Contractor: Research Triangle InstituteP. 0. Box 12194Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Title: Firefighters' CommunicationTransceiver Test Plan
Date: May 24, 2984
Type of Report and Contract Number:
Final ReportContract No. NAS 8-35816
Author: Robert J. Wallace
PREPARED FOR GEORGE C. MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER, ALABAMA 35812
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19850014543 2020-04-05T13:56:13+00:00Z
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
I. Introduction 1
II. Background 2
III. Testing the Fireground Radio Communication System . . . . 3
IV. Controlled Laboratory Testing of the Device 7
V. Testing the Intrinsic Electrical Safetyof the Device 10
VI. Operational Testing Critical Issues 11
VII. Field Tests of the Fireground Communication System ... 20
VIII. Post-Incident Survey Questionnaire 27
IX. Conclusions and Recommendations for FieldTest Implementation 31
Appendix A - Outline of EIA Standard RS-316-BMay 1979, Sections 2 through 5
Appendix B - Excerpt from Factory Mutual Research In-trinsic Safety Standard, "ApprovalStandard - Intrinsically Safe Apparatusand Associated Apparatus For Use in ClassI, II and III Division 1, Hazardous Location
Appendix C - Currently Available Ear Microphone Products
Appendix D - Study Contacts
I. Introduction
This document represents the results of meetings with representatives of
the U.S. Coast Guard and contacts with the U.S. Fire Administration to
identify the requirements for the operational testing of the Firefighters
Communication Transceiver. The major concerns of the firefighters and U.S.
Coast Guard Strike Team members centered around the integrity and reliability
of the firefighter/microphone interface. The technical characteristics of the
radio itself were of less concern. The major concern about the radio hardware
was that it be intrinsically safe in hazardous atmospheres. Another major
concern voiced by Lt. Glenn of the Coast Guard Atlantic Strike Team was that
the system not interfere with the fit or facial seal of self-contained
breathing apparatus (SCBA).
The single greatest concern for operational testing purposes was the
reliability and clarity of the line of communication between the firefighter
and those on the fireground with whom he must maintain contact. All
individuals interviewed cited several examples of the respective shortcomings
of existing microphone subsystems. An overall preference for the currently
available for the throat contact microphone was tempered by the need to use
tape or VELCRO neck bands to keep the microphone positively secured against
the throat. The Coast Guard Team members felt they would make the best judges
of the operational effectiveness of the final radio design. The Team stated a
desire to test any units developed in both training exercises and in real
responses to hazardous material incidents. Coast Guard Strike Team members
felt that a VOX-microphone built into the SCBA facemask would provide the best
performance. Short of this, the Team members expressed a desire to see a
better throat microphone that remained in place in spite of sweating and
without the need for taping or strapping. One new voice-pickup product of
particular interest is the "Earmic" available from KAVCO Industries of
California and TAD America in Hawaii. This device combines a bone conduction
microphone and a speaker into a single ear-mounted unit. The TAD America
device is certified as intrinsically safe and KAVCO Industries is
contemplating development of a VOX version of their "Earmic." The KAVCO
product is currently seeing successful use by the Huntington Beach, California
Fire Department.
II. Background
A "breadboard" version of a portable fireground radio has been developed
by REMIC Corporation to demonstrate the feasibility of producing a low-cost,
reliable, fireground communication system. The fireground radio was conceived
to provide the individual firefighter with automatic hands-free communications
between himself and his associates and his captain. The hands-free operation
of the radio is the major design requirement. Waterproof construction, light
weight, ease of operation, and reliable maintenance of the line of communica-
tion are other design objectives for the unit. The fireman's need to have
both hands free to carry out mission activities and provide for his personal
safety is clear cut. Securing a high level of firefighter confidence in
hands-free operation of the fireground radio will require very high reliabi-
lity in the voice-actuated microphone subsystem of the unit. Current portable
fireground radio units employ throat contact microphones (see Figure 1), boom
microphones, or bone conduction microphones when self-contained breathing
apparatus (SCBA) are worn. Problems with these alternative microphone systems
vary from the throat microphone slipping out of position to boom microphone
activation by loud external sources of sound, and other unique problems with
the conduction microphone. Improved design of the contact and conduction
microphones or replacement is necessary if the operational effectiveness of
2
the Firefighter's Communication System is to meet the stated requirements of
the firefighting population for whom it is targeted.
Among the human factors constraints placed on the communication system's
radio unit is its placement on the body of the wearer. The radio is to be
located inside the outermost layer of protective clothing. This means inside
the turnout coat of the firefighter and inside the outergarment (see Figures 1
and 2) of the U. S. Coast Guard's totally encapsulating Hazardous Chemical
Protective Ensemble (HCPE). Any vests, harnesses, or supporting straps must
compete for space with similar elements used for SCBA or found with inner
garments. The radio unit itself may compete with air hoses or cooling garment
components (e.g., the ice pouch) in the case of the Coast Guard's fully encap-
sulated suit (see Figures 2 and 3). Potential sites suggested by U.S. Coast
Guard Atlantic Strike Team members in order of preference include high on the
centerline of the chest in the area of the sternum, low on the front ribs, and
on the side of the thigh. Crowding was given as the reason for not preferring
a head mounted unit in the presence of SCBA and helmet straps.
III. Testing the Fireground Radio Communication System
The testing of the Fireground Communication System is divided into two
parts. One test series is established to measure device performance under
controlled laboratory conditions. The principal protocol for this test series
is taken from an Electronic Industries Association Recommended Standard for
portable/personal communication FM or PM equipment operating between
25-1000 MHz. Other subsystem specific tests will be proposed for different
items that make up the fireground radio. The second test series is based on
the actual use of the radio units by firefighting/strike force teams initially
engaged in training exercises and ultimately engaged in live responses to
fireground or hazardous material incidents. The vehicles for conducting the
3
ThroatMicrophone
FIGURE 1 - THROAT MICROPHONE/SELF-CONTAINED BREATHINGAPPARATUS COMBINATION
CLOSURE
ICE POUCHASSEMBLY
RELIEF VALVEASSEMBLY
EXPANSIONPANELS
FIGURE 2 - OUTERGARMENT DESIGN CONFIGURATION
or<oo
FIGURE 3 - COOLING GARMENT USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH TOTALLYENCAPSULATED HCPE.
field-based tests are an annotated communication log and a survey
questionnaire filled out by participating members of fireground test teams.
The details of the field test communication log and survey questionnaire will
be covered in a later section of this report. The following section
represents a general approach for the controlled laboratory testing of the
firefighter's transceiver.
IV. Controlled Laboratory Testing of the Device
For the purposes of the Firefighters' Communication Transceiver Test
Series, the scope and definition of the portable communications equipment is
taken to be that of EIA Standard RS-316-B (Revision of RS-316-A) May 1979.
"1.1 Scope—This standard details the minimum performance requirements
for portable/personal communicaton FM or PM equipments as defined in
paragraph 1.2, except temperature operating range of the power
source shall not be included. It excludes accessories like
chargers, power boosters, batteries, etc.
1.2 Definition--Portable/personal communications equipment are radio
transmitters, receivers, or combinatons of both, which can be
hand-carried or worn on the person, and which are operated from
their own portable power sources and antenna. Personal equipment is
further defined as that which is capable of being worn directly on
the person or within the clothing (e.g., surveillance or paging
equipments) and is, therefore, subject to less severe environments
than other classifications of portable equipment."
"Minimum Standards for Portable/Personal Radio Transmitters, Receivers, andTransmitter/Receiver Combination Land Mobile Communications FM or PM Equip-ment, 25-1000 MHz"
Also adopted for the controlled testing of the Firefighters' Communica-
tion Transceiver hardware are the paragraphs and subparagraphs of EIA Standard
RS-316-B. An outline of EIA Standard RS-316-B, Sections 2-5 is included in
this report as Appendix A.
The prototype radio assemblies developed under this program should be
tested using widely recognized standards for testing portable/personnel land
mobile radios. Most of the technical performance characteristics of the radio
will be tested in a laboratory setting in the first phase. These technical
characteristics are more or less covered by various available standards. Some
examples of standards or organizations whose standards have been used to
evaluate portable UHF transceivers similar to the fireground radio are
presented in Table 1 below.
Table 1Standards Which Have Been Used To Test Portable
UHF Transceivers and Transceiver Subsystems
TRANSCEIVER/SUBSYSTEM TEST FUNCTION
1. Transmitter/Receiver CombinationPerformance
2. Battery Pack/Internal Componentsintrinsic safety
ORGANIZATION/STANDARD
3. Radio/Battery Pack shock andvibration resistance
4. Radio/Battery Pack weather proofing
5. Rechargeable Battery Pack per-formance
EIA Standard RS-316-B May 1979
a) Factory Mutual ResearchCorporation, "IntrinsicallySafe Apparatus and AssociatedApparatus for Class 1,Division 1, Hazardous Loca-tions
b) NFPA Standard 493
EIA Standard RS-316-B May 1979
MIL STD 810-C (Driven rain test)
United Laboratories
The Firefighters' Communication System and Subsystem tests identified by
this minimum set of standards are to be superceded by more extreme fireground
requirements where ever greater performance was called for in the list of
desirable radio characteristics. Examples of more extreme requirements in-
clude:
1. Temperature extremes found inside the turnout coat or fully
encapsulated suit y_s standard temperature.
2. Full waterproof testing vs standard humidity.
The complete version of EIA Standard RS-316-B is incorporated by
reference as part of the controlled laboratory testing of the Fireground
Communications System Device. The standard is available from the EIA at the
following address:
Electronic Industries AssociationEngineering DepartmentStandards Sales Office2001 I Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20006Phone: (202) 457-4966
The test methods used to execute the test plan will be those explicitly
identified in EIA Standard RS-316-B or the other recognized methods identified
for the qualification testing of 450-512 MHz land mobile transmitter/receiver
combinations. Alternative test methods can be used when it can be shown that
excessive costs will be incurred in providing the test apparatus needed for
the test method identified. If a test method can be developed and shown to be
more suitable than the method specified in this test plan it may be
substituted as an alternative test method upon the written approval of NASA.
To gauge the variability in the capacity of fabricated Fireground Radios
to meet or exceed stated performance specifications it is recommended than ten
(10) units be put through the same battery of controlled laboratory tests.
The standard deviations for the measured properties will provide useful in-
formation on the repeatability in device fabrication techniques.
V. Testing the Intrinsic Electrical Safety of the Device
A major test procedure to be applied to the Firefighters' Communication
System device is the test for the intrinsic safety of the device under
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 493. NFPA Standard 493
establishes the "Standard for Intrinsically Safe Apparatus and Associated
Apparatus for use in Class I, II, and III, Division 1 Hazardous Locations."
Classes I, II, and III represent degrees of hazard for locations under the
National Electrical Code. Hazardous location Class I is the most dangerous.
New Firefighters' Communications System devices must be shown to provide at a
minimum the same intrinsically safe quality of portable communication devices
currently in use. Current U.S. Coast Guard portable/personal transmitter/
receiver combinations carry a label stating that the devices are
"Intrinsically Safe for Class I, Division 1, Groups C & D."
The U.S. Coast Guard need for intrinsic safety in their portable/personal
transceivers follows from the dangers of explosive atmospheres often produced
by hazardous materials incidents. Lower explosive limit (LEL) and permissible
explosive limit (PEL) for various hazardous materials is used by the Coast
Guard in determining a response to a hazardous material incident. Another
Coast Guard measure of hazardous atmospheres is the determination of
"Immediate Danger to Life and Health (IDLH)." In the presence of this type of
atmosphere, self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) and fully encapsulated
10
suits are donned to protect the guardsman. Such situations require a con-
tinuous positive facepiece-to-face seal for the SCBA. Any microphone sub-
system, whether contact or bone conduction, must never cause or contribute to
a break in the facepiece-to-face seal or in a break in the closure of the
fully encapsulated suit.
