11
UNIVERSITY COURSE
VERSUS WORK EXPERIENCE
Alain Jungman,
Marie-Lise Micheli,
Kristine Jurski.
Institut Universitaire de Technologie Paris Jussieu
Université Paris Diderot – Paris 7
FRANCE
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
2
University and enterprise are two different worlds
University Enterprise
General knowledge Competences Universal Approach Professional behaviour Traditionaly and historicaly designed Economic objectives
for job related to research and teaching (profit, efficiency, competition)
(non profit, objectivity...)
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
3
International competition and new technologies require a closer exchange between university knwoledges and technical competences of entreprise
- University must adapt to the demand of the students to acquire a practical training for better employment
- Enterprise must turn toward higher education to innovate in order to face the challenge of high tech and concurrence.
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
4
SUMMARYI - PRACTICAL PLACEMENT IN ENTERPRISEInternship : 2-3 monthes in enterprise, generaly at the end ofthe university year.
II - PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION Involvement of experts from enterprises in the curriculum Introduction of a corporate culture Professional approach to solve problems
III - ALTERNATE PERIODS UNIVERSITY- ENTERPRISE AND APPRENTICESHIPShorter sandwich periods of time spent alternately at universityand in companies all around the year.
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
5
PRACTICAL PLACEMENT
IN ENTERPRISE
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
6
PRACTICAL PLACEMENTS
Objectives :
• To train the student to industrial tasks in a professional environment
• To turn into practice academic knowledges
• To acquire professional skills
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
7
PRACTICAL PLACEMENTS
Added value :
It calls upon the three main qualifications
expected from a professional :
- Knowledge- Competences- Professional behaviour
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
8
PRACTICAL PLACEMENTS
All domains of education Science and technology : industry (e.g. : production, quality
control, research and development, maintenance…)
Management : services (e.g. : banks, insurances, administrations) and commercial activities
Humanities and Social Sciences : administrations, governement and states offices, publishing, human ressources, environment, communication, advertisements…
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
9
PRACTICAL PLACEMENTS
All level of education :
Bachelor : technician, employee
Master : engineer, manager
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
10
PRACTICAL PLACEMENTS
Evaluation of the practical work of the students
Written report Oral presentation Opinion grid Jury : academic and enterprise tutors
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
11
PRACTICAL PLACEMENTS
Evaluation grid
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
12
EVALUATION OF THE PLACEMENT
Above the expected At the expected Only partialy Do not correspond Note Observations
level level at the expected level to the expected level
Note max 3max/4 de max/2 à max/4 0 max
Appéciation of the supervisor 20
Efficiency 4
Ability to learn 2
Motivation 4
Initiative-autonomy 4
Curiosity 2
Assiduity-Punctuality 2
Participation 1
Sociability 1
Written report
Presentation of the project (problématic and stratégiy) 2
Identification et analysis of problèms 2
Analysis of résults 3
Clarity of the reports 2
Presentation of the report (use of software tools)) 1
Oral presentation
Ability to synthetize the work 3
Tools (power point…) 1
Quality of the oral 2
Quality of the answers to questions 3
Respect for the duration 1
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
13
PROFESIONALISATION OF
HIGHER EDUCATION
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
14
PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION
- Put the student in a professional situation
- Fix learning objectives in order to solve enterprise problems
- Define competences, i.e. turn academic knowledge into practice
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
15
PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Methods
Study caseProject base learningProblem base learning
Main steps : Analysis of the problem Looking for documentation Formulation of hypothesis Bringing a solution
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
16
PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION
1 - MATERIALS MEANS
Work in small groups
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) at students’s disposal
Scientific devices (self service…under control)
Documentary ressources
Adapted rooms and laboratories
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
17
PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION
2 – HUMAN RESSOURCES
Technical staff
( Management and control of the instrumentation)
Academic staff to supervise the project
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
18
PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION
3 – CORPORATE CULTURE Participation of experts from enterprises in the curriculum
a / Introduction of specific industrial fieldsProject managementEntrepreneurial approachCompetence managementEmployment and corporate lawQuality controlPrevention of risks
1/2
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
19
PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION
CORPORATE CULTURE
b / Approach to practical industrial applicationsIllustration of academi topics in the frame of the industrial activities
