A comparative evaluation of current A comparative evaluation of current theories of the origin of music (OoM) theories of the origin of music (OoM)
Richard ParncuttRichard ParncuttCentre for Systematic Musicology, Centre for Systematic Musicology,
University of Graz, AustriaUniversity of Graz, Austria
International Summer School on Systematic International Summer School on Systematic Musicology and Sound and Music Computing Musicology and Sound and Music Computing
(ISSSM), Genova, Italia(ISSSM), Genova, Italia
15 March 201415 March 2014SysMus Graz
Across cultures and periods, music is social (coordinating group behavior, strengthening group identity), emotional (evoking basic and everyday emotions but especially pleasure, wonder, tenderness, nostalgia), and melodic/rhythmic (within physical constraints of the human body). It is generally accepted that music and speech had a common ancestor called musilanguage; the two may have split between 10^6 and 10^5 years ago. The split must have occurred because music acquired a special non-linguistic function, e.g. to facilitate group cohesion (like grooming), mate selection (flirting), or cognitive skill acquisition (childplay). In other approaches, music developed in a continuous line from protomusical primate behaviors, or emerged accidentally because it was somehow pleasurable. Another candidate for music's origin is motherese, which emerged some 10^6 years ago because it promoted infant survival when gestation became shorter due to increased brain size and a narrower pelvis, in turn due to bipedalism (Mithen, 2009). Musilanguage and motherese may even be the same thing.
We do not know enough about ancient environments and behaviors - let alone ancient music or protomusic - to evaluate such theories directly. But we can evaluate how well each theory predicts the apparently universal social functions, emotional qualities, and structural features of music as we know it today. That may be the most objective way that we have to evaluate and compare competing theories.
In this presentation I will attempt to systematically list the main characteristic features of music as we know it today and evaluate the extent to which each theory predicts each feature. A list of such features is essentially just a definition of music. A major difficulty in defining music has always been to distinguish it from speech, with which it shares many characteristics. A possible solution is first to list the common features of music and speech (comparable with a definition of musilanguage) and then to list the ways in which music and speech differ. Music and speech are both acoustic signals, and both are structured (gestural, rhythmic, melodic, syntactic) and both are social (meaningful, emotional, intentional). By comparison to speech, music is less lexical, less socially essential, more spiritual, more repetitive, more exact in pitch/time, less exact in timbre, and more expertise-oriented. A careful analysis of the extent to which each theory predicts these features does not clearly distinguish four leading theories from each other (group cohesion, mate selection, skill acquisition, motherese) but it does seem to eliminate primate behaviors and non-adaptive pleasure seeking.
Centre for Systematic MusicologyCentre for Systematic MusicologyUni Graz, AustriaUni Graz, Austria
Bernd BrabecEthnomusicology
Erica BisesiExpression in piano music
Hande SaglamMusic and Migration
Michaela SchwarzSecretary
Sabrina SattmannMusic psychology
Andreas FuchsMusic technology
ContentsContents
Definition of music Definition of music What are we trying to explain, exactly?What are we trying to explain, exactly?
Overview of current theoriesOverview of current theoriesHow music might have “begun”How music might have “begun”
Comparative evalutionComparative evalution How well does each predict musical features?How well does each predict musical features?
Language and music Language and music universal featuresuniversal features
Language and music
Music(compared to language)
1. acoustic2. meaningful3. gestural4. rhythmic + melodic5. syntactic6. social7. emotional8. intentional
1. less lexical 2. less socially essential 3. more spiritual4. more repetitive5. more exact in pitch/time,
less exact in timbre6. more expertise-oriented7. DANCE???
Cecilia BartoliCécile Kyenge
Both language and music are
1. Acoustic1. Acousticphysical vibrations of voice, instruments, air, ear...
Physical limitations:Physical limitations: physiology of voice and earphysiology of voice and ear size size resonances of vocal tract resonances of vocal tract ff00 range of music ≈ 100 – 1000 Hz range of music ≈ 100 – 1000 Hz
Both language and music are
2. Meaningful2. MeaningfulThey communicate “information”
language: language: obvious?obvious?
music: music: mysterious?mysterious?
philosophical & psychological issuesphilosophical & psychological issues
Both language and music are
3. Gestural3. GesturalBoth involve body movement (corporality)
LanguageLanguage theories of origin based on sign and gesturetheories of origin based on sign and gesture
MusicMusic dance, conducting, musicians’ gesturesdance, conducting, musicians’ gestures talk about music: “rising melody”, “fast music”talk about music: “rising melody”, “fast music”
Both language and music are
4. Rhythmic and melodic4. Rhythmic and melodic
Speech: timing + intonation = prosody
Music: rhythm + contour = melodyD
onJo
hnso
nR
ice
Uni
vers
ity
Both language and music are
5. Syntactic5. Syntactic
LanguageLanguage nouns, verbs, subjects etc.nouns, verbs, subjects etc.
