Download - 2019 04:56 PM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
---------------------X
VINCENT V HODES FAMILY IRREVOCABLE Index No. 151712/2017
TRUST,
Plaintiff,
FOURTH AMENDEDVERIFIED COMPLAINT
- against -
JURY TRIAL REQUESTEDADVANCE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, JOSEPH
MELI, RESET PARTNERS, LLC, HARSH
PADIA, MOSTLY DUNE HOLDINGS, LLC,JASON LIEBMAN, KID SHELLEEN, LLC,KARL MIKAEL ANDREN and DAVID
MOLNER,
Defendants.--------------- --------X
Plaintiff Vincent V Hodes Family Irrevocable Trust("Hodes"
or "Plaintiff"), by and
through its attorneys, John Murphy & Associates, P.C., alleges the following against Defendants
Advance Entertainment, LLC ("Advance"), Joseph Meli ("Meli"), Reset Partners, LLC, Harsh
Padia, Mostly Dune Holdings, LLC, Jason Liebman, Kid Shelleen, LLC, Karl Mikael Andren,
and, David Molner (collectively, "Defendants"). Except where otherwise stated, all of the
following allegations are based upon information and belief.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
1. As also detailed in a Fourth Amended Complaint being filed at this time by plaintiff
in a companion case in this Court, TGT, LLC v. Advance Entertainment et al., Index No.
650633/2017 (the "TGT Plaintiff"), the allegations of which are incorporated herein, this action
arises from the creation and orchestration of a fraudulent investment scheme by Defendant Meli,
the co-CEO, head of the Entertainment Division, and a Director of DTI Management, LLC
("DTI"), a leading player in the live event ticket industry.
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
1 of 35
2. Meli, through the auspices of Defendant Advance first represented that he, DTI and
Advance were in the business of purchasing and reselling tickets to concerts and other live events.
3. Meli then falsely asserted that DTI and Advance, through Meli's efforts, had
secured an opportunity from Ambassador Theatre Group Ltd. ("ATG"), a major international
theatre organization, to purchase large blocks of tickets to the 2017-2018 two-part Broadway
performances of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child(the "ATG Agreement"). The fraudulent ATG
Agreersent was drafted for Meli by Defendant David Molner ("Molner"), who knew that the
agreement was a complete fabrication.
4. Meli fraudulently induced Plaintiff into believing that his companies DTI and
Advance had partnered in connection with the ATG Agreement, which, according to Meli, offered
a legitimate investment opportunity where Plaintiff would earn a substantial return on each ticket
sold based on the amount invested.
5. These multiple fraudulent and deceptive acts resulted in the theft of $300,000 from
Plaintiff (and $7,860,000 from the TGT Plaintiff) that Meli funneled into Meli's Ponzi scheme.
Rather than being used for the intended purpose of ticket purchases, Meli took Plaintiff and the
TGT Plaintiff's funds and wired them to the accounts of Defendants Reset Partners, LLC ("Reset
Partners"), Harsh Padia ("Padia"), Mostly Dune Holdings, LLC ("Mostly Dune Holdings"), Kid
Shelleen, LLC ("Kid Shelleen") and Karl Mikael Andren ("Andren"). The money transferred to
Mostly Dune Holdings was then transferred almost immediately thereafter to the personal account
of its sole principal, Jason Liebman ("Liebman"). It is indisputable that Plaintiff - and the TGT
Plaintiff - are the true owners of money being held by these Defendants, as their money is clearly
traceable toDefendants'
accounts.
- 2 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
2 of 35
6. Meli has since pled guilty to a felony count of securities fraud and was sentenced
to 78 months imprisonment. Meli still characterizes his extravagant scheme of willful and
intentional fraud as simple"mistakes"
and has yet to take full responsibility and accountability for
his actions.
7. Indeed, Judge Kimba Wood of the United States District Court Southern District of
New York even noted the lack of Meli's accountability in her sentencing when she stated that, "If
ever there was a case that could be expected to generate some general deterrence, it is one like this.
. . . In addition, I think Mr. Meli may well need individual deterrence in light of the many different
characterizations of his'mistakes.'
This is $100 million worth of mistakes and more. These
weren'tmistakes."
8. On June 21, 2018, Judge Wood entered an Order of Restitution directing Meli to
pay restitution to the victims of his fraudulent scheme in the amount of $56,037,924.28.
9. On February 5, 2019, Judge Wood entered a Final Order of Forfeiture against Meli
and Advance's remaining assets, which are the proceeds of the fraudulent scheme, as amended on
March 6, 2019. The U.S.Attorneys'
Office will use these funds for victim restitution. The amount
of funds that will be available for victim restitution pursuant to this Order will amount to only a
small fraction of the total amount of damages that Meli caused to his victims, as reflected in the
Restitution Order.
THE PARTIES
10. Plaintiff is a trust with its principal place of business at 2415 West 67th Street,
Mission Hills, Kansas. Amy E Hodes and Nick Hodes are trustees of Plaintiff, which was created
on or about December 22, 2009 as a vehicle for investment opportunities for the benefit of the
family of Vincent Hodes.
- 3 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
3 of 35
11. Advance is a Delaware limited liability company organized in 2011 and controlled
by Defendant Meli, its sole and managing member, with a principal place of business at 95 Horatio
Street, Apartment 701, New York, New York. According to the Delaware Department of State,
Advance is no longer in good standing.
12. Defendant Meli is a resident of New York, New York. Meli is the managing
member and 100% owner of Defendant Advance and, at all material times, was a Director, co-
CEO and the head of the Entertainment Division of DTL
13. Defendant Reset Partners is a California limited liability company organized in
2016, with a principal place of business at 9100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 100W, Beverly Hills,
California. Reset Partners is owned by James Stern, a successful film and Broadway producer
who is also a part owner of the Chicago Bulls of the National Basketball Association.
14. Defendant Padia is a resident of New York, New York. Padia is the CEO of HAP
Capital, LLC, a successful hedge fund and securities broker-dealer based in New York, New York.
Padia is also known for owning a lavish 5-bedroom, 6-bathroom penthouse in a luxury Tribeca
building purchased for $17.5 Million, which is prominently featured in the local news as a celebrity
hotspot. According to Advance Entertainment bank records, Padia received $2.4 Million from
Meli in the two months preceding Meli's arrest.
15. Defendant Mostly Dune Holdings is a single member Delaware limited liability
company organized in 2010 and controlled by Defendant Liebmañ, with a priñcipal place of
business at 56 Crosby Apt 5A, New York, New York 10012-4435.
16. Defendant Liebman is a resident of New York, New York and is the sole principal
of Mostly Dune Holdings. Liebman is a tech millionaire who made his fortune as the CEO of
Howcast, an instructional video website, and was the ultimate recipient of Plaintiff's funds
- 4 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
4 of 35
transferred by Meli to Mostly Dune Holdings, as the funds were later transferred from Mostly
Dune Holdings to Liebman's personal account.
17. Defendant Kid Shelleen is a Delaware limited liability company organized and
controlled by Paul Tudor Jones, with its principal place of business in the state of Connecticut.
