.0488
MEDIAN 2.7500 2.906
%WEST I ON 32 PART AX
SCORE INTERVALS F P I GP C -PCT F PCT GE P-BLvi
1.000 1 240 2 100.0 6,1 0.3 33.3 100.1)2.000 0 43.0 1 5060 04 C.03.000 1 50.0
33.2 2 9999.7.71 50.0 31102 99.7
CASES PROCESSED a 2 33.309NU BLANK DATA : 473 164 .0000NI N INUI4 VALUE a 14000 14,0000MAXIMUM VALUE a 3.00oo 300001,11P0 OF SCORES 4.41000 49.1295SUN SOD. SCORES 11' i O. u0U0PAEAN a 24,0000
496.9 SU2.9940
BIND. DEV. (NI as 1 eU OW 0.1084SIND. DEV. IN-11 a 1.4142 0.1101MEDIAN 11 2eS000 2.9949
32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)
PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4rI 4-1 r-1 r-I01 fd RI COr-1 4-I r-i ri
VIarl rl
CV LA 411 03 4.) VI AA 414 0:4 4-4 m
0 0 0 0 m i 0 AI 0 0 40 04.4 14 g 4.4 14 u 14 g u 1-4 gI-4 1:44 Z El C44 Z 1-4 1I4 Z El 1:14 Z
OTHER
ODD ODD ODD ODD1=1 ID El EGO DOE lc E3
Dar: CD D Ckttip EV49
QUESTION 32 PART AY
SCORE INTERVALS F Our t:F C-*PCT F PCT CF P-4iLW
1.000 1 st1.0 2 100.0 0.1 0.3 33.3 100.02.000 1 50.0 1 50.0 0.1 04 33.2 99.73.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 33.1 994 33.1 99.5
CASES PROCESSED = 2 33.3098NJ. BLANK DATA = 473 16460000MINIMUM VALUE 44 1.u004 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0040 3,4404SUR OF SCORES = 3.4040 99.4,81SOK SOD. SCORES 41 5.JOOO 2411643119MEAN 1.004 2.9914SiND. DEV. (N) = 0.1178LINO. DEV. (*1) 0.1071 061196MEDIAN VA 1.)040 2.9914
QUESTION 32 PART AZ
SCORE INTERVALS F 4F C -PCT
1.000 1 104.0 1 100.0 0.1 C.3 33.2 100.02.000 0 u.0 0 0.0 04,C 0.0 33.1 99.73.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 33.1 990/ 33.1 99.7
CASES PROCESSEDNU. BLANK CATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE
OF SCORESLO4 SOD. SCORES
McANsINO. DEV. (N)AdDIAN
a
a
aaa
1
4741.u0UU1.u0001.U0001UOUO1. J0UU0.01.400U
33.2384105.0000
1.000)3.0000
99. S1 A3
29044532 .99400.10060.11022.9910
33. Was any teacher resistance encountered in the implementation of the compensatoryreading program(s) in your school?
None at all
Some
A great deal
LILESTION 33
SCORE INTERVALS Ft.I t.F P IN F KJ CF C-PCT
1.000 7 5.4 52.7 ACM 349 _7.s.d 473 100.02.000 13.0 24.4 13.0 24.6 123 2600 124 24-.2
-0.03.000 0.0 Q*0 -0.0 1 0.2 1 0.2
'52,6925CASES PROCESSEDM. BL ANK DA TA
Ni NUN VALUE2*OCCOI OCCO
21. w000
PAS1 NUN VALUEWI OF SCORES
111. 2400065.6477 59160000
SUP WO. SCORES 9_40522, 654.0000MEAN 1.2459SIND. DEV. IN) * 0.4345 0.465'7
ST hi?. UEV. LI44. 346 4.4464
MEDIAN a 1.1629
34. Was any community resistance encountered in the implementation of thecompensatory reading program(s) in your school?
None at all
Some
(7_1 A great deal
LESTION 34
SCORE INTERVALS r" yCT CF P-81. F Ps.1 (.F C-PCT
1.0 CO 43.9 63.4 52.1.,40S.0 398 +34.L 474 ;00.02.000 6.2 15.6 $.d 16.6 73 13.4 75 15.93.000 0.5 1.0 0.5 1.0 2 U.4 2 0.4
Cita S PRULE:)Ef, :2.6625 473M. di. ASK CAT A - 2.CCCO 2MLhI MUM VALUE 1.4ouJ011041 SUP VALUE: * .0000 3. SOWS+.+14 UP SCORES * 61.9926 550.40004(M S00. 4WKES T0$ 0000MEAN 1.1.765 L. /624SY NA. DEV. IN) = 0.4 C 71 0.48%14$TISAst ...0k V I . 0.4009MEDIAN s 1.0996
35. What is the basis for determining pupil participation in the compensatoryreading program? (Mark all that apply.)
ti4 0
(10/0Membership in one or more specific target groups (i.e., economicallydisadvantaged, migrants, non-English-speaking)
All students in the school participate
te)
Depressed reading levels (as indicated by test results)
Teacher (or other staff) recommendation
Parent request
Volunteer
Other (specify)
UES71014 3$ PART A
fail INTERVALS r
43.71.000 9.2
PCT CF
62.617.4 9.2
F -PuT CF C-PCT
1000_385._*1.01 415 100.011.4 90 18.9 90.. 18.9
CASES PROCESSED
=
t4.41330.0iOCCO
475fa.t5*---
1.o040MI NI MUM VALUEMAXI MUM VALUESUM CF SCORES = 9.243b- 90.u000SUM SOO. SCORES 9.2030MEAN a 0.1740SING. OEV. Ift) 0.3191 0.3919STNO. OEV. EN-11 0.3826PEO I AN 0.1 Cf.-3 0.1169
QUEsTICN 35
SCORE INTERVALS
P ART 43
F FL I CF P",bLi4 F PLT C-PCT
0 'A. 35.5 61.1 52.9 100.0 313 65.9 475 100.0A.000 17.4 32.9 17.4 32.4 162 34.1 162 34.1
C14.E.S_ CRAKE S SEPMINIMUM VA LUtMAXIMUM vA LuLSUM_ OF scatig_sVA SOO. SCOMESMEAN
$111P. OAV. INI:trill°. Mi. 1 N-LMEDIAN
a
a
la.#6170.01.0000
A7.44.A017.41650.32930.470QL1.47450.2455
4750.01.U0OU
i62,4004162.o0040.34110.47410.4746O. 45do
35. What is the basis for determining pupil participation in the compensatoryreading program? (Mark all that apply.)
t4
[1]
Membership in one or more specific target groups (i.e.,disadvantaged, migrants, non-English-speaking)
All students in the school participate
Depressed reading levels (as indicated by test results)
Teacher (or other staff) recommendation
Parent request
Volunteer
Other (specify)
economically
SUESTION 35 PART C
F ea-- --CF C-PCTSCONE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-OLW
0.9 5.1 9.1 52.9 100.9 53 11.Z 415 100.03 .000 4708 S0.3 47.8 90.3 422 -68.8 aa2 88.8
CAS'S PRO;LSSE0 52.8817 475P1MINUM VALUE 0.0 0.71
MAXIMUM VALUE a 1.0000 1.0000SUN OF SCORES S 47.7510 422. J000
..-422.uTiOliSUM SOGe SCORES 47.7570AEAh 4 0.9030 0.6884ST60. 001. (NI 0 0.2540 0.4/48S7140. OEV. t N I o.2988mbOIAN a 0.9462 0.9372
4UEST10N 35 PART 0
SCORE 1NTERviLS
6 .6
1,000 46°3
PCT CF i".8LW
titi
F 6F C -Pa
eq_ _14.1 415 100.0408 8Sei 408 6.487.6 46.3 87.6
CASES_PROCEL:)E0 0_, 52.8877 475MillIMUN VALUE a (.1.0 0.0
PANIPUm VALUE 1.u0u0SUN OF SCORU 408.0000.SUP SOO. SCORES a 46.3198 408.0040MEAN 0.4758 0.6589MO. GEV. (NI .0 0.3298 0..1444
SIND. GEV. tbs-ti 4.3330 0.4484AEOIAN a 0. 9251 0.v1/i
11
35. What is the basis for determining pupil participation in the compensatoryreading program? (Mark all that apply.)
flUE ST I ON 35
Parent request
Volunteer
Other (specify)
PART
SGURE INTERVALS
1.000
CASES_PROCESSEO
11INIRUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUP OF SCORES
aaa
SLR SQL). SCORES aREARSTRO. OE V. thiSTNO. LAW. (01-11MEDIAN
QUESTION 35
SCOICINT EiiV ALS
__kg Q.1.000
_CASES mtoc EsteDMINI NUR VALUE aPAH NUM VALUE st
SUM O SCORES as
SUS WO. SCORES a!LEAN
1t4_1 aSTNO 08V. T
KOTAN4UtiT14N 35
ENV ATS
1.004.
CA s_..pko_t_415EDI Ali 141.40t VALUEPAA IMUN VALUE
a
LIdM QE_AWMA..._SUP SOO. SCORES 11
MEANSTNO. OEV, 4h1
UEV. 1 ft4-13 sI4ki+I AN
6
F PCT C,F 081.10 F P64- C C PCT
31.3 5'1.2 52.9 100.0 288 60.6 475 100.021.6 4C.8 21.6 4048 187 39.4 Lel 39.4
0.01.00GO
21.568221 .5.82
0.481110.49140.49610.3442
PART F
415
1.4000187.1400LAW-410)
0.449174/444886
-074-17in---0.44447
CF P-BL ii FF MLT
4b %IA _Aka ..A.Q.Q.S 4354.9 .2 4.9 9.Z 40
PuT 4F C
91.6 475 100.08.4 40 8.4
_UR 88.n 47.50.w0.0
1.0640 /..w0OU4.8733 40.110004 68733 40.40000.0921 064442
o. darn0.1920 0.47800.05c7 044"4.)460
PART 6
f PCT tF --P-B Lot PO- -PCTcf
5 so 52.9 IA ±C$ 458 90.4 475 100.02.4 4.4 2.4 4.4 17 3.6 17 3.6
52.8417. .
.0475
140000 L.4001)7. u0U0
x.3517 174440340.0445 0.11356012041 0.L8540.2081 O. .4.46J0.0231 0.vido
11.
36. Since June 1971, how many and what types of personnel in your school haveparticipated in inservice training activities to prepare them for teachingin a compensatory reading program for elementary students?
Number ofindividuals
f)Regular classroom teachers
School-located reading specialists
CC)
(P) School personnel other than above (specify)
School district reading specialists
L ES 1 ICIN 36
scdii ALS
0.0 1,992.00 5.99.40 9.99
10.00 y 33.9914.00 17.9918.00 21.992a_.00 25.9926.00 29.9930.00 33.99
38.00 41.9942.00 45.9946.00 49.99
53.195* .00 51019
0_,
PART
6.2
IiGT
23.5
Cf se.
35.1 100.0 66
PL
4449
.
GF C P CT
310 J0.010.61.83._4,,1.91.50440.4044
..0_,44;
0.0Del0_40.1Oet40
30.2ViaAA).
5.54.3
_LaLaCO4._(2_,0.0.).00.20.40.00.0
2601 7646316.2 46.3Act_ 4Zia__.
9666'34
30.420.9io.8
310 79.1154 48.7
___<kft_zi.....540 11.134 10.8
.. 19 6.0
5.0 14.43.1 liiil1.6 4.6
20159 .._,_,Z.0
-5-39.001100
6.44.7
1;ia0.9
. 9 f.9.O.0.00.3-41;:i0404.0
0.8 2.40.5 1.4Q.2.___ ._0..e0 .
(.2 0.60.2 0.6
_____0.2 ____9,6,_0.1 0.4
-0.0 -0.0-0.0 _7:0.0_
10 3.25 Le6
...; _. . 0 62 0.64 0.6Z,, 0.61 -0-.30 0.00 0.0
LASES PROCES SE& s 35.0554*40. BLANK OA fit a 117.0000NikiiiiiiiirAiii 46 0.0MAX 114UPI VALUE a 51.0000SUM 01F SCORES .s.,_ 433.9412.SUN SOC. SCOHES s 3438.8149PAEAN s 6.6146SThO. UEV. EN1 0 7.111551140. UEV I Ofrl i 0 7.4241AEOLAPi 5.5125
316159_
04451.0000
t310.400035430.0004
7.41017.4)604
7. 7265.4334
36. Since June 1971, how many attd what types of personnel in your school have I
Participated in inservice training activities to prepare them for teachingin a compensatory reading program for elementary students?
Number ofindividuals
--Iti----
Regular classroom teachers
School-located reading specialists
(c) School district reading specialists
(c)) School personnel other than above (specify)
PART l
22.3
F
40 13.1.40 OF16413 .4
U.41.3
a.*0o0:::0.000U0.04.00.00.40.00.00.00.O0.0
234 100.0
tESTTO61
SCORE INTERVALS
0.0
f
7.l 24.4
0)-aLis
100.01.0002.0003 4000
14.03640.7
ST 6313,93461
0.33.1
1.7
14.74.71.3C.6405
74.718.3
142398
1
30
144$213
424922.2$66
4.4005.0006.000
0 el0.4
2 eJ2.00.3
41
0fs.1
0.47.000Be 000
ALMML_ 40:10.!
Q. Go0!7:0,:0
G.00.00.0
0.00.3
0.10.1:11
0 .30 .3
00
111
0.40.40.4
0.00011.00012.000
0.00.0
-It0.04. i
0600 .0
0.0.0 .0
0600.0
0.10.1C.1
0.34.30.3
00000
1a00a0
1 "0:41 0.41 0.4
-----1---0.-4L 0.41 Oo 4
------Z17- 0.00 0.0-0 0.0-0- 0.a
0 0.0
13.000140000
0
0.1
0.10.3.
0630.30 .3
16.00017.00016.000
C.00 .0
0 .0
0.00.0
-C.Q0
-0.0
..0 .0
.0.0-0.0
19.00020.000
-060-0.0
.040-o .0
214'CA SE S PROCESSED 24.4214h(), BLANK OA TA a 238.AI 41 RUA VALUE x,
111
99 OeuMAX I MX VALUE 00000SUM OF SCORES 2666316SW SU 0 e SCORES * 6229
S7444.41000
gEAN 10945SIN°. Ok:V. IN! 1.1557 1.4330STN0e 12209... 1.4456
0 .9651
36. Since June 1971, how many and what types of personnel in your school fiaveparticipated in inservice training activities to prepare them for teachingin a compensatory reading program for elementary students?
Number ofindividuals
Regular classroom teachers
School-located reading specialists
School district reading specialists
School personnel other than above (specify)
61JESTION 34 PART C
dift Ls F PCT CF F*110 F PLT (.F
.____.060 5.1461____ 140 100.0 41 2).3 162. 100.01.000 10.0 52.9 134 71.1 85 M. Lii 74.72.000 2.0 10.6 3.5 10.11 22 13.6 36 22.234000 6204 ;AI_ JAL_ 003. 4 a., 14 3.64.000 0.7 3.d 1.2 6.2 6 4.7 10 6.25.000 0.2 Q. C.5 Z.4 2 1.2 4 2.56.000 4A.Q. . QA2._ 0.1__ 1.5 0 0.00 .
2 1.27.000 0.0 ,0.0 0.3 1.5 0 0.0 2 1.20.000 0a0 04 0.3 1.5 0 0.0 2 142
____ _ -4.000 ___ __ qks__ _060_ _0.4_ 1.1 .. 010.000 0.4 0.0 0.3 1.5 0
11.000 0.0 0.0 C.3 1.5 012, 000 0.2 1.1 0.3 1.5 1
t3.000 0.0 0.0 041 0.4 014.000 0.0 0.Q 0.1 004 00.2009 .4;1*. 0.4
.0 is 1 064 1
. .
li.000 ono -c.c -c.o -o.c 0
17.000 0.0 O. .q. c J. 0 0
14.000 .9 t0 0 41_ _ ,-0...g___ -..P 0._ 019.060 0.0 0.0 40.0 OA 020.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0
111.0. _A_
0.0 20.0 20.6
_
0.0 1
0i0 LOA 1
0000.0
___-- _
o.o0.0
CI 441
0..0J.
s2
a
_____ _......
10.0506300.0 CCO
. _ otg
162313
0.0
CASES PROCESSEDh(1. 01ANK GADMINI MUM V#I.UkmAximuo VALUE 6 15.0000 15.0000SW: WV SCORES 22.5103 202.1/000SON 000. scum a 85.0620 724.1/000
K. , 0 14,1936 1.44119STMO. 0EV. IN) a 1.1566 1.7071ST MO OE V. 4 N.q i 1,004 1. 7144
MEDIAN ID .934j Os V704)
1021.21.2IA 20.60.60.60.00.00.0G.00.0
36. Since June 1971, how many and what types of personnel in your school haveparticipated in inservice training activities to prepare them for teachingin a compensatory reading program for elementary students?
Number ofindividuals
Regular classroom teachers
School-located reading specialists
School district reading specialists
School personnel, other than above (specify)
60E5710N 36
F
46
kirla07 1741 100.0
PART O
SCORE INTERVALS
0.0 - O.99
F
6.aPCT
29.4
CF P-aLw
MA /00.01.00 ' 2.99 10.9 5165 14.9 70.6 04 46.8 U6 73.33.00 4.19 2.3 11.1 4.0 19.0 21 11t2 42 24.45.00 - 6.99 Oo 5 2.4 1.9 .7 . 401 21 12.27.00 .' 8.99 0.4 1.7
_ILAL_1a 5.5 3 Z9 L4 8.1
9.00 - 10.99 0.1. C5 0.8 3.8 1 0.6 9 5.2
11.00 -. 119
14.99_Q_*_3___Q.,0___0.1 0.5
0._7 3.3 °1
"0 8 4.713.00 ... 0.7 3.3 4.6 11-4.715.00 - 16.19 a./ 0.3 0.6 ha 1 0.6 1 4.11/.00 -. 18.99 04C 0.0 0.5 a.L 0 0°0 6 3.519.00 20.99 0.1. 0.3 C.5 2.5 T 41" 6 3.521.01; - 22.99 0.2 0.9 C.5 2.2 2 L.2 5 2.9
23.00 7-25.00
0.0 0.0 0.30.3
1.4 01
0000.4
3 1.7---71-- 1.7
_24.9926.49 0.1 OA 1.4
27.00 -. 20419 Cal 0.6 0.2 1.0 1 006 2 1.2
29.00 -. 30.99 GaG 0.0 0.1 0.4 0 000 I. 0.6.-31 04 - 32 .99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0 .4 d 41" 633.00 34.99 0.0 0.0 0. i 0.4 0 40 1 0.635.40 - 36.99 0.0 0.0 G.1 0.4 0
0--0.0000
1 0.6-1- 0.637 .00 3 1 19 0.0 0.0 04 0.4
39.00 -. 40.19 0.0 060 0.1 0.4 0 a.o 0.6..41.08 -
43.00 -42.9944.99
Os C0.1
0.0C.4
0.1 0 .40.4
01
"0"*.i.0
I. 0.6L- 0.6Col
45.00 - 46.99 0.0 0.0 -- Cs 0 -O. 0 0 0.0 0 0.047.00 - 48019 0.0 0.0 "000 ..00 0 0.0 0 0.049.00 .... 5C.00 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -o,c1 0 0:11- 3 0.0
CASLS PRLICES EDMI. 6L aNK OA TAAI NI MOM VAL UCItAXI0914 VALL)tSUM 01 SCORESSUN SEW. SCORENEANii-ND. (AV. i N I4.1 We PEW. (.1/*ED IAN
21.1161 Oa30000000 301
0.0 0.1043o0Q00 4 3 . 0400045.0502 43;4000.541.7056 6005. 00002.1335 2.64534.5937 "s;arss4.7065 5.498Y.1.7117 1.71524
37. Does the compensatory reading program use parents or other volunteers (paidor unpaid) to help in the classroom?
QUESTION 3710 Yes 20 No
S CONE E RV AL S F PCI
1.0002.000
CASES PROCE$SENO BLANK DATA 0
1141 NUN VALUE laMAXI MUN VM.UE
m
LF P-41 LP.
1.1.3 52.3 100a0295 5695 29.5 56.5
SUM OF SCORES *SUN SOO. SCORES aMEAN aSIND DEV N)SINO. DIV. 0NEC
.iL..30265 .00001.00002.0000
61444511.44.1241
la 564$0.49170.4005
F PT taF C-PCT
230 46.9 47U 0240 5-1.1 -2-40 51.1
4195.
1.00002J000,..
1190.410011
43.09990. )0041...22114
38. Does the compensatory reading program use pupils as tutors?
iUESIl ON 38
SCURE I NTE RV AL
1.0002 .000
10 Yes 212 No
S P PC
CASES PROCESSED di
NU. BLANK DATA 0MINIMUM VALUE 0PA I MUM VALUE rSSA OF SCORES 0SUM Sane SCORESNANSIND. °EV. (P9SIND UV. I N-1MEDIAN a
F PLI 4.E C-PT
21.2 4C.8 52.0_100.0 199 44.4 407 100.0
30.6 59.2 30.1 $94 2:48 11.4
11.0 figti 600001 'DODO2,0000
1.4/0002.0000
62.1557 -TAU=144.2,56 1271.0000
1.5920 1.37390 .4914 0.4900.4961 0.49501.6552 1.0287
39. Do you expect to have a compensatory reading program in the SUMMER of
1973 (the summer after next)?
I UE Sll ON 39
RV AL
1.[J Yes
F
20 No 30 Don't know
PCT CF P-81W F PLT 40F C C
1.000. 19.4 364 .5,2.3 100.0 109 J0.0. 1QQ..061.9.000 15.7 30.0 32.4 145 30.9 301 64.0
3.000 16.7 21.9 16.7 3/.9 /36 jJ.2 156 33.2
CASES pRatIllo si,;1151-- 410We BLANK DATA 5.0000 5MINittuh_VALOE_ r 1.0000 14$000PLUM VALUE 0 3.0000 3.0044SUM OP SCORES * 51.3295 459.U000SU SQO. sco4ess.meAN
42.211111.4404
_ 7449.0000letold
SINU. DEV. th) * 0.4903th7A) C!.5034 0.4993
MeLLAN 1.3932 /.4290
40. If you do expect Lp have a swayer program, for which of the following grpieswill the program be conducted? (Circle all that apply.)
-luesta ON 40
T 3
PAR; A
4 5 6 7 8 Ungraded
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF 146i0 Is 404 8411.0 52.9 10003_1400 4.4 12.4 64 Ilea
CAST'S nett ssecNININUR VALUE-MAXI NUM VALUESUM OF SCOkESSUN Say. SCuRESDEAN5110. DEVe IN1 *ST40. BEV. IN-41%nil*
a
a
GUESTLUN 4a PART fi
SCORE At
0.01.000
524111/70.0I *WM6,5513balifi0.1.201
o.3140..0682
F.. --p-.r------ C-PCT
411 412.1 100.011.5 44 1345
F PC.T CF P-44. al F
415
1.4$000buu00064o OW
13.13*7O.A414
-CF -C-PCT
42.7 6 1i9 549 100.0 297 444 4/5 100.020e2 341.1 20.2 31101 1/41 Ala tie 31.5
CASES PROCESSED'2
_411.._
52.0417 _PININUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE4UPLOFAGGREL
___ ________0.0L.0000
AAA1139 ..
SUM S40. SCORES 20.1530MEAN 2 0.31111511402 PO. Ni_ ___.. 0.4156..STNO. OEVe (M.4) 0 04,4903&DIAN * 0.3016
CufiS710m 40
SCORE I.NT EICOA LS
_ .
PART C
PC/
*75u
1.0000178.400u
O*00000.4700.4014,0.40460.997
CF P -8l.Yt ,F UF C-PC/
0(.1 313.1 ;t.9 52.9 100 0 2781;000 22 .8 43.a T2.1 45.1 19/
CASES PR10ES4a1mit,' pito' VALUENA I NUN VALutSum GF .SCORESSuig SQD. SCORES!LEAN
._Si144._StAifeSING. CEV.14Etil Ah
sd.5 473_100.041.5 in 41.5
52 al 6770.01.0060
47.5
-0;4100000
22. 77C2 197. uUUU22.7702004305 0.4/410.9419 Z_ 0.492/0.4959 0.49320.3 710 0.454..
O. If you do expect to have a summer program, for which of the fo11ot4ng grades
will. the program be conducted? (Circle all that apply.)
K 1 2Q.))3
) T. )4 5 6 7 8 Ungraded
CULSTION 40 P410.1
SCURE INTERVALS F PCT CF 1141L44 F CF C-PCT
24.8 _1_4_05 5209 141001L. 264 55.4 475 100.01.000 24.1 45.5 24m1 4545i211 44.4 214 44.4
EASES PROCESSEDFINIFUN VALUE aPARIMUN VALUESUM OF SCORES aSUM SOO. SCORESMEANSTN.
OEV. 114-4)MEDIAN
GUESTION 40
524,0072 4750.0 0.01.0000 100000
2400780 2114*(00001400780 21104000
0041103 0044420.4940 0.49490.5020 0.49740 04171. 0.4990
PART E
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.040
cues PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE *SW' C. SCURE,S1418 SOO. SCARESNAMSIMS. °E V. INSTAID. DEV. IN-11 *NEW 4114 ii
F PCT CF
30.2 57.0 U. 40044 276 S11.l
-14-1-44e9,75 100.0
2201 4300 SW 4360 199 41.9
CUiSTI ON 40- PART F
SCORE itirERv ALS
0.01.000
.45ES 40(0_5E4;M1 M1 NUM VALUESAXII4UM VALUE a5U4 OF SCORE SSUM SOO. SCORESSE Mt
_5710. OE V.STN.). DEW. t14-13MEDIAN
52 ._0107 4750.0 ----07i-i1.0000 1.00100
22 a 72_15 199.00002207215 199.0000
0042416 0.41890.4550 0049340.4998 -----G7-0949-0.37 0.1°05
4)43 CF C -PETF PCT CF F
32.5 61.3 52.9 100.0 294 61.9 47$ 100.020.3 36.5 20.3 3o.s 181 38.1 181 38.1
__32siall__...______._ 47 5 ....0.0 0.4)1.0000 1.0000
20.3449 181.000020.3449 181000000.3447 00441110.4145 0.48560.4912 .04)031,20.3126 0.1076
40. If you do expect to have a summer program, for which of the following grades
will the program be conducted? (Circle all that apply.)
(4) 1K 1 2 (13 4 5 Ungraded
atasTICti 40
SCORE INT-EA V ALS CF P-81.. al Pc. 1"
0.0 35.7 67.5 520 100.4 326 68.6 475 100.01.000 17 el 3205 1702 3205 eTif- 31.A A44 £1.4
CASES ILOCESSED .52.11111 AfaiMINIMUM VALUEPAM NUN VALUE
a*
0.01.4CCO io4000
SUM SCORES la 17.1645 14. 0060SUM SQ00 SC046 S 17 .1665 4414.09010MEAN a 0.3246 Owaltif3100. D. L$ * 0.4662 0.4640$ IND. UV. IN- fl 4 0.4127 0 .4643-MEDI AN 0.2403 Os/1285
PART H
SCORE I NTE RV ALS F PCT CF PdI,eLW F CF CPCT
0.0 411e.,1 9/_17 52.9 100 A 439 9204 475 100.0I*000 3.8 7.3 3.8 7,3 lob lob 46 7.6
CASES PROCESSED a
PART 1
32.8817 475$D4L*IM VALUE aRA X I RUN VALUE aStitIt OF SQURES _a
0.010000 1.0000
$W Set. sContsMEANST Ws DEV. IN) a
Se 83300607290_02593 _0.26180.0391
36au0oo0.e70.46470.6490. u4LJ
STRiD ()EV Ur-l1 aPiE0 IAN
5COR -6--1-i4-7-kit V ALS--
_0.0 41*91.000 3.0
-KT C*- P44. ti
9.401 52 10008596 3.0 5.6
F 134.T CF
449 94.5 475 100.026 .5 26 5.5
CASES PROCESSED U 542,6417 475Rat4UR VALUE a 0.0
PAA1 MUM VALUE 1u00SUM CF SCORE S a
2.964626. UOUj
-2-6;4046SL 14 SQL)* SCORESMEAN 0.0561 0.4547
TM). £i. 0.2300 0o42730.2322 -0.4277
'dual ilk a 0.0211 0.90
40. If you do expect to have a summer program, for which of the following grades
will the program be conducted? (Circle all that apply.)(a)
K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ungraded
CUE 11 ON 40 PART J
SCORE INTERVALS P PCT CF P.BLW F Pa.T C.F C -PCT
060 51.2 96.7 52.9 100.0 460 9644 475 100.01.000 1..7 3.3 1.7 3.3 15 344 L5 3.2
CASES PROCESSEC a 92sa I 11 475RI NI OUR VALUE 0 o0 NUPAX MR VALUE lig 1.0000 1.0000SIM OF SCORES a 17343 *1.0.0.94SW SUO. SCORES Se2343 150400PIE AN 0.0320 0.4316_STNO,_ AtiYA. itil_. _ 0.1111 0 1.749iT Na) OE V ft IN -11 4 04798 Oo A 751
MED /Art 0.0170 0.4103
40a. On what basis do you expect to select students for the summer program?(CNeck all that apply.)
(1) Previous participation in a compensatory reading program
0 Previous non-participation in a compensatory reading program
Depressed reading level
Membership in one or another specific target groups (economically deprived, etc.)
0 Teacher or other staff recommendation
Parent request
0 Volunteer
Other (specify)
QUt Si ION 4(A PAkT A
S CUR I Tit; i&-VALS
c 01.090
41.511.4
FC-1
711.521.5
GF P--BC
sao ice.oF
31010-
71.9A4.J.
CF C PC T
475 10060105 22.111.4. 21.5
CASES PROCESSEU a 52681177 475III WNW, VALUE . tl 0 0.0PAMPUti VALUE 0 1QCCO 1,4000SAM CF
iScokgS11.3820 105. 4000UI sii. scora 11.3820 105. 4000
NEAR * 04152 0.4211Me D. DE Id I NI 044110 0.4150S7$Q. DEV I AI1 ) a 0.4149 -0e4354MEDIAN 0.1371 0.1419
41a. On what basis do you expect to select students for the summer program?(Check all that apply.)
Previous participation in a compensatory reading program
Previous non-participation in a compensatory reading program
Depressed reading level
Membership in one or another specific target groups (economically
Teacher or other staff recommendation
Parent request
0 Volunteer
0 Other (specify)
deprived, etc.)
QUESTION 40A PAM'
SCORE F PC1 CF 15-b LW F C4C1
0.01.6000
5E3662.3
,o6 joo.p, 45 0;V 243 464 25
9467 *75 100.045 5.3
CASES_ PROCESSED a .148(117 475PIK RUM VALUE 0.0 06aMAX IMUR VALUE 1.0000 LUDO°SUS OF SCURES
is 24321325.094.*
254. 4000SUS $006 SCORESNE AN 060440 Oo if4i5166
_siotolk__Qgv,_ (N)(AV I N4.
0, 4012_0.2012
0.4233.4.-424$
MEDIAN a 060230 06027d
QUEST KIN 40A
SCORE IhTE1 VAL-5
C.01.0cd
COA54414kAtumiN)Aum VALUEPAAIOWM VALUE
CF ScidR.E$SQ-06 SCORE!:
MEANs!Np. tft)UNO. OEV. (W-11MEDIAN
tta
a
PART C
F PCT F Ps..T GP CPCT
41,60 51,61 242 Z4.9 475 10060-4961.25.9 46.9 233 49.1 433
54.410.0L. OCCO
25_05:0
0.480917.4119L. 3 C41064161
4750.41.0004
43364000al;0.490506499906i004064t1/4
40a. On what basis do you expect to select students for the summer program?(Check all that apply.)
Previous participation in a compensatory reading program
Previous non-participation in a compensatory reading program
Depressed reading level
(P) Membership in one or another speelic target groups (economically deprived, etc.)
(g) Teacher or other staff recommendation
Parent request
QQ) Volunteer
(9 Other (specify)
CUES71 ON 40A
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
CA tE S PROCESSEDPI NI NUN VALUEMAXIMUM VALUEsurt OF SCOitt$SUM Sa0. SCORESKANSTNO. OEU. (N)STAG. DEv. iN-1IMEDIAN
PART 0
F PCT CF P-SL6
410 16.J 52.4 100.012.2 2.1.4 1&.2 22.E
is 52.1417s 0.0a A (1000
11t2091a L1isZ097a 0.2120s 14:4411a 0.4126a 0.134S
GUEST1ON 4d4 PART i
SCORE IWTERVALS
1.000
CASES PRUC ESIE0NI NI NUM VALUEPAM NUN VALUESUN OF SLORESSUN SQD. SCORESNE ANSTNO. 02V... (AISTNO. DEV. IN -I)NE to I AN
L.
F PCT CE C-PCT
363 76.4 475 100.0112 2466 41.12 23.6
475.Cie 01.0000
132.0000112.0000
0*4350.....0. kattS_
0.42410.1543
F 44f -Coz- F 116T GP C.:OtT
.0.0 47.3. _52.9Z7.0 52.6 27.8
109.10 221 47.4 475 100.0-Tit--14.252,6 240 :42.i
i.Ais_14117_
0.0475
0.4/a I. COCCI 1,0000a 2708433 44 So v044
s 4.4.000427.6413a 0.S 265 0.b241
a 0.4995_0.5041
0.49150.i0J0
a 0.5502 4.,413
40n. On what basis do you expect to select students for the summer program?(Check ail that apply.)
Previous participation in a compensatory reading program
Previous non-participation in a compensatory reading program
Depressed reading level
Membership in one or another specific target groups (economically deprived, etc.)
LJ Teacher or other staff recommendation
I: Parent request
(..g Volunteer
Other (specify)
11.-Ii ii10,4 40A FART F
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CP PSLAi F FuJ ---Tir7C-70CT
32+1 52.9 100.0 292_ 6005..1.000 10.4 3444 20.4 38.6# 183 38.3
21 51.8877a 0.0= 1.0000II 20.3941..
20.3981a 0.3497
044.46
LASES PROCESSEDPI AI PLO ti VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESOS OF SCORES___ _ ___ _.
UN SOD. SCORESPLANST1210. 0EV. 14)SIM). 0EV. (N -11 0.4914PIED IAN 0.3139
"41.1EsTION 40A PART ta
SCORE ifiTimVAL F PCT
475 100.0183 385
40.5_0. 46
1.40004.44_40.4001830
04311530.4807..0.4d720.4144
CF PiLke F Pt. T
0.01.000
47.95.0
90.69.4
$ 199_r. *CI
L090_944
42554
d9.5te.6
47550
100.010.5
CASES PROCESSED 52.0877 475MI NI MUM VALUE a 0.0 0:4PAXIMUM VALUE leGOC4 1.000USulu 41; 4.9_81/ 50.4000.GIsi; S SCOPE SMEA.,4
4 .9 Os71 -0.0944
Tir.40000./053
Sink/. DEW. INI 0.2923 0..4069SINO. REV. IN-II 4.2951 0.4074',EDI AN 0.0,21 0.u5dd
40a. On what basis do you expect to select students for the summer program?(Check all that apply.)
(:] Previous participation in a compensatory reading program
c:3 Previous non-participation in a compensatory reading program
Depressed reading level
Membership in one or another specific target groups (economically deprived, etc.)
[:3 Teacher or other staff recommendation
Parent request
Volunteer
GO Other (specify)
Oti 40 A PART 11
av AL s F
P 51.8.1.400 1.G
GASES P110.ESSED
PCT CF
52.9 _100
F PwT CF C-PCT
465 9,704 47$ 1OU, 010 Z. 1.0
475
_90.02.0 1.0 240
ALMPIM PUlit VALUE, a 0.0 04QMAXMN VALUE as 1.0000 1.u000ALM OF SCURES s 110.440 .
SUN 540. SCORES a_
1.0410 0.4/000PEAS 0.01,8 0. galMO. GEV. IN/ 41 0494. 0.4436ST NU. ay. I N-11 a 0.1406Pie IAN 04101 0J/Ot/
PART II
TEACHER CHARACTERISTICS QUESTIONNAIRE
ITEM ANALYSIS
1. What is your sex? Male
QUESTION 1
SCORE INTERVALS
Female
-GRADE 2
F PCT CF
-GRADE 4 -GRADE. 6 '4-
F PCT CF P -8Lw F PCT CF P -8LW
1,000 0.3 0.5 58.2 100.0 14.6 32.9 5.8 10.6 54.3 100.02.000 57.9 99.5 57.9 99.5 29.7 67.1
_Ai4,3 .1900029.7 67.1 46.6 89.4 46.6 89.4
CASESPROCESSKO_ 58.1673 44.25469 54.3369NO. BLANK DATA 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 2.0000MAXIDPMVAJUE 2.0000 10268950_=SUM OF SCORES = 116.0278 73.9658 200.0166SUN SQD. SCORES 231.7412 133.3787 1.8937.MEAN 1.9947 166713 04000,
DEV« iN) 0.0716 0.4696 0.3109STAID, DEV. (N-1) = 0.0722 0.4750 1.9405MEDIAN 1.9973 1.7550
SCURE INTERVAL.; F PC1 CF P -8LW F PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P -8LW
1.000 3 0.5 600 I f t 0 I
2.000 597
_LASES PROCESSED
99.5 597 99.5 503
Edo
89.8 503 89.8 274
560
64.6 274 64.6
424Nu. BLANK DATA 1. 1,0000 1MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 2.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 1063.0000 2.0.000SUM OF SCORES 1197.0000 2069.Q000 698.0.000SUM SQD. SCORES 2391.0000 1.6962 1246.0,00
_MEAN 1.9950 0.13024 1.6462iTND. OE V. (N) 0,0705 0.3026 0.4761
DEV. (N-1) 0.0706 1.9433 0.4767etD1AN 1.9975 1.72L1
How many years of teaching experience (public andschool year, have you had?
QUESTION 2
One year or less
More than 1 year but
At least 3 years but
At least 6 years but
At least 10 years but
Twenty years or more
less than 3 years
less than 6 years
less than 10 years
less than 20 years
nonpublic), including this
Gs*SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CI P -8LW F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-BLit
_1.000 33 8.8 801 100.0 46 8.2 560 100.0 40 43.4 425 100-02.000 56 9.3 548 91.2 60 10:7 514 91.8 61 =14:4' 385 90.63.000 114 19.0 492 81.9 113 2002 454 81:1 79. -18:6' .324 76.2
_4.000 79 13.1 378 62.9 95 17.0 341 60.9 73 17.2 245 57.65.000 170 28.3 299 49.8 142 25.4 246 43.9 98 23.1 172 40.56.000 129 21.5 129 21.5 104 18.6 104 18.6 74 17.4 74 17.4
CASES PROCESSED 601 560. 425MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 6.0000 6.0000 6-0000SUM OF SCORES 2447.0000 2219.0000 1625.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 11461.0000 10117.0000 7277.0000MEAN 4.0715 3.9e25 1..11245STNO. DEV. IN) = 1.5787 144347 1:5021STNO. DEV. 1N-1$ = 1.5800 1.4391 ! 41-,01$40
MEDIAN' 4.4810
2. How many years of teaching experience (public and nonpublic), including thisschool year, ;Ave you had?
QUEST ION 2
One year or less
More than 1 year but
At least 3 years but
At least 6 years but
At least 10 years but
Twenty years or more
less than 3 years
less than 6 years
less than 10 years
less than 20 years
SCORE INTERVALS F
1.000 5.02.000 4.93.000 10.94.000 7.4_5.000 17.26.000 12.8
-GRADE 2 -GRADE 4 -GRADE 6
PCT CF P-BL W F PCT CF P81.iI F PCT CF
eol fi.L 100.0 4.5 803 54.3 loo...o... 44.4 9:9 44.3 100.08.5 53.2 91.3 5.5 10.0 - 49.8 91.1 S .3 ; 12.0 . 40.0 90.1
18.7 48.3 82.9 10.5 19.2 44.4 81.6 7.5 : 16.9 34.6 713.112..7 37 .464:281431.5.142131.9;62.44..47444--164/6 _71.1 _6.1.229.6 30.0 51.5 13.7 2502 25.6 47.2 10.8 24.3 19.8 44.621.9 12.8 21.9 12.0 22.0 12.0 22.0 9.0 20.3 9.0 20.3
CASES PROCESSEDNINIPILIN VALUEMAXI WI._VALVE
58.25111.0000
54.33691.00006.0000
239.9444 220.0330SUM OF SCORESSUP SQL:). SCORES 1131.7502 1025.3430PLAN_ 4.0494
1.5689 1..5724STND. DEV. INISTND. DEV. iN-1) 1.5826 1 o5.1170.14EVIAN _4.550 4. 3/51 .
44.3001 4419,1*.6.441111).'
174.8181804,0657
3. How many years, including this school year, have you taught in this school?
QUESTION 3
D
One year or less
More than 1 year but
At least 3 years but
At least 6 years but
less
less
less
than
than
than
3 years
6 years
10 years
At least 10 years but less than 20 years
0 Twenty years or more
Snide. Greide, 4 ervaacioSCORE 11-11-:R VAL S PCT CF P-BLit F PCT OF P-81.14 F PCT CF P--BLM
1.000 108 18.0 601 100.0 104 18.6_ 56_0 1000_0 103 24:2 . 425 100-02.000 110 18.3 493 82.0 123 22.0 . 456 81.4 87 20.5 32275.83.0004.000
166al
27.6 383217
63.736.1
14794
26.216.8
333186
59.5 109_15.2 __Ika_AAJL___
25.6 235 55.312611-29.6
5.000_11,5_
18.5 136 22.6 12.9 66 15.5111 76 13.6 92 16.4 556.000 25 4.2 25 4.2 16 2.9 16 2.9 11 2.6 11 2.6
CASES PROCESSED = 601MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXINUN,WALUE = 6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1855.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 7013.0000MEAN = 3.0865STND. DEV. (N) = 1.4636STMO. DEV. IN-11 = 1.4649MEDIAN 2.9970
V
5601440006.41000
1643.00005899.0000
2.93391:38781.311802:8625
-42514400-itaN8dIL
1185.00804163.4800
2.182236.LA233
_2,./A64
3. How many years, including this school year, have you taught in this school?
QUESTION 3
One year or less
0 More than 1 year but less than 3 years
0 Az least 3 years but less than 6 years
0 At least 6 years but less than 10 yer.rs
0 At least 10 years but less than 20 years
0 Twenty years or more
*GRADE 2 .4140E
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8L W F PCT
1.000 10.2 17.6 58.3 100.0 9.82.000 10.3 17.6 48.0 82.4 11 .33.000 15.7 27.0 37.8 64.8 14.54.000 8.1 14.0 22.1 37.9 9.05.000 11.2 19.3 13.9 23.9 7.96.000 2.7 4.7 2.7 4.6 1.8
18.020.926.716.614.53.4
41.4.1W7*
CF p-st.w F PCT
*4 3 100.8 _10_.5 23.7-
44.6 11100 8.8 , 19033.2 6142 ' 10.8 241867 34.5 7.1 14.0 :
9.7 11.9 5.4 12.31.8 3.4 1.7 3.8
CF P*8L W
4414 109.013.8 ,'illti.3
Z, AiS4514:111 42417.1 16.11.7 3.8
CASES PROCESSED " 58.2511 54.3369* , 44.3406.MI M 1 MUM VALUE 4 1.0000 : 1441000 . . 14016010MAXIMUM VALUE = 6.0000 ti,: 6666 6e0000SUN OF SCORES = 182.7558 162.4122 126. 3269SUM SQ0 SCORES = 700.8149 592. 8425 453.7708MEAN = 3.1374 20090 2i POSTN.). DEV. IN/ = 1.4791 144409.. . 1.4550STND. DEV. I N-1 / = 1.4920 iiiiiract 1'144916
_NED IAN = 3.0501 2Atiiit 2.7665
4. What type of teaching certification do you have?
No certificate
Temporary, provisional, or emergency certification
11:3 Regular certification
QUESTION 4
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT
Grids Grade 4CF P-.SLIT F PCT CF P-BLN F PCT OF P-8L W
1.000 0.1 4.1_ .57.9 100.0 Q,3 0.6 64.2 100.0 0.0 0.0 44.3 100.02.000 9.1 15.7 57.8 99.9 8.3 15.4 53.0 99.4 5.3 12.1 44.3 100.03.000 48.7 84.1 48.7 84.1 45.5 84.0 45.5 84.0 39.0 87.9 39.0 87.9
CASES' PROCESSED = 57.9325 54.1532 44.3406NO. BLANK/ DATA = 4.0000 2.0000 2.0000MINIMUM ALUE =
.. --istACM__ 1.0000 3.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.0000 3.0000 127.6626SUM OF SCORES = 164.5245 '153.4138 372.3552.$V$ SQ00 SCORES = 435.1729_ .443.0/1.54 2.4796MEAN = 2.8399 2.8341 0.3249SIND. DEVe IN) = 0.3701 0.3875 0.3286
_51ND. 0EY. IN-1) = 093733 0.3911 2.9314MEOIAN = 209056 2.9047
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT . CF PA3LW F PCT CF
1.000 1 0.2 SS" 100-0 4 0.7 Ssa 0 o.a 425 100.02.000 100 16.8 596 99.8 87 15.6 554 99.3 57 13.4 425 100.03.000 496 83.1 496 83.1 467 83.7 467 03.7 368 86.6 368 86.6
CASES PRCCESSE0 = 597 558 425NO. BLANK DATA = 4 2 2.0000IIBILWA_MALUE = 1.0000 1-nrinn 1-non0MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.0000 3.0000 1218.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1689.0000 15790,0000 3540.0000SUM Sjaa,_5CURES = 41165.:01M0 :4555.2280 2-2659MEAN = 2.8291 2.8297 03408STNO. DEV. (NI = 0.3808 0.3945 0.3412SIND. DEVA_IN-Lii = 0.3811 0.3948 2.4226MEDIAN 2.8982 2.9026
5. What is the highest earned college degree you hold? (Do not report honorary degrees.)
No degree
A degree or diploma based on less than 4 years of work
A bachelor's degree
A master's degree
A doctor's degree (EdD, PhD, etc.)
QUESTION 5
SCORE INTERVALS
GM& Gran 4 OreatbF PC' CF P-BLW F PCT CF F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 8 1.3 601 100.0 6 1.1 559 100.0 4 .0.61 425 1.00,0
2.000 7 1.2 593 98.7 9 1.6 553 98.9 6 iO4 421 99.13.000 480 79.9 586 97.5 430 76.9 544 97.3 305 71.8 415 97.64.000 106 17.6 17.6 113 20.2 114 2=4 110 25;03 Ale _25.9_5.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.2 1 0,2 0 0.0 0 0.0
CASES PROCESS1D 601- 559 .425MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0.000 1 -1640000.MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 1.0400 . - .440460-SUM OF SCORES = 1866.0000 5.11i100 4.411.apaa.SUM AD. SCORES = 6052.0000 1771.0000 4536.0000MEAN 3.1381 5745.0000 3.2259STND. OEV. (NJ = 0.4714 3.1682 0.5055SIND. DEV. IN-II 004416 0.4900 0.5101MEDIAN 3.0948 0.4904 3.1639
3.1151
5. What is the highest earned college degree you hold? (Do not report honorary degrees.)
No degree
O A degree or diploma based on less than 4 years of work
O A bachelor's degree
0 A master's degree
A doctor's degree (EdD, PhD, etc.)
QUESTION 5
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.0005.000
Grode Gnat 4-F PCT CF F PCT CF P81.1d F PCT CF PqiLM
0.7 1.2 58.3. 100+0 Oa ? 1.3 54.3 100.0 0.4 -0_a9 44.3 100.0, 1.4 2.4 57.5 98.6 14.6 .:160 51.6 98.7 0:6 )1.4 44-441194.147.5 81.5 5601 96.4 4149 '7T.2 51,;9 95,7 33+1 74..1 4 344V1:40 To 8
807 14.9 8.7 444.9 10 sie 18.4 10.1 .18.5 '10.2 23.1 Li1a2 "23.10.0 .0.0 .41.0 *: -O:0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 .0.0 -0.0 -0.0
PROCESsE0 =CASES _ 58.251/ 54..2601. 44.3404MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =
1.00004.0000
180.6295
1.0000-1.0000
1.6009:::4.111440-. , - -
SUM Sal). SCORES =MEAN =STNO. plEV. (NI =-iiio. 5i ii. ii.11) =MEDIAN =
572.39063.10090.4592
169.9169545.92073.14I5
464.73543.20040.4664
0.46313.0692
-0.=50*70.;50041:0923
c0Alf10.13./1106.
6. Haveyou had any special training in the diagnosis and treatment ofreading problems?
Dyes
QUESTION 6
ED No
Cl atit t Grade.4 Grata 4SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM 'CP SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTNS. DEW. 4N)STND. DE V. 4 N1 IMEDIAN
F PCT CF P-431.ti
34.3 59.8 57.3 100.0 29.023.0 40.2 23.0 40.2 25.3
57.32357.00001.00002.0000
80.3646126.4394
1040190.49020049451.3359
PCT CF F PCT CF
53.4 54.2 100.0 22.5 51.0 4401 100,.Q46.6 25.3 - 46006 21.6 49.0 21.6 . 49= 0
54«2352 440:068721.0000 2.00001100000 .0000
2.0000 2.0000_79. 65.663.;41919 Q its
0.4987 0.49980.5034 0.50561. 356 1.41102
SCORE 1 NT ERVALS PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF F PCT CF
I i I
2.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATARININUN VALUEMAXI MUM VALUESUM OF .SCORESSUN SOD. SCORES
STND. UEV. (N) =I
STNO. DEV. 4N1/ =
243 40.9 243
59471.00002.0000
837«0000132300900 -
0.49170.4921
40.9 211 49.9
423
211 49.9 269 48.2
21.0000
:484hielig41IMAM°0.10000.5006
S 5821.00002.0.000
.827 .0000..
.410*(1000:.i
0.45570 5 00 I.
6. Have you had any special training in the diagnosis and treatment ofreading problems?
0 Yes No
a. If Yes, at what academic level was the training?
QUESTION 6A
0 Undergraduate
0 Graduate
0 Inservice
U On thejob
0 Other (specify)
fir. gait/A.-6
SCORE INTERVALS F PCI CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
IASISLOL___ 11 264 100.0 74 33.0 224 100.D 57 33.9 168 100.02.000 143
_23-754.2 191 72.3 110 49.1 150. 67.0 83 49.4 111. 66.1
3.000 40 15.2 48 18.2 29 12.9 40 17.09 22 13.1 28 16.74.000 2 0.8 8 3.0 S 4.0 11 4.9 4 2.4 ___6 3.65.000 6 2.3 6 2.3 2 0.9 2 0.9 Z 1.2 2 1.2
usis PROCESSED = 264 224 168NO. BLANK DATA = 337 336 257MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000. 1.0400MALI MUM VALUE = 5 a40V:i5iiiiteD5ALIIi1ii0______SUM OF SCORES = 17.0000 427.0000 315.0000SLR SOO. SCORES = 1187.0000 969.0000 701.0000MEAN = 1.9563 1.903 "VPSUE). OEV. (NI 0.8i31
'*OS , 1:04106STNO. ()EV. IN-I) = 0.6141 440AW: 11.4430,MEDIAN = 1.9126 .1:11454' 1.4251_
7. Are most of your students of the same racial or national origin as you?
Yes
WiSIION 7
CI No
Grade a . 4SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.000
46.911.0
CF P-8LW
81.0 57.9 100.0
F
435PCT CF P-8114
8_0.6 53.9 100.035.7
F
8.2
PCT CE P -8LW
61.4 12A200.10219.0 11.0 19.0 10.5 19.4 10.5 19.4 18.6 8.2 18.6
CASES PROCESSED = 57.8781 53.9138 43.8545NO. BLANK DATA = 4.0000 4.0000 3.0000MINIMUM VALUE = t.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 2.0000 2.0000 2 .0000SUM OF SCORES 66.6856 64.4135 52.0272SUM SOD. SCORES = 90.8933 85.3664 68.3678MEAN_ = 1.1943 A.1/64.1.1902
0.3923 0.3955 0.3893STNO. DEV. (N)STNO. DEV. = 0.3957 0.3952 0.3938IMAWM 1.1145
SCORE INTERVALS F KT CF F-8LW F PCT CF F PCT CF P.BLW
1.000 477 60.0 596 100.0 436 7e.6 555 100.Q.. 448 E0.1 422 100.02.000 119 20.0 119 20.0 119 21.4 119 21.4 84 19.9- 84, 19.9
CASES PROCESSED = 596 SSS 422NO. BLANK DATA = 5 5 3MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.11000MAXIMUM VALUE = _2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES = 715.0000 67440440, 506.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 953.0000 912443000 674.0000-MEAN 1.1997 1.:2tA4 111441SU°. DEW. (NI - 0.3997 0.4104 0.3993STNO. DEV. (N-1) = 0.4001 0.4108 0.3998KELIIAN 1.1247 1.1365 1-1241
8. Were you assigned to or did you choose the school in which you are teaching?
QUESTION 8
SCORE
El Was assigned to school
INTERVALS
_1.0_1102.000
SARA_PRXES.E.D_ =NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUEMAXI MUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCOR ESMEAN
STND. DE V. 11.4e.1 =MEDIAN
PCT
Gragit16
Chose school
Cr P -BLW F PCT CF 13-.3L W F PCT CF P-81-$i
29.5 51.2 57.7 1Q0.0 28.1 53,1 _54.0__100.a2_3.5 5306213.2 48.8 28.2 48.8 25.3 46.9 25.3 46.9 20.4 46.4 20.4 46.4
.57.66785.00001.0000
.29.9310CL85.8319
142.15271.48840.49970.50411.4771
54.01554.00001.00002.0000
79.3322129.9588
1.46870.49890.50361.4409
4355634.00001.00002.0000
64.2248104.9568
1.46440.45860.50441.4334
SCORE INTERVALS F
1.000 301
FCT CF P -BLW
50.5 596 100.0
F PCT CF P-801 F
299 514.8 556 100.0 2A4
PCT CF P-81,A1
55-6 421 1002.000
CASES PROCESSED
295
=
49.5 295 49.5
596
257 46.2 257 46.2 187556
44.4 187 44.4421
NO. BLANK DATA = 3 4.MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0_000 2.0.000 2-0000SUM OF SCORES = 891.0000 41340000 608.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1481.41000 ' 13274000 982.0000MEAN 1.4950 1-42.2 10.4442SIND. DE V. IN) 0.5000 0.4586 0.4969STNO. DE V. IN-1) = 0.5004 0.4990 0.49758EDIAN 1.4_900 1.4258 1.3556
9. Were you assigned to or did you choose to teach the class you are teachingthis year?
Was assigned to class
QUESTION 9
SCORE INNTERVALS
Gi-ark
F PCT
ElChose class
CF P-BLW F
Grade 4PCT C F P- BL W F PCT CF P- BL
__Lek0_10 37.3 85.2 57.2 400.0 34.1 63.1 54.0 100.0 28.7 65.1 44.1 I m0- 0_2.000 19.9 34.8 L9.9 34.8 19.9 36.9 19.9 36.9 15.4 34.9 15.4 34.9
___CASEPROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
= 57.2289 54.0230 44.12891.000011.0000 4.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 14.0000 1.0000YALALE = 2.0000 2.0000
SUM OF SCORES Ix
. _2.1/000.77.1667 73.9499 59.5289
SUM SOD. SCORES = 117.0348 113.8370 90.3240MUM = 1:3694 1.3490_ _
STND. DE V. (N) =..._1*34134
0.4763 0.4825 0.4765STNO. DEW. (N-1) 0.4805 0.4870 0.4820
1.2672 )0111Z2-2.1 - 1.2679SCORE INTERVALS
1._000
F PCT CF P-EILW F PCT CF P-61.14 F PCT CF P-BLW
381_64.7 _58.-9_10_11:0_35_4_63.3____556__Lika.a_z_a_4_62_,,_0_42_4_2,016_0_208 35.3 206 35.3 202 36.3 202 36.3 140 33.0 140 33.0
589
2.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BL ANK OAT A 12 4 1MINI NUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
__pima MUM VALUE 2.0000 2:0000 2_nnnnSUM OF SCORES 797.0000 758.0000 564.0000SUM SQU. SCORES 1213.0000 1162.0000 844.0000MEAN 1.-1_531 1.3633 131112UM). DEW. (N) 0.4775 0.4810 0.4703STND DE V. (N-11 0.47E4 0.4814 0.4708MEDIAN 1.2730 1.2853 1.24E5
10. Compared with other elementary schools in your district or community, how
satisfied are you with respect to the following things about your school?
0 Physical facilities(buildings, etc.)
QUESTION 10 PART A
Highly Moderately Moderately
Satisfies. Satisfied Dissatisfied
Grade 2.
HighlyDissatisfied
Grack A Gra* 6SCORE INTERVALS PCT GF 15-8LIPI PCT CF P*BLW F PCT CF P-8LW
1.000 19.4 33.4 58.0 100.0 ;8.3 33.9 54.1 100.0 12.5 28.3 44.3 1 00. 02.000 27.7 47.7 38.6 66.6 25.6 47.3 11508 66.1 21 48 41162.>:.-- 3148 1.73.000 8.6 14.8 10.9 18.8 8.1 15.1 10.2 18.8 7.3 .; 1.66- 4 10.0- 22.54.000 2.3 4.1 2.3 4,1_2, 3fte---2.0 112e6 5tt92e6__-591
CASES PROCESSED = SI .9534 54.1194 44.2 145NO. M. ANA DATA = 3.0000 2. 0000 1.0 000MI NI MUM VALUE Al 1.0000 1.0000 ' 1.0000MAXI MUM VALUE At - 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000
QF SCORES 2: 008L 102.1190 88.6563_WASUN SQO. SCORES
.409,244. 7481 226.6783 207.9052
MEAN 1 .8948 1.8869 2.0024STN O. 0EV 0.7956 0.7919 o442.83.
SIND. 0E%. IN-11 0.8026 0.7993 0.8378MEDIAN 1.8471 1.8404 1.4041-1
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P- BLit F PC7 CF P-8LW PCT CF
. _
2. 000195 189 33.5 558 100.0 126 29.7
49.1424298
100.070.3
_ _32.0290 48.6
-402 67.3 263 474 369 66.1 208
3.000 88 14.7 112 18.8 85 15.2 106 19.0 64 15.1 90 21.2.24 4.0 _24 _4_00 3.8 21 3.8 26 6.1 26 6.1
CASES PRIX ESS EC) 54;7 55d 424NO. ESL ANK 0A_TA 4_ 2 1RINI NUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0,000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0 .000 4.0000 4.000SUN OF SCORES 1135.0000 1054.0000 gaa.nanoSUM WO. SCORES 2531. 0000 2342.0000 1950.0000SEAN 1.9012 1.8889 1.9764SINU. OE V 4N = 0.7906 0.7932 0.8324STNO . 0E1/. 4N-11 = 04.7913 0.7940 0.83B4MEDIAN = 1.8569 1.8422 1.9135
10. Compared with other elementary schools in your district or community, how
satisfied are you with respect to the following things about your school?
Whysical facilities(buildings, etc.)
t8) Faculty (teadhers)
QUESTION IC PART 8
SCORE I NI ERVALS
1«000_ 35.9.2.000 19.93.000 2.1
_ 0.1
CASES PROCESSED.___K_ANK DATA
MINIMUM VALUEMAXI NUM VALUESUM OF SORE SSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTISP. 4.11
STND. DE V. (N -I) =MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATAMINI MUM VALUE =MAXI MUM VALUE =
F
Highly Moderately ModeratelySatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied
HighlyDisiatisfied
E:]
Grade2. Oftute. . .
PCT CF P814,1 °CT
Grade.
6 1. .9_ 58.0 .10.Q.0 28.7 53.034.3 22.1 384 22.3 41.1
'of, 2.2 3.8 3.0 5.6. 0.2._ ._4,1_,.. 0. 2___0:104. 3
58.0329
1.00004.0000
.82.4554 .
136 .28221.4215
_ _
0.57741.3083
35621525_2
CF P81-W
54.125.43.20.1
100.047.0
5.90.2_
F
22.5
PCT
50.0
CF P-131 W
44.3 100.019.8 44.6 21.8 49.21:5 3.4 2.0 4.60.5 1.2 0.5 Ica
54.09 TO 44.261T3.00001.0000 - 1.00004. 0000 4.0000
82.8584 68.6266147.2823
1.51317123.5537
1.55050.6138 0.62250.6154. 0.62961.4438 I .4-849,
KT
39.5CF P-8LM PCT CF P-BLW F PCT W
598 100. 036.0 242
_29952.7553_11111.0_21125a,542414111.p_40.5 233 41.8 258rii46.3 184-- 43.4 208 49.1
4.2 27 4.5 23 4.1. .. 25_;:1::4.5 18 4.2 24 5.70.3 2 0.3 2 0.4 2 2 e 1.4 6 1.4_
5913 5573
4241
SUM SOD. SCORESMEANSIND. C.:EV et/SIND. DEv. (1.11) =ME0 IAN
1.0.000 impopo4.0000 4.0009:'
869.0_000 ;6162.ii110011...
1473. 0000 1470.0000 1210.00001.4532 1.5117 1.5613
0.59_50 ©.64c4_009290.59.34 0.5 955 0.64581.3399 1.4314 1.4815
10. Compared with other elementary schools in your district or community, how
satisfied are you with respect to the following things about your school?
Highly Moderately Moderately Highly
Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied
OQI Physical facilities(buildings, etc.)
WFaculty (teachers)
tDAbilitY of student body
QUESTION 10 PART C
SCORE INTERVALS-
. le°99.-2.0003.000
______4.000________..,..
CASES PR OCESSEf4NO. ALARA DATA =MI NI MUM VALUE!TAXI NUM VALUE =SRO 0F SCORE-_S_ _= .
SUM SQD. SCORES =MEANSIND. DEV. CNI =SING. DEV. 1141 =MEDIAN
-- SCORE INT EP VALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. IL ANK DATA
==
-MINI I* VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESWI OF SCORES
===
--- SUM SQD. SCORESMEANSTNO. DEV. (N) =
DEV. 1N-11 =MEDIAN
U aa a 0a
Cseute.4 Gale ip
F PCT CF P.-8LW F PCI CF P-BLW F PCI CF P -BLh
14.6 25.3 100.0 10.8 20.0 54.2 100.Q 8.1 18.2_- 44.3 100. C
34.4 59.6_57.6
43.1 74.7 34.5 63.7 43.3 80.0 26.0 58.8 36.2 81.E7.2 12.5 8.7 15,1 6.7 "12.4 8.8 16.3 9.1 20.6 10.2 23.01.5 2.6 ____1.5 2.b 2e1 3.8 2.1 3.6 1.0 2.4 .1.0
57,6353 54.1722 44.2745Z.9_000 2.0000 1.0000
. .
1.0000 1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000 44800
110.8779 108.4085 -91:7081240.6849 242.8085 211. 0907
1.9238 2.0012 2.07140.6892 0.6910 0.65080.6953 0.6274 0.69181.9143 1.9707 2.0406
F PCT CF F CF P8LW F PCT CF
142 23.c 593 100.0 74 17.5 424 100-0 112 20-3 556 100.0351 59.2 451 76.1 255 60.1 350 .:r:42.5 i 347. 62.4 443 79.783 14.0 100 16.9 as MO 9 -22.4 75 ` 13.5 96.18317 2.9 17 2.9 in .2..4 10 2.4 21 3.8 21 . -3.8
5 53
a424
15564
1.0000 4°9" 1.00004.0000 '440070 4.0000
1161. 0000 Aruammo 1116. 000D2565. 0000 2019.0000 2512.0000
1.9578 2.0731 2.00720A017_ 0.6E12 0.69940.7022 0.6820 0.7.0001.9402 2.0412 1.9755
10. Compared with other elementary schools in your district or community, how
satisfied are you with respect to the following things about your school?
Highly Moderately Moderately Highly
Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied
(p) Attitudes of student body
() Administration
404 Overall philosophy of
V..) education
QUESTION 10 PART 0
SCORE INTERVALS
Grade?) Onute.4.F CF P-11-14 F PCT CF
._19000 _12:4_2/.5_2.000 31.1 53.73.000 11.5 20.0
Grade.F PCT CF P-8L W
. _5100 I09 1145.4 78.5 29.9 55.2 45.1 83.2 22.5 51.0 3709 86.014.4 24.8 12.5 23.1 15.2 28.0 11.9 26.9 15.4 35.0
__2.0.____ 4 0- _. _2R 4.9 2.7 4.9 Z16 4.9 3.5 Ss 0 3s_5 8.0
CASES PROCESSED = 57.8480BLABILOATA.
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000144XIMUM VALUE = 4.0000
SUM_Qf WORE s = _ X29_4; 4459_SUM SQO. SCORE S = 285.6929MEAN 2.0825STNO. DEV... Al N.) =STNO. DIV. IN-4 I = 0.7827OE 01 AN 2.0312
54.21062.00001.00004.0000
117.1340283.9)414
2.16070.75430.76142.11012
44.02353.00001.00004.0000
100:8010259023E3
2.28570.803704;8129202052
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT
I I 9 I f
2.0003.0004 I I I
317126
53.321.2
CASES PROCESS EDNO. ANK CAT A =
595_01..
MI NI MUM VALUt - 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1263.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 3049. 0000MEAN 2.1227ST NO. DEV._IN) .7_8_65SIND. DEW. (N-1; = 0.7871MEDIAN 2.0631
CF P-131 W F PCT C F P-8LW F PCT CF P-81 W
476 80.0 304 54.6159 26.7 126 22.6
464 83.3 215 50.9160 - 28.7 118 28.0
366 86.7151 35.833 7.8
557a1.110004.0000
1218.008102987.0000
2.18130. 7.7750.77822.1102
422
14400044000
97211110120
2506. 00002.3033_0.-/S570.79662.2209
10. Compared with other elementary schools in your district or community, how
satisfied are you with respect to the following things about your school?
Highly Moderately Moderately HighlySatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied
(p)Attitudes of student body
Admimis trati 012
Overall philosophy of
tr i education
QUESTION 10 PART E
Give1 Gilgit4 4 araitioSCORE I NT E RV ALS- F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-EL W
1,000 27.8, 57.7. 100.0 23.0 42.6 53.9 100.0 19.2 43.6 44.1 1a0. 02.000 22.8
_44.339.5 29.8 51.7 25.1 46,6 30.9 57.4 17.6 40.5 24.9 56.4
3.000 5.5 9.5 7.1 12.3 5.4 10.1 5.8 10.8 5.0" 11.4 -7.0 16.04.90_8__ . 1.6 . 2913 lip_k 2a 0,A_ .0.8 0.4 0.8' 2.0 4.5 2.0 4.5.
CASES PROCESSED =DATA
57.6876 53.86766.001/0
44.07602:0000
0 NI MUM VALUE. .6.090111.0000 1.0000 1.0000
MAX1 HUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 40000SUP,. SCORE S. = 96.2067 91.0040 77%9882SUM SQD. SCORE S =- 193.7909 178.5493 167. 8723MEAN 166677 1.6894 1.7684SIND. OEV. N 0_.J40 0.6786 0.8234STMD. DE V. IN-li =
_
0.7670 O. 6850 0:8329MEDIAN 1.5437 1.6581 1.6590 .
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF
I.000 287 48.4 593 10.0 240 43.4 553 100.0, isi 42.8 423 100.02.000 227 3 6.3 306 51.6 249 45.0 313 56.6 176 4106 442 - 57.23.000 59 9.9 79 13.3 58 10.5 64 11.6 49 11.6 -'66 15.64.000 20 3..4._. ______20 3.46 1a() 1.1..7 _40017441_
CASES PROCESSEDKG. BL ANK DA TA
=-
593A.
5537
423
MI NI NUM VALUE go 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000.MAX 1 NUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUN OF SCORES = _498.01000936&011PLL_248A0000SUM SQL. SCORES = 2046.0000 1854.0000 1598.0000NE AN 1.6830 1.6926 1.7683SIM). DE VA__ LW_ -,-- 0.7E60 0.6984 0.8067ST NO. DE V.MEDIAN
_
0.78671.5419
0.69901.64e6
oa0771.6733
10. Compared with other elementary schools in your district or community, howsatisfied are you with respect to the following things about your school?
Highly Moderately Moderately HighlyDissatisfied Dissatisfied
WAttitudes of student body
() Admirals t rat ion
dOvertopnhilosophy of
QUESTION 10 PART F
Satisfied Satisfied
0
Gradzi.. Go& 4 Ciatte coSCORE INTERVALS F PCT Cf PCT Cf P'..8 LW F PCT CF N.8L.
1.000 24.5 42.5_ 57.6 100.0 AI* I I S I I I
2.000 28.1 48.7 33.1 57.5 28.3 52.6 34.0 63.2 22.1 50 29.7 67.43.000 4.5 7.8 561 8.8 4.7 8.8 507 10.6 6.3 14.63 71,6 17.240000 0.6 1.0 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.3 2.9 11.3 2.9
CASES PROCESSED =M,_.LANK . DATA . =
57.6072QOM
53.72326.0000
44. 07842.0000
1.0000 1.0000MINI MUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXI MUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 400000SUPL.DE-SCORES._- j5 . 96 o 3722 94.4321 32 e 6456
191.3098 179.9767SUM SQO. SCORES = 186 .2742MEAN 1.6729 1.7578 1.875011119:__DEILILSHI QM 6 514. 0.6865 0.7534
0.6930 0.7621MD. UV. i'&1 0.6652MEOIAN 1.6543
- .
1.7616 1.8470
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P*81-1
1.J100 _235_11.6_2.000 304 51.3 358 60.4 290 5204 347 62.7 216 51.1 289 68.33.000 45 7.6 54 9.1 46 8.3 57- 10:3 60 14.2 73 17.34.000 9 1.5 9 1.5L ii 2.0 11 ka. O s1 3.I 33 3.1
CASES PROCESSED1+40. FLANK DATA
= 5538
5537
4232
MINI MUM VALUE 1.o000 1410010 1ataqoMAXI MUM VALUE 4.0000 4:4009 440640SUM OF SCORES 1014.0000 11682001_. Iiia:asaaSUM SOD. SCORES 2000.0000 1956.0000 1146. 0000MEAN 1.7059 1.7505 1.8865iThOe DEV. IN) = 0.66-99--- Q66877 00541ST NO. OE V. I = 0.6705. 0.6884 0.7550MEDIAN 1.7023 1.7431 1.85$8
10. Compared with other elementary schools in your district or community, howsatisfied are you with respect to the following things about your school?
Highly Moderately Moderately HighlySatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied
IN Physical facilities(buildings, etc.)
Opaculty (teachers) 0 00( c) Ability of student body
( }Attitudes of student body
(g) Administration
seA Overall philosophy of ryvri education E:3
Entin tivador Grade('SCORE INTERVALS F PLi CF P -8Lw F PCT CF FozitLw F PCT CF P-BLWUM, SCWAO
A.SLOiL7.0008.000
___31 5.6 585_10.0.&__a__41.._e__54.5__LOA21.___12__2.9__4.1.6_1.110...0_41 7.0 552 94.4 26 4.8 519 95.2 21 5.0 404 97.162 10.6 511 87.4 61 11.2 493 90.5 38 9.1 383 92.1
9,00Q 6___132.0--_____44-9_16-i2.32__Z9.WA__345_82.4.9-10.00011.00012.00013.00014.00015.00016.00017.00018.000/9.00020.00021.00022.00023.00024.000
o5 11.1 373 63.8 65 11.9 366 67.2 45 10.8 306 73.676 13.0 308 52.6 63 11.6 301 55.2 48 U.S 261 62.789 15.2 232 39.7 71 13.O 238 43.7 6A 16.3 213 51.242 7.2 143 24.4 70 12.8 167 30.6 42 10.1 145 34.937 6.3 101 17.3 37. 6.8 97 17.8 45 10.8 103 24.827 4.6 64 10.9 24 4.4 60 11.0 20 4.8 sa 13.918 3.1 37 6.3 16 2.9 36 6.6 12 2.9 38 9.16 1.0 19 3.2 7 1.3 20 3.7 12 2.9 26 6.38 1.4 13 2,2_ 7 1.3 13 2_4_____b 1 4 14 3..4_2 0.3 5 0.9 4 0.7 6 1.1 4 1.0 8 1 90 0.0 3 0.5 2 0.4 2 0.4 3 .0.7 -4 1.00 0.0 3 0,5 0 0.0 0 Ot 0 i 0.2 I' 0.21 0.2 3 0.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 0.2 2 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
0 0 0.0 0 0.0
CASES PROCESSED = 585NO. 8LANK DATA = 16MINIMUM VALUE = 6.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 24.0000SO6,(9602QAglixi14CFSCU"-RE0
545 416
SUM SOO. SCORES = 73503.0000MEAN 10.8188STND. 0EV. tNi = 2.9325STNO. DEV. 4N-1) = 2.9350MEDIM = 10.7039
6.000020.0000
7.0920.000011.04592.84912.851710.9524
6.0,00021.0000
59139.000011.55052.95762.9612
10. Compared with other elementary schools in your district or community, how
satisfied are you with respect to the following things about your school?
Highly Moderately Moderately Highly
Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied
(() Physical facilities(buildings, etc.)
WFaculty (teachers)
( C)Ability of student body
(p)Attitudes of student body
Wpdministration
ir4 Overall philosophy of
m education
V.EIRE` INTERVALSCTIMIL SCARS)
6.00070000
4.00010.00011.00012.00013.00014.00015.00016.00017.00018.00019.00020.00021.00022.00023.00024.000
a 0
tPCT
3'7 G.040
CF P-BLW F 'CT CF P-EILW F PCT
ers& bCF P-SLW
3.2 506 57.0 100.0 2.6 4.8 53.1 100.0 1 0 1 2 0 5 4340L100. 0,4.8 8.4 53.8 94.4 2.7 5.2 50.5 95.2 2.1 4.9, :' . i 42:3 ,...,17.56.8 11.8 49.0 86.0 5.6 1006 4708 90.0 4.5 144 -"Vig76 .9 12.1 42.3 74.1 4A1 11.6 . 42.1 79.4 4.0 92: .:. .: Willa 036.3 11.0 9.735.4 62.0 6.7 12.6 36.0 67.8 4.2 31.7 73.17.7 1305 29.1 51.0 5.6 1.008 29.3 55.2 4.4 10.2 27.5 63.58.0 14.0 21.3 37.4 7.1 13.3 23.5 44.3 8.4 19.3 23.1 53.34.1 7.3 13.3 23.4 7.2 13.5 16.5 31.0 4.7 10e8 14147: . .34.03.6 603 9.2 16.1 3.6 6.8 9.3 17445 4.4 10.2 'Lea =;23.22.5 4o4 5.6 9.8 2.4 4.5 5. 7 10.3 1.7 16 AL__ Sgifil.1-11./.0
1.6 249 3.1 5.5 1.5 2.8 3.3 6.2 1.3 2.9 3.9 9.10.5 009 1.5 206 0.8 1.5 1.8 3.4 1.3 3.0 2.7 6.2Q*7 1.7 0.6 1442 P.O. 1 .1-0....5.L102 11.04 3.10.1
.1.2---D02
_WI_0.3 0.5 0.3 0.6 9.4 0.7 0.3 0.6 414;9.: 2.0
0,0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 .001 0.1 0.1 0.2 046 AU* ? 1.3000 0.Q . 0.2 0.3 0.O .* 000. : .460 ..0.41,_ 0.3 0.8 : 043 0.80.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 . -0.0 0.0 000 .0440 -0.00.0 .0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 4:$.0 . -0.0 000 0.0 . -41.0 t:i. 0
0.1. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 .0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 .40 . -0.0
CASES PROCESSED 57 o 0 346 53.1107 43443625NO. BLANK OATA 14.0000 15.0000 9..00MINI NUM VALUE =I 6.0000 6.0000 6.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 24.0000 20.0000 21.0000SON OF SCORES = 608.0020 586. 0088 5oQit7842SUM SQ13. SCORES = 6949.4688 68045825 616141004ME AN 10.6602 11*0337 1 /44.56i7
ST NO* OEV.*49 2.8646 2.8078 2.9450STNO. DE V* I N-1 ) = 2.8901 2.8346 2.9803
I t 4.74741
11. -How responsive is the administration of your school to any requests youmight make for additional teaching materials or equipment?
D Highly responsive
D Moderately responsive
O Not at all responsive
QUESTION 11
SCORE INTERVALS
14JOOD.2.000
F
27 e t .
29.23.000 1.7
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATAESN. VAIJA. =MAXI MUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =
.