MusicMusic motives, scale steps, beats etc.motives, scale steps, beats etc.
BothBoth contextual probabilitiescontextual probabilities hierarchical structureshierarchical structures ambiguities (esp. music)ambiguities (esp. music)
Language and music give groups and participants identityenable & motivate coordinated action
Different “natural” constellationslanguage: pairsmusic: groups
Both language and music are
6. Social6. Social
Both language and music are
7. Emotional7. Emotional
Emotional communication through prosody (timing, pitch, loudness, timbre)
Music focuses on: wonder, transcendence, tenderness, nostalgia, peacefulness, power, joyful activation, tension, sadness
(Zentner et al, 2008)
Both language and music are
8. Intentional8. Intentional
o PlanningPlanningo thinking about past and futurethinking about past and future
o Metacognition, reflectionMetacognition, reflectiono thinking about thinkingthinking about thinking
o Theory of mindTheory of mindo others’ “minds” are differentothers’ “minds” are different
language: lyinglanguage: lying
music: emotional manipulationmusic: emotional manipulation
DifferencesDifferences
Music – as compared to language
1 not lexical
2 less syntactic
3 less socially essential
4 more spiritual
5 more repetitive
6 more exact in pitch/time, less in timbre
7 more expertise-oriented
1. Music is not lexical1. Music is not lexical
Words can be defined in dictionaries. Words can be defined in dictionaries.
Meaning does not depend on sound.Meaning does not depend on sound.
Musical elements not defined in dictionaries. Musical elements not defined in dictionaries. Meaning does depend on sound.Meaning does depend on sound.
2. Music is less syntactic2. Music is less syntactic
Language Music
Is syntax integral to meaning? Yes No
Does scrambling destroy message? More Less
3. Music is less 3. Music is less socially essentialsocially essential
People with aphasiaPeople with aphasia Relatively big social problemRelatively big social problem
People with amusiaPeople with amusia Relatively small social problemRelatively small social problem
4. Music is more spiritual4. Music is more spiritualtranscendent, connecting, life-changingtranscendent, connecting, life-changing
Music is more ritualisedMusic is more ritualised• special times, special places, special feelingsspecial times, special places, special feelings
Language is more everydayLanguage is more everyday• any time, any place, any feelingany time, any place, any feeling
4. Music is more repetitive4. Music is more repetitive
people usually say things only oncepeople usually say things only once musical themes are usually repeatedmusical themes are usually repeated
I must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in class
I must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in class
I must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in classI must not talk in class
5. Music is more exact in pitch 5. Music is more exact in pitch and time; language, in timbreand time; language, in timbre
Pitch-time patterns in musicPitch-time patterns in music thousands of melodiesthousands of melodies
Timbre in languageTimbre in language thousands of wordsthousands of words
6. Music is more expertise-6. Music is more expertise-orientedoriented
SpeakingSpeaking everyone can do iteveryone can do it everyone practiceseveryone practices
Playing musicPlaying music experts are admiredexperts are admired only experts practiceonly experts practice
What is a “good” theory?What is a “good” theory? Satisfies general criteria for good theoriesSatisfies general criteria for good theories Accounts for many musical featuresAccounts for many musical features
A “good” theory is...A “good” theory is...
simple simple parsimonious, falsifiable parsimonious, falsifiable
general general accounts for range of phenomena accounts for range of phenomena
focused focused on the main issues on the main issues
concrete concrete clearly defined terms, processes clearly defined terms, processes
logical logical clear argument clear argument
empirical empirical observation-based, ecological observation-based, ecological
seminal seminal inspires new approaches inspires new approaches
Ockham Kuhn Popper GibsonOckham Kuhn Popper Gibson
A good theory of OoM A good theory of OoM should should explainexplain or or be consistent with be consistent with as many points as possible:as many points as possible:
Language and music
Music(compared to language)
1. acoustic2. meaningful3. gestural4. rhythmic + melodic5. syntactic6. social7. emotional8. intentional
1. not lexical 2. less syntactic3. less socially essential 4. more spiritual5. more repetitive6. more exact in pitch/time,
less in timbre7. more expertise-oriented
Music: a cultural construct of singing, dancing, playing instruments?