Paul Tudor Jones, who is a successful investor and hedge fund manager, is one of the wealthiest
people in the world.
18. Defendant Andren is a resident ofthe state of Connecticut. Andren is the President
and CEO of the Paul Tudor Jones II Family Office.
19. Defendant Molner is a resident ofNew York, New York. Molner prepared the fake
ATG Agreement for Meli, as well as other fraudulent agreements, and otherwise assisted, abetted
and conspired with Meli in his fraudulent scheme.
JURISDICTIO_N AND VENUE
20. Venue is proper in the Supreme Court ofthe State ofNew York, New York County,
because Defendants Advance, Meli, Padia, Mostly Dune Holdings, Liebman, and Molner are
located in the County and State of New York, and all Defendants, including Kid Shelleen and
Andren, conduct business in the County and State of New York. Moreover, Plaintiff wired the
payments to fund the fraudulent deal to a Merrill Lynch bank account in the name of Defendant
Advance based out of New York, New York. Funds were then wired from Advance's Merrill
Lynch account to the accounts of Defendants Reset Partners, Padia, Mostly Dune Holdings,
Liebmañ, Kid Shelleen and Andren, also based out of New York, New York.
21. This Court has jurisdiction over the Defendants because the Defendants "transact
business"within this state under CPLR 302(a)(1) and/or are located here so as to be subject to
general jurisdiction under CPLR 301.
- 5 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
5 of 35
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Defendant Meli "Baits" Plaintiff With His Position at DTI
22. Vincent Hodes is a close friend and business partner of Michael Connor who, on or
about June 10, 2016, was approached by Defendant Meli, Mr. Connor's friend of many decades.
Mr. Connor - a Governor on the Board of Plaintiff TGT - was informed by his friend Mr. Meli
about the business of DTI, a preeminent player in the secondary ticketmarket.1
Defendant Meli
was an event producer who was known for small private concerts he had organized in the
Hamptons. He told Mr. Connor that he was in discussions to purchase DTI through his company
Advance, of which Meli was the sole and managing member.
23. Meli wanted Mr. Connor to believe that Advance, which had no real track record
with respect to large ticket deals for live events, had been so successful in various deals that it was
financially capable of purchasing all or part of DTI.
24. Meli intended to use the upcoming DTI/Advance purchase transaction to increase
Mr. Connor's confidence in the legitimacy and likely success of the various "investment
opportunities"Meli would soon be offering him and others through the auspices of DTI and
Advance.
25. From June 2016 to January 2017, Meli solicited Mr. Connor's interest in investing
in live entertainment event ticket deals that were offered by the alleged DTI/Advance partnership.
Meli's representations ultimately induced Plaintiff in this case, and Mr. Connor and other investors
involved with the TGT Plaintiff, to invest millions of dollars with Meli, believing that these funds
were going to be infused into a DTI-affiliated ticket investment opportunity.
' Over the prior four years, DTI had worked with more than 100 ticket brokers and such professional sports teamsas the Cleveland Cavaliers, the New Jersey Devils and the Phoenix Suns in inanaging the respective teams' resalemarkets. (See Exhibit E to the TGT Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint).
- 6 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
6 of 35
The DTI/Advance Letter of Intent
26. On June 13, 2016, Defendant Meli provided to Mr. Connor a copy of a letter of
intent (the "LOI") entered into by Advance and DTI, by which the parties agreed that Advance
would purchase 100% of the ownership interest in DTI for a total purchase price of $63 Million,
including $48 Million in cash. (See a copy of the LOI and related cover email attached as Exhibit
A to the Fourth Amended Complaint filed March 12, 2019, by the TGT Plaintiff in a related case,
referred to herein as "TGT 4th Am. Comp.")
27. Shortly thereafter, Mr. Connor learned that the $250,000 Good Faith Deposit
described in Article 5 of the LOI had been paid by Advance to DTI. (See wire transfer from
Defendant Advance to DTI attached as Exhibit B to the TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
28. Meli shared the LOI with Mr. Connor intending to begin building on Mr. Connor's
confidence in Advance's ownership in or partnership with DTI. Under the LOI, Advance, a
company which had no reputation or track record in the live event ticket industry, would purchase
DTI, a preersiñcñt player in that industry. Notably, when Meli transmitted the LOI to Mr. Connor,
Meli titled the subject of his email "45 days away fromn[o]w[,]"
and included in the body of the
email "Ownershipstructure[,]"
indicating to Mr. Connor that Advance would effectuate the
purchase of DTI within 45 days. (See Exhibit A to the TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
29. The LOI contemplated that Advance would purchase DTI for $48 Million in cash
and $15 Million in Advance's stock.
30. What Mr. Connor did not and could not know, however, is that Meli flaunted
Advance's alleged upcoming acquisition of DTI to increase the likelihood that Mr. Connor and
others such as Plaintiff would later invest money into purported entertainment industry
"investmentopportunities"
(i.e. fraudulent schemes) that Meli was then orchestrating or prepariñg
to orchestrate.
- 7 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
7 of 35
31. In reality, Advance (Meli) never intended to actually close on the acquisition
contemplated by the DTI/Advance LOI.
32. As Advance's bank records demonstrate, Advance never had anywhere near the
$48 Million in cash required to fund the acquisition. Indeed, Advance's account balances show
that it was a significant financial strain for Advance to pay even the $250,000 Good Faith Deposit.
Meli knew that paragraph 2 of the LOI-which stated that Advance had "the requisite finañcial
capacity to consummate the Transaction without any Third Party financing of any kind"-was
false.
33. Rather, Meli's intention was to use the LOI to set a benchmark value for legitimate
prospective purchasers of DTI. Effectively, Meli hoped that the $63 Million purchase price offered
by Advance would induce third parties to bid even higher to purchase DTI.
34. At the same time, the DTI/Advance LOI served to buttress Meli's story that he was
presenting to third parties-that he was the owner of all, or a controlling interest in, DTI. He
boasted this partnership in pitches to third parties (such as Mr. Connor) about his various schemes
in the secondary ticket market.
35. Meli fully intended to make these representations to third parties.
36. Meli also intended to highlight to third parties how the DTI/Advance partnership
would work. Advance would be responsible for sourcing "investmentopportunities"
in the
secondary ticket market and investor funds to place. Those investors would thereafter be able to
use DTI's online platform to monitor their investment and see details such as the number of tickets
sold and amount of return earned.
- 8 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
8 of 35
37. Unaware of any of these events behind the scenes, Mr. Connor had no reason to
doubt that Advance was the soon-to-be owner of DTI. The LOI contemplated Advance's purchase
of 100% of DTI, and the Good Faith Deposit required under the LOI had been paid.
38. Meli, knowing that Mr. Connor was"hooked,"
and that Mr. Connor would trust
him even more so given their longstanding friendship, began to solicit Mr. Connor for funds in
connection with a number of investment opportunities in the live entertainment ticket market.
39. Meli continually touted Advance's purported ownership of DTI, a well-known
company with a track record of success in the industry.
