A comparison between Licenciatura and Bologna study plans: autonomy, stress
level, satisfaction and learning efficiency.
Gordillo, S.M., Deleito, C., Méndez, L., Duncan, C.
Facultad de psicología Sevilla
2º Curso
Eduardo Infante Rejano
1
Abstract:
This research studies the possible differences concerning stress level, autonomy,
satisfaction and learning efficiency in Licenciatura and Bologna students. The
methodology which we have carried out is an experimental one, with inter-individual
design and the experimental individuals were students, chosen randomly, from 2nd
course to 4th course from Psychology Faculty of Seville. We found significant
differences in the stress level, and no significant differences respecting the other
variables.
Key words: Bologna, Licenciatura, Stress level, Autonomy, Satisfaction, Learning
Efficiency.
2
INTRODUCTION:
The Bologna Process has triggered great changes in the Spanish Universities, in
order to adjust the new exigencies required by the European plan. In Andalucía, the
“experiencias piloto” started in the course 2004-05, and later in 2009 Bologna courses
began. But…what is Bologna? We will revise the University studies education plan
during the Spanish democracy in order to understand it. Spain’s education system has
four sections: Principles, Structure, Administration and New Educational Policy. The
first section describes the main guiding principles that govern the system, according
to the Spanish Constitution and the major education acts. Then there is an outline of
the structure that later includes a summary of the organization and curricula in all the
non-university levels and systems.
The Spanish system is built on the principles set by the 1978 Constitution and the
organics laws.
The General Organization of the Education System Act establishes the basic
structure of the Spanish education system, reforming non-university stages, levels and
education. The University Reform Act of 1983 defines the structure of the university
level.
University Education is regulated by the University Reform Act of 1983 and
Universities Act of 2001.
The Universities Act (LOU) seeks to adapt Spain to the changing society, Full
development of the decentralized state, emergence of a European space for higher
education, and the challenges of “knowledge society”.
3
It aims to improve quality in all university areas, better selection of teachers and
evaluating systems. It also promotes research in the universities.
One of the major goals in this act is the necessary measures needed to integrate the
Spanish system into a common European university space. Another important
objective this act includes is the increase in student and teacher mobility throughout
Europe and Spain.
It also includes measures such as the open district, grants system, and
encouragement of teachers to work in the universities.
The functions of the university are summarized in: creation, development,
transmission and critique of science, technology and culture; preparation for
professional activities; scientific and technical support for culture, social and
economic development; and broadening of the university culture.
Students wishing to study at the university have to pass a series of test named
“SELECTIVIDAD”. This test accounts for 40% of the final mark and the remaining
60 % comes from the student’s baccalaureate results.
The universities themselves will be allowed to select their students.
Concerning the grants policy, the government has a general policy for student grants,
aid and loans, and partial or total pays for tuition, depending on the family status
etc…
University education is organized into different phases with specific and
educational goals and it has separate academic ratings. There are five types of
education: education only up to the first phase, lasting three years and leading to a
Diploma, Technical Engineer or Technical Architect certificate; two-phase education
4
with no intermediary qualification, lasting four, five or six years, and leading to a
Bachelor’s degree or degree in Engineering or Architecture; two-phase education with
an intermediary qualification, under which students begin by studying the first phase–
on completion of which they obtain the corresponding diploma– and can then go on to
study a second phase in the same subject to obtain a degree; second phase education
only, leading to a bachelor’s degree or degree in engineering or architecture (students
taking this system must have passed certain first-phase studies or courses); and third-
phase education, lasting two years, taken by graduates, who must successfully submit
a doctoral thesis on a hitherto unpublished subject to obtain a PhD.
The main objective of the Bologna plan is to create the European Higher Education
Area by standardizing the academic degrees and quality throughout Europe. It is an
EU initiative with 47 participating countries. It is a major reform responding to issues
such as public responsibility for higher education and research, higher education
governance, the social dimension of higher education and research, and the values and
roles of higher education and research on modern, globalizes, and complex societies
with very demanding qualification needs.
With the implementation of the Bologna process, Higher education systems in
Europe are organized for easier mobility in Europe, further study or employment; to
attract foreigners to study and work in Europe. This plan provides Europe with an
expansive knowledge base and ensures the future development of a stable peaceful
and tolerant community. Also these new plans will benefit Research areas and
convergence between the U.S. and Europe.