VI. Operational Testing Critical Issues
The Operational Testing of the Fireground Radio Communication System will
be divided into six broad types of critical test issues. Effective treatment
of these issues will provide a thorough coverage of all areas of concern to
the firefighter or the strike team member. The six types of critical issues
include:
1. Mission performance
2. Human factors, safety, health
3. Survivability
4. Reliability, availability, maintainability
5. Training
6. Interoperability
Table 2 lists the six types of critical issues along with associated sets
of performance attributes and the criteria for measuring the issues.
11
I/)cu3tnini — i
4_>tnCU
\—
, —roc0
.fjroi.cuQ,
CD
1—
na• r—+J• r—J_
<_3
.CM
o>oro
i—
c
-ao.e4-*cu
4_>incu
1—
cu3tnin
J- 1-10
f
ro 4->•r-s- encu c.
4-} •»""•r- S-S- 3
c_) inrocus:
S-0
Q.CU ••-0 S-c oro mE cuS- Qo
if- CUi- 4->CU 3
Q- .0.
ll[ *4->
incu3
int— i
, —roo
• r—4->
(Ic_>
O
C -MfO fO
3
s- 'roo >
4~> CUro$- -oO r—n curo T-
— 1 <4-
-ocro
Q. tn3 C
S- O>, CU-i-— TJ 4J•I- C •!-
1- 3 13o c4->/-^ 0U 4-> Oro <4-t- TJin CD CU•i- LT> T34J cn curo r-t o.in ECU in c4J S- 3ro cuS- 4-> >>CU CU i—O- E CUo >
O •!-
r- 0 4->—• VD roro r—-C O OJ<~r> 4-> i-
cuencro
tnco
•r—1 *
rouc3E
OO
cu(_>
roC Eo t-i- Oin >i-in J-r- CUs: Q-
f
I— 1
^^^—cu
cu cur— 4J_a inro
•*— ^>r~~ J— •
CU O CUJ- 4-> J-
in 3<4- 4->O O U
I— 1 3CU S-
t— ro 4-*.0. inro cQ.-I- enro.ccU 4J -r-
•r- TJCU ? i—-Q T-
CU 3o u .ain c
<— ro curo E 4->
£- CU•— 0 J-r— <4- <Jro s- c-c cu om o. u
cu1 Cro >> c^ ^^ oi- >, incu cu cu s-in > i- cuJ3 S- -.- Q.o 3 ro
in c enTJ C Ccu c o -r-
t- -Jj roO C tn S-u o cu cucu -f- 3 a.
QC 4-> cr o
c•r- 1
ro m>> u ci 1- Oi— <*- -r-3 •<— in
•4- s_ inin cu -i-w > ECU inU CU Cu c ro3 O i-in 4-> 4-> in
cu cuCU T3 CU T34->-r- «J Oro tn -i- ES- 0«u -c: > xO-4-> OO ••-£->
2 cui— m -ai— CU 3 Cro "o ro.c o M-tn E o t—
t—4-> -C C Q-•r- O Oc ro T- c
=3 CU 4-> -r-
^^X
C 0^^0 > 1—
4- *">ro "o ^ — 's- cucu 4-> -*: >,Q. ro r- •—o 3 ro c
4-> 4-> OCU U 1-a ro o cuO 1 4-> >E CU 1 -i-i u -c cucu -i— m ucu o 3 cus- > a. a:
I— i i i
co
' 3ro3
r—
ro>cu^>t_0
roS-oJ3roi
*%enc
ro •!-C 4Jc cuCU -r-4-> 3c crro
034-> -aro
CD
r—O ?> *^— oS- r—u ro
•r- C£ ••-
ErH S-
CUV 4-»
>^4_)• r->
•r-4^• r—tnc01tn
5-ai
•r—CUucua:
co
«r-4_>
ro>S-cuinJDO
M"T~
s:•
P^»^~i
CDLO•=1-
cu.c4_>
4^
rotnO)•^ocCU T33 Ccr rocu .aS-
<+- LJ_a:
inco
4_>
roU tn
•f— r—C CU3 CE Ce roO -Co o
1E
>1 01 JQ Ue~io in TJ
c cT3 O 3eu -r- o
-0 4-> S-t- ro eno > cu0 S- S-CU CU •!-
Q£ tn 4-
CU r—ja >>ro
i— Ci— o> en•—>•<-ro -i- tn<~ 4^in ro T3
i — Cm cu roc s-o
•r- S- in4J CU Cro ~a oO C -r-
•r- 3 4-»C •!-
3 5- T3E ro cE CU 0O r— Uu o
T3-O T3 CUcu c -a> ro cu•^ oCU T3 EO 3 •!-
cu o cQZ. I 3
c tno cu
4-> Uo. ccu cu0 3cu o-S- CU\ J-c >*-o -am ro roin .Q
• l-~ >.E 4J Cin -i- •!-c s- .cro ro 4->S- • 1-
) — o 5
cu•a•f—roinc0
4->roo
• r—C3E
CU
r—r—
ro-f~in
CUenroS-cu>0urocccu4->Cro^^c•^ens_roE
tnco
tf—4_)rouc3EEOU
enc. oO r—
Iinc
c ro0 S-
O -4-J
0 O- CUs- cu ena. u ro
cu tn&S s- mLD CUen cu e
r—CU <^ CU
•O-r- 0
> ••- oO i— >S- r—O- CU T3
4-> Co c o4-> -i- U
cu4J H— tnC 0CU LT>
"'"' 5*1 CU 4-> >> 0•r- T- C -r-"4—1 — ro in<4— -i— in3 <""* *+— »r~ifl ro o E
c0
+J r—ro ro3 tn o E
r—
ro>cu
^JS-0
ro0
ro
-~
mr~ <4—
0 0• 4-> TJr_> ccu roi- JD•^
TJ >>1 U
•r- CC CUE 3O O~
CUCU S-
J3 «*-
r— CUr— S-ro •!-f~ 4^in c .
cu ccu oen cu •(-ro ^= 4->s- 4-> ro0) S-> S- CU0 0 0 .
<_> "*— O
tnc0
4_>
rou cu
•r- enc ro3 S-E CUE >O Oo o
S~^ f- •!- S-
4J CU TJ O- 4-> ro cc .c s_ \o en *=
c_> ••- TJ enCU 3 -Ct- 0•^ j- ro
cu /-^CU t- rHr" »r-
4-> <*-
-C= CU •4J TJ TJ in•r- S- 3 C~$. ro i— o
0 <J "-C ^2 C 4->0 TJ -r- U••- ro c4-> CU CU 3ro i- tn f-t- -Q CUcn= _c cuCU 1— 4->4-> cu roC JZ >
•r- 4-> • *^in 4->
i- C E Uo -i- cu ro
*4— 4-^TJ T- CU
TJ CU 4->CU f- 4-> Oen ro m Ei- CU CU CUro O.4J s-4J O-
ro i — **~^E ro roCU 4-> C4-> O 0 T3m c -i- c>, 4-> ro
to cu ro> s- -
in ro cu cuc .c o. co o o
•r— ^^ 4-*4-> to inro LU ro enu oi c
•r— H- 1 T3 ' ~C U_ CU C3 v-'TJ S-e 3 roE E r— 5o cu u0 4-> C >,
in ••— oro >> c
to c cui- cu enO 4-> CU S-
u— f- o niCU E
tn E 4-> CU4-> O- OC T- C Ccu 3 roE cr cuCU LU > -vj- ro CNJ
•r- CU -C3 ino~ c o .cQ) O tn us- O- 4->
in TJ •<->> cu c 5i — a: ro inS-ro TJ m cuCO CU CU TJ
4-> -r- Or- ro •— Ero i- jii- en E t-cu cu cu cu> 4-> in ^cu c in o
co i— i ro o.
• •LLJ
O•z.
.- i,
+Jc0
s^^
1/5cu~Tinin
i— i
-PinCU
I—f—tOco-P10i-coQ-O
r—too
• r—-P• t—£_
£_)
CM
CUr—
JO10
1—
~oojz:-pcu^~
-pl/lCO
1—
CO3inin
t- i — io4- CO
fO -P
Z. cncu c:•i- £S- 3co in
<oCO
$-o-pQ.
CU T-
(J S-C Uto inE CUi- f 1
o4- COS- -PCU 3
Q- JO
t!-P-P
inCU3inin
1—1
P~.10
•p
5-co
TJCU4JC=CUE C3 *r—i- --P T-in c:c to. . «—
CO1 <C
E c coO O ID5- in4-5-4-
co o>> 0--p in•f- -p -pin cu cc cu cuCO E E
-P CUC •— J-
• f— r— *r—fO 3
•o -c crr— in cuCU i-
•r- fO4- C T3
C S-T3 CO toCU -P M-P c totO O3 JZ i-H
•r— •"O CU •— LT)fO - " OJ O"i
0£. -p C CO
s-cuS-10cu^o
-atoMtoJZ
coi *10
-oIOoz
-JCin -pS- r—O re•P CUU JZto4-
C -Pto cue 4-3 (O
CM
c0
-0 •!-
C 4J(O fO
3^">r>~4- IOO >-P CUtoS- T3O r—o <otO ••"
— 1 <4-
inc
•a ocu •«-•p -p•P O•r- E
-P r—3 IOO CJ
•p—1 » (/}
0 >>
£ a.1/5 incu -S- S-
cu•p -po szC O)
r^ 4—i— CU10 J-f~ »r—
CO *4-
f~+-) to•r- C5 o
.,—
CO -Po oC ECUJ- i—CU 034- US- •!—
cu m•p ^>C J^
I-H Q.
c0
•a •!-f~ 4_>to m
3^»^—S- 100 >•P CU10j- -oO r—
JO CUIO •!-
s-o
4—o
cucu >S- •!-
3 -P</) Oo cu
r— -P(J O
S--P Q.U•i- 4-S- 0^^in in0) CUJ- r-
(J-P T- -P
o -p cC S- CU
(0 E>— o.la c 3j= -^ a-CO JO CU
-C.p• r^
^CU(J -pc c.at cui- ECU O.4- •!-
S- 3CU CT•P CUC
•r- CU>
»^ -r-tO -PU «J
•r- CDin -p>> ojr s-Q- a.
co
-o-.-C -P10 to
3^>^"~s- too >-P CUtoj- -aO r—
JO COIO -r-_J 4-
1
^ a>in ctO -r-E -C
cu toJZ CU-p i-
JO4^
<J 4-fO OO-E r—•i- to
CU-P in inO 3C CO -P
a to•— to S-i— 4- tOfO 1 Q-J= 0 Q-CO -P IO
J^4^• r—
^COuc inCU 3S- -Pcu to4- £-S- tOcu a.•P O-c to• t—
C75•— cIO •!-
U J=
in to>> cuJ= S-f^ f^
C 10 •«-
•r- T3 -P4-> c infO 3 CO3 O -P
f— J_tO O5i —> CO COco J- c in
•r- C i—-a 4- o to1 — I/) ••-
CO T3 S- C•r- C 0) 0U- IO OL E
COcnto
cu in_£3 ~^
r— COr— 4^>to o-C Ein o
S-0 0-
•5 T303 CS- IO
-a coC i—~i f^
o toS- -Pcn 0.a> coS- 0
•r- Ou_ to
COucto4->a.COuu
4^CCU
^cuJ_3inrOCUE
CUCLtoH-
0) >^E •—3 i—
,— 30 4-
i-E 03E -P
• r- 10 -PC O -r-
•r- (J 3E «/>
>> 3 -aa. o cu3 C 4->U i- IO0 3 •—O -P 3
in•— S- 0-r— CU fOtO T3 O
JC C CCO 3 Q)
CUNl
«f—CO
cuuc10
fOo
1 —-p•r—
*O)
CO
05
inr-oc(0J=p1/5 /•*">inCU in
r™~ }r—
f~C7)uO
•r— .a> i—i^ ^— •
-PJZcn•f—(U
co
•r—-P033»^to>CU
-aP—CO
•p-u_
-oc(O
O J= S-m cu
^> 4_>•a JQ 3CO OO COfO r— CU
a. to ••-S- 4J
CO CO (J-Q CL CU
0 4->r- 0r— CO J-10 J- Q-J= 03in cu
^>^ f~in cu -P
<— jc: -po -P cu cj- ~o cu-P -P T- Ec. 03 in J-O J= C 03co -P T- cn
-pcCOEcou03
r—
CL
inf—0S-4^Co
co
•r—-P<TJ3
r—to>
CO
•af—CO
u_
cur—r^ r^03 03 T3S- C COCU S- t-Q. CU T-O -P 3
X CT-V <U CUr— S-03 O•p c co -P1 JO Co •- co+J in •— e1 CU r— d.
