2
Beyond Myth Busting:Effectively Communicating with Industry
Breakout Session #C02
Name: Mark E. Hogenmiller
Chief Operating Officer, Integrity Management Consulting
Date: July 30, 2012
Time: 4:00 PM – 5:15 PM
Purpose & Objectives
3
Purpose: To highlight practical applications and lessons learned regarding vendor communications
Learning Objectives:
Suggest tools and techniques to effectively apply Myth Busting concepts
Improve vendor communications
Achieve better engagement results – for Vendors and the Government
4
Background Information Exchanges Communication Ground Rules Best Practices and Lessons Learned
Written Communications Industry Conferences and One-on-One
Meetings
Outline
Background
5
Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) memo 2 FEB 2011: “Myth Busting: Addressing Misconceptions to Improve Communication with Industry during the Acquisition Process”
Identified and refuted common misconceptions about vendor engagements; directed agencies to:
Develop vendor communication plans Reduce unnecessary barriers Publicize communication opportunities Prioritize engagement opportunities on higher risk,
complex, and minimally competitive procurements
Information Exchanges
6
Information Exchanges - Intent
7
Improve the understanding of Government requirements and industry capabilities
Allow potential offerors to judge if they can satisfy the Government’s requirements
Enhances the Government’s ability to Obtain quality supplies and services Reasonable prices Increase efficiency in solicitation preparation, proposal
evaluation, negotiation, and contract award
8
Enables vendors to better meet end-user requirements A basis of effective acquisition planning & market research Helpful for procurements of all types and dollar values This presentation explores beyond the FAR and OFPP
memo, from acquisition planning to solicitation release: When to use exchanges Proper amount of information required Best practices Benefits to government and industry
Information Exchanges – Outcomes
Communication Ground Rules
9
Communication Ground Rules
10
Prior to solicitation release Program manager, users, or contracting officer – may
meet with potential offerors and Exchange general information and conduct market
research related to an acquisition. No requirement that meetings include all possible offerors No prohibition on one-on-one meetings Information that could directly affect proposal preparation must be shared with all potential offerors
Most Frequent Responses
11
“ ……….“ “We are in procurement planning at this time, so a meeting
on the follow-on strategy would not be appropriate.” “The acquisition strategy is still being worked. Thanks for
your interest.” “Unfortunately, I do not have any information at this time.”
Why are information exchanges limited?
12
Educate program manager, users, contracting, and small business advocates
What are exchanges? Prior to solicitation After solicitation After receipt of proposals
What can be discussed? What are the limits? Who to notify?
Negotiations: Occur after establishment of the competitive range. They can be used in competitive and sole source acquisitions, and may include bargaining, which can apply to price, schedule, technical requirements, type of contract, or other proposed contract terms. Discussions: Negotiations that take place only in a competitive acquisition, only after establishment of the competitive range, and include bargaining. They should be tailored to each offeror’s proposal and must be conducted with each offeror in the competitive range. Conclusion: Exercising common sense and sound judgment will ensure that we maintain the integrity of the procurement process and avoid creating an unfair competitive advantage by the improper disclosure of:
Proprietary information, or Source selection information, or Advance procurement planning.
Contact: I.M Contracting Officer Acquisition Outreach Phone: 202-555-1212 Email: [email protected] Address: 1601 Pennsylvania Ave Washington, DC 22012
*On
the
bubb
le: T
hink
of a
leve
l and
the
bubb
le is
not
qui
te ce
nter
ed.
Thes
e ar
e off
eror
s w
hose
pla
cem
ent i
n th
e co
mpe
titive
rang
e is
unc
erta
in
GUIDE
TO
EXCHANGES
AND
VENDOR
COMMUNICATIONS
US Government Agency
Overcoming Communication Challenges
Best Practice – Desktop Trifold
13
Negotiations: Occur after establishment of the competitive range. They can be used in competitive and sole source acquisitions, and may include bargaining, which can apply to price, schedule, technical requirements, type of contract, or other proposed contract terms. Discussions: Negotiations that take place only in a competitive acquisition, only after establishment of the competitive range, and include bargaining. They should be tailored to each offeror’s proposal and must be conducted with each offeror in the competitive range. Conclusion: Exercising common sense and sound judgment will ensure that we maintain the integrity of the procurement process and avoid creating an unfair competitive advantage by the improper disclosure of:
Proprietary information, or Source selection information, or Advance procurement planning.
