2017 NALHFA Award Submission:
Multifamily Excellence
Stacy L. SpannExecutive Director
Multifamily Excellence: Pooled Financing of Multiple-Site Multifamily Developments
Innovation and Transferability Overthepastfouryears,theHousingOpportunitiesCommissionofMontgomeryCounty(HOC)workedatanacceleratedpacetobringabouttheredevelopment,modernizationandrecapitalizationofitsentirepublichousingportfolio.Servingasbothahousingauthorityandhousingfinanceagency,HOCownsapproximately7,000housingunitswithinthehighcostMontgomeryCounty,MDhousingmarket.Nearly,1,600ofthoseunitswereformerlyPublicHousing.Inaddition,HOCadministersnearly7,200HousingChoiceVouchersandcontrolsmanyfinancialtools,asaHousingFinanceAgency(HFA),allowingittoinnovate.
OnDecember18,2013andMarch26,2014, theU.S.DepartmentofHousingandUrbanDevelopment(HUD) awarded HOC a Commitment for Housing Assistance Payment Contracts for Seneca Ridge (71 units),ParkwayWoods(24units),KenGar (19units),SandySpringMeadow(55units),TowneCenterPlace(49units)andWashingtonSquare(50units).HUDsubsequentlyapprovedfinancingthesixproperties,knownastheRAD6,asoneproperty.Uponreceivingapprovaltoconvertsixmultifamilypublichousingcommunitiesintoasinglescattered site multifamily housing development for federal funding purposes, HOC began comprehensiverehabilitationifthesixpropertiesinDecember2014withtheworkcompletinginJuly2016.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD)programhas played a vital role inHOC’s efforts. RAD allowsHOC to leverage the value of the real estate byeliminatingdeedrestrictions,whichpreviouslyforeclosedtheuseofprivatecapitalanddebtservicewithintheproperties. Unleashing the potential of the assets allowedHOC to create a pooled finance transaction of sixsmaller,scatteredsitedevelopments,augmentingtheoveralldebtservicepotentialacrossitsRAD6properties.Asaresult,HOChaspreserved268low-density,affordableanddeeplyaffordable,multi-familyandsingle-familyunitsacrossa500squaremileareajustoutsideofWashingtonD.C.,reducingtheaverageageoftheseassetsfrom39.33yearsto1.5years.
As Montgomery County’s HFA, HOC offers bonds to finance development projects. For the RAD 6properties, HOC pooled individual properties and financed six distinct multifamily developments as onetransactionbyasingleborrower,RAD6DevelopmentCorporation.Criticaltocreatingthisstructurewastogenerateadditional revenuewithin theoverall transaction. Initially, everyunitwithin the six developmentswerePublicHousing,generatingnetrevenuethatinsomecaseswasinsufficienttofundsoperatingexpensesandcreatedabacklogofdeferredneeds.TheRADprogramallowedHOCtoreplace59subsidizedunitswithmarketrateunitswithinthedevelopmentbytransferringtheassistanceinthose59unitstounitsownedbyHOC.Intheend,therewas no net loss of extremely affordable units and povertywas deconcentrated across the county. Further, bytransferringassistanceoffsite,RAD6propertiesachievedaboostinitsrevenuesanditsnetoperatingincome,enabling it to raise sufficientcapital to fund its renovationbudget.Thevalueof combining theproperties intoonetransactioncreatedfuturerevenuestreamtosupportgreaterdebtservicethanwouldhaveotherwisebeenpossible.ThesupportableloanvalueincreasedbyaddingmarketrateunitsatRAD6properties,enhancingthevalueofthenetrentableareaof284,897squarefeet.Takenseparately,thenetrentableareaofthepropertiesranged from 22,525 square feet to 72,659 square feet. This financing strategy ultimately supported just over$60,000inperunitofhardcostinvestmentsacrossthe268units.
Thedevelopmentcost for theRAD6 redevelopmentwasfinanced through the issuanceof$24milliontax-exempt,governmentalbondswithmortgageinsurancebyFHApursuanttotisRiskShareAgreementwithHOC.ThemortgagewasunderwrittenbythestrengthoftheunderlyingrealestateandthebondswerepubliclysoldviaanegotiatedsaletoBankofAmericaMerrillLynch(BAML).
1 HOC has completed nine of eleven RAD transactions, effectively converting units out of the traditional Public Housing, into Section 8 project based assistance contracts. All units are expected to have completed conversion by April, 2018.
1
HOC’sfinancingandpreservationoftheRAD6propertiesreflectsinnovationinfinancingthatisreplicablewithinothercommunities,withtremendouspotentialtodeepenthelevelofredevelopmentthatcanbeaccomplished.
