Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

T H O U S A N D

$834$3.6$31.5$5.4

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

Sequestration could cut a total of $41.3 million from federally supported research funding in Alabama next year.

ALABAMA

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N T H O U S A N D

$4.0 $704$1.5Sequestration could cut a total of $6.3 million

from federally supported research funding in Alaska next year.

ALASKA

T H O U S A N D

$61

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$10.9 $2.2$21.4Sequestration could cut a total of $35.1 million

from federally supported research funding in Arizona next year.

ARIZONA

T H O U S A N D

$613

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$2.6 $2.6$5.2Sequestration could cut a total of $10.7 million

from federally supported research funding in Arkansas next year.

ARKANSAS

T H O U S A N D

$103

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$91.3 $6.3 $128$381.9Sequestration could cut a total of $607.5 million

from federally supported research funding in California next year.

CALIFORNIA

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$30.1 $2.6$36.4Sequestration could cut a total of $71.5 million

from federally supported research funding in Colorado next year.

COLORADO

M I L L I O N

$2.4

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N T H O U S A N D

$584$50.5$6.3 Sequestration could cut a total of $58.2 million

from federally supported research funding in Connecticut next year.

CONNECTICUT

T H O U S A N D

$892

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$3.3 $1.1$4.6Sequestration could cut a total of $9.6 million

from federally supported research funding in Delaware next year.

DELAWARE

T H O U S A N D

$672

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

T H O U S A N D

$44.4 $261$20.6Sequestration could cut a total of $65.9 million from

federally supported research funding in District of Columbia next year.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

T H O U S A N D

$611

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

$18.5 $5.6$54.7Sequestration could cut a total of $80.8 million

from federally supported research funding in Florida next year.

FLORIDA

M I L L I O N

$2.0

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$13.1 $5.3$52.4Sequestration could cut a total of $72.4 million

from federally supported research funding in Georgia next year.

GEORGIA

M I L L I O N

$1.6

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N T H O U S A N D

$4.1 $940$5.8Sequestration could cut a total of $10.9 million

from federally supported research funding in Hawaii next year.

HAWAII

T H O U S A N D

$137

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

T H O U S A N D

$2.2 $964$1.3Sequestration could cut a total of $4.8 million

from federally supported research funding in Idaho next year.

IDAHO

T H O U S A N D

$345

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$26.4 $3.7 $113.3$80.6Sequestration could cut a total of $224 million

from federally supported research funding in Illinois next year.

ILLINOIS

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$2.4$24.9$13.2 Sequestration could cut a total of $42.4 million

from federally supported research funding in Indiana next year.

INDIANA

M I L L I O N

$1.9

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

$4.5 $3.5 $3.5$17.2Sequestration could cut a total of $28.7 million

from federally supported research funding in Iowa next year.

IOWA

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

$3.7 $2.5$10.3Sequestration could cut a total of $17.3 million

from federally supported research funding in Kansas next year.

KANSAS

T H O U S A N D

$814

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

$3.0$18.7$2.9Sequestration could cut a total of $24.8 million

from federally supported research funding in Kentucky next year.

KENTUCKY

T H O U S A N D

$191

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$3.8 $1.8$13.7Sequestration could cut a total of $19.8 million

from federally supported research funding in Louisiana next year.

LOUISIANA

T H O U S A N D

$527

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$3.0 $1.4$8.9Sequestration could cut a total of $13.3 million

from federally supported research funding in Maine next year.

MAINE

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

$35.2 $3.0$137.8Sequestration could cut a total of $177.7 million

from federally supported research funding in Maryland next year.

MARYLAND

M I L L I O N

$1.7

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

$6.4$1.0$259.8$45.2

MASSACHUSETTS

Sequestration could cut a total of $312 million from federally supported research funding in Massachusetts next year.

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

$19.8 $4.3$68.9Sequestration could cut a total of $105.6 million

from federally supported research funding in Michigan next year.

MICHIGAN

M I L L I O N

$12.6

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$7.9 $4.2$50.5Sequestration could cut a total of $63.6 million

from federally supported research funding in Minnesota next year.

MINNESOTA

M I L L I O N

$1.0

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$1.9 $2.6$4.5Sequestration could cut a total of $9.2 million

from federally supported research funding in Mississippi next year.

MISSISSIPPI

T H O U S A N D

$278

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$6.1 $3.2$54.5Sequestration could cut a total of $64.9 million

from federally supported research funding in Missouri next year.

MISSOURI

M I L L I O N

$1.1

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

$2.7 $2.5$4.7Sequestration could cut a total of $9.9 million

from federally supported research funding in Montana next year.

MONTANA

T H O U S A N D

$59

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

$3.1 $1.8$11.1Sequestration could cut a total of $16.6 million

from federally supported research funding in Nebraska next year.

NEBRASKA

T H O U S A N D

$596

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$2.0 $1.2$3.2Sequestration could cut a total of $6.4 million

from federally supported research funding in Nevada next year.

NEVADA

T H O U S A N D

$92

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

T H O U S A N D

$3.5 $601$9.6Sequestration could cut a total of $13.9 million from

federally supported research funding in New Hampshire next year.