J= > 03 T-
in o J=. 33 <— in CTCL CD CO
inT3 >> C COC > O -PfO O3 •!— O3
CU -P S-CO J= (J COE cu a.3 JZ C Or- 4-> CO -r- O O> 3 u -P
>^4_>• r—r—• r—JO03£-CUQ-O
inr—oJ-
4_2dO
^^p
co^_J
13
T3O
ai
ina)
oo
ina>3in
inO)
reco+Jre01o.o
reu
a>3ini/>
S- >-iO
«t- atre
<u05c
•r- S-$- 3
c_j inreOJ
OI
re
s-o
4->Q.
O) -r-O ^C Ore mE a>J- Qo
<4_ <DS- +-><U 3
Q- .a
inQJ3inin
reU
in +->s- .—o re-M a>u .cre
cre ai cE i- o3 re un; in ^
co
' 3re3
r—
re>01-aO>
""
•OO)C
• r—
Ec i-
•r- O)+J
O) O)E T3
•4-> O)
M-<4- 00 -(->T^
l/lt- ^Oo c
oc uO O)o in
O)E
•r—
^_
o
coo
co
'£>re3
^—re>0)
-aO)
u_
O)
•4_>
i — l/>r— •*—re 5-C +Jin m
-T34-> -C Cu u reo) re -c
•i—) QJ<^ t- ^~3 -4-Jin - o
f^ O
-0 EQ) -i- O54-> r— C•i- (J •!-3 inin o 3
4_>
^> r™~r— oi :si— - re3 ^2 S-u. re o
^.t•_5os:
cO 1
•r~ OI-»-> S-
c in i— t•i- re coE 0) Zre E <tXO) O) J-
Q. O)i— re Q.re -(-> ro
in T3 C CT>•r- c: oi CO> re E M
>> CLi — 3 in.— . O)re u M
•^ »r— *r—u Q. in0)Q. O) i—in u < —O) •<- re
OT3 > 4->C *r—re s- t-
oE^-v 4->O) "O in
+-> C 3in re E^^U) 0) >,
C 0)O) O O4-> -C i—0) Q. 0
t— O CQ. £- J=E <J UO •!- OIc_> e -P
_,_>• r—
c0
' Jre3
r—re>o>T3
O)• r—LL.
0-t->
1 T3 •O O) >,i- C= i-O. OS 3
•r- T-JT3 in cC 0) -r-re -o
iin o) o)
r— .a c:o cS- r— 0
-»-> • — inc: re s-O -C O)u tn a.
r— in O)re c -aC 0 3t- •!- .—
a; </) u-l-> 3 OIX S- t-
LU +J O.
S-3
C
>.
•ao
CO
Pcoo"
14
, s
•P
C0CJ
inO)3inin
h-H
[ *
inOl
1—r—toco
toS-OlQ.O
1—
<oo
•r—4_>•r—5-
C_>
.C\J
<D^~oto
1—
c.
-ao-C
Ols:+jinO)
1—
Ol3inin
5- l— iO4- Ol
JZ(O -P
si ono» c•P T-•i- S-i- 3cj in
toO)
i-o
4_>Q.
Ol •!-CJ £-C l_>to inE 01^ "^o
M— <DS- 4JOi 3
P\_ ^^.,—
5-+J-P<c
inOl3IOin
h- 1
1ou
• -p
i
o4_)
tO3
toOl
T£Jf^
Ol• r-LJ_
^-J3
T3Ol•o•r—
>O inS- -4->o. c
OlC Eo s-
••- to•P D5(J0) 5--P Ol0 -Pi- 3
Q- 0
01J-3in0Q.X
UJ
-r—• r--Qto
i-3
CO
CO
C0
4_>
to3
to>Ol
•oOl
• r—u_
Ol^2o
Ol•4-•r—
^—
0>o
• r-
>S-OlIO "O
Olt- c0 T-
E10 i-i- Ol10 -POl Ol>- -a
^^^>•f—r—• j—J3toi.30
~i— 3c to•r- -P TJ 0fO C Ol 1 •!-S- Ol J- C T3
E 3 0 fOc c a) u s-0> 0 -r-> i- <4- Ol C
•r- -r- C S- OJ- > O 3
T3 C O -P C> — » oi in o
S- -r- -^S- - Ol O -POl ^^Q E to5 -P E inO 10 fO i- C-C Ol -C O OlCO 4-> U <4- TD
0)4^
fO
ID
s-oO t-t
IH-•a
c co to
• r—
IO CJs-oO) CSJE 00E
•r- C• r—
IOoi in> Ol•i- -P> 3i- C3 •!—
CO E
<+—
0OS-Q.S-Ol
4_>to
co
T3Ol
C3OE
+_>
•r—C
O)^~a>>01
ctoE3r~
04_>
r—to3CT
UJ
OlUCfO+Jin
• r—coOlS-
Ol_^oECO
T3f~fO
4^
toOl
C in•r- •>-> S--^ to O•i- Ol -Pc .c to i—tO S— toE O Ol -P
-P C C•a oi oioi ~a 01 E•P O) CC in oi ooi o -*: s-E Q.O-^ S-3 X E > 0)s- oi in c ^3-P Ol ECO T3 T3 toC C C C .C•I- tO 03 -r- U
.f_)inOl
a.os_T3
-aS-10T3CIO
^_>
CO
ex0 CUs- u•a to
4—-P S-O 3o cn
H—O)
CM +JrH 01
S-01 a> c•i- O> uj-3 O
CO -P
co
•r—
^>fO&_f^
• r->
-oC7tosX
UOf*
CO
co
•r--Pto3
fO
CU
•aOl
• r—
LL.
O)c
O) f^s- -o•i- C<«- to
-Cr—IO T3E CS- 10OC 10
1 >
in u-P fOa. a.01 EU •!-
ufO T3
C-P 3•r- 0c s-^3 0)
Ol0Cto-Pin
•r—inOlS—
Olin3-Qto
r—fOuin>^f~Q.
15
^^.pco
\^s
COOl3
CO1-H
coOl
t
roc:o
cos-O)Q.Or_
roU
•r—[ *.
£_( ^
.
C\J
Ol
o
ro1—
c
-ao.cOl^~i *COOl
1—
Ol3coCO
J- 1-HO
M— O>f-
CO -!->
u cnOl C
•r- i-S- 3
CJ CO
Ol
S-oa.
Ol -r-U J-c uCO COE 01S- Qo
M- Ols- -P01 3
Q- jQ•r-£-1 »[ *
<c
COat3coCO
i— i
, —COCJ£
S-CJ
O 1•r- C.3 •!-
•P COco E cn
•— oro -p i —> c:Ol Ol Ol
E UT3 O- C
Ol 3 C•r- cr oiu_ a> -t->
iai
1 1Ol 3U OC -Cco cnE 3S- OO 5-
S- -P OlOl *4-Q. CO -i—
i — Cr— Ol O)CO E CJ
O) •!—+ - > £ _ >Ol •!— t-
Ol 3 OlS cr co
COOlS-3
• r—CO CO
M- -Pc
C Ol COl E OO) O) T-
•P CJ O) CO i— i —O) CO 3 CO C COo o c -P -P O S—
O CJ 1 1 OOl >>••- CO O Ol CO -PE S- -P 1 -P > C CJ
•i- Ol CO Ol 1 -r- C co OlI i 1 * ^ (j r~ rjj Ol Ol C
+J +J .r- CO CJ -P S- CC c a u O 3 O ) C ' i - O
ats: i i iii
->;-i > «!-— <•">•i- i— COi— -i- C•r— f"* -r—f"> CO CO
•1- Ci— ra -i-Ol > CO0± ca E
j-
-ar—
01• r—t|_
T3CCO
>>S-o
^_>
COt-oJ3CO_l
^_r—
3(4..
EO£-
<4^
COS-30J=
CNJ
1 *
COCOOl
-!->
EO&-
M-
CO
• -+JrOS-0)a.0
co3O3C
•r-4_>CO
c0
4_)
m3^—ro>Ol
i >"r~ ^>E -!->CO 3c -aros- >>
4-> J3T3
0 rrjl-l -!->
COCO
^^cnoC 00
E -3 OlCO >CO -i—ro Ol
CJ0> Oicn s- o>£- r—co >§ o-C 0 >,CJ i-H CJ
^J^—O-o.3CO
t-Ol
0O-
>>t-Ol4^4_>CO
(~o
• r—) >
CO3
r—CO>0)
T3^—01•^LL-
aicn co. /^^ CO
at at .a^-^ f~
o -aCO -C CS- Q. 3•r- 0 0
CO S- i-o. cj cnOl •!-
s- E -»->CO
+J *.
C. CO T3oi c atE C EOl Ol i-CJ -P 0CO C <*_
.— CO J-p ajOl - O-5- >>
S- Olcj oi .a
• +->CO +J CCO CO CO
CQ JO CJ
Ol S-S- -^CO CO3 o.-a ois- s-co-C +J
c>, 0)t- ECO Ol
1 — (J«— ro•r— r—0 0-c oi<c s-
co c•r- 04-> T-CO •»->3 CO
r— >ro S-> OlO) CO
JOT3 Or^oi -a
•i— CU_ (TJ
>>
^~CO Ol
•r- CJCJ '1-
Ol Of~^ >co01 S-
0
r~ " 3CO C
COEOl Ol+•) *""CO O>^-C
co O-
0) 1-4-> CJOl T-
r— EQ.E 0)0 -C
CJ -P
f
O• r—
-PcOl-POlo:
-PC COo oi•r- -P•Pc. -aOl Ol•P -POl -Pi- -i- coi *+— -PC -P CJ0 3 01c o ••—>
r*t*^~ ^^ 3O JQ 10
C•r- <+-
CO OEOl T3S- 0
•P £—CO Ol 133 O- CE 3
^^ 3 t-cn o cnO -C Ol
•— cn s-0 3-r-
C O *^-jr s-U f^ <~a> -*-> o
o ^^Q. a -P3 CO 'i-
i— >
CJ -P• t— r- (jO-'i- CO
COT3 CC 0CO •>-E -PE coO OCJ •!-
C•0 3C E3 EO OS- CJcnOl -Pt- CO
•i— O
1 >»•i- co OlCJ C > >,c o s- .a
•r- •!- 31 -P CO O)
•P <O S-CO > C -r-0 t- 0 COa. oi cco -a c"O r^ Ol OC O t3 ••-ro J- -P
-P O COcn c u a>O Ol O) 3
u_ o-<— ~a t- cr
iCOCJ
• f—(~ QJ
3 -CE -PEO CCJ 0
M— i —O Ol1 COl Cc o
•i— COr— I—
01Ol O.
-P J=-P
**— 'l~o 5CO CCO OO T-
—4 -P
COC0
•r—<4_>
COCJ
•r—C3EEOCJ1
* -o1Olc
•r—_l
J_O T3 CO-P C i—
3 3 OLOl O CJ 33 S— *r— ^T3 D)-P CJ
Ol S- •!-
O> S- CO O_JO -r- O_ |
<4- Ol-p -c <j0 01 -P-i-C ^ ••— O
•P X >
f— <4- -P OlCO O C= JZf~ Q) +->co Ol E
5- Q. C
C r— 33 -i- cr coO CO Ol 'i~J- <4- COcn o coOl cO-i- JZt- -a a.••- 0 ro E<4- -P S- Ol
>,i-^JcOl
T3f- ^~3 OlO CJ- CO) OOl COS- S-
• - O)<t- Q.