40. Meli also repeatedly boasted to Mr. Connor about the high return on investment
earned by other investors in similar deals Meli had organized involving the purchase of large
blocks of tickets to the Broadway play Hamilton and concerts for the musical artist Adele.
CVC Invests in the DTI/Advance Company Group
41. On July 18, 2016, Defendant Meli informed Mr. Connor that the form of the
proposed transaction whereby Advance would purchase DTI had changed, but for the better.
Under the revised transaction, a subsidiary of CVC Capital Partners ("CVC,"), a private equity firm
with approximately $80 Billion in assets, would purchase and/or make a substantial investment in
DTI, and Advance would receive a significant minority equity interest in that entity.
42. Meli provided to Mr. Connor a copy of a proposal prepared by CVC (the "CVC
Proposal") and shared with DTI describing how CVC would reorganize the DTI/Advance
company group after an investment by CVC. (See a copy of the CVC Proposal attached as Exhibit
C to the TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
43. The CVC Proposal contemplated a "contribution of AE [Advance Entertainment]
to a newly formed company set up to acquireDTI."
- 9 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
9 of 35
44. In addition, the CVC Proposal contemplated the "ongoing execution of certain AE
ticketdeals"
which would be contributed to the newly organized DTI entity and included, as a
proposed compensation structure to Meli, a sizeable bonus based upon "EBITDA related to AE
ticketdeals."
45. Meli informed Mr. Connor that, even under the revised structure, Meli would still
be the top executive "in charge ofDTI"
who would be responsible for organizing entertainment
industry investment opportunities similar to those already offered for the Broadway show
Hamilton and the musical artist Adele.
46. CVC, DTI, Advance and Meli apparently agreed upon a transaction by which CVC
would acquire a substantial ownership stake in DTI. Advance was expected to own a stake in DTI
through its position in CVC's new investment vehicle.
47. Just as Meli"baited"
Mr. Connor with his alleged intention to purchase DTI, Meli
further enticed Mr. Connor with CVC's investment in DTI. Meli was continuing to build upon
Mr. Connor's confidence that any investment by Mr. Connor and others in DTI and its affiliate
Advance would be safe and profitable. Defendant Meli wanted Plaintiff, through his
misrepresentations to Mr. Connor, to believe that reputable, sophisticated private equity firms
wanted to partner with Advance by making a sizeable investment in DTI, which would appareñtly
be accomplished through a new entity in which Advance would become a minority owner.
48. Meli focused his efforts on Mr. Connor, as Meli knew through his personal
relationship with Mr. Connor that Mr. Connor and his extensive network - that included Plaintiff
- had the means to pool together a substantial amount of capital. Meli targeted Mr. Connor and
his extensive network, including Plaintiff, and kept them enticed with Advance's partnership with
- 10 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
10 of 35
DTI so that, when the time was right, he could count on Plaintiff and others to invest in whatever
ticket scheme he might be organizing and pitching at that time.
49. Mr. Connor's confidence in any investment opportunity offered by Advance/DTI
continued to grow. With the involvement of DTI, a market leader in the live ticket industry, and
with a substantial investment into the company group by private equity firm CVC (known for
managing billions of dollars), Meli convinced investors such as Plaintiff that there was little risk
in investing in proposals offered by DTI and Advance.
50. On or about September 9, 2016, DTI filed Form D with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission in connection with its endeavor to seek and raise capital. (See a copy of
DTI's Form D filing attached as Exhibit D to the TGT 4th Am. Comp.).) The Form D filing listed
Defendant Meli as a Director of DTI.
51. DTI's Form D filing lent further support to Plaintiff's confidence in Meli's
representations. In Mr. Connor's mind, the Form D filing fully supported all of Meli's previous
representations that he would become a top executive and Director who was "in charge ofDTI,"
and would organize various live event ticket investment opportunities, as the head of its
Entertainment Division.
52. Unknown to Mr. Connor, however, DTI had returned the Good Faith Deposit under
the LOI to Meli back on August 26, 2016. Meli's plan had worked: while he never intended for
Advance to purchase any part of DTI for that amount of money, Meli caused DTI and Advance to
enter into the LOI to induce others such as CVC into believing that someone (Advance) was
actually willing to pay $63 Million to acquire DTI. This, in effect, immediately raised the apparent
value of DTI inothers'
eyes, and was certainly an influencing factor in CVC's decision to invest
in DTI.
- 11 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
11 of 35
The CVC Investment in DTI Closes
53. On or about October 11, 2016, CVC Growth Fund officially closed the final
transaction and invested $75 Million to purchase a substantial ownership stake in DTI. (See a
CVC press release that describes the investment attached as Exhibit E to the TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
54. Now that CVC had invested in the Advance/DTI company group, Mr. Connor was
very confident regarding the success, security and legitimacy of any investment placed with DTI
and its Entertainment Division affiliate, Advance.
Meli Begins Offering"Investments" Through DTI
55. During the closing period and then after the deal closed, Meli began offering new
ticket investments through the auspices of his new position as co-CEO, Director, part owner and
Head of the Entertainment Division at DTI.
56. Meli explained that his new company DTI allowed him to have an immediate
platform by which the advance block tickets for the shows in questions (i.e., Hamilton, Harry
Potter, etc.) could be easily sold while investors could monitor their investments and later ticket
sales using DTI's online platform.
57. Indeed, Meli's role was to organize lucrative ticket deals, such as the purported
Hamilton block ticket opportunity in which DTI already had an interest, using the DTI platform to
resell those tickets into the secondary market.
Meli Offers Mr. Connor the Fraudulent Harry Potter
Investment Opportunity through DTI/Advance
58. In the late fall of 2016, Meli approached Mr. Connor, regarding an entertainment
investment opportunity involving a deal that Defendants DTI and Advance had secured with
Ambassador Theatre Group Ltd. ("ATG"), a major international theatre organization, for the
anticipated Broadway debut of the play Harry Potter and the Cursed Child.
- 12 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
12 of 35
59. As Meli had"baited"
Mr. Connor over the past few months with false
representations regarding the successes of alleged investors in Meli's various ticket deals and the
highly profitable future of DTI/Advance, Mr. Connor became very interested in this alleged
opportunity with ATG.
60. Defendant Meli, a top executive, Director and Head of the Entertainment Division
of DTI, shared with Mr. Connor that DTI and Advance had secured the right to purchase $62.5
Million worth of advance block tickets for the Broadway debut of the new Harry Potter play,
which was already a huge success in London.
61. The alleged agreement with ATG involved DTI/Advance's sale of those Harry
Potter tickets in the secondary market over a staggered period of time, which would give investors
in the deal a likely very lucrative return, given how successful the play already was.
62. Meli, through the auspices of DTI and Advance, estimated to Mr. Connor that
investors could expect to receive a return of three to five times their original investment. This
sounded reasonable to Mr. Connor, given that tickets to the Broadway hit Hamilton were then
selling for even larger multiples of the box office price, and Harry Potter was already a huge
success in London.