Kinds of theory of OoMKinds of theory of OoM
Prerequisites or behaviors?Prerequisites or behaviors? Different prehistoric periodsDifferent prehistoric periods One of more originsOne of more origins
Prerequisites versus behaviorsPrerequisites versus behaviorstwo kinds of “origin”
PrerequisitesPrerequisites include include physiologyphysiology
vocal tract, fast neural processing...vocal tract, fast neural processing...
psychologypsychology reflective language, theory of mind...reflective language, theory of mind...
latent abilitieslatent abilities ability to synchronize to a beat, e.g. ability to synchronize to a beat, e.g. Snowball
Behaviors includeBehaviors include animal “singing”animal “singing” motheresemotherese
Years ago Relevance for humanity Relevance for music
100 000 000 animals acoustic communication
10 000 000 primates sonic social coordination3 000 000 tools
1 000 000 large brain, social cognition lang.-music separation300 000 low larynx variety of sounds
100 000 • reflection, theory of mind• speech: complex vocab & syntax• cultural explosion: art, religion• exit from Africa
• instruments• scales, metre• complex ritual
10 000 • agriculture, villages, writing• hierarchical social structures
• pentatonic/diatonic• rich oral traditions
1 000 religious politics • polyphony, notation
100 electrical technologies • new tonalities• sound recording
When did “music” “begin”?When did “music” “begin”?
Origin or origins?Origin or origins?
Did different processes Did different processes contribute to music in contribute to music in different periods?different periods?
Leading theories of OoMLeading theories of OoM
MusilanguageMusilanguage Emotional coordinationEmotional coordination Non-human animal behaviorsNon-human animal behaviors Non-adaptive pleasure-seekingNon-adaptive pleasure-seeking
MusilanguageMusilanguageEmotional-lexical vocal communicationEmotional-lexical vocal communication
Were music and language once one? Does music exist Were music and language once one? Does music exist because it has different social functions from language? because it has different social functions from language?
My assumption:Yes, obviously
Not obvious:Separation was functional and deliberate? start of “consciousness”? cf. phylogeny and ontogeny
Emotional coordinationEmotional coordinationDoes music exist because it coordinates group emotion, Does music exist because it coordinates group emotion,
which promotes group survival?which promotes group survival?
Theoretical foundationTheoretical foundation• Music can coordinate emotions of many people (social control in ritual)Music can coordinate emotions of many people (social control in ritual)• Groups with music can be larger; compete better with other groupsGroups with music can be larger; compete better with other groups
Evidence:Evidence:• Language & music can fulfil social function of grooming (Dunbar)Language & music can fulfil social function of grooming (Dunbar)• Growth of group size with brain sizeGrowth of group size with brain size
Accounts for music’s...Accounts for music’s...social function, emotion, intentionalitysocial function, emotion, intentionality
NOT spirituality, strong emotionNOT spirituality, strong emotion
Non-human animal behaviorsNon-human animal behaviorsIs music an elaboration of ancestral behaviors?Is music an elaboration of ancestral behaviors?
Examples:Examples: singing (birds, whales, gibbons) singing (birds, whales, gibbons) territorial marking (wolves...)territorial marking (wolves...) synchronous chorusing (chimpanzees)synchronous chorusing (chimpanzees)
For: For: may explain unconscious “drives”may explain unconscious “drives”
Against: Against: isolated, impoverished skillsisolated, impoverished skills
Can account for music’s...Can account for music’s...repetition, social function, emotionrepetition, social function, emotionNOT complexity, intentionality, spiritualityNOT complexity, intentionality, spirituality
Non-human animals are amazingly bad at music and language - as the photos suggest
Non-adaptive pleasure seekingNon-adaptive pleasure seekingDoes music exist because it activates neural reward systems?Does music exist because it activates neural reward systems?