O•i- Ol-a -c
Ol £--c -a•P O) C
j= ra--P
EOl ** CO+•} co E •co E Oi E>> O) -P OlCO -P CO -P
J3 co >> co3 >> co >>CO CO JO CO
O " \ <->
>> 3 CO 3cn co coO cor- >,•— COo s- o c:c: at s- c:x: -P -P oiU -P C 4->Ol CO O C-P JO U CO
^^PcoCJ
16
•oo
O)
01O)
co
0)
I/)in
in<l)
roco
ros-O)Q.O
rou
CM01.nro
o>3inin
S- (—1o
ro +->•i—S- O)O) C
•I- uS- 3o in
roO)
s-o
Q.O) •!-«J S-C Uro 10E O)S- QoS- +-»O) 3
Q- J3
ind)
inin
rou
S-CJ
s- inO <U
OJ Ul -»->
O 5TD -C inS- +Jro <u TJ
T3 E 0>C i—ro o) ro
-»-> c 01I/) -I— U)
coo
in
U
co
ro i/>O) r—in o
t-> c
•r- O-t-> U•r-in "OO c
CL. ro
01urocOJ
ro
<uinro
LU
•i- JD•r-,— roi C
.Q ro ro -f-5
ro r— +j -•i- -r- C C•— ro -i- oo> > ro <_>o: ro E ^—'
17
/• N
_(_)_
C0
f 1s^^*
inat3inini — i+jinOJ
1—r—roCo
roS-<3Ja.o
roO
•i—4J• "s-0
.eg
OJr^
_Qm^~—
^o0-ci \•CL)
S
in<Uh-
ai3U)i/j
S- I— I0s- <ufO 4-)•r-
S- 0)<u c
-4-* *r—-r- t-t- 3
C_) COT3aj2:
s_oex
a> -i-0 S-C 0ro inE 0)i— *~^O
*+— OJi- 4->CD 3
Q- JQ• r—t-+j
<c
inCD
inin
rou
•r*
i.<_>
Co
•<-"fO
f-
inJDO
-c:(Oa.E
r— OfO U 4->3 o a>c ra m<oE 0 0
-!-> -r-in -a
— "O ros- a> s_o s-4-> ro T3rO Q. CS- OJ 3O) S- Oa. Q. s-O O5
OJ OJo .0 J-
•1— •!—
^3 ^^ ^~ro •—C- ra OJ
JC. .<C in •(->
r—to3c:(0F
in_s-o
4_>roS-OJexo
enccroS-
LO
co+J(O3
r—(O
OJ
73
"aj• r—U_
0)
<OOJ -!-> ra
<<- J3 S-O O OJ
r- CX J-c: i— -r-O (O O5 3•r- x: c cr+j in -i- ajro -!->$_s- o inO> T- ••- T3 C3)CXt3 X C CO ro OJ ro -i-
t- COJ *"" C *r—
-C T3 -(-> O ro-l-> C •!-•!- S-
3 ^ 4J -4->CO ro
O)»— OJ Oen ai JD exc $- ••- o E•i- •<- 4-> 3C t«- to o E
•r- CX-«- T-rO OJ E T3 Cfc. -C 0 ro ••-
1— +J 0 J- E
O)E
^_)
O)c
.,—c:
•r~rat-
1—1
18
X^s
_4_)_
C0
C_)\^^
v>OJrsi/)ini__i
+jU>O)^_
r—03<~O••-
03i-OlQ.O
, —03(J
+j•r-S-
f ^
.CNJ
01r—
.Q03
1—
C
-ao.e4->Ols:4_>inOl
1—
0>3inin
i- i— iO
4— Olf~
03 4J•i —S- O)Ol C
+-* *l~~•1- i.i- 3
r_> in03O)s:
S-o
4_>
Q.0) ••-a i-C. 003 inE OlS- Qof- 01S- -»->Ol 3
<"* 1^ '• r—i.
<c
inOl3inin
i— i
03O
£
O•a ••-C +J03 03
3^>*"^i- 03O >•(-> Ol03$- -oO i—O Q)
03 •!-
—1 4-
Ol
-1-*I H—C 0 <CO CQ
C I/)i- -r-O -^ <4—
03 OOl Olt- S- r-01 ja 03s- oi5- oi in0) J=.
•»-> 4-> Olc u
•r- O 03-P 4-
-fj 1O Ol Of~ ^_> _}
3 1-»-> JD -in -i- in3 S- (T3s: -i-> E
_c4_}•r—30)(JcOlS-Ol4-s_Ol4^c
••- <cC COo oZ 1/1
JD03S-01a.oS-Ol
c1—4
Id
co
T3 •!-C -P03 03
3
^^r—i- OJo >
+-> Ol03s_ -aO i—o oi03 ••-
1 T3O Ol O)E -0 C
Ol > •!->.C 0 J=-t-> fc. O)
Q-'i-0> H-m c oi••- 0 S-£ *|— •!—
0 •(-»*-$- 0a. c o>E 3 >0 H- -r-(J 4->
i. U+J O O) OlO +J .—C >, 0 J3
-!-> S- E•t-> -r- a. oiin < — in3 -r- >, CS -Q -Q Ol
^ 4J+-> -C•i- O)
«flOl Ol(J J-c: -r-Ol <f- OlS- •—Ol Ol X)
S- > ES- -r- OlOi •P in
•(-> (J CC Ol Ol
•r~ •PC O O )0 i- CZ O--«-
O)c•i- Ct- 03 -r-
T3 -P03
C 3O r—•i- fO4-> >03 01>£- -0Ol i—in oi<~> »r-0 M-
,.|2XOl "O
01.£= C4-> c in•^ 03 ES i— oi
r"» j_>Oi in
•— E >,.a S- in•r— Ol -Q4-> 4-> 3o3 inQ- S-E 03 T3O Ol CU C 03
O) "O m.0 C E
0] 01+J -(->in 01 in3 C >,2: -i- in
^^4^•r—i—
•r—<^
• n-4_>
03a.EO0
*
19
VII. Field Tests of the Fireground Communication System
The operational testing of the Fireground Communication System in the
field will entail the use of two test documents, an annotated communications
log and the post-incident survey questionnaire. The communications log will
be maintained by the communications aide(s) to the overall incident commander.
The communications aide in conjunction with front-line personnel will
coordinate for the pre-donning checkout of radio units during the breakout of
equipment. The pre-donning checkout consists of a check test of all fire-
ground radio controls, switches, indicators, and connectors. The radio
elements to be tested include:
1. Antenna connection2. Battery connection3. Battery light4. Busy lamp5. Channel selection switch (6 settings)6. Power/volume switch7. Receiver squelch8. Mode selection switch (3 settings)9. Speakers10. Microphone connection11. Microphone(s)
Simple voice transmit and receive tests will be conducted between pairs of
radio units as part of pre-donning checkout. Any malfunctioning radio will be
replaced by a working unit and the identification and apparent source of the
unit's malfunction will be recorded and later verified. A running log of
modes of failure will be maintained through the operational field testing.
The results of the malfunction log will be tabulated and used to identify
areas of unacceptable subsystem performance.
The resources used to execute the operational field tests include the
response team personnel, the firefighters protective ensemble (including fully
encapsulated suits where called for), six to ten fireground radio units,
20
self-contained breathing apparatus, and all appropriate supporting equipment
(i.e. ladders, hoses, hand tools, fire suppression equipment, etc.). The
response team is divided between the members of a command post and the fire-
ground personnel.
The members of the command post includes the overall incident commander,
sector officers, (responsible for specific areas of the fireground or specific
fire ground functions) and aides. If small response teams are used for
operational testing of the fireground radio the overall incident commander
(i.e. fireground commander, site safety officer, local on-scene coordinator)
will be directly in the communications test loop. This commander is supported
by a communications aide who logs the voice transactions involved in the
operational test. If a large response team and up to ten (10) radios are
involved in the test the commander may delegate communications
responsibilities wholly to sector officers. A large test team may require an
additional assistant to share the work load of the communications aide. The
minimum field test team should consist of six people, two (2) fireground entry
people, two (2) backups for the entry pair, one commander or officer, and one
communications aide. Each test team member is provided with a radio unit. In
both training exercises and real incident scenarios different functional
communications modes are allocated among the channels available. Standard
fire ground communications procedures and scripts will be prepared for each
functional communications mode, for example ladder company communications vs
rescue company or hazarouds materials team communications. Local department
custom will determine the specific format of messages and responses between
front-line firefighters, between firefighters and command posts, and between
firefighters and fire suppression apparatus personnel. Development of com-
munications procedures will be the responsibility of the communications
21
officer who would also select the operators for each of the frequencies used
in an exercise or incident. Among the procedures that must be established as
part of the test exercise are:
1) Procedures for operation on the channels available,
2) Procedures for testing the fire ground communications readi-ness of the front-line personnel,
3) Procedures for logging the time and contents of communica-tions,
4) Procedures for logging the status and location of committedpersonnel and equipment.
The operational field test protocol consists essentially of recording
observations of the availability and clarity of communications over the course
of an incident response. In both training exercises and real incident re-
sponses the necessary additional communications monitoring personnel must be
provided by the fire department or Coast Guard strike team. The com-
munications aide and any assistants will record a running log of fire ground
communications using the format or a similar format to that in Figure 4. The
first page of the field test communications log contains a header section for
recording the identifying characteristics of a given test. This includes
entries for the test number, test scenario and location, and the makeup of the
communications test team. The rest of the body of the log form and subsequent
pages of the log includes entries for the time and durations of com-
munications, the channel used, the radio unit or team member called or
calling, a message code number or summary, and indications of loud/weak and
clear/distorted communications. While the communications environment for any
given field exercise or live incident may produce conditions that outstrip the
capabilities of the proposed firefighters communication system a general goal
for transmission/reception clarity as stated in Table 2 is a 95% probability
22
CDO
COt— Z
LU 1 — 11— 1—<cQ CJ_J I— ILU Z' — ' __?u_ 2:
O CDI—I CJ
Q<c oQi I-H
Q «c§5O h-Q± COCO OLU Q-(X.HH CD
U_ Z^C2:2:CDCJ
d
.,->
CD
UjCD
CL.
u5j
<C~2 ^
CO
0£Ucj3
QiOc_JLUtt**
fV
UH
,
•)
J
<CC3
cID
o• r—T3roo;
CDU-
- s
V)x^OJ
re•z.
. jc:re
°- =>|=3 CD1LU
, .a.^^
i<; LU
1 1^ 1 1 ^ > ^^h- C LU
fO [ ••CO i. +->Z OJ 10 CO S-O T3 -r- Z ••-
CSJZ l-H C V> O 10 t-CD 1 — (O S- </> >-H O_ •<-
1— O E O <C i- 0.<£. I-H O *i-~ OJ OJ CJ OJCJ Z CJ *4— "O "O I-H +J S-o ID ><-•»- -r- z : <u—i 2: -t-> o <: <: ^ ."-"o3 O O J i / l i n i / ) 2 : 4 - O )
CJ " O C C C O OJ-r-C D O J - i - O O O C J t-<4-1— 1 (— - 1 U •!— •*—•!— •(— OJ
Qi CO O C-fJ+J+J CD LL.S-<: o o ; i - H < o m n o z -r-21 CL. < J < J U ^ T 3 i - i _
. LU 1 •!— •!-•!- O OJOCJ Q r— C C C C C >> 0.•2.
1—
: C O Z J 0 3 3 3 C D O 3«« S- E E E r- ^
-1 — •sr m e r c e r LU o tiCOCO 21 > O O O Q £ OJ <0u1-
r-
J LU o O CJ O CJ I-H CD CO- 1— CJ Ll_
• • (O JDH «d- tn LT>
.
a^LUcc. \—*** r*f
2: LU CDO —> 1 —C_> CJ CO
.
