![Page 1: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
The Theory of Dynamic Hedging
Nassim Nicholas Taleb
Courant Institute of Mathematical Science
Sept 4, 2003
![Page 2: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
About this part of the course
– This part is Clinical Finance, which will be further defined in the next lecture.
– It is not the marriage of theory & practice. Practice comes first & last. This is best called theoretically inspired & enhanced practice.
– No (or minimum) theorems, no proofs. The important matter is to be convinced. Why? Because theorems are only as good as the assumptions on which they are built.
![Page 3: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Some Holes With Existing Theory
– According to strict theoretical considerations, derivatives do not exist. Markets are fundamentally incomplete, and we have to live with it.
– Hakansson’s paradox: if markets are complete we do not need options; if they are incomplete then according to financial theory we cannot price options…
– The paradox has not been solved so far in finance theory Finance theory may be total nonsense.
– The objective of this course is to make you live with it as well so you do not get a shock when you get out of here.
– Ask questions --the real world does not have an owner’s manual.
![Page 4: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
– Clinical finance will be further discussed after a brief presentation of the existing theories --so we have enough material to engage in a critique of the current framework.
![Page 5: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
The Theoretical Backbone of Modern Finance
– This first lecture will focus on the theoretical backbone of modern finance, particularly in what applies to asset pricing
– We will explore the origin of the thinking in financial economics
– If so little in successful quantitative Wall Street is linked to the financial economics aspect of finance, it is not quite without a reason
![Page 6: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Neoclassical Economics
– Adam Smith’s invisible hand
– Walras’ auctioneer
– Marshall’s partial equilibrium
– Arrow & Debreu’s proof of the existence and uniqueness
– The central conclusion is the idea of laisser-faire: the government should not interfere with the system of markets that allocates resources in the private sector of the economy
![Page 7: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Arrow-Debreu General Equilibrium
– A competitive system with market prices coordinates the otherwise independent activities of consumers and producers acting purely in their self-interest.
– Stands on shaky empirical foundations • no information
• no adverse selection
• no intermediation, no transaction costs
• the model might have been reverse engineered, i.e. the correct assumptions were chosen because they led to the adequate solution.
![Page 8: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Some more attributes
• “Theoretically Elegant”• “Idealized”
![Page 9: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Enters Uncertainty
– Arrow is credited with the introduction of uncertainty in the model, thanks to a contraption now called “Arrow” (now “Arrow-Debreu”) securities.
– In a 2-period model, it delivers 1 unit of numeraire in a given state of the world, 0 otherwise.
– These securities complete the market, i.e. eliminate uncertainty as agents can buy them as insurance.
![Page 10: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Completeness
– Definition of a complete market
![Page 11: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
State Prices
– a.k.a.state contingent claims, elementary securities, building blocks,
– These securities, by arbitrage, sum up to 1. Like probabilities, they are exhaustive and mutually exhaustive.
– It is important to see that they are not quite probabilities, even when translated into their continuous price & time limit.
– This leads to the analog state price density for one period models.
![Page 12: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Lexicon
• State price: a security that pays 1 in a state of the world, 0 elsewhere
• The price paid today for a state price resembles a density.
• Why resemble? Because of the difference between probability and pseudoprobability.
• Why pseudoprobability? Something called arbitrage
![Page 13: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Credits
• Note: I credit for the exposition of the next three theorems, Rubinstein’s e-textbook (1999), www.in-the-money.com
• Note: a brief discussion of the “inverse problem”, i.e. the ability to pull out the state prices from derivatives (Breeden-Litzenberger, 1978)
![Page 14: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
First “Theorem”: Existence
– Risk-neutral probabilities exist if and only if there are no riskless arbitrage opportunities.
![Page 15: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Arbitrage opportunities
• an arbitrage exists if and only if either:• (1) two portfolios can be created that have identical payoffs in
every state but have different costs; or
• (2) two portfolios can be created with equal costs, but where the first portfolio has at least the same payoff as the second in all states, but has a higher payoff in at least one state; or
• (3) a portfolio can be created with zero cost, but which has a non-negative payoff in all states and a positive payoff in at least one state.