5
In Spain for years there have been two kinds of initial degrees, the three year
“Diplomatura” or 4-6 year “Licenciatura”. These degrees being completely separate.
The former one leading to a medium-level technical profession like nursing for
example, and the latter one giving access to higher-level professions or academic
disciplines, also opening the path to the Doctorate.
The new degrees have started for the master’s level in 2006 and for the undergraduate
level in 2008. The new degrees are: “Graduado” for the Bachelor’s degree, after four
years of study, except pharmacy or Dentistry, after five years, and Medicine, after six
years. Masters with an extra year or two and Doctor for the “Doctorate”
This reform will vanquish the tradition of centralized degrees giving the universities
more autonomy to define their programs and name their degrees.
What are the main differences between the old and the new study plan? In the first
one the classes were longer, usually 2 hours and in the new “grado” system there 1
hour each.
In the old system each student would have less teachers, since the new “grado”
system has more courses, unlike the old system that a lot of its courses where the
whole year, not half the quarter like the new “grado”. The new system has more
projects and small group divisions. That includes routine test and projects.
The new system also has obligatory hours that a student must attend to, unlike the old
system, which for students who work can cause a problematic situation. Another
major difference is the year difference and degree change which we stated earlier.
6
What kind of differences can we find between Bologna and Licenciatura (the old
study plan) in terms of learning efficiency, satisfaction level, stress level and
autonomy degree? Has Bologna had a significant effect to these variables? In what
sense? That is the object of our research. The different research which has been
carried out with the “experiencias piloto” praise the Bologna effect on students.
After having carried out some surveys to both, teachers and students from
Licenciatura and students that changed from Licenciatura to Degree (see annexes) and
having checked some research, we found the following information:
After analyzing the answers from the surveys, we observed that the Degree
students have more free hours, a more structured timetable, more oral expositions,
more works to carry out, and a requirement of having a minimum level of English to
receive the Degree’s title. That is to say, Bologna’s plans would have improved
Autonomy Students’ Degree. However, we need a cautious study in order to get valid
results.
According to Durán M.A., Peralta J.L., Gallego C.& Montalbán F.M. (2006) the
fact of studying on smaller classes, having the same amount of work and the
continuous assessment of the students, as by computerized media and by partial
exams, would produce less stress to students. This is the case of Degree students and
therefore we think that the environment in which it moves is more helpful and
rewarding than before, with the old study plan. This hypothesis was checked by a
research study which took place in the University of Málaga during the course 2005-
2006. In this research, levels of stress and burnout were studied with students from
Diplomatura de Relaciones Laborales and Diplomatura en Trabajo Social, carried on
during the application of a degree’s pilot experience. The perceived level of stress
7
between students was very low in comparison to the old plan. Nevertheless it is
necessary to remark that a great part of the student community have reported an
increase on their level of anxiety in some of the subjects. Otherwise, it is easier to
attribute this anxiety increases to a result of a bad organization on teaching the
subject. Another report carried out by Isabel María Martín Monzón from the
University of Sevilla (2007) found that the Licenciatura students stress increase in a
significant way when the final exams are coming up. This causes them an emotional
deterioration, decreasing their satisfaction. Due to results we could expect students
from degree to be less stressed than students from Licenciatura.
After asking our surveys how satisfied they were, we could set out that the level of
satisfaction has increased with Bologna plan. Students especially like to be on smaller
size classes and the more dynamic feedback with the teachers. This hypothesis is also
supported by a longitudinal research which was carried out in the University Pompeu
Fabra of Barcelona during 2002 and 2006. Although satisfaction was still low, they
found an increase on Degree students. This was because of the instauration of seminar
classes (more oriented to the learning based on problems resolution). This allows the
students to have a perception of their improvement in the subject, the opportunity of
participating in an active way during the classes… Therefore, as the researchers
postulated, we could interpret this low increase of satisfaction in terms of reluctance
to change rather than in terms of other factors (Lloret T., A. Mir, 2006). That way we
can expect students from degree to be more satisfied than students from licenciatura.