Meeting the Needs of Low- and Moderate-Income Households
WhileMontgomeryCounty,Marylandenjoysastrongeconomy,highAreaMedianIncome(AMI)andhighrateofhomeownership,thenearlysixpercent(6%)ofthepopulationlivingbelowthepovertylinestruggletofindqualityaffordablehousing.TheaffordablehousingneedintheCountyiswelldocumented.Asoneofthestate’slargesteconomicenginesandpopulationcenters,allsignspointtowardanincreasingneedforaffordablehousinginthecounty.MarylandDepartmentofCommercereportsthatMontgomeryCountyhasthelargestpopulation2
,largestlaborforce,scoreshighestonaQualityofLifeIndex,hada72.4%laborparticipationratein2014againamongthehighestinthestate,andhasseenitspopulationgrowbynearly200,000residentsoverthelast15years.Atthesametime,48.6%ofrentersinthecountyexperiencedhousingburdenorpaidmorethan30%oftheirincometowardsrent.Withonlya2.5%vacancyrateandincreasingrents,demandforaffordablehousingwillcontinuetoincrease.
AttheendofFiscalYear2013,asHOCwasformingitsredevelopmentstrategyfortheRAD6unitsandits other PublicHousing portfolio, data showed thatHOC’s programwas serving someof themost vulnerablehouseholds in the county.HOC’s residentswerepredominatelyminority (88%)households earningwell below30percentofAMI.Demographiccompositionbrokedowninthefollowingmanner:57percentBlack,16percentAsian,and15percentLatino,levelsfarbeyondtheirrepresentationinthebroaderpopulation.ThemedianincomeforfamiliesinHOC’sPublicHousingwasapproximately$22,000whiletheFY13AMIforMontgomeryCountywas$107,300.
AllofthefamiliesservedbytheRAD6unitspriortorenovationswereabletoremainintheirunitsoncerenovationswerecompleted–infact,oneofthehighestRADtenetsistoprotecttheRighttoReturnofcurrentparticipants.Theusefullifeofthisvaluableaffordablehousinginfrastructureremainsintactwithlong-termusecontractsinplacepreservingtheiravailabilityforthenext20years.Thisissignificantgiventhatnearly50%ofallrentersinthecountyarecost.However,theneedismostacuteamongthoseatthelowestendofincomespectrumwhere80%ofrentersbelow30%areamedianincome(AMI)experiencerentburden.Thecurrenthousingmarketundersuppliesunitsaffordabletohouseholdsearning50percentofAMIandbelow.While38%ofrentersearnbelow58percentAMIonly19%ofunitsareaffordableatthislevel.
Without taking advantageof the reinvestmentopportunity andHOC’s pooledfinancing strategy,manyof these units may have been lost to obsolescence. The average per unit investment of just over $60,000demonstratesthe levelofcapitalbacklogthatpreviouslyexisted.Beyondthe20yearsrequiredundertheRADprogram,HOC’smissionasanaffordablehousingproviderensuresthattheunitsremainaffordableinperpetuity.Thecurrentsubsidized, long-termvouchercontractpreservesthedeepaffordabilityofunitsforrentersearningwellbelow30%oftheAMI.Itshouldberepeated,thatwhilethenumberofdeeplyaffordableunitswithintheRAD6propertiesdecreasedonsite,thenumberofdeeplyaffordableunitswithinthecountyremainedconstantssoNOaffordableunitswerelosttothecommunity.
3 4 5
6
7
•WashingtonSquare,builtin1968andrenovatedin2002,isatownhousecommunitylocatedinGaithersburg,MD.The50-unitcommunityidealforlargerhouseholdsconsistsoftentwo-bedroomunits,30three-bedroomunits,andtenfour-bedroomunits.
•SenecaRidgeisalsoatownhousecommunityperfectlysituatedforlargefamilies.With40of71unitsbeing threebedroomsandanadditional20four-bedroomunitsthecommunityhousesverylowincomeandextremelylowincomehouseholdsinGermantown,MD.Therearealsotwoone-bedroomunitsandninetwo-bedroomunitstocompletethemix.ThetownhousesatSenecaRidgewerebuiltin1970andrenovatedin2008.
•TowneCenterPlace,LocatedinOlney,Maryland,thetownhousecommunitywasbuiltin1986;the49unitsarebrokendowninto20two-bedroomunits,20three-bedroomunitsandnineone-bedroomunits.
•SandySpringMeadow,Builtin1980,itisacommunityof55unitsinSandySpring,Maryland.Thedevelopmentconsistsof25townhousesand30single-familyhomes;eachtownhousehastwobedroomsorlargeone-bedroomandden,whilethesingle-familyhomeshavethreeorfourbedrooms.
•ParkwayWoodsisa24unittownhomecommunityconsistingofninetwo-bedroomunits,ninethree-bedroomunitsandsixfour-bedroomunits.Onthepropertytherearetwosinglelevel,handicapped-accessible,homes.LocatedinRockville,Maryland,thecommunitywasconstructedin1980.