Uses multiple existing neural systems: Uses multiple existing neural systems: motor, ASA, language, social, aggression...motor, ASA, language, social, aggression...
CounterevidenceCounterevidence based on accident – could go in the wrong direction?based on accident – could go in the wrong direction? musicians do not get addicted and suffer withdrawal!musicians do not get addicted and suffer withdrawal!
Accounts for music’s...Accounts for music’s...emotion, repetition, spiritualityemotion, repetition, spirituality
NOT gesture, structure, syntaxNOT gesture, structure, syntax
NOT social function, intentionalityNOT social function, intentionality
Music and stages of Music and stages of sexual reproductionsexual reproduction
1.1. FlirtingFlirting
2.2. Prenatal developmentPrenatal development
3.3. MothereseMotherese
4.4. ChildhoodChildhood
The ideaThe idea Males use music to attract femalesMales use music to attract females Females use music to judge male fitnessFemales use music to judge male fitness
Evidence (shaky…)Evidence (shaky…) love songslove songs musicians are mainly malemusicians are mainly male we are more creative when sexually activewe are more creative when sexually active
CounterevidenceCounterevidence no gender diff. in music ability; androgenyno gender diff. in music ability; androgeny other ways for females to evaluate fitnessother ways for females to evaluate fitness humans are smarter than peacockshumans are smarter than peacocks
Accounts for music’s...Accounts for music’s...emotion, intentionality, expertise orientation - NOT spirituality, social glueemotion, intentionality, expertise orientation - NOT spirituality, social glue
1. Flirting: Mate attraction1. Flirting: Mate attractionDoes music exist because it indicates male reproductive fitness?Does music exist because it indicates male reproductive fitness?
2. Prenatal development2. Prenatal developmentDoes music exist because it evokes the mother schema?Does music exist because it evokes the mother schema?
The ideaThe ideaFetus acquires Fetus acquires mother schema mother schema that promotes postnatal that promotes postnatal survival and includes sound and movementsurvival and includes sound and movement
motherese, play, ritualmotherese, play, ritual
Evidence Evidence Musical skills of infants and childrenMusical skills of infants and childrenMusic as Music as persona persona (mother perceived by fetus?)(mother perceived by fetus?)Musical emotion is strong, spiritual (e.g. awe), Musical emotion is strong, spiritual (e.g. awe), changed states, enclosure, flow, non-lexicalchanged states, enclosure, flow, non-lexical
Counterevidence: Counterevidence: Hard to test causal relationsHard to test causal relationsEvidence is circumstantialEvidence is circumstantialUnfalsifiable ?Unfalsifiable ?
3. Mother-infant communication3. Mother-infant communicationIs music elaborated motherese?Is music elaborated motherese?
Motherese & babbling are musicalMotherese & babbling are musical• prosodic exaggeration prosodic exaggeration • rhythmic, melodic, gesturalrhythmic, melodic, gestural• emotional, meaningfulemotional, meaningful
Evidence: studies onEvidence: studies on• motheresemotherese• infant musicalityinfant musicality
4. Childhood: Playing, training4. Childhood: Playing, trainingIs music elaborated childplay?Is music elaborated childplay?
Childplay develops cognitive, social and motor Childplay develops cognitive, social and motor skills, promoting survivalskills, promoting survivalperformance, dance performance, dance physical skills, coordination physical skills, coordinationlistening listening cognitive skills, language cognitive skills, language
Doubts: Doubts: Does this kind of training really promote Does this kind of training really promote survivalsurvival? ? Is there a “Mozart effect”?Is there a “Mozart effect”?
Accounts for music’s...Accounts for music’s...social functions, pleasureexpertise orientationsocial functions, pleasureexpertise orientationNOT spiritualityNOT spirituality
THEORY/CRITERION
animalbehav
uselesspleasure
flirting play skill
emotioncoord.
mother-infant
acoustic 1 1 1 1 1 1
meaning 1 1 1 1 1 1
gesture 1 1 1 1 1 1
rhy & mel 1 1 1 1 1 1
syntax 0.5 0 0.5 1 0.5 1
social 1 0 0.5 1 1 1
emotional 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 1
intentional 0 0.5 1 1 1 1
non-lexical 1 1 1 1 1 1
repetitive 1 1 1 1 1 1
spiritual 0 0.5 0 0 0 1
unessential 1 1 1 1 1 1
expertise 0 0 1 1 0 0.5
evidence 0.5 0 0.5 0 1 0.5
TOTAL 2.5 1.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 6.0
ConclusionConclusion
Is music...Is music...40% motherese40% motherese
20% flirting20% flirting
20% childplay20% childplay
20% emotion coord?20% emotion coord?