MEANSTND. DEV. (N) =SIND. KV. IN,-1)MEDIAN
St;ORE INTERVALS F
_..1,000 2842.000 2963.000 18
Grade 2, Gnade.4 Gracie 4PCT CF F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF
_4_6.3 58.0 100:S1_2541_47:4 54.2 1000 21.1 47.8 44.1. 100..050.3 30.9 53.3 27.0 49.8 28.5 52.6 20.9 4.7.4 23.1 52.23.0 1.7 3.0 1.5 2.8 . 1.5 2.8 2.1 4.8 2.1 4.8
58.01$i3..000010093.0000
90.6591
1.56260.55260.55741.5652
PCT
54.18472.00001.a0003.00008441944
147.20921055380.54980.55491.5523
CF P-8LW F PCT
41.5 598 100.04S.53.0
31418
52.53.0
27117
CF P-BLW F PCT
44.12872.00001.00003.0000
69.3263123.9951
1.57100.58460.59141.5473
CF P-BLW
48.63.0
28 '41:6*-- 3..0
201 47.5 220 52.019 4.5 19 4.5
CASES Pitt:LESSEE) 598NO. BLANK OATA = 3
UALUF I _noon.MINIMUMMAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 93040000
_SUM SOU.MEAN 1.5552STND. DEV. IN) 0.5542
DEV. (N-11 = 0.5547MEOIAN 1.5507
55821-acinn3.0000
863.0040
4232l_nnnn
.3.0000-66240000'
1.54660.55570.5cf.2
1.5332
1.56500.57930.58001.5423
12. For remedial or other help for one of your students?
Highly responsive
Moderately responsive
Not at all responsive
QUESTION 12
same INTERVALS
Grate 2. GPI webF PCT CF F".BLW F PCT CF 13.411LW F PCT CF P -BLW
40440 24.8_ 42.9 57.7 100.0 22.3 41.1 54o2 104o02.000 30.4 52.6 32.9 5701 29.9 55.1:. 31.9 501.93.000 2.5 4.4 2.5 4.4 2.0 3.7 2.0 3.7
CASES OROCESS EU 57.6843NO. BL ANK DATA 2: 60 0000
VALUE --: 1.0000_ _MaLRUMMAXI MUM VALUE = 3.0000SUM (F SCORES = 93.1469
- SUM SCA Qs. SPARE. _.- 169.15901.6148MEAN =
STND. DE V. (N) 0.57010EV_o_011.1_= _ 0.5751_57,40.
MEDIAN.-__
= 1.6339
18=3 41.5 44.1 100.022.9 52.0 25.8 58.52.9 6e5 2.9 6.5
54.1536 44.05602.0000 3.00001.0000 1.000034440 3.0000
88=0597 72.7077159.9421 135.73104
1.6261 1.65030.5554 0.59770.5606 0.60461.6049 1.6639
SCURE INTERVALS F PCI CF F PCT CF P..3LW
1.000 259 43.5 5S5 100=0 237 42o5 558 140o02.000 307 51.6 336 56.5 300 53.8 321 57.53.000 29 4.9 29 4.9 21 3.8 21 3.8
F PCT CF
16S 40.0 422 100.0224 5344 253 60.029 6.9 29 6.9
CASES PRCCESSEDNO. BLANK OATAMINIMUM VALUE
5956
55821.(1000
MAXI MUM VALUE 3.0400 300000SUM OF.SCORES 960.0000 900:0000SUM SOD. SCORES 1748.0000 16;6.4000MEAN 1.6134 1.6129STND. DEW. (N) 0.5785 0.5550
MEDIAN 1.6254 1.6400
.
4223i -42000
3.0000104.00001226.41a00___
1.66820.5993
1.6875
13. For changes in your curriculum?
El Highly responsiveEl Moderately responsive
0 Not at all responsive
QUESTION
SCORE INTERVALS
2.0003.000
21.732.43.8
Grade 2.
PGi
55.96.6
Gk GttlikCF P.-.8LW F PCT
57 :36.2 62.5
3.8 6.6
GASES PROGESSEO = 57.9011NO. 81. /INK DATA = 4. 0 000
= _ 1.0000_VALUEMAXIMS VALUE = 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 97.8916SUM SDD = .05.4603_5.08_ESMEAN 1.6907SIND DEV (NI = 0.5871_S1012.4 OE _...1.5.922MEDIAN 1.7234
SCORE INTERVALS
CF W F PCT CF .-P43LW
22.3 41.5 53.9 100.0 16.5 37.7 43.2_100.028.0
3.552.06.6
31.53.5
58.56.6
23.04.4
52.310.0
27.44.4
62.310.0
53.8904 43.6 8 594.0000 4.00001.000 1.00003.0000 3.0000
88.9880 . - 75.66181ik6.2697 ____ 148.0270
1.6513 1.72410.3988 006 3300.6045 0.64031.6643 1.7361
F PCT CF 1)81-ii F PC11 CF 1;81-y F PCT CF p-8L ;.;
1. ODD 223-316.11 557 100-02.000 337 56.4 37U 62.03.000 33 5.5 33 5.5
232 41.7 _554 100.0 173 41-1 A21 10.0.m.0292 52.5 -324 58.3 216 51.3 248 5805
32 5.8 ,Sa S.11 32 : 1.6 32 1 ivio
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
===
59741.0000
MAXI MUM VALUE = 3.0000SUM "OF" SCORE S 1000.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1872.0000MEAN 1.6750SIND. DEV t tr3 = 0.5744
_SIND. OE Vs ( N... 1 h = 0:5/49ME GI AN 1.7122
556 42141.0000_
4t-n000
3.0000912.0000 ,m4.000:
1.6403 1.66510.5 877 0.61216575 1.6 736
14. Do you believe there is a sound basis in educational policy for giving
compensatory programs to disadvantaged students at extra per pupil cost?
QUESTION 14
D0EDri
Definitely yes
Probably yes
am undecided
Probably no
Definitely noGt-wies. Gros:lel:1
SCORE INTERVAL'S
IsLOAO__.
F PCT
2704.__ _4_7_318._
CF P-q31. W F
5 707 10i/s_O_ 26.6
PCT
49 .1_
CF
54.2W
100.0_
F
19.7
PCT
44.6
CF P-31. W
44.3 L100.0_
30.1 52.2 17.5 32.4 27.6 50.9. 16.2 36.7 24.4' 55.42.000 20.2 35.0.3.000 7.3 12.6 9.9 17.2 8.1 15.0 10.0. 18.5 5.0, 1;p3 44.2 18.74.000 2.0 2.6 4.6 1.1 2.0 1.9 3.5 2.4 5.3 3.3 '.7.45.000
.3.50.6 1.1 0.6 1.1 0.8 1.5 0.8 1.5 0.9 2.1 0.9 2.1
CASES PROCESSED = 54.1666 44.0521M. SLAM DATA =
_57.7334_6.0000 2.0000 2.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 - 1.4181)0MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.O1SUM CIF SCORES 101.0642 94.4965 80.8622SUM SOD. SCORES 221.8489 207.6847 189.4330MEAN 1.7505 1.7446 1.8356STAID. DEV. IN) = 04,882/ 0:8892 4u9444STUD. DEV. = 0.8899 0.8975 0i91#9.MEDIAN _4.5625 1.5281
SCORE INTERVALS
1.000
F
284
PCT
4 7.7
CF 14.13LW
59.5 1_0=0
F
266_
PCT
47.7
CF P-BLit
558 100.0
F PCT
191 46.600 3545, na
A
CF
423226
7628
174.13Lbi
53.418.0
2.0003.0004.000
20280
33.913.4_10
311 52.3109 18.329____41
8 1.3
1858514
33.215.2
2.5292UM-22.
52.3.3.94-:.4s:469
5.000 S 1.3 8 1.4 8 1.4 9 2.1 9 2.1
.
CASES PROCES S 595 558 423NO. 8L ANK DATA 6 2 2MINI MUM VAL UE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
- MX1 MUM VALUE 5.0000 _SOMOOD 5.0.000.SUN OF SCORES 1052.0000 987.0000 762.0000Sul SQL). SCURES 2348.0000 2195.0000 1758.0000-MEAN 1.7681 1. 8014ST140. DE V. l NI = 0.9056 0.8972 0. 9544STNO. 0E9. (N1 I = 0.9064 0.8980. 0.9554
---
I_RAAA
15. Do you believe that compensatory
QUESTION 15
0 Definitely yes0 Probably yes
I am undecided
Probably no
Definitely no
-.SCORE INTERVALS
programs are generally worthwhile?
F PCT CF P-.81W F PC7 CF F PCT CF P -1/LW
42.8_ 56.8 57.7. 100.0 32.3 59.8 54.L 100.0 24.6 55.4 44.3 100.02.000 19.7 34.1 24.9 - 43.2 17.0 31.3 21.8 40.2 15.3 34.4 19.8 44.63.000 4.5 7.8 5.3 9.1 4.2 7.8 4.8 8.9 3.6 8.1 4.5 10.2
0 6 0.8 1.4 0.6 1.1. 0.6 Lel 0.8 1.9 0.9 2.15.000 0.1
__1.10.3 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.1 0.2 .0.1 0.2
CASE S_ERL1LESS.ED.NO. 01 ANK DATA =NI NI NUN VALUE =
-SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCONES =
_MEAN =STNO. DEV. (N) =-
5TNO. DEV. 1.61-4.1 =NED/ AN
SCORE INTERVALS
57=.487.6.00001.0000
. 0110.0_
88 .9 065165.7 782
1=5395.0.7 0750.71371.3802
F PCT CF
54.08983.00001.00004.0000
81.2576147. 6093
1.50230.68110.69361.i3264
44.340614)00005.0000
69.6598133.5412
1.37100.73730:74581.4029
F FCT CF 1).8LW F PCT CF P-8 LW
1.000 lon.0 224 52- 7_ 425100.11-2.000
.___.116564.15951110.10327201 33.8 261 43.9 183 32.9 232 ..i 10=7 ? 154 .36=2 201 47.3
3.000 50 8.4 60 , 1001 42 : 7.5 - 49 --A1=11, .47 8.7 47 11=14.00_0 8 Laa2.11132.4.._-5.000
__.1..3___ILD1sk72 0.3 2 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.2 1 0.2
CASES PROC 595 475ND. BLANK DATA 6 3 1. 0000RINI NUN VALUE
=1.0040s-ancio
'44000';'.4.A1160
5.00006134.nano
SUN OF SCORES 528. 0000 845.0000 1342.0000SUM SOO. SCORES 1766.0000 1547.0000 1.6094
___ &A N! /.3592 1.5171 0.7523STND. DEV. IN/ = 0.7318 0:6899 0.7542S7NO. DEV. IN-1/ = 0.7324 046905 1.4487
1.3907 1.3569
16. The following statements are all related to the academic capabilities ofdisadvantaged pupils. For each statement, indicate the degree to whichyou agree or disagree with the idea expressed.
QUESTION 16
SCOREINTEiVALS-
j60011.2.0003.0004.0005.000
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK OATA =MINIMUM VALUE =Aulgimum_yakug =SUM OF SCORES =
SUM SQ0. SCORES =MEANSTMD. OE V. IN) =STNS. DEV. INli =MEDIAN
a. With proper instruction they can learn about aswell as any other pupils.
PART A
6rade-2, Groff 4F PCT CF PBLN F PCT
1.2 57,9 100.0 0.7 1.313.0 22.5 56.7 97.9 1.6 214710.8 18.7 43.7 75.4 9.9 18;427.5 47.6 32.9 56.8 2641%48.65.3 9.2 5.3 9.2 5.4 10.0 5.4 10.0 3.9 8.9
0w10 0 HON0014 P WO W es P oo ss e) ctniie. pst
la 0 01.1 .1-I 1 1gcn 00 0 0 0 D
tvrtute 6CF F PCT CF P.15LR
53.8 100.0 0.8 1.7 44.2 100.053.0. 98.7 9.7 22.0 43.4 98.341:4 77.0 8.3 '1808 33.7 764,2'31.3 58.6 21:4 ,48.6 25.4 57.4
3.9 8.9
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.0005.000
57.67455.00001.0000.5.0000
196.3702723.9675_309A90.99831.00701.c6422 _
53.75677.0000.1.00005.6000
185.1002688.90943.44330.97930:91853,4770
2.00001 :0000 .
5.000015045245555.4824
3.40600.94080.99213.6525
F PCT CF P8LW F PCT
14 2.3 596 100.0 7 1.3
132 22.1 582 97.7 115 20.8115 19.3 450 75.5 96 1 17.4
46.5 335 56.2 274 49.558 5.7 58 9.7 61 11.0
CASES PROCESSED = 596NO. 8L.ANK DATA = 5
-MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 50_000SUM CF SCORES = 2021.0000SUM SOU. SCORES = 7459.0000MEAN = 3.3909STNO. 0EV. INI = 1.0083STNO. [AV. ti*.1) = 1.0091MECIAN
. . = 3.6336
CF PEILW F PCT CF 11-.81W
553 100.0 8 1.9546 98.7 98 23.2431' 77.9 71 14.8335 60.6 200 47.361 11.0 46 1.0.9
55371.00005.0000
1926.00007240.0000
3.48280.98090.98183.7135
473 100.0415 98.1317 7449246 58.246 10.9
42321.00005.00O0
1447.00005389.0000
3.42081.01681.02013.6/25_
b. No matter how good the instruction these pupilsreceive they will always score lower thanmiddle class children.
QUESTION 16 PART B
Great .GAILILL4 Gee {0
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8L W F PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF 13-81-W
1.000 ....a..L....1.1..5_ 58.0 100,0____itai-12- 54.0 100.0 4.9 11,0 44.1 '100.02.000 50.2 86.5 25.7 47.7 47.9 88.8 24.0 54.3 39.3 89.027.0 46.53.000 14.0 24.1 23.2 40.0 1146 21.4 22.2 % 4141 7. ; 17.9 15.3 34.7
15.5 10.8 ' 19.7 7.1' 16.1 7.4' 16.85.000
_ _9_0._0.2 0.4
__3A2_11_,AL--102--InD30.2 0.4 0.8 1.4 0.8 1.4 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.7
.Cm&S_ES _PROCESUU4.0600 2.0000NO. BLANK DATA = 3.0000
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.00011 1.0000VALUf = ___50_0110 5.6000 -salaam__JWAMUM
SUN OF SCORES = 135.4496140.5237 106.5041SUM SOD. SCORES = 390.7698 389.9429 293.5613
. KAN 2.5102 2.41100.9620STND. DEV. IN/ = 0.9194 0.9102
STNO DEV. (N-1I = 0.9274 0.0111 0.9207MEDIAN . 2..1110 . _2.2111A-
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P- 61W F PCIT CF P81-141 F PCT CF P -MA
1.000 79 13.2 597.10 006 72 1:i.9 5.5.6 100.0 ;5 12 7 4231=1.62.000 280 46.9 518 8 6.8 268 48.2 484 87.1212 50.1 365 86.33.000 140 238 3969.118 :214 216 38.8 80 18.9. 153 36.24.000 95 15.9 96 1 6.4 91 16.4 . 98 17.6 69 16.4 71 17...1
5.000 3 0.5 3 0.5 7 1.3 7 1.3 4 0.9 4 0.9
CASES PROCESS Sql 556 473_En
NO. BLANK DATA = 4 4 2MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1ouoqo . 161841180 -
MAXI /WM VALUE = 5.0000SUN OF SCORES - 1454.0000 1361. 0000 1018.0000SUN SOU. SCORES = 4054.0.000 3837.0000 2830.0000MEAN 2.4355 2.4478 2e_40_66_STND. OEV. IN/ = 0.9265 0.9535 0.9479SIND. UEV. = 0.9275. 0.9544 0.9490MEDIAN 839 2.2687 2.2241
c. These children do not want to learn.
QUESTION 16
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.0005.000
cAses PROCESSEDMD. M. MK DATA =IQ 111 MUM VALUE =
__INUILLWRAAVUESUN OF SCORES =-
SUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSTMO. OE V. INS =STMO. OE V. =MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
5.000
0 0 0 0 0
PART COral' 7., Gra& 4 Cytaae_b
F
19.6
PC7 CF LW F
33.8 58.0 100.0 18.8
PCT CF P13L W
34.6 54.2 100.0
F PCT CF P-OLW
16.5 37.3 44.2 100.031.64.41.6
54.5 38.4 66.2 28.97.6 6.8 11.7 4.92.7 2.4 4.1 0.8
5304. 35.4 '65.494.0 6.5 12.01.5 1.6 3.0
23.0 52.1 27.7 62.72.5 5,1 4.7 10.61.8 40 .2.24.9
0.8 1.4 0.8 1.4 0.8 1.5 0.8 1.5 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.9
58.0298 54.1785 44.20143. 0000 2 .0000 11. QOM1.0000 1.6000' 1.00005.0000 5.0000 _5.0000
106.4335 98.5941 79.1868231.1 897 212.0573 169.4961
1.8341 1.11198 1.79150.7874 047161. 0.79070.7943 0.7834 0479881.7973 An7180
F PCT CF P.BLI.1 F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF -Bud
197 32.9 558 100.0 188 33.7 558 100_40 158 37.3 424 100.033 5 56.0 401 67.1 300 53.8 370 66.3 216 50.9 266 62.743 7.2 66 11.0 51 9.1 70. 12.5 28 ,64.6 . 50 11.816 2.7 23__ 3.8 9 1.t6 19 3.4 17 4.0 22 5.2
7 1.2 7 1.2 10 1.8 10 1.8 5 1.2 5 1.2CASES PROCESSED = 598 558We BLANK DATA = 3 2.MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.4000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0_000 560.000SUM C.IF SCORES = 1095.0000 1027.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 2355.0.000 2241.0000MEAN 1.8111 1:8405STNO. OEV. 1N/ = 0.7650 0.7929SOW DEV. I 1+-1 I = 0.7656 0.7936MEDIAN 1.8045 1.8033
.
424/1.00005A110.00
767. 00001671.0000
1.anso0.111770.a1871.7500
d. The pupils want to learn but they not havethe right background for scho-A work.
QUESTION 16
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000 .
5.000
PART DCraig. t
PCT CF P-8LW
L7 O 1:1 CI CI
1.2 2.1 57.8.101.-0 0.85.9 10.3 56.6 97.9 6.48.2 14.1 50.6 87.6 9.4
37.3 64.5 ....42. 5 73.5 22.4_5.2 9.0 5.2 9.0 7.3
Globe.
PCT
1..5
CF
51-4
P8LW
100-0
F
)*A3499-_-040210e-0PCT CF
11.9 53.1 98.5 4.4 9.9 43.4 98.117.5 46.6 86.6 5.6 12.6 39.0 88.255.4 37.2 69-0 29.1 6506 33.4 75.613.6 7.3 13.6 4.3 9.8 4.3 9.8
CASES PNCf5SED__= 57._8 197 53.8738NOD BLANK DATA = 5.0000 5.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000
= 5.0000_-_MARIMUM_VALUESUN OF SCORES = 212 .7 347
_5.0400198.1463
SUM SQO. SCORES = 825.0674 772.7810.3.6759_ . 3.6780
STND. DE V. IN) = 0.8546 0.9038STIO. DEV = 0.8621 0.9123
F
..111EDIAM
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P8LW F
1.000 13 2.2 596 100.0 82.000 63 1,0.6. 583 97.8 633.000 71 11.9 520 87.2 1004.000 392 65-8 Isleg 75-3 3035.000 57 9.6 57 9.6 81
CASES pRnr.Fs_ckEn = 596NO. BLANK DATA = 5MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000SUM OF SCORES = 2205.0000SIAM S00. SCORES = 8601.0000MEAN 3.6957STOW. DEV. 4N1 0,8624STNO. D. = 0.8631MEDIAN_....- = 5..8652-
44.20831.00001.0000-5.0000
164.3207642.14673.71700S84240485213.88117 ---...__.
PCT
1.4
CF 128LW
555 100.0
PCT Cf 128LW
11.4 547 98.6 44 10.4 415 97.9.28.064.:6
484886
87.2.64.2
54266
12.762.7
371317
87.5
14.6 81 14.6 51 12.0 51 12.0
42451.00005.0000
I1.0000s.adon
2051.0000 1578.00008033.0000 6202.0000
3.69550.9040 0. 88110.9048 0.88213.8315 3.8947
e. It has been sufficiently Proven that such pupils 0.will never do as well as other students.
QUESTION 16
scoRe INTERVALS
.____ it220 _______2.0003.000
_ _____AseQk 0.. ._____
5.000
PART E
F
_._ _--bat_. 27.8
16.2. _ 4:0
0.3
Grode.2.
PCT CF
58.0 100.0
F
9.527.214.32.7
_14.0_6___47.9 48.4 83.428.0 20.6 35.4.
4.3 7.5__TAIL0.5 0.3' 0.5 0.5
CASES PRQC ES S ED = 58. 01 e6NO. 8LANK OAT A = 3.9000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000liALC1 KUM VALUE = 5.0000SUM CF SCORES .= 131. 5907SUM SOO. SCORES = 338.9058MEAN = 2.2681_..... __SIND. DE V. 4 NI
__*
_ ____
0.8350STNO. OE V. 1.1-11 = 0.8422MEDIAN = 2.1964
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8LW F
_1_01 598 100.0 1052.000 284 47.5 497 8341 27193.000 169 28.3 213 35.6 1404..000 40 6.7 44 7.4 *295.000 4 0.7 4 0.7 6
CASES PROCESSED 598NO. 81. ANK DATA 3KIM NUN VALUE = 1.01000MAXI MUM VALUE a, 5.0000SUM OF SCCRES 1356.0000SUM SOO SCORES = 3498.0000MEAN -= 2.21176SING. OEV. (N1 = 0.8412STI'40. OEV. (N-11 *.= 0.8419MEDIAN = --- --.2. 19.7_2_
PCT
6014114CF P'-81W
17.550.226.35.00.9
5_4.3 10,0.044.7 8205174.5 32.2. 2 .90.5 0.9
Grath. 6F PCT CF P-8Lw
4_4.3__ 100 .0s.2 CI 49.6 36.3 .81.9
25.1 13 32.32.6 -::44.9 6.60.4 0.8 0.4 0.a
54.225.13_7_40640 OW8siposti
98-.2019248.7549
2.21670.8330.84392.1436
x.oposz.,1.4otta':.
120.1-951302.7979
2.21540.82050442812.3:465
PCT
3s.a49.925.0
5,21.1
CF P-BL W F PC7
55.2 1.00.0 32 19_.34,4, 81.2.203 47.8423 .31.3 111 264 .45" 25 W
6 1.1 4 .0.9
559114000sit0180
1229.0000
CF P-BLW
425 100.0- 343
. -140: /.929 ---
4 0.9
3095.0000___2.19116___0.83840.8392.2..1254
tkeao2393.0000
2.21410.853_40.85442.1429
f., Materials are more important than methods in
the teaching of reading.
QUESTION 16 PART F
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003,4000
5.000
Cloget.
DDDD0 isk.14.
PCT CF 1..B LW F PCT CF E"81.6
13.8 23.8 58.0 100.0_ 9.6 17-R 54.1 100.035.5 61.2 44.1 76.2 34.0 62.9 44.5 82.25.2 9.0. 8.6 14.9 6.3 '11.6 : 1.0.4 19.33.2____Iak _1%4 5.9 3.Z_ 6.9 .4.2 7.70.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.8
LASES-MIX es SEDNO IL MK DATANI NI NUN VALUE
==
31. 9525 54.49143.00001.0000
3.00001.0000
_SAX/111M-VALUE - 5.01U ND
114.3570 113.10415SUM CF SCORESSUN SQO. SCORES =- 259.2.813 27300076MEAN /..1009STNO. OEV. IN)
-109733_0.74417 0.7958
DE V* = 0.7683 0.8033biEOIAN 109272 -2.11121
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW F
1.00Q 140 23.4 598 1000 992.000 372 62.2 458 76.6 2463.000 49 8.2 86 14.4 464.000 245.000 3 0.5 3 0.5 9
CASES_PROCESSfa = 558NO* BLANK DATA = 3NI NI NUN VALUE 1.0000
SUM OF SCORES = 1182.0000SUN SQO. SCORES = 2688.0000MEAN_ 1..9112b
'STNO. DEV. till = 047669STNO. OEV. = 0.7675imprahm
F PCT CF P-SLW
10.6 23.9 44.5 100.026.4 59.7 33,7 .76.14.6 3O.5 7.3 16.42.11 .6.5- 2.6 1:90.6 1.4 .0.6 1.4
-
44.21011 IMO140000544000-
88.5165205.8664
/699950.80770131:10
_102anPCT CF P-BLW F PCT
23.3 42458.0 3251008 ?9
2.1 9
424
CE P-BLW
/110.0_ ILI 8_ _19.A 557 100.0 --. 76.7 350 62.8 .449 : 80.6
4-466 60.E 10.8 --- - 99 : 17.88_ isill'Ai.:s : _:_a9 .'31) --
261 6 1.1 6 1.1
_557a
, 40000
1150.00002726.0000
2101246_0.1E460.79531.9811
870.00002106.0000
g. Methods are more important than materials in the Do onteaching of reading.
QUESTION- 16 PART GGvoae,A
SCORE INTERVALS
2.0003.0004.0005.000
F
9.16.7
31.210 e 2
PCT CF
_.._1:_3 _ 3212_9_100m15.7 57.111.5 48.053.8 41.4
P-BLW
0 1.2
PCT CF P -BLW
2.2 53.9 100.0-
F
O.
PCT CF P-8 LW
21,1 44.3 100.098.783.071.5
9.37.3
29.4
17.2- 52.7 97.813.5 43.4 80.5
- 36.2 67.1
7.84.1
24.7
17.6 43.4 97.99.2 35.6 80.3
55.6 - 31.5 71.117.7 10.2 17.7 6.7 12.5 6.7 12.5 6.9 15.5 6.9 15.5
CASES PROCESSED = 57.8638 53.9390 44.3406NO. BLANK DATA = 4.0000 4.0000 1.000":WWI NUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.-44942 5.0000 11.1.-7/95SUM OF SCORES = 214.6262 193.D 508 634.9182SUM SW. SCORES - 851.1277 743.2964 3.6472MEAN 3.7092 579 1.0085STNO. DEV. IN) 0.9753 0.9852 1.0200
OEV. I N-1 0.9839 0.9945 3.87929 5
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-44 LW
1.000 9 1.5 557 100:0 a 1-4 . 425 100.0 13 556 100.02.000 101 16:9 588 98.5 78 18.4 417 .: 98.1 . 94
_1.316.9 544.-j'00
3.000 70 11.7 487 81.6 43 10.1 339 - 7148 70 12.6 449 84. 8-4.000 317 53.1 417 69.8 229 53.9 2206 69.12,300 94,;;D 379 141.25.000 100 16.8 100 16.6 67 15.8 67 15.8 79 14.2 79 14.2
CASES PROLE SSED = _597 425NO. BLANK DATA = 4 1.1:4490
MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE =
1:110005.0000
5.01100 .
..1.544,koopo 71142114itSUM OF SCORE S = 2189.0 000 6046. 0000 2006.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 8615.00 CO 3.6329 7794.0000I4EAA 3.6667 1.0_137 3. 6079SIND. DEV. = 0.9 930 1.0149 1.11005STNO. DEV. to4.1) = 0.9938 3.8646 1.0014
3.8738 3+8 367
h. The teacher's ability is more important thaneither method or materials in the teaching
of reading.
QUESTION 16 PART h
SCORE fox ERVALS-
. 101100.2:0003.0004.0005.000
Groat
D D D D
grate 4ACT CF P -BLW F ACT CF
0.8 . 1:4. _5:49. 100.0__S4 0.8 54.1 10.0:0_5.0 8.7 57.2 98.6 5.2 9:6 53:7 99.25.7 9.8 52.1 90.0 6.5 12.0 48.5 89.7
28.1 48.6 .._4144 80.1.28.9 iloS 42,0"_71,718.3 31.6 18.3 31.6 13.1 24.2 13.1 24.2
cAMS.PROctS5ED .51A34AD,.111.NO. BLANK DATA 2.0000 3.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0400 1.0000VALUE 5:0000 5.0000.MARIKUM
SUM OF SCORES 231.9797 211.2918SUM SOD. SCORES 979.8521 869.1340MEAN 4.0032 3.9079WIND. DEV. INS a 0.9398 0.85162STND. DEV. (No4b aWO/ AN
0.94804.129"
0:9046
SCORE 1 NTERV ALS F CF ACTACT
1021 i 1.5 599 100.0 5
2.000 55 9.2 590 98.5 62 11.23.000 64 10.7 535 89.3 70 12.64.000 286 47.7 411_ 283 50.95.000 toy
_
185_1166._30.9 136 24.5
F PCT CF P-8LW
_0.4 1:0 44:1 100.04.2 9.6 43.9 99.07.2 163 39.1. 89.520.5 46.2 32.5 73.212.0 27.0 12.0 27.0
44.34061.06005.0000
132.3/19709.4475
3.887411.94220.95304.0621
CASES. PROCESSED 599 5512_
40. SUNK DATANININUN VALUE
a 2
1.00005.0000
41.0000"5.0000__AtainutsmNE
SUN OF SCORES 2380.0000 2151.0000SUN SQD. SCORES --: 10006.0000 8811.0000MEAN 3.9733 3.86E7SIND. 0E14 IN) = 0.9579 0.9382STND. DEV. IN-11 = 0.9587 0.9391
4N_ 3.99E2
CF A-8LW PCT CF
551 9901 38 809 422 99.3489 87.9 70 16.5 384 90.4419 25:4 200 . A2-1 214 73,9136 24.5 114 26.8 114 26.6
424A400905.4040
169S6001106835.0000
3.90350.0191-449to24.0075
i. Disadvantaged children have more trouble learning o 0 0 0to read than advantaged children.
QUESTION 16
SCORE INTERVALS
PART I
GraWL Gault it &luteF PCT CP P-BLW F
6000 Cl 6 X: 0 . 0.32.000 5.1 8.7 57.6 99.0 4.73.000 5.7 9.8 52.5 90.3 8.64.000 382 65_.7._ 46.1_11(6.11 32.95.000 8.6 14.8 8.6 14.8 7.8
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA =MINI MUM VALUE =
. MAXiMU.M_MALUE =SUM OF SC ORES =SUM SQ0. SCORES =MEAN.MO. OE V. IN) =STNO. °EV. *-11 =MEDIAN -
SCORE INTERVAL:i
1.0002.0003.0004.0005.000
50.1.514.1.00001.00005.0.000_
223.5789898.1040
31_84400.81360.82063.9( 36
F PCT
6 1.049 8.260 10.0
3S7 66.268 14.7
PCT CF P-81 W F PCT CF P-BLW
0.5 54.3 100.0 (1.3 9.6 44.3 100 ak8.7 54.0 99.5 -405 10.2 44.0 99.4
15.8 49.3 90.8 ,* o 1 1' 89.260.6 4.0.1 15.0 28.3 311.4 75..414.3 7.8 14.3 5.1 11.5 5.1 115
54.2553 44.26111.0000 : 1.-0000140000 140005.0000 5.04000
205.9795 166.2349817.3716 653.2222
3.7S65 3.75570.0075 0.11079
o.;8150- 0.183123.9129 3.8974
CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-43LW
594 99.0 49 8.8545 90.8 84: 15.0485 80.8 336 60.188 14.1 86 15.4
CASES PROCESSED 600NO. BLANK DATA = 1MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000SUM CF SCORES = 2312.0000SUM SQ0. SCORES = 9294.0000
18rIANK_ 3.8533STNO. DE V. IN/ = 0.a011STNO. DE V. IN-1I 0.8018MEDIAN
86 15.4 53 12.5
559 4241
-19440 1.0080:.'5400aM10 s_Anoo
2128.0000 1621.00008482.000u 6443.0000
3.8068 3.82310.8257 0.7)6130.8265 0.76223.9241 3..9111_
j. Disadvantaged children have a shorter attention 0 0 0 0span than advantaged children.
QUESTION 16 PART J
SCORE INTERVALS F
.22.000 10.93.000 12.24..QQO 29.45.000 4.5
PCT CF P-131.*
58.3 100.0_.18.7 57.0 97.921.0 46.1 79.150.4 130 5 La7.7 4.5 7.7
_4AWE5 PR04ES StO 58.2511.MINIKOM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000SUN. OF .SCORES 199./34651.04 SOD. SCORES 737.3989MEAN 3.4289ST_NO. DEW. IN 09A51STNO. DEV. 4N-1I 0.9580MEDIAN 34,617
SCORE INTERVALS
.
10.512.0
_25.25.1
PCT CF P131.61
. 2.5 5402,_100.0-1945 52.8 97.522.2 42.3 178.0''A6.6_ 30.3 55._9_9.3 5.1 9.3
F PCT CF P-8L44 F
14_.._2 ..3_
54.18482.00001000005,0000
1.8406219681.4885
3.40730.98370099293.6260
Givie,10F PCT CF P-BLW
1..1 2.5 44.3 100.09.2 20.1 .43.2 97.5
11.3 34.1 76.818.9 42. 22.8 1_1033.9 8.7 3.9 8.7
44.24061.00005.0000
538.51643.3438041190.99323.5314
20000 106 1706 587. 97,7 1013.000 124 20.6 481 80.0. 1254000 305 50.7 357.59. 4: .,C,
, 5.000' 52 8.7 52 80 56
CASES PIIIICF SSED$11 N1 NUN VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUN_OE_SCURESSUM SW). SCORES =MEANSIN _ A V . . 1 NiSTNO. 0EV. IN--11 TA
MEDIAN
6011.0.0005.0000
207&. aaon7734.0000
3.45760.95590.95673.6852.
PCT CF F PCT
557
-MA56
CF
77 ; 18v1 413 974'110 -25.9 336 79.1191 44.9 226 53.2
35 8.2 35 8.2
A25_3
Citteatii
1440054401NV
1896. 0000 241.00007008.0000 3.3765
3.4032 P44.500.4424 0446610.9983 3.57073.6111
k. Disadvantaged children have different lisguistic 0 0 0experiences than advantaged children.
V
QUESTION 16 PART Kgirattiei. Ospea..16.
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -BLW PCT CF PBL W F PCT CF PBLW
1.0002.000
0.32oU
0.5 58.23.5 57.9
100.099.5
0.5 0.9 54.2 100.0 0.0 0.0 44.3 100.01.8 3.4 53.7 99.1 1.7 3.9 44.3 100.0
3.000 6.6 11.4 55.8 96.0 4.3 8.0 51.9 95.7 4.2 9.4 42.6 96.14.000 37.8 65.0 49.2 84.6 37.9 69.9 47.5 87.7 31.1_ 38.4 86.75.000 11.4 19.6 11.4 19.6 9,7 1.7.9 9.7 17.6 6.7
_L1s515.1. 6.7 15.1
__PASESPRocgssEo 50.1695. 54../836 44.3406NO. BLANK OATA = 1.0000 2.0000 2.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.D000 5.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000 5.0000 176.421SUM OF SCORES = 232.5221 216.9707 7 19.7 354SUM SW, SCORES = 958.2715 894.4172 3.9789DEAN 3.9573 4.0044 _0.6322STNO. REV. (NI = 0.7037 0.6872 06399STNO. °EV., (N1/ 0.7099 0.6936 4.0123MFDIAN 4..0326 4.0397
SCORE INTERVALS E..' KT CF PBLW PCT C F P-BLW F PCT CF
1.000 3 0.5 I I I F I I I2.000 22 3.7 597 99.5 20 3.6 554 99.3 15 3.5 445 100.03.000 50 8.3 575 95.8 44 7.9 .534 95.7 37 6.7 "'MO . 96.5_4.000 403 67.2 5212. 87.5 384 68 ea 490 87.8 306 72. 0 . 373 87.85.000 122 20.3 122 20.3 1.06 19.0 106 19.0 67 15.8 67 1.5.8
.LAS 'ES PROCESSED = 600 55821.0000
4252.0200 .
5. 0000 .
Me BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE11AXIJI11/L__VALIIE_
= 11.00005.0.000._
SUM OF SCORES 2419.0000 2242.0000 6964.0000SUM SUL). SCE* ES 10039.0000 9274.0000 4.0000BEAN 4.0317 .4,0179 0962,12ST ND. DEV. (NI = 0.6909 0.4902 0.6219STND. DEVo l AF-13MEDIAN
= 0.69154.0583 0.6908
4.04554.0245
-
1. Disadvantaged children are disadvantaged mainly inthat they do not have the foundation of concepts 0 0 I:1 0 Dthat advantaged children have.
QUESTION 16
SCORE INTERVALS
/90002.0003.000400005.000
PART L
#1 PC7 CF P-8134
0.1 0.14.7 8.27.8 13.5
36.7 63.98.2 14.3
571457.3 99.952.6 91.744.9 _1111,a
8.2 14.3
CASES PROCESSED = _STAL.19.35__
NO. BLANK OA TA = 6.0000MINI NUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 54400SUN OF SCORES 220.4313SUM SQO. SCORES = 880.4924MEANSTNO. ()EV. IN) =ST NO. DE V. (N.../ l =MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
3_9_8A. DA
0076900.77583..9411
Coraits-L
0.6
PCT
1.1
CF 14-q1LW
54.2 100.0
F
0.2
FCT
0.5
CF P-8 LW
*4.3_100ALEL5.5 10.1 53.6 98. 4.4 9.9 44.1 99.59o5 11.5 4801 8808: 8.0 18.1 39.70 89.632.3 5907 118.6 71:3 211.2 6347 21::7 71.56.3 11.6 6.3 11.6 3.5 7.8 3.5 7.8
F PCT CF P-BLW
_
2.000 51 8.63.000 73 12.3
324 63.25.000 94 1!.8
595 144.0594 99.8543 91.3470 79.094 15.8
CASES PRIX E S SEEP za
=595
6NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE 100000
_11AXIMUM VALUE 5-0000SUM OF SCORES = 2256.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 9228.0000MEAN 3.85118STNO. DEV. IN)51140. DE Ve 11111 0.1873ago'AN 3. 958
54.1716 44o34_06
2.0000 1..00001.0000 5.0800500000 16343/38
200.7226 628.4189782.1401 3.6841
3,, 7053 0073_47
Oa 8419 0.1836008498 3oMQ-3.8566.
F PCT CF F PCT CF P-81.14
a 3 0.7 425 100.054 9.J
_558_100.0550 98.6 42 909 422 9903
94 16.8 496 88.9 83 1405 380 89041'41 44-7 442 72.4 263 61.9 247 651.Q6S 12.4 69 12.4 34 8.0 34 8.0
558 4252 141419°140000 . SAM
. _5.111101) 45AdAidd2075. 0000 5976.00008123.0000 3.6659
3.71E6 0.711900.8539 0178990.8546 3.82133.8694
la. Learning to verbalize complete thoughts isparticularly impottant for disadvantaged children. 0 El
QUESTION 16 PART II
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT
LAM 0.3 0.62.000 2.4 4.13.000 5.8 10.04.000 40.7 70.15.000 8.8 15.2
CASES PROCESSED =NO. AL M DATA =MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANMD. DEL, I N) =STND. OE V l W-1 =MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
VrreAtete
CF
58.057.755.449.58.8
58.04931.00001.00005.0000
229.5365934.4043
0.67920.68514.0039
F PC T CF P-8 LM
GroAte4 Ofettel
100.0 0.5
PCT
0.9
CF P -81.1
54.0 100.0
F
0.1
PCT
0.3
CF P-Blirt
44.0 100.099.4 2.3 4.3 53.6 99,1 2.4 5.4 43.8 99.795.4 5.5 10.1 51.2 94.8 5.5 12.4 41.4 94.385.3 39.2 U23_45:8_ 84.7 30 e4 69.2_ 36.0 81.1115.2 6.6 12.2 6.6 12.2 5.5 12.6 5.5 12.6
1.4a0 2 0-32.000 25 4.23.000 58 9.74:000 421 70.25.000 94 15.7
540_0486 43.96013.0000 4.00001.0000 00005.0000. 5.0000
211.2045 170.7271850.4590 684.22583.9077 3.88360.6820 0.69420.6864 0.7022
9 3.9596F PCi CF
600100.0 4
598 99.7 20573 95.5 595L5 85.8 397
- 94 15.7 77
CASES_PWICESSF0 = 600NO. WANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000PAXIMM VALUE 5.0000SUM OF SCURES = 2380.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 5710.0000MEAN ae_9667SIND. DE V. On =- 0.6700SIND. OE W. IN-1i = 0.67C6MEDI AN 4.41107
0.73.6
10.671.313.8
557
P...8LW F PCT CF PEILW
557 10000 1 0.553 99.3 19 4.5533 95.7 56. 13.3474 85.1 284 67.577 13.8 61 14.5
.
441
421 100.040 99.8Aq1 95.2.:345 81.961 14.5
31.00005.oako
lt:01)60.s.onan
2194.0000 1648.0 0008892.0000 6650.0000
3.9390 1491450. 6698 0.68740.6705 0.68E2
924 .....
n. Improving the student's self-image as a learner is r-1 (:-.1
particularly important for disadvantaged children. L--1
QUESTION 16
SCORE INTERVALS
2.0000..2.0003.0004.0005.000
PART N
Gahe2 C.tnktie
F PCT CF P.41Lid F PCT
_0.2 0.4.0.5 0.80.9 1.5
24.9 42.931.7 54.5
Gro.ste
.10.4:0. 0..158.4 99.6, 0.3 0.657.5 98.9 0.4 0.856.6 .97.3 -Z51.t.7 _. 4i. 331.7 54.5 27.5 50.6
CASES._PROCESSED 5801_655_NO. BLANK DATA 1.0000NI NI KM VALUE 1.0000MA XI If.LIK _V Al U. E 5.0.000,SUN CF SCORESUM Sari, SCORESMEAN
STND. OE V. (N1 =ST ND. OE V. (14-.4b1PIII/111
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000_
261.96291201.2097
0.60760.61294.5822
F PCT CF P-8LW
5 0.86 1.0
2A_CL
3.:7 54.5
600 10111,0598 99.7553 98.8
327 54.3
CF P..11LW F PCT CF P-8Lh
54.3 10,0 0.2 0.5 44.2 10Q.053.9 99.3 0.1 0.3 44.0 99.553.6 98.7 1.0 2.2 43.8 99.253.1 97.9 19.7 44.5 42.8 96.927.5 50.o 23.2 52.4 23.2 52.4
524.2:5531.0000 2.00001.0000 1.00005.0000 5.0000
242.2649 197.98201102.7170 903.5649
4.4656 4.48070.6186 0.61040.6243 0:61744.5Ala 4.5463
PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-BLW
4 559 109.0 _ 7 4,33 0.5 555 99.3 2 O. 420 99.3
.0.9 552 98o7 8 1.9 418 98.8
286 51.7 289 51.7 228 53.9 228 53.9
PRUCESSED = hnn 559NO. aL ANK DATA = 1 1MI NI MUM VALUE 1.0000 1..0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0.000SUM C1 SCORES = 2705.0000 2502.0000SUM SQL). SCORES = 12411.0000 11414.0000tfi AN 4.5 caa A.olt158STND. DE V. IN) - 0.5959 0.6208STND. DE V. = 0.6004 0.6213MEDIAN 4.5329
42321.00005.00116
1899.00008695.0000
4.A ElVt_0.63340.63414.5724
o. The ability to ask questions which require acomplete answer is extremely important inteaching reading to disadvantaged children.
QUESTION -16 PART 0
SCORE INTERVALSy
1.002_
F
0.3_
PGT
_.(642.000 8.9 15.53.000 12.2 21.14.000 29.8 51.65.000 6.5 11.3
11 D D 1:1
Csvmati. tikradul.4
CF P-41:.44 --FPCT
51.4 99.448.5 83.936.3 62.86.5 11.2
CF P -8LW
CVMULL (0
PCT CF P8LW
1.2 51.7 100.0 0.5 1.1 44.0 100.09.0 16.8 53.1 98.8 5.9 13.3 - 43.5 98.912.2 22.7 440 81140 1140 25..0 85.625.6.'47.6 .31.9 59.3 22.0 10O0 26=6 60.66.3 11.7 6.3 11.7 4.7 10.6 4.7 10.6
PROCE$V) 51.7520 53.72886.00001.00005.0000
_LASESNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
_MA1iINVII_VALU5
4.00001.0000
__AAMO206.4472 189.0324SUM OF SCORES
SUM SOD. SCORES 784.9224 713.0627-3.5183___KAM _-____
STNO. DEV. IN).3.57470.9015 0.9451
STND. 0EV. IM.4) 0.9094 0.9541.. _MEDIAN 1-74AS
. - _3=6939
___________ 43.97075.00001.00005.0000
156.4344591.24E83.55770.88840.89863./121_ --
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF PBLW F PCT CF P-8161 F
1.000 4 0.7 597 100.0 7 1.3 554 100 0 52.000 90 15.1 593 99.3 83 -15.0 .547 :98.7 363.000 134 22.4 503 84.3 134 24.2 464 83.8 1044.000 51.1 3695.000
_V.5.64 10.7 64 10.7 68 12.3 68 12.3. 48
- CASES PROCESSED = 5_97 554MD. BLANK OATA - 4 6MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 tamtio:MAXIMUM UALtif = _5..01100 _500140__SUM OF SCORES = 2126.0000 1963.0000SUM SOW. SCORESMEAN dm.
Mk.
8050.00003.5611
1437.00003.5433
SIND. DEW. IN) 0.8958 0.9322STND. DEW. IN11inEaLmi_
= 0.8965 0.9331_3.7023
PCT
1.2
CF P -8LW
42.0_1110.1--13.3 415 98.824.8 359 85.5
11.4 48 11.4
1497.00005677.0000
3.56430.90140.90253.7174
p. In teaching reading, a wrong response can beas useful as a correct response.
QUESTION 16
SCORE INTERVALS
_4000_2.0003.000
_._......_ 4:00.05.000
_CASES PROCESSED
PART P
F PCT
0.5 0,92.9 5.08.2 14.13704 . 64,18.8 15.2
cottlikt
DODO El
CF P-8LW F PCT
57.3 99.1 3.1 5.854.4 94.1 6.3 11.7
_3_61 _Alas 68.8 15.2 8.6 15.9
57.7560NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
. AligI14004 YAWL_
5.00001.0000
SUM OF SCORES 224.5453SUM SOD. SCORES 904.6646MEAN_ 3.40USIND. OEV. (NI 0.7473SIND. DEV. IN-1) 0.7538MEDIAN 3.9632
SCORE INTERVALS
Gra& 14
CF P-BLW
,9
f PCT CF P*43LW
44 1 I
54.Z100.05100 94.244.7 82.58.6 15.9
54.16662.00002.00005.0000
212.7110862.4971
3.92700.7084044150
2.5 5.7,7.0'154'-27,2 61.7.6.9 15.6
F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-.BLW F PCT
I.Onft S W% 100 _02.000 33 5.5 590 99.0 273.000 80 13.4 557 9305 684.000 386 &Am& _.471_16.03A55.000 91 15.3 91 15.3 98
_CASES PRCCES &EDNO. CLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE_BAILIMUIL/ALUE=
5
1.00005.0000
SUM Cf SCURES = 2311.0000SIAM SQU. SCORES = 9309.0000_AIAN 1,8775STNO. DEV. IN/ ?= 0.7642STNO, 0E V. IN-1/ = 0.7648_Ple01LAN__ 3.9.637
550
454 98.8404' 93.134;;P1 77036.9 15.6
44.11413.0000'1.005.0000
169.7568680.8640.3.84810011912041:'
34;94
CF P -8LM
100.0 .4D-9 427 laa-n4.8 558 100.0 21 5.0 -41202 531 95.2 55 13.0 -5es...4 - 463 83.0 262_____6:1 1 AWitiiigeb-17.6 98 17.6 80 19.0 80. 19.0
22.40004.00010
2208.00009010.0000
3.9570_0.69940.70004.041
3 !ift
1.4.8
1659.00006775.0000
3.93110.77430.77524.Q000
q. Disadvantaged children oftea have loweraspirations than advantaged children.
QUESTION 16
SCORE INTERVALS
PART 6,1
(61Nbel.
F PCT
0 0 0 0 El
CF P-8LW
Griat4.11,
F PCT CF P-8134 F PCT CF P-8110
1.0110_ 1.4 2.4 58.2_109_.O. 1.7 3.9 44.0 100.0 1.9 3.5 54.0 100.0_2.000 11.0 19.0 56.8 97.6 7.0 15.9 42.3 96.1 9.9 18.2 52.1 96.3.000 10.4 17.9 45.7 78.6 5.6 12.8 35.3 80.2 9.8 18.2 42.3 78.2
29..7 5121 25.2 57.1 294.7 67.4 27.2 50.4 324,4. 60:05.000 5.6 9.6
_"3503-1211.75.6 9.6 4.5 10.3 4.5 10.3 5.2 9.6 5.2 9.6
CASES PROCESSED 58.1.695 44.0203 54.0406I. BLANK DATA 1.0000 3.0000 3.0000MINI MUM VALUE 1.0000 100000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000._ 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 201.6143 155.8893 186.0917SUM SOO. SCORES 754.7637 596.2114 695.7058MEAN 3.4660 3.541___ 3.4436STNO. °EV. IN) 0.9809 1.0016, 1.0078ST NO. OE V. = 0.9895 1.0132 1.0173MEDIAN 3.7095 _3.11051 3.6987
SCORE INTERVALS F PC1 CF P-8LW F PCT CF F PCT CF P-8L14.
1.000 14 __2_.3 600 100.0 22 3.9. 557 1011440 lb 3_8 422100.0
2.000 107 17.8 586 97.7 93' 16.7 535 -.96+1 %70 16.6 406 96.23.000 101 16.8 479 79.8 102 ' 18.3 442- 79.4 .56 13.3 336 70464.000 321 53.5 378 61.0 280 50.3 340 6140 23R 56.4 280. 66:44--5.000 9.5 57 9.5 60 10.8 60 10.6 42 10.0 42 10.057
CASES PROCESSED = 600 557 422NO. BLANK DATA = 1 3 3MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
ie--- 5.4100SUM OF SCORES = 2100.0000 1934.0000 1486.0000SUM SQO. SCORES a; 7912.0000 7292.0000 5658.0000MEAN = 3.5000 3.4722____ 3.5213STND. DEV. INI = 0.9678 140176 1.0039STND. DEV. IN-.11 = 0.9686 1.0185 1.0051MEDIAN = 3 0_430 - 3.7196 .3.7859
SC
UR
F IN
TE
R V
AL
SF
PC
6114
8 C
FP
LT4kaie
CF
P-B
LWF
FC
T&
sox
CF
.22
.000
5.73
. -10
0.0
00
41-
.,42
100.
00
0.0
111"
407
1(10
,00 0
0.0
0.0
.at
23.0
0024
.000
0 00.0
0.0
573
100.
057
3 10
0.0
542
542
100.
010
0.0
0 00.
0D
e 0
407
40?
100.
010
0.0
_53
3-C
0.0
542_
100.
0__
CL
0.0
407
100.
0.S
IXF
4-2
5.00
026
.000
.
0.
0.0
-10-
057
3 10
0.0
1.0.
254
210
0.0
10.
24E
710
0.0
27.0
002
0.3
573
100.
00
0.0
541
99.8
10.
240
699
.8.57
199
.7I
1
0.6
540
.99
.60.
040
599
,52
9. 0
002
0.3
568
99.1
30.0
005
0.9
560
98.8
20.
453
799
.13
0.7
405
99.5
31.0
00..
..3-0
.5.-
5121
97_.
95
0.9
535
98.7
;0.
740
298
.855
897
.48
1.5
530
97.8
102.5
399
98.0
32.0
0011
1.9
33.0
0014
2.4
541
95.5
142.
652
296
.314
3.4
389
95.6
34,0
01j
93.0
V5.
050
893
.71/
2_35
375
X22
*135
.000
.19_ 25
4.4
514
89.?
264.8
481
88.7
215.
236
589
.736
.000
356.
148
985
.337
6.8
455
83.9
245.
934
484
.5--
--2
397.
241
877
.128
11.9
320
74341_
8.9
.454
._
400
69.8
459.
037
969
.940
9.8
38.0
0051
292
71.7
39.0
0057
9.9
349
60.9
468.
933
060
0936
8.8
252
6109
iki/0
_0_
579.
9--
4 41.0
00_
.-2
92 234
40.8
519.
422
341
.139
9.6
172
42.3
42.0
0046
8.0
177
30.9
367.
017
231
.743
10.6
133
32.7
39_
131
22.9
448:
113
424
.,728
6.9
44.0
0025
,
4.4
._
9216
.12b
5.2
9016
.621
5.2
6215
.245
.000
244.
267
11.7
203.
762
11.4
122.
941
10.1
4bag
043
Tel
e'.
101.
842
J.7
1k
2.7
9da
l--47
.000
101.
734
5.9
101.
832
5.9
92.
218
4.4
48.0
00.
101.
724
4.2
71:
322
4.1
71.
79
2.2
49.9
510_
-2-:
41+
115
2 ila
10:
2--
50.0
000.
49
1.7
00.
01
0.2
30.
57
1.2
51.0
002
0.3
40.
74
0.7
71.
30
0.0
0.2
----
----
--52
.0-0
-0-
10.
253
.000
10.
21
0.2
10.
21
0.2
00.
00
0.0
54.0
000
0.0
00.
00
0.0
00.
00
0.0
00.
0_5
5_0_
000-
00.
00
Dal
)0-0
.00
0.0
56.0
000
0.0
.0.0
00.
0C
.0.0
00.
00
-0.0
00.
057
.000
C0.
00
0.0
00.
00
0.0
00.
00
0.0
_00.
0
CA
SE
S P
RU
CE
SS
ED
573
542
407
A-
28IR
iii-I
4Q...
--0L
AR
K-D
AT
MI A
n M
UM
VA
LUE
=27
.000
026
.000
026
.000
0P
AA
I MU
M V
ALU
E=
sago
oco
52.0
000
.52
.0.0
00S
UM
OF
SC
UR
E-
2270
3.00
0021
.511
3_,Ia
kO__
____
____
__16
1112
,410
110_
___
SU
M S
00. S
CO
RE
S=
9096
69.0
000
6628
27.0
000
6446
40.0
000
ME
AN
39.6
.213
39.6
734
39.5
970
_S-T
-ND
. °E
V:
--=
-4.
2081
..3.
9514
.4sr
Nic
. ',A
V. I
N-1
1 =
4. 2
118
4.24
C1
3.9S
54
Ott
61 A
N39
,554
.dt8
E4.
39.7
641
271.3tpt $4 2 4AO Z A55 "I M(61 $12 `4co 0 1 E
2270..0 I 1
m FR Z xi i 1 i
,Ic < ec < ,C CD Itn 0 to to LA %A %A s.ln to 144 4% 4% A 4% 4% 4 4% 4% 4?' La %a %a %a $.0 le uo la a 4') NJ NJ NJ N N2 N,..se fe es m) .4 0. LA 44 tot N b5-6 0 op 0) 5-4 iCA VI 4 ko rJ $-* o 10 co;-v ct. Vs:44 L4 r4 0-*0 0 w -4 Ok lul 4,- w Ni pi
......0 mrlom foo:0000. or00000vo 444 4;4444444444444440fornCCkso 10000001000000000 000000:000000000000000107.2 X11r11111.4401 .00000900000000 0000000000000000000;0000
4. rn ,P. 01
X0111 10 00009110 0000000 C000 0000 00000000000404Z000 :
11 11 11 11 'II II 1I 'II fl
c) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 o 0 to to Ig W tfl tp to 4 44 to AJ po h4 CD CD CD CD CD C CD CD CD CD CD,cD cD CD CD P., A.5 Ao N CA m> tA tn 0 to u5 to to to 05 vs cp. tn 0 to 43 tn a. to NJ 0 0 C) 0 4) 1
COomi
;0 0 o :0 0 0 0 001w a.. ro 1-, to, tn 0,4 .0 .0 .0 to CO 04 4% tv to 1- c') 0 o 000.000:0 To
. .0 441444444444444444444444044444 n. L0 4$ w) to NIA., kr i4) CD 4):CD 0 ru 4-# A4 440.6 CA Do CD LA tn 10 CD 4, 40 tn Co C* 4% tn on 4) ca- tn 43 to to to 00 4) 4) 4) -4
4, 4% '0 4% LO ..1 :5-4 to ,Dowro N CA 04 ICA 0 0 10 4440 IA Ao On il* 0 0 0LP CN Id, 8 18u. 2.0, .1
4% 0.1IA to 0
0 11111 0- 1-4 1" IWK1 to to .4. 4.4'. vs us vi us vs tr VI to to V/ to to ,to
CD CD CD CD CD CD 0 CD CD Am to tO 44 -4 CD ua .4 NJ ft4 Uo CD'to CA 0 11. U0 41- 0- 4% tr Lo tn tn!tn LA vital......w........w.4........e..4... ri
0 0 0 0 0 1- rg uo Ix as) 0 k.r. a., i0 N.) .4 On co 43 ry -10 km 0 * ro $-..4% cc 0 it) 4,, 4. 4. 4. 0. 4% .rt
Ii
I I I0-5 b.1 10.b A. Pa ob. T5III
1 t- I- 1U to .1*. P us 0, 4 CO Co .0 4:0 ) 41 AO ,D bb 0 0 to 0 010 ICP 0 CD 0 0 0 CD 0 Cppo to cA .4 Ao co 4% Pw *0 0 .0 co -4 4% co N CA -4 Co 43 .0 .0 0 CD IF 0 CDICD CD***ow w * w000 op]. 1CD CD 0 CD CD 14) to tn 4) P...i CA 44 44 m3 4 -4 ..1 Ao 44 m) .4 CA Qui*. 4) CA A-0 CD Lo ,4 CD CD 0 CD 050 IL
i
16
CD CD 0 0 c) 4) CD CD C0 CD CD Ad A- U4 W 6) 4% kri 44 LP 110 44 Niro A-0 0 10 cd 0 CD Cp Cp C) 0+ s ** wo D 441.4444,41s14 4
0 0 p 0 1--4.) .4. skJ kr, .4 0) i0 NC 0 OD -4 O 1Z .4 0. Co 4, .01.-1 N. s.0 0 0w
co4.444.44
Nto..4 LA %A44(0A-6.. pooN
Ch Nrt) to tA 0 0 0
"II0 N 0 0 0 %A
0Co be) 0 0 0Ok CD C) 0 0
r
b CO
0'
.p...ow0
0 0% Poo
A.4 di ODa
cr
NP N0 o00 ts)
8 8
1
D D DaD D 0k
.00 D . -4 to C
I Io o 10 0 04000 00 0 0 0
141100000oc 00 4-4
000, OD
1.d Po
tr
tol rft1 .4
oo trs N 0
1,4
NNtotocANCAOoppose.*i .0 .4> Co Co 0 lo 444
*tit
4) 4) C0 CD CD CD CD CD cD 0 ,.. 1-, to N4' too w. o444446444rCD 0 C5 CD CD 1.- CD CD Ao -4 OD Ulf-, -4 tn
aloe0
0O 4 000 0
0 0 0 As N w.N Pe CCw ow* opCD 0 N -4 Ad CD LA LW CD to
1 1 1 A00 00000e 0 0100 00 P°
1 1 1 0 00 0 0 0 044 44 0400 00 KI N
1.)
44 0).N
toN4,
%,7i co
.0 El, .4 ;ft LA st. Ai 000 ID 0 0 0 0..... *wow*0 0. )lo to VI ...1 CA /0 PA * to 0 A5
/4, /A'0 CO 0Oo .1%
to CACO OD
44 0
4464 a
co coN co
to to to NN
02 .4 4`N
Co Co
Co
N tOCA 0
ttl
to
N
VI CIO
1101
CA
Vs vI0 0-4 CA
bC5 10Os -4
N co
4!)10 10
U) 04
1+w0004 444.1*. 0 4.1.0
N
4% 4%0 4.0, a-
000
04 0
*
Lo U4
On ft.1 OD Co bC, o) 40 10 4)fu 0 0 * vi ft4 co 10 10o p ** pop- 40 1/441 is.) us C4 to to ts)
0006.1
000 0sal tg
©0040
biz00
11
44.40, 0 Avo p.) N-N 4 n0. t P t II
sod Po I" ID0 0 0 Cp I40 0 0 0 Ct4 rco 0 00 a:
PART III
CLASS AM) PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS QUESTIONNAIRE
ITEM ANALYSIS
1. What grade do you teach?
Two
Four
Six
Ungraded
Gv-...t.ciet cle4=L e_6P-BLW FSCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW PC/ CF P-BLS;
1.000 58.5 IOC.° 58.5 100.0 0.0 0.0 54.7 100.0 C.0 0.0 44.8 100.02.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 000 0 44.8 100.03.0C.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.8 100.0 44.8 100.04. 0CG O.0 0.0 0.) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.
AlmCASES PROCESSEO 58.5473 54.7435 44.8092MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 2.0000 3.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 -2;000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 58.5511 109.4939 134,4351SUM SQL). SCORES 58.5511 218.9877 403.3052MEAN 1.0001 CIO 1 3.0002
SC.:1RE L4TERVALS F PCT C1 P-BLW F PCT F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 606 100.0 606 100.0 0 0.0 565100.0. C 0.0 431 100.02.000 C 0.0 0 0.0 565 100.0 565 100,0 0 0.0 431-i00.03.000 C 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 431 100.0 431 100.04.COC 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 9.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
U.SFS PSJCFSSE0 60u 56S 431MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 .0000 3.0000MAXIMUM VA1U47 1.0000 2.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 606.0000 1130.0000 1293.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 606.0000 2260.0000 3879.0000MEAN 1.0000 2.0000 3.0000STN C. 00/. (N) = 0.0 0.0 0,0STK:. REV. (N-1) 0.0 0.0 0.0.MEDIAN 1.0000 2.0000 3.0000
la.
How many pupils are in your class?
(Give actual number)
SCORE
1171TERVALS
PCT
ORAL*
2:CF
P-BLW
F
GRADE 4
PCT
CP-8LW
F
GRADE
ACT
6
CF
0.0
2.99
0.1
0.2
58.1
100.0
0.3
0.5
54.3 100.0
0.3
0.7
44.2
100.0
3.00 -
8.99
2.8
4.8
57.9
99.8
2.2
4.0
54.0
99.5 -2.4
5.4
43.9
99.3
9.00 -
14.99
3.6
6.2
55.2
95.0
3.0
5.4
51.9
95.5
1.8
4.1
41.5
93.9
15.00 -
20.99
8.0
13.9
51.6
88.8
5.4
9.9
48.9
90.1
4.9
11.0
39.7
89.7
21.00 -
26.99
.2.4
36.6
43.5
74.9
15.1
35.2
43.5
80.1 13.7
31.0
34.8
78.8
27.00
33.00
32.95
-38.99
18.0
1.9
31.0
3.z
21.1
3.1
36.3
5.3
17.7
4.6
-.12.5
8.5
24.4
44.9 14.8
6.8
12.4
3.1
33.4
7.0
21.1
6.4
47.8
14.4
39.00
-44.99
0.3
0.5
1.2
2.0
0.5
1.0
2.1-- *3-.4:- 0.3
0-.6
3.2
7-.;3"
45.00
-50.99
0.4
0.7
0.9
1.5
0.3
0.6
1.6
2.9
0.8
1.9
3.0
6.7
51.00
-5o.99
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.9
0.4
0.8
1.3
2.3
0.3
0.8
2.1
4.9
57.0C
-62.99
O. 0
0.0
0.2
0.3
O. C
0.0
0.8
1.5- 0.3
-C..6
1.8
4.1--
63.00
-68.95
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
(.0
C.0
0.8
1.5
0.6
0.0
1.5
3.5
69.00
-74.99
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.8
1.5
0.0
0.0
1.5
3.5
75.00
-80.99
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
-D-.8---1;-5---0.1
-0.'2
1.5
3.5-
81.00
-86.99
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.6
1.0
0.8
1.5
0.6
1.3
1.5
3.3
87.00
-52.99
0.0
U.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
L.2
0.3
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.9
2.0
93.00
-s8.95
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
-0.2---0.3
0.2-0.5
.0.8
1.8-
99.00
105.00
-104.99
-110.99
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0 .0
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1
0. 2
0.2
0.6
0.5
1.4
1.2
111.00
-116.99
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.1
0.2'
0.2-0-.----C.-0"--Ci.0
0:5
''I--:7T.
117.00
-122.99
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
123.00
129.00
-128.99
-134.99
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.0
-0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1.----0.-r-
0.1
0.1
Q.0.3
0.5
0.4
1.0
0 -:9
135.00
-140.99
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.6
141.00
-146.99
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.4
147.00
-150.00
C.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.0
0.0
'-'.-0:0-----0-.-0----0-.1-----07Z-----
0.1
-0--.7E
CASES PROCESSED
NO. BLANK DATA
58.0561
5.0000
54.3306
44;0000
44.23139
MINIMUM VALUE
1.0000
2.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE
SUM OF SCORES
110.0000
1440.6533
137.0000
146q;04447--
149.0000
----1783:S470
SUM SOO. SCORES
39789.7734
46712.7969
50814.1367
MEAN
--DWD. ()EY. IN)
24.8148
3421
27.0390
11.-3437
29.0263
17.4995
51t40. UE
V. IN
-118.4149
11.4496
17.700?
MEDIAN
24.8719
2.6.1328
26.5660
la.
How many pupils are in your class?
(Give actual number)
SCO
RF
INTER VAL S
PCT
CF
P -8LW
FG
.ro-
aeq
PCT
CF P-8LW
FG-Irs3-
e-PCT
--C
FP-8LW
0.0
-2.99
1600
3.00.0
20.4
561 100.0
2U.S
425 100.0
3.00 -
8.99
14
2.3
599
99.8
16
2.9
559 99.6
1.3
3:1:-
423-99.5
9.00 -
14.99
19
3.2
585
97.5
25
4.5
543
96.8
19
4.5
410
96.5
15.00 -
20.99
'78
13.0
566
94.3
49
8.7
518
92.3
39
9.2
391
92.0
21.00 -
26.99
244
40.7
488
81.3
194
34.6
469
83:6-
276
32.0
----
352
82.8
27.00 -
32.99
209
34.d
244
40.7
205
?6.5
275
49.0
156
.56.7
216
50.8
33.00 -
38.99
LO
3.1
5.8
Si
9.1
70
12.5
*et
8.0
6J
14.1
39.00 --
44.99
50.8
15
2.5
5C.9
19.
-
226-- 6.1
45.00 -
50.94
40.7
10
1.7
4U.7
14
2.5
61.4
24
5.6
51.00 -
56.99
40.7
1.0
40.7
10
1.8
30.7
18
4.2
57.00 -
62.9
00.0
20.3
00.0
6 -1.1-
6.5
15
-3.-5
63.00 -
68.99
10.2
20.3
0C.0
61.1
00.0
13
3.1
69.00 -
74.99
00.0
13.2
CU.0
61.1
0.0
13
3.1
75.00 -
80.99
CJ.0
i0.2
00.0
6--
0.2
81.00 -
86.99
00.0
10.2
30.5
61.1
'
30.7
12
2.8
87.00 -
9::.00
92.49
98.99
0 0
0.0
0.0
1 1
0.2
0.2
1 C0.2
0.0
30.5
'2
6.4
1'
0.2
-----
92.1
99.00 -
104.99
00.0
10.2
00.0
20.4
10.2
71.6
105.00 -
110.99
IO.?
10.2
00.0
20.4
10.2
61.4
111.00 -
116.99
00.0
00.0
10.2
2-0.4
-6-
0.0
117.00 -
122.99
00.0
00.0
00.0
10.2
00.0
51.2
123.00 -
128.99
00.3
00.0
C0.0
10.2
10.2
51.2
129.00 -
134.99
00.0
00.0
00.0
1-4
0.9
135.00 -
140.99
00.0
00.0
10.2
0.2
10.2
30.7
141.00 -
146.95
00.0
00.0
C0.0
0.0
1C.2
0.5
147.00 -
150.00
00.0
00.0
00.0
0.0
10.2
10.2
CASES PROCESSED
Nl. ALANK DATA
= =600
561 4
425 6
MINIMUM VALUE
1.0000
2.0000
2.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE
110.0000
137.0000
149.0000
SUM OF SCORES
13619.0000
15400.0000
12494.0000
SUM SOD. SCORES
=441779.0000
485106.0000
489702.0000
MEAN
26.0317
27.4510
.29.3976
STNP. OEV. (NI
=7.6584
10.5433
SIND. 0E4. IN-11
=7.6648
10.5527
16.9911
ME01.N
25.6229
26.8299
27.1346
--------
On N3 V) Cn 7.( 3
720-4
rn c:C>p.iQ
Cs z Zt A X X pc :e
01
P. CD CD ,11E
pm I-.
ill
1?
Vs C Z a Co Cn
0 "11
0CS
33 b"0
mm
.n
Z 7D
mt mc
CD 0G 0G 7C C)
01 C) 11. 10
C)
CsMr-r-c
mC
D rn C
f.e7D
v,rn
v,m
en
04
01
011
II11
IIN
1II
IIII
H
0..1
WALT.
tn
1.A)
..n N
04 O C.; J`0
so
NJ 0. 04 CO CP 04 C) Cn
-. 4 CP 0. VI CP 4) CD
0 CO
p4 CP ND Co 0.1 CD
GP 04
CI 4% .0 4) CD 4) CD
C)
N43 J
1.4
0. 4% Lc *4
to
4%0n O. 4% a. lA 0 0 Co 4.0
LO
C0 0 ta tA 0 0 C31 03
C0 CO 'NI 0 0 CD 0
0 VI
I-. 0% 4% 0. 0 VI 0 ON
LoNDOCCP00
0a1
-wCo
-d
r-
crC0 4
4'
4'
r. Cc tn -4 1.0 C
0)W
,IN
) cc -4 I-, 4,0.000-.1
VI it, it) -4
cko
CT .t" N
0 C.'
C, 0)
ND 4D ND Co 03 04 .4 -4 CP CP tn L11 SA 4'4' Lo to wn ND 0. .-M
O o 4% C1 O. 1.4 Co 4' e) Cn NJ CO 4% 0 en ND CO 4' 0Ch IN) CC 4% CD C0 Po 0
C) 0 c: Cs C5 0 CD 0
Cs 0 0 0 CD
C) C) 0 0 CD C) CD 0 e) 0 C.,
0 C) 0 CY CD C5 C3 0 0 0 cl 0 Cs 0 CD cs 0 0 CD 0
c cs CD C5 0
I
Inrs0rn-4m
41 45 co no co 04 .4 C0 CP cr Ln kr 4' 4' 4%
LO ND N.. Ns 0.4 0.6
Lo
tm t-d .4 to 41 VI *4 J to
LP 04 04 0 4) Ln . .4 ko qp Ln I
mcA
CD ND 45 ND QD 43 4) 43 43 4D 42 ND 42 NP ND 4)
.0 .0 ND QC ND 4) 0 QD o
r-
0 41 0 40 40 up 45 un ND 4) 41 C 43 ND 4, QD .0 .0 43 QD 45 mD
00 40 42
111
0. Po
C5 CD 0 CD CD C) 0 CD CD CD CD 0 C) 0 CD CI
cs
CD 4% 4) C 43 N 04
COO cD CD CD C GC0
CD CD CD 0' Cs NJ 4. (.) sjr; ww 4%
ta 1-d
11
V. La 04
0000OCCDC.00C 0000000000.--JaDVILTIUD0-
T40.0.800 0$80000SOOSOOSO
C) 0 0 0 CP CD CD CD CD CD P4 cp cp a 0.
4% -4 La %,14 0. NJ
cp up up
-4
72
Crn
1 1111 .111 8
1'0 4% tn tn tn
ND
00000CD.30000000000000.1" LAI-714%04CD
00
cp cp
cp a 0
cp c) r4 p4 p4 P. 0) 1'0 4% CC ND Cc 0" 4% CO tO 04 ND
-n
.
4111111111
p. 4. 04 3 ND CD
8
CD C3 CD C7 CD CD 0 CD CD 0 CD CD 0 C) CD 0 C) 0- 04 LW cD L0.0 CO 4% Co
C:-
0......
t-
0 CS Cs 0 C) CD C. CD CD C
-tu tu Cr aD CP 04 4% 0.1 04 PO 0. CD
le
N.
Cp CD 0 0; 0 0 0' c'D -)0c00'0000000-00:-.1U1No
...............
C Cs C)
C CD C) 0-
0" Ci 0' 0 C C) 0' 0" 1- 0
C) C) 0" *.0 U.
-11
14d
0 C) 0 0 CD CD 0 cp cn c
c, 0
eD ci C1 cD e: 0
NJ- 0" QD VI CD
1D
OSOOS .000 0000O 0000
0 0 0 C) 0 C) 0 0' CI CD NJ 0 CD CD CD CS hJ 1%.1 Us 00
C) 4' LA 14) tn
1110110
1".) 4%
to
0 CD C) C7 CD CD 0 CD CD CD 0 0 cs CD CD CD 0 0. P. po CO Co LA C) k0
0 CD cs GP 0 C) 0 04 0. h4 Ns ND -4 -4
.4 CC tD
0.1 CC Op 04 03 0J CD
1I
11
11
1e- k.t1 cc, 43 40 cs
I
0 0 0 0 CD 0 C) C) CD 0 C5 CD
0-0. 041."
l0 CP tO
4% .0 CD
cc
cs CS
csCD CD 0
to LO 4' 4' 4' 4' Vi Cc CD OD LO LO CO NJ VI CD
ir
I* 0.d
01.000:000i00C.5006.000000;0"ln/-04U1N0
I *co
S..
.0,0 0 0 0
CY
h.
P4 NJ NS 0. 4% 1-0
VI Vito ND C) Co 45 0) CD
11
CD 0 CD CD CD 0 0 C 0
C) CD CD CD 14
C)
04 NJ I.J0 .ftta Cc VI 0
I)
0 0 0O0 0 C i r s NN t n 0 4 % r s 0 I N J %0 hµ 04,up 4% Co 4D 4, LO 0
.4
10
CmCP
C)
I:
ra to 4s.
4%
00
0 0 C) 0 0 C7 CD C5 C5 0 t.d
4 04 ND ND to 43 NJ 04 04 OD 0J
0 CD CD CD C3 CD C) 0. ND IA V14co C to 4' Co" 1* 12"co *4
tn 4% 4 .4
0. 0'
1 1
111111 1.
Ntn co
4000I
C5 CS C CD CD C) C) CD CD 0 04 0A 04 Na LO lo La 4' VI co NJP4 tn 4% 0 CD
Cr
a1-
0 c, C0 CD C) CD 0 ro 4% 0, CD VI 4:0 P. CD NJ 0J Co NO 40. ND Co 04 0 C)
W.
0".4
11)
Cr0w
QUESTI0N
scr,iF
0.0.00
6.00
10.00
14.00
18.00
22.00
26.00
30.0G
34.00
38.00
42.00
46.00
50.00
54.00
58.0C
62.00
66.00
70.00
74.00
/8.00
82.00
86.00
90.00
94.00
99.00
1;3INTiO4VALS,
-1.99
-5.99
-9.49
-13.99
-17.99
-21.99
-25.99
-29.49
-33.99
-37.99
-41.99
-45.99
-49.99
-53.99
-57.99
-61.99
-65.99
-69.99
-73.99
-77.9S
-91.99
-85.99
-89.99
-93.99
-97.99
-100.00
F4
1276
2e4
21747
IL24201001)
1C000'
000000
PCT
0.7
2.0
12.6
57.3
36.1
7.,3
I.a
0.'5
0.1
0.3
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
U.0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Now
many are boys?
rade_ aCF P-dLW
i
601 100.0
3
597
99.3
4.1
585
97.3
4.3
509
S4.7 175
265
47.4 218
68
11.3
13
21
3.5
I0
10
1.7
2
81.3
1
40.7
1
;'
0.3
J?
0.3
01
0.2
01
0.2
31,
0.2
01
0.2
1
b0.0
00
0.0
00
0.0
1
00.0
00
O.0
00
0.0
00
0.0
0
00.0
00
0.0
00
0.0
0
4CF
557
554
533
485
310
92
199765555221110000000
P-BLW
100.0
99.5
95.7
67.1
55.7
16.5
3.4
1.6
1.3
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FC1?37
142
1366011422I21212i110000000
G v-ed e- 6
PCI
CF P-BLW
0.0
423 101).0
4.0
423 100.0
8.7
406
96.0
33.6
369
87.2
32.2
227
53.7
14.2
91
21.5
2.6
31
7.3
0.9
20
4.7
0.5
I
0.5
14
i.. .
0.2
.4
(1.5
112;.1'
0.2
90.5
81.9
0.2
61.4
0.5
5-
1.2
0.2
3
3.-51
0.2
0.
0.2
36
.1:::
0.0
0.00.0
0()
0.(0
0.0
)
0.0
O0.0
0.0
00.0
0.9
00.0
0.0
00.0
Grads
PCT
0.'3
3.8
8.6
.i1.'
39.1
13.1
1.3
0.4
C.2
0.2
C.0
0.0
0.3
0.5
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
CASES PROCESSED
NO. BLANK OATA
MINIMUM VALUE'
MAXIMUM VALUE
SUM OF SCORES
=74
===
60150.0
58.0000
3072.0000
55780.0
70.0000
7870.0000
42382.0000
70.0000.
6426.660b
SUM SOO. SCORES
=122180.0000
130982.0000
127418.0000
MEAN
=13.4309
14.1293
15.1915_
STN0.
0EV. (N)
=4.7858
5.9599
8.3930
STNP.
DEV. (N-1)
=4.7898
5.9652
6.4030
MFOIA-1
=1"3.7232
14.5780
14.4559
CD 0 Ch 01 4 on ch 4,r 4) 01 01 C4 4 o o CD c3 Ch st0CD 0 0 4:1 uN 40 .00 sr on on on (V .4 .4 .4 .4 04 0 0 CDCD CA ,r.4
r- ya ,r 0 ,001 an r- ul V) a.0 U, U1 Ul U51 1 1 , 9
rn 01 CP' 01 CP P. 01 04 .4 .4 1..4 04 0 0 C) p 0000st ,r on ql
;
.4 Ca
so 00 u1 u1rJ4D00Nt0.pOOC).4CD0 1
4' 0 CA CA .4 0 0 10 .4 CD 0QiO00,00N
4 0 C) 41 C) CN 4. ChCO <7 0 ml '''h C" 4t.1 0 0 CP n1 w cu C)P. 0 0 0 0 03 0 UN 40 st-
aD <7 C) .0 ,r sr o' 0+ m0) -4 CM .4 .