Contact: I.M Contracting Officer Acquisition Outreach Phone: 202-555-1212 Email: [email protected] Address: 1601 Pennsylvania Ave Washington, DC 22012
EX
CH
AN
GE
S A
ND
VE
ND
OR
CO
MM
UN
ICA
TIO
NS
S
PE
CIA
L LI
MIT
ATI
ON
S
Exch
ange
s enc
oura
ged
Exch
ange
s enc
oura
ged;
cont
racti
ng
office
r fo
cal p
oint
of a
ll exc
hang
es
May
not
be
used
to re
vise
d pr
opos
als
May
not
be
used
to re
vise
pr
opos
als.
Onl
y with
offe
rors
w
ho
are
on “
the
bubb
le” o
r hav
e ad
vers
e pa
st p
erfo
rman
ce in
form
ation
Mus
t be
don
e w
ith
all o
ffero
rs I
n th
e co
mpe
titive
rang
e
*On
the
bubb
le:
Thin
k of
a le
vel a
nd th
e bu
bble
is n
ot q
uite
ce
nter
ed.
Thes
e ar
e o
ffero
rs
who
se p
lace
men
t in
the
com
petiti
ve ra
nge
is un
certa
in
AC
QU
ISIT
ION
PH
AS
E
Acqu
isitio
n Pa
nnin
g; b
efor
e re
leas
e of
solic
itatio
n
Afte
r rel
ease
of s
olic
itatio
n;
befo
re re
ceip
t of p
ropo
sals
Afte
r rec
eipt
of p
ropo
sals
; co
ntem
plat
ing
awar
d w
ithou
t di
scus
sion
s
Afte
r rec
eipt
of p
ropo
sals
; be
fore
est
ablis
hmen
t
of th
e co
mpe
titiv
e ra
nge
Afte
r est
ablis
hmen
t of
com
petit
ive
rang
e; e
xpec
tatio
n of
rece
ivin
g pr
opos
al re
visi
ons
FAR
15.2
01
15.2
02
15.2
01
15.3
06(a
)
15.3
06(b
)
15.3
06(d
)
TER
MIN
OLO
GY
Exc
hang
es
M
arke
t Res
earc
h
Cla
rific
atio
ns
Com
mun
icat
ions
Com
mun
icat
ions
Neg
otia
tions
√
Dis
cuss
ions
√
Bar
gain
ing
GUIDE
TO
EXCHANGES
AND
VENDOR
COMMUNICATIONS
US Government Agency
Introduction: The 1997 revision of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15, Contracting by Negotiation, made some significant changes to the federal acquisition process, including the concept of exchanges and communications. This guide provides an overview of the scope and limits on exchanges with industry, primarily for program offices and others involved in acquisitions. Exchanges: The umbrella term used to encompass communications, clarifications, negotiations, discussions, and bargaining with offerors and prospective offerors during the acquisition cycle. Each term has a unique definition and role in specific phases of the acquisition. General information about an acquisition may be disclosed at any time. While program officials may meet with industry to discuss the market or a company’s products and services, they are also encouraged to consult Procurement early in the acquisition process. And if potential contract terms or conditions, such as proposal instructions or evaluation criteria, will be discussed, a contracting officer (CO) must be present. Discussions that could be perceived as negotiations or contractual commitments should never occur in such meetings. The purpose of exchanging information is to improve the mutual understanding of Government requirements and industry capabilities. Procurement can serve as a business advisor to facilitate exchanges with industry. Early exchanges, coupled with Procurement’s expertise, can improve the quality of proposals and source selections and enhance the Government’s ability to obtain quality supplies and services at reasonable prices. Exchanges prior to issuance of a solicitation: Agencies are encouraged to promote early exchanges of information about future acquisitions. These exchanges may occur among all interested parties, including potential users, Government acquisition personnel, program
officials, procurement personnel, and others involved in the conduct or outcome of the acquisition. Types of information that may be disclosed include:
Acquisition strategy Proposed contract type Proposed contract terms and conditions Acquisition planning schedules Feasibility of performance requirements Suitability of evaluation methodology Approach for assessing past performance
Techniques to promote productive exchanges of information include:
Market research One-on-one meetings Requests for Information (RFI) Requests for Comments (RFC) Draft Requests for Proposals (RFP) Pre-solicitation / pre-proposal conferences Site visits
Limits on exchanges: Any exchange of information, at any stage of the acquisition, must be consistent with the Procurement Integrity Act and the Freedom of Information Act. Government personnel must ensure that an unfair competitive advantage is not created for one offeror over another, and must avoid actions that:
Favor one offeror over another, Reveal an offeror’s technical solution, Reveal an offeror’s price without that
offeror’s permission, Reveal the names of individuals providing
past performance information about an offeror, or
Knowingly furnish source selection information in violation of procurement integrity provisions.