63. Mr. Connor and his fellow investors in the TGT Plaintiff entity chose to invest in
the ATG Agreement that DTI and Advance had allegedly secured with ATG relying on Meli's
considerable experience in the live entertainment ticket industry, and more importantly, relying on
Meli's representation of participation in the deal by DTI, of which CVC held the majority
ownership interest.
64. DTI's prominence in the secondary ticket market, and the fact that it had been
backed and was controlled by prominent private equity firms, lent further support to Mr. Connor's
- 13 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
13 of 35
belief that the Harry Potter investment was a legitimate opportunity for the TGT Plaintiff and
Plaintiff in this case.
65. As Mr. Connor further investigated the Harry Potter opportunity, Mr. Connor, on
behalf of the Plaintiff, requested to see a copy of the alleged ATG Agreement that DTI and its
affiliate, Advance, had procured with ATG.
66. The fraudulent ATG Agreement was drafted by Defendant Molner, who drafted
many other fraudulent agreemêñts for Meli as well. Molner willingly participated and conspired
with Meli because Meli funneled financial resources to him that he desperately needed.
67. Indeed, Molner even attempted to solicit and bring in other investor-victims to
participate in altcrñative fraudulent Harry Potter investment deals purportedly organized by Meli.
Molner knew the deals were fraudulent, because he had yet to even draft full terms of the fraudulent
agreement with ATG that would"document"
these fraudulent deals. Once again, Molner's desire
for a bigger "piece of theaction,"
given his own need for money, ruled the day.
68. Meli provided a copy of the ATG Agreemeñt, drafted by Molner, which was
purportedly entered into between ATG and DTI's affiliate and minority owner, Advance, and gave
Advance the right to purchase two hundred fifty thousand (250,000) tickets to the 2017-2018 two-
part Broadway performances of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child with a face value of $250 per
ticket. The ATG Agreement specifically provided that Advance and DTI would then re-sell these
Harry Potter tickets through DTI's online platform. Plaintiff was then promised it would
ultimately receive a portion of the profits from every ticket sold by Advance/DTI. (See the ATG
Agreement received from Defendants attached as Exhibit F to the TGT 4th Am. Comp.).
69. The ATG Agreement itself describes DTI as affiliated with Advance because it
states that Advance would assign the tickets to DTI which would sell them in the secondary market
- 14 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
14 of 35
through its affiliated online platform. Meli was a co-CEO, Director and the head of DTI's
Entertainment Division. DTI was also a prominent player in the secondary ticket market and had
just received a $75 Million investment from two high-profile private equity firms, which
presumably performed extensive due diligence on the company group and were allowing Advance
to hold a minority interest in DTI.
70. Moreover, the funding agreement governing Plaintiff's investment that was
prepared by Meli and Molner specifically refers to DTI as an Advance"affiliate"
in describing
DTI's role in the transaction. (See "Hodes FundingAgreement"
attached hereto as Exhibit A).
71. As Plaintiff would soon discover, however, the ATG Agreement was entirely
fabricated by Defendants Meli and Molner. Neither Advance, nor Meli had any such agreement
with ATG regarding the sale of tickets to the Broadway performances of Harry Potter and the
Cursed Child.
72. Molner conspired with Meli in the fraudulent scheme and drafted the ATG
Agreement, knowing full well that there was no actual deal in place between ATG, Advance and
DTI. Molner drafted many other fraudulent agreements for Meli knowing that the"deals"
were
non-existent and even solicited investors for such non-existent deals, so that he could obtain
additional compensation from Meli.
73. In Meli's endeavor to secure investments from Plaintiff and the TGT Plaintiff, he
made countless fraudulent representations as to the non-existent ATG Agreement. These
fraudulent representations continued through December 2016 and January 2017, culminating in
Plaintiff's ultimate decision in January 2017 to transfer to Advance a total of $300,000 - and the
TGT Plaintiff's contemporaneous decision to transfer to Advance $7,860,000 - which Plaintiff
- 15 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
15 of 35
believed would be used by Meli, Advance and DTI to purchase blocks of tickets for the hit musical
play Harry Potter.
74. Some of the most egregious examples of Meli's fraudulent representations during
this time period include:
(i) On December 13, 2016, Mr. Connor, referring to the success of the Harry
Potter show in the United Kingdom, asks Defendant Meli: "Based on the
response in London, it would be a safe bet that the $62M block sells out
QUICKLY."Meli responds: "Of
course."(See text messages from
Defendant Meli to Mr. Connor attached at Exhibit G to TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
(ii) On December 15, 2016, Mr. Connor asks Defendant Meli: "What do you
think the return will be?3x?"
Meli responds: "Just call it an easy 2+.
[Between] us it looks like it can be 5-6 [times thereturn][.]"
(See text
messages from Defendant Meli to Mr. Connor attached as Exhibit H to TGT
4th Am. Comp.)
(iii) On December 16, 2016, Mr. Connor asks Meli how investors would be able
to monitor their investment. Meli responds that investors would receive a
"[c]omputer breakdown. Your portion of the money goes into a dedicated
account foryou[.]"
Meli represents that investors would "[o]fcourse"
have
access to sales proceeds as they are deposited into the dedicated account
because, according to Meli, "[i]t is yourmoney."
(See text messages from
Defendant Meli to Mr. Connor attached as Exhibit I to TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
(iv) On December 18, 2016, Mr. Connor asks Meli: "Advance assigns Tix to
DTI to distribute/sell, correct? Advanced [sic] owns part of DTI,correct?"
- 16 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
16 of 35
Meli responds: "Yes and advance owns 22% ofDTI"
(See text messages
from Defendant Meli to Mr. Connor attached as Exhibit J to TGT 4th Am.
Comp.) Given that the LOI signed by Advance and DTI contemplated
Advance's purchase of DTI in its entirety, and that the CVC Proposal also
presupposed that Advance was at least a part owner of DTI, Mr. Connor had
no reason to doubt that Advance owned a minority 22% ownership interest
in DTI.
(v) On December 19, 2016, this time in an email, Defendant Meli again
represents that DTI is affiliated with the purported ATG Agreement, stating
that the theater tickets would be "issued toAdvance"
which would then
"assign [the tickets] toDTI."
In this same email, Meli represents that there
is "limited creditrisk"
since any such risk would relate only to Advance and
DTI, which companies "had CVC capital partners invest$75mm."
Defendant Meli also again touts DTI's success in the live event ticket
industry, stating that "DTI sell [sic] over $500mm in tickets Annually[sic]."
(See an email from Defendant Meli to Mr. Connor attached as Exhibit K to
TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
(vi) On December 20, 2016, Mr. Connor asks Meli for a summary of how its
investment would be used. Meli responds:
We assign you a prorated percentage of tickets purchased. Tickets
get sold thru [sic] DTI. You provide a bank account that we make .
. . deposits in regularly until all the tickets are sold. You are the onlypeople that have access to withdrawing the money and can access it
all the time. You will have portal access to the [Harry Potter] ticket
sales that you can access and monitor the sales in real time.