•KenGarTownhomescommunity,builtin1979,islocatedinKensington,Maryland.Theneighborhoodconsistsof14townhousesandfivedetachedsingle-familyhomes.Ofthe14townhousesthereareseventwo-bedroomunitsandseventhree-bedroomunits.Thedetachedsingle-familyhomesareallfour-bedroomunits.
Eachcommunityservesthediverseneedsofthecountyand inparticularthedemandfor larger, familyappropriateaffordableunits.Propertieswerebuilttoaccommodatelargerfamiliesinneedofthreeandfour-bed-room homes as well as the requirements of handicapped andwheelchair bound customers. After the RAD 6redevelopment,affordablehousingsuitablefor largefamilies isbeingpreservedforthe long-term. BasedonarecenthousingmarketstudyconductedbyMontgomeryCountyParkandPlanningCommission,only12%oflarger(3+bedroom)unitsareaffordablebelow80%oftheAMI.
Redevelopment and rehabilitation of the selected properties focused on in-kind upgrades based onmarketcomparablesthatwereamenityrich,energyefficientandcosteffectivefor long-termownership,givingparticularattentiontoimprovingenergyefficiencyofeachunit.Interiorworkconsistedofthefullscalereplacementofkitchen and bathroom appliances, cabinets, fixtures and finishes. Additionally, each unit received electricalmodificationsandnewHVACsystems.Manyunitswereretrofittedwithwalk-inclosets.(SeeExhibit2&Exhibit3)Extensiveexteriorupgradesincludedgradingandstormwatermanagementsystemsandreplacingwalkways,stoopsandwalls. Contractors also replaced vinyl siding, roofs, gutters andwindows.ModificationsundertakenduringRAD6rehabilitationwillresultinloweringannualoperatingexpensesfromtheupgradingofappliancestoenergyefficientsystemsandtheoverallcapitalinvestmentthatwilllowermaintenancecosts.GiventhestrongRight-to-Returnrequirement,HOChadanopportunitytoenhanceaccessibilityfeaturesparticularlyforcurrentresidentswithknownaccessibilityneeds.Further,theWashingtonSquarepropertywasenhancedwithacommunityclubhousetoaddanamenityforthebenefitofresidentswhileenhancingthemarketabilityoftheon-sitemarket-rateunits. After rehabilitation, the financial sustainability and competitiveness of the combined properties wassignificantly enhanced within the rental marketplace. However, HOC maintained the county’s affordablehousingstockbydesignating78%,or209,redevelopedunits,forhouseholdsintheExtremelyLowandtheVeryLowIncomecategories.Currently,these209unitsareleasedtodeeplysubsidizedhouseholdsatroughly30%AMI.Theremaining59unitswithinRAD6werereplacedwith“OpportunityHousing”forLowIncomehouseholdswithrentsaffordableat80percentofAMI–theFederaldefinitionoflow-income.Currently,the59unitsareleasedtofamiliesinthe50%to55%ofAMIrange.HOC’sRAD6conversionallowedtheAgencytoretainaffordablehousingwhileelevatingthequalityofhousingavailabletolow-incomehouseholdsinthecounty.
Indoingso,HOCwasalsoabletodiversifytheincomemixofcommunities,deconcentratepoverty,andincreaserevenuetoensurelong-termfinancialintegrity.
Thedeepredevelopmentofthispropertywasmadepossible,andgoalsachieved,throughtheinnovativefinancingstructure thatunderpinned theRAD6property.While thefinancingapproach is innovative, it isalsohighlytransferrableandmayserveasamodeltootherPublicHousingAuthorities(PHA).ThismethodwouldbeparticularlyusefultosmallerPHAsoranyownerofsmallerdevelopmentswhose individualpropertiesmaynotgeneratebroad interestamong investors.Bypoolingmultiple smallerassets,PHAs,mayhavegreaterability toattractprivateinvestmenttodevelopmentandredevelopmentprojects.
ThroughRAD,HOC is investing$230million in redevelopmentof its rentalhousingportfolio. HOCwillultimatelyexpandthesupplyofmixed-incomeaffordablehousinginMontgomeryCountybyleveragingtherealproperty.Insodoing,theAgencyisalsode-concentratingdeeplyaffordableunits.TheRAD6developmentallowedHOCtoleveragetherealpropertyassetsofitspublichousingstockandrecapitalizehousingasrealestateratherthanasubsidystream.Poolingthepropertiestogetherisasimplebutingeniousmethodthatacknowledgesthereisrealvalueintherealpropertyandhowwecanbestmaximizethatvalue.
