Download - 2:13-cv-00395 #167
-
8/9/2019 2:13-cv-00395 #167
1/13
-
8/9/2019 2:13-cv-00395 #167
2/13
2
received all of the necessary governmental approvals. Accordingly, pursuant to the Settleme
Agreement between the Bostic Plaintiffs and Defendant Rainey (attached as Exhibit 1), the
parties hereby jointly stipulate that all potential claims by the Bostic Plaintiffs for attorneys fees
and costs in this matter have been resolved.
Dated: January 28, 2015 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Charles B. LustigThomas B. Shuttleworth, VSB # [email protected] E. Ruloff, VSB # [email protected] B. Lustig, VSB # 29442
[email protected] M. Hendrick, VSB # [email protected] C. Porcaro, VSB # [email protected], RULOFF, SWAIN,HADDAD & MORECOCK, P.C.4525 South Blvd., Suite 300Virginia Beach, VA 23452Telephone: (757) 671-6000Facsimile: (757) 671-6004
Case 2:13-cv-00395-AWA-LRL Document 167 Filed 01/28/15 Page 2 of 6 PageID# 1353
-
8/9/2019 2:13-cv-00395 #167
3/13
3
David Boies,admitted pro hac vice [email protected], SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP333 Main St.
Armonk, NY 10504Telephone: (914) 749-8200Facsimile: (914) 749-8300
Robert B. Silver,admitted pro hac vice [email protected] I. Schiller,admitted pro hac vice [email protected], SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP575 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022
Telephone: (212) 446-2300Facsimile: (914) 446-2350
William A. Isaacson,admitted pro hac vice [email protected], SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP5301 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20015Telephone: (202)237-2727Facsimile: (202)237-6131
Jeremy M. Goldman,admitted pro hac vice [email protected], SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900Oakland, CA 94612Telephone: (510) 874-1000Facsimile: (510)874-1460
Theodore B. Olson,admitted pro hac vice [email protected] D. McGill,admitted pro hac vice [email protected]
Amir C. Tayrani,admitted pro hac vice [email protected] Fiebig,admitted pro hac vice [email protected], DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20036Telephone: (202) 955-8668Facsimile: (202) 467-0539
Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.,admitted pro hac vice
[email protected] S. Lipshutz,admitted pro hac vice [email protected], DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP333 South Grand AvenueLos Angeles, CA 90071Telephone: (213) 229-7000Facsimile: (213) 229-7520
Counsel for Plaintiffs
(counsel listing continued on next page )
Case 2:13-cv-00395-AWA-LRL Document 167 Filed 01/28/15 Page 3 of 6 PageID# 1354
-
8/9/2019 2:13-cv-00395 #167
4/13
4
Rebecca K. GlenbergAMERICANCIVILLIBERTIESU NIONOFVIRGINIAFOUNDATION, I NC.701 E. Franklin Street, Suite 1412Richmond, VA 23219
Telephone: (804) 644-8080Facsimile: (804) [email protected]
Gregory R. NevinsTara L. BorelliLAMBDALEGALDEFENSE ANDEDUCATIONFUND, I NC. 730 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 1070Atlanta, GA 30308Telephone: (404) 897-1880
Facsimile: (404) [email protected]@lambdalegal.org
James D. EsseksJoshua A. BlockAMERICANCIVILLIBERTIESU NIONFOUNDATION 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor
New York, NY 10004Telephone: (212) 549-2500Facsimile: (212) 549-2650 [email protected] [email protected]
Paul M. SmithLuke C. PlatzerMark P. GaberJENNER& BLOCKLLP1099 New York Avenue, NW Suite 900
Washington, D.C. 20001-4412Telephone: (202) 639-6000Facsimile: (202) 639-6066 [email protected]@[email protected]
Counsel for Harris Intervenors
Stuart A. RaphaelSolicitor General of Virginia900 East Main StreetRichmond, Virginia 23219Telephone: (804) 786-7240Facsimile: (804) [email protected]
Trevor S. CoxDeputy Solicitor [email protected]
Rhodes B. RitenourDeputy Attorney [email protected]
Mark R. HerringAttorney General of Virginia