- 17 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
17 of 35
Mr. Connor asks Meli whether "AE/DTI are bidding on the$62.5mm"
and
whether "the block is being purchased directly from the producers of the
show[.]"With elaborate yet completely fraudulentdetail, Meli responds:
Yes AE/DTI bidding $62.5mm. Yes being bought directly from
producer and box office. No other bidders . . . $250 a ticket is ticket
price . . . Mark up will be roughly $100 dollars per ticket . . .
Expected sales are going to be 3-4x face [value] . . . The secondarymarket i.e. Resale [sic] market defmitely staggers pricing which is
why we will not sell all of our tickets immediately and bleed tix [sic]into the market place over time maximizing on profits.
Mr. Connor questions Defendant Meli's representation as to the amount of
return the TGT Plaintiff would see on its investment, and Meli responds in
an email to Mr. Connor outlining the math involved in his calculation. (See
emails between Mr. Connor and Defendant Meli attached as Exhibit L to
TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
(vii) Later on December 20, 2016, Mr. Connor asks Meli: "You are the reason
why AE/DTI got a shot at this block, correct? How much are you personally
doing[investing]?"
Meli responds: "Yes I am the reason we are getting this
and I am doing [investing] $5mm personally."(See emails between Mr.
Connor and Defendant Meli attached as Exhibit M to TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
(viii) On December 31, 2016, Meli again makes fraudulent representations as to
the fabricated agreement with ATG. Mr. Connor asks Meli: "The $62.5M
is purchasing represents 20% of the house[?] Does ATG keep the rest of
the 80% and sell direct to consumer or do they break off other chunks for
[Advance]sales?"
Meli responds: "80% of the house goes on sale and we
help with thattoo."
Plaintiff responds: "So 100% of the house goes on sale
mid-June through Deceinber. 20% [is] owned and sold/distributed by
- 18 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
18 of 35
AE/DTI and 80% is owned/sold by ATG.Correct?"
(See text messages
from Defendant Meli to Mr. Connor attached as Exhibit N to TGT 4th Am.
Comp.)
75. On or about January 4, 2017, Meli traveled to Chicago, Illinois to meet with a
majority of Mr. Connor's members/investors and discuss the investment opportunity Meli was
presenting to the group-whereby they could invest in the AE/DTI deal, and make what Meli
promised to be a very large return.
76. At the January 4, 2017 meeting, Defendant Meli repeated to the attending investors
each of the false misrepresentations previously made, including that Advance was the
Entertainment Division affiliate of DTI which owned 22% of DTI; that Advance partnered with
DTI with respect to the ATG Agreement to secure the Harry Potter tickets, an "AE/DTI deal";
and that tickets would be "issued toAdvance"
who would then "assign them toDTI."
77. Following the meeting on January 4, 2017, the TGT Plaintiff investment entity was
formed on or about January 6, 2017 with the Minnesota Secretary of State, in order to provide its
members a receptacle in which to combine their funds to place the investment with Advance.
78. Mr. Connor asked Meli: "Question: DTI gets 6% rip [return] on gross sales. So
technically, we would break even at $371 ($350 x 6%).Correct?"
Meli responds:"Correct"
(See
text messages from Defendant Meli to Mr. Connor attached as Exhibit O toTGT 4th Am. Comp.)
79. On January 9, 2017, Defendant Meli again falsely represented that the ATG
Agreement investment opportunity was a DTI-related deal by stating that Defendants Advance
and DTI had a separate agreement in place with respect to the ATG Agreement. Specifically,
Defendant Meli said that, while he could "not share the AE/DTIagreement"
with respect to the
ATG investment opportunity, he could still"rep"
to it.
- 19 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
19 of 35
80. On January 11, 2017, Mr. Connor asks Meli: "[D]o you have an [sic] fully executed
copy of the ATG agreement?"Meli responds: "yes sir. I have hard copy [sic] need to
scan,"
referring to a hard copy original of the fully-executed ATG Agreement (See text messages from
Defendant Meli to Mr. Connor attached hereto as Exhibit P to TGT 4th Am. Comp.).) Of course,
no legitimate document existed; the fully-executed ATG Agreement that Mr. Connor received was
entirely fraudulent, as Plaintiff would soon discover.
Plaintiff Invests in the "AE/DTI"Harry Potter
Investment and Later Uncovers Defendants' Fraudulent Scheme
81. On or about December 30, 2016, Mr. Connor approached Vincent Hodes, for whose
family Plaintiff was established, about the purported investment opportunity with Meli and
Advance. Mr. Hodes is a close friend and business partner of Mr. Connor. Also, Mr. Hodes
understood that Mr. Connor was friendly with Meli and had known him since they were children.
82. As a result of Defendant Meli's fraudulent representations to Mr. Connor, who
repeated them to Mr. Hodes at Meli's request to secure additional money for the fraudulent
scheme, Plaintiff entered into the Hodes Funding Agreemeñt, dated January 1, 2017 with Advance,
which was drafted by co-conspirator Molner, and signed by Meli. (See Exhibit A.) The Funding
Agreement was premised on the underlying fraudulent and fabricated ATG Agreement.
83. Plaintiff invested a total of $300,000 with Advance, which was made on or about
January 13, 2017 through a wire transfer to Defendant Advance's BoA/Merrill Lynch Account in
New York, New York. Meli specifically represented that Plaintiff would send its ticket investment
funds with the understanding that the funds would be in a dedicated account available only to
Plaintiff such that Plaintiff could monitor both the funds and the subsequent ticket purchases at all
times.
- 20 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
20 of 35
84. To Plaintiff's knowledge, Mr. Connor was unaware that Defendant Meli's various
representations were false.
85. On or about January 26, 2017, Mr. Connor informed Vincent Hodes and Plaintiff
discovered that Meli was indicted on multiple criminal charges for securities and wire fraud. The
indictment included allegations that Meli had made false representations that he had entered into
a separate agreement that provided Advance the right to purchase tickets in advance to the
Broadway show, Hamilton, that could then be resold for a profit. Defendant Meli sold this alleged
investment opportunity to a different set of investors.
86. Mr. Connor contacted Meli in an effort to find out what was happening with the
investment because the news stories described a very similar investment scheme to what Plaintiff
had been offered-the only major difference being the substitution of Harry Potter and the Cursed
Child for Hamilton.
87. Defendant Meli kept indicating he had meetings to attend, so he could not follow
up with Mr. Connor, other than to proclaim he was innocent and would fight the charges.
88. As the news stories continued to grow, Mr. Connor demanded the return of the
monies that Plaintiff and the TGT Plaintiff had invested pursuant to fraudulent offerings in their
respective Funding Agreements.
89. On January 27, 2017, Meli responded that he could not return Plaintiff's investment
as his accounts were frozen.
90. Since the representation of Defendant Meli on January 27, 2017, Plaintiff
discovered that it was not until Monday, January 30, 2017, at 12:05 p.m. that the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a Temporary Restraining Order
- 21 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
21 of 35
freezing the accounts of Defendants and, in the interim, Meli continued to transfer money out of
the account. (See a copy of the TRO attached as Exhibit R to TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
91. On February 3, 2017, ATG confirmed to the Plaintiff-through an email to Mr.
Connor-that ATG had "noknowledge"
of the purported contract between Defendant Advance
and ATG and, in fact, the international theatre organization had never had any business dealings
with Defendant Meli or Defendant Advance. (See a copy of this email attached as Exhibit S to
TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
92. Defendants Advance Meli, and Molner have provided no evidence to Plaintiff that
Plaintiff's $300,000 has been used to fund the alleged ATG Agreement, or that any of the
representations contained in the Hodes Funding Agreemeñt or the ATG Agreement were actually
true.