Current Resident Demographics as of March 2017
DataPoint Value DataPoint ValueNon-ElderlyResidents 572 Non-ElderlyResidents 172ElderlyResidents 52 ElderlyResidents 39TotalResidents 624 TotalResidents 211%ElderlyResidents 8.3% %ElderlyResidents 18.5%
DataPoint Value DataPoint ValueNon-DisabledResidents 589 Non-DisabledResidents 211DisabledResidents 35 DisabledResidents 24%Disabled 5.9% %Disabled 11.4%
DataPoint Value1Person 412Person 383Person 514Person 405Person 166Person 107Person 48Person 29Person 010Person 1
DataPoint ValueAverageHouseholdSize 2.6
HOHandCo-HeadsAllHouseholdMembers
DataPoint ValueNon-ElderlyResidents 400ElderlyResidents 13TotalResidents 413%ElderlyResidents 3.1%
DataPoint ValueNon-DisabledResidents 413DisabledResidents 11%Disabled 2.7%
onHOHHouseholdMembers
MAP OF PROPERTIES
RAD 6 Development
RAD 6 Development CorporationSources and Uses
RAD 6 Development CorporationSources and Uses
LOW INCOME PORTION 78%TOTAL UNITS 268ACQUISITION PRICE $6,295,167
Current Plan Per Unit Percentage of Total
SOURCES:Maximum Mortgage $24,000,000 $89,552 89.79%CFP Allocations $0 $0 0.00%CIP (Capital Improvements Program) $2,729,845 $10,186 10.21%Existing Replacement Reserves As $0 $0 0.00%Deferred Developer's Fee $0 $0 0.00%Tax Credit Equity $0 $0 0.00%(Excess)/Gap $0 $0 0.00%
TOTAL SOURCES $26,729,845 $99,738 100.00%
USES:Acquisition Cost
Reimbursement to HOC (Prepay the Capital Fund Financing Program (CFFP) loans) $2,019,999 $7,537 7.56%Reimbursement to HOC (Prepay CFFP loans Accrued Interest - for 2/13/15 payoff) $15,591 $58 0.06%Equity $0 $0 0.00%Reimbursement of Capital Expenses $4,017,352 $14,990 15.03%Resident Relocation Costs (VPC I & II and Internal) $242,225 $904 0.91%Capitalized Interest $0 $0 0.00%
Total Acquisition Cost $6,295,167 $23,489 23.55%
Construction CostsHard Construction/Rehab - (GC Contract) - includes Davis Bacon $11,222,718 $41,876 41.99%Hard Cost Contingency (Without CIP) 10.25% $1,150,295 $4,292 4.30%Only CIP - Hard Cost $2,481,677 $9,260 9.28%Only CIP - Hard Cost Contingency $248,168 $926 0.93%Related to Construction/Rehab (fee, overhead, general conditions, GLI, P/P bond, etc) $1,020,973 $3,810 3.82%
Total Construction Costs $16,123,831 $60,164 60.32%
Construction Period Interest & Negative Arbitrage Soft Costs (Architecture, Construction Mgmt, etc) $474,999 $1,772 1.78%Operating Reserve for 6 months $618,750 $2,309 2.31%Construction Period Interest (Month) 15 $872,005 $3,254 3.26%Negative Arbitrage $365,495 $1,364 1.37%
Total Construction Period Interest & Negative Arbitrage Costs $2,331,249 $8,699 8.72%
Consultants-Preacquisition & SyndicationAppraisal $42,000 $157 0.16%Engineering (PNA) -Actual $35,140 $131 0.13%Environmental Phase 1 $16,546 $62 0.06%Environmental Phase II $9,567 $36 0.04%Survey $100,300 $374 0.38%RAD Consultant $211,556 $789 0.79%Legal/Cost Certification $42,000 $157 0.16%
Total Consultants-Preacquisition & Syndication $457,109 $1,706 1.71%
Financing ExpenseCost of Issuance (Based on Caine Mitter ) $353,627 $1,320 1.32%Lag (30 Days) $82,500 $308 0.31%MIP Payment Up Front (Two Years) 1.00% $240,000 $896 0.90%
Total Financing Expense $676,127 $2,523 2.53%