Infant musicalityInfant musicalitye.g. many studies by Trehub and collaboratorse.g. many studies by Trehub and collaborators
Sensitivity to...Sensitivity to... melodic contourmelodic contour relative pitch/durationrelative pitch/duration specific musical intervals specific musical intervals changes in unequal scales/rhythmschanges in unequal scales/rhythms+ pulse (Winkler; Phillips-Silver)+ pulse (Winkler; Phillips-Silver)
These are “predispositions”These are “predispositions”““evident in infancy, before they have evident in infancy, before they have obvious utilityobvious utility” ”
(Trehub, 2001)(Trehub, 2001)
Origins of infant musicalityOrigins of infant musicality
Genetic Genetic (Trehub)(Trehub)
selection for music (mate attraction, selection for music (mate attraction, training, social glue, motherese…)training, social glue, motherese…)
Learned Learned (Parncutt)(Parncutt)
prenatal exposure to changing maternal prenatal exposure to changing maternal sound, movement and hormone levelssound, movement and hormone levels
Prenatal cognitionPrenatal cognitionHuman gestation: 40 weeks
Taste from 15 weeksTaste from 15 weeks Hearing from 20 weeksHearing from 20 weeks Light sensitivity from 28 weeks (Lowery, 2002)Light sensitivity from 28 weeks (Lowery, 2002) Memory (Hepper, 1991) & learning (Hepper, 1996)Memory (Hepper, 1991) & learning (Hepper, 1996)
possible functions: possible functions: practice, practice, infant-mother bondinginfant-mother bonding, , promotion of breastfeeding, language acquisitionpromotion of breastfeeding, language acquisition
Prenatal hearing in animalsPrenatal hearing in animals
Yes: Yes: humans, sheep, goats, guinea humans, sheep, goats, guinea pigspigs
No: No: gerbils, rats, catsgerbils, rats, cats
Function:Function: Prenatal bonding?Prenatal bonding? Practice for postnatal perception?Practice for postnatal perception?
Prenatal learningPrenatal learning
Fetal rats learn in response to intrauterine Fetal rats learn in response to intrauterine stimulation administered stimulation administered occasionally over 5 days occasionally over 5 days (Smotherman & Robinson, 1990)(Smotherman & Robinson, 1990)
Fetal humans learn from maternal sound, Fetal humans learn from maternal sound, movement ... movement ... almost constantly for 20 weeksalmost constantly for 20 weeks
Trivial: Why should a fetus be less good at Trivial: Why should a fetus be less good at learning than a non-human animal?learning than a non-human animal?
Infant ≠ fetus?Infant ≠ fetus?
Sudden physiological changes at birth:Sudden physiological changes at birth: BreathingBreathing DigestionDigestion
No psychological or neurological change!No psychological or neurological change!““Birth is a trivial event in development. Nothing Birth is a trivial event in development. Nothing
neurologically interesting happens”neurologically interesting happens”
(Janet DiPietro, cited in Psychology Today, 1998)(Janet DiPietro, cited in Psychology Today, 1998)
From about 32 weeks fetus behaves like newbornFrom about 32 weeks fetus behaves like newborn
Extrapolate infant behavior to fetal behavior?Extrapolate infant behavior to fetal behavior?
The mother schemaThe mother schema(Parncutt, 2009)
Infant schema (Infant schema (cuteness) promotes survival (Lorenz)cuteness) promotes survival (Lorenz) Inverse: Inverse: Mother schemaMother schema??