^~rH
2J
OCJ
.roi-H
.Csli— 1
1—
Z
.rHi— 1
>_CJZLU~~)OLUFT*
1 1
.
CDi— 1
— 1OGO^_
CO
LU2:
|
1<cCJo
1
.fx^
.
l£>
23
HH
CD
Q^:O LU-J3:
ad<c2:CO
1 1 1
CD OH<f. OCOCO •LU O2: z
CDZ
CD I-HLU —I
i i-J <C<C CJC_J
r^O
^^_JLU"^ t~^\Z LU
'<t CODT =3C_J*^*s
CDLUCDZLU
LU2!I-H
h-
,
cn
z
CDLUCQ
LU2:h- H
I—•
oo
LU
<cCD
CD
LJ
3:
— 1
0
LJ
3:
— '
CD
LJ
3:
— '
0
LJ
3:
— '
CD
LJ
3:
— '
. ,COLU1 —CDZ
CD0
1
CO
CD
1—
OI-H^y
=3s:oo1—COLU1I
CDi
LUI-H
U-
Ll
oUJCD^ca_
— i<^I-H
1—
t—i
Zt— 1
•LUa:~~)
CDI-H
U_
of intelligible reception of any 5 second voice message transmission. This
degree of satisfactory reception can be verified by tabulating the proportion
of clear communications recorded in the Command Post Radio Communications Log.
Communications which are too weak to be intelligible will be recorded as being
distorted.
Calling and answering procedures will be established by the
communications officer in preparation for a field test. Typical communica-
tions included in the field test would be test transmissions and radio checks.
To establish a communications link the calling party might proceed as follows:
a. The caller listens to make sure that the calling fre-
quency is not busy. When not busy, the caller turns on the
transmitter and should say:
"(Unit or Firefighter Called), THIS IS(Name or unit number of calling party),OVER"
b. The reply to the initial call should be:
"(Name of calling party), THIS IS(Name or unit number of answering party),OVER"
If the calling frequency is different from the working
frequency the initial calling party will request the called
part to SHIFT to the working frequency. Once communication is
reestablished on the working frequency the calling part can
transmit a formal message.
24
c. The message transmission, which omits the name of the
party called, should be:
"THIS IS, (Name or unit number of calling party),(The message), OVER"
d. After receiving the transmission, the called party re-
plies:
"THIS IS, (Name of party called),(The response to the message),OVER"
e. A further response is made if necessary, otherwise the
transmission is concluded as follows:
"THIS IS, (Name or unit number of callingparty), OUT"
f. The called party will also conclude with:
"THIS IS, (Name or unit number of calledparty), OUT."
If a test transmission is to be performed, the transmitting party first
listens to make certain that the frequency on which the test is to be made is
not busy. Usually permission is obtained prior to making a test.
g. Permission to make a test is obtained by saying:
"THIS IS, (Name or unit number of party testing),TEST"
25
h. If the reply "WAIT" is not received from the answering
party, the party testing may proceed with the test by saying:
"THIS IS (Name or unit number of party testing),TESTING, (A number count or other phraseology whichwill not confuse listeners and of not more than 10seconds duration), (Name or unit number of partytesting), (Location and if appropriate, status, ofthe testing party at the time the test is made),OUT"
In addition to transmission field tests another major communications test
performed frequently during field exercises and live incidents is the radio
check. Requests for radio checks are made directly to each specific fire-
ground radio unit. The party requesting the radio check first establishes
communications as indicated above.
i. After properly establishing contact, the calling party
should say:
"HOW DO YOU HEAR ME?"
j. The proper response to the radio check request is as
follows:
"I HEAR YOU LOUD AND CLEAR," or"I HEAR YOU WEAK BUT CLEAR," or"YOU ARE LOUD BUT DISTORTED," etc.
This procedure is repeated for all radio units operating under various con-
ditions and at different locations on the fireground to determine the op-
erational performance of the communications system in actual use. Simple
radio check type messages like those indicated above can be used or more
detailed observations of fireground radio performance can be used for the
message traffic between firefighters and the communications personnel in the
26
command post. In all field tests the major burden for observing and recording
the presence and quality of clear lines of communciation will fall on command
post personnel. Adequate numbers of recorders and procedures for allocating
transmission and reception traffic among the recorders must be provided.
VIII. Post-Incident Survey Questionnaire
It is inevitable that some if not many of the field test events that
represent failures of the fireground radio system will not be captured and
recorded through messages to communications personnel at the command post. In
order to obtain the additional observations of the personnel actively engaged
in hazardous material or firefighting activities a post-incident survey
questionnaire will be used. The questionnaire will contain items that
correspond directly to the critical operational test issues included in Table
2 of this report. The questionnaire will be administered to all fireground
personnel that were supplied with a fireground radio for use in either a field
training exercise or a live incident. The questionnaire will at a minimum
provide for the following types of questions:
Mi ss i o [^Performance
1) Did your radio transmit and receive satisfactorily up to the
600 meter range limit under relatively unimpeded conditions?
2) If operated in a steel/concrete building structure did your
radio perform reliably at up to a 10-story separation between
you and another radio unit?
3) What conditions did you find that seriously degraded the range
of satisfactory communications?
27
4) Did your radio unit operate successfully in all three available
modes: voice-actuated; push-to-talk; receive only?
5) Was your voice transmission verified in the PIT and VOX modes
by a clear sidetone signal?
6) Did all six (6) channels available on your radio operate
properly?
7) Were received communications loud and clear under relatively
unimpeded conditions for the stated range of the radio unit?
8) In your estimate what was the percentage of intelligible
receptions out of all receptions received by you?
9) In general, did the radio unit perform up to the level that you
expected from what you were told? If it did not, why not?
10) What are your dissatisfactions with the radio, if any, in terms
of mission performance?
Human Factors, Safety, Health
11) Did the method for wearing the various elements of the radio
restrict your physical motions?
12) Did the method for wearing the radio interfere with other
necessary protective garments or equipment?
13) Did the method for wearing the radio interfere with the
mask-to-face seal of breathing apparatus?
14) Are the controls of the radio placed so that you can operate
them by hand inside your protective outer garment?
28
15) Are the volume and push-to-talk controls operable with heavy
gloves?
16) Are don and doff times for the radio system sufficiently short?
17) When fully outfitted and wearing the radio were you able to
climb, reach, twist and crawl using both hands?
18) Did you ever find that you were at risk of personal injury due
to the protrusion of the external controls or other external
parts of the radio?
19) What are your dissatisfactions with the radio, if any, in terms
of human factors, safety, and health?
Survivability
20) Did the manner in which the radio is worn ever expose the unit
directly to destructive fireground elements?
21) Have you developed any impressions of the durability of the
fireground radio? If so what are they?
22) Have you found that the radio unit accepts normal fireground
impacts and handling while continuing to operate normally?
23) What are your dissatisfactions with the radio, if any, in terms
of survivability?
Reliability, Availability, Maintainability
24) What has been your experience as to the reliability of major
radio parts such as:
a) the battery pack
b) the controls and activation elements
29
c) the antennas
d) wires
e) connectors?
25) Did you find that the battery power supply gave you at least 2
hours continuous operation from full charge?
26) Did the complete radio system and especially the microphone
and/or voice pick up elements of the radio remain in place
providing a positive line of communications throughout your
period of activity on the fireground? If not explain the
causes of the problem in detail?
27) Did a failure in any of the following radio subsystems cause a
loss of a line of communication during your period of activity
on the fireground:
a) voice pickup
b) battery
c) radio controls
d) antenna?
28) What are your dissatisfactions with the radio, if, any in terms
of reliability, availability, and maintainability?
Training
29) Is the operator's manual clearly written and easy to under-
stand?
30) Is the operation of the fireground radio compatible with
existing portable radio operating procedures?
30
Interoperability
31) Did you find that the fireground radio could be operated satis-
factorily in conjunction with the rest of the protective fire-
fighting ensemble?
32) In your opinion is the fireground radio compatible with exist-
ing and near-term planned firefighting/hazardous material
systems and subsystems? If not please explain.
33) What are your dissatisfactions with the radio, if any, in terms
of interoperability?
IX. Conclusions and Recommendations for Field Test Implementation
Interviews with firefighting professionals and members of the Atlantic
Strike Team of the U. S. Coast Guard National Strike Force have identified the
key issues of concern for the operational field testing of the Firefighters'
Communication Transceiver. The key test issues in order of priority are:
1) The verification of the intrinsic safety of the radio
2) The non-interference of the radio with facemasks and breathingapparatus
3) Very high availability of a clear line of communications toother radio units (this is considered to be primarily a func-tion of the reliability of the voice/microphone interface)
4) Reliable hands free operation
5) Human factors performance of the radio in terms of ease ofoperation, security of control settings from accidental switch-ing, compact size, light weight, etc.
6) Technical performance of the radio in terms of range, noisesuppression, power levels, etc.
31
The intrinsic safety and technical performance of the radio are best tested
using appropriate published standards under controlled laboratory conditions.
The radio features that impact the firefighter's confidence in having a re-
liable line of communications during his time on the fireground are best
tested during training exercises and ultimately during live incidents. Two
recording documents have been identified as providing the necessary vehicles
for documenting the field performance of the firefighter's communication
transceiver. The first is a communications log for recording all communica-
tions that occur during a field test with provisions for recording observa-
tions on the reliability and quality of the lines of communication. The
second recording document is a post-incident survey questionnaire which is
completed by all fireground personnel assigned a fireground radio in the
course of a field test. The results of the questionnaire are evaluated to
identify elements of the Firefighters' Communication Transceiver which will
require further improvements.
Comments made by many of the individuals contacted indicated there is
great interest among fire departments and the Coast Guard Strike Teams in
field testing an improved fireground radio. There should be no problem in
finding groups to participate in the implementation of the Firefighters'
Communication Transceiver field test.