Settlement CostsTitle Insurance $39,528 $147 0.15%Transfer tax - State $37,245 $139 0.14%Transfer tax - County (Exempt) $0 $0 0.00%Recording Tax - Tax $72,940 $272 0.27%Settlement Agent Costs $50,000 $187 0.19%Title Report $32,327 $121 0.12%Legal - HOC $130,000 $485 0.49%Misc. Costs $4,358 $16 0.02%
Total Settlement Costs $366,398 $1,367 1.37%
Misc. Development Costs & Soft Cost ContingencyInitial Deposit to Replacement Reserve $1,119.40 $300,000 $1,119 1.12%Soft Cost Contingencies 10% 10.00% $179,963 $672 0.67%
Total Misc. Dev. Costs & Soft Cost Contingency $479,963 $1,791 1.80%
TOTAL USES $26,729,845 $99,738 100.00%
RAD 6_Unit Mix
Proposed Unit Mix # of Units PercentageAffordable 209 78%
Opportunity Housing Units 59 22%Total 268 100%
Rent Detail information
Unit Type Size (sf) # Total SF Per Unit Per SF GRP/moAffordable (55% of AMI)Studio 2 1,000 $1,3101 BR 14 9,571 $10,1922 BR 75 71,066 $60,6753 BR 90 114,413 $92,4304 BR 28 42,186 $29,680
Total/Average 209 238,236 $930 0.82 $194,287
Opportunity Housing Unit (80% of AMI)1 BR 0 0 02 BR 5 4,420 $7,5153 BR 36 43,785 $63,7714 BR 18 25,964 $37,565
Total/Average 59 74,169 $1,845 $1.47 $108,851
Total/Average 268 312,405 $1,131 0.97 $303,138
Annual GRP $3,637,656Per Unit/mo $13,573
Variance
Proposed Unit Mix Summary
Underwriting Rents
C:\Users\jay.shepherd\Desktop\NALHFA RAD 6 Financials 3/20/2017
RAD 6_Unit Mix
AssumptionProposed Unit Mix # of Units Percentage
Affordable 55 77% Affordable 2.00% 1.0200Opportunity Housing Units 16 23% Opportunity 3.00% 1.0300
Total 71 100%
Rent Detail information
Unit Type Size (sf) # Total SF Per Unit Per SF GRP/mo Per Unit Per SF GRP/moAffordable (55% of AMI)
Studio / 1BA (Town House) 500 2 1,000 $693 $1.39 $1,386 $655 $1.31 $1,3102 BR / 1BA (Town House) 800 8 6,400 $811 $1.01 $6,488 $809 $1.01 $6,4723 BR / 1BA (Town House) 1,230 32 39,360 $1,021 $0.83 $32,672 $1,027 $0.83 $32,8643 BR / 1BA (Town House) 1,033 2 2,066 $1,021 $0.99 $2,042 $1,027 $0.99 $2,0544 BR / 2BA (Town House) 1,530 11 16,830 $1,264 $0.83 $13,904 $1,060 $0.69 $11,660
Total/Average 1,194 55 65,656 $1,027 $0.86 $56,492 $988 $0.83 $54,360
Opportunity Housing Unit (80% of AMI)Studio / 1BA (Town House) 500 0 0 $0 $0.00 $0 $0 $0.00 $02 BR / 1BA (Town House) 980 1 980 $0 $0.00 $0 $1,470 $1.50 $1,4703 BR / 1BA (Town House) 1,367 6 8,202 $0 $0.00 $0 $1,840 $1.35 $11,0404 BR / 2BA (Town House) 1,530 9 13,770 $0 $0.00 $0 $2,100 $1.37 $18,900
Total/Average 1,435 16 22,952 $0 $0.00 $0 $1,963 $1.37 $31,410
Total/Average 1,248 71 88,608 $88,608 $0.64 $56,492 $88,608 $0.97 $85,770
Annual GRP $677,904 Annual GRP $1,029,240Per Unit/mo $9,548 Per Unit/mo $14,496
Rent Limits Maximum Rent Per Bedroom 0-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR Utility Allowance 0-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR
$689 $882 $1,114 $1,161 Town House $34 $73 $87 $101
Seneca Ridge
Proposed Unit Mix SummaryUnerwriting Rents
Average Current Rents Underwriting Rents
C:\Users\jay.shepherd\Desktop\NALHFA RAD 6 Financials 3/20/2017
a
a
a 55% of AMI was used to project rents for units subsidized Section 8 Project Based Assistance. Tenant rents for these units are income
based, consistent with program reguirements.