Cynthia E. HudsonChief Deputy Attorney General
Allyson K. TysingerSenior Assistant Attorney GeneralChief, Health, Education & Social [email protected]
Counsel for Janet M. Rainey,in her official capacity as State Registrar of Vital Records
(counsel listing continued on next page )
Case 2:13-cv-00395-AWA-LRL Document 167 Filed 01/28/15 Page 4 of 6 PageID# 1355
-
8/9/2019 2:13-cv-00395 #167
5/13
5
Jeffrey Franklin BrookePOOLE MAHONEY, PC4705 Columbus StreetSuite 100Virginia Beach, VA 23462
Telephone: (757) 552-6053 [email protected]
David Brandt OakleyPOOLE MAHONEY, PC860 Greenbrier CircleSuite 401Chesapeake, VA 23320
Telephone: (757)[email protected]
Counsel for George E. Schaefer, III,in his official capacity as Clerk of the Court for Norfolk Circuit Court
David Austin R. NimocksAlliance Defending Freedom801 G Street N.W., Suite 509Washington, D.C. 20001
Telephone: (202) 393-8690Facsimile: (480) [email protected]
Byron J. BabioneKenneth J. ConnellyJ. Caleb DaltonAlliance Defending Freedom
15100 N. 90th StreetScottsdale, AZ 85260Telephone: (480) 444-0020Facsimile: (480) 444-0028 [email protected]@[email protected]
Counsel for Michle B. McQuigg,in her official capacity as Prince William County Clerk of Circuit Court
Case 2:13-cv-00395-AWA-LRL Document 167 Filed 01/28/15 Page 5 of 6 PageID# 1356
-
8/9/2019 2:13-cv-00395 #167
6/13
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the 28th day of January, 2015, I filed a true and correct copy of
the foregoing Joint Notice of Settlement Regarding Attorneys Fees and Costs with the Clerk of
the Court for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia via the Courts
CM/ECF system. Service was accomplished on all parties through the Courts CM/ECF system
/s/ Charles LustigCharles Lustig
Case 2:13-cv-00395-AWA-LRL Document 167 Filed 01/28/15 Page 6 of 6 PageID# 1357
-
8/9/2019 2:13-cv-00395 #167
7/13
EXHIBIT 1
Case 2:13-cv-00395-AWA-LRL Document 167-1 Filed 01/28/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 1358
-
8/9/2019 2:13-cv-00395 #167
8/13
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
NORFOLK DIVISION
TIMOTHY B . BOSTIC , eta ., )
Plaintiffs , ))
v. )) Civil Action No. 2 : 13 -cv-00395-A W A-LRL
JANET M . RAINEY , in her official capacity as )State Registrar ofVital Records, )
GEORGE E. SCHAEFER , III, in his official )capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of )Norfolk, )
Defendants, )
MICHELE B. MCQ U IG G , in her official capacity )as the Clerk o f the Circuit Court of Prince William )County, )
Int ervenor-Defendant. )
SETTLEMENT GREEMENT
This Settlement Agreement i s entered into by Plaintiffs in the above-captioned mat t e r
Timothy B. Bostic, Tony C . London , Carol Schall, and Mary Townley - and Defendant Janet M .
Rainey , in her official capacity as State Registrar ofVital Records, in full and final resolution o f
any claims Plaintiffs may have against any party for attorney's fees or cost s in this action .
B CKGROUND
1 In July 2013 , Plaintiffs Bostic and London filed a complaint in the United States
Distric t Court for the Eastern District o f Virginia, N orfolk Division (the Court ) challenging the
validity o f Virginia's laws denying marriage rights to same-sex couples, including Article I ,
15-A, of the Constitution o f Virginia , and Virginia Code 20-45.2 and 20-45.3. The suit
named as defendants Governor Robert M . McDonnell , Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli ,
II , and George E. Schaefer, III, th e Clerk of the Circuit Court ofthe City o f Norfolk. By
Case 2:13-cv-00395-AWA-LRL Document 167-1 Filed 01/28/15 Page 2 of 7 PageID# 1359
-
8/9/2019 2:13-cv-00395 #167
9/13
-
8/9/2019 2:13-cv-00395 #167
10/13
appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit were filed by Rainey,
Schaefer, and McQuigg.
