![Page 1: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Impact of agricultural practiceson ecosystem services
MOOLA RAMPh.D. SCHOLAR
DIVISION OF AGRONOMYINDIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
NEW DELHI-110012, Email- [email protected]
![Page 2: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Community of living organisms Interaction Flow of energy Components –biotic and abiotic
2
![Page 3: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Processes by which the environmentproduces resources
Transformation of a set of natural
What are ecosystem services?
Transformation of a set of naturalassets (soil, plants and animals, airand water) into things that we value.
3
![Page 4: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
RegulatingBenefits obtained fromregulation of ecosystem
processes
• climate regulation
• disease regulation
• flood regulation
• detoxification
ProvisioningGoods produced or
provided by ecosystems
• food
• fresh water
• fuel wood
• fiber
• biochemicals
CulturalNon-material benefits
obtained fromecosystems
• spiritual
• recreational
• aesthetic
• inspirational
• educational
To understand Ecosystem Services
4
• detoxification• biochemicals
• genetic resources
• educational
• communal
• symbolic
SupportingServices necessary for production of other ecosystem services
• Soil formation
• Nutrient cycling
• Primary production
![Page 5: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5MEA, 2005
![Page 6: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
![Page 7: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Priority ecosystem services and agriculture
Freshwater. Agriculture highly depends upon this ecosystemservice for watering crops—on rain-fed and irrigated farms—andfor generating electricity to run some irrigation systems. At thesame time, farmers can impact freshwater quantity (throughirrigation) and quality (through fertilizer and agrochemical runoff).
Water regulation. Farmers are dependent on the role thatwetlands and other ecosystems play in managing the timing and
7
wetlands and other ecosystems play in managing the timing andmagnitude of water runoff during the monsoon season and inrecharging aquifers.
Erosion regulation. Farmers depend on vegetation to retain topsoil.Poor agricultural practices are having some localized negativeeffects, but other practices such as living fences and minimumtillage are improving erosion control.
![Page 8: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Pest regulation. Farmers rely on some native organisms to helpcontrol crop pests in integrated crop management systems. Butfarming practices such as growing monocultures, fragmentingnatural habitats, and inappropriately using agrochemicals areeroding nature’s ability to manage pests.
Pollination. Many crops benefit from pollination by bees andother animals, although a substitute practice—pollination byhuman hand—is used especially for plant breeding. Agriculture has
8
human hand—is used especially for plant breeding. Agriculture hasa negative impact on natural pollination due to conversion ofpollinator habitat.
Nutrient cycling. Crops depend on nature’s processing of nutrientssuch as nitrogen and phosphorus, but synthetic substitutes exist.Poor farming practices sometimes inhibit this natural process,requiring more man-made inputs to replace lost nutrients.
![Page 9: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Agricultural trendsover the past 40 years.
9
Tilman et al, 2002
![Page 10: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Sonak, 2004
![Page 11: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Sonak, 2004
![Page 12: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Changes from agriculture that affect and are affectedby several ecosystem services
Agent of change Ecological services
Land cover
Erosion
Chemical use
Production services
-Food and materials for human consumption- Energy
Regulation services
-Water quality and quantity
12
-Water quality and quantity-Soil quality-Air quality-Pollination-Seed dispersal-Biodiversity-Pest mitigation-Protection from disturbances
Habitat services-habitat
Dale and Polasky, 2007
![Page 13: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Impacts of Agriculture on ecosystem services
13Knudsen et al, 2005
![Page 14: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Anthropogenic activities affecting C emission from theterrestrial to the atmospheric pool. Lal, 2004
![Page 15: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
![Page 16: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Clear forest vegetation (Dec-Jan)
Burning of vegetation (Feb-March)
Dibbling (April-May)
Impact of Shifting cultivation on ecology
16
Few years cultivation
Shifting
Returning back
Recovery of soil fertility and Nutrient conservationBarren hills
Ranjan and Upadhyay, 1999
![Page 17: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Loss in forest cover in north-eastern states (sq Km)
States 1993-95 1995-97
ArunachalPradesh
169 75
Assam 224 257
Manipur 65 603
Meghalaya 218 75
Mizoram 792 292
Nagaland 58 573
Tripura - -
Total 1526 1875
17
2.7 million ha of land has already been affected Each year 0.45 ha of land fall under shifting cultivation in northeastern India Jhum cycle has been reduced from 20-30 years to 2-3 years
Ranjan and Upadhyay, 1999
![Page 18: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Impacts of intensive agricultural practices onecosystem services
60% of geographical area faces soildegradation, water logging, salinity andalkalinity- threatens food security
Water table decline in the range of 3-10 m Water table decline in the range of 3-10 m
The use of agro-chemicals in Haryana is thehighest in India
Fertilizer consumption increased from 3 to30 kg/ha in the last 30 years.