32
APPENDIX A
Outline of EIA Standard RS-316-B May 1979
Sections 2 through 5
Minimum Standards for Portable/Personal Radio Transmitters,
Receivers, and Transmitter/Receiver Combination Land Mobile
Communications FM or PM Equipment, 25-1000 MHz
OPERATIONAL TEST ISSUE OR ITEM
2. Standard Test Conditions
2.1 Definition
2.2 Specific Standard Test Conditions
2.2.1 Standard Temperature, Relative Humidity
and Barometric Pressure
2.2.2 Standard Test Modulation
2.2.3 Rated System Deviation
2.2.4 Standard Test Voltage
2.2.5 Standard RF Signal Sources
2.2.5.1 Standard Integral RF Signal Sources
2.2.5.2 Standard External RF Signal Sources
2.2.6 Standard Audio Input Signal Source
2.2.6.1 Standard Audio Integral Signal Source
2.2.6.2 Standard Audio External Signal Source
2.2.7 Standard RF Output Load
2.2.7.1 Standard Integral RF Output Load
2.2.7.2 Standard External RF Output Load
2.2.7.3 Standard Integral Audio Output Load
2.2,1 A Standard External Audio Output Load
2.2.8 Standard Squelch Adjustment
2.2.9 Standard Modulation Adjustment
2.2.10 Standard Test Receiver
2.2.11 Standard Deviation Monitor
2.3 Standard Duty Cycle
2.3.1 Standard Duty Cycle for Equipment Containing
a Transmitter and a Receiver
A-2
PAGE NUMBER
LOCATION IN
STANDARD
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
OPERATIONAL TEST ISSUE OR ITEM
3. Items Pertinent to Receiver
3.1 Audio Power Output and Harmonic Distortion
3.2 Acoustic Audio Power Output
3.3 Audio Frequency Response
3.4 Audio Sensitivity
3.5 Hum and Noise Ratio
3.6 Usable Sensitivity
3.7 Quieting Sensitivity
3.8 Alerting Sensitivity
3.9 Average Radiation Sensitivity
3.10 Audio Squelch Sensitivity
3.11 Squelch Blocking
3.12 Receiver Attack Time
3.13 Receiver Squelch Closing Time
3.14 Usable Bandwidth
3.15 Adjacent Channel Selectivity and Desensitization
3.16 Spurious Response Attenuation
3.17 Conducted Spurious Output Signals
3.18 Intermodulation Spurious Response Attenuation
3.19 Temperature Range
3.20 High Humidity
3.21 Power Supply Voltage Range
PAGE NUMBER
LOCATION IN
STANDARD
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
6
6
6
7
8
8
8
8
9
9
10
10
10
11
11
A-3
OPERATIONAL TEST ISSUE OR ITEM
4. Items Pertinent to Transmitter
4.1 Carrier Power Output
4.2 Average Radiated Power Output
4.3 Acoustic Microphone Sensitivity
4.4 Modulation Limiting
4.5 Audio Frequency Response
4.6 Audio Frequency Distortion
4.7 FM Hum and Noise Level
4.8 AM Hum and Noise Level
4.9 Transmitter Carrier Attack Time
4.10 Radiated Spurious Emissions
4.11 Transmitter Sideband Spectrum
4.12 Conducted Spurious Emissions
4.13 Carrier Frequency Stability
4.14 Temperature Range
4.15 High Humidity
4.16 Power Supply Voltage Range
5. Items Pertinent to Package and Power Source
5.1 Size
5.2 Weight
5.3 Minimum Power Supply Life
5.4 Incidental and Restricted Radiation
5.5 Vibration Stability
5.6 Shock Stability
PAGE NUMBER
LOCATION IN
STANDARD
11
11
12
13
13
13
14
14
14
15
15
15
16
17
17
18
18
18
18
19
19
19
20
20
A-4
APPENDIX B
Exerpt from Factory Mututal Research Intrinsic Safety Standard
Approval Standard - Intrinsically Safety Apparatus
and Associated Apparatus for Use in Class I, II and III
Divison 1, Hazardous Locations
]1]]]]]
APPROVAL STANDARD
INTRINSICALLY SAFE APPARATUS
AND
ASSOCIATED APPARATUS
FOR
J USE IN CLASS I, II AND III
._ DIVISION 1, HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS
CLASS NUMBER 3610
OCTOBER 1979
Factory Mutual Research1151 Boston-Providence TurnpikeNorwood Massachusetts 02062
B-2
1
JJ
HOW TO APPLY FOR INTRINSIC SAFE EXAMINATIONS
Send a letter requesting an examination addressed to:
Instrumentation Section ManagerFactory Mutual Research Corporation1151 Boston-Providence TurnpikeNorwood, Massachusetts 02062
The letter should indicate the Class(s), Division(s) and Group(s) forthe hazardous locations you wish the examination to cover.
One copy of the following documentation should be submitted, logicallyorganized and neatly assembled into an indexed bound package.
(a) A complete list of all models and options by Class, Division andGroup.
(b) A list of major or specific use application of the equipment.(c) A system block diagram showing the location (i.e., hazardous or non-
hazardous location) and inter-connection of equipment.(d) Installation, operation, and maintenance instructions.(e) Circuit physical layout drawing(s), schematic(s), and parts list(s).(f) Assembly drawings showing overall physical separation of safe and
unsafe circuits if not shown in circuit layout drawing.| (g) Drawings, specifications, and source control information for all pro-— tective components.
(h) Quality control documentation, and test procedures for all protectivecomponents and assemblies.
(i) Drawing(s) showing proposed labels to be applied to final product(s).(j) If available, test report(s) by internationally recognized testing
laboratories (e.g., CSA, PTB, BASEEFA).
-•%J
~1
3j
B-3
JJ
JJJ
JJJJJJ
j
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Title
I INTRODUCTION
II SCOPE 3
2.1 Application 32.2 Requirements 32.3 Mechanisms of Ignition 32.4 Applicability of Other Standards 3
HI DEFINITIONS 5
3.1 Associated Apparatus 53.2 Clearance Distance 53.3 Creepage Distance 53.4 Fault 53.5 Fuse Protected Shunt Diode Barrier Assembly 53.6 Fusible-Resistor Protected Shunt Diode Barrier 53.7 Internal Wiring 53.8 Intrinsically Safe Apparatus 53.9 Intrinsically Safe Circuit 63.10 Normal Operation 63.11 Protective Component or Assembly 63.12 Resistor Protected Shunt Diode Barrier Assembly 63.13 Shunt Diode Barrier Assembly 63.14 Supply Voltage 6
IV EVALUATION OF INTRINSIC SAFETY 7
4.1 Fundamental Requirements 74.2 Normal Operation 74.3 Fault Conditions 8
V ENTITY CONCEPT EVALUATION 9
5.1 Concept 9
VI CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS 10
6.1 Creepage and Clearance Distances 106.2 Encapsulation 116.3 Field Wiring Connections 126.4 Internal Wiring Conductors 12
VII PROTECTIVE COMPONENTS 14
7.1 General 147.2 Transformers 147.3 Damping Winding 157.4 Current-limiting Resistors 157.5 Blocking Capacitors 157.6 Shunt Protective Components Fitted to
Inductive Elements 157.7 Shunt Diode Barrier Assemblies 16
B-4
[VIII OTHER COMPONENT REQUIREMENTS 18
8.1 Derating of Discrete Components 18 __8.2 Plug-in Boards and Components 18 T8.3 Relays 18 L8.4 Cells and Batteries 18
IX PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINING IGNITION CAPABILITY . 22 [_
9.1 General 22 «-9.2 Procedures 22 I9.3 Maximum Voltage and Current Levels 229.4 Sources of Ignition 229.5 Maximum Temperature 23 |
X PROCEDURE FOR TESTING TO DETERMINE IGNITION CAPABILITY 24
XI APPARATUS FOR CLASS II AND CLASS III LOCATIONS 25 L11.1 Requirements 25 .-11.2 Specific Requirements for Intrinsic Safety 25 I11.3 Dust-Tight Enclosures 25
XII TEST PROCEDURES 27 f
12.1 Tests for Protective Transformers 2712.2 Current-Limiting Resistors 28 f12.3 Shunt Diode Protective Barrier Assembly Tests 28 ]_12.4 Temperature Tests 2912.5 Small Component Thermal Ignition Test 31 f
12.6 Dielectric Tests 32 I12.7 Mechanical Tests 33 L
12.8 Battery Ejection Drop Test 3312.9 Dust-Tight Enclosure Test 33 T12.10 Dust Blanketing Temperature Test 33 L
XIII SPARK IGNITION TEST 35 r
13.1 General Requirements 3513.2 Factors 35
XIV MARKING 36 "•
14.1 Intrinsically Safe Apparatus 36 T14.2 Associated Apparatus 36 I14.3 Intrinsically Safe and Associated Apparatus
Optional Markings 36 i14.4 Marking Intrinsically Safe Connections 37 J14.5 Marking Battery-Powered Apparatus 3714.6 Entity Concept Markings 3714.7 Factory Mutual Approval Mark 38 [14.8 Marking Permanency 38 '14.9 Marking Abbreviations 3814.10 Marking Drawings 38 I
B-5 jI
JAPPENDIX A Additional Information 39
J APPENDIX B Ignition Voltage and Current Curves 44
APPENDIX C Procedure for Spark Test Apparatus . 53
APPENDIX D Entity Concept Examination Procedure 57
T APPENDIX E Reproduction Art:-J Factory Mutual Approval Marks 59
J.1
Jj
]
,JJJ-
B-6
J Factory Mutual Research
J
J
I
J
J
J
J
T
1151 Boston-Providence TurnpikeNorwood. Massachusetts 02062
Class No. 3610October 1979
APPROVAL STANDARD
INTRINSICALLY SAFE APPARATUS
AND
ASSOCIATED APPARATUS
FOR
USE IN CLASS I, II AND III
DIVISION 1, HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS
NOTICE: The asterisk following the subsection numbersignifies that explanatory material on thatparagraph appears in Appendix A.
I INTRODUCTION
1.1 This standard serves as the basis for Factory Mutual approval ofintrinsically safe apparatus and associated apparatus. This standardprovides requirements for the construction and testing of electricalapparatus, or parts of such apparatus, whose circuits are incapable ofcausing ignition in Division 1 hazardous locations as defined in Article 500of the National Electrical Code, NFPA-70.
1.2 Intrinsically safe apparatus and associated apparatus (includingwiring) is apparatus in which any spark or thermal effect, produced eithernormally or in specified fault conditions, is incapable, under the testconditions prescribed in this standard, of causing ignition of a specifiedmixture of flammable or combustible material in air.
1.3 Factory Mutual approval is based on satisfactory evaluation ofthe product and manufacturer in the following major areas:
1.3.1 Examination and tests to evaluate: (1) the suitability ofthe product; (2) the operation and performance of the product as required byFactory Mutual and, as far as practical; (3) the durability and reliabilityof the product.
1.3.2 Periodic examination of the manufacturing facilities toevaluate: (1) the manufacturer's ability to produce the product as examinedand approved; (2) the quality control procedures applied to the product; and(3) the marking procedures which shall be used to identify the product.
B-7
FACTORY MUTUAL RESEARCH CORPORATION T
3610 Page 2
1.4 Continued approval is based upon: (1) production or availability Lof the product as currently approved; (2) the continued use of acceptablequality control procedures; and (3) satisfactory field experience. r
1.5 The requirements of this standard identify Factory Mutual approvaltests and practices. Devices which do not conform to these requirements _may be approved if they meet the intent of this standard. Conversely, Ithose that do conform may not be approved if other conditions prevail. *•
1.6 The construction, tests and marking required by this standard fcorrespond, in general, to the National Fire Protection Association standard Lfor Intrinsically Safe Apparatus and Associated Apparatus For Use In Class I, IIand III. Division 1 Hazardous Locations. NFPA - 493 (1978) .NFPA-493was the result of extensive committee activity and analysis, coupled closelywith previous work done by the Instrument Society of America and the InternationalElectrotechnical Commission.
-'-Available from National Fire Protection Association, 470 Atlantic Ave.,Boston, MA 02210
B-8
1
FACTORY MUTUAL RESEARCH CORPORATION
3610
2.1* APPLICATION
This standard shall apply to:(1) Apparatus or parts of apparatus in Class I, II or III, Division 1
locations as defined by the National Electrical Code, NFPA-70.
Note: Section S00-2(a) of NFPA 70-1978, National Electrical Code, statesthat equipment approved for Division 1 locations shall be permitted inDivision 2 locations of the same class and group.
(2) Associated apparatus located outside of the Class I, II or III,Division 1 location whose design and construction may influence the intrinsicsafety of an electrical circuit within the Class I, II or III, Division 1location.
2.2* REQUIREMENTS
These requirements are based on consideration of ignition in locationsmade hazardous by the presence of flammable or combustible material undernormal atmospheric conditions.
2.2.1 For the purposes of this standard, normal atmosphericconditions are considered to be:
(1) An ambient temperature of 40°C (104°F) ;(2) An oxygen concentration not greater than 21 percent; and(3) A pressure of one atmosphere.
2.3 MECHANISMS OF IGNITION
2.3.1 This standard does not cover mechanisms of ignition fromexternal sources such as static electricity or lightning, which are notrelated to the electrical characteristics of the apparatus. However, thepossibility of static charge on polymeric materials and ungrounded metalparts shall be considered during the approval examination.
2.3.2 This standard does not cover apparatus based on highvoltage electrostatic principles (i.e., electrostatic paint spraying).
