![Page 1: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
2019/21073/FUL
Demolition of existing buildings and re-
development of site to accommodate Council
Depot building and light industrial units, with
access service areas and parking
Locomotive Building
Engine Shed Lane
Skipton
BD23 1UP
![Page 2: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Google Earth View
Industrial units
Industrial units
Sport Centre
![Page 4: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Surrounding Units
![Page 7: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Proposed site layout
A
B
C
![Page 8: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Unit A
![Page 9: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Units B & C
![Page 10: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Officer Summary
1. The site is within an established industrial area so the redevelopment of this site to provide
7 industrial units accords with the requirements of the LP.
2. The scale, design and materials of the proposed industrial units would be similar to
adjacent industrial units. Thus would not result in any visual harm to the character of the
area.
3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not
recommended refusal of the application.
4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards to highways safety, parking, flooding,
contamination or the management of surface water.
5. Accordingly, the development is considered to comply with the requirements of LP policies
in respect of industrial development to support the economic growth and expansion of the
district and subsequently complies with the National Planning Policy Framework.
![Page 11: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
That members resolve to grant planning
permission subject to the recommended
conditions outlined in the officers report.
Recommendation
![Page 12: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
2020/21560/VAR
Application to vary condition no. 2 (Approved Plans) of
Minor Material Amendment to allow Plots 1 and 7 to be
detached on planning application reference number
2019/20416/FUL granted 1st August 2019
Land off Skipton Road, Kildwick,
Keighley BD20 9BB
![Page 13: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
N
![Page 14: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
View from travelling from Skipton to Kildwick
Roundabout
![Page 15: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
View from Kildwick Roundabout
![Page 16: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Existing access into site
![Page 17: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
View of the hedge from Skipton Road
![Page 18: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
View from Skipton Road through the hedge into the
site
![Page 19: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Approved Site Layout
![Page 21: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Proposed revised site layout
![Page 22: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Approved layout
Proposed revised
layout
![Page 23: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Approved Elevations
![Page 24: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Detached
dwellingDetached
dwelling (linked by
overhand to next property)
Detached
dwellings
![Page 26: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Officer Summary
The amendments are considered to not give rise to any
unacceptable adverse impact that would warrant a refusal that
could be defended at appeal.
That members resolve to grant planning permission subject to the
recommended conditions outlined in the officers report.
![Page 28: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
2019/20654/REM
Approval of the appearance, landscaping, layout and scale as reserved by condition in outline
consent referenced 26/2015/15886 for 40 dwellings
Land at
![Page 29: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Site location
![Page 30: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Site Plan
![Page 31: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
View (South) from Shires Lane
![Page 32: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
View (South-West) from Shires Lane/Low Lane junction
![Page 33: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
View (West) from Low Lane
![Page 34: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Elevations (Type A)(E.G. PLOTS 3 & 4 – 2 BED)
FRONT (NORTH)
SIDE (EAST)
SIDE (WEST)
REAR (SOUTH)
![Page 35: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Elevations (Type L)(E.G. PLOT 13 –3-BED)
FRONT (NORTH)
SIDE (EAST)
SIDE (WEST)
REAR (SOUTH)
![Page 36: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
FRONT (WEST)
SIDE (NORTH)
SIDE (SOUTH)
REAR (EAST)
Elevations (Type M)(E.G. PLOT 24 –3-BED)
![Page 37: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Elevations (Type H)(E.G. PLOT 29 –3-BED)
FRONT (SOUTH)
SIDE (EAST) – PLOT 28
SIDE (WEST)
REAR (NORTH)
![Page 38: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070112/6057eb0cf393b57d331dfc21/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Main ConsiderationsPrinciple of development:• Principle established through extant outline permission (access only) for 7
dwellings – application 26/2015/15886 as varied by 2017/18839/VAR.
Character and appearance:• Two storey scale compatible with other dwellings in the area.• High quality materials proposed. Details reserved by condition 5 of this application.• Landscaping reserved by condition 7 of this application.
Amenity:• Spacing and relationship with neighbouring dwellings ensures no undue effects on
privacy and amenity of surrounding occupiers.• Ball stop netting/fencing – reserved by condition 10 of outline.
Highways:• No objections from NYCC subject to conditions. Highway improvement works
reserved by condition 8 of outline.
Affordable Housing and Open Space Contributions:• Affordable Housing – reserved by condition 6 of outline.• Open Space – reserved by condition 9 of outline.