Exchanges after release of solicitation until receipt of proposals: Once a solicitation is issued, the CO becomes the focal point for all exchanges. It is NCSD policy that the CO must be present whenever it is expected that issues such as solicitation terms and conditions, evaluation criteria, or contract requirements will be discussed with potential offerors. The CO will amend the solicitation to document any changes in Government requirements or terms and conditions. Exchanges with offerors after receipt of proposals: Can take many forms, including clarifications, communications, negotiations, bargaining, and discussions. While program officials and technical evaluation team members have a role in exchanges after receipt of proposals and during negotiations and discussions, the CO always controls exchanges after receipt of proposals. Clarifications: Very limited exchanges that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated. They may be used to resolve minor or clerical errors and to respond to adverse past performance information, but may not be used to make significant changes to proposals. Communications: Occur after receipt of proposals and end with the establishment of the competitive range. Communications are limited to:
Offerors whose inclusion in the competitive range is uncertain, or
Offerors whose past performance information is the determining factor precluding inclusion in the competitive range, or
Offerors who have not had an opportunity to respond to past performance information.
Best Practices and Lessons Learned
14
Announcements of Long-Range Acquisitions Estimates / Synopses of
Proposed Contracts
15
Strategy – Use the procurement forecast to generate interest and publicize those opportunities available to small businesses. Most Common Answers:
“……….” “We are in procurement planning at this time, so a meeting on
the follow-on strategy would not be appropriate.” “The acquisition strategy is still being worked. Thanks for your
interest. “Unfortunately, I do not have any information at this time.”
Best Practices: Announcements of Long-Range Acquisitions Estimates
16
Ensure the points of contact on the forecast are aware of the content and timing of the release of the document so they can address any inquiries
• Agency trained POC• POC is not the Program Manager/End User• Inquiries are screened and acknowledged• Vendors required to provide or have on file a
capabilities outline• Inquiries are forwarded to appropriate PM or End
User
Pre- Solicitation Notices
17
The XXXX Agency intends to issue a solicitation on or about April 5, 2012, for professional and technical support services to meet a variety of requirements for the National Defense University in Washington, DC. The required services fall under the following NAICS codes: 541512, 541611, 541612, 541712 and 928110. The Government intends to award three or more fixed price, indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contracts. A partial set-aside for small business concerns applies to this acquisition. Services will be acquired under individual orders placed under the resultant contracts.