2.4 APPLICABILITY OF OTHER STANDARDS
2.4.1 Except where modified by the requirements of this standard,intrinsically safe and associated apparatus shall comply with the applicablerequirements for ordinary locations, in accordance with FM Approval Standard3820.1
3another example of requirements for ordinary locations, see ANSI C39.5
Safety Requirements for Electrical And Electronic Measuring and ControllingInstrumentation, available from the American National Standards Institute,1430 Broadway, New York, NY 10018
B-9
FACTORY MUTUAL RESEARCH CORPORATION
3610 Page 4
Ipor guidance on installation, see ANSI/ISA RP12.6, Installation of IntrinsicallySafe Instrument Systems in Class I Hazardous Locations, available from the
Instrument Society of America, 400 Stanwix St., Pittsburgh, PA 15222.
B-10
L[Exception: Circuits operating below extra-low voltage or limited-power
are not included in the scope of FM Approval Standard 3820.Extra-low and limited-power circuits are defined as: • f
Extra-Low Voltage Circuit
An extra-low voltage circuit is one in which the maximum voltage ][.measured between the conductor or part in question and its associatedcircuit common is not more than 30 V rms (sine wave) or 60 V dc. _.
FLimited-Power Circuit
A limited-power circuit is one in which the maximum power available rffrom the circuit does not exceed 150 watts as measured by a watt meter and !L-an external test resistor connected in parallel to the circuit load afterone minute. w
12.4.1.1 Intrinsically Safe Apparatus or Associated Apparatus
which have one or more circuits operating above and below the specified levelsfor extra-low voltage or limited power circuits are subject to the requirements Iof FM Standard 3820 from two aspects. In these cases, the requirements are ^~applicable only to the circuits or parts of a circuit that exceed the specifiedlevels and between those that do and those that do not exceed the specified levels. fThis is to assure that the required degree of protection against electrical shock Land fire is provided where necessary and that the inherent protection affordedby the below limit circuits is not compromised. This concept also applies to requipment or accessories rated for connection to other circuits for measuring Ipurposes, etc. and exceeding the specified levels for extra-low voltage andlimited power circuits.
2.4.1.2 Whether circuits are extra-low voltage or power •limited is determined by measurement.
2.4.2 Associated apparatus and circuits shall..conform to the \,requirements of the location in which they are installed .
11
I
.3
FACTORY MUTUAL RESEARCH CORPORATION
Page 5 3610
III DEFINITIONS
3.1 ASSOCIATED APPARATUS
Apparatus in which the circuits are not necessarily intrinsicallysafe, but which affect the energy in the intrinsically safe circuits andare relied upon to maintain intrinsic safety.
3.2 CLEARANCE DISTANCE
The shortest distance measured in air between conductive parts.
3.3 CREEPAGE DISTANCE
The shortest distance measured over the surface of insulation betweenconductive parts. Air gaps less than 0.04 in. (1 mm) are not considered tointerrupt the surface.
3.4 FAULT
I A defect or electrical breakdown of any component, spacing, or insulationwhich alone or in combination with other faults may adversely affect theelectrical or thermal characteristics of the intrinsically safe circuit.If a defect or breakdown leads to defects or breakdowns in other components,the primary and subsequent defects and breakdowns are considered to be asingle fault.
1 3.5 FUSE PROTECTED SHUNT DIODE BARRIER ASSEMBLY
See definition under protective component or assembly.
3.6 FUSIBLE-RESISTOR PROTECTED SHUNT DIODE BARRIER
See definition under protective component or assembly.
3.7 INTERNAL WIRING
Wiring and electrical connections that are made within the apparatusby the manufacturer. Within racks or panels, interconnections betweenseparate pieces of apparatus made in accordance with detailed instructionsfrom the apparatus' manufacturer are considered to be internal wiring.
3.8 INTRINSICALLY SAFE APPARATUS
Apparatus in which any spark or thermal effect, produced either normallyor in specified fault conditions, is incapable, under the test conditionsprescribed in this standard, of causing ignition of a specified mixture offlammable or combustible material in air. This apparatus is suitable foruse in Division 1 locations.
B-ll
FACTORY MUTUAL RESEARCH CORPORATION I"
3610 Page 6
3.9 INTRINSICALLY SAFE CIRCUIT {_
A circuit in which any spark or thermal effect, produced either normallyor in specified fault conditions, is incapable, under the test conditions .[prescribed in this standard, of causing ignition of a specified mixture of *•flammable or combustible material in air.
3.10 NORMAL OPERATION
Intrinsically safe apparatus or associated apparatus conforming electri-
T
cally and mechanically with its design specification. I
3.11 PROTECTIVE COMPONENT OR ASSEMBLY
A component or assembly which is so unlikely to become defective in a —manner that will lower the intrinsic safety of the circuit it may be considerednot subject to fault when analysis or tests for intrinsic safety are made. T~
3.11.1 Shunt Diode Barrier Assembly
A fuse or resistor protected diode barrier. I
3.11.2 Fuse Protected Shunt Diode Barrier Assembly
A network consisting of a fuse, voltage limiting shunt diodes and a *—current limiting resistor designed to limit current and voltage. The fuseprotects the diodes from open circuiting when high fault current flows. r
3.11.3 Resistor Protected Shunt Diode Barrier Assembly
A network that is similar to a fuse protected shunt diode barrier with Ithe exception that the fuse is replaced by a resistor. "
3.11.4 Fusible-Resistor Protected Shunt Diode Barrier Assembly T
A network that is similar to a fuse protected shunt diode barrier with theexception that the fuse is replaced by a fusible-resistor. r
3.12 RESISTOR PROTECTED SHUNT DIODE BARRIER ASSEMBLY
See definition under protective component or assembly. F
3.13 SHUNT DIODE BARRIER ASSEMBLYw
See definition under protective component or assembly. .-
3.14 SUPPLY VOLTAGE f
The nominal operating voltage applied by an external source to theapparatus or associated apparatus. r
B-12
FACTORY MUTUAL RESEARCH CORPORATION
Page 7 3610
IV EVALUATION OF INTRINSIC SAFETY
4.1 FUNDAMENTAL REQUIREMENTS
4.1.1* Intrinsically safe apparatus, associated apparatus andcircuits shall meet the two basic requirements specified in 4.1.2 and4.2. Intrinsically safe apparatus with frequently operating contacts inparts of the apparatus likely to be exposed continuously or for long periodsto a flammable atmosphere should have such contacts provided with supplementaryprotective measures.
Examples of supplementary protective measures:
~! (a) Hermetically sealed enclosures of quality obtained by fusing_ glass;
(b) Protection by an explosion-proof enclosure;-j (c) Doubling of the factors applied on energy.
~" 4.1.2 The energy available in the hazardous location shall not_ be capable of igniting the hazardous atmospheric mixture specified in
I Appendix C2 due to arcing or temperature during normal operation or under—• fault conditions.
~| 4.2 NORMAL OPERATION
4.2.1 Normal operation shall include all of the following:
I (a) Supply voltage at maximum value. This maximum voltage to beapplied for normal operation tests shall be 1.1 times the manufacturer'sspecified nominal voltage for which the equipment has been designed.
J Note: Due to international interests of manufacturers and at their specificrequest Factory Mutual will examine equipment at 1.15 times the manufacturer's
•Tj specified nominal voltage.
—t (b) Environmental conditions within the ratings given for the apparatus-. or associated apparatus;* (c) Tolerances of all components in the combination that represents
the most unfavorable condition;(d) Adjustments at the most unfavorable settings;
"I (e) Opening, shorting, and grounding of the field wiring of the in-- trinsically safe circuit being evaluated.
-| Note: Opening means a complete separation of all strands of the wiring.
4.2.2* Normal operation shall include an additional factorfor test purposes of 1.5 on energy. Such factors shall be achievedaccording to the procedures outlined in Section 13.2. Before faults areintroduced the apparatus shall be in normal operation as specified inSection 4.2.
B-13
1
FACTORY MUTUAL RESEARCH CORPORATION
3610 Page 8
Note: Factors given in this standard differ from those published in theCanadian and CENELEC standards. This standard bases the 1.5 factor onenergy while other standards base the 1.5 factor on current or voltage, ,_which may result in a 2.25 factor on energy. Due to internationalinterests of manufacturers and at their specific request Factory Mutualwill examine equipment using the 1.5 factor on current or voltage.
4.3 FAULT CONDITIONS
4.3.1 Fault conditions shall include the following: r
(a) The most unfavorable single fault and any subsequent relatedfaults, with an additional factor of 1.5 applied to energy; _
(b) The most unfavorable combination of two faults and any subsequently Irelated faults, with no additional factor.
Such factors shall be achieved according to the procedures outlined pin Section 13.2. L
[
IrI'
rB-14
APPENDIX C
Currently Available Ear Microphone Products
TAD EARMICEAR MICROPHONE SYSTEMJUST WHISPER TO SPEAK WITH HIM MILES AWAY TAD EAR-MIC IS A UNIQUE 2 WAY COMMUNICATION DEVICE TO TALKAND LISTEN THROUGH YOUR EAR. IT PERMITS HAND-FREEOPERATION IN HIGH NOISE ENVIRONMENTSCOUPLED WITH TOUGH-LINE TAD RADIOS, THE EAR-MICALLOWS YOU TO OPERATE YOUR FIELD COMMUNICATIONSUNDER SEVERE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, INCLUDINGEXTREME HIGH NOISE LEVELS, ABNORMAL TEMPERATURESVIBRATION AND SHOCK.
C-2
CHOICE OF THE PROFESSIONALS
THE TAD EAR-MIC HAS BEEN SPECIALLYDESIGNED TO PROVIDE CLEAR SPEECHCOMMUNICATIONS BY MEANS OF BONE-CONDUCTION. OUR BONE CONSTRUC-TION OF THE HUMAN HEAD IS SUCHTHAT VIBRATIONS OCCUR WHEN WESPEAK THROUGH VARIOUS RESONANTPOINTSFOR CONVENIENCE, IT IS POSSIBLE TOUSE A SINGLE TRANSDUCER FITTED INTHE EAR TO PROVIDE BY TRANSMISSIONAND RECEPTION OF SPEECH MESSAGES.
_ -Fire fighters and other rescure."personnel who need to wear
/protective face masks can com-' municate without the need to
use a separate microphone.
, Police forces and security services oftenrequire to use 2 way radio communica-tions unobtrusively in crowded areas.
In military training, the TAD ear-micallows personnel to communicate in awhisper with hands-free operation.
Radio operation within construction sites can beperformed easily and efficiently even in high noiseareas-
Operators of noisy machinery infactories have no difficulty in conversingwith each other by using ear-mic
- Forestry and mining industry find\ •» -the ear-mic beneficial in overcommmg
• \ \ dangerous situations which can cause•f 'i. \ serious injuries due to the inability to
•'- •' *• ' /'jcommunicate in noisy environments.
C-4
DESCRIPTIONS OF PARTS
CURL CORD
PERSONAL BARRELRUBBER ADJUSTERTER
AMPLIFIER WITH CLIP
FINGER SWITCH (PRESS TO TALK)
6I
SPECIFICATIONS
Frequency Range
RF Output
Number of Channel
I-ower Supply
Pocket Si7.eMedium Duty
Model ME100
15OMII7
lOOmW
1
24VDC
FCC/DOC ['ending
Pocket Si/eHeavy DutyWater ResislnntCrush Pnx>f
ME10OO
VIIF/UIIF
uploSW
up Io4
7 2/9 6VDCRechargeable Nicad Batten,*
FCC:/DOC TypeAccepted
Extra Heavy DulyWater ProofIntrinsically Saf*Crush Proof
M1S20SE
VIIF/UIIF
up 10 5W
up to 6
120VDCPack
Operation
Ambient Temperature - 10 - ^ 50
Ambient Noise [>e\'cl Sat
D u w n l i n n s l W x D x H I 75x23x 135mm(3 ' 7 / B x 5 - l / 2 m l
Weight 260gllOo7)
Press to talk Simplex or Semi Duplex
- 3 O - - 6 O - 3 0 - * 6 O
isfacton communication under 100 Horn1130 Horn with Ear Cover Pad)
70 x 37 x 125mm 72 x 52 x 184mmn 3/4 < 1 112 x 5m I (2-7/8 x 2 x 6 l/4m)
•4OOgll5o/l 780(2907)
TAD TAD^TAD AIV1ERICA CORPORATlOtSJ
amwMiMMNotnt <•.6H6AhunSlrc«' l f hun i l i l l n Haimil <IGH1<>WWil/mS/H-i Tlli 'v vn U7TA1MM
TAD CORPORATIONitardi'H ( cmrfs•221-1 S/i,ir<i S/nl>ui|n kit Thlo/i) /•>()Tl'/o 02-12 ,12-J'iTHi-plinm- •)«•) O2 )l Fm -)«=> 1)2 11
C-5
NEW — PRODUCT — RELEASEKAV-COM - A new technology concept that permits you
to transmit and receive through your ear.