Because of the increase on student’s satisfaction, autonomy and the decrease of
stress we can expect an increase on learning efficiency, leading students to an
8
improvement in most of the subjects. This hypothesis have been supported by some
research, like the one carried out in the University of Jaén (Ramírez, E., Ortega A.R.&
Martos R. 2007), for example.
Nevertheless, as we previously mentioned, we will carry out a cautious study to figure
out which is the real relationship between those variables.
Due to the information previously given we set up the following hypothesis:
Students from Bologna’s plan will be more autonomous than students from the old
plan. Also, students from Bologna’s plan will have a lower level of stress. Those
improvements will increase the level of satisfaction on students from Bologna’s plan.
This increase on autonomy, satisfaction and the decrease of stress on students from
degree will lead them to a more learning efficiency. Therefore, students from the old
plan will be less satisfied than students from Bologna’s plan and will have a less
learning efficiency than students from Bologna’s plan. They will also be more
stressed and will have less autonomy than students from Bologna’s plan.
9
METHOD:
INDIVIDUALS:
The individuals who participated in our research were chosen in a random way
from the 2nd course of the Degree in Psychology and from the 3rd and 4th course of the
Licenciatura in Psychology, both from the University of Seville. Therefore, the ages
of the participants were between 19 and 22 years old. The participants answered the
survey in a voluntary way.
DESIGN:
We have chosen an experimental methodology, using as a tool to obtain data a
survey designed by ourselves (see annexes). We have four DVs (Degree of autonomy,
level of stress, level of satisfaction and learning efficiency) and two IVs (Bologna
study plan or Licenciatura study plan) so our research is factorial and multivariate.
We are studying two different kinds of individuals, Bologna and Licenciatura
students, so our design is an inter-individual one. Given the individuals just answered
the survey in one occasion, the design is also transversal.
STIMULI AND APPARATUS.
The participants used their own pens to fill the survey.
PROCEDURES:
The surveys were answered by fifty one Licenciatura students and by fifty one
Degree students during the third week of December 2010. These classes were chosen
in a random way. The individuals were explained with the same words that head the
10
survey what they had to do and the researchers solved the few doubts the participants
had. The survey was exactly the same as for Bologna as for Licenciatura students.
Encuesta.
Está usted realizando una encuesta para un trabajo de Psicología de las
Organizaciones. En este trabajo se está investigando acerca de qué relación hay entre
el nuevo plan de estudios de Bolonia y el viejo de la Licenciatura con las siguientes
variables: satisfacción, autonomía, eficiencia del aprendizaje y nivel de estrés. Gracias
por participar.
Edad:
Género:
1- ¿Cuál es tu nota media en la carrera? (Se ruega nos diga esta nota de 0 a 10 y
no de 1 a 4. Si no la sabe, puede darnos una aproximación).
2- ¿Te sientes estresado frecuentemente debido a la carga de trabajo de la carrera
o a la metodología aplicada en ella, por ejemplo, su forma de evaluación? Si tu
respuesta es afirmativa, explicite su nivel de estrés de 0 a 10.
3- Cuantifique su satisfacción con su carrera (no sólo con el contenido de las
asignaturas, sino cómo se dan, el acercamiento/lejanía de los profesores a
alumnos, los métodos de evaluación, el margen de participación que tienen los
alumnos…) de 0 a 10.
4- Cuantifique el grado de autonomía (entendido este como libertad que le da la
carrera para organizar su estudio y los trabajos a realizar, así como nivel de
11
conocimientos adquiridos que cree le serán de utilidad en su futuro
profesional).
Responda aquí:
R: 1-
2-
3-
4-
12
RESULTS
In order to prove our hypothesis we proceeded to do a simple linear regression
analysis (of each one of the four variables respectively) by using “Dummy-
Variables”.
In all of the four cases the qualitative independent variable (X) is the same:
Educational University System, which has two different values:
X₁ correspond to the old educational system in Spanish universities, or
“Bachelor”. While X₂ correspond to the new system, or “Grade”. Both values
are represented in two different groups or samples of students, each one
conformed by 50 students who course “Bachelor in Psychology” or “Grade in
Psychology”, respectively.
In our design we proposed for different null hypothesis corresponding to the
four independent variables:
1) H₀There are no statistic differences between both groups in
satisfaction level.
Here; IV= educational system, and quantitative DV=satisfaction level.
2) H₀There are no statistic differences between both groups in results
or marks.