4 4)
unirt .r - h. kr 01 r4 un on CD 4) 0 woi c) r4 I10 10 Ft) .4) :14 r4) ..ror:400 oo§o
. i000rc/
0 0 03 Ntot0C on I*. inno cn
coot CD 02 61 u, ul UN u1 .4 r4.4- .
IV .4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 014
000t
0 CD 01 1 I
tV
04. 0 43 en r. .4 C4 41 4 on en el en 01 r4 .4 .4 CD CD 0
Nt 01 c) e4 eN 4) C4 .4 0 0 0 CD CD CD CD 0 0 CD 0 0 0uN UN uN 4 eq I li C) 00 C) en P.
N O C) P.- 02 0 I% f.1
LA 0 CD .4 Nt CD 01 .4G CD 00 st 4) CD CO Ch 04
M 03 0 p- .4 01 mN ul UN 01c4 0 p. co tel 44 01 rq rn 0 0 CD CD st 0 0 .4 0 CD 0 40 CD ol .4SOW 1 f0 A. CA
.4 UN IA Nt 0 07 4.-10 c) CD CD CD CD 0 CD 0 0 001
4) ca 40 p. 43 43 0) p4 -4 .4 0 0 0 0 eq C7 CD .4 4D CD IDt
q.) 0 4 0 0 ca 43 ,r e.) 0 CD 0 (5 C7 (JO 0 0 CD CD C) CD44 44
1
1$ c) UN ) 0 00 0 0) 4 4 01 01 en .4 0 CD CD 43 0 CD C)t
CD C3 OD g) en 4) OD -4 C) 17 43 0 0 0 43 0 CD CD CD CD 431 0 G 00 ;111111
0. .4
U. .4 Al p. st P- C) 0 rl r4 esi e4 C) cD 0 0 0U O 09
03 I.. e4 (-4 .4 4 .46 C) 0 0 0 C) C) 43 CD CD CD CD CD
4 1 uN uN 4 ^4 111 111
uN 0+ CD a) m- 4 a) 4 0 r4 4) .4 0 CD CD 17 <7 4) 4)
() 0 0 ,a. .4 p. r. 4, a) 4D 0 0 CD CD 0 0 0 1) 0 0 17 0 1)
0" 40 Ch uN -4 C) -4 .4 .4 0 45 0 <7 0 0 C5$00 Nt 0+ . 4:1 I'M U:4, C5 0 47 CD ID ID 0 CD 0 (7 4)
0 cm Ch Ch cm Ch 0+ Ch +CP0crONCACAcm0crtrcr0
C) C) 4) 4, 0 q, Ntr''41 0 CD U1 01 CD 41' P. 01Nt 0 0 0% OD 01 CI^4 0 00 4 .0 0 Cr% Cntil
04 uN CD c4 on 04 4 404cn U't r.1 144
CAI
11 II 11 11 11 11 11 II II 11
woCP 41% 0 0 CP Cft Cp 0 Cp Ch e5% cm Ch Cm Ch Ch 0 0 0 Ch C) e5 vg ..4
11.1
.4 41 0 nh P.,...4 41 0 on P- .4 IA Ch 11 P. .4 U1 CA ill P. 0 0 F. aitu 0 cc
...3 U A% A% CD 0 . $
0aL> >U ;06 D.
C3 IIII1 1i11111,1111 i 1 1 1 1 !i lc lc 'a' (1 t t)2E
.4 LI) ...1 D Z J. C7 Z1-, CC 0 c) c) 0 0 CD CD 0 0 0 C7 o o o c) CD C) CD CD 0 (.41 c0 DE ): 0 0 Q1/1 0 0 0 CD 0 0 CD CD CD C) C7 C) cD 43 CD CD CD C) 0 C) 0 C7 oj ,. pm Z C5 CltrOUi U $ $ 002 ,C gE lE 41 Jt Z C)
.0 c) IA) 4D 0 ir 03 (NJ 4) CD .4P 0, CY 4) 0 4 02 4N1 40 CD st OD el C, «..-4C :3 ZD uu f.- h- (Ai
C O44 .4 44 c4 r4 co WI 01 s, 4 41 UN 41 .0 4) h, r- r- 1.) Z X X 0 0 *x 0 in r
10...TUN 1C.
How
man
y ar
e gi
rls?
scoRt,
INTEr:VALS
FG
rad
d e
aPCF
CF
/.18LW
FG
rade
IPCT
CF P -BLW
FG
ra. d
eb
PCT
CF
f"-BLW
0.0
1.99
71.2
600
100.0
4U.7
557
100.0
30.7
423
100.0
2.00
5.99
26
4.3
593
98.8
25
4.5
553
99.3
28
6.6
420
99.3
6.00 --
9.)9
34
14.0
567
94.5
77
13.8
528
94.8
56
13.2
392
92.7
10.00
13.99
238
39.7
483
80.5
1'08
-5.5
451
81.0
128
30.4
336
79.4
14.00
17.99
192
12.0
245
40.8
1E2
32.7
253
45.4
140
33.1
208
49.2
16.00 -
21.99
40
6.7
53
8.8
53
9.5
7!
12.?
41
9.7
68
16.1
22.00 --
25.99
71.2
13
2.2
a1.4
i8
3.2
71.7
27
6.4
26.00
29.99
30.5
61.0
5C.9
10
1.8
40.9
20
4.7
30.00
33.99
U-40
30.5
10.2
50.9
20.5
16
3.8
34.00 -
37.99
10.2
30.5
10.2
40.7
20.5
14
3.3
38.00 -
41.99
00.-1
L0.3
00.0
30.5
;3
0.0
12
2.8
42.00
45.99
0Cs.0
20.3
00.0
30.5
30.7
12
2.8
46.00 -
49.99
10.2
20.3
0U.0
:1
0.5
2O.
92.1
50.0C
53.99
10.2
10.2
00.6
30.5
-2
6.5
71.7
54.0C
51.99
00.0
00.0
20.4
30.5
00.0
51.2
58.00
61.99
00.0
00.0
00.0
10.2
00.0
51.2
62.00 .-
65.99
J0.0
00.0
00.0
..
0.2
00.0
51.2
66.00 -
69.99
3J.%;
00.0
10.?
10.2
10.2
51.2
70.00 .-
73.99
Jj.0
00.0
00.0
00.0
00.0
40.9
74.00 .-
77.49
00.0
00.0
oo:b
00.0
20.5
40.9
78.0C
80.00
0').0
00.0
00.0
00.0
20.5
20.5
CASES psoct:sseo
=
NO. BLANK DATA
z:
600 6
557 8
423 a
MINIMUM VALUE
=0.0
0.0
0.0
MAXIMUM VALUE
=52.0000
- --
64*-
066-
6--
----
-86
.000
0S
UM
OF 5001(
S=
7604.0000
7387.0000
6056.0000
SUM SO0. SCORES
=109626.0000
116203.0000
123750.0000
MEAN
=12.6733
13.2621
14.3168
SLID.
:,EV. (N)
=4.7007
5.7218
9.3586
'STNO. 0EV. (.41) =
4.7046
5.7270
9.3697
MEDIAN
=1.3.0756
13.4848
13.8906
2. How many of the pupils in your class receive compensatory reading instruction
as defined above?
0 All of the pupils in my class receive compensatory readinginstruction
SCORE IN F6-vacie
PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CFyCF P-8LW F
arwaa 6PCT CF F-BLW
0.0 37.9 64.7 58.5 100.0 35.1 64.0 54.7 100.0 26.1 58.3 44.8 100.01.000 20.7 35.3 20.7 35.3 19.7 36.0 19.7 36.0 18.7 41.7 18.7 41.7
CASES PROCESSED - 58.5473 54.7435 44.8092MINIMUM VALUE - 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES - 20.6851 19.6840 18.7005SUM SQ0. SCORES 20.6851 19.6840 18.7005MEAN 0.3533 0.3596 0.4173STMD. DEV. (N) = 0.4780 0.4799 0.4931STND. OEV. IN-1) = 0.4821 0.4843 0.4987MEDIAN 0.2731 0.2807 0.3581
. -SCURF. INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF P -151W CF P-OLW
0.01.000
CASES PROCESSED
396210
=
65.3 606 100.034.7 210 34.7
60o
352 62.3 5,e213 37.7 213
565
100..0251 58.2 4.31_ 130.037.7 160 41.8 180 41.8
.101MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.000SUS OF SCORES - 210.0000 213.0000 180.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 210.0000 213.0000 180.00aMEAN 0.3465 0.3770 0.4176SIND. OEV. (N) = 0.4759 0.41146 0.4932
.0.4937STNO. DEV. (4 -1) = 0.4763 0.4851MEDIAN 0.2652 0.3C)26 0.3586
gUtSTION 28 from me
some from me and some from another teacher
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.0002.000
rodeF PC
c.ra.clePCT CF P-BLW CF P-BLW
38.5 65.7 58.5 100.0 34.5 63.1. 54.7 100.012.1 20.7 20.1 34.3 11.8 21.6 20.2 36.97.9 13.6 7.9 13.6 8.4 15.4 8.4 15.3
F
27.310.47.1
Y.:o4.e. 4PCT
. CF Pl3LW
61.0 44.8 100.023.2 17.5-39:015.8 7.1 15.8
CASES PROCESSED = 58.5473 54.7435 44:11092-MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES 26.0111 28.6107 24:3354:-SUM SOU. SCORES 43.8878 45.4175 38.6541MEAN 0.4784 0.5226 0.5476STN!). DEV. IN)STNO. UEV. IN-1)
==
0.72160.7278
0.74600.7529
*075020.7587
MEOIAN 0.2608 0.2925 0.3196
SCORL INTERVAL S F Pef tF P -BLh CF -CO P-BLW
0.0 4(5 66.8 606 100.0 352 62.2 565 100.0 261 6C.6 431 100.01.000 123 20.3 201 33.2 121 21.4 213. 37.7 100 23.2 170 39.42.000 78 12.9 78 12.9 92 16.3 92 16.3 70 16.2 70 16.2
CASES PROCESSED = 606 565 431MINTMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0600 2.0000 2.0000SUM UF SCORES 279.0000 305.0000 240.0000SUM SOU. SCORES = 435.0000 489.0000 380.0000MEIC4 0.4604 0.5398 0.5568STNP. CEV. IN) = 0.7112 0.7577 0.7560SIND. OEV. IN-1) = 0.7118 0.7584 0.7569MEOIAN 0.2481 0.3026 0.3257
QUESTION 2C 0 Selected pupils in my class receive compensatory readinginstruction
SCORE INTERVALS
0.G1.000
F
12.146.5
PCT CF
20.6 58.579.4 46.5
P -8LW
100.079.4
13.841.-0-
31.7 44.8 100.0
F 470G-11244 WCF P-8L---FOertYP=8UW25.1 54.7 100.014.244.-f----71.0--TC;9)0;6--61L5-----30:W--Ea;3
CASES PROCESSED = 56.5473 54.7435 44.8092MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 46.4624 40.9879 30.5982SUM-50D. SCORES 46.4624 40.9879MEAN 0.7936 0.7487 0.6829STND. OEV. (N)STNC. 0EV. iN-11
==
0.40470.4082
0.4337 0.4654--CLW70-6----
MEDIAN 6.8699 0.8321 0.7677
SCORE INTERVALs F ()CT CF P -BLW F Pci CF ip-BLw -0 PCT CF P-ELw
0.0 132 21.8 606 100.0 154 27.3 565 100.0 147 34.1_ 431 100.01.000 474 78.2 474 78.2 411 72.7 411 72.7 284 65.9 284 65.9
CASES PROCESSED = 606 565 431MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0u00SUM CF SCORES = 474.0000 411.0000 284.0.400SUM SOD. SCORES = 474.0000 411.0000 254.0000MEAN 0.7822 0.7274 0.6189SIND. DEV. (N) 0.4128 0.4453STNO. DEV. (N-1) = 0.4131 0.4457
.0.47410.4746
MEDIAN 0.8608 0.8127 0.7412
QUESTION 20
SCORE INTERVALS
from me
CD some from me and some from another teacher
F PCT CF P -BLW PCT
0.0 14.0 24.0 58.5 100.0 15.8 28.8 54.7 10D.0 15.5 34.7 44.8 100.01.0002.000
17.626.9
30.1 . 44.5-76.045.9 26.9 45.9
16.2 29.6 39.0 71.222.8 41.6 22.8 41.6
13.7 30.5 29.3 65.315.6 34.8 15.6 34.8
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE
===
58.54730.02.0000
54.74350.02.0000
44.80920.02.0000
SUM OF SCORES = 71.4D15 61.7598 44.6T/USUM SOD. SCORES = 125.1761 107.3206 76.0732MEAN 1.2196 1.1282 1.0015STND. DEV. (N) = 0.8067 0e0293STN). DEV. (N-1) = 0.8137 0.8369 0.8429MEDIAN. 1.3644_ 1.2164 1.0023
:1
SCORE INTERVALS F
0.0 158
PCT CF P-8LW F
Z6.1 606 100.0 176
PCT CF P-8LW F
31.2 565 100.0 158
PCT CF P -BLW
36.7 431 1D0.01.0002.000
158290
26.1 448 73.9 15647.9 290 47.9 233
27.6 389 68.8 13741.2 233 41.2.136
31.8 273 63.331.6 136 31.6
CASES PROCESSED = 606 565 431MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES = 738.0000 622.0000 409.0000.SUM SOD. SCORES = 1318.0000 1088.0000 681.6060MEAN = 1.2178 1.1009 0.9490§TAD. DEV. (N) = 0.8318 0.8448 0.8243STNO. DEV. (N-1) = 0.8324 0.8456 0.8253MEDIAN = 1.4177 1.1827 0.9197
How many pupils receive compensatory reading instruction from you? (Include any
pupils who may be sent to your classroom especially for compensatory readinginstruction.)
QUESTION 3
SCURE INTERVALS
0.0 -
3.00 -9.00 -15.00 -21.00 -2_7.00 -33.00 -39.00:5.00 -51.0G57.00 --63.00 -69.00 -75.00 -81.00 -87.00 --93.00 -99.00
105.00 -111.00 -117.00123.00 -'129.00 -135.00141.00
2.998.9914.9920.9926.9932.9938.4944.9950.9956.9962.9968.9974.9980.9986.9952.9998.99104.99110.99116.99122.99128.99134.99140.99144.00
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQU. SCORESMEANSTND. OEV. IN) =STNO. DEV. 04-1)MEOIAN
Total number of pupils
Gra_ct,2 _ YF PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CO F
37 6.4224 38.9122 21.262 10.867 11.650 8.1
1.92 0.3O 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O 0.01 0.2O 0.00 0.0C 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O L..0
o 0.0
576 100.0 1 25 4.8 524 100.0539 93.6 164 31.3 499 95.2315 54.7 103 19.7 335 63.9193 33.5 67 12.8 232 44.3131 22.7 81 15.5 165 31.564 11.1 55 10.5 84 16.014 2.4 19 3.6 29 5.53. 0.5 1 0.2 10 1.91 0.2 1 0.2 9 1.71 0.2 3 0.6 8 1.5
1 0.2 5 1.0O 0.0 4 0.8O 0.0 4 0.8
576300.0
91.00007853.0000 -
16141:660613.63379.69879;7072
10.3279
1 0.21 0.2I 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.2O 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O *0.0O 0.00 0.0O- 0.0O 0.0O 0.0
Gedd, GPCT CF P -8LW
26 6.6109 27.762 15.752 13.267 17.052 13.213 3.3350
20
1 0.22 0.4l' 0.2000
0.00.00.0
O 0.0O 0.00 6.0O 0.0O 0.0O 0.0
4 0.8 03 0.6 01 0.2 0O 0.0 00 0.0 1
O 0.0 0O 0.0 0
O 0.0 0O 0.0 0
0.81.30.00.30.50.00.00.0 20.0 20.0----- 2
0.3 20.0 1
394 100.0368 93.4259 65.7197 50.0145 36.8-'
78 19.826 6.613 3.310 2.55 1.35 1.3.
4 1.02 0.52 0.5
0.50.50.50.50.3
O 0.0 0O 0.0 1
O 0.0 0
0.004.0
0.00.00.30.0
11
1
1
0
0.30.30.30.30.30.0
52441
39437
0.093.0000
8614.0000216436.0000
16.438911.950211.96113.2524
0.0141.0000
6907.0000195227.0000
17.530513.718013.735415.0000
0UFSTION 3How many pupils receive compensatory reading instruction from you? (Include any
pupils who may be sent to your classroom especially for compensatory readinginstruction.)
Total number of pupils
SCORE INTERVALS F PC,i6 rode a
CF 0-81'W
0.0 -- Z.99 4.8 8.5 56.0 100.03.00 - 8.99 22.4 39.9 51;3 91;59.00 - 14.99 11.6 20.7 28.9 51.615.00 - 20.99 5.7 10.1 17.3 30.921.00 -- 6.1 10.8 11:6 20.727.00 - 32.99 4.3 7.7 5.6 9.933.00 - 38.99 0.9 1.7 1.2 2.239.00 - 44.139 6:545.00 50.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.151.00 -57.0C -
56.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1_
63.00 - 68.9S 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.169.G0 74.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.175.00 - 80:94-* 0.-ti 130.- -Oa 0.181.00 - 86.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.187.00 - S2.99 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.193.00 - S 8. 97T -0 .0 11. -5- --11:0- -z0 TO99.00 - 104.99 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0
105.00 - 110.99 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0111.00 - 116.99 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -7-0;0 7
117.00 - 122.99 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0123.00 - 128.99 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0
-1-2-4.00 - 134.99 0.0 0.:6 -0.0 -0.UF135.00 - 140.99 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 -0.0141.00 - 144.00 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0
1
I
F PCPranria.itCF P-BLW
! 2.4 4.8 51.1 100.01 1 8 .9 48.7110.0 19.5 31.9 62.4
; 6.2 12.2 21.9 42.9: 8.1 15.9 15.7 30.7
4.9 9.6 7.6 14.8i 1.9 3.6 2.7 5.3
0.1 0.1 0.8 1.60.0 0.0 0.8 1.50.1 0.3 0.8 1.50.10.0G.00.10.30.10.0C.00.00.00.00.00.0
I 0.00.0
0.3 0.6 1.20.0 0.5 0.90.0 0.5 0.90.3 0.5 0.90.5 0.3 0c70.2 0.1 0.20.0 -0.0 -0.00.0 -0.0 -0.00.0 -0.0 -0.00.0 -0.0 .-0.00.0 -0.0 -0.00.0 -0.0 -0.00.0 -0.0 -4,00.0 -0.0 -0.00.0 -0.0 -0.0
CASES PROCESSED = 56.0370 51.0951NO. BLANK OA TA = 29.0000 38.0000RTNIETO VALUE = 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 91.0000 93.0000SUM OF SCORES 724.9241
-1-4504.4961825.5935
IUM-3QD. SCORES = 20783.4688MEAN 12.9365 16.1580SIND. DEV. IN)"SYNb.
= 9.5647 12.0698DEV. (4-1) = 9.6512 12.1897
MEDIAN = 9.4682 12.8047
F
3.1
PCF
7.6
CF
40.1
P -BUJ
100.011.4 85.3 13.3 25.6 63.96.4 16.0 20.3 50.66.7 16.6 13.8 34.54.9 12.2 7.2 17.91.2 2.9 2.3 5.70.2 0.6 1.1 2.80.5 1.3 0.9 2.20.0 0.0 0.4 0.90.0 0.1 0.4' 0.90.2 0.4 0.3 0.80.0 0.0 0.2 0.40.0 0.0 0.2 0.40.0 0.0 0.2 0.40.0 0.0 0.2 0.40.0 0.0 0.2 0.40.1 0.2 0.2 0.40.0 0.0 0.1 0.20.0 0.0 0.1 04.Z.0.0 0.0 0.1 0.20.0 0.0 0.1 0.20.0 0.0 0.1 0.2C4.1 0.2 0.1 0.20.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0
40.084037.00000.0
141.0000683.3975
18532.695317.049113.102413.Lb9015.2112
O
t c1
Mg.
4 I . . . 0,4 .4o coo
4 CO-
r4 04
14. I0ri
t.4'N
02 0
..
4001 «NI
01 AO 1%. N"0 N
0 0 0 CT 61t0 ttO0 01 04 N 14. N0 0
41
4' 01
00
0 0
r40aQ
01 N.
0 0
N00
NNN -4 0 0 0000,0,0,0 0 0 0 0
1 I 1?
r11
00O 0 0
0O 0 -01111
ONO 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 .4
000 0 0 0 0O00000 o 0 0 0
11 111 'MI 0 000 0 0 0 0
1 I
'0 N 0.1 m re 0 00 NO '404000 00 00
m N
bl tr) wt 14. N N1.3 tttt OtOtt
0.1 01 14%4. IA -4000oN r4
U. O'. P. P.
024
0 0 0 4401101111P..N0000
N0
0 .4 00 0 0
O 0 00 0
I
-00 0* 0.000 0 01 1 I I I
o 4. rft o elo Tr-! 4. N0 cri00 r
ill Nn t4,o cock.
..40 r.. P4 .004, r. tA
01 4.
CO°3 wit'. MIA CIN
O3 0 N NM-1 un
,000004. 0 01 *0 **000 -00100 p1.Y UN in4ossopoo00 0 0
00 0 0 0osos0 0 0 0 0
;2 0 *,0 Ch 00 N CO 0 01 .4 4 .4 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
ci3 OrAi1a;;AlsIZ088188O8O804808-1 0.3. itt N x/ 1 1 1 1 t I I 1 I
eo
et 03 !61 N 14 CO In N wt 0=4 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0o: 0
114 °Cg %0:1'..N0000000001 Crl . I 1
ft
$ 1"i mthiNr400Nopooa0000CI. 4) Pft kr% vo 4, 000 CD C3 0 0 c) Fa cD C2 0 0 Q,O
ol PO r4.1
U. 43 F3 r4 On NL.I 0 b r4 00 0 0 10 C) CD 1CD C2; 0'0 *0 , !rri.041(4114(\100 000 oopoom000cs
Co0 0 0:Co cr cr. !ai cftCO *co tr. 0 :m cn cr lir CP 0 C2CA 0 0 0% 1:14 0 0 X04 0 0 0% crprAo+oocAgNo- ! . ,.
UN co rN,ro r4 0,0 ol Po - al co 0N ro ro C2r4 rus4 01 0ri Qr uN 4D 4) 42 r- Pft 02
1 1 1 1 f 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 .1 1
000010001000000,_0001000000000:00000000 0 0 0 10 0oa- 1 Ict: Ic: I
0 'c%) 4) 0 ,4 03 r4 or c4 oD, 4. rg oD C2 02.4 !^4 Cn in 4- 0 0 0 o2 ro.
o I., IA po, p..0-4 0 it) al 4D (I 4) 0 HDa0000NNr 4Nio0o!! I A r4 C2 oft al 4) 0 al 4701 01 '4
4 L64.
II 11 II
°a4MI LU
VIU.k 0
4>
0. 4.J
N co Zw 0-1
V7 Z4 0 ".Z Z
c0
O
ed
;0"
E
0
oi
Dr 0 45 Om 41' CY 01 N; 4; UN C) C) UN UN pin In 04 01 CD CD CP C3_J 1,0oa 04) U! Oft .3* 0 r4 Pi Pi nlg0 C) C) C) CP CD C) C0 CP1 0 0 MD 4P N
ri
14. CO un 101 sr C3 Oa CD 4) 4e 0 04 N 1-e r4 r4 Pi CD CDU PIN. 1I1 CC) Ito NI rl rM N 1-e
I- 0SJO. m
u- rn
Cft IA N
0 CO01 om
CD .- 0 om opN ON 41 CYP i
3; CD r4 40 pi 0 on u1*pets,OD CD N. uN ri CY 02 CY
cD CN MD 64
u. 0) 01 0 efl M-f 0 4, r4
131 n1 CO .4
-43
kljcr. ul l to 01 00 00 4 11 o
04 ri Nt 0) Nt UlN pi r4
u. U (ft l'C4
4. 0 r-P- re?
0 It% 0i 0 0
141 0 M0 0 0
0 0
N 0 N 0 .4
NO .O0
Pi C)
(4 rt1
N 41I
00io
0
-cN
N000
N N
ONO11040
0 0
00011 110 0 0
0 0 0
N 0 0
0001-1 0 0
N 0 0
000
.4 0 0
in 0 011 o000
e4 0
000000
000
0 0 0o
0 0 0
000
0 o3 4.4 p. r4 uN r4 o4 04 0 CD C3 0 0 0 CD.4a0 0 o1 00 .4 Nt yl 0 CD CD 0 C) CD CD cD 0 0 0 CD 0I CD 01 O1 on r4
U. el 0 01 al 0 0 O1 on 04 .4 cp CD CD 0AU P. 01u1
n...c0 01uN 044 r4
C)
©0
O 000
0 0
a00
CP C)
00
0 000
0 0
O 01100
0 0
O
C) 0 0 ul on u) g)CD C3 0 4) m5 uN 4)CD 0 0 Pi P. Oa 01090 Pa 0 0d
11
In C) OthP. h 47+43 P. .43PM44
In
cD CD CD vO 04CD CD C3 04 u1 pi0 CD 0 Cr. 4- OD in
CD 0 CD 0 CD .4 pi 44io
*) r. 0 cD 0) CN CO.4 st 41 '4 C3U1 N m)
C) CD C3 0 041,010 CD C3 m 6.:C)!C3 0 0 N.0
0'0 0 0 P.- -.4 104o;
,o1 ^1 0,0n r4 M.P. 44 41!Prr4 P. r4 -4.0 .4r on 04 04 0 0 04 CD 0 CD CD CD cD 0 C) CD P- 01 mp ulof0000me oo0O01101100.410 1..0P-P-4)04000000000000000 0PMN,-,
ql ,r .4- 41 oo -4 .4 0.0 r4 CP 0 CD CD:CD CD 0,0 CD.4 .4 141 CP 141 N -
P4
I
U.' c r ' CP C l i C P C T Co 0 1 7 1 C r C P 1 3 + c e, Ch c p CP C l i CP C i C P C P 0 i i it it It It 11
:
It It it ll
j CP 7. cp cp cp 7, cri 0. cr 0. 7, 7, Ct. Cft 0 CN CN O 71,C11 04. .
4;> .4 IA CI% PO t".. ..4 uN th Ph p4 .4 ul CN on p- .4 Ul Ch h) P. C3 .Ca u) .4'
II).4 .4 r4 co N m1 01 0 ,r ,r un wl 42 mD 42 e- P.- a/ 11.1 44 W, ...... 1
SU tn I-- LU SU 0 Ce . 22P. 0 4r M n Ill 0 ' ..0 ...
z LIJ 0... .t..) 414 C) 0. '
I I 1 I I I I I I v II I 11-1 I i I I I (7)>;>.) > >1u4 ix Z , v) ...1.1 U.Ia 0 cD c) 0 0 C) 00 0 00 0 0 C.) C) 0 CD 00 CD cl. <C DCI3E CD: CD CD0 0000000000000,00000000 ..1 II 01 i Ztd ip 1 lo: Ad, a) 3E 27 C VI' 11.4tn CD (11 4D CD 4r CO N 3 0 4p CO N 40 0 .4p ca C4 40 0 4. co to ..y.4 ZE IA CD,r4
.. .4 .4 co cQ r1 0rt 01 4, 0 uN 44 u4 4) 43 e- p- P- (A 2!.)c lr 3 41 Z ;!,0.4 CD 4141 :, :D:Uu 1.- PrAiu.0 z x lc 0 0:x 0 0 lE
i!
QUESTION 3
SC
OR
E
PART
INTERVALS
8
F
b. How many are girls?
Geck-cle
PCT
CF P-8Lw
Gra.cLe
;c-litir----F-E
xcuci4.F
PCT
Pur
P-8144
0.0
-1.99
11.4
20.5
55.6 100.0
6.1
12.0
50.7
100.0
4.6
11.7
39.6
100.0
2.00 -
5.99
23.2
41.7
44.2
79.5
20.4
4U.3
44.6
88.0
14.5
36.6
35.0
88.3
6.00 -
9.99
9.1
16.3
21.0
37.8
9.5
18.7
24.2
47.7
6.8
17.2-
20.5
51.7
10.00 -
13.99
5.9
10.6
11.9
21.4
7.9
15.5
14.7
29.0
7.1
17.8
13.7
34.5
14.00 -
17.99
4.8
8.6
6.0
16.9
4.8
9.4
6.9
-13.5
18.00 -
21.99
1.0
1.9
1.2
2.2
1.1
2.2
2.14.1
1.53.7
2.2
5.7
22.00 -
25.99
0.1
0.20.2
0.4
0.4
0.7
1.0
1.9
0.24.5
0.8
2.0
26.00 -
29.99
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.11
0.61.2
0.4
1.0
0.6
1.5
30.00 -
33.99
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.6
1.2
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.5
34.00-
37.99
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.6
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
38.00
41.99
0:00.4)
0.1-
0:13
0.5
0;0---
0.2
0.4
42.0C -
45.99
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
46.00 -
49.99
0.1
0.2
-0.1
0.1
---0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
C.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
50.00 -
53.99
0.0
-0.0
0.0
D;-0
0.1
0.2
0.1
O.
D.2
0.4
54.00 -
57.99
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
58.0C -
61.99
0.0
0.0
-0.0
*0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.0
.-0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
-----62.00-
65.99
0.0
0.0-0.0
-43.00.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.4
66.00 -
69.99
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.0
C.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
70.00 -
73.99
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
74.0D- -
77.99
0.0
0.0orb
-0.0
-0.0
D*0
0.0
0.1
0.2
78.00 -
81.99
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
82.00 -
-----86.00-
85.99
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.0
0,0
-0.0
.-0.0
PS.99
0.-o0.0
-0.0-7o7u-
-13 .00. a
0.0-0.0
-0.0
0.0
90.00 -
53.99
0.00.0
-0.0
-0.0
C.0
O.
-0.0-0.0
0.0
0.0-0.0
- -0.094.00
57.99
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.0
-0.0
-
106.00-
0.0o
0.0-0.0
-0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.0
CASES PROCESSED
BLANK DATA
=55.5659
S47154IWO
50.7180
39.6080
40.0000
MINIMUM VALUE
=0.0
0.0
6.0
MAXIMUM VALUE
48.0000
56.0000
78.0000
-S-11M-TIF-tCeart-
-3-11g;TS-46-
358.6196
IF27913139-
SUM SAO. SCORES
=3207.3213
4652.9688
4201.9805
MEAN
5.5671
7.0709
7.6477
=-S
al&STAND. DEV. iNi
674-6-10-
6.15494
STNO. °EV. IN-1/
=5.2172
6.5;457
6.9882
MEDIAN
4.8279
5.7728
'
STIf.N
PAxi
4
b. How mazy are girls?
ra 41-
Y&
ro-cia,CF
P-8114
300X'.
FiJeT6
OCT
CF
P-BLW
F17F-414
0.0
-1.99
'.,6
it.3
570
100.0
68
13.1
519
100.0
41
10.5
390
100.0
2.00 -
5.99
249
43.7
474
e3.2
194
37.4
451
86.9
147
37.7
349
89.5
6.00 -
9.99
ed
i5.4
225
39.5
102
19.T
257
49.5
69
17.7
202
51.8
10.00 -
13.99
b9
1.2.1
137
24.0
80
15.4
155
29.9
57
14.6
133
34.1
1'..00 -
17.99
33
9.3
68
11.9
51
9.8
75
14.5
4.9
12.6
76
19.5
18.00 -
21.99
i2
2.1
15
2.6
14
2.7
24
4.6
17
4.4
27
6.9
2:f.CC -
25.99
20.4
30.5
51.0
10
1.9
30.8
10
2.6
26.00 -
29.99
00.0
10.2
0D.0
51.0
41.0
71.8
3000
33.99
00.0
10.2
00.0
51.0
10.3
30.8
34.00 -
37.99
00.0
10.2
10.2
51.0
00.0
20.5
3t1.00 -
41.99
C0.0
10.2
10.2
40.8
00.0
20.5
41.00 -
45.19
00.0
10.2
20.4
30.6
00,0
20.5
46.00 -
49.99
10.?
10.2
00.0
10.2
00.0
20.5
50.00 -
53.99
00.0
00.0
00.0
10*2
10.3
20.5
54.00 -
57.99
0.0
00.0
10.2
10.2
00.0
10.3
58.00.-
61.9S
00.0
00.0
00.0
00.0
00.0
10.3
62.00 -
65.99
00.0
00.0
00.0
66.0
o0.0
10.3
66.00 -
69.55
00.0
02.0
G0.0
00.0
00.0
10.3
70.00 -
73.99
0U.0
00.0
,0
0.0
00.0
00.0
1(1.3
74.00 -
17.99
00.0
00.0
00.0
.0
0.0
00.0
10.3
78.00 -
81.9S
00.0
00.0
00.0
00.0
10.3
10.3
82.00 -
85.99
00.0
00,0
0'0.0
00.0
00.0
00.0
86.00 -
89.49
.)
0.0
00.0
00
00.0
C0.0
00.0
50.00 -
93.99
0u...
00.0
00.0.
00.0
00.0
00.0
94.00 -
57.99
00.0
00.0
00.3
00.0
00.0
00.0
98.00 -
100.00
00.0
00.0
00.0
00.0
00.0
00.0
CASES PRUCESSED
=570
36
519
390
N1.-61:-ANVOATA =
46
41
MINIMUM VALUE
0.0
0.0
0.0
maxImumymus
48.0000
56.0000
78.0000
SUM OF SCORES
=3383.0005
3749.0000
3085.0000
SUM SQO. SCORES
=36007.0000
48445.0000
45213.0000
ME/IN
5.9351
7.2235
7.9103
ST '0. O'eV.
(N)
=5.2863
6.4159
7.3047
SL. OEV. (N-1)
=5.2909
6.4221
7.3141
MEOltN
5.0361
5.9485
6.4058
4A 4. What is the age range of the children in your compensatory reading class?
Age of oldest child:Years Months
SCORE INTERVAL S F
GRADE
PCT
2.
CF P-SLY
GRADE
PC T-
4 GRADE 6
CV- Pl;;81WF
40.0060.00
--
59.9999.99
0.06.5
0.013.7
47.447.4
100.0100.0
0.1---0-;11-
0.3 42.8 100.0 0.0 0.0--070----cr.
35.135.1
100.0160.00
100.00 - 139.99 40.5 85.5 40.9 86.3 0.2 0.4 42.7 99.7 2.0 5.7 35.1 100.0140.00 - 179.99 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.8 33.0 77.0 42.6 99.3 31.3 89.1 33.1 94.3
-180.0-0 - 219.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 , 9.0 21.0 9.6 22.3 -15.7220.00 - 259.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.6 1.3 ;0.0 0.0 0.4 1.1260.00 299.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.1
340.005g49379.99
0.00.0
0.00.0 0.2 0.4 6:130.0
0.00.0
0.20.2
0.60.6
0.2 0.60.0 0.0
0.40.2
-La-0.5
380.00 419.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 j 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5420.00 - 459.99 C.0- -0.0 0.2 -6;6- 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0460.00 499.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 U.5500.00 539.99 0.0 U.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 U.0 0.2 0.5
-54-0-;00 -579:9-9 0.0 '0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.2 o.580.00 619.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 . 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5620.00 -
-c60r:a0 -7659.99
-6-139719-0.0TE. 0
0.00.0
0.2 0.4-11.4
; 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 : 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.50.-0 0.2 0.6 0.1 o.2 0.2 0.5
700.00 . 739.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 -0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2740.00 779.99 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.6 . 0.0 0.0 -0.0
a --a. 0.1 0.3 ! moo---TGIT U0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 i
CASES PROLE SSEDBL INK UAW -46--
MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =
47.4237
84.0000765.0000
35.0894-42.841-T114.0000
16.0000
88.0000122.0000720.0000
SUM OF SZURE3SUM SQD SC ORE S =MEAN
--5278.9336670621.3750
111.3142
745.T)000--5916.4414
911888.1250
5696.5430982074.3125
162.3438-SIN D *-
STNO. KIEV.MEDIAN
-41.8354-42.2836
116.9790
138.080247.072847.6319
40.401540.9898
159.8871r2-5:750
QUESTION 4a
4. What is the age range of the children in your compensatory reading class?
GRADE 2
Age of oldest child:Years Months
GRADE 4 GRADE 6
SCAKE
40.00 -60.00 -100.00140.00180.002s0.00260.G0 -300.00 -340.00380.00420.00460.00500.00540.00 -580.00 -620.00
. .
660.00700.00740.00780.00
INTEkVALS
59.9999.99139.99179.99
- 219.99259.99299.99319.99379.99419.99459.99
- 499.95539.99579.99619.99659.99
- 699.99739.99
- 779.99- 800.00
065
42020
000
0000oo
ooo
2
0
PCT
0.013.385.90.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0o.o0.00.00.00.00.00.40.0
P-BLW
489_100.045§ 100.0424 86.7
4 0.82 0.42 0.42__ 0.4.2 0.42 0.42 0.44 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.2 0.42 0.4'2 0.42 0.42 0.40 0.0
F
I
01
143933
0
000000000
01
10
PCT
0.20.00.277.421.00.70.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.20.0
CF
443442442441985222
2
2
22
2
222
2
2
1
0
P-8LW
100099.899.899.522.11.10.5_0.50.50.5
F
00
2130612001
0000000
01
1
0
PCT
0.00.06.1
89.53.50.0
.0.00.30.0
.0.00.00.00.00000.00.0
CF P -BLW
342 100,0.342 100.0342 100.0321_93.915 4.43 0.93_ 0.93 0.92 0.62 0.6
0.50.5
2 0.62 0.62 0.6
0.50.50.5
2 0.62 0.62 0.6
0.50.50.5
0.3G.30.0
2 0.61 0.30 0.0
0.20.0
0 0.0
CASES PROCESSED-0. BLANK DA IAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALU-,i-3m OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCNESMEAN§rN0. DEV. (NISIND. DEV. (N-1)_MEDIAN
==
=
===
48911734.0000765.0000
54510.00006958916.0000
111.472442.483142.5266117.0952
44312216.0000
34289
-122.0000jgpl0000
55406.00009622774.0000
162.005843.484143.5479159.6078
745.000060864.0000
9144526.0000137.390542.025242.0727125.714----------
.QUESTION 48
4. What is the age range of the children in your compensatory reading class?
Age of youngest child: /Years Months
SCOREINTERVALS F
GRADE
PCT
2
CF P-BLW F
GRADE 4
PCT a-154tLW
_40.0060.00 -
59.9999.99
O457
0.095.4
479479
100.0100.0
07
0.01.6
441 100.0441 100.0
100.00 - 139.99 20 4.2 22 4.6 425 96.4 434 98.4_140.007_139.99180.00 219.99
00
0.00.0
2 0.40.4
61
1.40.2
9 2.0TG
220.00 259.99 0 0.0 2 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5260.00 - 299.99 0 0.0 2 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5
O 0.0 i---6;4 0 0.0 I 0.5340.00 - 379.99 0 0.0 2 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5380.00 - 419.99 0 0.0 2. 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5420.00 -- -459.99 0 0.0 2 0.4 0 6:6 20.5460.00 - 499.99 o o.o 2 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5500.00 - 539.99 0 0.0 2 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5540.00 - 579.99 0 0.0 2- -0.4 0 0.0 i-- *0;3
580.00 - 619.99 0 0.0 2 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5620.00 - 659.99 0 0.0 2 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5
699.99 0 :5.6 2 -0.4- -6 iY.:0--------- -1-1:14,-660.00 -700.00 739.99 0 0.0 2 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5
- 779.99 2 0.4 2 0.4 2 0.5 2 0.5_740.00780.00 - 800.00 co 0.0 0 0.0 0 OA- -0 0.0
F
(
04
GRADE
PCT'
17).(:221 66.2107 32.0
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o-o0 0.000
_0.0Oo
0 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.60 0.00 0.0
6
TF7413Lw
334 100.0334 Toci:b330 98.8109 32.62--2 0.62 0.62 0-:42 0.62 0.6
2 (T.:2 0.6
--72----o.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.60 0.00 0.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE
=======
-===
479 441 33412771.0000
779.0000
12496.0000
756.0000-526960TO52696:0060
7137528.0000119.49214M-6637"43.7133120.0941
97-T3.0000731.0000
SUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORESMEANSTND. DElf:(NI-SIND. 0EV. (N-11MEDIAN
45436:66005254230.0000
94.8559____ _________44.401744.448280.9628
41409.00007460979.0000
141.943146.80184b.8721129.5023
QUESTION 48
4. What is the age range of the children in your compensatory reading class?
Age of youngest child:Years Months
SCORE
40.00
INTERVAL S
59.99
F
0.0
GRADE 2
PC I
0.0 46.5 100.0 0.0
GRADE 4 GRAllE 6CF-p-=81-174--
34.3 100.0
pt-T
0.0 42.5 100.0-1-T2.75-11Y0.0
F PCT0.0 0.0
-0;-4-1:2---30--60.00 - $9.99 44.6. 96.0 -46:5-1-0-6.70---0-. a 1:8100.00 - 139.99 1.7 3.6 1.9 4.0 40.9 96.1 41.8 98.2 23.0 67.1 33.9 98.8140.00 .- 179.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.3 0.9-0.3 2.1 10.7 31.2 10.9 31.7180.00 219.99 C. 0 G.0 0.2 0.4 0:1 0.-2 0.8 0-.0 0.0 0.2 0.5220.00 - 259.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5260.00 - 299.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2
-0.0-0.6'0;6-
0.0 0.0 0.2 0.536(5.00-;- 339.99 0.0 0.0 0.2-- 0: 0.0" 0:2 000 090 0.2 0.5340.00 -- 379099 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 002 0.5380.00 -* 419.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 . 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5420000 - 459.99 0.0 0.6 -6.2- 0.4 '0.6 0.D 0.2- 0.6- o-;.--o--o; 0 002 07:5 4
460.00 499.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0,0 000 0.2 0.5500000 539.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 004 0.0 0.0 0.2
-0".0--
0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5540.00 519.99 0.0 0.0 -0;2 'OA- 0.0- 0.2- 0.6" 0-ay----0.0 -0.2 U.5580.00 619099 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 000 000 Oct 0.5620.00 659.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2
-0.-0-
006 0.0 000 0.2 0.566C000 699,99 0.0 0.0 6:T 6.4 D.0 0:2 0.6 CT. 0 0.0 0.2 0.5700000 739099 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5740.00-7alf.do
179.99e00,:00
0.2-D.*0
0.4---6.0-------6--zti.ci
0.2 0.4 .0.2 0.6 0.2 0.6-0.0
0.00.0
De 0
0.o---- -...0.0
-0.0-0.0-070--0.0 0.0 -0.0
CASES PROCE SSE°E-n-ANic OATH
=1--
46.4556 42.5398 34.28289-6.0000--T16.0000MINIMUM VALUE 12 71.0000 96.0000 73.0000MAXIMUM VALUE
aka779.0000 756.0000 131.0000
0.8164 4842.6680SUM SOD. SCORES = 503636.5625 716418.1250 745228.2500MEAN 94.5409 120.1421 141.2565STN-D. ITEV (N) 41:6264 49.0612 e 2406SIND. OEV. (N -11 = 44.1037 49.6483 42.8705MEDIAN 80.8401 120.0586 129.0937
5. What percentage of the pupils in your compensatory reading class have receivedcompensatory reading instruction prior to this year?
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0063.0004.000
F
9.913.65.84..2
PCT
17.0 58.02/.-4. 46:110.0 34.67.3 28.8
27-0- -2-4-.T5
14.9 6.7
100.0
F
3.2
PCT -CF-b
5.8 54.2
Li71
100.0 2.9 6.7 43.4 100.0-113.70
59.649.6
12.15.92.8
22.4 51;u-wzr-lo.o10.9 38.9 71.85.3 33.0 60.9
4.02.516.87.1
23.1 "40.5 93.39.2 30.4 70.25.8 26.4 60.9
38.7 23.9 55.116.4 7.1 16.4
5.-o-in6.00C
15.88.7
-W214.9
20.210.0
37.3 30.218.4 10.0
55.718.4
CASES PROCESSED = 58.-0400 54.1571 43.3712NO. BLANK DATA = 5.0000 5.0000 11.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000TOXINTA VALUE = 670116-0 6.0000 6.0000SUM OF SCORES 150.6448 157.3131 129.0102SUM SW. SCORES 580.3989 654.5210 539.1101MEAN 3.0328 3.5610 3.5590STND. DEV. (N) = 1.5628 1.4613 1.4853STND. DEV. (N-1) 1.5788 1.4781 1.5062
OTA- 2.7114 3.8256 3.9685SAMPLE FOR STATS = 49.3471 44.1772 36.2495
SCCRE INTERVALS F PC.T CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 90 15.0 601 100.0 33 6.8 560 100.0 21 5.0 4202.000 142 23.6 511 85.0 121 21.6 522 93.2 84 20.0 399
.109,095.0
3.000 58 9.7 369 61.4 59 10.5 401 71.6 44 10.5 315 75.04.000 49 8.2 311 51.7 32 5.7 342 61.1 25_
5.000 172 28.6 262 43.6 204 36.4 310 55.4 170 40.5 246.64.558.6
6.000 90 15.0 90 15.0 106 18.9 106 18.9 76 18.1 76 18.1
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE
==
6015
1.00006.0000
5605
1.0000
420111.0600
.6;bobb-6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1604.0000 1605.0000 1271.0000SUM SQL`. 4264.oppp 6665.0000 5403.0000.scPft.sMEAN 3.1389 3.5352 3.6948SYNC. DEV. IN) = 1.5509 1.4774 1.4336STND.MEDIAN
DEV. (4-.1) = 1.55242.9052
1.4790 1.43563.7813 4:4 To0
SAMPLE FOR STATS = 511 454 344
6. About what percentage of the children in your compensatory reading classattended some form of preschool? (Include Headstart, day care, or nurseryschool; DO NOT INCLUDE PUBLIC SCHOOL KINDERGARTEN.)
"SCORE INTERVALSGRADE 2
F PCT GF P-;13Lti,1-
GRADE 4F PCT
'GRADE 6CF P -BLIi F- PCT CF P -BtW
1.000 15.1 2509 58.1 1000 16.2 29.8 54.2 100.0 14.9 34.7 43.1 100.02.00 1907 33.9 17.3 32.0 3800 70.211.7 27.1 ZUol 65.330000 6.0 10.4 23.3 40.2 6.0 11.1 20.7 38.2 108 4.1 1605 38.240000 306 602 1703 29.8 2.3 4.2 14.7 27.1 1.6 307 14.7 34.15.600 402 102 1307 23.6 2.2 4.0 12.4 22.9 1.7 400 13.1 30.460600 905 1604 9.5 16.4 10.2 18.8 1002 18.811.4 26.4 1104 26.4
CASES PROEMED 54.1571 43.0824NO. BLANK DATA a 5.0000 1300000MINIMUM VALUE = loom) 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM-VALUE 6.0000 600000'-
SUM OF SCORES 107.8864 8868700 5865827SUM SOD. SCORESMEAN ."
310.1931 23066265 146.06901!-.00221 1.84/9
STND0 DEV., (ND 1.2060 1,0764 1.0921STND. DEV. (NID 1.2186 1.0888 1.1098PIED IAN 1006B6 105/113SAMPLE FOR STATS = 48.5966 43.9485 31.7W6
SCORE INTERVALSF PC T CF P-BLW F PC T CF PCT CFP-BLW P-BLW.
1.000 1117 22.8 602 10000 147-17i
26.2_ 560 10000 134 32.1 418 100.02.000 201 33.4 465 7702 3T7.-6 413 73.7 117 28.0 284 67.93.000 60 10.0 264 43.9 65 1106 236 4201 21 5.0 167 40.04.000 44 7.3 204 33.9 23 4.1 171 3005 16 3.8 146 34095.000 45 7.5 160 26.6 23 401 148 26.4 17 4.1 130 31016.000 115 19.1 115 19.1 125 22.3 125 22.3 113 27.0 113 27.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO BLANK DATA
6024
5605
41813
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1,0000MAXIMUM VALUE 6.0000 6.0000 6.0000SUM OF SCORES 1120.0000 903.0000 580.0000SUM SOO. SCORES 3310.0000 2383.0000 1472.0000MEAN 2.0759 1.9016SUM. DEV. (NI 1.2279 1.0812 1.1000SIND. DEV. (N -11 1.2291 1.0824 1.1018MEDIAN 1.8983 1.6581SAMPLE FOR STATS 487 435 305
7. About what percent of the pupils in your compensatory reading class are membersof the following racial or national origin groups? (Mark one box in eachlettered row.)
(a) Caucasian or WhiteNone 1-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100%
0
SCORE INTERVAL S F&wd 2-e
PC1a
CF P-BLW it-F57-BLW F PCT 8rck" GF P-BLWF PCral)
1.000 5.0 8.7 58.0 100.0 5.4 10.0 54.2 100.0 4.3 9.9 43.1 100.02.000 6.2 10.7 53.0 91.3 -5:1 1 0:----- 748.7' 9.070 7,-.1 15.4 38.8 90.13. CCO 5.3 9.2 46.8 80.6 4.8 8.9 42.9 79.1 3.1 7.3 32.2 74.74.000 5.3 9.1 41.5 71.5 5.5 10.2 38.1 70.3 3.1 7.2 29.1 67.55.00-0 36.2 62.4 36.2 62.4 32.5 60.1 32,5 60.1 25.9 60.2 25.9 60.2
CASES PROCESSED - 58.0200 54.1571 43.0824NO. BLANK DATA = 5.-0000 5.0000 f3.0000-MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE-SW
5.0000 5.0000 5.0000OF SCORES 235.4901 216:1577- 169.1293
SUM SQO. SCORES - 1061.1165 913.9492 757.5793MEAN-STUD; -DEV.
4.0588 3.9949 3.9257(N) 1.3851 1.4-22Y 1.4T42
STNO. ()EV. (N-1) 1.3972 1.4362 1.4916MEOIAN 4.6986 4.6679 4.6698
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1,000 62 10.3 601 100.0 65 11.6 560 100.0 47 11.2 418 100.02.000 68 11.3 539 89.7 70 12.5 495 88.4 64 15.3 ^371 88.83.000 56 9.3 471 78.4 46 8.2 425 75.9 26 6.2 307 73.44. 000 59 9.8 415 69.1 63 11.2 379 67.7 34 8.1 281 67.25,000 356 59.2 356 59.2 316 56.4 316 56.4 247 59.1 247 59.1
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEp!spcitlym VALUE_SUM OF SCORESSUM SQi). SCORESMEANSTUD. 0EV. (N)STND. DEV, IN-1)MEDIAN
==
60)51.00005.0000
2382.000010682.0000
3.96341.43711.43834.6559
560 41851.00005.0000
131.00005.0000
2175.00009667.0000
3.8839
1624.00007256.0000
1.47571.47704.6139
1.50481.50664.6538
OUFSTION 7 (b) Negro or Black
SCORE INTERVALS
1.000
F
35.8
y- ciL
PCI
61.7
e .
CF
58.0
P-8LW-- F
100.0 31.3
P
57.8 54.2 100.0 25.7 59.7 43.1 100.02.000 9.9 17.1 2 .3 16.9 -11.4 4U.33.000 5.1 8.8 12.3 21.2 4.4 8.2 11.8 21.9 4.2 9.7 10.1 23.44.000 2.6 4.5 7.2 12.4 2.6 4.9 7.4 13.6 1.6 3.7 5.9 13.75. got 4.6 8.0 4.6 8.0 4.7 8.8 4.7 8.8' 4.3 100,0 4.3 .10.11
CASES PROCESSED 58.0200 54.1571 43.0824NO. BLANK DATA 5.0000 5.0000 13.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000S UM aV SCORTs----- 50.7552SUM SOD. SCORES = 278.2385 276.4216 225.8712MEAN 1.7991 1.8651 1.8745
1.2749 1.3150STND. DEV. (N-13 = 1.2595 1.2868 1.3305MEDIAN 1.3105 1.3655 1.3373
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000"5:66.6.
F
348115533055
PCI
57.919*18.85.09.2
CF
6012531388555
P-BLW
100.042.123.014.19.2
F
302
PC T
53.9
CF
560
P -8LW
100.0
F
236
PCI
56.5
CF
418
P-BLW
100.01234729
22.08.45.2
25813588
46.124.115.7
813614
19.48.63.3
18210165
43.524.215.6
59 10.5 59 10.5 51 12.2 51 12.2
CASES PROCESSED46.---6LANK OATH
6015
560 4185 13
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5,0000giii14-OF SCORES 1132.0000 1100.0000 817.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 3140.0000 3156.0000 2383.0000MEAN__ 3.8835 1.9643 1.9545
UEV. (NI 1.2950 1.3332 1.3714STNO. OEV, (N-13 1.2960 1.3343 1.3730MEDIAN 1.3635 1.4272 1.3856
QUESTION 7
SCORE INTERVALS
(n) Spanish surnamed
Grade 2-F PCT CF P -BLW
1.000 45.6 78.6 58.02.000 9.5 16.3 12.43.000 0.7 1.3 2.94.000 1.3 2.2 2.25.000 0.9 1.5 0.9
CASES PROCESSED 58.0200NO. BLANK OATH 5.0000-MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000-suN 'OF SCORES 76.4048SUM S00. SCORES 133.0788MEAN 1.3169
DEv. (N) 0.7480SIND. GEV. (N-1) 0.7545MEDIAN 1.1358
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF
1.000 468 77.9 6012.000 98 16.3 1333.000 11 1.8 354.000 14 2.3 245.000 1.7 10
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATA
60.1
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE. 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 803.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 1433.0000MEAN__ 1.3361STND. DEV. (N) 0.7741STND. DEVe IN-1) 0.7747MEDIAN 1.1421
100.043.221.4 7.35.0 2.43.8 0.8
-G3
E
r ada_11PCJ P-8LW PCT CF P-BCW
79.8 54.2 100.0 33.2 77.1 43.1 100.013.4 ---1100---2D.2 7.1 16.5 9.9 22:g4.4 3.7 6.8 1.5, 3.6 2.8 6.41.4 1.3 2.4 0.7 1.7 1.2 2.9]-:-.U- 0.5 1.O -U.5- ---1:1 cim---r.-r
54.15715.0000-1.00005.0000
119.37181.30420.7040.71601.1268
P-BLW
100.0
F
441
PC T
78.722.1 83 14.85.8 20 3.64.0 10 1.81.7 6 1.1
43.082413.013-001.00005.0000
57.467059.67381.33390.73100.73961.1488
CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
560 100.0 328 78.5 418 100.0119 21.2 61 14.6 90 21.536 6.4 16 3.8 29 6.916 2.9 7 1.7 13 3.16 1.1 6 1.4 6 1.4
56051.00005.0000
737.00001263.0000
1.31610.72340.72411.1349
418131.00005.0000
556.1,000978.0000
1.33010.75530.756Z1.1372
QUFSTION 7
SCORE INTERVALS
(d) Oriental
CY4.8a C F
0
Graele yPCT 'CF
l;-Yo.d.e. 4.P-BLW F FLT CF -BLW
1.000 56.4 97.2 58.0 100.0'52.1 96.2 54.2 100.0 41.6 96.6 43.1 100.02.000 1.6 2.8 1.6 2.8 2.1 3.8 2.1 3.8 1.4 3.2 1.4 3.43.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.14.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.05.000 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0
CASES PROCESSED 58.0200 54.1571 43.0824N0.-6LANK DATA 5.0000 5.0000 13.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 3.0000
StOWES 39.6737 56.232/ 44.572SUM SOO. SCORES 62.9737 60.3773 47.6465MEAN 1.0285 1.0383 1.0346
6:160 0.1917 0.1883STNO. OEV. (14-1) 0.1675 0.1935 0.1905MEDIAN 1.0146 1.0199 1.0174
SCORE INTERVALS F PC.T CF P -BLW F
1.000 583 97.0 6012.000 18 3.0 183.000 0 0.0 04.000 0 0.0 0
0 0.0 0-5.000
PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLW
100.0 540 96.4 560 100.0 401 95.9 418 100.03.0 20 3.6 20 3.6 16 3.8 17 4.10.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.2 1 0.20.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0,0 0 0.00.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
CASE_ S PROCESSEDN0. BLANK DATA
==
601.
5
560 4185 13
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUEsUW o k. RE S
2.0000 2.0000 3.0000619.60'00 580.0000 436.0000
SUM SOD. SCORES = 655.0000 620.0000 474.0000MEAN_ 1.0299 1.0357 1.0431STNO. 0EV. = 0.1764 0.1856 0,2145SIND. REV. IN -1) = 0.1706 0.1857 0.2147MEDIAN 1.0154 1.0185 1.0212
QUESTION 7 (e) American Indian 0 0G A4 :L
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLS! F 17e; F -.BLW
1.000 5(s.4 95.6 52.7 100.0 47.0 93.7 50.1 100.0 35.6 95.0 37.4 100.02.000 2.0 3.8 2.3 4.4 2.9---5.7 3.4 6.3 1.7 4.6 1.9 5.03.000 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.Z. C.2 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.34.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0 .10.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.35.000 0.0 0.0 -0.6 -.).0 0.0 0.71 4.1.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0
CASES PRUCESSED 52.7041 50.1070 37.4338NO. BLANK DATA 60.0000 52.0000 63.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM-TP SCORES 55.3498 53.5816 39.5451SUM SQO. SCORES 61.2940 61.3589 44.5209MEAN 1.0502 1.0693 1.0564STNS. OEV. iN) 0.2451 0.2847 0.2708STND. DEV. (NI) 0.2474 0.2876 0.2745MEDIAN 1.0229 1.0334 1.0261
INTONALS F PC(;Y" F PCT lr°." 4CF-F=BEwF
1.000 22.7 92.1 24.6 100.0 21.0 94.7 22.2 100.0 14.5 95.2 15.3 100.0
2.000 -1;6 -6.4.-
1.9 7:4 7U:2 5.3 1.2 5. 0.6 4.0 0.7. 47:8
3.000 0.2 0.7 0.4 1.5 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.8
4.000 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 .-0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0
'5.00C C.2 0.8 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0
CASES PROCESSED = 24.6249 22.1677 15.2532
NO.BLANk DATA - 345.0000 326.0000 275.0000
MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALVE
==
1.00005.0000
1.00002.0000
1.00003.0000
SUM OF SCORES = 27.3274 23.3515 16.1115
SUM SQO. SCORES = 35.4163 25.7180' 18.0739
MEAN-ST NED-E-ir;
1.1097 1.0534 i.05630.2247 0.263i
S7ND. DEV. ( .1) = 0.4642 0.2300 0.2722
MEDIAN 1.0429 1.0282 1.0253
QUESTIIIN 7(f) Other (Specify)
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF
1.000 518 95.2 5442.000 23 4.2 263.000 3 0.6 3
4.000 0 0.0 0
5.000 0 0.0 0
P-BLW
.100.0 4744.8 330.6 20.0 1
0.0 1
PCT
92.8
CF
511
P-BLW
100.0
--F
347
-PCT
94.6
CF
367
P-BLW
100.06.5 37 7.2 18 4.9 20 5.40.4 4 0.8 0 0.0 2 0.50.2 2 0.4 1 0.3 2 0.50.2 1 0.2 1 0.3 1 0.3
CASES PRCICESSE0NO. BLANK DATA
=
=
54462
511 36754 64
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE .= 3.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES = 573.0000 555.0000 392.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 637.0000 665.0000 460.0000MaAN = 1.0533 1.0861 1.0681
. .
SIND. OEV. (N) = 0.2480 0.3489 0.3354STNO. DEV. (N-1) = 0.2482 0.3493 0.3359MEDIAN 1.0251 1.0390 1.0288
SCORE INTERVAL S
1.0002.0003.0004.000-5.606----
CASES PROCESSED =Na. War*5ii,-tr"--=--
F
23015202
PCT
92.46.00.80.00.8
249357
CF
24919422
P-BLW
100.0
F
210
PCT
93.8
CF
224
P-BLW
100.0
F
139
PCT
93.3
CF
149
P-BLW
100.07.61.60.8.0.8
1400
6.30.00.0
1400
6.30.00.0
91
0
6.00.70.0
101
0
6.70.70.0
0 0.0
224
0 0.0 0 0.0
149
0 0.0
341 282MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM ti---gtoitlr.- -,14.--SUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. (N).- =STND. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN
1.00005.0000
276-.-06fci-358.0000
1.1084
1.00002.0000
1.0000 ft
3.0000238.0000266.0000
1.0625
160.0000184.0000
1.07380.4573C.45821.0413
0.24210.24261.0333
0.28600.28701.0360
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
OUT OF RANGE
8a. Among the homes where the dominant language is not English, what languaga(s)is (are) spoken? (Mark all that apply.)
0 American Indian
F PC.PYI-dele.F P-8LW F PCP4-FP-8-Eli F PC rode (tr- -p=tt-cw
58.0 99.1 58.50.5 0.8 0.50.1 0.1 0.1
100.00.9(0.1
54.4 99.4 54.7 100.00.6
44.20.6
98.7 44.8 100.01.3------IG-6---r:30.3 0.6 --073
CASES PROCESSED -.58.547354.7435 44.80920.0 U.0
MINIMUM VALUE - 0.0 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE =. 4.0000
-0.77890.3303 0.5725
SUM* OF SCORES - 0.33-03 0.5/25SUM SQD. SCORES = 1.7266 0.0060 0.0128MEAN 0.0133 0.0774 0.1123STND. DEV. IN) - 0.0782 0.1136STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.1727 0.0030 0.0065MEOIAN 0.0047
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
OUT OF RANGE
F PCT
600 99.05 .0.8-1 0.2
CF P -8LW F PCT
60661
CF P-8LW- PCT CF P-BLW
100.0 560 99.1 565 100.0425 98.6 431 100.01.0 5 0.9 5 0.9 6 1.4 6 1.40.2
565 431CASES PROCESSED = 606 0.0 0.0MINIMUM VALUE - 0.0 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 5.0000 6.0000SUM OF SCORES 9.0000 5'0000 6.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 21.0000 0.0088 0.0139KEAN I 0.0149 0.0937 0.1172STND. DEV. IN) 0.1g5Z Va-137 0.1173STND. DEV. (N-1I 0.1857 0.0045 0.0071MEDIAN 0.0050
OUESTI6N 8
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
OUT OF RANGE
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE'Sbm OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSING. DEV. (N)STNO. DEV. 4N-1)MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
OUT OF RANGE
CASES PROCESSED =MINIMUM VALUE =ANXIMUMVALUE =SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORES =1.1AN.
STND. DEV. (N) =STND. DEV. 01-1) =MEDIAN =
0
(b) Chinese
.p-sco_a 01.1: PC CF P-8LW F
58.1C.40.1
99.20.60.1
58.5 100.00.5.---Da0.1 0.1
58.5473-0.02.00000.53670.69460.00920.10853.10950.0039
CG-ra4e.
PCT CF P-13LW F PGTrab e CF
54.2 99.1 : 54.7 100.0 43.9 97.9 44.80.5 0.9 0.5
F PCT CF P-8LW
60141
99.20.70.2
6060.02!QP9.06.00008.00000.00990.11450.11460.0042
PCI
606_100.0559 98.95 0.8 6 1,11 0.2
54.74350.01.00000.50360.50360.00920.09550.09640,0046
0.9 0.9 2.1 0.9
44.80920.01.00000.92860.92860.02070.14250.14410.0106
P-BLW
100.02.1
CF P-8LW F PCI
565 100.0 422 97.9
5650.01,00006.00006.00000.01060.10250.10260.0054
6 1.1 9 2.1
4310.01,00009.00009.00000.02090.14300.14320.0107
CF P -8LW
431 100.0.9 2.1
QUEST ION 8(C) El Japanese
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUE
F
58.30.2
;t.
PCra.
CF
99.6 58.50.4 0.2
58.54730.0
P-13LW
100.0
rude q v e.-P:71FEW F PC C
100.0 44.3 98.9 44.8
P-BEIT
100.0T.1
54.4
PCT
99.4
CF
54.70.4 0.4 0.6
54.
0.4
7435
0.6 0.5 1.1 0.5
44.80920.0 0.0
MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 0.2319 0.3534 0.4771SUM SOO. SCORES 0.3534 0.4171MEAN 0.0040 0.0065 0.0106$TND. 0EV. (N) 0.0628 0. 0801 0.1026Witt; -ay. 1N-11 0. CT6-54 0.0808 0.103dMEDIAN 0.0020 0.0032 0.0054
SCORE iiitERvALs. F PC CF P-Bill PC T CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-8LW
0.0 603 99. 5 606 100.0 560 99.1 565 100.0 427 99.1 431 100.01.000 3 0;5. 3 0.5 5 0.9 5 0.9 4 0.9 4 0.9
CASES PROCESSED = 606 565 431MINIMUM VALUE UE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 3.0000 5.0000 4. 0000SUM SOD. SCORES 3.0000 5.0000 4.0000MEAN 0.0050 0.0088 0. 0093STNO. DEV. (NI 0.0702 0.0937 0.0959STND. DEV. IN-1 at .6.-0702 0.0937 0.0960MEDIAN 0.0025 0.0045 0.0047
OUFST ION 8
SCORE INTERVALS
(d) Spanish-Portuguese
YakG-racl a 9
F PC CF P-8CW F PCT CF P-BLW FG-ra_de to
PCT CF P-BLw
0.01.000
OUT OF RANGE
48.110.40.1
82.217.70.1
58.5 100.0 45.7 83.5 54.7 100.0 36.4 81.3 44.8 100.010:4'17.80.1 0.1
8.4 18.7 8.4 18.7
CASES PROCESSEC54.7435 44.8092
58.5473 C.0 0.0MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 9.0091 8.3745SUM "OF SCORES 10.1igr8- 9.0091 8.3745SUM SQD. SCORES 11.6868 0.1646 0.1869MEAN 0.1826 0.3708 0.3898STNO. ISEV. tN) 0,4078 0.3742 0.3942SIND. DEV. IN-1/ 0.43.13 0.0985 0.1149MEDIAN 0.1085
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLit PC T CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
0.0 497 82.0 606 100..0 468 82.8 565 100.0 352 81.7 431 100.01.000 108 17.8 109 18.0 97 17.2 97 17.2 79 18.3 79 18.3
OUT OF RANGE 1 0.2 1 0.2
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE
= 6060.04.0000
565 4310.01.0000
97.0000
0.01.0000
79.0000SUM OF SCORES - 112.0000 97.0000 79.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 124.0000 0.1717 0.1833MEAN 0.1848 0.3771 0.3869SIND. DEV. (N) = 0.4129 0.3774 0.3874STN0. DEV. (N-11 = 0.4132 0.1036 0.1122MEOIAN 0.1097
QUESTION 8 (e) c 'French
SCORE INTERVAL S F. _
PC CE P-8LW Y" P- L W F PClarnAALItF
P-0131F PC T F
0.0 57.0 97.4 58.5 100.0 54.0 98.6 54.7 100.0 44.1 98.4 44.8 100.01. COO 1.5 2.5 1;5 2.6. 0.8 1.4 0.7 1.6 0.7 1.6
OUT OF RANGE 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.154.7435 44.8092
CASES PROCESSaft - 58.5473 0.0MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE =- 2.0000 0.7899 0.7379SUM OF SCORES =- 1.6107 D+7899 0.7379SUM SQO. SCORES =.* 2.7687 0.0144 0.0165MEAN 0.0275 0.1193 0.1273
DEV. (N) = V. 1716 0.1204 0.1281STNO. DEV. N-1) = 0.1731 0.0073 0.0084MEDIAN 0.0134
SCORE. INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
0.0 588 97.0 606 100.0 557 98.6 565 100.0 424 98.4 431 100.01.000 17 2.8 18 3.0 8 1.4 8 1.4 7 1.6 7 1.6
OUT OF RANGE 1 0.2 1 0.2
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE
6060.02.0000
565 4310.01.00008.0000
0.01.00007.0000
SUM -OF -SCbRE S. 14;060 8.0000 7.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 21.0000 0.0142 0.0162MEAN 0.0314 0.1181 0.1264STND. 0EV. (N) 0.1835 0.1183 0.1265STND. DEV. ( N-1) 0.1836 0.0072 0.0083MEDIAN 0.0153
QUESTION 8 (F) Other (Specify)
SCORE INTERVAL SGRADE 2
F PCT CF P-BLW
0.0 54.91.000 3.6
OUT OF RANGE 0.1.
CASES PROCE SSE°MINIMUM VALUEMAX IMUM VALUE
93.8 58.56.1 3.70.1 0.1
58.54730.02.0000
SUM OF* SCORE S 3.7356SUM SOD. SCORES 3.8935MEAN 0.0638STND. DEV. 041 0.2419STND. DEV. N-1) 0.2520MEDIAN 0.0333
SCORE INTERVAL S F PC T
YaleF PC CF P-BLprae
W PC-ci
F P-BLW
100.0 52.0 95.0 54.7 100.0 42.2 94.1 44.8 100.06.2 2.7 5.0 2.7 57,1:1- 2.4 5.4 2.i 5.90.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5
54.74350.01.00002.73782.73780.05000.21800.22000.0263
44.809-20.02.00002.88403.33430.06440.265-10.26810.0315
CF P-BLW F 45E1- CF P-BLW F T---- -CO P -BLW
0.0 564 93.1 606 100.0 534 94.5 565 100.0 405 94.0 431 100.01.000 41 6.8 42 6.9 31. 5.5 31 5.5 25 5.8 26 6.0
OUT OF RANGE 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE
6060.02.0000
5650.01.0000
31.0000
4310.02.0000
SLIM OF SCORES 43.0000 31.0000 27.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 45.0000 0.0549 29.0000MEAN 0.0710 0.2277 0.0626SIND. DEV. (N) 0.2631 0.2279 0.2517STNO. DEV. = 0.2633 0.0290 0.2520MEDIAN 0.0372 0.0321
8. Estimate the percent of the pupils in your compensatory reading class who arefrom homes in which the dominant language is not English.
None
1-25%
26-50%
51.-75Z
76-100%
Don't know
SCORE 1N TERVAL SG re...d. a
F PC T CF P-BLWGYe-a. e- 41
F PCT CF P-BLW F6-y-c,c1m.
PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 452 75.5 599 100.0 426 76.3 558 100.0 307 73.4 418 100.02.000 109 18.2 147 24.5 92 16.5 132 23.7 76 18.2 111 26.63.000 17 2.8 38 6.3 14 2.5 40 7.2 16 3.8 35 8.44.000 7 1.2 21 3.5 7 1.3 26 4.7 3 0.7 19 4.55.000 12 2.0 14 2.3 ---14-- -2-.5- 19 3.4 11fl 2,6 166.000 2 0.3 2 0.3 5 0.9 5 0.9 5 1.2 5 1.2
GASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
5997
5587
41813
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000;iAXIMUM VALUE = 6.0000 6.0000 6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 809.0000 750.0000 574.000DSUM SOD. SCORES = 1453.0000 1382.0000 1078.0000MEAN = 1.3551 1.3562 1.3898STND. DEV. (NI = 0.7730 0.8122 0.8237STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.7736 0.8130 0.8247ME-DIAN = 1.1604 1.1491 1.1726SAMPLE FOR STATS = 597 553 413
8. Estimate'the percent of the pupils in your compensatory reading
from homes in which the dominant language is not English.
None
1-25%
0 26-50%
1:] 51-75%
0 76-100%
Don't know
clas's who are
SCORE INTERVALS PCIGT-"e- -P-BLN$4 Grad a 6
F_6,--Aee
PC T I F P-BLWTci
CF P-BLW
1.000 44.5 76.9 57.9 100.0---13:1--273.1
41.7 77.2 54.0 100.0 32.4 75.4 43.0 100.02.000 10...0 17.3 8.5 15.7 12.3 22.8 7.5 17.5 10.6 24.63.000 1.5 2.6 3.3 5.7 1.4 2.6 3.8 7.1 1.6 3.6 3.0 7.14.000 0.6 1.0 1.8
-12-3.1'2;1
0.5 1.0 2.4 4.5 0.2 0.4 1.5 3.4-5.000' 1.1 1.8 1.4 2.6 1.9 3.5 1.0 2,3 1.3 3.16.000 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.8
CAS5S-PROCES-WrNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEKWICIPAJM-VACUE--SUM OF SCDRhS =SUM SOD. SCORES =
*****
STND. OEV. IN) =STND. DEV. (N-1) =REDTXR----------SAMPLE FOR STATS =
57:8527'7.00001.0000
54.01496.00001.0000
42.955213.00001.0000
-6:0000.76.6608
133.7329
6.000072.1123
132.2901
6.000057.5829103.2383
32-92-
0.74290.7495
-171479-
1.34680.81050.8182
1.35170.77220,78141.157,
42.599157.67301.141953.5452
9. Estimate the percentage of pupils in your compensatory reading class who havepersistent problems in each of the following areas. (Mark one box in eachlettered row.)
SC6RE INTERVALS
None 1-10% 11-50% 51-100% Don't know
(a) Speech
Grade aF -11aGra.cla
6;iyalit 4F PCT CF P-8LW P-8LW F 17cr CF P-8114
1.000 55.2 100.0 13.7 26.52.000 43.4 78:7 .30.6 59.23.000 12.7 22.9 5.8 11.14.000 2.5 4.6 1.3 2.55.0o G.S 1.6 0.9 1.6 0.3 --141.6
11.8 21.330.8 55.710.1 18.31.7 3.0
CASES PROCE55E0NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE -MAXIMUM_ VALUE =S7UM-D-F-t4ORESSUM S00. SCORES =MEANS7No. DEV. (N) =STND. DEV. (N-1)MEDIANSAMPLE FOR sTAIS =
55.214130.00001.00005.0000
110.3612252.65192.03120.7110.73082.000354.3153
51.7 100.0 14.9 35.938.073.5 21 351.3
51.712631.00001.00005.0000
97.5146209.1112
1.89680.68530.69211.8919
51.4/04
7.41.60.3
14.3 4.3 10.33.1 0.7 1.60.6 0.4 0.8
41.5 100.0Z6.6 64.71
5.3 12.81.0 2.50.4 U.8
41.476231.00001.00005.0000(3.002Z
149.37761.77520.69$60.70221.7668
41.1631
SCORE INTERVALS F PC1 CF P -BLW F PCT CF PCT CF
1.000. 118 20.5 576 100.0 160 30.0 533 100.0'129 32.2 400 100.02.000 329 57.1 458 79.5 308 57.8 373 70.0 211 52.7 271 67.73.000 110 19.1 129 22.4 53 9.9 65 12.2 48 12.0 60 15.04.000 16 2.8 19 3.3 8 1.5 12 2.3 9 2.2 12 3.05.000 3 0.5 3 0.5 4 0.8 4 0.8 3 0.7 3 0.7
CASES PROCESSED.ab.-8LANICCiATA
==
57630
533 40032 31
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE_SUM OF SCORES
5.00001170.0000
5.0000 5.0000967.0000 731.0000
SUM S00. SCORES = 2680.0000 1997.0000 1549.0000MEAN = 2.0419 1.8280 1.8413STN6. DEV. (N) 0.7126 0.6584 0.7151STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.7133 0.6591 0.7160MEDIAN 2.0122 1.8393 1.8294S4MPLE FOR STATS -515- 529 397
QUESTION 9 (b) Vision
SCORE INTERVAL S FGo-de-.2
PC T
1.000 21.0 38.1 55.12.000 28.2 51.1 34.13.000 4.4 8.0 5.94.000 0.3 0.5 1.55.000 1.3 2.3 1.3
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =
55.129636. OMIT
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000SUM OF SCORES' 91-.6924
=SUM SAO. SCORE S 177.7439MEAN = 1.7019Mb. DEV. CO 0.6346STNO. DEV. 01-1) = 0.6405MEDIAN 1.7102SAMPLE FOR $ T/iTS. = 55:117-6 9-
P- BLW T----TDCP":8-1F Gracie 4P-BLWP-8LW F PC T rr
100.0 14.3 28.8 49.7 100.0 11.4 27.7 41.4 100.061.9.27:1-5-5.9 35.4 71.2 23.8 57.5 29.9 72.3-10.8 6.4 12.8 7.6 15.4 5.0 12.0 6.2 14.92.8 0.4 0.7 1.3 2.6 0.3 0.7 1.2 2.82.3 1.8 0.9--- 1.8 0.9 2.1 0.9 2.1
49.739748.0000
1.00005.0000
90.4531188.6464
1.85260.65690.66381.8637
48.8245
41.395430.00001.00005.0000
75.1401156.1130
1.85490.64280.65081.8702
40.5090
SCORE INTERVALS F PC T CF P-BLW F PCT CE P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 214 37.5 570 100.0 153 29.7 516 100.0 116 28.9 401 /00.02.000 290 50.9 356 62.5 289 56.0 363 70.3 222 55.4 285 71.13.000 53 9.3 66 11.6 57 11.0 74 14.3 51 12.7 63 15.74. pop 5_ 0.9 13 2.3 5 1.0 17 3.3 3 0.7 12 3.05.000 8 1.4 8 1.4 12 2.3 12 2.3 9 2.2 9 2.2
CASES PROCESSED = 570 516 401NO. BLANK DA TA = 36 49 30MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES =- 973.0000 922.0000 725.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1931.0000 1902.0000 1511.0000MEAN
. 1.7313.. 1.8294 1.8495STAID. DEV. (N) = 0.6622 0.6536 0.6588STN D. DEV. IN -1) = 0.6628 0.6543 0.6596MEDIAN 1.7310 1.8426 1.8604SAMPLE FOR STATS = 562 5C4 392
QUESTION 9 (c) Hearing
SCORE INTERVALS FG Y
PCTcle a
CF
1.000 30.8 57.3 53.72.000 18.6 34.7 22.93.000 1.4 2.6 4.34.000 0.1 0.2 2.95.000 2.8 5.3 2.8
CASES PROCESSEDaa. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OV-ScdiusSUM SOD. SCORESMEAN
iN).STND. DEV. (N-1)MEDIANSAMPLE FOR STATS
SCORE INTERVALS F
1.000 3222.000 1933.000 184.000 25.000 24
0
P -8LWG. Iro.2te
F PCT CF P-bLW F PCIG-Ir-"--6CF7T7-RUW
100.0 27.1 54.9 49.4 100.0 22.0 53.6 41.0 100.042.7-17.8 N6.1 22.3 45.1 16.4 35.9 19.0 46.48.0 2.2 4.5 4.5 9.0 0.9 2.1 2.7 6.55.4 0.0 0.1 2.2 4.5 0.0 0.0 1.8 4.45.3 2.2 4.4 2.2 4.4 1.8 4.4 1.8 4.4
53.7392 49.3769 41.041847.0000 52.0000 35.00001.0000 1.0000 1.00005.0000 5.0000 5.0000
72.-6560 69.6199 51.3639119.4297 119.2007 95.36651.4266 1.4751 1.46180.5572 0.5913 0.54160.5627 0.5977 0.54861.3268 1.3708 1.3918
50.9-152 47.1955 39.2407
PCI
57.634.53.20.44.3
CASES PROCESSEDKid. RANK DATA
55947
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000SUM TI-F-SCEIRES 770.0000SUM SOO. SCORES 1288.0000MEAN 1.4393STND. DEV. (N) - 0.5797STND. DEV. (N-I) = 0.5802MEDIAN 1.3307SAMPLE FOR STATS = 535
CF P -8LW F PC T CF P-8L0 F PCT CF P -8LW
559 100.0 289 56.6 511 100.0 209 52.8 396 100.0237 42.4 186 36.4 222 43.4 159 40.2 187 47.244 7.9 17 3.3 36 7.0 8 2.0 28 7.126 4.7 1 0.2 19 3.7 0 0.0 20 5.124. 4.3 18 3.5 18 3.5 20 5.1 20 5.1
511 39654 35100000 1.00005.0000 5.0000
716.0000 551.00001202.0000 917.0000
1.4523 1.46540.5735 0.53980.5740 0.54051.3529 1.3995
493 376
JUESTION 9 (d) Frequent illness
SCORE INTERVALS F PCe
F P-$Lwy-ct.ae.