Plaintiff's Investment was Transferred to Defendants' Acce,üñts
93. The TGT Plaintiff subpoenaed Merrill Lynch for copies of Defendant Advance's
bank statements in order to determine whether its funds and the funds that Plaintiff wired were still
present in Advance's account. In reviewing the bank statements received reveal that within days
- and in some instances on the same day- after Plaintiff and the TGT Plaintiff's wire transfers
arrived in Defendant Advance's account, Advance wired out of the Merrill Lynch account almost
the entirety of Plaintiff's $300,000 and the TGT Plaintiff's $7,860,000 to third parties. These
transfers include:
(i) 1/19/17: Advance wired $600,000 to Reset Partners LLC
(ii) 1/19/17: Advance wired $2,000,000 to New Amsterdam AE, LLC
(iii) 1/19/17: Advance wired $250,000 to Karl Mikael Andren
(iv) 1/19/17: Advance wired $1,805,000 to Advance II
(v) 1/19/17: Advance wired $225,000 to 127 Holdings
- 22 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
22 of 35
(vi) 1/20/17: Advance wired $250,000 to Harsh Padia
(vii) 1/20/17: Advance wired $125,000 to MXCU Holdings, LLC
(viii) 1/20/17: Advance wired $15,000 to Richard Notar
(ix) 1/20/17: Advance wired $500,000 to Matthew P. Smith
(x) 1/23/17: Advance wired $28,064.55 to Michael R. Cardonick
(xi) 1/23/17: Advance wired $150,000 to Material Good NY
(xii) 1/24/17: Advance wired $1,000,000 to an account maintained by MostlyDune Holdings, LLC at Pershing, LLC, a clearing broker
(xiii) 1/26/17: Advance wired $1,250,000 to Kid Shelleen, LLC
94. The TGT Plaintiff also subpoenaed a number of other banks for bank records,
which documents served as the basis for the wire transfers described herein.
95. In total, in the few days after Plaintiff and the TGT Plaintiff's investment in Meli's
fraudulent scheme, Meli wired $3.35 Million out of the account to Defendants Reset Partners,
Padia, Kid Shelleen, Andren, and Liebman (through Mostly Dune Holdings).
96. Plaintiff was also shocked to learn that on January 26, 2017, $450,000 of the funds
had been wired to Defendant Meli's defense counsel, Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP,
to fund their retainer for his criminal and civil defense. Plaintiff learned that Meli indirectly wired
more of Plaintiff's funds ($235,000) to the Kasowitz law firm by transferring the money to 127
Holdings, which then wired the additional funds to Kasowitz.
97. Because Plaintiff, TGT Plaintiff and three other plaintiffs in related actions were
the last investors in Meli's fraudulent scheme, the subsequent transfers toDefendants'
accounts
are clearly identifiable as their money.
98. In fact, in United States v. Meli, 17-cr-00127, SDNY, the Government's crimiñal
case against Meli for fraud, FBI Special Agent Sean Sweeney submitted a Declaration in Support
of the Government's Preliminary Order of Forfeiture that explaiñêd Meli's fraudulent scheme and
- 23 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
23 of 35
tracing Plaintiff's money to various purchases and the above referenced wire transfers. Because
the accounts had negative balances prior to the Plaintiff's January 2017 transfers, Agent Sweeney
was able to determine which three victims the $10 Million transferred in mid to late January 2017
belonged to (the "related action plaintiffs") and to whom the $10 Million was later transferred. Of
this $10 Million, "no significant portion . . . was used to purchasetickets."
Instead, Plaintiff's
money was used to pay back previous investors, in furtherance of Meli's Ponzi scheme. (See
Sweeney Declaration attached as Exhibit T to TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
99. Therefore, it is without a doubt that the money transferred to the Defendants Reset
Partners, Padia, Mostly Dune Holdings, Liebman, Andren and Kid Shelleen belongs to Plaintiff
and the related action plaintiffs and must be returned.
100. Plaintiff, TGT Plaintiff, and the three other victims whose money was traced to
Defendants'accounts, have sent letters to Defendants Reset Partners, Padia, Lichmañ, Kid
Shelleen and Andren explaining that the wire transfers they received from Meli's Advance account
in January 2017 were stolen from the Plaintiff and the related action plaintiffs and that the funds
should be returned to Plaintiff, one of the rightful owners. (See demand letters sent to Defendants
attached as Exhibit U to TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
101. The Defendants wrongfully refused to return the money and continue to maintain
possession of money known not to be theirs, thus enriching themselves at the expense of the
Plaintiff and the related action plaintiffs.
102. Further, in two instances, Defendants Reset Partners and Liebman not only refused
to return the money, but also attempted to threaten and intimidate Plaintiff by saying that they had
notified the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York of Plaintiff's
- 24 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
24 of 35
attempts to regain possession of its own money. (See response letters from counsel for Reset
Partners and Liebman attached as Exhibits V and W to TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
Meli's Subseÿ üeñt Guilty Plea. Senteñciñg and Restitution and Forfeiture Orders
103. Meli was indicted for several counts of federal securities fraud on January 25, 2017
and was arrested two days later. On October 31, 2017, Meli pled guilty to felony securities fraud
in United States v. Meli, 17-cr-00127, SDNY.
104. During the course of the criminal proceedings, it was discovered that through his
Ponzi scheme, Meli defrauded over 130 investors out of approximately $97 Million and that Meli
used this money to purchase a variety of expensive trips, houses, cars, jewelry and meals, among
other things, for himself and his family members.
105. At Meli's sentencing hearing on April 3, 2018, Mr. Connor was invited to make a
victim impact statement. The court found his statement to be"eloquent"
and persuasive as Meli
was subsequently sentenced to 78 months imprisonment.
106. The court also noted that "[i]f ever there was a case that could be expected to
generate some general deterreñce, it is one likethis"
and that "Mr. Meli may well need individual
deterrence in light of the many different characterization of his'mistakes.'"
(See transcript of
sentencing hearing attached as Exhibit X to TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
107. On June 21, 2018, Judge Wood entered an Order of Restitution directing Meli to
pay restitution to the victims of his fraudulent scheme in the amount of $56,037,924.28. (See
Restitution Order attached as Exhibit Y to TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
108. On February 5, 2019, Judge Wood entered a Final Order of Forfeiture against Meli
and Advance's rernaiñiñg assets, which are the proceeds of the fraudulent scheme as amended on
March 6, 2019. The U.S.Attorneys'
Office will use these funds for victim restitution. The amount
- 25 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
25 of 35
of funds that will be available for victim restitution pursuant to this Order will amount to only a
small fraction of the total amount of damages that Meli caused to his victims, as reflected in the
Restitution Order. (See Forfeiture Orders attached as Exhibit Z to the TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
Moiner's Repeated Involvement in Meli's Fraudulent Scheme
109. The ATG Agreement that Molner drafted for Meli to tout to potential investors was
not the first fake ticket deal with which Molner was involved. In fact, the ATG Agreement was
only one of many fake agreements that Molner drafted to induce investment from potential
victims.2
110. Molner was well aware that the agreements that he was drafting for Meli were not
based on any real negotiations or terms. For instance, Meli instructed Molner to "lookup"
basic
information about the counter-party to the agreement, which clearly would have been in place
already if these were legitimate agreements.