4. On March 10, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
granted a motion to intervene on the side of the Plaintiffs-Appellees filed by the class of
plaintiffs certified in Harris v Rainey No 5 :13cv077 (W.D . Va.), a case involving identical
legal challenges to Virginia s same-sex-marriage prohibition. Plaintiffs, as well as the other
parties, opposed the proposed intervention by the Harris Class.
5 On July 28, 2014, following full briefing and oral argument, the Fourth Circuit
affirmed the judgment ofthis Court. Bostic v . Schaefer 760 F.3d 352 (4th Cir . 2014). On
August 20, 2014, the Supreme Court stayed the Fourth Circuit s mandate pending the timely
filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari. McQuigg v Bostic 189 L Ed . 2d 884
(2014).
6 Between August 8 and August 29 , 2014, three petitions for writs of certiorari
were filed with the Supreme Court by Rainey, Clerk Schaefer and Clerk McQuigg, to which the
parties responded or filed papers indicating they waived responses. All parties urged the Court
to hear the case. On October 6, 2014, the Supreme Court denied all three petitions for certiorari.
Rainey v Bostic 190 L. Ed. 2d 140 (2014); Schaefer v Bostic 190 L Ed . 2d 140 (2014);
McQuigg v Bostic 190 L. Ed. 2d 140 (2014). The Fourth Circuit s mandate issued at 1:00 p.m.
on October 6, 2014, at which time the Fourth Circuit s judgment took effect.
7. On October 21, 2014, this Court entered a consent order providing that any
prevailing party wishing to file an application for attorney s fees and costs under 42 U.S.C.
1988 must file such application by November 21 . The Court subsequently extended this
deadline to December 12. On December 11, Plaintiffs filed a joint motion to suspend their
3
Case 2:13-cv-00395-AWA-LRL Document 167-1 Filed 01/28/15 Page 4 of 7 PageID# 1361
-
8/9/2019 2:13-cv-00395 #167
11/13
deadline for petitioning the Court for attorney ' s fees for an additional45 days in order to allow
the parties to finalize a settlement.
8. Plaintiffs and Rainey have conferred in a good-faith effort to settle any claims for
attorney's fees or costs to which Plaintiffs may be entitled under 42 U.S.C. 1988 as prevailing
parties. For settlement purposes, Plaintiffs provided counsel for Rainey with detailed time
records kept by their attorneys at Gibson, Dunn, & Crutcher LLP ( Gibson Dunn ) and
Shuttleworth, Ruloff, Swain, Haddad & Morecock ( Shuttleworth ). Those records documented
the firms' cumulative expenditure of2 372 hours, resulting in $1,738,645 in attorney 's fees and
$5,422 in costs, arising from their legal work in this matter. Counsel for Plaintiffs represented
that that figure already reflected the firms' voluntary reduction of fees for time written off and
did not include other significant costs incurred in the course of the litigation. The figure also
reflected, however, the firms' fees calculated at billing rates substantially higher than prevailing
rates in the Norfolk legal market.
9. To determine Plaintiffs' reasonable attorney's fees, counsel for Plaintiffs and
Rainey agreed to the following methodology to facilitate their settlement negotiations:
limit the hours claimed to those expended by members of the core Gibson Dunnand Shuttleworth legal teams, as identified by Gibson Dunn;
reduce the hourly rates o f those core team members to rates within the range ofrates approved by the U .S District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia,Norfo lk Division, for partners, associates, and paralegals, respectively;
eliminate certain categories of billed time, including time incurred for travel or forwork in support oflegal positions that did not prevail e.g., Plaintiffs' opposition
to intervention by the Harris Class);
The Harris Class has reached an independent resolution with Defendants for anyclaims the Harris Class may have for attorney ' s fees and costs. The settlement agreementbetween Defendants and the Harris Class is unrelated to the Settlement Agreement betweenPlaintiffs and Rainey, and any fees and costs paid by the Commonwealth of Virginia to the
arris Class will in no way affect the settlement amount to be paid to the Plaintiffs under theterms of this Settlement Agreement.