Fetal knowledge of maternal sounds, movements and Fetal knowledge of maternal sounds, movements and emotions could promote bonding and infant survivalemotions could promote bonding and infant survival
Multimodal and holistic: baby cannot analyse itMultimodal and holistic: baby cannot analyse it
Evidence for mother schemaEvidence for mother schema very early hearing & learning – what function?very early hearing & learning – what function? fetus learns maternal smell, taste, diet fetus learns maternal smell, taste, diet preferences preferences
(Joy Brown, 2008)(Joy Brown, 2008) fetus distinguishes maternal voice from loudspeaker fetus distinguishes maternal voice from loudspeaker
on mother’s abdomen (Hepper et al., 2007)on mother’s abdomen (Hepper et al., 2007)
……All of this without reflective awareness All of this without reflective awareness
The phylogeny of musicThe phylogeny of music The “mother schema” theory The “mother schema” theory
Larger brain 2 to 1.5 million years ago (Falk, 2000; Mithen, 1996)Today, the first 3 postnatal months are the “4th trimester”
The ontogeny of musicThe ontogeny of musicThe “mother schema” theoryThe “mother schema” theory
* Prerequisite: Long-term multimodal recognition memory •multimodal = sound + movement + emotion•for similar, repeated patterns •not episodic memory! (e.g. no memory for birth)
** Play is like motherese , ritual is like play• Both evoke “motherese feelings” • Both are reinforced by operant conditioning
From motherese to musicFrom motherese to music
““It is not surprising that societies all over the world have It is not surprising that societies all over the world have developed these nodes of culture that we call ceremonies developed these nodes of culture that we call ceremonies and rituals, which do for their members what mothers and rituals, which do for their members what mothers naturally do for their babies: naturally do for their babies: engage their interest, involve engage their interest, involve them in a shared rhythmic pulse, and thereby instill feelings them in a shared rhythmic pulse, and thereby instill feelings of closeness and communion. of closeness and communion. The inborn propensities for The inborn propensities for imitation, reciprocity, and emotional communion in infancy imitation, reciprocity, and emotional communion in infancy have become further elaborated and used in ritualized and have become further elaborated and used in ritualized and ceremonial forms that themselves build and reinforce ceremonial forms that themselves build and reinforce feelings of unity among adults, feelings of unity among adults, all of which ultimately serve all of which ultimately serve to hold the group together.” to hold the group together.”
((Dissanayake, 2000, p. 64, cited by Davies)Dissanayake, 2000, p. 64, cited by Davies)
Musilanguage and mothereseMusilanguage and motherese
Hypothesis: They are the same thing•Makes theory more parsimonious, concrete, tangible•No evidence that they are different•A concrete scenario for OoM
Music and religion/spiritualityMusic and religion/spirituality
Why the strong connectionIn all known human cultures?
Prerequisites for religious beliefPrerequisites for religious beliefBasic moralityBasic moralityReciprocal altruismReciprocal altruismAre gods supernatural police? (Matt Rossano)Are gods supernatural police? (Matt Rossano)
Mental images and causalityMental images and causalityTool use Tool use (-2 000 kya) (-2 000 kya)
Formulation of beliefsFormulation of beliefsLanguage, ability to construct narrativesLanguage, ability to construct narrativesLarge brain (500 kya)Large brain (500 kya)Construction of gods: Theory of mind, agent detectionConstruction of gods: Theory of mind, agent detectionOral tradition: Gullibility of children (Dawkins)Oral tradition: Gullibility of children (Dawkins)
Monotheistic tendencies Monotheistic tendencies in world religionsin world religions
HinduHindu
Poly- or mono-theistic?Poly- or mono-theistic?
3 aspects of universal supreme 3 aspects of universal supreme god: Brahma (creator), Shiva god: Brahma (creator), Shiva (destroyer), Vishnu (protector)(destroyer), Vishnu (protector)
BuddhismBuddhism
A- or mono-theistic?A- or mono-theistic?
3 jewels: Buddha, Dharma 3 jewels: Buddha, Dharma (teachings) and Sangha (teachings) and Sangha (community)(community)
Religion Billions of people
Christianity 2
Islam 1.5
Hindu 1
Buddhist 0.5
folk 1
No religion 1
Origins of religious emotionOrigins of religious emotionAn approach from anthropology and animal behaviorAn approach from anthropology and animal behavior
““the soulful need to pray to gods, to praise God with hymns, the soulful need to pray to gods, to praise God with hymns, to shake in terror before the power of invisible spirits, to fear to shake in terror before the power of invisible spirits, to fear for one’s life at the hands of the unknown or to feel bathed in for one’s life at the hands of the unknown or to feel bathed in all-enveloping love from the heavens. … The inaccessibility all-enveloping love from the heavens. … The inaccessibility to language of the sacred experience mirrors what Martin to language of the sacred experience mirrors what Martin Buber writes … God ‘is wrapped in a cloud but reveals itself, Buber writes … God ‘is wrapped in a cloud but reveals itself, it lacks but creates language. We hear no You and yet we it lacks but creates language. We hear no You and yet we feel addressed; we answer—creating, thinking, acting: with feel addressed; we answer—creating, thinking, acting: with our being we speak the basic word, unable to say You with our being we speak the basic word, unable to say You with our mouth’”our mouth’”
Barbara King (2007). Evolving God: A provocative view of Barbara King (2007). Evolving God: A provocative view of the origins of religion. New York: Doubleday.the origins of religion. New York: Doubleday.