111. Additionally, Molner was simply recycling old contracts to tout before investors by
altering party names and terms as needed to fit their various fraudulent purposes. Molner tailored
each agreement to the individual preferences of the targeted investor, rather than base the contract
on any real negotiated terms, to induce reliance. For example, in an exchange between Meli and
Molner about a Funding Agreement for Hamilton, Molner says that "[he] needs to get his [prefs]
on governance provisions for the operatingagrccment."
(See email attached as Exhibit AA to TGT
4th Am. Comp.)
2 Of note, Molner is the subject of another lawsuit in New York Supreme Court related to his solicitation of other
investors into a parallel fraudulent scheme organized by Meli iñvülving a fake ticket resale agreement for theartist Adele.
- 26 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
26 of 35
112. Further, Molner blatantly fabricated multiple agreemeñts at Meli's discretion. One
fake purchase agreement was "revised per [Meli's]request"
and another was "the best [Molner]
could do on shortnotice."
(See emails attached as Exhibits BB and CC to TGT 4th Am. Comp.)
113. It is clear that Molner knew that these agreements were fraudulent as Meli and
Molner invented terms to these agreements together to induce more victims to invest into the Ponzi
scheme.
114. Not only did Molner perpetrate Meli's fraud by drafting fake agreements, he was
also active in soliciting investors. Molner approached potential investors on his own and provided
Meli with detailed lists of interested investors. (See emails attached as Exhibit DD to TGT 4th
Am. Comp.)
115. Indeed, Molner solicited those investors for deals he knew didn't exist - because
he had yet to draft the fraudulent contracts to document the deal.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
(Fraud against Defendants Meli and Advance)
116. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the prior paragraphs as if fully set forth
herein1 through 115 above.
117. Defendants Meli and Advance committed fraud against Plaintiff by falsely
representing the investment opportunity in the Broadway Harry Potter play and their contract with
ATG. In fact, Meli (through Molner) fabricated the ATG Agreement and did not invest the
Plaintiff's money, but used it forDefendants' own benefit.
118. Meli knew that the material representations and documents presented to Plaintiff to
obtain Plaintiff's investment were false.
- 27 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
27 of 35
119. Defendants Meli and Advance knew that Plaintiff was relying on the material
representations and documents presented in agreeing to enter into the Hodes Funding Agreement
put forth herein with Defendants Meli and Advance.
120. Had Defendant Meli not made the false representations put forth herein, Plaintiff
would not have made the investment and would not have entered into the Funding Agreemcñt.
121. Plaintiff reasonably relied on Defendant Meli and Defendant Advance's
misrepresentations.
122. As a direct and proximate result of the fraud committed by Defendants, Plaintiff
has suffered and/or incurred economic damages in the amount of $300,000, plus attorney fees and
costs for having to bring this action.
123. Moreover, Plaintiff seeks for the Court to impose punitive damages on the
Defendants Meli and Advance. Defendants are engaged in criminal and fraudulent behavior and
the present fraud perpetrated against Plaintiff is part of multiple fraudulent schemes of this type.
As Judge Wood noted in her sentencing of Meli, Defendants will continue to engage in such
reprehensible conduct until being deterred in the form of the most severe civil and criminal
remedies available.
124. Plaintiff therefore requests that the Court award punitive damages against the
Defendants in the amount of $1,000,000 for their fraudulent conduct.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
LAid_ing and Abetting Fraud against Malacr)
125. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the prior paragraphs 1 through 124 above.
126. Defendants Meli and Advance committed fraud against Plaintiff by falsely
representing the investment opportunity in the Broadway Harry Potter play and their contract with
- 28 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
28 of 35
ATG. In fact, Defendant Meli pled guilty to federal securities fraud in United States v. Meli, 17-
cr-00127, SDNY.
127. Defendant Molner fabricated the ATG Agreement that Plaintiff relied upon in
making its investment decision. Defendant Molner had actual knowledge of the underlying fraud
when he drafted the fraudulent ATG Agreement for Meli, because he knew that the agreement was
a complete fabrication.
128. Defendant Molner also drafted other agreements for Meli knowing that the"deals"
were non-existent. Molner recycled old contracts to tout before investors by altering party names
and terms as needed to fit Meli and Advance's fraudulent purposes.
129. Defendant Molner substantially assisted in the fraudulent scheme not only by
drafting the fabricated agreements, but also by attempting to solicit other victims to invest in
various fraudulent ticket deals. Molner knew that the deals were fraudulent, because he had not
drafted any legitimate contracts documenting the terms.
130. Molner willingly drafted the fraudulent agreements for Meli and solicited investors
for deals he knew did not exist in exchange for financial compensation that he desperately needed.
131. As a result of Defendant Molner's conduct, Plaintiff has suffered and/or incurred
economic damages in the amount of $300,000 plus attorney fees and costs for having to bring this
action.
132. Plaintiff also requests an award of punitive damages in the amount of $1,000,000,
which would deter such unacceptable and morally reprehensible conduct.
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
(Conversion anninst all Defendants except Moiner)
133. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the prior paragraphs as if fully set forth herein1
through 132 above.
- 29 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
29 of 35
134. Meli and Advance have wrongfully taken the $300,000 invested by Plaintiff for the
sole purpose of purchasing ticket blocks through to the Hodes Funding Agreement referenced
herein. Meli and Advance converted the funds for their own benefit and use rather than using the
funds for their intended purpose.
135. In all, Plaintiff, the TGT Plaintiff and the related action plaintiffs wired
$10,660,000 to Advance's Merrill Lynch account for the sole purpose of purchasing tickets
pursuant to their respective F1mding Agreements, but Meli transferred the entire $10,660,000 out
of the account within days.
136. Of the $10,660,000 invested, a total of $3,350,000 was transferred to Defendants
Reset Partners, Harsh Padia, Mostly Dune Holdings and Jason Lichmañ, Kid Shelleen and Karl
Mikael Andren. Specifically, Reset Partners received $600,000, Harsh Padia received $250,000,
Mostly Dune Holdings and Jason Liebman received $1,000,000, Kid Shelleen received $1,250,000
and Karl Mikael Andren received $250,000.
137. Defendants refused Plaintiff, TGT Plaintiff and the related actionplaintiffs'
demand for the return of their stolen money and have continued their unlawful possession of the
converted funds.
138. The Defendants named in Paragraph 136 as recipients of the funds transferred out
of Advance's Merrill Lynch account have converted the referenced monies for their own benefit
and use by refusing to return the money to the Plaintiff, TGT Plaintiff and the related action
plaintiffs.