4
Case 2:13-cv-00395-AWA-LRL Document 167-1 Filed 01/28/15 Page 5 of 7 PageID# 1362
-
8/9/2019 2:13-cv-00395 #167
12/13
apply a reduction of20% to hours that were block-billed (meaning the time spenton different tasks combined in a single time entry could not be determined); and
eliminate entries by Shuttleworth timekeepers that were duplicative of workperformed by Gibson Dunn timekeepers.
10. This methodology resulted in blended hourly rates across the two firms of 506
for partners, 274 for associates, and 145 for paralegals . After applying the adjusted rates, and
reducing the number of hours for the reasons described above, the firms ' demand was reduced to
523 ,500 . Counsel for Plaintiffs accepted Rainey' s settlement offer in the amount of 520,000,
with 459,000 allocated to Gibson Dunn and 61,000 to Shuttleworth.
11 . The parties to this Settlement Agreement continue to dispute the billing rates and
charges to which Plaintiffs are entitled. But the parties acknowledge the uncertainty and risks to
each party associated with litigating a fee petition submitted by Plaintiffs, and the range of
possible outcomes with regard to the quantum of fees sought. Acknowledging further the legal
costs and expense associated with litigating these issues , Rainey and Plaintiffs have agreed to
resolve their differences through this Settlement Agreement, each term of which is material to
the parties' willingness to enter into it.
AGREEMENT
1 The Commonwealth of Virginia shall make payment in the amount of 520,000-
459,000 to Gibson Dunn and 61,000 to Shuttleworth-in full satisfaction of all of Plaintiffs'
claims for attorney's fees and costs. That payment shall be made by check payable to Gibson
Dunn & Crutcher LLP and sent to Matthew D. McGill within 45 (forty-five) days after approval
ofthis Settlement Agreement by the Governor of Virginia , as provided in paragraph 3.
2 n consideration for this payment, and upon notification that the Governor has
approved the settlement as provided in paragraph 3, Plaintiffs release Defendants from any and
all claims for attorney's fees and costs that Plaintiffs may have that arise out of this action.
5
Case 2:13-cv-00395-AWA-LRL Document 167-1 Filed 01/28/15 Page 6 of 7 PageID# 1363
-
8/9/2019 2:13-cv-00395 #167
13/13
Plaintirts \'.ill seck no f u r t h ~ . rrdid' against mt) pnrty in this cusc unless necessary to do :>o to
cntorcc: t h ~Court's Judgmcnl.
3. The: pnrtic:s to this Scttkmcn t \ g r e ~ m c n tacknowkdgc that it is subjc:ct to
approval hy the Governor of Virginia and thut iris not c t f c ~ . t h c unkss anJ until the Go\ cmor
upprovcs it. Counsel f ~ > rRainey\\ ill p r o m p t ~ad\ isc Oih s\lll Dunn once the Go\'e-mor approw s
this settlement. Promptl) ti.JIIo"'ing such m>tilicutiou. the parth:s "'illjointl) uJ\isc the: Court
that the fee dispute has been rcsoh ed. In the c\'cnt that t h ~ . Go\ l ' rnor o ~s not appro\\ the
S.c:ttkmem A g r e t : m ~ . n t . Plaintiffs .:.xprcssl) rescn call rights as thi. ' p r ~ . n 1 i l i n gptuth:s in thb
litigation to tile an applkution in thl' Court lor attomcy's t ~ c sand costs .
ln witness to this Scitkmc-nl Agreement. thc- partie s t t l it lKt\ c sigm:J it l l l l thl' date s
indkat...'tl hdm'l :
TIMOTHY B. BOSTIC. TONY C . LONDON.CAROL SCHALL. unJ r