P-BiwbradeCF p-BLWP PCT CF
1.000 20.5 37.7 54.4 100.0 19.2 38.4 49.9 100.0 12.6 30.9 40.9 100.02.000 27.1 44.8 33.9 62.3 25.0 50.1 30.8 61.6 21.5 52.5 28.3 69.13.000 5.6 10.2 6.8 12.5 5.0 10.0 5.7 11.5 5.2 12.7 6.8 16.64.000 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.2 0,5 1.0 0.8 1.5 0.9 2.3 1.6 3.95.000 0.9 1.7 09' 1.7 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.7 T.6 0.7 1.6
CASES PROCESSEUNO.-BLANK DATA -
54.417640.0000
49.9493 40.893246.0000 35.0000
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES *
5.0000 5.0000 5.000092.6832- 86.1153 74.8943
SUM SOD. SCORES - 183.9743 171.8633 160.2097MEAN 1.7322 1.7338 1.8614
(V. = -0:6618 0.6739 0.7185STNO. DEV. (N-1) 0.6680 0.6808 0.7276MEDIAN 1.7302 1.7262 1.8488SAMPLE PQR -STATS = 53.5072 49.6680 40.2249
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF PC T CF P -81W
1.000 213 37.7 565 100.0 198 38.4 516 100.0 124 31.3 396 100.02.000 291 51.5 352 62.3 250 48.4 318 61.6 197 49.7 272 68.73.000 53 9.4 61 10.8 57 11.0 68 13.2 57 14.4 75 18.94.000 4 0.7 8 1.4 11 2.1 10 2.5 18 4.55.000 4 0.7 4 0.7 4 0.8 4 0.8 8 2.0 8 2.0
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK OA TA =
565.41
516 39649 35
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES = 970.0000 897.0000 724.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 1918.0000 1823.0000 1585.0000MEAN 1.7291 1.7520 1.8789STNO. DEV. (N) = 0.6552 0.7009 0.7449STvD. DEV. (N-1) 0.6558 0.7015 0.7459MEDIAN 1.7320 1.7320 1.8553SAMPLE FOR STAIS = 561 512 388
QUESTION 9 (e) Mental retardation
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.0005.CO
CASES PROCEsSEO =NO. BLANK 0A TA =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM sOD. SCORESMEANSTND OEV. iN) =STND. 0E14 (N-1) =MEDIANSAMPLE FOR STATS =
SCORE INTERVALS
F
34.014.41.30.23.2
F
PC i CF
64.0 53.227,1 19.22.4 4.70.4 3.46.1 3.2
53.168553.00001.00005.000067.5590106,56431.3528'0:5511'0.55681.2340
49.9399
PCT CF
P-8LW
100.036;08.96.4
F
33.0L32,30.2
PCTro.Ap
65.5 50.426 6 17-4--36:54.5 4.00.3 1.7
CF P-BLW
100.0 25.5
P T
62.9 40.5 100.0
8.03.5
11.61.50.5
Z8ft7 15,0 37.13.6 3.4 8.41.3 1.9 4.8
1.6 3.2
50.4036
1.4 3.5 1.4 T540.5265
46.00,01.00005.0000
40,00001.00005.0000
67.2183109.5098
1.3772
55.167193.27511.4110
0.58910.59521.2397
0.6e830.63651.2664
P-BLW F
48.8079
'PCT CF
3-9.9988
P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 360 65.2 552_109.0.349 67.8 515 100.0 252 64.5 391 100.02.000 144 26,1 192 34.8 124 24.1 166 32.2 98 25.1 139 35.53.000 18 3.3 48 8.7 23 4.5 42 8.2 16 4.1 41 10.54.4)00 4 0.7 30 5.4
-4.72 0.4 19 3.7 5 1,3 25 6.4
5.000 26 4.7 26 17 3.3 17 3.3 20 5.1 20 5.1
CASES PRgCESSEDN. BLANK DATA
==
55254
515 39150 40
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES = 718.0060 674.0000 516.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1162.0000 1084.0000 868,0000MEAN 1.3650 1.3534 1.3908STMD. DEV. = 0.5881 0.5873 0.6366STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0,5886 0.5879 0.6374MEOIAN 1.2306 1.2135 1.2361SAMPLE FOR STATS =- 498 371
.QUESTION 9 (g) Family instability 0
SCORE INTERVAL S Ff-rct de a..
PC CF P- BLW*Ira ae. 1.
Flyce-
CF P -BLW
1.000 6.3 11.4 55.2 100.0 6.3 12.0 52.5 100.0 4.8 11.3 42.7 100.0
2.000 22.1 40.0 48.8 88.6 -2LV.T 8.3 -4b1-3-08;0 T8.1 42.3 37.9 88.73.000 17.8 32.4 26.8 48.5 16.8 32.0 26.2 49.9 13.3 31.1 19.8 46.34.000 5.8 10.5 8.9 16.2 5.7 10.9 9.4 17.9 4.4 10.2 6.5 15.35.000 3.1 5.6 3.1 5.6 3-:)6 3.6 6.9 4.2 5.1 2.2 5.1
CASES PROCESSED 55.1530 52.5313 42.6989NO ANK DATA 32.0000 22.0000 19.0E100
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000
O F C OR ESUM ES 127.2370 -119.8097 .98.2063SUM SQD. SCORES 348.1614 329.7439 266.2180MEAN 2.4450 2.4506 2.4228
OEV. 4N) 0:8439 0.8598 0-.3353
STN D. °EV. t+-1) 0.8522 0.8687 0.8458MED IANSki4PEE FOR STATS
2.392652.0390
2.4056 2.3535WE. 8905 41:1.534t1
SCORE INTERVAL S F PCT CF P-BLW PC T CF PBLW F PC T CF F-.BLW
1..000 64 11.2 573 100.0 68 12.6 541 100.0_ 39 9.5 412 100.02.000 226 39.4 509 88.8 209 38.6 473 87.4 164 39.8 373 90.53.000 191 33.3 283 49.4 173 32.0 264 48.8 138 33.5 209 50..7
4.000 61 10.6 92 16.1, 59 10.9 91 16.8 46 11.2 71 17.25.000 31 5.4 31 5.4 32 5.9 32 5.9 25 6,1 25 6.1
CASES FRnCE SSEDND. BLANK DA TA
57333
541 41224 19
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 1333;5000 1241.0000 965.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 3663.0000 3405.0000 2673.0000MEAN 2.4594 2.4381 2.4935S trio. O-EV . N = 0.8424 0.8632 0.8302STNO. DEV. (N -11 = 0.8432 0.8641 0.8313MED IAN 2.4159 2.3923 2.4421
OR = 509 387
QUESTION 9 (f) Emotional problems D
SCORE INTERVALS F PC "de if* P.-80-141 ro.Ae 6pcp.ro-rie-CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 7.7 13.9 55.5 100.0 6.4 12.4 51.9 10000 5.6 13.3 42.3 100.02.000 28.5 51.2 47.8 86,1 25.7 49.6 45.5 87.6 20.8 49.2 36.1 86.T3.000 14.1 25.4 19.4 34.9 14.3 27.6 19.7 38.0 11.1 26.3 15.9 37.54.000 3.3 5.9 5.3 9.5 4.0 7.7 5.4 10.5 3.7 8.7 4.7 11.25.000 2.0 306 2.0 3.6 1.4 2.b 1.4 2.8 1.1 2.5 1.0 2.5
CASES PROCESSED 55.5331 51.9184 42.3044NO. BLANK DATA 28.0000 22.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 10000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES
5.0000"120aF074---
5.0000 5.0000116.8653 9503977
SUM SOO. SCORES 300.7246 302.2605 248.0534MEAN
-DEV.2.2418 2.3148 2.3125
STNfle IN). 0.;76-9-4 0.7929 0.8157STNO. DEV. (N-1) = 0.7767 0.8008 0.8257MEDIAN 2.1701 2°2307 2.22095A-14P-CE-FOR STATS 5305'31/6 -5D.4855 41.2531
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CI P-BLW CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -BLh
1.000 85 14.7 578 100.0 71_ 13.3 535 100.0_ 50 12.2 409 100.02.000 292 50.5 493 85.3 253 47.3 464 86.7 195 47.7 359 87.83.000 152 26.3 201 34.8 152 28.4 211 39.4 114 27.9 164 40.14.000 34 5.9 49 8.5 44 8.2 59 11.0 36 8.8 50 12.25.00C 15 2.6 15 2.6 15 2.8 15 2.8 14 3;'14. .4 3.4
CASE pftocEsspNO. BLANK DATA
57826
535 40930 22
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.00.00 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1261.0000 1209.0000 926.0000SUM SOO. SCORES - 3165.0000 3155.0000 2432.0000MEAN 2.2398 2.3250 2.3443STMO. 0EV. (N) = 0.7778 0.8134 0.8131STN?. 0EV. IN-1) 0.7785 0.8142 0.8142MEDIAN 2.1729
*5632.2470 2.2564
SAMPLE FOR STATS = 520 395
QUESTIdN 9
SCURF INTERVALS
(h) Other (Specify) 0
ae. a1 PC I
ro,CF P-BLW
1.0002.0001.0004.0005.000'
15.71.71.71.03.2
67.2 23.37.2 7.67.2 5.94.4 4.313.9 3.2
CASES PRUCESSED - 23.3279NJ. BLANK DATA 346.000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 28.1989SUM SQD. SCORES = 53.9463MEAN 1.4044STND. DEV. fN) = 0.8452STND. OEV. (N-11 0.8671MEDIAN 1.1399SAMPLE FOR STATS = 20.0768
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF
1.000 174 69.9 2492.000 20 8.0 753.000 15 6.0 554.000 7 2.8 405.000 33 13.3 33
CASES PR )CENO. BLANK DATA
=
=249357
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE .50000SUM OF SCORES = 287.0000SUM WO. SCORES = 501.0000MEAN 1.3287STNO. OEV. (N) = 0.7443STND. OEV. (N-11 = 0.74,60MEDIAN 144q7SAMPLE FOR STATS = 216
0 0
Gy-c,-cl e. -GraffPCT CF P-BLW -P-CT&
CF P--781-.10
100.0 14.1 70.732.8-25.5 1.1 5.618.3 0.3 1.613.9 -2 1-13,,;
P-BLW F
100.0 :15.9_30.1 1522.1 1316.1 5
13.3 24
19.9 100.0 12.8 75.9 16.9 100.0-5-a-2T:g- 0.5 2-4-.8 4.1 24.14.2 20.9 0.9 5.4 3.6 21.33.0 15.3, 0.6 3.3 2.7 15.8
------2:7--IN:7-2;1---1-2.-6 -2.1 12.6
19.9066 16.8804339.0000 2740-000
1.0000 1.00005.0000 5.0000
22.0284 r8.734435.8638 31.84021.2825
-ILT663111.26920.7391
0.6860 0.76551.1103 1.0760
17.1767 14.7614
PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
73.6 216 100.0 112 73.7 152 100.06.9 57 26.4 5 3.3 40 26.36.0 42 19.4 12 7.9 35 23.02.3 29 13.4 5 3.3 23 15.1
11.1 24 11.1 18 11.8 18 11.8
216 152349
1.00005.0000
2791.00005.0000
248.0000 178.0000416.0000 320.0000
1.2917 1.32840.7059 0.78960.7077 0.79261.1038 1.0982
192 134
10. Estimate the percentage of pupils in your compensatory reading class whosefamily incomes are derived from each of the following occupational categories.
(a) Unskilled or service workers
SCORE IN
1.COG2.G003.0004.0005.00C
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORESMEANSIND. DEV. (N)SINO. DEV. (N-11MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.0005.000
gPract -(EF-FR5L-w--PLI CF P-8LW -15*Cfr-.?1 cr
8.1 14.5 55.7 100.0 7.4 14.4 51.4 100.0 5.4 13.0 41.4 100.013.9 25.0 47.6 85.5 12.8 24.9 44;6"--8576---1-274-30.0 36.0 87.018.2 32.7 33.7 60.5 16.8 32.7 31.2 60.7 14.2 34.3 23.6 57.010.8 19.3 15.5 27.8 10.1 19.6 14.4 28.0 7.6 18.3 9.4 22.74.7 8.5 4.7 8.5 4.3 8.4 4 1.8- 4.4
55.7051 51.3761 41.425127.0000 33.00001.0000 1.0000 1.00005.0000 5.0000 5.0000
157.3246 11-272-8/b- 518.5264 478.5227 349.6907
=
2.82421.1542
2.8263 2.71061:1515-
1.1647 1.1629 1.05832.8225 2.8263 2.7032
F PCF CF. P-6LW PC1 CF P-81.W F PCT CF15ZBLW
80 13.8 578 100.0 76 14.4 527 100.0 58 14.6 398 100.0141 24.4 498 86.2 135 25.6 451 85.6 118 29.6 340 85.4195 33.7 357 61.8 163 30.9 316 60.0 128 32.2 222 55.8116 20.1 162 28.0 110 20.9 153 29.0 75 18.8 94 23.646 8.0 46 8:0 43 8.2 43 8.2 19 4.8 19 4.8
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM.OF SCORES
57826-
--
5.00001641.0000 .-
527 398381.00005.0000
331.00005.0000
11690.0000 1073.0000SUM SQ0. SCORES 5405.0000 4918.0000 3357.0000MEAN 2.8391 2.8273 2.6960-SIND.- DEV. (N) 1.1361 1.1569 1.0800STND. DEV. (N-1) = 1.1371 1.1579 1.0813MEDIAN 2.8487 2.8221
QUESTION 10
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.0005. C00
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES =SUM SLID. SCORES =MEANSTND. DEV. (N) =SIND. DEV. (N-1) =MEOIAN
(b) Skilled workers or farm owners
_Gyo.aF PC' CF R-8LW
15.3 27.819.8 36.014.4 26.23.5 6.42.0 3.6
F PC TG-ra.:1.q.
55.0 100.0 13.2 25.839.7 72.2 47.5-343--19.9 36.1 15.1 29.55.5 9.9 4.0 7.72,0 3.6 1;4---2.1
55.001825.00001.00005.0000
121.997932S.36912.21811.03371.04322.1150
51.2 100.0
20.4 39.95.3 10.41.4 --2;7-
51.176437.00001.D000
8.8 21.3 41.4 100.013.8 33.4 32.6 78.714.6 35.3 18.8 45.32.2 5.4 4.1 10.0
'a:9-- 4.6 --------1.T47-4-.7.6
41.435434.00001.0000
5.0000 5.0000116:11770 ---97.6364316.7424 279.28642.2715 2.3858
r=62-sa1.0247 1.03642.2051 2.3586
_ .
SCORE INTERVALS F PC r CF P -8LW F PCT CF .-0;81W F POT CF P-8LW
1.000 171 29.5 580 100.0.
142 27.0 526 100.0.
94 2.3.7 397 100.034.3 303 76.32.000 201 34.7 409 70.5 187 35.6 384 73.0 136
3.000 156 26.9 208 35.9 150 28.5 197 37.5 134 33.8 167 42.14.000 35 6.0 52 9.0 39 7.4 47 8.9 18 4.5 33 8.35.000 17 2.9 17 2.9 8 1.5 8 1.5 15 3,8 15 3.8
CASES PROCESSED = 580 526 397ma. BLANK DATA = 26 39 34MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.00D0 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES = 12k...4..5666 1162.0000 915.0000SUM S00. SCORES = 3364.0000 3064.0000 2507.0000MEAN 2.1828 2.2091 2.3048STND. 0EV. 041 = 1.0176 0.9720 1.0014STNO. DEV. IN-11 = 1.0185 0.9730 1.0027MEDIAN 2.0920 2.1471 2.2684_ .
QUESTION 10 (c) White collar workers (clerks,salespeople, etc.)
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CFCT-raagq ad
7F ---PCT CF P-BLW F PC
1.000 23.3 41.9 55.6 100.0 17.8 34.3 51.8 100.0 12.8 30.6 41.8 100.0
2.000 19.8 35.5 32.3 58.1 20.0 38.6--- 111:4-743.3 29.0 69.4
3.000 10.6 19.1 12.5 22.5 11.4 22.1 14.0 27.0 8*1 19.3 10.1 24.14.000 1.5 2.7 1.9 3.5 2.3 4.5 2.5 4.9 1.6 3.8 2.0 4.85.000 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.8 0:2 0.i O.2 0.4 c.4 1.r 0.4
CASES PROCESSEDNO* BLANK OATA
55.628331.00056
51.7528 41.7762r.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUESUM'OF SCORES
5.0000102.8450
5.0000 5.0000mr.747-67T-- -78-3.3zu9
SUM SAO. SCORES 232.6968 243.2526 197.3281
MEAN 1.8468 1.9801 1.9945
SIND* 0EV. IN) CAM 0.8833 U.8635STNO. BEV. 1144-.1) 0.8826 0.8919 0.8740MEDIAN 1..7272 1.9053 1.9285
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT GF P -BLW
1.000 219 38.2 574 100.0 173 32.5 532 100.0106 26.6 399 100.02.000 220 38.3 355 61.8 207 38.9 359 67.5185 45.9 293 73.43.000 114 19.9 135 23.5 123 23.1 152 28.6 89 22.3 110 27.64.000 16 2.8 21 3.7 25 4.7 29 5.5 15 3.8 21 5.35.060 5 C. 9 5 0.9 4 0.8 4 0.8 6 1.5 6 1.5
CASES PROCESSEDNO. RLANK OATH'MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SAO. SCORESMEAN - .
S7No. OEV. IN)-
STND. OEV* IN-q)MEOIAN
574321.00005.0000
1090.-0000-2506.0000
1.89_90_
0.87241.8091
532 399331.00005.0000
321.00005.0000
1076.00002608.0000
2.0226
829.00002029.0000
2.07770.90080.90171.9493
0.87660.87772.0109
QUESTION 10
SCORE INTERVALS F
(8) Business owners or managers
Cr ra.. ePCT CF P-BLW
1.0002.0003.0004.0005.000
35.915.03.30.S0.4
64.5 55.627.0 19.76.0 4.71.7 1.40.8 0.4
100.0
8.42.5-a.a
CASES PROCESSED 55.6361NO. BLANK DATA 30.0000*MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 81.6541'.SUM SQD. SCORES = 151.6964MEAN 1.4712-SIND. DEV. (N) -7=7- 0.7497
DEV. (N-1) 0.7565MEDIAN 1.2747
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 380 66.1 575 100.02.000 148 25.7 195 33.93.000 38 6.6 47 8.24.000 8 1.4 9 1.65.000 0.2 1 0.2
6i2(4a.e2L PCF P-aw-LF P-BLW F
_EinIAPCT
28.7 55.9 51.4 100.0 22.6 53.8 41.9 100.036.8 22.7 44.1 15.2 36.2 19.4 46.2
3.1 6.1 3.8 7.4 4.1 9.9 4.2 10.10.4 0.9 0.6 1.3 0.1. 0.2 0.1 0.2G.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0
51.443034.00001.00005.000071:.Wer
144.93181.53180.68620.69301.3950
41.940831.00001,00004.0000
65.6355121.79171.56500.67440.68261.4299
F PC T CF P-BLW F PICT CF P -BLW
300. 531 100.0 211 52.7 400 100.0194 36.5 231 43.5 145 36.2 189 47.231 5.8 37 7.0 43 10.7 44 11.04 0.8 6 1.1 1 0.2 1 0.22 0.4 2 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE
575311.00005.0000
531 400341.00005.0000.
311.00004.0000
SUM OF SCORES 87.0000 807.0000 634.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 1467.0000 1469.0000 1194.0000MEAN 1.4383 1.5198 1.5850SiNO. DEV. 0.6948 0.6758 0.6876SIND. DEV. (N-1) 0.6954 0.6765 0.6884MEDIAN 1.2566 1.3850 1.4479
QUESTION 10 (e) Professionals (doctors,
lawyers, etc.).
Ga-a.eSCORE INTERVALS F PCT LO
I.00O 40.9 77.9 52.52.000 9.5 18.1 11.63.000 1.9 3.7 2.14.000 0.1 0.3 0.15.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0
.CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
-=
52.479964.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 66.2905SUM S00. SCORES = 98.6771MEAN 1.2633STNo. DEV. (NI = 0.5332'STNO. OEY. (N-I1 = 0.5383MEDIAN 1.1417
1:";;BI.W PCFlibriP=111.w F PCf-"rckc' 4F P-8111
100.0 34.3 71.2 48.2 100.0 26.6 71.2 37.4 100.022.1 1-o.0--22.4 13.9 28.8 9.5 25.4 10.8 28.8-4.0 2.8 5.7 3.1 6.3 1. 1 3.0 1.3 3.40.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.4-0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0al 49.3
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF
1.000 414 77.0 5382.000 100 18.6 1243.000 22 4.1 244.000 2 0.4 2
5.000 0 0.0
CASES PROCESSEDND. BLANK DATA
53868
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMI:V ''SLUE 4.0000SLIM of SCORES 688.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 1044.0000MEAN 1.2788gfN0-..0-EV. (NI 0.5524STNO. DEV. (N-1) 0.5529MEDIAN 1.1498
48.199368.00001.00005.0000
65.5744108.4951
1.36050.63250.63921.2020
37.404466.00001.00004.0000
W9.564I76.95371.32510.54910.55661.2019
P-BLW F --CO P-BLW F PCT
100.0 352 71.1 495 100.0 254 69.8 364 100.023.0 115 23.2 143 28.9 95 26.1 110 30.24.5 25 5.1 28 5.7 14 3.8 IS 4.10.4 2 0.4 3 0.6 I 0.3 1 0.30.0 1 0.2 I 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0
495 364701.00005.0000
671.00004.0000
670.0000 490.00001094.0000 776.0000
1.3535 1.34620.6149 0.56550.6155 0.56621.2031 1.2165
QUESTION 10
SCORE INTERVALS FGro-de
PCT CF
(f) Unemployed
P CF P131.144
PCTGliduLe
CFF PCT
1.000 2:i.7 45.6 52.0 100.0 20.0 42.5 47.1 100.0 15.2 41.1 37.02.000 19.9 38.2 28.3 54.4 19.5 41.4 27.1 57.5 16.1 43.8 21.83.000 6.2 12.0 8.4 16.1 6.3 13.5 7.6 16.0 4.5 12.2 5.74.000 2.0 3.9 2.2 4.2 1.0 2.1 1.2 2.6 1.0 2.7 1.25.000 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5 u.2
P--q3LW
100.0saw15.43.20.5-
CASES PRUCESStO 51.9763 47.1470 37.0325NO. BLANK DATA 73.0000 T9.0000 77.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM CF SCORES 90.9697 83.2713 65.9461SUM SUD. SCORES 195.3981 176.9549 141.1337MEAN 1.7502 1.7662 1.7808SIND. 0EV. IN) 0.8343 0.7961 0.8000SIND. DEV. (141) 0.8425 0.8047 0.8110MEDIAN 1.6142 1.6804 1.7049
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-3LW F PCT CF F PCT. CF
1.000 227 43.0 528 100.0 192 39.7 484 100.0 140 39.5 354 100.02.000 210 39.8 301 57.0 209 43.2 292 60.3 159 44.9 214 60.53.000 68 12.9 91 17.2 66 13.6 83 17.1 43 12.1 55 15.54.000 21 4.0 23 4.4 2.5 17 3.5 10 2.8 12 3.45.000 2 0.4 2 0.4 5 1.0 5 1.0 2 0.6 2 0.6
CASES PRCCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
52878
484 35481 77
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 945.0000 881.0000 637.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 2065.0000 1939.0000 1373.0000MEAN 1.7898 1.8202 1.7994SIND. DEV. (N) 0.8412 0.8324 0.8004SIND. DEV. (N-."1) 0.8420 0.8333 0.8015MEDIAN )..6762 1.7392 1.7327
QUESTION 10 (g) Don't know
SCORE INTERVALS F PCTeCF P -8Lw PCTGcck.'"4. P -BLW F P-C1" F P-BLW
1.0002.0003.CGO4.0005.GOG
15.65.31.4C.11.2
65.822.56.00.55.2
23.68.12.81.41.2
100.034.211.75.75.2
12.6
1.10.51.6.-
60.6
5.12.2
20.8-8.22.51.51.0
100.0 7.4 51.0 14.5
2.21.3
100.049.0715.39.0
37.4-4-.912.1 0.97.0 0.4
-N-01- 6.9
-33;86.23.1
-6-0 0.9 6.0
CASES PRD0ESSEi) 23.6468 20.7698 14.4601NO. BLANK DATA 346.0000 265.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 37.0811 53;9316' -2577234SUM SQO. SCORES 82.2843 77.1105 63.6477MEAN 1.5681 1.6337 1.7927STNO. CEV. (N) 1.0103 I:02167 1.0698STNO. OEV. (N-1) 1.0324 1.0471 1.1296MEDIAN 1.2596 1.3251 1.4811
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCI CF P-BLW F PCI CF P-Blw
1.000 148 59.0 251 100.0123 54.7 225 100.0 83 51.2 162 100.02.000 66 26.3 103 41.0 70 31.1 102 45.3 51 31.5 79 48.83.000 18 7.2 37 14.7 14 6.2 32 14.2 12 7.4 28 17.34.000 3 1.2 19 7.6' 5 2.2 18 8.0 5 3.1 16 9.95.000 16 6.4 16 6.4 13 5.8 13 5.8 11 6.8 11 6.8
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
251355
162340 269
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM -OF SCORES 426.0000 390.0000 296.000DSUM SQO. SCORES 1022.0000 934.0000 750.0000MEAN 1.6972 1.7333 1.8272STND. 0EV. (N) 1.0914 1.0708 1.1363STND. DEV. (N-1) 1.0936 1.0732 1.1398MEDIAN 1.3480 1.4146 1.4759
11. What is the average absentee rate in yourwhat percentage of the class is absent on
0 0-10%
0 11-20%
21-30%
El 31-40%
0 41-50%
More than 50%
compensatory reading class? (Aboutany given day?)
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P -81WreLci e.
CF P-BLW F PCT4_CFPCT P-BLW
1.000 507 84.6 599 100.0 478 86.3 554 100.0 347 82.6 420 100.02.000 77 12.9 92 15.4 59 13.8 73 17.410.6 76 13.7 583.000 10 1.7 15 2.5 10 1.8 17 3.1 11 2.6 15 3.64.000 4 0.7 5 0.8 5 0.9 7 1.3 4 1.0 4 1.05.000 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 2 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.06.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA -
5997
55411
42011
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000 6.0000SUM (IF SCORES 712.0000 657.0000 512.0000SUM SOD. SCORES"MEAN
994.0000 945.0000 742.00001.1886 1.1859 1.2190
STNO, °EV. (NI 0.4965 0.5471 0.5297STND. DEV. IN-1, 0.4970. 0.5476 0.5303MEDIAN 1.0907 1.0795 1.1052
11. What is the average absentee rate in yourwhat percentage of the class is absent on
0-10%
11-20%
21-30%
31-40%
41-50%
More than 50%
SCORE INTERVALS F
1.000 49.7 85.92.000 7.1 12.23.000 0.7 1.24.000 0.3 0.6
0.46.000 0.0 0.0
,er 0C.2..F
57.88.11.10.4
-0.0
compensatory reading class? (Aboutany given day?)
(;ra.cie Gv-adt. 6P-80/ F PCI CF P-81-W F PCT CF P -81-W
100.0 47.1 87.8 53.7 100.0 36.4 83.9 43.4 100.014.1 5.3 9.8 6.5 12.2 5.6 12.9 7.0 16.11.9 0.8 1.5 1.3 2.3 1.1 2.5 1.4 3.20.7 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.70.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0-0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 L.0 -0.0 -0.0
-15-SES-FROZETS-EDNO. *BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE_
SUM of SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEAN-STND. DEV. IN1STND. DEV. IN-11WEITIAff
===
-57.7901-7.0000I.0000
53.666811.00001.0000
43.374511.00001.0000
5.0000'67.467390.9691
6.000c62.217085.5643
4.000052.043173.3902
-1;16750.45950.4636
1.15930.50030.5051
1.19990.50240.5082
1.0818 1.0694 1.0957
PART A 12. Which of the following would you judge to be the major causes of absenteeismamong your pupils? (Mark yes or no for each cause.)
1 2Yes No
Illness of pupil
SCORE INTERVALSG. e. D-
F PCGrade
P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLWGrade 62
F PCT CF P-BLW
1.0002.000
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOO. SCORESMEANSTNO. DEV. =STNC. DEV. IN-11 =MEDIAN - =
SCORE INTERVALS
53.93.2
F
94.5 57.1 100.05.5
57.074715;0666-L 00002.0000
49.3 93.4 52.8 100.0 39.0 91.4 42.7 100.0
52.7732
8.6 .7 6
42.717620.00001.00002.0000
18.001XF1.00002.0000
60.2444-66.57361.05550.2287-0.23071.0294
PCT CF P-BLW
56.246163.18541.0658
F
46.401253.76391.08620.2805-0.28391.0471
024770.25011.0352
PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW
1.0002.000
CASES P.kOCE SSEDNO. BLANK OA TA
==
559 94.6 591 lop.o_511 93.8 545 100.0 371 89.8 413 100.032 5.4 32 5.4 34
59115
6.2 34
545
6.2 42 10.2 42 10.2
41318
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES 623.0666 579.0000 455.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 687.0000 647.0000 539.0000MEAN 1.0541 1.0624 1.1017STND. DEV. (N) = 0.2263 0.2419 0.3022STND. OEV. ( N-1 ) = 0.2265 0.2421 0.3026MEDIAN 1.0286 1.0333 1.0566
PART 8
SCORE INTERVAL S F
1.000 8.92.000 42.4
CASES PROCESSEO -1104: -BLOW -DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM tW' SCORESSUM sflo. SCORESMEAN3This5:--br .*-1N)STND. DEV. 04-11 =MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
1. 0 002.000
F
100 18.5440 81.5
0 0 illness of other family member(s)
ro..deI CF
17.4 51.3
P-8L14
100.0-8276
de qP-BLW
100.0 10.4
p
11..0
PCT cF
22.7 48.482.6 42.4 37.4 77.3 37.4 77.3 29.1
51.3081 48.411265.000-0* 64.00001.0000 1.00002. 0000 2.0000
93..69-47 85.8310178.4613 160.6648
1.8261 1.7730-11:378-8 0.41880.3826 0.42321.8947 1.8530
pCT CF P -BLW PCT.- F
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA =
54066
41N1muM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2,9090SUM OF SCORES 980.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 1860.000014?.4N. 1.8148STNO. DEV. = 0.3884STND. DEV. IN-11 = 0.3888MEDIAN 1.8864
-irci_deFC CF
26.4 39.6 100.073.6 29.1 73.6
39.570742.0000i.00002.0000
68.7141126.9967
1.73650.44040.44611.8210
PCT CF P-BLW
540 100.0 118 23.7 498 100.0 104 26.8 388 100.0440 81.5 380 76.3 380 76.3 284 73.2 284 73.2
498 38867 431.0000 1.00002.0000 2.0000
878.0000 672.00001638.0000 1240.0000
1.7631 1.73200.4252 0.44290.4256 0.44351.8447 1.8169
PART C
SCORE INTERVALS
Lack of parental concern
6-ro-cia =LF PCT -CF P-BLS! L F PCT CF P-8LW
1.000 23.6 44.7 52.9 100.0 2342 47.0 49.4 100.0 19.1 47.7 40.0 100.02.000 29.3 55.3 29.3 55-.3-26.2 53.0 26.2 53.0 20.9 5=4. 2.0.9 52.3
CASES PROCESSED = 52.9259 49.3862 39.9655NO. BLANK DATA = 50:0000 54.0000 38.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SUM OF-SCORES 82.2114 75.5463 60.8657SUM SOD. SCORES 140.7757 127.8606 102.6620MEAN 1.5533 1.5297 1.52308114T:1; DEV.' 041 = 0:4970 0.4990 0.4994STND. DEV. IN-11 = 0.5016 0.5041 0.5057MEDIAN 1.5962 .1.5559 1.5437
SCORE INTERVALSGYa. d e KrIva d 6
F PCT CF P -BLW -T PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P -BLW
1.000 238 42.9 555 100.0 240 47.2 508 100.0188 48.0 392 100.02.000 317 57.1 317' 57.1 268 52.8 268 52.8 204 52.0 204 52.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATA
= 555.51
508 39257 39
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000
SCORES = 872.0600 776.0000 596.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 1506.0000 1312.0000 1004.0000MEAN 1.5712 1.5276 1.5204STNO. DEV. (N) 0.4949 0.4992 0.4996STN O. DEV. IN-1) = 0.4954 0.4597 0.5002MEDIAN 1.6246 1.5522 1.5392
PART 0
SCORE INTERVALS
0 0 Need for pupil to perform other duties at home
F Pc 'P1.-°-13 '2CF P-BLW F PCT* C LT P -dLh
1.000 9.6 18.7 51.4 100.0 17.7 36.3 48.9 100.0 16.8 42.4 39.b 100.02.000 41.8 81.3 41.8 81.3 3144- 63.7 31.2 63.7 22.9 57:7 22.9 57-.6
CASES PROCESSED 51.4280 48.9021 39.6440116:-ELANK-DAM 64.a0OD 60.0000 410000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SOM-- StORES 93:25-9-4- 80.0766 62.501.9SLIM SQD. SCORES 176.9156 142.4199 108.2134MEAN 1.8134 1.6375 1.57661TNC: DEV. IN) 0.3894 0.006 0.4940STND. DEV. IN-1) 0.3933 0.4856 0.5003MEDIAN 1.8852 1.7155 1.6326
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF 13-8LW PC T CF P-BLW
1.000 103 19.0 541 100.0 176 35.1 502 100.0 157 40.4 389.100.02.000 438 81.0 438 81.0 326 64.9 326 64.9 232 59.6 232 59.6
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE-Slim OF SCORESum SQD. SCORESMEAN
STUD. 06/. (N1STND. DEV. IN-1)MEDIAN
.1.--
541651.00002.0000
979.00001855.0000
1.80960.39260.39301.8824
502 389631.00002.0000
421.00002.0000
828.00001480.0000
1.6494
621.00001085.0000
1.59640.47720.4776
0.49060.49131.6616,
PART E
SCORE INTERVALS
0 0 Suspension or expulsion
F Pc 9."' _e i-F. -P-BILbe F PCTv-o ap y
LF P-EILW evyLAp_i.
F PC CF P-BLw
1.0002.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OA TAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE
=
=
1.2 2.4 51.0 100.0 1.5 3.2 48.0 100.0 2.2 5.5 39.1 100.049.8 .97.6 .49.8-91.6 46.4
51.0488
96.8 46.4 96.8
47.9590
36.9 94.5 36.9 94.5
39.096668.0000
1.00002.0000
69.00001.00002.0000
47.00001.00002.0000
SUM OF SCORES 100.9036 94.3746 76.0300SUM SQD. SCORES 200.6069 187.2003 149 «8928MEAN 1.9766 1.9678 1.9447STND. bEV. IN) = 0.1507 0.1761 0.2284STNO. OEV. IN-1) = 0.1522 0.1780 0.2314MEDIAN = 1.9880 1.9833 1.9707
SCCP INT.:.0/41:1S-GI,-04 e- 1
F . PCT CF P-OLW F PCTGra..,i& 4 a.G-v- ae 4
CF p-eiw F PCT CF P-11LW
1.000 12 2.2 131 100.0 17 3.4 493 100.0 27 7.0 383 100.0
2.000 525 97.8 525 97.8 476 96.6 476 96.6 356 93.0 356 93.0
CASES _PROCESSED_NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE_
==
===
==
537691.00002.0000
493 383721.00002.0000
481.00002.0000.=
SUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORESMEANgiiiirTiiEv: thI---STND. DEV. IN-11MEDIAN
1062.00002112.0000
1.97770.14780.14791.9886
969.00001921.0000
1.9655
739.00001451.0000
1.92950.18250.18271.9821
0.25600.25631.9621
PART
SCORE INIERVALS-
Other (Specify)
F -PtGrade.
F pCTG"-.11. P -8 LWPCT 1E P-BLW F
1.000 4.2 19.4 21.8 100.0 3.5 19.2 18.2 100.0 3.2 24.1 13.1 100.02.000 -17.6 80.6 -11.6 80.614.7 80.8 14.7 80.8-1000 75.9 10.0 75.9
CASES PROCESSEDDATA
21.8301 18.1792 13.1464-371AMOO 358.0000 .93.0000
MINIMUM' VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES 32.8688 23.1245SUM SOD. SCORES 74.4:449 62.2475 43.0808MEAN 1.8065 1.8080 1.75501INFO-DEV. IN) 0-03-95-0 0,3938 0.4277
DEV. (N -li 0.4044 0.4051 0.4449MEDIAN 1.8800 1.8812 1.8412
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-OLW F PCT CF P -0LW
1.000 42 18.8 223 100.0 42 21.8 193 100.0 30 22.7 132 100.02.000 181 81.2 181 81.2 151 78.2 151 78.2 102 7703 102 7703
CASES PROCESSE0NO. BLANK DATA
223383
193 1.32
372 299MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES 00/ 404.0000 344.0000 234.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 766.0000 646.0000 4380000MEAN _ . .
1.8117 1.7824 1.7727STND. DEV. (N) 0.3910 0.4126 0.4191SIND. OEV. IN-1J 0.3919 0.4137 0.4207MEDIAN 1.8840 1.8609 1.8529
13. Estimate the percentage of your pupils whose familiesschool attendance area during the school year.
None
1-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-100%
Can't estimate
have moved into this
SCORE INTERVALS FGv- co.a e 2-
PCT CF P-BLWa_cie 6; leota
F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 160 26.7_ 600 100.0 169 30.3 558 100.0 134 31.9 420 100.02.000 379 63.2 44673.3 334 59.9 389 69.7 .251. 59.8 286 68.13.000 44 7.3 61 10.2 34 6.1 55 9.9 16 3.8 35 8.34.000 5 0.8 17 2.8 10 1.8 21 3.8 4 1.0 19 4.55.000 3 0.5 12 2.0 3 0.5 11 2.0 2 0.5 15 3.66.000 9 1.5 9 1.5 8 1.4 8 1.4 13 3.1 13 3.1
CASES PROCESSED = 60--NO. BLANK DATA = 0MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAZiktimVADJE = e7.06$36-SUM OF SCORES = 1085.0000SUM SAO. SCORES 2227.0000MEAN 1.8359STNO. ()EV. (N) = 0.6307STNO. DEV.. (N-11 0.6312
OTAN f;t375SAMPLE FOR STATS = 591
13. Estimate the percentage of your pupils whose families have moved into thisschool attendance area during the school year.
None
1-25%
O 26 -50X
51-75%
76-100%
O Can't estimate
SCORE INTEkVALS F' 1CF CF P-B1.41F PCra-A4. P-131-14 F PC2sr.LI-cte.
1.000 17.2 29.7-61.0
58.0 100.0 15.8 29.3 53.9 100.0 14.3 32.9 43.4 100.02.000 35.4 WO./ 71).1 33.0 .61.2 38.1 TO./ 25.7 59,3 29.1 67.13.000 3.7 6.4 5.4 9.3 3.2 5.9 5.1 9.5 1.8 4.1 3.4 7.84.000 0.4
---0;20.7 1.6 2.8 0.9 1.6 1.9 3.6 0.3 0.7 1.6 3.6
5.00 0.4 1.2 la- 0.2 0.4 1.0 1.9 0.1 0.2 1.3 2.96.000 1.0 1.7 1.0 1.7 0.8 1.5 0.8 1.5 1.2 2,7 1.2 2.7
CASES PROCESSED 51.9680NO. BLANK DATA = 6.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = ET:DOooSUM OF SCORES = 102.0128SUM SQO. SCORES = 204.8499MEAN 1.SIND. 0EV. (NI = 0.6246STND. ()EV. = 0.6302MEDIAN 1.8182SAMPLE FOR STATS = 56.9857
14. Estimate the percentage of your pupils who have moved out of the schoolattendance area this year.
None
I-25%
26-50%
51-75%
O 76-100%
O Can't estimate
SCORE INTERVALS F
1.000 2192..000 3503.000 274.000_ 15.000 06.000 4
G-v-a-de. a, ,ft-sitl e 'L (;--iy-ozie. 4PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
36.4 60158.2 3824.5 320.2 50.0 40.7 4
==
6015
CAES PROCE SSE0NO . BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE = 1.0330.MAXIMUM VALUE = 6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1004.0000SUM WO. SCORES = 1878.0000MEAN = 1.6817.STND. DEV. (N) = 0.5634SIND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.5639MEDIAN = 1.7271SAMPLE FOR STATS = 597
100.0 215 .38.5 559 100.0 155 36.9 420 100.063.6 313 56.0 344 61:5 241 57.4 265 63.1s5.3 22 3.9 31 5.5 11 2.6 24 5.70.8 1 0.2 9 1.6 1 0.2 13 3.10.7 0 0.0 8 1.4 0 0.0 12 2.90.7 8 1.4 8 1.4 12 2.9 12 2.9
-SCORE -INTERVALS
14. Estimate the percentage of your pupils who have moved out of the schoolattendance area this year.
None
1-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-100%
Can't estimate
F -PCT rcce- 2CF P4CW F PC7taxi
P -BLN VraaeC F P-13LW
1.000-2.0003.0004.000
---5:13t0
21.8 37.5n;.-5 -57:72.3 3.90.1 0.1
58.1 100.03-673---62Y42.8 4.70.5 0.8
21.4
2.00.10.00.7
39.6
3.80.20.01.3
54.1
2.80.80.70.7
100.0.
5.21.4131.3
16.G 37.0 43.4 100.025.31.00.10.00.9
58.42.40.20.02.1
27.32.01.00.9-
0.9
63.04.6
2.12:1 3
2.16.0000.0 0.00.4 0.6
0.40.4
0760.6
==z
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
587:072-4
5.00001.0000
An 6-17-0141 VAL UE = 6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 96.0607SUM S00. SCORES = 177.8795MEAN = 1.6649STNO. ()EV. (N) a 0.5578MD. DEV. 1N..-1/ = 0.5626MEDIAN = 1.7101SAMPLE FOR STATS = 57.6979
15. How far do you expect the average pupil in your compensatory reading classwould be able to go in school if he were given the opportunity?
0 Eighth grade, or lower
El Ninth, tenth, or eleventh grade
[:3 High school graduate
0 Junior college, business school, or some other post-secondary course,but not a four year college
[:] Four year college or beyond
[:3 Other (Specify)
SCORE INTERVALS
1.000_.. _ .2.0003.0004. 000___....5.0006.000
F
2970
323115433
CPCT
5.012.055.419.77.40.5
CF
583554484161463
.4/CF P-BLW
538 100.0
F
14
PCT
3.4
CF P-BLW
406 100.0
P-BLW
100.0
F
20
PCI
3.795.083.027.6
101255110
18.847.420.4
518417162
96.377.530.1
55233
73
13.557.418.0
392337104
96.683.025.6
0.547
58.70.9
525
9.70_ . 0.9..
265
6.41.2
315
7.61.2
CASES PROCESSEDNO . BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
=
=
58323
1.0000MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORES
SIN Do DEV. (N)SIND. DEV. N-1)ñThiTSAMPLE FOR STATS
6.00001813.00006131.0000
-3.12590.89420.8950
580
15. How far do you expect the average pupil in your compensatory reading classwould be able to go in school if he were given the opportunity?
0 Eighth grade, or lower
0 Ninth, tenth, or eleventh grade
[:] High school graduate
0 Junior college, business school, or some other post-secondary course,but not a four year college
0 Four year college or beyond
0 Other (Specify)
FGra_cle.
Pt7cryeLde
IMW-13SCORE INTERVALS C-F-F=BUW F PCT CF F P011-cie
1.000 2.5 4.5 56.4 100.0 2.4 4.6 52.0 100.0 1.8 4.3 41.9 100.02.01RT 7:-0 12.4 51.9 9-5.5- 9.8 18.8 49.6 95.4 6.0 14.3 40.2 95.73.000 31.3 55.5 46.9 83.1 25.6 49.3 39.8 76.6 23.2 55.2 34.1 81.44.000 11.2 19.9 15.6 27.7 10.1 19.3
-70314.2 27.4 8.0 19.1 11.0 26.2
5.000 4.2 -7.4 ----47;74----7.7.-8-- 3.8 4.2 8.0 2.6 6.1 3.0 7.16.000 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.7 0.4 1.0 0.4 1.0
=CASES PROCESSED 56.43 IRTNO. BLANK DATA = 23.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM WIN 6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 176.2206SUM SQD. SCORES = 596.3271MEAN 3.1345STND. DEV. (N) = 0.8843
nEV. (N-li = 0.8923M E D I? tI = 3.0940SAMPLE FOR STATS = 56.2200
16. How far do you expect the average pupil in your compensatory reading classwill actually in in school?
Eighth grade, or lower
0 Ninth, tenth, or eleventh grade
[1] High school graduate
EiJunior college, business school or some other post -13econdary course,
but not a four year college
0 Four year college or beyond
0 Other (Specify)
_______ 6-Y4d4L _6-1f:aig 6SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 50 8.5 586 100.0 35 6.4 547 100.0 17 4.1 413 100.02.000 159 27.1 536 91.5 177 32.4 512 93.6 136 32.9 396 95.93.000 311 53.1 377 64.3 267 48.8 335 61.2 224 54.2 260 63.04.000 50 8.5 66 11.3 44 8.0 68 12.4 26 6.3 36 8.75.000 14 2.4 16 2.7 18 3.3 24 4.4 9 2.2 10 2.46.000 2 0.3 2 0.3. 6 1.1 6 1.1 1 0.2 1 0.2
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
58420
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1571.0000SUM SW. SCORES = '4635.0000MEAN = 2.6901STND. OEV4. INI = 0.8368'STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.8375MEDIAN = 2.7669SAMPLE FOR STATS = 584
16. How far do you expect the average pupil in your compensatory reading classwill actually g in school?
Eighth grade, or lower
Ninth, tenth, or eleventh grade
High school graduate
Juniorcollege, business school
but not a four year college
Four year college or beyond
C:] Other (Specify)
or some other post-secondary course,
E -maw_ s P- ANCTrade a- (25-ro.sle rcA_A e_
CF P=ITOT- F PCT F F PCT F P-BLW
1,0002-ao0
4.6.A.5.1
8.226.7
56.9 100.0 3.8-917816.5-
7.1 53.0 100.0 2.1 4.9 42.3 100.031.1 49.2. 92,9' 13.8 32.1 40.2 95.1
3.000 30.7 54.0 37.0 65.2 26.9, 50.7 32.7 61.8 22.9 54.0 26.4 62,54.000 5.0 8.7 6.3 11.2 3.8 7.2 5.9 11.0 2.7 6.4 3.6 8.43.000 1.3' 2.3 1 74 2.5 1.6 3.0 2.1 3.9 0.8 1.9 0.1 2.16.000 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 '0.5 0.9 0.4 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2
ra-E-S--PAOCE S-EO. -56.8526NO BLANK OATA = 19.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000WiafgUm VALUE = 6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 153.4477SUM SAO. SCORES 453.6777
-2:70311WEAlf---SING. OEV. IN) 0.8278STNO. OEV. 1N-1) = 0.8352WEOIAN 2.7794SAMPLE FOR STATS = 56.7683
QUESTION 16.1II. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS
The following questions refer to your compensatory reading instruction (see definitionon page 1). If you are a classroom teacher, and all of the pupils in your class receivecompensatory reading instruction, answer the questions in terms of the total class. Ifonly some of the pupils receive compensatory reading instruction, answer the questionsin terms of those pupils only, and in terms of that part of the instructional programthat is directed to them.
If you are a reading teacher or specialist teaCher, answer the questions with referenceto the class to which your instruction applies. If you teach more than one class (asclass is defined on page 1), answer the questions with reference to the one class perprogram that meets earliest in the week. Be sure to include all meetings of that class.If you teach in MORE THAN ONE PROGRAM, fill out separate questionnaires for one Class ineach program.
If you do teach more than one class, check this box.
a 6-v-ei / CA.Acc.SCORE INTERVALS F PCI a P-81-14 F PCT CF- P--61-14 F PC
0.01;000-
CASES PROCESSED =
MINIMUM VALUtMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES =SUA 140. SCORES =MEANSTNO. ()EV. (N) __
G. DEV.MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
49.9 85.2 58.5 100.0 43.3 79.1 54.7 100.0 31.48;1 11.7 14-01 11.4 20.9 11.4 20.9 13.4
58.5473-0.0-1.00008.69418.64410.14850.3556U:33670.0872
F PCT CF
511 84.3_1.000 95 15.7 95 15.7 110 19.5
54.74350.01.0000
11:443711.44370.20900.4066
70.229.8
0.41040.1321
P-BLW F PCI CE P-BLW F' PCT
606 100'0'455 8C.5
CASES pROCESSED______MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSING. OEV. IN) =
MEDIAN
6060.01.0000
95.000045:0666-0.15680.3636'0.36390.0930
5650.01.0000
110.0000110.00000.19470.39600.39630.1209
565 100.0 317 73.5110 19.5 114 26.5
CF -111-W
44.8 100.013.4 29.8
44.80920.01.0000
13.375213.31520.29850.45760.46280.2127
4310.01.0000
114.0000114.00000.26450.44110.44160.1798
CF P-BLW
431 100.0114 26.5
QUESTION 16.2 If you teach in more than one program, check this box. 0
SCi3RE INTERVALae &o-e6.
PCT P 8LN F PCfrV-64-de- P -BLW F PCT CF PfiLW
0.0 53.5 91.5 58.5 100.0 50.6 92.4 54.7 100.0 40.2 89.7 44.8 100.05.0 8.5 5.0 -8.5 4.2 7.6 4.2 7.6 4.6 10.3 4.6 10.3
CASES PROCESSED - 58.5473 54.7435 44.8042WINTRUM- %WOW-- 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1. 0000 1. 0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORE S 5.0040 4.1780 4.5582SU OD. RE = 4.1780 4.5982MEAN 0.0855 0.0763 0.1026STNO. UV. (N) = 0.2796 0.2655 0.30351-Tria7TTEV. TN=11 072-870- 0.2680 0.3069MEDIAN 0.0467 0.0413 0.0572
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF F PC P -BLW F PCT CF P -BLW
0.0 554 91.4 606 100.0_ 522 92.4 565 100.0 386 89.6 431 100.01.000 52 8.6 52 8.6 43 7.6 43 7.6 45 10.4 45 10.4
CASES_ PROCESSED __=.MINIMUM VALUE =
clo60.0
565 4310.0 0.0
MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCOR E S = 43.0000 45.0000SUM SW. SCORES = 52:06-66 43.0000 45.0000MEAN 0.0858 0.0761 0.1044syNo._ DEV._ (y) = 0.2801 0.2652 0.3058SIND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.2803 0.2654 0.3061MEDIAN 0.0469 0.0412 0. 0583
17. When is compensatory reading instruction carried out? (Check all that apply.)
SCORE INTERVAL S.
During regular school hours in time scheduled for regular readinginstruction
G a-F PCI
ra-de tr 15=B1. P-B PCT CF P 8 IN
0.0 3.3 5.6 58.5 100.0 4.0 7.3 54.7 100.0 5.7 12.8 44.S 100.01.000) -33.3 537.3- 94;4 50.8 92.7 50.8 92.7 39.1 87.2 39.1 87.2
CASES PROCESSED 58.5473 54.7435 440 8042MINIMUM- VALUE = 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 55.2546 50.7739 39,0E94SUM SQD. SCORES 55.2.546 543.7739 39.0694MEAN 0.9438 0.9275 0.6719STND. DEV. = 0.2304 0.2593 0.3342WNTS-n-ftTil.:-C4=11- 6 0.3380MEDIAN 0.9702 0.9609 0,9265
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
32 5.3 6136 100.0 41. 7.3 565 100.0 41 9.5 431: 100.01.000 574 94.7 5'74 94.7 524 92.7 524 92.7 390 90.5 390 90.5
CASES PROCESSED = 606 _ 565 431MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE
0.01.0000.
0.01.0000
0.01.0000
SUM OF SCORES 574.0000 524.0000 390.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 574.0000 524.0000 390.0000MEAN 0.9472 0.9274 0.9049STND. DEV. (NI
-=
0.2236 0.2594 0.29340.2238 0.2597 0.2937
MEDIAN 0.9721 0,9609 0.9474
t -a LITS-flbii 17During regular school hours in time released from other class work
--WIRE INTER VAC S. F
0.0 39.21.000 19.4
PC -s17-chcl"C.F--P."-IfL14
66.9 58.5 100.0
v.cL" t--F--.1-)C PC4:7"-a-de. ''F P-.BLW
72.1 44.8 100.0
F P-8114 F
38.9 71.1 54.7 100.0 32.333.1 19.4 33.1 5 8.9 12.5 27,9,
CASES PROCESSED = 58.5473-0.-0-
54.7435 44.8092141NIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES-SUM-S00. -SCORE
= 19.3786 15.8158 12.4674S 193786 15.8158 12.4874
MEAN = 0,3310 0.2889 0.2787STND. DEV. IN/ = 0.4706 0.4533 0.4483STND. DEW-W-11 = 0.4146 0.4575 0,4534MEDIAN = 0.2473 0.2031 0.1932
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF 0-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -8LW
0.01.000
CASES PROCESSED
,
Wil._i!,T 606 106.0 409 72.4 565 100.0 322 74.7 431 100.0198 32.7 198 32,7
606._
156 27.6 156 27.6 109
565
25.3 109' 25.3
431MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0 0,0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 198.0000 156.0000 109.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 198.0000 156.0000 109.0000MEAN MP 0.3267 0.2761 0.2529STND. EV. IN) 0.4690 0.4471 0.4347STND. DEV. IN-I/ = 0.4694 0.4475 0.4352MEOIAN = 0.2426 0.1907 0.1693
QUESTIUN 17 Before or after school or on weekends
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUE
VALUE ..MAXIMUMSUM OF SCORES
--i-SUM SOO. SCORESMEANSIND. DEV. IN)UNI5. -15-0/.-IFI-=11MEOIAN =
SCORE IN- TERVAL S
0.01.000
F
54.64;0
F
56442
PCf"4-de. CF
93.2 58.5-6:8 4.0
58.5473-0.'0'
L.ro-d e q G-Ini_cie. 4
P-8-Lw . F
100.0 52.5
PC LF P-BLW
96.0 54.7 100.0
F
43.4
OCT CF P-8LW
96.8 44.8 1.00.06.8 -2--.-2 4.0 2.2
54.7435
4.0 1.4 3.2 1.4 3.2
44.80520.01.06601.4418
1.00003.96983.96 ,180,06780.25140.25360.0364
OCT CF
93.1 606
0.01.06002.21672.21610.04050.1971
1.44180 .03220.1765
P-BLW F
100.0 544
0.19890.0211
PCT CF
96.3 565
P-BLW
100.0
F
417
0.17850.0166
OCT CF P-BLW
96.8 431.100.06.9 42 6.9 21 3.7 21 3.7 14 3.2 14 3.2
CASES PROCESSED = 606 565 431MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 42.0000 21.0000 14.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 42.0000 21.0000 14.0000MEAN 0.0693 0.0372 0.0325SIND._ oEy. (N). 7.
sf40.15-Eir. -(N-1) -0.2540 0.1892 0.1.773-6;144T-- 0.1.893 0.1775
MEDIAN = 0.0372 0.0193 0.0168
QUESTION 17
SCORE INTERVALS
During the summer
G-v-a.de C-;VO,s4F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT P-BLW F
G-ro-cte 6PCT F F-aLw
0.0 52.3 89.3 58.5 100.0 50.2 91.7 54.7 100.0 40.3 89.9 44.8 100.01.000 6.3 10.7 6-a---10.7 4.6 8.3 4.6 8.3 4.5 10.1 4.5 10.1
CASES PROCESSED"VALUE
58.5473 54.7435 44.8092MINIMUM 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUN OF SCORES-SUM
6.2888 4.5701 4.5438-SW. SCORE S 6.2188 4.5701 4.5438
MEAN 0.1074 0.0835 0.1014STNO. OEV. 0.3096 0.2766 0.3019
MEDIAN 1).06020.27920.0455
0.30`30.0564
SCORE INTERVALS F
0.0 5391.000 67
PCT
88.911.1
CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-BLW F
606 100.0 521 92.2 565 100.0 391
PCT CF P -BLW
90.7 431 I00.067 11.1 44 7.8 44 7.8 40 9.3 40 9.3
CASES PROLE SSED = 606 565 431MINIMUM VALUE =- 0.0 0.0 0.0MA XIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES
=--
1.0000 1.000044.0000
1.000040.0000
sum SOD. SCORES 67.0000 44.0000 40.0000ME AN 0.1106 0.0779 0.0928SIND DFV = 9?!.?(? 0.2680 0.2902STNO. 0EV. N-1 = 0.3138 0.2682 0.2905MEDIAN 0.0622 0.0422 0.0512
QUESTION 17 Other (Specify)
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
CASES PROCESSED =MINIMTJM VALUE -MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =-§014-sTat: stbitES"MEAN =STNO. OEV. DO =STNO. tiEV. 1-61.1 FMEDIAN =
SCORE INTERVALS
.
56.91.6
F
Pc v-cLd e 0
97.2 58.52.8 -.". 1;6
58.54730.01.00001.6412
-1764120.02800.16510.1600.0144
PCT CF
"cle i;- rst...a.to 4,P-FEIT
100.0
F PCT P-BLW
53.5 97.7 54.7 100.0F PCT CI:- P-8LW
43.9 98.0 44.8 100.02.8 1.3 2.3 1.3 2.3
54.7435
0.9 2.0 .0.9 2.0
44.80520.01.00001.2525
0.01.00000.8931
1.25250.02290.1495
0.89310.01990.1398
P-BLW---
0.1509.0.0117
Ptr----- .-.CF P-8LW F PCT
0.14130.0102
CF F-0--eLw
0.0 59297.7. 606 100.0 551 97.5 565 100.0 425 98.6 431 100.01.000 14 2.3 14 2.3 14 2,5 14 2.5 6 1.4 6 1.4
CASES PROCESSED =...._,...MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =-SUr4 SQO. SCORES =MEAN =STND. OEV (N) =
-fFid. EitTciN-11- i---MEDIAN =
606 565 431_._ _____ _0.0... -1.0000
14.0000
0.01.0000
14.0000
0.01.00006.0000
14.00000.02310.1502
14.00000.02480.1555
6.00000.01390.1172
0.15040.0118
0.15560.0127
0.11730.0071
18. If compensatory reading instruction is carried on in time released from otherclass work, which of the fol.:lowing subject matter areas receive correspondinglyreduced time? (Mark all that apply.) .
Social Studies
SCORE thIRVALS
0.01.000
F
47.111.4
PCT
80.5 58.519.5 11.4
Gco-ce.PCT CF P-BLW F PC7G"r"8. GF P-BLW
84.6 54.7 100.0.38.3 8!..4 44.8 100.0
CF P-BLWCF
100.019.5
F
46.3-a.5 15.4 8.5 15.4, 6. 146 6.5 14.6
CASES PROCESSE0 58.5473 54.7435 44.8092VALuE- 0.0 0.0 0.0
MAXIMUA VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 11.4157 8.4510 6.5342SURSOD, SCORES 11";4157 8.4510 6.5342MEAN 0.1950 0.1544 0.1458STND. DEV. IN) 0.3962 0.3613 0.3529SYNC. DEV. (N-11 0.3996 0.3647 0.3569MEDIAN 0.1211 0.0913 0.0854
SCORE IN F PCT CF P-BLW F KT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLW
0.01.000
cog5,PROCOSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUEjitpi_CFswtEsSUM SQD. SCORES rm
MEAN_sINPt_DEY. 4N) -SINO. DEV. IN-11 =MEDIAN
502104 17.2
82.8_ 606 100.0 489104 17.2 76
.606_0.01.0000
104.0000104.00000.17160.37700.37740.1036
86.5 56513.5 76
5650.01.0000
76.0000
100.0373 86.513.5 58 13.5
431
1.000058.0000
431 100.058 13.5
76.00000.13450.34120.34150.0777
58.00000.13460.34130.34170.0777
QU
ES
T IO
N 1
8S
cien
ce
SC
OR
E IN
TE
RV
AL
SG
-fro
-Ae
e,F
-PC
T-
CF
P-I
SLW
FP
CI
CF
P-a
LwF
Per
-C
F
0.0
49.3
84.2
58.5
.100
0047
.887
0354
.710
0.0
39.0
87.1
4408
1.00
09:
215
.89:
215
.87.
012
.77O
D12
.75.
812
.95.
8
CA
SE
S P
RO
CE
SS
ED
-58
.547
354
.743
544
0809
2M
IN IM
UM
VA
LUE
=O
Z.
0.0
0.0
MA
XIM
UM
VA
LUE
=1.
0000
1.00
001:
0000
SU
M O
F S
CO
RE
S-
9.23
0260
9770
5,77
96S
UM
SO
N s
caM
s=
9023
026.
9770
5.77
96M
EA
N0.
1577
0.12
7400
1290
MO
. °E
V. I
N)
SIN
D. t
V. (
N-t
i=
0.36
44G
.:367
6-0.
3335
0,33
520.
3366
0033
90M
ED
IAN
0.09
360:
0730
0.07
40
SC
OR
E IN
TE
RV
ALS
FP
C T
TC
FP
C T
CF
0.0
519
85.6
606
100.
049
988
.356
510
0.0
380
88.2
431
10
1.00
087
14.4
8714
.466
11.7
6611
.751
11.8
51
CA
SE
S P
RO
CE
SS
ED
=60
656
543
1M
INIM
UM
VA
LU
E--
0.0
000
0.0
MA
XIM
UM
VA
LUE
=1.
0000
1.00
001.
.000
0su
m O
F S
CO
RE
S=
87.0
000
66.0
000
51.0
000
SU
M S
QO
. SC
OR
ES
87.0
000
66.0
000
51.0
000
ME
AN
0014
360.
1168
0011
83S
IND
. DE
V0
IN)
=00
3506
0.32
120.
3230
0.35
090,
3215
0.32
34M
E0
IAN
0.08
380.
0661
0.06
71
GULSTICN 18
StOkE INTERVALS F PC
Mathematics
F PC9r°CF P-8LW6
F PCT CF P -8LW
0. 0 55.1 94.1 58.5 100.0 51.8 94.7 54.7 100.0 41.4 92.3 44.8 100.01.000 3.4 5.9 3.4 5.9- 2.9 5.3 2.9 5.3 737e7---7.77------3:4 7.7
CASES PROCESSED 58.5473 54.7435 44.8052M1NTRUM VALUE 0:0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 3.4444 2.9165 3.4355SUM IQD. SCORES 3.4444 2.9165 3.4355MEAN 0.0588 0.0533 0.0167STND. 0EV. (N) 0.2353 0.2246 D.2661SYNU. DEV, (N-4) 0:2371 0.2267 0.2691MEDIAN 0.0313 0.0281 0.0415
SCORE INTERVALS F PC.T CF 13-8LW F --OCT CF P-8LW F PCT C1.'115451
0.0 578 95.4 606 100.0 536 94.9 565 100.0 401 93.0 431 100.01.000 28 4.6 28 4.6 29 5.1 29 5.1 30 7.0 30 7.0
CASES PROCESSED 606. 565 431MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
OF SCORES 28.0000 29.0000 30.0000_SUMSUM sop. SCORES 28.0000 29.0000 30.0000MEAN 0.0462 0.0513 0.0696
OEV. (N) 0.2099 0.2207 0.2545STND. DEV. (N-1) 0.2101 0.2209 0.2548MEDIAN 0.0242 0.027/ 0.0374
QUkSTION 18
SCORE INTERVALS F PC
Foreign Language
0.0 56.8 97.0 58.5 100.053.31.000 1.7 3.0 1 ;7-----37-.0 T.
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESS UM SOD.; S- 2:-
ME ANSIND. °EV. IN)
MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. (N) =SIND. =MEDIAN
58.5473-6;0--1.00001.7464
0.02980.17010.17160.0154
F PCT
14 2.3
CF
PC
97.4 54.72.6 1.4
606 100.0 54814 2.3 17
6060.01.0000
14.000014;0000--D.02310.15020.15040.0118
54.74350.01.00001.42911.4.2910.02610.15940.16090.0134
it
97.03.0
5650.01.0000
17.000017.00000.03010.17080.17100.0155
P3D1Ger, et&.
PCT CF P -BLW
100.043.6 97.3 44.8 100.02. 1.2 2.7
CF 1;i3Li F
565 100.041517 3.6 16
44.80920.01.00001.22581.22580.02740.16310.16500.0141
PC T
96.33.7
4310.01.0000
16.000016.00000.03710.18910.18930.0193
CF P0LW
431 100.016. 3.7
QUEST ION 18 Language Arts
SCORE INTERVAL S,":".e G v-c: a el
i.F-7C4-7.2(*("t' i'F 'P- MI F Pc CF P-TEF F PCT P-3 LW
0.0 52.3 89.4 58.5 100.0 48.1 87.8 54.7 100.0 39.2 67.4 44.8 100.01. COD -----6,-2-- 10.6 6;2 ro-.-6 6.7 1.2.2 6.7 12.2 5.7 12.6 5.7 12.6
CASES PROCESSED = 58.5473 54.7435 44.809231:11TiMUM Writ- -WO- 0.0 0.0I4A X1MUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 6.2139 6.6916 5.6580SUM SQO. SCORES = -6:21.59 6.6916 5.6580MEAN = 0.1061 0.1222 0.1263STNO. DEV. IN) = 0.3080 0.3276 0.3322
-STN 15..0EV., (Ii-Ii = U. 3 107 0.3306 0.3359ME 0 IAN = 0.0594 0.0696 0,0723
SCORE INTERVAL S F PCT CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
0.0 541 89.3 606 100.0 499 88.3 565 100.0 382 88.6 431 100.01.000 65 10.7 65 10.7 66 11.7 66 11.7 49 11.4 49 11.4
CASES PROCESSED 606 565 431.MINIMUM VALUE = 0,0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1 . 0 0 0 0 1.0000 1.0000SUM _p;7 SCORE S = 65,0000 66.0000 49.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 65.0000 66.0000 49.0000MEAN = 0.1073 0.1168 0.1137STNO. DEV. (NI ... 0.3094 0.3212 0.3174STNO. DEV. (N11 = 0.3097 0.3215 0.3178MEOIAN = 0.0601 0.0661 0.0641
GUESI ION la Physical Education
SCORE IN faVAL S
0.0
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUE-- =MAXIMUM VALUE -SUM OF SC_ ORE S -SUM SQO. sCiiiitt***-=*-MEANSTNO. DEV. NJ =
MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
53.94.6
F
55650
6-y-o_ap 4. 17r-V-ri-ag.P
92.1 58.57+9 4
58.5473
P w
100.0 52.9
PCT F P -BLW F
96.7 54.7 100.0 43.6
PCT CF P-BLis
97.4 4 4.8 100.01.8 3.3 1.8
54.7435
3.3 1.2 2.6 1.2 2.%
44.8092
1.00004.6130
0.01.00001.7966
0.01.0 0001.218t3
4.61300.07880.2694
1.79660.0328D.1782
1.18630.02650.1605
O. 27170.0428 0.0170
0. 16240.0136
PC T CF P-BLW
91.7 606 100.0
F
546
PCT CF
96.6 565
P-BLW F
100.0.421
PC T CF P -BLW
97.7 431 100.08.3 50 8.3 19 3.4 19 3.4 10 2.3 10 2.3
CASES PROCESSED = 606 565 431MINIMUM VALUE =- 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 50.0000 19.0000 10.0000
SCORESr 50.0000 19.0000 10.0000MEAN 0.0825 0.0336 0.0232STUD. op/. IN) 0.2751 0.1803 0.1505STND. DEN/. IN -I3 = 0.2754 0.1804 0.1507MEDIAN 0.0450 0.0174 0.0119
QUESTION 18
SCORE INTERVALS F
Art
-de C. r--rcLA P 4_x.-0PC T- P-BLW -**---T. Ft -.C12--"igt-F"-- B L W F PCT CF P-BLW
0.0 52..0 9C.5 58.5 100.0 5C.4 92.0 54.7 100.0 42.8 55.5 44.8 100.01.000 5.5 9.5 5.5 9.5 4.4 8.0 4.4 8.0 2.0 4,5 2.0 4.5
CASES PROCESSED 543.54E; 54.7435 44.8092MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 5.5474 4.3826 2,0260SUM SOD. SCORES = 5.5478 4.3826 2.0260MEAN = 0.0948 0.0801 0.0452STAID. OEV. (N)'1410-. OE V. 1N-1)
= 0.2929 0.2714 3.20780.2954 0.2739 0.2101
MEDIAN = 0.0523 0.0435 0,0237
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-BLW. F PCT CF P-BLW
0. 0_._ 545 89.9 606 100.0 517 91.5 565 100.0 412 95.6 431 100.0_1.000 61 10.1 61 10.1 48 8.5 48 8.5 19 4.4 19 4.4
PASESPROCESSED =MINIMUM VALUE -MAXIMUM VALUE In
SUM _OF SCORES -Wor SQO. SCORE s =MEAN =.SIND._0E.V.. iN) ?-
STND. 0EV. (N1) =MEDIAN =
606.6-.ti-1.0000
61.0000
565 4310.01.0000
48.0000
0.01.0000
19.000061.00000.10070.3009..._... .._0.30110.0560
48.00000.08500.2788
19.00000.04410.2053
0.27910.0464
0.20550.0231
QUESTION 18 Music
-Sala-- -1-WManii S
0.0
F PC 16- Ica-"cl-ear-
54.6 93.3 58.53. 9 6.7 3e9
42'- PCGT rElk-<:1'*CF P-BLi
94.6 44.8 100.0
P--81W F
100.0 51.2
PCP-v-fl-ciP-BLW F
93.6 54.7 100.0 42.440500 6T7 3.5 6.4 3.5 6.4 2.4 5.4 204 5.4
CASES PROCESSED = 58.5473 54.7435 44.8052MINIMUM VALUE Oe 0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORE S = 3.9491 304953 2.3588SUM S40. SCORES = 3.9491 304953 2.3988MEAN = 0.0675 000638 0.0535STNO. 0011. INS = 0.2508 0.2445 0.2251SIND. DEV. OTFr) = 0.250 0.2467 0.2277MEDIAN = 0.0362 0.0341 0.0283
SCORE INTERVAL S F PC T CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-BLW
0.0-1Toob
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES
-SUM StiO.---SCO.RES
MEAN =STND. DEV. IN)STNT. DEV. IN-11 =
7____.
MEDIAN =
==..-.-
560 92.4_ _... ..46 7.6
606 100.0 52746 7.6 38
6060.01.0000
46.000046.00000.07590.26490.26510.0411
93.36.7
5650.01.0000
38.000038.00000.06730.25050.25070.0361
565 I00.04C 838 6.7 23
94.75.3
4310.01.0000
23.0000
431.100.023 5.3
23.00000.05340.22480.22500.0282
CLiiST1 LN 18
SCORE 1Wiett VA I -S F
Seat work, study time, etc..
P-C-1.411.-ci e. ir P- aLw F F P LWI 6
F PC CF P-BLW
0 . 0 40.1 68.5 58.5 100.0 40.8 74.6 54.7 100.0 35.3 7.8 44.8 100.0.1 .. 0-00 18.4 31.5 18.4 31.5 13.9 25.4 13.9 25.4 9.5 21.2 9.5 21.2
.CASES PROCESSED =ffIN I MA --VAt VIEMAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =-
11.071 S0T).-S-C-0-Ft E S'- --z--MEAN =STND. DE V. IN/ =
-STN-D-.- 'KV -.- ( N..- 1 V. 4-4-
MEDIAN =
58.5473 54.7435 44.80520.01.0000
18.4229
0.01.0000
13.9251
0.01.00009.4 979
18;42790.31470.4644
13.92510.25440.4355
9.45790.21200.4087
074-68-4-
0.22950.43950.1706
0.41330.1345
SCORE INTERVAL S F PC T CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-8LW F PC T CF P-BLW
0.01.000
427179
70.529.5
606179
100.0432 76.5 565 100.0 353 81.9 431 100.029.5133 23.5 133 23.5 78 18.1 78 18.1
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUE
==
606 __0. 0
565 4310.0 0.0
MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES as 179.0000 133.0000 78.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 4--
_179.0000 133.0000 78.0000
MEAN = 0.2954 0.2354 0.1810DEV. (N O = 0.4562 0.4242 0.3850_STK!.
SIND. 0E11. IN-13 = 0.4566 0.4246 0.3854MEDIAN = 0.2096 0.1539 0.1105
QUEST 1 U111 10.. 0 Other (Specify)
SCORE IN TEit VAL S,rdF
11r-=13W F4-yr, A
PCT CF p-01-14F PC Fpc42rvo-ciPift
0.0 57.2 97.6 58.5 100.0 52.3--1;4; -2.4
95.5 54.7 100.0 42.2 94.1 44.8 100.01.000 X04 2.4 4.5 2.4 T;5- 2 5.9 2.6 5.9
CASES PROCESSED-VAL
58.5473 5407435 44.8042MIN IMUM UE 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0400 1.0000 1.0000-SUM OF SCORES-SUM"
1.3973 2.4458-704458
2.6443S40; SCORE S 2.64431.3' 13
MEAN 0.0239 0.0447 000590STNO. DE V (N) 0.1526 0.2066 0.2357STFIN-T)E-V. N-1) 0,134'0 -0.2085 0.2383MEDIAN 0.0122 0.0234 0.0314
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8LW F PC*1 CF 1:31-W F PCT CF P-BLW
0.9. 588 9 Z. 0 606 100.0 541 95.8 565 100.0 410 95.1 431 100.01.000 18 3.0 Id 3.0 24 4.2 24 4.2 21 4.9 21 4.9
CASES PROCESSED
21
6060.01.0000
18.000018.00000.02970.1698
0.0153
565 431MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES
0.01.0000
24.0000
0.01.0000
21.0000SUM S40 . SCORE SMEANsTNp. oEy.sTNP:PEv. f N-1)MEDIAN
24.00000.04250.2017
21.00000.04870.2153
0.20190.0222
0.21550.0256
19. What is the average amount of formal instruction time per student incompensatory reading?
a. Minutes per instructional period:
aUESTION -19A.