RAD 6_Unit Mix
AssumptionProposed Unit Mix # of Units Percentage
Affordable 20 40% Affordable 2.00% 1.0200Opportunity Housing Units 30 60% Opportunity 3.00% 1.0300
Total 50 100%
Rent Detail information
Unit Type Size (sf) # Total SF Per Unit Per SF GRP/mo Per Unit Per SF GRP/moAffordable (55% of AMI)
2 BR / 1BA (Town House) 806 7 5,642 $771 $0.96 $5,397 $809 $1.00 $5,6633 BR / 1BA (Town House) 1,091 7 7,637 $934 $0.86 $6,538 $1,027 $0.94 $7,1893 BR / 1BA (Town House) 1,091 2 2,182 $934 $0.86 $1,868 $1,027 $0.94 $2,0544 BR / 2BA (Town House) 1,218 4 4,872 $1,174 $0.96 $4,696 $1,060 $0.87 $4,240
Total/Average 1,017 20 20,333 $925 $0.91 $18,499 $957 $0.94 $19,146
Opportunity Housing Units (80% of AMI)2 BR / 1BA (Town House) 806 3 2,418 $0 $0.00 $0 $1,515 $1.88 $4,5453 BR / 1BA (Town House) 1,091 21 22,911 $0 $0.00 $0 $1,745 $1.60 $36,6454 BR / 2BA (Town House) 1,218 6 7,308 $0 $0.00 $0 $2,080 $1.71 $12,480
Total/Average 1,088 30 32,637 $0 $0.00 $0 $1,789 $1.64 $53,670
Total/Average 1,059 50 52,970 $52,970 $0.35 $18,499 $52,970 $1.37 $72,816
Annual GRP $221,988 Annual GRP $873,792Per Unit/mo $4,440 Per Unit/mo $17,476
Rent LimitsMaximum Rent Per Bedroom 1-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR Utility Allowance 1-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR
$939 $1,189 $1,250 Town House $130 $162 $190
Washington Square
Proposed Unit Mix SummaryUnerwriting Rents
Average Current Rents Underwriting Rents
C:\Users\jay.shepherd\Desktop\NALHFA RAD 6 Financials 3/20/2017
RAD 6_Unit Mix
AssumptionProposed Unit Mix # of Units Percentage
Affordable 22 92% Affordable 2.00% 1.0200Opportunity Housing Units 2 8% Opportunity 3.00% 1.0300
Total 24 100%
Rent Detail information
Unit Type Size (sf) # Total SF Per Unit Per SF GRP/mo Per Unit Per SF GRP/moAffordable (55% of AMI)
2 BR / 1BA (Town House) 979 2 1,958 $699 $0.71 $1,398 $809 $0.83 $1,6182 BR / 1BA (Town House) 1,173 7 8,211 $699 $0.60 $4,893 $809 $0.69 $5,6633 BR / 1BA (Town House) 1,415 7 9,905 $901 $0.64 $6,307 $1,027 $0.73 $7,189
3 BR / 1.5BA (Town House) 1,415 1 1,415 $901 $0.64 $901 $1,027 $0.73 $1,0274 BR / 2BA (Town House) 1,714 5 8,570 $1,179 $0.69 $5,895 $1,060 $0.62 $5,300
Total/Average 1,366 22 30,059 $882 $0.65 $19,394 $945 $0.69 $20,797
Opportunity Housing Units(80% of AMI)2 BR / 1BA (Town House) 979 0 0 $0 $0.00 $0 $0 $0.00 $02 BR / 1BA (Town House) 1,173 0 0 $0 $0.00 $0 $0 $0.00 $03 BR / 1BA (Town House) 1,415 0 0 $0 $0.00 $0 $0 $0.00 $0
3 BR / 1.5BA (Town House) 1,415 1 1,415 $1,620 $1.14 $1,620 $1,640 $1.16 $1,6404 BR / 2BA (Town House) 1,714 1 1,714 $1,809 $1.06 $1,809 $1,985 $1.16 $1,985
Total/Average 1,565 2 3,129 $1,715 $1.10 $3,429 $1,813 $1.16 $3,625
Total/Average 1,383 24 33,188 $33,188 $0.69 $22,823 $33,188 $0.74 $24,422
Annual GRP $273,876 Annual GRP $293,064Per Unit/mo $11,412 Per Unit/mo $12,211
Rent LimitsMaximum Rent Per Bedroom 1-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR Utility Allowance 1-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR
$1,034 $1,304 $1,385 $225 $277 $325
Proposed Unit Mix SummaryUnderwriting Rents
Average Current Rents Underwriting Rents
Parkway Woods
C:\Users\jay.shepherd\Desktop\NALHFA RAD 6 Financials 3/20/2017
a
a
a 55% of AMI was used to project rents for units subsidized Section 8 Project Based Assistance. Tenant rents for these units are income
based, consistent with program reguirements.