Here; IV= educational system, and quantitative DV=marks.
13
3) H₀There are no statistic differences between both groups level of
autonomy.
Here; IV= educational system, and quantitative DV=autonomy level
4) H₀There are no statistic differences between both groups in level of
stress.
Here; IV= educational system, and quantitative DV=level of stress
*Note that the level of stress is measured in question 2 of our questioner
To prove so, first of all we test statistic assumptions :
a) as both samples are formed by 50 students, 50= N, N>30. We assume
Normality principle by definition.
b) We test Homoscedasticity (homogeneity of variance):
We obtained:
Satisfaction
(Y₁)
Marks (Y₂) Autonomy L.
(Y₃)
Stress (Y₄)
F max 1,27 1,21 1,29 1,71
F th. 1,87 1,87 1,87 1,87
In the four cases the Fmax obtained for the four dependent variables respectively are
lower than the theoretical F; we assume that the homogeneity of variance assumption
is satisfied in all our variables.
14
We apply the technique “Dummy variables in simple linear regression analysis”
- Codification dummy – Fictious variable:
- 0 = absence; 1 = presence
- Example: 1 = Bolonia plan; 0 = Licenciatura plan (absence of
being “Bolonia plan”).
In all the variables the values for:
Α 0,05
K 2
n-1 49
H₀There are no statistic differences between both groups in satisfaction level.
Here; IV= educational system, and quantitative DV=satisfaction level.
1,6605875
5
1,4757910
4 desvest
6,76 6,84 media
338 342 ∑
2,7575510
2
2,1779591
8 varianza
15
S₁ S₂
a)We calculate regression equation:
a= Ÿ₀= 6, 76
b= Ÿ₁-Ÿ₀= 6,84- 6,76= 0, 08
Ŷ= a + b·X = 6, 76- 0, 08
b) We calculate goodness of fit:
= 0, 00065455
c) Model validation:
= 0, 0317 ≈ 0, 032
* 0, 032 ≤ 4, 19 Null hypothesis is accepted. The variables are
not related. The model is not valid. There are no statistical differences between the
educational system and the level of satisfaction.
(k = number of independent variables)
H₀There are no statistic differences between both groups in results or marks.
Here; IV= educational system, and quantitative DV=marks.
16
1,0709144
7
0,9722722
4 desvest
6,5644 7,0064 media
328,22 350,32 ∑
1,1468578
0,9453133
1 varianza
M₁ M₂
RXY2 =b2∗S X
2 / SY2
RXY2 =(Y 1−Y 0 )
2∗p∗q /SY2
F= R2 /k(1−R2)/ (N−k−1)
F≤F(α , k , N−k−1 )
a)We calculate regression equation:
a= Ÿ₀= 6, 5644
b= Ÿ₁-Ÿ₀= 0, 442
Ŷ= a + b·X = 6,76 – 0, 442 X
b) We calculate goodness of fit:
= 0, 045
c) Model validation:
= 2,2864 ≈ 2, 29
* 2,23 ≤ 4, 19 Null hypothesis is accepted. The variables are not
related. The model is not valid. There are no statistical differences between the
educational system and the results obtained (marks).
(k = number of independent variables)
17
RXY2 =b2∗S X
2 / SY2
RXY2 =(Y 1−Y 0 )
2∗p∗q /SY2
F= R2 /k(1−R2)/ (N−k−1)
F≤F(α , k , N−k−1 )
H₀There are no statistic differences between both groups in level of stress.
Here; IV= educational system, and quantitative DV=level of stress
2,2687765
3
1,7326692
9 desvest
6,16 7,27 media
308 363,5 ∑
5,1473469
4
3,0021428
6 varianza
1,7145576
3 Fmax
a)We calculate regression equation:
a= Ÿ₀= 6,12
b= Ÿ₁-Ÿ₀= 1,11
Ŷ= a + b·X = 6, 12 + 1,11 X
b) We calculate goodness of fit:
= 0, 126
18
E₁ E₂
RXY2 =b2∗S X
2 / SY2
RXY2 =(Y 1−Y 0 )
2∗p∗q /SY2
c) Model validation:
= 6, 99
6, 99 > 4, 19 Null hypothesis is rejected. The variables are
related. The model is valid. There are statistical differences between the new
educational plan and the old plan and the level of stress in students
As our results show, the level of stress perceived is higher among undergraduate
students of the new system, than among undergraduate students of the old one (the
one stipulated in the new Bolonia plan).