1-15 41-50
16-30 51-60
31-40 61-75
I:3 76-90
0 91 or more---..---__ ----,-
-PCT CF-SCORE' iNTER VACS F PCT CF P-8LM F PLT cF -aLw
1.000 15.2 26.2 58.1 100.015.4 25.0 53.2 100.011.4 26.2 43.5 100.02.000 22.7 39.2 42-.8 T3,814.7 27.7 37.7 71.0 9.1 22.4 32.1 73.83.000 7.8 13.5 20.1 34.6 6.5 12.3 23.0 43.3 6.9 15.9 22.3 51.44.000 4.2 7.2 12.3 21.1 7.4 13.8 16.5 31.0 9.1 20.9 15.4 35.575.CO 3-.3 -5.8 -13.1---m9 6,7 10.7 9.1 17.2 3.8 8.8 6.4 14.66.000 1.1 1.9 4.7 8.1 1.3. 2.5 3.4 6.4 1.5 3.5 2.5 5.97.000 2.4 4.1 3.6 6.2 1.5 2.9 2.1 3,9 0.8 1.9 1.0 2.4870-00- 1.2 2,-1 -1.2 2.1 0.5 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5
CASES PROCESSED = 58.0557 53.1536 43.4628NO. BLANK -DATA = 14.0000 10.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUEsum-u-sc-aR-a---
8.0000-----f50.8977
8.0000 8.0000145.5769 123.4746
SUM SQO. SCORES 563.0110 551.8335 461.2559MEAN 2.5992 2.7388 2,8408STN t5. UEV;-11111 = 1.71b2 1,6973SIND. OEV. IN-1) = 1.7302 1.7135 1.6131MEDIAN 2.1068 2.2580 2.5869
19. What is the average amount of formal instruction time per student incompensatory reading?
a. Minutes per instructional period:
ri
QUESTION 19A
1-15 41-50
16-30 51-60
31-40 61-75
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
5.0006.0007.0008.000
0 76-90
0 91 or more
F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF PBLW F PCT CF P -BLW
157 26.1 601 100.0 151 27.4 551 100.0 111 26.4 421-100.0226 37.6 444 73.9150 27.2 400 72.6 83 19.7 310 73.687 14.5 218 36.3 70 12.7 250 45.4 68 16.2 227 53.945__ _7.5 131 21.8 78 14.2 180 32.7 90 21.4 159 37.834 5.7 86 14.3 63 11.4 102 18.5 41 9.7 69 16.412 2.0 52 8.7 16 2.9 39 7.1 16 3.8 28 6.7
_25 _4.2 40 6.7 16 2.9 23 4.2 10 2.4 12 2.915 2.5 15 2.5 7 1.3 7 :1.3 2 0.5 2 0.5
CASES PROCESSED_NO. BLANK OATA =
601 551 4215 14 10
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 8.0000 8.0000 8.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1587.0000 1552.0000 12284,0000SUM S00. SCORES - 6031.0000 6012.0000 4714.0000MEAN = 2.6406 2.8167 2.9169STNO. OEV. (N) = 1.7499 1.7255 1.6398
OEV. (N+1) 1.7514 1.7270 1.6418MEOIAN 241350 2.3300 2.7426
b. Number of instruction periods per week:
O One
O Two or three
0 Four or five
O More than five
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.000
F
0.2
1CT
0.4 57.8 100.0
F---PCT---
0.5 1.0
CF P-BLW
53.5 100.0
F
0.3
PCT
0.8
CF P -8U
43.4 100.05ra-99 6 6.5 12.2 52.9 99.0 7.1 16.5 43.1 99.2
3.000 35.7 61.8 54.4 94.1 40.2 75.3 46.4 86.8 33.7 77.6 35.9 82.84.000 18.7 32.4 18.7 32.3 6.1 11.5 6.1 11.5 2.2 5.1 2.2 5.1
CASES PROCESSED = 57.8204 53.4536 43.4241NO BLANK DATA = 7.000C 11.0000 10.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 188.5746 158.9034 124.7055
633.7622 487.1518 368.1140MEAN 3.2614 2.9727 2.8719STNO. DEV. IN) = 0.5694 0.5258 0.4789STNO. DEV. (N-1) = 0.5744 0.4846MEDIAN 3.2143 2.9885 2.9223
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF -PBLW
1.000 2 0.3 599 100.0 6 1.1 554 100.0 3 0.7 421 100.02.000 33 5.5 591 99.7 65 11.7 548 98.9 1 16.9 418 99.33.000 377 62.9 564 94.2 424 76.5 483 87.2 320 76.0 347 82.44.000 187 31.2 187 31.2 59 10.6 59 10.6 27 6.4 27 6.4
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
5997
55411
42110
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1947.0000 1644.0000 1213.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 6519.0000 5026.0000 3599.0000MEAN 3.2504 2.9675 2.8812SIND. DEV. (N) = 0.5638 0.5158 0.4972STNO. DEV. (N-1) 0.5643 0.5163 0.4978MEDIAN 3.2016 2.9858 2.9266
20. Do most pupils receive compensatoryday every instructional day?
1 Yes
2 0 No
QUEST ION 20
SCORE INTERVALS
reading instruction at the sane time of
Grade, IF PCT
GrackC-F F
1.000 50.4 86.7 58.1 100.0
CASES PROCESSED131:WIir
= 58.0634OUGO
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 2.0000
65;7-6-71-
Sum SQO. SCORES = 81.1672MEAN 1.1327
DEV. I N) 33-9-0-STND. DEV. IN-11 = 0.3420MEDIAN 1.0764_.QUESTION 20
48.1--13.3 5.5
SCORE INTERVALS F
1.000 5202.000 81
PCT CF P-BLW F
601 100.0 493.8.6.5
13.5 81 13.5 63
CASES PROCESSED = 601NO. BL Am( OA TA = 5MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VAL UE a 2.0000SUM OF SCORES -- 682.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 844.0000MEAN 1.1348STND. DEV. (N) = 0.3415STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.3418MEDIAN 1.0779
PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF
89.8 53.6 100.0 37.0 84.9 43.5 100.010.2 5.5 10.2 6.6 L54 6.6 15.1
53.58759.00001.00002.0000
59.061570.00281.10210.30260.30551.0568
43.54719.00(.01.00002.0.000
50.131963.29971.15120.35810.3E231.0850
PCT
88.711.3
55691.00002.0000
619.0000745.0000
1.11330.31700.31731.0639
CF P-BLW
556 100.063 11;e3
F PCT
352 83.470 16.6
42291.00002.0000
492.0000632.0000
1.16590.37200.37241.0994
CF P-BLW
422 100.070 16.6
a. If yes, when is the instructional period?
Before school
Morning (Before lunch)
Afternoon (After lunch)
O After school
Gradell, Gtotte.4 Gmxteig.-SURI Di-ravArS"- *F PCI CF 1)=78rn CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLIN
1.000 0.1 0.3 48.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 46.6 100.0 0.0--roo.o
0.0 35.5 100.02:boo 42.2 88.0 4708 99.7 39.7- 85.5- 46.6 26.4 74.4 35.5 100.03.000 5.6 11.7 506 11.7 6.5 14.0 6.8 14.7 9.0 25.2 9.1 25.64.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =
47.9811210.0000
46.566386.0000
35.51088.0000
MI NINUM-VATUE 1:U000-- -2:710oo 2.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 101.4556
-II9--;61.5n100.2748 80.2890
SCGRES 222.5607 188.6843MEAN 2.1145 2.1534 2.2-610STND. DEV. IN/ = 0.3269 0.3774 0.44E8STNO. OEV. (NIf = 6:3303 0.3815 0.4552ME0 IAN 2.06.S0 2.0860 2.1725
PCT CF 0BLW- FSCORE INTERVALS F PCI CF PBLW F PCT CF P -BLW
1.000 1 0.2 492 100.0 1 0.2 478 100.0 0 0.0 341 100.02.000 431 87.6 491 99.8 405 84.7 477 99.8 261 76.5 341 100.03.000 60 12.2 60 '12.2 68 14.2 72 15.1 78 22.9 80 23.54.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.8 4 0.8 2 0.6 2 0.6
CASES PROCE SSEDNO. BLANK DA TA
-=
492114
47887
34190
MINIMUM VALUE = 175-60 1.0000 2.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1043.0000 1031.0000 764.0000SUM SOD. SCORES - 2265.0000 293.0000 1778.0000MEAN 2.1199 2.1569 2.2405STND. DEV. IN/ 0.3311 0.3914 0.4409STND. DEV. (N -l1 = 0.3314 0.3918 0.4415MEDIAN 2.0684 2.0877 2.1533
b. If no, when does instruction usually take place?
CD Mostly in the morning
0 mostly in the afternoon
0 About equally divided between mornings and afternoons
QUESTION 208
SCORE INTER-VAL S* T
1.000 4.8 51.32;000- 0.6 6.63. 000 3.9 42.1
PRDCE-S'SED-NO. BLANK OATAMINIMUM VALUE
---WAXIFFUM-VATUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORES =
STND. DEV. (N) =STND. DEV. (ft-1) =
Cft/let Gititio#P-8111-1- PCT CF P-8114 F PCT
9.3-4;:5--487.-7-737.3
100.0 4.3 59.2 7.2 100.0 4.2 56.610.6 3.0 40.8 1.2 16,2
3.9 42.1 2.2 30.2 2.2 30.2 2.0 27.2
-9;2483497.0000
1.000037.013150"
17.745242.4692
SCORE INTERVAL S
0.96191.01821-."4-75-4
F PCT
&Me 6.CF P -8LW
7.4 100.03.2 43.42.0 27.2
7.2434466.0000
1.00003.0000
12.383727.0336
1.70910.89960.96901.3446
CF P-8LW F PC
7.3678347,0000
1.00003.0000
12.616227.07391.70540.8b680.93211.3828
CF P-8L)1 F PCT CF P-81W
1.000 48 50.5 95 100.0 52 63.4 82 100.0 49 62.8 78 100.02.000 5 5.3 47 49.5 8 9.8 30 36..6 8 10.3 29 37.23.000 42 44.2 42 44,2 22 26.8 22 26.8 21 26.9 21. 26.9
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
= 95511
1.0(100
82483
1.0000
78353
1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 184.0000 134.0000 128.0000SUM WO. SCORES = 446.0000 282.0000 270.0000MEAN 1.9368 1.6341 1.6410STND. DEV. (N) = 0.9713 0.8767 0.8767STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.9764 0.8821 0.8824MEDIAN 1.4896 1.2885 1.2959
21. What additional personnel are available to you in your teaching ofcompensatory reading?
}Remedial reading teacher orsupervisor
Frequently Occasionally Rarely Not Available
QUESTION 21 PART A
Gloat-SCORE TA ItkvAL s F PCT CF P--131.W
1.000 22.6 42.4 53.4 100.0
3.000 4.8 9.0 18.9 35.54.000 14.2 26.5 14.2 26.5
CASES PROCESSED = 53.4027NO. BLANK DATA = 43.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 117.2524SUM SQO. SCORES = 339.4116MEAN = 2.1956STND. DEV. (N) = 1.2391STND. DEV. (1i11-1-= -1.2508MEDIAN = 1.8428
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
F PCT
16.8 33.510.0 20.06.6 13.116.7 33.3
CF r=q1Lw
50.0 100.0.0.6-33.3 66.5 8.6
23.2 46.5 6.016.7 33.344.4
50.030247.0000
_1.00004.0000
123.2159382.795D
2.46281.25921.21202.3232
Griale 14,PCT CF P-BL m
26.8 39.6 100.021.7 29.0 73.215.2 20.4 51.536.3 14.4 36.3
39.600544.00001.110004.0000
103.3346329.0366
2.60S41.22471.24052.5974
F PCT CF P -131W F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-131%
245 43.5 563 100.0 182 35.1 528 100.0 104 26.9 387 100.0133 23.6 318 56.5 112 21.6 336 64.9 101 26.1 283 73.150 8.9 185 32.9 72 13.9 224 43.2 62 16.0 182 47.0135 24.0 135 24.0152 29.3 152 29.3 120 31.0 120 31.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
56343
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1201.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 3387.0000MEAN 2.1332STND. DEV. (N) = 1.2105STND. DEV. (N-11 = 1.2116MEOIAN 1.7744
51847
38744
1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000
1230.0000 972.00003710.0000 2986.0000
2.374$ 2.51161.2344 1.18641.2356. 1.18792.1875 2.3861
00ther professionals (counselors, 0'psychologists, etc.)
QUESTION 21 PART B
O D El
Getute,,2,
SCORE INTERVAL S- CF P-BLW F ACT CF P-8LW F ACT CF P -BLW
1.000 5.1 10.3 49.6 100.0 5.6 11.9 47.1 100.0 2.4 6.4 36.8 100.0,2.000 C4:589.7 13.8 29.4 41.5 88.111:3 30=7 34.4 93.63.000 13.5 27.3 25.1 50.5 15.6 3301 27.6 58.712.7 34.5 23.1 62.84.000 11.5 23.3 11.5 23.3 12.1 25.6 12.1 25.610.4 28.3 10.4 28.3
CASES PROCESSED = 49.5775 47.0720 3607804NO. BLANK DATA = 83.0000 73.0000 74.0000
---MIWINUN7VACTIE 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 130.6390 126.2119 104.7202SUM SQO. SCORES = 181:0012 393.9443 328.4707MEAN 2.6350 2.7237 2.8472STNO, DEV. IN/ = 09502 009748 0.9078
0=95179 -6.9853 0.9204MEDIAN 2.5199 2.7622 2.8718
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P--81.W E PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-8LW
1.000 59 11.4 517 100.0 56 11.5 486 100.0 27 7.6 356 100.02.000 194 37.5 458 88.6 152 31.3 430 88.5 110 30.9 329 92.43.000 152 29.4 264 51.1 157 32.3 278 57.2 122 34.3 219 61.540000 112 21.7 112 21.7 121 24.9 121 24.9 97 27.2 97 27.2
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
51789
48679
35675
MINIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1351.0000 1315.0000 1001.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 3995.0000 401300000 3117.0000MEAN 2.6132 2.7058 2.8118STNO. DEV. = 0.9480 0.9675 0.9216S7ND, DEV. IN-1/ = 0.9489 0.9685 0.9229MEDIAN 2,5362 2.7229 2.8361
finParaprofessionals or teacher
="1 aide
QUESTION 21 PART C
Gude 21
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT
Ortuite-
CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -BLW F
AWLPCT CF P-8LW
1.000 18.9 36.0 52.4 100.0 14.8 30.6 48.3 100.0 6.5 22.2 38.3 100.02.000 8.3 15.9 33:5 64.0 7.6 15.7 33.5 69.4 6.1 16.o 29.8 77.83.000 4.5 80.5 25.2 48.1 4.5 9.3 25.9 53.7 4.7 12.3 23.7 61.84.000 20.7 39.5 20.7 39.5 21.5 44.4 21.5 44.418.9 49.5 18.9 49.5
CASES PROCESSED =NO. 8LANK DATA =
520.364961.0000
48.307368.0000
38.270158.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0.000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 131.7396 129.2508 110.6600SUM SQO. SCORES = 423.5935 428.85-A 378.5203MEAN 2.5158 2.6756 2.8916STNO. 0EV. (N) = 1.3267 1.3111 1.2368SIND. OE V. (N--IT 1.3395 1.3249 1.2533MEDIAN 2.3778 2.8986 3.4582
SCORE INTERVALS F FCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -BLW
1.000 199 36.9 540 100.0 137 28.0 490 100.0 81 21.7 373.100.0.2.000 91. 16.9 341 63.1 83 16.9 353 72.0 5g 15.8 292 78.33.000 51 9.4 250 46.3 48 9.8 270 55.1 51 13.7 233 62.54.000 199 36.9 199 36.9 222 45.3 222 45.3 182 48.8 182 48.8_
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
54066
49075
37358.
MINIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1330.0000 1335.0000 1080.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 4206.0000 4453.0000 3688,0000MEAN 2.4630 2.7245 2.8954STND. 0EV. (N) = 1.3125 1.2903 1.2263SIND. °EV. (N-1) ' 1.3137 1.2916 1.2279MEOIAN = 2.2802 3.0208 3.4118
t) Parent or other volunteer
QUESTION 21 PART 0
Nuke it goo& bSCORE INTERVALS
1.000
F
3.4
OCT
7.1
C"15:-Bifi
47.6 100.0
F
2.8
PCT
6.3
CF P-8LW
44.2 100.0
F
1.2
PCT
3.5
CF P -BLW
35.2 100.07.2 15.2 44.2 42.9 5.0 11.4
3.000 8.5 17.8 37.0 77.7 7.0 15.9 36.3 82.2 508 16.6 30.2 85.74.000 28.5 59.9 28.5 59.9 29.3 66.3 29.3 66.3 24.4 69.2 24.4 69.2
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
47.6378101.0000
1-0:10150-
44.1536109.0000
35.216990.0000MINIMUMt 1.0000 1=0,000
MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 400000SUM OF SCORES 157.4273 151.1195 12307583SUM SOD. SCORES = 565.1128 5 4.8020 45806641MEAN 3.3047 3.4226 3.5142STND. DEV. LN) = 0.9705 0.9226 008213STNO. DIV. (WIVW 07.9113F8 0.9332 008332MEDIAN 3.6647 3.7459 3.7770
SCOREINTERVALS F PCT CF P-4SLW F PCT CF P-4SLW F PCT CF P-.BLW
1.000 37 7.4 500 100.0 31 6.9 449 100.0 15 4.4 339 100.02.000 85 17.0 463 92.6 61 13.6 418 93.1 36 10.6 324 95.63.000 93 18.6 378 75.6 68 15.1 357 79.5 57 16.8 288 85.04.000 285 57.0 285 57.0 289 64.4 289 64.4 231 68.1 231 68.1
CASCS PROCESSED----NO. BLANK DATA
500106
449116
33992
MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE
1.00004.0000
1.00004.0000
1.00004.0000
-SUM OF SCORES 1626.0000 1513.0000 1182.0000SUM SCID. SCORES 5774.0000 5511.0000 4368.0000MEAN 3.2520 3.3697 3.4867
- STND. DEV. IN) 0.9862 0.9586 0.8531STND. DEV. = 0.9871 0.9597 0.8543MEDIAN = 3.6228 3.7232 3.7662
(E.) Student teacher
QUESTION 21 PART E
Coat lel- atilt e. Lo
SCORE 1WTERViiIS F PCT --CF P--611-4 F PCT CF P..8LW F PCT CF
1.000 2.9-6.9
6.1 47.0 100.0 2.5 5.6 45.0 100.0 1.2 3.6 34.1- 100.62:00-0 14.6 44.1 93.9----5.2 11..6-427.5 94.4 3.2 9.5 32.9 96.43.000 4.0 8.4 37.3 79.3 3.6 37.3 82.8 3.1 9.2 29.7 86.94.000 33..3 70.9 33.3 70.9 33.7 74.9 33.7.74.926.5 77.8 26.5 7708
CASES PROCESSED = 47.0181 45.0130 34.1119NO. BLANK DATA = 110.000(1 100.0000 9800060MININVH-VALUE 1:000-0 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0.000SUM OF SCORES = 161.7786 158.4692 123.2039SUM SQD. SCORES- t)95.T.17rY 594.7615 466.8464MEAN 3.4408 3.5205 3.6118STND. DEV. IN) =
=0.9510 0.9050 0.8006
ST TD. DEV. 04-.4)MEDIAN
0.9-6133.7945
0x1w--3.8223
0.81263.8572
SCORE INTERVALS F PCI CF P -8LW F PC T CF P..4$LW F PCT CF P -BLN
1.000 30 6.1 489 100.0 27 5.9 458 100.0 12 3.6 332 100.02.000 79 16.2 459 93.9 59 12,9 431 94.1 38 11.4 320 96.43.000 40 8.2 380 77.7 41 9.0 372 81.2 34 10.2 282 84.94.000 340 69.5 340 69.5 331 72.3 331 72.3 248 74.7 248 74.7
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
489117
458107
33299
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000- SUM OF SCORES = 1668.0000 1592.0000 1182.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 6146.0000 5928.0000 4438.0000MEAN 3.4110 3.4760 3.5602STND. DEV. IN) 0.9661 0.9278 0.8320STNO, DEV. 01-4) = 0.9671 '0.9288 0.8332MEDIAN 3.7809 3.8082 3.8306
e Media specialist
OUESTION 21 PAK i
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.00C4.000
I-
F
3.35.46.4
30.9
OptericvPCT
7.1 45.911.9 42.713.9 37.267.1 30.9
CF P-BLW
100.0
gnat-4 webF PCT
2.8 6.4 43.6
CF P-BLW
100.0
82.570.7
F PCT CF
2.1 o.1 34.23.6 1.0.5 32.15.8 16.8 28.5
22.8 66.6 22.8
P-81..3%
100.042.463.466.6
92.961.167.1
4:Tr-Y1:1 4-0-.7V-0-T;i5-5.1 11.8 36.0
30.9 70.7 30.9
CASES PRUCE SSED = 45.9453 46.6404 34.2221NO. BLANK DATA = 120.0000 135.0000 97.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 -1,-0-0T) 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 156.7336 151.3611 117.7120SUM SOD. SCORES = 576.2017 432.5336562.2483McAN- 3.4113 3.4684STND. CEV. (N) =STND. DEV. IN-12 =MEDIAN
0.95080.96133.7553
0.9242a.gs-403.7929
0.90530.91683.7490
SCOR c INTERVAL S F ?CT CF P-BLW CF P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 34 7.1_ 478_100.0 27 6.1 442 100.0 20 6.0 332 100.02.000 59 12.3 444 92.9 50 11.3 415 93.9 41 12.3 312 94.03.000 79 16.5 385 80.5 53 12.0 365 82.6 56 16.9 271 81.64.000 306 64.0_ 306 64.0 312 70.6 312 70.6 215 64.8 215 64.8_
CASES PROCESSED =O. BLANK DATA
_
478128_
442123
33299
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1613.0000 1534.0000 1130.0000SUM SOO. SCORES = 5877.0000 5696.0000 4128.0000MP Am 3.3745 3.4706 3.4036
Tg V. (N)_ .= 0.9528 0.9175 0.9215STND. DE V. IN-1) = 0.9538 0.9186 0.9229MEDIAN 3.7190 3.7917 3.7279
0) Resource teacher (musicoart ,etc.)'[:]
QUESTION 21 PART G
0,1431b2Ar GibSCORE INTERVAL S F PCT CFP -81W F PCT P -LIU( F PCT CF P-.8L8
1.000 9.6 20.4 47.0 100.0 8.1 17.9-8.70-17476
45.5 100;0 4.3 12.5 34.6 100.02. 660- 7.9 16.7 37.5 79.6 3743 82.1 5.3 15.5 30.3 87.53.000 6.5 13.8 29.6 62.9 5.7 12.6 29.3 64.5 7.0 20.1 24.9 72.14.000 23.1 49.1 23.1 49.1 23.6 51.9 Z3.6 51.918.0 52.0 18.0 52.0
CASES PROCESSED = 47.0404 45.4802 34.5881NO. BLANK DATA = 111.0000 93.0000 92.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1,60-60 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 137.2088 135.7789 107.7877SUM SQD. -SCORES 469.1-683 469.5044 375.9761MEAN 2.9168 2.9854 3.1163STND. DEV. IN/ = 1.2107 1.1876 1.0764
1.2238 1.2009 1.0923MEDIAN 3.4361 3.5368 3.5381
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P -BLW
1.000 95 19.4 490 100.0 81 17.4 466 100.0 46 13.6 338 100.02.000 93 19.0 395 80.6 81 17.4 385 82.6 52 15.4 292 86.43.000 73 14.9 302 61.6 66 14.2 304 65.2 63 18.6 240 71.04.000 229 46.7 229 46.7 238 51.1 238 51.1 177 52.4 177 52.4
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
490116
46699
33393
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 -1:6000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1416.0000 1393.0000 1047.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 4788.0000 4807.0000 3653.0000MEAN 2.8898 2.9893 3.0976STND. 0EV. IN) 1.1919 1.1746 1.1011STND. OEV. iN-1) 1.19311 1.1759 1.1027MEDIAN 3.2808 3.5210 3.5452
OA) Older student in school
QUESTION' 21 PART N
ID D 0 0
Q4stie/2d G-eAe_1+
SCORE INTEgVALS
1.000
F
4.7 9.9
-CT-P-11m F
47.5 100.0 3.4
PCT
7.5
Cf 1:18LW F
44.9 100.0 2.0
PCT
5.9
CF P-.9L W
34.4 100.0.2. 000 9.8 30s7 41:8--9-0.1 5.1 12.6 416 92.5 4.3 12.4 32.4 94.13. 000 7.8 16.3 33.0 69.4 7.3 16.3 35.9 79.9 3.5 10.3 28.1 81.74.000 25.2 53.1 25.2 53.128.6 63.5 28.6 63.524.6 71.4 24.6 71.4
CASES PROCESSED = 47.4931 44.9370 34.4072NO. BLANK DATA =
--14INTRUFFVATUE---100.0000
1: uo0O101.0000 95.00001.0000 1.00017
MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 148.5163 150.9857 119.4421
-7VMW UFO , SCORE 549.1169 443.4146MEAN = 3.1271 3.3599 3.4714STND. DEV. IN) = 1.0564 0.9646 0.9234STND. DENa-IN747-= 1:0677 0.9755 0.9372MEDIAN = 3.5585 3.7131 3.7996
SCORE INTERVALS F PICT CF P -BLW F PCT CF F PCT CF P -8LW
1.000 53 10.5 503 100.0 32 7.0 458 100.0 20 6.0 334 100.0_2.000 105 20.9 450 89.5 69 15.1 .426 93.0 39 11.7 314 94.03.000 86 17.1 345 68.6 75 16.4 357. 77.9 43 12.9 275 82.34.000 259 51.5 259 51.5282 61.6 282 61.6 232 69.5 232 69.5
CASES PROCESSED = 503 458 334NO. BLANK OATA = 103 107 97MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1557,0000 1523.0000 1155,0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 5391.0000 5495.0000 4275.0000MEAN 3.0954 3.3253 3.4581STNO. DEV. (NI = 1.0658 0.9695 0.9171STND. DEV. = 1.0669 0.9706 0.9185MEDIAN 3.5290 3.6879 3.7802
() Other (Specify)
QUESTION 21 PART I
Girtute. It- Crab-stoRE P PCT CF PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-8Le
1.000 3.5 31.0 11.2 100.0 1.3 15.2 8.5 100.0 2.0 25.4 8.0 100.02004 T. 0 8.6 7:7-69,0 0.8 9.6 7.Z 84.8 0.4 4.9 5.9 74.63.000 0.5 4.7 6.8 60.4 0.3 3.3 6.4 75.2 0.4 5.4 5.5 69.74.000 6.2 55.7 6.2 55.7 6.1 71.9 6.1 71.9 5.1 64.4 64.4
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
4=
11.1949479.0000
8.4744458.0000
7.9578353.0000
-WYNIKUM VALUE 1.0000 1.4000MAXIMUM VALUE - 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 31.9287 28.1247 24.5113SUM SOD.1CDRES 111.8861 104.5501 89.3522MEAN 2.8521 3.3188 3.0877STNO. 0EV. (N) - 1.3638 1.1501 1.3036STND. oev. IN-11 1.4291 1.2247 1.3941MEDIAN a 3.6030 3.8048 3.7234
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PL1 CF P -81W F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 31 27.7 112 100.0 14 15..6 90 100.0 17 23.6 72 100.02.000 9 8.0 81 72.3 8 8.9 76 84.4 4 5.6 55 76.43.000 5 4.5 72 64.3 2 2.2 .66 75.6 4 5.6 51 70.84.000 67 59.8 67 59.8 66 73.3 66 73.3 47 65.3 47 65.3
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
112494
90475
72359
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUN OF SCORES = 332.0000 300.0000 225.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 1184.0000 1120.0000 821.0000MEAN 2.9643 3.3333' 3.1250STND. DEV. IN) 1.3358 1.1547 1.2795STND. DEV. IN-1) 1.3418 1.1612 1.2885MEDIAN 3.6642 3.8182 3.7340
22. During the school year, how many teachers other than yourself have held your
particular teaching assignment with your compensatory reading class for at
least two consecutive weeks? COUNT SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS AND REPLACEMENT TEACHERS;
DO NOT COUNT STUDENT TEACHERS OR CLASSROOM AIDES.
0 None 0 Two
One 0 Three
OU EST ION 22 More than threeCoutek. Grodelo
SCORE INTERVALS F -PCT 15.B1if F PCT F PCT CF 12-.3Lk
1.000 48.1 82.9 58.0 100.0 46.8 87.1 53.8 100.0 36.0 83.5 43.1 100.02.000 5.3 '9.1 9.9 17:1 3.6 6.7 .1 16.53.000 2.9 5.1 4.6 8.0 1.6 3.0 3.4 6.3 1.9 4.4 2.6 6.14.000 1.0 1.7 1.7 2.9 0.8 1.5 1.8 3.3 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.75. COO 0.7 1.2 -0.7- la 1.0 1.8 1.0 1.8 0.6 1.3 0.6 1.3
CASES PROCESSED = 57.9834
1.00005.0000
7-47-574-7-128.7100
1.2913-0-.7432**
0.74971.1030
53.7933 43.1050NO . a-4W DI TA- -7=-MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =
"SUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES =MEAN
0EV. IN-1 ) =MEDIAN
9.00001.00005.0000
14.00001.00005.0000
66.8496112.5411
1.2427
54.143487.7812
1.25E10.74010.74711.0742
0.61130.68531.0988
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF
/400 501 83.4 601 100.0 475 85.4 556 100.0 346 83.0 417 100.02.000 54 9.0 100 16.6 41 7.4 81 14.6 44 10.6 71 17.03.000 29 4.8 46 7.7 17 3.1 40 7.2 16 3.8 27 6.54.000 10 1.7 17 2.8 11 2.0 23 4.1 3 0.7 11 Zob5.000 7 1.2 7 1.2 12 2.2 12 2.2 8 1.9 8 1.9
-
CASES PROCESSED^NO. BLANK DATA
MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE
= 601 556 417= 5
1.00005.0000
91.00005.0000
141.00005.0000
SUM OF SCORES = 771.0000 712.0000 534.0000SUM SOO. SCORES = 1313.0000 1268.0000 914.0000MEAN_ _ 1.2829 1.2806 1.2806SIND. DEV. = 0.7341 0.8004 0.7429SIND. °EV. = 0.7347 0.8012 0.7438MEDIAN 1.0998 1.0853 1.1026
23. If your compensatory reading class is organized into groups, indicate thefrequency with which you organize these groups by each of the following criteria.
Frequently Occasionally Rarely Never
Reading grade level
QUESTION 23 PART A.
GmtSCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 414 77.7 533 100.02.000 90 16.9 119 22.33.000 18 3.4 29 5.44.000 11 2.1 11 2.1
GeeF OCT F PCT Cf P-BLW
235 66.2 355 1002.0_356 13.6 484. 100.086 33.8 '95-- 19.6 128 26.425 7.0 34 9.6 19 3.9 33 6.89 2.5 9 2.5 14 2.9 14 2.9
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
53373
35576
484di
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 692.0000 518.0000 659.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 1112.0000 948.0000 1131.0000MEAN 1.2983 1.4592 1.3616STND. DEV. INI = 0.6330 0.7357 0.6949SIND. DEV. (N-11 = 0.6336 0.7368 0.6956MEDIAN 1.2437 1.2553 1.1798
SCORE INTERVALS
1.000 40.2
PCT
77.4 51.9
P-BLW---f
100.035.0
PC1
73.7
CF
47.5
P- 110.
100=0
F
24.,6
Pt-T
66.6
CF P-BLW
37.0 100.02.1)015-
3.0004.000
9.01.81.0
17.33.41.8
'11.72.71.0
22.6 9.45.3 1.81.8 1.3
19.73.72.8
12.53.11.3
26.36.62.8
9.22.40.8
24.86.52.1
12.43.20.8
33.48.62.1
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
51.881372.0000
47.498375.0000
37.027475.0000
MINIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 I I 1 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 67.2948 64.4743 53.3897SUM SQD. SCORES = 107.3804 110.069 55.6341MEAN 1.2971 1.3574 1.4419SIND. DEV. (N) = 0.6223 0.6890 0.70S7SIND. DEV. = 0.6284 0.6964 0.7195MEDIAN 1.1460 1.1785 1.2511
Specific skill deficiencies
QUESTION 23 PART B
SCORE INTERVALS F
1.000 31.82.000 14.33.000 2.24.000 1.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA-MI NIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES
SOffi. SCORESMEANSTND. 0EV. (N)
---3TND:-DEV; (N1)MEDIAN
O E3 0 0
Gracia.PCT
Gude lb 4- Gam. bCF P-EILM F PCT
64.5 49.329.0 17.54.4 3.22.0 1.0
49.292987.000010-00.64.0000
70.9138124;1638-.
1.43860.67360:68051.2746
SCORE I-NTER VACS F PCT
100.0 26.235.5-1-6:96.4 2.12.0 1.3
56.336.34.52.9
CF PBLW F PCT
46.520.33.41.3
100.043.77.42.9
18.713.12.41.5
52.336.86.74.2
CF P-11w
35.7 100.017.0 47.73.9 10.91.5 4.2
CF P -BLW F
1.000. 333 64.4 517 100.02672.000 153 29.6 184 35.61713.000 20 3.9 31 6.0 234.000 2.1 11 2.1 15
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA =
51789
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 743.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 1301.0000MEAN 1.4371STND. DEV. (N) = 0.6716
0.6723MEDIAN 1.2763
56.1
46.455684.00001.00004.000071.5071
133.76021.53930.71410.72201.3880
35.651781.00001.00004.000058.0436116.59521.62E10.7E730.79851.4558
35.94.83.2
CF PffEW F PCT
4762093815
100.0 18343.9 1278.0 243.2 15
52.436.46.94.3
CF P -BIM
349'100.0166 47.639 11.215 4.3
47689
34982
1.00004.0000
738.00001398.0000
1.55040.73020.73101.3914
1.00004.0000
569.00001147.0000
1.63040.79270.79391.4536
(1;) Shared interests
QUEST ION 23
-SCORE INTERVAL S
PART C
titaatz
0 0
Gra& 4-F PCT CF P-BLit F PCT CF P-BLit F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 11.8 25.1 47.3 100.0 11.6 25.4 45.9 100.0 10.5 30.5 34.6 100.02.000 19.9 42.0 35.4 1-4.9 21.1 45.4) 34.3 14.6 16.1 46.5 24.1 69,53.000 10.3 21.8 15.5 32.9 7.5 16.3 13.2 28.8 4.3 12.5 8.0 23.04.000 5.3 11.1 5.3 11.1 5.7 12.5 5.7 12.5 3.6 10.5 3.6 10.5
CASES PROCESSED 47.2662 45.9401 34.6236NO, BLANK DA TA 107.0000 92.0000 93.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 103.5075 99.1905 70.3066SUM SOD. SCORES 266.1333 255.0628 172.1310MEAN 2.1899 2.1591 2.0306STNO. DEV. IN) = 0.9369 0.9435 0.9211
DEV. (N-1) = 0.9540 0.9346MEDIAN 2.0931 2.0371 1.9200
SCORE INTERVAL S F PC T CF P-BLW PCT CF P BLW PCT CF P -SLW
1.000 118 23.7 497 100.0 109 23.5 464 100.0 97 28.9 336 100.0_2.000 202 40.6 379 76.3 210 45.3 355 76.5 157 46.7 239 71.13.000 115 23.1 177 35.6 85 18.3 145 31.3 49 14.6 82 24.44.000 62 12.5 62 12.5 60 12.9 60 12.9 33 9.8 33 9.8_
CASES PROCESSEDNO BLANK DA TA
3 497109
464101
33695
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1115.0000 1024.0000 690.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 2951.0b00 2674.0000 1694.0000MEAN 2.2435 2.2069 2.0536STND. DEV. IN) 0.9532 0.9447 0.9080STND. DEV. IN-1) 0.9541 0.9458 0.9094MEDIAN 2.1460 2.0857 1.9522
CD) Specific projects
QUEST ION 23
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK OA TA =*MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUN-SOD. SCORESMEANSTND. DE V. (N) =-STNO. OE V. (N-lI =MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000t.P139
0000PART D
F
( NA* 1PCT CF
Cotaut.OrtukbeP-81W F PCT CF FL-8LW F FCT CF P--8Lw
9.4 15.8 47.6 100.0 10.1 22.2 4505 100.0 8.3 24.2 34.3 100.020.'4-42.5 38.2 8Ii.'D 2 20.4 44.7 35.4 77.8 17.0 49.5 26.0 75.811.8 24.7 17.8 37.3 S.7 21.4 15.0 33.1 5.4 15.6 9.0 26.36.0 12.6 6.0 12.6 5.3 11.6 5.3 11.6 3.7 10.7 3.7 10.7
47.6300 45.5031 34.3377104.0000 97.0000 94.0000
1.11000 1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000 4.0000
109.5790 101.2632 73.0977212.1214 264.0752 183.41372.3006 2.2254 2.12es0.9258 0.9225 0.8558w)336 0.9328 0.91322.2038 2.1215 2.0218
F PCT CF P -BLW---
F PCT CF P-45LW F PCT CF PI3LW
95 19.0 500 100.0 92 20.0 460 100.0 86 25.6 336 100.0209 41.8 405 81.0'208T-45.2 368 80.0 160 47.6 250 74.4132 26.4 196 39.2 110 23.9 160 34.8 55 16.4 90 26.864 12.8.. 64 12.8 50 10.9 50 10.9 35 10.4 35 10.4
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
500106
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXI MUM VALUE 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1165.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 3143.0000MEAN 2.3300STND. DE V. (N) = 0.9258STND. DEV. 1*-1) = 0.9267MEDIAN = 2.2416
460105
33695
1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000
1038.0000 711.00002714.0000 1781.0000
2.2565 2.11610.8989 0.90710.8999 0.90852.1635 2.0125
1E) Other (Specify)
QUESTION 23 PART E
0
Cwitig.1
D 0 0
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT F CF
1.000 9 15.0 60 100.0 8 13.3 60 100.0 17_36.2 47 100.02.000 8 13.3 51 85.0 7 11.7 52 86.7 7 14.9 30 63.83.000 5 8.3 43 71.7 5 8.3 45 75.0 1 2.1 23 48.94.000 38 63.3 38 63.3 40 66.7 40 66.7 22 46.8 22 46.8
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATA
60546
60505
47384
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000
192.0000 197.0000 122.0000_SUM"SOD.
,SCORESSUM SOD. SCORES 694.0000 721.0000 406.0000MEAN 3.2000 3.2833 2.5957STNO. DEV. 1.1518 1.1119 1.3786.(4)
-'STND. DEV. -1) 1.1615 1;1213 1.3935MEDIAN 3.7105 3.7500 2.4286
SCORE INTERVALS F-- PtY Z F1-131W FL. I --8LW F PCT CF P-BLw.
1.000 0.8 13.6 6.2 100.0 0.8 13.3 5.7 100.0 1.6 34.1 4.8 100.02.000 0.9 14.7 86.4 0.8 14.4 5.0 86.1 0.8 16.9 3.1 65.9'3.000 0.5 8.3 4.4 71.6 0.7 11.8 4.1 72.3 0.0 0.0 2.3 49.14.000 3.9 63.3 3.9 63.3 3.5 60.5 3.5 60.5 2.3 49.1 2.3 49.1
CASES PROCESSED 6.1899 5.7154 4.7685NO. BLANK OATA 530.0000 489.0000 378.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 19.6915 18.2643 12.5915SUM SQD. SCORES 71.8450 65.4627 42.2762MEAN 3.2135 3.J956 2.6405STND. DEV. (N) 1.1314 1.1143 1..3759STND. OEV. (it-.11 1.255-6 1.2268 1.5478MEDIAN 3.7106 3.6739 2.4447
24. How often do the followingcourse of your teaching of
ins tructional groups operate (occur) in thecompensatory reading?
All ofthe time Frequently Occasionally
(N) Adult and child in one-to-onerelationship
QUEST ILA 24 PArtT A
Rarely orNever
to
SCORE INTERVAL r PC T CF. P-61.14 F PCT P-BLV1 F PCT CF
1.000 5.9 10.6 55.4 100.0 2.4 5.6 51.9 100.0 2.3 5.5-41.4
41.5 100.02.000 25.5 46.0 49.5 89.4 -21;0 -473:4 1-7-.7 39.2 94-:5
3.000 20.1 36.3 24.0 43.4 21.5 41.4 28.0 54.0 17.2 41.3 22.0 53.14.000 3.9 7.1 3.9 7.0 6.5 12.'6 6.5 12.6 4-5.9 11.7 4.9 11.7
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE
55.360923.0000
-1.. 0000'
51.97030.0000
41.54412/3.00001.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE - 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES - 132.7698 135.4939 107.7233SUM SQU. SCORES = 351.2476 3134-.7T63 I 303.6 C4MEAN 2.3983 2.6093 k.5930SYNC. DEV. (NI = 0.7701 0.7754 0.76t7SYNC. DEV. IN-f).= '0.7771 D. /82V 0.7751MEDIAN 2.3562 2.5956 2.5742
SCORE INTEVALS F PCT CF PCT CF P-BLW PC T CF P-8LW
1.0002.000
48257 44.2
582534
100.091.8
31216
5.840.6
532501
100.094.2
26167
6.441.3
404378
100.093.6
3.000 234 40.2 277 47.6 212 39.8 285 53.6 161 39.9 211 52.24.000 43 . 7.4 43 7.4 73 13.7 73 13.7 50 12.4 __50
CASES PROCESSED 582 532 404NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
24 --00
..1.00
33 271.0000 1.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1436.0000 1391.0000 1043.0000SUM SW,. SCORES 3876.0000 3971.0000 2943.0000MEAN 2.4674 2.6147 2.5817STNt. rEV. (N) 0.7494 0.7924 0.7871STMD. °EV. (N-1) 0.7501 0.7931 0.7881MEDIAN 2.4455 2.5896 2.5559
L) Adult and children in groupsof between 2 and 10
QUESTION 24 PART
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -8LW
1.0002.0003.0004.000.
29.9 53.9 55.520.6 37.1 25.6*2.6 4.7 5.02.3 4.2 2.3
CASES PROCESSED 55.5459NO. BLANK OATA = 27.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE - 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 88.45665UM-540. SCORES = 173.5488MEAN 1.5925STNO. DEV. (N) 0.7671
601. (N-I) = 0.7741MEDIAN 1.4274
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT
014.4.4-
100.0 17.7 34.146.1237:17-4-67r----714-8.9 6.5 12.54.2 3.7 7.2
LF
51.8.1
10.23.7
CF P-BLW F
1.000
==
320 55.4 578 10D.0 1722.0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATA
209 36.2 258 44.6 24628 4.8 49 8.5 7621 3.6 21 3.6 42
57828
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 906.0000
SOD. SCORES = 1744.0000MEAN 1.5675STND. DEV. (N) = 0.7485STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.7 92MEDIAN 1.4031
51.772129.00001.00004.000099.8633
231.45181.92890.86600.81451.8445
P-BLW
100.0
F
9.6
PCT
23.4
CF P-BLw
61.1 100.060,4.9 18.4 44.9 31.5 76.619.8 9.0 21.9 13.0 31.77.2 4.0 9.8 4.0 9.8
41.075232.00001.410004.0000
89.6288228.93552.16190.90150.91262.0929
PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
32.1 536 100.0 85 21.4 398 100.045.9 364 67.9184 46.2 313 78.614.2 118 22.0 86 21.6 129 32.47.8 42 7.8 43 10.8 43 10.8
53629
39833
1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000
1060.0000 883.00002512.0000 2283.0000
1.9776 2.21860.8807 0.90220.8815 0.90341.8902 2.1196
Lc)Adult and children in groupsof between 11 and 20
QUESTION 24
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM-S00. SCORESMEANSING. BEV. IN)*STNIX. DEV. IN-1)MEDIAN
PART C
ert42.2>
F PC T CF P-BLW F PC
4.27.57.531.1
8.3 50.3 100.0 6.214.9 46,1* 91.7 9.614.8 38.6 76.7 8.661.9 31.1 61.9 23.1
50.254975.00001;00004.0000
165.9728598.690'6
3.30261.00491.01503.6918
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATAMINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES._SUM SOD. SCORES =ME!!,.N
SIND. OEV. IN) =STNO. DEV. IN-1) =MEDIAN
F PCT
50._ 9.5.79 15.077 14.6
322. 61.0
C.stuitt 10
13.120.218.148.6
CF P-BLW r
47.541.331.723.1
100.086.966.748.6
2S9.48.1
18.2
PCT
7.524.520.94701
CF P'13LW
38.5 100.035.626.2 68.018.2 47.1
47.531467.0000100UU400000
143.66334910/446
3.02251.1001
3.4225
CF P -BLW F PCT
100 .0 61 12.3478 90.5102 20.6399 75.6 95 19.2322 61.0236 47.8
CF P -BLW F PCT
38,545652.00001.0000400000
11805675403.6646
3.07601.00521.0185303414
CF P-BLW
494 100.0 26 6.9 378 100.0 _433 87.7 91 24.1 352 93.1331 67.0 84 22.2 261 69.0236 47.8 177 46.8 177 46.8
52878
49471
37853
1.0000 1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000 4.0000
1727.00D0_ 1494.0000 1168.00006211.0000 5100.0000 3978.0000
3.2708 3.0243 3.08991.0319 1.0851 0.98791.0329 1,0862 0.98933.6801 3.3842 3.3571
WAdultand children in groups
lor more than 20 (includeswhole class instruction)
QUESTION 24 PART
eittutu_4.SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT- CF P-81. F PCT CF
1.000 2.5 5.0 50.5 100.0 3.5 7.4 46.9 100.0 2.9 7.6 37.9 100.02.000 7.9 15.6 48.0 95.0 073 19,8 43.4 92.6 9.0 23.7 35.1 92.43.000 10.1 20.0 40.1 79.4 10.5 22.3 34.1 72.8 6.9 18.3 26.0 68.64.000 30.1 59.5 30.1 59.5 23.6 50.5 23.6 50.419.1 50.4 19.1 50.3
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
50.524276.0000
46.871366.0000
37.945556.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 168.7542 148.0221 118.1617SUM SQO. SCORES 605;7522 513.1218 407.1111MEAN 3.3401 3.1581 3.1140STND. DEV. IN) = 0.9128 0.9870 1.0158
DEV. IN-11 = 0.9220 0.9977 1.0255MEDIAN 3.6596 3.5089 3.5069
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 28 5.3. 528 100.0 37 7.5 495 100.0 32 8.6 374 100.02.000 80 15.2 +:5co 94.7 106 21.4 458 92.5 90 24.1 342 91.43.000 108 20.5 420 79.5 108 21.8 352 71.1 75 20.1 252 67.44.000 312 59.1 312 59.1 244 49.3 244 49.3 177 47.3 177 47.3
CASES PROCESSED = 528 495 374NO. BLANK DATA 78 70 57MIN VALUE -1:6600 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1760.0000 1549.0000 1145.0000!;w4 s00. SCORES 5337.0000 3899.0000MEAN 3.3333 3.1293 3.0615STNO. 0EV. IN) = 0.91840.9184 0.9947 1.0258STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.9193 0.9957 1.0272MEDIAN 3.6538 3.4676 3.3667
lc\ Individual pupils workingKV, independently
QUESTION 24 PART
G-Tata. be Grulta.1SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
F
9335112412
PCT
16.060.521.42.1
CF
58048713612
P -.8LW
100.084.023.42.1
F
7331612721
PCT
13.6-----
8.823.63.9
CF
537464148_21
100.0 4186,4-15127.6 1003.9 11
PC7
10.2
CF
403
P-8LW
100.089.827.52.7
62.324.82.7
36211111
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
58026.
53728
40328
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0006 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1215.0000 1170.0000 887.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 2805.0000 2816.0000 2121.0000MEAN 2.0948 2.1788 2.2010STK!. DEV. (N) 0.6693 0.7049 0.6470STND. DEV. IN -1) 0.6698 0.7056 0.6478MEDIAN 2.0613 2.1187 2.1394
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF157.FLW F PET CF P-OLIF1 PC7 CF
1.000 9.1 16.5 55.2 100.0 7.8 15.1 51.7 100.0 4.7 11.4 41.4 100.02.000 33.2 60.2 46.0 8-3.530,2 58.4 43.9 84.9 25.7 62.2 36.7 80.63.000 11.4 20.7 1208 23.2 11.9 23.0 13.7 26.5 9.7 23.5 10.9 26.44.000 1.4 2.5 1.4 2.5 1.8 3.5 1.8 3.5 1.2 2.9 1.2 2.s
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
55.156225.0000
51.651826.0000
41.392427.0000
wir-vmm hest 1111 .0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 115.4010 111.0089 90.2127SUM SQO. SCORES 267.0789 264.252-2 214.52.1?MEAN 2.0923 2.1492 2.1795STNO. DEV. (N) 0.6817 0.7050 0.6379STND. DEV. (N-.1) 0.6879 0.7120 0.6660MEDIAN 2.0555 2.0979 2.1208
ice) Pupil teams workingindependently
QUESTION 24 PART F
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004..000
0
Gtiatld
F PCT CF P-8LW ---F---FCT
3.3 6.2 54.119.4 35.9 50.822.9 42.4 31.38.4 15.6 8.4
()tide 4-CF P-BLW F
Ora&CF P--81.W
1 00.0 2.8 5.5 50.5 100.0 2.7 t.7 40.5 100.093.8 18.3 36.2- 47.7 94.5 14.2 35.1 37.8 93.357.9 19.2 38.1 29.4 58.3 16.6 41.1 23.5 58.215.5 10.2 20.2 10.2 20.2 6.9 17.0 6.9 17.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
54.133435.0000
50.494936.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 144.6942 137.8929SUM SOD. SCORES = 422.1877 412.4773MEAN 2.6729 2.7308STNO. DEV. (N) 0.8090 0.8434STND. DEV. (N-1) 0.8166 0.8518MEDIAN 2.6867 2.7184
SCORE INTERVALS PC I CF P -BLW F OCT CF P-BLW F
1.000 32 5.6 569 100.0 26 5.0 525 100.0 172.000 198 34.8 537 94.4181 34.5 499 95.01393.000 250 43.9 339 59.6204 38.9 318 60.6 1634.000 89 15.6 89 15.6114 21.7 114 21.7 75
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
=
=56937
52540
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE - 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1534.0000 1456.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 4498.0000 4410.0000MEAN 2.6960 2.7733STND. OEV. (N) 0.7981 0.8418STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.7988 0.8426MEDIAN . = 2.7180 2.7721
40.478635,00001.00004.0000
108.6816319.7429
2.68490.83090.84132.083
PCT
4.3
CF
394
P -8LW
100.035.3 377 95.741.4 238 60.419.0 75 19.0.
394371.00004.0000
1084.00003240,0000
2.75130.80860.80962.7515
CO Other (Specify)
QUEST ION 24
SCORE INTERVALS
PART
PC 1
1.000 0.3 6.62.000 -0:3 .-/.r3.000 0. 0 0. CI4.000 4.1 86.1
CASES PROCESSED =NO BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SQD. SCORES =MEANSTNO. DEV. IN)SIND,' DEV. (1111MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
0
Oraiet Gtaek
CF`P.;-Blw pr-f CF P-81.14 E PCT CE P -BLw
4.8 100.0 0.7 12.9 5.1 100.0 0.1 2.6 3.0 100.04._5 9L 17,3- 9.3 4.5 87.1 0,1 2.6 2.9 97.24.1 86.3 0.2 3.7 4.0 77.8 0.3 11.1 2.8 94.64.1 86.3 3.8 74.1 3.8 74.12,5 83.4 2.5 83.A
4.796554 O. 0000
1. 00'00-4.0000
174558467:92133.66G70.87270,48103.9209
F PC T CF
1,000, 3 6.0 502, 000 4 8.0 473.000 0 0.0 434.000 43 86.0 43
5.1109497.0000
3.0051-396.0000
1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000
17.3255 11.274764.8490 43.5 2583.3899 3,75191.0940 0.63831 '7100 0078143.8249 3,9007
P -8LW
100.0 3
PCT
5.9
CF
51
P -8LW
100.0
F
1
PCT
3.4
CF
29
P-81.1,4
100.0-94.086.086.0
42
42
7.83.9
82.4
484442
94.1 1
86.3 382.4_24
3.410.382.8
282724
96.693.182.8_
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DA TA
==
50556
51514
MINIMUM VALUE =MAXI MUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORE S =
1.00004.0000
18360000 --1.00004.0000
185.0000STK§1515;- 707.0000 709.0000MEAN 3.6600 3.6275STND. DE V. (N) = 0.8628 0.1i623
TND. UV. = 008715 0.8709MEDIAN 3.9186 3.8929
29402
1.00004.0000
108.0000416.0000
3.72410.68970.74193.8958
25. If your compensatory reading class is organized into groups, about howfrequently does the composition of the group change?
0 Daily
C:3 Weekly
QMonthly
Rarely, if ever
Other (Specify)
QUESTION 25
SCORE INTERVAL S
1.0002.0003.0004.0005.41Ct6.000
5.22:*8
1.47.8
23.89.8
PCT
10.2
2.715.346.8L 9.4
CF
50.8-43:642.841.433:69.8
P-BLW F
100.0 3.1
PCT
6.6
CC P-8LW
46.2 100.0
F
2.1
PCT
5.7
CF
37.1 100.069;8 3.884.2 2.681.5 7.9
8.25.6
17.2
43.139.336.7
93.485.179.5
3.62.57.4
9.66.720.0
3.1-1
31.525.0
v4.384.778.0
66.121.919.4 6.9
47.315.0
28.86.9
62.3A5.0
14.96.6
40.217.8
21.56.6
58.037.8
--CASES 37.1299NO. BLANK DATA = 80.0000 84.0000 73.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 6.0000 6.0000 6.0000SUM OF SCORES . 165.1298 159.5455 121.0291SOK SOD. SCORES 748.4004
-4-.70E851,15.2554 530.E531
MEAN 4.0627 3.9660STND. DEV. 4N) 1.4245 1.3069 1.2883STNO. DEV. d N-11 1.4422 1.3239 1.3100MEDIAN 4":W181 4.60/5 4.4549SAMPLE FOR STATS = 40.9906 39.2713 30.5165
NOTE:VATUES DI LAST INTERVAL ERCEUUEU-R-(04 CALCULATIONS.
25. If your compensatory reading class is organized into groups, about howfrequently does the composition of the group change?
F-1 Daily
E) Weekly
0 B1- weekly
Monthly
0 Rarely, if ever
Ei Other (Specify)
QUESTION 25
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF 0-8LW F PCT CF P-BLW F
1.000 47 9.0 5232.000 27 5.2 4763.000 18 3.4 4494.000 88 16.8 4315.000 242 46.3 3436.000 101 19.3 101
PCT CF P-BLW
100.0 29 6.1 474 100.0 22 6.2 357 100.091.0 41 8.6 445 93.9 32 9.0 335 93.885,9 27 5.7 404 85.2 21 5.9 303 84.982.4 81 17.1 377 79.5 68 19.0 282 79.065.6 221 46.6 296 62.4 150 42.0 214 59.919.3 75 15.8 75 15.8 64 17.9 64 17.9
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =
52383
47491
35774
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1,0000giCIMUM-liALUC 6.-0000 6.0000 6.0000SUM OF SCORES 41: 1717.0000 1621.0000 1171.0000SUM sqp.scpREs 7775.0000 7257.0000 5177.0000MEAN 4.06W1 4.062/ 3.9966STNO. DEV. IN) = 1.3674 1.2972 1.3024STND. DEV. IN-1) = 1.3690 1.2989 1.3046MEDIAN 4.6281 4.5973 4.5233SAMPLE FOR STATS = 422 399 293
NOTE:VALUES IN LAST INTERVAL EXClUDED FROM CALCULATIONS.
27. Which one of the following terms comes closest to describingclassroom approach to the teaching of compensatory reading?
0 Linguistic-phonetic
Language experience
0 Modified alphabet
your major
0 Eclectic
0 Other (Specify)
SCDFtE INTERVAL S F PCT CF P-BLW --F PCT CF P-BLW f CF P-BLiiPCT
1.000 35.3 66.7 52.9 100.0 27.7 56.7 48.8 100.0 17.8 44.9 39.6 100.02.000 6.5 12.2 17.6 33.3 9:1---I9;-8- 7172 43.3-26.7 21.8 55.13.000 C.2 0.3 11.2 21.1 0.2 0.5 11.5 23.5 0.0 0.0 10.4 26.44.000 9.0 16.9 11.0 20.8 9.4 19.2 11.3 23.1 9.2 23.3 10.4 26.45.GOG 2.0 3.8 2.0 3.8 ---179- 3.9 1.1 37.17- 1.2 3.1 1.2 ..i,1
CASES PROCESSED 52.81353 48.8455 39.5E20ND. BLANK DATA 54.0000 59.0060 47.0.Ci00MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0.000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 94:6694 94.6741 83.4894SUM SQO. SCORES 256.663i) 265.7715 241.2771MEAN
--STM-DEV..(14)1.790k1.2842
1.9382 2.10931.2-979 1.2832
STND. DEV. (N-1) 1.2964 1.3113 1.2997MEDIAN 1.2496 1.3824 1.67E9
SCORE INTERVAL S F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 N)A 549 100.0 281 55.6 505 100.0 165 43.2 382 100.02.000 68 1.2.4 188 34.2 104 20.6 224 44.4 108 28.3 217 56.83.000 2 0.4 120 21.9 2 0.4 120 23.8 0 0.0 109 28.54.000 97 17.7 118 21.5 101 20.0 118 23.4 95 24.9 109 28.55.000 21 3.8 21 3.8 17 3.4 17 3.4 14 3.7 14 3.7
CASES PROCEcSED 549 505 382NO. BLANK DATA = 57 60 49MINIMUM VALUE T.-- 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 996.0000 984.0000 831.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 2728.0000 2756.0000 2467.0000ME AN 1.8142 1.9485 2.1754STNO. DEV. = 1.2953 1.2887 1.3137STNO. REV. IN-1) = 1.2964 1.2900 1.3154MEDIAN 1..2604 1.3986 1.7407
28. How long have you used this method?
This is the first year
For one or two years
For three, four, or five years
ED For six years or more
SCORE INTERVALS F PCI CF P-BLW PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 9.3 16.0 57.8 100.0 12.8 24.1 53.1 100.0 10.0 23.5 42.4 100.02.000 11.4 19.7 48.6 64.0 11.8 2Z.2 -70.3 75.9 10.0 23.6 32.4 76.53.000 17.3 29.9 37.2 64.3 14.7 27.7 28.5 53.7 10.3 24.4 22.4 52.94.000 19.9 34.4 19.9 34.4 13.8 26.0 13.8 26.0 12.1 28.5 12.1 28.5
CASES PROCESSED 57.8327 53.1069 42.4065NO. BLANK DATA 8.0000 16.0000 19.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALVE 4,0000 4.0000 4.41000SUM OF SCORES 163.4692 135.7559 109.3965SUM SQO. SCOPES 528.6868 413.3518 336.6584MEAN 2.8266 2.5563 2.5796STNO. OEV. (NI 1.0733 1.1175 1.1332
DEV. (N..1) 1.1282 1.148MEDIAN 2.9779 2.6331 2.608
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF. F PCT FCF P.431-W PCT CF P -BLW
1.000 104 17.4 598 100.0 96 23.3 412 100.0 141 25.7 549 100.02.600 -128 21.4 494 82.6 107 26.0 316 76,7 118 21.5 408 74.33.000 167 27.9 366 61.2 104 25.2 209 50.7 148 27.0 290 52.84.000 199
. _33.3 199 33.3 105 25.5 105 25.5 142 25.9 142 25.9
CASES PROCESSEONO. BLANK DATA
598a
41219
54916
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1657.0000 1042.0000 1389.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 5303.0000 3140.0000 4217.0000MEAN 2.7709 2.5291 2.5301STND. DEV. (N) 1.0909 1.1067 1.1314SIND. DEV. (N-1) 1.0918 l-Tabl)1 1.1324MEDIAN 2.9012 2.521111 2.6047
29. To what extent do you use each of the following approaches to teachingcompensatory reading in your classroom?
Not atAll Minimally Somewhat Extensively
Basal readers UQUESTION 29 PART A
SCGRE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -ULW F PCT CF 1581.F4- -17 PCT CF P-04,
1.000 2.4 4.1 57.5 100.0 2.5 4.8 53.0 100.0 5.4 12.b-10:8
412.9 100.02.000 3.4 5.9 55.1 95.9 4.7 ---8.-8' 37.5 07.43-0.4- g5;2 .4TM-
3.000 11.3 19.6 51.7 89.9 13.7 25.9 45.7 86.3 12.5 29.3 32.9 76.74.00C 40.5 70.4 40.5 70.4 32.0 60.5 32.0 60.420.3 47.4 20.3 47.4
CASES PROCESSED = 57.5003 5'2.9505 4-.86t9NO. BLANK DATA 10.0000 19.0000 1:1.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1,0000 1:1313-0-0 1.0CCOMAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.00COSUM OF SCORES 204.8098 181.0946 133.5703SUM SOU. SCORES 764.6754 -656:U694-- 461.0593MEAN 3.5619 3.4201 3.11.16STNC. GEV. (N) 0.7821 0.8417 1.034oSTND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.7890 0.8498 1.0468MEDIAN 3.7893 3.6728 3.4122
SCORE INTERVAL F KT CF P -8LW F OCT CF P -8LW PCT CF P -8LW
1.000 25 4.2 595 100.0 52 12.5 415 100_.0 20 511:6_ 100.02.000 35 5.9 570 95.8 44 10.6 363 87.5 51 9.3 518 94.93.000 121 20.3 535 89.9 124 29.9 319 76.9 135 24.7 467 85.54.000 414 69.6 414 69.6 195 47.0_ 195 .47.0_ 332 332 60.8
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATA
59511_
41516_
54619
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORES
2114.00007878.0000
_.1292.9.9094464.0000
1863.00006759.0000
ME 4N 3.5529 3.1133 3.4121SIND. DEV. IN) = 0.7855 1.0316 0.8584STND. DEV. (N-1) 0.7861 1.0329 0.8591MEDIAN 3.7814 3.3992 3.6777
Programmed ins traction
QUESTION 29 PART 8
SCORE INTERVALS F ?CT CF p-EiLw F OCT tF P-3LW F PCT CTP-13114
1.000 17.7 32.4 54.7 100.0 13.4'8;4
26.7 5000 100.0 907 24.1 41.1 100.02.000 8.9 16.2 37.0 67.6 16./- 36;7 71F0F9.0 21,8 31.2 75.93.000 16.9 30.9 28.1 51.4 19.6 39.2 28.3 5606 1407 35o7 2202 54.14.000 11.2 20.5 1142 20.5 8.7 17.5 807 U.S 7.6 18.4 7.6 18.4
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQL. SCORESMEANSING. 0EV. IN)SING. OEV. (N-1)MEDIAN
SCORE IN
54.'0S342.00001.00004.0000
131.0632384.93552.39581.13871.14932.5451
F PCT CF P-BLW F
50.03884500000
10-04.0000
123.7990)62.92432.47411.0639
-1707472.6689
PC 1 CF P-8LW--
F
41.1444:12000001000004.0000
102.2161299.16502.48431.04E41.06142.6143
4CF P -RLWPCT
1.000 200 35.7 560 10000 150 29.1 516 100.0 103 25.S 398 100.02.000 96 17.1 360 6403 78 .1501 366 70.9 80 20.1 295 74.13.000 152 27.1 264 47.1 201 39.0 288 55.8 142 35.7 215 54.04.000 112 20.0 112 0,0 16.9 87 16.9 73
. _18.3 73 18.3
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
'56046
51649
39633
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORES
1296.0000 1257.0000- . . - _ _ . . --3663.0000
981.00003744.0000 2869.0000
MEAN 2.3143 2.4360 2.4648SIND.DEV. (N) 1.1532 1.0791 1.0645
DEV. (N-1) 1:1542 1.0802 1.0659MEDIAN 2.3333 2.6493 2.6127
A total phonics program
QUESTION 29 PART C
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW 'F'' -PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-6LW
1.000 12.3 22.5 54.5 100.0 13.1 26.5 49.4 100,0 14.1 34.5 41.0 100.02,00') 7.3 13.5 42.2 77.5 11.6-23.6 36.3 (3.5 19.3 32.5 26.8 65.53.000 16.2 29.8 34.9 64.0 16.0 32.5 24.6 49,9 9.9 24.3 13.5 33.04.000 18.6 34.2 18.6 34.2 8. 17.4 8.6 17.4 3.0 E.7 3.6 8.7
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATA ='MINIMUM
54.479141.0000
49.380357.0000
40.952338.0000
VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES =-SUM
150.1818 118.9156 84.8669SQD. SCORES = 495.8406 341.6531 213.9796
MEAN 2.7567 2.4082 2.0723STND. DEV. (N) 1.1483 1.0581 0.9647TND. CEV.AN-1) = 1.1590 1.0690
MEDIAN 2.9697 2.4957 1,9770
SCURF INTERVALS F PCT CF. P-BLW PCT CF PCT CF P -BLW
1.000 130 23.1 563 100t011 392 100.0 146 29.0 504100.0,2.000 68 12.1 433 76.9125 31.9 258 65.8 fli2-2,Or 358 7100--3.000 185 32.9 365 64.8 98 25.0 133 33.9 161 31.9 247 49.0_4.000 _180 32.0 113s! 32.0 35 8.9 35 8.9 86 17.1 86 17.1
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
56343
39239
504
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1541.0000 818.0000 ).195,0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 4947.0000 2076.0000 3415.0000MEAN 2.7371 2.0867 2.3716STND. t)EV. (N) = 1.1380 0.9703 1.0742STND. DEV. IN-1) = 1.1390 0.9715 1.0753MEDIAN 2.9514 L.9960 2.4550
A Supplementary p-ionics program
QUESTION 29 FART 0
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P -8LW CF P -iiLW
1.000 3.7 7.G 33.1 100.0 4.5 8.9 50.3 100.0 4.9 12.0 41.0 100.02.000 7.7 1444 91.1 13.2 32.). 36.1 88.093.0 z--20.3 45.93.000 25.0 47.1 41.8 78.6 25.9 51.5 35.6 70.8 20.7 50.3 22.9 55.94.000 16.7 31.5 16.7 31.5 9.7 19.3 9.7 19.3 2.3 5.6 2.3 5.6
CASES PROCESSED 53.1109 50.3377 41.0256NO. BLANK DATA 49.0000 37.0000 34.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 161.0135 141.5539 102.3549SUM SOD. SCORES 27.2644 --4S4.0796 280.0288MEAN 3.0316 2.8121 2.4949SING. DEV. IN) 0.8583 0.8459 0.7755STNO. OEV. (*-11 0.8665 0.7651MEDIAN 3.1074 2.9036 2.6115
SCORE INTERVALS F PC T CF CF 11BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 42 7.6 556 100.0 52 9.9 525 100.0 50 12.6 396 100.02.000 84 15.1 514 92.4 102 19.4 473 90.1 137 34.6 346 87.43.000 265 47.7 430 77.3 268 51.0 371 70.7 184 46.5 209 52.84. 99. 165 29.7 165 29.7 103 19.6 103 19.6 25 6.3 25 6.3
CASES PROCESSED 556 525 396NO. BLANK DATA 50 40 35410111a VALUE-- 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.D000SUM OF SCORES = 1665.0000 1472.0000 976.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 5403.0000 4520.0000 2654.0000MEAN 2.9946 2.8038 2.4646STNO. DEV. IN) 0.8660 0.8650 0.7922SIND. DEV. (N-1) 0.8668 -0.8658 0.7932MEDIAN 3.0736 2.9049 2.5598
Language experience
QUESTION 29 PART E
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-81w F -PCT -CF FiCT CF P-8Liq
1.000 1.3 2.4 56.3 100.0 2.7 5.-4 51.0 100.0 1.7 4.0 4.1.7 100.G2.000 6.9 12.2 55.0 97.63.00C 31.9 56.8 48.1 85.4 24.6 48.2 40.5 79.4 Z0.5 49.0 31.4 75.24.000 16.1 28.7 16.1 28.7 15.9 31.1 15.9 31.1 10.9 26.i 10.9 26.1
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
56.284522.0000
51.023534.0000
41.730727.CCC0
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0131TO 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.00coSUM OF SCORES
-SUM'SQ0.175.4576 155.7075 124.0567
SCORES 574.4900 509.5813 395.0300MEAN 3.1173 3.05.17 2.9728STK:. DEV. (N) 0.6994 0.8212 0.7929
OEV. (N-1) 0.7057 ---0.8294 0.8026MEDIAN 3.1240 3.1086 3.0129
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW P PCT CF P-BLW F TV' f-61.ti
1.000 15 2.6 582 10.0.p. 28 5.3 529 19 4.72.000 73 12.5 567 97.4 8 16.4 501
_100.094.7 74 384 95.3
3.000 330 56.7 494 84.9 245 46.3 414 78.3 199 49.4 310 76.9164 28.2 164 28.2 169 169 31.9 111 111 27.5
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
58224
52936
40328
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SOH OF SCORkS = 1807.0000 1613.0000 1208.0000SUM SOD. SCORES -= 5901.6066 38B2.0000MEAN 3.1048 3.0491 2.9975SING. 0.7066 0.8326 0.8048STNb. DEV. (N-1) = 0.7072 0.8334 0.8058MEDIAN 3.1152 3.1102 3.0452
A linguistic program
QUESTION 29 PART F
SCORE INTERVALS F NCI CF P -BLW PCT CF P-BLW F PCT Cr- P-81:;4
1.000 9.0 16.8 53.4 100.0 7.2 14.6 49.1 100.0 7.4 18.2 40.9 100.02.000 10.1 19.0 44.4 83.2 12.0--24.5 41.9 35.4 9.7 23.7 33.5 81.83.000 24.3 45.6 34.3 64.2 23.2 47.3 29.9 60.8 18.5 45.3 23.8 58.14.000 9.9 18.6 9.9 18.6 6.6 13.5 6.6 13.5 5.2 12.8 5.2 12.8
CASES PROCESSED - 53.3650 49.0694 40.9028NO. BLANK DATA = 45.0000 58.0000 36.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.000 1.0060 1.0.000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 141.9947 127.4544 103.3679SUM SOD. SCORES = 427.5152 370.4846 296.7417MEAN 2.6608 2.5974 2.5272STND. DEV. IN) = 0.9656 0.8964 0.9318STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.9747 0.9057 0.9434MEDIAN 2.8120 2.7292 2.6789
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT---------CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 92 16.5 558 100.0 77 15.2 506 100.0 76 19.2 395 100.02.000 100 17.9 466 83.5119 23.5 429 84.8 105 26.6 319' 80.83.000 266 47.7 366 65.6234 46.2 310 61.3 169 42.8 214 54.24.000 100 17.9 100 17.9 76 15.0 76 15.0 45 11.4 45 11.4
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
558. . .
506. _
5939536
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000_
1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE - 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1490.0000 1321.0000 973.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 4486.0000 3875.0000 2737.0000MEAN 2.6703 2.6107 2.4633STND. DEV. IN) = 0.9535 0.9179 0.9281STND. DEV. IN-11 = 0.9544 0.9188 0.9292MEDIAN 2.8271 2.7436 2.5976
Non - standard orthography
(ex., i.t.a.)
QUESTION 29
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
--MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =-.SUPT SOD. SCORES =MEAN =
STNO. DEV. (N) =--STEM. DEV. (N -I1 =
MEOIAN
a
PART G
F PC7 CF PCT 'CF--PB1WP -BLW F- *WA' CF P-1314
42.5 85.4 49.7 100.0 38.2 82.2 46.4 100.0 32.3 64.0 38.1 100.04.0 8.1 7.2 14.6 4.4 9.6 -8.3 17.8 4.2 11.1 5.9 15.42.5 5.0 3.2 6.5 2.9 6.2 3.8 8.2 1.4 2.6 1.6 4.30.7 1.5 0.7 1.5 0,9 2.0 0.9 2.0 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.6
SCORE INTERVAL S F
1.000 4492.000 343.000 274.000 9...
CASES PROCESSEDND. BLANK DA TA
==
MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SQO. SORE S =MEAN =STND, DEV. (N) =STND. DEV. (N-1)MEDIAN
s
2C
49.7171 46.4095 3d.123284.0000 82.0000 57.0000I.00CO 170.01}0 1.00004.0000 4.0000 4.0000
60.9256 59.4172 45.870592.7251 96.8064 6::).62661.2254 1.2803 1.0320.6023 0.6684 0.52320.60891.0852
0.61511.1082
0.53021.0508
PCT
86.56.65.21.7._
CF
519-70369
P-BLW
100.0---_.13.56.91.7
F
312
PCT
83.9
CF
372
P 8-LW
100.0
F
395
PC T
82.8
CF
477
P-BLW
100.044142
11.83.80.5
60162
16.14.30.5
4726
9
9.95.51.9
82359
17.27.31.9_
519_87 __
37259
47788
1.0000 1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000 4.0000
634.0000 450.0000 603.0000972.0000 646.0000 961.0000
1.2216 1.2097 1.26420.6169 0.5227 0.64540.6175 0.5234 0.64611.0780 1.0962 1.1038
Words in color
QUESTION 29
SCORE INTERVAL S
PART H
0
F PC T
0
CF P -BLW F PC T CF P -BLIi F pCT CF P-81-ii
1.0002.0003.0004.G00
CASES PROCESS W) =P.0. 81. ANK DA TAMINIMUM VALUE -MAXIMUM VALUE -
37.57.56.11.5
71.3 52.614.2 15.111.7 7.62.8 1.5
52.615:556.000G1.00004.0000
100.0 35.7 74.5 4709 100.0 :30.525.54:39.5 4.31.4 0.1
71.9 39.211.0 8.710.9 4.30.2 6.1
100.022 0 i11.1
0.2
28.714.52.8
7. 63.90.7
16.0 12.28.1 4.51.4 0.7
47.862562.0000
39.164143.0000
1.000Q400000
1.00004.0000
SUM OF SCORES = 76.8490 65.2543 52.2518SUM S00. SCORES 146.5092 111.7447 87.3612MEAT = 1.4606 1.3634 1.383557ND. DEV. ( N) = 0.8070 0.6899 0.6718ST.140. DEV. I N..1 / = 0.8148 0.6972 0.6805MEDIAN = 1.2016 1.1708 1.1417
SCORE INTERVAL S F PCT CF P-81-hi----__
F_
PC T CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-Blw
1.000 395 72.1 548 pq.p 380 76.2 499 100.0 305 78.8 387 100.02.000 82 15.0 153 27.9 72 14.4 119 23.8 45 11.6 82 21.23.000 56 10.2 71 13.0 40 8.0 47 9.4 36 9.3 37 9.64.000 15 2.7 15 2.7 7 1,4 7 1.4 1 0.3 1 0.3
CASES PROLE SSED = 548 499 387NO . GI- ANK DA TA. 58 66 44MINIMUM VALUE - -row 1..0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORE S = 787.0000 672.0000 50700000SUM-SOD . -SCORES = 1467. 6600 1140.0000 825.0000ME AN 1.4361 1.3467 1.3101STND. DEV. I N /._ =_ 0.7839 0.6863 0.6446StN-0 .-- ISEV . IN--1) 0.7846 0.6870 0.6454MEDIAN =. 1.1937 1.1566 1.1344
Individualized programs
QUESTION 29 PART I
O E
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT
1.000 9.1 16.62.000 12,0 21.93.000 20.0 36.64.000 13.6 24.9
CF P-BLW
54.7 100.0 5.3-83;471,5
33.6 61.5 21.313.6 24.9 15.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
54.659034.0000
'MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 147,43333UM SOO. SCORES = 454:5178MEAN 2.6973STND. UEV. (N) 1.0198STN71: 0EV. 4N-11 -1-:0292MEOIAN 2.8130
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT
1.000 102 17.92.000 128 22.53.000 '10 .36.84.000 130 22.8
CASES PROCESSED =No. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES =SUM SQO. SCORESMEANSTND. UV. (N)STND. DEV. 4N-11 =MEDIAN m
570361.00004.0000
1508.00004584.0000
2.64561.02121.02212.7619
PG I P -ULW r PCT CF P -BLW
10,5 50.2 100.0 3.6 S.0 41.8 100.017.-0 44.9 6975 6,4 15.0 3001 91.042.5 36.4 72.5 17.5 41.7 31.8 76.030.0 15.0 30.0 14.3 34.3 14.3 34.3
CF P-BLW
5.7o 100.0 37468 82.1 63340 59.6 168130 22.8 139
50,177937.00004000004.0000
146.51964124.16 /Z
2.92000.93990.94$43.0294
41.825624.00001.00004.0000
126.0425415.4363
3,01320.92310.93433.1234
PCI CV15:81*--F PCT CF P-BLW
9.1 4 07_100.0 58 11.0 527 100.015.5 3 70 90.9 85 16.1 469 89,041.3 3 07 75.4222 42.1 384 72.934.2 1 39 34,2162 30.7 162 30.7
40724
52738
1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000
1223.0000 1542.00004025.0000 4988.0000
3.0049 2.92600.9273 0.95050.9285 0,95143.1161 3.0428
Technological devices such asthe "talking typewriter" orteaching machines
o E 1-1 D
QUESTION 29 PAR T
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
J
F
34.37.78.13.0
PCT CF P-BLW
64.7 53.1 100.0 32.314.5 18.8 3'5O 3 -7:115.3 11.1 20.8 8.15.6 3.0 5.6 2.3
F-PC7 CF-1581,W.