RAD 6_Unit Mix
AssumptionProposed Unit Mix # of Units Percentage
Affordable Units 17 89% Affordable 2.00% 1.0200Opportunity Housing Units 2 11% Opportunity 3.00% 1.0300
Total 19 100%
Rent Detail information
Unit Type Size (sf) # Total SF Per Unit Per SF GRP/mo Per Unit Per SF GRP/moAffordable (55% of AMI)
2 BR / 1BA (Town House) 917 7 6,421 $700 $0.76 $4,900 $809 $0.88 $5,6633 BR / 1.5BA (Town House) 1,188 5 5,942 $770 $0.65 $3,850 $1,027 $0.86 $5,1354 BR / 2BA (Town House) 1,452 2 2,904 $950 $0.65 $1,900 $1,060 $0.73 $2,1204 BR / 2BA (Single Family) 1,439 3 4,317 $950 $0.66 $2,850 $1,060 $0.74 $3,180
Total/Average 1,152 17 19,584 $794 $0.69 $13,500 $947 $0.82 $16,098
Opportunity Housing Units (80% of AMI)2 BR / 1BA (Town House) 917 0 0 $1,402 $1.53 $0 $0 $0.00 $0
3 BR / 1.5BA (Town House) 1,188 0 0 $1,620 $1.36 $0 $0 $0.00 $04 BR / 2BA (Town House) 1,452 0 0 $1,809 $1.25 $0 $0 $0.00 $04 BR / 2BA (Single Family) 1,586 2 3,172 $1,809 $1.14 $3,618 $2,100 $1.32 $4,200
Total/Average 1,586 2 3,172 $1,809 $1.14 $3,618 $2,100 $1.32 $4,200
Total/Average 1,198 19 22,756 $22,756 $0.75 $17,118 $22,756 $0.89 $20,298
Annual GRP $205,416 Annual GRP $243,576Per Unit/mo $10,811 Per Unit/mo $12,820
Rent LimitsMaximum Rent Per Bedroom 1-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR Utility Allowance 1-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR
$1,036 $1,311 $1,396 Townhouse $227 $284 $336$1,461 Single-Family $401
Underwriting Rents
Average Current Rents Underwriting Rents
KenGar
Proposed Unit Mix Summary
C:\Users\jay.shepherd\Desktop\NALHFA RAD 6 Financials 3/20/2017
RAD 6_Unit Mix
AssumptionProposed Unit Mix # of Units Percentage
Affordable 48 87% Affordable 2.00% 1.0200Opportunity Housing Unit 7 13% Opportunity 3.00% 1.0300
Total 55 100%
Rent Detail information
Unit Type Size (sf) # Total SF Per Unit Per SF GRP/mo Per Unit Per SF GRP/moAffordable (55% of AMI)
1 BR / 1BA (Town House) 727 5 3,636 $680 $0.94 $3,400 $728 $1.00 $3,6402 BR / 1BA (Town House) 1,022 24 24,533 $705 $0.69 $16,920 $809 $0.79 $19,416
3 BR / 1.5BA (Single Family) 1,458 15 21,867 $785 $0.54 $11,775 $1,027 $0.70 $15,4053 BR / 1.5BA (Single Family) 1,458 1 1,458 $769 $0.53 $769 $1,027 $0.70 $1,0274 BR / 2BA (Single Family) 1,564 3 4,693 $1,026 $0.66 $3,078 $1,060 $0.68 $3,180
Total/Average 1,171 48 56,187 $749 $0.64 $35,942 $889 $0.76 $42,668
Opportunity Housing Unit (80% of AMI)1 BR / 1BA (Town House) 727 0 0 $0 $0.00 $0 $0 $0.00 $02 BR / 1BA (Town House) 1,022 1 1,022 $0 $0.00 $0 $1,500 $1.47 $1,500
3 BR / 1.5BA (Single Family) 1,458 6 8,747 $0 $0.00 $0 $1,820 $1.25 $10,9204 BR / 2BA (Single Family) 1,564 0 0 $0 $0.00 $0 $0 $0.00 $0
Total/Average 1,396 7 9,769 $0 $0.00 $0 $1,774 $1.27 $12,420
Total/Average 1,199 55 65,956 $65,956 $0.54 $35,942 $65,956 $0.84 $55,088
Annual GRP $431,304 Annual GRP $661,056Per Unit/mo $7,842 Per Unit/mo $12,019
Rent LimitsMaximum Rent Per Bedroom 1-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR Utility Allowance 1-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR
$901 $1,036 $1,367 $1,461 Town House $173 $227$1,367 $1,461 Single Family $340 $401
Average Current Rents Underwriting Rents
Sandy Spring Medow
Proposed Unit Mix SummaryUnerwriting Rents
C:\Users\jay.shepherd\Desktop\NALHFA RAD 6 Financials 3/20/2017
a
a
a 55% of AMI was used to project rents for units subsidized Section 8 Project Based Assistance. Tenant rents for these units are income
based, consistent with program reguirements.