c / Technical visits of enterprises
d / Evolution of the contain of the program to industrial requirements
2/2
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
20
PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Cross curriculum competences :
Communication
Written and oral presentations
Foreign language (english)
Direction for the use of an instrument
Summary and keywords of a report
Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
21
PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION
EVALUATION
Self evaluation « Peer-to-peer » evaluation Competences (skills, abilities) instead of only
knowledge
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
22
ALTERNATE PERIODS
AND APPRENTICESHIP
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
23
ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP
Exists since more than a century for manual jobs
Spectacular rise in higher education since the
beginning of the 21st century
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
24
ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP
ALTERNATE PERIODS
During the whole university year :
Alternate periods : - learning at university
- working in enterprise Two supervisors : - university
- enterprise
1/2
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
25
ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP
APPRENTICESHIP
Same system + Job contract for the student Salary Management by an office (public or private)
CFA = Centre de Formation en Apprentissage
= Training Center for Apprenticeship
2/2
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
26
ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP
ORGANIZATION AND CONTRAINTS
Team work to conduct the relationship between the different partners Company manager Tutors / supervisors Students Academic staff
Pedogical engineering Time table planning the university and enterprise periods Pedagogical management of the academic program versus the entreprise training
Monitoring the work of the student By the supervisor of the entreprise By the academic tutor Using compulsory procedures
(written evaluations, visit in the enterprise)
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
27
ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP
ADVANTAGES(Compare to Practical placement)
Total Duration (per year) : ≈ 6 months (instead of less than 4 months)
Most significant work experience More relevant for a CV
Progressive learning of The competences The professional behaviours specific to a given job
Adaptation and improvement of the training courses by aContinuous « going back and forth » between academic learning and enterprise apprenticeship
1/2
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
28
ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP
ADVANTAGES
Stronger involvement of the student in the working environment
Stronger partnership between the university and the enterprise
Stepping stone to a first job
2/2
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
29
ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP
QUALITY CONTROL OF ALTERNATE AND APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING COURSES
Two different evaluations
Evaluation of the student
Evaluation of the alternate apprenticeship education system
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
30
ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP
EVALUATION OF THE STUDENTS
Assessment of the student’s work in the company
Report book
Definition of the objectives for the student
Definition of the tools to reach the objectives
1/2
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
31
ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP
EVALUATION OF THE STUDENTS
Evaluation grids written by the enterprise’s supervisor
Autoevaluation by the student through the apprenticeship diary
Reported by the student, based on 4 criteriums :
Efficiency Level of qualification Practical skill Behaviour
2/2
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
32
ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP
EVALUATION GRIDS
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
33
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
34
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
35
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
36
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
37
ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP
QUALITY CONTROL OF THE ALTERNATE/APPRENTICESHIP
EDUCATION SYSTEM
I / By the student 1- The apprenticeship diary Evaluation of the work conditions Evaluation of the tasks to carry-out
2 – Regular interactive report at the university
II / By the academic tutorVisit(s) the company by the academic tutor Presentation of the student’s task(s) Visit of the work environment Talk with the supervisor of the enterprise
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
38
CONCLUSION
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
39
CONCLUSIONQUALITY OF STUDENTS PRACTICAL PLACEMENT
Three approachs :1- Formal approach
Grid 3 indicators : - efficiency
- autonomy
- technical competences
2 – Qualitative and informal approach Visit Reports : oral and written
1/2
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
40
CONCLUSIONQUALITY OF STUDENTS PRACTICAL PLACEMENT
3 – Post-diploma survey
6 months and 3 years after graduation Employment
• Type of jobs• Salary• Status in the company
More studies• Type of studies• Level
2/2
IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski
EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008
41
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
QUESTIONS ?
COMMENTS ?
IDEAS ?