64.7 49.8 10000-1-43
F PCT CF 76-4Ciir
26.8 66.7 4002 100.0-11:6--35 v37
16.3 1004 21.04.7 2.3 4.7
507 14,2 13.4502 13.0 106204 6.0 204
33.319.06.0
CASES PROCESSED = 53.0927 49.8361 40.1863NO. BLANK OA TA -MINIMUM VALUE =
48.00001.0000
-... _49.0000 3800000
100000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 400000SUM OF SCORES - 85.8734 80.1779
-171.029363,6043
SUM SOD. SCORES = 185.3956 135.3421MEAN = 1.6174 1.6088 1.5827STNO. OE V. (N) = 0.9359 0.9184 0092E9-VCN.O. DEV. (N1) = 0.9448 0.9278 Oo 9407PIE 0 IAN 1.2730
*PC
1.2723 1.1,2491
SCORE INTERVALS F T CF P -8LW F PCT C1 PBLW PCT CF P -BLW
1.000 357818732
64.114 0515.65.7
557_100.0 335 65.4 512 100.0 265 67.8 391 100.02.0003.0004.000
---
^200 35.9119 21.432 5..7
7177
_29
13.915.05.7
17710629
34.620.75.7
584820
14.812.35.1
1266820
32.217.45.1
CASES PROCESSED =NO . BLANK DA TA =MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES
--SUM sciti; SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. 1N) =
-
STND. DE V. 1 N1 / =MEDIAN =
=
=
55749i.00004.0000
908.00001976.0000
1.63020.94350.94431.2801
512531.00004.0000
824.00001776.0000
1.60940.93740.93831.2642
391401.00004.0000
605.00001249.0000
1.54730.89450.89571.2377
Other (Specify and describe)
QUESTION 29 PART K
SCORE IN F PCT CF P-BLW F P-8Li---F---PCT --CF-P-BLWPCT CF
1.000 4.1 35.2 11.5 100.0 2.1 A,t.c 5.6 100.0 3.7 5G.5 7.4 100.02.000 1,2 10.5 7.5 64.8 8,7 37.7--49«5004 ,9 2.9 52.0 -D.63.000 3.7 31.8 6.3 54.3 1.8 21.1 2.8 49.1 1.6 21.4 3.0 40.84. GCO 2.6 22.5 2.6 22.5 1.0 18.1 1.0 18,1 1.4 19.4 1.4 19.4
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
11.5454482.0000
5.6494367.0000
7.4091469.0000
MINIMUM VALUE = 1,0000 1.41000 1,0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 27.8904 12.3835 15.5463SUM SOD. SCORES = 83.4923 35.4827 43.6336MEAN = 2.4157 2,1920 2,0983SIND. DEV. (N)
--STND. DEV. (N-1)=
=1.18151.2363
1.2149 1.21921.3391 1,3109
MEDIAN = 2.6351 2.1996 1.4910
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT- . .
Cr' P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 43 39.8. 1.08_100.0 44 54.3 81 100.0 27 46.6 58 100.02.000 9 8.3 65 60.2 7 8.6 37 45.7 2 3.4 31 53.43.000 32 29.6 56 51.9 15 18.5 30 37.0 18 31.0 29 50.04.000 24 22.2 24. 22.215_ 18.5 15 18.5 11 19.0 11 19.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. 8LANKDATA
==
10d498
81484
58373
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1,0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 253.0000 163.0000 129.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 751.0000 447.0000 373.0000MEAN = 2.3426 2.0123 2.2241STNO. DEV. (N) = 1.2108 1.2120 1,2183STND. DELI, (N-1) 1.2164 1.2196 1.2289MEOIAN = 2.5625 1.4205 2.5000
30. Who selected the materials that you are currently using in your teaching ofcompensatory reading?
0 You, and you alone
You, as a member of a team or committee
O An individual who asked for your views; or a team or committee ofwhich you were not a member but on which your views were represented
O An individual, team, or committee, operating without any input fromyou
O Other (Specify)
QUEST ION 30
SCORE 1N TER-VAL s P PCT CFP -BLW F PCT CF r-BLW F PCT CF p-Bul
1.000 7.9 14.3 55.0 100.0 10.7 21.1 51.0 100.0 9.1 22.1 41.1 100.02.000 14.3 26.0- 47..1-65;7 12.5 24.4 40.3 78.9 9.8 23.8 32.0 77.93.000 12.2 22.3 32.8 59.6 9.4 18.5 27.8 54.5 9.4 22.8 22.2 54.04. 000 15.0 27.3 20.5 37.3 12.6 24.8 18.4 36.0 9.2 22.3 12.8 31.2
-15-0-C. 5.5 1D-.1 5.5 ro.1 5.T 11.2 5.7 11.2 3.7 8.9 3.7 8.9
CASES PROCESSED --= 54.9517 51.0142 41.1255ND. BLANK 0A TA = 33.0000 38.0000 30.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.00000 14.0000MAXI MUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000
--S014 OP SCORES - -160a-41. 143.1910 111.8912SUM SQO. SCORES 553.4312 490.9661 371 .2732MEAN .... 2.9270 2.8069 2.7207STN D. DEV. TNT -1:2 2Z-2 1.3212 1.2749STNO. DEV. (N-1) 1.2375 1.3343 1.2907ME0 IAN 2.9314 2.7433 2.6772
30. Who selected the materials that you are currently using in your teaching ofcompensatory reading?
CD You, and you alone
0 You, as a member of a team or committee
0 An individual who asked for your views; or a team or committee ofwhich you were not a member but on which your views were represented
ri An individual, team, or committee, operating without any input fromyou
[:) Other (Specify)
QUESTION 30
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF 13-6-64 F PCT CF
1.000 85 14.8 573 100.0 1.14_2.1.7 525 100.0 93 23.2 401 100.02.000 132 23.0 488 85.2 114 21.7 411 78.3 88 21.9 308 76.83.000 136 23.7 356 62.1 104 19.8 297 56.6 89 22.2 220 54.94.000 164 28.6 220 38.4 135 25.7 193 36.8 91 22.7 131 32.75.000 56 9.8 56 9.8--8 58 11.0' 40 10.0 40 10.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
- 57333
525 40140 30
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 1693.0000 1484.0000 1100.0000SUM SOO. SCORES = 5861'0000 5116.0000 3702.0000MEAN 2.9546 2.8267 ?.7431STND. OEN/. (N) = 1.2-243 1.3247 1.3066STNO. OEV. 1N-1) = 1.2253 1..3259 1.3082MEDIAN 3.0110 2.8317 2.7191
31. How satisfied are you with the materials you are currently using in yourteaching of compensatory reading?
Totally satisfied
0 Satisfied in major aspects; dissatisfied in some minor ones
0 Lukewarm; neither devoted nor opposed to the materials
0 Dissatisfied in major aspects; satisfied only in some minor ones
0 Totally dissatisfied
QUFST!I)N 31
SCCE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -6L' F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CV0;st_w
1.000 84 14.0 598 100.0 63 11.3 558 100.0 51 12.2 418 100.02.000 393 65.7 514 66.0 345 61.8 495 88.7 236 56.5 367 87.83.000 86 14.4 121 20.2 92 16.5 150 26.9 97 23.2 131 31.34.000 31 5.2 35 5.9 52 9.3 58 10.4 30 7.25.000 4 0.7 4 0.7 6 1.1 6 1.1 4 1.0
.34___8.14 1.0
CASES PROCESSED = 59t) i58 416NJ. BLANK OhTAMINIMUM VALUE
=
1.00007
1.0000131.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.09PQ____SUM CIF SCORES 1272.0000 1267.0000 954.0300
SUM SOO. SCORES = 3026.0000 3253.0000 2448.0000ME.IN 2.1271 2.2706 2.2823
OEV. (N) 0.7319 0.8216 0.8047SIND. PO/. = 0.7325 0.8218 0.8057MEDIAN 2.0471 2.1261. 2.1695
31. How satisfied are you with the materials you are currently using in Yourteaching of compensatory reading?
0 Totally satisfied
ED Satisfied in major aspects; dissatisfied in some minor ones
0 Lukewarm; neither devoted nor opposed to the materials
0 Dissatisfied in major aspects; satisfied only in some minor ones
0 Totally dissatisfied
QUESTION 31
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -8LW F FCT CF P -8-LW F FCT CF P-81,
1.000 7.4 12.9 57.4 100.0 6.1 11.3 54.0 100.0 6.2 14.3 43.2 100.02.CCO 39.6 69.0 50.0 67.1 34:0 63.1.; 41.9 tio.r 2.5 5v.0 37.0 85.73.000 7.8 13.6 10.4 18.2 8.6 15.9 13.9 25.7 8.8 20.3 11,5 26.74.000 2.3 4.0 2.6 4.5 4.8 8.8 5.3 9.8 2.6 eG 2.8 6.45.000 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6, 0.5 I.G 0.5 1.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4
CASES PROCESSED = 57.4171 53.9500 43.1871140.-61_14* 'DATA 8.0400 7.0000 13.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000
'120:81745.0000 5.0000
--1-0F.SCOkE-S7_44 111.5879 54.6564SUM SOD. SCORES = 280.8347 309.1858 232.7806MEAN = 2.1042 2.2537 2.1S18-MO. IIEV. IN) = 0-.-6608--
_0.8073 0.7k56
STND. ()EV. (N-11 = 0.6868 0.8149 0.7746MEDIAN = 2.0385 2.1150 2.1046
32. How frequently do you use the following materials in the course of yourcompensatory reading instruction?
NotAvailable Often Sometimes
Textbooks other than basalreaders
QUESTION 32 PART A
0 D 0
Rarely orNever Use
SCORE INTERVALS F PC T CF PCT CF P -BLWCF P-8LW
1.000 1.7 2.9 57.9 100.0 1.8 4.3 42.8 100.0 1.6 2.9 53.6 100.02.000 29.9 51.6 56.2 97.1 17.4 40.7 41.0 95.7 25.4 47.5 52.0 97.13.000 Z2.5 38.9 26.3 45.5 18.1 42.2 23.6 55.0 21.1. 39.4 26.6 49.64.000 3.8 6.6 3.8 6.6 5.5 12.9 505 12.9 5.5 10.2 5.5 10.2
CASES PROCESSED 57.9097 42.8237 53.6138NO BLANK DATA 7.0000 17.0000 12.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1=elati 1.0000 100000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 44,0000SUM OF SCORES 144.3326 112.8679 137.7339SUM SQO. SCORE S 385;1826 322.1777 381.0596MEAN 2.4924 2.6361 2.5690SIND. DE V (N) = 0.6629 0.7578 0.7125STNO. OEV. IN -1) 6:6681 0.7668 0.7193MEDIAN 2.4128 206195 2.4918
SCORE INTERVAL S F PC T CT P BLW F PCT CF F PCT CF
1.000 14 2.3 599 100.0 19 3.4 551 100.0 17 4.1 413 100.02.000 307 51.3 585 97.7 258 46.8 532 96.6 158 38.3 396 95.93.000 236 39.4 278 46.4 216 39.2 274 49.7 177 42.9 238 57.64.000 _ 42 7.0 42 7.0 58 10.5 58 10.5 61 14.8 61 14.8
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA -
5997
55114
41316
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1504. 0000 1415.0000 1108.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 4038.0000 3923.0000 3218.0000MEAN 2.5109 2.5681 2.6828STNO. 0EV. (N) = 0.6610 0.7245 0.7709STNO. DEV. (1+,11) 0.6615 0.7251 0.7718MEDIAN 2.4300 2.4942 2.6780
Books and printed materialsother than textbooks
QUEST ION 32 PART
SCORE INTERVAL S
8
F PC T CF P-BLW -g TT. P=BIT, F PCT CF
1.0(30 0.4 0.6 57.7 100.0 0.4 0.7 53.5 100.0 0.4 0.9 43.1 100.02.000 35.b 61.b 57.4 99.4.33 53.1 99.3 28.9 67.1 42.7 99.13.000 19.1 33.0 21.8 37.8 16.7 31.2 19.3 36.1 12.9 29.9 13.8 32.04.000 2.7 4.7 2.7 4.7 2.7 5.0 2.7 5.0 0.9 2.1 0.9 2.1
CASES PROCESSED = 57.7395 53.4902 43.0533NO. BLANK DATA = 7.0000 12.0000 15.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.'0000 1:0000 1.00G0MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 139.6657 128.6084 100.3941SUM SQO. SCORES = 358.0867 ST8.0957- 246.1890MEAN 2.4189 2.4043 2.3219STND. OEV. IN) = 0.5922 0.5941 0.5298STND. 0EV. (N-1) = 0.5974 0.5997 0.5361MEDIAN 2.3016 2.2804 2.2316
SCORE INTERVAL S PC I CF P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW
1.pqo 5 _0..8.. 599-_10 0. 0 3 0.5 552 100.0 4 1.0 416 100.02.000 359 59.9 594 99.2354 64.1 549 99.5 277 66.6 412 99.03.000 20B 34.7 235 39.2169 30.6 195 35.3 124 29.8 135 32.54. 000 27. 4.5 27 4.5 24 4.7 26 4.7 11 2.6 11 2 ..6
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
5997
55213
41615
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SON OF SCORES 1455.0000 1322.0000 974.0000_SUM SOD. SCORES 3745.0000 3356.0000 2404.0000MEAN 2.4290 2.3949 2.3413STND. OEV. (N) = 0.5931 0.5865 0.5449STND. OEV. (N-l) = 0.5936 0.5871 0.5456MEDIAN 2.3203 2.2712 2.2365
-
Newspapers, magazines, andother periodicals
QUESTION 32 PART C
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUEMAX/MUM VALUE 'SUM OF SCORES -SUM SQO. SCORES =MEANSTNC. DEV. IN) =SIND. DEV. 4N-11MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK OATA =MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE -SUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSTNC. DEV. INI =STND. DEV. IN-1) =MEDIAN
E
F PCT CF
1.2 2.115.8 28.324.8 44.314.2 25.3
56.054.839.014.2
55.983718.00001.00004.0000
163.9422514.4353
2.92840.78330.79042.9425
F PCT
13155266154
2.226.445.226.2
D
P-BLW
100.0 6.7
PCT
1.7
CF P-BLW
42.3 100.097.9 15.6 37.5 4105 98.369.6 20.7 48.8 25.7 60.825.3 5.1 11.9 5.1 1109
CF
588575420154
588181.00004.0000
1737.00005491.0000
2.95410.78220.78292.9737
42.282721.00001.04004.0000
114.5909330.8186
2.71010.65230.70062.72C8
F PCT CF P-BLW
1.1 2.1 53.2 100.0142:2267MT.V27.8 52.1 37.9 71.310.2 19.1 10.2 19.1
53.227014.00001.00004.0000
153.43864T0.4585
2.88270.72710.73402.9079
P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW F PCT
100.0 14 2.6 549 100.0 9 2.297.8 145 26.4 535 97.4154 37.771.4 280 51.0 390 71.0195 47.726.2 110 20.0 110 20.0 51 12.5
CF P-BLit
409 100.0400 97.8246 60.151 12.5
54916
40922
1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000
1584.0000 1106.00004874.0000 3196.0000
2.8852 2.70420.7439 0.70830.7445 0.70922.9125 2.7128
Teacher-prepared materials(dittos, etc.)
QUESTION 32
SCORE INTERVAL S
1.0002.0003.0004.000
PAR T Ct
0 0 0
E PCT CF P-BLW PCT
0.1 0.3 57.7 100.0 0.0 0.046.910.4
81.318.0
57.610.7
99.718.5
37'. 5
14.8 27.60.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 1.3 2.3
CF P-8LW
53.6 100.053.6 TOO O16.1 30.01.3 2.3
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
57.71869.0000
53.576410.0000
N )(RUM VALUE 1.0000 2.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 126.1990 124.4750SUM SOD. SCORES = 285.4524 303.4121MEAN 2.1865 2.3233SIND. 0E11. N) = 0.4062 0.5151
DEV. = 0.4098 0.b200MEDIAN 2.1120 2.2140
SCARE- INTERVAL S
1.0002. 0003.0004.000
F PCT CF P-BLW
2 0.3 597 .100.0490 82.1 595 99.7103 17.3 105 17.6
2 0.3 2 0.3
F PCT
r PCT CF
0.1 C.3 42.826.8 62.8 42.613.0 30.4 15.82.8 6.6 2.8
CF P-8LW F PCT
412.77118.00001.00004.0000
104.0132269.3171
431.90.61E70.62602.2516
0
CF P-8
0 0.0 555 10_9,0 1 0.2 413 100379 68.3 555 100.0 250 60.5 412 99162 29.2 176 31.7 140 33.9 162 3914 2.5 14 22_5 22 5.3 22 5
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAKINMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESLIM _AF .,sccT.ESUM SOD. SCORESMEANSIND. DEV. (N)
-s-fiNTEG-MEDIAN
=
=--=
=...
5979
55510
1.00004.0000
U99.00002921.0000
2.17590.39790.39832.1051
2.0DDO4.0000
1300.00003198.0000
2.34230.52500.52542.2322
4131$1000004.0000
1009.00002613.0000
2.44310.59850.59922.3220
Motion pictures and/orfilmstrips
QUESTION 32 PART E
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F---P.CT- CF P-BLW' F FCT CF P-6-LW
1.000 1.0 1.7 56.9 100.0 1.4 2.6 53.2 100.0 2.0 4.7 42.7 100.02.000 20.5 36.1 55.9 98.3 15.0282 --5178-97.4- 11.2 26.3 40.8 95.33.000 26.7 46.9 35.4 62.226.7 50.2 36.8 69.2 20.0 46.8 29.5 69.14.000 8.7 15.3 8.7 15.310.1 19.0 10.1 19.0 9.5 22.3 9.5 22.3
CASES PROCESSED 56.9119NO. BLANK DATA 10.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCOPES = 156.9376SUM SOD. SCORES 462.5747MEAN 2.7576STND. DEV. IN/ = 0.7237STND. DEV. IN-11 = 0.7302MEDIAN 2.7597
SCORE INTERVALS F.__PCT
1.000 11 1.82.000 269 35.13.000 282 47.34.000 94 15.8
CASES PkOCFSSEDNO. BLANK DATA =
59610
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1651.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 4889.0000MEAN 7- 2.7701STNO. DEV. (NI = 0.7276STND. DEV. IN-11 =
_0.7282
MEDIAN = 2.7766
53.194515.0000-17.1K0-0
4.0000151.9607463.6689
2.8567
42.745318.00001.;(1000
4.0000122.5567379.34232.8672
0.7455 0.8E660.75267 0.81E22.8831 2.9015
CF P-814-F iitf- CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
596 100.0 16 2.9 550 100.0 17 4.1 413 100.0585 98.2155 -28.2 534 97.1 96 23.2 396 95.9376 63.1271 49.3 379 68.9 198 47.9 300 72.694 15.8108 19.6 108 19.6 102 24.7 102 24.7
55015
413)8
1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000
1571.0000 1211.00004803.0000 3815.0000
2.8564 2.93220.7576 0.79970.7583 0.80062.8838 2.9722
Slides and transparencies
QUESTION 32 PAK] 1-
SCORE INTERVALS F PC1
1.000 3.2 5.82.000 10.1 18.23.000 23.1 41.54.000 19.2 34.5
D
CF P-BLW F
55.7 100.0 3.052.4 94.2 9.242.3 76.022.019.2 34.5 17.3
PC T
D
CF P-BLW
5.9 51.5 100.0.17-.9----W8757-94.142.6 39.3 76.333.6 17.3 33.6
CASES PROCESSE0NO. BLANK DATA
55.655824.0000
51.481332.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.6600MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 169.5793 156.5333SUM SQO. SCORES 558.7451 514.41.ifMEAN 3,0469 3.0406ST NO. (iEV. IN) 0.8692 0.8643
y0:87ST. 0EV. IN-1NO ) 0.8771 9MEOIAN 3.1258 3.1160
SCOPI- INTERVALS F PCT CFP-BLW-- F
1.000 36 6.2 583 100.02.000 100 17.2 547 93.83.000 229 39.3 447 76.74.000 218 37.4 218 37.4
CASE.; PRUCESSE040. BLANK DATA
MAXIMUM VALUEOF SCORES
SUM SQO. SCORESMEANSTND. 5EV. IN)STND. DEV. IN-1)MEDIAN
583231.00004.0000
_1795,00005985.0000
3.07890.88670.88753.1790
33101212186
2.0
PCT
4.8
CF
4C.8
P -6L0
100.07.2 17.6 38.8 ')5.217.3 42..5 31.6 77.614.3 35.1 14.3 35.1
40.772329.00001.00004.0000
125.5483415.64283,07930.84410.85463.105
P-8LW F PC I CF P-BLWPCT CF
6.2 532 21. 401 00.019.0 499 93.8 60 15.0 380 94.839.8 398 74.8 168 41.9 320 79.835.0 186 35.0 152 152 37._9
53233
40130_____________
1.0000-
1.00004.0000 4.0000
1615.0000 1253.00005321.0000 4205.0000
3.0357 3.12470.8867 0.85010.8876 0.85113.1226 3.2113
Tape recordings and records
QUESTION 32 PART G
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F FLT CF
1.000 1.1 2.1 56.0 100.0 1.7 3.2 52.4 100.0 1.4 3.4 41.7 100.02.000 20.7 37.0 54.9 97.9 16.0 30.4 5 TIT,7 96.6 13.0 31":1 40.3 g6.63.000 26.2 46.7 34.2 61.0 26.5 50.5 34o8 66.3 18.9 45.2 27.4 65.64.000 8.0 14.3 8.0 14.3 8.3 15.8 8.3 15.8 8.5 20.4 8.5 20.4
CASES PROCESSEU = 56.0347 52.4291 41.7127NO. BLANK DATA = 16.0000 23.0000 22.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 /00OO 14,0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 153.1162 146.2522 11708e69SUM SOO. SCORES = 447.6687 436.6248 358.9346MEAN 2.7325 2.7895 2.8281STND. DEV. (N) 0.7228 0.7392 0.7861STND. OEV. (N-1) = 0.7293 0.7464 0o7557MEOIAN 2.7354 2.8234 208444
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F ***Vel CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 14 2.4 590 100.0.19 3.5 541 100.0 15 3.7 408 100.02.000 ?09 35.4 576 97.6169 31.2 522 96.5 125 30.6 393 96.33.000 282 47.8 367 62.2254 47.0 353 65.2 177 43.4 268 65.74.000 85 14.4 85 14.4 99 18.3 99 18.3 91 22.3 91 22.3
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
--MIWIMU*4-VaUE*--
==
590161.0000
541244.-6600
408)3
1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES
-SUM-1618.0000 1515.0000 1160.0000
SOD. SCORES = 4565.0000 3564.0000MEAN 2.7424 2.8004 2.8431STND. 0EV. (N) = J.7258 0.7720 0.8074STND. DEV. (N-11 = 0.7265 0.7727 0.8084MEDIAN 2.7553 2.8248 2.8616
Video or television tapes
QUESTION 32 PART H
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -BLW F P01 V-OLW r V-81.1v
1.000 16.5 30.3 54.4 100.0 17.3 34.6 49.9 100.0 12.2 30.S 39.5 100.02.000 6.8 12.6 37.9 69.7-4:3- ---8-.5-----32;"6---65;4-' 3.6 27.3 69.13.000 7.8 14.4 31.0 57.1 7.8 15.6 28.3 56.9 6.0 15.2 23.7 60.04.000 23.2 42.7 23.2 42.7 20.6 41.3 20.6 41.3 17.7 44.8 17.7 44.8
CASES PROCESSED = 54.3521 49.8655 39.4857NO. BLANK DATA = 39.0000 45.0000 45.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 400000SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORES
14604867485.7283
131.4124 108.1856433:5759-- II63.7878
MEAN 2.6951 2.6453 2.73'46SIND. DEV. IN) 1.2934 1.3225 1.3065SUE). DES/. (N*1) = 1.3055 1.335-9 1.3233MEDIAN 2.9939 2.9396 3.1593
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P*BLW CF P -BLW PC7 Cr-P*81W
1.000 171 30.2 567 j00.0 167 516 100.0 122 31.7 385 100.02.000 68 12.0 396 69.8 48 9.3 349 67.6 21 5.5 263 68.33.000 77 13.6 328 57.8 79 15.3 301 58.3 62 16.1 242 62.94.000 251 443
_ ..... _ 25_1 44.3 .222 222 43.0 180 1_41..-2!-§!,111
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DAIk..,_! . _MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUESUM- OF SCORES =_SUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSTNO. DEV. (N) =
=MEDIAN
56739
-- _ _1.00004.0000
1542.00005152.0000
2.71961.30011.30133.0779
51649
38546
1.00004.0000
1388.0000
1.00004.0000
1070.0000.4622.0000
2.68991.3121
3644.00002.77921.3194
1.31343.0443
1.32113.2984
Games, puzzles, and toys
QUESTION 32 PART I
SCCRE INTERYALS F PCT CF P-8LW PLI CF P-BLW PCT -CP P-804
1.000 0.6 1.0 56.7 100.0 1.8 3.4 52.6 100.0 1.6 3.E 41.7 100.02.000 34.1 60.1 56.1 99.0 19.5 37.0 --50:4--9-6.6 12.8 3 7 40.1 S6.23.000 19.7 34.7 22.0 38.9 26.0 49.5 31.4 59.6 18.8 45.0 27.3 65.54.000 2.4 4.2 2.4 4.2 5.3 10.1 5.3 10.1 d.6 20.5 8.6 20.5
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF W:CIKESSUM SQL.MEANSTND. (N)STNO. 0E-V. (N-1)MEDIAN
56.658613.00001.00004.0000
137.1879351.855v
2.421.-3
0.5ZS<,0.5942.3153
52.649319.0000
---1.0000
41.687928.0000
4.0000140.1860
1.00,004.0G00
117.6754399.2358
2.66260.7024
358.52952.82290.7S48
07-ATT12.6933
0.80452.8451
SCORE INTERVALS
1.000 8 1.3
CF
593 20
F
20
P-BLW
100.0
PC3-
3.7
CF
544
P-BLW
100.0
PC.3
5.0
Cr
402
P -8LW
100.02.000 347 58.5 385 98.7 199 36.6 524 96.3 118 29.4 382 95.03.000 215 36.3 238 40.1 262 48.2 325 59.7 176 43.8 264 65.74.000 23 3.9 23 3.9 63 11.6 63 11.6 88 21.9 88 21.9
CASES PROCESSED 593 544 40?NJ. BLANK DATA 13 21 29MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1439.0000 1456.0000 1136.0000SUM SOD. .JCORES 3699.0000 4182.0000 3484.0000MEAN 2.4266 2.6765 2.8259STND. DEV. (N) = 0.5909 0.7239 0.8253STND. DEV. 0.5914 0.7245 0.8263MEDIAN 2.3314 2.7023 2.8580
Other (Specify)
QUESTION 32 PART J
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW F PC. CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-PLk
1.000 5 7.8 64 100.0 6 9.4 64 100.0 7 30 100.02.000 29 45.3 59 92.2 19 29.7 58 90.6 5 16.7 23 76.73.000 10 15.6 30 46.9 12 18.8 39 60.9 5 16.7 18 60.04.000 20 '41.3 20 31.3 27 42.2 27 42.,2 13 43.3 /3_43.3
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
=
=64
54264501
30 _MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 173.0000 188.0000 84.0000.SUM SOD. SCORES = 531.0000 622.0000 280.0000MAN 2.7031 2.9375 2.8000STNO. DEV. (N1 = 0.9950 1.0440 1.2220STND. DEV. IN-1) = 1.0028 1.0522 1.2429MEDIAN Z.4310 3.0833 3.1000
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT U- P-BLW F PCT
_ _
CF P -8 LW
1.060 1.2 17.2 6.8 100.0 0.4 6.3 5.9 100.0 1.0 31.7 3.2 100.02.0-00 3.0 44.3 5.6 82 8 1.7 28.9 5.5 93.7 D.5 16.1 2.2 68.33.000 1.0 14.9 2.6 38.5 1.4 23.6 3.8 64.8 0.4 11.5 1.7 52.24.000 1.6 23.6 1.6 23.6 2.4 41.2 2.4 41.2 1.3 40.7 1.3 40.7
CASES PROCESSED = 6.7624 5.8998 3.1820NO. BLANK DATA = 526.0000 487.0000 315.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES - 16.5623 17.6812 8.3141SUM SW: SCUM = 47.7563 '8.6L04 27.0872MEAN 2.4492 2.9969 2.6128STNO. DEV. (N) = 1.0313 0.9770 1.2484STND. DEV. IN-11 s 1.01Z1 1.5679MEDIAN 2.2406 3.1279 2.6943
33. How much time does a typical pupil in your compensatory reading class spend
in each of the following types of activity?
A great deal Some
Improving motor abilities related to reading
Little or none
QUESTION 33
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM S0D. SCORESMEANSTNO. OEV. (NISTNO. DEV. IN-1)MEDIAN 0
SCLIRE INTERVALS
PAr1T A
F
14.432.79.9
F
PCT CF
25.2 57.057.4 42.617.4 9.9
56.963316.00001.00003.0000
109.441?234.1726
1.92130064780.65361.9313
OCT CF
P-BLW F
100.0 9.2
PCT CF-V701131------f7 C F 1)- b
17.8 52.0 100.0 6.5 15.3 42.5 100.74.827.317.4 15.4
52.6 742;7---82.2--5.78 36.0 d4.29.6 15.4 29.6 13.1 30.9 13.1 30.
25.000U1.0000
42.458121.00001.0000
3.0000110.0672257.0601
3.000091.5255215.65E7
2.118401.67810.6847
2.15570.66120.6651
P-BLW
2.1.124
PCI CF P-BLit F
2.1444
PCT cr7157-7610T
1.000 147 25.0 589_100.0 84 i5.6 54_0 100.0 58 14.1_ 410 100.02.000 329 55.9 442 75.07282- 52.2 456 84.4 205 50.0 352 85.93.000 113 19.2 113 19.2 174 32.2 174 32.2 147 35.9 147 35.9
CASES P.PoCrS.soNO. BLANK DATA 17
54025
41021
MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE
1.0000 1.0000 1.0000_ _ _3.00003.0000
SUM OF SCORES 1144.0000 1170.0000 909.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 2480.0000 2778.0000 2201.0000
1.9423 2.1667 2.2171STNO. DcV. IN) = 0.6619 0.6708 0.6730SIND. DEV.(N-1) 0.6624 0.6714 0.6738
- 1.9483 2.2171
Increasing attention span
QUESTION 33
SCORE IN
PART 6
F PLT CF P --BLS! F PCT CF PC1
1.000 26.4 46.1 57.2 100.0 19.9 37.4 53.1 100.0 1403 34.7 42.o 10J.02.000 28.2 49.2 30.8 53.9 30.9 58.1- 33.2 62.6 23.2 54.5- T7.11.- 65.2.3.000 2.7 4.7 2.7 4.7 2.4 4.5 2.4 4.5 4.6 14.8 4.6 10.
CASES PROCESSEDNU. BLANK DATA
57.198812.0000
53.-Tt515.0000
42.614018.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000---370U6D-
1.0CCOMAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 90.7365 88.7268 75.0654SUM SOD. SCORES 163.1822 164.7257 149.1611MEAN 1.5863 -1.670 1.7t15STMC. OEV. (N) 0.5800 C.5571 0,6305SIND. DEV. (N-11 0.5852 0.5624 0.630MEDIAN 1.5797 f: 166 1.7813
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -ALW F PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF P -BLW
1-P00 ?5, 43.6 594 100.0 20.0_ 36.4 550 100.0 125 3C.3 413 100.02.000 298 50.2 335 56.4 321 58.4 350 63.6249 60.3 288 69.73.000 37 6.2 37 6.2 29 5.3 29 5.3 39 9.4 39 9.4
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA =
59412 15
41318
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 966.0000 929.0000 740.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1784.0000 1745.0000 1472.0000MEAN 1.6263 1.6891 1.7918STND. OEV. (N1 0.5989 0.5654 0.5948
(N-1) = 0.5994 0.5659 0.5955.STNO..DEV.MEDIAN 1.6275 1.7336 1.8273
Developing .sual discrimination
QUESTION 33 PART C
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0CC2.0003.000
F PCT CF
34.8 451.6 56.519.9 35.2 21.71.8 3.2 1.8
CASES PROCESSED = 56.5214NO. BLANK DATA = 13.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 80.0424SUM SQD. SCORES = 130.6864MEAN i.4161STND. DEV. IN) = 0.5538STND. OEV. (N-1) = 0.5588MEDIAN 1.3118
SCOkE INTERVALS PCT
0 0
P-BLW F PCI
100.0 21.6 40.638.4-24-1.6 46.43.2 6.8 12.9
0
CF-F=8Lw F PCT
53.0 100.0 11.9.11:4 236.8 12.9 5.9
28.058.2
LF P-6L191
42.6 100.030.6 72.05.9 13.6
57:9773 42.55i517.00001.0000-3.000091.1648181.1616
1.72100.67680.68331.6991
19.00001.00003.0000
79.0507163.78441.85780.63070.63831.8/76
CF P-BLW F
1.000 358 60.4, 59? 100.02.00U 212 35.8 235 39.63.000 23 3.9 23 3.9
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATAMINIMUM VALUE
-Wkicikum VACIJE
= 593131.00003.0000
SUM OF SCORES 851.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 413.0000MEAN 1.4351STND. OEV. (N) = 0.5686STNO. ()EV. (N71) = 0.5691mE01AN 1.3282
21426964
PCT CF P-BLW F
35.1 547 100.0 11849.2 333 60.9 23311.7 64 11.7 60
3107-181.00003.0000
944.00001866.0000
1.72580.65800.6587
PCI
28.756.714.6
1.7212
CF P-BLW
411 100.0293 71.360 14.6
411201.00003.0000
764.00001590.0000
1.85890.64280.64361.8755
Matching letters or words
QUEST /ON 33 PART D
SCORE INTERVAL S F
1.000 22.82.000 29.23.000 5.0
CASES PROCE sseoNO. BLANK DATA -
PCT CF
39.9 57.051.2 34.28.8 5.0
57.001313.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE - 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 96.2696SUM SQO. SCORES = 184.8517MEAN- 1.6889SIND. DEV. IN) 0.6249SIND. DEV. (N-13 = 0.6305MEDIAN 1.6963
SCORE INTERVAL S F PCT
P -8LW F PCT CF E -CF ii;g1;
100.0 11.8 22.4 52.660.1-26;9-3-1-.7-43:138.8 13.9 26.4 13.9
C1 P-BLW
1.000 252 42.5 5932.000 287 48.4 3413.000 54 9.1 54
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
59313
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORE S - 988.0000SUM SQD. scpREs
..
MEAN1886.0000
1.6661SIND. DEV. IN) 0.6360SIND. ()EV. IN-1 / = 0.6366.MED IAN 1.1;551
100.9 11857.5 2859.1 139
100.0 5.0 11,8 42.2 100.0-77:6 21.1 5U.1 37.2 b13.226.4 16.1 38.1 16.1 38.1
20.00001.0000
42.217621.00001.0000
.0000- zi.00OO107.2902 95.5435244.5235 234.37E5SOT 2.2610.6975 0.65570.7042 0.6636
---2 039-6 2.2626
PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
21.8 542. 100.0 50 12.2_ 409 100.052.6 424 78.2 189 46.2 359 87.825.6 139 25.6 170 41.6 170 41.6
542231. ppuo3.0000
1105.00002.509. ()cop
2.03870.68750.6881_2.0368
409221.0000
938.0000233.6.0000
2.2440.67220.67302.3175
Learning letter forms
QUESTION 33 PART
SCORE INTERVALS
E
PCT CFF PCT CF P-8LW F V-ILW F PCT
1.000 24.2 42.5 57.1 100.0 7.4 14.1 52.6 100.0 3.3 7.d 42.5 100.02.000 24.6 43.1 32.8 57.5 -23.8 -4.5.2 85:9- 16.1 37.9 39.2 92.23.000 8.2 14.4 8.2 14.4 21.4 40.6 21.4 40.6 23.1 54.3 23.1 54.3
CASES PROCESSED = 57.0644 52.5676 42.5464NO. BLANK DATA 14.0000 /9.0000 19.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0060 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 98.1089 119.0869 104.8591SUM SQO. SCORES 196.6371 294.8503 275.648MEAN 1.7193 2.2654 2.4646STND. DEV. (N) 0.7000 0.6906 0.6362
STND. DEV. (N-1) 0.7062 0.6973 0.6438MEDIAN 2.5,B3-1.6741 2.2V51
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF
1.000 255 43.1 592 100.0 79 14.5 543 100.0 34 8.3 411 100.02.000 254 42.9 337 56.9 240 44.2 464 85.5 143 34.8 377 91.73.000 83 14.0 83 14.0 224 41.3 224 41.3 234 56.9 234 56.9
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
-i.WX-01-0g- VALUE._-
SUM OF SCORESSUM SQD..., SCORESMEANSIND. DEV. (N)STND. DEV. IN-I)MEDIAN
592141.0000
543221.0000
411201.0000
1012.00002018.0000
3.00001231.00003055.0000
3.00001022.00002712.0000
1.703-0.69750.6981
2.26700.69760.6983
2.48660.64440.6452
1.6614 2.3021 2.6218
Developing a sight vocabulary(Whole word recognition)
QUESTION 33 PART F
SCORE INTERVALS F
1.000 41.52.000 15.13.000 1.2
PCT CF
71.8 57.826.1 16.32.1 1.2
CASES PROCESSED 57.8435NO. BLANK DATA 7.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 75.3840SUM SQD. SCORES 11.2.8852'MEAN 1.3032STND. DEV. (N) 0.5031STNO. OEV. (N-1) = 0.5675MEDIAN 1.1965
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
_ .
F PCT
0
P-BLW F -
E
tr-r=mtv-- 1%. t.r r-DLW
100.0 29.1 54.9 53.0 100.0 2C.7 46.6 42.7 100.028.2-21:*0---39;7----2-3.9 45.1 I8.T A2.T 22.0 51.42.1 2.8 5.4 2.8 5.4 3.7 8.8 3.7 8.8
F
52.-9930516.00001.0000
79.7218138.8697
0.59780.6035
-1:VICOD
PCT OCT
16512
10.5_27.52.0
59917712
100.0 305.
29.5 2132.0 30 5.5
548J00.0.194243 44.318230 5.5 38
44.09.2
CASES PROCESSED =
NO. BLANK DATA = 7
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 788.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 1190.0000MEAN 1.3155S7ND. DEV. (N) = 0.5060STND. DEV. = 0.5064MEDIAN 1.2097
44.705817.00001.00003.000
68.4167127.3203
1.60200.64400.65171.5335
CF P-BLW
414 L00.O220 53.138 9.2
----------54817
41417
1.0000 1.00003.0000 3.0000
821.0000 672.00001427.0000 1264.0000
1.4982 1.62320.5996 0.64680.6001 0.64761.3984 1.5714
Learning word meanings (Vocabulary)
QUESTION 33
SCORE INTERVALS
PART G
F PCT CF P -8LW F F ACT CF F-13Gi
1.0002.000
38.218.7
66.4 57.532.5 19.3
100.033.6
39.313.4
73.4 53.611::
31.4 72.6 43.1 100.024.9 14.3 2111 11.2 26.0 11.7 27.2
3.000 0.6 1.1 O. 1.1 0.9 1.7 0.9 1.7 0.5 1.2 0.5 1.2
CASES PROCESSED = 57.5116 53.6222 43.1123NO. BLANK DATA = 9.0000 10.0000 14.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1,0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0-000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 77.4454 68.8478 55.3717SUM SOO. SCORES = 118.5423 101.1563 80.9456MEAN 1.3466 1.2834 1.2845STNC. (AV. IN) = 0.4978 0.4878 0,4770STNO. °EV. = 0.5022 0.4924 0.4826MEDIAN 1.2527 1.1816 101872
SCOkE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-3CW PC1 CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -.81W
1.000 4pp_ 67.0 597 100.0 408 73.5 555 100.0 307 73.6 417 100.02.000 189 197 33.0 143 25.8 147 26.5 105 25.2 110 26.43.000 8 1.3 8 1.3 4 0.7 4 047 5 1.2 5 1.2
CASES PROCESSED 555 417NO. BLANK DATA = 9 10 14MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 802.0000 706.0000 532.0000SUM S00. SCORES = 1228.0000 1016.0000 772.0000MEAN 1.3434 1.2721 1.2758STNO. DEV. (N, = 0.5023 0.4609 0.4730
0.5027 0.4614 0.4735MEOIAN 1.2462 101801 1.1792
Phonic and/or structural analysis 0 D D
QUESTION 33 PART H
SCORE INTERVALS F
1.000 49.22.000 8.03.0G0 0.4
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOO. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. (N)STNL. OEV. (N-1)MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS F
PC1 CF P-BLW
85.5 57.5 100.013.8 8.40.7 0.4
57.52788.00001.00003.0000
66.306184.67501.5260.37870.38211.0-851
PCT CF
F
34.514.5-1-7:70.7 1.0
PCT
64.9 53.233.3 18:71.8 1.0
-53.1888-14.00001.0000
CF
100.0-35.1
1.8
f -00
18.6 43.4 42.8r2-.-1-517.7-2-4.22.1 4.9
100.0
2.156.64.9
42.795517.00001.0000
3.000072.8001113.9255
3.000069.1033125.88/0
1.36810.51820.5231
-1---27013
1.61470.57810.5m1.62/4
P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 516 86.3 598 100.o 362 65.8 550 100.0.194 46.9 414 100..02.000 78 13.0 82 13.7 178 32.4 188 34.2 198 47.8 220 53.13.000 4 0.7 4 0.7 10 1.8 10 1.8 22 5.3 22 5.3
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
_MINIMUM VALUE
5989
1.0000
550--15
1.000o171.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 684.0000 748.0000 656.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 864.0000 1164.0000 1184.0000MEAN 1.1438
. . . . . .
1.3600 1.5845STND. DEV. (N) 0.3695 0.5165 0.5909STND. PEY(N-0 0.3698 0.5170 0.5916MEDIAN 1.0795 1.2597 1.5657
Being read to
QUESTIUN 33
SCORE INTERVALS
PART I
0
F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P -81p;
1.000 19.0 33.1 57.3 100.0 9.8 18.4 53.3 100.0 5.7 12.4 42.7 100.02.000 35.9 62.6 38.3 66.9 -55.7-67;04375816 29.3 68..5 37.0 86.63.000 2.4 4.2 2.4 4.2 7.8 14.5 7.8 14.5 7.7 18.1 7.7 18.1
CASES PRuC=SScu 57.2865 -53.2980 42.7:. i7
NO. BLANK OATA 12.00J0 14.0000 17.0000MINIMUM vALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.00J0 3.0000SUM OF SCt:"ES 98.0202 104.5313 87.4710SUM SQO. SCORES 184.3227 222.4958 192.3707MEAN 1.7111 -1=9613 2.0467STNO. OEV. IN) 0.5384 0.5727 0.5588STND. °EV. IN-I) 0.5432 0.5782 0.5654MEDIAN 1.7692 ----1.9710 2.030
SCORE INTERVALS- F PCT CF P-BLW F PCI CF P-B6777--F PCT CF P-BLW
1 000- _
2.0003.000
19536930
32.867.15.1
59439930
100.0 102 18.5 550 100.0 53 12.8 414 100.067.2 37Z5.1 76
67.613.8
44876
81.528113.8 80
67.919.3
36180
87.219.3
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
59412 15
41417
MINIMUM VALUE_ _1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 1023.0000 1074.0000 855.0000SUM S00. SCORES
----MEAN1941.0000
1.72222274.0000 1897.0000
1.9527 2.0652>EV. (N) 0.5492 0.5669 0.5630
SIND. IEV. (N-1) 0.5497 0.5674 0.5637mId1WSJ 1.-7164 1.9651 2.0480
Reading aloud
QUESTION 33
SCORE INTERVALS
PARE J
F PCT
D 0 0
CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-B.LA F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 38.9 67.5 57.7 100.0 I:;.1.) 43.1 100.0 24.1 45.2 53.3 100.02.000 18.5 32.0 18.8 32.5 2'11.2 5 3.9 28.1 65.2 27.5 51.6 29.2 54783.00C 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.5 4.9 11.3 4.9 11.3 1.7 3.2 1.7 3.2
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
57.72618.00001.0000
43.105614.00001.0000
53.295814.00001.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 76.8277 76.0951 84.2457SUM SOD. SCORES = 115.6412 151.8197 149.5624MEAN 1.3309 1.7653 1.5807STNO. OEV. (N) 0.4816 0.6369 0.5546STNC. DEV. IN-1) 0.4859 i).6445 0.5599MEDIAN 1.2412 1.1b22 1.5939
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW PC T CF P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 394 65.9 598 10.0.0 228 41.5 550 00.0_143 34.3 417 I00.02.000 202 33.8 204 34.1 304 55.3 322 58.5 226 54.2 274 65.13.000 2 0.3 2 0.3 18 3.3 18 3.3 48 11.5 48 11.5
CASFS PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMINIMUMMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES
59881.00003.0000
804.0000
550151.00003.0000
890.0000
41714
3.0000739.0000
sum sap. SCORES un,qopp 1606.0000 1479.0000MEAN 1.3445 1.6182 1.7722STND. 0EV. (N) 0.4822 0.5491 0.6373STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.4826 0.5496 0.6381MEUTAN = 1.2589 .6546 1.7698--
Reading silently (independent silent reading) 0
QUESTION 33 PART K
SCORE INTERVALS F
1.000 35.92.000 20.53.000 1.2
PCI CF
62.3 57.735.6 21.82.1 1.2
CASES PROCESSED 57.6936NO. BLANK DATA 8.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 80.7041SUM SQO. SCORES 129.1805MEAN 1.3988SIND. DEV. (N) 0.5313SIND. DEV. (N--1) 0.5360MEDIAN 1.3031
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT
0 0
P-BLW PCT
100.0 33.0 61.637.7 -f q:6-736.-52.1 1.1 2.0
CF
1.000 376. 63..0 597-221
100.02.000 204 34.2 37.03.000 17 2.8 17 2.8
CASES PROCESSEDND. BLANK DATA
5979
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM' VALUE 3.0000SUM. OF SCORES 835.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 1345.0000MEAN 1.3987STND. DEV. IN) 0.5447SIND. DEV. (N-1) 0.5451MEDIAN 1.2939
F
CF P -8LW F PCT Cr P-8LW
53.6 100.0 28.1 65.5 42.9 100.020.6 38.4-13 32.4 14.8 34.51.1 2.0 0.9 2.1 0.9 2.1
53.644910.00001.00003.0000
75.3103120.7424
0.52910.5341
----1.3119
CF F PCT
42,907515.00001.00003.000058.584491.71031.36540.52270.52t91.2629
CF P-8LW
349 62.9 555 100.0 277 66.6 416 100.0197 35.5 206 37.1133 32.0 139 33.4
9 1.6 9 1.6 6 1.4 6 1.4
1041615
1.0000 1.00003,0000 3.0000
770.0000 561.00001218.0000 863.0000
1.31374 1.34860.5194 0.50590.5198 0.50651,2951 1.2509
Creative writing
QUESTION 33 PART L
SCORE INTERVALS E
1.000 13.92.000 34.43.000 8.5
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATA
PCT CF
24.4 56.860.6 42.915.0 8.5
56.795410.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 108.2590SUM SQO. SCORES 228.2454MEAN 1.9061STNO. OEV. (N) 0.6208STNO. DEV. (N-.11 0.6264MEDIAN 1.9223
0
100.075.615.0
0
F
11.3
8.8
PCT CF PCT CF 13-8144
21.2 53.2 100.0 11.6 21.0 43.G 100.07 55.1 31.4 73.0
16.6 8.8 16.6 7.7 17.9 7.7 17.9
5i.236-314.0U001.0000-3:omo
104.0034223.1727-179'536
0.61280.61861.96Z6
15.00001.00(.03.0000
82.1477175.7522
1.90690.0634
0.67121.9173
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P -131..101 F PCT CF F Oc-T
1.0002.000
154354
25.859.4
596442
100.0 10874.2 228
26.0 415307
100.011574.0350
204963.5
551436
100.079.1
3.000 88 14.8 88 14.8 79 19. 0 79 19.0 86 15.6 86 15.6
CASES PROCESSED 596 551NO. BLANK DATA I0 16 14MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMA VALUE 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 1126.0000 801.0000 1073.0000SUM SQO. SCORES
-M
2362.00001.8893
1731.00001.9301
2289.00001.9474
STND. 0EV. (NI 0.6275 0.6676 0.6017STND. fiEV. (N'1) 0.6280 0.6684 0.6022MEDIAN 1.9068 1.9364 1.9586
Reading for enjoyment
QUESTION 33
SCORE INTERVAL S
PAKi M
0 0
F PC T CF P-BLW PC-1 F PCT CF P-BLw
1.000 27.0 46.6 57.9 100.0 25.6 48.0 53.5 100.0 20.0 1:6.2 43.2 100.02.000 29.1 50.2 31.0 53.4 24.2 43.2 27.8 52.0 21.3 49.3 23.2 53.83.000 1.9 3.2 1.9 3.2 3.7 6.8 3.7 6.8 1.9 4.5 1.9 4.5
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
57.91206.0000
b3.46'1212.0000
43.208713.0400
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0003 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES =
3.000090.7258
3.000084.9368
3.000069.3809
SUM sop. SCORES 160.0542 155.1903 122, 6043MEAN 1.5666 -1.5888 1.5826STND. DEV. (N) 0.5563 0.6154 0.5170STND. OEV. (N-1) 0.5612 0.6212 0.583aMEDIAN 1.5686 1.5449 1.5762
----SCORE INTERVALS. F PC CF P-BLW F CF F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 ?77 46.2 600 100.0 251 45.5 552 100.0 199 47.7 417 100.02.000 302 50.3 323 53.8 263 47.6 301 54.5 198 47.5 218 52.33.000 21 3.5 21 3.5 38 6.9 38 6.9 20 4.8 20 4.8
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
6006
55213
41714
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000mAxTgaW-V4LuE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 944.0000 891.0000 655.0000SUM SQt. SCORES 1674.0000 1645.0000 1171.0000MEAN 1.5733 1.6141 1.5707STND. DEV. (N) = 0.5609 0.6121 0.5839STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.5614 0.6126 0.5846MEDIAN 1.5762 1.5951 1.5480
Enriching cultural background
QUESTION 33
SCORE INTERVALS
PART N
F PCT
0 0 0
CF P-BLW CFF-81.W F
1.000 13.9 24.7 56.3 100.0 10.0 19.6 52.8 100.0 9.8 23.1 42.5 100.02.000 33.0 58,6 42.4 75.3 '33;7-63.9 63.0 32.' 76.S3.000 9.4 16.7 9.4 16.7 9.0 17.1 9.0 17.1 5.9 13.9 5.9 13.9
CASES PROCESSED 56.3289NO. BLANK DATA 15.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 108,2041SUM SOD. SCORES 230.7918-WEAN 1.9209STNO. DEV. (N) 0.6382STNO. DEV. (N-1) 0.6440WED14N = 1.9324
SCOkE INTERVALS F PCT.
52,795815.000G1.00003.0UU0
104.6293226.3840
-1.9H-18C. 60040.6062Z. 9856
CF P-8LW F PCT
1.000 142 24.0 5912.000 351 59.4 4493.000 98 16.6 98
591.
15CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 1138.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 2428.0000MEAN 1.9255STND. DEV. IN) = 0.6329STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.6334MEDIAN 1.9373
CF P -8LW
42.514619,00001.00003.0OO
61.1945170.34S2
1.90890.60130,6Ef51.9276
F PCT. CF F-8EW
100.0 103 18.9 544 100,0 97 23.6 411 100.976.0 341 62.7 441 81.1 248 60.3 314 76.416.6 100 18.4 100 18.4 66 16.1 66 16.1
54421
41110
1.0000 1.00003.0000 3.0000
1085.0000 791.00002367.0000 1683.0000
1.9945 1.92460.6108 0.62520.6114 0.6260L.9956 1.9375
Other (Specify)
QUESTION 33 PART C)
SCO,.E INTERVALS F
1.000 0.72.000 0.530 000 2.7
CASES PRUCESSEDNU. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE 7.4
SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTNO. OEV. (N)STND. DEV. (N'-1)MEDIAN
PC I
17.213.369.5
3.8618550.0000
1.00003.00009.740926.86362.52240.77070.89532.7801
SCOAE INTERVALS
CF F PC T CF P-BLW F PLT CF F'-.13 LW
3.9 100.0 0.9 2o.1 4.4 100.0 0.6 a,' 2.7 100.03.2 82.8 0.7 3.5-79.9--6.4 14,8 201 7809207 69.5 2.8 64.0 2.8 64.0 107 64.1 1.7 6401
4: i319 2.71'79502.0000 401.0000
1.0000 1.00003.00D0 3.0000
10.8110 60604029.2420 17.8599-7204393 2.42590.8048 0.81660.9145 1.02732.7188 2.7198
CFP.4a---g OCT- v--Lr-P-BLW F PCT CF P.-3LW
1.000 17.5 40 )00.0 7 14.6 48 100.0 4 13.2 22 100.02.000 15.0 33 82.5 7 14.6 41 85.4 4 18.2 1g 81083.000 27 67.5 27 67.534 70.8 34 70.8 14 63.6 14 6306
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK QA TA
=-= 566
48517
22409
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000-= 3.0000 3.X5-0TE 3.0000
SUM OF SCORES = 100.0000 123.0000 5400000SUM SQD. SCORES - 274.0000 341.0000 146.0000
2.5625 2.4545SING. DES/. (N) 0.7746 0.7333 0.7620STNO. DEV. = 0.71345 0.7411 0.8004
2.7593 2.7941 2.7143
34. Have you had any special training in the teaching of reading or in instructional
techniques for disadvantaged pupils in connection with your current teaching
assignment?
1 0 Yes
2 0 No
QUESTION 34
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF
1.0002.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
26.831.2
==
MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES =MEAN =STND. OEVe IN) =STND. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN =
46.2 58.053.8 31.2
58.00446.00001.00002.0000
89.2028151.59201.53790.49840.50281.5702
SCORE INTERVALS F pEi----- CF
1.0002.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
265335
==
44.2 60055.8 335
6006
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0300MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000SUM OF SCORES 935.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1605.0000MEAN- 1.5583STND. DCV. (N) = 0.4966STND. OEV. (N-1) = 0.4970MEDIAN 1.6045
P-BLW F PC1 CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-aLbo
100.0 19.7 36.5 53.9 100.0 16.E 38.S 43.1 100.053.8 34..2.--b3.5-----34.2 63.5 26.3 61.1 26.3 61.1
53.9472 43.07937.0000 14.00001.0000 1.00002.0000 2.000088.1923 69.4105
156.6760 122.06E31.6348 1.61120.4814 0.48740.4859 0.49211.7122 1.6b18
P-BLW F PCI CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
100.0 193 34.6 551_100..0 165 39.655.8 365 65,4 40.4
417 100.0. _252 60.4
5587
41714
1.0000 1.00002.0000
923.0000 669.0000'-1653.0000 1173.0000
1.6541 1.60430.4757
.
0.48900.4761 0.48961.7356 1.6726
35. What form did the special training take? (Check all that apply.)
0 Summer workshop or institute
GVeSTION 35 PART A
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
F
45.013.5
PCT CF
76.9 58.523.1 13.5
P-BLW
100.0
F PCT CF
45.4 33.7 54.7
P-8LW F
100.0 36.8
PCT CF P
82.2 44.8 100.023.1 8:7157.98.9
0.2 0.4 0.216.3-8,00.4
17.8 e.0 17.8
CASES PROCESSED = 58.5473 4408052MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 54.7433 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 0.0 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 13.5103 3.0000 7.9658SUM SQD0 SCORES = 13.5103 9.2338 7.9658MEAN 0.2308 10.0012 0.1778STNO. DEV. IN) = 0.4213 0.1687 0.3823STENO. DEV. IN-11 = 0.4250 0.3927 0.3867MEDIAN 0.1500 0.3964 0.1081
0.0975SCORE IN7EkVALS F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLW
0.0 474 78.2 606 100.0 482 85.3 565 100.0 367 85.2 431 100.01.000 132 21.8 132 21.8 81 14.3 83 14.7 64 14.8 64 /4.8
2 0.4 2 0.4CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUE =
606GO--
431565 0.0
MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 0.0 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 132.0000 3.0000 64.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 132.0000 86.0000 64.0000MEAN 0.2178 94.0000 0.1485SIND. DEV. IN) = 0.4128 0.1522 0.3556STNO.DEV. IN -11 = 0.4131 0.3784 0.3560MEDIAN '0.1392 0.3788 0.0872
0.0861
College course (whether or not for degree credit)
QUESTION 35 PART
SCORE INTERVALS
13
F PCT CF P-8LW F 0,1 CF P-BLW r -PtT- CF P-8L.
0.0 4.1 30.6 13.5 100.0 1.6 18.7 8.7 100.0 2.9 36.1 8.0 100.01.000 9.4 69.4 9.4 69.4 7.1 81.3 1.1 817.3-5a- .9 5.1 63.9
CASES PROCESSED 13.5102 8.7176 7.9658MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 9.3811 7.0878 5.0866SON-SQD. SCORES 9.3811 1.0818 5.0866MEAN 0.6944 0.8130 0.6386
OEV. (N) 0.4607 0.3899 0.4804DEV. (N-1) = 0.4787 0.4144 0.5137
MEDIAN 0.7799 0.8850 0.7170
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLS! F PCT CF P -8LW
0.0 39.93
29.5 132 Ippo 1770.5 93 10.5 64
132
81_100.02079.0
___---..._64 79.044
31.3 64 100.068.8 44 68.8
64
1.000
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 93.0000 64.0000 44.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 93.0000 64.0000 44.0000MEAN 0.7045 0.7901 0.6875STNO. DEV. (N) = 0.4562 0.4072STND. DEV. (N-1/ = 0.4580 0.4098
.0.46350.4672
MEDIAN 0.7903 0.8672 0.7727
0 After school or weekend workshop(s)
QUESTION 35
SCORE
PART C
INTERVALS F PCT CF
0.G 9.5 1C.5 13.51.000 4.0- 29.5 400
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VA-CUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SQD. SCORES =MEANSIND. DEV. (N) =SIND. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN =
SCU'RE INTERVALS
0.0.1.000
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUE =MA XI MUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM s1)6:--sCciRtsMEANSIND. OEV. (N) =SIN°. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN
P-BLW F PCT ---CF-1"--8LW F PCT
100.0 5.3 6007 8.7 100.06.7 8A.5 8.0 1000029.5374-39.3 304 39.31.2 15.5 102 15.5
13.5102 8.7176 7.96580.0 0.0 0.01.0000 1.0000 1.00003.9835 3.4259 1.23523.9835 304259 1.23520.2949 003930 0015510.4560 004884 0.36200.4738 005191 0.38710.2091 0.3237 000918
PCT
85_ 64.447 35.6
CF P-BLW
13247
1320.01.0000
47.0000_4.7:66156
0.35610.47880.48070.2765
Oct CF P-BLWF PCT CF P -BLW
10000 47 58.0 81 10000 50 78.1 64 100003506 34 42.0 34 4200 14 21.9 14 21.9
810.01.0000
34.000034000000.41980.49350.49660.3617
640.01.0000
14.000014.00000021880041340.41670.1400
U Released-time workshop(s)
QUESTION 35
-
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
CASES PROCESSED =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SQO. SCORES =MEANSIND. DEV. (N1 =STNO. DEV. 1N-11 =MEDIAN
PART D
SCORE INTERVAL S
O.01.000
CASES PROCESSED _7=
MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSIND. DEV. (N) =SIND. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN
F PCT CF P-BLW C_F "P =3LW 1 PrT Cr P -BLI
84.7 13.5 100.0 7.1 81.1 8.7 100.0 o.8 85.6 5.0 100.015.3 2.1 15.3 r:7-18.-9 1.7 1E69 1.1 14.4 1.1 14.4
13.5102 8.7176 7.96580.0 0.0 0.01.0000 1.0000 leOCCO2.0657 1.6519 1.14442.0657 1.6519 1.14440.1529 0.1895 0.14370.3599 0.3919 0.35070.3740 0.416 0.3/510.0902 0.1169 0.0829
i
_107 81.125 18.9
CF P-BLW F PCT
132 18.8.86425 18.917
CF P-BLW F PCT CFP -BLW
81 100.0 51 79.7 64 100.021.0 17 21.0 13 20.3 13 20.3
132 81 640.0 0.0 0.01.0000 1.0000 1.0000
25._pcloo_25.0000
17.0000 13.000017.0000 13.0000
0.1894 0.2099 0.20310.3918 0.4072 0.40230.3933 0.4098 0.40550.1168 0.1328 0.1275
36. Which of the following areas were explored in the course of the specialtraining you received? (Check all that apply.)
Li New instructional techniques in reading
QUESTION 36
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01. COO
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSTNO. OEV. IN)STND. DEV. 4N-11MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVAL :s
0-01.000
CASES PROCESSED =MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SQO. SCORES =MEANSTND. DEV. IN) =STND. DEV. (N-1) =MEOIAN
PART A
Cr rade 2
F PCT 015-411A
2.0 14.911.5 85.1
13.5 100.011.5 85.1
13.51020.01.0000
11.501011.56100.85130.35580.36980.9126
F PC T CF
17 12.9115^ 87.1
Crraee.. A-F PCT CF F PCT CF p-aLw
1.5 17.7 8.7 100.0 1,2 14. S 8.0 100.07.2 82:3------71-1Ennr- b..8 85.1 6.8 85.1
8.7176 7.96580.0 0.01.0000 1.00007.1789 6.78257.1789 6.78250.8235 0.85150.3813 0.35560.4052 0.38030.8928 0.9128
132 100.0115 87.1
132_------0.01.0000
115.0000115000000.87120.33500.33820.9261
PC T CF PEILW PCT
15 18.5 81 100.0 9 14.1 64 100.066 81.5 66 81.5 55 85.9 55 85.9
81 640.0
1.0000 1.000066.0000 55.000066.0000 55.00000.8148 0.85940.3884 0.34760.3909 -0.35040.8864 0.9182
0 Diagnosis of reading problems
QUESTION 36 PART d
Grade, Crtztae,11- G-ratte..c,-SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
F
1.512.0
PCI
11.3 13.586.7 12.0
CF -P-BLW
100.0
FELT1.1 12.8
I,F F-13LW---
8.7,100.0F PC7
0.3 3.8
CF P-BLil-
8.0 100.08e.7 -7:6-87.2 1.b 131.2 7.7 96.2 1.1 96.2
CASES PROCESSED -4-. 13.5102 8.7176 7.9658WINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 11.9840 7.6014 7.6E31
-31.114-SQD. SCORES 11:9840 7.6014 7.66=7MEAN 0.8870 0.8720 0.9621STNO. DEV. IN) = 0.3166 0.3341 0.1910
-STITIY,-; DENG fN-1) = 0.3290 0.9971 0.2043MEDIAN 0.9363 0.9266 0.S6C3
-----SCORE INTERVAL S F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF-T)=FLW PCT CF P-BLW
0.0 18 13.6 132 100.0 12 14.8 81 100.0 4 6.3 64 100.01.000 114 86.4 114 86.4 64 85.2 69 85.2 60 93.8 60 93.8
CASES PROCE SSED = 132 81 64MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 114.0000 69.0000 60.0000SUM SW. SCORES 114.0000 69.0000 60.0000MEAN 0.8636 0.8519 0.9375STNO. DEV. IN) 0.3432
*0.34450.3552 0.2421
STNO. DEV. (N-1) = 0.3575 0.2440MEDIAN . 0.9211 0.9130 0.9667
0 Open classroom methods
QuEST WN 36 PART C
Clrorte2 Grroe_11- C,racia.L,SCURF INTERVAL S F Pc T --C-F- P---81:ii F PC T CF P -8tW p PCT CF p-aLl.
0.0 9.5 70.0 13.5-4.-1
100.0 4.5 51.9-.MX-472-48.1
8.7 100.0 4.2 52.4 8.0 100.01.000 4.1 30.0 4.2 48.1 3.8 47.6 3.8 47.6
CASES PROCESSEDM IN 'NUM VALUE
==
13.5102OA
8.7176 7.9658070 0.0
MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.000oSUM OF SCORESSUM WO. SCORES
4.05074.0507
4.1895 3.79294.1895 3.7929
MEAN - 0.2998 0.4806 0.4761STND. DEV. IN) = 0.4582 0.4996 0.4954STND. DEV. (N-1) --2 ci-:4761 0.5310 0.5341MEDIAN = 0.2141 0.4626 0.4545
SCORE INTERVAL S F PC T CF P-81.14 F PCT CF P-8Lw F PCT CF P-BLW
0.0_ 89 67.4 132 100.0 46 56.8 81 100.0 38 59.4 64 100.01..000 43 32.6 43 32.6 35 43.2 35 43.2 26 40.6 26 40.6
CASES PROCESSED = 1.32 81 64MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES - 43.0000 35.0000 26.0000SUM SOO. SCORES 43.0000 35.0000 26.0000MEAN 0.3258 0.4321 0.4063STND. DEV. (N) = 0.4687 0.4954 0.4911STND. OEV. IN-11 = 0.4704 0.4985 0.4950MEDIAN = 0.2416 0.3804 0.3421
'QUESTION 36 PART D
0 Individualized instruction
LZ rack Gracke-io
-SCORE INTERVAL S F PC T CF P-BLW r PCT LF P-8114 F PCT CF
0.0 2.9 21.4 13.5 100.0 1.4 16.3 8.7 100.01.9 23.4 8.0 100.01. COO 10.6 78.6 10.6 78..6 7.3 83.7 7'73 83.16.1 76.6 6.1 76.6
CASES PROCESSED--MINIMUM VALUE =
13.51020.0
8.7176 7.96580.0
MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0CCOSUM OF SCORES
-SUM-SOO.= 10.6231 7.2943 6.1022
SCORES = 10.6237 6. 42MEAN 0.7863 0.8367 0.7661STNV. DEV. IN)
DEV. (N-1I==-
0.40990.4260
0.3696 0.42330.4527--D*39Z8
MEDIAN 0.8641 0.9024 0.8413
SCORE INTcRVAIS F PC T CF P-8LW PC T CF P -BLW PO' CF-P-8LW
0.0 27__ 20.5 132-105
100.0 16 19.8 81 100.0 10 15.6 64 100.01.000 105 79.5 79.5 65 80.2 65 80.2 54 84.4 54 84.4
CASES PROCESSED T_-
Wait mu/4 VALUE132._
0.081 640.0 0.0
MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF scpEs___=-___________ 105.0000 65.0000 54.0000SUM WY. SCORE S 105.0000 65.0000 54.0000MEAN = 0.7955 0.8025 0,8438STND. DEV. I N I = 0.4034 0.3981 0.3631STN D. DEV. IN-1) = 0.4049 0.4006 0.3660MEDIAN 0.8714 0.8769 0.9074
El Individual instruction with supervised Praccice teaching
QUESTION 35
SCORE INTERVALS
0.0
PART E
F
11.4
PCT CF
84.4 13.5
P-BLW F
100.0 6.8
PCT
77.7
CF
8.7
15-81W
100.0
F
7.5
PCI CF
94.7 8.0 100.01.000 2.1 15.6 2.1 15.6-71:9 o.4 5.3 0.4 5.3
CASES PROCESSED 13.5102 8.7176 7.9658MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 2.1035 1.9399 0.4197SUM SOD. SCORES 2.1035 71.9399 0.4197MEAN 0.1557 0.2225 0.0527STND. DEV. (NI 0.3626 0.4/59 0.2234STND. DEV. (N-1) 0.3768 --7.1.4421 0.236/MEDIAN 0.0922 0.1431 0.0278
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF F PCT CF P-BLW PCT cri-BLW
0.01.000
CASESPROCESSE0MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESsuA'sQp. SCORESMESTENO. DEV. IN/-Mb. D£ V. (N-1)MEDIAN
47.
110Z2
83.316.7
1320.01.0000
22.0000
13222
--
100.0 64 79.0 81 100.0.60 93..86.3
64
644
100.0_16.7 17 21.0
81
17 21.0 4 6.3
0.01.0000
17.0000
0.01.00004.0000
2'.00000.16670.37276;314T.0.1000
17.00000.20990.4072
4.00000.06250.2421
0.40980.1328
0.24400.0333
El Other (Specify)
QUESTION 35 PART F
SCORE IN TER VAL S F
0 . 0 13.11.000 0.4
PC I CF P-BLW
97.0 13.5 100.03.0 0.4 3.0
F.--
8.0
FC T
91.8 8.7
CF P -BUFF- r100.0 7.9
FCT
59.2
CF P8Lit
8.0 100.0077 8.1 0.7 13.2 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.8
CASES PROCESSED a 13.5102 8.7176 7.9658MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE a 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 0.4008 0.7177 0.0637SUM SOU. SC ORE S 0.4008 0.717-7- 0.0637MEAN 0.0297 0.0823 0.0080STNO. °EV. (N) 0.1697 0.2749 0.0891 ..MID. DEV. IN -11 :-- 0.1763 0.2941. 0.0952MEDIAN m.- 0.0153 0.0449 0.000
SCORE INTERVAL S F PC T CF P-81.,1 F PCT CF P -BLW F PC T CF P8LW
U. 0 128 97.0 132 100.0 35. 92.6 81 100.0 63 98.4 ________,64 _100.0_..-- -7.4 6 7.4 11.000 4 3.0 4 3.0 6 1.6 1 1.6
CASES PROCESSED 7:
MINIMUM iiAL UE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SOO . SC ORE S =ME ANSTNO. OEV . ( 14)
1320.01.00004.0000.4- odob0.03030.1714
...0:1110.0156
81. 640.01.00006.0000
0.01.00001.0000
6.00000.07410.2619
1.00000.01560.1240
STNO. DE V .---IN.:i i. =MEDIAN =
0.26350.0400
._-- _-- - .._0.12500.0079
QUESTION 36 PART E
Use of equipment and materials
SCORE INTERVALS
1.000
F
3.310.2
Crircul
PCT
24.8 13.5'75.2 10.2
CrtaLde4 erradie_t.CF P-OLW
100.0
F PCT CF P-BLW
2.0 22.7 8.7 100.0
F PLT
0.9 11.4
Cr P -8Lw
8.0 100.075-.2 6.7 77.3 6.7 7.3 7.1 88.6 7.1 88.6
CASES PROCESSED 13.5102 8.7176 7.9658MINIMOMNALUE --= 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 10.1649 6.7422 7.05E3-8UM-S06.-tC0kES = 10.1649 6.7422 7.0563MEAN 0.7524 0.7734 0.8E61STNO. DEV. IN/ 0.4316 0.4186 0.3177
0.4485 0.4449 0.3398MEOIAN 0.8354 0.835 0.9357
SCORE INTERVALS-- F PCT CF P-664 F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
0.0 33 25.0 132_100.0 19 23.5 81 100.0 9 14.1 64 100.01.000 99 75.0 99 75.0 62 76.5 62 76.5 55 85.9 55 85.9
CASES PROCESSED = 132 81 64MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 99.0000 62.0000 5500000SUM SOD. SCORES = .99.0000 62.0000 55.0000MEAN 0.7500 0.7654 0.8594STNO. DEV. (N) = 0.4330 0.4237 0.3476STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.4347 0.4264 0.3504MEDIAN 0.8333 0.8468 0.9182
QUESTION 36 PART R
Techniques for cultural enrichment
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT
Gotten.CF P-BLW
0.0 6.9 51.3 13.5 100.01.000 6.6 48.7 6.6 48.7-
CASES PROCESSED--MINIMUM VALUE
MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES-SUM SQD. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. (N)STND. DEV. (N-1)MEDIAN
13.51020.01.00006.58026.5E020.48710.49980,51940,4748
i P -JAW I e-b A
5.2 55.8-3.5-6-0-.2
8.7 100.0 4.5 1-.6.9 8.0 100.i3.5 40.2 3.4 43.1 3.4 43.
1141hKVALS
0.01,000
_cASS PROCSSSED
r rt. a
72 54.5 132.100.060 45.5 60 45.5
132MINIMUM VALUE 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 60.0000SUM SO. SCORES 60.0000MEAN 0.4545STND. DEV. (N)_ = 0.4979STNO. DEV. (N-li = 0.4998MEOIAN 0.4107
8.71760.01.00003.50533.50530.40210.4903075Zr/0.3362
PCT CF P-BLW F PCT
33 40.7 33 40.7 30
810.01.0000
33.000033.00000.40740.49140.49440.3438
46.9
7.96580.01.00003,42123.42120.43070.45520.5255
640.01.0000
30.oppo_30.00000.4688
CF P-BLW
64 100.030 46.9
0.4990_ . _ _ _
0.50300.4412
0 Other (Specify)
QUESTION 36
SCORE INTERVALS
PART G
&a:1e2 CK043e-
F PCT CF *P-81..W rPrr CF
0.6 13.1 96.8 13.5 100.01.060 0.4 3.2 0.4 3.2
CASES PROCESSED = 13.5102MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0_-MAXIMUM VALUE - 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 0.4316
--SUM S00. SCORES = 0.4316MEAN 0.0319STNC. DEV. (N) =
--fi46. DEV. -(N-1)-=0.17590.1828
MEDIAN 0.0165
SCORE INTERVALS
O.01.000
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUMMEANSTND. DEV. (N)
OEV. IN -11MEDIAN
F PCT
8.3 95.8-Z.4 4.2
CF P-BLW. F PCT
127 96.2 132 _100,05 3.8 5 3.8
=
==
1320.01.00005.00005.0000
= 0.0379= 0.1909- 0.4916
0.0197
8.71760.01.00006.36820.36820.04220.20110.21380.0221
P -SLW F
8.7 100.0 7.30.4 4.2 O.T
PCT CF
91.8 6.08.2 0.7
7,96580.01.00000.65420.65420.06210.27460.29360,0447
P-BLW
100.08.2
77 95.14 4.9
.CF P-BLW F PCT
810.01.00004.00004.00000.04940.21670.21800.0260
81 100.0 62 96.94 4.9 2 3.1
64
CF P-BLW
64 100.02 3.1
0.01.00002.00002.00000.03130.17400.17540.0161
37. Over what time period did the special training extend?
One summer
One academic semester
One academic year
C-i.e calendar year
One summer and one academic year
(:11 Other (Specify)
SCORE INTEKVALS F
(1X044PCT CF
1.000 20 22.2 902.000. 6 6.7 703.000 11 12.2 644.000 2 2.2 535.000 23 25,6 516.000 28 31.1 28
P-BLW F
Grme.CF -01.66W-
Grade.6Z-F P BLW
100.0 19 33.9 56 100.0 17 36.2 47 100.077.8 3 5.4 37 66.1 2 4.3 30 63.871.1 1 1.8 34 60.7 2 4.3 28 59.658.9 1 1.8 33 58.9 0 0.0 26 55.1_56.7 11 19.6 32 57.1 14 29.8 26 55.331.1 21 37.5 21 37.5 12 25.5 12 25.5
CASES PROCESSEDND. BLANK DATA
==
9042
5625
4717
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 6.0000 6.0000 6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 356.0000 213.0000 169.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 1758.0000 1087.0000 825.0000MEAN' 3.9556 3.8036 3.5957SIND. DEV. IN) = 1.9715 2.2234 2.1503STNO. OEV. IN-1)
._MEDIAN= 1.9826
4.76092.2435 2.17364.8636 4.6786
QUESTION 37
SCORE INTERVALS F(.1111.40)
PCT CF P-EILW r(rnalt.
PCTOde.6
CF-P-
1.CCO 2.2 26.3 8.5 100.0 1.7 2d.2 6.2 100.0 2.s; 6 I 100.02.000 0.7 8.6 6.3 73.7 0.3 4.9 -4;4-7178-0.3 4.4 2.2 52.63.000 C.9 10.7 5.5 65.1 0.1 2.1 4.1 67.0 U.1 2.4 2.9 48.24.000 0.2 2.3 4.6 54.4 J.2 3.6 4.0 64.8 0.0 0.0 2.d 45.85.000 1.9 22.4 4.4 52.2 1.4 22.0 Z.d6.CCC 2.5 29.8 2.5 29.8 2.4 38.4 2.4 38.4 1,4 2L1.