Best Practices:Synopses of Proposed Contracts and Requests for
Information
18
Provide general information on requirement: Performance Work Statements (PWS) are nice but
not necessary Save for Draft PWS/Request For Comments
Skills required/personnel requirements Security Location(s) Capability Experience
19
Contract vehicles/teaming arrangements Size and business type Other relevant information
Cost accounting system Unique Payment Terms Bound the size and length of the response – if you
give it they will take it More than a marketing pitch/Less than a proposal
Best Practices:Synopses of Proposed Contracts and Requests for
Information
Advisory Multi-Step Process (FAR 15.202)
20
STEP ONE: Publish a pre-solicitation notice General description of the scope or purpose Identify the information that must be submitted and the
criteria that will be used in making the initial evaluation May be limited to a statement of qualifications and other
appropriate information Provide sufficient information to permit a potential offeror to
make an informed decision about whether to participate
Advisory Multi-Step Process (FAR 15.202)
21
STEP TWO: Evaluate all responses Advise each respondent in writing either
Invited to propose ORUnlikely to be a viable competitor. All respondents may participate in the resultant
acquisition.
Why release a Draft PWS/ Request for Comments?
22
Receive input on alternative solutions Obtain input on Acceptable Quality Levels for
performance-based acquisitions Solicit effective industry performance incentives Identify commercial practices Identify applicable industry standards and federal, state,
and local standards Resolve confusing language in the PWS
Why release a Draft Solicitation?
23
Identify and eliminate unnecessary provisions and clauses that slip in due to boiler plate
Obtain feedback on potential cost drivers, e.g. restrictive data rights, excess CDRLs and reports
Obtain input on evaluation criteria Reduce multiple rounds of questions and amendments Contra Proferetem: “against he who proffers” – the Gov’t
is responsible for ambiguity in the solicitation (and subsequent requests for equitable adjustments)
Industry/Pre-solicitation/Pre-proposal Conferences
24
4/16/2012 11:48 AM “2012 Small Business Outreach and Industry Brief will take
place on 08 May 2012 at the University Campus from 0800 to 1200.”
4/17/2012 8:28 AM “Registration Closed - Due to overwhelming response, the
registration period for the 2012 Small Business Outreach and Industry Brief is closed. Fire Marshall restrictions limit attendance, and capacity has been reached. Thank you for your support and participation.”
Best Practice:Industry Conferences - Government
25
Leverage electronic communications and virtual mediums More participation Fewer security, access, escort, facility needs Cost effective Can allow for ongoing dialogues
Don’t wait for perfect information; industry knows things change; identify sources of potential change:
“If sequestration occurs, then …”
Best Practice:Industry Conferences - Industry
26
Ask your questions in during the conference; don’t wait for a one-on-one meeting or hallway exchange
Your question may spark an important discussion Any significant one-on-one exchange WILL be
made public anyway For critical questions, follow up the conference with a
formal written request Even if answered in the conference Provides a record you can refer to later
Best Practice:One-on-One Meetings
27
Pre-Industry Day? Post-Industry Day? Set ground rules up front Keep general notes of the discussion Consolidate and post only information that could directly
affect proposal preparation
Communication in a Virtual Medium:
GSA Industry Community
28
GSA Industry Communities
29
Website is used to collaborate with GSA’s industry partners and gain sufficient input and feedback Virtual Industry Day Presentation Other Presentations Questions from Industry Answers from Government Discussions/Blogs Posts
May not be an effective feedback mechanism?
GSA Industry One-on-One Meetings
30
Established a series of questions for Industry to respond to in writing along with ground rules for interaction, etc.
Solicited Industry responses to these questions in “white paper” form White papers treated as proprietary White paper required in order to participate in a one-
on-one session
GSA Industry One-on-One Meetings
31
The intent of this exercise is to: Gather meaningful input from Industry Provide a mechanism for all Industry partners to
contribute to the creation of the vehicle Keep the burden low for all companies while still
allowing all to have meaningful input into the process
GSA Industry One-on-One Meetings
32
What this exercise is NOT: An avenue for marketing efforts
Intent is to talk about issues affecting the procurement contract, not go through company capabilities
Participation in this effort is voluntary Strongly desires input from Industry, Participation has ZERO bearing on companies
being awarded a contract
Conclusion
33
Level of communication and transparency is increasing Provide guidance and education to all levels, in when and
how to communicate Review which tools you’ll use during Acquisition Planning
Establish a communication plan Early and frequent feedback will result in:
Better requirements Clearer solicitations Fewer amendments Fewer REAs Better performance Easier contract admin