Rice-wheat CS (5.8 lakh ha)- N, P, Zn
Residue burning-C emission18Singh, 2000
![Page 19: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
![Page 20: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
![Page 21: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Contemporary Geography of Non-sustainable Withdrawals for Irrigation.
21
The following divisions are based on calculated consumptive use by crops : High overdraft: 1 km3/yr; Moderate: 0.1–1 km3/yr; Low: 0–0.1 km3/yr. The map indicates where there is insufficient fresh water to fully satisfy irrigated cropdemands. The imbalance in long-term water budgets necessitates diversion of surface water or the tapping ofgroundwater resources. The areas shown with moderate to-high levels of non-sustainable use occur over eachcontinent and are known to be areas of aquifer mining and/or major water transfer schemes. (MEA, 2005)
![Page 22: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
![Page 23: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Agriculture and air quality
23
![Page 24: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
![Page 25: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Net Change in Forest Area by Continent (in millionhectares per year)
FRA, 2000
![Page 26: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
![Page 27: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
![Page 28: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
![Page 29: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Contrast between Contemporary and Preindustrial Loadings of Easily Transported Nitrogen onto Land Mass of Earthand Geography of Relative Increases in Riverborne Nitrogen Fluxes Resulting from Anthropogenic Acceleration of Cycle.
29
MEA Report, 2005
![Page 30: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Balance Sheet – Ecosystems Services
30
![Page 31: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
ISSUE: The capacity of many ecosystems to provide certain services has
been declining…
Condition ofEcosystem
KeyEcosystem Type
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Food-Fiber Production
Water Quality
Services
31
Not Assessed
*Source: Pilot Assessment of Global Ecosystems. WRI, 2000.
Decreasing
Poor
BadWater Quantity
Biodiversity
Carbon StorageIncreasing
Mixed
ChangingCapacity
www.wri.org/
![Page 32: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
1. Promoting a diversified farm landscape, including croprotations and intercropping within the fields, but alsodiversification on the edges and outside of the farm, forexample, in crop-field boundaries with windbreaks,shelterbelts, and living fences, which can improve habitatfor wildlife and beneficial insects, provide sources ofwood, organic matter, resources for pollinating bees, andin addition, modify wind speed and the microclimate.
2. Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) i.e. thejudicious use of both organic and inorganic sources of
BEST PRACTICES
judicious use of both organic and inorganic sources ofnutrients rather than either alone;
3. The use of conservation tillage rather than continuousdeep ploughing;
4. Using nutrient recycling mechanisms through the use ofcrop rotations, crop/livestock mixed systems,agroforestryand intercropping systems based on legumes, and soforth.
5. Reduce applications of pesticides6. Practice conservation agriculture
32
![Page 33: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Maintaining Balance
33http://rs.resalliance.org/category/tools/millennium-ecosystem-assessment/
![Page 34: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Conclusion
We all rely on Ecosystems
Ecosystems provide a wide range of goods and services –provisioning, regulating, cultural and supporting
In meeting demands and raising production a significantnumber of the worlds ecosystems have been degraded
To co-create a sustainable future, we need to deviseadequate means to value our natural capital and humanresourcesresources
It is possible to do something about the ecological problem.This requires substantial changes in policy and practice andthe conceptualization of a new paradigm in our agriculturefor sustainable development
The future depends on wise eco choices of today. Thechoices we make today in how we use land and waterresources will have enormous consequences on the futuresustainability of earth’s ecosystems and the services theyprovide
34
![Page 35: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
ReferencesDale, V. H. and Polasky, S. (2007). Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on
ecosystem services. Ecological economics 64:286-296
FRA (2000). Online at www.forestresources.org/
Knudsen, Marie Trydeman, Niels Halberg, Jørgen E. Olesen, John Byrne, VenkateshIyer and Noah Toly (2005) Global trends in agriculture and food systems. Online atwww.agrsci.dk
Lal, R. (2004). Agricultural activities and the global carbon cycle. Nutrient Cycling inAgroecosystems 70: 103–116.
MEA (2005). Online at http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index.aspx
Ranjan, R. and Upadhyay, V.P. 1999. Ecological problems due to shifting cultivation.Current science 77(10) : 1246-1250.Current science 77(10) : 1246-1250.
Singh, R.B. (2000). Environmental consequences of agricultural development: a casestudy from the green revolution state of Haryana, India. Agriculture, ecosystem andenvironment 82 : 97-103.
Sonak, S. (2004). Global environment change: an overview. Accessed online athttp://www.iedm.ges.kyoto-u.ac.jp/seminar/060421-001.pdf.
Tilman, David, Kenneth G. Cassman, Pamela A. Matson, Rosamond Naylor &Stephen Polasky (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive productionpractices. Nature 418 : 671-677.
WRI (2000). Online at www.wri.org/
http://earthtrends.wri.org
http://rs.resalliance.org/category/tools/millennium-ecosystem-assessment/ 35
![Page 36: 3. Impact of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062319/557210ed497959fc0b8df095/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
THANK YOU