CASES PROCESSED = 9.4594 -6.1606NO. BLANK DATA = 42.0000 24.0000 17.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0060MAXIMUM VALUE = 6.0000 6.000u t.CCCCSUM OF SCORES - 31.8E65 24.8468 1.0543SUM SQO. SCORES = 155.0883 128.0183 68.t:523MEAN 3.7518 4.0332 3.1240STNO, DEV, TN) = 2,0422 2.1245 2,1815SIND. DEV. TN-I) = 2.1741 2.3213 2.3658MEnIAN 4.5970 -4.9924- 2.13-8-sT
38. How long ago did you receive your special training?
Less
DMore
than one year ago
than one but labs than
but less than
years ago
D More than two
Three or more
QUESTION 38
SCORc INTERVALS
two years ago
three years alt;
Crin 46 1
PCT CF P-BLW PCT
GrraAeACF P-BLW
CrtukeioPLT CF 13-6Lw
1.000 2.e 18.1 12.4 100.0 1.4 15.6 7.3 100.0 2.4 32.2 7.5 100.02.000 3.5 26.2 10.1 81..9 1.5 20.1' . -1 .4 6-1.d3.000 2.7 21.5 6.6 53.7 1.6 21.8 4.4 60.2 U.6 10.6 2.8 49.64.000 4.0 32.2 4.0 32.2 2.8 38.5 2.8 38.5 3.0 39.2 3.0 35.2
CASES PRUCESSEUNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOLO. SCORESMEANSTNC. ()EV. (N)SIND. DEV. (N-1)MEDIAN
=
=
=
12.374811.00001.00004.0000
33.1509103.9476
2.6789'1.10611.15372.6735
7.319811.0000
4.000020.4288
7.5372
'.9(401.00004.000019.3519
2.56751.[S40
66;7272-2 . 7909
1.1519
2.97031.36952.4E12
scupr 1NTtiRVALS F PC.T CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-BLW".
1.000 26 2:.5 121 100.0 14 20.0 70 100.0 20 33.3 60 100.02.000 30 24.8 95 78.5 15 21.4 -80.0 14 23.3 40 66.73.000 21 17.4 65 53.7 13 18.6 41 58.6 8 13.3 26 43.34.000 44 36.4 44 36.4 78 40.0 28 40.0 18 30.0_ 18 30.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OA' TA
12111
7011
604
MINIMUM VALUE 1.006o 1.0660 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCIRES 325.0000 195.0000 144.0000SUM SOC. SCORES 1039.0000 6 39. odix) 436.006UMEAN 2.6860 ?.7F57 2.4000SINK). (N) 1.1715 1-IAA& 1.2275STNC. 7JEV. IN-1, 1.1764 ./182- 1.'2318MEDIAN 2.7143 2.9615 2.2143
39. For a typical pupil in your compensatory reading program, about howmuch in-school time is devoted to each of the following reading orreading-related activities?
Basic reading instructional
QUESTION 39
SCORE 1NTERVAL-S
1.000 0.32..000 0.3.000 7.34.000 5.5
Less than Between More than 11 hour 1 and 4 hour a day(5+
None per week hours/week hours/week
0Gioule2,
PCT CP isz-81W
2.1 13.2 100.01.3 13.0 97;1
54.9 12.8 96.641.8 5.5 41.8
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OA TA
==
13.23363.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VAL UE - 4.0000SUM OF SCORES - 44.5043SUM SOO. SCORES = 154.7277MEAN 3.3630STND. OEV. (N) 0.6184STN0, = 0.6432-MEDIAN 3.3498
SCORE INTERVALS
2:0063.0004.000
F pC1
3 2.3-2
75 58.149 38.0
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =
1293
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE - 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 428.0000SUM SOO. SCORES = 1470.0000MEAN 3.3178STND._OFV._ (N)__.. 0.6224STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.6248MEDIAN 3.2933
CF p-BLw
F
0.4
PC I
5.7
F
0.0
PCT"
0.0
CF-P-EILW
8.0 100.0
-CF
7.8 100.0UB5.51. 8
11.468.322.4
8.0 100.07.3 90.61.8 22.4
0.95.70.7
11.87?..49.2
1.3 94.36.4 82.50.7 9.2
8.0492 7.75413.0000 1.00002.0000 1.00004.0000 4.000025.1960 22.1812131.2872 66.68163.1302 2.66060.5480 0.64550.5856 0.61163.0954 2.9436
F PCT CF F CF P -8L1
129 100.0 1.3 78 100.0 3 4.8 63 100.0126 97.7 8 10.3 77 98.7 8 12.7 60 95.2124 96.1 51 65.4 69 88.5 47 74.6 52 82.549 38.0 18 23.1 18 23.1 5 7.9 5 7.9
78 633 1
_
1.00004.0000
242.0000780.0000
3.10260.61160.61563.0882
1.00004.0000
180.0000538.0000
2.85710.61350.61852.9362
Compensatory reading
QUESTION 39
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.CCC3.0004.CCO
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA -MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSTND. DEV. IN) =SIND. DEV. IN-11 =MEO1AN
SCORE INTEkVALS
PART B
0 0
&DAC,/ C911216APA'
F PCT CF P-BLW -F---PCT CFWIFER--
0.2 0.34.5 8.536.8 68.612.1 22.7
53.6 100.0 0.3 0.553.4 99.7 -5 0 Ta48.9 91.238.5 75.612.1 22.7 7.1 14.0
53.597739.00001.00004.0000
168.0863543.4351
3.13610.55150.55683.1012
F PCT
50.8 100.0 0.450.6 99.5 5.545.6 89.7 30,27.1 14.0 5.0
50.836536.0000
-174:101r0
4.0000154.1399480.4292
3.03210.50700.51203.0244
ci=
C.9 41.2 100.012.4 40.8 99.172.5 35.3 85.612.2 5.0 12.2
CF P-BLW F PC1.------ ---------
CF P-BLW F
41.16GS28.00001.00004.0000
122.33E0373.46582.97150.53640.54502.9865
CF P-BLW
1.000 2 0.4 566 100.0_ 3 0.6 528 100.0 4 1.0 403 1b0.02.000 51 9.0 564 99.6 54 10.2 525 99.4 61 15.1 399 99.03.000 391 69.1 513 90.6 393 74.4 471 89.2 288 71.5 338 83.94.000 122 21.6 122 21.6 78 14.8 78 14.8 50 12.4 50 12.4
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =MIN ?MUM_ VALUE -
566401.0600
52831
40328
1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1765.0000 1602.0000 11'90.0000SOM-SOD. SCORES = 5677.'0000 5004.0000 36.,0.0000MEAN 3.1184 3.0341 2.9529STND. OEV. = 0.5530 0.5211 0.5594SIND. DEV. 1 NL11-= 0.5216 0.5601MEDIAN 3.0882 3.0267 2.9740
Instructional program (onlyif compensatory reading pro-gram is different from basic E:3
instructional program)
QUESTION 39
SCORE INTERVAL S
PART C
F
1.000 7.82.000 4.13.000 12.84.000 2.4
Grtuie."2.,PCT
28.9
CF P-8LW
27.1 100.0
F
7.715.3 19.3 71.1 4.647.1 15.2 55.8 13.88.7 2.4 8.7 2.8
CASES PROCESSES = 27.1490NO. BLANK DATA = 313.0000MINIMUM VAL UE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 63.9842SUM ..SO: SCORE S = 177.4404'MEAN 2.3568STND. DEV. (N) = 0.9906
0E41.' (N -I) = 1.0094MEDIAN 2.6238
Gmdteii- G-ratiePCT
26.715.847.79.8
CF 17-.-BLW F
28.9 100.0 8.421.2 73.3 5.416.7 57.5 10.82.8 9.8 0.9
SCORE INTERVAL S
1.0002.0003.0004.000
F
834513523..
PC T
29.015.747.28.0
_ ...
CF
28620315823
P-.81W
100.0
F
8171.055.28.0
4614532
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
====
286320
MINIMUM VAL UEMAXIMUM VALUE
1.00004.0000
SUM OF SCORES = 670.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1846.0000MEAN = 2.3427SIND. DEV. (N) = 0.9831SIND. °EY. (N-1 ) = 0.9848MEDIAN = 2.6111
28.9351250.0000
1.00004.000069.6543
195.41592.40730.9855i.ouZV2.6582
PCT CF 11-.11-w
32.7 25.6 100.0214, 17.2 67.342.4 11.8 .46.03.6 41.9 3.6
25.5560/55.00001.00004.0000
55.4429142.4064
2.16930.93060.94942.3129
PC T
26.615.147.710.5
CF P-8LW F
304 100.0 75223 73.4 48177 58.2 9932 10.5 10
304261
1.00004.0000
736.00002082.0000
2.42110.99360.99522.6724
PCT
32.3
CF
232 100.020.7 157 67.742.7 109 47.04.3 10 4.3
232199
1.00004.0000
508.00001318.0000
2.18970.94150.94352.3542
Reading in content areas(Science, Social Studies,etc.)
QUESTION 39
SCORE INTERVALS
PART 0
D
GroffF PCT CF
Ckllakt4F CF
Gee. 6P.3LW F PCT CF Pi3L0
1.000 3.8 6.9 55.4 100.0 3.1 5.9 52.1 100.0 2.7 6.5 41.5 100.02.000 18.5 33.3 51.'6 93: 1 94.1 6.8 i6.4 3b.8 93.53.000 30.5 55.1 33.1 59.8 31.5 60.6 41.3 79.4 22.4 53.9 32.0 77.14.000 2.6 4.6 2.6 4.6 9.8 18.9 9.8 18.9 9.6 23.1 9.6 23.1
CASES PROCESSED 55.4018 52.0538 41.52G1NO. BLANK DATA 26.0000 23.0000 26.000CMINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 142.6578 152.2260 121.9510
-Son SCORES 474.5356 365.2126MEAN 2.5750 2.9244 2.9172STND. DEV. (N) 0.6895 0.7511 0.6068
OEV.x.698 0. (584 0.8167
MEDIAN 2.6770 2.9859
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 44 7.6 580 100.0 34 6.3 541 100.0 :o 7.4 404 100.02.000 201 34.7 536 92.4 88 16.3 507 93.7 70 17.3 374 92.63.000 315 54.3 335 57.8 324 59.9 419 77.4 211 52.2 304 75.24.000 20 3.4 20 3.4 95 17.6 95 17.6 93 23.0 93 23.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
Mit 58026
541.
2440427
M I NI-RUN VTOTE 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1471.0000 1562.0000 1175.0000SiTM rdr5. SCORES 4003.0000 4822.0000 369 .0000MEAN 2.5362 2.8872 2.9084STND. DEV. ( N)
-TTNO.0.6851 0.7596 0.8319
DEV. N11 0.6857 0.7603 0.8330MEDIAN 2.6429 2.9583 2.9834
Independetit (self-selected)reading
QUESTION 39
SCORE INTERVALS
PIR1 E
Groat% Ghtele.4-F PCT CF P-81W F PIT LF 1J7-13LW
ComJle.F PCT CF P-1:13LW
1.000 0.7 1.2 55.8 100.0 0.9 1.7 51.8 100.0 0.3 G.7. 41.8 100.02.000 21.9 39.3 55a--913V.8 20.6 31.1 50.9 95.3 /01 36.2 41.5 99.33.000 30.1 54.0 33.2 59.6 28.1 54.3 30.4 58.6 22.3 26.4 63.14.000 3.1 5.6 3.1 5.6 2.2 4.3 2.2 4.3 4.1 9.7 4.1 9.7
CASES PROCESSED 55.7642 51.8406 41.7871NO. BLANK DATA 22.0000 28.0000 22.00G0MINIMUM VALUE 1.60130 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0(100 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 147.2185 135.4043 113.7169SUM SOD. SCORES 409.02-59 372.2461 326.5854MEAN 2.6400 2.6119 2.7213SIND. DEV. (N) 0.6043 0.5987 0.6401STND. DEV. IN-li 0.6098' 0.6045 0.6479MEDIAN 2.6771 2.6585 2.7451
SCORE INTERVAL F PCT CO-P-BLW F PCT__ 0:41.7 F CF P -BLWPCT
1.000 9 1.5 584 100.0 10 1.9 536 100.0 3 0.7 408 100.02,000 225 38.5 575 98.5 220 41.0 526 98.1 162 39.7 405 99.33.000 326 55.8 350 59.9 286 53.4 306 57.1 212 52.0 243 59.64.000 24 4.1 24 4.1 20 3.7 20 3.7 31 7.6 31 7.6
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATA
==
58422
53629
40823
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1533.0000 1388.0000 1087.0000SUM SO. SCORES = 4227,0000 3784.0000 3055.0000MEAN 2.6250 2.5896 2.6642STND. DEV. IN) = 0.5394 0.5949 0.6243tfNO. OEV. (N-1) = 0.5049 0.5955 0.6250MEDIAN 2,6779 2.6329 2.6840
Library activities
QUESTION 39
SCORE INTERVALS
PARI F
0 p 0
(x04WP Grazte.A.F PCT CO P-BLW F PCT CFP-F-W
1.000 1.9 3.42.000 38.8 70.03.000 14.3 25.74.000 0.5 C.9
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =-MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SQD. SCORES =MEAN
DEV. (N) =-.SIND. DEV. (N-1)MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
CrtadtF PLY P-a.
55.4 100.0 1.7 3.3 52.0 100.0 2.0 4.8 42.3 100.053.5-96.6 37.4 72.0 50.3 96.1 25.8 61.0 40.3 v5.214.8 26.6 12.3 23.6 12.8 24.7 13.9 32.9 14.5 34.20.5 0.9 0.6 1.1 0.6 1.1 0.5 1.3 0.5 1.3
55.4440 51.9944 42.295326.0000 24.0000 20.00001.0000 1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000 4.0000
124.2526-293.3608-
115.7079 97.558927 6 239.1716
2.2410 2.2254 2.30660.5185
-0.5232-0.5119 0.57820.5169 0.5852
2.1658 2.1487 2.2406
PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF
1.000 18 3.1 580 100.0 19 3.5 541 100.0 222.000 417 71.9 562 96.9 390 72.1 522 96.5 2573.000 141 24.3 145 25.0 127 23.5 132 24.4 1264.000 4 0.7 4 0.7 5 0.9 5 0.9 5
5.462.730.71.2
P-864
410 100.0388 94.6131 32.0
5 1.2
CASES PROCESSEDND. BLANK DATA
58026
54124
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1291.0000 1200.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 3019.0000 2802.0000MEAN 2.2259 2.2181SIND. DEV. IN) 0.5007 0.5092SIND. DEV. IN-11 = 0.5011 0.5097MEDIAN 2.1523 2.1449
410211.00004.0000
934.00002264.0000
2.27800.57660.57732.2121
Enrichment activities (in-clude trips, specialassemblies, etc.)
QUESTION 39 PART G
SCORE INTERvAS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM NACREMAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES ='SUM SQn. SCORESMEANSTNC. (*V. (N)
0Ev.*-CWq)MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM-VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSIND. 0EV. IN)STNO. :REV. (N-1)MEDIAN
0
Cyrouiel. c r ae_ 4 GrwietoF PCT CF-P-ECK F PCT CF P-BLW F T
11.636.94.80.0
21.8 53.3 100.0 11.2 22.1 50.8 100.0 10.5 25.3 41.7 100.069.2 41.7 78;2-33:7 66..3 39.6 t7.9 26.1 64.1 31.1 74.76.9 4.8 8.9 5.6 11.1 5.9 11.6 3.8 9.2 4.4 10.60.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.6 1.4 0.6 1.4
53.3190 50.7745 41.696336.0000 38.0000 26.000G1.0000 EONNUY--- -raZ003.0000 4.0000 4.0000
99.7779 96.4685 77.8424202.2250 400.b630 161.2635
1.8713 1.8999 1.86660.5393 0.5837 0.61840.5444 0.5895 0.6 2601.9070 1.9209 1.8852
F PCT ii:iitTri PCT CF P-8LW PCT CF P -81W
119 20.9 569_100.0_12fL__23.9 527 100.0 106 26.2 404 100.0397 69.8 450 79.1 341 64.7 401 76.1 261 64.6 298 73.853 9.3 53 9.3 57 10.8 60 11.4 33 8.2 37 9.20 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.6 3 0.6 4 1.0 4 1.0
=
==
56937
52738
40427
1.0000 1.0000 1.00003.0000 4.0000 4.0000
1072.0000 991.0000 743.0000164.0000 2051.0000 1511.0000
1.8840 1.8805 1.8391= D.5374 0.5964, 0.5981= 0.5379 0.5970 0.5989
1.91 i9 1.9032 1.8678
Other relevant activities(Specify)
QUESTION 39 PART H
0 Q
Grae.,10SCORE INTERVALS
1.000
F PCT
36.0
CF
9.6
P-BLW
100.0
F
4.3
PCT
52.5
CF
8.1
P-BLW
100.0
F
4.2
PCT
5.5.8
CF
7.6
P-IiiLW
100.02.000 2.3 24.6 6.1 64.0 2.3 28.1 3.9 47.5 2.4 31.2 3.3 44.23.000 3.6 38.1 3.8 39.4 1.5 18.1 1.6 19.4 V.7 8.7 1.0 12.94.000 0. 1 1.3 0.1 1.3 0.1 1.3 0.1 1.3 0.3 4.2 0.3 4.2
CASES PROCESSED 9.5672 8.1237 7.5514NO. BLANK OATAMINIMUM VALUE
498.0000 463.0000 358.00001.606-6 1.0000 1.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 19.5928 13,6661 12.1845SUM SQO. SCORES 41.;7061 28.3336 24.6855MEAN 2.0479 1.6822 1.6134STND. DEV. (N) 0.8902 0.8111 0.8158STNO. OEV. (N-1) 0.9407 0.8661 0.8759MEDIAN 2.0701 1.4522 1,3954
F F PCT e.F F PCTSCORE LNTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 35 37.2 94 100.0 49 57.6 85 100.0 37 56.9 65 100.02.000 26 27.7 59 62.8 20 23.5 36 42.4 18 27.7 28 43.13.000 32 34.0 33 35.1 14 16.5 16 18.8 7 10.8 10 15.44.000 1 1.1 1 1.1 2 2.4 2 2.4 3 4.6 3 4.6
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
94512
85480
65366
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1,0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 400000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 187.0000 139.0000 106.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 443.0000 .87.0000-MEAN 1.9894 1.6353 1.6308STNO. DEV. (N) 0.8690 0.8380 0.8516STNO. DEV. (N-1) 0.8737 0.8430 0.8582MEDIAN 1.9615 1.3673 1.3784
40. Please Indicate below what materials you use in your compensatory readinginstruction, and to what extant you use them.
Use as major Use as supple- Occasionally Don'tresource in mental or op- refer to my- useteaching tional course self but don't at
Series Titles(Specify) reading in class use in class allScott Foresman
SCORE INTERVALS
1.00C2.0003.000
ZASTI-PRXEsSED =NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE =-104TATA-WituE---=SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORES
STND. OEV. (N) =STND. OEV. (N-1) =
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE .MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF .SCORESSUM SAD. SCORES -MEANSTND. OEV. (N) =STND. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN
CriadaF -pCT cF Pt&A64LIF-15=4kiw F PCT CF P -BLw
6
18.8 40.4 46.5 100.0 13.5 32.5 41.6 100.0 14.9 55+C 27.2 100.027.0. -1i5...2--. '27.7 59.6 2-8;0- 67..L 28.1 67;751;=275 12.2 45.00.7 1.4 0.7 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 1.2 4.3 4.8 17.6
3.6 13.2 3.6 13.2
137,0000 27.1834. 1.0000 179.0000
46;4927126.00001.00003760-074.8850
133.0039
0.51620.5218
F PCT CF
170..
139 35.010 2.578 -(=k
3972278878
397209
1.00004.0000
790.00002064.0000
1.98997.1132.1.11461.7050
3.00007-69.8869126.7115
1.671190.47460.48041.7608
P-BLW F PCT
10040 137 32.557.2 283 67,122.2 2 0.519.6
42a1431.0000
CF P-BLW
1.00004.0000
47.7977112.95071.75831.03121.05071.4058
PCT
422 100.0 134 53,8285 67.5 70 28.1
2 0.5 10 4.0AS 14.1
CF P -BLW
249 100.01115 46.245 18.135 14.1
3,0000709.00001287.0000
1.68010.47650.47711.7615
249182
1.00004.0000
444.00001064.0000
1.78311.04571.04781.4291
qO!k
Sc.dif Plresh,All
SCORE INTERVALS
&rcule 2
FPCT
CF PBLW
0
C;
PCt
a
va
P -BLW
FPCT
CFPBLW
1.000
12.6
31.7
39.7
100.0
9.Y
27.6
36.0
100.0
4.5
!C.0
9.0
100.0
2.000
26.7
67.2
27.1
68.3
25.6
71.1
26.1
72.4
2.9
32.5
4.5
50.0
3.000
0.4
1.1
0.4
1.1
0.5
1.3
0.5
1.3
0.4
4.1
1.6
17.5
1.2
13.4
1.2
13.
CASES PROCESSED
39.7044
W:9951
NO. BLANK DATA
195.0000
203.0000
9.13149
MINIMUM VALUE
1.0000
1.0000
352.0000
MAXIMUM! VALUE
3;6665
3.0000
1.0000
SUM OF SCORES
67.2565
62.5459
4.00G0
SUM SQO. SCORES
123.2255
116.5986
16.3139
MEAN
.-
f.6939
1.7376
38.9133
STND. DEV. IN/
0.4839
0.4690
1.8CS7
STNO. DEV. 0-1)
WOTAN--
----
0.490/
1.7722
0.4757
1.02C6
1.8154
1.0824
1.50C4
SCORE INTERVALS
FPCT
CFPBLW
-PCT
CF P -BLW
FPCT
CF
P -81W
1.000
64
40.3
159
100.0
94
26.4
356
100.0
32
44.4
72
100.0
2.000
65
40.9
95
59.7
25?
72.2
262
73.624
33.3
40
55.6
3.000
00.0
30
18.9
51.4
51.4
45.6
16
22.2
4.000
30
18.9
30
18.9
12
16.7
12
16.7
CASES PROCESSED
NO. BLANK DATA
159
447
356
209 1.0000
72
359
r WORM VALUE
1.0000
3.0000
1.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE
4.0000
623.0000
4.0000
SUM OF SCORES
314.0000
1167.0000
140.0000
SQL). SCORES
804.0000
1.7500
356.0000
MEAN
1.9748
0.4643
1.9444
STND. DEV. (NI
1.0755
0.4650
1.0787
STND. OEV. (N1)
1.0789
1.8268
1.0863
MEDIAN
1.7385
1.6667
q0(c) Scat+ roviesman
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA -MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORESMEANSTNO. 0EV. (N) =STND. uEV. (N-1)MEOIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
F PCF-1-cude2-CF P-BLW F PCP.-1"c"le-6-1513111 F PC14311-1 P-BLW
12.2 33.1 37.0 100.0 6.0 21.0 28.8 100.0 4.5 31.924.5 66.3 24.7 66.9'27:5--7-8:70- 79,0 4.1 29;20.2 0.6 0.2 0.6 0.3 1.0 0.3 1.0 0.5 la
4.9 35.136.9658
224.00001.00003.0000
61.8968112.17081.67440.48030.48701:7544
F PCT
14.1 100.09.6 68.15.5 38.84.9 35.1
CF F PCT
4b. f !UV
260.00001.0000
51.810498.45051.80050.42410.4317L.8719
CF P-BLW
14.0628253.0CCC
1.00004.000034.0295
--1(74.63212.41981.25891.30622.1113
F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 101 37.3 271 100.0 65. 217 100.0 37 28.2 131 100.02.000 66 24.4 170 62.7 228 76.8 232 78.1 37 28.2 94 71.83.000 9 3.3 104 38.4 4 1.3 4 1.3 6 4.6 57 43.54.000 95 35.1 95 35.1 38.9 51 38.9
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
271335.
29726B
1.0000131300
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 3.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 533.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORES
==
640.00001966.0000
/913.0000 333.00001.7946 1055.0000
MEAN 2.3616 0.4360 2.5420STNO. 0EV. IN) = 1.2951 0.4368 1.2616STK/. DEV. (N-1) = 1.2975 1.8662 1.2665MEDIAN 2.0227 2.2703
'41(d ) Harper Row
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
F
9.S20.30.t.
G.Y.04,de 1PCT CF
32.3 30.865.8 20.91.9 0.6
100.067.71.9
r:..4^et A.- to
6.1ma-TxTr--0.2
F PCT LF
26.1 23.2 100.0
F PCT CF P-BLW
1.5 23.0 6.4 100.017.2
0.8 0.273.90.8
2.7 41.6 5.0 77.00.3 5.0 2.3 35.42.0 30.4 2.0 30.4
CASES PROCESSED = 30.8115 IN:2758NO. BLANK OA TA = 292.0000 310.0000 6.4463MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 367.0000MAXIMUM. VALUE - 3.0600 3.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 52.2660 40,5785 4.0000SUM SQD. SCORESMEW.
96.31621.6960
75.6633 15.65E146.48E21--.7r4/1
STNO. DEV. IN1 = 0.4990 0.4531 2.4267STNO. DEV. IN-11 0,5073 0.4632 1.1459MEDIAN 1.7691 1.8269 1.2467
2.1492
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 61 46.9 130 100.0 64 26.2 244 100.0 10 17.9 56 I00.02.000 30 23.1 69 53.1 178 73.0 180 73.8 24 42.9 46 82.13.000 1 0.8 39 30.0 2 0.8 2 0.8 2 3.6 22 39.34.000 38 29.2 38 29.2 20 35.7 20 35.7
CASES PROCESSED =NO. 3LANK.DATA =
130476
244321
1.000056375
MINIMUM VALUE = I;i5060- 3.0000 170-01:r0--MAXIMUM VALUE - 4.0000 426.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 276.0000 794.0000 144.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 798.0000 1.7459 444.0000MEAN 2.1231 0.4538 2.5714STND. DEV. IN1 = 1.2771 0.4547 1.1473
IN -11 = 1.2820 1.8258 1.1577MEDIAN -- 1.6333 2.2500
1-10(.0 blo.vper Rot*,
SC0RE INTERVALS F PC CF P-BLW^ AA& Ya e
CF P-8140-15Cqlr P-BLW f_ard
PCT
1.000 7.3 29.6 24.6 100.0 4.3 22.3 19.1 100.0 0.3 7.1 3.8 100.02.000 16.3 66.2 17.3 70.4 o 14.3 77.7 1.3 32.7 3.6 92.93.00c 1.0 4.2 1.0 4.2 0.5 2.6 0.5 2.6 0.2 4.2 2.3 60.1
2.1 55.9 2.1 55.4CASES PROCESSED 24.5543 19.0540NU. BLANK DATA 345.0000 354.0000 3.8311MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 385.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 42.8871 34.3537 4.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 81.6301 65.9531 11.8342hitAN 1.7466 1.6030 41.0165SIND. DEV. IN) 0.5233 0.4590 3,0890STNO. DEV. IN-11 C.5342 0.4716 1.0791MEDIAN -.= 1.8085 1.8667 1.2553
3.609
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT C! P-BLW
1.000 36 37.9 95 100.0 43- 21.4 2PILWP!.0. 10.5 38 100.028.9 34 89.52.000 23 24.2 59 62,1 153 76.1 158 78.6 11
3.000 5 5.3 36 37.9 5 2.5 5 2.5 2 5.3 23 60.54.000 31 32.6 31 32.6 21 55.3 21 55.3
CASES PROCESSED 95idi364 38
NO. BLANK DATA 511 1.0000 393MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 3.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 364.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 221.0000 116.0000SUM SAO. SCORES 669.0000
_70.0.9000
1.8109 402.0000MEAN 2.3263 0.4506 3.0526sTNp. DEV. (NJ 1.2769 _qp418 1.1227
1.1377SIND. DEV. 1 N-1) 1.2836 1.8758MEDIAN 2.0000 3.5952
0(c) ecTei Roy,/
SCORE INTERVALSG v-
F PC-1- CF P-8Lw__C4L_ArwAp 4 av&d., 4
F PC7 CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-ELW
1.000 6.3 30.9 20.3 100.0 3.4 23.8 14.2 100.0 .1 34.3 14.9 100.02.000 13.6 67.1 14.0 69.1 NT 7174- 10.8 76.2 4.0 7Z7.0 9.W 65.73.000 C.4 2.0 0.4 2.0 9.7 4.8 0.7 4.8 0.8 5.6 5.8 38.7
4.9 33.2 4.9 33.2GASES PROCESSED = 20.2561NO. BLANK DATA = 351.0000 403.0000 14.8655MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 279.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.0000 3.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 34.6667 25.7188 4.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 64.3122 50.0898 35.3241MEAN 1.71.14 1.8094 107.4830-STNC. °EV. (NJ = 0.4960 0.5000 2.3762STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.5087 0.5186 1,2585
MEDIAN 1.7848 1.8665 1.30312.0885
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-8Lw
1.000 100 36.2 276 100.0 40 26.5-70.9---7--"-
151 100.0 48 33.1 145 100.02.000 68 24.6 176 63.8 107 111 73.5 S9 26.9 97 66.93.000 4 1.4 1.08 39.1 4 2.6 4 2.6 7 4.8 58 40.04.000 104 37.7 104 37.7 51 35.2 51 35.2
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
=-
2763?0
151414
1.0000145286
MINIMUM VALUE' = 1.0000 3.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 266.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 664.0000 504.0000 351.0000SSW SQ 3. SCORES = 2C72.0000 1.7616 1C83.0000MEAN 2.4058 0.4843 2.4207STND. ,EV. (N1-SYND-.-
= 1.3113 0.4859 1.2686()EV. (N-11 = 1.3136 1.8316 1.2730
MEDIAN 2.0588 2.1282
Macmillan
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.CGC
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSIND. DEV. IN/STNO. DEV. IN-1)MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0006.000
CASES. PROCESSED =NO, BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOO. SCORES =MEANSTNO. DEV. IN/STNO. DEV. IN-1) =MEOIAN
PC7 P-BLW F PC f-T- "P. tiCF
o
Gy.eLelo 6P-8LW F PCT CF P-BLW
4.7 30.2 15.6 100.0 3.2 27.2 11.7 100.0 0.6 13.8 4.0 100.010.6 68.0 10.9 t9.8 t706:17 8.6 72.8rr:7-4:$.3 3.5 86.20.3 1.8 0.3 1.8 0.5 4.4 0.5 4.4 0.1 2.8 1.7 42.9
1.6 40.1 1.6 40.115.6265 11.7468
434.0000 427.0000 4.00171,0000 1.0000 386.00CO3.0000 3.000 1.0000
26.8186 20.8196 4.000049.7742 40.0098 10.77621.7162 1.7724 34.16440.4897 0.5145 "P.69290.5062 0.5380 1.13611.7912 1783735 1.3117
2.3367
F PC1 CF P-BLW F PCT *F PCT CF P-BLW
70 51.5 136 100.0 35 29.2 1 20 100.0 6 16.2 37 100.033 24.3 66 48.5 83 69.2 85 70.8 12 32.4 31 83.81 0.7 33 24.3 2 1.7 2 1.7 2 5.4 19 51.4
32 23.5 32 23.5.
17 45.9 17 45.9
136470
120445
1.000037394
1.0000 3.0000 1.00004.0000 207.0000 4.0000
267.0000 385.0000 /04.0000_723,0000 1.7250 344.0000
1.9632 0.4824 2.81081.2091 0.4844 1.18181.2136 1.8012 1.19811.4714 2.7500
Yo(1,) 1\10_c
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. 8LANK OATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORESMEANSTNC. OEV. (N)STNO. DEV. (N-1)MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
F
4.67.00.3
F
PC 1yagLe
CF
38.8 11.958.9 7.32.3 0.3
11.8564476.0)001.0a03.0000
19.390335.01311.63540.52770.5515*1.6903
PCT CF
P-8114
100.061.22.3
P-BLW
F PCi
2.0 23.4
r-F7ECW
8.7 100.0
F
0.1 4.3 3.0 100.06.4--74:20.2 2.4
6.60.2
76.62.4
1.0 34.7 2.8 9-5.70.0 0.0 1.8 60.91.8 60.9 1.8 60.9
E.6587458.0000
1.00002.9539
396.0000
15.494529.5751
1.00004.00009.3798
F
1. T8950.46200.4912
33.0Z263.17541.04E6
ra-382
PCT CF P-BLW F
1.2E933.6795
PCT CF P -BLW
1.0002.0003.0004.000
35163
35
39.318.03.4
39.3
.89543835
100.060.742.739.3
21682
Z3.174.72.2
91 100.0 2 7.4 27 100.0702
76.92.2
70
18
25.90.0
66.7
251818
92.666.766.7
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
89517
1.0000
91474
1.000027
4043.0000 1.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 163.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 216.0000 3/1.0000 88.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 684;6060 1.7912 318.0000MEAN 2.4270 0.4573 3.2593STNO. OEV. (N) 1.3482 0.4599 1.0747STNO. DEV. (N-1) 1.3559 1.8603 1.0952MEDIAN 2.0938 3.7500
lip CZ) nick.c Yr% 1 11 o..)-1 0
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW CF 17,-78EWF PCT CF P-BLW F PCT
1.000 2.4 33.2 7.1 100.0 1.8 28.4 612 100.0 3.6 25.7 14.1 100.02.000 4.3 61.2 4.7 66.t-4.4 70.2 4.5 71.6 4.6 32.7 10.5 74.33.000 0.4 5,5 0.4 5.5 0.1 1.3 0.1 1.3 0.7 5.2 5.9 41.6
5.1 36.4 5.1 36.4CASES PROCESSED 7.0825 6.2406NO. BLANK OATA 516.0000 481.0000 14.1016MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 303.0000MAXIMUM- VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 12.2029 10.7912 4.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 23.2278 20.0600 35.5753MEAN 1.'7230 1.7292 110.7783STNC. OEV. (N) 0.5577 0.4736 2.5228STNO. t;EV. (N-1) 0.6018 0.5168 1.2212MEDIAN 1.7737 1.8012 1.2669
2.2426
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CJ P-11LW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -8011
1.000 34 16.7 203 100.0 17 26.2 65 100.0 29 24.0 121 100.02.000 53 26.1 169 83.3 47 72.3 48 73.8 36 29.8 92 76.03.000 6 3.0 114 57.1 1 1.5 1 1.5 6 5.0 56 46.34.000 110 54.2 110 54.2 50 41.3 50 41.3
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOO. SCORESMEANSTNC. DEV. IN1SIND. DEV. (M-11MEDIAN
203.
4031.00004.0000,
598.00002060.0000
2.94581.21241.21543.5773
65500
1.00003.0000
114.0000214.0000
1.75380.46510.46871.8298
121310
1.00004.0000
319.0000-1027.0000
2.63641.23981.24502.3750
American 846k Co.
--tCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
CASES PROCESSED -NU. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUETIAXYWOM VALUE =
SUM OF SCORES =
SUM SOD. SCORES =WEANSTNO. DEV. =
STNC. DEV. (N-11 =MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
F PCT
1.4 25.64.1 72.90.1 1.5
CF P-BLW F PCT
5.7 100.0* 1.1 23.24.2 74.4 3.6 76.80.1 1.5 0.0 0.0
GF P -ELW F PCT
4.7 100.0 0.7 1703.6 76.8 1.8 45.2
-0.0 -0.0 0.2 4.11.3 33.0
CF
4.0 100.03.3 82.31.5 37.11.3 33.0
5.6512535.0000
1.00003:600*9,938118.67811.758-60.46110.50821.8544
4.7262496.0000
1.00002.00008.355715.61481.76800.42210.47541.8489
x.96853d 3.0000
1.00004.000010.015130.281;72.52361.12421.2SS82.2143
F PCT
21 29.214 19.42 2.8
.35 48.6
CF P-BLW PCT
72 100.0 11 21.651 70.8 40 78.437 51.4 0 0.035 48.6
CF P-BLW
51 100.0 640 78.4 160 0.0 2
14
PCT
15.842.15.3
36.8
CF P-BLW
38 100.032 84.216 42.114 36.8
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK OA TA =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORES -MEANSTNO. DEV. (N) =
OEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN
72534
1.00004.0000
195.0000655.00002.70831.32751.33683.0000
51
5141.00002.0000
91.0000171.0000
1.78430.41130.41541.8625
38393
1.00004.0000
100.0000312.00002.63161.13371.14892.3125
(I) /-)rn
cosi
Co-
SCORE
INTERVALS
6447,2eL.,
seep
PCT
CE P-OLW
P-PCT
CF P-BLW
rPVT
CFPtIW
1.000
1.2
31.5
3.8
100.0
0.6
24.5
2.5
100.0
0.!,
15.,
3.1
100.0
2.000
2.5
66.4
2.6
68.5 IT7--ZW.IF
--r7.9
75.5
1J.
37.t
2.6
84.5
3.000
0.1
2.1
0.1
2.1
0.2
8.6
0.2
8.6
0.0
0.0
1.5
47.3
1.5
47.3
1.5
47.3
CASES PROCESSED
3.7658
2.5166
NO. BLANK DATA
552.0000
51a.0000
3.08C1
MINIMUM VALUE
1.0000
1.0000
395.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE
3.0000
3.0040
1.0000
SUM OF SCORES
-6.4232
4.6344
4.0000
SUM SOO. SCORES
11.8960
9.3033
8.5929
MEAN
1.7057
23.3527
SIND. DEV. (N)
0.4996
0.5528
2.7898
SIND. DEV. (N-1)
=0.5830
0.7121
1.1925
MEDIAN
1.7783
178.816
1.4510
2.4264
SCORE INTERVALS
PCT
CF
P -BLW
FPCT
CF
1.000
10
15.9
63
100.0
620.0
30
100.0
414.3
28
100.0
2.000
12
19.0
53
84.1
21
70.0
24
80.0
932.1
24
85.7
3.000
23.2
41
65.1
310.0
310.0
00.0
15
53.6
4.000
39
61.9
39
61.9
15
53.6
15
53.6
CASES PROCESSED
NO. BLANK DATA
= =
63
543
30
535 1.0000
23
403
MINIMUM VALUE
3..0000
3.0000
1.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE
4.0000
57.0000
4.0000
SUM OF SCORES
-196.0000
117.0000
82.0000
SUM SOD. SCORES
=700.0000
1.9000
280.0000
MEAN
3.1111
0.5385
2.9286
STND. DEV. (N)
=1.1967
0.5477
1.1931
SIND. DEV. (N-1)
=1.2063
.1.9286
1.2150
MEDIAN
3.6923
3.5667
140(L) /1)-n r; .a v1 Bovk C
StbkE IN. fERVALS PCT CF P8LN F PC4-cteFT-7-ELw F PCTGckci°*L CF P -8Lk
1.000 10.6 30.9 34.4 100.0 9.7 41.8 23.3 100.0 6.0 33.9 17.7 100.02.000 14.6 42.5 23.8 69.1 6.9 29.6 13,5-1547f 6.4 36.4 11.7 66.13.000 2.3 6.6 9.2 26.7 1.2 5.2 6.6 28.6 1.0 5.9 5.3 29.74.000 6.9 20.0 6.9 20.0 5.4 23.3 5.4 23.3 4.2 23.8 4.2 23.8
CASES PROCESSED = 34.3702 23.2771 17.7192ND. BLANK DATA = 245.0000 306.0000 260.0000MINIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 1.0000 1.000oMAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 74.1873 48.9072 38.9328SUM SOD. SCORES = 199.6986 135.1965 ioa.aoo9MEAN 2.1585 2.1011 2.1972STND. DEV. IN) = 1.0729 1.1805 1.1457STND. DEV. IN1)-= 1.0889 1.7067 1.1744MEDIAN 1.9505 1.7766 1.5432
SCORE INTERVALS CF Pq1LN F PCT CE-0;t1A F CF-P -diw
1..000 116 33.0 351 100.0 99 40.2 246100.0 61 34.9 175 100.036.0 1142.000 144 41.0 235 67.0 70 28.5 14'i T9'.8 63 IT&al
3.000 27 7.7 91 25.9 12 4..9 77 31.3 9 5.1 51 29.14.000 64 18.2 64 18.2 65 26.4 65 26.4 42 24.0 42 24.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
==
351255
1.0000
246319
175256-
1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 741.0000 535.0000 382.0000SUM SO. seats '190.00(30 1527.0000 1066.0000MEAN 2.1111 2.1748 2.1829STND. DEV. IN1 = 1.0604 1.2156 1.1518STMT.a-V. = 1.0619 1.2180 1.1551MEDIAN 1.9132 1.8429 1.9206
Ginn & Co.
SCUP INTERVALS
.ra
deF
P-8LW
FPC
'r.c."-
C-rYOB
fo
PCT
CF P --=BL;
1.000
5.5
36.8
14.8
100.0
3.0
42.9
7.0 100.0
1.4
26.5
4.8
100.0
2.000
6.1
40.9
9.4
63.2
4.0--57:I
35.3
3.4
71.5
3.000
0.8
5.4
3.3
22.3
0.1
1.5
2.2
32.1
0.2
4.4
1.7
36.2
4.000
2.5
16.8
2.5
16.8
2.1
30.6
2.1
30.6
1.,
31.8
1.5
31.8
CASES PROCESSED
NO. BLANK DATA
MINIMUM VALUE
MAXIMUM VALUE
SUM OF SCORES
SUM SUL). SCORES
MEAN
STND. 0EV. (N)
STND. 0EV. (N-11
MEDIAN
= = = = = = =
14.8012
434.0000
1.0000
4.0000
29.9384
76.7709
2.0227
1.0467
1.0839
1.8220
6.9745
476.0000
4.8187
315.0000
1.b000
4.0000
15.3336
1.0000
4.0000
11.5417
A75:0783-4
2.1985
1.2769
r:37117---
1.7836
34.6009
2.3952
1.2015
1.3457
2.1096
SCORE INTERVALS
PCT
CF
P-BLW
FPCT
CF P -BLW
FO
tf---
-1.000
60
37.5
160
100.0
32
44.4_
72
100.0
15
31.3
48
100.0
2.000
65
40.6
100
62.5
16
22.2
40
55.6
16
33.3
33
68.8
3.000
85.0
35
21.9
11.4
24-
33.3
24.2
17
35.4
4.000
27
16.9
27
16.923_
.23
_31.9
15
31.3
15
31.3
CASES PROCESSED
NO. BLANK DATA
= -160
446
72
48
383
MINIMUM VALUE
ZT
.1.0000
*
1.00
001.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE
4.0000
4.0000
4.0000
SUM OF SCORES
=322.0000
113.0000
SUM SOC. SCORES
=824.0000
.159,0000
337.0000
MEAN
2.0125
2.2083
2.3542
STN O. GEV. (N)
STND. DEV. (N-1)
= =1.0487
1.0520
1.3010
1.2160
--1.2289
MEDIAN
1.8077
1.75
002.0625
G Pi VI Co 0 El
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF 1"4/LW F PC/ a P-BLW F
1.000 3.4 37.2 9.0 100.0 1.6 36.6 4.4 100.0 0.2 S.2 2.6 100.02.000 2.7 29.8 5.7 62.8 O. 2(7.8 2. 613.13-:9 35.2 2.3 90:13
3.000 0.3 3.0 3.0 33.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 42.5 0.0 0.0 1.4 55.74.000 2.7 30.0 2.7 30.0 1.9 42.5 1.9 42.5 1.4 5.7 1.4 55.7
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATA
==
9.0044493.0000
4.4435505.0000
2.5617354.0000.
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1-0-00 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 20.3293 11.0379 7.7416SUM SOD. SCORES = 59.7276 35.563W-- 26.6557MEAN 2.2577 2.46'41 3.0221STND. DEV. IN/ = 1.2393 1.3539 1.12E8.STND. DEV. IN -11 = 1.3145 1.5379 1.4457MEDIAN 1.9290 2.1412 3.6020
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P F
1.000 57. 37.0 100 100.0 142.000 31 31.0 63 63.0 93.00C 2 2.0 32 32.0 04.000 30 30.0 30 30.0 22
PC T CF P -BLW PC T CF -BLW
26.2 42 100.0 3 12.0 25 100.021.4 31 73.8 7 28.0 22 88.00.0 22 52.4 0 0.0 15 60.0
52.4 ?? 52.415 60.0 15 60.0
CASES PROCESSEDND. BLANK OATAMINIMUM VALUE
==
1005061.0000
42523Tailibe.
25
4061.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM nF SCORES = 225.0000 117.0000 77.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 659.0000 399.0060 271.0000MEAN 2.2500 2.7857 3.0800STND. DEV. (NJ = 1.2359 1..3190 1.1634STNO. OEV. 4N-11 = 1.2421 1.3350MEDIAN 1.9194 3.5455 3.6667
if° (0) G-,;11-1 1' Co.
SCORE INTERVALS F PCCT1-414e.a_CF P-BLW
1.000 9.1 35.5 25.6 100.02.000 5.3 20.6 16.5 64.53.000 1.0 4.0 11.2 43.94.000 10.2 39.8 10.2 39.8
CASES PROCESSE0 = 2i.5555NU. BLANK DATA = 345.0000MINIMUM VALUE 0 I.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 63.4861SUM SOD. SCORES 20,4677MEAN 2.4813SIN°. DEV. (N) 1.3253SIND. DEV. IN-1) = 1.3520MEDIAN 2.2017
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 78 31.2 250 100.02.000 46 18.4 172 68.83.000 11 4.4 126 50.44.000 115 46.0 115 46.0
CASES PROCESSEDNi). BLANK DATA
==
250356
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 663.0000SUM SAO. SCORES = 2201.0000MEAN 2,6520SIND. OEV. (N) = 1.3307SIND. OEV. (N-1) = 1.3334MEDIAN 2.5909
0
yo_ e. Ovc,cipF PCT CF F=:11-0,7
7.3 41.3 17.5 100.0 4.3 314.5 13.4 100.02:5--14:0 10.3 -513:I- 2.w iti.s 9.1 O8.i1.5 8.4 7.8 44.7 0.5 3.8 6.3 47.26.4 36.3 6.4 36.3 5.8 43.4 5.6 43.4
17.5496 13.3EE7373.0000 3C6,0000
1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000
42.0502-rnnalanT
144.6443113.0486
2.3961 4.58761.3383 1.32211,3782 1.37452.1188 2.3668
F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -BLW
61 34.3 178 100.0 32 27.1 118 100.024 13.5 117 65.7 26 22.0 86 72.911 6.2 93 52.2 4 3.4 60 50.862_ 46.1. 82 46.1 56 47.5 56 47.5
178387
118313
1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000
470.0000 320.00001568.0000 1068.0000
2.6404 2.71191.3554 1.30261.3592 1.30812.8636 2.7500
'70(0Houghton-Mifflin
SCORE INTERVALS FGN-a..1d. 4
PCT:LCF P-BLW F PC IY4A CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-81.11
1.000 5.0 54.4 9.6 100.0 4.0 56.8 7.0 100.0 1.3 3/.5 4.1 100.02.000 1.5 15.7 4.6 47.6 0.4 6.3 3.0 43.2 1.3 30.1 2.8 68.13.000 G.3 3.1 3.1 31.9 0.4 6.4 2.6 36.9 0.0 G.0 1.5 37.54.000 2.8 28.8 2.8 28.8 2.1 30.5 2.1 30.5 1.5 37.5 1.5 37.5
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
= 9.6336500.0000
6.9694484.0000
4.055'3b5,otico
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0-00D 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 20.0618 14.6617 9.959SUM SOD. SCORES = 58.1533 45;i6-17 30.8745MEAN 2.0825 2.1066 2.4 3CSIN°. OEV. (N) = 1.3038 1.3570 1.2775SIND. DEV. (N-1i = 1.3772 1.4662 1.4694MEDIAN 1.4541 1.3805 2.0SCa
SCORE INTERVALS F PC I CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BIM F PC T CF P-BLit
1.000 43 46.7 92 100.0 30 48.4 62 100.0 13 34.2 38 100.02.000 15 16.3 49 53,3 6 9.7 32 51.6 9 23.7 25 65.83.000 4 4.3 34 37.0 3 4.8 26 41.9 0 0.0 16 42.14.000 30 32.6 30 32.623 37.1 23 37.1 16 42.1 16 42.1
CASES PROCESSEDND. BLANK OA TA
==
92514
62503
38393
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 205.0000 143.0000KUM SOD. -SCORES = 619.0000 449.0000
.95.0000305.0060
MEAN 2.2283 2.3065 2.5000STND. DEV. (N) = 1.3278 1.3864 1.3328STND.'OEV. (N-1) = 1.3351 1.3978 1.3507MEDIAN 1.7000 1.6667 2.1667
flo 0-011) et_
SCORE INTERVALS F PCcreco_ae
CF P-BLW F- P-BLI0G,ta_271 e
F PCT
1.000 3.3 42.5 7.8 100.0 1. 7 37.8 4.4 100.0 0.3 9.5 3.4 100.02.000 1.3 16.6 4.5 57.5 0. F T.6 2.7 62.2 Z.0 3.0 90.53.000 0.1 1.3 3.2 40.8 0.3 7.1 2.7 60.6 0.0 0.0 2.0 60.74.000 3.1 39.5 3.1 39.5 2.3 53.5 2.3 53.5 2.0 60.7 2.0 60.7
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM S00. SCORESMEANSING. DEV. IN)STNO. DEV. IN-11MEDIAN
22
7.7913518.0000
1.00004.000018.530958.69712.37841.37001.46741.9486
4.3925504.0000
3.356039.0000
1.00004.000012.1377
1.00G04.000010.4676
42.34632.76331.4160
3o.9 1503.11901.1275
.1.611Z3.5648
1.34573.6764
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF F PCT CF
1.000 25 34.Z 73 100.0 14 32.6 43 100.0 2 6.7 30 100.02.000 13 17.8 48 65.8 1 2.3 29 67.4 7 23.3 28 93.33.000 1 1.4 35 47.9 2 4.7 28 65.1 0 0.0 21 70.0
4.000 34 46.6 34 46.6 26 60.5 26 6p.5_21 70.0 21_70.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
73533.
43 30401
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000_522
1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 190.0000 126.0000 100.0000
366.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 630.0000 452:0000MEA 2.6027 2.9302 3.3333STNO. DEV. IN/ 1.3623 1.3876 1.0435SIND. DEV. IN-1/ 1.3717 1.4040 1.0613
MEDIAN 2.3846 3.6131 3.7857
yo(Y) FicAtylion fYi, (Pi 6
SCORE INTERVALS F PC16 y-cm_cie. CF P -I LW F PCfri v";7":6 AiCF .1J-131.64 F ----FEFY-ct4g-6-1-CF11-13 re
1.000 1.7 8.6 19.7 100.0 1.0 9.2 11.3 100.0 0.32.000 5.1 26.0 18.0 91.4 2.3 20.4 10.3 90.8'1.23.000 1.7 8.7 12.9 65.4 0.3 2.8 8.0 70.4 0.44.000 11.2 56.7 11.2 56.7 7.7 67.6 7.7 67.6 6,4
CASES PROCESSED 19.7444 11.3387NO. BLANK OAIA = 393.0000 423.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 61.8862 37.2777SUM SOO. SCORES 216.7468 135.7835MEAN 3.1344 Et.2877
STND. UEV. (N) 1.0739 1.0801STND. DEV. 1.1022 [7,1311MEOIAN 3.6175 3.7605
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF-0:13L-t. F
1.000 19 9.5 201 100.02.000 44 21.9 182 90.53.000 17 8.5 138 68.74.000 121 60.2 121 60.2
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
201405
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 642.0000SUM SQO. 'SCORES 2284.0000MEAN 3.1940STND. OEV. {N) L.0777STNO. DEV. (N-11 1.0804MEDIAN 3.6694
1g
94
7.915.0-3.1
74.0
127 100.0117. 92.198 77.294 74.0
127438
i.o60o--4.0000
,436.00001626.0060
3.43311.00851.01253.8245
3.3r46-5.6
77.2
8.3 100.08.0 .9471:7
6.8 82.Z6.4 77.2
8.2909345.0000
1.00004.000029.5140111.16473.5598O.65780.91483.850
4 5.19 11.45 6.3
61 77.2
CF P -BLW
79 100.075 94.966 $3.561 77.2
,.
79352
1.00004.0000
281.0000106a.0000
3.55700.88230.88793.8525
Lippincott
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -8LW F CF P -8L T F I-CT CF P-8LW
1.000 0.7 12.8 5.3 100.0 0.6 16.5 3.4 100.0 0.1 2.3 2,7 100.02.000 1.3 23.9 4.6 87,2 0.4 11;Z-- 2.8 83.5 u.6 22.7 2.6 96.73.000 0.2 4.4 3.3 63.3 0.1 3.9 2.4 71.7 0.2 7.5 2.0 74.04.00C 3.1 58.9 3.1 58.9 2.3 67.8 2.3 67.8 1.8 66.5 1.8 66.5
CASES PROCESSEUNO. BLANK DATA
= 5.2942534.0000
3.393o516.0000
2..6670398.0060
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 176000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 16.3770 10.9602 8.9544SUM SOU. SCORES = 57.7163 46.169 32.6913MEAN 3.0934 3.2297 3.3725STND. DEV. IN/ = 1.1544 1.1353
-17:41130.9402
STND. DEV. (N--lb = 1.2818 1.1652MEDIAN 3.6512 3.7628 307481
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CE P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLW F P-BLWPCT CF
1.000 9 15.5 58 100.0 5 13.9_______ 3_6 1_00.0 1 4.0 25 100.02.000 11 19.0 49 84.5 4 11.1 31 86.1 4 16.0 24 96.03.000 3 5.2 38 65.5 1 2.8 27 75.0 2 8.0 20 80.04.000 35 60.3 35 60.3 26 72.2 26 72.2 IS 72.0 18 72.0
CASES PROCESSED = 58 36 25N3. BLANK DATA = 548 529 406MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 180.0000 120.0000 87.0000SUM SOU. SCORES = 640.0000 446.0000 323.0000MEAN 3.1034 3.3333 3.4800STN&. DEV. (N) = 1.1845 1.1304 0.8998STND. CEV. (N-1) = 1.1949 1.1464 0.9183MEDIAN 3.6714 3.8077 3.8056
90(0 ovi coif
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002,0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESWM-S-40-. SCORESMEANSTN D. DEV. IN)
MEOIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA -
MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES'SUM SOD.-SCORESMEANSIND. VEV. (Ni .=5TND. DEV. IN-1) =MEDIAN
0
Fcycta.c.
PC CF P-BLWG-Nr
0:61-7WF.r617NreXao,
PC CF P-BLW PCT CF
0.4 8.2 4.3 100.0 0.3 8.2 3.1 100.0 0.1 2.5 100.00.4 10.3 3.9 91.8 071.4-- 12.1 271r Tra61.7 25.7 2.4 94.i0.0 0.0 3.5 81.5 0. 0 0.0 2.5 79.8 0.1 2.4 1.b 65.23.5 81.5 3.5 81.5 2. 5 79.8 2.5 79.8 1.5 61.8 A.5 61.6
4.2926 3.0791 2.4818544.0000 512.0000 3c9.0CCO
1:0000 1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000 4.000015.2248 10.8181 7.988658.-0691 41.0303 28.31223.5468 3.5134 3.21890.9738 0.9907 1.03511:1118 1.2056 1.33953,8862 3.8731 3.6911
F PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
4 8.5 47 100.0 2 5.7 35 100.0 1 4.2 24 100.03 6.4 43 91.5 4 11.4 33 94.3 6 25.0. 23 95.80 0.0 40 85.1 0 0.0 29 82.9 1 4.2 17 70.8
40 85.1 40 85.1 29 82.9 29 82.9 16 66.7 16 66.7
47559
35530
24407
1.0000 1.0000 1.00004.0000. 4.0000 4.0000
170.0000 126.0000 80.0000656.0000 482.0000 290.00003.6170 3.6000 3.33330.9352 0.9008 0.98600.9453 D.9139 1.00723.9125 3.8966 3.7500
iitqa..) j_i pp ty C ott-
SCORE INTERVALScry- es-de a
F PC CF
0 a D
lea_ cl& e.P-8LW 7-- PCrv-Q-5- Le-gCF P-I3N- F PCT CF IT-BL
1.0002.0003.0004.000
2.14.60.4
12.7
10.5 19.8 100.023.3 17.7 89.52.1 13.1 66.2
64.1 12.7 64.1
CASES PROCESSED = 19.8186NO. BLANK OATA = 395.0000M1NIMUm VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 63.4016SUM SQO. SCORES = 227.6739MEAN = 3.1991STNO. DEV. (N) = 1.1157UN°, DEV. (N-1) ...'Z 1.1490MEDIAN = 3.7205
SCORE INTERvALS F PCT CF P -8LW
1.000 19 9.5 199 100.02.000 46 23.1 180 90.53.000 3 1.5 134 67.34.000 131 65.8 131 65.8
CASES PROCESSEDNO, BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE
====
199407
1.00004.0000
SUM OF SCORES = 644.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 2n6.0000MEAN = 3.2362STND. DEV. IN) = 1.1025STNO. DEV. (N-11 = 1.1053MEOIAN = 3.7405
1.4 12.3-1..3 -63.50.5 4.27.9 69.9
11.39.98.47.9
100.0 0.1874.7 2.474.2 0.369.9 6.6
11.2914419.0000
1.00004.0000
37.4589138.1224
3.31751,10771.16023.7850
F PCT
.14 1.9..6 _____13216 12.14 3.0
98 Till!? _
7.0[..1.8
2.766.o
10.0 100.G9.3 "'3.06.9 69.36.6 66.6
9.9652:;2a.0060
1.00004.0000
32.7759118.76093.28901.04671.10573.7492
CF13-aLw F PCT CF P -8LW
100.0 10 10.5 95 100.0118 89.4 18 18.9 85 89.5102 77.3 3 3.2 67 70.598 74 2 64 67.4 64 67.4
132____433__
1.00004.0000
450.00001682.0000
3.40911.05851.06263.8265
1 .
95336
1.00004.0000
311.00001133.0000
3.27371.09971.10553.7578
(v) Allyn & Bacon
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA-WINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOU. SCORESMEANSTNC. OEVo (NISTNC. DEV.MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002,0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SO. SCORES/.411N
STNO., (N)STND. 0EV. (*-1)MEDIAN
c:c aF PC CF P 13EW
1.61.20.02.8
F
15130
31
0
PC --C1--PRZW F Pt.4;42:16hP-71Wi
23.6 5.6 100.0 0.7 i9.2 3.4 100.0 0.2 7.5 2.3 100.021.6 4.0 71.4 0-.;4 11.7 2.7 8 006 24.0 2020.0 2.8 49.8 0.2 6.3 2.4. 69.0 U. 1.8 1.6 68.5
49.8 2.8 49.8 2.1 62.7 2.1 62.7 1.5 66.7 1.5 66.7
5.5814 3.4049 2.2950532.0000 509.0000 400.0000
1.0000 100000 1.00004.0000 4.0000 4,0(10015.1278 1006417 7.535550.8986 38.3625 27.2972.7104 3.1254 .27781.3316 1.2241 1.06241.4697 1.45-66- 1..41342.4909 3.7031 3.7507
PCT
25.422.00.0
52.5
CF
59443131
100.074.652.552.5
F
65
224
PCT
...16213.5'5e4
64.9
CF
37312624
P -BLW
O p.0 2
PC T
8.7
CF.P-BLW
23 100.0-83o8*
70.364.9
41
16
17.44.3
69.6
211716
91.373.969.6
59547
37528
23408
1.0000 1;0000 i 1.00004,0000 4.0000 4.0000
165.0000 118.0000 77.0000563.0000 428.75066 283.0000
2.7966 3.1892 3.34781.3120 1.04711.3233
_1.18181.0706
3.5484 3.7292 3.7813
171004 Allyn B._ co N, 0
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF
1.000 1.1 2i.9 4.82.000 0.6 12.2 3.83.000 0.2 4.1 3.24,C00 3.0 61.8 3.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES
4.8450542.0000
1.0000-4,000014.8159
SUM SOD. SCORES 53.1201MEAN 3.0580SIND. CEV. (N) 1.2699STNO. DEV. (N-1) 1.4255MEDIAN 3.6911
F -81W
100.0
F
0.3
PCT
10.7 2.7 100.0
F fCT
/
iF P-BLw
2.,* 100.t)78.1 0 --33 -106 2.4 89.8 L. 2.3 96.365.9 0.0 0.0 2.1 78.7 0.9 0.0 1.7 73.461.8 2.1 78.7 2.1 78.7 1.1 73.4 1.7 73.4
2.7278 2.3556516.0000 dIC0.00001.0000 1.00004.0000 400009.4554 8.0836
75.7884 29,9180:3.4663 3.43171.0510 C.96161.3206 1.26753.8645 3.8191
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -8LW PCT CF P-864
1.000 8 16.3 49 100.0 2 6.7 30 100.0 1 4.3 23 100.02.000 6 12.2 41 83.7 3 10.0 28 93.3 4 17.4
T22 95.7
3.000 1. 2.0 35 71.4 0 0.0 25 83.3 0 0.0 18 78.34.000 34 65.4 34 69.4 25 83.3 25 83.3. 18 78.3 18 78.3
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
49557
30535
23408
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 159.0000 108.0000 81.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 585.0000 .414.0000 305.0000MEAN 3.2449 3.6000 3.5217SIND. DEV. (N) 1.1872 0.9165 0.9264SIND. DEV. (N-1) 1.1995 0.9322 0.9472MEDIAN 3.7794 3.9000 3.8611
lip (
x)19
illi
Yt +
Ba-
c-W
ri
SCORE INTERVALS
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
CASES PROCESSED
NO. BLANK DATA
MINIMUM VALUE
MAXIMUM VALUE
SUM OF SCORES
SUM SOD. SCORES
MEAN
STND. DEV. IN1
-ST46; DEV. (N-1)
MEDIAN
= =
SCORE INTERVALS
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
CASES PROCESSED
NO. BLANK DATA
MINIMUM VALUE
MAXIMUM VALUE
SUM OF SCORES
SUM SOD. SCORES
MEAN
STND. 0EV. 01
STNO. OEV. IN-11
MEOIAN
=
0D
00
F-e
a-ci
e..:4
PCT6
CF 0 -8LW
r---Fu.vA.c
i
---TFC\I-er-C141-4----.TFP-8LW
42
CyF P-OLW
1.0
5.S
17.5 100.0
0.9
6.5
13.4 100.0
1.8
16.7
10.5
100.1)
3.6
20.3
16.5
94.1
3.2
23.9
12.5
93.5
2.6
26.8
8.7
83.3
1.0
5.8
12.9
73.8
1.6
12.1
9.3
69.7
0.1
1 0.8
5.9
56.5
11.9
68.0
11.9
68.0
7.7
57.5
7.7
57.5
5.9
55.8
5.9
55.6
17.5269
13.4085
10.4523
415.0000
404.0000
325.0000
1.0006-
1.0000
1.0000
4.0000
4.0000
4.0000
58.8866
43.0058
31.0231
215.1710
151.7444
10.3640
3.3598
3.2074
2.9365
0.9942
1.0149
1.2210
1.0244)-
1.0550
1.2E37
3.7649
3.6311
3.6037
FPCT
CF
P-BLW
FPCT
CF
P-BLW
TF
PCT
CO-P-BEW
11
6.1:
179
100.0
10
6.8
147
100.0
15
15.2
99
100.0
35
19.6
168
93.9
33
22.4
137
93.2
25
25.3
84
84.8
73.9
133
74.3
96.1
104
70.7
11.0
59
59.6
126
70.4
126
70.4
95
...._
64.6
95
64.6
58
58.6
58
58.6
179
427
147
4113
99
332
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
4.0000
4.0000
4.0000
606.0000
483.0000
300.0000
2230.0000
1743.0000
1052.0000
3.3855
3.2857
3.0303
0.9983
1.0302
1.2015
1.0011
1.0337
1.2076
3.7897
3.7263
3.6466
day) Holt, Rinehart &Winston
SCORE INTERVALS4; V- 0.4Ad Dr-
F PCT CF P -8LW
a
-Ptir-a4g- 10F P-BLW F PCT CI- P -8 LWe:,:,,-.2..a.8. 6
1.0002.0003.0004.000
0.61.3G.03.6
100424.00.0
65.5
5.54.93.63.6
100.089.665.565.5
C.5E.F--0.02.5
1C.9 4.4 100.0 0.3 10.4 2.7 100.0
0.057.1
3:92.52.5
89.157.157.1
0.80.01.6
25.10.0
60.6
2.41.61.6
89.660.660.6
CASES PROCESSEDNO. !LANK DATA
==
5.5067533.0000
4.3573504.0000
2.65013S7.0CCO
MINIMUM VALUE -7-' 100000 100000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 17.6564 13.2159 8.2351SUM SOD. SCORES = 63.6074 745.8568 29.0330MEAN = 3.2064 3.0330 3.1074STND. 0EV. (NI = 1.1270 1.1510 1.1398STND. DEV. IN-1) = 1.2458 1.44451.3113MEDIAN = 3.7370 3.6241 3.6743
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8LW F-
PCT--CF
-----._P-8CW
-F
-OCT CF P -BLW
1.000 5 8.6 58 100.0 4 s.A____...._. 4.3 100.0 3 11.5 26 100.02.000 14 24.1 53 91.4 12 27.9 39 90.7 6 23.1 23 88.53.000 0 0.0 39 67.2 0 0.0 27 62.8 0 0.0 17 65.44.000 39 67.2 39 67.2 27 62.8_ 27 62.8 17 65.4 IT 65.4
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE
====
58548
1.00004.0000
43522
26405
1.00004.0000
1.00004.0000
SOM OF scnREsSUM SOO. SCORES =
189.0000685.0000
139,929.9.. 83.0000484.0000 299.0000
ME V4 3.2586 3.1628 3.1923STND. DEV. (N) = 1.0917 1.1192 1.1442STNO. 0EV. IN-1) 1.1012 ra32-4-------- 1.1668MEDIAN 3.7564 3.7037 3.7353
yo(z) holt, loulvsfort
SCORE INTERVALS61-ecuie
CF F-81.W 7r----0Cfrv-6""- P-6Lw PC,4;-(6-111-.7ffLAF PCT
1.000 0.4 S.0 4.7 100.0 0.1 4.2 3.2 100.0 ti.1 B.6 2.3 100.0.1'6.42.000 1.2 24.8 4.3 91.0 0.-2 .3.1 95.8 o. a0 B 2.3
3.000 0.0 0.0 3.1 66.2 0.8 23.5 2.9 90.6 0.0 0.0 1.5 65.64.000 3.1 66.2 3.1 66.2 2.1 67.1 2.1 67.1 1.5 65.6 1.5 65.c
CASES PROCESSED 4.7231 3.1990NO. BLANK DATA 541.0000 517.0000 461,0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0CtOMAXIMUM VALUE - 4,0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF ScORES 15.2716 11.3103 7.6618SUM SOD. SCORES 55.1247 41.9155 27.512*MEAN 3.2334 3.5356 3.2761STND. DEV. (N) 1.1030 0-7762 1.0/5ITNO.OEV. (N-11 = 1.2423 0,9362 1.3422MEDIAN 3.7446 3.7548 3.7378
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F __ - - -.PC
T CF P-BLW F PCT CF
1.000 5 10.0 50 100.0 1 3,3 30 100.0 1 4.5 2Z 100.02.000 10 20.0 45 90.0 3 10.0 29 96,.7 5 22.7 21 95.-5
3.000 0 0.0 35 70.0 1 3.3 26 86.7 0 0.0 16 72.74.000 35 70.0 35 70.0 25 83.3 25 83.3 16 72.7 16 72.7
CASES PROCESSED = 50 30 22NO. BLANK DATA = 556 535 409MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 165.0000 110.0000 75.0000SUM SLID. SCORES 605.0000 422:5650 277.0000MEAN 3.3000 3.6667 3.4091STND. DEV.
DEV. IN-11= 1.1000
1.11120.7888 0.9844
..0+315-0.8023MEDIAN 3.7857 3.9000 3.8125
go11
-, R
t;ei-
Nav
ttjt;istov-t
SONE IN 1.00C
2.000
3.00C
4.000
F
6.9
13.6
0.7
7.9
PCs
23.7
46.7
2.5
27.2
v-a..cl
al-
CF P-BLW
29.1. 100.0
22.2
.76
.38.6
29.7
7.9
27.2
7.1
r9.7
0--6
270.5
3.6
_ _vrq_x-_sea
23.5
1.8
12.1
e-
Cl "
lea
4.P-BLd
100.0
17--BLW
F
30.3 100.0
e.8
pC
26.5
25.6
.-273:177-6:5-13.3
4.2
13.8
1.0
3.6
12.1
2.5
59.5
3.9
9.6
3.5
2.5
13.6
9.6
CASES PROCESSED
=29.0983
30.2524
25.5644
NO. BLANK DATA
=310.0000
244.0000
183.0CCC
MINIMUM VALUE
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE
4.0000
4.0000
4.0CCO
SUM OF SCORES
=67.8588
61.2358
50.3357
SUM SQD. SCORES
=194.2866
14'6;1655
114).6430
MEAN
2.33
212.0242
1.9674
STNC. DEV. (NI
=1.1128
0.8569
0.8297
STNU. 0EV. IN-11
=1.1325
C.8114
0.8464
MEDIAN
2.0643
1.9230
1.8924
SCORE INTERVALS
FPCT
CF
P -8LW
FPC
TPC
TCF
P
1.000
58
20.4
285
100.0
69
311
100.0_57,
23.4
244
100.0
2.000
/35
47.4
227
79.6
187
60.1
242
77.8 154
63.1
187
76.6
3.000
93.2
92
32.3
72.3
55
17.7
93..7
33
13.5
4.000
83
29.1
83
29.1
48
48
15.4
24
9.8
.24
9.8
CASES PROCESSED
NO. BLANK DATA
= =285
321
311
254
244
187
MINIMUM VALUE
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE
4.0000
4.0000
4.0000
SUM OF SCORES
687.0000
_ .
__ _656.0000
488.0000
1138.0000
SUM SQD. SCORES
=2007.0000
1648.0000
MEAN
2.4105
2.1093
2.0000
STND. 0EV. IN)
=1.1097
0.9e18
-0.
8148
STND. DEV. IN-11
=1.1117
0.92
330.8165
MEDIAN
2.1259
1.9626
1.9221
110 0_161
SRA
SCORE INTERVALS
1.CCO
2.000
3.000
4.000
CASES PROCESSED
NO. BLANK DATA
MINIMUM VALUE
MAXIMUM VALUE
SUM OF SCORES
SUM.SQC. SCORES
MEAN
STND. DEV. (N)
SIND. DEV. IN-11
MEDIAN
r-G
,ce
FPCT
CF
P-BLW
0
FPCT
CF P-
F
00
rk
PCf
CF P-BLA
2.1
29.4
7.3
100.0
0.7
10.3
6.8
100.0
1.4
2ti.7
6.3
106.0
1.9
25.5
5.2
70.6
574---55:6--
S:6-75672-
8977
4.f
74.3
0.0
0.0
3.3
45.1
0.0
0.0
2.3
33.4
0.0
0.0
1.3
20.7
3.3
45.1
3.3
45.1
2.3
33.4
2.3
33.4
1.3
20.7
1.3
20.7
SCORE INTERVALS
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
CASES PROCESSED
NO. BLANK DATA
MINIMUM VALUE
MAXIMUM VALUE
SUM OF SCORES
SUM SOD. SCORES
MEAN
STND. DEV. IN/
STNO. DEV. IN-1)
MEDIAN
7.2925
517.0u00
6.8384
475.0000
6.3442
361.0CCO
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
4.0000
4.0000
4.0000
19.0234
17.5443
13.6773
62.2223
*36.2097
2.6086
2.5655
2.154
1.3143
1.0588
1.0295
1.4149
1.1459
1.1216
2.3084
2.2055
1.9526
FPCT
CF
P-BLW
CF
P-BLW
FPC T
CF
18
24.3
74
100.0
79.6
73
100.0
17
26.6
64
100.0
19
25.7
56
75.7
40
54.8
66
90.4
33
51.6
47
73.4
00.0
37
50.0
00.0
26
35.6
00.0
14
21.9
37
5C.0
37
50.0
26
35.6
26
35.6
14
21.9
14
21.9
74
532
73
492
64
367
1.0000'
1.0000
100000
4.0000
4.0000
4.0000
204.0000
191.0000
139.0000
636.0000
3433
:156
611.
----
---373.0000
2.7568
2.6164
2.1719
1.2925
1.0680
1.0541
1.3013
1.0754
1.0624
3.5000
2.2375
1.9545
610
(0-c
)S
R A
SCORE. INTERVALS
1.000
2. C00
3.060
4.000
CASES PROCESSED
NO. BLANK DATA
MINIMUM VALUE
MAXIMUM VALUE
SUM OF SCORES
=
SUM SOD. SCORES
=
MEAN
STND. DEV. (N)
=
SIND. DEV. 1N-1) =
MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
CASES PROCESSED
NO. BLANK DATA
MINIMUM VALUE
MAXIMUM VALUE
SUM OF SCORES
SUM SOD. SCORES
ME 4r
STND. DEV. (N)
STNO. DEV. 1N-1)
MEDIAN
0
FG
ro.a
ea
PCT
CF P-BLW
pgrlecut,.
P-BLW
^'PCT
1.0
21.9
4.5
100.0
0.2
7.2
3.3 100.0
1,e
17.6
3.5 100.0
0.4
8.6
3.5
78.1
0.9
28.4
1 1 .--g2.0"
1.5
42.4
2.9
82.4
0.0
0.0
3.1
69.6
0.0
0.0
2.1
64.4
0..0
0.0
1.4
39.9
3.1
69.6
3.1
69.6
2.1
64.4
2.1
64.4
1.4
39.9
1.4
39.9
4.4517
3.3166
3.5105
545.0000
1.0000
510.0000
389.0000
---Eannw
1.0000
4.0000
4.0000
4.0000
14.1228
52.0445
10.6680
9.2050
-3871-369
.29.0044
3.1725
3.2166
2.6221
1.2753
1.0806
1,076
1.4483
4.3945
3.7812
3.7236
2.2626
FPCT
CF
P-BLW
FPCT
CF
P-BLW
FOCT
CF P-BLW
715.2
46
100.0
38.3
36
100.0
7_2 04
_35
-24
100.0
510.9
39
84.8
925.0
33
91.7
13
37.1
80.0
00.0
34
73.9
00.0
24
66.7
00.0
15
42.9
34
73.9
34
73.9
24
.10.67
2466.7_
15
42.9
.15
42.9
=46
560
36
529
35
396
1.0000
1.0000-
1.0000
4.0000
4.0000
4.0000
153.0000
117.0000
(p.plapo
=571.0000
423.0000
299.0000
3.3261
3.2500
2.6571
= =1.1620
1.1748
1.0897
1.2176
--
1.1052
1.2353
3.8235
3.7500
2.3077
/1( t) S RA
same INTERVALS
LOCO2.0003.CCO4.000
CASES PKUCESSE0NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTN G. DEV. (N)STND. DEV. IN-1)MEDIAN
. - 7 Y* cta e .2,.F PCi LF P-BLW
._______Gy-,La.21F PCT CF P-BLW
G-w-cxele__4F PCT CF P-IlLw
1.9 12.3 15.3 100.0 1.1 11.5 9.4 100.0 1.0 10.7 649 100.61.9 12.4 13.4 87.7 6.8- -1.7 8.3-18.75" 2.1 23.9 8.0 69.3G.7 4.7 11.5 75.3 1.0 10.6 7.5 79.7 ).2 2.3 5.9 65.4
iC.8 70.6 10.8 70.6 6.5 69.1 6.5 69.1 5.6 63.1 5.6 63.1
= 15.3181 9.3885 8.947= 439.0000 439.0000 537.0CCO- 1.0000 1.00607 1.0000= 4.0000 4.0000 4.00GO= 5/.0918 31.6681 2d.4277= 188.9731 117.1379'1 iol.boe= 3.3354 3.3731 3.1776= 1.04:96 1.0495 1.1254= 1.174 1.1:101 1.1942= 3.7914 3.7768 3.7074
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003. DCO4. COO
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESLIM JF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. IN)STND. OEV. IN-11MEDIAN
F PC T CF P-BLW F PC T 7ET-------evii=ecwCF P -BLW
i9 12.3 154 100.0 12 10.9 110 100.0 8 9.2 87 100.018 11.7 1.35 87.7 10 9.1 98 89.1 19 21.8 79 90.89 5.8 117 76.0 8 7.3 88 80.0 3 3.4 60 69.0
108 70.1 108 70.1 80 72.7 80 72.7 57 65.5 57 65.5
= 154 110 87= 452 455 344= 1.0000 1.0000 '1.0000= 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000= 514.0000 376.0000 283.0000= i900.0000 1404.0000 1023.0000= 3.3377 3.4182 3.2529= 1.0944 1.0391 1.0851= 1.0980 1.008 1.0914= 3.7870 3.8125 3.7368
510<
o-e)
Harcourt Brace &
World
SCORE INTERVALS
GY
-o-c
iePCT
I.
111-
8LW
FPC?ra-cLg2-1F
P-BLW
FPCT
CF
1.000
C.6
10.3
5.7
100.0
0.3
7.9
3.7
10D.0
0.1
5.4
2.8
100.0
2.000
0.4
6.2
5.2
89:7
a.4
11.2
3.4
92.10.6
22.