NEW HAMPSHIRE

T H O U S A N D

$213

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$11.7$1.8$23.5$14.7 Sequestration could cut a total of $51.7 million

from federally supported research funding in New Jersey next year.

NEW JERSEY

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

T H O U S A N D

$4.1 $945$8.8Sequestration could cut a total of $14 million

from federally supported research funding in New Mexico next year.

NEW MEXICO

T H O U S A N D

$208

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

NEW YORK

$46.2 $4.1$236.9

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Sequestration could cut a total of $340.5 million from federally supported research funding in New York next year.

M I L L I O N

$53.3

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

$18.6 $6.1$126.2Sequestration could cut a total of $152.9 million from

federally supported research funding in North Carolina next year.

NORTH CAROLINA

M I L L I O N

$2.0

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

$1.4 $1.1$1.9Sequestration could cut a total of $4.4 million

from federally supported research funding in North Dakota next year.

NORTH DAKOTA

T H O U S A N D

$38

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$16.7 $4.8$73.5Sequestration could cut a total of $96.9 million

from federally supported research funding in Ohio next year.

OHIO

M I L L I O N

$1.9

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

$2.2 $1.9$8.6Sequestration could cut a total of $13.1 million

from federally supported research funding in Oklahoma next year.

OKLAHOMA

T H O U S A N D

$408

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

$14.0 $1.9$31.1Sequestration could cut a total of $47.2 million

from federally supported research funding in Oregon next year.

OREGON

T H O U S A N D

$260

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

$23.5 $3.8$162.9Sequestration could cut a total of $193.3 million

from federally supported research funding in Pennsylvania next year.

PENNSYLVANIA

M I L L I O N

$3.1

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

T H O U S A N D

$3.9 $847$17.4Sequestration could cut a total of $22.5 million

from federally supported research funding in Rhode Island next year.

RHODE ISLAND

T H O U S A N D

$419

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

$5.7 $2.7$17.7Sequestration could cut a total of $26.5 million from

federally supported research funding in South Carolina next year.

SOUTH CAROLINA

T H O U S A N D

$470

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

$1.3 $1.5$2.1Sequestration could cut a total of $5.1 million

from federally supported research funding in South Dakota next year.

SOUTH DAKOTA

T H O U S A N D

$208

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Sequestration could cut a total of $167.8 million from federally supported research funding in Tennessee next year.

TENNESSEE

$6.3 $3.8 $108.3$49.4

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

$37.5 $6.4$111.9Sequestration could cut a total of $159.7 million

from federally supported research funding in Texas next year.

TEXAS

M I L L I O N

$3.9

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

T H O U S A N D

$6.2 $842$20.5Sequestration could cut a total of $28.1 million

from federally supported research funding in Utah next year.

UTAH

T H O U S A N D

$598

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$1.7 $1.7$5.1Sequestration could cut a total of $8.5 million

from federally supported research funding in Vermont next year.

VERMONT

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

$14.0 $3.1 $13.7$37.3

VIRGINIA

Sequestration could cut a total of $68.1 million from federally supported research funding in Virginia next year.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

$13.9 $3.5 $19.9$93.8Sequestration could cut a total of $131.1 million

from federally supported research funding in Washington next year.

WASHINGTON

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$1.4 $1.5$3.1Sequestration could cut a total of $6.1 million

from federally supported research funding in West Virginia next year.

WEST VIRGINIA

T H O U S A N D

$101

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O NM I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

$9.3 $2.8$43.3Sequestration could cut a total of $59.5 million

from federally supported research funding in Wisconsin next year.

WISCONSIN

M I L L I O N

$4.1

To learn more visit sciencecoalition.org

Methodology: Estimates based on projected, non-inflation adjusted sequestration cuts of nine percent for non-defense spending applied to FY19 enacted funding levels (Center on Budget and Policy Priori-ties). Individual program projections based on DOE, NIH, NSF, and USDA FY18 grant awards and FY19 enacted numbers for DOE Office of Science funding by laboratory site.

Congress and the administration must act by October 1, 2019 to avoid across-the-board spending reductions to defense and non-defense discretionary spending. The sooner they reach a deal, the better it is for research agencies, America’s research universities,

and the efficacy of our nation’s scientific ecosystem.

Failure to reach an agreement could have serious implications for federal investment in scientific innovations and life-changing technologies.

Decreased funding has a very real impact for regional economies supported by these resources.

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 is right around the corner, and with it potentially devastating sequestration cuts to federally funded research. Nationally, sequestration would cut $5.1 billion from core federal research agencies that improve human health and well-being, create next generation energy technologies, support our national defense, and grow local economies, among other essential public benefits.

POTENTIAL IMPACT TO FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCY INVESTMENTS IN FY 2020

M I L L I O N M I L L I O N

S E QU E ST R AT I O N ’ S I M PAC T

T H O U S A N D

$1.5 $481$1.2Sequestration could cut a total of $3.4 million

from federally supported research funding in Wyoming next year.

WYOMING

T H O U S A N D

$270