KAV-COM permits clear voice transmission tobe sent and received through the earpiece. Thetransducer mounted in the ear picks up soundenergy through the otolarynx canal as the useris talking. These sounds are fed into an inter-face amplifier module which is an integral partof the KAV-COM unit. They are then trans-mitted through the users radio.
Custom molded to the individual users own ear,the earpiece snaps on or off of the KAV—COMtransducer module. This allows anyone withtheir own earpiece extensive flexibility and mo-bility when using the dynamic new KAV-COM.
The system can be installed in virtually anyVHP, UHF, or HF radio and when disconnectedfrom the radio, returns to it's former normaloperating mode and capability
KAV-COM'S ear to radio interface picks up minute sound energies from the otolarynx canal as theperson talks. These are amplified through a control module and transmitted through the user'sradio.
KAVCO Industries Inc.Sales Office- 416 East Alondra Blvd. • Gardena, CA 90248 • (818) 782-2902
Corporate Office: (213) 324-2401
KAV-COM
HISTORY
While the concept of throat and ear type micro-phones is not new, the constant problem associatedwith each, that of interference from outside ambientnoises with the basic voice range frequencies wastotally unacceptable and thus the concept wasvirtually discarded.The concept of a molded earpiece to reduceambient noise has been used successfully and wasaccepted as commonplace as well
However, the idea of plugging up the outside ear incombination with providing a miniature implantedtransducer unit, capable of both transmitting andlistening at different intervals was the real challenge
That challenge has been met and perfected byKAVCO Industries of Gardena, California with theintroduction of their new KAV-COM modular earadapter transceiver communications module
BASIC COMPONENTS
1. Earpiece - custom molded from an actual cast ofthe users own ear to assure complete comfortduring long hours of use as well as blocking out allunwanted ambient outside noises thus assuringquality audio reception and voice transmissionunequalkd by any s/stcrn available to date
2. Transducer - completely self contained microsystem designed to mate instantly with the aboveearpiece providing all necessary electronic inter-face between the configurations of the users ownear and the basic two way hand held or pocketcarried light-weight modern radio system.
3. Connector - unit provided to interface transducerwiring to actual radio unit This may be a side screwtype fastener adapter or the more common plug intype unit.
4. Amp-Mod Unit - this is the nerve/capsulatedmain control system of the KAV-COM successstory this mini/micro system, when connected tothe selected hand held radio enables that radio tofunction in every normal mode without the KAV-COM attached, and yet, by simply attaching theKAV-COM unit to the same radio function as anentirely new concept of ultra-light, hands free, non-cumbersome communications system
APPLICATIONS
Firefighters: If free flow airpack eliminates the maskmike, KAV-COM is now able to take up the slackKAV—COM allows you to talk and listen indepen-dent of any other equipment being worn
Law Enforcement (immigration, military, commer-cial uses of all types conceivable); Foot patrol - noidentifiable transmissions or loud audio to discloseposition Normal voice audio when transmittingSuspect interrogation - with non-obvious push-to-talk switch All conversations transmitted andrecorded if desired ONA calls pre-empted whennecessary
C-7
Undercover - worn inconspicuously in the ear with acord running down to radio When supplied withunder arm or sleeve cord push-to-talk switch com-munications can be completed with minimum inter-ference with other essential activitiesMotorcycle officers - being totally independent ofvehicle enables user to dismount and pursue on footwithout interruption of vital communications link.
Paramedic/Fire Jumpers, Etc. (aviation, commer-cial uses): Stability and function of your commu-nications system even when worn under crashhelmet is unsurpassed. It assures continualcommunications even during a normally disablinglanding
goi
oI—tH
UI—I
SI
i&ouwuO
uu
Q
X2
WuOu
w
oCM
CMOO
£"
2.
•00
CO <0)0
co<D ,T3 CO
• 0). O
"O •£
coT—
•f
d)o
C75
C-8
OH >-fc) CTCO &>
—ex
11S ts</> o
on
ansm
i
03
6.«-•••to3a•n
exte
nde<
5 fre
e o
pera
tion w
ith
•ac£•
08cotoa03c10
wu
m
mold
ed
earp
ie
o.»~*CO
3U
•
O
2
£S!%3
S"3C
1
W
ro
ono
5o0
£J03
J3"cctv
1•35TJCO.gW-*
o2
w3
2(0a8-oncH
terfe
renc
e w
ith b
reat
r
_co&
1
'S•au_.)
T3
103
gC
•aww3
J^
§
OT303
05
•aKcrf\t£!
J6O03a
S03
X>W•«-•
2S.55oS
i_w
t*-i*i-i
ca
!8
!
18to•3
oTJ
03
a£a2t-
TJ
03
c">cyu8!
^wx!
s ou
t ou
tsid
e n
oise
w
^c,(jo
PQ
IDS2a"3'o
1
gx>2So2
•0 £c *r,03 .ya
^_*c ^<v <yto o
3O "O
X) £03
0 ij•V-« *^
Cxi.2 Hi/)toC wC uto wr* ••-
2 &i: 03wo u'6 £> 5!
ll*o ~
sf° a'oB'tS6 "08 cy
1> 3fc U
he
otol
aryn
x ca
nal
as
the
ipli
fied
an
d tr
ansm
itte
d
~ fc£ ra
£ £8"on wu. tow w oeel
"§ • <"§ J2 sn ~5 to° S 3
S! ££3 ~c c x:•g c x>n6 § HCX W £
0.-S
S'sD toPu-SDC 2> £!c o03^> 2
3 w
r£'>c "Oc (U
he
syst
em
can
be
inst
alle
d i
IF
radi
o.
Whe
n di
scon
nect
*lo
rmal
ope
ratin
g m
ode
> EA
RPI
ECE
£ &>'03 (/>W 3
:•« u-& °to3 i2
^ °•£ x:
*° c5
^ oto —03u on
"o3 'C3 30*0!0
Cus
tom
m
olde
d fr
om
anA
ssur
es
com
plet
e co
mfo
nbi
ent
nois
es
and
assu
res
'oic
e tr
ansm
issi
on.
"3 "
Blo
cks
out
all
unw
ante
dun
equa
lled
aud
io r
ecep
tion
a
o y -a~ "5 co J2T> i3 -CW 0c *> >on^3 §
'to >w >-•°ls£ gl5
S y_^to c -5^ = T!03 cO 03¥. wu W j-
S? 8p ,r
• TR
AN
SDU
CER
Com
plet
ely
self
-con
tain
edm
ate
wit
h th
e ea
rpie
ce
Prin
terf
ace
betw
een
the
user
':he
ld o
r po
cket
car
ried
rad
io
> CO
NN
ECTO
R
w"2'to03
WX>
>-03S
6T32w4-J
o
Inte
rfac
es
tran
sduc
er
wir
ing
the
mor
e co
mm
on p
lug-
in
oV~i
Sia03
TJ03
S
Wto.2CJa>w •£
*" C
1 w& &to 4^
SWIT
CH
aM«
• EX
TEN
DED
PU
SH-T
O-T
i
o
113C03
(0
0
•o(Vx;uro"Jo
§ g
Cor
d ru
nn
ing
do
wn
th
e ai
allo
ws
han
ds
free
tr
ansm
issi
<
switc
hes
avai
labl
e up
on
on
• C
usto
m
desi
gned
tr
ansm
itre
ques
t.
D
O
CD>
5oo
•pro•uc
i3 H
3 11:3 11"
• o o " 8
.— <yC u
toQJ
• >*~"3 a
6 ">Issi(SI
w —CO £
•= w
§ £
CNJ00)CM
00
CO 05
APP
LIC
ATI
ON
S
• FI
REF
IGH
TER
S
2> o <y•*•• *rt ^%(0 Ji; **^C c/) ^_.C ft) f\\
1*1flS1!Il|ro -- x:5, o o
o w cc & «r-i W-.
w is owit! </>.>rrt ^3*mlit£«.S
• L
AW
EN
FOR
CE
ME
NT
:aTu
»«4r:uco
s*.i— r«Oi•T
8£PkIn01
1«
aT
1
w o c - c x g S ^ o Sl:n EM inFo
ot
Patr
ol
- N
o id
entif
iabl
e tr
an:
to
disc
lose
po
siti
on.
Nor
ma;
tran
smit
ting
. Su
spec
t in
terr
ogat
push
-to-
talk
sw
itch.
A
ll co
nver
tre
cord
ed i
f de
sire
d.U
nder
cove
r -
Wor
n in
cons
picu
ousl
'ru
nnin
g do
wn
to t
he r
adio
. W
hen
or
slee
ve
cord
pu
sh-t
o-ta
lk
switc
hco
mpl
eted
w
ith
min
imum
in
esse
ntia
l ac
tiviti
es.
Mot
orcy
cle
Off
icer
s -
Bei
ng
1ve
hicl
e's
radi
o en
able
s us
er
to
dfo
ot w
ithou
t in
terr
uptio
n of
vita
l con
H«
• PA
RA
MED
ICS/
FIR
E
JUM
PER
S
tJ 3 -Sc c _, a3 *3 2 *-"c13 o
Stab
ility
of
sy
stem
w
hen
wor
nun
surp
asse
d.
Thu
s as
suri
ng
coev
en
duri
ng
land
ing,
w
hich
w
osy
stem
to
mal
func
tion
due
to s
hock
• O
TH
ER
A
PPL
ICA
TIO
NS:
-S u. (02 o x3 ,„ .c
Con
stru
ctio
n,
Min
ing,
L
oggi
ng,
BG
ate
Age
nts,
R
amp
Ope
ratio
n:an
ywhe
re
that
2-
way
vo
ice
wit
t: —r— 1 <—•" C
. w•P G
disc
reet
com
mun
icat
ion
is r
equi
reva
luab
le i
n a
high
noi
se e
nvir
oni
outs
ide
nois
es.
\y o °vmE?§
Kav
Co
Indu
sti
;s O
ffic
e: 4
16 E
ast
Alo
ndra
Blv
d •
Gar
deC
orpo
rate
Off
ice (
21
3)
CO
C-10
APPENDIX D
Study Contacts
A number of individuals and organizations provided material, insights,
and recommendations that have been incorporated into this Firefighters
Communication System Operational Test Plan. Among the contributing
sources are:
Electronic Industries Association
Pete Bennett, Staff Vice-PresidentWashington, DC
Factory Mutual Research
Robert L. Martell, Jr., Manager, Instrumentation SectionNorwood, MA
Federal Communications Commission
Frank Coperich, Electrical EngineerColumbia, MD
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Joseph L. Bell, Electrical EngineerNASA Marshall Space Flight CenterHuntsville, AL
National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health
John Etherton, Explosive Atmospheres SpecialistMorgantown, WV
United States Coast Guard
Lt. S. Phil Glenn, Response OfficerMr. Lundburg, Strike Team MemberMr. Perkins, Strike Team MemberMr. Snyder, Strike Team MemberNational Strike ForceAtlantic Strike TeamElizabeth City, NC
Lt. JG Jeff Stull, R&D Officer HeadquartersWashington, DC
United States Fire Administration
Mr. Tom SmithNational Emergency Training CenterEmmitsburg, MD
D-2