2.6
94.6
3.000
0.1
1.9
4.8
83.5
0.2
5.8
3.0
80.90.1
2.4
2.0
72.3
4.0CC
4.7
81.6
4.7
81.62.7
75.1
2.7
75.1
1.9
70.0
1.9
70.0
CASES PRUCESSE0
NO. BLANK DATA
5.7434
529.0090
3.6507
503.0000
2.7537
393.0000
MINIMUM VALUE
1.0000
1,0000
1.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE
4,0000
4,0000
4.0000
SUM OF SCORES
20.3780
12.7115
9.2768
SUM SQO. SCORES
77.9833
47.1123
34.0149
MEt.N
3.5481
3,4819
'J.366(1
STND. 0EV. (N)
0.9945
0.9723
1.0018
STND. 0EV. (N-1)
1.0943
1.1411
1.2553
MEDIAN
3.8871
3.8344
3.7855
SCORE INTERVALS
FPCT
CF
P-BLW
FPCT
--
CF
P-BLW
PCT
P-BLW
CF
1.000
57.';;
63
100.0
49.1
44
100.0
77.1
28
100.0
2.000
57.9
58
92.1
613.6
40
90.9
517.9
26
92.9
3.000
23.2
53
84.1
24.5
34
77.3
3.3.6
21
75.0
4.000
5181.0
51
81.0
32
?"1_
_20
71.4
20
71.4
CASES PROCESSED
ND. BLANK DATA
63
543
44
521
28
403
MINIMUM VALUE
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE
4.0000
4.0000
4.0000
SUM OF SCORES
225.0000
95.0000
SUM SOD. SCORES
859.0000
558.0000
351.0000
MEAN
3.5714
3.4091
3.3929
STND. DEV. (N)
STND. DEV. (N-1)
0.9380
0.9455
1.0295
1.0120
-1.0414
1.0306
MEDIAN
'3.8E24
3.8125
3.8009
oF
)O
pen
Cou
rt
SCORE INTERVALS
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
CASES PROCESSED
=
NO. BLANK DA'.A
=
MINIMUM VALUE
MAXIMUM VALUE
SUM OF SCORES
=
SUM SOD. SCORES
=
MEAN
STND. DEV. IN)
S7
NU
.DE V.
=
MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
F
0.7
0.8
0.2
12.0 F 3
11 3
116
retA
e.PCI
CF
5.3
13.8
5.5
13.0
1.7
12.3
8/.5
12.0
13.7596
457.0000
1.0000
4.0000
51.0890
198.4162
3.7130
0.7562
0.8269
3.9283
PC
TCF
5.8
138
8.0
130
2.2
119
84.1
116
P-BLIP
100.0
94.7
89.1
87.5
I
0.1
0.2--
0.2
7.5
6=Y:Aula._
-Pt
1.7
2.6
2.7
93.1
CF
8.1 9
7.7
7.5
15-81W
100.0
9-8.1
95.7
93.1
F
0.1
1.7
CF
6.2 100.0
6.1.-..3
5,4
87.3
5.2
84.S
0.1
11.0
0.1
2.4
5.2
84.9
8.0723
453.0000
6.1594
365.0000
ITotmo
4.0000
31.2442
1.0000
4.0000
22.82E6
P -8LW
100.0
94.2
86.2
84.1
123.0880
3.8706
0.5167
1
67.8522
3,7063
0.7256
0.7928
3.5113
PC T
1.7
tV-Tc-sLw
58 100.0
57
98.3
52
89.7
50
86.2
91
0.5520
3.9627
2.1
CF
97
P...13LW
100.0
2.1
2.1
93.8
95
93
91
97.9
95.9
93.8
5 250
8.6
3.4
#§!?
CASES PROCESSED
NO. BLANK DATA
= =138
468
97
463
58
373
MINIMUM VALUE
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE
4.0000
4.0000
4.0000
SUM OF SCORES
=503.0000
376.0000
217.0000
SUM SQO. SCORES
=1935.3003
1484.0000
839.0000
MEAN
3.6449
3.8763
3.7414
STND. DEV. IN)
=0.8580
0.5228
0.6838
SINU. DEV. IN-1)
=0.8612
0.5255
0.6898
MEDIAN
3.9052
3.9670
3.9200
90(9)
SCORE INTERVALS
1.00C
2.000
3.000
4.000
CASES PROCbSSED
NO. BLANK DATA
-
MINIMUM VALUE
MAXIMUM VALUE
-SUM OF SCORES
SUM SOD. SCORES
=
MEAN
STNO. 0EV. IN)
STNC. DEV. (N-II
MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
ITA
D
e_ a
67-v-44.c1
FPC;
CF P-BLW
FCT----
P-BLW
F
C.6
4.4
0.4
2.6
0.1
0.6
12.6
92.5
13.6 100.0 0.0
13.0
95.6-GT
12.7
93.0 0.0
12.6
92.5 7.6
13.6365
458.0000
I. -ODD
4.0000
51.9722
204.4529
3.8113
0.6836
0.7102
3.9592
FPCT
85.9
32.2
10.7
123
91.1
0.0
0.0
98.9
CF P-BLW
F
135 100.0
0127
94.1
1124
91.9
0123
91.1 91_
CASES PROCESSED
NO. BLANK OATA
MINIMUM VALUE
MAXIMUM VALUE
-=135
4711.0000
4.0000
SUM OF SCORES
=509.0000
SUM son. SCORES
=1997.0000
MEAN
3.7704
STNU. OEV. IN)
0,7595
STNO. 0EV. (N-II
=0.7-624
MEDIAN
3.9512
7.6657
458.0000
2.0000
4.0000
30.4963
1-21.6513
3.9783
0.2072
0:2221
3.9945
PCT92
4732.0000
4.0000
Grad e_
pzTc3
PCT
w
7.7
100.0
0.1
1.5
5.8
100.0
7.-7I000-
0-5
8.8
,,T
7.6
98.9
0.0
0.0
5.2
89-7
7.6
98.9
89.7
5.2
89.7
3.7St6
369-0000
1.0000
4.0000
21.90E1
b5.3248
3.7791
0.6615
0.7276
3.9426
CF
P-BLW
PCT
CF
P-BLW
921000
11.9
54
100.0
92
100.0
35.6
53
98.1
91
98.9
00.0
50
92.6
91
_98.9
50
92.6
50
92.6
54
3771.0000
4.0000
366.0000
207.0000
1460.0000
813.0000
3.9783
0.2074
0.2085
3.9945
3.8333
0.6009
0.6066
3,9600
go (0-9 Merrill Linguistics
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT
1.000 C.5 3.4 14.92.CCO 2.2 14.6 14.43.COC 0.7 4.9 12.24.CCO 11.5 77.1 11.5
CASES PROCESSED = 14.E644NO. BLANK DATA 447.000CMINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 52.8665SUM SOD. SCORES = 199.0924MEAN 3.5566STNO. DEV. (N) = 0.8629TTNIY. OEV. (N-1) = 0.8935MEDIAN 3.6516
SCORE INTERVALS F FCT CF
1.000 6 4.1 1472.000 18 12.2 1413.000 9 6.1 1234.000 114 77.6 114
D
.
P-BLW F PCT F
100.096.682.077.1
P-8LW
100.095.983.777.6
-cr&Irad&Ci CF P-44IW
0.5 4.7 10.1 100.0 0.! E.7 7.6 100.02.11 1 ILT 9.6 43.3 1.0 12.5 7.1 93.30.3 3.1 7.6 75.7 0.9 12.3 6.1 79.37.3 72.6 7.3 72.6 5.1 67.4 5.1 67.4
10.0604433.0000
1.00004.0000
34.5641177:99693.43560.95871.01023.8110
7.60C2356,00(0
1.00004.0000
23.875095.04E73.404,0.95671.02c63.7585
F OCT CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-BLW
6 5.1 - .5 7.5 67 100.020 16.9
.1113_100f.9112 94.9 13.4 62 92.5
4 3.4 92 78.0 4 6.0 53 79.188 88_34.6 49._ 71.1_ 49
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
147459
118447
67364
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.000D 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES - 525.0000 410.0000 231.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1983.0000 1536.0000- -711T:MEAN 3.5714 3.4746 3.4478STND. DEV. CM) = 0.8571 0.9452 0.9817STNO. UEV. IN-1) = 0.8601 -6:947§.2 0.9891MEDIAN 3.8553 3.8295 3.8163
41. Do you create any of the materials you use in teaching compensatoryreading?
1:1 Yes
20 No
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.000
CASES PROCESSED -NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE -SOP' OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES -MEANSIND. DEV. (N) =
SIND. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
F
55.d2.0
E
G v-c....1e
PC7 CF
96.5 57.93.5 2.0
57.89427.00001.00002.000059.942664.03201.03540.18440.186J1.0183
PCT CF
P-8LW
100.049.43.5
P-BLW
ra_as_Ct--F=-31..w
100.0
F PC
91.9
CF P-BLW
53.7 100.04.3 11:r
53.6695
F PCT
37.4 66°3 42.3
42.31E4
4.3 --"80,1
11.00001.00002.0000
16.00001.00002.0000
47.282857.20681.1113
58.024066.68651.0807
F PCT
0.27220.27481.0439
F
0.32160.32551.0664
CF P-BLW PC T CF P-BLW
1.000 579 96.7 599 100.0 502 99.6 554 100.0 366 88.2 415 100.02.000 20 3.3 20 3.3 52 9.4 52 9.4 49 11.8 49 11.6
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
5997
554 415Yr---- 16
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES 619:6006 606.0000 464.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 659.0000 710.0000 562.0000ME-AN 1.0334 1.0939 1.1181SIND. DEV. (N) = 0.1797 0.2916 0.3227SIND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.1798 0.2919 0.3231MEDIAN = 1.0173 1.0518 1.0669
SCORE INTERVALS
a. If Yes, which of the following(Check all that apply)
El Worksheets
G.co.cleF PCT CF P -8LW
types of materials do you create?
F P-BLW F
0.0 3.5 6.0 58.5 100.0 6.6 12.1 54.7 100.0 7.7 17.2 44.6 100.0LOCO 55.0 94.0 55.0 94.0 48.1 87:9 48.1 87.9 31.1 62.a 37.1 82.3
CASES PROCESStO = 58.5473 54.7435 44.8042MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0 v.0MAXIMUM VALISE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES - 55.0451 48.0982 37.0835
-SUM 500. SCORES = 55.0451 4T.0982 37.0t35
MEAN 0.9402 0.8786 0.8276STNC. DEV. (N) 0.2371 0.3266 0.3777SING. 0EV. IN-11 0.2392 0.3296 0.2820MEDIAN 0.9681 0.9309 0.6958
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT LF P-8LW F. PhT CF P-BLW
0.01.000
35571
5.894.2
606571
100.094.2
77488
_13.6. . . .
86.4_ _565
488100.0
. _
86.476
35517.682.4
_101 100.082.4
CASES PROCESSED 606 565 431MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 571.0000 488.0000 355.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 571.0000 488.0000 355.0000MEAN 0.9422 0.8637 0.8237SING. DEV. (N) 0.2333 0.3431_ 0.3811SING. REV. IN-11 0.2335 0.3434 0.3815MEDIAN 0.9694 0.9211 0.8930
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
CASES PROCESSED
F
18.336.7
MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORES =MEANSTND. DEV. (N) =STND. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS F
0.0 1851.000 386
0 Printed stories, poems, or essays
PCTGractev-a_Ap 6
CF P-BLW F PCfv " 62. P-BLW r FCTG
CF P-8L;
33.3 55.0 100.066.7 36.7 66.7
55.04160.01.0000
36.736136.73610.66740.47110.47550.7508
PCT
32.467.6
CF P-BLW
571 100.0386 67.6
17.3 36.0 48.1 100.0 14.7 35.8 37.1 100.030.6 64.0 30.8 64.0 22.3 60.2 22.3 60.2
48.0955 37.08160.0 0.01.0000 1.0000
30.7870 22.338030.7070 "22.33800.6401 0.60240.4800 0.48940.4850 0.45810.7188 0.6859
PCT CF P-BLW r PCT
184 37.7 488 100.0 133 37.5 355 100.0304 62.3 304 62.3 222 62.5 222 62.5
CASES PROCESSED 571 488 355MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0
MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
SUM OF SCORES = 386.0000 304.0000 222.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 386.0000 304.0000 222.0000MEAN 0.6760 0.6230 0.6254STND. DEV. = 0.4680 0.4846 0.4840
OEV. (11-1) = 0.4684 0.4851 0.4847MEDIAN 0.7604 0.6974 0.7005
I Ylcd
SCORE INTERVALS
0,01.000
CASES PROCESSEDMINAMUM VALUEMAXIMUM'VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. IN)STND. DEV. IN-11MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.600
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. (N)STNO. DEV. (N-1)MEDIAN
Transparencies for overhead projector
F PCIG-ratle. CF -F---Fcr cF-VzITUT- r F-BLvi
33,8 61.3 55.0 100.0 26.2 54.5 48,1 100.0 22.2 37.1 100.021.3 38.7 21.3 38.7 21.-4-455- 21.9 45.5 14.5 14.-V 40.1
5.04160.01.0000
2,-290521.29050.36680.48700.49150.3154
F PCT CF P-BLW F
48.0955
1.000021.884721.88470.45500.4980
PCT
0.t4d20.4174
353 61,8 571 100.0 280 57.4.218 38.2 218 38.2 208 42.6
CF P -8LW
44.0208 42.6
213142
.PCT
60.040.0
37.081611.0
2.0000Itones14.8/f50.40120.45010.49650.37449
CF P -BLW
355 100.0142 40.0
5710.0
488_ 3550.00.0
1.0000 1.0000 1.0000218,0000 208.0000 142.0000218.0000 2013.0000 142.6000
0.3818 0.4262 0.40000.4858 0.4945 0.48990.4863 G.4950 0.49060.3088 0.3714 0.3333
SCORE INTERVAL S
0.G1.000
CASES PROCESSED =MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES =SUM SOL. SCORES =MEANSTNC. DEV. (N) =SIND. DEV. (N-1) =MED IAN
SCORE INTERVALS
0 . 02.000
CASES PROCESSED =MINIM-U VALUE -MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORE S =MEAN--SEND. DEV. =STN). DEV. (N-11 =MEDIAN
F
El Filmstrips
v-a-d e. a.PCT CF F -ELW
Gy-F P-BLW F. PCT P-aLt.4
51.3 93.2 55.0 100.0 43.4 90.2 48.1--9:-a
100.0 3'2.4 87.3 37.1 100.03.7 6.8 3.7 6.8 4.7 4 .7-9:8- 4.7 12.7 4.7 12.7
55.0416 48.0955 37.08160.0 V. V 0.01.0000 1.0000 1.00003.7498 4. 7267 72343.7498 :72-6T- 4.72240.0681 0,0983 U.12740.2520 0.2977 0.33340.2543 0.3008 0.33E00.0365 0.0545 0,0720
F PCT CF P -BLW F PC T CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-BLW
53140
93.0 571.100.97.0 40 7.0
44048
90.2 488 100.0 311 87.6 355_100.09.8 48 9.8 44 12.4 44 12.4
5710.0
480d-
3550.01.0000 1.0000 1.000040.0000 48.0000 44.000040.0000 48.0000 44,00000.0701 0.0984 0.1239
0.2552 0.2978 0.32950.2555 0.2981 0.33000.0377 0.0545 0.0707
OUESTICN 41
SCORE INTERVAL S
0 . 0
1.000
CASES PROCESSED--MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES
--SUM SQ0. SCORESMEANSTNO. i;EV. tN)
-STNO. DEV. tN-11MEDIAN
QUESTION 41
=
=
SCORE INTERVAL S
0.01.000
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMF. 6N
ST40. DEV. (N)SIND. OEV. (N-1)MEDIAN
PART E
D Slides
G-_-rcticia. a-F PC1 CF P-BLW
5G.2 51.2 55.0 100.04.8 8.8 4.8 8.8
PART E.
53.04160.01.00004.84244.84240.08800.28330.28590.0482
F PCT CF
Y'SLa4c'd1:- --PCT 1..*F -P-BLW
43.?4.4
P-BIN F
Ne OLa .0
CFez,
P -15-C-r p-81w91.0 48.1 100.0 33.9 51.4 37.1 100.09.0 4.4- -5.a s, 4, 2 6.6 3.2 8.6-
PCT
48.0955(7.0
1.00004.3515C-35150.09050.28690.28990.0457
37,0616
- ..CF P-13114 F
0.01.00003.1E153.16150.0E600.28030.e8420,0470
PCT CF P-BLit_
530 92.8 571 100.0 448 91.8 488 100.0 319 89.941 7.2 41 7.2 40 8.2 40 8.2
4f2.: TO.I5710.01.0000
41.000041.00000.07180.25820.25840.0387
4880.01.0000
40.000040.00000.08200.27430.27460.0446
_50.01.0000
36.0000---Y62tiatiO"
0.10149.?019
---0.So-i
0.0564
3. 55_100.0. . _36 10.1
QUESTION 4i
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
CASES PROCESSED =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQ0. SCORESMEANSTN). DEV. (N) =STNO. OEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN
QUFSTION 41
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
CASES PROCESSED =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES =SUM SQO. SCORES =MEANSTND. DEV. (N) =STND. DEV. IN-11 =MEDIAN
PART
PART F
Motion Pictures
Gv-otsl_e_ aPCT CF F-BLW
Gy-a..cLa 6F PC1 CF
52.9 96.1 55.0 100.0 45.8 95.2 48.1 10(.0 3-4.2 92.1 37./ 100. ti2.1 3,9 2.1 3.9 2.3 4:1- 273 4.0 4-9 1.9 2.9 7.9
55.0416 48.0955 37.06160.0 0.01.0000 1.0000 1.00002.1335 2.3271 2.51E32.1335 2.3271 2.91830.0388 0.0484 0.07870.1930 0.2146 0.2693
0.216a- 0.277100.0202 0.0254 0.0427
F PCT CF P -BLW F PCI CF P-804 F PCT CF P-BLW
548 96.0 571 100.0 463 94.9 488 100.0 326 92.4 355 100.023. 4.0 23 4.0 25 5.1 25 5.1 27 7.6 27 7.6
571 488 3550.0 0.0 0.01.0000 1.0000 1.0000
23.0000 25.0000 27.0000-27.000023.0000 25.0000
0.0403 0.0512 0.07610.1966 0.2205 0.26510.1968 0.2207 0.26550.0210 0.0270 0.0412
`f1(
31
ww7ST10N 41
PART G
SCOKL INTERVALS
F
Cha
rts
-2_
PC1
CF
P-8
LW
0.0
8.3
15.1
55.0 100.0
1.000
46.7
84.9
46.7
FP
CLE
7WF
q-C
fszL
'C
FP-B
I w
13.3
27.7
48.1 100.0 14.0
31.7
37.1 100.0
84.9
34a
--72
-.1-
34:8
72.
3 'M
r" 6
2..3
23.1
WITS
CASES PROCESSED
55.0416
48.0955
MINIMUM VALUE
0.0
0.0
MAXIMUM VALUE
1.0000
1.0000
SUM OF SCORES
46.7419
34.7666
SUN SQL). SCORES
46.7419
34.7666
MEAN
0.8492
0.7229
STND. DEV. (N)
0.3578
0.4476
STNO. OEV. (N-1)
0.3611
0.4523
MEDIAN
=0.9112
0.8082
QUESTION 41
PART G
SCORE INTERVALS
0.0
1.00
0
FPCT
79
13.8
492
86.2
CF P -8LW
E
571 100.0 139
492
86.2 349
PC
T01,;KW"
37.0E16
0.0
i'OCCO
23.0935
23.0S:t5
o.ezke
0,4E47
0.4914
0.6571
488 .100..0 132
37.2
355 100.0
71.5
349
71.5 223
62.8
223
62.8
CASES PROCESSED
571
488
_ .
_.
-MINIMUM VALUE
0.0
0.0
MAXIMUM VALUE
1.0000
1.0000
SUM OF SCORES
492.0000
349.0000
SUM SQO. SCORES
492.0000
349.0000
MEAN
0.8616
0.7152
STND. DEV. (N)
'
0.3453
0.4513.
STNO. DEV. (N-1)
0.3456
b.4518
MEDIAN
0.9197
0.8009
355 0.0
1.0000
223.0000
223.0000
0.6282
0.4833
0.4840
0.7040
QUESTION 41 PARI H
SCORE INTERVALS
0 Tapes
G".1,041e gF PCT cf P-6114
0.01.000
29.9 t...4.4
25.1 45.655.025.1
CASES PROCESSED =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =
.--§Coitio. SCORES =MEAN =SYNO. OEV. (Ni -=
STAID.DEV. (N-1J =MEDIAN =
QUESTION 41
SCORE INTERVALS
PART H
55.04160.01.0000
25.109625.10960.45620.49810.5D270.4194
F PCT
100.045.6
GV- OA P 14
F PCT CF F -BIM6t,et A A,
F PCT CF P:TC-ti
26.6 55.4 48.1 100.0 21.4 57.6 31.1. 100.021.4 44.6 21,4 44.6 1.5.7 42,4 15.f 42.4
48.09550.01.0000
21.448521.44850.44600.4971
---6.5023U.4024
37.08160.01.0C41015.715015.71500.42280,45420.50100.2677
CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
0.01.000
CASES PROCESSED
321250
=
56.2 57143.8 250
571MINIMUM VALUE - 0.0.MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 250.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 256A0OoMEAN 0.4378STND. DEV. IN) = 0.4961STMD. DEV. IN-13 = 0.4966MEDIAN 0.3894
F PC T CF P-BLW
100.0 274 56.1 488 100.0 202 56.9 355 100.043.8 214 43.9 214 43.9 153 43.1 153 43.1
_
4880.01.0000
214.0000214.00000.43850.49620.49670.3905
3550.01.0000
153.0000 ____153.0000
0.43100.4952_0.49590.3787
- -
QUESTION 41
SCORE INTERVALS
0.01.000
CASES PROCESSED-MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUH SQ0. SCORESMEANSINE. DEV. (N)STNO DEV. (N-1)MEDIAN
QUESTION 41
SCORE INTERVALS
0.0.1.000
CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES§UM-SQD. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. (NISTNO.* DEV. IN-1)MEDIAN
PART I
PART I
Other (Specify)
F
41.213.9
PCF1.6-6 iF P-BLW
74.8 55.0 100.025.2 13.9
4-v a(1.F
38.9
PCT-"--/81.0
CF P-811(
48.1 100.0---79.2--17:0
F
31.8
FLT
85.E
CF
37.1
P-131..p
100.%',
5.3 14.4 5.3 14.2
F PCT
55.0416 48.0955 37.08160.0 0.0 0.01.0600 1.0000 1.0000
13.8908 9.1512 5.288413.8906 1:151-2 5.26640.2524 0.1903 0.14200.4344 0.3925 0.34910.4384 0.39b 0.35390.1888 0.1/75 u,0828
CF p-BLW
423148
74.125.9
571148
100.025.9
390_98
79.9 488 100.0 30550
85.9 355 100.020.1 98 20.1 14.1 50 14.1
573. 488 3550.0 0.0 0.01.0000 1.0000 1.0000148.0000 98.0000 50.0000148.0000 98.0000 50.00000.2592 0.2008 0.14080.4382
_ _ 0.4006_____ 0.34790.4366 0.4010 0.34840.1749 0.1256 0.0820
How would you rate each of the followingto you as goals in your current teaching
Improving motor abilities relatedto reading
activities in terms of importanceof compensatory reading?
Major Secondary Of little or noImportance as a goalGoal Goal
QUESTION 42 PART A
SCORE INTERVALS F PC7 CF P-BLW F FDT CF P -8LW F PCT cfT=IP717,
25.8 49.0 52.7 100.0 21.4 46.5-Y8.4
45.9 100.0,3.4 37.1 36.1 100.02.CCO 23.0 43.7 26.9 51.0 17.6 24.6 53.5'6.2 44.9 22.7 62.93.CCC 3.9 7.3 3.8 7.3 6.9 15.1 6.9 15.1 6.5 18.0 6.5 18.0
CASES PROCESSED 52.6810 45.9398 36.0629NO. I3L4NK DATA 20.0000 24.0000 9.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SLIM OF SCORES 83.3919 77.4329 65.2590SUM SOD. SCORES 152.5097 154.2765 136.6343MEAN -1.58M 1.6855 1.8CS6SIND. DEV. (N) 0.6239 0.7192 0.7171STN&. DEV. (N-I) C.6299 0.7271 0.7272MEDIAN -1:5223 1.5901 1.188o
suIREYRTERVAis F PCT Cr P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 274 49.7 551 100.0 197 42.6 462 100.0 108 31.2 346 100.02.000 232 42.1 277 50.3 195 42.2 265 57.4168 48.6 238 68.83.000 45 8.2 45 8.2 70 15.2 70 15.2 70 20.2 70 20.2
CASES PROCESSEDND. BLANK DATA =
55120
46226
3469
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 873.0000 797.0000 654.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1607.0000 1607.0000 1410.0000
1.5844 1.7251 1.8902STND. DEV. (N/ = 0.6374 0.7088 0.7088SIND. DEV. (N71)_= 0.6379 0.7095 0.7098
1.5065 1.6744 1.8869
Increasing attention span
WftSlion 4z YAK 1 6
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =
F PCT CF P-BLW
41.7 77.2 54.1 100.012.1 22.4 12.4 22.8-13.30.2 0.4 0.2 0.4
54.069210.0000
F- TZ1----
32.7 69.2 47.2
CI- P-BLW
100.0 23.7
F
rri,9--1.2
PCT CF P -B-L
64.4 36.7 10C.2-8:1--14.5 30.8
1.3 2.7 1.3 2.732.3 13.13.2 1.2
35.3.
47.214310.0000
?.6.74E34.0CLO
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000-MA X I 1.1-UM VA-CUE = 3.0.0-00 3.0000 _3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 66.6620 62.9950 51.009SUM SQO. SCORES = 92.3096 97.0598 81.8937
--KEAN = 1.2'329 1.335Z 1..38E0STND. DEV. IN1 = 0.4327 0.5249 0.5494STNC. DEV. IN-11 = 0.4367 0.5306 0.5571
-----74EDIAN = 1.1481 1.Z221 1.2(0
----
SCORE IN F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF P.:BL
1.000 432 ..7.7.0. 561 100.0 320 66.9 478.100.0 215 61.3 351 100.2.000 126 22.5 129 23.0 146 30.5 158 33.1 123 35.0 136 38.3.000 3 0.5 3 0.5 12 2.5 12 2.5 13 3.7 13 3.
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM 590. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. (N1STND. DEV. IN-11
1-IEDIAN
=-
561101.0000
.-478101.0000
35141.0000
==-
3.0000693.0000
3.0000648.0000
3.0000500.0000
963.0000 1012.0000 824.00001.2353 1.3556 1.4245
=0.43660.4370
0.52860.5291
0.56420.5651
1.1493 1.2469 1.3163
Developing auditorydiscrimination
QUESTION 42
SCORE INTERVAL S
PART C
0 0
F PCT CF P-BLW -F -PCT
1.000 46.5 86.7 53.72.000 6.6 12.4 7.23,000 0.5 1.0 0.5
CF P-BLW F FCT CF P-BL 0
100.0 32.3 68.5 47.2 100.0 1-1.2 47.6 36.1 100.013.3 13.3 28.2 14.8 3175 16.7 46.3 16.9 52,41.0 1.5 3.2 1.5 3,2 2,2 6.1 2.2 6.1
CASES PROCESSED' 53-.6572 47.1928 35.1150NO. BLANK DATA 13.0000 9.0000 10.0CCCMINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIAOMVALliE = 3;0000 3,0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES - 61.3343 63.5650 57.2388SUM 9Pf..5c.WS 77.7070 99.3476 103.8820
1.1'431 1.3469 1.5849STND. DEV. IN) = 0.3763 0.5394 0.6037STND. OEV, 4N-11 0.3798 0.5452 0.6123MEDIAN 1.2295 1.5516
SCORE IN tERVAL PCT P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PC7 CF P -BLW
1.000 477 85.5 558 100,0 327 68.3 479 100.0 171 49.6 345 100.02.000 75 13.4 81 14,5 136 28.4 152 31.7 151 43.8 174 50.43.000 6 1.1 6 1.1 16 3.3 16 3.3 23 6.7 23 6,7
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA =
55813
4799
34510
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES =- 645.0000 647.0000 542.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 831.0000 1015.0000 982.0000MEAN 1.1559' 1,3507 1.5710STND. DEV. IN) = 0.3913 0.5427 0.6151STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.3916 0.5433 0.6159MEDIAN 1.0849 1.2324 1.5099
Matching letters or words
QUESTION 42
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEWAIRDA if-AE (1ESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORES
-WEANSTND. °EV. (N)STND. DEV. (N-13
-WED IAN
PART 0
SCORE
1.9002.000.-3.000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSTUD. DEV. IN) =STND. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN
F PCT
28.023.03.1
51.842.65.7
CF P-BLW PCT
54.126.13.1
54.10379.00001.00003.0000
83.2452147.6358
1.53860.60120.60681:4653
F PCI
299 53.2227 40.436 6.4
CF P-BLW F LF
100.0 13.0 27.5 47.2 100.0 6.0 16.9 35.6 100.048.2 13;2 29.6 63.13cr2--7z;5-7-,;9--50.25.6 11.0 23.3 11.0 23.311.7 32.9 11.7 32.9
47.176310.00001.0000
35.6C6011.00001.0000
3.0000 3.000092.4177 76.9431
204.9261 183.07331.9590 2.16100.7115 0.66700.7191 0.65.681.9582 2.1602
CF P-BLW
56226336
56291.00003.0000
861.00001531.0000
1.53200.61410.61461.4398
PCT CF F PCT CF
100.0 133 27.9 477 100.0 60 17.4 344 100.)46.8 236 49.5 344 72.1 163 47.4 284 82.66.4 108 22.6 108 22.6121 35.2 121 35.2
47711.
1.0000
344111.0000
3.0000 3.0000929.3000 749.0000
2049.0000 1801.00001.9476 2.17730.7089 0.70340.7096 0.70441.9470 2.1871
Learning letter forms
QUESTION 42
SCORE INTERVALS
PART E
0 0 0
F PC r
1.0002.0003.000
30.918.3.
4.9
57.133.89.1
CF P-BLW
54.023..24.9
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORES____MEANSTUD. DEV. (N)STND. DEV. (N-1.)MEDIAN
.
====
======
54.035811.00001.00003.0000
82.1244148.1089
1.51980.65660.66271.3755
-----SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
---tWStgi5OCSSED ...
100.042.99.1
F PCT CF P-BLW-- F PCT CF P-Bi.h
11.022.913.1
23.448.827.8
47.036.013.1
100.0 3.476.6137927.813.3
16.545.338.1
35.0 100.029.2 83.513.3 38.1
46.9/5312.00001.00003.0000
96.0187220.2223
2.04400.71410.72192.0450
34.974013.00001.00003.0000
77.5001189.22122.21590.70710.71742.2380
F -PCT CF 0-BLS!
323 57.8188.-33.648 8.6
55912NO. BLANK DATA
MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. (N)STND. °EV. (N-1)MEDIAN
===
==
===
_
_ .
1.0000________3.0000
843.00001507.0000_ . _ _ . . _
1.50800.64940.64991:3653
PCT CF 15-13Lw PCT CF P-BLW
559 100.0 120 25.3236-42.2219 46.148 8.6136 28.6
475 100.0 56355 74.7 148136 28.6 138
16.443.340.4
342 100.0.286' 83.6.138 40.4
475131.0000___ ____3.0000
966.00002220.0000_ _ _ _
2.03370.73340.73412.0365
342131.00003.0000
766.00001890.0000
2.23980.71400.71502.2770
Developing a sight vocabulary(Whole word recognition)
QUESTION 42
SCORE INTERVALS
PARI
F P&.1 CF P-BLW F PCT
1.000 42.72.000 '11.43.000 0.3
78.5 54.421.0 11.70.6 0.3
--CASES PROCESSEDNO. dLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
54.35767.00001.0000
XTKUM-VAL IiE 3:0000SUM OF SCORES 66.3735SUM SOD. SCORES 91.0177
- 1,'2211
STN G. DEV. (NI 0.4283SIND, DEV. IN-1I 0.4323
-AEDIAN- 1:1372
SCORE INTERVALS
CF P F PC 1 CF P-8L
100.036.8 77.2 47.7 100.0 23.7 64.5 34.8 100.214.5-977750740.6 1,1 2.4
10.91.1
22.g-11.,12.4 1.9
30.35.2
13.11.9
35.5.
47,69144.00001.00003.0000
59.688885.93551.25160.48530.49041.1475
F PCT CF P-BLW E PCT
36.77534.000U1.00003.0000
51.772785.60391.40770.5620.59641.2(55
CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-B1
1,000 446 79.2 563 100.0 365 75.6 483 100.0 226 64.4 351 100.2.000 114 20.2 117 20,8 106 21.9 118 24.4 101 28,8 125 35.3.000 3 0,5 3 0.5 12 2.5 12 2.5 24 6.e 24 6.
5638
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
= 4835
3514
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 683.0000 613.0000 500.0000SUM SOD, SCORES 929.0000 897.0000 846.0000MEAN 1.2131 1.2692 1.4245SIND. DEV. (N) 0.4223 0.4964 0.6173SIND. DEV. IN-1) = 0,4227 0.4969 0,6182MEDIAN 1.1312 1.1616 1.2765
Learning word meanings(Vocabulary)
QUESTION 42
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
PART 1..;
0
F PCT
45.48.96.0
CF P.43LW PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF Pte'
83.6 54.3 100.0 42.1 88.0 47.8 100.029.9 81.7 36.6 100.016.4 8.9 16.4 5.7 12.0 5.1 L1.° 6.5 1/./ 6.7 18.30.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.6
CASES PROCESSED 54.3164 47.8223 36.61E0Na. BLANK DATA 7.0)00 3.0000 5.DOCCCMINIMUM VALUE 1.0000
.
1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 .0000SUM OF SCORES 63.2445 53.5527 43.5353SUM SQO. SCORES 81.0939 65.0080 5708107MEAN 1.1644 1.1198 1.1889STND. UEV. IN) 0.3704 0.3246 0.4065STND. DEV. IN -1) 0.3739 0.3280 0.4122MEDIAN 1.0983 1.0680 1.1118
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-8134
1.000 470 83.3 564 100.0 424 87.4 485 100.0 293 83.7 350 100.02.000 94 16.7 94 16.7 61 12.6 61 12,6 56 16.0 57 16.33.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.3 1 0.3
CASES PROCESSEDNO0 BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
=564
71.0000
4853
1.0000
35051.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 658.0000 546.0000 408.0000SUM 500. SCORES 846.0000 668.0000 526.0000MEAN 1.1667 1.1258 1.1657STND. DEV. IN) 0.3727 0.3316 0.3794STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.3730 0.3319 0.3800MEDIAN 1.1000 1.0719 1.0973
Phonic and/or structuralanalysis
QUESTION 42 PAK I-I
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002:0003.000
-CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA =
F PCT CF
49.9 92.0 54.24.1 7.6 4.40.3 0.5 0.3
54.24737.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000-MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 58.8637SUM S_OC. SCORES = 68.6824MEAN 1.0855STN&. DEV. IN/ 0.2964STN). DEV. = 0.2992
-leaTAN 1;0438
SCORE INTERVALS PCT
F
100.0 36.38.0 11.-30.5 0.2
FCT
75.9 47.7 100.0273.6-----MT5.--247r--rs.70.4 0.2 0.4
T---TZT
21.7
CF P -81.$
54.7 36.3 100..
1.037.6 14.6 40.2.7 1.0 2.
47.7421 3t. 61324.0000 700CCO1.0000 1.00003.00-00 3.0000
54.4352 51.930683.2230 e5.1(781.2449 1.43010.4397 0.54640.4444 0.5.t4111.1584 1.3318
CF P -BLW F PCT CF PBLYI F
1.0002.0003.000
. . . - . - -516- - - . . . . .
453
91.5- . . . _ _
8.00.5
564_100.048 8.53 0.5
376 77.8 483 100.0 214 61.5 348 100.0103
421.30.8
1074
22.20.8
12311
35.33.2
13411
38.53.2
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OA TAMINIMUM VALUE
===
5647
1.0000
48351.0000
34871. 0000
MAXIMUM VALUE - 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 615.0000 594.0000 493.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 723.0000 824.0000 805.0000MEAN 1.0904 1.2298 1.4167STNO. DEV. IN) = 0.3048 0.4400 0.5534STND. DEV. (N-11 = 0.3050 0.4404 0.5542MEDIAN 37,57W61 1.1423 1.3131
Developing skill in using contextclues
QUESTIUN 42
SCORE INTERVALS
i-ART I
F PCT CF
1.000 44.1 82.42.000 9.3 17.33. OOC 0.2 0.4
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OA TA
=
=MINIMUM VALUE
-MAXIMUM VALUE==
SUM OF SCORES =SUM SQD. SCORES =MEAN =
SYNC. DEV. (N) =STND. DEV. (N-1) =
-MEDIAN =
SCORE INTERVAL S
1.0002.0003.000
53.69.50.2
53.60828.00001.00003.0600
63.266882.96451.18020.39350.39721;1071
F PCT
a
P-BLW F '-to. - - CF
100.017.60.4
39.77.20.4
P-BLW F PCT Ce P-BL*I
83.9 47.3 100.0 23.7 80.2 3700 100.0-1-57.1
0.7 0.46.10.7
.20.1
1 .40.4
7.30.1
19.80.4
47.2696 36.5Sa8.0000 i.00CO1.0000 1.00003.0000 3.0000
55.2220 44.457971.8299 59.64551.1682 1.2Clo0.3935 Oo 41010.3977 0.41561.01967 1.1233
CF P-BLW F PCT
463 82.2 56398 17.4 1002 0.4 2
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
56381.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.000SUM OF SCORES 665.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 873.0000MEAN = 1.1812STND. DEV. (N) = 0.3943SING. DEV. (N-1) = 0.3946MEDIAN 1.71U0-
100.039617.8 800.4 4
CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
82.5 480 100.0 290 81.9 354 100.016.7 84 17.0 62 17.5 64 18.10.8 4 0.8 2 0.6 2 0.6
48081.0000
3541
1.00003.0000 3.0000
568.0000 420.0000752.0000 556.0000
1.1833 1.18640.4079 0.40370.4083 0.40431.1061 1.1103
Practicing syllabification skills
QUESTION 42 PART
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003. 000
16.5243.1
8.7
F PCT CF
31.0-52.716.3
53.336;88.7
100.0 25.0 52.6
16.3 1.8 3.8
F FCI CF
47.622.61.8
100.0..1 41.141.41.9 54.43.8 .7 4.5
p-ah
36.7 100.021.6 58.91.7 4.5
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
-MANI-KM VALUESUM OF SCURESSUM SOD. SCORES
STND. DEV. (N)SIND. DEV. IN-11MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
5S:338310.00001.00005..0000
98.0457207.2599
1.-8-532
0.67190.6783
-4776374-5.00001.00003.0000
72.0340124.3992
1.51210.56990.5760
F MT' CF P-BLW F
36.67S14.0CCO1.00003.0000
59.9323109.73891.63400,56750.5i541.6633
PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
.I.000.2.0003.000
166295100
29.6_52.617.8
561 100.0 244 50.5395 70.4215 44.5100 17.8 24 5.0
483 100.0 143239 49.5 18824 5.0 19
40.953.75.4
350 100.0207 59.119 5.4
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESBUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSIND. DEV. (N) =
SIND. DEV. IN -1) =MEDIAN
561- 48310 51.0000 1.0000-6:61560 3.0000
1056.0000 746.00002246.0000_ 1320.0000
176824 1.54450.6785 0.58940.6791_ 0.59001.8881 1.4898
35051.00003.0000
576.000D1066.0000
1.64570.56080.58161.6702
Practicing punctuation andparagraph skills
QUESTION 42
SCORE INTERVALS
PART K
0 0
F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-BLW F FCT
1.000 15.1 27.6 54.5 100.02.000 33.0 60.6 39.4 72.43.000 6.4 11.8 6.4 11.8
16.5 34.7 47.5 100.0 12.0 32.9 36.6 100.627.3 57.4 31.0 65.3-20.9 57.2 24.5 67.13.8 7.9 3.8 7.9 3.6 9.9 3.6 9.9
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
54.50255.0000
47.54616.0000
36.56275.0060
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 100.3520 82.3414 64.7253SUM SQD. SCORES 204.8626 159.4321 128.2909MEAN 1.8412 1.7318 1..TTO3
STNC. DEV, IN) 0.6071 0.5950 0.6124STNO. DEV. IN-1) 0,6128 0.6013 0.4209MEDIAN 1.8689 1.7662 1.7'9421
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF 13.41CW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 150 ?6.5 565 100.0 158 32.8 481 100.0 118 33.7 350 100.02.000 341 60.4 415 73.5 284 59.0 323 67.2 198 56.6 232 66.33.000 74 13.1 74 13.1 39 8.1 39 8.1 34 9.7 34 9.7
T4Sts PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
5656
4817
3505
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 1054.0000 843.0000 616.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 2180.0000 1645.0000 1216.0000MEAN 1.8655 1.7526 1.7600BIND. DEV. IN) = 0.6151 0.5902 0.6137STNC. DEV.MEDaN
==
0.61571.8886
0.5908 0.61461.7905 1.7879
Developing comprehens ionskills
QUESTION 42
SCORE INTERVALS
PART L
F PCT CF P-8LW -F-- tF-157=1311,7-
1.00G 52.3 96.6 54.2 100.0 46.2 96.5 47.8 100.0 34.1 93.0 36.7 100.02.000 1.9 3.4 1.9 3.4--1:7 2.6 7.03.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0
CASE; PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
=
=
54.17937.0000
4.7.713Z.4.3
3.000036.70853.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 2.0000 ---7:0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES = 56.0510 49.4855 39.2817SUM SQD. SCORES = 59.7874 52.8064 44.4242MEAN 1.0345 1.0348 1.0701STNC. DEV. IN) = 0.1823 0.1829 0.2551STND. OEV. = 0.1E140 0.1848 0.25E7MEDIAN 1.0179 1.0180 1.0377
SCORE INTERVALS F
1.000 5442.000 193.000 0
PCT CF 0-41:w
96.6 563 100.03.4 £9 3.40.0 0 0.0
CASES PROCFSSED -= 56SNO. BLANK DATA -MINIMUM VALUE_ 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000SUM OF SCORES = 582.0000SUM WO. SCORES = 62o.p000MEAN 1.0337STNO. DEV. IN) = 0.1806STN D. DEV. = 0.1807MEDIAN 1.0175
F PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF 13-81.W
468 96.5 485 100.0 336 95.5 352 100.017 3.5 17- 3.5 16 4.5 16 4.50 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
4853
3523
1.0000 1.00002.0000 2.0000
502.0000 368.0000536.0000 400.0000
1.0351 1.04550.1839 0.20830.1841 0.20861.0182 1.0238
Improving comprehension rate
QUESTION 42 PART M
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW P -Fro P-BLW F PCT CF P-8Lh
1..00C 38.8 71.8 54.1 100.0 36.2 76.1 47.6 100.028.9 78.7 36.7 100.02.CCC 13.8 25.6 15.2 28.2 10.5 -2-2.1 11.4 23.4-6.9 18.8 7.8 21.33.000 1.4 2.6 1.4 2.6 0.8 1.7 0.8 1.7 0.9 25 0.9 2.5
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
54.071510.0000
47..57006.0000
36.74373.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.6000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0060 300000SUM OF SCORES 70.7131 59.7549 45.4653SUM SOD. SCORES 106.7808 85.7714 64.7183-MEAN 1.3078 1.2561 1.2374STND. OEV. (N) 0.5143 0.4745 0.4795STND. CEV. IN-11 0.5192 0.4796 0.4E65MEDIAN 1.1:461 1.1568 1.1350
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT- CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 401 71.5 561 100.0 355 73.8 481 100.0 278 79.0 352 100.02.000 145 25.8 160 28.5 116 24.1 126 26.2 64 1802 74 21.03.000 15 2.7 15 2.7 10 2.1 10 2.1 10 2.8 10 2.8
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
56110
4817
3523
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 736.0000 617.0000 436.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 1116.0000 909.0000 624.0000MEAN 1.J119 1.2827 1.2386STNV. DEV. IN) 0.5178 0.4943 0.4884STNO. DEV. IN-1) 0.5183 0.4949 0.4891MEDIAN 1.1995 1.1775 1.1331
Developing listening skills
QUESTION 42
SCORE INTERVALS
CASES PROCESSEDNU. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORESMEAN-STNC. DEV. (N)STNO. OEV. IN-1)MEDIAN
1.000 49.9 91.9 54.3 100.038.9 82.02.000 4.4' 8.1 4.4 '8.1 EL-5 --1-8.0
3.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0
SCORE INTERVALS
PART N
F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P' 81W
F .PCT. CF P-BLW F PCT
54.26198.00001.00002:000058.661767.45431.08110.27270.27531;0441
47.3138.00001.00002.0000
55.892572.92521.11980.38390.3680.1.1096
FLT
47.4 100.0e9.88.5 18.0 7.1 19.Z
-0.0 -0.0 0.1 0.3
CF P -8LW F PCT
3b. 99E31.00L01.00003.000044.350159.2ses1.19E70.40720.41291.1213
CF P-8L.
37.0 100.07.2 19.50.1 0.3
CF P-8LW
1.000_
2.0003.000
517 91.846 8.20 0.0
563 100.0 388 80.846 8.2 92 19.20 0.0 0 0.0
480 100.0285 80.592 19.2 66 18.60 0.0 3 0.11
354 100.069 19.53 0.8
MEDIAN
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORESMEANSTNO. 0EV. (N) =
STND. DEV. (N-1) =
5638
1.00002.0000
609.0000701.0000
1.08170.27390.27421.0445
4808
1.00002.0000
572.0000756.0000
1.19170.39360.39401.1186
3541
1.00003.0000
426.0000576.0000
1.20340442310.42361.1211
Reading aloud
QUESTION 42 PART
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002-00-0-0
3.000
CASES PAbtESs80-NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE
-MAX-ft-WM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORES =
STNO. DEV. (N)STND. DEV. (N-1)
-14-E-01AN
0
F
27.224.92.3
F
PCT CF
50.1 54.445.8 27.24.1 203
54.42246.00001.00003.0000
83.8683147.2678
1.54110.57540.58081.4990
-Pc f CF
P -BLW
100.015,449-.9'2-7.1-
4.1
VIOLA%
100.0
F PCT CF
32.6 47.3
P-BLW
100.0
F
0,0
PCT CF
21.6 3t.9
4.637;7-----31:99.7 4.6
67.C.3.59.7 5.4
64.4 2U.914.6 5.4
78.414.6
47.26299.00001.0000
36.85C93.00001.0000
3.000083.7187
165.8238
3.000071.1283150.4656
P-BLW
1.77130.60900.6156
1.93020055800.00E31.9451
F
1.8016
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 272 48.1 565 100.0139 29.1 478 100.0 78 22.2 352 1D0.02.000 271 48.0 293 51.9289 60.5 339 70.9218 61.9 274 77.83.000 22 309 22 3.9 50 10.5 50 10.5 56 15.9 56 15.9
_ _. . _ . _ _ _
*.6561.0000
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE -
478101.0000
35231.0000
MAXIMUM VALUE --Taidurs 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 880.0000 867.0000 682.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 1554.0000 1745.0000 1454.0000MEAN 1.5375 1.8138 1.9375STNO. DEV, IN) = 0.5697 0.6006 0.6138STND. DEV* (N-1/ = 0.5702 0.6012 0.6147MEDIAN 1.5387 1.8460 1.9495
Reading silently (independentsilent reading)
QUESTION 42
SCORE INTERVALS
PART P
F PCT CF P -B LW
1.000 45.8 84.6 54.2 100.02.000 6.2 15.1 8.3 15.43.000 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3
1:- PC7-- PCT CF P-ct.CF P-81.14 F
36.4 76.9 47.4 100.027.9 75.9 36.7 100.010.8 22.7 11.0 23.1 790.2 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.S 2.6 0.9 2.6
USES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATH
==
54:16429.0000
WT.74-1-047.0000
36.68004.0000
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000-1411/AUOt VALUE 3.0000 3.0000---73:0000SUM OF SCORES = 62.6922 58,6110 46.4543SUM SQO. SCORES = 80.0967 81.4516 67,8664MEAN 1.1574 4.2-362 1.26E5STND. OEV. (NJ = 0.3729 0.4355 0.4568STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.3764 0.4402 0.5037MEDIAN = 1.0911 1.1506 1.1565
F PCT CO P -BLW F -OCT CF--0-BLg F PCT CF P -BL
2,0003.000
470902
_83.616.00.4
562922
100.016:40.4 2 0.4
481119
2
100.024.70.4
269766
76.6 351 100.21.7.7
826
23.1..
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
==
5629
4817
3514
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 656.0000 602.0000 439.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 843.0000 848.0000 627.0000MEAN- 1.1673 1.2516 1.2507STND. DEV. IN) - 0.3826 0.4434 0.4712STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.3830 0.4438 0.4719MEDIAN 1.0979 1.1644 1.1524
Developing study skills
QUESTION 42
SCORE INTERVALS
PART ij
El L7 U
F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT tF F PCT CF P-8Lte
1.000 38.6 71.5 54.0 1000 38.3 80.6 47.6 100.0 30.9 84.0 36.7 A00.0.2.000 14.2 2602 15.4 28.5 901 19.1 902 19.4 5.6 1504 5.9 16.03.000 1.2 2.3 1.2 203 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.6
CASES PROCESSED 54.0148 47.5702 36.-7214NO. BLANK DATA 10.0000 6.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 300000SUM OF SCORES 70.6441 56.9504 4208,016SUM SOD. SCORES 106.3569. 76.0033 5503662MEAN 1.3079 1.1972 101654STND. DEV. (Ni 0.5084 0.4055 0.3666STNO. DEV. (W'1) 0.5132 0.4099 0.3920MEDIAN .40 1049'93 1.1203 1.0514
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT
1..000 400 71.32.000 146 26003.000 15 2.7
CF P -8LW F PCT CF P-.BLW F PCT CF P -BLW
561 100.0 377 78.2 482 10000 289 82.1 352 10000161 28.7 21.4 105 21.8 61 1703 63 17.915 2.7 2 0.4 2 0.4 2 0.6 2 0.6
----EASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
56110
4826
3523
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 73700000 589.0000 417.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 1119.0000 807.0000 551.0000MEAN 1.3137 1.2220 1.1847STND. DEV. (N) 0.5184 0.4255 0.4024STNO. DEV. = 0.5189 0.4259 0.4030MEDIAN 1.1393 1.1090
Developing library skills
QUESTION 42 PART R
F FCT CF P -8LW iF- PCT CF P-BLit PCT CF P-BL og
1. COG 11.6 21.4 54.3 100.0 15.7 33.2 47.4 100.0 13.9 37.9 36.7 100.02.000 35.8 65.9 42.7 78.6-28.3 59.8 31.7 66.8E20.3 55. 22.B 62.13.000 6.9 12.7 6.9 12.7 3.3 7.0 3.3 7.0 2.5 6.9 2.5 6.S
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
=
=
54.31928.0000
4/.38798.0000
31).70485.0000
MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0006 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 103.9333 82.3840 62.0590SUM SOO. SCORES = 216.9724 159.0237 117.8552
1.9134- 1.1385 1.6SC8STND. DEV. (N) = 0.5774 0.5774STNC. DEV. (N-1) = 0.5828 0.5836 0.o017MEDIAN 1 9342 1.7131Z 1.(1v8
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF 0--KW CF P-BLW F PCT CF 0.-bLW
1.000 _121 21.5 563 100.0155 32.4 478 100.0126 36.0 350 100.02.000 370 65.7 442 78.5285 59.6 323 67.6200 57.1 224 64.03.000 72 12.8 72 12.8 38 7..9 38 7.9 24 6,9 24 6.9
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
===
8
1.0000
478101.0000
3505
1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1077.0000 839.0000 598.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 2249.0000 1637,0000 1142.0000MEAN 1.9130 1.7552 1.7086STMD. DEV. (N) = 0.5790 0.5864 0.5862STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.5795 0.5870 0.5870MEDIAN 1.9338 1.7947 1.7450
Improving verbal communication
QUESTION 42
SCORE INTERVALS
PART S
F PCT CF P -6LW PCI- CF-P=B-CR- r PC I CF P-eLw
1.000 39.6 73.6 53.9 100.0 34.0 71.4 47.7 100.0 26.5 72.2 36,7 100.02.000 13.9 25.8 14.2 26.4-12.7-22,6 13.7 28.6 FUO1 27.5 10.2 27.83.000 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.7 1.0 2.1 1.0 2.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2
CASES PROCESSED 53.8977 47.6600 36.7151NO. BLANK DATA 11.0000 5.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 68.5141 62.2954 47.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 98.4668 93.5167 6707212MEAN 1.2712 1.3071 1.2800STNC. DEV. IN) 0.4593 0.5037 0.4538SIND. DEV. IN-1) 0.4637 0.5091 0046C1MEDIAN -1.1747 1.2008 1019.22
-SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-8LW
1.000 426 76.1 560 10000 338 70.1 482 100.0249 71.1 350 100002.000 129 23.0 134 2309133 27.6 144 29.9100 28.6 101-28093.000 5 0.9 5 0.9 11 2.3 11 2.3 1 0.3 1 0.3
CASES PROCESSEDO. BLANK OATA
56011
4826
3505
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 699.0000 637.0000 452.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 987.0000 969.0000 658.0000MEAN 1.2482 1.3216 1.2914SIND. DEV. (N) = D.4522 0.5136 0.4607STNO. DEV. = 0.4526 0.5142 0.4613MEDIAN 1.1573 1.2130 1.2028
Creative writing El
13.US TION 42
SCORE INTERVAL S
1.0002.0003.000
PART T
F
17.732.74.0
PCT CF P-BLW
32.5 54.4 100.060,1 36,7 67.5
7.4 4.0 7.4
15.327.7
4.8
---CF
32.0 47.7
P-BLW F
100,0 11.8
ECT CF
32.3 36.5 100L5-8.D 32.5 68.0 20.3-53,7 24.1 67.710.0 4.8 10.0 4.4 12.0 4,4 12 .0
-CASES PROCESSED =- 54.3796 547747,7391NO. BLANK OA TA = 6.0000 4.0000 3.00CGMIN IMUM VALUE -=
--MA XI MUM VALUE1.00003.0000
1.0000 1.00003.0000 3.0000
SUM OF SCORE S = 95,1265 84.9861 65.6631SUM SQD. SCORE S = 184.6844 169.0166 132.6611-MEAN 1.7493 1. (U04 1.79E6STND, DEV. IN) = 0.5798 0.6093 0,6 .3;,STND. 0EV. (N-1) =
--ME D IAN0.58521.7912
0.6158 0.64281.8105 1,8172
SCORE INTERVAL S F PCT CF P-6LW F PCT CF LW F -)67 CF
1.000 192 34.0 565. 100.0 152_ 31.5 483 100.0 120 34.3 350 100.02, 000 329 58.2 373 66,0 281 58.2 331 68,5 183 52,3 230 65,73..000 44 7.8 44 7.8 50 10.4 50 10.4 47 13.4 47 13.4
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
-=
5656
4835 5
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3,0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 982.0000 864.0000 627.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 1904.0000 1726. 0000 1275.0000MEAN = 1.7381 1.7888 1.7914STND. OEV. (N1 = 0,5908 0.6112 0.6585STND. DEV. IN-11 = 0.5914 0.6119 0.6595MEDIAN = 1:771 1.8185 1.8005
Reading for enjoyment
OUESTION 42 PART U
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW CF 13-81-14 F FC7 177771XTIF
1.000 43.6 79.9 54.6 100.0'20.1
36.9 77.4 47.7 100.0 26.8 78.0 37.0 100.02.000 10.7 19.7 1100 10.4 21.8 10.8 22.6 8.1 21.8 8.2 22.03.000 C.3 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.8 001 0.2 0.1 0.2
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
54.59795.0000
47.66305.0000
36.55E3160060
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 65.8702 58.8215 45.2305SUM SOD. SCORES 88.9455 81.9108 6108480MEAN 1.2065' 1.2341 1.2225STND. DEV. (N) C.4166 0.4422 00420SIND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.4205 0.4469 0.427MEDIAN 1.1261 1.1459 1.1413
SCORE INTERVALS. F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 447 79.0 566 100.0 372 77.0 483 100.0 282 79.7 354 100.0_2.000 115 20.3 119 21.0 107 22.2 111 23.0 71 20.1 72 20.33.000 4 0.7 4 0.7 4 0.8 4 0.8 1 0.3 1 0.3
CASES' PROCESSEDND. BLANK DATA
56-6
5
4835
3541
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE - 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 689.0000 598.0000' 427.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 943.0000 836.0000 575.0000MEAN 1.2173 1.2381 1.2062STNO. DEV. (N) = 0.4292 0.4449 0.4115SIND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.4296 0.4454 0.4121MEDIAN 1.1331 1.1492 1.1277
Enriching cultural background
QUESTION 42
SCORE INTERVALS
PA WI V
Major Secondary Of little or noGoal Goal importance as a goal
0 ID
F PCT CF P-8LW
1.000 21.4 40.2 53.32.000 27.0 50.8 31.83.000 4.8 9.0 4.8
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK OA TA =MINIMUM VALUE =
-MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES =
--M1ANSTND. DEV. (NI =
STNO. DEV. (N-1I =MEDIAN
SCORE INTERVALS
1.0002.0003.000
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSTND. DEV. (NI =STND. DEV. (N-11 =MEDIAN
53.276013.00001.0u003.0000
89.9249172.8159
1.68790.62830.63431.6925
F PCT
221 39.6.287 51.450 9.0
558131.00003.0000
945.00001819.0000
1.69350.62590.62651.7021
CF
P-8LW- PCT Cr P=7P-
100.0 18.4 39.0 47.2 100.0 14.7 40.3 36.5 10G.59.8-24:2- 51.3 -213.8 61.0 17.9 49.0 21.8 55.9.0 4.6 9.7 4.6 9.7 3.9 10.7 3.9 10.
47.243/ 36.51779.0000 5.00001.0000 1.00003.0000 3.0000
80.6480 62.2602156.6198 121.54471./071 1.70450.6333 0.64E80.6401 0.65E91.7143 1.654,
P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT
558 100.0 171 35.8 478 100.0 131 37.5 349 100.0337 60.4 257 53.8 307 64.2 178 51.0 218 62.550 9.0 50 10.5 50 10.5 40 11.5 40 11.5
478101.0000
34961.0000
3.0000 3.0000835.0000 607.00001649.0000 1203.0000
1.7469 1.73930.6311 0.64960.6317 0.65051.7646 1.7444
Improving self-image
QUESTION 42
SCORE INTERVALS
PART h
F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW r FCT CF P-BLw
1.0002.0003.000
46.06.90.5
86.112.81.0
53.47.40.5
100.013.91.0
41.06.40.2
86.1 47.6 100,0 31.4 85.9 36.E 100.013.40.4
6.60.2
13.E0.4
4.60.4
13.01.1
5.20.4
14.1.1.1
CASES PROCESSED 53.3940 -47:60$07- 36.5914NO. BLANK DATA 12.0000 5.0000 4.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.000D 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 61.3492 54.4218 42.1450SUM SOD. SCORES 78.3525 68.4531 54.0660MEAN 1.1490 1.1431 1.1519STNO. DEV. (N) 0,3837 0,3621 0.3E82STND. DEV. (N-1) 0.3874 0.3660 0.3937MEDIAN 1,0805 r7.0-air6- 1401319
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW--
1.000 481 86.0 559 100.0_415 85.9 483 100.0 299 85.4 350 100.02.000 72 12.9 78 14.0 65 13.5 68 14.1 46 13.1 51 14.63.000 6 1.1 6 1.1 3 0.6 3 0.6 5 1.4 5 1.4
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
55912
4835
3505
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1,0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 643,0000 554.0000 406.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 823,0000 702.0000 528.0000MEAN 1,1503 1.1470 1.1600STND. DEV. IN) 0.3862 0.3712 0.4037STND. DEV. IN-1) 0.3866 0.3716 0.4043MEDIAN 1.0811 1.0819 1.0853
.
Improving attitudes toward reading
QUESTION 42 PART X
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW CF F-tU;--
1.000 50.2 92.2 54.5 100.0 44.6 93.6 47.6 100.0 33.8 92.2 36.7 100.02.000 3.9 7.2 4.2 7.8-279--6-1- 3:1 6.4 1.9 1.8 2.9 7.83.000 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.D
-CASES PROCESSED = 54.4739 -47:33'49 36.65E0NO. BLANK DATA = 7.0000 5.0000 ,f.0C(,0MINIMUM VALUE =
VALUe1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
MAXIMUM = 1.0000- 3.0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES = 59.0477 50.8178 39.5578SUM SOD. SCORES =
-MEAN68,8616 57.4631 45.2735
= 1.0840 1.0610 1.071STNO. DEV. IN) = 0.2986 0.2608 0.2679STND. DEv. IN-1) =KE01AN =
0.3014 0.2635 0.2716I:o42.27--1.0421 1.0.343
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT PCT CF P-BLW
1.000 525 93.1. 564 100.0 449 93.0 483 100.0 328 93.7 350 100.02.000 36 6.4 39 6.9 33 6.9 34 7.0 22 6.3 -22 6.33.000 3 0.5 3 0.5 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
--=
======
===
5647
1.00003.0000
606.0000696.0000
1.07450.28210.2823
"1..457-1-
4835
1.0000
35051.0000
r---- MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORES
3.0000518.0000590.0000
2.0D00372.0000416.0000
MEANSTNO. 0EV. (N)
___STNO. DCV._ IN-1)MEDIAN
1.07250,26710.2674
1.06290.24270.2431
1.0379 1.0335
Other (Specify)
QUESTION 42
SCORE INTERVAL S
PART Y
F PC T CF W-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW r FCT CF P-BLW
1.000 1.0 56.6 1.8 100.0 0.7"43.4.-0.1
46.1 1.6 100.0 0.6 42.1 1.3 100.02. COO 0.0 0.0 0.8 5.3 0.9 53.9 0.1 5.2 0.8 37.93.000 0.8 43.4 0.8 43.4 0.8 48.5 0.8 48.5 0.7 52,7 0.7 52.7
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE-MAXIMUM
'=
==
1.811i---536.0000
1.0000
1.5839457.0000
1.0000
1.34503.19.0000
1.0000VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000
SUM OF SCORES = 3.3817 3.2060 2.8322SUM SOD. SCORES-NEM-
8.0936 7.9880 7.22331.8673 2.0241 2.1058
. STND. DEV. IN) = 0.9911 0.9727 0.9676SIND. 0EV. (N-1) = 1.4811 1.6021 1.9107MEDIAN 1.3828 2.2266 2.5506
SCORE INTERVAL S
1.0002.0003.000
I_CASES "FROG` ME)NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORE S -SUM SOD. SCORES =MERV--
DEV. IN) =SIND. DEV. IN-1) =
F PCT CF P-BLW F PC T CF P -BLW F PC T CF P-BLW
11 55.0 20 100.0 7 41.2 17 100.0 5 55.6 9 100.00 0.0 9 45.0 2 11.8 10 58.8 1 11.1 4 44.49 45.0 9 45.0 8 47.1 8 47.1 3 33.3 3 33.3
20551
1.0000
17471
1.0000
9346
1.00003.0000 3.0000 3.0000
38.0000 35.0000 16.000092.0000 87.0000 36.00001.9000 2.0588 1.77780.9950 0.9375 0.91621.0208 0.9663 0.9718
2.2500 1.4000
- .-
43. About how often does each child in your compensatoryopportunity to read aloud to the class?
At least once a day
Several times a week, but not daily
About once a week
QUESTION 43
reading class have the
Less than once a week, but regularly
Seldom or never on a regular basis
--SCORE IN-TER-VAL S F PCT CF P*-8LW----F PCT CF P-BLW E PCT CF P-81.11
1.000 30.0 54.9 5447 100.0 12.3 25.9 47.6 100.0 6.4 17.4'45.1
86.8 100.02.000 16.2 29.7 24.7 24.2 50:1 35.3 .744.115.7 42.7 30.4 a2.63. OCC 3.7 6.8 8.5 15.4 5.2 11.0 11.1 23.4 0.8 18.4 14.7 39.94.000 2.0 3.7 4.7 8.6 2.2 4.6 5.9 12.4 3.8 10.2 7.9 21.55.000 2.7 4.9 2.7 4.9-377---7:7377--ar .i.. 1-1-1:3 4.1 11.3
CASES PROCESSEDNO BLANK DATA
54.7317 47.6181 313.80544.0-600 5.0000 4.0000
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE
-SUM5.0000 5.0000 5.0000
OF SCORES 95.51-60 103.642T 93.9754SUM SQD. SCORES 228.4530 283.6631 294.Z 344MEAN
IN)1.7414-.1/6-84--
2.1765 2.55301 1.,[147
STND. DEV. 11+11 1.0783 1.1162 1.2315MEDIAN 1.4111 1.9755 2.2638
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-13LW F PCT
297 52.4 567_100.0. 110 22.8 483 100.0 55 15.7 351 100.02.000 178 31.4 270 47.6 254 52.6 373 77.2 158 45.0 296 B4.33.000 39 6.9 92 16.2 56 11.6 119 24.6 64 18.2 13B 39.34.000 22 3.9 5.3 9.3 24 5.0-___ a3..1,_9_ 7.4.. 21,15.00c 31 5.5 31 5.5 39 8.1 39 8.1
_37.
37_10.51b.5 37 16.3
CASES PROCESSED ==
5674
483 351NO. BLANK DATA 5 4MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.00D0MA?(.111PMY4IJE. 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1013.0000 1077.0000 846:0000-SUM SOO. SCORES 2487.0000 2989.0000 2780.0000MEAN 1.7866 2.2298 2.5527STND. DEV. (N) = 1.0928 1.1029 1.1849STND. DEV. IN-l) = 1.0938 1.1040 1.1866MEDIAN 1.4545 2.0177 2.2627
44. About how often does each child in your compensatory reading class have theopportunity to read aloud to you alone (or to another adult)?
El At least once a day
Q Lessthan once a week, but regularly(:ISeveral times a week, but not daily
*QUESTION 44
SCORE INTERVALS
About once a week
F PCT -CF
Seld9m or never on a regular basis
P-BLW F -197f CF P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLw
1.00C 16.5 3(.3 54.5 100.0 7.3 15.4 47.5 100.0 4.2 11.5 36.9 100.02.000 20.9 38.4 38.0 69.7 14.4 53:47 40.2 84.6 8.0 21.8 32.6 88.53.000 5.5 10.1 17.1 31,3 8.5 17.9 25.8 54.2 90:.: 25.4 24.6 66./4.000 3.1 5.8 11.6 21.2 6.7 14.1 17.3 36.4 6.6 18.0 15.2 41.35.000 804 15.4 8.4 15.4 10.6 22.2 10.6 22.2 8.6 23.3 8.6 i3.?
CASES PROCESSED = 54.4902 47.505a 36.85C2BL AN OA TA = 60-0000 300000
MINIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 500000-am DF SCORES = 124:5331 141.3155 11708666SUM SOO. SCORES = 410.4814 512.9746 44105204MEAN 2.3772 2.9747 3.190
DEV. (N) = 1:31-176 1.3962 103232STNO. DE/. 1*-11 = 1.3846 1.4111 103415MEDIAN .2.0137 2.7372 3.15E5
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BL4--- F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF PeLW
1.000 159 28.1 565 100.0 68 14.1 481 100.0 34 9.7 352 100.02.000 212-5-1-:5 406 71.9 146 30.4 413 85.9 84 23.9 318 90.33.000 62 11.0 194 34.3 90 18.7 267 55.5 84 23.9 234 66.54.000 35 6.2 132 23.4 69 14.3 177 36.8 64 18.2 150 42.65.000 97 17.2 97 17.2 108 22.5 108 22.5 86 24.4 86 24.4
CASES PROCESSED = 565 481 352NO. BLANK DATA = 8 -7 3MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1394.0000 1446.0000 1140.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 4550.0000 5266.0000 4300.0000MEAN = 2.4673 3.0062 3.2386STNO. OEV. (N) = 1.4020 1.3822 1.3142SIND. DEV. IN-1) = 1.4033 1.3837 1.3161MEDIAN = 2.0825 2.7944 3.1905
=NIMINI1=1,,45. How successful would you consider your compensatory reading teaching to be
with respect to each of the following criteria?
Highly Moderately ModeratelySuccessful Successful Unsuccessful
Enhancing pre-readingskills
QUESTION 45
410'SCORE INILf4V
1 A
F PCT
TotallyUnsuccessful
CF P-8LW F PC7 F CF P-BLw
I. (..oC 13.7 26.0 52.7 100.0 7.2 16.4 4::.7 100.0 2.4 7.6 31.2 100.02.COO 17.1 70.5 39.0 74.0-712-4;8 75.1 36.5 833.6 2-4.i 1-8.0 21,4.8 92.43.00C 1.! 3.2 1.8 3.5 3.5 0.1 3.7 8.5 3.6 11.5 4.5 14.44.000 0.1 G.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.5 2.9 0.9 2.9
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
--MINIMUM VALUE
52.659331.00002.0000
43.670846.0000
31.2033:7.0000
1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 93.5963 84.0658
-112.401V465.4432
SUM' S00. SCORES 179.7126 140.5733MEAN 1.7774 1.9250 2.0978STND. DEV. IN) 0.5036 0.5056
-70-;51150.54to
DEV. (N-1/ 0.5084 0.5556MEDIAN 1.0400 1.9472 2.0415
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BIW PCT CF
1.000 134 24.8 540 100.0 70. 1,77 440 100.0 25 8.4 297 10.02.000 387 71.7 406 75.2 319 72.5 362 82.3 227 76.4 272 91.63.000 17 3.1 19 3.5 39 8.9 43 9.8 33 11.1 45 15.24.000 2 0.4 2 0.4 4 4 .Q.R9 12 4.0 12 4.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
54031
44040. --
29758
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCOPES 967.0000 849.0000 626.0000SUM 500. SCORES 1867.0000 1769.600.6MEAN 1.7907 1.9295 2.1077STND. DEV. 04) 0.5007 0.5876SING. DEV. (N-1) 0.5011 0.5459 0.5886MEDIAN 1.8514 1.9451 2.0441
Enhancing measuredreading achievement
QUESTION 45 PART
PC7 CF PBLW PCT CF P-81-4SCORE IN F. F PCT CF P -8LW
1.000 13.3 24.5 54.4 100.0 7.4 15.8 47.2 100.0 500 1:7.9 35.8 100.t
2.000 7FT:6 69.1 41.175.5 36.2 76.7 39.8 84.2 27.9 7700 30.9 86.13.000 3.4 6.3 3.5 604 3.6 7.6 306 7.6 2.8 7.9 3.0 8.14.000 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 000 000 0.2 0.4 0.2 O.
CASES PROCESSEDNO. 8LANK OATA
==
54.43857.0000
47.22209.0000
35.849013.0000
MINIMUM VALUE = 100000 100000 100000..MAXIMUM VALUE = 400000 3.0000 400000SUM OF SCORES = 99.1357 90.5836 6908768SUM SQO. SCORES = 195.7880 184.4572 144.5261MEAN 1.8211 1.9183 1.9492STNO. OEV. iN1 = 005294 0.4759 0.4818STNO. OEV.-14411 = 0.5343 0.4810 004887MEOIAN 108696 1.9466 1.9645
SCORE INTERVALS F PC T CF P8LW F PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P8LW
1.000 138 24.5 563 100.0 82 17.1 479 100.0 50 14.6 342 100.020000 387 68.7 425 75.5 366 76.4 397 8209 265 77o5 f292 0504,3.000 37 6.6 38 6.7 31 6.5 31 605 25 7.3 27 7.94.000 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.0 0 000 2 0.6 2 006
CASES PROCESSEONO. 8LANK OATA
5638
4799
34213
MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000, 1.0000 100000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 3.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1027.0000 907.0000 66300000SUM SOO. SCORES 2035.0000 182500000 1367.0000MEAN 1.8242 108935 1.9386STNO. OEV. IN) 0.5357 0.4739 0.4888STNO. OEV. iN14 0.5362 004744 0.4895MEDIAN = 1.8708 1.9303 1.9566
Improving attitudestoward reading
QUESTION 45 PAR r C
SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW F
1.000 26.6 48.7 54.7 100.0 17.22.CCO 26.2 47.9 28.1 51.3 28:03.GCG 1.8 3.2 1.8 3.4 2.24.000 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES-SUM SQO. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV, (N)STND. DEV. (N-1)MEDIAN
54.78174.00001.00004.0000
84.7434148.7746
1.54830.56650,57171.5273
PCT -PVT- Tr."
36.2 47.4-59;0------30.2
100.0 13.5 36.7 3t.E 100.663.8-2J:5 55.7 23.3 63,3
4.7 2.2 4.7 2.7 7.5 2.8 7.60.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1
47.40647.0600
3.000079.8816
-1493 3T411.68500.55710.56301,7331
36.7941-r.00001.00004.0000
62.9254120.9517
1.71020,60200.61041.7287
SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF
1.000 268 47.3 567 100.0 187 38.9, 38.2 351 100.02.000 280 49.4 299 52.7 270 56.1
_441100.0134294 61.1 189 53.8 217 61.8-
3.000 18 3.2 19 3.4 24 5.0 24 5.0 27 7,7 28 8.04.000 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 Cy:L__ 0_0.0_ 1 0.3 1_0.3
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES
_ .
SUM SQD. SC. ORF.SMEANSTND. 0EV. (N)SIND. DEV. IN-1)MEDIAN
zt
=
56741.00004.0000
886.00001566.0000
1.56260.56580.56631.5554
481
71.0656--3.0000
_799,0000
35141.00004.0000
597.00001483,0000
1.6611_0.56910.,5647"
1.6981
1149.00001.70D90.61690.61781.7196
Improving students' selfimages
OC%STION 45
SCORE INTERVALS
1.CCO2.0003.0004.000
CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SQO. SCORES =MEAN =STND. DEV. IN) =STND, DEV.. (W-1) =MEDIAN =
PAR.'. D
----ZtikEftii-CliiiiiCS"
0 0
F PCT CF
22.331:21.20.0
40.856.92.20.0
54.732.41.2
-0.0
E 0
P -BLW F PCT tP P-BLW F PCT CF P:TIGT
100.0 16.9 35.8 47.3 100.0 12.6 34,3 36.8 100.059.2 20:4--T0-.1 30.3 64.2 21.7 59.1 24.2 65.12.2 1.9 4.0 1.9 4.1 2.3 6.3 2.4 6.6
-0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3
54.7317 47.2519 36.19324.0000 8.0000 -.4,0000
1.0000 1.0000 1.00003.0000 4.0000 4.0000
88.3491 79.5435 63.5334158.0340 148.1218 122.3c46
1.6142 1.6834 1.72660.5308 0.5486 0.5E12O.:5357 0.5545 0.59541.6610 1.7358 1.7657
--ifT-fsiii-----
1.000.4613-
3.0004.1300._ ______
CASES PROCESSEI) =NO. BLANK DATA =
233 41.1 W1.09.0-jii-3(7,;(----334 58,912 2.1 12 2.1
0.0 0 0.0----._ __0____
5674
MINIMUM VALUE - 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE - 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 913.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1629.0000MEAN 1.6102STND. DEV. IN) 0.5293STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.5298MEDIAN = 1.6568
114_280211
15ff-- CF P-611,1 F PCT CF P-BLW
37.1 480 100.0 126 35.9 351 100.058.3 302 62.9 201 57.3 225 64.14.4 22 4.6 22 6.3 24 6.80.2 1 0.2 2 0.6 2 0.6
480a
3514
1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000
805.0000 602.00001503.0000 1160.0000
1.6771 1,71510.5645 0.60270.5651 0.60361.7214 1.7463
Reiaediating culturaldeprivation
QUESTION 45 PART E
SCORE INTERVALS F PC7 P - BLit CF P -8LU F ?GT CF P-81.14
1.000 4. 0 7.7 51.8 100.0 3.4 7.6 44.8 100.0 2.b b.1 34.4 100.02.000 38.8 74.9 47.8 92.3 32.4 72.3 41.4 92.424.1 70.3 31.6 'F1.93.000 8.6 16.6 9.0 1704 707 17.2 9.0 20.1 7.0 20.5 7.4 21.74.000 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.8 1.3 2.9 1.3 2.9 U04 1.2 0.4 1.2
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA
=
=
51.777338.0000
44.773037.6000
34.35172I.00CO
1.0000 1.0000KM IWO VAra 1-.01300-
MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 108.9575 96.4380 73.1865.
D St ORES 242..9278." 222.9809 169.1 769MEAN- 2.1043 2.1539 Z.i4E0STNO. DEV. ( N) = 0.5133
-0:51134'0.5838 0.5578
--STNTW OM 4 N'..1 ) 0.5904 0.5661MEDIAN 2.0644 2.0861 2.0967
SCORE INTERVALS F PC I C F -P-BLit -Off P43Lti --0 PC T CF P8LW
1. 000 44 8.3 533 100.0 35 7.8 450 100.0 30 9.2 326 100.02.000 385 72.2 489 91.7 314 69.8 415 92.2 225 69. 0 296 90.83.000 98 18.4 104 19.5 8H 19.6 101 22.4 66 20.2 71 21.84.000 6 6 1,1 13 2.9 13 2.9 5 1.5 5 1.5
CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE
=53338
dodo
45038
32629
1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES
-SCORES-- 1132.0000 979.0000 698.0000
SUH SOD. 2562.0000 2291.0000 1604.0000MEAN 2.1238 2.1756 2.1411STNO. DEV. (N)
'DEV.= 0.5442 0.5984 96
STND. ( ) 0.5447 0.5991 6.5805MEDIAN 2.0779 2.1051 2.0911