![Page 16: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Second Major Theorem: Uniqueness
– The risk-neutral probabilities are unique if and only if the market is complete.
– Hint: an incomplete market provides many solutions under this framework.
![Page 17: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Third Major Theorem: Dynamic Completeness
– Arrow, in 1953, (tr. 1964) showed that, under some conditions, the ability to buy and sell securities can effectively make up for the missing securities and complete the market.
![Page 18: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Bachelier
– Aside from minor problems concerning the returns (arithmetic v/s logarithmic, which constitute a very small difference in common practice), Bachelier presented an option pricing tool that reposes on the actuarial distribution. In essence we are using his pricing method supplemented with arbitrage arguments.
![Page 19: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Keynes’ Arbitrage argument
– In 1923, Keynes effectively showed that by arbitrage argument, the forward needs to be equal to its arbitrage value, when lending & borrowing are possible.
– Covered Interest Parity Theorem:applied to the forward for a currency pair and, by extension, to any security that can be lent and borrowed.
![Page 20: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Keyne’s Argument
• Currency 1 has a rate r1
• Currency2 has a rate r2
• Spot rate S• Forward rate F
• F = S (1+r1)/(1+r2)
• The Forward has nothing to do with expectations!!!
![Page 21: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
The Importance of Keynes’ Intuition
• Keynes was the first person in modern times to express the notion that the forward is not an expected future price, but an arbitrage-derived pseudo-expectation.
• However it is of required use as an equivalent mean return in an arbitrage framework
• Arrow’s state prices are the equivalent probabilitites pseudoprobabilities
![Page 22: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
The Essence of Black-Scholes-Merton
• What Black-Scholes did was not “price” options as we do it today. It merely made option pricing compatible with financial economics.
• There are two aspects to BSM
• First aspect: the mean of the probability distribution used in their framework is that of the risk-neutral one (the µbecomes the difference between the carry and the financing).
• Second aspect: There is no risk premium involved in the
process --the package is deemed to be riskless.
![Page 23: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Assumptions Behind BSM
• no riskless arbitrage opportunities• perfect markets• constant r• constant and known volatility (comment on the
known)• no jumps
![Page 24: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
The Intuition
• Assuming an economy with no interest rates, the operator has two packages:– L1: short the European call option
– L2: long the local sensitivity of the option worth of stock
– L1: +C(St,t) -C(St+t,t+t)
– L2: (St+t -St)
![Page 25: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
– It is important to see that L1 and L2 are negatively correlated, that the negative correlation increases as t goes to 0
– It is important to see that, since the portfolio is delta neutral, there is no corresponding sensitivity of the total package to the asset price returns --therefore the return of the asset price becomes sensitive to the square variations .
– Pricing by replication allows the option to be a redundant security.
![Page 26: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Dynamic Hedging Effect
![Page 27: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Risk and Insurance
• Why dynamic hedging separates finance from other disciplines of risk bearing
• The option value is no longer the actuarial value of the payoff
![Page 28: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Food for Thought
• As an option trader I deem dynamic hedging unattainable --most of the package variance comes from the jumps. We cannot ignore the actuarial aspect of things.
• Black-Scholes reposes on a “known” distribution, with known parameters --I do not know much about the distribution
![Page 29: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
The problem of the Normal/Lognormal
• Blaming Bachelier for having a “normal” not “lognormal” distribution may be unfair since in the real world we use a distribution of some uncharacterized shape
![Page 30: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Butterfly
• Buy call Struck at K +• Buy call Struck at K - • Sell 2 calls struck at K• What do we get at expiration?
![Page 31: 1 The Theory of Dynamic Hedging Nassim Nicholas Taleb Courant Institute of Mathematical Science Sept 4, 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d135503460f949e707b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Breeden-Litzenberger
• The “infinitely small butterfly” scaled by 1/ at the limit delivers 1 at expiration at K and 0 elsewhere
• More on that with JG’s part: the butterfly, called elementary securities, are the building block of everything