![Page 1: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
2013-14 Data
Review
![Page 2: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Consecutive Year Grade Grouping ComparisonsREADING Proficiency
3rd to 4th 73% to 87% UP 14%
4th to 5th 69% to 62% Down 7%
5th to 6th 62% to 76% UP 14%
2012-13 to 2013-14
![Page 3: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Consecutive Year Grade Grouping ComparisonsMath Proficiency
3rd to 4th 76% to 63% Down 13%
4th to 5th 63% to 46% Down 17%
5th to 6th 62% to 72% UP 10%
2012-13 to 2013-14
![Page 4: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Where are we ranked within Clay County?
![Page 5: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
READING: 3rd : 6th 4th: 1st 5th: 17th 6th: 9th
MATH: 3rd : 17th 4th: 16th 5th: 23rd 6th: 9th
WRITING: 4th
SCIENCE: 14th
![Page 6: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
In READING, ROE 3rd to 4th Graders moved up 8 positions to 1st!In MATH, ROE 3rd to 4th Graders moved down 14 positions.
Reading Math0
5
10
15
20
25
Growth by District Ranking3rd-4th Grade Reading & Math, 2013-2014
20132014
![Page 7: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
In READING, ROE 4th to 5th Graders moved down 5 positions.In MATH, ROE 4th to 5th Graders moved down 8 positions.
Growth by District Ranking4th-5th Grade Reading & Math, 2013-2014
Reading Math0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Growth by District Ranking4th-5th Grade Reading & Math, 2013-2014
20132014
![Page 8: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
In READING, ROE 5th to 6th Graders moved up 8 positions.In MATH, ROE 5th to 6th Graders moved down 1 position.
Reading Math0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Growth by District Ranking5th-6th Grade Reading & Math, 2013-2014
20132014
![Page 9: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Learning Gains
![Page 10: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Roughly 70% of ROE 4th-6th graders made learning gains in reading.
4th 5th 6th0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percent of Students Making Learning GainsReading, Grades 4-6
![Page 11: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Roughly 2/3 of ROE 4th-6th graders made learning gains in math.
4th 5th 6th0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percent of Students Making Learning GainsMath, Grades 4-6
![Page 12: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Growth
of
Lower Quartile
![Page 13: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
4th Grade: 73% evidenced adequate growth.5th Grade: 60% evidenced adequate growth.6th Grade: 82% evidenced adequate growth.
![Page 14: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
4th Grade: 46% evidenced adequate growth.5th Grade: 65% evidenced adequate growth.6th Grade: 72% evidenced adequate growth.
![Page 15: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Let’s Put It
All Together!
![Page 16: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
READING RATES
PROFICIENCY 74%GAINS 72%LQ 78%
![Page 17: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
MATH RATESPROFICIENCY 61%GAINS 66%LQ 68%
![Page 18: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Writing Proficiency Rates
59% (L3.5)
4th in Clay County!
![Page 19: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Percentage of students scoring 3.5 and above on FCAT Writes. ROE made a 5% gain while the district and state made declines.
2013 20140
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
FCAT 2.0 WritingGrowth from 2013-2014, Percent ≥ 3.5
SchoolDistrictState
![Page 20: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Students scoring at Level 4 on the FCAT Writes at ROE decreased by 12 percentage points, while the district remained static and the state declined dramatically.
2013 20140
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
FCAT 2.0 WritingGrowth from 2013-2014, Percent ≥ 4.0
SchoolDistrictState
![Page 21: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
2013 20140
5
10
15
20
25
Growth by Rank in District Writing ≥ 3.5
ROE ranked 4th in the county!
![Page 22: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Science Proficiency Rate:
59%
![Page 23: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
School Grade 2014Proficiency %:Reading: 74 Writing: 59Math: 61 Science: 59
Learning Gains (Weighted %) : Reading: 72 Math: 66
Lowest Quartile % :
Reading: 78 Math: 68
![Page 24: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
537 POINTS!
![Page 25: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
8th in the county!
![Page 26: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
You did an“A”mazing job!!!
![Page 27: 2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032612/56649ec05503460f94bcbcd4/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
What do we need to work
on?