Pre- & perinatal mother schemaPre- & perinatal mother schema multimodal representationmultimodal representation behavior, states, predictionsbehavior, states, predictions the first schema ever the first schema ever
- in ontogeny and phylogeny- in ontogeny and phylogeny mirror of mother‘s infant schemamirror of mother‘s infant schema both schemata both schemata infant survival infant survival
human qualities human qualities
of gods and spirits?of gods and spirits?Bhārat Mātā = Mother India
national personification of India as a mother goddess
God God according to Wikipediaaccording to Wikipedia
Not only the origin of everything, but also:o supernatural and eternal o overseer of the universeo omni-scient, -potent, -present, -benevolento divinely simple
…a culturally reconstructed mother schema?o originally ungendered and unpoliticized
o cf. Jung’s mother archetypeo transmitted by non-episodic, pre-linguistic memory
o not “remembered” in the everyday senseo social and cultural - not individual
Chora - Chora - χώραχώρα
Ancient / modern GreekAncient / modern Greek womb; popular dance / womb; popular dance / country, regioncountry, region
PlatoPlato maternal space where forms materializematernal space where forms materialize
Julia Kristeva Julia Kristeva prelinguistic spaceprelinguistic space place of mobility, dissolution, renewalplace of mobility, dissolution, renewal source of emotion, instinctive drivessource of emotion, instinctive drives
Jacques DerridaJacques Derrida feminine roles: mother, nurse, receptaclefeminine roles: mother, nurse, receptacle
Carnegie Hall
Canterbury Cathedral
Acoustics of churchesAcoustics of churches
““Appropriate for worship”Appropriate for worship”= psychological connection to prenatal experience?= psychological connection to prenatal experience?
1. Reinforcement of low frequencies1. Reinforcement of low frequenciesPrenatal sound is low-pass filteredPrenatal sound is low-pass filtered
2. Suppression of directional cues2. Suppression of directional cues(Criteria for good room acoustics include “envelopment”)(Criteria for good room acoustics include “envelopment”)
Fetus cannot localise sound sourcesFetus cannot localise sound sources
““Supplication” or fetal position?Supplication” or fetal position?
Islam
Hinduism
Buddhism
Jewish prayerPlaza Hall, Jerusalem
youtube
Baha‘i Sikhism
Origin of consciousnessOrigin of consciousnessreflective language reflective awareness
100 000 years ago…100 000 years ago…No fundamental neural changeNo fundamental neural changeNo clear benefits for survival and reproductionNo clear benefits for survival and reproduction
Scenario:Scenario:bigger brain bigger brain earlier birth earlier birth fragile infant fragile infant motherese motherese
Infant survival depended on mother Infant survival depended on mother guessingguessing its needs its needs strong evolutionary pressure!strong evolutionary pressure!empathy, role of mirror neuronsempathy, role of mirror neuronstheory of mind, metarepresentation, consciousnesstheory of mind, metarepresentation, consciousnessparallel linguistic development (motherese)parallel linguistic development (motherese)
The origin of music in the The origin of music in the mother-infant relationshipmother-infant relationship...maybe even the origin of language and religion…...maybe even the origin of language and religion…
Larger brain + bipedalism Larger brain + bipedalism earlier birth earlier birth infant fragility “atriciality”infant fragility “atriciality” more parental care more parental care survival survival new, complex infant-mother interactionnew, complex infant-mother interaction Reflective language, arts, culture…Reflective language, arts, culture…
Accounts for music’s...Accounts for music’s...• structures structures • functionsfunctions• emotionsemotions• spiritualityspirituality