RAD 6_Unit Mix
AssumptionProposed Unit Mix # of Units Percentage
Affordable 47 96% Affordable 2.00% 1.0200Opportunity Housing Units 2 4% Opportunity 3.00% 1.0300
Total 49 100%
Rent Detail information
Unit Type Size (sf) # Total SF Per Unit Per SF GRP/mo Per Unit Per SF GRP/moAffordable (55% of AMI)
1 BR / 1BA (Town House) 660 9 5,936 $685 $1.04 $6,165 $728 $1.10 $6,5522 BR / 1BA (Town House) 895 20 17,900 $707 $0.79 $14,140 $809 $0.90 $16,180
3 BR / 1.5BA (Town House) 1,255 1 1,255 $832 $0.66 $832 $1,027 $0.82 $1,0273 BR / 1.5BA (Town House) 1,255 17 21,327 $832 $0.66 $14,144 $1,027 $0.82 $17,459
Total/Average 988 47 46,417 $751 $0.76 $35,281 $877 $0.89 $41,218
Opportunity Housing Units (80% of AMI)1 BR / 1BA (Town House) 660 0 0 $0 $0.00 $0 $0 $0.00 $02 BR / 1BA (Town House) 895 0 0 $0 $0.00 $0 $0 $0.00 $0
3 BR / 1.5BA (Town House) 1,255 2 2,510 $0 $0.00 $0 $1,763 $1.40 $3,526Total/Average 1,255 2 2,510 $0 $0.00 $0 $1,763 $1.40 $3,526
Total/Average 999 49 48,927 $48,927 $0.72 $35,281 $48,927 $0.91 $44,744
Annual GRP $423,372 Annual GRP $536,928Per Unit/mo $8,640 Per Unit/mo $10,958
Rent LimitsMaximum Rent Per Bedroom 1-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR Utility Allowance 1-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR
$903 $1,034 $1,304 Town House $175 $225 $277
Towne Centre Place
Proposed Unit Mix SummaryUnerwriting Rents
Average Current Rents Underwriting Rents
C:\Users\jay.shepherd\Desktop\NALHFA RAD 6 Financials 3/20/2017
a
a 55% of AMI was used to project rents for units subsidized Section 8 Project Based Assistance. Tenant rents for these units are income
based, consistent with program reguirements.
StabilizedOperating Budget
Stabilized Operations_RAD 6
RAD 6 Development Corporation
Stabilized Operating Projection Max Mortgage Amount $24,000,000Term 30
Forecast (Vacancy, Concessions & Bad Debt Rate) 7.00% Interest Rate ** 4.125%Total Units 268 Debt Service Constant 5.82%Income Growth Rate 2.00% MIP 0.50%OCAF 3.14% "All-In Constant" Rate 6.32%Management Fee 3.00% Debt Coverage Ratio Target (FY 2017) 1.26 Other Income Growth Rate 2.00% NOI $1,903,420Expense Growth Rate 3.00% Debt Service $1,514,678
Current Vacancy, Concessions & Bad Debt RateANNUAL MONTHLY
Total Per Unit Total Per UnitINCOMEAssisted Units $2,404,651 $8,973 $200,388 $748Opportunity Housing $1,332,336 $4,971 $111,028 $414 Less: Vacancy & Concessions, Bad Debt ($261,589) ($976) ($21,799) ($81)Net Rental/Tenant INCOME $3,475,398 $12,968 $289,617 $1,081
Other Income Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Revenue $202,507 $756 $16,876 $63EFFECTIVE GROSS INCOME $3,677,905 $13,724 $306,492 $1,144
OPERATING EXPENSESAdministrative $92,964 $347 $7,747 $29Utilities $179,831 $671 $14,986 $56Management Fee $264,463 $987 $22,039 $82Payroll & Benefits (Included Tenant Services) $588,442 $2,196 $49,037 $183R&M / Contract Services $421,337 $1,572 $35,111 $131Misc License, Insurance & Taxes $101,274 $378 $8,439 $31
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $1,648,310 $6,150 $137,359 $513Replacement Reserve $126,175 $471 $10,515 $39
TOTAL EXPENSES $1,774,485 $6,621 $147,874 $552Capital Expenditures
NET OPERATING INCOME (Excludes C.E.) $1,903,420 $7,102 $158,618 $592Expense Ratio 48.25%
DEBT SERVICEDebt Service-New Mortgage $1,395,791 $5,208 $116,316 $434MIP $118,541 $442 $9,878 $37Asset Management Fee $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Debt Service & Capital Expenditures $1,514,332 $5,650 $126,194 $471
Net Cash Flow after D.S. Distributions $389,089 $1,452 $32,424 $121
Debt Coverage Ratio 1.26
**Interest Rate include Loan Management Fee and Trust FeeLoan Management Fee will be $60,000
STABILIZED - FY 2017
C:\Users\jay.shepherd\Desktop\NALHFA RAD 6 Financials 3/20/2017
RAD Program Summary of Standard Finishes
Property Progress Photos
KENGAR
BEFORE
BEFORE
AFTER
AFTER
BEFORE
AFTER
BEFORE
PARKW
AYWOODS
AFTERIN PROGRESS
BEFORE
AFTER
PARKW
AYWOODS
AFTERBEFORE
BEFORE
BEFORE AFTER
AFTER
SANDYSPRIN
GM
EADOW
AFTER AFTER
AFTER
BEFORE
AFTER
AFTER
SENECA
RIDGE
AFTER
AFTER
AFTER
AFTER
TOWNECEN
TREPLACEBEFORE
BEFORE
BEFORE AFTER
AFTER
AFTER
WASH
INGTO
NSQ
UARE
BEFORE
BEFORE
WASH
INGTO
NSQ
UARE
AFTER
AFTER
AFTER
AFTER AFTER
10400DetrickAvenue,Kensington,MD20895(240)627-9400(Phone)|(301)949-4690(Fax)
MarylandRelayNumber:711(TTY)