139.Defendants'
conversion of Plaintiff's money, in the amounts put forth above, has
deprived Plaintiff of its property byDefendants'
unauthorized act in assuming dominion, despite
Plaintiff's demand for its return.
- 30 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
30 of 35
140. As a direct and proximate result of the conversion committed by Defelidarits Meli
and Advance, Plaintiff has suffered and/or incurred economic damages in the amount of $300,000.
141. As a direct and proximate result of the conversion committed by Defendants Reset
Partners, Harsh Padia, Mostly Dune Holdings and Jason Lichmari, Kid Shelleen and Karl Mikael
Andren, Plaintiff, TGT Plaintiff and the related action plaintiffs have also suffered and/or incurred
economic damages in the amount of $600,000 as against Defendant Reset Partners, $250,000 as
against Defendant Harsh Padia, $1,000,000 as against Defendants Mostly Dune Holdings and
Jason Liebman, $1,250,000 as against Defendant Kid Shelleen, and $250,000 as agaiiist Defendant
Karl Mikael Andren.
FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(Uniust Enrichmcat against all Defcadants except Moiner)
142. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the prior paragraphs as if fully set forth herein 1
through 141 above.
143. Defendant Advance entered into the Hodes Funding Agreement, which is a valid
and enforceable contract, whereby Advance and Meli agreed to utilize Plaintiff s funds to purchase
tickets to the Broadway performance of Harry Potter.
144. Plaintiff performed its obligations under the contract by wiring Advance $300,000.
in accordance with the Hodes Funding Agreement.
145. Defendant Advance breached the Hodes Funding Agrccmcnt by not using
Plaintiff s funds to purchase the Harry Potter tickets but instead for its own purposes (i.e. to pay
back prior victims of its Ponzi scheme).
146. As a result of Meli and Advance's breach of the Hodes Funding Agreement,
Plaintiff has been damaged
- 31 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
31 of 35
147. By reason of their wrongful taking of Plaintiff's $300,000, Defendants Meli and
Advance have been unjustly enriched at Plaintiff's expense in that they have directly received
money from Plaintiff as the result of fraud and otherwise unlawful conduct and that, in equity and
good conscience, they should be not be permitted to keep.
148. Plaintiff is therefore entitled to restitution from Defendants in the amount of
$300,000-the amount by which they have been unjustly enriched.
149. By reason of their wrongful detention of the Plaintiff and the related action
plaintiffs'stolen money, Defendants Reset Partners, Harsh Padia, Mostly Dune Holdings and
Jason Liebman, Kid Shelleen and Karl Mikael Andren have been unjustly enriched, at all of the
plaintiffs'expense, in that they were transferred stolen funds and have subsequently refused
demands that the funds be returned and that, in equity and good conscience, they should be not be
permitted to have used for their own financial benefit.
150. Plaintiff, TGT Plaintiff and the related action plaintiffs are therefore entitled to
restitution from Defendants Reset Partners, Harsh Padia, Mostly Dune Holdings and Jason
Liebman, Kid Shelleen and Karl Mikael Andren in the amounts by which they have been unjustly
enriched.
151. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff has sustained compensatory damages and have
been injured by Defendants Meli and Advance in an amount in excess of $300,000, and Plaintiff,
TGT Plaintiff and the related action plaintiffs have sustained compensatory damages and have
been injured by Defendants Reset Partners, Harsh Padia, Mostly Dune Holdings and Jason
Liebman, Kid Shelleen and Karl Mikael Andren in an amount in excess of $3,350,000.
FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(Conspiracy to Cerr!± Fraud against Defendants Advance. Meli and Moiner)
- 32 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
32 of 35
152. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the prior paragraphs as if fully set forth herein 1
through 151 above.
153. Defendants Advance, Meli and Molner conspired in a corrupt common scheme
and/or purpose to defraud Plaintiff in the amount of $300,000, as pled in the First and Second
Causes of Action above.
154. Defendants Advance, Meli and Molner committed overt acts in furtherance of the
fraudulent scheme for a number of months leading up to Meli's indictment for securities fraud.
155. Defendants Advance, Meli and Molner also intentionally and willfully participated
in furtherance of the fraudulent scheme.
156. By reason of the conspiracy to commit fraud of Defendants Advance, Meli and
Molner, Plaintiff has been harmed in an amount of $300,000, which Plaintiff has demanded, but
has yet been unsuccessful in recovering from Defendants.
157. Plaintiff requests an award of punitive damages in the amount of $1,000,000.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that this Court enter judg:ncat in favor of Plaintiff
and against the Defendants as follows:
(i) Damages in the amount of $300,000 and all of Plaintiff's attorney fees
incurred in bringing this action against Defendants Advance and Meli;
(ii) Damages in the amount of $300,000, including interest and costs, incurred
in bringing this action against Defendant Reset Partners;
(iii) Damages in the amount of $250,000, including interest and costs, incurred
in bringing this action against Defendant Padia;
(iv) Damages in the amount of $300,000, including interest and costs, incurred
in bringing this action against Defendants Mostly Dune Holdings and
Liebman;
(v) Damages in the amount of $300,000, including interest and costs, incurred
in bringing this action against Defendant Kid Shelleen;
- 33 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
33 of 35
(vi) Damages in the amount of $250,000, including interest and costs, incurred
in bringing this action against Defendant Andren;
(vii) Plaintiff's costs and disbursements incurred herein;
(viii) Pre-judgment interest running from the date of Plaintiff's initial investment
for Defendants Meli and Advance;
(ix) Pre-judgment interest running from the date of the denial ofDefendants'
return of the funds for Defendants Reset Partners, Harsh Padia, MostlyDune Holdings, Jason Liebman, Kid Shelleen and Karl Mikael Andren;
(x) Punitive damages against Defendants Meli, Advance and Molner in the
amount of $1,000,000; and
(xi) Such further relief as the Court deems just and equitable.
DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands trial by jury on all counts so triable.
Dated: New York, New York
March 12, 2019
JOHN MURPHY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
By:
John Murphy1450 Broadway,
39* Floor
New York, NY 10018
(646) 862-2012
Counsel for PlaintiffVincent V Hodes Family Irrevocable Trust
- 34 -
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
34 of 35
VERIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK )
) ss.:
COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
JOHN MURPHY, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
I am counsel for Plaintiff in this action. I submit this Verification pursuant to
CPLR 3020(d)(3). I have read the foregoing Verified Complaint, know the contents thereof, and,
based on my communications with my client and the documents provided by my client, state that
the same is true to my knowledge, except as to those matters therein alleged on information and
belief, and as to those matters, I believe them to be true.
This verification is made by me because my client is a foreign corporate entity.
JOHN MURPHY
Sworn to before me this12th
day of
March, 2019
Notary Public
ANDREW LlLLIS
NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK
No. 02L16309857
Quallfled in Queens County
my eernmisslan mmpiren August 98, 9918
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2019 04:56 PM INDEX NO. 151712/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2019
35 of 35