H₀There are no statistic differences between both groups level of autonomy.
Here; IV= educational system, and quantitative DV=autonomy level
*Note that the level of satisfaction is measured in question 3 in our questioner
1,5592057
1
1,7728105
2 desvest
6,85 5,6 media
342,5 280 ∑
19
A₁ A₂
F= R2 /k(1−R2)/ (N−k−1)
F> F(α , k , N −k−1)
2,4311224
5
3,1428571
4 varianza
1,2927597
1 Fmax
a)We calculate regression equation:
a= Ÿ₀= 6,85
b= Ÿ₁-Ÿ₀= -1, 25
Ŷ= a + b·X = 6, 85 -1,25 X
b) We calculate goodness of fit:
= 0, 1215
c) Model validation:
= 6, 70503 ≈ 6, 71
6, 71 > 4, 19 Null hypothesis is rejected. The variables are
related. The model is valid. There are statistical differences between the new
educational plan and the old plan and the level of autonomy in students
20
RXY2 =b2∗S X
2 / SY2
RXY2 =(Y 1−Y 0 )
2∗p∗q /SY2
F= R2 /k(1−R2)/ (N−k−1)
F> F(α , k , N −k−1)
As our results show, the level of autonomy perceived is higher among
undergraduate students of the old system, than among undergraduate students of the
new one (the one stipulated in the new Bolonia plan).
DISCUSSION:
After a detailed statistic analysis of the variables: satisfaction, stress, level of
autonomy and academic results, in both: new and old educational university system,
we can now answer to our previous questions.
According to previous results we expected that students from Bologna’s plan
would be more autonomous than students from the old plan. However, those results
are not coherent with results found in the Faculty of Psychology, in the University of
Seville. Our results show a different correlation, the level of autonomy perceived is
higher among undergraduate students of the old system (Licenciatura), than among
undergraduate students of the new one (the one stipulated in the new Bologna plan).
We also obtained contradictory results in stress level, respecting to previous research.
In this case the statistical differences are higher, and clearly show that students from
Bologna’s plan live with more stress than students from “Licenciatura en Psicología”.
These results, of course, are not conclusive: we cannot take for granted a
relationship of causation between both variables and the type of educational system.
But we can affirm that there is at least a correlative relationship which clearly shows
21
no improvement in autonomy and stress perceived levels in the Faculty of Psychology
(University of Seville), which coincides with the arrival of the new plan.
Previous researches also suggest an improvement in efficiency and that the
satisfaction of students would be higher. But we did not obtained significant statistical
differences among both groups in the values of those variables, which corroborate or
contradict the data of other studies.
REFERENCES:
Durán, M. A., Peralta, J. L., Gallego, C. y Montalbán, F. M. (2006). Análisis de una
encuesta de evaluación de la Experiencia Piloto de Implantación del Crédito Europeo
en las titulaciones de Relaciones Laborales y Trabajo Social. Jornadas de Trabajo
sobre Experiencias Piloto de Implantación del Crédito Europeo en las Universidades
Andaluzas. Disponible en
http://www2.uca.es/orgobierno/rector/jornadas/documentos/012.pdf.
Lloret, T., Mir, A. (2007). ¿Qué ha ocurrido en el primer año de
implementación del EEES en algunas titulaciones?: Un primer balance en la UPF en
términos de rendimiento académico, satisfacción y proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje.
Red U. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, número 1. Disponible en
http://www.redu.um.es/Red_U/1/
Martín, I.M. (2007). Estrés académico en estudiantes universitarios. Apuntes de
Psicología, vol.25, nº 25, pp. 87-99. ISSN 0213-3334. Disponible en:
www.cop.es/delegaci/andocci/files/contenidos/VOL25_1_7.pdf.
22
Ramírez, E., Ortega A.R.& Martos R. (2007). Experiencia piloto en Psicología:
Evolución del rendimiento académico. Revista Electrónica Iniciación a la
Investigación, Universidad de Jaén. Disponible en
http://revistaselectronicas.ujaen.es/index.php/ininv/article/viewArticle/223
23